WEBVTT - NYC Mayor Adams Plots Comeback Off Of Mamdani's Win

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>today's complex economy, plus global business, finance and tech news

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast with Carol

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>A Republican planned to cut two hundred and fifty billion

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars in medicaid another healthcare spending hit a procedural roadblock

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate today. It complicates efforts to pass Donald

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump's massive tax and spending package. We go down to

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Katherine Lucy, Bloomberg News White House correspondent, Catherine, is this

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>bill at risk as a result of cutting two hundred

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>and fifty billion dollars in medicaid?

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 3>It just certainly slows this bill down. It certainly complicates it.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 3>As you said said, what's an issue here is a

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>plan to cut two hundred and fifty billion in medicaid

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 3>and healthcare spending that the Senate parliamentarian has said they

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>can't move in this bill with the processes that they

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>are doing here. Leaders are saying they have time, that

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>they have plans they can do this, and I think

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 3>they are looking at ways to refashion this. But it

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>does take time to rewrite legislation. It does take time

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>to do this and to keep a sort of combative

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 3>a group of Republicans on board. So trying to keep

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>everyone rowing in the same direction is an issue. That said,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 3>the event at the White House today is Donald Trump

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to do just that. He is trying to rally

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>support behind this bill. He is aggressively pushing for it

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to be passed by July fourth, He is personally a

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 3>lobbying for it, and so I think he's going to

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>pull out all the stops to try and make sure

0:01:58.600 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that this happens.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>So what's the time? What does this due to the timeline? Right,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 4>that's what everybody We know that there's a lot of

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 4>pressure Catherine on the President in the next couple of

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 4>weeks to get a bunch of stuff done, including trade

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 4>tariffs and of course his tax and spending bill. So

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 4>what's the timetable if there is a rewrite, how do

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 4>they do it? You're right, that's complicated, it's complicated.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>You know they are now working to do this and

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>we'll have to see how quickly they can come up with,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, a new version of it. I mean, I

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>think you guys know as well as anyone that Congress

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 3>never does anything until they're up against a hard deadline.

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 3>So things do happen when they feel like they're just

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 3>against the wall. So there is a little bit of that.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>But I think you are really going to see an

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>aggressive effort by the President who really wants to do

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>this by July for them, and we'll see if he

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>can make it happen. But it is I mean, this

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>is his main legislative focus, you know that, you know,

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>for this term, this is his top legislative priority, and

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 3>he and Republicans really think that they need to pass

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 3>this to have something to run on next year in

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the midterms, so it is a top priority.

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, good stuff. We wanted to check in and

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 4>find out what kind of where we are on this,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 4>so really appreciate it. Catherine Lucy. She has Bloomberg News

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 4>White House correspondent joining us from our bureau in the

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 4>nation's capital.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 2>Well from the nation's capital to the financial capital of

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the world. We are of course talking about New York City,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>where Andrew Cuomo's loss is Eric adams game. Just days ago,

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the New York City mayor faced steep reelection odds, but Adams,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 2>who dropped out of the campaign as a Democrat to

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>run as an independent, is suddenly looking less toxic to

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a class of moderate voters. Laura Namius is Bloomberg News

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 2>New York politics reporter. She joins us here in the

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Laura, you were honor with us

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>earlier this week, and you said, don't count out Eric Adams, right, essentially,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's what the strategists have been telling you. But

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of the public had said, you know,

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>after the challenges he faced and him dropping off the

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Democratic tick, he's kind of done.

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 5>He's not so done now he's not so done, in

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 5>part because of the drastic underperformance of Andrew Cuomo in

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 5>the primary. I think toward then there, Cuomo backers were

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 5>maybe expecting the race to be close. They didn't expect

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Cuomo to be losing on the first ballot in

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>this contest by more than six percentage points, a gap

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 5>that's likely to widen next week when all of the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 5>ballots are fully counted. Despite the fact that he had

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:31.119
<v Speaker 5>an insane money advantage over every other candidate in the race,

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 5>including a twenty five million dollars super pack backing his candidacy.

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 5>So they're wondering, if he couldn't win this, can he

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 5>win the whole thing? And should Cuomo drop out and

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 5>consolidate behind a different moderate candidate, maybe Eric Adams, so

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 5>that he doesn't play spoiler in hand the election to

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 5>Mom Donnie or a Republican Curtis Lee was running on

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 5>the GOP line Laura.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 4>Eric Adams looking less toxic is still toxic. So I'm

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 4>just curious, like how that plays politically.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 5>That remains to be seen. We haven't seen fresh polling

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 5>that's non partisan post primary, but the most recent poll

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 5>numbers for Eric Adams are terrible. He was polling in

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 5>the teens. His favorability in New York City among voters

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 5>was in the teens. Like seventy percent of New Yorker's

