WEBVTT - How Gilligan Plays Into Bill Gross Neighbor Feud

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grasso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly not a typical dispute between neighbors about a

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>fence or a dog crossing property lines. The feud between

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>billionaire Bill Grows and tech entrepreneur Mark Talfick involves a

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>private Kenny Loggin's concert, a TV shoot for the HBO

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>series Ballers, and a million dollar glass sculpture. Today, Grows

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>issued a public statement offering to end all hostilities with

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>his Laguna Beach neighbor, but Talfick rejected the settlement, calling

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it a stunt to stem the tide of negative press.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is Bloomberg Legal reporter Patricia Hurtado, who's covering

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the trial. Why is a neighbor's dispute in court and

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for so long? Well, I think it has to too.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a combination of the bad feelings between these two neighbors,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>provoked dueling, harassment complaints, and as a result, it's because

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic it's taking so long, But it does

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to be taking extra long even under the pandemic circumstances.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>So they're only doing one day of hearing, like a

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>brief four hours or so of hearing every Monday, and

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>then the judge in the case decided to sort of

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>increase the number of days she sees them. But because

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of COVID, there have to take breaks, and there has

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to be social distancing, and so everything seems to take

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>extra long under the circumstances. I imagine that these are

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>huge properties. Explain how the houses are situated. These aren't

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like Greenwich, Connecticut or someplace on the Gold Coast in

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 1>um Long Island where you have massive property. These are

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>adjoining giant beachfront houses, and um they're not a beach shack.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>These are very large. They're like thousands of square feet.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>They're built on a bluff overlooking and a cliff side

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>overlooking Laguna Beach, which used to be an artist colony

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for you know, basically hippies and artists when I was

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>growing up, and it has transformed into this extremely desirable space.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's beautiful with lots of cliffs and beach front down.

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So lots of wealthy, wealthy people have migrated there and

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>built their wonderful homes. But they're kind of cheek to jowel.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not as probably as tight as Malibu. If people

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have ever seen those Malibu homes, but um, they're very

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>massive houses adjacent to each other. It seems that at

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one point they were friendly. So tell us about the

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Loggins private concert. Yeah, that was quite extraordinary. Having

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>grown up with Kenny Loggins, it was quite something to

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>hear that Phil Gross is so rich and they are

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>different from you and me, that he had a private

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>concert in his backyard, catered and everything with Kenny Loggins

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for his girlfriend's fiftieth birthday party. So this isn't just

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like honey, I'm taking you to Acapulco. This is like, honey,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting Kenny lock And to play in my backyard

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for us. And apparently what also started with this was

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a for her birthday, he installed a million dollar Dale

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Chululi glass sculpture that is about twenty ft long and

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>fourteen ft deep, So it's it might be the size

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of some studio apartment for New York, or let's just say,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's tall, and its glass, it's blown glass. And

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they looked like lots of little like organ pipes made

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>out of glass with colors. And they were apparently very

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>good friends. There's two different, diametrically opposing stories. Of this

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>relationship and how it's soured. According to Mark Talfok, he's

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a tech entrepreneur who built his multimillion dollar mansion first

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on this cove. He built a beautiful dream house and

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>work from home. And he says that Bill Gross later

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>bought the place next door and started renovating and had

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the sculpture and then had the Kenny Loggin's concert and

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>everything was great, and he let Kenny Loggin's crew run

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>their gigantic cables, passed his through his property to their trucks,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the generating trucks, and let them trample his plants, and

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he never complained, but even thanks Bill Gross's girlfriend, and

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they had a text he read saying, you know, thank

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you for this, and she said you're very welcome smiley

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>face emoji. But Gross says the bad blood between them

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>started when to Fick had a TV show HBO program

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>called Ballers, which is about former NBA players, and they

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>used to fix house as the scene and they filmed

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there for an entire week and jammed up the Coast

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Highway with the film crew trucks and disrupted their laws.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>The MINTO filed dueling Harassment Plan Games, which is what

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the judge has been hearing of who harassed who, and

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>there's also they were speaking temporary restraining orders against each other.

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Stay away from me, No, you stay away from me.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross says that he has been stalked by to Pick,

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>who is tech obsessed, as a basic implications through the

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>testimony and the allegations of all these cameras everywhere, including

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a camera that spied on him that was posted on

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a palm tree, a real live palm tree. Here's a

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>camera on the palm tree which Bill Gross says death

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Tosik isn't ogling him and his girlfriend when they dressed

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>antily in the pool. So to Fick actually complains to

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the city about that million dollar glass sculpture, and then

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>he says that Bill Gross engaged in hours of sonic

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>abuse with music blaring from Gross's home, including the theme

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>songs from shows like Gilligan's Island and Matt Yeah. So

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Tofick called the police, and Laguna Beach police officers have

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>come to stay testified that yes, I did respond to

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the scene. I was at the address of Tefick's home.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I arrived at eleven thirty. Yes, I did hear Gilligan's

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Islands playing. So to Fix says he was told or

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>instructed or advised by the police to record these so

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that we have heard over and over again multiple tapes,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and we have heard the sitcom introduction tunes, to theme songs,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to mash Green Acres, Gilligan's Island, and all kinds of stuff.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And then you also didn't heard hip hop, and we

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>heard Carlie Jepson's Call Me. So he made he made

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>these tapes and he recorded them including he says in

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the background you could see Bill Gross and his girlfriend

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Sash Shane and dancing on their balcony nearby. In said

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>he saw them giving him the finger. The officers had

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times that the men music has been very,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>very loud, and he said it was ear splitting. And

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>he says he has ultra sick windows because he wanted

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to necessarily not have to hear the noise of the

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Coast Highway, which is adjacent to the house. You

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>at the front of the house, and he has a

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>six cement walls, and yet the music was coming from

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>next door with the speakers from outdoors were pointed at

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>his house. So um to Fix says it all started

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>when he complained to the city of Laguna Beach about suddenly,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the blue, it looked like a giant soccer

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>net was put over the sculpture that's lit up at night.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So imagine that something looks like a Christmas display, or

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a church organ made of glass that's

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>illuminated at night, and it's you know, blue and white

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and all different colors, and then it's got a big

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>giant white net over it. Now to Fick complain, he

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>says about the lightly, not the sculpture per se. He

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>loves art, but that he complained about the unsightly netting.

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Gross complained that the netting was fine. But what ends

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>up happening is to pick winds a city ordinance. He

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>has the city come out looks at the Grosses sculpture

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and then find gross In failed to comply the zoning regulations.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>When he has that installed. You can imagine someone might

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be annoyed that if you sent a million dollars installing

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>art and then somehow it got broken and then you

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>put net over it. But suddenly the city says that's

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not okay. And that's when Topi says the abuse started.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>At one point, a police officer says she arrived one

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>morning and she heard very loud Spanish music and then

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they asked her to be more clear, explaining what kind

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of music, and she said she could hear very loud

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Mariachi music plane instead of Gilligan's Island, and she said

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it was louder than the Pacific Coast Highway traffic on

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a Saturday. If you can imagine, you know, it's very

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>loud highway traffic as well. It was louder than the

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ocean roar. So now is that the testimony is coming

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on too. This week we're hearing more from the property manager,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>who's a Latino. He is testified that he liked to

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>play what has been called Spanish music when he was working,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and that he was given a decibel meter reader by

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the by Gross and Shorts to use it and to

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>test whether his music was playing was too loud for

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>anyone task to hear. And this would happen when Gross

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and his girlfriend weren't at the property. So Gross has

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>been fined. Is he supposed to remove that? Well, it

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>seems like everything is kind of been hold, it sounded

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>from the testimony of the zoning guard it came to

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>testify the sculpture wasn't necessary. Really the problem, what was

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem may have been that the netting was not

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in compliance with local ordinances its height, instance in distance,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a size and its height and its location.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.719
<v Speaker 1>So he was supposed to remove it. Now, Bill Gross's

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>people have testified that it was only put up on

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>windy days to keep palm fronds from falling down and

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>possibly breaking the sculpture. So what this has been is

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a judge has been asked to kind of she's kind

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of trying to be um disciplinarian of two middle school

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>boys who can't get along, and she's been asked to

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>basically decide to dueling harassment allegations against each other. So

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we've heard from to Fick. He spent multiple days on

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the stand, and of course this is going in an

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>excruciatingly slow paced because of the breaks they've been taking

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and they can only have a hearing one day a week.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And we expect to also here from Amy Schwartz, Bill

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Gross's girlfriend, who's a former model and professional tennis player,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to also hear from Bill Gross.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You right, that you can sense the animosity between these

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>two now, and that that has even been demonstrated in

