WEBVTT - Graham Allison: War with China?

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>We have a big bonus episode today. I'm handing over

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the reins for this one to Mr Brian Goldsmith. It

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is all you, baby, So who did you talk to?

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Graham Allison, who has written the foreign

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>policy book of the year. It's all about whether the

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>US and arising China are headed ultimately for war, which

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is a subject that hasn't gotten very much attention. Graham

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>has been an advisor to the last seven or eight

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Secretaries of Defense. He knows a lot about nuclear terrorism,

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about the North Korean challenge, about what's happening with the

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration and the Russians. So we covered a wide

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>range of issues, and I think people who are interested

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in foreign policy are going to really like this conversation.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to hear it, and I think that it

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>comes at a very important time. He sounds like a

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>real smarty pants by the way, Brian, but I'm really

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>excited to hear him his take on the President's recent

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>trip abroad, on some of the things that Uncle Merkel

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>has been saying, as you mentioned, what's going on with Russia,

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and kind of going deeper into why this should spark

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>outrage if in fact the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course and a very tense situation in North

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Korea with them launching that missile that landed in the

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Sea of Japan. I mean, there's so much going on internationally,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and I welcome somebody smart to give me a deeper

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding and better perspective of all the things that are

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>going on. Well, needless to say, I could completely geek

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>out with Graham Allison about all those topics and a

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more. So take a listen. Dr Graham Allison, my

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>former professor at the Kennedy School. Thank you so much

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for doing the show. Thanks for having me. Well. I

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>read this new book with great interest and fascination because

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it really steps back from the day to day and

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>asked a really big question, which is are the United

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>States and China inevitably heading to war? And and what

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is what is the answer to that question? Well, that's

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the sixty four dollars or sixty four trillion

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars questions, and I think the answer is yes and no.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And in case it seems to profits oial, I think

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not a very satisfying answer, not very satisfying, but

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's true. So in this case, I believe business as

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>usual will likely produce history as usual, and in that case,

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that would be a war between China and the US

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be catastrophic for both. That's the yes and

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>no is that UH. As the saying goes, only those

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>who fail to study history are condemned to repeat it.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And there are enough ingredients in the relationship to UH

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine that far sighted states craft, both in Washington and Paging,

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>could find a way to live together to mutual benefit.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of learning from the past, you studied in

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this book, UH sixteen occasions in which, over the past

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>five years, a rising power threatened to displace an existing superpower,

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and you found that in twelve of those cases the

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>result was war. For those cases the two parties avoided war.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>What were the distinctions between them? Well, great question. So

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve cases, UH, normally they succumb to the

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>normal pressures and normal misunderstandings and normal mistakes of a

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>rising power and a ruling power. So a rising power, thanks,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm bigger, I'm stronger, my interests deserved more weight than

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they got when I was smaller and weaker. I deserve more,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>say more. Sway, So when an upstart threatens to an incumbent,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you get a rising power syndrome and a ruling person.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>The ruling power looks and says, wait a minute. The

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>way things were were great. They were the only circumstances

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>which you got a chance to grow up. You should

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be grateful, you should even help support them. And your

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>actions now seemed there were to be threatening. So that

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>dynamic is the something you see in the cases of failure.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And I would say the dramatic case of that, and

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>most relevant for us today, is the circumstances that got

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>us to World War One. That's on the one hand.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, as you say, what about the

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>cases in which wear was averted and a very interesting case,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the US rose to rival and then ultimately overtake Britain

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the twentieth century. Britain found a

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>way to adapt and adjust that was so nuanced and

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>subtle that they kept what was vital for Britain on

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, but they accommodated the US and other

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>areas and so smoothly that Americans came to understand our

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>interest is largely aligned with Britain. So then when World

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>War One came, the US was Britain's lifeline both with

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>supplies and with money while the war was going on,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>until when the US entered World War One, we naturally

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>entered is Britain's a lie And then between the wars,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the U S British relationship thicken, and then when World

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>War Two came, the US was again the essential ally

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for Britain. So that was a great case of life adaptation.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>When you think about the case you just described of

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the US and Britain, Britain was, in a sense managing

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>its own decline. It was deteriorating as the great empire

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of the world as the US was coming up. And

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd imagine a lot of Americans would reject that comparison

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and would be made very uncomfortable by it. And so

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 1>when you think about those two things, on the one hand,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>war with China more likely than not. On the other hand,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Americans, not feeling comfortable with managing peacefully

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>are declined visa via the Chinese. Are Are we just

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>headed sort of inexorably towards a big conflict? Are well?

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think thucydities would say, there's an unstoppable rising China

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>on a collision course with an immovable ruling America, that

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>would be business as usual and history as usual. But

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if we look at the cases of success, I mean

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a more positive example that maybe is more appealing as

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we think about it, and no cases exactly like the other.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.119
<v Speaker 1>But in the case of the Cold War, the US

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>faced a surging Soviet Union. When John Kennedy became President

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the US in nineteen sixty one, he believed, and

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>conventional wisdom believed the Soviet Union was going to overtake

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the US as the dominant economy by the end of

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the seventies. Again, history people can't even believe that today,

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but that was the fact. You can go back and

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the economics textbook of the time, the Samuelson

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Textbook in nineteen sixty four, it says by the end

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the seventies, Soviet Union will overtake the US, which

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is why analysts should never make these predictions. Well, but

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to live in a world where uncertain as

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>we are, we have to have expectations. So for sure,

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union was thought of and appeared to be

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a existential threat to the US. Rather than having a

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>war with the with the Soviet Union, people invented a

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>whole new crazy idea. How about Cold War? So in

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>my column this figures in the no war because war,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is only a metaphor, Cold War was competition

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in every dimension by every means except bums and bullets

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>killing thousands of each other. And we had some proxy wars,

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>proxy wars, we had the covered killing of people, we

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>had economic war, we had propaganda war, but we didn't

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have bums and bullets killing each other. And so I'm

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about in this book, I mean by war, I mean

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people killing each other. That's that's what means war.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And in the case of the Cold War, people invented

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a strategy that was highly imaginative, very adoptable, but which

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>coped with the threat successfully. So I would say, if

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to think about the situation today, we

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to manage to guous the client like Britain,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want a Cold war just like the

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Soviet unit. This is a whole new, different situation. But

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>from each of these cases we can get some clues, uh,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as well as from the mistakes that were made in

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the cases that led to war. The new strategy that

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>would have to be created will be as strangely different

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to be successful from all of the

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>conventional conversation today as the Cold War was from the

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>conversations previously. And one of the most powerful passages in

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this book is when you describe just how big, how

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>powerful China is becoming. And one of the many reasons

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to read this book is just to wrap your mind

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>around the scale of blockbuster growth that we're talking about.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, every two years, the increment of Chinese growth

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is greater than Indie as whole economy. China has already

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>surpassed the US as an economic power, particularly in manufacturing

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and consumer goods. It's the largest automaker in the world,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and it is only a matter of time. It's a

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>question of when, not if China becomes the dominant world superpower. Well,

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that the uh, your point is exactly right.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So uh, unless once been watching China carefully, and maybe

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you have, it's hard to appreciate what's happened

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in a single generation. So in a single generation, a

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>country that didn't appear in any of the International League

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>tables has leaped to the top in every arena. Uh.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We never, never in history has a country risking so far,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so fast, on so many different dimensions. In fact, in

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the chapter on the rise of China, I quote backliffe

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Hovels good line in which he says things have happened

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>so fast we haven't yet had time to be astonished.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So everywhere in every arena, one sees China in our

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>face and three times the size of if the trend,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>if the trend should continue, Because do the math, there's

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>four times as many Chinese as there are Americans. So

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if there are only one fourth as productive as Americans,

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the two economies are equal, So they're not that. Sometimes

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they're only half as good as we are, half as productive, well,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>then there twice as big as we are. And for Americans,

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and especially red blooded Americans like me, even red neckt Americans.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm from North Carolina, we know USA means number one.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I can take off my shirt here and you'll find

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a tattoo you know that says USA means number one.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Note that's a joke. But but but but if you

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>took but if you took the skin off, you would

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you would. Basically, Americans under believe, most Americans, people like me,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>believe that we have been number one all our that's

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the way the world is supposed to be, somewhere in

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bible, or in the Constitution or the laws of nature,

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it says, Usa. One of the points you make in

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the book is that you know, in large part this

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is due to the fact that we have the biggest economy,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because then we can fund the biggest military, the biggest

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligence apparatus, the biggest diplomatic apparatus, the biggest thing. Exactly,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not that we're inherently better. And so if another

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>country is three times the economy and there therefore three

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>times the resources to do this stuff, are we going

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to be number one anymore? Probably not? Probably not. And

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think in the in the book, I give you

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>an abbreviated version of the chart I give to my

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>students and of course at Harvard. So the top of

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the chart says when could China become number one? And

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I give twenty six indicators. So biggest auto manufacturers, you say,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but the biggest cell phone manufacturer, biggest smartphone user, biggest

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>robot producer, biggest artificial intelligence, biggest economy. And students in

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Harvard class say, oh, maybe forty for this one.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We make a you know, pick a number for each

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the twenty six indicators. Then I have chart

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>two and chart to the top of which says already,

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>so every one of these twenty six indicators, China has

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>overtaken the US. But there's an asterisk attached to all

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of this, all these projections in the future, which is,

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if the present trends continue and a lot of people

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>take a darker, dimmer review of Chinese authoritarianism, of their

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>governance model. Condi Rice just came out with a new

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>book about democracy in which she notes that there are

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighty thousand protests a year in China.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>There's still no reliable rule of law. There's mass seizure

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of people's assets there they the Chinese government has to

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>employ over a million people just to censor the internet.

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And so is this model of an open economy but

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a closed political system actually sustainable or is there going

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to be some disruption over time? It's a great, great question,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>And I would say of a fundamental question about China

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as their government system, I say in the conclusion of

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the book, a fundamental question about the US is our

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>governance system exactly? Things are just working fine. So basically,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to think of, you know, what would

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>be a conceivable accommodation between the two parties for the

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>time being. Let's imagine that there were adult supervision for

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a second in international affairs. Of course, they're not. We

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we live in a hobsey in the world. There's nobody

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>who's superior to. She's impaying and Trump. But let's just

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.239
<v Speaker 1>imagine hypothetically. I knew this in my class, that their work. Okay,

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So here's a Martian strategist who's an adult and she

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>parachutes into Mary Lago for the summit between she and Trump,

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and she says, guys, I have a couple of things

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to point out to you. First, each of you have large,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>probably insurmountable problems. At first. Secondly, the most important of

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>these problems occur in early within your own border, not

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the problems you were talking about between the between the

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>two a few So I have an idea for you.

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you take a little breather like Pericles did

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Sparta in the thirty year piece. The thirty

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>year piece basically said, why don't we just each focus

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on our own problems for thirty years and then we'll

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>get back to trying to kill each other. And so

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, you know, to think the unthinkable yet again

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>before we move on to other topics, what does a

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>war between the US and China? Look like? Is there

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a war between these two nuclear powers that's anything but unmanageable, catastrophic,

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions of people dying on both sides. Again,

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>great questions. So anybody who's looked at this carefully in

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Defense department and the Chinese counterpart have done, can

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>see that a full scale war between the US and

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>China would be kin austrophic for both and nobody would win.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Nobody what's war. Everybody understands a war would be catastrophic.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So if that was the case, how could a war happen? Well,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>war has happened if we look at the previous cases,

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>not because somebody wanted war, but because some third party

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>action or event becomes a match that makes a fire

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of which people are somewhere where they

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be. So let's take in this case.

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'd say the most most likely path today the

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>war between the US and China, and which large numbers

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese and Americans are killing each other goes just

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like North Korea. So North Korea will in the months

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead either conduct I CBM tests that will give it

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the capability to strike Los Angeles with a nuclear weapon.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.359
<v Speaker 1>That's on the one hand, or it will be interrupted

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's on the other. So I've written about this as

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a Cuban missile crisis in slow motion. So just to

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>back up, the scenario is North Korea has the capability

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>or proves that they have the capability to strike Los

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Angeles with a nuclear tipped missile. Trump decides to strike

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the North Koreans to prevent them reaching that final point. Yes,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and North Korea responds by killing more than a million

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>people soul South Korea, which they have the capability of

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>doing today, And then the US and South Korea declare

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>war on North Korea, and and where do the dominoes

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fall after that? Okay, then it's then the game becomes

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>thick because if we if if we attack North Korea

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to make sure it can't conduct another round

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of attack, including nuclear weapons against South Korea or against Japan,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>well possibly some of those weapons get fired in the process.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So now you can even have nuclear weapons exploding in

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>South Korea or Japan. We're upon As Colin Powell once

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>said to the North Korea counterparts, he said, the movement

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear weapon explodes on the soil of any ally

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the U s, We're gonna turn the whole of

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>North Korea into a charcoal biscuit. Uh So maybe when

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>then we just simply say too much is too much?

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh toasts the whole place, that we can do that. Okay,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be one possibility, and then we have to

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>see how does that play with the Chinese. The more

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>likely possibility, I think is that will end up with

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a ground war in South Korea, in which the South

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Koreans and the Americans will otherwise capture North Korea and

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>unify the country unless China enters the war. But we

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>should remember what happened in the First Korean War. Again,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Americans don't do much history here, but it's worth to remember.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen fifty UH North Korea attack South Korea, almost

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>capture the whole country. US came to the rescue very

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>last minute, pushed the North Koreans back up the peninsula.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We're approaching the Chinese border, the border between North Korea

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and UH and China. The Chinese then out of the

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Blue to the bedazzlement of MacArthur, attacked and pushed beat

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Americans right back down the peninsula to the thirty

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>parallel where the war ended, because China was determined that

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>no American military ally was going to be on its border,

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>even in nineteen when it was, you know, one the

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>size of the U S. The US had a monopoly

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear weapons. US had just finished World War Two

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>by dropping bombs on a Roshoma and Nagasaki, and that

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>China attacked the US. So most people believe that China

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>would not tolerate a unified Korea that was a military

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>ally of the U. S. It seems like the rational

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>way to prevent this and acknowledging we're not in a

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>fully rational world here, at least in terms of the

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>North Korea track, is to get the Chinese to prevent

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the North Koreans from going nuclear. That we would accept

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the status quo if North Korea weren't threatening our country

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>or our allies with nuclear weapons. But the question is

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can the Chinese do that and will the Chinese do that? Well,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you're you're channeling Trump Chagan, and I think in a

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>way that most Americans would so when most Americans hear

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of this. I mean I've I talked to, you know,

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>people in the government as well as students or others.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They say, I don't believe this, Okay, I a little impoverished.

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Pip squeak cannot have nuclear weapons. I mean, nobody would

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>allow that. And I say, well they do. The American

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence community says they have an arsenal nuclear weapons. Now,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is unbelievable if you were just you know,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>not paying attention. But but it's a fact. But do

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have the capacity or the will to influence

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the North Korean's not to proceed any further with their

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>weapons program? Well, yes and no. So yes, okay, So

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese control a lifeline for North Korea. If the

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese were prepared to collapse the North Korean regime, they

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>could do so because any five percent of the trade

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with North Korea goes to China and nine of the energy,

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>so the oil that keeps Panyon's factories, uh, their military

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>uh their heat in the winter, all of this comes

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>from China. And if they were prepared to squeeze that lifeline,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they could squeeze them. Now, what would didn't happen and

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this is. I mean, I've sat down with Chinese and

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>game this several times and they say, okay, so let's

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine the place collapses. Now we have a what chaos?

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>A civil war? Are there South Koreans and you're gonna

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>get involved in this situation? And I say, well, the

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>South Koreans are not gonna let their cousins in North

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Korea start without trying to be helpful to them, and

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have an interest in the matter, and so well,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe they'll get engage a little bit. And then well,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>if they do, won't they end up inheriting the of Korea?

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say that would be the normal thing. They're

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>very successful country and wealthy. These guys are poor and miserable.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it'll take them a long time, like East

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Germanita get the country back together, but I think that's

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>probably how it will come about. Well, then they say,

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so there's gonna be a U. S military, a lie

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on our border, and that's the reason why we went

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to war with you earlier. And the scenario you're describing

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is that basically the North Koreans don't buy the idea

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese would really squeeze them because They know

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese don't want to have an American ally

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on their board, and therefore their leverage well impressive on paper,

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is maybe, you know, not so much in reality. So

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>when we come back with Graham Allison, we're going to

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about what if anything, the United States can do

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to prevent a war with China, and we're also going

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some other foreign policy issues. Uh, stay

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. Just a reminder next week, Brian and I

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>will be talking with that during comedian Matt Walsh. You

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>probably know him as Press Secretary Mike McClintock on HBO's

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>V one of my favorite shows. So what questions do

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you have about Matt's life career and how he really

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>feels about Julia Louis Dreychus call us and leave a

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>message at four four six three seven nine two two

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>four four six three seven What can we do right

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>now to get us off the path toward inevitable, horrible,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>destructive war with the Chinese. I say, this is not

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem to be fixed the way Washington likes to

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>fix a problem. The rise of a five thousand euro

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>civilization with one point four billion people is not fixable.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>This is a chronic condition to be endured and managed

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for a generation. So that's the point. One point two

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in this case is specially diagnosis must proceed prescription. Just

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like if you went to the emergency room and the

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>doctor said get on the guerney, I'm pulling you into

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the operating room and I'm gonna do surgery, you would say,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, how about a diagnosis first? So diagnosis

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>should proceed prescription. And this book is mainly about trying

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to help us with the diagnosis. Okay, if we were

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just adults trying to work out some of these problems

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>or these workable or is it really this is hopeless?

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, well, now, wait a minute, what's

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on the asset side and what the liability on the

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>asset side. First, we both have nuclear arsenals that produce

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>mutual assured destruction, So if you decide to kill me,

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you can, but only by committing suicide. So everybody knows

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a lousy idea, and as I say, everybody in

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the national security establishment both places gets that. Secondly, we

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.479
<v Speaker 1>have economic inner relationship here which is so thick that

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the war between the US and China, basically Walmart's would

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>be empty, and Chinese factories would be producing goods for nobody,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and the U S couldn't get loans to pay for

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>our deficit. So basically these are thickly interdependent. Now that

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>economic interaction has allowed both of us to be wealthier

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>than we would be otherwise, there's kind of economic mutual

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>assured destruction as well as military. But yeah, absolutely. Then thirdly,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 1>there's climate. Now that's not agreed to by everybody in

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. But but every every person UH with

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>any scientific competence who's looked at this agrees that on

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the current trajectory, we may make an uninhabitable climate for

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>our great great great grandchild or hundred years from now.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 1>So if if we succeeded in doing that, that's clearly

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>contrary to the violent interests of the US. So is

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>there any way the U S could solve this problem

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>without China? No, we're the two biggest greenhouse gusto manors. Together.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>We may not be able to solve it. We may not,

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but for sure, independently we can only fail. I wonder

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to look back from a strategic perspective

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as as the year that we the United States seated

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>global leadership. If you look at our withdrawal from the

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Trans Pacific Partnership, which basically delegated the rules of the

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>road in Asia to the Chinese. If you look at

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>our withdrawal from climate leadership as we pulled out of

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Deal, you look at the the anger and

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the resentment that we're triggering with the travel ban and

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of increasing isolationism, picking an alliance with Russian effect

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>over an alliance with NATO by not reaffirming our commitment

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to all for one and one for all, and and

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>being consumed by political infighting here at home. Is this

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a pivot point that you know, we need

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>to focus on and and reverse or America is going

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to go off in a very bad direction. I don't

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the implication of the question, but I

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>can't resistant. I mean, I think that's the logic of

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>the situation. And I've been trying to look at the

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>cases that I've seen previously, but with a rising and

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ruling power, and which basically the ruling power we tweeted

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>from the field of leadership in areas of its strength,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't been able to find one. But I'm

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>hoping maybe you know, breaking new ground here. We may

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>be breaking new ground, but I'm hoping maybe that somebody

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>else will, you know, we'll find some analog because generally

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what happens the ruling power tries to strengthen its relationships

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>with other powerful entities that allow it to help shape

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the environment for the rising power, so that it has

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to adapt, as opposed to allowing it to lead in

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 1>in writing new rules which clearly will be disadvantageous for us.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>And in in fact, you can argue that that's what

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration was trying to do with both the

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Paris Deal on climate change, with the Trans Pacific Partnership

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on trade to some extent, with the Iran Deal on

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons. Absolutely at all in all three cases, and

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in all three cases recognizing that our power

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>is not unlimited, uh, that we have to find compromises,

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>but that we would do the best we can. So

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Iran deal is not what you would want, but

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing deal in terms of what would be

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>feasible because for a decade, here's rand uh, you know,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>postponing any nuclear advance. That's pretty fantastic compared to the alternative,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>which would have been basically either Iran would be a

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons state or we would be at war with Iran.

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So in the climate arena, while I was not a

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of Pair US in terms of its accomplishments

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in actually resolving the climate challenge, which is way, way,

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>way more severe. You know, with the Nicaraguans, you you

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>weren't signed on to Paris because you didn't think it

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>went far enough. No I I I signed on, but

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with with the notion that we shouldn't delude ourselves. This

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is what this did is say we all recognize the problem,

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>We recognize the magnitude of the problem, We recognize that

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>we have to cope with this together. We recognize that

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the big greenhouse cimeters have to carry most of the burden.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And we're making a big step. I mean not a

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>big step, a small step, but a real step in

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. And I thought the most interesting part

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for me in the Paris record was the agreement both

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>by private venture capitalists like Bill Gates and the governments

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to invest heavily in new technologies that may transform the problem.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't think we're gonna stop the problem with

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the current parameters that we have technically. I think unless

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a technological breakthrough that makes it possible for people

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to have electricity and light bulbs and air conditioning. Uh,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and not ruined the climate. We will get screwed, so

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I and I said, I'm an optimist. I think I

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>think we will get there, but I think we part

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the way we get there is as Paris did,

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, okay, here we have some bench marks that

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we're reaching towards. Plus then lots of people in lots

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of different countries. So this wasn't just the U. S

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and China. This was the Europeans, very importantly the Europeans

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and if you're but but also the big little guys

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>coming along for whatever reason, big guys. Germany was playing

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely equescial role in this. And as Mrs Merkel said,

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean for her the climate thing, she feels it

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as existential a threat is she fails the threat of

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what we would call terrorism or what you know, Russia

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>or others. So she thinks, well, wait a minute, and

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>if for a hundred years I've left an environment that

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Germans can't live in, I can't give an account of

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>my chancellorship. No, that's just makes sense. And yet in

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>an act of intentional or unintentional misunderstanding. The Trump administration

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is saying, oh, well, the Paris Accord imposes all these

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>regulations on the United States that will kill our economy,

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>when the fact is the standards in the deal are voluntary.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Each country sets its own plan and its own carbon

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>limitations itself. If Trump really felt like what Obama agreed

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to in terms of carbon reduction was too tough, he

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>could have weakened those standards without leaving the agreement. So

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this was really a political statement more than a substantive one.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>If I were gonna write it up in on this

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not because I'm focused on the Ginus stubs you

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, but I would call it the Napoleon's Great line,

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because this is worse than a crime, This is a blunder. Yeah.

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're a very famous defense strategist, and it really

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>struck me when uh General McMaster and Gary Cohne, the

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>president's top economic and national security advisors, wrote a peace

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Wall Street Journal in which they basically said, um,

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the world is not a global community but an arena

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>where nations, NGOs, and businesses engage and compete for advantage.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>We bring to this forum unmatched military, political, economic, cultural,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and moral strength. Rather than deny this elemental nature of

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>international affairs, we embrace it. And so, what do you

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think are the consequences of this sort of hobbsy in

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at the world. Well, Uh, I'm a

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>big fan of hr McMaster. I know him for a

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>long long time, and I'm grateful that he's serving in

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this job. I know Gary Cohen a little bit, not

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not much. Do you think General McMaster really believes what

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>he wrote? I do? I do? I do? I think

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that he believes what he thinks. And so there's a

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a schizophrenia in this a little bit. So on

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, UH, we talk about a global community

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and the international rule based order and uh uh the

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>subordination of sovereignty UH and globalization UH, and there's a

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of rhetoric around that. On the other hand, uh,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>does the US ever asked permission when we want to

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>go uh couple Saddam Hussein or Kaddafi or conduct their

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>strikes on UH terrorists in some other country or drop

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>into Pakistan and kill Osama bin lad Well. And we

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>rely on our friends and allies, not just because often

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing is in their interests, but because there

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are friends and allies and we've helped them over the years,

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and they've helped us, and it's a it's a mutually

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>beneficial relationship and not necessar serially a purely transactional one.

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a different point. But yes, i've been I

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>agree with that, and I know we have to go

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in a few minutes, but I would be remiss if

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ask you a couple of questions that Katie

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted me to bring to your attention. The first is,

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of talk about President Trump rolling

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>back the rap pro Schman or normalization of relations with

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Cuba that President Obama really started. You're obviously one of,

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>if not the greatest expert on the Cuban missile crisis.

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think would happen if we were to

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to status quo anti You know what the

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>world looked like before President Obama started um changing our

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Cuba like and I think this reflects some

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>political impulses rather than strategic compulses, and I think it

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>would be a mistake. I think that if you look

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at it, uh, the only communists and communists like countries

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that have survived, have the ones that have been able

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to isolate themselves from the world. So North Korea is

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the poster child. Cuba has been as well

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 1>every other country that became engaged in the world where

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>information comes into them and trade comes to them, and

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>otherwise what happens cockamami systems get overthrown by their own regimes.

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Look and see what happens. So rarely in policy world

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>do you get a kind of almost scientific experiment or

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>what You've got a lot of countries, either you isolate

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>them or you engage them. In the in case of

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the engagement. Basically, freedom and market economies overwhelmed the regimes

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that they have In a few cases, they isolate themselves

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and they sustained it. So I would say we've been

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>way better off undermining Cuba by the policies that are

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And I whether at this stage if Trump

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>would roll it back. I haven't looked at the details

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>enough to judge. And lastly, the hope of the foreign

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>policey establishment in many ways has been the presence of

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all these generals in the Trump administration, Maddis and McMaster

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and Kelly. But the other side of that is as

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>people say, if you're a hammer, every problem looks like

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a nail. Do you worry about too much of a

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of militarization of American foreign policy in this administration?

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So in a word, yes, So I would say, on

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the one hand and the other. On the one hand,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no question whatever than an hr McMaster and Maddis

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and Kelly, we have outstanding Americans and great and wise

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>military leaders. I be happy to give my wallet to

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>any one of them and trust them that they would

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>do well and wisely. On the other hand, it's not

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>for nothing that the Constitution and the tradition from George

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Washington on has been civilian leadership of the military. Because

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're a military man and your whole career is

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about operating instruments of violence to achieve national objectives, and

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're part of the greatest military machine the

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>world has ever seen, with a set of hammers that

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>can nail anything that looks like a nail, you're inclined

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to look for a hammer and for an ail. And

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if I watch what's happening both in Afghanistan

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and in Iwaq, and also to some extent in Syria

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit in Yemen. You see now a

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>first order push for military instruments over other instruments, and

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular sense, President Trump basically uh in this budget

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>reflects I respect for more hammers in a slicing back

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>of the other instruments. Now, to his credit, Maddess has said,

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you don't have a very active state department,

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>including reducing its capabilities by reducing its budget, then you're

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to buy for me more bumps than bullets,

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>because I can't go bomb anybody you want me to bomb,

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and I can go shoot anybody you want me to shoot,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but that's not going to be the end of the story,

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's not the better way to deal with the bobom.

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we're going to be in a Rock

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and Afghanistan for the foreseeable future. I'm afraid yes, and

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think neither of them will turn out well. Well

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>on that happy note, Professor Graham Allison, thanks so much

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>for talking with us today. Thank you for having me

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>joined the conversation special thanks this week to Ryan Connor

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for recording this conversation off site in l A. Thanks also,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as always to our producer Gianna Palmer, and to our

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sound engineer Jared O'Connell. Alison Bresnik does social media for us,

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and we thank her of course, thanks to Emily Beanoff

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>her part in producing this show, and Nora Richie for

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>additional editorialists stints, Mark Phillips, thank you so much for

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>our theme music. Katie Currik and I are the executive

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>producers of this podcast, and please remember you all can

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>leave us a voicemail at nine two to four four

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>six three seven, and don't forget to call him with

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:19.280
<v Speaker 1>your questions for Matt Walsh from hbos VP. He is hilarious.

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be on our show next week. We're

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>very excited about that. You can also email us at

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 1>comments at currect podcast dot com. Please be nice because

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really painful. If you're not, find me on social

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>media at Katie Curic on Twitter and Instagram, Katie dot

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Curic on Snapchat, and brian Is Goldsmith be on Twitter.

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And hey, if you like our show, please rate and

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>review us on Apple Podcasts. That really keeps us going

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and keeps the podcast going actually, and don't forget to

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>subscribe as well. Thanks so much for listening and we'll

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to you next time.