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 5>disapproved of the job that he was doing as mayor

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 5>as recently as a month ago.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 4>So it's not an.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 5>Easy path to victory. But there's some thinking that maybe

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 5>if people are disenchanted enough with the idea of a

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Mom Donnie candidacy they could get behind in Eric Adams.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>One, have you heard anything? So there's the supporters of

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 2>former Governor Cuomo. Yes, And we should note that Michael Bloomberg,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 2>the founder of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg Radio,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>did support Governor Cuomo ahead of the primary. Do you

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 2>supporters of Have any supporters of Governor Cuomo come and said,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 2>wait a second, we can now support Mom Donnie.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 5>So here's what's going on. Donors are having a conversation.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 5>There are also some powerful backers of Andrew Cuomo who

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 5>are labor unions, and right now conversations are happening with

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>labor unions about who they are going to pivot toward

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 5>backing in the general and we are hearing from some

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 5>sources that it's likely that a lot of them are

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 5>going to coalesce behind Mom Donnie. Their agenda largely dovetails

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 5>with some of the things he said he wants. That's

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>very different from some of the donors who backed Cuomo

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 5>who are in finance or real estate, who are seeing

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 5>some of Mom Donnie's policies around rent control, around taxes

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 5>as like an existential threat. But those conversations are happening

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 5>right now. It's fair to say that a lot of

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 5>conversations are happening, and that there's maybe a panicked air

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 5>to some of the conversations they're going on right now.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 5>It's likely or that the unions might back Mom Donnie

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 5>than some of the big money backers.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, that's really fascinating, right, Like, you know, where

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 4>there's politics, there's money, and where there's money, there's politics.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 4>But it's just like you do wonder if ultimately Cuomo

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 4>is out. You know, what's the assumption about a lot

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>of those you know, a lot of the political donations.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Does it automatically go to Adams like we could.

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 5>See so in twenty thirteen, if people will remember back then,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 5>Christine Quinn was the favorite of moderates and a lot

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 5>of people in finance in the Democratic mayoral primary. She lost,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 5>build a Blasio ultimately won. There was an effort to

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 5>consolidate support behind Deblasio because it was thought that he

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>was going to face a competitive general election against Joe Lodo,

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 5>the Republican at the time, and a lot of people

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 5>got behind Deblasio, and they also sort of talked to

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 5>him about moderating his positions about his nominees and who

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 5>he was going to bring into his administration, and there

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 5>was this sort of a moderating force by people who

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 5>had backed his opponents getting behind him at that point.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, speaking of backers, prominent backer Bill Ackman, who was

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the most prominent backers in the super Pac

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 2>supporting guests former Governor Cuomo. He has a very long

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>post on x which is pretty typical for him. He

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>writes very long messages on the platform, and he writes

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>about crowdsourcing the next candidate. He's really worried about Mom Donnie.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>He said, who is your best centrist candidate who could

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>go toe to toe with Mom Donnie on the campaign

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 2>trail and on the debate stage. Let's crowdsource the names

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and then do a poll. If someone is ready to

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>raise their hand, I will take care of the fundraising.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 6>Is it that easy.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 5>It is definitely not that easy. This is a little

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 5>bit of inside baseball. But after tomorrow, Andrew Cuomo cannot

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 5>get his name off of the November ballot. He's running

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 5>on an independent line that he set up in case

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 5>he lost the primary, which it looks like he did.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 5>After tomorrow, if he doesn't decline that nomination, it's impossible

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 5>to get his name off the ballot. The ballot is

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 5>basically set. In order to get someone off of the ballot,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 5>that person has to either be nominated to run for

0:08:56.080 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 5>a vacant position somewhere else, or be disqualified by death,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 5>going to prison, or moving out of the state. Those

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 5>are really significant events. You don't want to force someone

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 5>to die or move out of the state or prison.

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 5>So it's just not that easy. It's not a question

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 5>of right candidate plus right money. There's rules, you know,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 5>in elections, and they've.

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Been said in I'm gonna say favorite quote of the day.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 4>We gotta put that one and send it out. It's

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 4>still early. A lot can happen.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh yes, I mean think about three months ago, if

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 5>we were having this conversation, nobody in the general public

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 5>really knew who Zoron mom Donnie was, And now he's

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 5>looking like the next mayor we're talking about right now,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 5>possibly of the City of New York.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Anecdotally speaking, I live in South Brooklyn. The ground game

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 2>that Mom Donnie had was unbelievable. I would get notifications

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Carol saw him of like door knockers. Yes, you know,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>coming over to talk to different members of our building

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of wild, like he built something really

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>from the ground up. Do we see that happening during

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the general election from now until November? Does that continue

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>for him?

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that that's plausible.

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 5>It's too soon to say what will happen for the

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 5>other candidates who are in the race. Curtis Leiwa, there's

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>independent Jim Walden, an attorney, and Eric Adams of course

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 5>running on his own ballot line. You know, we can't

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 5>predict the future. But this enthusiasm that mom Donnie had

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 5>and actually this sort of managerial competence that he did

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 5>show in getting this campaign organization off the ground and

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 5>ultimately looks like winning this primary is nothing to be

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 5>trifled with. It's a serious operation. He had a huge

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 5>get out the vote effort and the data is really

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 5>showing us that he was able to convert people who

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 5>had never voted before into voters in a New York primary,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 5>usually a very low turnout affair. He has shocked everyone.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 4>That's a big deal. Yeah, an indication that we would

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 4>assume that that interest is going to carry all the

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 4>way through or it depends like who's left in the race,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 4>right yes, definitely. I don't know you're the New Yorker.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>What's your last question?

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 7>It is?

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I'm just I'm still blown away by

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 2>the ground game and the interest. I think he was

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 2>seen as somebody literally twelve weeks ago that didn't have

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>name recognition.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and he also really lacks managerial experience or much

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 5>experience in all money to be Yes.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 8>His opponent's made on the debate stage, right.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 5>But he has been saying, and I think people are

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 5>really starting to take this more seriously now that his

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 5>biggest qualification managerially is look at the campaign that I've

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 5>runage built up from nowhere to more than twenty thousand

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 5>individual donors, tons of volunteers, that converted enthusiasm into actual votes,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 5>a much more difficult thing to do than it looks like.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 4>And there's a leader, and then there's all the people

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 4>that are around him too, right, it's not just the one.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it obviously the candidate first and foremost, but

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 4>it's his whole team or her team. Laura, thank you

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>so much, Laura and Omius keeping us informed on New

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 4>York City politics. She is Bloomberg New York, bloom News

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 4>New York Politics reporter.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 9>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 9>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 9>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot we want to talk about with Mark Moriol.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we certainly do. He is, of course, president and

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 4>CEO of the National Urban League. It is called itself

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 4>the nation's largest historic civil rights and urban advocacy organization,

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 4>devoted to empowering communities and changing lives since nineteen ten.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 4>He's also a former state senator in Louisiana and the

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 4>former mayor of New Orleans. When he was elected, he

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 4>was the youngest mayor of New Orleans in fifty years.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 4>He jones us from Atlanta. Hey, that's where we want

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>to start.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 6>Mark.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 4>First of all, great to be talking with you again.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, Greg to be with you this afternoon.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you. You were thirty six when you were

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 4>elected mayor. If our math is right, age, how is

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 4>that like? How do you don't know when is age?

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 4>It could be a problem for someone when isn't it not?

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 10>So every thirty six year old is not the same age.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 10>Sometimes gives you energy or willingness to innovate, But the

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 10>question is really a question of maturity and the ability

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 10>to deal with a difficult and demanding job, pressure on

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 10>all fronts, and the ability to make decisions under pressure.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 10>So age can be both a asset, but it also

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 10>can be a liability if you've never experienced pressure, you've

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 10>never been in a decision making position before, and then

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 10>all of a sudden you find yourself leading a major

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 10>American city, So you.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 6>Know, the jury is out.

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 10>It was out on me when I first got elected,

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 10>although I had a political career as a state senator

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 10>and a very successful state senator who had passed at

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 10>that time some fifty bills, and a career as an

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 10>active lawyer doing a lot of high profile cases. So

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 10>when I got elected, certainly the city of New Orleans

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 10>was in a great crisis of murder and police corruption.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 6>And economic stagnation for the for the.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 10>Busting of the oil bust, and uh, you know, I

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 10>think at the end of the day, I proved all

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 10>my critics wrong and and and and had an incredibly

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 10>successful career turning the city around in those days.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 6>So you know, in the New York situation, with my

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 6>mam Donnie.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 10>Uh. You know, he is a new face, not a

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 10>very well known face, but pulled off a very important

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 10>and spectacular upset. But forty four percent of the Democratic

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 10>primary does not achieve a consensus of New York voters.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 10>And there's a general election ahead, and I think although

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 10>he has momentum, I don't think he can pop the

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 10>cork and say I'm going to be the next mayor

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 10>just yet.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 8>What do you think it's that is? That is so clear?

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And we had a conversation with one of our colleagues here,

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Laura Naimus, earlier in the day, about the challenges that

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>he still faces. Lornamias, you know, Mark, the question that

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I have for you is a bigger question about the

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party and what this says about if anything, If

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>it says anything about the identity of the Democratic Party

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>on a national level, can you extrapolate from New York City.

