WEBVTT - The Home Run Approach

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to prognosis. I'm Laura Carlson. As some states start

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to reopen and ease physical distancing, the message from most

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>experts remains clear. The only true way back to normal

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is a vaccine. In hopes of getting that as soon

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as possible, people around the globe are volunteering to be

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>human test subjects to be intentionally injected with the coronavirus.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Now scientists, top health officials, and pharmaceutical executives are taking

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>very seriously an option that would normally be unthinkable today.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>With the help of trade Offs. A podcast about our costly, complicated,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and counterintuitive health care system, we explore how scientists could

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ethically and safely in fact people to speed up the

0:00:54.360 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>fight against COVID nineteen. Dan Gornstein reports Hua Gray knows

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the risks of volunteering to be infected with stars covie

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to the virus that causes COVID nineteen. It is a

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>disease that doesn't have a cure and is something that

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>could possibly kill you me could possibly kill me. A

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>friend shared a journal article describing what are called human

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>challenge trials, where healthy, young, consenting adult volunteers are intentionally

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>infected to speed up vaccine development. The article suggested this

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of study could shave three months off the time

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it would take to get a COVID nineteen vaccine. Three

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>months would be huge, three months could save a lot

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of lives. The thirty two year old away the personal cost,

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>she weighed the larger societal benefit, and she volunteered herself

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for science. Actually, Hua was among the first few thousand

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>people to sign up through the online Adequacy Group One

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Day Sooner, back in April. As of thousand eighty six

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>people have now signed up, with numbers growing every day.

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Seema Shaw is a bioethicist at Laurie Children's Hospital of

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Chicago and one of the world's top experts on when

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's okay to put people at risk for the benefit

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of others. She says infecting volunteers for vaccine research is

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a common tool under certain conditions. They're typically used when

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>either there's a treatment that you can give people, or

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a disease where we know a lot about the

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>disease and how to manage it. Cholera, malaria, influenza. Researchers

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have five months of data on the coronavirus, meaning little

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is known about how to protect Lahua or any other

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>human test subject. But Seema says the need for vaccine

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is so urgent. There's a growing camp of scientists and

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bioethicist who think this moment warrants a break from standard protocol.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We're all looking for a way out of this pandemic,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and the thought of a novel, innovative idea that even

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds a little bit crazy the first time you hear it,

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it might be a way out. Not

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>all scientists and ethicis are on board, but that hasn't

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>stopped the idea from catching fire. In April thirty five,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan members of Congress urged the FDA to consider challenge trials.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Johnson told The Financial Times the company would

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>do challenge trous if okayed by ethicists, and working groups

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at the World Health Organization and the National Institutes of

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Health are now both exploring the issue. Simon, who's part

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the w h O group, says much of the

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>excitement has centered on one particular use of intentionally infecting people.

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>You could use challenge studies to replace the step of

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>efficacy testing for a vaccine. Here's the step she's talking

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about replacing Normally, researchers recruit thousands of people, give half

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of them the vaccine, and then let them live their

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>regular lives to see if they're protected from the disease.

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This can take years. Advocates of challenge trials say you

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>can save three to six months by infecting a few

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>dozen volunteers with the virus, giving half of them the

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and not giving it to the other half, then

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing what happens. If the vaccine works and the researchers

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>are confident it's safe, then it's off to the f

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>d A. This is the home run approach, or maybe

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the inside the park home run approach, instead of the

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>usual deliberate trot around the basis of vaccine development, and

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the scientists could sprint home, growing from a promising candidate

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to a widely distributed vaccine. But before even stepping into

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the batter's box, federal regulators have to sign off. In

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the US, the FDA must approve any vaccine, and Seama

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>says they rarely do that without evidence from the big,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>time consuming field trials. They're often concerned about what are

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>giving someone a virus in a non natural way. Um

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>who's young, healthy volunteer is going to tell you enough

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>about how well the vaccine works to then feel confident

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually going to work in the general population. There

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are other concerns too. Scientists would be infecting people with

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the deadly virus that we don't have a sure fire

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>way to treat, and some even question how much time

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this would say With some vaccines expected to start normal

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>field trials this summer, and FDA spokesperson said any decisions

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>about using challenge trials will be made on a case

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>by case basis. Most of the conversation over the first

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>few months of the pandemic has focused on this home

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>run approach, but if people are going to be intentionally

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>infected for research, there are a few other uses that

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>experts think are more likely. Sticking with the baseball metaphor

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>here for a second. If replacing field trials with challenge

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>trials is a home run, figuring out how to prioritize

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the hundred plus vaccine candidates is more like hitting a

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>double that sharply hit ball down the third base line.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Having a hundred potential vaccine candidates is great, but it

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>also creates difficulties. Zab m Erosic is a physician and

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>bioethicist at the man Ash Bioethics Center in Melbourne, Australia.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>We spoke to him via zoom. If the first of

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a second vaccine don't turn out to work, then we

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>need to select among the next ten vaccines or twenty

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that are ready for human testing. Doing each trial

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one after another or even all at once would be

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>really difficult and require tens of thousands of people across

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the world. We could test ten or twenty vaccines in

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a challenge study in a short space of time and

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>decide which three of those vaccines look the most promising,

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and then to just as those ones well. This still

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>saves sometime regulators would get their traditional big field trial

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to look at before green lighting of vaccine for the

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>general public. Then there are reasons we might infect volunteers

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that feel even further away for finding a vaccine approaches

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>where scientists are just trying to get on base. JOHNS

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins vaccine researcher and A. Durban has developed challenge models

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for Dana vaccine and is working on one for Zica.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>She says challenge trials could help us learn more about

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>how immunity works. Can you develop antibodies to COVID nineteen

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that would protect you from another infection with COVID nineteen.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>In the future, scientists could infect people who have already

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>recovered from COVID nineteen to see if they get sick again,

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't, they could try and figure out

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>what in the body is protecting them. Or they could

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>try to learn more about how the virus spreads. Challenge

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one person and then you have an unchallenged person in

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>there and and see if that virus is able to

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>be transmitted, and if so, then you know, is it

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>just touching surfaces? Um you know, how close do you

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be, how long do you have to be

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in contact risking your life to study how disease spreads

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>may feel glamorous, more like a walk than a home run. Scientists, regulators,

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and especially the people volunteering to be infected would have

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether the possible benefit to society was worth

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the personal risk. Hu Gray says she needs to see

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a direct line between her role and some kind of

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>game changing breakthrough. Whatever I was volunteering for, I would

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>want to have some confidence that it was reducing risk

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to everyone else, even scientists and ethicis who are a

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>way of challenge trials. I think we should start preparing

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for them now so that when the time comes to

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>actually decide if it's worth infecting people like Lahua will

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>be ready. I'm Dan Gornstein. This is trade Offs. That

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was Dan Gornstein on a segment brought to us by

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast trade Offs. It was produced by Ryan Levy.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Music by Tai Sidderman, Blue Dot Sessions and Bacon. Additional

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Tom Darton, Josh Morrison, Peter Niels, and Peter Smi.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed today's story, subscribe to the Tradeoffs podcast

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>or check them out at tradeoffs dot org. The Prognosis

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Daily edition is produced by Tophur foreheads Jordan Gospure, Magnus

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Hendrickson and me Laura Carlson. Original music by Leo Sidran.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Our editors are Francesco Levi and Rick Shy. Francesco Levi

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts. Thanks for listening.