WEBVTT - The Closest Thing to a Meme ETF

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillians. I'm Joel Webber America. I'll shootis I

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>am so excited about this week's guest Eric. It's like

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the perfect guest for this moment. Yeah. This is a

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>company that has been putting et s out for I

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>believe about two years. They don't have a ton of them,

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're interesting for variety of reason. But they hit

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>my radar specifically in the past two weeks because of

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this sort of what I'm calling the a m C eclipse. Uh.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>This is that movie chain company that a lot of

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the redditors have, you know, sort of come back that

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>once you put you know, Game stop, you know, to

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the Moon back in January, and then it went right

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>back down. But they're back and they've really rallied around

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a m C. It's gone up I don't know, each

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>week for the past way. Yeah. Yeah. And here's the

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thing with a m C is that they're really united

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on this one. Um when games Stop happened in January,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>then they splintered off. Some people wanted to go into

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a MC, some said silver. This time they're all into

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a MC and it's showing. The volume on a m

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>C has been well over a hundred billion over the

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>past seven eight days, and it's traded more than any

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>other stock for seven days straight. Nothing has traded more

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>than Tesla and the Fang stocks for more than a

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>day in decades. It's just crazy. So there's a ton

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of activity. And what what I was looking for is Okay,

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>AMC is having a good rally like what E t

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>F s own it and the the E t F

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that owns the most am C and game Stop together

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>about a twenty allocation as of today is uh so

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 1>fis fifty E t F, which I hadn't thought about

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in a while, but now I get it. It tracks

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the stocks that are used by their retail investors on

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the discount brokerage. UM. I've been telling people it's like

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a slightly classier version of the Robin Hood fifty. UM.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You know the stocks that that were tracked by Robin

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Hood all they stopped letting people track them. But this

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is the probably the best way to capture that sort

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of retail yolo kind of audience, I think. And yet

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>it's gone largely unnoticed and it's just been an interesting

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>case study for me for a variety of reasons. So

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it'd be interesting to talk to them about

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this e t F but also some of the other

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>ones and just sort of how it works into their

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 1>bigger business plan. So joining us from so Far John Gardner,

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the business head of investing at so Far. Can't

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>wait to speak with him this time on trillions. The

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>closest thing to a meme et F you can find, John,

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillians, Thanks for having me. The e t

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>F s F y F is almost the closest thing

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to bottled lightning you could basically have for what's been

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>happening in the market this year. How does it feel

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to have bottled lightning? UM? Well, I think we've you know,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>we think about building products that resonate with our members

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and help them become better investors and ultimately a chief

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>financial independence over time. UM. And you know we've we've

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>launched six ets to date. S F y F was

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 1>born about a year ago, UM and really just replicates

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the top fifty holdings of our members. And you know,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we thought we saw something very interesting because we have

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as part of a feature of our our retail brokerage platform, UH,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>something we call social Invested. So it's the ability to

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>actually follow what other members by and you can see

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of buying a percentage basis, but not a dollar

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>basis what people are holding, and then you can comment

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and engage with with other members. It's been pretty engaging

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>utility for for our members. So on the back of that,

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we launched the s F y f UM as a

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mechanism basically enable our members to very quickly sort of

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>replicate sort of the mind of of the group UM.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's been interesting that I think it's

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a sort of bifurcated between some of the meme stocks

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and then more traditional holdings like Amazon or Apple or

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Tesla that our members hold. Yeah, Joel, look, let me

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>give you some numbers on this thing. So it's up

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty three percent this year, probably a little more by

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the time this airs. UM the Stars of right the

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Cues is up seven um smps up. That's up more

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 1>because values having a big comeback this year, and then

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>ARC is down twelve percent. So it's hard to come

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>up with an e t F this year that's sort

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of able to break out unless you're a value stock

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>et F for commodities, but for something that holds just

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>general equities that are not value stocks. It's just an anomaly.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And as John said, it's interesting. It's also has like

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of airline companies which obviously aren't you witness

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>associate them so much with um, you know, a growth stock,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's got um what looks like a pot Company's got

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire in here. It's got ex On Mobile, which is

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>having a great year, Virgin galactic Um. It's a real

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting mix. I guess John, could you walk through how

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the stocks are picked and how this et F works

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in relation to those investors that are using your brokerage platform. Sure. So,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the top fifty most widely held US listed stocks

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on our sofa in best platform. And mechanically, the way

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that we look at it is by first the top

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty holdings by number of members that actually hold a

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>stock or a share or a portion of a stock

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>or share in the portfolio, and then we basically wait

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio based on the value of the shares that

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>make that top fifty from waiting standpoint, and then we

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>re balanced the portfolio once a month to basically reflect

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics that I just discussed. And now just real quick, Um,

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>your your ideal weight for a stock isn't going to

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be nine, but a MC has grown to We saw

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this with game stock UM and the video game et

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>F where it became like a thirty waiting um. Can

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit about how that works, Like,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>if the stock like this goes on some crazy run,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have a bigger waiting for a while

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>until there's a the stock goes back down or rebalance.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So I think that this was someone

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fortuitous for us. So we saw a massive run up

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>into the end of the month, and then we did

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the rebalance. So while the stock was you know in

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the in i think total of holdings for a period

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of time, when we we balanced that it's back to

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhe somewhere around a six percent waiting right now. So

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>when did you get a sense that AMC was gonna

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>light up? I think, as probably most people, we watched

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the NBC all day and you could see that the

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>stocks started trending, and you know, we we look at

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>all the meme boards, the redded boards and things like that,

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can start to see some momentum behind it.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think we're we're agnostic, you know, I

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think we're we're we we philosophically, UH as a company

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>want to provide a lot of selection for our members

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>UH and make it easy for them to invest, which

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>is why we do things more broadly on the on

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the retail broken side, like no commissions and being able

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to do fractional share trading. So while it was again

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fortuitous that we saw a sort of a run up

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in the stock, I think we you know, we're literally

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just trying to give our members, you know, the best

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and easiest way to invest their money and then an

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>easy way for both our members on the platform, but

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then you know, off platform and other brokerage brokerage platforms

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the ability to sort of easily with a single purchase

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to you know, get an exposure to the

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>mind of sort of what our members are doing. So,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that I get asked

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot on Twitter, especially when one of these stocks

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>goes crazy, is how come there isn't a meme TF

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and trying to explain to people that it is hard

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to predict a meme stock or a situation before it happens.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Potentially a short squeeze et F would make sense because

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the memurs seem to want to buy stocks that are

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>heavily shorted. But I guess this brings up labeling because

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the c t F, it's taken

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of cash over the past week. Um.

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But relative to this sort of shiny object moment it

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is having where it's you know, doubling tripling the market, Um,

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not a lot. And I wonder if there's any

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>temptation to to change it or I don't know, not regret,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>but like do you do you ever think about, well,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if this had a ticker that was more clear that

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it was tracking retail traders or something or are you

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>just let me let me ask a question from my friend.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't the e t F called meme or you know,

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a the retail trader something that would allude to the

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're capturing young retail traders. That is definitely

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>missing from the E t F marketplace. That's why it's

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>an interesting situation. So I have a couple of observations.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I do think the ticker name is

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>critically important in creating brand awareness. Um. And you know,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>one of our other products is called the gig g

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>i G for the gig economy, which we can talk

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about later. The reason why we didn't call this the

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>meme stock um e F is largely because really what

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do is reflect sort of the mind

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of the retail invest there. And what's been interesting is

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that while we're capturing I think UM some of the

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>early friends for from meme stocks, and you know, and

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, we've seen like our investors started buying Tesla

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>before we got into the SP five hundred, and there

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>was a big position in the portfolio. UM. We also

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>see that that our retail investors are holding more traditional

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>names like Apple and Amazon and Microsoft and Disney UH

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in big positions. So I think you get a good

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>balance of sort of opportunistic high price movement UM stocks

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>with some of the meme things, but then also more

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>high growth, traditional high growth companies. And you know, I

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>also think that while you might try to chase the

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>meme stocks, and Eric you alluded to this that you know,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to sort of identify what's going to

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>take off and and those things, those things turn around

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just as quickly as they as they scale up. So

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're trying to build basically products that haven'tdurt

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>and during value for our members um and are basically

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve for specific needs. So um, you know,

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason we created the s F y F portfolio

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>initially was because we saw, as I alluded to before

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on our social investing platform, that there's a high degree

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of interest in following successful investors on the PLA form,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and we thought this would be a great way to

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of very easy make it very easy for our

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>members to basically, with one trade, be able to get

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the mind of basically the entire member basis

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so far okay. So the difference that I guess I

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>see here or or could potentially see, is like you

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>have a membership and a so far investors set that

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you're clearly targeting, but at the same time, like assets

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>under management in this in this particular et F is

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what twenty two million like you there seems like there's

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>such a bigger opportunity with a different presence of chicker

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>or sell to the marketplace, because I mean, what you're

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>what you have under the hood here is kind of amazing,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and yet the assets still reflected necessarily and look, can

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I jump in on that real quick? Just because we're

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so used to the opportunism in the e t F

0:10:56.040 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>market that it might also speak to your main at

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>so far, you're not an e t F fishuer, you're

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a fintech company that that happens to have E t s.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you just walk through that balance and is that

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>why that that you can that your aren't maybe thinking

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in such but the word is like marketplace trends and

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>terminology and maybe you just have no interest in being

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that thing to the market. Yeah, I think that it's

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be helpful just to step back

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and sort of introduced so far for those um that

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't familiar with it. So we're an online personal finance

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>company that enables people to invest, borrow, save, spend and

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>protect their money. UM. We were recently listed on the

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>nasdac UH. We went public vs back through social with

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Social Capital H and SAM and you know, broadly, our

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>goal is to help people achieve their financial independence, to

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>realize their ambition. And we'll be able to do that

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for for millions or millions of our members. And you know,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as I think about the invest leave and specifically for

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for so far, you know, we we want to be

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the one stop shop for our members to help them

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>achieve that financial independence. So we started out with auto

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>investing and then migrated into also offering a Brokeren solution,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which we call active investing. And there, you know, we

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>were very early on and going commission free. We were

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we were one of the first firms to offer fractional

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>share trading that we did UM initially on about a

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty names and now we do on about names

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in a real time basis. And then UH in two

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nineteen, we also launched a crypto platform so

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that basically members that had brokerage accounts could very easily

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>open a crypto account UH and get access to something

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more traditional UH cryptocurrencies. And I think as we think

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about why we entered the marketplace for ETFs, you know,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to continue to provide selection for our members

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>that help them become better investors. And UM we found,

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we found that there were some interesting request

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the needs that we could we thought we could we

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>could support. So we we came to market in two

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nineteen with our first E t F first

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>two E t F s, s F Y and s

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>F y X, and we were first to market with

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>no fee E t F s. They were basically passively

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>managed accounts that were replicating the SMP five and then

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of the next five. From there, we've launched a

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>handful of other UH E t F s that we

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>think meet specific needs for our members. So we came

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to market with a product called t g i F

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>which was a week fixed income weekly UH weekly dividend

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>payment UM fund, which recently won UH the UH Best

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Best Named E t F for two thousand and twenty,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and then more recently launched w K o I which

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>is basically the equity component of weekly dividend e t F.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Sea can I jump here on these two? T G

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I F Remember when it came out? So this is

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a it pays the dividend out weekly. Now what's the

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>point of this, Like normally an e t F that

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>holds equities and whether it's divid or not, will pay

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out monthly. UM Is this is because the younger investor

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>wants that payment on a quicker basis or is there

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>another reason like what's behind the need for weekly payout? Yeah?

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I think broadly, we you know, as we

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think about so FI RIT large, you know, we help

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we try to help people think about their cash flow

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>management UM and We have a tool called Relay as well,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>which is basically our advice platform that you can aggregate

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all your data and we provide helpful tips around how

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to sort of optimize your finances. Uh, And we thought that,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think a couple of things. One is

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just a more predictive income on a weekly basis.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And then too, to the extent that you're going to

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>sell out of out of the port the out of

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the the e t f UM, you're basically not missing

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>any of the fun distributions, which is probably more wele

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>than on the w k l Y, which is the

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the equity etf But I think it was

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a combination of those two things. So when you think

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about overall strategy and you walk through a lot of

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the products that you you currently have brought to market,

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like what do you what do you feel like the

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>endgame looks like I think, you know, we're trying to

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>build and they can go back to go back to

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>answer your original question. You know, while obviously it's important

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for us to grow assets on these platforms, you know,

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately we want to create a suite of

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>enduring financial products and ETFs UM that specifically support that

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of things that our members are most interested in. So, UH,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>while you know, it's it's uh, it's it's interesting to

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially chase UM revenue opportunities and try to scale assets,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, really really quickly, and you never know when

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna catch lightning in a bottle UM. You know,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we've had this product in market for less

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>than two years. I think all of our funds, like

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we literally have been in market for about two years,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>just over two years for all of them. I think

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what we're starting to see is we're starting starting to

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>reach at inflection point UM, both from performance and track

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>record that we're starting to get more attention. So, you know,

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I look at this as building and enduring platform of funds.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got six today, we plan on launching another three

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>by the end of a year. UM. There'll be more

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>thematic in nature. They'll touch on different aspects of what

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we think our members are interested in. UM. You know

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in our view that this this will be a significant

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and profitable stand a little business for for so far

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>over time. UM, but it's always going to be in

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the service of really thinking about what our core members

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that are investors on the SOFI active invest platform are

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for and building around those needs. Can you put

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself in your own portfolio, in your own e t

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>F When you say ourselves, you mean SOFI? Yeah, Um, yeah,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great question. So no, So for

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the UH, it would be significantly heavily weighted on s

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>F y F if we could know we purposely excluded

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so far as a as a constituent member in the portfolio. Eric,

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>does anybody do that? Do they have themselves in their

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>own portfolio? Well, this is what aren't got in trouble

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with or not trouble. I don't have a problem with it.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>But in a r k X the space ETF, the

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>second or third biggest holding is a r k uh

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>PR and T the three D printing e t f

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>UM black Rock. They have target date type funds that

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>hold black Rock ETFs UM, and black Rock probably has

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of atfs that own black rock stock. It's

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not unheard of. Um, it depends on what it is.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>In this case though, if you're tracking the holdings and

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they outright hold so far way more than a normal

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>person would, that you wouldn't want it in there. That's

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like a distortion, but I wouldn't I wouldn't like ding

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>them on that if it were like a reasonable waiting John.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we talked about a lot is

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>how it really does seem like the marketplace for E

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>t f s has been polarized, for lack of a

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>better term, between really cheap stuff, you know, cheap beta

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>as Eric will call it, and like on the other side,

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>shiny objects. And so I'm wondering how you you kind

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of attempt to thread that needle, because in a way

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you can effectively kind of do both. Yeah, So I

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the funds that we have,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously we came with the no fee UM e t

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>f s and we we decided just to extend the

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>no fees for for a third year, which I think

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we're doing the filing for UH this week. UM. I

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>think obviously you want to provide value and differentiated value

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>from return standpoint that you can charge for UM. We

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>currently charge twenty nine basis points for the s F

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>y F product because it is basically a mechanical nature

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the way that we UM construct and manage it.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And then we charge fifteen nine basis points for the

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>gig product because it's an actively managed product. I think

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my view is broadly, you know, we don't want to

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's very hard to compete with the eye

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>shares of the world at vant guards of the world

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in low costs. So I think where our opportunity is

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is to find uh unique investment opportunities or themes that

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to play and and bring those uh to

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>our members and you know, be able to charge what

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we think is a reasonable fee of something you know,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between twenty nine and fifty nine basis points UH,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's potentially a little bit more if we find

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>something that's actively managed, it's a little bit more heavy

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lifting to manufacture and manage. So um. You know, I'm

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at your product lineup and there's a couple other

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>issuers that we have seen where you could tell there

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like maybe they have beta and then they tilt

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>urse of growth growth area. I would assume maybe you

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at other areas that have started to

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>come back this year that have been sort of lagging

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for the past decade. That would be value, small caps, um, international,

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, commodities. Good question. Yeah, I mean I think

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we're spending a lot of time this year UM is

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>our retail investor business grows and we we think about

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the types of things that they're investing in UH and

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>where we see some thematic trends in the marketplace that

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we might take advantage of, where we want to introduce

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the next funds UM. I think that they're probably less

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>focused around sort of style UM and asset class and

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>more around thematic investing, where I think it's just a

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>way to easily express view UM for our for our members.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So I want to bring it back to s F

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>y F because we started there and I'm curious, like, say, say,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>your members got really keen on on something and you know,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe as keen as they've gone on AMC, and we

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you all have to, you know, give it

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a spot, a special spot in in the portfolio and

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in the e t F. Well, what happens if it's

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>a done right? AMC definitely went up and and everyone

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like geniuses for it. But but what happens if

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>it goes the other way? So a couple of things. So,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 1>so one, we have a security max weight of ten

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>percent on the rebalancing, so there's some constraint even if

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you see an outsized position in the portfolio and a

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sector sector max weight of thirty UM with buffer to

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of the limit UM turnover around those numbers, and

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>then we'll rebalance on on a monthly basis. So I

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think it would naturally wash out, uh, you know, on

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the rebalancing both the upside, and then if things underperformed

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>that we would reweight them down UM to sort of

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>manage against that. All right, John, I've got my closing

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>question for you, which is what's your favorite e t

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>F ticker that is not your own? Um. I really

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like what Kathy Wood's doing at ARC obviously. I think

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a line to the types of things that uh,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, big, big thematic trends in the marketplace. You know.

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think she's a good thinker and taking relatively concentrated

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>positions and being early on things. And UM, I like

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the brand because I think they're so transparent in the

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>way they think about uh, their investment ccs, how they're

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>doing research, and what's in the portfolio. Okay, so that's

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a vote for a r K K. Okay, there we go,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>John Gardener, thanks for joining us on trillions. Nice out

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. Guys, Thanks, thanks for listening to Trillions. Until

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple podcast Spot, Defy, and wherever else

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you like to listen to, but we'd love to hear

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Paul Junas, and you can find more

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about so Fie at Sofi. This episode of Trillions was

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>produced by Magnus and Rixon Manjessica Levy is the head

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of Conberg Podcast. Bye m