WEBVTT - How Did Some Enslaved People Sue for Their Freedom — and Win?

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of iHeartRadio, Hey, Brainstuff. Lauren

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Vogelbaum here a Revolutionary War era court case, but granted

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>an enslaved woman freedom from her cruel enslavers, a benevolent

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>white lawyer turned employer, a name change at a crucial

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>turning point. These are all moments in Elizabeth Freeman's life.

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Her story, or at least what we know of it,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>reads like a tale of grit and justice, ripe for Hollywood,

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, the circumstances of Freeman's triumph were rooted

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in necessity and survival. A Freeman called Bet before she

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>chose her new Moniker was born into slavery on an

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>unknown date in the seventeen forties, by either inheritance or purchase.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Freeman was enslaved as a child by Colonel John Ashley

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and his wife Hannah at the Ashley House in Sheffield, Massachusetts.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Freeman did domestic work, served visitors, and dealt with the

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>reported brutality of Hannah Ashley. But by seventeen eighty, Freeman

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had become aware that documents like the Declaration of Independence

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Massachusetts Constitution espoused the ideas of freedom and

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>equality as birthrights. A freeman determined that she too was

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>entitled to freedom by law. In the wake of other

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>enslaved black people and abolitionists who took their claims to court,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a Freeman decided to sue for her freedom. She had

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the help of lawyers Theodore Sedgwick and Tapping Reeve to

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>do so. This was not a common course of action.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Some enslaved people weren't aware that they could petition for

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>their freedom and win, nor did they have the resources

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to do so. On top of that, challenging the law

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and ones enslavers could be risky and feudal. However, such

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>freedom suits in which enslaved people filed lawsuits against their

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>enslavers to their freedom, were not unprecedented in colonial times.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Many of these suits were brought by men, and many

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of the claimants challenged their own enslavement rather than the

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>entire institution of slavery. For instance, Elizabeth Key sued for

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>her freedom in Virginia in sixteen fifty six on the

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>basis that her father was a free white man and

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that she was a Christian, conditions that entitled her to

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>freedom by English common law. Before the article. This episode

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is based on how stuff work spoke with Lamarchie Fraser,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>an artist, educator and director of Education and Interpretation at

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Museum of African American History, Boston, and Nantuckett. She

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>explained that there were many legal reasons enslaved people petitioned

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>for freedom, and many levels of awareness about their ability

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to do so. A quote, maybe the enslaved petitioners haven't

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>been manumitted, that is, set free when their contract says

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they should be. Maybe they should be at this point

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in time, earning wages for their s. There are distinct

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>differences in cases where petitions are brought, but they are

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.399
<v Speaker 1>not without the knowledge that they exist. They're not existing

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum. Some enslaved people found ways to organize

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to win their freedom. Freeman asserted that she was free

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>according to the rules the United States politicians had enshrined

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in governing documents. Some of what we know today about

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Freeman comes from Catherine Maria Sedgwick, who was the daughter

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of Freeman's lawyer. Theodore Freeman helped raise her, and Catherine

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>later wrote about Freeman's life and convictions. She quoted Freeman

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>as saying, I'm not a dumb critter. Won't the law

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>give me my freedom. Sedgwick went on to say about Freeman,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine her upright form as she stood dilating

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with her fresh hope based on the declaration of her

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>intrinsic inalienable right. Freedom. Suits were often unsuccessful, resulting in

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>neither the emancipation of the plaintiff nor the abolition of

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>slavery in the place where the case was brought, but some,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>including Freeman's, were stories of liberation. Of Freeman's lawyers decided

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to add Brahm, one of four other enslaved people at

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ashley estate, to the suit, making it Brahm and

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>Bett versus Ashley. A Freeman may have sought Sedgwick's help

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>since he visited the Ashley house, or Sedgwick and Reeve

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>may have pursued Freeman and Brahm in order to test

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>whether slavery was legal in Massachusetts under the new state constitution.

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Either way, Sedgwick got a writ of replevin, which is

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>an order authorizing the retaking of property by its rightful owner,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>from the court, ordering John Ashley to release Freeman and

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Brahm because they were not his property. Ashley refused to

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>release them and was ordered to appear in court on

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>August twenty first of seventeen eighty one, Sedgwick and Reeve

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>argued before the court that slavery was unconstitutional because the

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts Constitute stated that all men are born free and equal.

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The next day, the jury determined that Brahm and Freeman

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>should be emancipated. The two were awarded thirty shillings in damages,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and Ashley had to pay the court costs. Freeman, upon

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>her victory, took her new name, an assertation of her

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>newfound independence. The outcome of this case and one other

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that year showed that the legal and moral foundations of

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the institution of slavery were disintegrating. These cases marked the

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the end of slavery in Massachusetts. According to

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ninety census, no enslaved people lived in the state.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That said, the state constitution was not amended to outlaw slavery,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and people remained in bondage as chattel. Slavery became obsolete

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts. Freeman went on to work for the Sedgwicks,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>providing her services in the household and community as a servant, midwife,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>and governess, and, in a reversal almost too improbable for

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a third act, the Freeman became one of the first

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>women in Massachusetts to own property herself. She bought a

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>home and land of her own, amassing enough wealth and

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>property to create a will a couple of months before

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>she died in December of eighteen twenty nine at the

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>age of about eighty five. The items that she owned

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and chose to pass down, the shawls, gowns, earrings, quilts, spoons,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and gold beads, among other objects, tell a story about

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>her character and what she valued. Despite the lack of

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>autobiographical accounts of Freeman's life, Fraser said, as we see

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>her life unfolded in the ways that are accessible to us,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and we find a woman who is not deterred from

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>her honesty, her truth, and her will to be free.

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is based on the article how Enslaved Elizabeth

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Freeman mum Bett Sued for her Freedom and one on

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Housetofwork dot com, written by Eve's Jeff Cope. Brainstuff is

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio in partnership with HowStuffWorks dot Com and

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Tyler klang A. Four more podcasts to

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts or

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows,