WEBVTT - A&G Replay Thursday Hour Four

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Getty, Armstrong and Gatty and He.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty Strong and Happy Thanksgiving. It's the Armstrong

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>and Getty replay. I hope you eat as much as

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 3>you can. I hope you're in pain by the end

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 3>of the day. I know I will be.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 4>Now Here are some delicious Armstrong and Getdy leftovers.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 5>Get filled up with more of Armstrong and Getty with

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 5>our podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Your loved one or maybe yourself wants an Armstrong and

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Getty hoodie, T shirt, hat or more. They're at Armstrong

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 4>and Geeddy dot com.

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 5>Here's the funniest thing I thought that happened on the

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 5>Saturday Night Live Go Open with the guy who does Trump.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>He was talking about.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 5>You're in Abi Dabby Ami, Dabbi Abi dabbi do like

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 5>the late great friends Flintstone.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was so funny, eh boy, the late

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>great Fred Flintstone.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 5>So I Southern News yesterday that they were going to

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 5>have a voting session on the Big Beautiful Bill at

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 5>ten o'clock Sunday night, and because it's the weekend, and

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm a normal human being.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I didn't like.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Take a second to look into that, because I thought,

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 5>what the hell kind of a procedural deal is a

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Sunday night at ten o'clock thingy? But I just did

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 5>see that the four holdouts went along with whatever and

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 5>it passed, So there you go.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the four holdouts went along with whatever is a

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 4>pretty good description of it. I will be a bit

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 4>more detailed. And this is the reason I'm disgusted and embittered.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 4>This is the most sausagey of sausage making. If you're

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 4>familiar with the old reference to politics, here's your headline

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 4>from the WAPO. I'm going to read you just a

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 4>little bit because it's kind of revealing of at least

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 4>a couple of things.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tax and immigration.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Bill clears Hurtle after late night vote to the House

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Budget Committee passed a massive tax and immigration package central

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 4>President Trump's agenda late Sunday, overcoming opposition from hardline conservatives,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.839
<v Speaker 4>overspending four fiscal conservatives, all deficit hawks aligned with the

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 4>old truck conservative House Freedom Caucus, changed their vote to present,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 4>allowing the legislative monstrosity. I injected that package to be

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 4>recommended favorably to the House by a vote of seventeen

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>to sixteen, but their hesitance to vote for the One

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Big Beautiful Bill Act out of committee is a reminder

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 4>that the far right flank of the Republican Conference remains skeptical.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I see where you're going here. Yeah.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Now, it could just be your typical WAHPO journalistic bias,

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 4>although the WAPO is improved somewhat lately a little bit.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, I think it's.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately closer to true that I'm comfortable with that there

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 4>are only a handful of like lunatic hard liners who

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 4>are against the following headlines. This is from the Richard

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Ruben writing in The Wall Street Journal. The stark math

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 4>on the GOP tax planet doesn't cut the deficit.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 2>It grows the deficit.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 4>The Republican Party, with both Houses of Congress and the

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 4>White House, are going to grow the deficit. It's undeniable.

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Next headline, National Review, Republicans should stay the course on

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>reducing medicaid spending. They're not going to. They're running in

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>the other direction, partly because the incredibly smart calculating what

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 4>is he up to? Josh Cawley of Missouri is all

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden, this is the guy now.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Who led the charge to repeal Obamacare.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 4>He's now out schumering Schumer, saying that the party's Wall

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Street wing, a noisy contingent of corporist Republicans want to

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 4>slash health insurance for the working poor.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we mentioned that.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 5>On Friday, he wrote that op ed piece that the

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Republicans need to back off cutting Medicare.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Any Well, it's a reform of Medicaid. Any reforms are

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 4>a hidden tax on working poor people. And this is

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and he's referring to a thirty five dollars copay for

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 4>able bodied adults covered by Obamacare Medicaid for a visit

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 4>to the doctor. Thirty five dollars copay is some sort

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 4>of hidden tax on working poor people.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 5>And that's just the calculation that Republicans are now the

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 5>party of the working class, and they feel like they

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 5>got enough a working class that are on Medicaid that

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 5>they Josh Holley at least doesn't want to mess with it.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 4>And a yeah, now the party of pandering to and

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 4>writing checks to people to win their votes.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was going to say that it's interesting they

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 5>call these people ultra conservative of right wing, when not

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 5>very many years ago you would have been the center

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 5>of the Republican Party. I mean that would have been

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 5>I mean as like what the Republican Party was.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 5>It was, it was a term you would have used

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 5>to define the party. Fact, it was so intrinsic to

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 5>the Republican Party. You'd feel silly even repeating what you

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 5>just repeated, right that there's no need fisically conservative. But

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 5>I suppose in reality, given where most of the party is,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 5>they are ultra right wing or ultra conservative because the

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 5>bulk of the party doesn't care apparently apparently not voters.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 4>So spending your children, grandchildren into tax and spend oblivion.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 5>Well all right, Well, this story got repeated a lot

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 5>over the weekend that we got downgraded on one of

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 5>our credit scores by one of the major organizations that does.

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 2>That sort of thing.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 5>And uh, over the weekend it kind of got put

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 5>out there that it was like a Trump thing because

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 5>of tariffs or whatever. It was basically around the fact

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 5>that our debt is just so high. It's just like

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 5>this would happen to you if you go to the

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 5>bank and they take a look at your well you've

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>got with your car payments. Now you bought like eight

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 5>cars and two houses, and you're just overmaxed.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 4>So you have eighty thousand dollars in credit card bills

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 4>and you only make ninety a year, right, right, So

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 4>they just dong Grady because you just spend more than

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 4>you make.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 2>That's what happened. That didn't happen just in the last

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>one hundred days under Trump. We've been building this for

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 2>a long time.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 4>And the final reason I am completely embittered about the

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party in politics and America and democracy and life

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 4>on Earth is the fact that, and it's a two

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 4>part horror show, Part number one is that there are

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of swing district Republicans from big blue states

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 4>California and New York most notably, who are not only

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 4>trying to defend the idea of the salt deduction this

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>state and local tax deduction, they want to raise it

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 4>from ten thousand dollars to at least thirty thousand dollars

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 4>and maybe fifty thousand dollars. Meaning if you live in

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 4>a tax and spend lunatic state like say California, all

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 4>of those incredibly high taxes you're paying, you can deduct

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>from your federal tax return. So the other states will

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 4>subsidize the tax and spend lunacy of New York and California.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 5>So my brothers in Kansas pay some of my taxes

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 5>because I live in California.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you get a giant subsidy from the other states.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 4>You pay a lower federal tax rate, significantly lower depending

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 4>on you know, how much money you make than folks

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 4>in fiscally responsible states, and is indefensible morally. It's indefensible

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 4>as for Republican reason, not the party, but the idea

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 4>of we have a federal system than states, and the

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 4>states can do what they want, and they should.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Do what they want.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 4>If you're fine, if Massachusetts wants to have a sixty

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 4>five percent income tax, go ahead.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not living there, but go ahead.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 4>But then to transfer that profligacy to the other states

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 4>is it's a horror. And as a conservative slash Republican,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 4>he says, trying not to vomit because of my embitteredness,

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 4>the idea that that is a plank of the Republican Party.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm done.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 5>It's it's hard to swallow. I mean, you know, it

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 5>would help Joe and I if this happens financially. But

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 5>it's awful, absolutely awful.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>You I mean, you can't defend it.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 4>No, it's it's it's I am horrified. I don't care

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 4>how much it would benefit me. God bless me. I

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 4>have principles. It's really held me back in life. Jack too.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 4>I just I'm done. I'm done.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's well.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 5>Like I said last week, Sarah Isger of The Dispatch,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 5>I heard her on a podcast They're having this discussion

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 5>about party, and she said, there are no political parties.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>What are we talking about here? Yeah?

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 4>I need to seek that out because I think she

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 4>nailed absolutely, one hundred percent. There are no political parties.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 4>There's just whoever emerges as the candidate, cycle by cycle,

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 4>and then whatever they believe, the party goes along with.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 4>And it's true on both sides. So the idea that

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 4>there are parties that stand for something, we.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Need to all move past that.

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 4>From my hero hl Menken, every election is a sort

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 4>of advanced auction sale of stolen goods. That's always been true.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 4>There was a time when a certain party had certain

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 4>principles that I admired.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Do you have time has passed. You know what.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 4>My high school sweetheart, college sweetheart, my wife of forty

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 4>years is. When she's not turning tricks, she's killing people

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 4>for the mob. Okay, she's not a woman, I felt.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 4>This is by the way, fictional illustration has nothing to

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 4>do with my beloved bride Judith.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>She's not the person she was. It's you can forget it.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It's over, so move on. Get a get an Ai.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Girlfriend like a normal person and a love bod or

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 4>something I girlfriend like a normal prison.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show. Yeah more Jack Morgio podcasts

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and our hot links.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show. Yet another one of these?

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Do they run this quarterly?

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Is it some sort of requirement warning issue to anyone

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 4>using this smiley face emoji to older people not gen Z.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 4>A smile face means you're conveying that you're happy. Yeah,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 4>but gen Z takes this grinning face to convey sarcasm

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 4>or irony.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>And then it has the inevitable twenty three year old employee.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Who says, at first I thought my coarchers were being

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 4>called and sarcastic to me, and then I realized when

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 4>they send a thumbs up, they really mean thumbs up

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 4>because he is a sarcastically and the tone of the

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 4>article is always therefore, you're you. Older people really ought

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 4>to be careful in a.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Finger and they should switch to the way we do

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 5>it as opposed the other way around.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I would say to Hovey's at BESHI, twenty one

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 4>year old intern, excuse me, I run this place.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I own this place. People like me run the world.

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 2>So you figured out.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 5>My son sends me the emoji with the tears streaming

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 5>down the face. Yes, at what seemed to me inappropriate times,

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 5>it seems to mean something different to freshmen in high

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 5>school than all the other adults who ever send me

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the emoji with tears streaming down the face?

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, k, Katie, you're not old and bitter. Well, don't

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 2>go that better.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 6>But several of my younger friends send me that, which

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 6>usually would mean like you're crying legitimately, like.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 5>You were really touched by something, or you know, my

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 5>dog just died, or I heard about your mom or whatever.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it means something's hilarious now, like you're crying, you're

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 6>laughing song.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, that's what I kind of picked up on. I thought,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 5>this is highly inappropriate. Does this mean you're laughing?

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I cracked. You have a laughing till you're crying,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 2>right they do.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 6>I cracked a joke to one of my girlfriends and

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 6>I sent her that and she sent me one of

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 6>those back, and I was like, did something just happen?

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 2>What's wrong? She's like, that's exactly that what I have.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 2>And I thought, oh, geez, I hurt somebody's feelings.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exact same thing came over me. I was like,

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 6>what did I do? No, that's just their laughing face.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 6>Now are we talking about the tears streaming down?

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 4>See, we used that in my family a lot. Like

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 4>I didn't get the wordle So you're really upset.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but you're you're you're you're you're being sarcastic about

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 5>how upset you are. Yes, exaggerating, Yeah, but it's kind

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 5>of the opposite meaning for my son.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now I get it. I'm laughing so hard I'm

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>even though they've got one of those already.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>My favorite texting story of all time, and it will

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 4>be for the rest of my life, was the woman

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 4>who said I'm sorry I didn't get back to you

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 4>my mom just passed away, and her friend replied lol,

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 4>thinking it meant lots of love.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.119
<v Speaker 2>To me. They no longer speak.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 4>And I'm lolling now is the ironic concluded?

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>That's sorry anyway?

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 5>So to get like this, I feel like lol is

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 5>like charity laugh or you know what is that term

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 5>where you you laugh? You know, somebody says simple sympathy

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 5>laugh at this point and I and then I don't

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 5>know how to respond with a that actually is freaking funny.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, well I don't know.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 5>I usually write out because I don't use emojis, because

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 5>I'm a grown up. I usually write out. I actually

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 5>laughed out loud at that. That was very funny, like

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 5>that much it's something really long and tedious.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 6>You're such a boomer, or you just send the word

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 6>funny with zero punctuations, so you can't tell if you're

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 6>being serious or not.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I have done that.

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 4>I will frequently respond ha because I was laughing lots

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 4>of oz. Yeah. So, but there's more linguists studying emojis. Emoji,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm supposed to say I'm not Japanese, all right.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Have also pointed out that the symbols new meetings can

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 4>often emerge from slang that older users might not be

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 4>aware of. For example, older social media users might see

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 4>the skull emoji as a literal symbol of death or

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 4>a sign that someone is figuratively dead, isn't dead, tired

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 4>or dead to me, whatever, But for the younger users,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 4>the skull is used to say I'm dead, which means

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 4>that they found something hilarious and have died laughing.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Oh okay, the skull is that was really funny. I'm

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 5>gonna hit somebody I can. I can think of people

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 5>i'd hit with that today would be very confused.

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 4>While the sparkle emoji is frequently someone being sarcastic about

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 4>how something, how good something is, and too much sarcasm.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 4>But here's the part I found really interesting.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 5>So I send to like. If somebody says, hey, I

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 5>got that promotion at work, I respond with an eggplant

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 5>and then sprays of water.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that the proper thing? Good Lord? Yes? Yes, do that?

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's perfect, Oh my god. Or if you give

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 4>a thumbs up and a sparkle, they'll think you're mocking them,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 4>which is again, we run the world. We old people

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 4>run the world. You adapt us. But is your youngster

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 4>texting about cannabis, for instance, sometimes known as pot or marijuana.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 4>The shamrock, the leaf, the maple leaf, the lemon, the grape,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 4>the watermelon, the strawberry, the cherry, the pineapple, the dog face,

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 4>the candy, the cake, the ice cream cone, and the

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 4>cookie can all be references to cannabis.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Because I understand it.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 5>The egg plant is the traditional vegetable of success, and

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 5>so if somebody has some good news.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Keep believe in that, jack and use it frequently. Jack.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 4>These emoji can be references to cocaine, a rocket ship,

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 4>a fish, a gas pump, a snowman or a snowflake.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>They're all sorts of drugs.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Uh, sexting the peach which looks like God forgive me

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 4>a woman's hind end, or the egg plant, the water

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, or cherries.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's see.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 6>I was embarrassingly baffled the other day when I got

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 6>a text message from a friend that said kiss my

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 6>and then there was a peach emoji, and I'm going,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 6>this is my peach?

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean? I saw somebody with a cherries

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>tattoo on them? What does that mean? You, Katie? Is

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 2>that a girl? What's that mean? Women.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 6>Cherries were trendy late nineties early two thousands, But I

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 6>don't know if.

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 2>That meaning what was the message A delicious fruit? It

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>was just a cute pattern.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So okay, it didn't mean anything, all right, that's fine,

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 5>doesn't need.

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>To We're looking it up.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 6>Often associated with sensuality, feminine power, innocence, and youth.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, According to an Instagram post, that's a stupid tattoo.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Don't get that and if you haven't, get it removed.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Arm Strong and the Armstrong and Getty shar So.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of technology a different sort than an AI story,

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 4>I am completely convinced that mankind has invented its doom.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm just there's nothing I can do about it, so

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 4>I try not to worry about it. I hope my

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 4>kids are smart and savvy enough to, you know, to

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 4>have happy lives in spite of the coming.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>AI apocalypse.

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 5>If nothing else, the biggest change in the shortest amount

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 5>of time that's probably ever happened, which would be whip sawing,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 5>even if it turns out okay.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Alicia Finley, who writes for the Journal opinion page, who

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I think is just terrific one of my favorite writers.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Has a piece today. I think it is recently.

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Analyzing what people are saying so far, including the CEO

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>of Amazon about AI with that employee memo that he

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 4>sent out, the key line of which was, we will

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 4>need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 4>being done today and more people doing other types of jobs,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 4>and that the people who will keep their jobs are

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 4>people who learn how to use AI effectively. And he

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 4>explained that AI advances me and employees will do less

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 4>wrote work and more thinking strategically, which sounds really super great.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.239
<v Speaker 4>And all this will require high level of cognition than

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 4>does the rote work many white color employees now do.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 4>But as AI is getting smarter, I'll start quoting Alicia. Now,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Younger college grads may be getting dumber. Like early versions

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 4>of chat GBT. They can regurgitate information and ideas, but

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 4>struggle to come up with novel insights or analyze issues

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 4>from different directions. And then she goes in an interesting direction,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 4>and this is the fruit of the tree of knowledge stuff.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 4>We don't know what we're doing to ourselves, she mentions.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 4>The brain continues to develop and mature into one's mid twenties.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 4>Some of us longer than that, but like a muscle,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 4>it needs to be exercise, stimulated, and challenged to grow stronger.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Technology and especially AI, can stunt this development by doing

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 4>the mental work that builds the brain's version of a

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 4>computer cloud, a phenomenon called cognitive offloading.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Cool. Yeah, yeah, cool, But.

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Growing research shows and I remember we talked about this

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 4>a while ago. We had a debate about cursive cursive writing,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 4>which seems silly and unnecessary in handwriting in general. But

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 4>then these studies have come out that show that handwriting

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 4>engages parts of your brain that play a crucial role

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 4>in learning and help children with word and letter recognition.

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 4>But more than that, taking notes by hand also promotes

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 4>memory development by forcing you to synthesize and prioritize information.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 4>When you plunk away on a keyboard. On the other hand,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 4>information can go as it were, in one ear and

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 4>out the other. And then they study the electrical activity

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 4>of university students during the activities of handwriting and typing,

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 4>and the way their brains worked were very, very different.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Now that's just kind of a side point to the

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 4>greater point, which is the dopey grunt work that now

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 4>the computers do do or the AI can do is

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 4>the very dope y grunt work that give builds the

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 4>neural muscles it takes to do the more advanced stuff.

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 4>You can't skip to bench pressing two hundred and fifty

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 4>pounds having not bench pressed one hundred pounds ever, neurologically speaking.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 5>That's really interesting. I was just thinking in my own life,

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 5>I do some I hate the term journaling. I don't know,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 5>it sounds so woosy. My son would say gay and

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 5>so at all is high school friends, including gay ones.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>But funny, isn't it. Uh?

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, writing about things that are you know, difficult

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 5>to try to get them out or figure them out.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 5>But I do it a lot, typing into my notes

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 5>and my phone, and you're you're saying that doesn't count,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 5>that that doesn't work right. Interesting way, I mean to

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 5>be completely wasting my time. I hate handwriting. I did

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 5>say I'm left handed, I have short fingers. I just

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 5>the physical act of handwriting.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I hate.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 5>It's just physically that's funny. My my my son who's

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 5>left handed, is that way. He just he just he

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 5>almost says it hurts. It's just like it's physically awful

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 5>for him to do.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 4>It does get kind of crampy because you're taught that

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 4>your letters ought to have a certain slam slant. And

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 4>if you're left handed you have to like form a

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 4>hook with your hand, and right.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Sideways you're some sort of degenerates. We all, we all

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>know it. Well, you know, if you don't know this,

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>you should.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 4>The The word sinister is Latin for left handed for

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 4>good reason, right, and what's the uh the uh the

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 4>equivalent right hand and it's like noble or something. Anyway,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 4>that's why I'm a Satanist. Anyway, moving along, then you

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 4>get well, I kind of made the point already. But

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 4>if you don't do the stuff to work up to

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 4>the advanced stuff, you'll never be able to do the

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 4>advanced stuff.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>And college and high.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 4>School students are increasingly using large language models like chat

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 4>GPT to write papers, perform mathematical proofs, and create computer code.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 4>That means they don't learn to think through, express or

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 4>defend ideas. And Aha moments occur spontaneously within your brain

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 4>with a sudden burst of high frequency electrical activity.

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 2>When the brain connects seemingly unrelated concepts, it finds the

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 2>connections and sees patterns and then it says, oh, wow,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and we're denying ourselves all of the grunt work to

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 2>get there. Wow. That's interesting.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 5>I've had that happen with music before, with after years

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 5>of doing well. It's like learning scales and then something else,

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 5>and then somehow it all comes together at one point. Yeah,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 5>it makes sense so that it can happen with this

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 5>other stuff. But we're stitch in the first part. We're

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 5>skipping the scale.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 4>RNE as a quick aside, and I realized this sounds

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of silly and makes it clear that I'm an

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 4>old bastard at this point.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>But Judy and I are really into doing crossword puzzles.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 4>We do like the hard New York times like Friday

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 4>through Sunday crossword puzzles, and I will and we do

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 4>him as a team, which is fun and brings us together.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 4>But I will be utterly stumped. Saturday's the hardest one.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 4>Sunday's kind of a mind blank because often there's a

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 4>trick within the puzzle.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>But Saturday is really hard.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 4>And often I will be completely stumped, and I will

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 4>go away for an hour two hours. I will come

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 4>back and I will crush it. What happened there? That's

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 4>worth thinking about.

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 5>How I've been utilizing that my whole life, like writing

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 5>papers for school.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I always knew that.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 5>If I thought about it, thought about it, thought about it,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 5>couldn't come.

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Up with it. If I slept, I'd wake up and

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd have it. I would have it.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, and I won't tell you what does happen.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm reading this book right now. It's a Graham Green.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 5>He's a fantastic author. I've never written his stuff, but

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 5>he's in this novel I'm reading right now about an author.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 5>So he's talking about himself basically. But how writing is

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 5>something that happens while you're not thinking about it. He says,

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 5>you're gathering all this information, coming up with plot ideas,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 5>and then the writing happens when you're not thinking about it,

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 5>and then it comes out on the page. So it's

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 5>just exactly what you're describing. It's your brain is doing

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 5>something while you're asleep or occupied doing something else, synthesizes

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 5>it and then it comes out.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Or and this is a bit of a quibble, and

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 4>this is what I was about to say. I'm not

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 4>going to lecture you, but I now discipline myself harshly

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 4>using a lash to be bored a certain amount of

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 4>the day, to be doing nothing, reading nothing, looking at

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 4>nothing but the trees and the sky and my dog

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 4>peeing over there. I am committed to being not occupied

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 4>a certain chunk of the day.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 5>So you're like Putty Elaine's boyfriend sitting on the plane

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 5>just staring at the seatback.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm fine. Do you want something to read? No,

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm a right. Oh anything, crossword puzzle, I'm fine. Yeah.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 4>I sat next to a lady like that a few

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 4>months ago. I think I talked about it on the air,

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 4>and it was freaking me out. It was weird me out.

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 4>I was like, is she going to take over the

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 4>plane or kill me or explode into a rage or

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 4>this is not natural shoes are going to catch on fire.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 4>But take time to daydreams. Seriously.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Earlier, we were talking about the new Tesla robotaxis.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 2>One of them.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 5>Paused in an intersection in Austin or something like that

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 5>and made some news. But I would see the automated

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 5>driving on the Tesla, which kind of fits into the

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 5>AI stuff, is so much better than it was three

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 5>years ago when I first started writing Tesla.

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's night and day, and it's so good now.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 5>And I never thought I would have any interest in

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 5>using automated driving, similar to the first time I ever

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 5>saw somebody texting and learned about it, I thought, why

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 5>would anybody do that? And then obviously we all text constantly.

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 5>Now I use automated driving all the time. When I

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 5>drive my vehicle that doesn't have it, it seems like, oh,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 5>this is kind of a pain in the ass, So convert,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 5>don't well, don't pretend you know what things you'll like,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 5>and you don't. I know in my own life, I've

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 5>been proven wrong multiple times.

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 4>So the NFL is about to change thanks to AI,

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 4>and they in the Athletic they're talking about how coaches

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 4>are already using AI to analyze tendencies of opponents and

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing. They use the example of there's

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 4>a wide gulf between the math used to optimize fourth

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 4>down decisions and a voiced AI agent telling you to

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 4>look out for the weak side linebacker while you're sitting

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 4>alone in your office on a Tuesday night. This assistant

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 4>coach who's the offensive coordinator for the Falcon says, I'm

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 4>getting a little scared.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I could see where this would go. Very quickly,

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 5>and there are I mean, without even thinking of reading

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 5>with this or thinking about it, I just AI could

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 5>crunch the last five years of all the plays. Say,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 5>look eighty seven percent of the time, the other team

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 5>is going to do this in this situation, and you

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 5>react to it, and then that will be cool up

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 5>until the point that it's just AI against AI. You know,

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 5>a season from now.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Your computer telling you what play to run in their

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 4>computer are telling them how to counter it. Having a

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty good idea what's coming. And they're talking about coaches

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 4>being replaced entirely, but he just already have. This guy

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 4>was hired by the Raiders as the head coach research specialist,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 4>but the job may be better understood as AI coordinator.

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 4>He uses AI every single day. He's clearly going to happen.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why I hadn't thought about this before.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 4>This is clearly going to happen.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 5>You got super smart people who study, like like maniacs

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 5>for this stuff to make decisions in the like forty

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 5>five seconds you have before between plays or whatever it is,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 5>and now AI.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Is going to be able to do it. Let me

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>read you some of this.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 4>I feel pretty confident saying that some team is going

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 4>to win a Super Bowl in the next few years

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 4>utilizing AI at a very high rate, significantly higher than

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 4>it's ever been used before, said this coach. It's really

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity to differentiate your differentiate yourself from a team

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 4>that might have a more talented roster.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Better coaches or whatnot.

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Ruin, there's just going to be more and more separation

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 4>with teams that are have bought in.

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they might have to outlaw that. I mean because

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 5>it's similar to when computers got better at chess than

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 5>humans and people thought that'd be the end of chess

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 5>or whatever. No, people still like watching the best humans

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 5>play each other, even though they're a computer out there

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 5>could beat either.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 2>One of them.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Who cares? You still want to know who the best

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 5>human is. I think knowing who the best humans are

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 5>at guessing the plays is more fun than two computers

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 5>battling it out right.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 4>It'll be so interesting to see how the league and

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 4>the rules adapt to this and how people will then cheat.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Because they're talking about there are systems that can watch

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 4>game film, sure of multiple teams, multiple games, analyze it

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 4>come up with the probabilities. The next layer, they say

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 4>is understanding personnel as well, because, as they put it,

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Fourth and One with Mike Vick and Algae Crumpler looks

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot different than Fourth and One with Kirk Cousins

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 4>and Kyle Bitts.

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I fear for that. Hey, I will figure that

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 2>out because they can take it into much of give

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it a week. Armstrong and Genny Christmas Shopping. Sometimes it's

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>so tough.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 8>It can feel like you're just buying a bunch of

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 8>random stuff. Get focus, stand, spend your money right. We've

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 8>got the perfect gift, but special person in your life.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 8>The Armstrong and Gunny super Stone Shop Now, I'm Strong

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 8>and Ganny.

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Dot Com The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 7>Eight months after the election, Democrats are still trying to

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 7>dig themselves out of a hole, but a new poll

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 7>from the Wall Street Journal paints a bleak picture. It

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 7>reveals only thirty three percent of registered voters today view

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 7>Democrats favorably, while a staggering sixty three percent see them negatively.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 7>That's the worst rating from the same poll since nineteen ninety.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 4>At Saisha Hasny on Special Report Last Night with Brett Brettbaar,

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Fox News Slash so Yes Analysis in a Moment I

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 4>found this next segment pretty interesting though.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Aisha. We're in the doghouse yet again.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 5>We certainly do have a problem, and it's a messaging problem.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 7>If messaging is the problem, the new poll signals Democrats

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 7>attacking President Trump isn't working at least yet. That's because

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 7>even when more voters disapprove of Trump on issues like inflation,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 7>they still trust congressional Republicans more than Democrats to handle

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 7>that issue by a whopping ten points. On immigration, the

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 7>same thing, More voters disapprove of Trump's handling of the matter,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 7>but Republicans once again are trusted more than Democrats to

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 7>manage it.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't know.

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if I believe this analysis that people

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 5>have been going with. I think it's the crazy factor.

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 5>It's the uh, I don't know. You've got a friend

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 5>who does a few things that are just so crazy

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 5>you don't trust his judgment on anything else.

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what's driving it. It's not that.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the Democrats view of the economy is specifically blah

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 5>blah blah.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 9>It said, you're the people that want boys plan girls.

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 9>You're the people that want me to say LATINEX. You're

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 9>the people that think we shouldn't have police. I don't

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 9>trust you on anything. I think it's the crazy factor.

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah you put a grown man in my little girl's

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:11.959
<v Speaker 9>locker room. Yeah exactly.

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 4>But to her point though, and it's not in contrast

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 4>to your point, it's agreeing with it. So like on

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 4>inflation and rising prices, Trump is eleven points underwater, okay,

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 4>but the Republicans in general are ten points to the positive.

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 4>So what Trump's doing right now on immigration he sees

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 4>just three points underwater, but generally speaking Republicans that are

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Democrats seventeen.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Point advantage for Republicans.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 4>So there are momentarily momentary quibbles with the way Trump

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 4>is approaching this, that or the other, But in terms

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 4>of general philosophy that I don't care. I want the Republicans,

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 4>which again I don't think disagrees with your point.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it agrees with it.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Why do they have that percent or why do they

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 4>lean so strongly that way?

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Because they think that Democrats have lost their effing mind.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's see, So the Democrats are thirty three percent favorable,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 4>sixty three percent unfavorable, far weaker assessment than voters give

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.720
<v Speaker 4>to either President Trump or the Republican Party.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're underwater.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 4>But of course political parties ought to be underwater, remember

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 4>when you got their opponents, and number two you got

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 4>neutrals or independence and their own party members who'd like

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 4>them to change what they're.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Doing a little bit.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, Trump is seven percent underwater and Republicans are

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 4>eleven percent underwater. But again keep in mind, the Democrats

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 4>are thirty points underwater.

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, as always that number of people that are unhappy

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 5>with the Democrats, it's a certain chunk who think they're crazy,

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 5>like I was just talking about, and a certain chunk,

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 5>smaller chunk, but a certain chunk that thinks they haven't

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 5>gone far enough, they haven't stuck to their guns on

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 5>I's issues and defunding the police and climate change and

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 5>all the other important things.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Which is even worse news, really, But a mere eight

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 4>percent of voters view the Democrats very favorably, two and

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 4>a half times as many have the same level of

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 4>enthusiasm for the GOP.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 5>I we got a long way to go on what direction?

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 5>You know what the Democratic Party is going to look

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 5>like next presidential election. But I keep hearing people like

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 5>smart people throughout AOC is the current front runner slash

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 5>face of the Democratic Party, and she probably is.

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Who else would have doomed They are doomed, doomed. If

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>it was you that go ahead, try it.

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know who else would it be as a

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 4>rhetorical question, but the answer is a blue state governor

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 4>who's a moderate.

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but it's got to be a human being so

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 5>that yeah, you're right, but it's got to be an

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 5>actual name at some point.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I could throw out a list, but nobody,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 4>nobody is talking about Bill Clinton. Nobody's throw We're talking

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 4>about Bill Clinton even after he entered Sure, Armstrong and

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Getty