WEBVTT - #304 Guest Host Gilbert King with Robert DuBoise

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jason Flammett Wrongful Conviction. We're proud to be a

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the ever growing landscape of true crime shows

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that revealed just how our criminal legal system works and

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>often where it fails. This week, I've invited a colleague

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>from another podcast to bring their unique style to our

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>coverage of yet another wrongful conviction.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Back in the late seventies and early eighties, there was

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a string of violent crimes in Florida. Young women were

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>being raped and murdered seemingly at random. One of the

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>perpetrators was the infamous Ted Bundy. He was convicted for

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>one of these murders, and among the mountain of evidence

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that was presented against him was a bike mark. A

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>dentist named doctor Suveran was called to testify against Bundy,

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>making famous the use of bike mark evidence known as

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>forensic odontology. Four years after Bundy was sent to death

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>row a young woman's body he was found with obvious

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>signs of sexual assault near Tampa. There was also an

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>injury on her cheek that the medical examiner determined to

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 2>be a bite mark. Given that it followed the highly

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 2>televised Bundy trial, police honed in on that bitemark to

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the exclusion of all other evidence. They began taking bite

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>impressions or denticians from dozens of men in the neighborhood

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>and brought them to doctor Suveran. One of those men

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 2>was eighteen year old Robert Dubois. Doctor Suveran alleged that

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Robert's dentician matched the bite mark on the victim, and

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Robert was arrested. No other physical evidence tied him to

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the case, but with the use of a jailhouse informant,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Robert was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to die

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>by electrocution for a crime he did not commit. This

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 2>is wrongful conviction. Welcome to Wrongful Conviction. I'm Gilbert King.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm the Pulitzer Prise winning author of Devil in

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the Grove, about Thurgood Marshall's representation of the young men

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>known as the Groveland Four who were just exonerated by

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the State of Florida last year. I'm also the writer

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and host of a new nine part narrative podcast called

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Bone Valley by Lava for Good Podcasts, and I'm honored

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to be guest hosting this episode of Wrongful Conviction. Today,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 2>we have two very special guests, and I'm going to

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 2>ask them both to introduce themselves before we get into

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the interview. So let's start out with Robert Dubois.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, my name is Robert Dubois. So I was just

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>exonerated in twenty twenty and right now I'm sitting in

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>my apartment in Tampa, Florida to you guys, and we also.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Have Susan Friedman. Susan, you want to introduce yourself?

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks Gilbert for having me. My name is Susan Friedman.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm a senior staff attorney at the Innocence Project based

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 4>in New York City, and I represented Robert through his

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 4>wrongful conviction.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, this is amazing. We have so much to talk

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>about then, because this is really going to be really fascinating.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I studied the case very familiar with Tampa. Robert, the

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 2>event that would change your life occurred back in nineteen

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 2>eighty three in Tampa. You were just eighteen years old.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk about who you were and what your

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>life was before that arrest.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, at that time, I was working in town and

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>country at an auto a postry shop for Noel's Autawa Postry.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>So I used to ride my bike. It's like, I

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 3>guess about five miles. So I wrote it to town and

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>country every day for the job. So suddenly my whole

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 3>world was upside down because I'm doing my everyday thing,

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 3>going back and forth to work, and then next thing

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm in a cell wondering why now.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this has just came out of the blue

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>for you. I mean, do you didn't have any prior

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>runnings with the law or do you have you had

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>any understanding of what was happening.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I did have a prior running with the law when

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I was a teenager, so it was about an empty

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 3>house or car parts, just some dumb stuff. And I

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>had moved past that and had two years probation community

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>work hours for the Police Athletic League, which I completed,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 3>and next thing you know, I'm in jail being accused

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 3>of murder.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>And let's go back to that in a minute. But Susan,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I just want to ask you your experience you're coming in.

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>What does you like really understand about Tampa, Florida and

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>this time the early eighties. You know a lot of

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 2>people think of like Miami Vice, this is that era,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>but this is not like South Florida. This is Central Florida, Tampa.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 2>It's a little sleepier, right, Yeah.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the one thing to know is that around

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.239
<v Speaker 4>the time when this crime occurred that Robert was wrongfully

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 4>convicted of, there actually were a string of women who

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 4>were sexually assaulted and murdered. There wasn't a clear m

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 4>but there were a number of women that turned up dead,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 4>one of them obviously being the victim and Roberts case.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that turns out to be really important

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 4>is that Florida is the home of the Ted Bundy case.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 4>And in the nineteen seventies, Ted Bundy eventually comes to

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>confess to around thirty cases, and one of the really

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 4>important pieces of evidence is bitemark testimony, and that's what

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 4>actually puts doctor Richard suver On on the map. And

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 4>doctor sub On testified in the Ted Bundy trials and

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>he also lived in Florida. So this was just a

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 4>very high profile time for bitemark evidence generally in the

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 4>criminal legal system.