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 10>Though some people want to focus on this sort of

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 10>what I call an idiological distinction between progressives and moderates,

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 10>I think maybe one way to look at it is

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 10>that there may be an generational shift that this represents

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 10>in many respects, A younger candidate who ran an aggressive

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 10>grassroots campaign and used the taxic to social media, running

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 10>against candidates who ran more traditional campaigns that focus heavily

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 10>on television and indeed endorsements and so underneath that, for Mamdanie,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 10>he has to demonstrate that he.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 6>Can expand his coalition.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 10>He has to demonstrate that he can govern govern right.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 10>Govern is not an ideological thing. Governing does bring into

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 10>play one's values and one's philosophy, but it is The

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 10>mayor is the local chief executive officer. Basic services, public safety, education,

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 10>the condition and cleanliness of streets and neighborhoods, affordable housing.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 6>Those are the issues. It's not a.

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 10>Job of foreign affairs, although because it is New York,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 10>there are global issues that the mayor of New York

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 10>has to deal with. So to me, one of his

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 10>challenges is can he expand that coalition in an effort

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 10>to win a general election and build a kind of

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 10>coalition it will require to govern. I can say this,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 10>I learned that getting elected. I had a decisive win,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 10>but I had a win in a somewhat racially polarized situation.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 10>I got ninety five percent of the African American vote.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 10>At the time, I got less than ten percent of

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 10>the white vote. I had to expand my coalition home

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 10>my base, but expand my coalition to be able to

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 10>effectively govern, get things done, make things happen, reform the police,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 10>expand you services, put together a coherent economic development plan.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 10>And that indeed is a challenge that is in front

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 10>of him. So I think people need to watch his

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 10>early moves and what he does. But Andrew Como right

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 10>now is on the ballot in the general election. Eric

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 10>Adams is on the ballot in the general election. There's

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 10>a Republican candidate on the ballot in the general election.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 10>And as I understand it, in the general election there's

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 10>no rank choice voting. So obstensibly someone could get elected

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 10>with twenty eight percent of the vote in a general

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 10>election in a four way general election. So it remains

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 10>to be seen. You know, the Democratic Party, like the

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 10>Republican Party, is a coalition. I think that using the

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 10>term party may be outmoded and outdated, and for it

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 10>to achieve success in local elections like mayor of New York,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 10>or mayor of Philadelphia, mayor of Chicago, mayor Detroit may

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 10>be different than what is required in a national election.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 10>So someone that may be successful in a New York

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 10>where there's a strong progressive base.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 6>May not be.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 10>And so I don't tape the Mayor of New York

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 10>or who wins the mayoralty in New York as a

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 10>stalking horse on the Democratic Party on a national basis.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 6>It never has been.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 10>It wasn't that way with Mayor Bloomberg, who turned who

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 10>was a Republican term Democratic. Wasn't that way with Mayor Kacha,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 10>Mayor Dinkins or Mayor Adams, even though they may have

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 10>said I'm the future of the Democratic Party, I don't

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 10>think who the Mayor of New York is represents necessarily

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 10>the future of a party that exists in fifty states

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 10>and what may happen in a national election.

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 6>But having said that, like the Republican.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 10>Party has to unite its far conservative wing and its

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 10>more moderate wing, a Democratic candidate running nationally in a

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 10>presidential election, right, he has to do the same thing.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, we should point out right now we are talking

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 4>with Mark Moril, he's president and chief executive officer of

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 4>the National Urban League, joining us remotely. At the same time,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 4>we're keeping an eye on Washington, DC and the White

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 4>House specifically where Republicans are gathering as they expect the

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 4>president to participate in what his press office calls one big,

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 4>beautiful event. So we do assume he is going to

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 4>talk about that spending and tax bill that he is

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 4>trying to get through in the next couple of weeks.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 4>So there's some pressure on that. And we also do

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 4>have some earnings out that have crossed the Bloomberg and

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about Nike, and that's docked him. We are

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 4>seeing it trend a little bit lower right now in

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 4>the aftermarket, down about one and a half percent.

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the company did report revenue for the fourth quarter

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 2>that beat the average analyst estimate. The estimate was for

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 2>ten point seven billion dollars. It came in at eleven

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>point one billion dollars. North America revenue was higher than

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 2>analysts expected. EMEA revenue came in at three billion dollars

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 2>that was higher than estimates. Greater China revenue came in

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>right in line with estimates at one point four eight

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. We're going to be speaking with Punamguyl of

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence a little later to break down these Nike earnings.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it does seem like investors are trying to make

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 4>sense of it because the stock has been down a

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 4>few percentage points. Now it's relatively flat, but still a

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 4>little bit lower, So we're going to continue to track it.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 4>We should point out that the company did say the

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 4>results are in line with expectations, but not what we want.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 8>This is really interesting.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Elliott Hill in the press release saying, our financial results

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 2>are in line with our expectations, they are not where

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>we want them to be moving forward, we expect our

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>business to improve as a result of the progress we're making.

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 8>Three are win now actions.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so kind of interesting. I will point out that

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 4>the gross margin was forty point three percent versus forty

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 4>four point seven percent a year ago. The estudent was

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 4>forty point two percent, so it did beat that. But

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 4>again and now this stocks up about half a percent,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 4>So continue to track that, watching and waiting for the

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 4>President to make some comments. And we're talking with Mark Morel,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 4>president and CEO at the National Urban League, and Mark,

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, we are awaiting comments from the President when

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 4>it comes to this massive spending and tax bill. What

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 4>do you want to see?

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think it's clear that this bill is in

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:42.719
<v Speaker 10>somewhat trouble the polling is two to one against. There

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 10>are number of Republicans in the Senate and many in

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 10>the House who I think have become less enthusiastic about

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 10>deep cuts to Medicaid, veterans programs, and other programs, and

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 10>they're hearing from their constituents. I think because it's been

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 10>an aggressive campaign to educate people. I sent is the

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 10>more people learn about the bill, the less likely they

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 10>are to support the bill. And most of the polling

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 10>shows that Democrats and independents, and maybe twenty five to

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 10>thirty percent of Republicans are not in favor of the

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 10>bill and would like to see them sort of scrap it,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 10>go back to the drawing board and put something together

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 10>that's better and that may be able to achieve some

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 10>bipartisan support. The great concern I have is the deep

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 10>cuts to programs like Medicaid, the deep cuts to workforce,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 10>job training, and education, and the potential recessionary impact.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 6>Data I've seen shows that.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 10>There would be layoffs, that there would be holes bloan

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 10>into the budgets of many states Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia,

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 10>to name a few. If Medicaid is cut, it would

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 10>damage them fiscally in a really, really be a way.

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 10>So I think the President with this today is trying

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 10>to rally support, trying to play a bit of catch

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 10>up in an effort to demonstrate to the Congress his

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 10>strong support for the bill. But that runs counter to

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 10>what the American people are saying. And now this bill

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 10>is too much on the cut side to pay for

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 10>tax cuts that benefit only a handful of people. That's

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 10>really the misbalance here. And they could do a better job.

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 10>They could come up with a better package. Congress has

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 10>achieved consensus packages in the past, and I think that's

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 10>what's in order today.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 8>Mark, when you look at the bill.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 2>The President, by the way, speaking right now, and again

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll bring you comments if he does make comments that

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 2>are really focused on our investing audience. As you mentioned,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>he is trying to garner support for this. In your view,

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>do you think that the bill in this current iteration

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 2>will become law?

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 10>No, I do not think the margins right now with

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 10>the changes that are being made in the Senate in

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 10>an effort to put the votes together. The bill yet

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 10>has to go back to the House of Representatives.

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 11>If it does pass the Senate, and it passed by

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 11>one vote in the House the last time, so there

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 11>will be an effort to get the House to accept

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 11>the changes that the Senate made. But I think this

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 11>bill is in precarious shape and I do not think

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 11>that it will ultimately be passed in its current form,

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 11>although there's going to be a great effort to do so.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 11>Because you know, politicians, I'm a recovering politician, you know,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 11>think long and hard about the impact of a vote.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 11>One certainly on their constitutions, the two on their elect

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 11>on their reelection.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 6>And I think.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 12>If swing district are as Republicans think that this is

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 12>going to really make their reelection difficult and hard may

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 12>say I've got to put push back for a better

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 12>deal because that is in my best political interest.

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I did want to bring in Wayne Sanders. He's Bloomberg

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence senior defense analyst. He's a former colonel in the Army.

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 2>He's got a keen knowledge of intelligence analysis, information technology, counterinsurgency,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and more.

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 8>Wayne.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you back with us. Thanks for patiently waiting.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 2>Things are little off schedule thanks to comments that we

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 2>took from the President a little earlier speaking of Washington, DC,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>though we did hear from the US Defense Secretary earlier.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>He took aim at press coverage of a preliminary assessment

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 2>by the Defense Intelligence Agency that the US attack likely

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't cripple core components of Iran's uranium and richmond program

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>at the underground FOURDO facility. The President has said the

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 2>facility was quote completely complete and totally obliterated. In your experience,

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>do we have to wait for a battle damage assessment

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to understand the full extent of damage in a situation

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 2>such as this, or can we take comments that we

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 2>get through the press, from leaks from the president, from

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>other sources. Can we take those at face value?

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a great question, and thanks for having me back.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 13>I think that for the President when he said that

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 13>right when you're actually when you watch the video that

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 13>was part of that press conference this morning, it was

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 13>pretty definitive that there was a lot of damage, But

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 13>it's once we talked about it before, you're three hundred

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 13>feet down and so it's very difficult to see what

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 13>kind of damage that specifically is. And so when somebody

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 13>puts out this preliminary assessment, right, I used to be

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 13>an intel guy. I used to do battle damage assessment

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 13>for the army, and so that initial report that comes in,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 13>you have a very limited amount of information, and so

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 13>you normally look to try and corroborate all that.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 7>You look for.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 13>Signals intelligence, human intelligence as well as as well as

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 13>imagery intelligent in it, and there are others as well.

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 13>You try to put all those together and corroborate what

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 13>it is. And that's why I think that Secretary Heasas

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 13>is really trying to push and say, stop trying to

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 13>jump directly to what we said originally that was the

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 13>initial assessment, and then let us be able to do

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 13>as much as we can, let the intelligence community do

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 13>what they're supposed to do and provide a better assessment. So,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 13>even with de IA putting out what they had that

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 13>was from a leaked perspective, we don't know when that

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 13>initial assessment was made. A secondary piece of that that's

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 13>really important is a lot of battle damage assessment that's

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 13>normally done is normally classified.

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 7>So in terms of what the.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 13>Public normally gets a hold of, what is normally comes

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 13>out that is normally something that is almost like pared

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 13>down based off it because you're always trying to protect

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 13>sources and methods of how you found out that information.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 4>So here we are doing the math. There, what six

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 4>days since the US attacked those sites, the nuclear sites

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 4>in or on. How long does it really take Wayne

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 4>to get a really accurate picture or maybe you never

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 4>get a fully accurate picture, but a mostly accurate picture

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 4>of exactly what happened.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, the pieces start to fall into place a little

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 13>bit over time, right. I think that the chatter that

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 13>comes from signals intelligence, right as well as the human

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 13>source network that provides some of that intel, some of

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 13>that does take time. I was working, I was working

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 13>National Security Agency, US cyberc Command all the way back

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 13>when the bin Ladin strike. And the funny part about

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 13>that is is that we were still getting we were

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 13>still getting reports even three weeks a month, two months

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 13>after bin Laden was killed that he was alive.

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 7>You know that there was this one piece of tell

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 7>that came up that was that way right.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 13>That's why you always look and it's so important to

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 13>corroborate what that information is. If we put out a

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 13>piece of news, we put out a piece of intel

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 13>that says says he if it then goes and the

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 13>UK picks up on it or another one of our

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 13>allies and says, hey, I've got this piece of reporting.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 7>If they end up reporting on.

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 13>That, somebody might grab it and think that that's too

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 13>corroborating piece of information. But somebody's just reporting off the

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 13>original and so that's a very dangerous thing. And that's

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 13>why you heard the chairman, you heard General Kine talk

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 13>about allowing the IC to do their independent assessment. That's

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 13>why CIA has one versus what the DEA had and

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 13>I know that's why a Secretary of Access is bringing

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 13>that up to.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 4>So what you know, interesting times. I mean, there was

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of criticism at media. Media reacts to what

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 4>gets leaked, right, and that's what we that's what we do,

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 4>and we are supposed to be responsible with it and

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, do our own reporting and check it out.

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 4>But we're also there to ask questions. So you know,

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, obviously somebody leaked it and put it out there.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, I'm just trying to understand, you know,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 4>are they right to be so defensive and critical or

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 4>this is just kind of how it goes, not the

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 4>first administration where stuff gets leaked.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 14>No.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 13>The biggest thing there is it's we call it raw intelligence,

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 13>right if it is unanalyzed data. At that point in time,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 13>data becomes information, information becomes intelligence, Intelligence becomes decisions. So

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 13>that's just the way that the military mindset looks. So

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 13>if you're at that data layer and you have something

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 13>that's leaked that's still at that raw unanalyzed data, then

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 13>it's important to know where that is in that So

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 13>when it comes to a leak and it's something that

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 13>we can't completely substantiate in terms of an actual report

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 13>that's been put together, that's why the intelligence community takes

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 13>the time that it has. Is why they're safeguards in

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 13>intelligence directives that are in place, is to when you

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 13>want to publish a report, you have to go through

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 13>a lot of different pieces to make sure that you're

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 13>not providing misinformation to the American public.

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, so in this environment where there's a lot of

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 4>tensions between Republicans, Democrats and so on and so forth,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 4>or the White House and members of press at large.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what we need to do is just kind

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 4>of though then be smart and maybe possibly would have

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 4>been better to say, listen, guys, it's raw data, so

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 4>just understand that it's out there. We've got to deal

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 4>with it. We're just going to let you know it's

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 4>raw data. And we all know raw data can have flaws.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 4>And that's kind of the point right here, because we

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>just think about our audience and we're saying the endgame

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 4>is to understand what are the enrichment capabilities, nuclear enrichment capabilities,

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 4>ever on. That's the endgame, right, and so that's what

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 4>all these questions are all about. Ultimately, yep, no.

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, when you're trying to put that together, the other

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 13>piece of it is, hey, the intelligence community never stops.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 7>They are going to continue to look.

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 13>Last time we were talking about whether or not they

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 13>moved any of the FISTLE material to another location.

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 7>The intelligence apparatus the United States.

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 13>Never sleeps, it never sleeps, So they are going to

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 13>confirm or deny everything that is out there, with every

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 13>piece of intelligence collection that's underneath the US arsenal.

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 15>Okay, next step, well, I want I want to I

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 15>want to ask about the enrich geranium. Okay, yeah, well

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 15>we heard we exactly we don't know, well, do we

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 15>know where it is? Do you think the US government

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 15>actually knows where it is? Because they seem confident in

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 15>some comments that we've heard from officials that it was

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 15>not moved out of facilities.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 13>So so that that's the difference I think between commercial capabilities,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 13>uh and military capabilities as well.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 7>Right, So I trust I trust the military leaders. I

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 7>always have.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 13>Obviously, I think that they've they've earned that respect, they've

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 13>earned that trust. And so when when you look at

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 13>the difference between it that intelligent, those intelligence apparatus, all

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 13>the pieces of information that they have uh in terms

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 13>of what they're doing and all that, they're not going

0:32:58.200 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 13>to come out and make an assertion unless they're able

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 13>to it up. So I would trust that side a

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 13>little bit more when it comes to that because they

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 13>have no political agenda involved in being able to do that.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 13>They want the truth because at the end of the day,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 13>they provide the commander in chief and the National Command Authority,

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 13>they provide the president with options. They provide them with

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 13>the latest and greatest and says here's the situation and

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 13>hear your military strike in response options based off of that.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 13>There's no reason to try and skew the numbers or

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 13>anything of that nature, because at the end of the day,

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 13>then you're making a decision off of bad intel and

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 13>nobody wins there.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 4>All right, We're going to have to leave it there.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 4>It sounds like, you know, we all got to be

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 4>a little bit patient and wait for more of the

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 4>intel to come in. Hey, Wayne, thank you so much

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 4>always walking us through exactly what's going on so that

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 4>we have a better understanding. Wayne Sanders, Senior Defense analyst

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 4>at Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us once again from Maryland.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 9>live weekday afternoons from two to five pms. Listen on

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 9>Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 9>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Hey, folks, us up forget. We've still got some earnings

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 4>and we did have Nike crossing after the closing, bellstock

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 4>down about two percent in the aftermarket. Let's get to

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 4>our Punam Goyle, who follows Nike as well as e

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 4>commerce at leisure. At leisure, excuse me an off price retail.

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 4>She's there in our Princeton bureau bi headquarters. All right,

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 4>Nike's down. It's been bouncing around. Punhum, what do we

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 4>need to know?

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 14>You know, the numbers are better than expected, but the

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 14>issue here is the inventory was just flat, and we

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 14>expected inventory to be down more. You know, if there's

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 14>one thing I'm looking for in this turnaround, it's that

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 14>they rework their inventory levels down to get aligned with sales.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 14>So when sales are down double digits and inventory is flat,

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 14>it's still a problem.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 2>We'll explain why you want inventory down.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 14>Well, they have a lot of inventory that's old in aged, right,

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 14>that they just need to sell and get rid of

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 14>so they could introduce more new product that resonates better

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.479
<v Speaker 14>with shoppers and can drive more full price sales. There's

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 14>a lot of old inventory in the pipeline. They've talked

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 14>about it. They need to bring it down. I was

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 14>surprised with sales doing better that inventory isn't actually down

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 14>a lot more.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 10>So.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 14>Really, you know, the question going into this call in

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 14>just ten minutes is that what is the mix of

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 14>this inventory? Is the inventory higher because you have a

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 14>lot more new stuff now in it and a lot

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 14>of the old stuff is in fact gone? Or is

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 14>there still too much of the old stuff?

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 10>Right?

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't everybody want the snowfer?

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 8>What is it?

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 4>The sneaker loafer? I mean, isn't that the big thing?

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 14>The five hundred dollars one?

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, that's like the big platform.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 8>Why is that so expensive?

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Hey, it's not.

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 14>It's one hundred and fifty five dollars when they actually

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 14>drop it, I believe if that's the right price.

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 4>The resale prices, right, these are resale price.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 14>These are resale prices. So you know the prices are

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 14>or what they are.

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 4>Just look up by the Nike ticker snow for s

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 4>no a FVR like a loafer, snowfer, snoffer, sneaker loafer. Yeah,

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 4>we get the cross between sneakers and high heels, right,

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I forget right, So we get that, but the guys

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 4>get the snow first, all right, So it does. So

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 4>what's the number one question you want to you want

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 4>to be asking about the inventory? What specifically? Or is

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 4>it just as simple as like, why is it still

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 4>so high?

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 14>It's actually the mix of it, right, it's an inventory,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 14>they're just flat. How much old inventory still needs to

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 14>be cleared? How much of it Have they cleared right?

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 10>So?

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 14>Have they cleared half of it by now, three fourths

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 14>of it, a fourth of it versus where they were

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 14>last quarter. Just to get a sense of their inventory position,

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 14>to know the new and old balance within it, that's

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 14>probably my biggest question. And then of course you know

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 14>there's questions around the Skims partnership that's being delayed for

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 14>this year. What's going on there? Why is it being delayed?

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 14>The tarriff question. They're raising prices, but are they seeing

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 14>any demand fall off from consumers or consumers pulling back?

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 14>That's all uncertainty. We'd love to hear sentiment around new launches,

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 14>new product, the basic questions.

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Aside from that, Jeerlan, we're both drawn to this headline

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>in commentary from Elliot Hill, the president and CEO of

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 2>the company, who said, well, our financial results are in

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 2>line with our expectations. They are not where we want

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 2>them to be moving forward, we expect our business to

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 2>improve as a result of the progress we're making through

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 2>our win now actions. Matthew Friend, the CFO and EVP,

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 2>also said that the fourth quarter reflected the largest financial

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 2>impact from our win now actions. Remind everybody what win

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 2>now means for Nike investors.

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 14>So this is a strategic plan to get Nike to

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 14>come back to growth. So when you think about all

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 14>the actions that they've taken, the inventory reductions, staffing reductions,

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 14>the investments and technology creating efficiencies, etc. I think what

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 14>they're trying to say is we've done a lot of that,

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 14>and now here's the path forward. The headwinds will be fewer,

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.800
<v Speaker 14>and now they can actually start to push the pedal

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 14>to accelerate into growth. So the dirty work is kind

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 14>of done, all right.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 4>So massive company, ninety two billion dollar market caps stocks

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 4>down seventeen percent year today.

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 8>I feels to be a bigger market cup it did

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 8>used to be.

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 4>And I feel like punam. We've been talking about their

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 4>struggles for a while. I mean, is Nike's heyday over

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 4>or they just have to kind of figure out the

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 4>inventories and get their groove back.

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 14>Their heyday is not over. We actually ran a survey

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 14>just probably a few weeks ago that published this week,

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 14>and it asked people, just surveyors, one thousand people, this

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 14>common question, what do you want to buy in the

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 14>next six months? And the number one response when you're

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 14>buying sneakers was Nike. So Nike still is very very

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.839
<v Speaker 14>visible with people in the US for sure, because that's

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 14>where the survey was run. But I'd say even around

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 14>the world, it's still the largest athlet uar brand. I

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 14>believe that if they can fix their inventory position and

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 14>really focus on product, which I think Elliott Hill is

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 14>doing and that is what he came in for. I

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 14>think they can win back customers as long as they

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 14>can stay on top of innovation, true to their game,

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 14>true to sports, because Nike is a sports for a company. Yes,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 14>we'd love to see more snowfers or you know, those

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 14>kind of things, but at the end of the day,

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 14>it's a performance company, right, and I think they have

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 14>to stay true to that.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you do this. I sometimes in

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 4>the subway and I'm just kind of looking down and

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 4>of course all you see is feet, right if you're

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 4>sitting or standing, and like I kind of count like

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 4>what the brands are. There's a lot of on sneakers

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I have on full discleasure, but I do I try

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 4>to get an idea of like what people are really

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 4>into in terms of what they're wearing on their feet.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 4>I know I'm strange. What can I tell you?

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 14>I do that too, so you're not.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 8>You guys are both analysts.

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 4>That's the way I had a good company. But here's

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 4>the thing to get an idea. A year ago, I'll

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 4>look at ages too, to see who's wearing one.

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't it like a year ago or maybe two years

0:39:58.120 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 2>ago that analyst went to Central Park and he actually

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 2>looked at who was running and what and that was

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 2>a big issue because Nike had lost market share just

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty seconds.

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, Look, Nike has lost market share and it is

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 14>losing market share. But Ken it went it back as

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 14>a question. We think yes, On is definitely growing. But

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 14>if you look at the size of the two companies,

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 14>you're looking at someone with, you know, more than forty

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars in sales versus someone with less than ten.

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 14>So there's a big difference.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Good point, all right, Nike, you shows down one point

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 4>seven percent. Put of you Rock Punam Goyle Senior analysts

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 4>for e Commerce at Leisure, off Price Retail at Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 4>joining us from BI headquarters in Princent.

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple,

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal