1 00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there, 2 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:16,120 Speaker 1: and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. 3 00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:19,319 Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the 4 00:00:19,400 --> 00:00:21,959 Speaker 1: tech are you. It's time for the tech news for 5 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:25,880 Speaker 1: the week ending on May tenth, twenty twenty four, and 6 00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 1: first up is a potential retraction. So not long ago, 7 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:33,279 Speaker 1: I talked about how an Apple analyst named Ming chi 8 00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:37,320 Speaker 1: Quo said that Apple had significantly scaled back its production 9 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 1: plans for the Apple Vision Pro mixed reality headset. So 10 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:45,479 Speaker 1: if you'll recall this, analyst said that Apple initially planned 11 00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 1: to produce seven hundred and fifty thousand to eight hundred 12 00:00:48,440 --> 00:00:52,160 Speaker 1: thousand units, but subsequently cut back to around four hundred 13 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: and fifty thousand units in the wake of less demand 14 00:00:55,640 --> 00:01:00,000 Speaker 1: than anticipated. But other analysts have argued that Apple's play 15 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 1: and from the get go, was to ship around half 16 00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 1: a million units this year, so that four hundred and 17 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:10,040 Speaker 1: fifty thousand number isn't really that far off from that estimate. 18 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:12,760 Speaker 1: So I guess this is what I get for talking 19 00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:16,560 Speaker 1: about analysts who make their living scrutinizing a company that's 20 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:21,120 Speaker 1: famously very quiet. It only communicates stuff when it darn 21 00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:24,480 Speaker 1: well feels like it. So either the Vision Pro isn't 22 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: selling as quickly as Apple once or it's on the 23 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:31,000 Speaker 1: right track. I don't know the right answer. And we 24 00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 1: have a couple of other Apple stories for this week, 25 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:36,800 Speaker 1: so we might as well stick with Apple. So Apple 26 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:39,839 Speaker 1: held an event at which it unveiled a new iPad 27 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:42,640 Speaker 1: pro model this week, which the company says is the 28 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 1: thinnest one yet also fun side note, Apple also subsequently 29 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: apologized for an ad that talks about it being the 30 00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 1: thinnest iPad pro because the ad showed an enormous hydraulic 31 00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:59,040 Speaker 1: press crushing stuff like musical instruments and stereo equipment and 32 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 1: paint containers and more, and that really upsets some artists 33 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 1: who traditionally have been among the most enthusiastic customers of 34 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 1: the iPad, and so Apple said, whoops, sorry about that. Anyway. 35 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 1: The iPad pro comes in thirteen and eleven inch sizes. 36 00:02:13,919 --> 00:02:18,000 Speaker 1: It's got an M four processor and an ultra retina 37 00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:22,120 Speaker 1: XDR display. It's supposed to be real pretty. Apple says 38 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:27,079 Speaker 1: it is quote an outrageously powerful device for artificial intelligence 39 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:31,080 Speaker 1: end quote. So you know, buzzwords of the day it 40 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:34,760 Speaker 1: is available starting May fifteenth. You can pre order it now, 41 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:39,160 Speaker 1: and the base model for the eleven inch version that's 42 00:02:39,240 --> 00:02:42,840 Speaker 1: Wi Fi only starts at nine hundred and ninety nine dollars, 43 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 1: and obviously the price goes up from there depending upon 44 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:50,240 Speaker 1: the size and the features you want, how how much 45 00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:53,520 Speaker 1: storage you want in it, et cetera. Also, if you 46 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:56,120 Speaker 1: want the new Apple Pencil Pro to go with it, 47 00:02:56,160 --> 00:02:58,160 Speaker 1: that'll set you back an extra one hundred and twenty 48 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:04,080 Speaker 1: nine bucks, So yay. Speaking of Apple and AI, the 49 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:07,440 Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal reports that Apple has a new project 50 00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:11,040 Speaker 1: code named ACDC, which is not a reference to the 51 00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:16,200 Speaker 1: Australian rock band. Instead, ACDC stands for Apple Chips in 52 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 1: Data Center and that part of this project involves Apple 53 00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 1: developing its own chips for data centers that are running 54 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 1: AI applications. So, according to The Wall Street Journal, Apple's 55 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:30,040 Speaker 1: plan is to hone in on data centers that run 56 00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:34,240 Speaker 1: actual AI implementations as opposed to data centers that are 57 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,960 Speaker 1: used to train AI models. So why is Apple not 58 00:03:38,080 --> 00:03:42,440 Speaker 1: getting into the training area. That's largely because Nvidia has 59 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:46,160 Speaker 1: a huge head start as far as developing chips for 60 00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:49,600 Speaker 1: AI training purposes, and Apple would rather aim for a 61 00:03:49,640 --> 00:03:54,200 Speaker 1: different spot on the AI food chain. Whether Apple's ACDC 62 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 1: plan will shake me all night long remains to be seen. 63 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 1: Microsoft's top brass made some big and somewhat controversial decisions 64 00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 1: this week. One of those decisions affects executive compensation and 65 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:12,040 Speaker 1: it links it to cybersecurity. So essentially the new Secure 66 00:04:12,160 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 1: Future Initiative or SFI, which is a kind of an 67 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:19,839 Speaker 1: umbrella plan at Microsoft, the new version is tying security 68 00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:25,159 Speaker 1: milestones to part of executives pay. Now which part of 69 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:28,800 Speaker 1: executives pay, I don't know how much of executives pay 70 00:04:28,839 --> 00:04:31,839 Speaker 1: will be tied to this, I don't know, but the 71 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:35,520 Speaker 1: message is pretty clear. Microsoft wants to reverse the trend 72 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:39,040 Speaker 1: of recent security intrusions, which is not a surprise for 73 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:42,000 Speaker 1: multiple reasons. I mean, among the things that Microsoft does 74 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:46,520 Speaker 1: is it hosts services that are used by other companies, 75 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:50,720 Speaker 1: and if Microsoft can't demonstrate that it is secure, then 76 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:54,480 Speaker 1: it loses all that business. You know, having bad security 77 00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:57,920 Speaker 1: is a bad business plan. Plus, the US government, in 78 00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:00,400 Speaker 1: the form of Homeland Security, has been very very much 79 00:05:00,440 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 1: concerned about Microsoft's failure to detect and stop some high 80 00:05:03,800 --> 00:05:07,479 Speaker 1: profile hacker attacks. So not a big surprise that Microsoft 81 00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:10,360 Speaker 1: is telling executives, hey, we need to get on this 82 00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:13,479 Speaker 1: or else you're not gonna get all your bonuses. But 83 00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:17,360 Speaker 1: I said, Todd Brass made some big decisions, which is plural, right, 84 00:05:17,520 --> 00:05:21,200 Speaker 1: not just tying executive pay to security. So among those 85 00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 1: big decisions were some pretty sad ones, like closing multiple 86 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:28,880 Speaker 1: video game developer studios. Microsoft is one of the few 87 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 1: really big companies that have scooped up a bunch of 88 00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:35,400 Speaker 1: smaller companies in the video game space in recent years, 89 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:39,640 Speaker 1: and now some notable studios are getting shut down. Among 90 00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:45,360 Speaker 1: those are Austin Arcane, which recently produced the vampire shooter 91 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:50,120 Speaker 1: game Redfall. Notably, Redfall got a very lukewarm reception, but 92 00:05:50,200 --> 00:05:53,920 Speaker 1: from one I understand, the team behind Redfall was put 93 00:05:53,960 --> 00:05:57,400 Speaker 1: in a pretty impossible situation. It's sounded to me like 94 00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:00,320 Speaker 1: there were a lot of shifting priorities during development that 95 00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:03,599 Speaker 1: we're coming from leadership, and when that happens, it's pretty 96 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:07,599 Speaker 1: much impossible to deliver upon expectations because the expectations themselves 97 00:06:07,720 --> 00:06:11,599 Speaker 1: keep changing. But in addition to Austin Arcane, Microsoft is 98 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:15,400 Speaker 1: also shutting down Tango Game Works, which recently produced the 99 00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 1: acclaimed game Hi Fi Rush Alpha Dog Games is also 100 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:23,279 Speaker 1: on the chopping block. That company makes mobile games, and 101 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:29,120 Speaker 1: Zenemax Online Studios is to absorb another company called Roundhouse Studios, 102 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:32,480 Speaker 1: which will be no more. The closures are going to 103 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:37,640 Speaker 1: affect previous promises that were you know about unreleased content 104 00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:41,400 Speaker 1: for titles like Redfall. So if gamers actually shelled out 105 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 1: money for stuff that was supposed to include DLC, that's 106 00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:47,760 Speaker 1: you know, supposed to be coming down the pipeline. Well, 107 00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 1: now that DLC is gone, it's been scrapped. But Microsoft 108 00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: says it will make good on those various deals. No 109 00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:58,279 Speaker 1: word yet on how many staff are going to be 110 00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 1: laid off. Some people are going to be show to 111 00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:03,800 Speaker 1: new teams, but other people will be let go. And 112 00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 1: it's a really tough time in the video game industry 113 00:07:07,640 --> 00:07:11,160 Speaker 1: in particular, but tech in general right now. And just 114 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 1: as a matter of contrast, I feel I should also 115 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 1: point out Microsoft currently has a market capitalization of more 116 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:25,040 Speaker 1: than three trillion dollars. It is a three trillion dollar company, 117 00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:27,880 Speaker 1: you know, I think that's something that should be kept 118 00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:30,720 Speaker 1: in mind as we hear about how many people are 119 00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 1: getting laid off from this three trillion dollar company. Also, 120 00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:39,680 Speaker 1: the day after the announcement talk about tone death. The 121 00:07:39,720 --> 00:07:42,640 Speaker 1: head of Xbox Game Studio said in a town hall 122 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:46,120 Speaker 1: call that quote, we need smaller games that give us 123 00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 1: prestige and awards end quote. But literally that was Hi 124 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:54,480 Speaker 1: Fi Rush. High Fi Rush was a smaller game. It 125 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 1: was released in a surprise release. No one had even 126 00:07:57,440 --> 00:07:59,680 Speaker 1: heard about the darn thing when it came out, and 127 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 1: it actually won some awards, so it meets those criteria. 128 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:08,320 Speaker 1: And the day when this guy says we need games 129 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:11,000 Speaker 1: that are going to be small and prestigious was the 130 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,280 Speaker 1: day after they had shut down a studio that had 131 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:17,360 Speaker 1: made a game like that. So yeah, very much mixed 132 00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:20,760 Speaker 1: messages and very upsetting. All right, up next, we'll talk 133 00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:24,360 Speaker 1: about some more trouble in big tech. Google reportedly had 134 00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:27,000 Speaker 1: a bit of a tense all hands meeting this week. 135 00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 1: The company recently posted an extremely positive earnings report for 136 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 1: the company, like they did gangbusters business this past quarter. 137 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:37,680 Speaker 1: But this comes at a time when Google's also been 138 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 1: making some pretty drastic cuts across its businesses, including significant layoffs. 139 00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:47,240 Speaker 1: So employees had left comments wanting to know what the 140 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 1: company was going to do to address issues with morale, 141 00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:52,760 Speaker 1: which is a good question because it sucks to work 142 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 1: for a company where you or your coworkers are worried 143 00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 1: about getting laid off every day while the company itself 144 00:08:58,760 --> 00:09:03,679 Speaker 1: seems to be flourishing. That kind of disconnect is really upsetting. 145 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,840 Speaker 1: Staffers argued that Google has done very well, but in 146 00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 1: the meantime quote many Googlers have not received meaningful compensation 147 00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 1: increases into quote. That's according to one staff member who 148 00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,840 Speaker 1: left a comment on this town hall Zoom meeting or 149 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:19,439 Speaker 1: call meeting. I guess I don't know if it was 150 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,240 Speaker 1: over Zoom probably wasn't with it being Google anyway. Others 151 00:09:22,240 --> 00:09:26,120 Speaker 1: pointed out that Google was investing billions of dollars in 152 00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:29,400 Speaker 1: AI and spent like tens of billions of dollars in 153 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 1: stock buybacks, and instead maybe Google should have been spending 154 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 1: that money on the people who work at the company. 155 00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:38,840 Speaker 1: It sounds like it was a really uncomfortable meeting, and 156 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:43,240 Speaker 1: you know, to their credit, the executives actually had responses 157 00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:46,200 Speaker 1: to these. They didn't just sit there silently waiting for 158 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:48,840 Speaker 1: the clock to run out so that they could leave 159 00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 1: the meeting. They actually did say, you know, and tried 160 00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 1: to express what the strategy was. But I think it 161 00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:58,680 Speaker 1: was such a hard time at Google that those answers 162 00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:01,680 Speaker 1: probably weren't met with a lot of satisfaction. But here's 163 00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:04,800 Speaker 1: hoping that everything gets sorted out fairly. Okay, we've got 164 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:06,960 Speaker 1: a lot more news to talk about, but before we 165 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:18,959 Speaker 1: get to that, let's take a quick break. So we're back. 166 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 1: So over at Tesla, we saw even more job cuts 167 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,000 Speaker 1: this week. That's been going on for a while now. 168 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:28,520 Speaker 1: According to the Register, this latest round of cutbacks impacted 169 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:31,240 Speaker 1: engineers and developers. This appears to be part of the 170 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:35,000 Speaker 1: larger move for Tesla to downsize by around fourteen thousand 171 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,280 Speaker 1: jobs total compared to where it started out the year. 172 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:41,199 Speaker 1: The company also appears to have put a hiring freeze 173 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:44,239 Speaker 1: in place, at least in North America. So according to Gizmoto, 174 00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:47,880 Speaker 1: Tesla went from having three four hundred job listings across 175 00:10:48,240 --> 00:10:52,360 Speaker 1: North America down to just three job postings across the 176 00:10:52,480 --> 00:10:54,839 Speaker 1: entire continent, which is a big old wolf. And then 177 00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:58,400 Speaker 1: Tesla's head of product a guy named rich Otto, which 178 00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,240 Speaker 1: to me is hilarious. His name is rich Auto and 179 00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:05,880 Speaker 1: he worked for Tesla anyway, He's left. He has resigned 180 00:11:06,120 --> 00:11:09,440 Speaker 1: and said he is donezo with Tesla. He had worked 181 00:11:09,559 --> 00:11:13,680 Speaker 1: there for nearly seven years. Actually came from Faraday Future, 182 00:11:13,880 --> 00:11:17,560 Speaker 1: another electric vehicle startup. That one went belly up, but 183 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 1: Auto did not mince words about his decision for leaving. 184 00:11:20,640 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: He posted on LinkedIn that the moves that Tesla had 185 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:26,600 Speaker 1: absolutely disrupted employee morale and made it hard to create 186 00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:29,480 Speaker 1: a long term vision for the company, and he couldn't 187 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:32,000 Speaker 1: really work there anymore, so said it was time for 188 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:35,319 Speaker 1: a change and he resigned. Video games are going to 189 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:37,760 Speaker 1: be popping up throughout this episode. We're back to it 190 00:11:37,840 --> 00:11:40,840 Speaker 1: right now. We had talked previously about Microsoft shutting down 191 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 1: some studios. This one's going to be a quick one. 192 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:46,720 Speaker 1: Nintendo has announced that it is pulling x slash Twitter 193 00:11:46,800 --> 00:11:51,240 Speaker 1: integration from Switch platforms. So previously Switch owners could post 194 00:11:51,280 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 1: images from gaming sessions to their connected x formerly known 195 00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:57,800 Speaker 1: as Twitter accounts, but Nintendo is following the lead of 196 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:01,120 Speaker 1: Sony and Microsoft, which have already ended similar support for 197 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 1: such integrations. Nintendo did not explain why it made this decision, 198 00:12:05,559 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 1: but the educated guess is that it's tied to x 199 00:12:08,920 --> 00:12:12,920 Speaker 1: slash Twitter hiking up the price of its API policies, 200 00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 1: which means that if you build an app that taps 201 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:20,559 Speaker 1: into x now you have to pay a pretty substantial 202 00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:24,440 Speaker 1: amount of money depending on how frequently your app does that. 203 00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:27,480 Speaker 1: So my guess is Nintendo said, we're not seeing benefit 204 00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 1: from this particular feature, let's just cut it because it's 205 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:33,800 Speaker 1: costing us money. Rumor has it that open ai will 206 00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,920 Speaker 1: announce an AI powered search product next week. Reuter's reports 207 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:40,760 Speaker 1: that the plan is to unveil the search offering on Monday, 208 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:44,800 Speaker 1: although this is not set in stone. We've been hearing 209 00:12:44,880 --> 00:12:47,920 Speaker 1: some scuttle butt that open ai has an AI backed 210 00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:50,480 Speaker 1: search engine in the works for a while now, and 211 00:12:50,559 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: it seems like this is pretty much a direct shot 212 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:55,880 Speaker 1: at Google's dominance in the space. This also explains why 213 00:12:55,920 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 1: Google has invested billions in AI research and development, because 214 00:12:59,440 --> 00:13:02,200 Speaker 1: the company is terrified that AI is going to drink 215 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:05,240 Speaker 1: its milkshake. If open ai does announce something on Monday, 216 00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:07,320 Speaker 1: then really it is a big slap in the face 217 00:13:07,360 --> 00:13:11,240 Speaker 1: of Google because Google is launching its annual Io Developer 218 00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:15,880 Speaker 1: conference on Tuesday, and undoubtedly that conference is going to 219 00:13:15,920 --> 00:13:20,000 Speaker 1: include a lot of talk about AI. So yeah, shots fired. 220 00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:23,680 Speaker 1: Some users over at stack overflow, which serves as a 221 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 1: question and answer site for software developers, are really getting 222 00:13:27,400 --> 00:13:30,200 Speaker 1: ready to do some digital vandalism. In fact, some folks 223 00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:32,880 Speaker 1: have been doing it already. Now the reason they're unhappy 224 00:13:32,920 --> 00:13:36,160 Speaker 1: has to do with open Ai. Stack Overflow recently announced 225 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:39,680 Speaker 1: a partnership with open ai, and some users are really 226 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:43,880 Speaker 1: steamed about this. So, to begin with, stack overflow was 227 00:13:43,960 --> 00:13:46,880 Speaker 1: upset at open ai because of the assumption that open 228 00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:51,960 Speaker 1: ai was scraping stack overflow for information to train up 229 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:56,800 Speaker 1: AI models. But then this actual official partnership forms, and 230 00:13:56,840 --> 00:13:59,680 Speaker 1: now some of the folks who have been providing answers 231 00:13:59,800 --> 00:14:03,319 Speaker 1: in stack overflow are really upset because they don't want 232 00:14:03,480 --> 00:14:06,720 Speaker 1: their knowledge to be used as training data for AI. 233 00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:10,960 Speaker 1: And they were never consulted or asked about this, you know, 234 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:14,640 Speaker 1: in advance. It just happened. Now some of them have 235 00:14:14,720 --> 00:14:17,560 Speaker 1: already started to go into their old answers and attempt 236 00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: to delete or deface them to foil AI training. But 237 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 1: that doesn't really seem to have helped much because according 238 00:14:24,760 --> 00:14:29,400 Speaker 1: to Ours Technica, stack overflow employees have been suspending users 239 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:32,480 Speaker 1: who are doing this. So if you have provided an 240 00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:35,280 Speaker 1: answer and you've gone in and changed it, you could 241 00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,360 Speaker 1: get suspended for a given amount of time, like a week, 242 00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 1: and they also revert your changes back to what they 243 00:14:42,520 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 1: were before, so all that effort goes to nothing anyway. 244 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:50,560 Speaker 1: But it does sound like users are expressing themselves and 245 00:14:50,640 --> 00:14:53,760 Speaker 1: making it known to stack overflow that they are not 246 00:14:54,000 --> 00:14:58,480 Speaker 1: happy with this particular arrangement, and I'll be curious to 247 00:14:58,480 --> 00:15:01,760 Speaker 1: see if stack overflow does anything to try and smooth 248 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 1: this all out, or if they just try and take 249 00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 1: a weight and hope that it goes away approach. TikTok 250 00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:11,400 Speaker 1: announced this week that it will be including a digital 251 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 1: watermark on content posted to the platform that was generated 252 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:18,120 Speaker 1: by AI. The company also said it would remove realistic 253 00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 1: AI content that is not labeled as AI, and this 254 00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:24,120 Speaker 1: is all in an effort to curtail attempts to use 255 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:28,280 Speaker 1: AI to spread misinformation. The digital watermark doesn't just magically 256 00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:31,240 Speaker 1: detect AI though, It's not like it has some killer 257 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:34,520 Speaker 1: ability to know when something was AI generated. This is 258 00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:40,040 Speaker 1: actually an industry standard that some but not all, generative 259 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 1: AI tool makers will incorporate in their tools. So if 260 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:48,000 Speaker 1: you were to use their tool to create something, there'd 261 00:15:48,040 --> 00:15:51,080 Speaker 1: be this digital watermark there, and that would be what 262 00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:56,160 Speaker 1: TikTok would detect and then apply its AI generated watermark 263 00:15:56,240 --> 00:15:59,160 Speaker 1: on top of whatever was being posted to TikTok. But 264 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:02,640 Speaker 1: if the tool may doesn't incorporate the standard, well then 265 00:16:02,680 --> 00:16:06,480 Speaker 1: TikTok doesn't know magically that it was AI generated. So 266 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:09,640 Speaker 1: it's not a perfect cure. It just works with the 267 00:16:09,640 --> 00:16:12,880 Speaker 1: companies that are all agreeing to play by this set 268 00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:17,760 Speaker 1: of rules. Streaming services continue to try and reinvent cable TV. 269 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:21,360 Speaker 1: This week, Disney and Warner Brothers Discovery revealed that US 270 00:16:21,440 --> 00:16:25,440 Speaker 1: customers will be able to purchase bundled services this summer 271 00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 1: that include Hulu, Disney Plus, and Max for an unannounced 272 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:33,320 Speaker 1: amount of money. Like they don't say how much the 273 00:16:33,320 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 1: subscription is. Users will have a choice between ads supported 274 00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:41,200 Speaker 1: and ad free tiers of service. Hulu already has options 275 00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:43,520 Speaker 1: to add on access to Max as well as to 276 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:47,000 Speaker 1: Paramount Plus. So yeah, we're edging closer to having bundles 277 00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 1: of streaming services resemble what used to be cable television offerings, 278 00:16:51,040 --> 00:16:54,000 Speaker 1: or actually what still is cable tv. It's just that 279 00:16:54,040 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 1: cable tv is really starting to kind of die off. 280 00:16:57,320 --> 00:16:59,440 Speaker 1: But then everyone has been struggling to find a way 281 00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:02,520 Speaker 1: to make streaming a profitable business, so this isn't that surprising. 282 00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:06,040 Speaker 1: And now for some more video game news, Roadblocks announced 283 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:09,480 Speaker 1: it was cutting back its annual bookings forecasts, so essentially, 284 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:12,240 Speaker 1: this is an estimate of how much revenue the company 285 00:17:12,320 --> 00:17:16,560 Speaker 1: expects to earn in the upcoming quarters, and Roadblocks said 286 00:17:16,560 --> 00:17:20,560 Speaker 1: it estimated a lower amount than was previously you know, estimated, 287 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:24,520 Speaker 1: And obviously that got investors in a tizzy because numbers 288 00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: supposed to go up. No, like when number not go up, 289 00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:31,360 Speaker 1: grow grow grow. Sorry, the older I get, the grouchier 290 00:17:31,400 --> 00:17:34,840 Speaker 1: I am about late stage capitalism anyway. In other video 291 00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:38,080 Speaker 1: game financial news, EA confirmed that the company is looking 292 00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:41,439 Speaker 1: at introducing ads in Triple A video games in the future. 293 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:44,960 Speaker 1: Advertisements in games is not a new thing. There's been 294 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:48,560 Speaker 1: everything from brand integrations to full on commercials to those 295 00:17:48,600 --> 00:17:51,040 Speaker 1: annoying little ads that pop up in mobile games, and 296 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 1: so they've been part of the industry for a while. 297 00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:56,720 Speaker 1: But you don't typically see very many of those pop 298 00:17:56,800 --> 00:18:00,800 Speaker 1: up in a seventy dollars triple A title because you know, 299 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:03,879 Speaker 1: customers get grouchy if they've spent seventy bucks on something 300 00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:06,320 Speaker 1: and then they have to watch ads in it. EA 301 00:18:06,520 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 1: CEO stressed that any ad integrations would be quote very 302 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:13,159 Speaker 1: thoughtful end quote, which is good to hear from a 303 00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:15,960 Speaker 1: company that was voted as the worst in America two 304 00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:19,680 Speaker 1: years in a row and happier video game news. Nintendo 305 00:18:19,760 --> 00:18:22,199 Speaker 1: confirmed that the successor to the Switch is coming and 306 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:25,479 Speaker 1: that the company will announce it this fiscal year. However, 307 00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:28,680 Speaker 1: Nintendo's fiscal year starts in April, so that means it 308 00:18:28,720 --> 00:18:31,560 Speaker 1: may not be until the end of March next year 309 00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 1: that we hear anything. But it is coming. It just 310 00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:37,240 Speaker 1: is not going to be part of Nintendo Direct in June. 311 00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:39,639 Speaker 1: That is not going to be when the company announces it. 312 00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:42,200 Speaker 1: They've already confirmed there will be no information about it 313 00:18:42,560 --> 00:18:45,080 Speaker 1: at that event. However, you know, the Switch is seven 314 00:18:45,160 --> 00:18:47,479 Speaker 1: years old, it's not really a surprise that the company 315 00:18:47,520 --> 00:18:50,760 Speaker 1: is prepping a follow up. One last story for this week. 316 00:18:50,920 --> 00:18:53,320 Speaker 1: It was supposed to be a test launch for the 317 00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:57,960 Speaker 1: Boeing Starliner spacecraft with an actual crew abord it this week, 318 00:18:58,040 --> 00:19:01,359 Speaker 1: but engineers detected a malfunction in a pressure regulation valve 319 00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:04,679 Speaker 1: on a liquid oxygen tank aboard the Atlas five launch 320 00:19:04,760 --> 00:19:08,720 Speaker 1: vehicle that ended up necessitating scrubbing the mission. It was 321 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:11,719 Speaker 1: another frustrating setback for Boeing, which is obviously dealing with 322 00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 1: some really serious problems unrelated to the star Liner at 323 00:19:15,080 --> 00:19:18,040 Speaker 1: the moment, so the earliest date for another attempt is 324 00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:21,960 Speaker 1: May seventeenth, at six sixteen pm if everything is ready 325 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:24,119 Speaker 1: to go by then. At that point, the star Liner 326 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:26,960 Speaker 1: will be lifted by rocket up into orbit and then 327 00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:29,560 Speaker 1: head off to the International Space Station. So we'll have 328 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:33,760 Speaker 1: to see if that actually happens next week. All right, 329 00:19:34,160 --> 00:19:37,160 Speaker 1: that's it for this week's tech News. I hope you're 330 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:40,840 Speaker 1: all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon. 331 00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:51,480 Speaker 1: Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, 332 00:19:51,800 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 1: visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen 333 00:19:55,560 --> 00:19:56,639 Speaker 1: to your favorite shows.