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom. Yeah, the first day, to Fick was supposed

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to take the stand. You can imagine that they have

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>plastic shields around the witness, the judge, and the witness box,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and the courtroom seating is limited to the parties only,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and a film crew and one I guess, one media representative.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And I note the first day as as a trial

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>inside edition got the price seat of being the pool

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>or the only camera allowed in the courtroom. And so

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to Fick takes the stand to testify. It the dueling harassment, hearing,

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you heard uh. And then someone said mr

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Gross, where are you going? And then Gross said

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't hear him, and someone said it must be

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's mumbling. And so they were arguing immediately, bickering,

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and um, the judge was asking him not to speak

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to each other. And then so Gross planted himself as

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, they're supposed to be socially distanced, and

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he sat in the jury box. He said he was

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>hard of hearing and he couldn't hear. So he sat

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in the seat number two, second seat next to the

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>witness box. In the jury box, there's no jury, of course,

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and then Tofi complained that he didn't like Gross sitting

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so close to him, so he that he should move.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And then there was the discussion back and forth where

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>could he sit? And then the Gross said he couldn't sit,

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he would stand throughout the entire hearing. And

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then he said his hearing aid was breaking because he

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hear, and then should the judge asked him to

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>raise the volume in his hearing aid and suddenly hear that,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that very painful screeching noise when someone's hearing

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>aid has back play on a speaker. And then the

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>judge said, that was painful for all of us. We've

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>turned that down. Change seats, Mr Gross. So this has

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>been quite interesting to Mr Gross, of course, is a

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy man, and he promises to bring basically his

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>side of the story includes to fix former neighbor, the

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>guy he bought the house from, and you know, all

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>kinds of experts to say that that anything that to

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Fick recorded on his iPhone has been distorted because iPhones

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are not giving an actual audio volume. It's kind of crazy. Well,

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money that he must be spending on

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>legal fees and experts and investigators. It's probably off the charts.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>But what is Gross's current complaint against to keep saying

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that Mark to Fick has a stalker Essentially, as his

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>lawyer said, he's essentially a stalker uh and essentially engaging

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in stalking practices that he has been following uh growth

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and his girlfriend with his camera, that he's surreptitiously filming him. Uh.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>That this is that he also alleges. So, you know,

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>we have the Laguna Beach Police come in and testify

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about the noise complaints they constantly had to respond to,

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and they basically affirm or confirm elements of topick story.

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>There's music, plane, it's late, it's late at night, and

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>their position it is very loud. He's complaining that Topick

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is obsessed and has weaponized If he got the police

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to testify to confirm his version of the story, it's

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's weaponized the Laguna Beach Police Department for in

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>his favor. And I guess that one thing is that

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all sitting and weathering under very bad, terrible news

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>about you know, tragic news about the pandemic. A lot

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of people are kind of asking what's going on and

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>why are we in court? So, so the decision here

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is up to the judge, no jury, it's a judicial hearing,

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and and it's uh superior court, Orange County Superior Court.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>She said she wants to finish this hearing by December fifteen,

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and she's going to issue her own finding. Uh. So

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>she's being asked to consider dueling harassment claims. And then

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there's also a slew of other lawsuits that have been

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>our corollary suits and complaints. They filed on a variety

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of different method measures, you know, So she seems to

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>be dealing specifically with the harassment claims. It's unclear. You know,

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody's got deep pockets in this story. So this litigation

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and all its corollary allegation, you know, allegations and complaints

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>will probably proceed into Thanks for being on the Bloomberg

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Law Show. Pat. That's Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg Legal reporter. President

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump canceled the dot A program soon after he took office,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and data has been caught in legal battles ever since,

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>battles that went up to the Supreme Court. Now, a

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration must

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fully restore the so called Dreamer's program that protects undocumented

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>immigrants brought to the US as children. My guest is

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Leon Fresco, a partner at Hollandon Knight. To set this up,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>go back to June when the Supreme Court blocked Trump

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>from ending data. In June, what the Supreme Court did

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was they issued a decision about the legality of the

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>process chosen by the Trump administration to refend the docup program.

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And what they said was that the process that the

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration used to resend the doctor program was unlawful

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because it did not sufficiently explain the rationale for revoking

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the program and did not sufficiently take into account different

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>interests were in place in terms of reliance interests and

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of winding down the program and the relevant

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>time friend for doing so, and so because the Trump

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>administration had failed to do that, the revocation of the

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>doctor program was arbitrary and capricia. So then the question

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>became what could the administration do next about the doctor program?

