WEBVTT - Retail Sales, AI Investing, EVs, And Adobe (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. The consumer, despite this

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>rampant inflation that's hitting all of us, whether the gas

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>pumper in the supermarket, the consumers kind of hanging in there,

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, we got some retail sales today

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of came in a little bit better than expect

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to look. Under the hood, there's definitely some concern there,

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the headline number was pretty decent. I

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to break it down with Angie Solanki, National director

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of Retail Services in the United States for Colliers. Colliers

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>is a publicly traded company uh NASDACS c I G

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I is a took her to put into your Bloomberg

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>terminal and you what you make of the August retail

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>sales numbers. It was great to see that we had,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>even though it was a slight rise, that there is

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>still confidence. Uh spend is still occurring, but it's occurring

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>more so where they're focused on value oriented because there's

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>still the inconsistency. Right there may be still a little

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 1>bit of concern as we see inflation still continuing to occur,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but overall there's still some confidence. I think retailers were

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pleasantly surprised. So the headline number onto was again of

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>three tenths of one per cent, and I'm wondering what

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that looks like when you adjusted for inflation, because these

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>numbers are not adjusted for inflation, right, correct? Correct? Um,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>They definitely are not. I think that what we should

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>look at is if we look at, you know, the

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>last time we've seen inflation hit as as high as

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it is right now this year, it was many many

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>moons ago. So yes, it's hurting us in terms of

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the pocketbook, but overall, the drag we're seeing is still

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't it's it's not as significant. People still understand that

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>there's an increase that they need to be mindful, um,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>but they're still you know, they still need to look

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at staple products, groceres spend um we're seeing from retailers

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, though, is this really interesting kind of juxtaposition

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of they are starting to push out more

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>private labeled brands. So they're they're pushing out their more

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>their own brands and other brands good stuff. So it's September,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>but I know retailers they're thinking holiday season already. UM,

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>what's the expectation when you talk to some of the

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>retailers out there about how this holiday season may shape up. Well,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>there's still quite a bit of product in inventory out there,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the concern right now is how much

0:02:55.320 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>discounting really is required, So retailers are preparing for that. Um,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to be, you know, a fairly busy

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. If they start to discount the product to

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>lure you know, the inflation worried shopper in UM, that

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>will start to show spend an increase in spend. But

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really more that there's a quite a

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of inventory be concerns still around discounting. You know,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>this is the first holiday season that we're seeing where

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers are going to most likely slow down due to

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the high inflation UM in many many years. So we

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>don't really have any learnings from this since it's been

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so long. UM, there's been talk about third party sellers

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>over at Amazon looking to potentially cut prices even further

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to move these you know, this inventory that they're sitting on,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So that will be interesting for us to watch. In

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of the gasoline component, we've seen prices at the

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pump come down. Paul checks the regular unloaded up gas

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>average every day, um, and you know, the sales figures

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>excluding gas we're up zero eight percent, So I'm pretty strong.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you see people taking the savings essentially that they're

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>getting from the drop in pump prices and putting it elsewhere? Yeah. Actually,

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, um, you know, roughly a one percent rise

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in spend at restaurants and bars. And this was in

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the month of August. So even though food costs have

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, have been hit pretty hard, you know, there's

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>still this you know, need to go out to be

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>out socialized. So it's a small percentage increase, but I

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>think people are saying, hey, if I'm going to spend

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, call it a hundred and fifty dollars for

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a meal for two people at home groceries I have

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy, then I have to cook, and then I

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have to clean. Why not just go out and have

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>a little fun. So, Um, I think that people are

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>really thinking where should they spend their time and if

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a cost versus time versus value there they're spending

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>it in the restaurants, which is great for for definitely

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 1>our our restaurants and bars. Well, my household, I clean.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm the cleaner guy. I take care of it. Yet

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I love doing that. Just leave me alone in the kitchen,

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine. I'll clean up all day long. So, Angie,

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and you're going out and spending money at restaurants and bars,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I am absolutely that that that's kind of my thing, Angie. Um,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for these retailers, can they are they gonna have enough

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>labor here for this holiday season? It just seems to

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be a persistent problem across many industries. Yes, that is

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the one worry, right, um, because you're it's a combination

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of just resources human resources people. Um. But the second

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of this, right is the uh, the cost. So

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>wages continue to be a concern for many retailers. Um,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they continue to increase wages. So that's going to be

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>really something that they're gonna have to focus on. It

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is it relates to Okay, if we need to push product,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>need to bring in volume of people. We want to

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>increase our sales. We need people to to have that movement.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing we're also seeing is technology. Right,

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so technology continued to be a big play. I don't

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>know if you've read, like Starbucks is coming out with

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this what they're calling their reinvention strategy to kind of

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>offset some of that labor concern and labor issues. And

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>so they're looking at automating more so over the next

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>several years where you can just get your food and

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>drink orders very quickly and and it cuts down on

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>that employee labor shortage and or cost issue. Alright, Angie,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Great Great stuff has always Anti Slanki, national director of

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Retail Services for Colliers, talking about retail sales came in

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better than expected for the month of August.

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Let's get over speaking of driving across this beautiful country.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's get over to Brent Shooty right now. He's a

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>chief investment strategist at Northwestern Mutual. Brent, are you in Chicago.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Milwaukee. Know I was in Chicago earlier in

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>my career, but I moved to the beautiful city of Milwaukee.

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Got it, Well, I just knew that you did your

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>MBA at the University of Chicago. They do numbers there

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>at the university. Highly respected by this program. UM. I'm

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>glad to have you on because I have been having

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>discussions with investors here in New York and and yesterday

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we heard from Ray Dalio that he's on the bare side.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>He says if the FED raises rates to four and

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a half percent or more, which looks highly likely they'll do,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks could fall. On the other hand, UM. David Rubinstein

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>UM yesterday of Carlisle Fame, who also has a television

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>program here on Bloomberg Television, said he thinks that professional

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>investors are looking for bargains right now. This is when

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you should be buying. Um. Do you side with one

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or the other? I think it comes down to your

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>out look on inflation. And certainly, as I look at charts,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>graphs and mosaics of ford looking indicators of inflation, I

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>find it very hard to see any reason and why

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation is permanent or here to stay, and why the

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fudge should actually raise rates above four and a half percent.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that people can point to is the

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>actual backward looking number itself. You're gonna hear chair Pal

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>again talk about inflation being broad and being sticky. Let

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>me take those two things apart really quickly to explain

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>why I don't think either one of them is relevant.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So the broadside people look at the medium or the

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>trimmed mean PC, and they're all elevated. The odd thing

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this time reflecting the economy is that the good side

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>was at twelve percent it's now coming down to seven

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>point one percent on a year of your basis. The

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>services side is actually going up. And so yes, the

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>meeting is high, but this is really odd. They usually

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>move in the same direction. They're moving in the opposite

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>direction because goods was favored early and now it's moving

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to services. That's that's going to resolve itself. That's one

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>thing about because rent has been a real thorn in

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the fed side as well as you know my kid

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>brother trying to find an apartment in New York. Sure,

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean sticky reflects housing and and housing unfortunately comes

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in with lag. Tell me who on Wall Street doesn't

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>know that that owner's equivalent rent of that shelter has

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a twelve to sixteen month leg And where do you

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think home prices are going next? Take a look at

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>housing demanded look at the mortgage demand this week. It

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>was done year over year. The housing market has gone

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>from boom to bust. And so as I look forward,

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think inflation is still set to slow. The CPI

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>data is backward looking, and I have trouble finding anything

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>other than the labor market right now, which tells me

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is going to be permanent. So given that backdrop, Brent,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have have we seen the lows in these equity markets?

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we'll retest that low back? And I

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>guess late June, I'm not for sure that we won't

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>retest it. I mean you just mentioned to smart people

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>having different outlooks, and that usually has AT's a war

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>until we resolve it. On one side, I do think

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom is in. I think if you look back

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to the sixties eighty two time period when inflation was

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the economic problem like it is today. So I don't

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>ignore the recent time trades, but I look back to

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that one when cp I peaked, the market bottomed. That's

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened in every one of those sixty six, seventy,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy four eight and then Volker did Voker did um.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to happen this time. But

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>those times where when CPI peaked the market bottom, that's

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.599
<v Speaker 1>point number one. Two. Sentiment is already awful. People have

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sold already. The AI sentiment has been below twenty nine

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>times this year. It only been below thirty eight. Are

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>only been below that thirty times in the prior thirty

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>forty years. Each one of those times except one lead

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to four looking positive returns, throwing a positive throwing the

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent retracement of blows that we had, which has

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>a nearly perfect record going back to and I think

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you have the basis for the market having put in

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. That doesn't mean it won't be a grinding

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>back and forth advance, but I don't think we're going

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>to go below those tune sixteenth lows. Alright. So with

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that outlook, Brent, if you have UM cash to put

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to work here, what do you do with it? Where

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>do you put it? Do you like equities? UM? Have

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bonds taken a big enough beating, our yields high enough?

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you like commodities that they're still room to run

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>there or they rolling over? I mean, what do you

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>do with money? Sure? And so this is where We've

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>been expressing our belief for the past here two years

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that you need to invest in things that are cheap UM.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>You need to invest in value, not the technology favorites

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of the past and the growth favorites of the past,

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the hope streams and themes hope them dreams, teams and

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>mean stocks I talked about before. You need to invest

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>across the board, I stage should say, but we do

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>like on a marginal basis value type stocks and the

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred, We like the SMP six hundred, which

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is UH the small cap area of the market, higher

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>quality small cap UM. And I do think bonds right

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>now are going to once again hedge stocks. They certainly

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't this year, but I think at current yields right

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>now really yields UM they do provide a hedge and

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so I would I would make sure that people UM

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 1>don't be don't start selling your bonds right now like

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think many people want to do. UH. And so

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where we're position. We still do own commodities,

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>albeit we are underweight our normal benchmark. And by the way,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a position that we have owned historically.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We weren't the people who believe that inflation was dead.

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Now it's here. And I'm kind of on the other

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>side of that argument right now. I think that the

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation that we're having right now will come back because

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it is mostly related to what happened post COVID. All right, Brent,

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you said you're in Milwaukee. Milwaukee is one of my

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite towns. Vernon it is. Um, it's a great town.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Talk to how is the market there? How is Milwaukee?

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Because I think, you know, how's the economy how are

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>people kind of feeling about things in general? Just kind

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in mama real estate? What's the

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate? Looks like we're all feeling pretty good right

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>now because the weather is still nice. Come visit me

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 1>in a month or two much and people will be

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a little tour um. In general, I think the Milwaukee

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>economy is doing just fine. I mean, you know, certainly,

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think as you look around the country, people are

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>doing good. I mean, the unemployment rate is low. The

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>one big thing that sticks out that is the thing

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have to fix. And if you fix that thing,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you fix the market is inflation. And that's where I

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's good news because I do believe the Ford

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>indicators point to lower inflation. Yeah, you know, um, somebody

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>who was telling me yesterday she didn't think we're gonna

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>come down to four or five percent by May June

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of next year, and I reminded her of the cops.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, surely for that reason. It would be insane

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if we were still over five percent after a nine

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>point one percent in June of this year. Yeah. I mean,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, supply and demand. I mean, the

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>said talks about that all the time. Demand has moderated.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Um PC is running a PC, Consumptions running two point

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>two percent year every year. UM it was running six

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent before the Fed started hiking. The

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>housing market has slowed, inventories have rebuilt, and so I

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do think it will begin to push back. I think

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the big risk is that the Federal Reserve doesn't feel

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they can have a forward outlook because they see, I

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>assume some of those things that many of us in

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the market see. The question that I have is are

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>they so hot haunted by what happened in eighty that

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they feel the need to keep ongoing Because inflation right

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>now is still high and there are lots of screaming

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. Are they able to actually pause, because I

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think they've accomplished in six months a lot already. I

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>just think it hasn't completely shot up in the numbers.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brent, great stuff as always, appreciate getting some

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of your valuable time. Brent Shooty, Chief investments Strategist, Northwestern

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Mutual located in beautiful Milwaukee, Wisconsin. We're talking beer. I

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think they do that there. They do brought worst, they

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do cheese. Uh. They get a lot of good money

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>management institutional investor money in Milwaukee. Believe it or not.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It punches way above its weight. Francis O joined us

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Craft Technologies. I think they do artificial intelligence for investing.

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. When I started on the block trading

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Nescar Payne eight six. Every morning, my boss, Johnny coglan

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>would just run by and screaming my ear by them low,

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sell them high. That's all I had to do. But

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>now you can use artificial intelligence. Francis, thanks so much

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Tell us what you guys are

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing a Craft Technologies, Thank you, thank you for inviting me. Um. Yeah,

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the Fiow and sale high we tried to do something

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so like that as well. So the Craft clons. We

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>very the artficture Intelligent investment tech company providing the services

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to us A management companies from the S location Signal

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>MONGST the signal security selections. We provide a cater solution

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to our plan. Also the sponsor of the an units

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>et F as well. So first of all, I want

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to point out that Craft is not like the macaroni

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and cheese that's spelled q R A F T craft technology.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And um, you said you have an AI E t F.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So how does that work? It's an active e t

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>F and you use your algorithm to trade it. Yes, exactly,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we are using the artificial intelligence, specifically the deeplonging model

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to trying to predict relative strengths of the stocks among

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe. So you apply the uh DAT technology into

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the activity manager of the ETF of the world. So

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we're calling me the listing four et FC and n

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I S right now. But so hang on, you trade

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>E t F with your algorithm or you offer an

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>e t F that's actively traded. Yes, later one we

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>offer on EPO. So what's the ticker. The ticker we

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have the mb q UM, the quality A moment h

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>d IV, the one of most performing beast performing ETF

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this series MVQ. Nice alright, I go on e t F,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>go on my Bloomberg and um, it's pretty cool. You

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>can put in craft there and then you can define

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the family of francis. How does how does your

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>technology the use of artificial intelligence? How does that or

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>how has it been doing this year when we've had

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous underperformance of both equities and fixed income, lots

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of volatility, the fixed pushing higher? How has your process

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>worked well? So you're utilizing a the diploming model, which

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is training the am L don't to liplicate the well

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>framed human perform management there. This is a making process

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but without human emotional bience risk. So processing from the

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mental data, price data, and macmak data to be our

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>model is trying to the maker scores and the foecust

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>relative performance at the stack amongst the universe. But the

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>EATP that I mentioned m v Q, the next value

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>et which is applying the ai WA m AIM methodology

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>into the value invest in the world, UMDAB each are

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>actually performing value well this year uh year today. As

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of today NVQUE is only full person below the full

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>person losses, which is almost eleven percent point of performance

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>even against the widely used nscr U s A and

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as value index UM show and even for the last

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>long year period NVC is even more possibly tend close

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to percent. All right, I want to point out that

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>is n v Q as in Victor, Nancy Veronica. Okay, Um,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>what's Q in the craft craft? Yes, exactly, n v Q. No.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I I was thinking in the military alphabet. If I

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>had Greg Jarrett here, he would do me right away.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Q looks like Quebec. So it's actually in the military

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>alphabet November Victor Quebec. Really que is a taker? Okay,

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>very good? All right, So francis, what's kind of what

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>do you guys as you look at the market here?

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>What what's what are you thinking about here as you

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to your clients? Right? The carom back environment is

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>definitely not so multi papab between investors at all, Like

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you're there are a lot of risk um that we

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen this year, from being the heightened inflated inflation

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>environments and then the fact the hike is also not

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>favorable poetical risk and also be pretty much like the

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>perfect storm is hitting the financial market right now. And

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>if someone who still wants to have a position into

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>active market a letter I think about the lever wants

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, let's think about the value investments. UM could

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>be the way to play for the next six to

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve months on until there was a clear trajectory of

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>decidities are deciding to any sign on deluring there interested

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>UMU the legend back to the normal area shop for

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>now the gross act mark had it won't be so

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>much the value. The values that delated relate to play

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>relatively safer than the other mechandescent classes. All right, francis

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. We appreciate it. Francis Oh, CEO of Craft Technologies,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>UH talking to us about the e t F. He

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>uses artificial intelligence there in the investment process. Where is

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Tyn I am so pumped for him. He's at

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Auto Show. UM. For a number of reasons.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>This is spend a lot of time in Detroit. I

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>used to spend a ton of time in Detroit, and

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the Auto show was typically in January, like the worst

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>time in the year to visit Detroit, but everybody went

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>because the super Bowl of UM, the automotive industry. Now

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they have it in a more reasonable season, but I

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>don't think as many people are there. Well, the ce

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>S Show, I think is an auto show with a

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of computers around it. Yeah, that's what the Toyot

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>president was saying yesterday as well. Kevin tell us first

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of all about what the auto show is like. I mean,

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't the hype um this year that there

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>used to be, you know, pre pandemic back in the

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>day when Detroit was all about it. Yeah, it is

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very very different. Um, I would say for the most part,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>full displays are only General Motors, Ford and Statlantis. There's

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a small Toyota booths and even smaller Subaru booth, and

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that is it's what is it. Yeah, So there's a

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of you know, there's a couple of like drone

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and see plane companies showing stuff and electric truck plot

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>forms that so they they went out of the way

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to fill the space with non automotive stuff. And then

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>there's this thing called automobility which is charging companies and

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>light ar and so it's and even the media center,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would come in here and media center

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>would take up this entire ballroom and Bloomberg and our

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>our team from Southfield here would just have a whole

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>table editors, reporters running from scrum to scrum and uh,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's like a closet now. And there was

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>five people in the entire media it used to be.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It used to cover bill multiple halls and multiple floors.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>And well, I think it reflects I mean, you guys

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>know Kevin and Matt. I mean it reflects auto companies

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are technology companies today. I mean, and I guess that

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>makes more sense to be in Vegas, you know, in

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>for the ce S show, because man, that's what the

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cars today are. I mean, we saw all these micro

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about just the general buzz there as

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the transition to electric vehicles. Um, you know,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>where are we? You know? The interesting thing is, and

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember who wrote the story that I read yesterday.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It was either Elizabeth Berman or Monica Raymond or Chris Ralvald,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But one of our German reporters talking about Herbert Diese

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at his going away speech, you see this Kevin Um, Yeah,

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this former CEO of Folkswagen when he was leaving. Um

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he basically pointed out the fact that the transition to

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>electric is easy. The transition to software is hard. That's

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>where everyone's getting it wrong. Right. Anyone can put a

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>battery in a car, Okay, Tesla seems to have been

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>doing it better than anyone else. But putting all these

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>software systems and getting them to work together and getting

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>them to work as well as your iPhone or whatever

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you use, it's not easy, and a lot of them

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>are failing or at least having real troubles, right, Kevin, Yeah,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And and it's the same thing with autonomous. Right. We've

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 1>heard so much about self driving, and you know how

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>right around the corner it is. And really we've we've

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>got the hardware figured out, right, and if that's of

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the battle, that the last ten percent is as difficult

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>as it was to get to that point. And I

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're seeing that in electrification and you're also seeing

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it in autonomous. But but Paul, to your point about

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the show being technology, you know, the other thing too,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is that you're you're you're having an auto show to

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>drum up demand and get the public to see your

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>new product, of which you have none in inventory. So

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>so to you in four years, right, I mean so

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of I think the feeling puts, you know,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the main auto shows right Detroit in January

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>used to be in January, you have New York right

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>around um Easter, and then you would have California right

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>around Thanksgiving, and it would always be kind of divided.

