WEBVTT - What’s the Deal With ESG ETFs?

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome a trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bel

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Tunis Eric. This time on Trillions, we're gonna talk about

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:18.159
<v Speaker 1>E s G. What is E s G. Yeah, A

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't know which I think that's part

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of the hurdle of people getting more interested is just

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>knowing what that acronym is. It stands for Environmental, Social

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and Governance, which is sort of like the three pillars

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that generally are used as screens to find out which

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>companies are, you know, sort of progressing in the world

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how to behave And it's sort of

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a way to grade companies um on things that aren't

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just profit right, it's sort of the other side of

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>the equation besides just making money. And it's become much

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>more popular in recent years and and there there's a

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of speculation that this could be a massive opportunity

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as an investing thesis going forward. The hype is unbelievable.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>E s G articles are plant of full, They get

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great press. People seem to be into it.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who who wouldn't be into Its really good? Right? Yeah,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there's dozens and dozens of E t s being launched

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>every year that are in the E s G themes,

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So there's plenty of product. However, the app assets are

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of lacking. They have it looks like six point

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>eight billion, right, so that's not a lot. Okay, that's

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>some Yeah, the Banguard takes that in a week, all right.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a little bit of a gap between the

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>hype and assets, which I think is really what we

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>want to explot to day and also practically how you

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>use them. This is one of those topics that I've

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>been picked on Twitter about. People do want us to

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>do an E s G episode. So here we are,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>we are and joining us to help us make sense

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of this is someone that you brought in and you

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>guys are up in Boston today, I'm in New York.

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Who do you have with you? Here with us are

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>two experts from the E s G field, but in

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>different ways. Graham Sinclair, who I know on Twitter and

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>actually met through a friend a long time ago, who

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is the at E s G architect, So he's he's

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>literally that's his whole life. He isn't a consultant to

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>companies about E s G. He'll go over that in

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>a minute. And Matt Bartolini from State Street. He has

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to take E. S G and make a product out

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of it and then try to get the products sold.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have, you know, the two sides

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the equation in terms of trying to figure out

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with S G T S and how

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to use them. This man, trillians, what's the deal with E?

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>S G, E T S. Matt Graham, thanks for joining

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>us on the show. Graham, you actually didn't come alone,

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>did you. You brought someone with you who'd you No,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got a fairly aggressive intern program at Sincoe s

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>same of S and consulting it. I came in with

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>my daughter. Friday's a geogik and daddy days alright, child labor.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>We have a couple of questions we'd like to ask her. Uh, yeah,

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that'd be great, and to be clear, not childly, but

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's extreme millennial. By the way, what generation would she be?

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Is she z or is it? Are we beyond that?

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>With her? Well, I'm pitching it's it's double A. I

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>will say she's the youngest guest we've had on this podcast,

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and potentially the youngest guest in the studio. I could

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>tell from the looks we were getting from a lot

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of people talk about a lot of people talk about

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>E s G as the future. So let's actually talk

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to someone who's rooted in the future. What what does

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>your daddy do? Spinning? Spinning? It's pretty instructed, he's he's um,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>he's an expert at E s G. Do you like

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>E s G? You haven't been there yet. It's it's

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty it's an interesting place to visit. Well, you

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like clean water, right? And trees? Trees? Can you tell um,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Mr Eric, are you watching puffin rock? Right? And do

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they like to swim in the clean ocean or the ocean? All? Right?

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I think she's on word, Graham. Once you

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get someone sold on clean ocean and water, you're pretty

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>much halfway there with the s G pitch. It's interesting

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>she said E s G as a place. Um, you know,

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think my kids probably think E T F is

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a place and I live Daddy lived there. You guys

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>have done the dad episode. You gotta do the kid episode.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That okay, So Graham, Matt, let's let's have a better

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of what what you guys do and how you

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>got into this space. Joel, I got into retirement funds

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Investments out of law school back in South Africa, rolled

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>up through a various shops, ended up at SCI Investments,

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which explains how I ended up in the U S.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to be. I was abducted by a beautiful,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>brilliant woman. I am an E. S. G architect, which

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>means I take an investment problem and I integrate environment,

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>social governance factors into solving that problem, into the management

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>systems and the processes, the manufacturing, the marketing. And the

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>other way we come at it is if if there's

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>an issue that we need to develop the investment thesis

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for the investment case. An example would be how designed

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the access to nutrition index? And the other question came

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Gates Foundation Foundation a couple of lines to

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>improve nutrition UH, And the question was how do we

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>make nutrition a serious investment issue? To Wolf Street UH.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's how we developed the investment case. And Matt,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>can you talk a little bit about what you do

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>at State Street? Yeah? Sure, So within State Street and

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Spider Et f business and the head of research

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for for that area and sitting within a broader asset

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>management firm, one of our goals is to solve clients

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>issues and one of those is how to align financial

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>goals to also social goals and that's where E s

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>G naturally fits in. So how do you be able

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to provide you know, long term diversified returns, but do

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that matches how you feel about

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, your carbon footprint or about gender diversity and

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's really what the solutions that we have

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>within our firm we're trying to do. And then it

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>just comes down to just portfolio construction. And that's a

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>big part of my role is taking all of these

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>different et s, not even just from ourselves, but other

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>actual wars and their neutual funds and different other managed accounts,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when you blend them all together? Do

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you start to have overcrowding risk and enter into something

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that you maybe not want it? Just let's just define

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>E s G. I've been on panels where it takes

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty five minutes. Can you guys give me the one

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>minute definition of E s G dumbed down? Um, and

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>each of you do it that way people can just

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>get their handle around what exactly it is. Gham. The

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>investment case summarizes the forward looking business case for put

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>photo companies. At any point in time, all factors matter

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to doing business in the twenty one century, all factors,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.119
<v Speaker 1>including environment, social, and governance factors. They're on the side

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>onto corner on something you plug in later. If you

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are building a business on investing on planet Earth, using

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>humans to move money or do things or buy things,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and you rely on the rule of law to make

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sure stuff ends up what it's meant to end up

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and you get your money back. This environment, social, governance

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and every investment decision, the biggest question has to be

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>why hasn't this always been profiles proactively managed about the

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>investment industry. It's getting better. It's coming from a long

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>way back. There was like five lines what's yeah. I mean,

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's a it's a problem to label it,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's it's really hard because even if

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the US listed E t F industry,

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and we look at the funds that are classified as

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>e s G by data providers anyone focused on the US,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of dispersed amount of returns last year. It's

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>difference between the best performing and worst performing e s

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>G fund So classification is one of these problems that

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as an asset management firm and someone deeply engaged in

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>E t f s, that's really hard for to do,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why you do to Eric's point earlier,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't see that big of asset growth because you

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>needed it's a very personal decision. What is the most

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>E s G fund? Does it not invest in any oil?

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Or do is invest in some oil? And I think

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the biggest problems of creating a deep

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>rooted classification system. It also feels like it's become hot

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively recently. But that naive perspective is it how much

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>data is actually out there so that we can make

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>informed decisions here? Well, if you check your Google search

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as you'll see it, it goes ballistic. Even even on

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>analysis of studies of the impact of environment, social governance factors,

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the studies themselves from early seventies, almost nothing from nineteen seventy,

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>when Milton Freeman has had this classic business of business

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as business misunderstanding through the fifteen it's just basically it's

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a hockey stick. So even studies of studies of what's

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.239
<v Speaker 1>happening in the investment units universe has ramped up. Absolutely

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of hubris. There's there's a lot of hype,

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of greenwashing. There's there's situations where companies

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>claim to do things and they don't. I mean, how

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>many of you believe those towels that you hang back

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in the rack is because the hotel company is trying

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>to be sustainable, you're supposed to hang him back on

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the rack. You leave them on the floor to get

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it a clown one. Let's just think about an E

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>S G approach, right, are you screening out for things

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>or are you going and trying to track companies that

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>are literally making solar panels? What's the method that's really

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the the best way to do it? So, working with

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the institutional investor a house, he's making these decisions. It

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>starts with how you view the world, what do you believe?

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So in Kelpus rebuilt the whole investment process earlier this decade.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They started with what I believes, how do we see

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the world? What is our That rolls into what is

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>our investment philosophy? And then you work through the various

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>elements of what are your processes? Were the people you're

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna put in place, how you're going to build these portfolios.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to attract the impact and the performance.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So E s G is really a systems level issue.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>That's why I came to the Monica at s G

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>architect the same way that investment today relies on digital

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on software to execute and make things happen and inform

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>making it better. So too with the E s G.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>E s G sits across the investment life cycle. Yeah,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's there's different levels of E s G.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Same with smart data. You can have something that's like

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a factor tilt that invests in every stock in the

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>SP or you can just do high octane the fifty

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.599
<v Speaker 1>cheapest stocks for a value screen. E s G is

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhat similar. You can do something where you just divest

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>from energy companies that have proven fossil fuel reserves, or

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you can take the m s C I ACQUI optimize

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it to have the lowest carbon footprint for a level

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of tracking error. And there's sort of those two spectrums

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of purity versus something that will give you a benchmark

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>like return, but in a more E s G framework.

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to just jump on Eric please if we could,

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on your awesome podcasts. Could we walk away from using

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>language like doing good, soul, feelings, values, personal, This is

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this is just the way investment will be in future

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on one planet, using humans, using a rule of law.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no extra earth, there's no extra water, there's

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>no extra clean air. Right, so part of this is

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and your your fingers curled up every time you watch

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>these interviews. It takes about three questions and then the

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>talking head is gonna ask the investment specialists, so can

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>this match your values? You know almost here that the

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>change in the chan technical this is architecture. Well this

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>brings up one thing I hear on Twitter a lot

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>when I point out, like when Vanguard launched the s

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>G and it was cheap, I was like, well, now

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>we finally got dirt cheap e s G. Now we

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>now we know whether it was, you know, a cheap

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>thing or just an E s G issue. And a

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people replied with it doesn't matter what the

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>cost is. It's too subjective. Vanguard thinks you're supposed to

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>screen out alcohol, tobacco, this, that, and the other. Actually

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>only think three of those things are important, those other

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>two are fine, and so subjectivity of what's important to you.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I've heard makes people is sort of stop from applying

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it to investment and maybe do it in their own way,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in their own like personal life. But the idea that

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>your state street going to decide for me what is

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>E s G and what isn't. Yeah, And that's one

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that you do run into is that

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to that personal decision. So I've had

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>conversations with investors and advisors of all walks of life,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was talking to one of them and they say, well,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we invest in a separately managed account focused on animal welfare,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so companies that have really strong animal welfare programs. That's

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>really hard to package into an e t F because

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the impetus for an e TF was to offer democratized

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>access to an area, and you want to make that

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>broad and appealing to a pretty wide swath of investors,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and something like animal welfare that might not be as

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>applicable to something that is maybe just you know, uh,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fossil of your reserves free, something that's broader. And that's

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the adoption challenges within E s G is

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that to your point, everyone has a different classification. What

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>it means to me. I don't want to own anyone

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that ever interacts with oil. That's a that's a harder

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>broad exposure to give someone because there might not be

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>that many people out there for that. Let's just talk

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>about oil for a minute. I always find this to

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat hypocritical. I think the term is slacktivism. You know,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you tweet something and all of a sudden you're a

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>good person. Um, you know investing in a say s

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>P y X, which is yours, which is the S

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred x fossil FUELU. So you carve

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of oil uh producers in their oil

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>companies Exon and such. But a lot of people still

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>use oil, right, so they are actually not investing in

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a company they helped make profitable. So isn't the real

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>answer to just get an electric car and then not

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>invest in it? Because if your goal is to have

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio that makes money and you're not willing to

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not use oil in your day all life, what would

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be the point of not investing in that company? Yeah,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would be you know, you'd be hedged, right,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So you want to make sure that you still have

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the oil upside beta. But you know, yeah, to your point, like,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to invest in this way, you're likely

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be living this way. And if you're not there,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a different of aligning your financial values to your

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>social ones. You know that that just creates an asymmetric profile.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think to your point about you know, how

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>do you construct these exposures. There's to some extent people

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that would you want to have no exposure even to

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the oil refineries because they're still conducting in the business

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and supporting the oil industry. And you know, that's why,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at firms that are really

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>at the innovative state of renewable energy, you might want

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to look for those first. And in some instances they

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actually might be in the traditional energy sector, like a

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>company like enter Bridge. They definitely run a lot of

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>natural gas pipelines, but they also have a significant amount

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of wind farms across the United States in North End Canada,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so there are This is where it goes to the

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>environmental space where you want to actually look what these

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>firms are doing and how they're actually organizing their business.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Because climate change is real in companies interacting in fossil

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>fuell understand that there's gonna be a natural shift towards renewables.

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>We're definitely going to see that over the next ten

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty years where renewables take a bigger stage in terms

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of um energy production. And there's also regulation coming down

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the pike, which changes the whole model for portfolio companies.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>When regulation changes, then it doesn't become an issue of

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>oh do I have a green investor brown investor. Then

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just I'm a company. I need to work in

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this environment. I need to upgrade the way I'm working.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And the classic example is a circular economy and McDonald's

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>or Starbucks in the UK following Blue Planet too horrific images.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>People realize this plastic floating around the world. Now they're

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>going to say McDonald's, Starbucks about all that plastic and

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>those cups that you you put into the trash. It's

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>your problem, now go and solve it. Yeah, and these

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>disasters definitely can can hurt a company. And you know,

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about this this sub brass tax of investing, right,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So the biggest E C S G T F no

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>offense MATT is from my shares, It's s U s A,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the M S C I, E S G it's

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the only one over a billion, and it it to

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>me it's kind of embodies a typical E. S G fund.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a little overweight tech and it's a little underweight energy.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So in the last twelve months, right those fang stocks,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the tech stocks didn't do well, so this was down

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one percent more than the market. Talk about how someone

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>might need to stomach under performance to go all the

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>way with this, But obviously if tech does better and

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>energy struggles, you might do a little better. So talk

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about the both you guys, the performance aspect and selling

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people on that regard. Yeah, I mean, part of it

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>comes down to just index construction, right, So the ability

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to be craftsman in creating this exposure to not introduce

0:16:55.360 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>any Indian syncratic risks. And you're talking about sector sector weightings.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>So obviously you know our phosilphy or reserves free spy X.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>We are naturally underwraight energy. So if the energy sector

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>pops by because of for some catalysts, you will underperform.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And having that level of intelligence while entering that product

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is important so you can understand what that client experience

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>will be. The same thing was she we knew that

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we didn't want to just look at the firms with

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the best gender diversity and then just allocate to those

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because sector biases can play a huge role into it.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So think about the close lower volatility strategies that become

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just utilities and reads funds. They become very highly correlated

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to whatever that sector is doing. So you want to

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>really let that stock selection in the index construction drive returns.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we have with SHE where you have

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a sector controlled bias. So it just comes

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>down to understanding the index construction and being comfortable with

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the potential return path, knowing that yes, I'm going to

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>be underwraight energy of energy is I'm going to underperform.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But my viewpoint is that overall a long time frame

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about this shift more renewable energy, that

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>firms that are embracing that renewable capability will lead to

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>better performance. And you know, I understand that going into

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's the big problem, was just knowing what

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you own. I mean, that's the old Peter Peter Lynch

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>adage and that applies to anything. Yeah, and and something

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we haven't touched on Eric enjol that you know I

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>really follow trillions, and I really enjoyed what you guys do.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>That the technology, the method, the vessel, the vehicle that

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>these investment opportunities come through, the same way. We love

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Jack Bogle for how you change the industry. That's a

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>great shot you put up recently, Eric about the average

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>cost of managing money through Vanguard or mutual fund business others.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Is the availability through e t F. The E t

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>F is the right structure. So what I don't prefer

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to see is fund manager ABC with you know, wood

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>paneling and high end cappuccino machine talking to me about

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>sustainability and the STU for moments in fact of their portfolio.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But they're still delivering it in a sleeve with a

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>big fat one two up to two and a half

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>percent fee. It's got to be low priced and delivered

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>delivering the Well, here's the follower that question, which is

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what would E s G be without E t S.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so in mutual fund land, there's actually a

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>sizeable portion of E s G products. There's actually more

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>assets and more products in within mutual fund structures. However,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the direction I travel is more launches within the et

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>F structure, likely or a result of some of the

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>benefits that E t F have relatives mutual funds. All

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the money is going there, Yeah, that it flows to that.

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And how many more E E s G E t

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>F s do we expect to enter the market going forward.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think any fund, any strategy, is trying to do that.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>And a green Alpha advises the guys who co branded

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Sierra Club, they used to run a mutual fund,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they shut it down, was unsuccessful. They've got a new strategy.

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>The twenty nineteen toss list top of list roll out

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of E t F. I think every strategy and what

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy about the low fee structure and the ability

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to be tactical rolling out product into the E t

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>F space is that it means you can cater for

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for nuance and for a variety of opportunity. So it's

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not just it's each it's E s G or not no, no, no,

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's E S G. And it's got a tilt towards

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on how do we focus on people solving for water?

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It's got a tilt, how do we solve for people

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>solving for dirty year? How do we tilt for diversity,

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, race, gender, and so on. So E t

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>F gives you that opportunity. There's even a vegan e

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>t F coming out soon which a claims to save

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen animals per ten tho dollar invested in the e

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>t F. So I do think we're going to get

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to these levels where they're actually going to post what

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing with the purchase. Um. I want to ask

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just about one of the things about E s G

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that might be a limiting factor and also penalizes investors,

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is that it's a really tidy way for investment management

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>companies to make a little bit more money, right because

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the feast can be high. Uh is that is that

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick around? Or will the will that has to

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>be downward pressure to get the fees down. Well, I mean,

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the average fee and

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the anything classified as E s G, I thinks about

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>forty six basis points, which is roughly the average fee

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>of ETF. So they're kind of on par. I mean,

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>our philosophy is that if you're intending for I know

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we said we don't want to use these terms earlier,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but if you're intending to do good in portfolios and

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>be good actors and try to enrich in the environment

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the call for governance that we have

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that you shouldn't have to pay a ton for it.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So we have a pricing philosophy around that. They're very

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>cost effective. And I think that that's going to be

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the trend going forward, is that investors are to make

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this decision. They don't want to be charged fees that

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>are you know, in the eighties and nineties. Well let

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>me just jump in here with this because I know

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.479
<v Speaker 1>what she's saying. Um, thematic ETFs in particular, I think

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>are really where you see some of that sixty seventy

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>basis points, but most of these are twenty or below

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>point to percent or below. And listen, compared to what's

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going on in the mutual fund area. I mean the

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>amount of money taken in these you know, four or

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>three B plans and the loads and the expenses, this

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is nickel dime. I mean, this is not much fees

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. Plus there's no capital gains distributions. Um. Look,

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the e t F fishers have to live in a

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>virtual terror dom with where there's no revenue so that

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>investors can have like this paradise portfolio. So in general

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I find that punching down is E T F S.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Punching up is two mutual funds. I don't find a

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of slickness in terms of E t F E

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>S G E t F fees. I think some of

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the early ones were fifty, but they've now been competed

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>out Goldman vanguards. They story have come in under twenty.

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think every area has this fee pressure. Some

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just take a little more longer to catch up than

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the plane vanilla area. So let me jump on the

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>end there, Eric, So I agree, and E t F

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>is the onset to um acid gathering funny shop right

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>now and should be going full it. I also want

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to investment professionals, So remember the basis of your question

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>there is, oh, we cannot consider environmental, social, and governance

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>factors when you make decisions about a company. And if

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we put it in there, uh no, we're gonna charge

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your extra fee. That is that is intellectually bankrupt. Like

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I will laugh at someone who tries to make that

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>argument to me in a pitch deck or presentation on

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like going to a restaurant and saying, uh, you

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna buy the food, You're gonna pay extra

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>for the fork, the plate and the air conditioning. E

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>s G is an every decision of planet Earth using humans,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>using a rule of law. And just to the mutual

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>funds the track E s G. We looked at this.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>The average fee is about one percent and they have

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>sixty billion, whereas the E t F average fees UM well,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>if you asset weight at average is more like thirty um,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you know you're looking at a third of

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the cost. So, if anything, the e s G E

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>t F would be a smart move for the people

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in the E s G mutual fund. And a lot

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of those mutual funds underperformed general benchmarks as well, so

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of that money is probably going

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to come over eventually. The question is can you get

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>new audiences too? And there's guys who haven't talked much

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about the alpha opportunities. Let's there's the best study that

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the most the broadest study out in Twitter December twenty

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen by Germans. They're going to be pretty thorough right

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if we're working uh stereotypes. Yet of the studies two thousand,

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred studies of performance and connections between portfolio performance

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>company performance in s G of studies found a non

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>negative relationship. Thirty five percent were positive, seven percent were negative.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Ms c I E s G Leaders Emerging Markets Index

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>one three and five year has outperformed the MSc I

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Emerging Markets Index without an E s G tilt an

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>E s G filter to it. So it's there's an

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>alpha opportunity that we really haven't addressed yet. I think, guys,

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we should come back and talk about the alpha opportunity.

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I will always welcome the opportunity to talk about alpha.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Graham Matt, thanks for joining Central. You guys totally outperformed.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>We also just want to take a moment and give

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a shout out to Jack Bogel, the founder of Vanguard

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>who passed away last week. Yeah, I mean huge loss. Uh.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who, in my opinion, will probably

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>have ended up having the biggest impact and the at

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>least the investment space, if not the whole financial industry

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred years stretch. He is different. You know,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>there's great people running money Warren Buffett, and that's not

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He was about something completely different, and I think it

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was interesting how he changed the system. But he was

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>invented the index fund. Millions and millions of people have

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a retirement basically thanks to him. But the bigger deal

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>was the mutual ownership structure of Vanguard, you know, having

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the fun investors own the company. Every time they had profit,

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they would vote to lower the fees, not to pay

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the managers more and or expand end and so over

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the thirty years, if I showed you a chart of

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard's average fee, it goes about sixty five and nine

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and just slowly goes down to now it's average ten

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>basis points right. And they were lowering fees when no

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>one cared in the nineties, you didn't have to lower

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your fees. People a buying mutual funds didn't know what

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they cost. So he had to wait thirty years really

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>for his idea to catch fire. And you got to

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>take your hat off to the guy, and he sacrificed

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>some personal wealth. He was definitely wealthy at eighty million

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>net worth. But I think history is going to be

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>very very kind to him, especially as these new generations

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>come up and think more about incoming equality. He'll be

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>revered more and more and I only see his sort

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of legend growing. So if you haven't checked out our

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>interview with him, we had him on the show over

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the summer, and then he again makes an appearance on

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>our other show, The et F Story. I was really

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>happy we got that interview. Um, there's a lot we

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>can actually go into the file and I think bring

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>out and have a part two down the road. But man,

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he riffed on everything, especially he spun it forward. He

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about the future of the advice business, the future

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of money management, and I loved he dropped a lot

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of little pearls of wisdom Ben Franklin style. We got

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just an incredible hour and a half with him and

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in one of the last interviews. So Mr Bogel, thank you.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to traits until next time. You can

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and wherever else you like to listen. We'd love to

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Ball Tunas. You can find Grahamson Claire

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at E S. G Architect and you can find Matt

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Bartolini at State Street E T S. Trillions is produced

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Bye