WEBVTT - Stocks Head for First 2026 Drop

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I've never ever ever said this before. How about making

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>a book of the year, a book that's eighteen months

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>old and now two years old. Rushia Sharma in twenty

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>four took every award for What Went Wrong with Capitalism?

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the book you throwed a twenty one year

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>old brat, Paul. I'm talking to you, and you say,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>shut up and read this Rushia Sharma and the President's

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>here are going to Fdr Nixon, Reagan, Biden and on

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to President Trump, ever more important, two years down the road.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't say enough about it. Rich here, thank you

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining us this morning. If you were

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to write a new epilogue for What Went Wrong with Capitalism?

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 3>How would you write it?

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Tom First, thank you so much for your kind words,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 4>because nothing warms the heart of an author more than

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 4>to hear it from someone like you. But yeah, that's

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 4>exactly been the aim of this book, which is to

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 4>sort of show that how the capitalism we have today

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 4>is a very distorted form of capitalism we have can.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 5>We even call it that?

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 4>And the main reason I wrote the book is something

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 4>that you tease just now in your introduction, which is

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 4>that so many young people today, when they are polled

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 4>in America, say that they're disillusioned with capitalism, and in fact,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 4>many of them, particularly progressives, say that they would rather

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 4>have socialism. Now, that tells you about what is the

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 4>disenchantment with the cutting system.

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 5>That we have.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 4>And what I've tried to do in the book, and

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I would change anything from what I

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 4>wrote about this eighteen months ago when it was published,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 4>is that you've seen more of that, which is that

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing much wider income inequality, wealth inequality, and we

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 4>are seeing a lot of the incumbents get much more entrenched.

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 5>And my point is that.

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Capitalism is not supposed to work this way. Capitalism is

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be pro churn. It's supposed to be pro competition,

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 4>and we are supposed to weed out a lot of

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 4>the old players rather than have this kind of system

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 4>where it gets cleroossos.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>That's right, where I wanted to go wead out the

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 2>old players post Trump. Whatever your politics, folks, I don't care.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Russhier is great about that. Post Trump. What happens to

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 2>populism is all of this solved at the ballot box.

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that, you know, the main issue that

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Americans have today is one of affordability, and the affordability

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 4>crisis that we're facing in America, A lot of that

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 4>comes because of home prices, and that goes to the

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 4>heart of what went wrong with capitalism. Why are home

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 4>price is so unaffordable for so many Americans that so

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 4>many twenty year olds today cannot afford to buy a

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 4>home and are prefering to living in with their parents. Well,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the main reason for that is that the amount of

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 4>regulation we have had in the system that has made

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 4>home supply in very short supply. In fact, so the

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 4>number of new homes we're building in America today is

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 4>roughly the same level as it was thirty forty years ago,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>when the population was a lot less. The kind of

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>regulation we have today makes it very difficult to build

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 4>new homes, so keeps going up, but supply just doesn't

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>come on the market. So I think that this is

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 4>what we need to do that how do we get

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 4>capitalism back to functioning the way it was, closer to

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 4>what the founders had in mind. I'm not saying we

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>return to the Dicxanian form of capitalism that we had

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen twenties without a welfare state. But this capitalism

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 4>where you have, at least for the rich, capitalism on

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 4>the upside, and then socialism on the downside, where the

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 4>losses are socialized.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 5>The government's there how to protect you.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that that distorted form of capitalism is something

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 4>which we'll keep producing these perverse outcomes that we're getting

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>today across America.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Rusher Shearmer with us of course, chairman at Rockefeller International,

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 2>can't say enough about his work, including my book of

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the Year, What Went Wrong with Capitalism?

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney with Russier Sharma.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 6>Sure, I think we all grew up, most of our listeners,

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 6>have yourers with globalism? Is globalism dead these days?

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 5>Really?

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Because if you look at what's happening in the world

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 4>over the past year, the yes that America is withdrawing

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 4>from the global trade system, but the rest of the

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 4>world is learning to trade without America. So if you

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>see what's happened to trade volumes over the last few quarters.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 4>America's share is declining in global trade volumes, but the

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>rest of the world, the trade volumes are actually going up.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 4>And as I travel the world, what I find is

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 4>that more and more countries are trading with each other,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 4>signing trade agreements with each other Europe and Latin America.

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Even countries that it.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Turned quite protectionous like India, are signing more trade deals

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 4>with the Middle East or with New Zealands.

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 5>So at least on the trade front, what I.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Find is that globalization outside of America continues. Now, of

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 4>course globalism is more imperiled has to do with immigration,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 4>and this is one of the top trains of my

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 4>year that we are seeing this backlash against immigration, not

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>only in America but across the Western hemisphere. So therefore

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 4>immigration rates have collapsed in much of Europe as well,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 4>not just in America. But as far as trade is concerned,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 4>the world is really learning to trade without America.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 5>Increasingly China.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 6>That's one of the big wild cards I think as

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 6>we think about global trade here here, what's your view

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 6>on China in the West over the next several years.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 4>I think the single biggest story of twenty twenty six

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 4>which could emerge is the fact that China's dumping is

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 4>causing so much pain to so many countries around the world.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 4>What exactly is going on here, which is that China's

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 4>always known to be an export powerhouse, but over the

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 4>last decade or so, this is beginning to shift in

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 4>one very important way. In the past, yes, China would

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 4>export a lot, and it would also increase prices over

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 4>time last few years, what's begun to happen and this

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 4>has become more acute in the last couple of years

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 4>that China's export volumes have surged, but it is done

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 4>so by cutting prices. So Chinese export prices are declining

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 4>by twenty percent a year, whereas export volumes are surging

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 4>by forty percent, and that is leading to a flood

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 4>of Chinese goods around the world, which is hurting them

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing sector in places from Europe to Southeast Asia. And

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 4>I suspect that that backlash will really become more intense

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty six because a lot of these countries

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 4>were so focused on fighting Trump's trade battle in twenty

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, but that seems to have peaked now I

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 4>think the attention is going to turn to what China does,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>and I think that the backlash against this China dumping

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 4>is going to get pretty intense this year.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Rushier Sharma with a Sirockefeller International celebrating his top ten

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>trends for twenty twenty six, published of course by the

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Financial at Times. Sure you got a beautiful sentence here,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and I just want to get to this for twenty six,

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>for twenty seven, for twenty eight, until the money dries up?

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 2>What's the Rushier Sharma timeline? Asking for a friend? Rush

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>here is what is the Rushier Sharma X axis look

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>like for quote until the dries up?

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that the world is very sensitive to

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 4>higher interest rates. I know that some of the previous

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>guests are forecasting lower interest rates this year, but I

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 4>think that the real surprise could be that by the

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 4>end of this year we get higher interest rates, particularly

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 4>long term interest rates. And when interest rates go up,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 4>that's when money really starts to dry up.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 5>So I think that what you're alluding to here, Tom

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 5>is the fact that I wrote that.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 4>We have some sort of an AI bubble, but the

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 4>bubble can keep inflating until interest rates go up and

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 4>money dries up. I think that that happens possibly by

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the end of the year, when you end up getting

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 4>higher interest rates as inflation remains sticky, and the fact

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>that we still have, you know, like a lot of

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 4>this liquidity propping up financial assets. But the moment interest

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 4>rates go up particually long term interest rates, that's when

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 4>money dries up.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't go away. Because Paul Sweet's gonna save here? Did

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>you save me from this?

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 6>I can save good time because he's got ten big

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 6>themes for twenty twenty six, and number ten jumps out

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 6>of me peak alcohol.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 7>What's going on there?

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Was shre Yeah.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is one of the things which surprised

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 4>me too, which is the fact that when I looked

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 4>at the latest Gallop survey of the posters asking Americans

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 4>that how much are they drinking? You know that since

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 4>they've been asking this question since I think nineteen thirty

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 4>eight or something, the lowest share of Americans today are

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>drinking alcohol than before, right, So, which is that what

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing is that people's alcohol consumption is dropping. In

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 4>places like UK even Russia, alcohol consumption is close to

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 4>a record low.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 5>So I think that that's what's really going.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 4>On, which is that there's a lot of awareness about

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 4>the negative consequences of alcohol. Even the old line, which

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 4>is that a drink a day is good for you.

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I think that that.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 4>Myth has also been busted, and so a lot of

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 4>young people in particular are turning off alcohol, and so

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 4>therefore we see the.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Consequences of that. Then, even as global.

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Stocks continue to rally, one of the worst performing subsectors

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>in the world over the last few years have been

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.479
<v Speaker 4>alcohol stocks, and these include wineries, distilleries.

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 5>So you know, we've seen this across the.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Board, right, So there's a negative, you know, sort of

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 4>attitude towards alcohol leading to lower consumption of alcohol. Some

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 4>of it is getting cannibalized by cannabis as people switch

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 4>to that. But I think that that's a small part

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 4>of the story. The biggest story is that due to

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 4>health awareness, people are turning off alcohol, just like they

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 4>did with cigarettes before that.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>We have Lisametery to help us with that.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Richard Sharma, my book of the year, What Went Wrong

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>with Capitalism, can't say enough about it, but stay with us.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast just live weekday

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Applecarplay

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or watch

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>John Bilton had a global multi asset strategy at JP

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Asset Management.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>We're thrilled you could be with us. Thank you this morning.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>You nail the risk of disinflation and outright deflation. There

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>is a raging battle now in the zeitgeist over if

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this disinflation is just lowering inflation or does it lead to.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Dampened output in Europe and around the world. Does Kasmin

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>and Feroli do they see dampened output from the disinflation

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 3>you talk about.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think what it does is having seen the

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 8>ECB firmly on Holt probably for most of the years,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 8>some manly, some of the dates we've seen in the

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 8>past couple of days suggests that just maybe, Jess, maybe

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 8>the ECB might have a Midsummer gift for folks.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 7>Adding Europe, they've done a lot.

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 8>To bring to bring rates down to what they are

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 8>effectively close to zero in real terms. That's important. Remember

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 8>this is the biggest consumer block on the world. I

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 8>apologies to American consumers. European consumer block is twice as big.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 8>They just don't spend, they save, So it's really important

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 8>how it feeds through the ECB policy. The European households

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 8>are saving fifteen point three percent of their income each year.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 2>That's the same thing docimal point, we're saving one point

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>five exactly.

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 8>So the point is, but we just need a little

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 8>bit of impetus to set some spending in train.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 7>There Europe can look pretty good.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 8>So these these disinflationary forces give the ECB a lot

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 8>of wiggle room. But remember there's a lot of capex

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 8>coming as well through into Europe over the course of

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 8>twenty six, twenty seven, twenty eight under the Made for

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 8>Germany plan, but also on some of the defense spending

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 8>et cetera that's yet to hit the system. So do

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 8>we see a return to the bad old days of

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 8>disinflation even flirting with deflation? Probably not, because this is

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 8>a different picture. We've got fiscal as well as monetary

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 8>right now.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 6>We had use markets equitym marks perform very well in

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty five, but rest of the world did a

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 6>lot better. So what are we doing in twenty six

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 6>to expect than our performance to continue.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 7>So it's kind of an interesting one.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 8>There's been some real changes in terms of what's driven

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 8>the equity markets within If we look at the actual

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 8>indices themselves in local currency terms, they're kind of level

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 8>pegging if we take develop markets versus us later on

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 8>the currency. And of course this has been a great period.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 8>If you've been an American investor buying European, Eurozone, UK, Swiss,

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 8>you've done pretty well because of the currency move as well.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 8>We think the currency's got a bit further to go,

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 8>but the balance is changing. The differential over the long

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 8>term in terms of what we see as dollar weakening

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 8>against the euro, maybe about fifty sixty basis points a year.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 8>It could be two percent against the end. It could

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 8>be two point two percent on average over the next

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 8>ten years against the ranimby in the end. So it's

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 8>really the Asian markets we're beginning to get that potential

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 8>for that currency pickup.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 2>This is what, John, I'm so happy you're here for

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>this red sticky. This is what when we do a

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>fancy headline Bloomberg, we color it red. Sweety demands ad

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Alaska Air is buying one hundred and ten Boeing aircraft

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>in global growth push. We my currency is gloom. People

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 2>don't tune in, they don't listen, they don't watch on

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 2>YouTube unless Lisa, am I right, Unless we're worried.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>What about our children? Yes, we're worried. We're worried.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Here's Alaska Air betting on global growth. I mean, what

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>does your bank see of the optimists just saying no,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to worry about this, We're not going

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to worry about disinflation. Let's go what's the John built

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and let's go meet right now?

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think par it back to pay back to

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 8>basic fundamentals. If we look from nineteen seventy three to

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 8>present day, we can count the NBA recessions. We look

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 8>at the economic data today, it is not pointing to

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 8>a recession in the US, and we've got fiscal stimulus

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 8>and monetary support in the rest of the world. Take

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 8>a look at S and P total returns over those periods.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 3>In a non.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Recession year, nine times out of ten, the S and

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 8>P five hundred gives a positive total return. So the

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 8>idea that one would better against the economic momentum today

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 8>when you've got everything aligned, fiscal stimulus, regulatory easing, the

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 8>glagg defect of monetary stimulus all coming together in twenty

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 8>twenty six, I would be betting on equity markets continuing

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 8>to climb a wall of worry and some of the

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 8>investments spending from companies needing to play catch up in

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 8>order to stay relevant in terms of a growing global economy.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Allocations, stocks, barns, alternatives, thirty thousand foot view. Where's JP

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 6>Morgan asset management these days?

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 7>So we're a little bit overweight equity.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 8>We're conscious that valuations are kind of peaky, but at

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 8>the same time we think fundamentals are good. We think

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 8>broadening out is important. We're not talking about sort of

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 8>going and playing around in small caps here. We're talking

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 8>broadening out globally across some of those bigger, you know,

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 8>recipients of that capital spending. So broadening out overweight equity.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 8>We like Hong Kong because of the Asia play. We

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 8>like the UK because we've gone continuing to see some

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 8>decent yield there. We like Japan in terms of bonds.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're looking for further steepening in curves. They're

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 8>better likely to cut rates. We think one more time

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 8>this year, and then in terms of the other markets,

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 8>we're getting a little bit tight on credit, so we

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 8>think it's probably equity over credit as we move into

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 8>the ladder stage.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 3>If you moved to New York or are you based

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>in London?

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 7>So I'm based in London.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Can we take a note? Can you get mister Damon

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>on the phone? We need God to come over there,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 3>over there.

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 7>And there are slights both ways.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for joining us. Thanks with the

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 3>JP morgan a Bank.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Stay with those More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the most important conversation of the day because

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>you're not paying attention to your four oh one k cam.

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Dawson is I haven't said this in ages OMG rotation.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>What is the character of the rotation going on in

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the markets right now?

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 9>I think we have to appreciate it.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 10>At the start of the year, we typically do see

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 10>some of this last shall be first kind of rotation

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 10>where the names that had lagged start to lead, at

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 10>least for a short period of time. What's interesting is

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 10>that actually started back in November. The rotation really kicked

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 10>off in November, because that's when we saw the blowoff

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 10>top and some growth shares. They'se traded to an eighty

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 10>five percent premium to value at the peak in October,

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 10>so there was a lot of room for valuations to

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 10>come in. And I think the character of this rotation

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 10>has been one that's been very pro cyclical. If you

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 10>look at what's leading, its things like banks, and you

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 10>have industrials doing better, industrial commodities doing better. So it

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 10>appears that this pro cyclical rotation is coming with a

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 10>narrative of global reacceleration, which I think remains to be

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 10>seen if the data actually supports that.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 6>Boy, I'm thinking about my inbox over the last i

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 6>don't know, six weeks from the cell side, and their

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 6>twenty six outlooks almost universally positive bullish ten percent, twelve percent,

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 6>fifteen percent expectations for SMP stock performance in twenty twenty six.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 7>That makes me nervous?

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 6>Does that make you nervous at all?

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 10>There's not a single strategist who's expecting a down year

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty six.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 11>No, do you expect I gotta make some news this Well, Look,

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 11>we think that we'll have volatility along the way, but

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 11>that there's still room for the markets to press higher

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 11>through the end of the year.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 10>But here the key point is that in the fourth

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 10>year of the bull market. We've had twenty three bull

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 10>markets that have been three years over the last fifty

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 10>years fifty sixty years or so, and the conclusion is

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 10>about fifty percent of the time they're able to get

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 10>to that fourth year of positive returns. So we have

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 10>a fifty to fifty chance of being able to deliver

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 10>positive returns in twenty twenty six.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 6>Earnings, I guess that's the good news for bulls out

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 6>there because of the expectations are in twenty twenty six,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 6>again double digit growth in earning twelve thirteen percent growth

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 6>in earnings. Is that enough to support this valuation this market?

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 10>That has been what has supported the valuation through twenty

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 10>twenty five, the fact that you saw the vast majority

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 10>of returns in twenty five driven by earnings growth, and

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 10>that's expected to continue in twenty six. So if we

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 10>break down the twenty twenty six earnings number, it's three

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 10>hundred and ten dollars a share. That implies an acceleration

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 10>in the top line. That's interesting because if you look

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 10>at consensus forecasts for GDP, consensus is expecting a deceleration

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 10>in nominal GDP growth. Remember, sales are nominal. The other

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 10>important point is that you have over two hundred basis

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 10>points of Martian expansion that's already been baked into current forecasts.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 10>So we think if we're if we're thinking about what

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 10>drive drive markets over the course of the next couple

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 10>of months, it's whether or not you take the over

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 10>under on that earnings number.

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Karon Dawson with New ed We we welcome all of

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 2>you across the nation, including her Florida.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 5>We're doing Florida.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Music today for Cameron Dawson. Do you know who Leonards

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 3>Skinner is?

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 9>I was thinking you're gonna go with Tom Petty, but yeah.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just thought you were too young to know

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Leonard Skinner.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, folks, we're gonna play free Bird.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Get over it.

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to have a simple man.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, yeah, okay.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I look Kim Dawson at this equity market I don't

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>see the exuberants out there. I know there's Robin out

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 2>exuberants in. You know, Lisa's kids are traded on the couch,

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 2>But it's not like a three year double digit OMG.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Stocks are going up field, is it?

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 10>And to support your notion of there being a lack

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 10>of exuberance, you look at the Deutsche Bank and boldmin

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 10>SAX positioning indicators, and they're showing that institutions are effectively neutral.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 9>You cannot say that about households.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 10>Though retail investors are max overweight, max all in. You've

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 10>seen huge growth in marginal imbalances. AAI positioning is at

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 10>seventy one point two percent.

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Wow, I didn't know that.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 10>That's that's back to the peak from twenty eighteen and

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty one.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 9>So households are all in.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 3>So institutions under own NVIDIA.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.479
<v Speaker 10>Likely yes, simply because they have positioning size caps.

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 9>At the end of the day, when you have a.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 10>Market that's so very concentrated, and you have certain mutual

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 10>funds that cannot own positions as large as what some

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 10>of these names are, by definition, they're institutionally forced to

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 10>being underweight.

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 9>Some of these leaders.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 6>Fixed income is a great performer in twenty twenty five.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 6>What do you think about the bomb market in twenty tins.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 10>So, because we're starting this year at lower yields, we're

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 10>actually in our strategic tactical acid allocations, I should say,

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 10>actually taking some money out of fixed income and allocating

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 10>into other areas somebody, because you're not getting as much

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 10>of a return as you were at the beginning of

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 10>the year, given yields are lower and the strong performance

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 10>that we've had this year, so we don't think that

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of room for spreads to compress that

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 10>much further. In high yield and investment grade, they're pretty

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 10>darn tight. But note that they are thirty basis points

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 10>wider today than they were at the start of twenty five.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 10>So really you can, in fact squeeze blood from a stone.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Cameron Dawson with us a nice lengthy interview. We're going

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 2>to continue with this, Dawson. Kevin Gordon came in yesterday.

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Can we take a forty five second short biscuit break.

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Gordon came in yesterday with schwab and he brought

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>in pumpkin honey cookie and it's all in Korean.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 3>I can't understand it. Let's hand these these around control them,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 3>dat on them. They were looking over them a full one,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, Lisa he our tin director turned around.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to pass it down.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 3>It's it's just Kevin and Lazie Zanders. Thank you so much.

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>That was really easy. We learned a lot from them.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Kim Dawson at Charles Schwaz about.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 2>This retail cooking, what do you tell retail in a

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>famed Cam Dawson.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 10>Seminar, Well, I think that that the key message is

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 10>when we think about volatility in markets and as being

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 10>an individual investor, the most important thing is to make

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 10>sure that you were not positioned in a way that

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 10>when volatility eventually does strike, that you were forced to

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 10>sell positions that you shouldn't. That's the only way to

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 10>destroy value over the long run. So what that means

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 10>is not being over concentrated to certain factors, not having

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 10>too much leverage, and making sure that the overall allocation

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 10>is not so extended that if you have the quick

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 10>he needs during a time out of an inevitable volatility,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 10>you don't have to sell your equities.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 6>What I mean, one of the things that investors I'm

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 6>talking about is we need this market the broaden out.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 6>Do we need this market the broaden out, or can

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 6>we just kind of live the way we've been living

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 6>in our list of years.

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, you do in the sense that the MAG seven

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 10>is seeing a deceleration in earnings growth. So we've been

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 10>in a super normal earnings growth period the last three years.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 10>MAG seven has delivered two hundred percent earnings growth. That

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 10>compares to the equal Weight at just eighteen percent.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Stop this is too important, Paul Brilliant. We got double

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 2>digit earnings growth coming, but it's all skewed towards twenty

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 2>five stocks, right.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, see, consensus is expecting that to broaden out. You

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 10>have this expectation by consensus that equal Weight is going

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 10>to start to catch up, not quite to the point

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 10>of MAG seven, but close that gap. But the thing

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 10>is people were expecting that at the beginning of twenty

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 10>five and guess what happened. Mag seven surprise of the upside,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 10>equal Weight surprise to the downside.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Gordon called in, Tom, how is it? And I said,

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a rice cookie. It's very Korean cookie. Dawson on

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the Cosby and buying Asia this year, do you buy internationals.

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you buy Korean cookies?

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, don't forget that Korean and the Korean Index, the

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 10>COSPY is about thirty seven percent made up of just

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 10>Samsung and sk Hignex, So you when you buy the cospy,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 10>you were buying that. But also remember there's a lot

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 10>of casino capitalism and speculation that happens in the Korean Index,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 10>so it has very pronounced boom bus cycles.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 9>So know that you're playing with fire.

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 10>Live by the sword, die by the sword kind of

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 10>of mentality when it comes to trading in those areas.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 2>You know that twenty four years ago when we were

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>starting to act, that was one of the names on

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the list of the show Casino capitalism.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 7>Really Yeah, we tried it.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 9>We tried and it ended up on the cutting room floor.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah we Ken Dawson, thank you so much for do

0:25:55.520 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 2>it well. Seriously, stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveys

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 2>coming up after this.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We're their newspapers, lisamit to.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 12>Okay, this one is right up your alley because're away

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 12>talking about LinkedIn, right, Okay. So apparently more people are

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 12>logging onto LinkedIn, and it's not just for looking for

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 12>a job. So if you look at the numbers, so

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 12>revenue Microsoft phone site jumped to seventeen billion and twenty

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 12>twenty five from seven billion, and twenty twenty membership doubled

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 12>to one point three billion. So what the Wall Street

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 12>Journal did is they spoke with a couple of people.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 12>They said that the reason why is because people like

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 12>the fact that you have to put your real name

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 12>on the site.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 12>It says it helps with toxicity, misinformation scams, things like that,

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 12>and LinkedIn is saying it's actually helping because people, you know,

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 12>are more careful with what they post, you know, because

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 12>a recruiter could be looking or you know, things like that.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 12>They're smarter conversations on LinkedIn.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 9>That's what they're saying.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Major shutout.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Shaali Basek said to me like three four years ago,

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 2>he's stupid, get back on LinkedIn.

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 3>She was right.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Dan Roth saved LinkedIn for Microsoft, and it's just as

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you describe, Lisa, the quality I can't say enough about

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:24.479
<v Speaker 2>subscribing to LinkedIn.

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Not for Tom Keene, not even for Lisa Mantay or

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney, for our guests like Tina Fordham. They're all

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 3>out there, smart smart.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 12>Smart, I do, and I just feel for me personally,

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 12>I feel a more of a trust issue, like I

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 12>trust things better on LinkedIn.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Major Dan Roth, who did that for Microsoft? What do

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 3>you got next?

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 12>This is an interesting question that the journal asked, what

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 12>happened to happy hour?

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 7>Okay?

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 12>Because people are.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 9>Interesting for me or for Paul, people are drinking less.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 12>Companies are kind of reeling in those fun budgets, you know,

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 12>the epic holiday parties things like that. I remember the

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 12>time and the boss would come to the bar and

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 12>just drop down the corporate car.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 7>You know you do that. And I remember that.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Sparta, could we get Rotto keeper of the Ax to

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>drop the corporate car?

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Happening?

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 9>Not happening anymore.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 12>But you know, people working from home and then those

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 12>people who do go to the office, they want to

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 12>be home early, like you know, by six in bed early.

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 12>That's the new generation. They have to get their full

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 12>eight you know, nine hours sleep. So it's a different

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 12>kind and what people are saying is that they're missing

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 12>out on those opportunities to schmooz with the boss.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 6>Or this is how it worked on Pain Webber in

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 6>the eighties. Imply our equity training desk market closes at

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 6>four four fifteen hurlies in forty eighth and six, not.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 7>Every day, every day, four days a week.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 6>And you get you know, got a cocktail too. Then

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 6>you go to the train and that's how you roll.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 6>But I mean, or you stayed later.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>But I remember the train cars out the Gardens City

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and Londer Island as well.

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 3>It's cars, you're gone.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And the key thing Paul said is you stop working

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>three thirty four, four fifteen or so.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Now everybody's ordered on pizza and working till seven.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 6>And then I went into investment banking and that stuff.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 6>That's yeah, shoulder state on the training desk.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 5>One more squeeze then to say.

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 12>Okay, this one, I'll go to sports.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 12>So the Blue Jay shortstop Bobashet, he's a free agent, right, Okay,

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 12>So he's getting interest from a lot of teams, including

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 12>the Yankees. I'm just saying, but a local steakhouse is

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 12>actually making him an offer to stay in Toronto. They're

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 12>offering free steak for life. Oh okay, that's a good cell.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 12>That's a really good set.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 9>It's it's animal.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 12>It's a high end steakhouse in downtown Toronto. He said

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 12>it's one of his favorites, and they said, yep, no negotiations,

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 12>no fine print, just reserve a table and they will

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 12>give him free steak for life.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 3>He's the kind of player of his culture and character

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 3>every day.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's great, but it's it's about the attitude

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 5>I love it.

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 3>I love that he's the way she rolls and he

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>thank you the newspapers.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spot,

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>each weekday, seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal