WEBVTT - US Unveils Fresh Sanctions on Russia After Navalny’s Death

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 2>podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Tomorrow will mark the beginning of the third year of

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 4>the Russian invasion in war with Ukraine. On this cusp

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 4>of another year of war potentially between the two. Likely

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 4>between the two, the US unveiling its biggest one day

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 4>sanctions paction package excuse me against Russia since the invasion

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 4>of Ukraine. They targeted more than five hundred people in entities.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 4>It's a fresh bid to squeeze the country's economy, the

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Russian economy, and send a message over the death of

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 4>dissident Alexei Navalni.

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Here's US Treasury's Deputy Secretary Wally Idayamo addressing the new

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 5>sanctions earlier on Bloomberg Survey.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Important to remember that our objective remains the same, going

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 3>after Russia's military and Dutch sized complex and their ability

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 3>to earn money to prop up their economy and buy

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the goods they need to fight the war they want.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 3>What we're doing today is we are furthering those actions

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 3>by going after companies in Russia that are helping to

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>build military equipment.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 5>That's US Treasury Deputy Secretary Waliadiyamo earlier on Bloomberg to

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 5>understand the strategy and endgame of Russia and for President

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 5>and President Putin, Carol, let's get to the interview.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 4>YEP back with us a favorite informed voice on Russia

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 4>and President Putin. Angela Stent, Senior Fellow at Brookings Institution,

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 4>author of Putin's World, Russia Against the West and With

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 4>the Rest. A former National Intelligence officer for Russia and

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 4>Eurasia at the National Intelligence Council. Also served in the

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Office of Policy Planning at the US State Department. This

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>is why she's a favorite voice to go to. She's

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 4>in Washington, d C. Angela, welcome back. I have loved

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 4>our conversations over the past two years, but I have

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>been sad that we've had to keep having them because

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 4>the war continues on. Here we are about tomorrow the

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 4>third year of war. Are the sanctions These latest sanctions

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 4>by the United States, and your view largely symbolic and

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 4>unlikely to impact Russia and its crusade against Ukraine.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, we'll have to see. So far, all of the

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 6>sanctions that were imposed by the US and its allies,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 6>they've certainly dented the Russian economy to some extent, but

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.119
<v Speaker 6>they haven't changed Putin's course. And right now Putin thinks

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 6>that Russia is winning. He appears to be very self confident.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 6>So we have sanctioned and you know, industries that are

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 6>feeding the military industrial complex. We've sanctioned individuals. We're still

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 6>trying to go out after energy companies in Russia's energy

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 6>exports and trying to persuade those who are helping Russia

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 6>to evade those energy sanctions in fact to implement them.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 6>But a lot of this, I fear is symbolic. I mean,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 6>we've sanctioned the people who are involved in Navani's death

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 6>in the prison camp where he was, but they're not

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 6>likely to want to come to the United States, nor

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 6>do I think that they have any bank accounts here.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 6>So I think there could be more of what we

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 6>would be doing and that we haven't done, and that

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 6>is taking the frozen Russian assets, or at least the

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 6>interest on them, and using that to help support Ukraine,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 6>and we could do more in the energy realm. It's

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 6>unfortunate that the Biden administration now says that USLNG exports

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 6>going should cease after a few years, when we should

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 6>be exporting more LNG, say to Europe, so that they

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 6>don't keep importing Russian LLERG.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Why do you think the sanctions have been so ineffective

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 5>at crippling Russia's economy, Because over the last two years,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>doctor Sten, we have a lot of people on their

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 5>program who said, you know, especially at the beginning of

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 5>the war, given the sanctions that the US and a

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of the West is putting on the country, the

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 5>economy is going to be taken to its knees, and

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 5>that absolutely has not happened over the last two years.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 6>It hasn't happened because what Russia has done is it's

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 6>taken its economy to a wharf footing, so it's now

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 6>really a war economy and the defense industries working over time.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 6>Russia had a GDP growth rate last year of zero

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 6>point three percent, which was higher than any one thought

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 6>and higher than a lot of European countries given the

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 6>situation that we're in, So I think we have miscalculated

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 6>the Russian's ability to deal with these sanctions, and then

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 6>I have to say, you know, there's a lot of sanctions,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 6>invasion evasion. A number of countries are helping Russia these sanctions,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 6>including some of its neighbors in Central Asia. We know

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese are to some extent. So it's very hard

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 6>for these kind of sanctions to succeed if you don't

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 6>have really global agreement on them. And it's really only

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 6>the US and its European and Asian allies that have

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 6>been implementing these sanctions.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Angela, Will we be having a different conversation if China

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 4>was more on the side of Europe and the United

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 4>States in.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 6>This, I think we might because even though so that

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, the president Jijinping warned Putin about the use

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 6>of nuclear weapons, and we haven't heard Putin talk about

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 6>that for a long time, although some of his colleagues have.

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 6>The Chinese they're not really neutral in this. I mean

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 6>they are exporting components to the Russians that are being

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 6>used in weapons and for other industrial uses. They haven't

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 6>really put any pressure on the Russians to wind down

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 6>this war, and even though they attended a couple of

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 6>the first meetings with a number of different countries about

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 6>the Ukrainian peace plan. They did not attend the meeting

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 6>in Davos or the one that was held in December.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 6>So I would say that they have neutrality but leaning

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 6>toward Russia. And Jijinping just said again, you know how

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 6>great the relationship was. So I think if the Chinese

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 6>had acted differently, it wouldn't have been as easy for

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 6>the Russians to be at the point where they are now.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Angela, we saw Senate my majority leader Chuck Schumer make

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 5>us a prize visit to Ukraine in part well in

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 5>a big part to try to reassure Volodimir Zelenski that

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 5>the US will make good on its next round of

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 5>aid even though it faces obstacles in Congress. What would

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 5>your message be to lawmakers right now who oppose an

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 5>aid package to Ukraine.

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 6>I think the message to them is if you do not,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 6>if we do not send the sixty billion dollars to

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 6>Ukraine and more weapons, the kind of sophisticated weapons they need,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be very hard for them to prevail

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 6>against Russia. And I think these people have to think,

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 6>do you really want Russia to win this war. Do

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 6>you know what it might mean going forward? It will

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 6>then reinforce the aggressive tendencies of the Russian regime, and

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 6>that does not make the US any safer. It certainly

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 6>makes our allies a lot less safe. And do we

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 6>want to be drawn back into a broader European conflict

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 6>as we were twice in the twentieth century. I think

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 6>those are the kinds of things they should think about.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 6>And also that a lot of this money that we

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 6>would be allocating to Ukraine goes to US defense companies,

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 6>so it's money that's being earned and staying in America.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Ukrainian President Zelenski is pressing for NATO membership. Many say

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 4>that that's unlikely before this war ends. But I do

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 4>think about the risk in this now third year whether

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 4>or not Ukraine gets just enough support to continue fighting

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and resisting, but not sufficient enough to defeat Russia. And

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 4>ultimately that's how it plays out. Do you have any

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>idea or I don't know how you see maybe what

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 4>happens here in this third year.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 6>So I think in this third year the war will continue.

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Putin is waiting to see what happens in our elections.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 6>In November, and he's hoping that if President Trump is

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 6>reelected that that then the US will cease supporting Ukraine

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 6>and so it'll be over and Russia will win. And

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, I think that we, you know, we really

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 6>need to think very carefully about what we're doing going

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 6>forward in terms of supporting Ukraine. And as it is,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 6>even if that sixty billion dollars does go to Ukraine,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 6>as you said, it will be enough for the Ukrainians

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 6>to continue to push back, but not to win.

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately. And I think about the nuclear ambitions we talked

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>about a little bit earlier this week. I believe President

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Putin he denied it, that that was in his intentions.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that that's potentially, in terms of Russia's

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 4>nuclear ambitions, a real threat of something being put up

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 4>in space against the United States and others.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's possible. It's of course against the treaties

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 6>that we have signed with the Visions and other countries too.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't put it past him. I think at the

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 6>moment he wants us to believe that he might do

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 6>it and to deter us from doing certain things. I mean,

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 6>the main aim at the moment is just to spread

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 6>fear both in Russia's neighbors and in the West about

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 6>what Russia might do. But I think we have to

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 6>watch this very carefully, and obviously our intelligence agencies are

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 6>doing that.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 5>Do you think that's working, that he's successively spreading fear

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 5>about what Russia is doing and what Russia could do.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 6>He certainly had succeeded in some European countries, in some

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 6>of Russia's neighbors, and I think that people in the

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 6>United States as well, who think, you know, we're so

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 6>concerned about what Russia will do. We have to be careful.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 6>And I think the White House has been deterred from

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 6>sending some weapons to Ukraine which could hit really into

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 6>the heart of Russia, because they do fear escalation, not

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 6>necessarily the space escalation, but certainly escalation that could go

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 6>to the potential use of a tactical nuclear weapon.

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 4>Angela thirty seconds left here. If President Putin and Russia

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 4>succeed for a second time here in Ukraine, what's the

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 4>next target? Because I would assume there will be another one,

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 4>or is that wrong? And just quickly?

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 6>I think ultimately there's another one, but I think not

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 6>immediately because clearly the Russian armed forces would have to,

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, regrow and refurbish themselves. It could be the

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Baltic States, one of the Baltic States which did used

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 6>to be part of the Soviet Union, and that's what

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 6>you know, who has lamented the collapse of the Soviet Union,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 6>or potentially Poland that's certainly what the polls think.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 4>All right, kind of leave it there as always so

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 4>much appreciation. Angela doctor Angela Stent joining us there in Washington,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.599
<v Speaker 4>as we said, author of Putin's World, Russia against the

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>West and with the Rest. She's a senior fellow at

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 4>Brookings Institution, former National Intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 4>at the National Intelligence Council. Just a great voice when

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 4>it comes to what's going on and trying to figure

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 4>out what's next.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 5>It's just hard to believe that we're already going to

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 5>be in your three So manytime.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 4>We said, do you think it's another six months? Do

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 4>we think it's another year? And here we are start

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 4>the third year.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoon from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and and brout auto with a Bloomberg business

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 2>app or wanting us live on YouTube.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, one of my most read stories on the Bloomberg

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 4>today is about a Fidelity International money manager that dumped

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 4>nearly all of his positions in US treasuries from friends

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 4>he oversees. His expectations are that the world's biggest economy,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 4>the US economy, still has room to expand. Check it out.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a great read on the Bloomberg terminal on at

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg dot Com. It's just kind of one of the

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 4>resets we continue to see.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 5>Tim Yeah, on that reset. I want to bring in

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Maddi Destner, head of Global Asset Class Services at Capital Group.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 5>It's global investment and management organization manages more than two

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 5>point five trillion dollars. Maddie joining us from Los Angeles

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 5>right now. Maddie, good to have you with us. The

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 5>reason you're on is because Capital Group is out with

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 5>its twenty year Capital Markets Assumptions Report. It sets out

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 5>some pretty clear expectations about where you all at Capitol

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 5>Group think the market is going. And when we say market,

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 5>we're talking macroeconomics, equities, fixed income, and FX market performance

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 5>over the next twenty years. Carol and I were talking

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 5>about this. You do this, yeah, I mean, how clear

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 5>is your crystal ball to be able to help us

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 5>understand what US equity markets are going to do over

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 5>the next twenty years and what emerging market equities are

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 5>going to do over the next twenty years.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's a great question, Tim and Caryl, and thanks

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 7>so much for having me on. When we think about

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.479
<v Speaker 7>the long term, you have to consider what is directional,

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 7>what you know is about to occur, and then what

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 7>you can assume for the long term. So, really, what

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 7>our expectations are our inputs to ensure that our clients

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 7>are set up for success for the long term, and

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 7>our expectation as we look forward is that they are.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 7>Actually our broad expectation for a sixty to forty portfolio

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 7>is about six percent annualized over twenty years. And when

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 7>we look through the asset classes, we've changed things a

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 7>bit as we've seen action in the markets over the

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 7>last couple of years. Actually brought down our equity assumptions

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 7>just by a bit, about six point nine percent for

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 7>US equities given the evaluation.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 8>Change that we saw over the last year.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 7>Not extreme, but our expectations are that valuations are a

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 7>little less attractive, and then for a fixed income we've

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 7>actually brought up our expectations. You're seeing some equity like

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 7>returns out of fixed income sectors, particularly some of those

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 7>extended sectors. So we really feel good about the puts

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 7>in takes of the long term expectations and the fact

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 7>that investors will be set up for success as long

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 7>as they stay invested.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, what's how do you figure it out? Like

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 4>we said, your crystal ball, But what are these assumptions

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 4>based on. I'm always interesting in how do you make

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 4>the sausage here in terms of investing? So what is

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 4>it that these are based on in terms of kind

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 4>of reducing your equity assumptions over the next twenty years,

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 4>but maybe raising your fixed income assumptions.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So we actually decompose the returns into building blocks.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 7>So as you start to pick apart the pieces, you

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 7>can think about what will change in those building box.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 8>So we think about economic.

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 7>Growth, what does that look like over the next twenty years, productivity,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 7>what happens to the labor force, inputs into demographics, how

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 7>that picture will change over the next twenty years.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 8>These are knowable things.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 7>Our expectation of changing technology and the productivity of the workforce.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 7>We think that has a big impact on the expectations.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 7>And then of course currency, certainly for US based investors

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 7>of international assets, both developed as well as emerging, our

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 7>expectations for the dollar and other currencies, how that impact

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 7>the supply demand dynamics and the balance of trade. And

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 7>then of course the expectation of the change in share count.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 7>There's been quite a lot of buybacks and that has

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 7>changed the expectation for earnings for companies for individual shareholders.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 7>And then the last thing is yield, both on the

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 7>fixed income and the equity side. Are expectation is that

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 7>you're going to start to see healthier dividend yields, particularly

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 7>in the international space, less so in the US, and that,

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 7>as I said before, starting yield and fixed income are

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 7>much higher.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 8>So as we look at each of these building blocks,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 8>we sort of.

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Build up the elements from the bottoms up perspective and

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 7>then look top down and ask ourselves how realistic are

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 7>these numbers?

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Madie, I want to dig into the equities research

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 5>that you and the team over a Capitol Group have done,

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 5>because I was pretty surprised to see that over the

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 5>next twenty years, you expect emerging market equities to outperform

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 5>US equities pretty significantly given and that surprised me given

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 5>the out performance we've seen from US equities over the

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 5>last ten to fifteen years.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 7>At this point, Yeah, our expectation is that there are

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 7>both cyclical and secular changes going on in emerging markets.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 7>So if we just frankly look at the inflation picture

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 7>within emerging markets, inflation accelerated early on. Central banks start

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 7>to ease or tighten pretty quickly, and now they're in

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 7>the path of easing policy, so they're a bit ahead

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 7>of us in that cycle.

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 8>We expect to see an upturn. From that perspective.

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 7>There's certainly a benefit from a continued weakness of the dollar, which.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 8>We expect to see over the long term.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 7>And then one of the most important things about emerging

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 7>markets is the change in supply chains that we expect

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 7>to see over the long term. So we know that

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 7>Chinese growth is slowing due to demographic impacts as well

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 7>as less than friendly market reforms. But what's happening is

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 7>companies are starting to remove their supply chain exposure to

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 7>China and going to places like India, like Mexico, like

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 7>Southeast Asia, so we really do expect a resumption of

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing centers in those areas.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 8>And then the last thing I'll point to is.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 7>That from an emerging markets perspective, the demographic picture, the

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 7>age of the workforce looks a lot healthier than in

0:16:58.360 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 7>some other areas of the world.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 4>That makes a lot of sense. I'm also curious, you know,

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 4>here we are coming off a week where we were

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 4>all agog over Nvidia, right, its result, its outlook, its

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 4>impact on the trade continues to play out today. You

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 4>guys did look at as one of your key criteria

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 4>the changing technology on workforce. Talk to us a little

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 4>bit about what's the changing technology that you focused on

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 4>and its impact.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a number of things, Carol, It's not just one.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 7>If we think about the impact of you know, how

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 7>productive is every single worker, if everybody was doing the

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 7>same jobs that they did in nineteen fifty versus today,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 7>how much more can they build, how many more patients

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 7>can they see, How long is the expectations for life

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 7>expectancy and how that's changing. So things like artificial intelligence

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 7>and how that's helping us do our jobs, cloud computing

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 7>and how that's helping us be more efficient, and even

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 7>some of the innovations in healthcare, whether it's gene therapies

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 7>or immunizations, these will impact our longevity and frankly, our

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 7>health as a nation and as a world society. So

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 7>all of these things are incorporated together, from our perspective,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 7>significantly increase the productivity of each hour work from individuals.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 7>So it's a bit of a give back to the

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 7>giveaway that we have from demographics, because we know that

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 7>this is an aging nation for aging all over the world,

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 7>and that will impact.

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 5>We talked about that a lot here on the program,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Matt It We only have thirty seconds left, but we

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 5>got to talk politics and how you factor politics into

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 5>your analysis here, not just here in the US, but

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 5>around the world. Just thirty seconds left.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, exogynous factors hard to incorporate into the actual analysis,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 7>so we really do try to look through that and

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 7>think long term.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 8>From our perspective.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 7>Though, as we look at the last twenty three election cycles,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 7>what we notice is that markets trend up on average

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 7>every single time. There's lots of volatility around the primary environment.

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 7>But once we have regardless of who sits in the

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 7>administrative chairs, we tend to see upmarkets in that election

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 7>cycle more so than a non election year.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 8>So we're pretty constructive.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 4>All right, Really appreciate this and look forward. Hopefully we

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 4>can get you back real soon. Mattie Destner, she's head

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 4>of Global Asset class Services over at Capital Group, a

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 4>global investment management group managing more than two and a

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 4>half Truly and Matty of course joining us from Los Angeles.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>New York station, just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, Well, the US Bitcoin ETFs that debuted back

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 4>on January eleventh and the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that converted

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>into an ETF that same day have as of Tuesday,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>brought in about a net five billion dollars of investment.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Your inflows so far, so money coming in, tim.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's real money. The anticipation and roll out of

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 5>the products, by the way, stoking a doubling in bitcoin's

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 5>price over the past twelve months. For more on the

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Space and the opportunities that he sees. Let's bring in

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Dave Donnelley, managing director at Spider Rock Advisors. It's a

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Chicago based asset management firm that specializes in, in their

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 5>own words, providing customized option overlay strategies to investors. By

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 5>the way, they've got about four point five billion dollars

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 5>in assets under management. Dave, good to have you with

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 5>us for a weekly crypto segment this afternoon. You don't

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 5>have a spot bitcoin ETF. Rather, you were going to

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 5>introduce an option's overlay strategy on the ETF. Explain what

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 5>exactly this is for people who aren't familiar with the

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 5>strategy and what that gives for clients.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 9>Sure, thanks for having me. Really a couple thoughts here.

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 9>You know, you've got, as you just stated, billions of

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 9>dollars in inflows into these ETFs. We're not an ETF manufacturer. Instead,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 9>we're an advisor who tries to help intermediaries and clients

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 9>hedge the existing positions that they have. So, you know,

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 9>while you've got five or so billion dollars in these

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 9>ETFs already, you've got a trillion dollars worth of bitcoin

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 9>out there owned in the more traditional way, you know,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 9>with hot wallets and cold storage. You know, we think

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 9>these ETFs make it so much easier for normal investors

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 9>to access these these products and get something to track

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 9>the price of bitcoin. But here's the benefit. They can

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 9>now hold it in a securities account, and at some

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 9>point very soon, these ETFs are going to have listed

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 9>options on them, which allows us to do our work.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, whether it's single stock positions or indexes or

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 9>now spot bitcoin ETFs. Our focus is helping folks hedge

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 9>those existing positions in their brokerage account in an advisory account,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 9>helping to manage the risk in a customized way. Options

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 9>on bitcoin ETFs are going to be the gateway to

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 9>doing that. Interestingly, not only on the ETFs that people own,

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 9>but there are ways to do it on the bitcoin

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 9>they own elsewhere and do that from their securities account.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Got to say, Dave, what are the things we love

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 4>to ask? It's a simple question, why are you doing this?

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 4>And we're just curious if your clients and the investors

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 4>are the clients that you guys help have been asking

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 4>for something like this.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 9>Everything we do is really driven by client demand. We

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 9>hold ourselves out to be able to do our best

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 9>to help clients hedge, you know, whatever they own in

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 9>the public security space. So we've gotten a lot of

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 9>asks about this over the years and haven't been able

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 9>to do anything. Obviously, trading bitcoin or unlisted bitcoin options

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 9>isn't something that's readily available in your brokerage or advisory account.

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 9>So the proliferation of these spot ETFs, and you know,

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 9>we've been in contact with CEBO who's working with regulators

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 9>to get the options on those spot ETFs available, that

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 9>is really that's new, and that is going to open

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 9>the door to being able to help folks hedge. Obviously

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 9>a highly volatile instrument. Some folks enjoy that for training.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 9>A lot of people just made a lot of money

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 9>in it, and just like you'd want to hedge anything

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 9>where you had significant gains but don't necessarily want to

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 9>sell and pay taxes on it. That's where our business

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 9>comes in to help folks hedge and we're really excited

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 9>to be able to do that with relation to bitcoin.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 5>Now, when do you think you'll be able to actually

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 5>do that? Like, what's the ETA.

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 9>Last night I heard is that there's some regulatory going

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 9>on in mid March, so it could be by the

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 9>end of Q one, but we're basically just waiting to

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 9>get those options listed, make sure that there's enough liquidity available,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 9>and we'll be ready to go to work.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I just want to say, when it comes to regulators

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 5>and cryptocurrency, specifically bitcoin, it's been a waiting game, Dave,

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 5>So are you real is that? Are you being realistic?

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Do you think in those expectations.

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 9>Unequivocally it has been a waiting game. I think, you know,

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 9>the decision that was made to allow the spot bitcoin

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 9>ETF was sort of the biggest decision that had to

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 9>be made. I have heard nothing from the exchanges we're

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 9>speaking with that make it sound like it's going to

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 9>be anywhere near as protracted the time period for the

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 9>options as that was.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 4>So I am also curious how the strategy is actually

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 4>going to work and in terms of mitigating the volatility

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 4>that we have seen with the spot you know, spot

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin over the last couple of years. So how does

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>it work specifically?

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 9>Sure, I think the most sort of typical approach to

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 9>reducing risk for a client is just simply a costless collar.

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 9>In this strategy, pretty straightforward. We want to buy protection,

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 9>buy insurance against the decline in the price. So we're

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 9>buying a put option on that spot bitcoin ETF. That

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 9>put is probably going to be reasonably expensive, especially given

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 9>the ball in bitcoin, and therefore we need to pay

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 9>for it somehow. We don't typically advise folks paying for

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 9>it with cash. Rather, we'd rather pay for it with

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 9>sort of foregone potential upside, and that's by selling a call.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 9>So your caller is buy a put, sell a call,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 9>and do that in a way that is sort of

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 9>slightly net positive from a cash flow perspective. You can

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 9>take up to seventy percent of your risk off the

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 9>table without selling any and so that's that's a move

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 9>we do for a lot of folks with concentrated stock

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 9>positions today. We don't view bitcoin ETFs any differently.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 4>What would you anticipate in terms of kind of a

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 4>typical return then off of this kind of investment, because obviously,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 4>for those who are looking to play the swings, they're

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 4>not going to have that advantage to the upside, but

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 4>they're also going to be immune from most of the

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 4>downside as well in terms of the swing the swings

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 4>that we see on spot bitcoin. So what kind of

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 4>returns are you thinking about off of this strategy.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 9>I'd really redirect that to thinking about what kind of

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 9>volatility reduction are we going to see? And again that's

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 9>typically taken up to seventy percent off. For the tactical

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 9>folks who enjoy trading it, it is a tool you

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 9>can use to mitigate risk for a time period without selling,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 9>and then take it off to sort of re establish

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 9>your overall position and participate in the upside. But for

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 9>other folks where it's just it's been such a long

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 9>term winner for them, this might just be a way

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 9>to take chips off the table without having to pay taxes.

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 4>All right, I get it, because when you said you've

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 4>got kind of a high fee on it, I was

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 4>just trying to kind of figure out in terms of

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 4>what we could expect in terms of returns off of it.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Dave, I want to take a step back and

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 5>just talk a little bit about Spider Rock Advisors, because

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 5>on your website you do say that derivatives have a

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 5>place in almost all portfolios with volatility as an asset

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 5>class serving as a core holding. I'll be honest, it's

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 5>not something that we talk about a lot when it

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 5>comes to an individual's portfolio, but talk and I don't

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 5>think a lot of people have derivatives apart from you know,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 5>ETFs in their portfolios, So why do you think derivatives

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 5>have a place in everyone's portfolio?

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 9>Especially for the taxable investor. Listed options can help in

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 9>a number of ways. It's really the only way to

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 9>change your risk profile without having to sell your existing

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 9>underlying holdings, which of course triggers a tax bill permanent

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 9>drag on performance. So reshaping risk, whether it's through too

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 9>much risk and single names that you've owned that have

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 9>had great rallies a few stories on those even this week,

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 9>to just lowering your overall beta exposure, to creating additional

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 9>cash flows through call selling or put selling. There are

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 9>all kinds of different tools you've got available with the

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 9>listed option market with respect to a typical wealth management portfolio, stocks, bonds, funds,

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 9>and through our technology and our business, you know, our

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 9>goal is to bring a lot of customization to that

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 9>and help folks achieve the changes they want to make

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 9>in their portfolio using options, because they're the only way

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 9>you can deliver some of these solutions. Maximizing after tax

0:27:58.800 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 9>is the real goal.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 4>It's an important aspect certainly of this strategy. Hey, Dan, Dave,

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 4>excuse me, thank you so much, really appreciate it, Dave Donnelly.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 4>He's managing director at Spider Rock Advisors, as we said,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 4>at Chicago based asset management firm, and they've got about

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 4>four and a half billion dollars in assets under management.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 4>But this makes sense, like coming off of the spot

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin etf that we've seen approve, like everybody's trying to

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 4>figure out the strategies off of it, and you know,

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 4>minimizing volatility through options obviously makes a lot of sense. Yeah,

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 4>or it's going to be, certainly something that we knew

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 4>was coming.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 5>I have to wait for those regulators to give the

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 5>nod of approval.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, not yet, but you would assume that, right,

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 4>they're going to allow for kind of an expansion of

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 4>some of these trading strategies.

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>A brother mark a.

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Journal.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 8>How about you let me drive?

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 9>No, no, no, no, honey, please, I'll do the driving gravels.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 9>Excuse mate, I want to drive.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question time.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 9>This is the drive to the globe.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Music well Don on Bloomberg Radio, TikTok, everybody eighteen well, yeah,

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 4>eighteen minutes left trading session. Hell, I'm not a good rounder.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 4>We're definitely off our best levels of the session. As

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 4>you heard Charlie break it downs like Gaines on the

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 4>S and P and down Nazac lower. I feel like

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a break a pause, if you will,

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 4>from the n video rally that was yesterday. But S

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 4>and P what we're still at a record right, doesn't

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 4>matter what.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 5>I've just got to be in the green and Carol,

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 5>we're in the green right now five points exactly. Hey,

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 5>let's see what Katerina Simonetti has to say about this.

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 5>She's senior vice president and private wealth advisor at Morgan

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Stanley Private Wealth Management. She joins us on Zoom from Philadelphia. Katerina,

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 5>how are you?

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me on the show. It's good,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>good to be here on the Friday.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 5>It's good to have you back with us. What a

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 5>week it was. Help us make sense of the game

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 5>that we've seen in the S and P five hundred

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 5>so far this year, in the now so far this year,

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 5>when you know we're talking already up six point six

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 5>percent in the Nasdaq, six point eight percent in the

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 5>S and P five hundred. Uh, what's left for the year?

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, what an incredible start of the year, and when

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you kind of think about the transition that we finished

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three with this focus on what FED is

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to do, and then we went into January with

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this wide expectation that we're going to have, you know,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>five raid cuts, and what we're seeing now are these

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>earning surprises. And they're not just surprises across the board.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>There are surprises specifically in the names. The magnificent seven

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>names that you know have done so well, you know,

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>so now it's going to be progressively difficult for the

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>FED to be very aggressive with rate cuts, and consensus

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>now is that we're going to have about three of them,

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and the focus for investors is really on these fast

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>moving stocks. And what we're seeing as the biggest trap

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to avoid is when investors are starting to

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>doubt their diversified portfolios, starting to dow to acid allocation

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and are kind of saying like, should we stay with

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>blue chip stocks, should we stay diversified, or should we

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>switch direction into this highest growing stocks, And that's what

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are the type of conversations that we're having,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the beginning of this year.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, having said that we kicked off earlier with our

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Gina Martin Adams, our chief eculty strategist to here at

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence, and she said, you know, with all of

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 4>the interest and mania surrounding Nvidia and our obsession with technology,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 4>that she said more stocks in industrials and financials made

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 4>more highs than tech over I think she said the

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 4>past week or so, which was kind of interesting, and

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 4>that's why she said she was finding it constructive for

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 4>investors to look specifically at those spaces. How are you

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 4>seeing it? Could you drill down a little bit more

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 4>specifically in terms of where you think not just a

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>broadening out where investors should be maybe adding some more

0:31:58.400 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 4>in terms of acid allocation.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I want to be clear that we are

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not advocating giving off on tech because tech is playing

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely instrumental role in the growth of the sectors

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like industrials and financials and healthcare. And we're seeing some

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of these companies all across the sectors, you know, making

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>significant investments in AI, in increasing profitability, in cutting costs,

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and technology is going to play and absolutely essential role there.

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So technology should be in the portfolios, but we're seeing

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the other sectors, sectors like financials industrials with this huge

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>government spending in that space. With health care, you know,

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we have agent population and the need for healthcare services

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is becoming more and more, and they are exciting developments

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>with genomics and biotech. So we see the opportunities across

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the board. We're advocating looking at valuations. What we are

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>cautioning investors not to do is when we are looking

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>at earnings, and especially their earnings that are so exciting

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and are looking very good. You know, the question is

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>how sustainable are there? Are they? And there's no such

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>thing as growth and perpetuity right like, so the reason

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that we diversity.

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Yet and yet don't you feel like constantly there's a

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 4>pushback against the Magnificent seven, those growth names, and yet

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 4>here we are year after year focusing on them and

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 4>talking about them, and they continue to lead the market gains.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, So I think the real question we should be

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>asking is what should we do about it? And investors

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that don't own those names and really want to own them,

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there is no you know, we're not telling them don't

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>own them. The question is how much what we are

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>cautioning them from is abandoning healthcare and financials and industrial

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>health instead of just going and focusing and concentrating in

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>these individual names, but taking a reasonable position because you

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>want to be part of that AI story and want

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to be part of that growth, and you don't want

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to feel like you're missing out. That's perfectly acceptable, that

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>makes sense.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 5>So I guess the question I have is really about

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 5>the macro environment and it does, you know, politics, notwithstanding

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 5>here in the election, notwithstanding here in the US, what

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of derails the path that we're on right now,

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 5>because it does seem like so many economic signs that

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 5>we're getting, so much the data, it's seemed pretty good.

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I think that tim the economic data that

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to look at more than any other area

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is labor market because the data that we're seeing from

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is extremely mixed. On one side, we

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have full employment, we're seeing high wages, but we're also

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing this waves of layoffs or you know, the cost

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>cutting projections that include the possibility of the layoffs. And

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, you know, the consumer confidence and

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>willingness of consumers to spend and their optimism about the

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>market is something that is playing a very big role.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's this huge headwid I'm sorry the tailwind, you know,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for the growth of the economy, but if we're going

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to start seeing this shift and the change in the

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>labor market, that is something that is going to be

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty pivotal, you know, with the slow down of the economy,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and something that FED is playing a very close attention

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to when it comes to the decision on the timing

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>with amount of bread cuts.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 5>Carol, this is exactly what Gina Martin Adams said earlier today.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Watch the labor market totally. It just doesn't seem like

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 5>we're getting any signals that there's weakness there except for

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 5>and this is kind of ironic, the tech industry layoffs

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 5>that we've seen over the past six weeks.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:45.720
<v Speaker 4>And she said, if we do start to see overall

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 4>the labor markets start to roll over and that the

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 4>FED does feel like it needs to cut rates sooner

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.919
<v Speaker 4>rather than later, I mean that could be problematic that

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 4>the economy is slowing down and that ultimately will lead

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 4>to slower earnings growth. Like it all relates back, and

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 4>then you have to start rethinking about valueations on the

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 4>equity side of things. Potentially, potentially, potentially, all right, Katerina Simonetti,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 4>She's Senior vice president and private wealth Advisor at Morgan

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Stanley Private Wealth Management, joining us from Philadelphia.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Jermale