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And can you just talk briefly about how that science

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>has come to be viewed today as opposed to back

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen eighties.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So, you know, we today know that fitemark evidence

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 4>has been wholly discredited. Not only has the National Academy

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 4>of Sciences, who did a review of this type of

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 4>evidence back in two thousand and nine, even the ABFO,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 4>the group that regulates forensic odeontologists, have made significant revisions

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 4>to the conclusions that they can make in twenty sixteen,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 4>and so in twenty sixteen, after a number of research

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 4>studies that they concluded that they no longer can do

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 4>what's known as source attribution. I mean that's say a

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>certain individual was the bier in a case. And so

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 4>that came after years of research in this to finally

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 4>debunk this type of evidence that for so long has

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 4>been held up as an important piece of evidence, but

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 4>that we know today has led to many, many wrongful convictions.

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 4>We know of at least thirty four wrongful convictions in

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 4>the United States, Robert being one of them.

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Susan, can we just talk about the case that brought

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Robert into trouble? Can you just talk about the facts

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of the crime.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. On August nineteenth, nineteen eighty three, in the early

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 4>morning hours, a dentist was showing up at work. He

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 4>was opening up his shop and in the back he

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 4>found the victim in this case, she had been she

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 4>was severely beaten, and she was there was certainly evidence

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>that she had been either actually sexually assaulted or there

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 4>was an attempted sexual assault. She was completely nude except

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 4>for a tube top that was pushed up above her

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 4>chest that exposed her breasts. So police immediately started investigating

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 4>and they canvass the neighborhood. Unfortunately, there were no eyewitnesses,

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 4>and so what we know about the victim is that

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 4>she worked at a local restaurant, a local fast food chain,

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 4>and she had left somewhere around nine to nine fifteen

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 4>in the evening after closing up. We know that someone

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 4>saw her about nine thirty PM a couple blocks away

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 4>from her home. But then she's found eight blocks south

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 4>of that, and so police started canvassing. They couldn't find

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 4>anyone who had any information, and so very quickly this

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 4>case focused in on the physical evidence, and that evidence

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 4>came from the medical examiner's office. During the autopsy, the

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 4>medical examiner concluded three things. First, that the victim was

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>killed as a result of blunt force trauma. As I said,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 4>she had been severely beaten, and at the crime scene

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 4>they found a total of four to two by four

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 4>wooden boards by her, and they all had and a

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 4>few of them had blood and hair on them, which

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 4>suggested that they were the murder weapon. The emmy also

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 4>concluded that she likely was sexually assaulted. And then the

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 4>third when he washed her face, he saw that there

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 4>was a pattern injury on her left cheek, which he

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 4>concluded even though he is not an odontologist or a

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 4>bitemark expert, he actually concluded must have been a bitemark.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 2>How did police begin to narrow this down to certain suspects?

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 4>So, because law enforcement didn't have any eyewitnesses, they really

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 4>focused in on the bite mark, and in this case,

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 4>the medical examiner identified what he believed to be a

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 4>bitemark on the victim's left cheek. He excized it and

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 4>put it in formal to hide, which caused it to shrink.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 4>But then the photographs of the bitemark were shared with

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 4>doctor Suban, and doctor Subarron concluded that this was a

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 4>human bitemark and that he would be able to make

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 4>a comparison. So doctor Subron then advised law enforcement to

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 4>start collecting denticians from individuals who they believed were suspects,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 4>and to do that using bees wax and if folks

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 4>are thinking about why beeswax. It doesn't really make sense.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 4>You're right, because beeswax is not a good method for

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 4>capturing someone's dentition, but that's what they were using. And

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 4>so Detective Saladino started going around and collecting dozens and

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 4>dozens of denticians from basically any individual that they came

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 4>into contact with, and they turned their attention to Robert

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 4>because they interviewed a woman who had worked at at

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>a store about a block away from where the victim

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 4>was discovered. And what's interesting about this individual is that

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 4>she worked at the store back in February, which is

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 4>six months before this crime. But she alleged that she

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 4>knew a couple of boys who, as she said quote,

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>caused trouble. That's what led police to focus in on

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Robert and to ask him for his beeswax tentition.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>So, Robert, can you just talk a little bit about

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 2>your first contact with police and what you were thinking

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 2>when you got approached. What was that like that moment?

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I wasn't very fond of cops in general. I

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>was a teenager. But when I was approached, he's like,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 3>would you mind doing a beeswax impression? And I'm like,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 3>for what he says, Well, we're just doing you know,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>everybody in the neighborhood or whatever, even though I'm not

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>even from that neighborhood. So I went with him downtown

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 3>with the only two in the police detective division, and

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 3>he asked me to bite into a soft piece of beeswax,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>so I did, and he drove me back home and

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>he made a crazy statement on the way home. He says,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 3>there was two girls walking down the street. I thought

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>it pretty weird. He says, which do you prefer? Blonde

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>or brunette? I said, what does it matter? You know?

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 3>So he didn't say anymore, and he dropped me off

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 3>at home. So then I didn't hear anymore until October

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 3>twenty first, nineteen eighty three, when they came to my

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 3>door at two thirty in the morning and asked me

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 3>to go downtown and said that my mom needed to

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 3>see me. So, taking the consideration, my father's in a wheelchair,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 3>he's completely paralyzed, so I'm thinking, if my mom needs

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>to see me, something's really going on here. So I

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 3>go downtown. Of course my mom isn't there, and then

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 3>they tell me Detective Saladino will come shortly and explain

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 3>what's going on. So in the interim, I'm sitting there

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 3>and the detective looks at me and he's talking about fishing,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the weather, all this normal stuff, and then he says,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>why'd you do it? I said, why did I do?

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>What?

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 3>He said, why did you kill her? I said kill who?

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I said, what? Are you crazy? So I'm thinking it's

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 3>some kind of sick joke.

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 2>So aside from this, there's no other physical evidence that

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 2>is causing police to focus in on Robert. It's just

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 2>they're doing this thing with the.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Teeth, right, Yeah, that's right. Police approach Robert and he's

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 4>completely cooperative because he has nothing to hide. He knows

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 4>he didn't commit this crime. In fact, the other forensic

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.359
<v Speaker 4>evidence excludes Robert.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>And would you consider that an example of tunnel vision.

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>You have all this other evidence that's possibly exculpatory, is excalpatory,

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>and yet here they are focusing on this something that

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 2>we now consider junk science. What happened there?

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly right. This is classic tunnel vision and cognitive

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 4>bias setting in. This was a case with no eyewitnesses,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 4>and when police got their tip and they believe that

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Robert was the source of the bite mark. All the

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 4>other evidence that was exculpatory, they found reasons to ignore,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 4>and they focused in on Robber and were able to

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 4>explain away any facts that didn't line up with their

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 4>theory of the case.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Robert, this must have been, you know, the worst day

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of your life to get accused of something like this

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and arrested. Can you just walk through the arrest and

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 2>what that was like for you?

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I was very angry and baffled. I

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 3>mean I was very angry, angry with the police when

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 3>they tried to handcuff me because I knew I had

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 3>done nothing wrong, you know. And then because I'm angry

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 3>when they took me to the jail, they had the

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 3>nurse shoot me up with how doll, so that put

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 3>me out, and when I woke up, I was strapped

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 3>down to a steal bunk with leather straps. So then

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 3>the following morning they take me for all these dental

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>impressions and I'm still doped up off the how doll

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it was, and I was just baffled. I

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>was just trying to get it over with because I

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 3>knew I had done nothing wrong. So I was living

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 3>kind of like in a bad dream, I couldn't wake

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 3>up for him.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 5>This episode is sponsored by the AIG pro Bono Program.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 5>AIG is a leading global insurance company, and the AIG

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 5>pro Bono Program provides free legal services, as well as

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 5>other support to many nonprofit organizations as well as individuals

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 5>who are most in need, and they recently announced that

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 5>working to reform the criminal justice system will become a

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 5>key pillar of the program's mission.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>And any of the time, did you ever occur to

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>you like I need a lawyer at this point.

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 3>No, because I knew I had done nothing wrong, So

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>it never even really crossed my mind. I didn't know

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 3>enough about the legal system to even know I had

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>that right.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think one of the things that's really important

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 4>about Robert just said is that a lot of times

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 4>people's innocence puts them at risk, especially in interrogations and

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 4>in these kinds of situations where they're interacting with law enforcement.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 4>They know that they're innocent, and they believe that the

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 4>evidence will prove that. And so Robert went ahead and

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 4>completely cooperated with law enforcement knowing that he didn't commit

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 4>this crime, he didn't bite the victim, he was never

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 4>there and so he had no reason to hide on anything,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 4>and so he didn't think he needed a lawyer.

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm always amazed by the exgonneries that you talk to.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>They have so much faith in the justice system. They

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>will just clear this up together. We'll talk this over

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 2>because I didn't do it, and they are at the

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>most risk of anybody because they're just talking the police

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>right off the bat. So, Susan, can you just give

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>us a brief summary of what Robert's trial was like?

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Sure? So you know, the focus of this case was

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 4>the bitemark evidence, but police and prosecutors wanted to have

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 4>more evidence to support this conviction. Police alleged that someone

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 4>named Claude Butler, who was no stranger to the Tampa

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Police Department, they were very well acquainted with him, alleged

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 4>that Robert actually confessed to him while they were both

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 4>incarcerated at the local jail while Robert was awaiting trial.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Claude Butler at the time had been arrested previously for

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 4>various offenses, but at that time he also was facing

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 4>charges for kidnapping, robbery with a firearm, grand theft, auto

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 4>dealing in solo, and property battery on a law enforcement agent,

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 4>so he was looking at multiple life sentences, and so

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Claude was the second piece of evidence that police used.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Then the third piece of evidence was this witness named Jack.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 4>And Jack was really perplexing because there were no police

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 4>reports that memorialized any interviews with Jack. He was not

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 4>on the witness list. He didn't testify in the grand jury.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 4>He pops up two weeks before Robert goes to trial,

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 4>and Jack alleges that he was staying at the Peter

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Pan Motel, which is where Robert was arrested, and that

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 4>one day, he doesn't remember exactly what day it was,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 4>but there was a party going on. He walked in,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 4>he saw Robert sitting on the bed. He looked very glum,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and when he asked Robert what was going on? Again,

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Robert does not know this person. Robert just says I

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 4>wanted for murder. And so from there they want the

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 4>jury to infer that Robert is confessing to committing this

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 4>crime or in some way corroborating the allegation that he

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 4>did commit this crime. And that's the entire case.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Robert, what are you thinking when you're watching you know,

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>people like Jack and Claude Butler, get up there on

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 2>the stand and talk about you what's going through your

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 2>mind when you're watching this testimony.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I was sitting there in disbelief, you know. I'm just

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 3>sitting there like, how can they even believe this stuff?

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 3>You know? So I just watched it like I was watching,

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of like I was outside watching in you know.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 3>So I said there every day they took me to

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the courthouse at five am, and I didn't get back

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 3>to the jail till like midnight because they keep you

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 3>on the hold and sale for transport and all that.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 3>So I was just sitting there. I was tired, I

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>was baffled. I just had no clue why we're sitting here,

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 2>And Susan, what kind of defense did Robert have to

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 2>start in this trial?

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 4>One thing that's important here is that this was a

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 4>capital trial, so Robert was facing the death penalty, and

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:28.239
<v Speaker 4>he had an attorney whose defense in this case was

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 4>number one. He put on another dentist, doctor Norman Sperber,

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 4>who said that, oh no, this is a bitemark, but

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 4>it's not Robert's bite. There are too many inconsistencies here,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 4>and so it can't be Robert's fight. So Now, basically

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 4>you had these two bitemark experts going at it and

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 4>what we call in the legal field the battle of

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 4>the experts, and it just came down to the jury

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 4>obviously siding with the prosecution. And the second thing was

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 4>that Robert's mother testified that Robert was home on the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 4>night of the crime. And then the third part of

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 4>the case really was or trying to prove or trying

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 4>to convince the jury that Claude Butler should not be

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 4>trusted and that he was an incentivized witness. Right he's

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 4>facing multiple life sentences instead only got five years, and

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 4>to prove that that is why he cooperated with law enforcement.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, just listening, it seems like a really hard

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>thing for the defendant to overcome when this science is

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>just deemed, as you know, infallible. And then you have

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>a jailhouse snitch who we don't even know anything about

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 2>jailhouse snitches. Back then, we didn't know how often they

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>were being used. So these two things just must seem

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 2>impossible to overcome a trial.

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 4>That's right, you know. So you have this dentist who

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>gets on he is a famous dentist. He's known for

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 4>the Ted Bundy cases. He's got all of his fancy degrees,

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 4>he's got lots of credentials that he's telling the jury about,

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 4>and he testifies that to a reasonable degree of dental certainty,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Robert is the source of the bite. How does anyone

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 4>dispute that, who on the jury would then decide that,

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 4>in fact, actually this dentist is wrong and I better

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 4>and this isn't a bite. This is something that we've

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 4>seen time and time again with a lot of cases

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 4>that involved the misapplication of forensic science. You have these

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 4>techniques that were born out of a need for law

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 4>enforcement to use them, that never are validated, that don't

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 4>go through the rigorous research that we do in other

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 4>areas of science and medicine. Yet then they're used in

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 4>courtrooms to convict people and to sentence them to death

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 4>the way this happened in Robert's case, Right, And.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I imagine just coming off knowing what a storm that

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 2>hold Ted Bundy case was. I mean, he was a superstar,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 2>a superstar Dennist. He's the one that basically his credentials like,

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm the one who solved it and enabled us to

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 2>catch Ted Bundy. So you know, you go on to

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the next case, and you have this guy testifying. That's

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot to overcome. Robert, can you talk about what

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>it was like. You know, you mentioned just sort of

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 2>being in a daze and being disbelieving that this was

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>actually happening to you, which is a pretty common theme.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 2>But you know you obviously had to wait for that

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>verdict to come back. Can you just walk us that

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>moment in your life. What you can remember of that

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 2>moment when the jury has a verdict.

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>During the trial, I kind of detached myself, so to speak,

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>so I wasn't worried about the verdict because I knew

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 3>I had done nothing wrong, so I still had a

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 3>little faith left in the system. So when they came

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 3>back with the verdict, yeah, I was just amazed. But

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the senticing thing was the same way. You know, It's

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>like the jury recommended life in prison. The judge overwrote

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 3>it and said, you know, sentenced me to die by electrocution.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm just upset and baffled about the whole thing. And

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>now I know I'm really in a mess. I'm in

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 3>a trap, you know, and I don't see a way out.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I can't even imagine what that's like. The

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>jury comes back, says you're guilty, and then says they're

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 2>sentencing you to life, and it gets worse the judge

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>overrides the jury recommendation.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember going back into your cell after that

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>and thinking I just got sentenced to death for a

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>crime I didn't commit.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So once they sentenced me to death, it's like

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 3>from that moment on, I had like thirty officers around me,

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, escorting me all the way back to the

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 3>jail into my cell. If I had if they let

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 3>me out to use the phone, I had thirty officers

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 3>surrounding me. So I think it was only like until

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the next morning. They got a transport to take me

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>to Death Row at two thirty in the morning.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>And what was that like? You were rivaling, you know,

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 2>at this age, arriving at you know, Florida's most notorious

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 2>death row. What was that like? I mean, could you

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>just imagine yourself in this situation and how do you

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 2>hang on to any optimism at this point?

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 3>Well, I know, the ride to death Row, still in

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 3>a daze, and I'm wondering, how could this be happening?

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, how did this just happen to me? Why

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 3>am I going to death Row, you know. And then

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I arrive at Death Row, or Florida State Prison, and

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I see this big green building and it's like a

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 3>filling of gloom when you see this building. And then

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 3>I go up into the building. They escort me down

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>this long hallway into a cell on death Row and

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 3>they slammed the door, and that's my new home. And

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, man, are these guys like sitting here waiting

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 3>to die? So it was very disturbing. And you know,

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 3>some of the guys already had warrant signed, so they

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 3>were really afraid because they knew if their name may

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 3>come up, once it comes up again, they might get killed.

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 3>You know. So these things, you know, went through all

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 3>of our heads. You know, is it going to be

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 3>my turn? When you hear that plane fly over the prison?

0:23:59.200 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 3>You don't know?

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 2>And is it true that old Sparky the Florida's Electric

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Chair it's right there on death Row, isn't it correct?

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean in the eighties it was pretty active, right.

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, it was on Q wing. So yeah, well,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 3>just while I was there alone, they killed Marvin Francois,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Dawtry, Willie Darden, Ted Bundy, another guy I only

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 3>knew him as Frog another guy named Tiny, So they

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>killed all total while I was there, like twelve.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 2>What is that like being on death row when that happens.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 2>What's the general mood among people on death row?

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 3>It's very quiet and gloomy, you know. It's like, let

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 3>me tell you the torture, the mental torture they used

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 3>on death row, even though they may not even realize

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>they were doing it. I thought they did though. Is

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 3>a plane Whenever the governor signs a death war. The

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 3>plane flies over Florida State Prison, lands on their runway,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 3>and walks the death war into the colonel of the prison.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 3>The colonel sends his officers to death row to get

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 3>whoever it belongs to. Then they escort them up to

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the colonel's office, they go to death watch, and nine

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 3>times out of ten you don't see them no more.

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>That must be just the most terrifying sound when you're

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 2>in death row to hear a plane landing.

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, that. And then every Wednesday, at one o'clock

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 3>in the afternoon they would test the electric chair, so

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 3>all the lights on death row would them.

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Robert, three years after your conviction, your attorney managed to

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 2>get your death sentence changed to life in prison with

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 2>a mandatory quarter, meaning you'd get to go see the

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>parole board after twenty five years served. You must have

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>felt a bitter relief when that happened.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all. So now I'm not on death row.

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I no longer have the right for legal representation anymore.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 3>Now I am literally on my own. You're entitled to

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 3>legal representation as long as you have a death sentence.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I was not happy when my death sentence got overturned

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>to life because I had asked the attorney over and

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>over again to please fight the conviction, and he kept

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 3>fighting the sentencing. How do I hope to prove my

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 3>innocence is all if all you're doing is fighting to

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>get a death sentence turned to life. Now I went

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 3>from death row to the worst population in the state

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of Florida. So FSP is the dumping ground for what

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 3>they considered the worst of the worst. Okay, this is

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>inmates that's been at other institutions, stabbed of the inmates,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 3>raped out the inmates, stabbed officers, and done just numerous

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 3>awful things and they got sent here as a punishment.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 3>So it's like the wild Wild West. They won't accept

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 3>me to no other prison because I came from death row.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>That's how I end up at FSP.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>FSP, by the way, is Florida State Prison. And while

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you were there, you were writing a lot of letters.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 2>How did you get to be such a prolific letter writer?

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 3>I had never written a letter till I went to jail,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 3>not that I remember, you know, And now that's all

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Susan, can you just give us a brief synopsis of

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 2>this post conviction history that Robert had, Like what he

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 2>was trying to do, what kind of appeals he was

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to find, what areas he was looking to explore.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 4>Robert was his own best advocate. He wrote to everybody,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and that included lawyers, the media, really anyone who would listen.

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 4>And you know, after his death sentence was vacated, he

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 4>continued to have hope that the truth would come to

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 4>light and that he would be proven innocent. And one

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 4>of the really important things that Robert did was in

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and six, he filed emotion for access to

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 4>DNA testing because he believed if we use this modern

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 4>DNA testing that's now available, it would prove that he

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 4>was innocent. And what is truly remarkable here is that

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 4>he was convicted in nineteen eighty five, and what we

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 4>learned is that in October of nineteen ninety, just five

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 4>years after he's convicted, the State of Florida destroys all

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 4>of the evidence that was admitted at his trial, including

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 4>the victim's rape kit. So they have an extensive hearing

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 4>where the state puts on evidence that everything was destroyed

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 4>and that the only evidence that's remaining are a few

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 4>hairs and two cigarette butts and su as.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just really curious the laws about, you know, in

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a capital case, they're disposing evidence after five years, Like,

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>what are the laws about that?

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 4>So today we have preservation laws in I believe every

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 4>single state, but here in nineteen ninety, Robert's death sentence

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 4>had been vacated and so the court just entered an

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>order disposing of all of the evidence. Luckily, as we

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 4>learned in post conviction with the reinvestigation, that was actually

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 4>not the case. But it was shocking to see that

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen ninety, just five short years after a death sentence,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 4>that the state destroyed all of that biological evidence, especially

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 4>because in nineteen ninety we did start to have DNA

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 4>come online and it was started, it was being used,

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 4>So that was really shocking to see in this case.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Susan, how did you become involved in this case?

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Robert wrote to the Innocence Project the way he wrote

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 4>to many organizations. And when we reviewed this case, there

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 4>were two things that set out to us that he

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 4>was convicted based on faulty forensics and a jail house informant,

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 4>which are two leading contributing factors to wrongful conviction. And

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 4>we believe that even though they said that a significant

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 4>amount of the DNA evidence was destroyed, it's possible that

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 4>we could still get access to some of that other

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 4>evidence and do some additional retesting. And so we accepted

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Robert's case and we started investigating immediately.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And Robert, what was that like for you? I mean,

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 2>just being in this situation and just thinking about all

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 2>these years that are passing for you.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you know, I was hoping to have

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>a wife and kids and a house and all this stuff.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 3>So that was taken for me. That didn't happen still

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 3>has to happen. So I started focusing on not the

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>things I didn't have, but be grateful for the things

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 3>I do have and did have. So I just moved forward.

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 3>And as the years went by, I had three parole hearings,

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 3>all three were negative. It didn't happen. Now, in my mind,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 3>this is like the last straw, you know, this is

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 3>pretty much blocks off everything I had going for me.

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, you know, I just felt total hopelessness,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and I just put my hands together and I said, God,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>send your hands. That night, they have what they call

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 3>a legal call out sheet letting you know you have

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>legal mail. So the next day I went to get

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 3>the letter and it was from Susan saying that hey,

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>we read your case. We're taking your case, you know,

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 3>And then like I think a week later, she was

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 3>sitting across the table from me talking to me.

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 4>When we accepted the case, I started digging into Robert's file.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 4>This was a capital case. There were a lot of materials.

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 4>While I had hope that we'd be able to do

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 4>some additional DNA testing on the items that we believed

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 4>still existed, I also knew that this was going to

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 4>be an informant case. We had to get to the

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>bottom of what was going on with Claude Butler because

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 4>just from a cold read of the record, it is

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 4>clear that he is incentivized and that he was testifying

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>falsely at Robert's trial. So we started digging into him immediately,

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and very quickly, a lot of things surfaced about him

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 4>that confirmed all of our original suspicions. The trial prosecutor

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 4>in Robert's case, who elicited all kinds of testimony about

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the fact that Claude Butler was not receiving any benefits,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 4>he was testifying out of the goodness of his heart.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 4>He believed this was the right thing to do, to

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 4>tell everybody what Robert confessed to him. We found out

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 4>that the trial prosecutor in Robert's case filed e motion

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 4>to mitigate in the informants case, urging that judge to

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 4>let Claude Butler walk free because Claude Butler was a

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 4>key witness in Robert's case and that he was part

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 4>of him securing a death sentence against Robert. The other

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 4>thing that we did is we started digging into Jack

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 4>because we were so surprised by Jack. We didn't understand

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 4>where he came from. Just like the trial defense counselor

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 4>was shocked by him, so were we. And what do

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 4>we do we found a criminal case where he was

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 4>the star witness. And in that case, Jack alleged that

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.239
<v Speaker 4>someoneknocked on his door, he was covered in blood, This

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 4>person entered his hotel room that he helped him dispose

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 4>of the clothes that were covered in blood. And then,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 4>as it turned out, this person was charged with capital murder.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 4>And so Jack, who at minimum could have been an

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 4>accessory after the fact in this case, is not charged

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 4>at all. He becomes a star witness in this other case,

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 4>and he pops up in Robert's case, and Robert has

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 4>no idea who this is. There are no police reports

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 4>connecting Jack to this case, and all of a sudden

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 4>it becomes very clear that Jack is a plant. Right,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Jack is inserted into this case on the eve of

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Robert's trial.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Susan, what did you learn about that bitemark after all

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>these years.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 4>So one of the things that we did during the

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 4>reinvestigation was we submitted all of the materials, we had photographs,

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 4>testimony about the bitemark evidence to doctor Adam Freeman, who

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 4>is a board certified forensic coodeontologist and dentist, and he

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 4>examined all those materials and he made a number of

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 4>conclusions about both the evidence collection and the pattern injury itself.

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 4>So first, he concluded that the way that people's denticians

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 4>were collected using that beeswax was an improper way to

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 4>collect to obtain denticians. He evaluated the pattern injury on

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 4>the victim's cheek and specifically he was looking at measurements

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 4>and concluded that this was way too big to be

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 4>a human bitemark. So ultimately we found out that this

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 4>was not a bite mark at all. And one of

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 4>the things that I think is really important here is

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 4>that the victim was beaten so severely in the face

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 4>that this may have actually been from the boards. The

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 4>severe damage that she suffered, maybe one of the boards

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 4>left an injury that appeared to be the pattern injury

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 4>that the dentist obviously assumed was the bitemark, but this

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 4>in fact was not a bitemark on the victim at all.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I really want to get into this part of it.

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>So you're dealing with the thirteenth circuit in Florida, Can

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you just talk about these conviction integatory view units and

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>how important they were to this particular case.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Conviction integrity units, sometimes also called conviction review units, are

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 4>specialized units within prosecutors' offices that are supposed to look

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 4>at cases where an individual is factually innocent and reinvestigate.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.439
<v Speaker 4>They're really important units that allow for prosecutors not only

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 4>to correct wrongful convictions, but also prevent them by implementing

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 4>policies that they realize are important in order to prevent

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 4>wrongful convictions in the future and have implement those policies

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 4>in their offices. And so after I did as much

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 4>investigating as I possibly could on Claude, Butler and Jack

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 4>and obtained all of the records that I could from

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 4>the police department, I put together a memo to Teresa Hall,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 4>who was the chief at the time, the chief of

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 4>the Conviction Review Unit, and I put forward all the

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 4>evidence I had that made me suspicious about the conviction,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the reasons why I thought that Butler and Jack didn't

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 4>have any credibility, and then I put forward an investigation

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 4>plan and asked her to join me in read investigating

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 4>this case. And so that was my pitch to her,

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 4>and then very quickly she came back to me and

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 4>we started our joint reinvestigation. But the timing was tough

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 4>because it was March of twenty twenty, and we all

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 4>remember what happened in March of twenty twenty, the world

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 4>shut down as a result of the COVID nineteen pandemic.

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 4>But to her credit, we pushed through and we continued

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 4>to investigate, and we got a lot done despite the

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 4>fact that we were all working remotely right.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>And do you recall a moment where, you know, maybe

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Teresa Hall sent you an email or called you on

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the phone and said, we're going forward with this, this

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 2>is we're going to move on. This was there at

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>one of those moments.

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think there were two moments that stand out

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 4>to me. One was Teresa emailing me and accepting the case.

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 4>The second was when she called me and said, I

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 4>think we may have vaginal swabs from the victim's rape kit,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 4>which blew my mind because there was an entire hearing

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 4>about the fact that all of the evidence was destroyed,

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 4>but she got a tip that there may still be

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 4>swabs from the victim's rape kit at the medical examiner's office.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I knew that the DNA was going to be a

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 4>game changer, so when she called me and told me

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 4>she thought there was even a slight possibility that this

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 4>vaginal swab was still available. That was huge for us.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 2>And Robert, what was it like for you getting all

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>this news all of a sudden?

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 3>She told me, you know, they did the DNA test

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and not only did they exclude you, but they also

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 3>put it into codis and found a match. So I

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 3>was like floored by all this. And she says you

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 3>would be free by Thursday morning.

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>And what was the reaction on the phone, Robert, what

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 2>did that feel like?

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 3>No, it was very special. I was very thankful for

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 3>all of them. I've always told everybody I didn't do it,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, and you know, you would get some responses

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 3>such as, yeah, everybody says that, But I say, yeah,

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 3>but everybody ain't telling you the truth. I said, I

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 3>really am innocent. So I've had a lot of staff

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 3>members from the prison contact me when I got out

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 3>and they said, you know, you always said you were

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 3>in this and we always knew there was something different

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 3>about you, you know. So they still stay in touch.

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 2>And so you were given your date of freedom. Was

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 2>it the next day or it was Thursday? Was on Thursday?

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Her birthday. Oh that's a great birthday.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's really nice present. All right, What was it

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 2>like being free, finally walking out of there.

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Man, it's undescribable, you know, to actually walk out

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 3>of that prison and know that that was it. The

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 3>nightmare is finally over.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Robert. What has it been like since your release?

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's been very challenging. Remember nineteen eighty three, I

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 3>went into a world I didn't know, and then in

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty, I come back into another world that I

0:38:55.320 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 3>don't know anymore. You know, modern technology, cell phone, never

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 3>seen one home depot, Walmart, all the different restaurants. Now

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 3>there's just self checkout, as Susan and I became accustomed

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 3>with together. It was pretty exciting. It's it's been it's

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 3>been an adventure.

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Just coming out of prison during a pandemic. Not only

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 2>are you having to adjust to, you know, decades that

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 2>have passed by while you were in prison, but now

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 2>you're coming out during a pandemic. What was that like

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 2>for you?

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? It was that was challenging as well, because you know,

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 3>everywhere you went required a face mask, and you know,

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 3>it's like when I was walking by an armored car

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 3>wearing a face mask, I'm like, if I would have

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 3>done this in nineteen eighty three, they would have shot me.

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 3>So then I found out, you know, there are obstacles,

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of course. So my goal when I got out was

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 3>to get my voter registration car, to get my passport

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 3>which I've never had one, which I thank god, to

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 3>get my license. So I went over there with a

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighty three expired license to get it renewed. It

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 3>was pretty exciting to see in their face trying to

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 3>figure out how I'm bringing nineteen eighty three license to

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 3>have a renewed right, You've been.

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Driving this whole time?

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Actually, Susan, let me ask what has been the challenge here.

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Robert was not eligible for compensation from the state after

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>this exoneration. Can you talk about that? Yeah?

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, I think that people see an exoneration

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 4>and it's so beautiful and it's so joyful, and they

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 4>believe that this is the end of the journey. But

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 4>this is just the beginning of the next part of

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 4>an individual's journey, where they have to heal from the

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 4>trauma that they have suffered from their wrongful conviction. And

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 4>although no amount of money will ever make anyone whole,

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 4>certainly compensation goes a long way at helping someone get

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 4>on their feet, get a job right, feel some sense

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 4>of security. And in Florida currently there is a there

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 4>is a bill pending to fix Florida's compensation statute. So

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 4>right now, the statute in Florida prevents anyone who had

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 4>any prior convictions compensation. And so Robert, when he was

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 4>a teenager, he had two minor nonviolent felony convictions and

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.760
<v Speaker 4>now because of that, he is completely barred from seeking

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.439
<v Speaker 4>compensation through the Florida compensation scheme, even though he spent

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 4>thirty seven years wrongfully incarcerated, including three years on death row.

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, and these charges had nothing to do with the

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 2>crime that he was accused of. It was something from

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 2>his teenage years, correct, So look at you. The call

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to action, Susan, I'll start with you. Is there anything

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>that you know our audience who's listening to this, who's

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 2>just outraged by these kinds of stories, anything that you

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.800
<v Speaker 2>know they any specific issues that you feel need changing

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and that we can help as audience members listening to this.

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for asking about that, Gilbert. So I am going

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.919
<v Speaker 4>to urge the audience if they want to learn more

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 4>about how they can help us fix Florida's compensation statute.

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 4>They should go to the Innocence Project web PAGs to

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 4>learn how they can join us in calling on the

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Florida State legislature to finally fix the broken compensation statute

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 4>in Florida. There right now is a bill that is

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 4>pending that would make two critical changes, One that would

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:23.439
<v Speaker 4>allow individuals with prior convictions to see compensation, and two

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that would extend the very tight deadline that they had

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.919
<v Speaker 4>that Florida currently has of ninety days for a person

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 4>who's been exonerated to file their request for compensation. So

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 4>again I urge everyone to head over to the Innocence

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Project website and learn how they can support xoneries in

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Florida finally receive the compensation that they are entitled to.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 2>And Robert, is there anything from your point of view

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 2>that could make life easier for recent exoneries.

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 3>The most challenging thing is like for me, when I

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 3>went to a bank to open a bank account, or

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 3>when I try to get an apartment or even try

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 3>to get a job. I have no history, so they're

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 3>looking at me like I'm an alien. Where did I

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.760
<v Speaker 3>come from? You know, what was your past employment? Prison?

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 3>What was your past resident prison, you know, so you

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 3>don't want to tell this to your new employers or

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 3>to a bank or whoever. So you know, you just

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 3>have to kind of explain the story. And this is

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 3>why I don't have a history.

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to enter the closing argument phase of this

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>conversation today, and I think I'm going to start with Susan. Susan,

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to give you the floor here. What

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 2>do you want to say about your work with Robert

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and how the importance of what the Innocence Project does

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the importance of what the public can do in order

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 2>to not only bring justice to these gross injustices, but

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 2>also to prevent them from happening again.

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 4>The Innocence Project just had its thirtieth anniversary in August,

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 4>and over these last thirty years, we have learned so much,

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 4>such about the criminal legal system and the significant flaws

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 4>that we have that lead to wrongful convictions and also

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 4>that just lead to unfair trials that bio late people's

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 4>constitutional rights. There is a role for every single person

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 4>in correcting and preventing wrongful convictions and preventing just injustice

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 4>in the criminal legal system. I would urge people to

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 4>see what issues are impacting your communities, and get out

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 4>there and vote. We don't endorse anybody, but certainly get

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 4>out there, educate yourself and understand the issues, because every

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 4>single citizen has a role to play in correcting our very,

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 4>very flawed criminal legal system.

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, I really want to thank you because I learned

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 2>so much just listening to you today about the Florida

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 2>justice system, and so I really am grateful for that.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 2>So thank you. And Robert will give you the closing argument,

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the real closing argument here. Anything you want to talk about,

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 2>it's all yours.

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm just happy to be with my family. And my

0:44:56.080 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 3>goal really is to tell people that, you know, if

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 3>they support the Innocence Project in this I'm not the

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 3>only one. There's still others in there, you know, and

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 3>they need help. They're in the same predicament I was

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 3>when I was begging for help. You know. They just

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 3>don't see an out, you know, and without the Innocence

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Project and people like Susan, you know, they have no hope.

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'm your guest host,

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Gilbert King. I'd like to thank our executive producers Jason

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Flamm and Kevin Wurdis. The senior producer for this episode

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 2>is Jackie Pauley, and our producers are Lyla Robinson and

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Cliburn. Our editor is Roxandra Guidy. The music in

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 2>this production is by three time OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph.

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Be sure to follow us on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction,

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction Podcast, and on Twitter at

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 2>wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava for Good on

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 2>all three platforms. If you're interested in more wrongful conviction

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 2>stories in Florida, check out my new nine parts series

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Bone Valley. The podcast investigates the case of Leo Schofield,

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 2>a young man accused of murdering his wife in nineteen

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.280
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven and who has been in prison ever since,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 2>despite his unwavering claims of innocence. Subscribe to Bone Valley

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts. You can find more information

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 2>at Lava for Good dot com. Wrongful Conviction is a

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 2>production of Lava for Good Podcasts in association with Signal

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Company Number one.

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Next week, on the guest hosted episodes of Wrongful Conviction,

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>investigative reporter Beth Shelburne, We'll talk with Jeffrey Hollman about

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the Alabama criminal justice system and Jeffery's experience of being

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>incarcerated for ten years for a crime he did not commit.

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>They'll talk about the crime, Jeffrey's time in prison, and

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the extremely rare pro se motions Jeffrey filed that eventually

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>led to his release. Beth Shelburne is an Alabama native

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and a veteran journalist who has spent her career focused

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 1>on the criminal justice system and the issue of mass incarceration,

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and this conversation will touch on many of the issues

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>she's covered in her work. Listen next Monday in the

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction podcast Feed