WEBVTT - Criminal Justice Reform and The Abolition of Prisons

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:26.276
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:26.356 --> 0:00:29.316
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:29.756 --> 0:00:37.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. There's no more pressing question facing the

0:00:37.396 --> 0:00:40.396
<v Speaker 1>United States today, or really at any time, than the

0:00:40.436 --> 0:00:46.076
<v Speaker 1>relationship between race, crime and incarceration. Today, one in every

0:00:46.116 --> 0:00:49.996
<v Speaker 1>three young African American men is locked up. That's a

0:00:50.036 --> 0:00:52.956
<v Speaker 1>moral crisis, and it's one that has troubled leaders in

0:00:52.996 --> 0:00:55.236
<v Speaker 1>the United States, white and black for most of the

0:00:55.276 --> 0:00:59.076
<v Speaker 1>last century and a half. To talk about this crucial question,

0:00:59.356 --> 0:01:03.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Khalil Jiubran Muhammad. He's professor of history,

0:01:03.396 --> 0:01:06.636
<v Speaker 1>race and public Policy at Harvard and he's the author

0:01:06.716 --> 0:01:11.236
<v Speaker 1>of a deeply insightful and prize winning book called Condemning Blackness.

0:01:12.076 --> 0:01:14.076
<v Speaker 1>He's one of the leading thinkers in the United States

0:01:14.436 --> 0:01:17.676
<v Speaker 1>on the deep causes and potential solutions to what he

0:01:17.756 --> 0:01:21.636
<v Speaker 1>sometimes calls the carceral state, the state that puts people

0:01:21.676 --> 0:01:24.876
<v Speaker 1>in prison. Khalil, thank you so much for joining us.

0:01:25.076 --> 0:01:29.236
<v Speaker 1>Glad to be here. So, Khalil, you're a historian. Your

0:01:29.636 --> 0:01:33.276
<v Speaker 1>major book really a field changing book that came out

0:01:33.316 --> 0:01:37.476
<v Speaker 1>almost a decade ago. Not quite No, that's a that's

0:01:37.476 --> 0:01:39.276
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. I mean, when you transform a field,

0:01:39.276 --> 0:01:41.876
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes time for it to spread to everybody.

0:01:42.476 --> 0:01:45.276
<v Speaker 1>The book's called The Condemnation of Blackness, Race Crime, and

0:01:45.316 --> 0:01:47.916
<v Speaker 1>the Making of Modern Urban America. You showed in the

0:01:47.956 --> 0:01:52.676
<v Speaker 1>book that this phenomenon of white people in the white

0:01:52.676 --> 0:01:57.556
<v Speaker 1>power structure thinking of African Americans as criminals to be imprisoned,

0:01:58.436 --> 0:02:02.516
<v Speaker 1>goes back way beyond that period. That there is no

0:02:02.596 --> 0:02:07.036
<v Speaker 1>idyllic picture of nineteen fifties and sixties. The idyllic picture

0:02:07.516 --> 0:02:10.716
<v Speaker 1>never existed in fact at all. With respect of these questions,

0:02:12.076 --> 0:02:15.956
<v Speaker 1>you take us back to the period immediately after reconstruction

0:02:16.036 --> 0:02:18.836
<v Speaker 1>or the failed reconstruction in the wake of the Civil War.

0:02:20.116 --> 0:02:23.476
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about your core story there,

0:02:23.556 --> 0:02:30.356
<v Speaker 1>about what fundamentally didn't happen after the end of slavery. Yeah.

0:02:30.396 --> 0:02:35.356
<v Speaker 1>So the easiest way to think about the origin story

0:02:36.196 --> 0:02:41.636
<v Speaker 1>is that for most of the last fifty years, Americans

0:02:41.676 --> 0:02:44.916
<v Speaker 1>have been thinking about a racism in our criminal justice

0:02:44.956 --> 0:02:50.396
<v Speaker 1>past that ran through Southern lynch mobs and convictly sing.

0:02:51.356 --> 0:02:55.796
<v Speaker 1>And if you sort of pull the average white American

0:02:55.876 --> 0:02:57.996
<v Speaker 1>on the street, they would say, yeah, that was a

0:02:58.036 --> 0:03:01.316
<v Speaker 1>bad time in American history, even the Marchicket. Anyone to

0:03:01.316 --> 0:03:03.356
<v Speaker 1>speak in favor of lynching today. Yeah, Like even the

0:03:03.396 --> 0:03:06.556
<v Speaker 1>most red meat Republican you know is proud of the

0:03:06.596 --> 0:03:09.276
<v Speaker 1>civil rights movement and it uses that moment and it

0:03:09.356 --> 0:03:12.036
<v Speaker 1>is precisely a break point to say that in everything

0:03:12.076 --> 0:03:16.796
<v Speaker 1>that happens now is about individual responsibility. But it turns out,

0:03:17.476 --> 0:03:19.716
<v Speaker 1>because of the work that many historians have done looking

0:03:19.716 --> 0:03:22.676
<v Speaker 1>at the South in particular, we know that that was

0:03:22.716 --> 0:03:25.236
<v Speaker 1>an era when the criminal justice system did the work

0:03:25.356 --> 0:03:29.036
<v Speaker 1>that chattle slavery once did. So people who had been

0:03:29.436 --> 0:03:32.996
<v Speaker 1>enslaved and forced to use their labor on behalf of

0:03:32.996 --> 0:03:36.996
<v Speaker 1>white slaveholders get arrested for petty or significant crimes, doesn't matter.

0:03:37.436 --> 0:03:40.516
<v Speaker 1>They get put into chain gangs or prisons, and those

0:03:40.596 --> 0:03:45.276
<v Speaker 1>become the kind of second rebirth, as it were, of slavery, Yeah,

0:03:45.316 --> 0:03:49.036
<v Speaker 1>to use that metaphor. But more particularly their labor and

0:03:49.076 --> 0:03:52.436
<v Speaker 1>their new civil rights, in particularly the right to vote,

0:03:53.356 --> 0:03:57.276
<v Speaker 1>become contested to reign for their own autonomy as economic beings.

0:03:57.356 --> 0:04:01.676
<v Speaker 1>Like do you actually get to own land and negotiate

0:04:01.716 --> 0:04:05.156
<v Speaker 1>contracts that are mutually beneficial or at least fair to you?

0:04:05.396 --> 0:04:07.676
<v Speaker 1>They answer kind of is no, because the more that

0:04:07.796 --> 0:04:11.556
<v Speaker 1>you demand an autonomy and agency as a black Southerner

0:04:11.796 --> 0:04:14.916
<v Speaker 1>one step out of slavery, the more likely you were

0:04:15.156 --> 0:04:19.356
<v Speaker 1>to face the wrath of white property owners, which essentially

0:04:19.476 --> 0:04:22.316
<v Speaker 1>was regulated by the criminal justice system. They just simply

0:04:22.356 --> 0:04:24.116
<v Speaker 1>called the sheriff and say this person is a vagrant,

0:04:24.196 --> 0:04:26.596
<v Speaker 1>arrest them, and then you might be subject to a

0:04:26.636 --> 0:04:28.956
<v Speaker 1>sheriff's auction and sold back to the same person you

0:04:29.036 --> 0:04:32.236
<v Speaker 1>were just negotiating a labor contract with as now a

0:04:32.276 --> 0:04:34.436
<v Speaker 1>convict who has to work off their fine, and you

0:04:34.516 --> 0:04:36.956
<v Speaker 1>might never work off that fine. So a really important

0:04:37.036 --> 0:04:39.156
<v Speaker 1>part of that story that I think is not known

0:04:39.236 --> 0:04:41.836
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people who do understand that there

0:04:41.916 --> 0:04:44.636
<v Speaker 1>was an era of segregation and Jim Crow laws that

0:04:44.716 --> 0:04:48.396
<v Speaker 1>followed the failure of reconstruction is the component that involved

0:04:48.436 --> 0:04:51.236
<v Speaker 1>taking African Americans who wanted to assert their rights that

0:04:51.276 --> 0:04:56.476
<v Speaker 1>they in theory had and literally imprisoning them and through imprisonment,

0:04:57.116 --> 0:05:01.756
<v Speaker 1>returning their labor to white landholders, to the white power

0:05:01.796 --> 0:05:04.876
<v Speaker 1>structure of the South. That's right, And even something like

0:05:04.916 --> 0:05:08.596
<v Speaker 1>felony disenfranchisement laws, which we just saw in Florida for example,

0:05:08.636 --> 0:05:11.636
<v Speaker 1>come down out off the books, were born in this

0:05:11.756 --> 0:05:15.956
<v Speaker 1>era as a way of again controlling the political autonomy

0:05:15.956 --> 0:05:18.156
<v Speaker 1>of the black population that then was voting for the

0:05:18.196 --> 0:05:21.676
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party and very much opposed to a lot of

0:05:21.676 --> 0:05:24.596
<v Speaker 1>the most extreme forms of white supremacy that we're entrined

0:05:24.636 --> 0:05:27.876
<v Speaker 1>in the Democratic Party of the One Party South. So

0:05:28.076 --> 0:05:30.836
<v Speaker 1>there's no moment to your point, your initial point, in

0:05:30.876 --> 0:05:36.036
<v Speaker 1>the post slavery period, when the notion of black criminality

0:05:36.276 --> 0:05:39.516
<v Speaker 1>and the function of criminal justice are not deeply invested

0:05:39.556 --> 0:05:44.316
<v Speaker 1>in controlling black freedom. So that's a story about Southern

0:05:44.396 --> 0:05:48.476
<v Speaker 1>white control of mostly Southern African Americans. Not only is

0:05:48.796 --> 0:05:51.796
<v Speaker 1>people's labor only momentarily given back to them an in theory,

0:05:51.836 --> 0:05:54.516
<v Speaker 1>and then taken away from them through the criminal justice system,

0:05:54.556 --> 0:05:56.876
<v Speaker 1>and I put them in quotation marks, but even the

0:05:56.996 --> 0:05:59.636
<v Speaker 1>right to vote is then taken away on the theory

0:05:59.636 --> 0:06:01.636
<v Speaker 1>that if you've been committed of a crime, you no

0:06:01.676 --> 0:06:04.196
<v Speaker 1>longer have the right to vote. But your book is

0:06:04.276 --> 0:06:07.636
<v Speaker 1>also really importantly a Northern story, a story about the

0:06:07.676 --> 0:06:11.316
<v Speaker 1>part of the country where people like to tell themselves,

0:06:11.396 --> 0:06:13.796
<v Speaker 1>or white people they like to tell themselves, well, that

0:06:13.956 --> 0:06:17.356
<v Speaker 1>never happened. Jim Crowe did not exist in the Northern States.

0:06:18.756 --> 0:06:21.716
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about what happens, especially as African Americans in

0:06:21.796 --> 0:06:24.756
<v Speaker 1>larger and larger numbers begin to come north for jobs

0:06:24.756 --> 0:06:27.236
<v Speaker 1>as part of the Great Migration. Yeah. So the reason

0:06:27.276 --> 0:06:30.476
<v Speaker 1>why that backstory is so important is because it produced

0:06:30.876 --> 0:06:34.876
<v Speaker 1>what I like to say, an artifact. And that artifact,

0:06:35.196 --> 0:06:39.276
<v Speaker 1>that thing that came as a result of all this contestation,

0:06:39.356 --> 0:06:43.316
<v Speaker 1>in all this criminalization of black Southerners, was a national

0:06:43.396 --> 0:06:46.756
<v Speaker 1>census that pointed out that African Americans, who were only

0:06:46.756 --> 0:06:49.156
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent of the general population, with thirty percent of

0:06:49.156 --> 0:06:52.716
<v Speaker 1>the nation's prisoners. And so all of a sudden, overnight,

0:06:52.876 --> 0:06:57.756
<v Speaker 1>you have this subjective fact, an actual fact that looks

0:06:57.796 --> 0:07:00.036
<v Speaker 1>like black people have a crime problem because they're nearly

0:07:00.036 --> 0:07:04.556
<v Speaker 1>three times overrepresented in the national prison statistics. And the

0:07:04.636 --> 0:07:06.276
<v Speaker 1>question is what do we make of this? Why is

0:07:06.276 --> 0:07:09.156
<v Speaker 1>this important? So let's really dig into this question of

0:07:09.236 --> 0:07:11.356
<v Speaker 1>the census of eighteen ninety. You know, I'm one of

0:07:11.396 --> 0:07:13.556
<v Speaker 1>those people who I've always been interested in American history,

0:07:13.596 --> 0:07:16.036
<v Speaker 1>but when someone says the word census, my eyes usually

0:07:16.036 --> 0:07:19.436
<v Speaker 1>glaze over. And reading your book, I was really hit

0:07:19.796 --> 0:07:21.916
<v Speaker 1>that much like the upcoming census, which is much in

0:07:21.916 --> 0:07:25.996
<v Speaker 1>the news because of the possible consequences of a citizenship question,

0:07:26.316 --> 0:07:27.836
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, in fact is going to weigh in

0:07:27.876 --> 0:07:30.116
<v Speaker 1>on this sometime in the before at the end of June.

0:07:30.116 --> 0:07:34.116
<v Speaker 1>I guess, much like the current census, which has real weight,

0:07:34.156 --> 0:07:37.996
<v Speaker 1>real political controversy associated with it, the eighteen ninety census,

0:07:37.996 --> 0:07:40.796
<v Speaker 1>which I myself had never heard of before. I don't

0:07:40.836 --> 0:07:42.556
<v Speaker 1>think any of my great grandparents were in the country

0:07:42.556 --> 0:07:44.516
<v Speaker 1>for that census, so I never bothered to look it up,

0:07:46.036 --> 0:07:49.756
<v Speaker 1>really had a transformative effect on the way first scholars

0:07:49.756 --> 0:07:52.636
<v Speaker 1>and the the general public thought about race and crime

0:07:52.996 --> 0:07:57.076
<v Speaker 1>in America. So you mentioned this statistical result of the

0:07:57.116 --> 0:08:02.076
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety census, disproportionate in theory representation of African Americans

0:08:02.676 --> 0:08:05.876
<v Speaker 1>in prison right, African Americans twelve percent of the population,

0:08:05.876 --> 0:08:11.356
<v Speaker 1>I think you said, and thirty percent nations prisoners. What

0:08:11.476 --> 0:08:14.116
<v Speaker 1>was really going on there? There's there's a whole steep

0:08:14.196 --> 0:08:17.956
<v Speaker 1>story here. Give us the essence of it. Yeah, the

0:08:18.316 --> 0:08:23.596
<v Speaker 1>essence is that eighteen ninety was a perfect generational cohort moment.

0:08:24.236 --> 0:08:27.436
<v Speaker 1>This is twenty five years after the end of slavery,

0:08:28.036 --> 0:08:32.356
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of demographers, a lot of journalists, a

0:08:32.396 --> 0:08:35.916
<v Speaker 1>lot of vested interest wanted to see how we're black

0:08:35.956 --> 0:08:38.836
<v Speaker 1>people faring on their own. If you think of all

0:08:38.836 --> 0:08:43.636
<v Speaker 1>the craziness that took place for wild eyed, radical white

0:08:43.676 --> 0:08:46.836
<v Speaker 1>abolitionists to literally lay their bodies on the line in

0:08:46.916 --> 0:08:49.996
<v Speaker 1>defense of black humanity for those who believed it. Others

0:08:49.996 --> 0:08:52.756
<v Speaker 1>had other reasons. But nevertheless, if you take John Brown

0:08:52.836 --> 0:08:54.476
<v Speaker 1>did exist, that's right, John Brown did so. If you

0:08:54.476 --> 0:08:57.876
<v Speaker 1>take the purest motive of the abolitionist, they essentially argued

0:08:57.916 --> 0:09:00.476
<v Speaker 1>that black people were no different than white people. And

0:09:00.556 --> 0:09:02.996
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to Brian Stevenson today who says, we

0:09:03.076 --> 0:09:05.276
<v Speaker 1>won the Civil War, but we would lost the narrative battle.

0:09:05.556 --> 0:09:09.036
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, those wild eyed abolitionists lost the narrative

0:09:09.116 --> 0:09:12.676
<v Speaker 1>addle eventually, because as soon as the eighteen ninety census

0:09:12.796 --> 0:09:16.356
<v Speaker 1>came out, people look to that senses to then judge

0:09:16.556 --> 0:09:19.756
<v Speaker 1>the health and welfare the fitness of the black population.

0:09:19.796 --> 0:09:22.156
<v Speaker 1>They said, hey, well, sure, someone born in eighteen sixty

0:09:22.156 --> 0:09:25.076
<v Speaker 1>six is now twenty five years old later, they're an adult.

0:09:25.156 --> 0:09:28.036
<v Speaker 1>How are they faring. Oh, it looks like a third

0:09:28.076 --> 0:09:30.276
<v Speaker 1>of the population of black people are now in prison

0:09:30.796 --> 0:09:35.516
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to landowners or business owners, in other words,

0:09:35.516 --> 0:09:38.996
<v Speaker 1>showing their productive capacity making a real contribution to America.

0:09:39.076 --> 0:09:41.836
<v Speaker 1>And what that did is mask it masked all of

0:09:41.836 --> 0:09:45.276
<v Speaker 1>that history on the ground that was happening that made

0:09:45.276 --> 0:09:49.116
<v Speaker 1>those statistics virtually irrelevant. And I can just think off

0:09:49.116 --> 0:09:50.436
<v Speaker 1>the top of my head, and you write about this

0:09:50.476 --> 0:09:52.116
<v Speaker 1>a greater length in your book. Of things that would

0:09:52.196 --> 0:09:56.716
<v Speaker 1>make those statistics highly misleading, even assuming they're correct, one

0:09:56.756 --> 0:09:59.196
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about is length of prison sentence. How

0:09:59.236 --> 0:10:02.196
<v Speaker 1>did that work? Yeah, Well, if as is true today,

0:10:02.236 --> 0:10:05.396
<v Speaker 1>if Abrican Americans are serving longer time for the same crime,

0:10:05.716 --> 0:10:08.356
<v Speaker 1>they're more likely to be in prison on the day

0:10:08.356 --> 0:10:11.476
<v Speaker 1>a census, because the census is just a literal snapshot.

0:10:11.516 --> 0:10:13.556
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be on one day, that's right, And

0:10:13.596 --> 0:10:16.316
<v Speaker 1>so that's just one example. Or if a population over

0:10:16.356 --> 0:10:20.636
<v Speaker 1>indexes for men, then their expected crime rates or in

0:10:20.676 --> 0:10:23.596
<v Speaker 1>this case incarceration rate is expected to hire. Or if

0:10:23.636 --> 0:10:26.396
<v Speaker 1>a population over index is for being young. So all

0:10:26.436 --> 0:10:29.036
<v Speaker 1>those facts, and what about arrests, what about probability of

0:10:29.076 --> 0:10:32.436
<v Speaker 1>being arrested? Well, every probably being convicted. You can imagine

0:10:32.476 --> 0:10:35.236
<v Speaker 1>point after a point, every decision point within the criminal

0:10:35.276 --> 0:10:39.196
<v Speaker 1>justice system, from police contact, to prosecution and to sentencing

0:10:39.676 --> 0:10:44.916
<v Speaker 1>were all evident points for absolute discrimination being directed against

0:10:44.956 --> 0:10:48.076
<v Speaker 1>black people. Now, the reason this has such an impact

0:10:48.196 --> 0:10:50.876
<v Speaker 1>is partly that it's eighteen ninety and that's a kind

0:10:50.916 --> 0:10:55.836
<v Speaker 1>of perfect storm moment for the birth of the American

0:10:55.956 --> 0:11:01.596
<v Speaker 1>obsession with data with numbers, where we think the data

0:11:01.716 --> 0:11:04.756
<v Speaker 1>say it, it must be true. I sometimes say that

0:11:04.796 --> 0:11:06.916
<v Speaker 1>the words that make me most unhappy in English language

0:11:06.916 --> 0:11:09.556
<v Speaker 1>are the words the three little words. The data shows

0:11:09.956 --> 0:11:13.436
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So what was it about that moment that

0:11:13.596 --> 0:11:17.356
<v Speaker 1>made people especially prime to say, well, hey, it's in

0:11:17.396 --> 0:11:19.436
<v Speaker 1>the data, it must be true. Well, this is where

0:11:19.436 --> 0:11:24.996
<v Speaker 1>your question about the North really matters, because one story

0:11:25.196 --> 0:11:28.116
<v Speaker 1>of this period, in particularly the end of reconstruction, which

0:11:28.116 --> 0:11:30.676
<v Speaker 1>happened with a presidential compromise in the election of the

0:11:30.676 --> 0:11:34.196
<v Speaker 1>contested election of eighteen seventy seven, where miraculously Florida first

0:11:34.196 --> 0:11:37.076
<v Speaker 1>shows up as a controversial state. Yeah, that's a that's

0:11:37.116 --> 0:11:40.956
<v Speaker 1>a very strange one. The whole eighteen seventy six the election,

0:11:41.196 --> 0:11:43.796
<v Speaker 1>Just in case you're wondering, the election was a tie,

0:11:44.276 --> 0:11:46.916
<v Speaker 1>and then they figured it out by a very very

0:11:47.076 --> 0:11:50.796
<v Speaker 1>complicated and strange political process with a special commission with

0:11:50.836 --> 0:11:53.516
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justices and all kinds of shenanigans, and it

0:11:53.596 --> 0:11:56.676
<v Speaker 1>ended up with Rutherford B. Hayes the first president ever

0:11:56.756 --> 0:12:00.756
<v Speaker 1>to graduate from Harvard Law School. Not very memorable becoming

0:12:00.756 --> 0:12:03.396
<v Speaker 1>president United State's. Luckily, our second president, Barack Obama did

0:12:03.396 --> 0:12:05.556
<v Speaker 1>a little better for us. But go on, So going

0:12:05.596 --> 0:12:09.476
<v Speaker 1>with your point. So this was an exhausting process, and

0:12:09.676 --> 0:12:12.796
<v Speaker 1>one manifestation of this was what you might call racial fatigue.

0:12:12.836 --> 0:12:15.836
<v Speaker 1>The North was kind of tired of the race problem,

0:12:15.876 --> 0:12:19.396
<v Speaker 1>tired of dealing with Southerners, tired of worrying about black people,

0:12:19.436 --> 0:12:23.396
<v Speaker 1>and so they sort of took their they firearms, and

0:12:23.556 --> 0:12:28.476
<v Speaker 1>took their tanks and their presence and pulled out of

0:12:28.476 --> 0:12:31.756
<v Speaker 1>the South. And so reconstruction ends and the North turns

0:12:31.756 --> 0:12:35.116
<v Speaker 1>to the business of industrialization, leaving black people essentially on

0:12:35.156 --> 0:12:38.156
<v Speaker 1>their own. And as a consequence, that was just the

0:12:38.196 --> 0:12:42.876
<v Speaker 1>beginning of a process of what we call national reconciliation.

0:12:43.516 --> 0:12:46.396
<v Speaker 1>It was a process where the South sort of began

0:12:46.436 --> 0:12:49.396
<v Speaker 1>to rewrite the narrative of the Civil War first period,

0:12:49.436 --> 0:12:52.996
<v Speaker 1>when monuments start to go up to celebrate the Confederacy

0:12:53.636 --> 0:12:56.316
<v Speaker 1>and the North is kind of tired. We began to

0:12:56.356 --> 0:13:00.396
<v Speaker 1>see early writings by Northern scholars that began to shift

0:13:00.436 --> 0:13:05.476
<v Speaker 1>the conversation away from Southern racism to black pathology. And

0:13:05.676 --> 0:13:10.836
<v Speaker 1>it's that moment where the North begins to articulate its

0:13:10.916 --> 0:13:15.436
<v Speaker 1>own understanding of black people's inferiority, and mostly for them,

0:13:15.476 --> 0:13:18.236
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of temporal thing. It's like, well, of course,

0:13:18.316 --> 0:13:22.676
<v Speaker 1>since they were slaves, now for now they need time

0:13:22.796 --> 0:13:25.356
<v Speaker 1>to what they would often say, work out their own salvation.

0:13:26.076 --> 0:13:29.236
<v Speaker 1>And they turned to crime statistics to kind of justify

0:13:29.996 --> 0:13:33.036
<v Speaker 1>what we might recognize today as a post racial logic.

0:13:33.556 --> 0:13:36.556
<v Speaker 1>And in their moment, the post racial logic was where

0:13:36.556 --> 0:13:38.516
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by post racial? Yeah, well, what I

0:13:38.556 --> 0:13:43.356
<v Speaker 1>mean is that to identify black people as more criminal,

0:13:43.596 --> 0:13:48.396
<v Speaker 1>as more illiterate, as less capable of self governance for

0:13:48.436 --> 0:13:51.236
<v Speaker 1>them in the eighteen nineties turn of the twentieth century

0:13:51.436 --> 0:13:54.676
<v Speaker 1>was not understood to be racist. It was objective. It

0:13:54.716 --> 0:13:58.036
<v Speaker 1>was historical because it was less racist than the old

0:13:58.276 --> 0:14:01.756
<v Speaker 1>pre Civil War idea that African records are just inferior,

0:14:01.796 --> 0:14:04.316
<v Speaker 1>Black people are just inferior. So then compared to that,

0:14:04.476 --> 0:14:06.636
<v Speaker 1>it's post racial to say, what's not the black people

0:14:06.636 --> 0:14:09.276
<v Speaker 1>are inferior, they just tend to be criminal. Yes, in

0:14:09.556 --> 0:14:12.636
<v Speaker 1>a nutshell, because it still sounds I mean us now now,

0:14:12.676 --> 0:14:14.756
<v Speaker 1>it still sounds completely racist. So it sounds weird. Don't

0:14:14.756 --> 0:14:16.276
<v Speaker 1>think if it is post racial. Well, but you're saying

0:14:16.276 --> 0:14:18.076
<v Speaker 1>it's a different form of racist. It's a different form

0:14:18.116 --> 0:14:21.116
<v Speaker 1>of racism. But this is why the story of this

0:14:21.156 --> 0:14:24.756
<v Speaker 1>early period matters so much to us today, because if

0:14:24.796 --> 0:14:29.236
<v Speaker 1>we miss that logic, if we miss an understanding that

0:14:29.356 --> 0:14:32.276
<v Speaker 1>for and I write a lot about liberals, if we

0:14:32.396 --> 0:14:35.516
<v Speaker 1>miss that, what they're saying is it's not in their blood.

0:14:36.076 --> 0:14:40.276
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they're incapable. They just need more opportunities,

0:14:40.676 --> 0:14:45.476
<v Speaker 1>they need more education, they need more time to build

0:14:45.476 --> 0:14:49.876
<v Speaker 1>their families so that they can adopt our values. And

0:14:50.116 --> 0:14:52.476
<v Speaker 1>once they have all of this, they'll be able to

0:14:52.516 --> 0:14:57.476
<v Speaker 1>participate fully. So it was a recipe for eventual inclusion

0:14:57.956 --> 0:15:02.116
<v Speaker 1>and acceptance and full assimilation. But it was predicated on

0:15:02.156 --> 0:15:05.276
<v Speaker 1>what essentially the South was saying, which is that these

0:15:05.316 --> 0:15:11.476
<v Speaker 1>people are insufferable. If you've been high and mighty and

0:15:11.676 --> 0:15:16.436
<v Speaker 1>taking the high horse and being righteous, self righteous about

0:15:16.476 --> 0:15:19.716
<v Speaker 1>the North being free of slavery stain in the nineteenth century,

0:15:19.956 --> 0:15:22.156
<v Speaker 1>will wait till they show up at your doorstep, wait

0:15:22.156 --> 0:15:23.916
<v Speaker 1>till they move to your neighborhood. So you know, it's

0:15:23.956 --> 0:15:26.916
<v Speaker 1>not a perfect comparison at all. But one interesting way

0:15:26.956 --> 0:15:30.076
<v Speaker 1>to think about this for a contemporary comparison is the

0:15:30.196 --> 0:15:34.236
<v Speaker 1>US efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan to rebuild, and indeed

0:15:34.276 --> 0:15:37.316
<v Speaker 1>reconstruct we even use that same word, believe it or not,

0:15:37.676 --> 0:15:40.036
<v Speaker 1>societies that we had invaded, that the United States had

0:15:40.036 --> 0:15:44.196
<v Speaker 1>invaded by creating new social norms, new social dynamics, and

0:15:44.276 --> 0:15:46.196
<v Speaker 1>the US. I'm not saying this is the reason that

0:15:46.236 --> 0:15:49.356
<v Speaker 1>the United States invaded Iraq and Afghanistan anymore than it

0:15:49.396 --> 0:15:51.956
<v Speaker 1>was the original cause of the Civil War to liberate

0:15:51.956 --> 0:15:53.876
<v Speaker 1>African Americans. It wasn't the original cause of the war

0:15:53.916 --> 0:15:56.116
<v Speaker 1>for at least, you know, most of the advocates of

0:15:56.116 --> 0:16:01.196
<v Speaker 1>the war. But at some point, just like the North

0:16:01.316 --> 0:16:03.796
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen seventies got as you said, fatigued or

0:16:03.836 --> 0:16:05.996
<v Speaker 1>tired of the effort, you know, the United States gave

0:16:06.076 --> 0:16:09.476
<v Speaker 1>up on its reconstruction efforts in Iraq and afghan Aniston.

0:16:10.156 --> 0:16:12.716
<v Speaker 1>And now in the United States, to some degree you

0:16:12.796 --> 0:16:15.956
<v Speaker 1>have a rise of anti Muslim sentiment, and in Europe

0:16:15.956 --> 0:16:18.116
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of increased anti Muslim sentiment. As

0:16:18.116 --> 0:16:22.436
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, those people quote unquote, you know, that's

0:16:22.476 --> 0:16:25.756
<v Speaker 1>just what they're like, quote unquote, we can't fundamentally make

0:16:25.756 --> 0:16:29.756
<v Speaker 1>a change, and then that enables a kind of blame.

0:16:30.796 --> 0:16:32.556
<v Speaker 1>And at least in Europe, the analogy is that you

0:16:32.636 --> 0:16:35.476
<v Speaker 1>have lots of immigrants from the Middle East, a bit

0:16:35.596 --> 0:16:40.476
<v Speaker 1>like African Americans migrating north from the South, and you

0:16:40.556 --> 0:16:45.316
<v Speaker 1>have a big public fight about whether the new immigrants

0:16:45.316 --> 0:16:48.676
<v Speaker 1>can be assimilated into the norms of the society. That's right,

0:16:48.676 --> 0:16:51.636
<v Speaker 1>and who's responsible, I mean, who bears the burden? Becomes

0:16:51.676 --> 0:16:54.516
<v Speaker 1>the kind of question that Europe is answering now around

0:16:55.276 --> 0:16:59.036
<v Speaker 1>refugees and immigration from North Africa and from the Middle East.

0:16:59.316 --> 0:17:01.876
<v Speaker 1>And that was essentially the same question Northerners said. Look,

0:17:01.876 --> 0:17:05.836
<v Speaker 1>we fought a civil war, we supported reconstruction, we pass

0:17:05.876 --> 0:17:10.196
<v Speaker 1>civil rights legislation, and now we have to deal with

0:17:10.236 --> 0:17:14.756
<v Speaker 1>these people who are backwards and uncouth, and who bring

0:17:14.876 --> 0:17:20.156
<v Speaker 1>diseases and inferior education. And the point is that the

0:17:20.236 --> 0:17:25.716
<v Speaker 1>justification for what we would recognize today as Northern racism

0:17:26.676 --> 0:17:31.556
<v Speaker 1>was crime statistics, illiteracy rates, illegitimacy rates, the whole package

0:17:31.916 --> 0:17:36.516
<v Speaker 1>of disparity data that held whiteness as a norm against blackness.

0:17:36.556 --> 0:17:39.716
<v Speaker 1>To say this is not about racism, this is about

0:17:39.756 --> 0:17:44.276
<v Speaker 1>their inferiority and the numbers, that's exactly, or they would

0:17:44.276 --> 0:17:47.156
<v Speaker 1>say the numbers speak for themselves. So you say, a

0:17:47.156 --> 0:17:49.276
<v Speaker 1>fascinating thing in your book about this because you point

0:17:49.316 --> 0:17:51.796
<v Speaker 1>out that exactly the same time that this is happening,

0:17:52.436 --> 0:17:59.756
<v Speaker 1>you have South European, Italian, East European Jewish and Slavic immigrants.

0:18:00.676 --> 0:18:03.636
<v Speaker 1>You had had Irish American immigrants over the previous fifty

0:18:03.716 --> 0:18:05.756
<v Speaker 1>years who were still working out their issues, who we're

0:18:05.796 --> 0:18:08.836
<v Speaker 1>still working out their issues, who still have high crime rates,

0:18:09.196 --> 0:18:12.236
<v Speaker 1>who still are captured by a range of statistical measures.

0:18:12.236 --> 0:18:15.316
<v Speaker 1>The most famous is that Eastern European Jews were ranked

0:18:15.316 --> 0:18:17.596
<v Speaker 1>by the early inventors the IQ test as the lowest

0:18:17.876 --> 0:18:19.836
<v Speaker 1>IQ group and were therefore you know, that was a

0:18:19.876 --> 0:18:23.756
<v Speaker 1>reason to exclude them. And yet you point out there's

0:18:23.796 --> 0:18:29.716
<v Speaker 1>a somehow a difference between how white thought leaders think

0:18:29.756 --> 0:18:35.356
<v Speaker 1>about the crime, the backwardness, the limitations of these new

0:18:35.396 --> 0:18:39.396
<v Speaker 1>immigrants who were not quite white but call them Whiteish

0:18:39.436 --> 0:18:43.196
<v Speaker 1>and African American migrants. Yeah. To me, that's the most

0:18:43.396 --> 0:18:45.956
<v Speaker 1>fascinating finding from this book. I mean, it's the thing

0:18:45.956 --> 0:18:48.316
<v Speaker 1>that surprised me. It's not something I went looking for,

0:18:48.516 --> 0:18:51.676
<v Speaker 1>nor did I expect to see it. It is amazing

0:18:51.716 --> 0:18:56.356
<v Speaker 1>to watch some of the same criminologists, some of the

0:18:56.436 --> 0:19:00.636
<v Speaker 1>same demographers, as you call them, white thought leaders, who

0:19:00.676 --> 0:19:05.156
<v Speaker 1>are looking at Irish, Italian, and New York Jewish crime

0:19:05.156 --> 0:19:09.356
<v Speaker 1>statistics through the roof. By comparison to their native born

0:19:09.356 --> 0:19:12.916
<v Speaker 1>American counterparts, they have disproportionate crime rates across the board

0:19:12.956 --> 0:19:17.356
<v Speaker 1>in many instances. And for one group of Americans prominent

0:19:17.396 --> 0:19:21.076
<v Speaker 1>to be sure, called them eugenicists, called them social darwiness.

0:19:21.076 --> 0:19:24.316
<v Speaker 1>These were people who believe that they were biologically inferior,

0:19:24.396 --> 0:19:26.876
<v Speaker 1>as you've already described, and shouldn't be in the country,

0:19:27.036 --> 0:19:29.116
<v Speaker 1>and we're advocating for closing the borders to it and

0:19:29.156 --> 0:19:32.396
<v Speaker 1>successfully did. Yeah, that happened. That happened in nineteen twenty four.

0:19:33.356 --> 0:19:35.836
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, for the first time, we

0:19:35.876 --> 0:19:42.436
<v Speaker 1>see this eruption of progressive activists and reformers, people who

0:19:42.516 --> 0:19:46.756
<v Speaker 1>were we would recognize today as modern liberals, who believe

0:19:46.876 --> 0:19:50.796
<v Speaker 1>that government had a role, that antidiscrimination was a core value,

0:19:51.316 --> 0:19:54.836
<v Speaker 1>and they went to great lengths to push back against

0:19:54.916 --> 0:19:59.036
<v Speaker 1>the eugenic tide. And they did it. Here is the irony.

0:19:59.116 --> 0:20:02.396
<v Speaker 1>They did it on the basis of crime statistics. They

0:20:02.476 --> 0:20:06.036
<v Speaker 1>read the crime statistics or interpreted them amongst the Irish,

0:20:06.036 --> 0:20:11.836
<v Speaker 1>the Italians, the polls as evidence ass sdemic economic inequality.

0:20:11.876 --> 0:20:15.116
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what that means updated to today.

0:20:15.596 --> 0:20:19.076
<v Speaker 1>You know, here you have these wealth, you know, well

0:20:19.116 --> 0:20:22.836
<v Speaker 1>intentioned people who say, well, you know, these immigrants will

0:20:22.876 --> 0:20:25.356
<v Speaker 1>get over it. But African Americans, on the other hand,

0:20:25.356 --> 0:20:27.076
<v Speaker 1>they're not so convinced we'll get over it. In fact,

0:20:27.116 --> 0:20:30.356
<v Speaker 1>they start to imagine that there's some inherent criminality in

0:20:30.396 --> 0:20:34.076
<v Speaker 1>African American culture, or maybe it's in the experience of

0:20:34.116 --> 0:20:37.676
<v Speaker 1>slavery initially, or you know, they're not using racialized language,

0:20:37.676 --> 0:20:40.716
<v Speaker 1>but they're still saying that it's unsolvable. How do you

0:20:40.756 --> 0:20:45.356
<v Speaker 1>see that played out today in the context of observers

0:20:45.396 --> 0:20:50.716
<v Speaker 1>of ongoing disparities in incarceration rates for Whites and African Americans. Well,

0:20:50.716 --> 0:20:53.636
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious way is that there is no racialized

0:20:53.716 --> 0:20:57.116
<v Speaker 1>language to describe white criminality today. I mean, I can

0:20:57.236 --> 0:20:59.836
<v Speaker 1>use the term as a descriptor, but we have there's

0:20:59.836 --> 0:21:02.836
<v Speaker 1>no conversation about it. The closest thing that we have

0:21:02.956 --> 0:21:05.916
<v Speaker 1>to it is what has been defined as the opioid

0:21:06.036 --> 0:21:09.396
<v Speaker 1>or heroin crisis, and before that the meth crisis, which

0:21:09.476 --> 0:21:14.756
<v Speaker 1>breaking bad made more prominent and famous. But these crises

0:21:14.916 --> 0:21:18.876
<v Speaker 1>among white Americans that include criminality, include violence, and obviously

0:21:18.956 --> 0:21:22.796
<v Speaker 1>include drug addiction, are not understood to be a reflection

0:21:22.996 --> 0:21:26.556
<v Speaker 1>of white people. They're generally understood to be some kind

0:21:26.556 --> 0:21:30.876
<v Speaker 1>of public health crisis, often localized to particular kinds of communities,

0:21:31.396 --> 0:21:34.156
<v Speaker 1>and for the most part, the nation respond to them

0:21:34.196 --> 0:21:37.996
<v Speaker 1>with a sense that we have to do something about this.

0:21:38.076 --> 0:21:40.996
<v Speaker 1>We have to find the origin of the problem in

0:21:41.236 --> 0:21:43.956
<v Speaker 1>the community, in the environment, and something that's happening. So,

0:21:43.996 --> 0:21:47.956
<v Speaker 1>of course big farmers paying a heavy price for prescription

0:21:48.036 --> 0:21:51.996
<v Speaker 1>drug overdoses, but it's treated as an isolated problem though

0:21:52.036 --> 0:21:54.156
<v Speaker 1>blame big Pharma. It's treated and I think of it

0:21:54.156 --> 0:21:56.156
<v Speaker 1>as the battle of the TV shows. It's breaking bad

0:21:57.396 --> 0:21:59.836
<v Speaker 1>show that's almost exactly the same astorical moment the Wire,

0:22:00.476 --> 0:22:02.716
<v Speaker 1>which is just a brilliant show in many many ways,

0:22:02.876 --> 0:22:06.956
<v Speaker 1>but one of its themes is the depressing impossibility. I

0:22:06.956 --> 0:22:09.916
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's an overstatement of reform. The show shows

0:22:09.956 --> 0:22:13.036
<v Speaker 1>people trying to reform, but it keeps on showing a

0:22:13.116 --> 0:22:15.276
<v Speaker 1>series of failures. So it's different, and it's thought of

0:22:15.316 --> 0:22:18.436
<v Speaker 1>as systemic, and there's a kind of okay, not sure

0:22:18.436 --> 0:22:21.556
<v Speaker 1>what to do next theme, And it's also I mean,

0:22:21.636 --> 0:22:24.596
<v Speaker 1>it leads to a number of the kind of productive

0:22:24.596 --> 0:22:28.316
<v Speaker 1>conversations that progressives had a hundred years ago, they begin

0:22:28.396 --> 0:22:30.636
<v Speaker 1>to have these conversations about, well, what's in the water,

0:22:31.596 --> 0:22:34.596
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that metaphorically, so what's in our society

0:22:34.596 --> 0:22:38.476
<v Speaker 1>that produces this level of alienation. One of the same people,

0:22:38.476 --> 0:22:40.996
<v Speaker 1>Fredrick Hoffman, who sort of put in circulation this idea

0:22:40.996 --> 0:22:45.836
<v Speaker 1>of black criminality time to crime stistics, was virtually a socialist.

0:22:45.876 --> 0:22:48.876
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was certainly in community with other socialists

0:22:48.916 --> 0:22:52.436
<v Speaker 1>who were very clear about if we have high rates

0:22:52.436 --> 0:22:56.596
<v Speaker 1>of crime and suicide and mental illness, then it is

0:22:56.636 --> 0:22:59.996
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of something wrong in our society. But you

0:23:00.076 --> 0:23:02.676
<v Speaker 1>hear those questions today, I mean, as you're saying, we

0:23:02.716 --> 0:23:05.276
<v Speaker 1>don't really hear that about No one says white society

0:23:05.396 --> 0:23:10.156
<v Speaker 1>is broken because of the opioid epidemic. People do say

0:23:10.476 --> 0:23:13.396
<v Speaker 1>African American society is broken in some way because of

0:23:13.436 --> 0:23:16.756
<v Speaker 1>ongoing rates of criminality. What conversation would you prefer to

0:23:16.796 --> 0:23:20.476
<v Speaker 1>have us engage in, Well, the most the easiest way

0:23:20.476 --> 0:23:22.156
<v Speaker 1>to say is we should be having the same public

0:23:22.196 --> 0:23:27.116
<v Speaker 1>health conversation about rates of violence and drugs and property

0:23:27.116 --> 0:23:29.556
<v Speaker 1>related crimes in the black community as we started in

0:23:29.556 --> 0:23:32.116
<v Speaker 1>the progressive era and continue to have in the opioid era.

0:23:32.596 --> 0:23:34.956
<v Speaker 1>In other words, there's a positive lesson there in the

0:23:35.036 --> 0:23:36.636
<v Speaker 1>way they did it better. At one time, they did

0:23:36.636 --> 0:23:40.716
<v Speaker 1>it much better. The other thing is the disparity between

0:23:41.316 --> 0:23:45.556
<v Speaker 1>poverty and crime in rural white America is also a

0:23:45.596 --> 0:23:50.756
<v Speaker 1>disparity of invisibility. There's a disconnect between the fact that

0:23:51.276 --> 0:23:56.716
<v Speaker 1>where poverty over indexes as a cause of crime. So

0:23:57.276 --> 0:23:59.036
<v Speaker 1>if you're poor, you're more likely to be involved in crime,

0:23:59.036 --> 0:24:01.716
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you're rased. That's right, And therefore, if

0:24:01.716 --> 0:24:05.716
<v Speaker 1>it's happening in rural wide America, there's no media markets

0:24:05.956 --> 0:24:07.956
<v Speaker 1>to speak of, and certainly none that show up on

0:24:08.036 --> 0:24:12.956
<v Speaker 1>our television sets. And there is a level of political

0:24:12.956 --> 0:24:17.436
<v Speaker 1>accountability at the local level that has always been broken

0:24:17.476 --> 0:24:19.956
<v Speaker 1>for the black community. So to be very clear, if

0:24:20.036 --> 0:24:23.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm a local sheriff and I'm elected and twenty percent

0:24:23.436 --> 0:24:26.156
<v Speaker 1>of my town is engaging in criminal activity or of

0:24:26.156 --> 0:24:28.676
<v Speaker 1>one form or another, it is not in my political

0:24:28.676 --> 0:24:31.036
<v Speaker 1>interest to lock up everybody. I can, yep, but I

0:24:31.036 --> 0:24:33.076
<v Speaker 1>actually can lock up everybody in the town who's got

0:24:33.116 --> 0:24:36.236
<v Speaker 1>an okioddiction or or is not only was involved in

0:24:36.276 --> 0:24:38.636
<v Speaker 1>producing the stuff, were distributing it, or who is a

0:24:38.956 --> 0:24:41.236
<v Speaker 1>serial robber or burglar. I mean, you know, there's a

0:24:41.276 --> 0:24:43.916
<v Speaker 1>little name it, rename it. But you can do that

0:24:44.196 --> 0:24:46.596
<v Speaker 1>in the black community. Not only can you do it

0:24:46.636 --> 0:24:50.196
<v Speaker 1>in the black community, but you're likely if you're a prosecutor,

0:24:50.236 --> 0:24:52.436
<v Speaker 1>to go on to higher office. If you're a judge,

0:24:52.436 --> 0:24:56.916
<v Speaker 1>you're likely to be promoted at every level of the

0:24:56.996 --> 0:25:01.956
<v Speaker 1>professional incentive structure within criminal justice picking off black people.

0:25:02.236 --> 0:25:04.596
<v Speaker 1>But why is that true even in districts which have

0:25:04.676 --> 0:25:08.956
<v Speaker 1>majority of African American voters. Because what you said is true. Well,

0:25:09.276 --> 0:25:12.276
<v Speaker 1>I mean James Forman Junior, his really interesting book argues

0:25:12.316 --> 0:25:16.436
<v Speaker 1>that some African American community leaders played some role in

0:25:16.516 --> 0:25:20.556
<v Speaker 1>welcoming some of the higher punishments for crime and some

0:25:20.596 --> 0:25:24.356
<v Speaker 1>of the policies now very much criticized policies of the

0:25:24.356 --> 0:25:27.116
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties. Yeah, and I wrote a real book.

0:25:27.596 --> 0:25:30.956
<v Speaker 1>The book very well, and I love the argument. So

0:25:31.676 --> 0:25:36.156
<v Speaker 1>there's a fine distinction to be made for some subset

0:25:36.356 --> 0:25:39.156
<v Speaker 1>of law and order black types or black types who

0:25:39.196 --> 0:25:42.276
<v Speaker 1>are law and order advocates for thinking they were actually

0:25:42.316 --> 0:25:45.836
<v Speaker 1>delivering a civil rights justice to black black people, that

0:25:45.956 --> 0:25:50.276
<v Speaker 1>black people deserve police accountability and justice and safety in

0:25:50.276 --> 0:25:53.196
<v Speaker 1>their community just like others. So fortunately the face of

0:25:53.236 --> 0:25:55.276
<v Speaker 1>it is a good argument. Foreman does a great job

0:25:55.276 --> 0:25:59.116
<v Speaker 1>of that. The harder argument that Foreman doesn't extend into

0:25:59.196 --> 0:26:01.836
<v Speaker 1>too much is that black people have imbibed these views

0:26:01.836 --> 0:26:06.476
<v Speaker 1>as well. And the degree to which African Americans imagined

0:26:06.596 --> 0:26:09.916
<v Speaker 1>that punitiveness some subset of them imagine the punitiveness was

0:26:09.916 --> 0:26:12.796
<v Speaker 1>the only natural response to crime in the community, is

0:26:12.836 --> 0:26:18.516
<v Speaker 1>itself a reflection of segregated thought and policymaking, which has

0:26:18.556 --> 0:26:22.356
<v Speaker 1>always had this particular conversation more or less policing, more

0:26:22.516 --> 0:26:24.716
<v Speaker 1>or less prisons. But white people were getting a whole

0:26:24.796 --> 0:26:28.276
<v Speaker 1>different level of options. They were getting very different options

0:26:28.316 --> 0:26:30.636
<v Speaker 1>in their community, and their political leadership could do so.

0:26:30.836 --> 0:26:32.796
<v Speaker 1>The third option I would say to answer your question

0:26:32.876 --> 0:26:34.916
<v Speaker 1>is that no matter how many black people are in

0:26:34.996 --> 0:26:37.756
<v Speaker 1>charge at the municipal level, they're still accountable to some

0:26:37.836 --> 0:26:41.076
<v Speaker 1>kind of white economic or political community. And if they

0:26:41.116 --> 0:26:43.556
<v Speaker 1>have aspirations for moving from being a mayor of a

0:26:43.596 --> 0:26:47.076
<v Speaker 1>community to being a governor or a congressperson, then they're

0:26:47.156 --> 0:26:52.236
<v Speaker 1>even more accountable to thinking about what will the decisions

0:26:52.276 --> 0:26:55.716
<v Speaker 1>I make here now, how will that impact me later? Right,

0:26:55.756 --> 0:26:57.836
<v Speaker 1>Corey Booker is the mayor of Newark. But Corey knew

0:26:57.836 --> 0:26:59.196
<v Speaker 1>perfectly well when he was mayor of new Work that

0:26:59.196 --> 0:27:00.436
<v Speaker 1>was not going to be the last job he held,

0:27:00.436 --> 0:27:02.236
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And Corey Senator and he was going to

0:27:02.356 --> 0:27:05.636
<v Speaker 1>run for president and yeah, And Booker's Police Department under

0:27:05.636 --> 0:27:08.876
<v Speaker 1>Gary McCarthy, who was a former NYPD a senior official

0:27:08.916 --> 0:27:11.996
<v Speaker 1>who went on to Chicago, ended up under a consent

0:27:12.076 --> 0:27:18.556
<v Speaker 1>decree for systemic racial profiling. Fascinating, fascinating and not without

0:27:18.596 --> 0:27:21.516
<v Speaker 1>its troubling side. In fact, Gary McCarthy, just to put

0:27:21.516 --> 0:27:24.596
<v Speaker 1>a finer note on it, who was running Booker's Police department,

0:27:25.036 --> 0:27:27.956
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of Chicago's police department when the Laquam

0:27:28.036 --> 0:27:31.916
<v Speaker 1>McDonald cover up took place and lost his job over it.

0:27:32.436 --> 0:27:35.236
<v Speaker 1>So there's just, in a nutshell, an example where black

0:27:35.236 --> 0:27:39.636
<v Speaker 1>political leadership has not been sufficient to addressing these problems

0:27:39.716 --> 0:27:42.476
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a social response or a collective response.

0:27:42.596 --> 0:27:45.356
<v Speaker 1>You can also see, in relation to an NYPD origin

0:27:45.396 --> 0:27:48.676
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned there, that the modern version of the

0:27:48.716 --> 0:27:52.756
<v Speaker 1>statistical argument is the so called comstat model, the idea

0:27:52.756 --> 0:27:56.036
<v Speaker 1>according to which statistics are the magic, the special sauce

0:27:56.316 --> 0:27:59.636
<v Speaker 1>they will enable police to handle urban crime by flooding

0:27:59.636 --> 0:28:02.516
<v Speaker 1>the zone in areas where there's been crime. The core

0:28:02.636 --> 0:28:06.716
<v Speaker 1>criticism there is that it drives a structure of racial profiling,

0:28:06.996 --> 0:28:11.316
<v Speaker 1>which vastly increases arrests of African Americans, especially of young man.

0:28:11.596 --> 0:28:15.436
<v Speaker 1>Your book actually has a kind of prehistory, the origin

0:28:15.516 --> 0:28:17.676
<v Speaker 1>story of racial profiling itself. You want to tell us

0:28:17.676 --> 0:28:19.996
<v Speaker 1>about that, Yeah, so. So. One of the ways in

0:28:20.036 --> 0:28:23.076
<v Speaker 1>which the evolution of this early statistical discourse, starting with

0:28:23.076 --> 0:28:28.236
<v Speaker 1>the census metastasizes in the North is that everyone begins

0:28:28.316 --> 0:28:34.436
<v Speaker 1>to bake in racial crime statistics into their reporting, their

0:28:34.636 --> 0:28:37.796
<v Speaker 1>municipal reporting, for example, and what we begin to see

0:28:37.836 --> 0:28:40.836
<v Speaker 1>as a collapsing everything comes from somewhere. We think cops

0:28:40.836 --> 0:28:43.996
<v Speaker 1>are always using the statistics that actually that was born somewhere. Yeah. Yeah,

0:28:44.036 --> 0:28:46.436
<v Speaker 1>So what we saw, for example, when there were a

0:28:46.476 --> 0:28:49.476
<v Speaker 1>lot of Europeans and their future was still under indetermined.

0:28:50.556 --> 0:28:52.956
<v Speaker 1>European immigrants, you could pull out a police and your

0:28:52.956 --> 0:28:57.756
<v Speaker 1>report and see arrest categories robbery, battery, assault, and it

0:28:57.836 --> 0:29:01.996
<v Speaker 1>would say Russian, Scandinavian, German, Italian, sold and so forth.

0:29:02.036 --> 0:29:04.476
<v Speaker 1>It looked like an Excel spreadsheet, you know, in print.

0:29:05.116 --> 0:29:09.276
<v Speaker 1>By the nineteen thirties, most local statistics were reduced to

0:29:09.316 --> 0:29:15.276
<v Speaker 1>white black other and the federal government reduced them to white, black, Indian, Mexican, Japanese, other.

0:29:15.956 --> 0:29:19.956
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, blackness became kind of the most dominant signifier

0:29:19.996 --> 0:29:22.356
<v Speaker 1>of deviation from a norm, which was a white norm.

0:29:22.516 --> 0:29:25.076
<v Speaker 1>Didn't really matter what white people were doing, And in

0:29:25.116 --> 0:29:29.796
<v Speaker 1>that sense, the agencies of law began to focus explicitly,

0:29:30.036 --> 0:29:32.836
<v Speaker 1>both because the statistics told them to do so, but

0:29:32.996 --> 0:29:36.356
<v Speaker 1>also because they were controlling white spaces in the way

0:29:36.396 --> 0:29:39.756
<v Speaker 1>that we've had a conversation more recently about hashtag living

0:29:39.756 --> 0:29:43.636
<v Speaker 1>while Black. So they were helping on the front lines

0:29:43.716 --> 0:29:47.596
<v Speaker 1>of a kind of surveillance of black communities, ensuring that

0:29:47.636 --> 0:29:50.596
<v Speaker 1>black people would not move into white neighborhoods if there

0:29:50.636 --> 0:29:54.596
<v Speaker 1>were competition over jobs or business ownership. The police were

0:29:54.636 --> 0:29:57.836
<v Speaker 1>often enforcers, and there was tremendous corruption to boot with

0:29:57.876 --> 0:30:01.596
<v Speaker 1>all of this, and that early story which shows up

0:30:01.636 --> 0:30:05.196
<v Speaker 1>in letters to the NAACP complaining about systemic harassment by

0:30:05.236 --> 0:30:07.996
<v Speaker 1>white police officers or observing it on the street, It

0:30:08.076 --> 0:30:10.756
<v Speaker 1>shows up in the first Blue Ribbon Commission, which grew

0:30:10.756 --> 0:30:13.196
<v Speaker 1>out of a race ride in Chicago in nineteen ninety.

0:30:13.516 --> 0:30:17.676
<v Speaker 1>The commission found evidence that there was systemic racial profiling,

0:30:18.076 --> 0:30:21.356
<v Speaker 1>quoted criminal justice officials, all of whom were white, saying, yes,

0:30:21.436 --> 0:30:23.876
<v Speaker 1>it is true if we see a black suspect, we

0:30:23.876 --> 0:30:25.516
<v Speaker 1>will stop and arrest them. If we see a white

0:30:25.516 --> 0:30:27.356
<v Speaker 1>one will just keep an eye on them to see

0:30:27.356 --> 0:30:30.036
<v Speaker 1>if they do something in the future. The results of

0:30:30.076 --> 0:30:36.196
<v Speaker 1>this incredible commission led the authors to say racial crime

0:30:36.236 --> 0:30:39.956
<v Speaker 1>statistics are unreliable and should not be used because they

0:30:39.996 --> 0:30:43.356
<v Speaker 1>do more harm than good. They confuse. So we've been

0:30:43.396 --> 0:30:45.076
<v Speaker 1>down this road. We've been down this road before, and

0:30:45.076 --> 0:30:47.316
<v Speaker 1>there's a kind of sixthical thing. So that actually leads

0:30:47.316 --> 0:30:49.676
<v Speaker 1>me to a question about what should we do about

0:30:49.716 --> 0:30:53.556
<v Speaker 1>this problem. One of the responses that you hear a

0:30:53.556 --> 0:30:56.396
<v Speaker 1>lot today is we need fundamental change, and that comes

0:30:56.396 --> 0:30:58.756
<v Speaker 1>in a moderate form and in a more radical form,

0:30:58.796 --> 0:31:02.036
<v Speaker 1>so to me. An example of the more moderate form

0:31:02.196 --> 0:31:04.436
<v Speaker 1>is a new initiative which has gone a lot of publicity,

0:31:04.516 --> 0:31:09.996
<v Speaker 1>mostly because of Jay Z's involvement in it, to limit

0:31:10.156 --> 0:31:14.436
<v Speaker 1>or maybe do away with supervised forms of release, probation

0:31:14.556 --> 0:31:17.636
<v Speaker 1>or parole that have the effect of putting formerly in

0:31:17.676 --> 0:31:19.356
<v Speaker 1>prison people are in some cases people who didn't go

0:31:19.356 --> 0:31:22.116
<v Speaker 1>to prison at all under kind of constant states surveillance,

0:31:22.116 --> 0:31:24.476
<v Speaker 1>with the risk that if they violate the terms of

0:31:24.516 --> 0:31:28.036
<v Speaker 1>their supervised release, boom, they can go right back to prison.

0:31:28.476 --> 0:31:31.756
<v Speaker 1>The more radical form, which from the moment is still

0:31:31.796 --> 0:31:35.076
<v Speaker 1>heard mostly among activists and on university campuses, is the

0:31:35.156 --> 0:31:38.996
<v Speaker 1>call for genuine abolition, where abolition is the abolition of

0:31:39.116 --> 0:31:43.636
<v Speaker 1>prison altogether. So maybe let's take those in turn. What

0:31:43.676 --> 0:31:48.076
<v Speaker 1>do you think about the let's change supervised release what

0:31:48.116 --> 0:31:52.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling the moderate version of big scale reform. Yeah,

0:31:52.196 --> 0:31:57.596
<v Speaker 1>so I'm all for it. I mean, there's no legitimate

0:31:57.636 --> 0:32:02.196
<v Speaker 1>basis to critique that suggestion for the most part, because

0:32:02.516 --> 0:32:05.996
<v Speaker 1>in some states, the vast majority of new admits are

0:32:06.156 --> 0:32:09.876
<v Speaker 1>supervised released of recommitments. So people who are caught for

0:32:09.916 --> 0:32:13.276
<v Speaker 1>technical violations of parole improbation are the vast majority people

0:32:13.276 --> 0:32:15.196
<v Speaker 1>who are then readmitted to prison or admitted to prison

0:32:15.276 --> 0:32:17.756
<v Speaker 1>at all. In some states it is actually the majority

0:32:17.756 --> 0:32:21.076
<v Speaker 1>of new emits because because the system has been churning

0:32:21.076 --> 0:32:24.436
<v Speaker 1>for so long, there's a vast population. There's something like

0:32:24.476 --> 0:32:26.916
<v Speaker 1>seven million people in our country who are under some

0:32:26.996 --> 0:32:29.676
<v Speaker 1>form of criminal justice supervision has compared to only two

0:32:29.676 --> 0:32:31.716
<v Speaker 1>point two million one point four million are in prison

0:32:31.756 --> 0:32:36.356
<v Speaker 1>the rest and only right only. So so yes, that's

0:32:36.756 --> 0:32:40.116
<v Speaker 1>for some states that would be a huge reduction in

0:32:40.316 --> 0:32:42.156
<v Speaker 1>new admits to say, you know what, they serve their

0:32:42.156 --> 0:32:44.876
<v Speaker 1>time they've been released, they're done. They can't. And the

0:32:44.876 --> 0:32:47.356
<v Speaker 1>most obvious reasons for this is because the reasons to

0:32:47.436 --> 0:32:51.196
<v Speaker 1>trip people up are very much baked into the social

0:32:51.276 --> 0:32:54.356
<v Speaker 1>hierarchies that exist in our community. Which is to say

0:32:54.356 --> 0:32:57.116
<v Speaker 1>that people who are already overly surveiled because they live

0:32:57.156 --> 0:32:59.996
<v Speaker 1>more public lives in urban cities are much more likely

0:33:00.036 --> 0:33:03.716
<v Speaker 1>to get caught having a brusque in a brown paper

0:33:03.756 --> 0:33:05.596
<v Speaker 1>bag because they don't have a nice living room to

0:33:05.596 --> 0:33:07.996
<v Speaker 1>have it right, or even a joint. I mean, the

0:33:08.036 --> 0:33:10.316
<v Speaker 1>God forbid that we still think that somehow, you know,

0:33:10.476 --> 0:33:13.916
<v Speaker 1>you can question someone's moral fitness because they had a joint.

0:33:14.276 --> 0:33:18.116
<v Speaker 1>But yet prosecutors and probation officers will still say, you know,

0:33:18.236 --> 0:33:20.436
<v Speaker 1>this is what Rick Scott, as governor Florida, was still

0:33:20.476 --> 0:33:22.556
<v Speaker 1>doing when he was just a year ago, saying, you know,

0:33:22.756 --> 0:33:24.436
<v Speaker 1>you had that joint, you shouldn't have done it. You

0:33:24.436 --> 0:33:27.716
<v Speaker 1>don't get your right to vote. So what about you said,

0:33:27.716 --> 0:33:29.876
<v Speaker 1>there isn't really a rational counterargument in the way you

0:33:29.956 --> 0:33:32.756
<v Speaker 1>just presented it. You've convinced me. But my question is,

0:33:32.756 --> 0:33:35.236
<v Speaker 1>isn't there at least a possibility that if supervised forms

0:33:35.236 --> 0:33:37.596
<v Speaker 1>of release were eliminated that there would be a public

0:33:37.716 --> 0:33:40.516
<v Speaker 1>push for longer sentencing. I mean, isn't it the case

0:33:40.516 --> 0:33:42.276
<v Speaker 1>that lots of people that are on supervised release would

0:33:42.316 --> 0:33:47.036
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be incarcerated. Well, I think that we have to

0:33:47.076 --> 0:33:54.076
<v Speaker 1>separate out what reformers and scholars are saying about the

0:33:54.116 --> 0:34:01.156
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of decarceration from the popular appetite for retributive justice. Yep.

0:34:01.636 --> 0:34:04.396
<v Speaker 1>And that's a big problem, and that is not addressed

0:34:04.476 --> 0:34:08.076
<v Speaker 1>by supervised released, right, the mechanics of a legislative fix

0:34:08.156 --> 0:34:10.916
<v Speaker 1>that said, this is one way to get as significant reductions.

0:34:11.196 --> 0:34:13.476
<v Speaker 1>And the other problem is, well, what happens if one

0:34:13.476 --> 0:34:15.596
<v Speaker 1>of those people who would have been on supervisor released

0:34:15.836 --> 0:34:18.596
<v Speaker 1>does something terrible and the public says, lock them up.

0:34:18.676 --> 0:34:20.516
<v Speaker 1>But it's sort of it's sort of dealt with in

0:34:20.556 --> 0:34:23.156
<v Speaker 1>the following sense, in the sense that it's an escape valve.

0:34:23.596 --> 0:34:26.516
<v Speaker 1>So you have people who are in the system, you know,

0:34:26.636 --> 0:34:31.876
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors and police officials and prison officials who know that

0:34:31.916 --> 0:34:35.556
<v Speaker 1>there's just too many people in the system, and then

0:34:35.596 --> 0:34:37.516
<v Speaker 1>you have a public saying lock them up, lock them up.

0:34:37.796 --> 0:34:40.796
<v Speaker 1>So then there's a kind of secret pact among the

0:34:40.836 --> 0:34:42.996
<v Speaker 1>people who run for elected office saying, well, we're locking

0:34:43.036 --> 0:34:45.276
<v Speaker 1>them up, We're giving people log sentences, but then in

0:34:45.316 --> 0:34:47.756
<v Speaker 1>fact they are being released to be a supervised release.

0:34:48.316 --> 0:34:50.476
<v Speaker 1>Take away the supervised release you're taking away. I mean,

0:34:50.516 --> 0:34:53.116
<v Speaker 1>it's not a very attractive method of dealing with their problem.

0:34:53.156 --> 0:34:56.396
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it, in some structural sense a way that

0:34:56.476 --> 0:34:59.796
<v Speaker 1>elected officials have tried to reduce the effects of the

0:34:59.836 --> 0:35:04.676
<v Speaker 1>public's long run, you know, apparently insatiable desire to have

0:35:04.756 --> 0:35:08.116
<v Speaker 1>at least a symbol of strong crime response. Well, I

0:35:08.356 --> 0:35:10.756
<v Speaker 1>think we should harst the public a little bit more so.

0:35:10.836 --> 0:35:14.156
<v Speaker 1>There are some publics who genuinely think that we've gone

0:35:14.196 --> 0:35:17.356
<v Speaker 1>way overboard with sentencing period and have been advocating for

0:35:17.476 --> 0:35:21.036
<v Speaker 1>and calling for rejection of all kinds of mandatory minimals,

0:35:21.036 --> 0:35:22.956
<v Speaker 1>particularly at the state level, which we're not addressed by

0:35:22.956 --> 0:35:25.796
<v Speaker 1>the first step back. I think the other aspect of this,

0:35:25.956 --> 0:35:29.836
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to thinking about various forms of supervisor release,

0:35:29.916 --> 0:35:33.756
<v Speaker 1>people are calling for alternatives to incarceration, which might include

0:35:33.756 --> 0:35:38.436
<v Speaker 1>electronic monitoring. So that's not even about release at the

0:35:38.476 --> 0:35:41.716
<v Speaker 1>point of the shortening of a sentence. That is actually

0:35:41.716 --> 0:35:45.276
<v Speaker 1>a disposition that the person never goes instead of and

0:35:45.716 --> 0:35:48.516
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us and I would express concern here too,

0:35:48.676 --> 0:35:53.156
<v Speaker 1>is we may be trading on one form of a

0:35:53.276 --> 0:35:56.436
<v Speaker 1>punitive system for another, because now it's like, oh well,

0:35:56.476 --> 0:35:58.236
<v Speaker 1>we don't even have to spend money on these people.

0:35:58.276 --> 0:36:02.476
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have a wrinkle bracelet on everybody, even people

0:36:02.476 --> 0:36:06.116
<v Speaker 1>who through plea bargaining, we just figure so we have

0:36:06.516 --> 0:36:08.956
<v Speaker 1>one way to answer. This is what jay Z and

0:36:09.116 --> 0:36:12.596
<v Speaker 1>others are calling for. Are not addressing the cultural roots.

0:36:12.796 --> 0:36:15.396
<v Speaker 1>I don't addrest. It's a it's a it's a band aid,

0:36:15.436 --> 0:36:18.516
<v Speaker 1>it's a fix. So what about them the people who

0:36:18.556 --> 0:36:21.076
<v Speaker 1>claim and La Davis most famously, but lots of other

0:36:21.076 --> 0:36:23.596
<v Speaker 1>people are on board for something it's not a band aid,

0:36:24.116 --> 0:36:27.916
<v Speaker 1>namely abolition of prisons altogether. To me, this is an

0:36:27.916 --> 0:36:31.836
<v Speaker 1>issue that hasn't yet fully penetrated. Certainly, it's it's making

0:36:31.836 --> 0:36:33.916
<v Speaker 1>inroads in the African American public. I don't think it's

0:36:33.916 --> 0:36:38.076
<v Speaker 1>penetrated the average white person's consciousness yet, except on campuses.

0:36:39.196 --> 0:36:40.876
<v Speaker 1>What's your what's your view on it? When I first

0:36:40.916 --> 0:36:42.196
<v Speaker 1>heard about it, you know a few years ago, I

0:36:42.236 --> 0:36:45.396
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself, this is utopianism. Now I'm not so sure. Well,

0:36:45.396 --> 0:36:47.476
<v Speaker 1>this is where the two things we just talked about

0:36:47.516 --> 0:36:50.436
<v Speaker 1>may intersect in an odd way. So I would agree

0:36:50.436 --> 0:36:54.556
<v Speaker 1>with you that African Americans are may over index, you know,

0:36:54.676 --> 0:36:57.836
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of the activist community. But I would

0:36:57.876 --> 0:37:00.756
<v Speaker 1>not I would not suggest, going back to Foreman's work

0:37:00.796 --> 0:37:03.996
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, deeper roots of how black people

0:37:03.996 --> 0:37:07.236
<v Speaker 1>have understood punitiveness as a civil rights project itself, say

0:37:07.276 --> 0:37:10.676
<v Speaker 1>that they're all all on board either, but especially in

0:37:10.716 --> 0:37:14.796
<v Speaker 1>communities that feel their closest to the kind of gun

0:37:14.916 --> 0:37:17.676
<v Speaker 1>violence that does happen. I didn't mean to suggest that.

0:37:17.676 --> 0:37:20.076
<v Speaker 1>I just meant that if you pull the average African

0:37:20.076 --> 0:37:22.116
<v Speaker 1>American and maybe the people ever heard of the idea

0:37:22.116 --> 0:37:24.036
<v Speaker 1>of abolition, not that they're on board with it, but

0:37:24.076 --> 0:37:25.516
<v Speaker 1>they might have at least heard of it. I think

0:37:25.516 --> 0:37:28.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm waitfuless not even so clear that's true. I'll take

0:37:28.756 --> 0:37:31.956
<v Speaker 1>that one, and I think that it begs the larger

0:37:32.076 --> 0:37:35.516
<v Speaker 1>question of how radical are our imaginations? Because to me,

0:37:35.596 --> 0:37:37.796
<v Speaker 1>the most generative aspect, well, how radical should they be?

0:37:37.876 --> 0:37:39.716
<v Speaker 1>I mean, press they should, they should be. They should

0:37:39.716 --> 0:37:42.636
<v Speaker 1>be as radical as ending prison because the first prison

0:37:42.676 --> 0:37:48.156
<v Speaker 1>that was built in Philadelphia, in Eastern State Penitentiary at

0:37:48.156 --> 0:37:51.396
<v Speaker 1>the top of the nineteenth century, failed and it failed

0:37:51.396 --> 0:37:53.236
<v Speaker 1>by the standards of the people who built it, and

0:37:53.396 --> 0:37:55.796
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to rehabilitate people and they couldn't. Well, it

0:37:55.796 --> 0:37:58.036
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even that they wanted to rehabilitate people and they couldn't.

0:37:58.156 --> 0:38:00.476
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't about a recidivism problem. It was about a

0:38:00.476 --> 0:38:04.516
<v Speaker 1>brutality problem that people who genuinely thought that a prison

0:38:04.516 --> 0:38:07.236
<v Speaker 1>could be a place for penitence in isolation, so that

0:38:07.236 --> 0:38:10.436
<v Speaker 1>a person could be reborn, were object to systemic abuse

0:38:10.516 --> 0:38:13.916
<v Speaker 1>by the people by their jailers, and the very construction

0:38:13.956 --> 0:38:15.836
<v Speaker 1>of the prison, while they thought it was going to

0:38:15.876 --> 0:38:18.396
<v Speaker 1>bring people closure to God, turned out to produce insanity.

0:38:18.996 --> 0:38:21.356
<v Speaker 1>We've never solved that problem, and in fact, in the

0:38:21.356 --> 0:38:24.836
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century we doubled down on solitary confinement because we

0:38:24.916 --> 0:38:27.476
<v Speaker 1>believed it was the best, the best way to manage

0:38:27.836 --> 0:38:30.676
<v Speaker 1>the prison population, which grew and grew and grew, and

0:38:30.716 --> 0:38:33.236
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't enough room to do this. So we've failed

0:38:33.516 --> 0:38:36.796
<v Speaker 1>by every generation, by every standard that the people who

0:38:36.796 --> 0:38:40.316
<v Speaker 1>were innovating thought was the best next best thing to

0:38:40.356 --> 0:38:43.316
<v Speaker 1>do to meet our own goals and expectations. So this

0:38:43.356 --> 0:38:45.756
<v Speaker 1>may be an example of where going deep into the

0:38:45.836 --> 0:38:47.916
<v Speaker 1>history can actually change your perspective on it. I mean,

0:38:47.916 --> 0:38:50.916
<v Speaker 1>if you think that prisons all you've ever had. Then

0:38:50.956 --> 0:38:52.796
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, we're stuck with it. But in fact,

0:38:52.796 --> 0:38:56.796
<v Speaker 1>there were other mechanisms of addressing crime before prisons, and

0:38:56.876 --> 0:38:59.436
<v Speaker 1>prisons were invented at a certain moment, and when those

0:38:59.436 --> 0:39:01.116
<v Speaker 1>other methods were thought out to work, they got rid

0:39:01.156 --> 0:39:03.436
<v Speaker 1>of those, And maybe it's now time to think about

0:39:03.476 --> 0:39:06.356
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of prisons. So then the obvious next question

0:39:06.476 --> 0:39:09.116
<v Speaker 1>is what are those alternatives? I mean, the options from

0:39:09.196 --> 0:39:12.916
<v Speaker 1>before now seem to us unimaginably brutal, sort of in

0:39:12.956 --> 0:39:14.996
<v Speaker 1>the way that maybe in the future people will think

0:39:14.996 --> 0:39:17.676
<v Speaker 1>of prison as having been just inherently not just the

0:39:17.676 --> 0:39:21.676
<v Speaker 1>conditions that currently exist, but inherently fundamentally brutal. But you know,

0:39:21.716 --> 0:39:24.036
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to go back to chopping off people's hands.

0:39:24.076 --> 0:39:26.276
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we don't believe in transport. Maybe we

0:39:26.316 --> 0:39:28.556
<v Speaker 1>would transport people to Australia if we could, but we

0:39:28.596 --> 0:39:32.676
<v Speaker 1>don't have so many places that are obvious sources or locations.

0:39:32.956 --> 0:39:36.076
<v Speaker 1>So what are the kinds of options that are credible today? Yeah,

0:39:36.516 --> 0:39:38.876
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to shout out a colleague of mine's work.

0:39:38.996 --> 0:39:41.596
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Daniel Serich. He runs an organization in

0:39:41.956 --> 0:39:45.156
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn called Common Justice, and she's written a book called

0:39:45.236 --> 0:39:48.836
<v Speaker 1>Until We Reckon, And the most important point of this

0:39:48.876 --> 0:39:55.116
<v Speaker 1>book is that if we think about the problem of

0:39:55.156 --> 0:40:02.796
<v Speaker 1>harm and violence, especially as a recipe for shame and accountability,

0:40:02.876 --> 0:40:05.916
<v Speaker 1>in other words, that people who have done something terrible

0:40:05.956 --> 0:40:08.836
<v Speaker 1>to someone feel shame, and people who have been victimized

0:40:08.876 --> 0:40:12.756
<v Speaker 1>by violence often feel shame, and that prison itself is

0:40:12.796 --> 0:40:18.236
<v Speaker 1>a shame factory. So prison's not working if if we could, well,

0:40:18.396 --> 0:40:21.396
<v Speaker 1>why because it's made for shame. I buy that interpretation

0:40:21.396 --> 0:40:23.636
<v Speaker 1>of it right on. A theory that shame will work

0:40:23.756 --> 0:40:26.036
<v Speaker 1>is the argument that it's shaming but failing to work.

0:40:26.916 --> 0:40:30.836
<v Speaker 1>It's shaming and producing violence and makes more violence. It

0:40:30.876 --> 0:40:33.636
<v Speaker 1>makes more violence, and that people who are exposed to violence,

0:40:33.676 --> 0:40:36.876
<v Speaker 1>according to epidemiologists, are more likely to convince by So

0:40:36.916 --> 0:40:39.396
<v Speaker 1>the very thing that we use as punishment is a

0:40:39.476 --> 0:40:42.796
<v Speaker 1>violence producer. And so her work is the first and

0:40:42.876 --> 0:40:48.276
<v Speaker 1>most significant effort for an alternative to violent offenders. So

0:40:48.796 --> 0:40:52.836
<v Speaker 1>one one line of defensive response this would be to say, well,

0:40:52.876 --> 0:40:55.436
<v Speaker 1>that's true, prison doesn't fix people, and in fact, it

0:40:55.476 --> 0:40:58.556
<v Speaker 1>does make people worse off. But you know, the last

0:40:58.596 --> 0:41:01.756
<v Speaker 1>fallback of a scoundrel who's got no alternative institutional option

0:41:02.276 --> 0:41:03.756
<v Speaker 1>is to say well, at least people who are in

0:41:03.796 --> 0:41:06.716
<v Speaker 1>prison aren't commending violence on people outside of the prison.

0:41:06.956 --> 0:41:10.396
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a kind of sad last defense, but

0:41:10.476 --> 0:41:12.476
<v Speaker 1>it is out there as a possible defense, and maybe

0:41:12.476 --> 0:41:15.036
<v Speaker 1>it's even heard among people who live in communities that

0:41:15.036 --> 0:41:18.036
<v Speaker 1>are most likely to be affected by violent offenders. So

0:41:18.156 --> 0:41:20.956
<v Speaker 1>then think of it this way. So while the single

0:41:21.036 --> 0:41:26.396
<v Speaker 1>individual who is being incarcerated for violence may be incapacitated

0:41:26.436 --> 0:41:30.276
<v Speaker 1>by the experience of incarceration, that individual can't hurt anybody

0:41:30.316 --> 0:41:33.476
<v Speaker 1>outside of prisoners, right, is touching someone who's coming home tomorrow.

0:41:33.956 --> 0:41:35.796
<v Speaker 1>In some way, shape or form. They share the same

0:41:35.836 --> 0:41:39.076
<v Speaker 1>social ecology, So you may not as that are breeding

0:41:39.076 --> 0:41:41.556
<v Speaker 1>ground for more violence, right for the person who now

0:41:41.596 --> 0:41:43.836
<v Speaker 1>has been exposed to you, who are not being treated

0:41:43.876 --> 0:41:47.516
<v Speaker 1>for your violence, who have no mechanism to actually seek

0:41:47.556 --> 0:41:50.956
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness or redemption through the means of being in community

0:41:50.996 --> 0:41:52.796
<v Speaker 1>with the person who you did harm to. The other

0:41:52.876 --> 0:41:55.476
<v Speaker 1>point that she makes is that individuals who have been

0:41:55.516 --> 0:41:59.396
<v Speaker 1>harmed are now subject themselves to committing violence, and they

0:41:59.396 --> 0:42:04.716
<v Speaker 1>don't get the opportunity for accountability from the wrongdoer that

0:42:04.796 --> 0:42:08.076
<v Speaker 1>they need. So it becomes a vicious cycle where the

0:42:08.116 --> 0:42:11.916
<v Speaker 1>people who have been armed, are more likely later on

0:42:11.956 --> 0:42:16.036
<v Speaker 1>to become violence perpetrators, and the violence perpetrators are in

0:42:16.036 --> 0:42:18.836
<v Speaker 1>an institution that produces violence and sends people home back

0:42:18.876 --> 0:42:23.316
<v Speaker 1>every day. Now, I am not one to both use

0:42:23.476 --> 0:42:27.676
<v Speaker 1>kind of the language of damage imagery to reinforce these

0:42:27.676 --> 0:42:29.356
<v Speaker 1>notions where I don't want to live anywhere near these

0:42:29.356 --> 0:42:30.996
<v Speaker 1>people because they sound like they've got a lot of issues,

0:42:31.036 --> 0:42:33.116
<v Speaker 1>and you also use them. You also use the metaphor

0:42:33.116 --> 0:42:38.276
<v Speaker 1>of epidemiology, that's right, or the discipline of epidemiology, which

0:42:38.316 --> 0:42:41.356
<v Speaker 1>is of course comes from infectious diseases. That's the word epidemics.

0:42:41.716 --> 0:42:44.236
<v Speaker 1>That's also a that's a I mean fraud nothing. I mean,

0:42:44.276 --> 0:42:47.796
<v Speaker 1>that's a terrifying and I think worrisome image to use.

0:42:47.836 --> 0:42:50.316
<v Speaker 1>It implies that criminality is catching in some way, which

0:42:50.556 --> 0:42:52.476
<v Speaker 1>might be our own up to date version of the

0:42:52.516 --> 0:42:55.756
<v Speaker 1>old idea that there's something inherent in people's qualities. So

0:42:55.836 --> 0:42:58.116
<v Speaker 1>one way we have to wrestle with this, and this

0:42:58.196 --> 0:43:00.556
<v Speaker 1>is a conundrum that I haven't solved yet. Just in

0:43:00.596 --> 0:43:04.116
<v Speaker 1>describing these mechanisms is what we keep coming back to

0:43:04.396 --> 0:43:08.356
<v Speaker 1>is prison is not helping. And so one way that

0:43:08.476 --> 0:43:11.156
<v Speaker 1>she just this work and is proving the work in

0:43:11.196 --> 0:43:13.876
<v Speaker 1>the work that she does daily is people are being

0:43:13.916 --> 0:43:18.116
<v Speaker 1>remanded to her care, and that includes people who have

0:43:18.156 --> 0:43:21.316
<v Speaker 1>committed violence. And just so your listeners know, the vast

0:43:21.356 --> 0:43:24.116
<v Speaker 1>majority of people in prison are not murderers. Fifty four

0:43:24.156 --> 0:43:27.156
<v Speaker 1>percent are convicted for what is considered a violent crime,

0:43:27.196 --> 0:43:30.836
<v Speaker 1>which is robbery. And so this is not necessarily about

0:43:30.836 --> 0:43:34.356
<v Speaker 1>people who just are schizophrenic or psychopaths who just go

0:43:34.396 --> 0:43:37.276
<v Speaker 1>out and kill people. This is often related to their poverty.

0:43:37.636 --> 0:43:40.676
<v Speaker 1>So to solve this problem for her and the work

0:43:40.716 --> 0:43:43.796
<v Speaker 1>that she does means that outside of the prison system,

0:43:43.836 --> 0:43:46.596
<v Speaker 1>we can actually achieve two things. We can help people

0:43:46.596 --> 0:43:50.036
<v Speaker 1>who have done harm find their voice of accountability which

0:43:50.076 --> 0:43:53.476
<v Speaker 1>makes them feel better, and the victim of it can

0:43:53.516 --> 0:43:55.716
<v Speaker 1>feel better so that they can move on with their

0:43:55.716 --> 0:43:59.436
<v Speaker 1>lives as well. So there you break that cycle. There's

0:43:59.436 --> 0:44:03.236
<v Speaker 1>something scary, though, to me, at least underneath that description,

0:44:03.276 --> 0:44:06.356
<v Speaker 1>because you made what I think is an incontrovertible point

0:44:06.396 --> 0:44:07.916
<v Speaker 1>that if there is a root cause that we can

0:44:07.956 --> 0:44:11.556
<v Speaker 1>identify and associate with crime, it's poverty. That implies that

0:44:11.716 --> 0:44:14.596
<v Speaker 1>unless something can be fundamentally done about the structure of

0:44:14.596 --> 0:44:16.876
<v Speaker 1>poverty in the United States, and particularly the racialized structure

0:44:16.876 --> 0:44:20.476
<v Speaker 1>of poverty, there won't be a solution to the problem

0:44:20.556 --> 0:44:24.036
<v Speaker 1>of crime. Most broadly, is that a fair interpretation of

0:44:24.036 --> 0:44:26.036
<v Speaker 1>what you just said? Oh? Absolutely, so, you know, don't

0:44:26.076 --> 0:44:28.276
<v Speaker 1>get me started on the root causes argument that have

0:44:28.436 --> 0:44:32.436
<v Speaker 1>mostly been dismissed as you know, too hard in this country,

0:44:32.516 --> 0:44:35.556
<v Speaker 1>and we need to reclaim and I think having conversations

0:44:35.556 --> 0:44:38.076
<v Speaker 1>about new deals, whether they're green or otherwise, you know,

0:44:38.196 --> 0:44:40.596
<v Speaker 1>is a step in the right direction. But I also

0:44:40.636 --> 0:44:43.236
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear that we also know what decarcerated

0:44:43.236 --> 0:44:45.876
<v Speaker 1>communities look like. They can look around and see them.

0:44:45.916 --> 0:44:48.876
<v Speaker 1>They look like those rural communities that we've already talked about,

0:44:48.916 --> 0:44:51.436
<v Speaker 1>and they look like affluent suburbs. And if we put

0:44:51.716 --> 0:44:54.076
<v Speaker 1>this sounds like oh there he goes again, like if

0:44:54.116 --> 0:44:56.796
<v Speaker 1>you put a police officer on every corner of a

0:44:56.836 --> 0:44:59.116
<v Speaker 1>college campus, you know, the place would be, you know,

0:44:59.196 --> 0:45:02.516
<v Speaker 1>full of X felans. Well, we might be dismissive of

0:45:02.556 --> 0:45:05.356
<v Speaker 1>the thought of that, but it's true. And the degree

0:45:05.396 --> 0:45:08.956
<v Speaker 1>to which we're watching in the Trump era, men of

0:45:09.196 --> 0:45:13.316
<v Speaker 1>affluence and wealth and connections have the kind of lawyering

0:45:13.916 --> 0:45:19.236
<v Speaker 1>that turns on levels of evidence that the vast majority

0:45:19.236 --> 0:45:22.236
<v Speaker 1>of indigent defendants in this country never even come close

0:45:22.276 --> 0:45:24.556
<v Speaker 1>to being able to argue, and even if they argue

0:45:24.596 --> 0:45:27.396
<v Speaker 1>them successfully, if they go before a judge are not

0:45:27.516 --> 0:45:29.316
<v Speaker 1>likely to win the case, and if they go before

0:45:29.316 --> 0:45:31.636
<v Speaker 1>a jury are also not likely to win the case.

0:45:32.036 --> 0:45:35.996
<v Speaker 1>Tells us a lot about the moral corruption and bankruptcy

0:45:36.396 --> 0:45:39.636
<v Speaker 1>of our entire system that, as Brian Stephenson says to quote,

0:45:39.636 --> 0:45:41.636
<v Speaker 1>if you're rich and guilty, you're more likely to go

0:45:41.676 --> 0:45:44.396
<v Speaker 1>free then if you're poor and innocent. Khaliljubran Mohammed, thank

0:45:44.396 --> 0:45:48.916
<v Speaker 1>you for taking us deep into the prehistory and looking

0:45:48.996 --> 0:45:51.196
<v Speaker 1>us looking with us into the future. Thank you very much,

0:45:51.236 --> 0:46:05.516
<v Speaker 1>great to be here. We have the tendency to think

0:46:05.836 --> 0:46:08.956
<v Speaker 1>that the problems of racing incarceration are pretty new problems.

0:46:09.516 --> 0:46:11.516
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they go back to the nineteen sixties, we think,

0:46:11.636 --> 0:46:13.996
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they're even more recent. Maybe they have to

0:46:14.036 --> 0:46:17.076
<v Speaker 1>do with the crackdown on crime in the nineteen eighties

0:46:17.436 --> 0:46:20.796
<v Speaker 1>and the rise of stop and frisk policing. But listening

0:46:20.796 --> 0:46:23.116
<v Speaker 1>to Khalil made me realize that's just not the way

0:46:23.116 --> 0:46:26.916
<v Speaker 1>it is. He traces the problem of race and incarceration

0:46:26.996 --> 0:46:29.236
<v Speaker 1>being closely linked all the way back to eighteen ninety

0:46:29.436 --> 0:46:32.796
<v Speaker 1>and even maybe before then, to the very moment when

0:46:32.876 --> 0:46:37.476
<v Speaker 1>slavery went away and was replaced almost immediately by segregation

0:46:37.716 --> 0:46:41.076
<v Speaker 1>as the main mechanism of establishing racial control over black

0:46:41.116 --> 0:46:45.116
<v Speaker 1>people in the United States. That's a devastating thought, and

0:46:45.196 --> 0:46:48.276
<v Speaker 1>it makes you worry about whether America's DNA is so

0:46:48.316 --> 0:46:51.196
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally racist that we can't fix the problem of race

0:46:51.236 --> 0:46:54.316
<v Speaker 1>and incarceration. And I think it helps explain why it

0:46:54.436 --> 0:46:57.076
<v Speaker 1>is that so many serious thought leaders in this area,

0:46:57.156 --> 0:46:59.796
<v Speaker 1>people like Khalil, have begun to argue for the most

0:46:59.876 --> 0:47:03.636
<v Speaker 1>radical possible solution to the problem, namely the abolition of prisons.

0:47:04.756 --> 0:47:07.396
<v Speaker 1>Not sure I'm there myself quite yet, but it's really

0:47:07.396 --> 0:47:09.636
<v Speaker 1>clear to me that I and the most of us

0:47:09.836 --> 0:47:12.396
<v Speaker 1>need to be thinking pretty darn hard about whether that's

0:47:12.396 --> 0:47:18.596
<v Speaker 1>the way to go. Deep Background is brought to you

0:47:18.636 --> 0:47:22.316
<v Speaker 1>by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia Geancott, with engineering

0:47:22.316 --> 0:47:26.596
<v Speaker 1>by Jason Gambrel and Jason Rostkowski. Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon.

0:47:26.876 --> 0:47:29.996
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music is composed by Luis GERA special thanks

0:47:29.996 --> 0:47:33.636
<v Speaker 1>to the Pushkin Brass Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Lobel.

0:47:34.076 --> 0:47:36.356
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:47:36.356 --> 0:47:39.316
<v Speaker 1>Noah R. Feldman. This is deep background