WEBVTT - Apple Cuts Jobs in Online Services Group as Priorities Shift

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Apple shares a little bit lower in today's trade.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>This, as one of the world's largest market cap companies,

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>as you know, took the rare step of cutting about

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred jobs. It happened in its digital services group.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 3>It's part of a shift and priorities for the critical

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>division at least that's according to people with knowledge of

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the matter.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Well reporting this out as he does all things Apple.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Back with this is Bloomberg News Chief Technology correspondent Mark

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.639
<v Speaker 4>Germ and he joins us from Los Angeles. Mark. When

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 4>we talk about Apple, we talk about a company that,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 4>as of its latest filing, as about one hundred thousand

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 4>employees around the world. The cut of one hundred people,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 4>it's not huge, but as you write, it's pretty rare

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>for Apple to do layoffs.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 5>What's going on one hundred in context of how big

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 5>Apple is and in context of the size of the

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 5>layoffs that some of Apple's peer group have done is

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 5>very minimal. But layoffs at Apple, no matter how many

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 5>people are involved, have an outsized influence. Right, It's an

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 5>outsized understanding of what's going on here. Apple simply does

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 5>not do this. They've done it four times this year,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 5>four times. Right. They've probably done four rounds of layoffs

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 5>in the twenty years prior to this year.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 6>Wow, So this is notable.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 5>At the beginning of this year, you had one hundred

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 5>and twenty one people at an AI serie related operations

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 5>group in San Diego, California. The end of February, you

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 5>had several hundred people across two projects that were shut down,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 5>one the self driving car initiative, the other a micro

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 5>led project. Right, And if you really look at it,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 5>both of those have to do with cost cutting. Even

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 5>the San Diego one has some cost cutting involved. There

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 5>cut to the services division, which by the way, is

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Apple's fastest growing and one of its most important organizations

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 5>in the entire company, one that most people would probably

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 5>believe would never face any layoffs. That is where the

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 5>cuts happened. So about one hundred jobs mainly across Apple

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Books and Apple News. We're talking about engineers, we're talking

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 5>about design, we're talking about software quality assurance and testing.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 5>These people worked across many different platforms within Apple Services.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Some of them probably touched the App Store, some of

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 5>them probably touched Apple Music and Apple TV to some extent.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>So that's one hundred resources there. And if it wasn't

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 5>purely a cost cutting move, Apple probably could have relocated

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 5>those people to other teams from the get go. To

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 5>be fair, they're getting sixty days notice here, they have

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 5>sixty days to find another job within Apple. I would

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 5>venture to guess that far fewer than half of the

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 5>one hundred people will find a new job within Apple

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 5>in the next two months. So most of those people

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 5>probably will be leaving the company in sixty days from

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 5>yesterday when this was announced internally, So this is quite

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 5>a big deal, although it is one hundred people comparatively.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and if you're one of those one hundred, it

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>certainly doesn't feel like a small job cut. Having said that, Mark,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>why is it then happening? As you said four times

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>this year, this does not happen at this company, So

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 3>why is it. It's a company that's got a very

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>rich balance sheet, it's got lots of cash.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 2>What's going on.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 6>So let me start with yesterday's cut.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 5>So Apple Books is not a big part of the

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 5>overall PI of revenue for the Apple Services organization, right,

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 5>It's probably one of their weaker services. They don't invest

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 5>a ton in it. It's not a true money maker.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Apple News doesn't make a ton of money either, even

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 5>though there's advertising, even though there is that subscription which

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 5>I believe is now thirteen dollars a month, So it's

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 5>simply less of a priority. So there's a bit of

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 5>a priority shift in Apple Services towardstreaming, video, streaming music, gaming,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 5>the App Store and such. Remember there was that app

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 5>store reorganization a couple of weeks ago, which meant that

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 5>they probably had to reallocate some resources related to that

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 5>as well. Now, in terms of the layoffs and totality,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 5>I think it shows that, you know, Apple is bracing

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>for some sort of recession or trying to get ahead

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 5>of the possibility of a recession. Obviously we've seen stats

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 5>out there, and Apple wants to be a leaner company, right,

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 5>They're not able to spend extra few billion a year

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 5>at this point, or they don't want to spend an

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 5>extra few billion a year at this point on bets

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 5>like the self driving car, like the micro led project

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 5>that they believe there's a strong chance will never come

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 5>to fruition. Right, Apple can continue to spend a billion

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 5>a year on each of those projects, rack up a

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 5>bill of an extra ten billion over the next five

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 5>years and get absolutely nowhere. But they decided to save

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 5>that ten billion and probably reinvest it into bigger priorities

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 5>like generative AI. They're working on the tabletop robotics project

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 5>that I reported all and they're working on a new

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 5>iPad that's going to require a lot of R and D.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 5>This is a nineteen inch iPad that can fold in half.

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 5>They need to reduce some R and D to redesign

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 5>the iPhone. They need to put money into shrinking down

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 5>their components and making them more efficient so they can

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 5>roll out new form factors. There are some health technologies

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 5>that they want to roll out. But you know, the

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 5>big picture here is AI and probably reinvesting that money

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 5>into artificial intelligence development.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Mark Apple as a lean company. I didn't think i'd

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 4>hear you say that. How would you describe Apple? How'd

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>you characterize Apple in terms of it being a quote

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 4>unquote lean company.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 5>I watched this great interview with Luca Maystree, the outgoing CFO,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 5>earlier this week, and he said that he runs the

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 5>company with about ten percent in his finance office. The

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 5>amount of people he had, Well, he was a CFO

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 5>with other public companies prior, even though Apple's market cap

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 5>is ten times the size, if not more than those companies. Right,

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 5>he worked at Xerox, he worked at General Motors, a

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 5>few other companies before Apple. Those are big companies internationally, right,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 5>they're global titans as well.

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 6>He gave this example.

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 5>So he said his investor relations group has two people.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 5>He says that Apple's hedge fund. That's Brayburn Capital out

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 5>of Nevada. They manage Apple's cash, right, several hundred billion dollars,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 5>he says, that's seven people, right, And so I think

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 5>those are some good examples of how lean they run

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 5>in terms of their R and D budget. Over the

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 5>past few years, I've seen the overall company y R

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 5>and D budget either stay stagnant or grow less than

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 5>five percent on an annual basis. And if you compare

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 5>that to the R and D budget growth of companies

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 5>like Meta and Google and Microsoft.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 6>It's slim right.

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 5>Apple knows that the iPhone and some of their other

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 5>products and services are going to continue to print a

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 5>lot of cash and a lot of money. Right, They

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 5>don't want to upset the status quo and risk doing

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 5>something that is going to put the company in a

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 5>bad position. Now, what I will tell you is Apple

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 5>as an issue here where they're not really reinventing themselves.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 5>They're not really moving the needle. They are very far

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 5>behind in artificial intelligence, robotics in some other areas, and

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 5>there is a lot of catchup to do. They have

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 5>become too reliant on this annual September formula of new iPhones,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 5>Apple watches, and AirPods does great for the stock, make

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 5>shareholders happy. There's not a lot of needle moving there,

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 5>and so I believe the company needs to take more risk.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 5>And so I guess the hope as a consumer and

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 5>someone who watches the company, and maybe the hope for

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 5>employee morale the people who are still there, is that

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 5>this amount of money could be reinvested in other areas

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 5>that will allow Apple to pursue new growth opportunities and

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 5>create some really cool products. When was the last time

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 5>you waited in line for an Apple product, and when

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 5>you got your hands on that device for the first time,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 5>you were amazed. I have never seen anything like this before.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 5>I can give you a few examples. There was the

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 5>iPad Air in twenty thirteen. There was the first retina

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 5>iPad the Air before that, the iPhone four with that

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 5>threat and display in that glass back in front design

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 5>with the aluminum band around the edges.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 6>That was pretty incredible. But it's been a while.

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Maybe the twenty eighteen iPad Pro, maybe the original Apple Watch,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 5>maybe the AirPods, but it has been a serious number

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 5>of years since the last time. I feel like they

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 5>came out with something that was really earth shattering, and

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 5>I think COVID played.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 6>A part in it.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Right between across the pandemic or the hide the Pandemic,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Apple was able to churn out products still at an

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 5>amazing pace. They were able to get out the iPhone

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 5>twelve with five G only with about a month and

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 5>a half to lay right in the height of COVID.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 5>That is crazy that they were able to do that,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 5>and that was a major accomplishment. But that what people

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 5>don't realize is how many years of R and D

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 5>how many years of Apple working on these new types

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 5>of form factors and products and software and services that

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 5>they normally be doing during COVID, how much of that

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 5>was just pushed to the wayside in order to prioritize

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 5>the products they had to get out right and everything

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 5>else going on with the pandemic working from home versus

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 5>the office. So there's a bit of a delay there,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 5>and I think it's going to take a few more

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 5>years for them to.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Catch up, all right.

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>And for me, I think it was when I got

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 3>my Apple Watch, which was the second version, and it's

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't even have it on right now.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean I haven't touched upgrade.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.119
<v Speaker 4>She still has the second version of the Apple Yeah,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 4>anti collectors.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 6>You'll get some new ones in a few weeks.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Hey, listen, you mentioned the CFO that you listened to

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 3>that conversation about being lean and how he ran his

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 3>office and his team. He is stepping down from the

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 3>job at the end of the year. It sounds like

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>he's not leaving the company, but are they getting ready

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of a younger c suite thinking about the

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>company moving forward.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 5>I've been writing a lot about this and my latest

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 5>point of view and You can read my power on

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 5>column this weekend on Sunday at Bloomberg dot com to

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 5>get more insight on this. But they've come up with

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 5>a new Formula's a succession here, right, do everything you

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 5>can to make sure the old guard, Kim Cooks most

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 5>trusted lieutenants don't really leave the building. The last you know,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.239
<v Speaker 5>four major executive departures.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 6>They didn't let them leave.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean they didn't you know, handcuff them to

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 5>their office or anything like that, right, but they gave

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 5>them enough money and enough of a business card and

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 5>responsibility to stay. Phil Schiller is not marketing chief anymore.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 5>He runs the app store. Dan Riccio is love hardber

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Engineering chief. He runs the Vision pro. Now you have LUKEA.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Maistreet who's no longer CFO, and he's going to run ISMT,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 5>which by the way, is probably the most controversial and

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 5>boring division in the entire company. So you know, you

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 5>can see what they're doing here. They're trying to keep

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 5>the band together as long as possible because I don't

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.599
<v Speaker 5>think they they're I think they're a little afraid of

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 5>evolving and reinvention and risk taking. Given that you don't

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 5>want to upset something that is working so well, but

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 5>you also have to at the same time balance, you know,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 5>long term management of the company. And so that's really

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 5>the succession story there. Kevin Perrick, he basically came to

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Apple alongside Bucca may Street. In two thousand and thirteen

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 5>or so, Park joined the company. He's been the heir apparent.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 5>Apple has been signaling this CFO transition for months now.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 5>I wrote about it earlier this year. They have been

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 5>showing off Parick so to speak to financial institutions, investors,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 5>financial analysts and the like. They've been talking him up

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 5>externally and internally. He has been really shadowing Luca has

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 5>been involved in every CFO related meeting over the last

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 5>year or so they've been preparing for this. It was

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 5>down to two candidates at the end of last year,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 5>so Kevin, Parrit and cr Ac. When Casey apparently found

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 5>out that, you know, she wasn't going to be the replacement,

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 5>she left. Maybe I think that was at least a

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 5>component of her leaving Apple. At the beginning of this year,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 5>she became the CFO of Sonos, So it seems clear

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 5>that she wanted a public company CFO role, and Sonos

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 5>is a great brand despite the issues they've been facing lately.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we could do a whole segment on those app issues. Mark,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 4>we have twenty eighty two. Yeah, we have twenty seconds left.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Very briefly, what about filling Tim Cooks shoes twenty seconds?

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 5>I wrote earlier this year. My belief is that John

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 5>turnis the senior VP of hardware Engineering. He's still not fifty.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Tim cook stays around another three.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 6>To five years.

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Turnas is the only one that would have a long

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 5>runway a CEO and Apple board can make a strong

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 5>argument about getting a hardware person back in those shoes.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>All right around the world.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 3>And Apple of Apple and about what seven eight minutes,

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 3>nine minutes. You did it as you always do. Mark German,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>thank you, Thank you. He is Bloomberg News Chief Technology

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 3>correspondent Mark German.

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 4>And apples hedge fund Rayburn. It's a type of Apple.

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Lean lean Apple Apple like sticking with me.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then brout Auto with a

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's get a view of the private mind.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that's because NFL owner is voted to allow private

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>equity firms to buy stakes in their franchises and move

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 3>expected to attract billions in fresh capital while boosting team

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 3>valuations that have already been surging.

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. During a special one day league meeting in Minneapolis,

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 4>the group loosen some of the strictest ownership rules in

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 4>professional sports to allow private equity to own it as

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 4>much as ten percent of a team. That's according to

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. You know who was there, Randall Williams was

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 4>there and he's fresh off a plane from Minneapolis. Wow,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 4>we've all we've all been there.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>You have been there.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 4>You right into the office. Yeah.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, Thank you all for having me.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks so much for joining us. Randall's Bloomberg News

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 4>US sports business reporter. He's the perfect guy to have

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 4>on talking about this. When this broke yesterday, we read

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 4>your story on air. Randall, it's the red headline. A

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 4>big deal. I was being a little cynical in my

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 4>analysis of this. I was like, Oh, you know, a

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 4>bunch of folks get together who own assets that are

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 4>worth a lot of money, and they vote to open

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 4>up to allow them to become worth more. AM I

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 4>do I look at the AM I looking at this incorrectly.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 7>I think there's an argument for both. There are a

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 7>lot of private equity pros in the NFL, but they're

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 7>invested individually, and the NFL has limited the role that

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 7>they can play as individuals in investing through funds. So

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 7>I think they've structured it in a way so that

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 7>it isn't unfair, or it isn't. Yeah, it isn't unfair

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 7>for some of these NFL owners. I think I did

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 7>a really good job.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>But doesn't it by bringing in a new group of

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>investors just automatically the demand will increase the value of

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>these teams. So those existing NFL owners are like, yeah, come.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 7>On, right, thousand percent. I mean, there is an expectation

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 7>that a couple of these deals will happen before the

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 7>end of the year. I've had NFL executives and in

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 7>their in their building their HQ and NFL team executives

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 7>say they expect these deals to go fast and furious.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Because an NFL team is so expensive that they're only

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 4>a handful of individuals.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 7>Or thirty two of them, and technically thirty one.

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Really and if you think about who can actually afford

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 4>to buy a new one or to buy a team

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 4>that goes up for sale. Yeah, there's a small number

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 4>of people because these these are so expensive. So if

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 4>now you're allowed to sell ten percent to private equity,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 4>you're opening up the available pool of purchases just so

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 4>many more people. Doesn't that just automatically increase the value

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 4>for sure?

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 7>But there's only four groups. Arctose Aries Sixth Street in

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 7>a consortium that consists of Dynasty and Curtis Martin led

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 7>this other group. It's Dynasty, it is I'll have to

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 7>pull up the names.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 4>It's fine.

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 7>He's off of Dynasty, CVC, Blackstone, and Carter all together

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 7>at the same time. And so those four will get

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 7>the first right and then eventually they may open it

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 7>up to more firms, but they'll have to be pre

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 7>approved and the NFL will do its due diligence.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>There what's the due diligence like? It kind of sounds

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 3>like a credited investors You know, you can.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 7>First of all, you have the money. You have to

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 7>have the money. If you don't have the money, there's

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 7>no way. So it starts with the funds, and then

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 7>I think it depends on how you're going to invest.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 7>One of the things that the NFL CFO was saying

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 7>was that each of these funds have a different strategy

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 7>for how they're investing in sports teams, and so that

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 7>for a team perspective, what you're going to expect is

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 7>a team may not want to do a deal with

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 7>one for one fund. They may want to do something

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 7>with somebody else. So they have enough capitals for them

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 7>to have a wide variety of choices.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>How much, say, will private equity investors they have in

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>this zer row?

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 2>How do you know that?

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you're anteing up, I mean, what are

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the limitations on how much a private equity firm can

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>put in a team?

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 7>Is So the reason that this is happening is because

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 7>when Josh Harris raised money last year, he had I

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 7>would say significant difficulty doing it. Is six billion dollar

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 7>team and he has to put up a lot of

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 7>money by himself. I believe his ownership group is twenty plus.

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 7>The cap for an ownership group is twenty five. That

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 7>raised concerns if you have private equity who can offer

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 7>ten percent. Let's say an average NFL valuation by Sportico

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 7>is five point nine to three billion. That's five hundred

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 7>million right away. They have to hold the team for

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 7>six years, so then you have a little bit more leeway.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Other leagues having done this, Yes, what have we learned?

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, the NBA, MLS, all of the other leagues allow this.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 7>The NFL's rules are the strictest. They also have the

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 7>highest valuations. The NBA's are the most expansive. The ARCTOS specifically,

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 7>is a pioneer in this private equity sports space. I

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 7>expect them to be one of the first, just because

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 7>there they've been the most active.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Hey, what was this meeting? Like you were actually did

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 4>you actually get to go into the meeting?

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 7>Of course not, of course not. But a lot of

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 7>the NFL owners meetings are watching the owners come in

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 7>saying hi, hello, how you doing, Watching the NFL's employees

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 7>come in, Hi, Hello, how you doing? And then they go,

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, they'll walk past, they'll they'll speak, and when

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 7>it's meeting time, it's meeting time. You don't hear anything

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 7>unless you have sources like the really really good reporters.

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 7>And then you sit and wait, you wait to hear

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 7>what happens. You get to ask questions to Roger Goodell,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 7>Jerry Jones is always going to talk to you. That's fun, guy.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 7>But it's quite the interesting meeting because I'll say, at

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 7>the March and May league meetings it's a lot more

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 7>free flowing. Owners bring their families, coaches bring their families.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 7>They're more relaxed, they're happy to talk to you. In

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 7>the season. Absolutely not, it's a competition, huh.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 3>You know in your story, though, you say the move

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to allow private equity and to ownership has the potential

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>to shift how teams are run. Limited ownership partners have

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 3>traditionally been friends, former players and local celebrities. I mean,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>this definitely does change the dynamics. We'll find out I

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 3>guess over time what that actually means.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's going to be different.

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 7>It's going to be different. There's an example in the

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 7>story where I talk about how the Atlanta Falcons welcome

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 7>some new limited partners, but they won't be able to

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 7>sell to private equity. Only people that can sell are

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 7>family limited partners and controlling owners. So if you just

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 7>happen to have a piece of the team, but you

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 7>are not a member of the family that owns the team,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 7>you're out of luck. But if you own a piece

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 7>of the team, and you're a member of the family,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 7>it's a good time for you.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 2>So we'll still have family ownership.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 7>Of course, of course you got to protect the f

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 7>on my ownership.

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>That's really fair, and that's kind of in.

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 4>The family ownership will get di looted a little bit.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 7>Technically, it depends. It depends on the relationship within the families.

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 7>So if you have a sibling that you don't get

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 7>along with and they want out, this is an opportunity

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 7>for them to get out.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's also an opportunity for some of these families

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 4>to cash in on an asset that has insuest in

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 4>value quite a bit.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely. I mean there are some as you said there,

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 7>you know, there's these are family run businesses, but if

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 7>your money is all tied in the family, you might

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 7>not have unlimited cash flow to be able to spend

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 7>on the things you want to spend on. This liquidity

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 7>is an option for that. And then there's a stadium

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 7>part of it. Some of these NFL owners and teams

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 7>want to host a Super Bowl, they want to host

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 7>an NFL Draft, an NFL combine without a stadium or

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 7>a facility that can show off that can really be

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 7>a state of the art arena. It's not going to happen.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 7>So if you have private equity coming in paying for

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 7>some of these renovations or new stadiums.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>It helps ten seconds. So the next thing you watch

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 3>now is the deals to start happening.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 7>Of course, of course the green light is officially lit.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Maybe get some sleep too, I'm gonna try.

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not a lot of work ahead.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 4>I have got a lot of work doing a lot

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 4>of work on this.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 7>Thank you all for having Thank you.

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Randa Williams, Bloomberg News US Sports business reporter. Check out

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 4>all his work at the Bloomberg Terminal and of course at.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg dot com.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>each weekdays starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>York station, Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Many kids across the country are already back in school

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 4>after summer break. Can you believe that?

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>That is crazy? Like I just I don't know.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I can feel it though, and like this city's winding down,

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>gave the city's winding on.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>We do it a little differently we do in New York.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we start later after.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Labor day, after labor day, New Jersey.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 2>To wait, California. Did you grow up that way?

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 4>I don't even remember.

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we didn't. We were after every day.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 4>Well in New Jersey.

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Many of the kids when they go back to school,

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 4>or maybe they're back in school, they'll take language classes.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Maybe they'll learn Spanish, Mandarin, French, or they'll do what

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 4>I did. What's that? Nothing? Take Latin? Yeah, not the

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 4>most practical of languages when it comes to world. That's

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 4>pretty good. Well, you don't have to be in school

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 4>to learn a new language. There's no shortage of apps

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 4>and services out there to help you do that. Do

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 4>a lingo, Rosetta Stone Memorized, and more, such as Babbel

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Back with Us as Julie Hansen, us CEO of Babbel,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 4>She joins us from New York. Julie, good to have

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 4>you with us. Happy almost September. Back to school. I

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 4>mentioned a few names there, some of them publicly traded,

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 4>including due Lingo. How do you differentiate given that when

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 4>you google language learning apps just like five up there

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 4>that are just sponsored results. There's a lot of competition

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 4>in your space. How do you do it?

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 8>There is a lot, Tim and Carol, thanks for having me.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 8>It is a competitive space. But I think there really

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 8>are two big players in the market, and Babel is

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 8>one of them. Our differentiation is all about our pedagogy.

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 8>But I can use that term or you know, the

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 8>kind of the way we approach the learning, the seriousness

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 8>of it, and the effectiveness of it. You know, we

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 8>have studies that have shown that Babel is more effective

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 8>than others in actually learning a language. But a lot

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 8>comes down to also your personal style, the way you learn.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 8>Everyone learns differently, so we try to make sure we

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 8>reflect all the different ways of learning in the app, writing, reading, speaking,

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 8>of course the most important.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Hey, how do you measure success?

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Because I think about we talked with you, wasn't it

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>around like the New Year, and we talked about how

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 3>people in the New year sometimes are like I want

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 3>to learn to do this or that, I want to

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>lose weight, I want.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:56.719
<v Speaker 2>To learn a language.

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>So I am curious, how do you guys measure success

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 3>that people act actually have become have learned the language?

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>And can converse and are fluent even.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that is a great question, and I can assure

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 8>you we spend so much time on that topic.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 6>There's really two main ways to think about it.

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 8>One is against the SEAFER, the common European frame of reference,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 8>which is kind of a formal way of evaluating language abilities,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 8>and that is that's very common in Europe.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 6>Everyone knows it.

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 8>But even here in the US that framework is understood

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 8>and used in some circles, and so we measure people's

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 8>advancement against it. But at the same time, the most

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 8>important thing and what we're trying to do in babble,

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 8>because we know will never make you fluent, No app

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 8>will make you fluent, So we're trying to help you

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 8>get comfortable having a conversation. So we actually ask our

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 8>users to evaluate subjectively, personally their view of their progress,

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 8>and that's for us, the like they're kind of their

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 8>own personal learner. Success rating is our number one way

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 8>of looking at it, because at the end of the day,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 8>if you're you know, a B one on the C

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 8>for scale, but you can't speak, then are you really

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 8>making the progress you want? Or if you're a sloppy

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 8>a something but you're you're getting out there and making

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 8>conversation like that's really more success in many ways. So

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 8>those two.

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Ways you said that no app will will make you fluent,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 4>but can developments with AI and perhaps maybe a conversation

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 4>partner that is a bot eventually make you fluent. Like,

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 4>do you think that no app will ever make you

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 4>fluent or are we on a on a sort of

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 4>pace to get to that at some point in the

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 4>near future.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 8>Well, fluence is a very high bar. Fluent is you know,

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 8>live there, speak it like in.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 4>That language, right, Yeah, that's what they always say.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 8>Exactly exactly, And when I got to that point in college,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 8>when I dreamt in French, it was incredibly thrilling.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 6>It's long gone.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 4>By the way, I know a place where you can

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 4>work on it.

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 8>We completely agree with you that a chat bot can

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 8>serve that purpose.

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 6>In fact, in our.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 8>US product where for English speakers learning Spanish, we have

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 8>rolled that out already and people are very engaged with it.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't judge you. I mean, it gives you feedback,

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 8>but you're not embarrassed in front of the AI. You know,

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 8>it's very effective. We didn't, by the way, just throw

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 8>an LLM in the app and say have at it

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 8>like we had a kind of an expert train at

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 8>for a considerable period of time and that's what makes

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 8>it successful. But absolutely that is going to help more

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 8>and more.

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 2>What's the demographics.

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 3>Is it a lot of people maybe younger starting jobs

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 3>or what is it?

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Is there some kind of.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm always curious about, like the folks using your platform, It.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 8>Is a mix. Honestly, it's not school kids. We are

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 8>not aimed at that at that market for various reasons.

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 8>In many ways, our best users are older, you know,

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 8>over call it forty five, because they have time, you know,

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 8>they have time in their lives to pursue this. But

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 8>it's really all ages and people, you know, starting from

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 8>eighteen and up. So the remember that in the US,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, in grade school, only twenty percent of students

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 8>ever take a language. By the way, the state with

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 8>the highest percentage of kids taking a second language in

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 8>public high school is New Jersey. So well done there.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that is just.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I took a lot of Spanish.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I probably took maybe ten years starting in fifth grade.

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 4>We will do the interview in Spanish, maybe in.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 8>Can we try French.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 6>I'm a little better at that, But I also.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Think, you know, it's interesting.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I have a daughter who, when she was younger, she

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 3>was learning Chinese, then she learned fro like in Latin,

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 3>she did really well. Like I think there are people

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 3>that can just take to learning a language pretty quickly.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've traveled with her overseas and she can

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 3>converse and understand, and I feel like I can do

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 3>that a little bit when I've been in some Spanish

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 3>speaking countries.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's just interesting.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 3>I do think there are people who have a knack

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 3>for learning it.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Is that a fair thing to say?

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 6>No question?

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I mean we believe anyone can learn a language,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 8>but there's no question that some people take to it

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 8>more instantly. And aren't we all better at the things

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 8>we enjoy? I think it kind of lines up pretty

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 8>closely there.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking about what you've talked to us language. Yeah,

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I took Spanish, well, Latin was what I took in

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 4>high school. And then when I got into college, there's

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 4>this very strange program. They said, this is true, are

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 4>you to go overseas? I'd go overseas for my first

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 4>semester freshman year, so I frantically worked on Spanish but

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you what, Julie, it didn't stick for me

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 4>until I got there and moved in with a family

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 4>that only spoke Spanish, and I had to be speaking

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 4>in Spanish completely immersed. I mean, there's no there's no

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 4>substitute for that, Julie. As you mentioned one hundred percent.

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 8>This summer, our family went on a vacation in France

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.719
<v Speaker 8>and I went back to the town in which I

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 8>was an au pair back in college, and I was reminded,

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.239
<v Speaker 8>you know, kids are the best language teachers a their

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 8>vocabulary is a little simpler and but be they have

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 8>no mercy. So that's just really a great way to learn.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 3>So I am curious about you know, I always think

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 3>about someone who's listening. So to start, you just you

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>just dive in, right, You just start from the beginning

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 3>and just start going with it. Don't get discouraged. Like,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>what is your advice for someone who's learned a language,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 3>a second language or first language.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's exactly right everything you said. Just start and

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 8>also be consistent. You know, binge learners as people who

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 8>do it hour one day and then nothing for the

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 8>next six You're not going to learn as fast. You're

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 8>not going to retain it as well as if you

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 8>do ten to fifteen minutes every day, and we've shortened

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 8>our lessons over time so that you know, hey, if

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 8>you've got five minutes, that works too. So absolutely is

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 8>the repetition. But just start and have fun with it.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 8>And also the more ways you can learn, the better

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 8>you use the app, but also watch a movie in

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 8>your target language, or have a conversation if you can,

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 8>or all of those things cumulatively are the best way.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Or go to France, Okay, just hang out there, no parents, Yeah,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 4>go back in time and do that. Sounds pretty good.

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Julie Hansen. Always good to check in with you. Thanks

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 4>so much for joining us. Happy end of summer, Happy

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Labor Day. As US CEO of Babbel joining us from

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 4>New York.

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 9>I'm brother Mack.

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 8>Journal.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 9>How about you let me drive?

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 7>Oh no, no, no, no, who's going to drive?

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 9>Alright?

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Please gravel?

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 6>Let's wait, I want to drive.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 7>This is the drive to the globe. We'll buy around

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 7>other don on Bluebirg Radio.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, we've got eighteen minutes left in today's

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 3>trading session, and then add another twenty minutes on top

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>of that, and then we'll get in video earnings.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to put it all together.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 4>This is your super Bowl.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>So roughly forty minutes more or less. That could change

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 2>narrative thirty eight.

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Minutes, sentiment if the countdown is on.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>If the countdown is on.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 4>And as a reminder, we're going all in on in

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 4>video in our four o'clock Wall Street Time hour.

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>As we should.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 3>You know, like we talk about it's been kind of

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's been kind of quiet. We keep, you know,

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 3>ticking off things. Our next guest has some thoughts on Invidia.

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Jeffaclain, managing partner at Solidarity Capital, is with us,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 4>joining us from Utah. Jeff happy in video earning. Stay,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 4>how are you?

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 6>I'm doing great.

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 9>Everyone's the edge of their seat over here for the

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 9>big day.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah you got what are you guys doing to celebrate.

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 9>Pop and open some doctor Peppers, you know, and just

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 9>waiting to hear Jensen preach the good work.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, let's talk a little bit about that. The

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 4>doctor is in That would be doctor Pepper, Naja, that's

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 4>the doctor. What do you think about in Nvidia?

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 9>Look, I mean they are a massive driver to the

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 9>economy and to the market right now, and I think

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 9>there's I don't think there's a single company that's more

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 9>tied to how the S and P is going to

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 9>do tomorrow than in Vidia, and so I think they're

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 9>going to come out really strong today. The question for

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 9>Nvidia long term is how do they keep it up?

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the numbers are just astronomical at a company

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 9>there's eyes to continue to set the standard on beating

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 9>earnings by insane amounts and growing at this incredible piece.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 9>How do they keep it up is really the big

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 9>question long term. And does someone try to steal their lunch?

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 9>Like does someone come in and what are their threats?

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 9>That's the big question. But I think today's going to

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 9>be a big day for them.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, So this is obviously a company that's on

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 3>your radar. Do you suggest to your clients to investors

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 3>to own it? Do you own it?

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Great question?

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 9>And so we like it if you're already in it,

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 9>if you got in early, and video is a great

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 9>spot if you're buying in trying to buy in now

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 9>at this price point of where they're at, We're a

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 9>no on new money going into in video. Simply from

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 9>a valuation perspective. I mean their valuation numbers are off

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 9>the charts when you really dial in and look at it.

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean they're treating at forty times revenue. That's a

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 9>big number and hard to swallow. And so as you

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 9>look hopefully, I think it's a great company if they

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 9>stub their foot and you can get it down a

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 9>good value cuation by emotional trading in the market. Great.

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 9>But for new money going in, it's a tough one

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 9>to say yes to.

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 4>But you're not willing to sell yet, no.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 9>I if you're in now, this is actually a great

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 9>question because guess who is selling Jensen? Yeah, yeah, he

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 9>sold like a half a billion dollars in the past month.

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 4>And a half, the tiny fraction of what is interesting.

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 9>But he owns so much, Yeah, he's worth so much.

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 9>Maybe he wants to buy a yacht. I don't know,

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 9>but that's an interesting data point to.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>The least, or some new leather jackets.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he sounds like he works a lot.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, listen, I get it, And you're right. When it's

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>such a big part of your portfolio. How many times

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 3>do we talk to folks like yourself or other money

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 3>managers who say, you know, don't have all your eggs

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 3>in one basket, even if you out those eggs.

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Hey, you know who you can't say that too? Is

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 4>someone like Steve Bomber seriously, because he did leave all

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 4>his eggs in one basket. Yeah, and it worked out well. Yeah, great,

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 4>And Bill Gates didn't. Bill Gates diversified and he moved

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 4>away from Microsoft, and if it would have held on

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 4>a Microsoft, he would be wealthier.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 3>Like, I know, he's having such a tough time right now.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, little sarcasm there, but no having said that though,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 3>is there something like Jensen Wong though, because of his

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 3>connection with this company that when he is the ultimate

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 3>insider that he is selling, does it potentially those send

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 3>a message even a little bit?

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah for some people. I mean I don't put a

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 9>lot of weight into this specific instance, one because he

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 9>owns so much of it. But also two, I mean

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 9>we know he's grinding. I mean he's given all these

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 9>talks about suffering and wishing suffering upon Stanford students so

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 9>they could learn things in life. He's put on a

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 9>long track record. We have zero concerns around Jensen and

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 9>his activity here. But it is an interesting data point

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 9>of is it at a momentary kind of top where

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 9>he's taking advantage of it. That's something to keep in mind.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 9>As for anyone who's not in n video right now

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 9>and thinking about getting in, it's an interesting data point

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 9>of how is the right time to get in? I

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 9>would hesitate on that point.

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 4>You make the point of that there are several customers

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 4>that make up a good portion of revenue. Alphabet Meta, Microsoft,

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 4>super Micro is a big customer. Yeah, gonna go talk

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 4>a little about super Micro, and my decliner is just

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 4>a deep teas. There is there concern though, as our

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 4>own Ian King pointed out our Chip King here at

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg that with a big portion of CAPEX being spent

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 4>individually by these companies, there's not so much room for

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 4>growth from these companies. And and Nvidia has to diversify.

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Where do they diversify their revenue?

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, And that's the catch is that these companies it's

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 9>not just a small amount. I mean Microsoft alone almost

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 9>accounts for twenty percent of the revenue at Nvidia. That's

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 9>such a huge number that not only do they need diversify,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 9>I think the bigger risk to them is microft saw

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 9>saying why don't we do this ourselves? We have the capex,

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 9>we can easily acquire the talent, why not do it ourselves?

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 9>And so Nvidia is going to have to expand the

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 9>scope of who they're going after, but it's going to

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 9>take a whole lot of companies, as you might imagine,

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 9>to make up for a Microsoft, you know, is around

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.760
<v Speaker 9>twenty percent, you have Meta around ten percent, Alphabet seven

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 9>percent of in Nvidio's revenue. Those are big numbers and

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 9>with what comes with that concentration risk is if you

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 9>stub your toe or if Microsoft or Meta wakes up

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 9>tomorrow and says, forget you in a video, We're going

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 9>to do this ourselves. We're going to build our own stuff.

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 9>That becomes a problem. Now, how they stay ahead of

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 9>that is they continue to iterate with Blackwell and other

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 9>type of the next gen stuff that they're working on

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 9>that's obviously going to be hugely important. And that's really

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 9>what I think everyone's waiting for Jensen to talk about today.

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 9>Where are they at with the next gen stuff and

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 9>what does that look like from a timeline perspective.

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Hey, rybod, I do want to mention a headline crossing

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal, and that is the Telegram ceo been

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 3>charged in France for alleged criminal use of the app,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 3>his app, you might recall, over the weekend, Pavlodorov, the

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Telegram, was arrested outside of Paris. Authorities alleged

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that he he's Russian born, he's a billionaire, he founded the

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 3>service back in twenty thirteen, that he had failed to

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 3>fight crime committed on the app by its users, including

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 3>the spread of child sexual abuse material. So there's been

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 3>some concern with his arrest about free speech in terms

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 3>of social media and media. But nonetheless, the Telegram CEO

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 3>has been charged in France for the alleged criminal use.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Of his app.

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Jeff, we only have about thirty seconds left with you,

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 4>but we got to get your thoughts on Nike very briefly.

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 4>It's not just in Nvidia out there. What's going on

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 4>with Nike for you.

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 9>Nike is violating the maximum of Warren Buffett around a

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 9>hamstand which should run a successful company could run it someday,

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 9>and the ceo is failing. I mean, it is an

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.959
<v Speaker 9>incredible marquee brand. I can't tell you how many Nike

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 9>shoes I have in my closet, but according to my wife,

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 9>too many. And so it's an incredible company and he's

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 9>tanking it. They have to make a change. Bill Ackman

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 9>got involved with Nike, and I hope he makes the move.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 9>I'm a big Nike fan from a long term investor perspective.

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 9>I think it has a massive moat around its business.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 9>But they have a management consultant guy screwing it up,

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 9>and they need a product guy in there.

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 3>All right, interesting stuff your perspective. Nike shares down about

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty four percent year today. Jeff McLain, Magic partner over

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 3>at Solidarity Capital of joining us.

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a Little Apple,

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal alone