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And that is when the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Judd Wolf, issued a memorandum saying that what he would

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>do while he was weighing the future of the doctor

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>program was to allow people to extend their doctor sabus

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>by one year increment and not allow any new people

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to apply for DOCTA. And so that was the current

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs before this weekend when a judge ruled

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that that memorandum was no longer valid. Tell us why

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the judge ruled that the memorandum wasn't valid. Know what

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the judge in the New York case, which is a

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>case called the tie of the Dial versus Chad wolf

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 1>held was that Chad wolf who was the acting Secretary

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security, isn't actually a validly appointed acting Secretary

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security. Chad Wolfe was confirmed to be an

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Assistant Secretary for Policy and was appointed via a series

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of memoranda to be the acting Secretary of Homeland Security.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But what the judge ruled was that that series of

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>memoranda was clawed not just for Chad wolf but also

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>even for Kevin McAleenan who was the acting Secretary of

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security before Chad wolf And that the last actual

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>valid person who the Secretary of Homeland Security was Kirstin Nielsen,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>who was confirmed by the Senate, and that she drafted

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>a memo about who goes back in the succession plan.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That memo was never followed, such that there is currently

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>no legitimate person that can be appointed as acting Secretary

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security because there's no one who can actually

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore because the process was fractured, but that

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the only way to remedy this is for the Senate

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to confirm a new Secretary of Homeland Security. The judge

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>also told the Department to put out a notice so

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that new DOCTA applicants could start applying. Correct. So, one

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of the main features of the decision of this District

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Court judge was not only that the District Court judge

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>restored the doctor program to what it was in its

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>entirety under the Obama administration, but basically said, I don't

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>want any delay whatsoever in the implementation of this, because

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>his concern was that the administration would slow walk this

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this and not a really implements the decision, and so

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>he wanted immediate reporting on the fact that applications would

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be immediately accepted the beginning of December seven, and he

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted statistics up without about how many people were applying,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>how many people were being approved, how many people are

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>being rejected. D Jess says it's going to appeal the decision.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>How long might that appeal take? Is there any way

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the appeal could be finished before Trump leaves office. So

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's two issues, and both are important. The first issue

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is whether they will be able to get us say

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 1>on the decision requiring the DOCCA applications to move forward.

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>If they don't, then they're gonna have to be accepting

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>these applications immediately or they will be subjects to consents

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of court. But the larger issue is they need to

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>appeal this decision about whether Chad Wolfe is a legitimate

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Homeland Security because if he isn't, that doesn't

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>just affect Dacca, that affects everything he's done as Secretary

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security and potentially everything that Kevin McAleenan has

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>done as Secretary of Homeland Security. And so because of that,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they need to appeal this. And it's an interesting question

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as to whether they will get a decision in time

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the Trump administration. And if they

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>don't get such a decision in time from the Supreme

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Court or at least from the Second Circuit, that tells them, hey,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, there was a legitimate appointment here. If they

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>don't fix that part, it will be very interesting to

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>see what a Biden administration does as to whether it

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>continues to try to defend other actions reached by Tad

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Wolf or whether it's basically jettisons every single thing that

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Chad Wolf did as Secretary of Homeland Security and maybe

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>even that Kevin McAleenan did as Secretary of Homeland Security

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and basically says the last two years were a wat

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and nothing happened, and any policy that was there is invalid,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and we only returned to whatever the policies were at

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first and Nielsen's security tenure. This

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is just one case. There are also challenges to data

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>in other states. Texas is challenging doc and a judge

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there could rule that it's illegal. What happens then if

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>if a judge in Texas says DOCA is illegal, and

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you have this decision by a Brooklyn judge. So that

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is a separate and completely distinct, but equally important challenge,

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>which is there has been this bucket of lawsuits, which

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that reached the Supreme Court on the

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>manner in which DOCTA was revoked, and all of those

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>have failed to reach the fundamental issue of whether DOCTA

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>was lawful to begin with or should be ended just

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's an unlawful program. We have not had that adjudication,

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's the litigation that happening in Texas right now.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And the thought process is because the composition of the

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court has changed since the last DOCTA decision, where

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Justice Ginberg has been replaced by Justice Cody Barrett, there

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is a significant possibility that if that case gets to

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, the entire doctor program would be invalidated

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for the same reason that with President Obama tried a

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>larger program called DAFA, which was for undocumented parents of

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>US citizens. That program was invalidated because it was viewed

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>as a procedurally incorrect because it did not use notice

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act, but be

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it also violated the Immigration and Nationality Act because there

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act which require

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Homeland Security to place undocumented individuals in

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>removal proceedings when they come across undocumented individuals, not to

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>give them work permits, and so the idea is you

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>could do that on an individual basis, but once you

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do it on a programmatic basis, you're violating the law.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the two theories that are going to

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be litigated as the Biden administration seeks to restore doctors.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Joe Biden has pledged to restore data within

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred days of his taking office. But his restoration

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that would just mean an executive order. Correct, he would

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>simply say that the Obama administration policy is restored in

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>its entirety and applications begin in earnest. Again. Now, the

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>only question is President Biden is getting a lot of

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>pressure to change the date of eligibility because under the

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>current DOCTA program, you had to be eligible because you

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>arrived before two thousand and seventh. That's a long time ago.

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's south thirteen years ago. He may get some pressure

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to move up that date. Uh. And if he does

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, that makes it easier to challenge in court

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because now there will be people who did not have

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote the reliance interests on DOCCA that the current

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>people in the program has. It seems like data recipients

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have never really been able to feel safe because ever

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning, there have been legal problems with data

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely correct. Since the beginning of DOCCA, there

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>have been legal challenges. There was an illegal There was

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a legal challenge originally in the Fifth Circuit by ICE agents,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're the legality of the program was not ruled

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>upon because at that time, the Fifth Circuit held that

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the ICE agents did not have standing to challenge the

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>DOCTA programs. There was never a ruling on that. But

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened after the Obama administration expanded the doctor program

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to become DAFA to include parents of U. S citizens,

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>then the state attorney general's food as opposed to ICE agents,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And because the state attorney generals food, then the courts

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>ruled that those state attorney generals did have standings because

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the issue was that DOCCA recipients were able to get

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>driver licenses in those states and that that gave the

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>state standings, whereas the ICE agent never had standing. So

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we've never been able to confront once and for all

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the legality of SOCCA, meaning to twelve. People in the

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>program have always been worried that it would be held

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to be illegal, and as such, they could have their

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>saddest strips away. And so that's why it's ultimately important

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>either a Congress the past lasting relief or for the

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration to use a different form of relief to

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>help the doctor students. And that's why I've been one

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of the people advocating for something called temporary protective status

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>for not to SOCCA Hope, but for everyone under the

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>COVID rubric and saying that at least for the next

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>eighteen bunds don't deport any non criminals anywhere until we

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate everybody and get everything under control with COVID such

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that we can actually have a functioning immigration system again

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>where people can go to courts and actually have real

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hearings and not buy in detention facilities, etcetera, etcetera. And

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if that idea is going to

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>get traction, but that's one of the ideas that they're

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>considering in the Biden's administration. So, I mean, theoretically, what

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>could happen is if that Texas case goes up to

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court could say that DACA

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is illegal, and then the Biden administration would have to

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>come up with some other kind of rubric to correct

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if the Supreme Court hold that the DOTA program is

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>illegal for the same reasons that it it held that

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the DA program was illegal. Now it didn't write a decision,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>it's just a firm the Texas decision. Back then there

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was a four four slip that just affirmed the Texas

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>decision without a written opinion. But if it holds that

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal for the same reason, then the bid administration

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will actually have to come up with a new administrative

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>way to try to protect data recipient, and I think

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that way would be temporary protective SIBUS. They can potentially

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>also just tell people apply for something called the humanitarian

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>parole and we're not gonna put any criteria in it.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And that way because the the insertion of criteria that

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>makes the program the legal. But if it's a one

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>by one decision, it's legal. And so they could just

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tell people, we can't give you any guarantee that it

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>will be granted, and we can't lay out any criteria

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for how it will be granted, but if you apply,

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you'll get this humanitarian parole. And that would be

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>another way to try to take care of this population.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Leon that's Leon Fresco, a partner at Hollandon Night.

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show.

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm June Grass. Thanks so much for listening, and remember

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you can always get the latest legal news on our

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law podcast. You can find them on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your favorite podcasts. Thanks so much

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Please tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>week and now at ten pm Eastern right here on

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio