1 00:00:09,039 --> 00:00:11,119 Speaker 1: What do you think about Oliver Stones JFK. 2 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:17,919 Speaker 2: It's just it's a super well directed, entertaining, big movie. 3 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 2: So even if you don't agree with everything, or there 4 00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:25,440 Speaker 2: are holes in the case that he's making, which there 5 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 2: definitely are, it's still a super fun, great movie to watch. 6 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:34,800 Speaker 2: There's also Joe Peshi in one of his best roles. 7 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:38,320 Speaker 2: David Ferry is like the most insane character you can't 8 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:41,240 Speaker 2: believe out of everything that's maybe made up in the movie, 9 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:44,319 Speaker 2: that guy and all of his quirks are real. And 10 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:50,280 Speaker 2: then Ed Asner, John Candy, Jack Lemon, Walter Mathow. It's like, oh, 11 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:52,840 Speaker 2: you should watch the movie just for all of that cast. 12 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 2: Sissy Spacek, Laurie Metcalf. 13 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:05,000 Speaker 1: I'm George Severis, I'm Lyra Smith. 14 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:08,800 Speaker 3: And this is United States of Kennedy, a podcast about 15 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,280 Speaker 3: our cultural fascination with the Kennedy Dynasty. Every week we 16 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:15,440 Speaker 3: go into one aspect of the Kennedy story, and today 17 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:19,160 Speaker 3: we have our first installment of the monthly Kennedy Movie Club. 18 00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:23,559 Speaker 3: So for today we watched Oliver Stone's JFK. Oliver Stone, 19 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:26,920 Speaker 3: of course, you might know from such movies as Wall 20 00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:29,720 Speaker 3: Street and its sequel, Wall Street, Money, Never Sleeps, The 21 00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:34,039 Speaker 3: Doors movie, Heaven and Earth, Natural Born Killers, and then 22 00:01:34,080 --> 00:01:37,960 Speaker 3: for our Purposes. He's also a real chronicler of American 23 00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:43,679 Speaker 3: power and American politics. So he's done w about George W. Bush, 24 00:01:43,720 --> 00:01:46,680 Speaker 3: he's done Nixon about Nixon, and of course he's done 25 00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 3: JFK about not quite JFK, but more the controversies around 26 00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:52,919 Speaker 3: JFK's assassination. 27 00:01:53,360 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 4: Released in nineteen ninety one, it's very well known for 28 00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 4: its real life impact. After the movie came out and 29 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 4: was very popular, the Assassination Records Review Board or a 30 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:12,679 Speaker 4: ARRB publicly agreed with the film's message that quote, Americans 31 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:17,320 Speaker 4: could not trust official public conclusions when those conclusions had 32 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 4: been made in secret. 33 00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 3: So it's a fascinating movie because on the one hand, 34 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,680 Speaker 3: it was roundly criticized and mocked by people that said 35 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:29,800 Speaker 3: it was completely conspiratorial. It really like leans into the 36 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 3: idea that we are constantly being lied to that there's 37 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 3: some sort of conspiracy involving the CIA, various other people 38 00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:40,080 Speaker 3: in power that essentially some combination of the American government 39 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 3: and various other American institutions along with the Mafia, random 40 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:47,120 Speaker 3: gay guys, you name it, came together and murdered JFK. 41 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 3: So on the one hand, it was sort of in 42 00:02:50,200 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 3: a sense discredited by some mainstream people in mainstream media. 43 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:57,320 Speaker 3: But on the other hand, it was incredibly critically acclaimed. 44 00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:00,239 Speaker 3: It was nominated for Oscars, It won the or for 45 00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:02,799 Speaker 3: at least editing, I believe, and it was nominated I 46 00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:05,239 Speaker 3: think Tommy Lee Jones was nominated for Best Supporting Actor. 47 00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:07,799 Speaker 3: It is an incredibly well made movie. It's a really 48 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 3: incredible feat of filmmaking. So it has this mixed reputation, 49 00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:15,119 Speaker 3: and so we thought who better to discuss it with 50 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:18,720 Speaker 3: than Amy Nicholson, the Los Angeles Times film critic and 51 00:03:18,800 --> 00:03:21,119 Speaker 3: co host of the film podcast Unspoiled. 52 00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:26,480 Speaker 1: Hi, Amy, thanks for being here. Hello, Hi, great to 53 00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: be here. 54 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:31,359 Speaker 4: We are discussing Oliver Stones JFK today. 55 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:32,799 Speaker 1: Had you seen it before? 56 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:36,240 Speaker 5: I was one of those creepy kids with a bunch 57 00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:39,320 Speaker 5: of books on the JFK assassination that I would just 58 00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 5: flip through and look at all the pictures and be 59 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 5: like WHOA without really understanding much about who JFK was 60 00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:49,000 Speaker 5: and what he represented in what he meant and pretty 61 00:03:49,080 --> 00:03:51,080 Speaker 5: much anything besides like glamor and glitz. So I had 62 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:55,000 Speaker 5: watched jfk Oh when I was a child and not 63 00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:58,440 Speaker 5: really understood anything except you know, back into the left, 64 00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 5: back into the left, yack into the left. 65 00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 1: Yeah. 66 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 4: After watching the movie and then having like adult sized 67 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:09,440 Speaker 4: questions kind of like ruined the conspiracy of my youth. 68 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:13,680 Speaker 4: It really is like had the opposite effect on me 69 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:15,760 Speaker 4: that Oliver Stone intended. 70 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:16,920 Speaker 1: I sort of agree. 71 00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:20,040 Speaker 3: I really wish I had watched it as a teen 72 00:04:20,560 --> 00:04:23,719 Speaker 3: like I had. I have such nostalgia for watching similar 73 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:27,760 Speaker 3: things and being like mind blown, like they're lying to 74 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,040 Speaker 3: us man, and I just like really wish I had 75 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 3: watched this when I was younger and more impressionable. 76 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:35,280 Speaker 5: I mean, I don't am I the only person here 77 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,120 Speaker 5: who was a weekly world news teenager who like read 78 00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:40,320 Speaker 5: tabloids and just thought they were too and grew up 79 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:42,040 Speaker 5: being like, yeah, this all makes sense. 80 00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 4: Well, I grew up thinking that literally every single person 81 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:49,280 Speaker 4: on earth knew for a fact that this was a conspiracy, 82 00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:52,320 Speaker 4: and that conspiracy wasn't even the right word to use, 83 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:56,120 Speaker 4: like this is just a fact Oswald didn't kill Kennedy 84 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:58,360 Speaker 4: or was not the only one who shot at Kennedy. 85 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:02,839 Speaker 4: That's what I grew up thinking. And apparently I think 86 00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:07,120 Speaker 4: it's less than thirty percent or something of Americans today 87 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:08,440 Speaker 4: would disagree with that. 88 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:09,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's tracks. 89 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 4: Yeah, but the majority of people are like, yeah, the 90 00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:16,880 Speaker 4: CIA kill JFK, what are you talking about CIA or 91 00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:18,920 Speaker 4: the MOB or you know, like it's like a known 92 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:20,359 Speaker 4: fact is the way it's treated. 93 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 5: So we're living in Oliver Stones America. We are all 94 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:25,040 Speaker 5: post all of our Stone children. 95 00:05:25,680 --> 00:05:25,919 Speaker 1: I know. 96 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 3: I think, well, I think there's a sort of It's 97 00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:30,320 Speaker 3: tough because on the one hand, there are things we 98 00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:32,039 Speaker 3: are not being told. On the other hand, I don't 99 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:34,719 Speaker 3: think this specific conspiracy that is being laid out in 100 00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 3: this movie is the correct one from beginning the end. 101 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:39,240 Speaker 1: But isn't it convincing? 102 00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:42,920 Speaker 5: It's so convincing in the moment, right, I should say 103 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:45,159 Speaker 5: maybe my strength and weakness as a folk critic because 104 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 5: I could be incredibly susceptible, Like my heart is very open. 105 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:50,040 Speaker 1: It's a things. 106 00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 5: So I saw a documentary a few years ago that 107 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:55,480 Speaker 5: convinced me that Marilyn Monroe was murdered because she was 108 00:05:55,640 --> 00:05:58,479 Speaker 5: having an affair with RFK, and I was like, okay, 109 00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:01,120 Speaker 5: that all tracks, So yeah, I have to do a 110 00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:03,040 Speaker 5: lot of research when I finished watching something to try 111 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:05,440 Speaker 5: to put my feedback on the ground, Well, I am. 112 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:05,880 Speaker 1: The same one. 113 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:09,240 Speaker 3: I mean, that's also the issue with conspiracy culture is 114 00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 3: like it stems from a very correct impulse, which is 115 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:16,279 Speaker 3: that at any given time we are not being told 116 00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 3: like one hundred percent the truth, which is of course 117 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 3: right in any kind of like globalized world that is, 118 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 3: you know, where the systems of information are controlled by 119 00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:27,720 Speaker 3: various powerful people. 120 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 1: I know, I already sound like. 121 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 3: A conspiracy theorist, but then of course you're right, that 122 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 3: is sort of just like an obvious fact. And then 123 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:37,960 Speaker 3: of course people let their imaginations run wild, and if 124 00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:43,279 Speaker 3: you're sort of like unmoored from wanting to remain within 125 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 3: like a respectable circle of discourse, then suddenly you just 126 00:06:46,320 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 3: like go all the way off and suddenly it's you know, 127 00:06:48,920 --> 00:06:51,359 Speaker 3: Tommy Lee Jones in a sort of like fabulous wig. 128 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 1: I So I. 129 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:58,880 Speaker 4: Watched it twice this weekend, and the first time I 130 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:03,400 Speaker 4: was and I believed it all, or at least I 131 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 4: was like, yes, okay, sure, all of the timelines that 132 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,720 Speaker 4: they present, I'm like, yeah, you're right, he couldn't do it. 133 00:07:10,760 --> 00:07:14,280 Speaker 4: And I was just really fully on board to believe 134 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:18,120 Speaker 4: even everything. You know, mister X said, And then I 135 00:07:18,200 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 4: watched it again while tracking along, I found this guy, which, 136 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:26,000 Speaker 4: by the way, he's just some guy. This is what's 137 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:29,320 Speaker 4: so hard about trying to find the truth online is 138 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:33,320 Speaker 4: there's this man who has a scene by scene fact 139 00:07:33,400 --> 00:07:37,120 Speaker 4: check website of the movie. But it's Geo cities and 140 00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:39,160 Speaker 4: he doesn't really explain who he is or you know, 141 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:41,840 Speaker 4: it's but it looks incredibly well researched. So then I 142 00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:45,560 Speaker 4: watched it again while looking for answers to my questions. 143 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 3: I actually watched it once and I had to do 144 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:50,040 Speaker 3: it in two parts. I enjoyed it for the record, 145 00:07:50,040 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 3: but I had to do it in two parts because 146 00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 3: it's so the editing is so chaotic, and it really 147 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:57,520 Speaker 3: is so dense. I mean, I had to watch it 148 00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:01,200 Speaker 3: with subtitles same. I was really, you know, struggling. So 149 00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 3: the fact that you watched it twice is very impressive. 150 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:04,800 Speaker 3: But what so then the second time? 151 00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 1: What happened? 152 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 4: The second time I was following along with a GeoCities fact. 153 00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 1: Check, okay of jan and what did you learn? 154 00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:13,920 Speaker 5: So? 155 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: I learned that even things that on the first watch, 156 00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 1: I thought, well, there's no way that they would be 157 00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:25,600 Speaker 1: lying about that. Why would they fictionalize that isn't that 158 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 1: a date and time? 159 00:08:27,280 --> 00:08:27,360 Speaker 5: Like? 160 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 4: Why would that be wrong? They're all wrong. Almost everything 161 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:35,520 Speaker 4: is completely fictionalized. And it's very hard for me to 162 00:08:35,559 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 4: say that. I don't want it to be true, but 163 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:38,160 Speaker 4: it is true. 164 00:08:38,200 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 5: But are you saying that your experience of watching this 165 00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:43,280 Speaker 5: movie while listening to a person telling you why it's 166 00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:45,200 Speaker 5: wrong at every single minute, but also knowing that this 167 00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 5: person is a stranger from GeoCities dot com means you 168 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 5: felt like you were living in a mystery wrapped inside 169 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:52,120 Speaker 5: a riddle wrapped inside and enigma occur that I did 170 00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:53,720 Speaker 5: not realize came from this movie. 171 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:57,760 Speaker 4: Yes, I know, I truly because also, George, Yes, it 172 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:00,160 Speaker 4: took me an entire day to watch it the first 173 00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:02,719 Speaker 4: time I watched it in multiple parts. 174 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:05,520 Speaker 1: I had to eat, I had to live. It's three 175 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:06,480 Speaker 1: and a half hours long. 176 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,400 Speaker 3: I also, it really made me wish I could have 177 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 3: seen it in the theater because and I I really 178 00:09:12,480 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 3: did a good job of putting my phone in another room. 179 00:09:14,440 --> 00:09:17,400 Speaker 3: I was paying full attention, and yet still even the 180 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 3: fact of being able to even look at other things 181 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:23,480 Speaker 3: was distracting enough where I had to rewind ten seconds 182 00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 3: constantly because I didn't catch some line or another. 183 00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:32,600 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean there's something in the dizzying barrage of dates, numbers, 184 00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:35,600 Speaker 5: and your own suspicions trying to parry and fend them 185 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:37,360 Speaker 5: off while you're taking them all in at the same 186 00:09:37,440 --> 00:09:41,320 Speaker 5: time that really, in a way makes this movie. 187 00:09:41,880 --> 00:09:44,120 Speaker 1: And we can say a lot of it is fiction. 188 00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: We can say much of it is fiction. 189 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:49,160 Speaker 5: The fiction of it, in some crazy way feels like 190 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 5: it gets closer to the truth of what it is 191 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 5: like just living in an information barrage and not being 192 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:58,679 Speaker 5: sure if we should ever trust anything. Really, even if 193 00:09:58,679 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 5: you don't trust this movie, are we to trust anything? 194 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:05,320 Speaker 5: Is the queasy C sixth sense I got enduring this movie. 195 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:09,199 Speaker 1: Pleasurably enjoying this movie. I mean, this is the thing. 196 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 4: It's separating the art from the artist, but it's separating 197 00:10:11,960 --> 00:10:14,199 Speaker 4: like the movie from the facts. 198 00:10:14,679 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 1: As a movie, it very much accomplishes its goal. 199 00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 3: And also, I think, even exactly as you were saying, Amy, 200 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 3: it actually, whether consciously or not, replicates kind of the 201 00:10:26,800 --> 00:10:31,720 Speaker 3: feeling of manically going down a conspiratorial rabbit hole, whether 202 00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:34,400 Speaker 3: or not the rabbit hole you're going down is true 203 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:37,440 Speaker 3: or not, it has this manic energy, and I think 204 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:39,200 Speaker 3: so much of it has to do with the editing, 205 00:10:39,280 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 3: Like which is the in fact the one or I 206 00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 3: think one of two oscars at one is editing. I 207 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:45,880 Speaker 3: was wondering if you have any you know, as an 208 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:49,120 Speaker 3: actual expert, like, how do you feel technically? It accomplished 209 00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:52,079 Speaker 3: that general vibe where for three hours you just feel 210 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:54,320 Speaker 3: like you are on an intellectual roller coaster. 211 00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:56,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, you feel like you're on a ride. 212 00:10:56,400 --> 00:10:57,920 Speaker 5: Right, you feel like you're on I don't know, the 213 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:00,720 Speaker 5: tea cups at Disneyland getting spun and spar and spun around, 214 00:11:00,760 --> 00:11:02,680 Speaker 5: and the movie goes faster and faster, and then about 215 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:05,559 Speaker 5: two thirds of the way through, you have Kevin Costner 216 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:08,080 Speaker 5: delivering a recap to his own team. All right, here's 217 00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 5: what's going on. You suddenly realize he's broken them. The 218 00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:14,320 Speaker 5: machine has broken down, and everybody's just staring at him, 219 00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:17,720 Speaker 5: like I can't handle this anymore. And I appreciate that 220 00:11:17,720 --> 00:11:20,320 Speaker 5: that Oliver Stone in the chaos of this movie builds 221 00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:23,200 Speaker 5: in moments where you realize, I understand, I'm taking this 222 00:11:23,280 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 5: a little bit too much. I've lost the jury when 223 00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:27,680 Speaker 5: I say this. I've lost my own team when I 224 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:32,319 Speaker 5: say this, And yet don't we all just feel caught up? 225 00:11:32,360 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 1: I mean, Oliver Soona. 226 00:11:33,840 --> 00:11:37,920 Speaker 5: Says something really interesting, which is, once you start accepting 227 00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 5: that maybe you've been lied to about anything in history, 228 00:11:41,960 --> 00:11:44,040 Speaker 5: then you start wondering if anything. 229 00:11:43,640 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 1: In history is true. 230 00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 5: That he says of himself, you know, he grew up 231 00:11:47,160 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 5: in the forties and fifties, and that he would read 232 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:51,599 Speaker 5: books on American history about Washington and Columbus in the 233 00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:54,640 Speaker 5: Civil War, and then as soon as he experienced history 234 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:57,720 Speaker 5: and the shakiness of it, he began to doubt everything, 235 00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:00,280 Speaker 5: which I feel like is an idea that I didn't 236 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 5: understand when I was a child in the nineties who 237 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 5: believed most things. 238 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:04,600 Speaker 1: I was taught. 239 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:07,160 Speaker 5: But it's an understanding I definitely have now when we're 240 00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 5: fighting over what history even gets taught period. 241 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 4: I mean, my moment for that was when I, as 242 00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:18,960 Speaker 4: a super fan of Pocahontas, the animated film, watched a 243 00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:22,160 Speaker 4: History Channel special on the true story of Pocahontas and 244 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 4: found out that she was just a child who is 245 00:12:25,320 --> 00:12:29,400 Speaker 4: kidnapped and abused, and not like a gorgeous woman like 246 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:32,680 Speaker 4: living independently. 247 00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:36,640 Speaker 3: Are you thinking Disney's Pocahontas is not actually correct, I'm saying. 248 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:39,560 Speaker 1: That was the moment that I learned never to trust again. 249 00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:42,640 Speaker 3: We should at some point give, you know, attempt to 250 00:12:42,679 --> 00:12:45,160 Speaker 3: give a synopsis of the movie. But while we're on 251 00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:48,679 Speaker 3: the topic of like American mythologies that we you know, 252 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 3: sour on and we realize our lives and everything, something 253 00:12:52,400 --> 00:12:55,120 Speaker 3: that is fascinating to me is that he's almost replacing 254 00:12:55,160 --> 00:12:58,559 Speaker 3: one mythology with another. There is a such a romantization 255 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:03,000 Speaker 3: of JFK in this movie that actually feels weirdly, if 256 00:13:03,040 --> 00:13:07,880 Speaker 3: not conservative, then then almost more optimistic than what he's 257 00:13:07,920 --> 00:13:10,560 Speaker 3: trying to debunk. Does that make sense? I mean this 258 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:14,120 Speaker 3: idea that the conspiracy centers around the idea that JFK 259 00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:19,360 Speaker 3: is such a pacifist and such a liberatory figure that 260 00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 3: all the powerful forces in America had to band together 261 00:13:23,080 --> 00:13:26,679 Speaker 3: to eliminate him. I just don't necessarily think JFK was 262 00:13:26,760 --> 00:13:30,520 Speaker 3: some like left wing, you know, figure that was going 263 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:35,200 Speaker 3: to usher in a completely different decade of prosperity or something. 264 00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:37,920 Speaker 4: I mean, that's one of the big things from mister 265 00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 4: x Donald Sutherland's incredible performance, by the way, like truly, 266 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 4: truly I watched it a few times because I just 267 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:53,400 Speaker 4: could not believe how he just shows up and gives 268 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:59,160 Speaker 4: this incredibly wordy dates and locations monologue and it all 269 00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:00,680 Speaker 4: gets through and he's so. 270 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:04,480 Speaker 3: Also is especially impactful because the rest of it is 271 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:07,200 Speaker 3: so choppy. I'm not saying that in a negative way, 272 00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:10,160 Speaker 3: like it's intentionally just so choppy. And it's like fifteen 273 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:14,160 Speaker 3: million frames per second. And then the Donald Sutherland part 274 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:16,720 Speaker 3: is almost like the first time it slows down and 275 00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:21,160 Speaker 3: you hear someone talking and delivering a long monologue where 276 00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:23,400 Speaker 3: the camera isn't like shaking in front of their face, 277 00:14:23,400 --> 00:14:25,920 Speaker 3: and also cutting to like historical footage and also cutting 278 00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:29,480 Speaker 3: to Jackie in the car, and so there's it's really 279 00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 3: framed in this way to give it even more gravitas 280 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,880 Speaker 3: and to be like, this is the real truth, right. 281 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:38,240 Speaker 5: And he has that line in that whole area where 282 00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:40,920 Speaker 5: he says, Hey, this feeling that you're having of being 283 00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:43,520 Speaker 5: barraged by all of this facts, all of these names. 284 00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:45,240 Speaker 5: The thing that this movie is doing, the way that 285 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 5: the people in the country felt even at this moment, 286 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:49,760 Speaker 5: is to keep you from asking the extra question, which 287 00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 5: is why, yeah, we have so much information thrown at 288 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:55,800 Speaker 5: us that just begins to feel like a shell game, 289 00:14:55,880 --> 00:14:58,320 Speaker 5: like a parlor game. But I also think that what 290 00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:02,200 Speaker 5: he's getting at here is, you know, Kennedy, I always say, 291 00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:04,280 Speaker 5: was like the first television president, right, the first person 292 00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 5: who understood the power of the visual medium and blah 293 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:09,080 Speaker 5: blah blah and the Checkers speech. And he was handsome 294 00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:11,520 Speaker 5: and Nixon was sweaty, you know, the whole thing. And 295 00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 5: because we've all grown up in like a post JFK America, 296 00:15:15,840 --> 00:15:18,440 Speaker 5: I think it's really natural for us to see our 297 00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 5: presidents as TV characters, you know, more than even like 298 00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:25,640 Speaker 5: political figures. But we're getting the natural outgrowth of that. 299 00:15:25,720 --> 00:15:27,840 Speaker 5: I was literally born under like a movie actor president, 300 00:15:28,360 --> 00:15:30,440 Speaker 5: and we don't need to talk about the current people. 301 00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 5: But like, because of that, I think I have a 302 00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 5: way of seeing JFK not as a person, but as 303 00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:38,160 Speaker 5: a character, you know, Like I grew up thinking of 304 00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:40,840 Speaker 5: JFK as Camelot, and then I heard that JFK was 305 00:15:40,880 --> 00:15:43,880 Speaker 5: just like a cheating adulterer who slept around and was 306 00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:46,960 Speaker 5: kind of ineffectual. And then there's this JFK who was 307 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:49,680 Speaker 5: a totally different JFK to me, like a JFK who 308 00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 5: actually could have accomplished great. 309 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:54,240 Speaker 1: Practical things and kept us out of a war. 310 00:15:54,440 --> 00:15:56,840 Speaker 5: And it was just it's like three characters, you know, 311 00:15:56,880 --> 00:15:58,560 Speaker 5: the way that you were saying that you feel as 312 00:15:58,560 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 5: though we have giant argument to fighting at each other. 313 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 5: This movie feels like a mech suit of different JFK's 314 00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:07,360 Speaker 5: battling for control of the legacy. 315 00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:08,680 Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. 316 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:11,600 Speaker 3: That's actually something that keeps coming up when we do 317 00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 3: research into other elements of the Kennedy story is the 318 00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:19,280 Speaker 3: Kennedys as people are almost secondary to the Kennedys as symbols. 319 00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 3: It's just like there's sort of a Rshac test for 320 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:24,080 Speaker 3: how you feel about, you know, how you feel about 321 00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 3: twentieth century American politics, how you feel about liberalism, how 322 00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 3: you feel about Catholicism, how you feel about you know, 323 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:35,840 Speaker 3: the media ecosystem and the publicity ecosystem, and power and 324 00:16:35,880 --> 00:16:39,440 Speaker 3: the American dream. And it's like, I think, the average 325 00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:41,120 Speaker 3: despite the fact that JFK is one of the most 326 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 3: recognizable historical figures in America, the average person could not 327 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 3: really tell you what his legacy is as a president. 328 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 1: Really. I mean, I guess. 329 00:16:51,040 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 3: People could think of like the Bay of Pigs and 330 00:16:53,640 --> 00:16:56,800 Speaker 3: the assassination, but like could the average person that has 331 00:16:56,840 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 3: really strong opinions about Reagan or about George W. Bush, 332 00:17:00,040 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 3: sure about Trump, like actually produced what was the what 333 00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:08,560 Speaker 3: the Kennedy doctrine was No, thanks thanks, Lara. 334 00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:14,639 Speaker 4: But I think also because specifically in this the Sutherland 335 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:19,880 Speaker 4: monologue where and this is like a common piece of 336 00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:24,479 Speaker 4: this type of JFK love and the conspiracy is that 337 00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:28,119 Speaker 4: they often cite that he was going. 338 00:17:27,920 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 1: To sign. 339 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:32,360 Speaker 4: And that he was he was going to sign this, 340 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:35,760 Speaker 4: or he was not going to sign it, and by 341 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:38,800 Speaker 4: not signing it, they were going to get troops out 342 00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:41,760 Speaker 4: of Vietnam immediately, and they were not going. 343 00:17:41,600 --> 00:17:42,240 Speaker 1: To have a war. 344 00:17:42,440 --> 00:17:46,600 Speaker 4: And then because he died, Johnson signed it gave them 345 00:17:46,640 --> 00:17:50,880 Speaker 4: their war. And if not for this assassination, like everything 346 00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:52,200 Speaker 4: would have been different. 347 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 1: And we would have no one would have died in 348 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:56,400 Speaker 1: Vietnam and we would have had civil rights immediately. 349 00:17:56,640 --> 00:18:00,840 Speaker 4: Like it's just like a total reimagining because the fact 350 00:18:00,920 --> 00:18:04,520 Speaker 4: is that he was signing it. He had a draft 351 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:28,040 Speaker 4: made up two days before Dallas. So this movie is 352 00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:32,640 Speaker 4: about the only murder case that was brought to trial 353 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:38,879 Speaker 4: concerning JFK's assassination, and it is the story of the 354 00:18:38,920 --> 00:18:45,520 Speaker 4: New Orleans DA Jim Garrison collecting information, finding witnesses, and 355 00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:50,600 Speaker 4: basically in real life we know that he would come 356 00:18:50,680 --> 00:18:53,600 Speaker 4: up with a story and then try to find people 357 00:18:53,800 --> 00:18:57,959 Speaker 4: to support that story. But in JFK, it's that he 358 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:05,600 Speaker 4: is uncovering the conspiracy to kill Kennedy and frame Oswald. 359 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, he's uncovering the conspiracy that some combination of the 360 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:16,159 Speaker 3: CIA slash American Intelligence Apparatus and various other people in 361 00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:20,480 Speaker 3: power and the mafia and various people involved in Cuba 362 00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:26,960 Speaker 3: came together to assassinate JFK because he was going to 363 00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:28,880 Speaker 3: be basically too progressive of a president. 364 00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, he was going to stop the war and he was. 365 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:35,439 Speaker 3: Not hard enough on communism and so and as the 366 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:38,879 Speaker 3: New Orleans DA, Kevin Costner is the only person that is, 367 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:41,920 Speaker 3: you know, seeking out the truth. Everyone is against him. 368 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 3: He's dealing with all these people in great positions of 369 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 3: power that want to discredit him. He in fact does 370 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:50,280 Speaker 3: a solid job of proving that his theory is correct, 371 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:53,359 Speaker 3: and despite that, he loses a trial. And you know, 372 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 3: the movie ends with this like plea that it's the 373 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:58,000 Speaker 3: next generations that are going to keep seeking the truth. 374 00:19:58,520 --> 00:19:58,680 Speaker 2: Yeah. 375 00:19:58,720 --> 00:20:00,800 Speaker 5: It he is seen as almost this no he right, 376 00:20:00,840 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 5: like he enters the courtroom with this case against a 377 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:06,200 Speaker 5: figure it named clay Bertram slash Clay Shaw, who's played 378 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:08,400 Speaker 5: by Tommy Lee Jones, who he knows he doesn't have 379 00:20:08,520 --> 00:20:12,639 Speaker 5: that strong of an actual case specifically about him, you know. 380 00:20:12,840 --> 00:20:14,280 Speaker 5: But it's more like he just wants to get this 381 00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:18,160 Speaker 5: entire story on the record because he's really imagining himself 382 00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:19,959 Speaker 5: as like a figure in the court of public opinion. 383 00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:21,720 Speaker 5: He wants to get this all down. He wants to 384 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:23,720 Speaker 5: get it in testimony. He wants people to be aware 385 00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:25,560 Speaker 5: of this. He wants the zup root of footage to 386 00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:30,680 Speaker 5: be out there so that even if his generation won't actually, 387 00:20:30,680 --> 00:20:32,680 Speaker 5: you know, stand for the principles that he thinks America 388 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:35,760 Speaker 5: has has lost in terms of trusting that our government 389 00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:38,199 Speaker 5: won't lie to us, may maybe our future will live 390 00:20:38,200 --> 00:20:41,119 Speaker 5: in a much clearer news environment, which clearly did not 391 00:20:41,160 --> 00:20:42,800 Speaker 5: come to pass, even though his idea of the court 392 00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:44,520 Speaker 5: of public opinion definitely did. 393 00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:47,760 Speaker 1: Mm hm. I mean that is the even on. 394 00:20:47,720 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 4: The first viewing where I was totally sold, if I'm 395 00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:56,280 Speaker 4: being honest, when we get to the verdict and I 396 00:20:56,320 --> 00:21:00,000 Speaker 4: think we're supposed to be shocked and appalled and heart 397 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:04,520 Speaker 4: broken that he's found not guilty, but even within the movie, 398 00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:07,240 Speaker 4: you're like, well, what are you proving him being guilty 399 00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,080 Speaker 4: of in court? You know, he really just has like 400 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:15,320 Speaker 4: second hand stories. He doesn't have evidence, like tying clay Shaw. 401 00:21:15,240 --> 00:21:18,840 Speaker 5: To it, right, he's basically tugging on that lie, right, 402 00:21:18,960 --> 00:21:21,120 Speaker 5: like you to believe you've been lied about one thing, 403 00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:23,440 Speaker 5: maybe later you'll believe you're lied to about the rest 404 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:23,720 Speaker 5: of it. 405 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:27,399 Speaker 4: The other part of the real story is that Garrison 406 00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:31,480 Speaker 4: didn't have like a great reputation in the end for 407 00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:33,919 Speaker 4: being of sane mind. 408 00:21:34,240 --> 00:21:35,879 Speaker 1: I mean, I don't like to say that, but just 409 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:37,600 Speaker 1: that he had. 410 00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:40,359 Speaker 4: There's like quotes of him saying that this was a 411 00:21:41,240 --> 00:21:45,400 Speaker 4: sexual thrill kill and he was just kind of like 412 00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:49,000 Speaker 4: throwing together anybody that he could find in New Orleans 413 00:21:49,080 --> 00:21:51,240 Speaker 4: that was part of any kind of underbelly. 414 00:21:51,920 --> 00:21:55,520 Speaker 3: And yeah, I mean it's also, of course, when the 415 00:21:55,640 --> 00:21:59,480 Speaker 3: narrative is that everyone is out to get him and 416 00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:02,800 Speaker 3: everyone is out to discredit him. When that is the narrative, 417 00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:06,080 Speaker 3: than anything you hear against him almost like fits into that. 418 00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:07,600 Speaker 3: And then it makes you, if you're on his side, 419 00:22:07,640 --> 00:22:09,880 Speaker 3: let's say, it makes you even more conspiratorial because you're 420 00:22:09,880 --> 00:22:11,879 Speaker 3: like Oh, look, the media is in on it, and 421 00:22:11,920 --> 00:22:15,240 Speaker 3: the newspapers are in on it, and Shaw is in 422 00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:19,399 Speaker 3: fact controlling the public narrative, and so which is in 423 00:22:19,440 --> 00:22:22,800 Speaker 3: fact like one of the elements of conspiratorial thinking is 424 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:27,720 Speaker 3: how self perpetuating. It is like, once you consider yourself 425 00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:30,320 Speaker 3: to be part of a community that is truth seeking 426 00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:34,320 Speaker 3: against all odds, than anything that is being set against 427 00:22:34,359 --> 00:22:37,040 Speaker 3: you is like further proof that you are correct and 428 00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:40,000 Speaker 3: that you are getting closer to the truth. I want 429 00:22:40,000 --> 00:22:42,679 Speaker 3: to sort of talk a little bit amy about the 430 00:22:42,720 --> 00:22:46,080 Speaker 3: way this was received at the time and where it 431 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:50,760 Speaker 3: fits into Oliver Stone's filmography and Oliver Stones specifically like 432 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:55,920 Speaker 3: work as a chronicler of American power and corruption. It 433 00:22:55,960 --> 00:22:59,360 Speaker 3: feels like a movie like this if it were released now, 434 00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:03,120 Speaker 3: it would be seen as so you know, quote unquote irresponsible, 435 00:23:03,240 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 3: like with the current conspiracy culture that exists at the time. 436 00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:08,919 Speaker 3: There were definitely detractors, but it was, you know, a 437 00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:12,679 Speaker 3: critical hit. It was nominated for Oscars. What would you say? 438 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:14,880 Speaker 3: The immediate response was. 439 00:23:15,400 --> 00:23:18,800 Speaker 5: Well, the Jack Villinti, who ran the NBA, the most 440 00:23:18,960 --> 00:23:22,320 Speaker 5: measured Picture Association of America. He likened it to Lenny 441 00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:25,640 Speaker 5: Riefenstahl's triumph of the Will. So there was also some 442 00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:30,600 Speaker 5: pretty strong detractors who were going after the film very, 443 00:23:30,680 --> 00:23:31,320 Speaker 5: very harshly. 444 00:23:31,400 --> 00:23:33,320 Speaker 1: You know, there were a lot of people who were alive. 445 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 5: Of course, to witness this whole trial go down, and 446 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:37,600 Speaker 5: they came into the movie with very strong opinions about 447 00:23:37,600 --> 00:23:40,000 Speaker 5: Garrison the way that I'm sure years from now we're 448 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:41,960 Speaker 5: going to have really strong opinions if somebody ever does 449 00:23:41,960 --> 00:23:45,280 Speaker 5: a movie about, you know, James Comey. And so a 450 00:23:45,280 --> 00:23:47,200 Speaker 5: lot of the immediate reaction was like, you're leaving out 451 00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:49,960 Speaker 5: everything about this guy, you know. In Stone's rebuttals to 452 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:51,320 Speaker 5: that was like, well, if I really made this a 453 00:23:51,359 --> 00:23:54,600 Speaker 5: movie about Jim Garrison and all of his flaws, then 454 00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:57,080 Speaker 5: the film becomes a biography, it becomes smaller, and I 455 00:23:57,119 --> 00:23:59,920 Speaker 5: think that that takes the focus off of the larger issue. 456 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:02,240 Speaker 5: But then you also have to say, you're casting Kevin 457 00:24:02,320 --> 00:24:05,240 Speaker 5: Costner at one of the peaks of his career, you know, 458 00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:07,919 Speaker 5: a pre water World Kevin Costner, when everybody was in 459 00:24:07,920 --> 00:24:11,480 Speaker 5: love with him, including my mother, and you're gonna think, yeah, Garrison, 460 00:24:11,760 --> 00:24:14,879 Speaker 5: totally reasonable guy, perhaps the greatest living American, you know. 461 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:20,680 Speaker 5: And so it's interesting, like I find movies like this 462 00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:25,240 Speaker 5: that challenge the audience honestly by asking us to be 463 00:24:25,520 --> 00:24:28,960 Speaker 5: aware that every movie we ever go see is at 464 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:31,760 Speaker 5: some point a film with an agenda, is at some 465 00:24:31,800 --> 00:24:34,560 Speaker 5: point not going to tell the truth. That fiction actually 466 00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:39,240 Speaker 5: can never recreate the truth exactly, it's impossible. There's a 467 00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:43,800 Speaker 5: really fantastic documentary by Noam Chomsky with Michelle gondikelt Is 468 00:24:43,800 --> 00:24:46,040 Speaker 5: The Man who is Tall Happy that's about almost this 469 00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:49,080 Speaker 5: like paradox of absolute zero. You can never make a 470 00:24:49,119 --> 00:24:53,359 Speaker 5: fictional recreation of anything that is the truth. And yet 471 00:24:53,480 --> 00:24:55,040 Speaker 5: we live in a world where it always gets shaky 472 00:24:55,080 --> 00:24:58,320 Speaker 5: and people are obligated to say, like, depiction is not endorsement. 473 00:24:58,359 --> 00:25:00,080 Speaker 5: And I think this is a film that, to me, 474 00:25:00,640 --> 00:25:03,479 Speaker 5: regardless of what you feel about JFK in the present, 475 00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:06,600 Speaker 5: regardless of how much people even think about JFK, speaks 476 00:25:06,640 --> 00:25:10,200 Speaker 5: to our common crisis that we're all in right now 477 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:13,240 Speaker 5: about not knowing what to believe. And it's almost like 478 00:25:13,280 --> 00:25:17,160 Speaker 5: a vaccine or an inoculation, right Like, can you watch 479 00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:20,880 Speaker 5: this movie trusting that it's okay that it has an agenda? 480 00:25:21,080 --> 00:25:21,240 Speaker 4: You know? 481 00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 1: Because I think, honestly every film should have an agenda. 482 00:25:23,359 --> 00:25:24,520 Speaker 1: Why are you even bother making it. 483 00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:26,840 Speaker 5: You know, I want minecraft to have an agenda, even 484 00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 5: if that agenda is just like make kids really excited 485 00:25:29,680 --> 00:25:30,680 Speaker 5: and throw popcorn around. 486 00:25:31,960 --> 00:25:35,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, no, completely, And I think that is I mean, 487 00:25:35,280 --> 00:25:39,240 Speaker 3: I think it's also about almost respecting your audience in 488 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:42,560 Speaker 3: that way, like I think you can trust that they 489 00:25:42,680 --> 00:25:45,600 Speaker 3: can draw the different conclusions than you do, but still 490 00:25:45,640 --> 00:25:47,960 Speaker 3: appreciate the way you told the story and the way 491 00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:49,440 Speaker 3: you put forth an argument. 492 00:25:49,440 --> 00:25:51,480 Speaker 5: Exactly like Oliver Stone thought that if he could get 493 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:54,800 Speaker 5: free things across, he would be content, and those three 494 00:25:54,840 --> 00:25:57,359 Speaker 5: things are not pleased by everything in this conspiracy. But 495 00:25:57,400 --> 00:26:00,960 Speaker 5: it's a I want to prove that Oswald was actually 496 00:26:01,320 --> 00:26:04,520 Speaker 5: anti communist or at least hung around with anti communist people. 497 00:26:05,119 --> 00:26:07,040 Speaker 5: B I want you guys to know that there were 498 00:26:07,119 --> 00:26:11,240 Speaker 5: doctors being getting bossed around by military officers in the autopsy. 499 00:26:11,560 --> 00:26:13,040 Speaker 5: That that is a fact, and I just need that 500 00:26:13,119 --> 00:26:17,200 Speaker 5: on the record. And see really putting the zapruder footage 501 00:26:17,280 --> 00:26:20,680 Speaker 5: on a big screen, because isn't that impactful? Like I 502 00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:23,120 Speaker 5: found that really astonishing. You know, when JFKA get shot 503 00:26:23,119 --> 00:26:25,159 Speaker 5: at the beginning, it's represented by a flock of birds. 504 00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:28,199 Speaker 5: Two hours and forty five minutes in the movie, you 505 00:26:28,320 --> 00:26:31,160 Speaker 5: see his actual death, and after talking about it for 506 00:26:31,680 --> 00:26:33,440 Speaker 5: minutes and minutes and minutes and minutes, it's such a 507 00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:37,600 Speaker 5: breakneck speed. For some reason, watching it then hit me 508 00:26:37,680 --> 00:26:38,960 Speaker 5: harder than I think it's ever hit me. 509 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:43,840 Speaker 4: Yeah, I had very similar experience where it felt like 510 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:48,439 Speaker 4: the most gruesome thing I've seen. And I've seen it before, 511 00:26:48,840 --> 00:26:51,679 Speaker 4: but it really is hard to watch and it is 512 00:26:51,720 --> 00:26:54,240 Speaker 4: a shock every time, and then especially the way they 513 00:26:54,240 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 4: do it with like repeating it over and over again. 514 00:26:57,200 --> 00:26:59,919 Speaker 4: And I always think about either Jackie OH said the 515 00:27:00,240 --> 00:27:02,679 Speaker 4: or somebody said it after speaking to Jackie O, or 516 00:27:02,720 --> 00:27:06,560 Speaker 4: describing what she does in the zeppid Or film is 517 00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:11,480 Speaker 4: that she jumps to the back and reaches for parts 518 00:27:11,520 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 4: of JFK's head. 519 00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:16,840 Speaker 1: She reaches to get them and collect them. 520 00:27:17,160 --> 00:27:21,880 Speaker 4: It's such an human response that's not based in logic, 521 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:25,640 Speaker 4: and so like watching that over and over again really 522 00:27:25,680 --> 00:27:26,119 Speaker 4: struck me. 523 00:27:26,560 --> 00:27:29,400 Speaker 5: I love that description of it because I think that's 524 00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:31,440 Speaker 5: something that's really easy to miss when we look back 525 00:27:31,440 --> 00:27:34,760 Speaker 5: at history, that things don't always add up because we're 526 00:27:35,480 --> 00:27:38,080 Speaker 5: flailing and figuring out the best time. I mean, I 527 00:27:38,080 --> 00:27:39,800 Speaker 5: could just imagine being in that moment and thinking like, 528 00:27:40,080 --> 00:27:42,160 Speaker 5: let me grab for my husband's brains. 529 00:27:42,240 --> 00:27:44,919 Speaker 1: Maybe I can fix this mm. 530 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:49,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's interesting that, you know, compared to other biopic 531 00:27:49,800 --> 00:27:52,679 Speaker 3: like depictions of the Kennedy's that go to great lengths 532 00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:57,600 Speaker 3: to have these long speeches or you know, show Jackie 533 00:27:57,760 --> 00:27:59,399 Speaker 3: with the blood on her dress and all this stuff, 534 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:02,400 Speaker 3: like the impact of just that tiny moment being played 535 00:28:02,440 --> 00:28:05,040 Speaker 3: over and over again is actually can be so much 536 00:28:05,040 --> 00:28:07,840 Speaker 3: more meaningful than you know, an entire two hour movie 537 00:28:07,880 --> 00:28:11,240 Speaker 3: that's like about her staring into the distance and mourning 538 00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:12,640 Speaker 3: her her husband. 539 00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:15,239 Speaker 5: Yeah, and I found it so touching. As soon as 540 00:28:15,280 --> 00:28:19,639 Speaker 5: the assassination happens, you see Americans in this movie running 541 00:28:19,720 --> 00:28:21,680 Speaker 5: to a bar where they know that there's a TV 542 00:28:21,840 --> 00:28:25,000 Speaker 5: to sit together. Like the idea of I feel like 543 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:27,159 Speaker 5: right now, I spent a lot of time witnessing what 544 00:28:27,280 --> 00:28:30,320 Speaker 5: feels like epic tragedy is alone on my couch, on 545 00:28:30,359 --> 00:28:33,680 Speaker 5: my cell phone, and the idea that you could sit 546 00:28:33,760 --> 00:28:35,800 Speaker 5: with your community, even if some of your community is 547 00:28:35,800 --> 00:28:41,480 Speaker 5: clapping because they're happy JFK Is dead, which wow, you 548 00:28:41,520 --> 00:28:43,920 Speaker 5: know it really it really affected me. 549 00:28:44,360 --> 00:28:47,320 Speaker 1: It was interesting how in that scene there was actually 550 00:28:47,400 --> 00:28:51,120 Speaker 1: relative civility in the bar, Like in my mind when 551 00:28:51,160 --> 00:28:55,680 Speaker 1: I imagine how people of different political views react to 552 00:28:56,000 --> 00:28:58,520 Speaker 1: I don't know, a Trump executive order or something. I 553 00:28:58,560 --> 00:29:02,080 Speaker 1: don't imagine people like yelling at the TV, but then 554 00:29:02,360 --> 00:29:06,320 Speaker 1: ultimately remaining civil and consuming it communally. There was something 555 00:29:06,360 --> 00:29:07,640 Speaker 1: about which is of course. 556 00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 3: The difference between consuming information remotely and consuming it physically 557 00:29:11,840 --> 00:29:13,960 Speaker 3: together in the same space, Like you have no choice 558 00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:17,520 Speaker 3: but to exist communally with your fellow person, and it 559 00:29:17,520 --> 00:29:20,760 Speaker 3: would it takes much more like courage or something to 560 00:29:20,840 --> 00:29:25,080 Speaker 3: actually start like yelling or fighting in real life. I 561 00:29:25,120 --> 00:29:28,040 Speaker 3: wanted to go back to just in terms of your 562 00:29:28,080 --> 00:29:31,360 Speaker 3: relationship with Oliver Stone, like how what do you think 563 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:32,960 Speaker 3: of him as a filmmaker and how do you think 564 00:29:33,000 --> 00:29:34,680 Speaker 3: this fits into his filmography? 565 00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:35,480 Speaker 4: Yeah? 566 00:29:35,520 --> 00:29:40,440 Speaker 5: I think he's vital, passionate and frustrating. I have a 567 00:29:40,480 --> 00:29:44,920 Speaker 5: soft spot in my heart for filmmakers who stirs it up. 568 00:29:45,000 --> 00:29:47,120 Speaker 1: Can I say stirshit up on this? Yes? Yeah? 569 00:29:47,160 --> 00:29:49,800 Speaker 5: Okay, because how else are you going to describe Oliver Stone? 570 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:52,840 Speaker 5: That's what he does. This is a guy who went 571 00:29:52,920 --> 00:29:55,640 Speaker 5: to war when he was young, grew up or grew 572 00:29:55,680 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 5: cynical super fast, and then wanted to translate his experience 573 00:29:59,280 --> 00:29:59,760 Speaker 5: to the screen. 574 00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 1: A ton of powerful movies. 575 00:30:02,000 --> 00:30:03,640 Speaker 5: I think Born on the fourth of July, a movie 576 00:30:03,640 --> 00:30:07,280 Speaker 5: he made right before this with Tom Cruise, is one 577 00:30:07,320 --> 00:30:10,280 Speaker 5: of the better things anybody's ever made about war, and 578 00:30:10,280 --> 00:30:13,080 Speaker 5: it's also one of the better Tom Cuse performances. So 579 00:30:13,320 --> 00:30:15,680 Speaker 5: I don't know what I think about Oliver Stone as 580 00:30:15,720 --> 00:30:17,520 Speaker 5: a human being, because I try to really keep that 581 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:19,760 Speaker 5: out of the movie themselves. 582 00:30:20,160 --> 00:30:22,600 Speaker 1: But I think that people like. 583 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:27,760 Speaker 5: Him who use the power of cinema to put a 584 00:30:27,760 --> 00:30:30,280 Speaker 5: hot laser beam on things they want us to be 585 00:30:30,360 --> 00:30:33,880 Speaker 5: talking about. I love them even when they make people mad, 586 00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:37,240 Speaker 5: you know, even when they make me mad. And so this, 587 00:30:37,400 --> 00:30:40,680 Speaker 5: to me feels like one of the ultimate Oliver Stone movies. 588 00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:42,280 Speaker 5: Although I have to say, on a tiny side note, 589 00:30:42,320 --> 00:30:44,600 Speaker 5: when he made The Doors, my boyfriend was a gigantic 590 00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:46,320 Speaker 5: Doors fan, went to go see it as a kid 591 00:30:46,640 --> 00:30:49,640 Speaker 5: and was so furious he went outside and like lit 592 00:30:49,680 --> 00:30:52,400 Speaker 5: a cassette tape on fire and started screaming. 593 00:30:52,680 --> 00:30:55,040 Speaker 1: So that's just the effect Oliver Stone has on people. 594 00:30:56,720 --> 00:31:02,120 Speaker 4: Well, my personal experience with this one is that I 595 00:31:02,160 --> 00:31:06,200 Speaker 4: am from Tennessee and some of the accents are phenomenal, 596 00:31:06,360 --> 00:31:08,320 Speaker 4: and I feel like a lot of the cast, like 597 00:31:08,480 --> 00:31:10,840 Speaker 4: you know, a lot of the cast already has accents 598 00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 4: or Southern accents, and it's like Sissy's Basic and Tommy 599 00:31:13,600 --> 00:31:16,040 Speaker 4: Lee Jones and they're making these like kind of like 600 00:31:16,160 --> 00:31:18,360 Speaker 4: subtle adjustments to fit the region. 601 00:31:18,400 --> 00:31:19,440 Speaker 1: And I really love that. 602 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:23,400 Speaker 4: And I actually find that Costner's accent is like very reserved, 603 00:31:24,120 --> 00:31:26,960 Speaker 4: and I did really like it. But I hate to 604 00:31:27,000 --> 00:31:31,040 Speaker 4: say it, but like John Candy's accent is really rough. 605 00:31:32,040 --> 00:31:35,360 Speaker 1: He's from Canada. You can't you can't, you know, blame him. 606 00:31:35,680 --> 00:31:39,600 Speaker 4: Also, I read that he was sweating profusely the entire 607 00:31:39,640 --> 00:31:41,520 Speaker 4: time they were filming because he was so nervous to 608 00:31:41,560 --> 00:31:44,040 Speaker 4: be in a dramatic film, and that that was just 609 00:31:44,080 --> 00:31:44,680 Speaker 4: real sweat. 610 00:31:44,760 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 1: Oh that's so funny. 611 00:31:45,760 --> 00:31:48,760 Speaker 3: I mean everything about it seems so intentional, to be honest, 612 00:31:48,800 --> 00:31:50,520 Speaker 3: even the accent being insane. 613 00:31:50,920 --> 00:31:52,920 Speaker 1: I thought it just adds to the character. Well, that's 614 00:31:52,920 --> 00:31:53,160 Speaker 1: the thing. 615 00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:55,680 Speaker 4: Also, is it like when Joe Peshi first shows up 616 00:31:55,720 --> 00:31:57,640 Speaker 4: and you're like, is that a bad wig? 617 00:31:57,840 --> 00:31:58,880 Speaker 1: On the productions? 618 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:02,040 Speaker 4: I mean the eyebrows, yeah, But then towards the end 619 00:32:02,080 --> 00:32:04,320 Speaker 4: you realize, like, no, it's a bad wig because he 620 00:32:04,400 --> 00:32:06,560 Speaker 4: wore a bad wig and now we're going to show 621 00:32:06,560 --> 00:32:08,760 Speaker 4: you how bad it is. Like he starts tearing, like 622 00:32:08,840 --> 00:32:11,120 Speaker 4: pulling it and moving it around while he's like having 623 00:32:11,200 --> 00:32:33,480 Speaker 4: his episode. And here's the thing, though, the same way 624 00:32:33,520 --> 00:32:39,120 Speaker 4: that there's the idealized JFK memory being presented, I feel 625 00:32:39,120 --> 00:32:42,720 Speaker 4: like there's like a lot of southernisms that are thrown in. 626 00:32:42,960 --> 00:32:45,160 Speaker 4: Some of them I've never heard of before in my life, 627 00:32:45,520 --> 00:32:48,840 Speaker 4: and I don't know if Oliver Stone got them from 628 00:32:48,840 --> 00:32:51,200 Speaker 4: anyone that he knows or what, but it's like they're 629 00:32:51,240 --> 00:32:55,600 Speaker 4: really trying to remind you that these are simple Southern, 630 00:32:55,680 --> 00:32:58,960 Speaker 4: good Americans and they don't take no crap from no 631 00:32:59,160 --> 00:33:01,720 Speaker 4: But I wrote down some of them that I really liked. 632 00:33:01,800 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 4: But I think my favorite one that I never heard 633 00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:10,000 Speaker 4: before is her reputation's lower than crocodile piss, which I. 634 00:33:09,960 --> 00:33:12,080 Speaker 1: Will be like using for the rest of my life. 635 00:33:12,120 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 1: But the one that like, really. 636 00:33:14,920 --> 00:33:18,240 Speaker 4: The one that really took me out of it, though, 637 00:33:18,320 --> 00:33:20,920 Speaker 4: is that when they're talking about the magic bullet, and 638 00:33:20,920 --> 00:33:24,280 Speaker 4: he says theoretical physicists can also prove that an elephant 639 00:33:24,360 --> 00:33:27,520 Speaker 4: can hang off a cliff with its tail tattoo a daisy. 640 00:33:27,880 --> 00:33:31,640 Speaker 3: I actually think the sort of florid nature of the 641 00:33:32,160 --> 00:33:36,959 Speaker 3: Southern people as imagined by as imagined by Oliver Stone, 642 00:33:37,200 --> 00:33:43,200 Speaker 3: kind of adds to the weirdly fictionalized, almost like dreamscape vibe. 643 00:33:42,920 --> 00:33:43,480 Speaker 1: Of the movie. 644 00:33:43,680 --> 00:33:46,880 Speaker 3: Like when you're in a courtroom and someone is speaking 645 00:33:46,920 --> 00:33:49,600 Speaker 3: like that and they're saying, theoretical physicists can prove that 646 00:33:49,640 --> 00:33:51,840 Speaker 3: an elephant can hang off a cliff with its tail 647 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:54,360 Speaker 3: tied to a daisy. You're sort of like, Okay, we're 648 00:33:54,360 --> 00:33:56,880 Speaker 3: in this kind of like suspended world, and I don't 649 00:33:56,880 --> 00:34:01,200 Speaker 3: have to fully believe this conspiracy theory to engage with it, 650 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:03,760 Speaker 3: Like I actually think it sort of helps put you 651 00:34:03,960 --> 00:34:06,880 Speaker 3: in a you know, in a reality that's halfway between 652 00:34:07,680 --> 00:34:08,360 Speaker 3: truth and fiction. 653 00:34:09,680 --> 00:34:12,480 Speaker 5: Right, we are all Joe Peshy's wig, feeling like we're 654 00:34:12,480 --> 00:34:15,600 Speaker 5: sliding off of it, exactly as a girl who grew 655 00:34:15,640 --> 00:34:17,800 Speaker 5: up in Texas. If we want to talk about presidents 656 00:34:17,920 --> 00:34:20,719 Speaker 5: creating characters or politicians creating characters, do not get me 657 00:34:20,760 --> 00:34:23,640 Speaker 5: started on George W. Bush in his Texas accent, or 658 00:34:23,680 --> 00:34:26,440 Speaker 5: most people who moved to Texas and suddenly reinvent themselves 659 00:34:26,440 --> 00:34:27,440 Speaker 5: as a real American. 660 00:34:27,560 --> 00:34:29,160 Speaker 1: Oh my goodness. Yeah. 661 00:34:29,760 --> 00:34:31,480 Speaker 4: And then the other thing that I kept noticing, I 662 00:34:31,520 --> 00:34:33,880 Speaker 4: didn't know if anybody else had seen it. Pes she 663 00:34:34,040 --> 00:34:38,560 Speaker 4: keeps playing with people's nipples and it's like a character choice. 664 00:34:38,920 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 3: Yeah, actually, you know, Pesche playing with everyone's nipples is 665 00:34:42,040 --> 00:34:47,600 Speaker 3: a great segue into the the depiction of like the 666 00:34:47,640 --> 00:34:50,440 Speaker 3: homosexual underground then. 667 00:34:52,120 --> 00:34:55,160 Speaker 1: Underbelly, Yes, Kevin Bacon, Yes, that. 668 00:34:55,160 --> 00:34:58,000 Speaker 3: Is depicted in this film, which I know I'm supposed 669 00:34:58,000 --> 00:34:59,920 Speaker 3: to be offended by, but I have to say I've 670 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:03,200 Speaker 3: found it to be so fun and like the scenes 671 00:35:03,239 --> 00:35:06,480 Speaker 3: of them, you know, having the sort of like weird 672 00:35:06,600 --> 00:35:09,799 Speaker 3: sex parties where one of them is covered head to 673 00:35:09,800 --> 00:35:11,480 Speaker 3: toe in gold paint and the other. 674 00:35:11,360 --> 00:35:14,440 Speaker 1: One is dressed like what was it. I'm trying to think. 675 00:35:17,080 --> 00:35:17,239 Speaker 3: Thing. 676 00:35:17,600 --> 00:35:19,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, well, and they've clearly got a lot of time 677 00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:21,560 Speaker 5: on their hands to put on that gold paint and 678 00:35:21,560 --> 00:35:23,919 Speaker 5: then wash it off. That gold paint. They clearly could 679 00:35:23,920 --> 00:35:25,200 Speaker 5: be planning a conspiracy. 680 00:35:26,480 --> 00:35:28,640 Speaker 4: I loved Tommy Lee Jones in this movie, and I 681 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:31,879 Speaker 4: wanted to hang out with them. The character, but he's 682 00:35:31,920 --> 00:35:36,000 Speaker 4: definitely in that cinematic gay villain. I don't know if 683 00:35:36,000 --> 00:35:38,359 Speaker 4: it starts with Peter Lorie, but he's definitely doing like 684 00:35:38,840 --> 00:35:40,719 Speaker 4: a kind of Maltese falcon Peter Lori. 685 00:35:41,400 --> 00:35:44,800 Speaker 3: It's a very you know, Javier Bardem in that Bond 686 00:35:44,840 --> 00:35:48,560 Speaker 3: movie where he's very clearly like gay coded. Although I 687 00:35:48,600 --> 00:35:50,759 Speaker 3: will say one thing, and maybe this is just because 688 00:35:50,760 --> 00:35:53,200 Speaker 3: I love Tommy Lee Jones, but I felt like you 689 00:35:53,200 --> 00:35:56,160 Speaker 3: could argue that it's written in a kind of latantly 690 00:35:56,160 --> 00:35:59,600 Speaker 3: homophobic way. But I actually think the performance is a 691 00:35:59,680 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 3: very lost portrayal of a closeted gay man. Like I 692 00:36:04,200 --> 00:36:07,360 Speaker 3: think he's not going over the top, he's not going 693 00:36:07,880 --> 00:36:11,600 Speaker 3: super flamboyant in this very kind of stereotypical way. I 694 00:36:11,680 --> 00:36:15,120 Speaker 3: really think there's like a dare I say, a quiet 695 00:36:15,160 --> 00:36:16,560 Speaker 3: dignity to the performance. 696 00:36:16,760 --> 00:36:19,680 Speaker 4: No, yes, I because I think he also he rides 697 00:36:19,800 --> 00:36:24,400 Speaker 4: this line of is it that he's hiding this or 698 00:36:25,600 --> 00:36:29,520 Speaker 4: is it that he's actually being quite condescending mm hmm 699 00:36:29,920 --> 00:36:31,600 Speaker 4: to the people around him who don't get it. 700 00:36:32,040 --> 00:36:35,160 Speaker 3: Yes, And I think that is a there's a there's 701 00:36:35,200 --> 00:36:41,040 Speaker 3: a certain mix of like self loathing and also narcissism 702 00:36:41,200 --> 00:36:44,839 Speaker 3: that is a speake from experience often unique to gay 703 00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:48,640 Speaker 3: man and I honestly think that like that is portrayed 704 00:36:48,680 --> 00:36:52,320 Speaker 3: in such a clear way, and it's actually very difficult 705 00:36:52,320 --> 00:36:52,759 Speaker 3: to get right. 706 00:36:53,040 --> 00:36:55,719 Speaker 1: Gosh, it is so wild because like when this came out, 707 00:36:55,760 --> 00:36:57,279 Speaker 1: there was backlash h. 708 00:36:57,440 --> 00:36:59,719 Speaker 3: Yes, no, absolutely, which of course, I you know, of 709 00:36:59,760 --> 00:37:02,719 Speaker 3: course you get when there's like a you know, a 710 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:08,040 Speaker 3: group of kind of like slightly gross, sexually perverse gay 711 00:37:08,080 --> 00:37:12,440 Speaker 3: men that are basically in charge of murdering the president 712 00:37:12,560 --> 00:37:14,640 Speaker 3: because he's because he wants to end war. 713 00:37:15,000 --> 00:37:19,680 Speaker 4: You know, I will say, Kevin Bacon, Tommily Jones, not gross, No, 714 00:37:19,840 --> 00:37:20,319 Speaker 4: not at all. 715 00:37:20,480 --> 00:37:22,880 Speaker 1: They're very, very handsome. In this movie, Did. 716 00:37:22,760 --> 00:37:25,080 Speaker 5: You wish that the wife, Sissy Spacek, you know who, 717 00:37:25,320 --> 00:37:28,480 Speaker 5: is kind of establishing that Jim Garrison's the opposite of 718 00:37:28,520 --> 00:37:30,840 Speaker 5: all that he's a married man with five children that 719 00:37:30,880 --> 00:37:33,480 Speaker 5: he barely has enough time to hang out with. She 720 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:36,120 Speaker 5: has that tiny little dig at him, like are you 721 00:37:36,160 --> 00:37:38,400 Speaker 5: going after this man because you're big at it? 722 00:37:38,520 --> 00:37:40,080 Speaker 1: Because you're homophobic? 723 00:37:41,239 --> 00:37:43,279 Speaker 5: And I was kind of I kind of wanted the 724 00:37:43,320 --> 00:37:45,680 Speaker 5: film to dig into that just a little bit more, 725 00:37:45,760 --> 00:37:47,360 Speaker 5: like is that it all part of it? Because it 726 00:37:47,719 --> 00:37:50,120 Speaker 5: lets him shrug it off really easily. But I think 727 00:37:50,200 --> 00:37:52,760 Speaker 5: people at the time thought that that was the case, 728 00:37:53,000 --> 00:37:55,360 Speaker 5: that he was basically bringing these charges against the Tommily 729 00:37:55,440 --> 00:37:57,759 Speaker 5: Jones character to make him say on the record in 730 00:37:57,760 --> 00:37:59,960 Speaker 5: front of America that he was out of the clock. 731 00:38:01,000 --> 00:38:01,239 Speaker 1: Yeah. 732 00:38:01,280 --> 00:38:04,160 Speaker 3: I actually thought that that was part of a larger 733 00:38:04,600 --> 00:38:11,200 Speaker 3: character choice to not make him overtly chauvinistic and super masculine. 734 00:38:11,320 --> 00:38:12,759 Speaker 1: You would expect a character. 735 00:38:12,520 --> 00:38:14,520 Speaker 3: Like that, especially in the movie that is so like 736 00:38:14,760 --> 00:38:17,319 Speaker 3: that really wears its arguments on its sleeve. 737 00:38:17,320 --> 00:38:18,799 Speaker 1: You would expect a character like that to be so 738 00:38:18,920 --> 00:38:19,880 Speaker 1: much more abrasive. 739 00:38:20,480 --> 00:38:24,880 Speaker 3: And there's something about Costner's performance that's actually like relatively 740 00:38:25,000 --> 00:38:27,040 Speaker 3: understated considering the movie he's in. 741 00:38:27,440 --> 00:38:30,600 Speaker 5: Yeah, I would agree with that. He's almost more of 742 00:38:30,680 --> 00:38:33,640 Speaker 5: just an interviewer passing the mic around to hear other 743 00:38:33,760 --> 00:38:36,400 Speaker 5: crazy people talk. Because there are performances in this that 744 00:38:36,480 --> 00:38:38,719 Speaker 5: are massive to your point. I mean, we didn't even 745 00:38:38,760 --> 00:38:41,520 Speaker 5: get in John Candy saying the word daddio like this happens. 746 00:38:41,920 --> 00:38:44,720 Speaker 5: You've got Joe Peshi with mice everywhere in his apartment 747 00:38:44,719 --> 00:38:46,360 Speaker 5: because he's trying to work on a cure for cancer. 748 00:38:46,920 --> 00:38:49,920 Speaker 5: I mean, you get the sense that Costner's Jim Garrison 749 00:38:49,960 --> 00:38:51,560 Speaker 5: is a guy who's just sort of quiet with his 750 00:38:51,600 --> 00:38:54,000 Speaker 5: own Roman empire that's keeping him up at night, right, 751 00:38:54,080 --> 00:38:57,600 Speaker 5: and these are all the caligulas making his life interesting. 752 00:38:58,160 --> 00:39:03,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, to me, it's almost the comparison of what the 753 00:39:03,120 --> 00:39:06,600 Speaker 4: response was then to how we see it now. 754 00:39:06,840 --> 00:39:08,200 Speaker 1: I feel like is a. 755 00:39:08,080 --> 00:39:14,920 Speaker 4: Sign of like progress in acknowledging and accepting and enjoying 756 00:39:15,320 --> 00:39:19,640 Speaker 4: that there are complex gay characters and that it's not 757 00:39:19,880 --> 00:39:22,439 Speaker 4: just an automatic that you have to be a good 758 00:39:22,520 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 4: guy if you're a gay character, or else it's an attack. 759 00:39:26,440 --> 00:39:27,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I agree. 760 00:39:27,400 --> 00:39:29,319 Speaker 3: I was because I knew that it had this sort 761 00:39:29,320 --> 00:39:32,279 Speaker 3: of reputation in this criticism, I expected it to be 762 00:39:32,360 --> 00:39:32,839 Speaker 3: much more. 763 00:39:33,440 --> 00:39:36,160 Speaker 1: I don't know, bother some or something. Let's see it. 764 00:39:36,160 --> 00:39:38,279 Speaker 3: Why or should we go into sort of final questions? Well, 765 00:39:38,280 --> 00:39:40,399 Speaker 3: first of all, Amy, our first question for our last 766 00:39:40,480 --> 00:39:41,840 Speaker 3: question for you is who killed JFK. 767 00:39:43,920 --> 00:39:44,560 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know. 768 00:39:44,520 --> 00:39:46,920 Speaker 5: What the scarier answer would be. I mean, coming out 769 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:49,600 Speaker 5: of this movie, you get two options. A either believe 770 00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:51,160 Speaker 5: it one ass asked and can change the world, or 771 00:39:51,200 --> 00:39:54,600 Speaker 5: be you believe that a very powerful president cannot change 772 00:39:54,600 --> 00:39:58,440 Speaker 5: the world it will wind up getting murdered. Oh gosh, 773 00:39:58,560 --> 00:40:01,600 Speaker 5: I don't want to be to goolag by anybody, But 774 00:40:01,640 --> 00:40:03,200 Speaker 5: I don't think Oswald acted alone. 775 00:40:03,560 --> 00:40:05,919 Speaker 1: Oh me, yeah, I think we can all agree there. 776 00:40:06,120 --> 00:40:07,160 Speaker 1: Oh okay, good awesome. 777 00:40:07,239 --> 00:40:09,920 Speaker 5: I get it's when you talk about conspiracy and then 778 00:40:09,960 --> 00:40:11,680 Speaker 5: you believe it a little part of the conspiracy. 779 00:40:11,680 --> 00:40:13,640 Speaker 1: Don't you feel like you're insane? Yes? 780 00:40:14,440 --> 00:40:16,440 Speaker 4: Well, and I'm also I cannot tell you how many 781 00:40:16,520 --> 00:40:19,640 Speaker 4: times I've been there's kind of like a an ongoing 782 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:22,600 Speaker 4: joke about like when you meet like new mom friends 783 00:40:23,120 --> 00:40:26,919 Speaker 4: and you have to kind of subtly at first see 784 00:40:26,920 --> 00:40:31,040 Speaker 4: if they're anti VAXX or not. You're just like kind 785 00:40:31,040 --> 00:40:35,160 Speaker 4: of checking out the vibes in the beginning, like right. 786 00:40:35,640 --> 00:40:39,160 Speaker 4: But that's how I have felt talking about JFK with people, 787 00:40:39,400 --> 00:40:43,359 Speaker 4: is that I'm like, well, but I can see this, 788 00:40:43,600 --> 00:40:45,759 Speaker 4: and then by the end you're all just like, yes, 789 00:40:45,840 --> 00:40:49,600 Speaker 4: of course, and there was a second shooter at least 790 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:52,000 Speaker 4: that you know, And it's like every single person I 791 00:40:52,040 --> 00:40:54,360 Speaker 4: think is on the same page with that once you 792 00:40:54,400 --> 00:40:55,160 Speaker 4: get down to it. 793 00:40:55,640 --> 00:40:58,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, I would honestly love to see more 794 00:40:58,719 --> 00:41:03,960 Speaker 3: big directors tackle what happened with the JFA assassination. It's 795 00:41:04,000 --> 00:41:06,400 Speaker 3: one every year, Yeah, like when every year, just seventeen 796 00:41:06,440 --> 00:41:08,239 Speaker 3: in a row, and then we'll decide which one is 797 00:41:08,280 --> 00:41:10,360 Speaker 3: the best one in terms of the actual theory and 798 00:41:10,360 --> 00:41:12,239 Speaker 3: which one is the best one in terms of the filmmaking, 799 00:41:12,520 --> 00:41:15,759 Speaker 3: because I actually think, you know, do I think this 800 00:41:16,080 --> 00:41:22,319 Speaker 3: movie is very explicitly spreading unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. Yes, but 801 00:41:22,400 --> 00:41:25,080 Speaker 3: do I think it's sort of like the right instinct 802 00:41:25,120 --> 00:41:27,879 Speaker 3: to question the official learner of a history. Also, Yes, 803 00:41:28,040 --> 00:41:32,160 Speaker 3: so you know, let's fund I don't know Darren Aronofsky's JFK. 804 00:41:32,239 --> 00:41:33,120 Speaker 3: Let's actually not do that. 805 00:41:33,160 --> 00:41:36,880 Speaker 1: But you know, it's just an idea. Who would do 806 00:41:36,920 --> 00:41:39,640 Speaker 1: the best JFK assassinations? Oh that's a great question. 807 00:41:40,000 --> 00:41:40,160 Speaker 4: Oh. 808 00:41:40,239 --> 00:41:41,680 Speaker 5: The first thing in my head was I want the 809 00:41:41,680 --> 00:41:43,600 Speaker 5: comb brothers to get back together so they can do it. 810 00:41:43,640 --> 00:41:46,600 Speaker 1: I do think that, yes, that would be the right reference, 811 00:41:48,120 --> 00:41:48,920 Speaker 1: that's their homework. 812 00:41:49,239 --> 00:41:52,160 Speaker 4: But who would do the most truthful or most accurate? 813 00:41:52,320 --> 00:41:54,799 Speaker 4: Does anyone come to mind that, like, does like extremely 814 00:41:55,000 --> 00:41:57,520 Speaker 4: accurate but powerful period pieces? 815 00:41:57,760 --> 00:42:00,840 Speaker 1: Or I mean, I don't know about accurate. 816 00:42:00,880 --> 00:42:03,920 Speaker 3: But you know, Scorsese is in a sort of you know, 817 00:42:04,680 --> 00:42:08,440 Speaker 3: has done morally nuanced historical films. 818 00:42:08,719 --> 00:42:10,279 Speaker 5: You know, I feel like this guy's version of it 819 00:42:10,320 --> 00:42:12,680 Speaker 5: will get maybe a little closer to Oliver Stone one. 820 00:42:12,920 --> 00:42:16,120 Speaker 5: But the director that I thought really captured this idea 821 00:42:16,160 --> 00:42:18,680 Speaker 5: of fiction nailing the truth better than the truth does 822 00:42:18,800 --> 00:42:22,080 Speaker 5: is David Chisel, with the movie Babylon, which got the 823 00:42:22,280 --> 00:42:25,960 Speaker 5: chaos of Silent Film exactly right, even though we got 824 00:42:25,960 --> 00:42:28,080 Speaker 5: the year right. I think his film feels like it's 825 00:42:28,160 --> 00:42:29,960 Speaker 5: very nineteen nineteen, but he's trying to say it in 826 00:42:29,960 --> 00:42:33,480 Speaker 5: like nineteen twenty seven anyways, like the idea of making 827 00:42:33,480 --> 00:42:35,120 Speaker 5: a movie where you're like, here's the truth, but it 828 00:42:35,160 --> 00:42:38,560 Speaker 5: also has orgies and elephants and fire breathers and all 829 00:42:38,600 --> 00:42:42,040 Speaker 5: sorts of mania. Yeah, and yet that is closer to 830 00:42:42,239 --> 00:42:44,680 Speaker 5: the Silent Film and how it felt to that era 831 00:42:44,800 --> 00:42:47,080 Speaker 5: of like wild people coming to La inventing a new 832 00:42:47,120 --> 00:42:49,560 Speaker 5: form of art and just being the outcasts with a 833 00:42:49,560 --> 00:42:51,920 Speaker 5: new dream than almost anything I've ever seen that tried 834 00:42:51,920 --> 00:42:53,400 Speaker 5: to get it right and does it too soberly. 835 00:42:53,560 --> 00:42:53,840 Speaker 2: Yeah. 836 00:42:53,960 --> 00:42:57,439 Speaker 3: No, I do think focusing on the chaos of it 837 00:42:57,480 --> 00:42:59,120 Speaker 3: is the right way to go rather than being like, 838 00:42:59,160 --> 00:43:01,960 Speaker 3: who is you know, who is a meticulous enough filmmaker 839 00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:02,400 Speaker 3: to get. 840 00:43:02,239 --> 00:43:04,560 Speaker 1: The truth exactly right? Like, you know, give it to 841 00:43:04,560 --> 00:43:08,520 Speaker 1: boz Luhrman, Yeah, boz Larman's JFK. Okay. 842 00:43:08,560 --> 00:43:11,680 Speaker 3: Well, speaking of buzz Larwin's JFK. As we wrap up, Amy, 843 00:43:11,800 --> 00:43:15,880 Speaker 3: I was wondering, what are your favorite Kennedy related pieces 844 00:43:15,920 --> 00:43:18,680 Speaker 3: of pop culture and films and everything else? We Lyra 845 00:43:18,719 --> 00:43:21,360 Speaker 3: and I have a real soft spot for Grey Gardens, 846 00:43:21,600 --> 00:43:25,279 Speaker 3: and I also recently watched House of Yes for the 847 00:43:25,280 --> 00:43:25,799 Speaker 3: first time. 848 00:43:27,000 --> 00:43:27,720 Speaker 1: I mean, Grey. 849 00:43:27,560 --> 00:43:29,480 Speaker 5: Gardens is fantastic. I don't know if you can pick 850 00:43:29,520 --> 00:43:32,680 Speaker 5: a better choice than that, but I really came to 851 00:43:32,840 --> 00:43:38,239 Speaker 5: admire the Natalie Portman take on Jackie because I never 852 00:43:38,360 --> 00:43:42,000 Speaker 5: quite vibed with Natalie Portman often as an actress, But 853 00:43:42,080 --> 00:43:43,880 Speaker 5: when you cast her in a role where she's playing 854 00:43:43,880 --> 00:43:47,400 Speaker 5: somebody incredibly aware of what her image is in trying 855 00:43:47,400 --> 00:43:49,680 Speaker 5: to keep it together for everyone else's sake and doing 856 00:43:49,760 --> 00:43:52,200 Speaker 5: a bad job, that's the lane that I love Natalie 857 00:43:52,239 --> 00:43:55,000 Speaker 5: Portman in. And I felt like that movie. Even if 858 00:43:55,040 --> 00:43:59,319 Speaker 5: I don't necessarily think it's a proper synergy of either 859 00:43:59,360 --> 00:44:02,520 Speaker 5: one of those women individually, her or Jackie O, I 860 00:44:02,600 --> 00:44:05,520 Speaker 5: do think it captures a venn diagram of them really well. 861 00:44:06,239 --> 00:44:09,239 Speaker 1: Well, thank you so much for joining us today. This 862 00:44:09,360 --> 00:44:12,000 Speaker 1: was so fun. Oh my pleasure always down to get 863 00:44:12,040 --> 00:44:16,359 Speaker 1: conspiratorial with y'all. Thank you so much, Amie. So that's 864 00:44:16,360 --> 00:44:17,640 Speaker 1: it for this week's episode. 865 00:44:17,880 --> 00:44:20,760 Speaker 3: Next week, we're diving into the life of Rosemary Kennedy 866 00:44:20,960 --> 00:44:24,640 Speaker 3: with historian Kate Clifford Larsen, author of the biography. 867 00:44:24,280 --> 00:44:28,480 Speaker 1: Rosemary, the hidden Kennedy daughter. So subscribe and follow United 868 00:44:28,480 --> 00:44:28,840 Speaker 1: States 869 00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:35,520 Speaker 4: Of Kennedy for all things Kennedy every week,