WEBVTT - Surveillance: Protectionism Will Make Us Poor, Salmond Says

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Who you put your trust in matters. Investors have put

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>their trust and independent registered investment advisors to the two

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollars. Why Learn more at find your Independent

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Advisor dot com. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you insight

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>of course, on the Bloomberg. Donald Trump's and victory triggered

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>a sell off in global bonds and emerging market assets

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>while the dollar rose. Now we're seeing some of those

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>post election moves scale back as investors assess whether they're

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>overreacting the Trump's victory. For more, we're very pleased to

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome Alex Salmon. He is the former First Minister of Scotland.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Holger's meeting. Chief economist at Barenberg also joins us.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. Let me start off with you, right,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>What does it Donald trump victory mean to you? Is

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this the end of austerity? Is this actually inequality? How

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>do you explain it? Because if you can explain it,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it means that he has a clear mandate to do

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what exactly. Well, I don't think Hamdy knowes. I mean, obviously,

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the campaign rhetoric employed by the Donald is very frightening

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to lots of people, to Mexican, to Muslims, perhaps to

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>gaze to minorities, and you see some of that reaction.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not just disappointment, there's fear in that reaction. And

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>more international terms, then, I think it's a balance between

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>an expansionally domestic policy in the economy, but also the

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>threat of protectionism, which an international affairs and trade. Now,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean the few things which are absolutely hastan laws

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and economics, but one of them is protectionism makes everybody poorer.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The less international trade you have, the less freedom of

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>trade you have, the more the more poor people. Yet

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>this is where the world is going. Well, there's a

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of protections forces. I mean, it's it's one of

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the natural populist instincts, and it's usually the job of

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>politicians to resist that populist instinct for the greater good.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>But so you've got the balance between an expansionary policy

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to restore the broken infrastructure of the of the United

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>States in the one hand, but the looming threat of protectionism,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>which certainly will absolutely make everybody poorer, including the dispossessed,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the disappointed of the United States who Donald Trump was

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>meant to be appealing to. Now it's helped me here

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with my observation that London has barely been affected by Brexit.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>How is brexit the initial days here, the initial weeks,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>How has it affected Scotland. Well that there hasn't been

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic effect, but of course know that's one in London.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's about like jumping off the post Office talent

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and halfway down saying well, we're all right so far

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at the ground jet. There hasn't been a Brexit in Scotland.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It would be jumping off the scott Monument in Edinburgh,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>being halfway down and saying we're all right so far.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know. I mean. The difficulty I think

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's looming in the economy is there's a growing realization

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>that the UK government doesn't know either, and the indicatetion

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>no clear strategy will affect real economic and fancy. That

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>sets us up for our next segment on Brexit. But

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>really today to me is almost currency dynamics. Yeah, it's

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>currency dynamics. It's also again to access point you know

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about protectionism. If you're in Europe and whole ground, I

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>know you've held the view the German jew for for

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>quite some time. Right an angler miracle has been the

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>beacon of stability for eleven years. How does she fight

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this current wave of populism which brings a lot of

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>things with it. How we cope with immigration, how we

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>cope with trade deals, how we cope with open borders.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, life fully agree with what we just heard.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Protectionism is the real risk here. So far, policymakers around

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Western world have held the line we have not

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>had an increase in protectionism yet, but now with the

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Brexit move vote and Donald Trump, there is a risk

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of protectionism writhing. The German position is very clear. Germany

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>did the hard labor market reforms ten twelve years ago.

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>As a result, it has record employment, It has a

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>strong domestic situation, and as a result, populists in Germany

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are at around fifteen fourteen percent. They are not close

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to anywhere where they are in the UK or the US,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but very I mean very you know, clearly, we spoke

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of the Trump advisors David now Pass, Mr.

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Navarro and Peter Navarro was very clear he believes that

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>any country with a surplus, and he mentioned Germany, he

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>talked about China, any country with a surplus is cheating

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>America in trade deals. That is just wrong. Economics period,

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>simply wrong. Any sort of second year student of economics

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>or first year student of economics food, No, that is wrong.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the German date of what you

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>see is dependents are rising four percent, government spending is

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>rising four percent year over, Your private consumption is fairly strong.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You cannot simply accuse the Germans of underspending. Alright, we

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>have Sirry Alex, And it was some time of Alex

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>pulled that thought because we're just getting the former French

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>finance minster, Emmanuel mccoon, who has just said he's running

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for president. I was seeing life pictures from Bob Tom.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is north of Paris. I think it's about forty

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>five minutes from Paris. We had covered him extensively. When

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about reforms again, remember there's a presidential election. Um,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm losing my voice town, but there's a presidential election

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in France next year. The markets need to decide whether

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they believe the polls. There is certainly someone from the

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>far right is Mahin Lupin, who is much more palatable

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>than her father ever was. But with anti Europe stands,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>antimmigration stands. Macon is not from that camp. He's very young,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>he's about thirty nine. He answer, it's a crowded field

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of where mccorn wants to be. Right, he's a socialist.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at the left of talk field.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's rip up the script right now. We see this

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>this important moment for France. Alex Samon, you've seen this

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>before and it's almost a new populism. Did Mr Trump

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and frankly other elections, did they change the traditional calculus

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of voting across Europe. Well, I think it'd be be

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>very adventurous after Brexit and after Trump to state that

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Marie La Penn is not going to have a chance

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of winning the Fence presidential election. However, you would say

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that the electoral system in France can of mitigates against

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it because they have a knockout system which goes to runoff.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And I was you couldn't, for example, when a presidential

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>election of France without winning the popular vote like Mr

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump did. I could also say that, you know, scott

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was quite interesting here that Scotland is a country where

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the insubject party, the SMP, the one who's become dominant.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It's actually very progressive party in both in towns of

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>international trade but in terms of domestic politics. So it's

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>not a given that parties which are against the establishment

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be protectionists in terms of attitude the world

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or for that matter, device you had your referendum, settled

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it well last year. Yeah, I mean looks since it

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was two years ago. But since then the SMP has

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>won fifty six out of fifty nine Westminster seats in

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the elections, and the SMP have

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>been domestical. Yeah. I just like to emphasize one point.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>If we look at France, we find that among the

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>most popular politicians in that country on the center right

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>up reformer for your reformer on the center left, Macon

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Vales an economic reformer. So while there's a lot of

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about lupendent, there is a tail risk. The really

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing in France is reformers are reformed. Do you

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>mean a more Anglo Saxon model, I mean a more

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Merker reforms and stability. Can I can I steal

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the phrase you can tell with royalty, so you have

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay a premium to Holger every time you use it.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we're also seeing life pictures of Mahin Lupin,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>who's actually rebranding her movement and doesn't want to be

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>called Mahein Lupin anymore. She wants to be called Mahein

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem Holgar and then I'll ask Alex the same thing.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>She's opening her headquarters in Paris. Their tom is that

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>all has been around forever, right, He's been in politics

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for what sixty years, and so if you see a

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>wave of people wanting something new, then he's a favorite currently.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But he may not be the right person. Well, actually

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he would be because he when he was Prime minister,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>he was the one who actually instituted reformed and then

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it was his president she Raq who did not back

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>him up against street protests. But so risk the record

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is that he actually wants to perceivee it, wants to

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>do reformed and if president he would That's a reasonable point.

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But remember and it's the supports that in France, by definition,

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you come up against the strongest candidate because of the

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>knockout system, Lepine will face the strongest alternative candidate argument

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't up and then the United States, right. I mean,

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of two thousand and two. I was

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>covering the French elections. Then Tom and her father Jean

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>marche Lupin you know, came out of nowhere to that

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>second round of the presidential elections. Always driving the conversation

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in international relations with that question. The gentleman who invented

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it out of the Washington consensus, Joseph and I of

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>course at the Harvard Kennedy School. His power and interdependence

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is the iconic text, professor, and I wonderful to have

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you with us. How do you define Trump foreign policy? Well, Tom,

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it's early. We don't know based on the campaign which

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of the contradictory statements is going to be operational. But

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say on security policy he's more likely to

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>day on course. On trade policy, I think you can

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>have radical changes the end of TPP and t tipped

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and stuff forth. So a mixed bag and still unconnectable.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>The backdrop from your wonderful monograph of a year ago,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>your smaller size book, which is which I claimed was

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a must read, and your reaffirmation and project syndicate the

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>other day is on your optimism on the nation. Let's

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the quote I called my morning must read

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for this morning, This from Professor uh Ni and it's

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>real simple. We oscillate between triumphalism and declinism. The US

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is not in decline. Finally, Professor and I goes on

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, there is Russia a country in decline. Mr

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump is correct to avoid the complete isolation of Russia,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with which we have overlapping interests. No one would could

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>gain from a Cold war, Professor and I. How should

0:10:53.840 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump uh discuss, act and behave with Mr Putin? Well,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got a double task. One is, he doesn't want

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to undercut the sanctions which tell Putin that you can't

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>steal yourr neighbor's territory by force, as he did with Ukraine.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, we do have business to do

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Russians, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, the Arctic. There

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>are lots of things where we and and of course

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Syria in the Middle East, lots of things where we

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have to do business. So he's got to have a

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>business like relationship, which is of course what he prides

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>himself in, but at the same time not not let

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>pouting off the hook in regard to his aggression against Ukraine. Professor,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I love what you wrote. Forget soft power, the US

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>risks losing hard power, right, I mean, if they're retrenching,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>if they're becoming much more inward looking. You could also

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>see the Chinese uh, you know, forcing the rest of

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the world to adopt the reminbi as a reserve and

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>s do you think there's a real possibility that four

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>years from now the US loses real power. I doubt

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to see that rendom b is the

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency. You have to have deep and flexible capital

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>markets and a real rule of law before a currency

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>becomes a dominant reserve currency. China is a long way

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>from that, uh. And in terms of hard military power,

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump has said that he is going to invest in

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that area. So I think we're actually likely to lose

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more in the terms of soft power people who want

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to follow our values because of the rhetoric we're using.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>A right, doubt, we're going to lose a lot in

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>hard power, either economic or military capability. Right, Professor, what

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are your values are the values under this presidency going

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the same as they were ten years ago.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I I believe in democracy. I believe in tallers towards

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>people as certain openness, and those are issues which have

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>been questioned in UH in the campaign. I hope that

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that the President elect is going to reaffirm them, as

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>many people have urged him to do. Professor, Now you

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have a chapter in your classic book Coping with Interdependence.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Help us here with President Trump and how he needs

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to cope with a new Westphalian world, how he needs

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to quote, UH, cope with his Fred Zacharias says, a

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>hub and spoke system, there's a new calculus here. How

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>does a president cope with that? Well? Well, UH, for

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy years since Harry Truman's day, the United States is

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not a system of alliances which has provided stability and security.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And every market requires a political framework of security for

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>itself for it to flourish. And if Trump undercuts those

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>alliances is then you're going to see the spillover into

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the UH prospects for markets and growth. I think if

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at his initial statements since the last week's election, UH,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he's tended to be reaffirming on those alliances. He complains

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about NATO not paying enough for its own defense, but

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>so did previous presidents, and he has at least so

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>far authorized the view that we will defend the NATO partners.

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>This is what we love about Bloomberg surveillance. Joseph and

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I with us UH and also joining US today Jim O'Neill,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, with his service to Goldman Saxon, then to

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom. Mr O'Neil, you're here, professor and I

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about interdependence and the new calculus. Help you

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>here with how the United Kingdom fits into a new

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump foreign policy. So Higil Farage, I believe is stepping

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in on this debate. It's great to be on the

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>same UH session as A as somebody like Jokes had

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of trusting him about the big world in

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the PASTA. I find the line thinking that this is

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just the whole chump development is a further step on

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the path to an increasingly complex world and a couple

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of other things that for the UK, and I think

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the Chancellor articulated reasonably well that we just

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>had the so called economic con functional dialogue with China

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and He was pretty clear because he was quiz directly

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about that. As the you know, the number one finance

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>guy in this country, we have to We're a very small,

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>open country and especially post Brexit, we have to have

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>as good relationships with the US as we can, but

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to be probably even more on the front

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>foot with some of these newer guys like China. Is

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>an agel forage help with that conversation or is he

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>an abstraction? You know that that is something for the

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tactics of the policy makers to focus on what it

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what is really important for the underlying and long term

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>health of the UK. We need to be on the

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>front foot with the likes of a China, despite some

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of the obvious challenges that creates, because we we need

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to be in the center of global trade flows more

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>than we have successfully been in the past, and we

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have to remain in the sense of global capital flows

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and whilst that raises some challenges for us, as we

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>saw in things, I was involved in the policy. We

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>were one of the earliest participants in the Asian Infrastructure Bank.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I was there for the signing. We have to do

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like no other It doesn'ntagonizing or playing tough guy with

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>China work. Listen, I'll go back to what I said

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about the dollar. I remember all this stuff in the

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>early eighties about beating up on Japan, and you know

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it never really happened. Who you put your trust in matters.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Investors have put their trust in independent registered investment advisors

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of four trillion dollars. Why they see

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>their rules to serve, not sell, That's right. Charles Schwab

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is committed to the success over seven thousand independent financial

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>advisors who passionately dedicate themselves to helping people achieve their

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>financial goals. Learn more and find your independent advisor dot com.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me bring in now, Charles wide Plots, Professor of

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>International Economics the Graduate Institute of International Development Studies in Geneva,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on a day when President Obama is speaking about democracy

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>in Athens, preparing to head to Germany after that to

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>meet with the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel. Let's start

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in France. We're reaching you in France today, Professor white Plots.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Macrons declaring his candidacy in France this morning. What

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>does that say to you about what's going on in France? Indeed,

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in Europe him declaring his candidacy. Well,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>generally in Europe, as you know, there is also a

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump like phenomenon happening. All sorts of strange populist are

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>climbing in public opinion polls. Next month we have a

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>referendum in Italy that can turn ugly, and then next

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>year we have an acceence in France. So there's plenty

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. Cho's why plots. It's wonderful to speak

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to you today. We sparked with Paul Degar yesterday, and

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so much of this is about clearing the markets and

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>how your Europe is behind. What is the urgency of

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Europe clearing their markets to move forward to get to

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>us like growth. Well, the problem with Europe is that

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a large number of countries and everyone as its

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>share of trouble. So today President Obama is in Greece,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a very very troubled country. Interestingly, he's been

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>calling for that restructuring public that restructuring in Greece is

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right, but the others don't want. And his next

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>trip to Germany he might raise the issue with Chancellor Miracle.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 1>He will be told no way so that's one issue.

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you think about my own country, friends,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is pretty much in a mess. The

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>government is huge, uh and has been running a deficits

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen seventies three. Uh. So the list of things

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that have to be done in every country is pretty

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>well known. What's missing is the politician's readiness to do that.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>And I think when they watch what's happening in the US,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they are even less willing to tackle any of the

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>real issues. How are they hearing what President Obama has

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to say on this trip and light of what happened

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>here in the US last week, how is his message

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>being interpreted? Do you think, well, it's a goodbye message.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>People in Europe like the Obama way more and the Americans,

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, And they are sad to see him go,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and they are sad to see him being replaced by Trump. Uh.

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>They are very worried about that, by the way. Uh.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, when he goes and makes a

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>great species about democracy and all of that, that's viewtiful.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>But everybody knows that. Everybody knows that democracy is are

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>very complex things to make work. And at the time

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>when the population in Europe pretty much like in the US,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>A significant segment of the population is really upset about

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what has been there a lot for the last twenty

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or thirty years. It's very, very, very hard to think

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>about good outcomes. Charles White plots with us, of course

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>he is. He's joining his by phone from from France.

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have you with us again here. Let's

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about productivity. We're focused here on

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing in the US. When you look at it more broadly,

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the state manufacturing globally, what do

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you see. Well, we we had a major slowdown in

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>productivity for the last twenty years. Uh. One reason is

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that industries shrinking and services are increasing, and services are

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>typically low productivity gains or zero productivity gains. So this

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>shifting production in production pattern through the developed world these

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is a major source of low productivity gains. Is it

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>because there's too much money slashing around? Is it just

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we're paying the price of capital deepening of just over investment.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there has been over investment quite to

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the country. Since the crisis in two thousand and eight,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>investment has been extremely low, extremely depressed. Had many discussions

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about why. I tend to believe that the poor over

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>old growth pattern in the developed country as discouraged firms

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>from from investing, and that's weighing on productivity gains. You

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you're right when you when you look at the complement

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of what the e c B is considering when it

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>meets at the beginning of December, how heavily does productivity

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>way When they're looking at the data, I don't think

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>they are very worried about that. They maybe they shoot,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>but I think they are. They are very worried that

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation is stuck uh, not far from zero and has

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>been there for the last three years. Uh. And therefore

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and they want to keep growth, but that's not happening easily.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It chose White Plots and with a shout out to

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>John the Sylvia of of Wells Fargo with your work,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Professor white Plots on labor mobility. As we have economic slowdown, disinflation,

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we become rigid as a society. How critical is that idea,

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that dream of moving to a new place, How does

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that fold into European and for that better US economics. Well, uh,

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we we have in most European countries very rigid markets.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So It's not only that people don't move from one

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>country to another, they don't even move within their own countries,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>or they move much less than the US worker is

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>used to to move. So that's that's been that's been

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>known for for decades before we stopped the monetary union. UH,

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>And it was clear that this was one of the

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks of having a common currency. UM. But to me,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not the most important issue. To me, the

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>most important issue is that many in many countries, labor

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>markets are frozen. It's hard to fire people, so firms

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>don't hire. Uh. They are in some countries minimum wages

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>are very high, so they are discouraging employment of the

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>non qualified workers. UH. Dismissals are very difficult, very costly,

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and legally uncertain, and so and so forth. So we

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the problem really is at the national level that this

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>labor markets just not function and and we generate their

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>machinery to create an employment. I don't know if you

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>thought about this, but if we get Trump inflation, if

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we get some forms stimulus and reflation within the United States,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>do we just presume economic growth that raises wages? Is

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>there the real riskier stag wage inflation where we've got

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation with no real rage increase. Well as you know that.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The mystery is why inflation wage inflation is not higher

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the US, given that the unemployment rate is very low.

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The continuous debates about why it is the case. I

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>think the silver lining of Trump is that if he

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>does it, he might UH in pomp up government spending

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure, increase the deficit. That would be good news

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for the world over because it would mean more growth

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US, return of inflation in the US. We

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>all need to see some inflation from the zero levels

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we have had, so that there is a little bit

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of silver lining out there, depending on what the next

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>president will do or not to. Let's we talk about

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a pause here in the US among policymakers as they

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>wait to see what kind of infrastructure package a president

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>elect Donald Trump will be able to get through the

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress and how that might affect monetary policy. How do

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you how do you see that playing out in Europe

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a similar short of wait and see approach. Yeah, everybody

0:25:55.200 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>is UH is mesmerized by the political situation Asian in

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, A great number of economies at least had

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>been calling for the US to pump up public investment

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure, but as we know, Obama had exactly zero

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>chance of passing that through Congress. I am not sure

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that Trump will be able to do much better with

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>his Congress, but I certainly wish him good luck. You

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this a moment ago, our colleague Tracy Alloway, tweeting

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>out a timetable from JP Morgan here of what electoral

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>events we will have here in two thousand seventeen in Europe,

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>branching from primaries and France to the Italian referendum, to

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>an Austrian presidential election, a German presidential election, in general

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>elections in the Netherlands. It's a busy year two thousand seventeen.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>What does Europe look like after that year is done?

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, that's a scary question. It's likely that the

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Australians real elect Natzi president. That wouldn't be the first time.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>They already did it fifteen or twenty years ago. Uh So,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing. In the Netherlands there is a very

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>virulent far right, reasonably racist party which is going up

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and up and up in a in a Germany. Well,

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe miracle will still be the miracles. Chancellor. She has

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>been and win it. Uh and in Germany as in France,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as you may know, there is a serious challenge from

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the far right Marian Lepin. I personally don't believe she

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>has any chance, but I also believed from had zero chance,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>so I wouldn't bet on it. Yeah, well, yeah, you

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of company in that. Thank you so

0:27:53.760 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>much with the Graduate Institute, Geneva. David our next guest,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and thrilled these on because we we have not been

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>good about commodities. We are in the surveillance commodity time

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>out share amid the blur that you described, Tom, we

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have not talked enough about oil and other commodities. As

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you say, I'm pleased to bring in Dane Davis now

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>he's a commodities analyst at Barclays. Is I look at

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>oil here? Brent sven W T forty dang. Great to

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have you with us, glad to be here. Let's start

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with with the big question here. We we've seen what's

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>happened in the equities market since Donald Trump was elected.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>What have we seen in the commodity space broadly? What

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of moves have we seen? Well, to put it

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>quite shortly, Donald Trump through his election has made medals

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>great again. Uh. And I'm being cheeky here, but tom

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It says that, yeah. No, but what we've seen is

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a massive rally across the entire complex and medals um

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it's wide ranging. It's not just iron

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>or it's steel, it's copper, it's sinc and the like.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Now this rally has started appear out recently, but since

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It's election, there's just been a massive increase in the

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>metals complex. Looking at the timing here, what do you

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of it? How how closely can

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you tie these two things together? Obviously investors placing a

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>big bet here on the fact that Donald Trump has

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>said he wants to get an infrastructure built through through

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress that could have an effect on metals prices. Uh,

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>do you draw the correlation that closely? Well? I think

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to commodities, you have to be careful

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of disentangling causal relationships, right. I think it's very easy

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for me to come on here and say, yep, Donald Trump,

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's all him. But in actuality, I think a closer

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the data and the price movement shows that

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the prices for the metals complex in particular, they were

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>rallying before the election of Donald Trump. Now that tells me,

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>given that very few people thought he was able to win,

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not a Donald Trump thing. What I think is

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>going on here is I think that this is a

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>China story. Uh so, the Chinese economy has actually coming

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>quite strongly in twenty sixteen. I think that's leading to

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a rallying commodities. Dane. I've got a copper chart which

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>shows a rally and really it's through two thousand sixteen

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>range bounded and up we go with the recent news.

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's great, I'll put out the copper chart folks

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter under be surveillance. But is it a breakout

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of what is a five year old bear market? I

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>don't see it technically, is it? We don't know yet.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Coppers are really interesting in the you identified something. I

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's quite important. The other medals were rallying earlier

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>into this year, yet copper was lagging. And if you

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>believe the doctor Copper thesis, whereas copper is the best

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>tracker for the macro economy, that tells you something. That

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>tells you that we had a global economy that was

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>still stuck in mediocre growth, and we had a Chinese

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>economy that was returning to growth and it was growing,

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but yet the market wasn't really certain about it. I

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>think as we go forward, I would say fall the

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>copper price among all of the medals, because that's going

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what's going on. The Chinese property mark.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It has been reheated. That is what's triggered the iron

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ore rise. It triggered the steel rise, and now it's

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to trigger the other medals to increase. If that

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>property market, though, shows signs of slowing down, we could

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be back where we were at the beginning of this year. Uh.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a rally built on very tenuous grounds. Agreed.

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I strongly agree with that. And I just you know,

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to frame through the Barclays lens and

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>all the different people you've got telling you what to do,

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you are not calling this a commodity breakout. I want

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to be clear on that. Yeah, I think that's absolutely clear.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's still a lot that we haven't

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>yet determined. I think the property market within China, I

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's number one. Number two returning to Trump is

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of hype about his infrastructure plans.

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't yet know what those infrastructure plans will be. Moreover,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the market is focusing I think on the good things

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about the Trump's plan, but less on the bad things

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are the less desirable things. For example, if Trump threatends

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the global trade order, that's going to have knock on

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>effects in the world's largest market for metals consumption, China.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can imagine a trade war would have

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>terrible effects onto the Chinese economy, could also affect other

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets such as Mexico and Brazil. So whereas we

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>might see a gain in metals consumption in the US,

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we could see a fall in other markets, and you

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>could actually have a net decline. Now that's not what

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're calling for, but that's a possibility and something to

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind as we cut through the euphoria that

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing. Dan Davis in the latest Barkley's Commodity

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to You, you describe that tension very well. I let

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom use his standard caveat here about respecting the copyright

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the gas, but check check out the note if

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can seek it out from from Barkleys. You

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.479
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that the Chinese property market, what does what does

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Chinese policy look like right now when it comes to

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>economic stimulus, great questions, So I think it's important to

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to there are very real concerns of a

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hard landing. I talked to a lot of clients that

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were concerned that the Chinese ECON would actually go negative.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We were in a very different environment. Automobile production was

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>down in the first nine months of the year. The

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.719
<v Speaker 1>real estate market was showing severe signs of weakness. Than

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what the Chinese did in the very beginning this year

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is uh. They played a song with the familiar tune.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>They essentially loosen up their credit bubble. Uh. They loosen

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>up credit standards, loaning standards, and they allowed people to

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>invest and buy homes. Now, this had the very positive

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>effect in the short term of twenty sixteen of boosting

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>construction UM. But as we start to look into the foreword,

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a real question here of how many times can

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you stimulate your way to growth, how many times can

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you reheat the property market. I think it's likely that

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it cools as we go into seventeen and eighteen and moreover,

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's the very hard limit of demography.

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Chinese population is aging, a lot of

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the growth is already behind it in terms of its

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>population bubble, So that puts another heartlement on the property market.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm looking at trade figures here, trade figures for October,

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese trade figures, and they look disappointing to me. How

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>much of a red flag is that for you? I

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think you need more than one data point to make

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a trend. Uh. The weakness in October, I think it

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>is concerning, but it's not yet concerning enough, and it's

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not yet confirmed by more trade data points to be

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a worrying trend. But I think it is something that

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>goes back to my key thesis here is let's hold up.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen this massive rally and copper going

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>from two o eight to two fifty. Uh, let's just

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>recheck fundamentals, look at what the data is actually telling

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>us and not what you know, we might think may

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future. Help me with the esoterics. You know,

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I've spent too much money in London? Can I make

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>it back in Zinc? I mean, we don't talk enough

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on this show, David Grafinitely there's a reason for that,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think that's that is a very esoteric question,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>and here would be my answer to you. I think

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're are a new air of commodities, and so

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>when you look at something like copper or zinc or nickel,

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>or that it's no longer the rising China lifts all boats.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that the price outlook for various commodities inc

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>concluded copper included iron ore will be increasingly determined by

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>supply fundamentals. UH. Look for those markets which have very

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>tight supply fundamentals, which are facing problems and getting production

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>into into the market, which are facing the threat of

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>resource nationalism. Those commodities, I think are going to be

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>your best chance going forward. The other commodities though that

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have new supply coming online in fifteen sixteen, new supply

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>coming online in the future, iron ore, I think it's

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a good example of this. I think those commodities are

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the most pressure as we move forward. I want to

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>get to oil here in just a minute, but maybe

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>one more more question here about about metals. What are

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we seeing in terms of disruption when it comes to

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>demand for copper. I know that there were strikes Indonesia

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and and labor disputes improve these things having effect on

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the price of copper where they pretty at the margins.

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they do have a psychological effect on the

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 1>price of copper. So you're right, we've been having it's

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>been a quiet ear so far. But then in this

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>third quarter, going into the fourth quarter of the disruption

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>started to suddenly tick up. There were storms in Australia

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that knocked out several copper mines. There were labor disputes

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in Indonesia at the Grassburg mine. Uh, there's been issues

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Philippines and there they have a very new

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory climate. So there's been more disruptions to production and

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>copper and other metals. But I think that doesn't really

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily affect the balances today. I think that does, though,

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>give you a psychological argument for higher prices. Whether or

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not it actually is impacted the true balances, it's hard

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to determine, but I think it does give you know,

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a market boost. Dane Davis with his fundamentals and the

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>medals and the courses work with Michael Cohen and others

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at Barclays on oil as well. Dane Davis with us

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with Barclays, and you know, we're lucky folks, and that

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Dane Davis. Well, he like deals in the land of rebar, copper, palladium.

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Down the hall is Michael Cohen or in Russell, Mr

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mahesh they look at oil. Help us here, Dane.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>And this is within the microeconomics and commodities. I mean,

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like aluminium is aluminum and it's totally different. There's fewer

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>bearers to entry, et cetera than copper. What's your interpretation

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of oil microeconomics right now? Is it a whole new

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>terrain because of US fracking where the rules of guys

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like you use are forever changed. Well, I think the

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>way to address this is to look at the supply

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>side and let's do some comparisons here. Let's talk about oil,

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and let's talk about natural gas and copper. For copper,

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really had any revolutions in the production of

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>copper mining since the nineteen eighties. Uh in the nine

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>eighties they create a new process using various as. It's

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>where they could extract copper from deposits that were previously

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>on an economical But since then, really, if you want

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to get copper today, it's the same way you got

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>copper ten years ago, twenty years ago, thirty years ago.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>You dig a massive pit in the ground and you

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you just mine it out. Now, when we talk about

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>natural gas or if we talk about oil, we've seen

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>massive revolutions on the supply side for both of those commodities.

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And so when I think when you look at prices

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>today and you look at trying to understand price action,

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to understand we're in a new

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>world with say natural gas production. You know, I'm from Ohio,

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Northeast Ohio, and I've witnessed firsthand the the revolution that

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen thanks to shale gas technologies and the transformation

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Ohio and Pennsylvania economies. I thought you were

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna say the Cleveland Indians. No, no, no. You know,

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>my father's actually a Yankees fans, so I uh no, No,

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we're Yankees fans in the David's household. So he needs

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>he needs to protect he does, he does. No. But

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but in oil it's the same thing too. I mean,

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to two thousand and seven and

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, there were the concerns of peak oil,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and that which was once a fringe theory, was seriously

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>being discussed in the mainstream. And then we've had the

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>tight oil in the US revolutionized the market. So when

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we look at the microeconomics of commodities, whether it's oil,

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>natural gas, copper, or some of the metals, it's important

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind, how are these commodities brought to

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the market and have there been any technological innovations and

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>bringing those commodities to the market. Dan Davis, I'm looking

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>at Brent your forty two a barrel. Let's look at

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that through the prism of this meeting taking place in

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Vienna at the end of the month. Is optimism based

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>into that price or pessimism? Well, I you know, I

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>think when it comes to OPEC, I think the key

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>thing here is that you have to separate rhetoric from reality.

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's two questions here, one whether or

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not OPE comes to an agreement, and then the second

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>question is are they actually able to carry through any

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>agreements that they reach? Right, So, we are in a

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>new world. Going back to what I just said with

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>regards to oil supply, It's no longer the situation that

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we found ourselves uh in the nineteen seventies or nineteen eighties.

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>There's new ways to get oil to the market. And

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there's new areas where we get oil to the market.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>And so when you have an economics going back to microeconomics,

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>when you have an organization of cartel which consoles supply,

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they already have a difficult time and you know, rashing

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>supply among the different producers, they're strong incentives to cheat.

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you have a market, when that cartel has

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a declining share of overall input, the incentive has become

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that much more stronger. So I think the real question is,

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and not not to avoid your question, is are they

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>able to enforce any agreements that they come to. Didn

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>One last question on a revisit of the arch call,

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>which is the China commodity boom, the boom of the

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>last x number of years. Are we back on the

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>track of what has been well over a half century

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of just general commodity deflation due to technological progress and

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>due to improve processes worldwide. Are we back to the normal? Well,

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sound like an economist here and give it

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>classic economist answer. It depends, It depends. It depends on

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the commodity. Uh. Look, I think for something like UH

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>copper or zinc or that where the supply side is constrained.

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that you you you might not see strong deflation,

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 1>but for other commodities where we've seen technological revolutions, you might.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think to the demand outlook for commodities are

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>very different. If you take aluminium copper. I was just

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in London for Luman Week. The outlook for aluminium is

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>very very bright. Uh, there's this substitution effect that you

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>were using aluminium and vehicles were using aluminum, and our

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>iPhones and our you know, our laptops in the like.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>So the demand growth there looks to be pretty strong. Copper, surprisingly,

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>despite being the macro metal, the demand outlook isn't that great.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It's you're looking at one point five to two percent

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>growth annually per year. So it all depends on, you know,

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the particulars of each commodity. I think that's the message.

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Look at each commodity on its own, don't view it

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>as an asset. Classic Dane Davis thinking so much with Barclays.

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm out on Twitter at Tom

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Keene David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast,

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Who

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you put your trust in matters? Investors have put their

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>trust and independent registered investor and advisors to the two

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and four trillion dollars. Why Learn more at find your

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Independent Advisor dot com