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Where Detroit obviously is four GM and the De Lantis

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>domestic brands backyard, you would have the European makes really

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of focus on New York because it was considered

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the premium show, and then the West Coast show would

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more high tech, and you'd have

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the Asia based manufacturers UM with a bigger presence there.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And now it just seems like I'm not sure there's

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>any presence anywhere other than like Paul said at CEF,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess Baby Vegas. I got. I prefer Detroit, honestly,

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>no matter what time of year, I prefer Detroit to

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. But I have a special treat for for

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all of you. Um there is one really cool thing

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that happened at this car show, and that is Ford

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>unveiling It's brand new seventh generation Mustang and icon of

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>car that I have been a huge fan of ever

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>since I got gum on the seat of my dad's

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and a half notch back. Um, and we've

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>got Jim Owns with us on the line here from

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Detroit as well. He is the marketing manager for the

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Mustang project. Jim, you know, this looks at first glance,

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks more like an evolution than a revolution. But

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>there's some pretty major changes both to the power train,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>UM and the interior as well as the exterior designed

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that I really think makes this car a much more

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>attractive UM proposition. And I already wanted the old one,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about it. Um, we're so excited to

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be on and talk about this. And you know, the

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and a half Mustang that you got the

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>gum stuck on literally was a sixty five. You know,

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there was really no such thing as the sixty four

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half, even though all the Mustang fans around

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the world they were all titled sixty five. So don't

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>worry about getting that gum stuck on your dad. That's

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he He would always refer to it that way. And UM,

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>even yesterday my wife was saying, that's silly. Why was

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it sixty four and a half? I don't know why

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it was. I don't know why that year sticks with me.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's when they showed it at the World's Fair,

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>or they put it up. You know, they took apart

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know this, they took apart a Mustang for the debut.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>They carried it up the Empire State Building and put

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>it back together on the view on platform. We did

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>it twice. We did it in nineteen six and at

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the time the size of the Mustang and the elevator

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>sizes have not changed on the Empire State Building, right,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they have never changed because of you know, the historical

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>aspect of that building. So in sixty six it took

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>four different times to go up the elevator when we

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>did it with the Gen six Mustang and we put

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it out there the bright yellow one. UM, it took

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a few more times to put it up there, and

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we installed it up there. So yeah, it's been on

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>top of the Empire State Building twice. UM sixty four

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half piece is when Ford started changing production

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>runs in their customers wanted to delineate between the original

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the second one where they delineated it, and

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the sixty four and a half, sixty five and

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's always a fun conversation over um. You had mentioned

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the seventh generation and how you thought of it as

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>an evolution and and it has to be a you know,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for the six generations previously, it still has to be

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>unmistakably Mustang, right, and that we think we hit a

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>home run on it. And in the seventh generation it

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>has to reach to that new audience to bring the

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>new seventh generation customers in, and we think we hit

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a home run with the design and that interior which

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is just completely filled with gaming technology that the younger

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>audiences love. And then you said you talked a little

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about the power trains and an all new Eco

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Boost that has better performance, better power, more efficient production

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of power. And then for Mustang fans globally, right, you

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have cars on six of the seven continents. Um, it

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is a fourth generation Coyote that will be the highest

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>horsepower Mustang gt tyote I've ever done. I'm so happy

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to hear that, you know, because I was worried that

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the horse power figures were gonna go down. And I

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>know that you're not going to tell us, well, go

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead and tell us, just tell us, well, so i'd

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>loved I'd love to tell you just as a secret

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>whisper in your ear, But no, the asterisks are that,

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're still in the testing and certification pieces

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that will come closer to the summer of twenty three

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>when we launched the twenty four model year. But as

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a you know, as a person who has not only

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>worked for Mustangs for four generations of them, also worked

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for Carol Shelby for four years, you know, horsepower means

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>something and this is this is going to be one

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that pulls you from the seat of your pants. And

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't tell you how excited we are. All right, Jim,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's say I order a new Ford, when am I

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get it? It looks like we're not going

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to have a railroad strike, so that's good news. But

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to us just about the supply chain getting stuff

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>from the auto industry these days. Yeah, and it's been, um,

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it has been, you know, just like every other industry.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's been you know, a struggle to identify you know,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>when you can have your plant open and what parts

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are coming in. And with Mustang, you ask about the Mustang.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>This will be a twenty four model year, right, so

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it'll be the fifty nine year model year for this

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Mustang and that will be available in June of her

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, in the summer of twenty three as a

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four model year. Right now, you can still go

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in and order your twenty two are soon to order

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your twenty three model your Mustang that is the existing one. UM.

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've been able to UM keep the

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>plants running and keep Mustang customers happy by delivering you know,

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>not only the Eco Boost, but right now the mach one,

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trema. Yeah, with the Trumic seven speed dual clutch.

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, shifts years in eighty milliseconds. Yeah, that's

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. I want that. And are are

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we going to have? Do we know about the transmission

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>options available in the new seventh gen? Yeah? So what

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we've announced last night with the reveal of not only

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the coup and convertible Eco Boost and GT, we introduced

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in twenty one years, a new

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>specialty performance brand called the dark Horse. UM. For time

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've had the forward facing pony on the car

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>UM and it is UM. It is extremely UM that

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the fitting now of the dark Horse name. Now that

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>will be our specialty performance derivative that will have the

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>tremack box in the manual and the drift break and

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the break manual transmission. It'll have a manual, it'll have well,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it'll have the automatic. I think the auto boxes pretty

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>amazing as well, and I'm gonna save the manuals guy.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So um, I was so impressed by the Shelby GT

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>five auto boxes. I think I would take that over

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the stick. The cool thing about this new Mustang is

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have an electric emergency break, a drift break.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Nobody likes a good m and a trade more than me,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because again, the first thing I do is I go

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the m A page and I see who the bankers are.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And my good friend Frank Quattrone advised the seller, so

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I know he got maximum price from this. So Adobe's

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>minus software company, Adobe's down? What is going on? He

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>covers all things technology for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's located. I

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have no idea where, but we have him in the

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio here in New York. Today. Adobe

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a great company, big market cap um and this is

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty billion market cup company stocks down six

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>on this. What's up? So you think about it. When

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the deal, I said, okay, twenty billion,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it must have good financials. They're gonna do two million

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and annual recording revenue it's aigma. It's a private company.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.479
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna do maybe four million after that. So if

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you do a little bit of math around it, that

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>means fifty times sales or sales hundred times sales cash flow.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's what's happening here. The street is saying,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>why are you overpaying so much for an asset where

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the contribution to the top line is going to be

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>very small and the bottom line is actually going to

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>dilute your margins. It is insane to pay that much,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>especially now when valuations have come in. What are people

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>paying for similar assets? So again it see, according to Adobe,

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a technology that they're buying that that nobody

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>else has, So that's their rationale. The outside people are

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>buying less than ten time sales right now for software companies.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But once again their argument is this is the technology

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that can reshape the company. Um, we published a note

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>yesterday where we basically say said that Adobe's long term

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>growth is not going to be like it has been

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>over the past decade because it's coming to a mature business.

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So they really need to figure out what they do,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and if that means acquisitions, they may do the acquisition.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But we don't think that valuation is going to bounce

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>back ever again like it was in the you know,

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic or during the pandemic. All right, so

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.479
<v Speaker 1>tell us what Adobe is in one set, and tell

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>us what Figma is in one sentence, and why Adobe

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to buy Figma and spend twenty billion large. The

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>real killer app that Adobe has is their creative cloud product,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Adobe Photoshop all the photo editing tools that you need.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Figma is a platform where people can collaborate. You are creators.

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You can use you know, to exchange ideas. You can

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>go there. That's a whiteboard all web based stuff, and

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>those two things marry very well for the next generation creator.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Adobe is um. For some sometimes it's the bane of

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>my existence because I try and access files on my

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>computer that I can't unless I'm subscribed to Adobe. And

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>then once I subscribe to Adobe, I found it impossible

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to cancel that subscriptions. They just suck me dry. Um

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is everybody else or other consumers as annoyed. Do they

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>struggle to find another word? Do they hate Adobe as

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>much as I do? You can open those documents using

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a web browser, So if you're just using a PDF

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>opener to do that, that's a free thing. You probably

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>downloaded a more expensive version and never deleted it from

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>your computer, but we can talk about that another time.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But so in a case, if you just want to

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>read a document, it's okay, that's free. But if you

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>want to you know, signature on it, you want to

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>go out and edit it and highlight it and send

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it to your teammate, then you have to pay for

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that particular software package. And that's the second piece of

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>their business called a document cloud, which is all of PDF.

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>But the real killer app is the the Photoshop, which

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there is no graphic design and outdate in the world

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that would not be using that for the world work

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that they do. To me, that product is as powerful

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>as Microsoft ex Cell. Alright, and Paul, I guess you

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>probably spent decades with Microsoft Exel as your number one

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, most clicked back in the day.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And the analyst, yeah, absolutely was before it was before Xcel. Actually, U,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what we had before Excel. What do

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we use on our I don't know WordPress, I have

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that even before that. All right, I'm bringing up one

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of Matt Miller's favorite functions here, c O m p uh.

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Comparative returns Adobe over the last five years about fifteen

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>percent return the SMP about eleven. So it's done pretty well.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of buy ratings out there for Adobe,

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>six or seven kind of hold ratings, no cells. So

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the street still likes this name. What's the what's the

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>theme behind the bullish call here? So go back in

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>four or the company went into a massive undertakeoff, changing

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>their business model, went from a license model to a

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>subscription model. Unbelievable success since then, very strong growth rate

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>plus in fact, I would say, closer to margin expansion

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like you have not seen as of today. Margins are

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>closer to adjusted operating margins for this company. So massive

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>margin expansion. And that was an entire call yesterday that Okay,

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>it's done exceeding well in the last you know, ten

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>audios or seven eight years. But now they're coming to

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a point that growth rate goes to closer to fifteen

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and there is no Mougin expansion. So the valuation. I

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>would say premium they got close to compared to Microsoft,

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to die now. And Microsoft's you know,

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>economics look a little bit better here compared to Adobe.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Software. I mean it's it's a I mean,

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>you've got the easiest drap in the world. You just say,

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I slapped by ratings on everything software. I mean, it's

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>just like growing business. How has it performed? Just probably

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking forget about the hardware soft We'll talk to some

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>other you know, man deep on that one maybe. But

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the software side, is it just a secular growth story.

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a massive secular story. You you go back

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and read and reasons you know later from ten years

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>ago and say software is going to eat the world.

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Software at that time, Paul, when you hired me was

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred billion in market size. It's close to

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>seven billion market now. You don't have to do much

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just right the way. Yeah, and now and now what

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the kids are talking about is the cloud. That's the

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 1>new thing. And I play the clouds three point, which

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>by I'm still have no idea what that. If you

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>have any call on web three point, it's it's a gimmick, right, Yeah,

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, let's let's get started. Somebody's gonna send

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>me a lot of hate me a lot, Okay, So

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>best call right now in or the best growth story

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in tech right now? I would say, given the cuttered

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>macro environment, I would put it put Microsoft on that

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this because it's a safety stock as well as it

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>does everything right. Even in a bad, bad, bad economics environment,

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll still grow tender. And it's Microsoft. The story a

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>cloud story, it is all. It's purely a cloud story.

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a Windows story at all anymore. No,

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>but Windows does provide a lot of good cash flow,

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>except and again Office provides a very good cash flow.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It has two cash cows that fund anything they want

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>to fund, you know, to be honest, video games, activision

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>like and they can do anything out there. But what

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>happens is Microsoft is now the de facto thing you

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>need no matter where you are, what enterprise you are.

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>And it is a growth story for me because you

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>know what, they will double their revenue in the next

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>five years. Can you imagine that at the company with

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>three billion revenue will double the revenue in the next

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>five years. Oh yeah, yeah, I mean it's just an awesome,

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>awesome story. Anora Rana, senior software in I T Services

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>analyst Bloomberg Intelligence. Actually in the office he's supposed to

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be in, which is the New York City world headquarters

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg and Bloomberg Intelligence. A Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. What's

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of them that are in the office. I

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm gonna say maybe half, you know, I

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know who knows. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet On Ball

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.