WEBVTT - Chip War Author on Global Fight for Tech Supremacy

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Semiconductors are at the heart of America's geopolitical rivalry with China.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>They're vital to products we use every day, including smartphones

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and computers, and for advanced technologies like AI, electric vehicles

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and defense systems. China's made in twenty twenty five policy

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago called for aggressive manufacturing and self sufficiency

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>in this space.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>That's been worrying Washington ever since, with both the Biden

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and Trump administrations adding tougher rules like cutting access to

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>American technology and certain semiconductors, and it's been met with

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>limited success. Chinese firms are still finding ways of getting

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>the hands on US and Taiwanese advanced semiconductors, and the

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Chinese government continues to double down on its own industry.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So where are we in a great chip war? Who's winning?

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>If anyone? Could we see more thawing in the relationship

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as China and the US try to negotiate a trade deal,

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and how can regions like Taiwan, South Korea and Japan

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit from this rivalry. You're listening to Asia Centric from

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm Katydmitreva in Hong Kong.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm John Lee also in Hong Kong.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And today we have Chris Miller, who wrote the book

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>on Justice. He's a professor at Toft University and the

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>author of Chip War, The Fight for the World's Most

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Critical Technology, often seen as required reading for understanding this space.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>He joins us in Boston. Thank you for joining us, Chris,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Chris in your own words, why are semiconductors so important

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>to the great powers?

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think there are two reasons why. The first

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 3>is that chips are just important for the global economy

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 3>writ large. If you look at the world's biggest companies

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>by market capitalization, they're all either designers of chips, producers

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>of chips, or companies that really couldn't function without chips.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Look at global trade.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>The largest single flow in all of global trade is

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the flow of chips into China each year, from Taiwan,

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 3>from Korea, from Southeast Asia. And so you can't understand

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>modern economies without chips. That's one reason. The second is

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 3>that when you look forward towards the application of artificial

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 3>intelligence to every aspect of the economy, what you find

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>here too, chips are central the advances that we've seen

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 3>in AI over the past couple of years have been

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 3>driven by better and better semiconductors, which are both used

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 3>to train these ultra capable AI systems but also in

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>deploying them at scale. And so, just like all of

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>the world's governments, tech CEOs too are betting that if

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>you want to be able to build and deploy the

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 3>best AI systems, you've got to be able to access

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to large numbers of high quality AI chips. And so

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>these two factors, the macroeconomic centrality and the importance to AI,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 3>have put chips not just on the radar screens of

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley leaders, but also of the world's top political officials.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And just sort of a historical point for those who

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't read the book yet, when did this all begin?

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>In terms of this importance of chips, Well.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 3>In some ways it dates back to the origins of

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the chip industry. The first ships were invented in the

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>late nineteen fifties. The aim was to miniatureize computing powers.

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>You could fit a computer in the nose cone of

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a missile and guide it more accurately towards its target,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>and this was critical for the Cold War competition between

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>the United States and the Soviet Union. But it really

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of kicked up a notch about ten years ago

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>when the United States was the dominant player in the

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>chip supply chain, not the dominant manufacturer of chips, but

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the dominant producer of many of the key inputs into chips,

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>the ip the design know how, many of the key tools,

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>and China realized that it's economy was becoming more and

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>more dependent on ships that at the time it was

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 3>almost completely an importer of. It produce many at all

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>domestically in the chips that it did produce were all

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>low end, and so in twenty fourteen, China launched a

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 3>major industrial policy effort trying to develop more self sufficiency

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>in semiconductors. It set up a very large central government

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 3>investment fund, and each of the provinces set up their

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 3>own investment funds to try to build a self sufficient industry.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 3>And this was seen not just by the US but

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>also by other key players Taiwan, Korea, Japan is a

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>economic and potentially down the road, a security threat.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 2>And where is China now in its aims to become

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 2>self sufficient? How would you grade the efforts so far?

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, the chip industry is large and complex, and you

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>get a different answer depending on which corner of the

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 3>hip industry.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>You look at. So there's different types of chips.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 3>There's processor chips, there's memory ships, and there's also different

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>segments of the supply chain, the design process, the manufacturing itself,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the production of the tool rules that are used to

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>make chips, and you need to kind of look at

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>each of these segments individually to really understand how China

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>stacks up against other competitors. At a high level, I

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>would say this, On the one hand, China's import of

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 3>chips from the rest of the world, which means largely

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>from Taiwan and Korea and their assembly facilities in Southeast Asia,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 3>generally hits a new high each year it's grown for

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>most of the last decades. China is importing larger numbers

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>at least larger dollar values, of chips from abroad. But

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>China is also producing more at home as well, and

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>so when it comes to lower range and mid range ships,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>China's building a lot of self sufficiency in the types

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>of ships that go into cars and to refrigerators and

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 3>industrial equipment, but the high end ships are getting even

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>more important. Both the chips that go in phones and PCs,

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>but also critically the processors and the memory ships that

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>make AI possible in data centers, and for these cutting

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 3>edge ships, China is still mostly importing the chips that

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>its tech firms need to deploy advanced computing at scale.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>So how far behind is China behind global leaders in

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>terms of being self sufficient?

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, it really depends again on what exactly one wants

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to measure. If you ask how far behind is China

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to designing smartphone processors, I would say

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>it's hardly behind at all. The smartphone processors that Huawei's

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 3>high silicon arm designed are by a lot of metrics,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 3>almost as good or just as good as what Apple

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 3>or Qualcom would design, And for every different category of

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>chip you get a different rough metric. But there's a

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 3>couple places where China remains meaningfully behind, and it's been

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 3>struggling to replicate the capabilities of industry leaders. And I'll

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>flag two of them which are the most critical. The

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 3>first is in the production of the machines that make chips.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 3>If you go inside a chip making facility in China today,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 3>to the complex machines, especially at the high end, are

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 3>imported imported from Japan, from the Netherlands and from US firms,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 3>and China has been trying to build out its own

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>suite of machines that can make chips. But this is

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>extraordinarily complex equipment, and it's been struggling to make a

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of progress in replacing foreign chip making tools with

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>domestic variants. And because of that, China's also struggled to

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>ramp up cutting edge capacity to manufacture chips itself. And

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>so you can look, for example, at the leading Chinese firm, SMIC,

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>which is a chip maker, and compare it to the

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>leading Taiwanese firm, which is the world's leader, t SMC,

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>and they have similar manufacturing trajectories. And so you can

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>look at what SMIC does this year and look at

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>what TSMC did several years ago and measure the gap

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 3>between them as a way of assessing where China stacks up.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>And here you find that SMICK right now in Shanghai

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>has got a seven nanimeter process that it has just

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 3>ramped at scale. It's producing ai chips, producing smartphone processors.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>But TSMC and Taiwan did that six years ago. So

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 3>there's a five or six year gap between what Smith

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>can produce at scale and what TSMC can produce a scale.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>So those are two segments where it's clear there is

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>still a significant gap between China's capabilities and the leading

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Taiwanese US Japanese firms. But those are only two ways

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you could measure the gap. And in other segments, especially design,

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 3>China's got very impressive capabilities, and I would argue it

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>has been closing the gap in recent years.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a technical point, but you mentioned that China kind

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of legs behind in the equipment that makes chips. So

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>could you describe just a bit why these machines are

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>so complex and why China is perhaps behind in it.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Because when you think of China as a manufacturer, I

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>mean the world's factory floor, it's really got the supply

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>chains down. So what is it about the equipment that

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not able to do now?

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>When I first myself began studying the industry, it was

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of a puzzle, why could Chiny to make everything

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 3>except for these tools? And the answer, it turns out,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>is that these are the most complex and precise tools

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 3>humans have literally ever produced. So if you take, for example,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 3>the most complicated and expensive tool called an extreme ultraviolet

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 3>photo lithography tool. These are tools produced by just a

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 3>single company in the world, ASML of the Netherlands. They

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 3>have hundreds of thousands of components, including the flattest mirrors

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 3>humans have ever made, the most powerful lasers ever deployed

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>in the commercial device, the capable of manufacturing at nanometer

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 3>scale that's billionths of a meter with close to perfect accuracy.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.599
<v Speaker 3>And that's just one of the tools you need to

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 3>make chips. There are many others that are only scarcely

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>less complex, and so when you start to look at

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>these tools, you realize that there's nothing that comes close

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>in terms of complexity and really any other industry. And

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 3>so it's not a surprise that China hasn't caught up

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 3>because most of these types of tools, there's just one

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 3>or two companies in the entire world that can undertake

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>this activity. And people have been ask why hasn't China

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 3>cut up and the production of extreme multi violet photo

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 3>lithography tools, Well, no one else has caught up either.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 3>There's just one company that can do it. Others have

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 3>tried and failed because the engineering is so complicated and

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the business model is so hard to make work, and

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 3>so it really is the fact that we're at the

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 3>frontiers of engineering the frontiers of physics that explain why

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 3>it's not easy for China to replicate this, even though

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>China's a course, very good at manufacturing many other types

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 3>of machinery.

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Asia Centric is produced by Bloomberg Intelligence. We're more than

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>five hundred experienced analysts and strategists work around the clock

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to bring you timely, world class research. Our coverage spans

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>two hundred market industries, currencies, commodities, and industries, as well

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 2>as over two thousand equities and credits. To learn more

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>about Bloomberg Intelligence, visit b I go on the blue

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the terminal. If you like what you hear, don't forget

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 2>to subscribe and chair Chris, Look, I read your book,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>But for the uninitiated who didn't read your book, can

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>you explain why like this industry lends itself to monopolies

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>like you mentioned that ASML pretty much like no one

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>else makes these you know, lithic of methography on machines,

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think you said no one else makes these

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>TSMC also manufactures over ninety percent of the advanced AI chips.

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Why is this the case? That there are monopolies formed

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 2>in the supply chain.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I think there are two factors that lend the chip

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 3>industry to these sort of oligopolistic rin monopolistic markets. The

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 3>first is the capital expenditures are often tremendous. So for TSMC,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 3>every new factory they build is the world's most expensive

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 3>factory because each factory is more expensive and breaks the

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 3>prior record. We're talking twenty or twenty five billion dollars

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>per FACI, and so this scope for a new startup

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>firm to compete is approximately zero. That has really kept

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>competition down because the number of players that could even

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 3>conceive of taking on TSMC is very small, and the

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>same dynamic is true in other segments of the supply chain.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 4>The dollar values are lower, but not much lower.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Even if it's only three billion dollars for a new

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>factory that makes the ultra purified a silicon wafers, for example,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 3>that's still a monumental capital expense for most companies, and

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 3>it deters new entrants from even trying. The second factor

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 3>is that the R and D is really extraordinarily highly specialized,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>and for a lot of the process steps and making chips,

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the only way you learn about how to undertake that

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 3>specific step is by having already been in the industry

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 3>and learning alongside your suppliers and your customers.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 4>And so, if you think of.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 3>The way the chip industry's R and D works, every year,

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the entire industry works together to bring a new process

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that's more capable than the prior years, often dramatically more

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 3>capable in terms of the computing power it produces. And

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 3>so you've got really tight alignment between the existing chemicals producers,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>existing machinery producers, existing chip manufacturers themselves to make sure

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 3>that these processes arrive on time and that all the

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 3>necessary components are together. There's a lot of shared learning

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 3>inside of that small circle. But if you're an outsider

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>who's never been part of that learning process, there's no

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 3>way to do it on your own. You can't just

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 3>test on your own very easily whether your new chemical

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>will work with a existing extreme ultraviolet photogthography machine. If

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 3>you want to buy one of those machines yourself, it

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>costs you one hundred and fifty million dollars. And moreover,

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>companies aren't going to let you run a lot of

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 3>tests in their fab because they just spend twenty billion

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 3>dollars building a fab they.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Need to run that at full capacity.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>So it's really hard to break in from an R

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 3>and D perspective, And when you combine that with the

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 3>capital intensivity, it means that many of the firms that

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>have key roles in the supply chain have had them

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>for the last decade or in some cases the last

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>three or four decades, and that has kept competition down

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 3>in the hip industry.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So you wrote your book in twenty twenty two, that

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>was under the Biden administration. We're now under the Trump

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>administration two point zero. What are the big differences you've

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>seen in how both administrations have handled this issue? Are

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there some similarities that come up, but also some of

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the big big differences, because of course under Biden we

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had the Chips IRA Act, But under both administrations it

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like a bipart is an issue.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it is, and I think that the

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 3>similarities are to me more substantial than the differences. So first,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a focus on domestic manufacturing in the United States,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 3>an effort to reduce reliance both on the lower end

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 3>ship produced in China, but also dependence on high end

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>chips produced in Taiwan the Chips Act. Although Biden claimed

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>credit for it, it actually emerged under the trumpetministration. That was

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 3>when the Congress first started discussing the bill, and people

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 3>like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo played a major role

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 3>in some of the early investments that the Taiwanese from

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 3>TSMC announced the United States. So there's been a through

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>line of support for manufacturing chips in the United States

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>that has been bipartisan.

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a point of continuity.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the second point in continuity has been a desire

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 3>to stop China from accessing the most advanced ship making technologies.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 3>The export controls on ASML tools, for example, started under

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>the first administration, were expanded under Biden, and we'll see

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 3>they could well be expanded further at some point under

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 3>the current TRUP administration. So that's also a through line.

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think the third is concern about Chinese industrial

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 3>subsidies in the chip industry and implications for trade policy.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 3>The Trumpdministration in round one imposed higher tariffs and Chinese

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 3>ships imported the United States. Biden expanded those tariffs, and

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of course President Trump right now is considering what he's

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 3>going to do.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 4>On chip tariffs.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>But there's widespread expectation that there will be another round

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>of chip tariffs coming at some point later this year,

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 3>and so that's also a through line of concern about

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Chinese subsidies. I think there are differences. Obviously, you know,

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see where exactly Trump's chip tariffs land,

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>and they might end up being much broader on a

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>whole range of different countries, not just China focused.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 4>If so, that would be a difference.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 3>But I think when you zoom out, you actually end

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>up seeing a pheromounta continuity, despite some nuances that are different.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>President Trump seems to be dialing back on some of

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the policies now. Under the previous administration, they banned the

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>export of high end in Nvidia chips into China, but

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump recently suggested that they could allow the export

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of certain Age twenty chips back into the country. What

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>does this mean, Well, I.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Think it's too soon to have a confident judgment. I

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 3>would say when the Biden administration left office, in Videau's

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>H twenty were still legal to sell China. Then in

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 3>month four of the trumpdministration, the President banned the export

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 3>of Age twenty chips, and now there's suggestions they might

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 3>be allowed again. As of today, we're still at a

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 3>tighter restrictive policy than when the Biden administration ended.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 4>When the Trump administration started.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll see exactly how this plays out, but I think

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 3>it speaks again to a continuity, which is that both

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Biden and Trump feel like they need to balance action

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>on chip issues with the broader.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 4>US China relationship.

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 3>So into the Biden administration, it was regularly the case

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 3>that the Commerce Department would have a new regulation ready

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 3>that would limit this or that aspect of the chip trade,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 3>and then it would wait for three months or six

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 3>months or nine months while the State Department found what

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 3>they thought was a quote unquote good window in which

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>to roll out a new restriction that the Chinese wouldn't like.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And cour we're seeing the trumpministration as something similar.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Right now.

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 3>The President wants to negotiate a trade deal with China.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Their White House is trying to get rare earth magnets

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 3>flowing again, and so there's concern in the White House

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 3>that if they were to take punitive steps on chips

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 3>or on chip making tools, that this would disrupt the

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 3>US China relationship. One can debate whether that's the right approach,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>but I think it is a striking similarity to a

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of the delays and the kind of half hearted

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 3>decision making that you saw in the Biden administration when

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 3>it came to whether or not to restrict certain types

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 3>of tools or chips.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>So, after the Trump administration recently allowed the export of

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>H twenty chips, very closely afterwards, China called in Nvidia

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>staff to have a discussion with them behind that is

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at least partly the Trump administration suggesting to track these chips.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is all happening within the context of a

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>trade war and trade negotiations. So one of the questions

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been thinking about is, you know, why are the

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>US and China right now fighting over what are essentially

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of third rate chips. I mean, these aren't like

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the most advanced chips out there. As John ass like,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>how should we read this kind of back and forth.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, I wouldn't say it's right to consider the H

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 3>twenties third rate chips. I think if you're a Chinese

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 3>tech company, these are first rate. These are the US

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 3>you can get at scale can you smuggle in small

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 3>volumes of the higher quality H one hundred yes. Can

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 3>you access small volumes of Huawei ASSN chips Yes? But

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 3>can you access either by the tens or hundreds of thousands, No,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>both because Huawei can't produce that efficient scale and because

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 3>smuggling you can do a medium scale, but not at

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 3>the scale you need. So you know, judging by the

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>purchasing patterns of byte Edance and Ali Baba Intense, these

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>are great chips, which is why they really want to

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 3>spend hundreds of millions or billions of.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Dollars on them.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that is why this is such

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 3>a critical issue, both for the US and for Chinese

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 3>tech firms.

0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 4>If they really were third rate, we wouldn't be talking

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>about them.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Chris like and Vidia CEO Jensen Huang was very critical

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>about the US ban on chips to China. He said

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 2>it hurts US businesses, and he also insinuated that it's

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>going to accelerate China's domestic semiconductive development. Do you agree

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 2>with him? Do you think these mergers are in some

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 2>way self defeating?

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think there's no doubt that in the short

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 3>run it reduces in video sales. That's certainly clear. So

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 3>does it hurt that business? I think the answer is yes.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>One of the dilemmas that any sort of export control

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 3>regime faces is that if you restrict the sale of

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 3>a certain tool, you hurt the tool makers, but you

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>benefit the domestic companies that use that tool, who have

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>less foreign competition. So, for example, if you restrict the

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 3>sale of chip making tools, it's bad for the companies

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 3>that make chip making tools, but it's actually better for

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 3>chip makers in the West, including in Taiwan and South Korea,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 3>because they don't have strong competition in China at the

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 3>cutting edge. And if you thought about the counterfactuals pose

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 3>the Trudministration had not leaned on the Netherlands in twenty

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 3>nineteen and said the Netherlands don't sell UV tools to China,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 3>China would be operating today a fleet of many UV tools,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>possibly the second largest behind Taiwan in the world, and

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>that'd be a totally different landscape for the world's chip makers.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>It'd be better for sellers of chip maker tools, but

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 3>worse for chip makers. And we're in a similar dynamic

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 3>right now with chips. If you sell more chips it's

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>good for chip makers, but it's probably worse for the

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>companies that use chips, which are the big tech companies,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 3>cloud computing companies.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 4>And AI labs. Why is it that.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>We haven't seen large deployments of AI chips buy Chinese

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>firms outside of China's because they can't produce enough, because

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 3>they haven't been able to access large volumes of the

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 3>high end tools that foreign firms have. And so I

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 3>think that the trade off that the US has to

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 3>navigate is, Yes, it's true that it's worse for your

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 3>chip makers if you don't allow sales to China, but

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>it's also probably better for your tech firms that use

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 3>those ships because they won't have strong Chinese competitors or

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 3>as strong Chinese competitors, and that's a trade off. I

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 3>think there's no doubt about that. I think the other

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 3>question is is US policy accelerating China's technological development?

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 4>And here I look for empirical data points.

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 3>We know that in twenty fourteen, China launched its first

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 3>national level Integrated Circuit Investment Fund.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 4>It's been re upped now twice.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Since then at the national level, and each province has

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>If you ask yourself is it clear from the data,

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and the data's kind of messy, but is it clear

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>that there's been a major increase in Chinese government subsidies

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 3>towards the ship industry after export controls? It's not really

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 3>clear because it started in twenty fourteen and it's been,

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 3>as far as we can tell, roughly steady since then.

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 3>If you ask, has there been a noticeable increase in

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese government pushing companies to buy domestic chips after

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 3>export controls?

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's clear.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I think you've seen from twenty fourteen to present a

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 3>steady push to buy a local And so if you ask,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, what's the evidence that there's been a major

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 3>uptick in self sufficiency, either support or pressure from the

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Chinese government.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Around export controls? It's hard to find.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, could you argue that domestic Chinese tech firms before

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 3>export controls would have said, of course, we're going to

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>test local products. They would have bought local products and

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>put them in the closet and instead relied on imported products.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 3>And now if they can't import products, they've got no

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 3>choice but to take the domestic products. Seriously, I think

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 3>you could argue that and perhaps that's happening to some degree,

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 3>but I would say, again, the evidence for that is

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 3>not super robust. And so if you're just trying to

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 3>be empirical and say, what's been the evident changed in

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Chinese policy or the approach of Chinese tech firms or

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>export controls, I would say it looks pretty continuous over time.

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 3>In other words, export controls didn't obviously have a major impact.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Are the expert restrictions enough though? Are there other things

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that you see the administration moving towards well?

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot depends on the broader US China relationship.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 3>There are certainly voices in the administration that want to

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 3>do a lot more on the restrictive side. There are

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 3>also voices administration that want to do a lot more

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 3>on the promoting US technological advances side. But of course

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 3>the administration has many priorities, and it's hard to see

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 3>which is going to win out. I think in terms

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 3>of the restrictions, it's very clear that the White House

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 3>is going to try to balance the Hawk's desire for

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 3>restrictions with the broader US channel relationship. And so as

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 3>we approach what many people think is going to be

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 3>a summit, this fall. I think history would suggest you

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't expect freemen restrictions and then run up to a

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 3>summit on the promoting technological development side. I think there

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>certainly are a lot of voices administration that want to

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 3>see more money flowing to new firms with disruptive technology.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>But there's also a desire for pretty dramatic budget cuts

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 3>to science and technology in the USA, and that cuts

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 3>in the opposite direction. So how exactly these political priorities

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 3>balance out is hard to predict with any certainty.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Just a quick follow up on the point you made

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about this balance or dichotomy between US producers and exporters

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of chips and tech firms, how do you see the

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration to serve the next few years navigating that?

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Does it mean that they need to find other ways

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of supporting chip makers, for example, if they're going to

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>be closing the route to China.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think any administration has done a great

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 3>answer to that question. I mean, China's obviously the second

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 3>large economy in the world, and you know, twenty percent

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 3>of GDP is a really large market to not be

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>able to serve. I think the US has tried to

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 3>argue to tech firms. Look, you can't serve this twenty percent.

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 3>You have the rest of the eighty percent you can serve.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think tech companies are inclined to serve that

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>other eighty percent anyway to a large degree.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 4>But is it right that companies.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Would be more profitable have high revenue if they could

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 3>sell to the entire one hundred percent of GDP?

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 4>For sure, no doubt about that, Chris.

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to talk about TSMC now. The company became

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the first Asian stock to reach a market capitalization of

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 2>one trillion dollars. That was just you know recently. Can

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 2>anyone challenge TSMC's dominance in this space.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, not anytime soon.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't think TSMC's as you mentioned, of the outset

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent or so market share and high end chips

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 3>for many of the key designers of chips, TSMC produces

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>all of their high end chips. That's true for Apple,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 3>that's true for Nvidia, that's true right now for Qualcomm's

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 3>high end chips, for AMD. It's this absolutely central producer

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 3>and so deeply internit into the rest of the tech sector,

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 3>into how Silicon Valley functions. It's just very hard to

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 3>see it being displaced, and rather than being displaced, I

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>think it's more plausible that we end up in a

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>situation in ten years where it's really the only player

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 3>left stand at the cutting edge because it's two main competitors,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Intel and Samsung are both facing real challenges to their

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 3>business of manufacturing high end processor chips.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>How did we get here? Like, how did TSMCA become

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this giant?

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's an extraordinary story.

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean it really goes back to one individual and

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>a unique business model. So Morris Chang, the founder of TSMC,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 3>spent most of his early career in the United States,

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 3>but was passed over for the CEO job at Texas

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Instruments and was approached by the Taiwanese government in the

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 3>mid eighties, where he made a number of professional contacts

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 3>and they said, would you like to start a business

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 3>in Taiwan And he said, yes, but only if I

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 3>can try a new business model, which was called the

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 3>foundry business model. The intuition was that if you didn't

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 3>design any chips, you only manufactured them, you could become

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 3>a manufacturing partner for multiple different chip design companies. Therefore

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>you could build up scale drive down costs but also

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 3>improve your manufacturing process because you were gathering data and

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 3>know how across a larger number of chips. And that

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>business model was radical at the time. Most people thought

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 3>it would fail. At the time, Morris Chang went to

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 3>the leadership at Intel and other titans of the chip

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>industry for investment. Most of them turned him down, but

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 3>it turned out it was the right business model. And

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>so today TSMC is both the most advanced and the

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 3>largest producer of processor chips, and those dynamics are deeply

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 3>interlink because it has more data about chip manufacturing, so

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 3>it can hone its production processes to a much greater

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 3>degree than its competitors can.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 2>And how important is Morris Chang to TSMC now? The

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>reason why I'm saying is that he is ninety four

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>years old. There's going to be a time when TSMC

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.239
<v Speaker 2>lives without Morris Chang. Will this interrupt the business at all?

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I think TSMC is now and it's a second leader

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 3>post Morris Cheng, so it's had multiple leadership transitions. Now,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 3>of course, it's still a company that has in the

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 3>past been profoundly influenced by the sets of principles. The

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 3>operating model the culture if you will, that he set up.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's operated independently of his leadership since

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 3>he's been retired now for some time. So do I

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 3>think it can continue, Yes, but what's continuing as an

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>organization that he set up with the culture that he

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 3>established in a business model that he also deserves credit for,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and for now it looks like both that culture and

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 3>that business model are working extraordinarily well.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>We've touched on some regions outside of Taiwan and China

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in the US, you know, there's also Japan, South Korea.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Are there ways that countries can kind of take advantage

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Chip War? Do you see scope for new alliances,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>potentially jee political alliances as a result of this.

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I think if you ask most other countries, they will

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 3>describe themselves as having been taken advantage of.

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 4>In the context of the Chip.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 3>War, the metaphor of when elephants fight, the grass gets trampled,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>that type of thing is often cited.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I think there are those aspects of both.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, it's the case that for medium sized countries Korea,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Southeast Asian countries, India, they've got to be responsive to

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the decisions that both China and the US are making

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 3>You can't take either one on head on, either from

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a business perspective or from a geopolitical perspective. But I

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 3>think also there's a lot of companies that have realized

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 3>the industry is going to shift a lot. Already has

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 3>shifted a bit, and it's going to shift a lot

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 3>more over the coming years, and that will open up opportunities.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I think India is an interesting example. India until recently

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 3>played an absolutely marginal role in electronics manufacturing, including in

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 3>ship assembly and chip production. But India is looking at

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the desire for diversifying supply chains away from China and

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 3>has attracted some big US companies as well as some

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 3>big Taiwanese companies to set up manufacturing facilities in India

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>as part of that diversification play. So there's an example

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 3>of a country trying to capitalize on the US China rivalry.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 3>But for every example I could give you of a

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 3>country capitalizing and give you another example on the opposite

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>side of a country feeling it was getting squeezed between

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 3>two larger powers in a struggle over which it had

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 3>no control.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>How are they getting squeezed? I mean, what does that

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>look like.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll give you an example with Korea. So you know,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Korea is getting squeezed in a couple of different ways.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>On the one hand, Korean firms have to follow US

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>export controls that impact China because every advanced Korean chip

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>is made partly with tools that are imported from the

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 3>United States, and therefore the US claims export control jurisdiction

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 3>on basically every ship made in Korea, basically every shipman globally.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 3>And so for both Samsung and Skhiinex, the two leading

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Korean shipmakers, they've had real impacts on both the facilities

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 3>they currently operate in China, which can't upgrade with the

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 3>types of tools they would like to because those tools

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 3>are now illegal to ship to China. But also certain

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 3>types of memory chips that are used in AI servers

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 3>they now can't sell to China, and so that's locked

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>them out of some potential revenue. It's just like in

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Nvidio has been locked out of some potential revenue in China.

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 3>So that's how the US has impacted Korean firms. On

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the flip side, if you ask yourself, who's the one

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 3>of the key potential losers from China self efficiency drive.

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's Korean firms.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Korean firms e support large volumes of chips to China,

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>especially in the memory category, and that's where Chinese firms

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 3>like CXMT and YMTC have made really impressive strides at

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 3>catching up technologically and displacing Korean firms from at least

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the low and mid range of the memory markets. You've

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 3>seen already really substantial price impacts in the memory market,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 3>pushing down margins for Samsung and eskhaiinix because of this

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 3>increased competition from Chinese firms. And so that's how Chinese

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 3>industrial policy is also squeezing companies that previously had access

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 3>to the Chinese market in theory still have access, but

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 3>in reality are being displaced by Chinese firms.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>How big of a part of the trade talks do

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you think this issue is? Because we just had, you know,

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the reciprocal tariffs announced on much of the world, we've

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>also seen more attempts by the Trump administration to kind

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of target China's manufacturing kind of throughout the supply chain,

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and also this idea of secondary tariffs coming up as

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>well as well as tariffs on transshipt goods, which seems

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to be. They haven't said China in relation to that,

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but we can guess it's probably China. So how do

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you think that's coming up in trade talks? And do

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you think tariffs maybe act counter to like it disincentivizes

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>countries in a way from targeting this, You.

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Know, I think it's it's really complicated based on which

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 3>country one is talking about, and because the tariffs are

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 3>still all in flux, it's difficult to draw I think,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 3>confiding conclusions. We still don't know, for example, what the

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 3>US is going to do on chip specific tariffs.

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Right now, there are basically no.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Tariffs on ships, with the exception of some old tariffs

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>on Chinese ships. But President Trump as repeatedly says there

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 3>will be. And so where exactly that lands we don't

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 3>yet know. Is it going to be only on China,

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be on the entire world, is going

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 3>to be ten percent, fifteen percent, fifty percent, who knows?

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 3>And those numbers, those details really really matter. And so

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 3>I think we're still as of early August in two

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 3>studtel territory just because some of the key tariff decisions

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 3>have yet.

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 4>To be made.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 3>One example, right now, we've got US tariffs on Taiwan

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 3>that have been announced. Those could change, but ships aren't

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 3>part of that because there's a separate process happening in

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 3>the US, And of course, the most important decision that

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the US will make visa the trade of Taiwan is

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the potential tariff on ships being discussed. So I think

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 3>we are in two studitel territory. I think the one

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 3>other dam I that's interesting though, I think to me

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 3>is that when it comes to the question of Chinese

0:34:55.680 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 3>content in other countries' supply chains, there's an interesting alignment

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 3>of interest between what the trumpministration says that it wants

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 3>and what businesses in many third countries want, which is

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they want more value produced domestically rather than by Chinese companies.

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 3>So you go to Vietnam, for example, and none of

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the business leaders in Vietnam want to be transhipping goods

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 3>from China to the US. They want to be making

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the goods and capturing the value themselves.

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Now do they know how to do it? Not always?

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Is it easy to do not necessarily, But there's actually

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 3>an interesting alignment between what Trump Minstration vis will say

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 3>they want and what the Vietnamese business class would like

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 3>to be doing. And so whether or not the Trump

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 3>ministration has the diplomatic finesse to actually make that potential

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 3>alignment into a reality, I'm not sure, but I think

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 3>it is true to note that it's not only the

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 3>trumpministration that has been looking nervously at the expansion of

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Chinese companies market share across the region and perceiving as

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 3>much throughouts Upper Unity.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Chris, I know you get this question all the time,

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and I read the book and I think I know

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 2>what the answer is.

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 4>But a lot of people.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Are probably thinking, you know, if China, for example, does

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:16.919
<v Speaker 2>take over Taiwan and none of the factories of TSMC

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>are damaged, does that mean that China dominates the semiconductor

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing space.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 3>I think the first thing to note is that, you know,

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the factories themselves are only a small part of what

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 3>you need to actually make the advanced ships. You need

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the people, critical input, you need materials flowing from Japan.

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 4>You need the.

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Spare parts and software updates flowing from the US and

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 3>the Netherlands and elsewhere. So you've got to think about

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.959
<v Speaker 3>the entire ecosystem. But in that scenario where you've got

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 3>a takeover without any disruption to the chip supply chain.

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 3>It would be an extraordinary asset to China. Right now,

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the US can tell TSMC don't sell your most advanced

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 3>ships for phones or for PCs or for AI to

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 3>certain Chinese firms, which means sell them to US firms

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 3>or Korean or European firms, and Chinese firms are a disadvantage. Well,

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that would flip if China were to take control over Taiwan.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 4>It could say.

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 3>TSMC provide your most events capabilities to Huawei and none

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 3>to Apple, or your most Huawei for GPUs and none

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 3>to in Nvidia, And that computing advantage I think would

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 3>be fundamentally important, especially as AI relies more and more

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 3>on vast volumes of computing power.

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked about the US export controls. One thing

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about is how Chinese companies are avoiding them.

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So somehow there are still factories in China and in

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia that have chips that are not supposed to

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>be there from the US. How are they able to

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>do this?

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I think that the key with assessing

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 3>chip export controls is that if you want a high

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>end AI data center, you need tens of thousands of chips,

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 3>so we shouldn't ignore when there's one or five or ten,

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 3>but they're not strategically relevant. The key question is how

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 3>can you get access to tens of thousands of cutting

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 3>EDGI chips? And the best evidence we have is that

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 3>this is mostly not happening by smuggling in.

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Tens of thousands.

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 3>It's mostly happening by accessing data centers abroad in places

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 3>like Malaysia and Thailand and perhaps elsewhere in Southeast Asia

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 3>that can legally buy.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Large volunes of chips.

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 3>So if I were the US government think about this problem,

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 3>I would say, of course I want to crack down

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 3>on the ten ships here, ten ships there, But you

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 3>really want to find are the ten thousand ships and

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 3>where they're flowing. And it isn't obvious that we have

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 3>chips flowing by the ten thousand increments into Chinese data centers,

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 3>but it is obvious that there are chips flowing by

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 3>increments that large and larger to countries in Southeast Asia

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 3>that don't have domestic demand for that volume of chips.

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 3>And so I think when you think of smuggling, you

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 3>should think, yes, some people putting an extra chip in

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 3>their suitcase and flying it across the border. But that's

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 3>probably the less important challenge than the question of how

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 3>can you confirm that a data center built in a

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 3>third country isn't providing the compute to be in cloud

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 3>computing services to a Chinese customer you are hoping to

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 3>cut off. And that's part of the debate that is

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 3>a bit more technologically complex and therefore not discussed, but

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 3>probably more significant in the long run.

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It makes you such interesting stories though. You know, the

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>men with suitcases full of chips boarding your next axetally happening.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 2>So the students caught in Dubai with chips.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 3>And that's why you know the US is you mentioned

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the outset Congress is considering legislation to require location verification

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 3>for AI data center chips precisely with that in mind.

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.760
<v Speaker 4>You know right now there's a single.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 3>Sport Control verification official posted by the US government and

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 3>all of Southeast Asia, and that single individual is expected

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 3>to track the flow of thousands of chips.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 4>It's just a hopeless task.

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 3>And so you need if you want to actually address

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the problem of physical smuggling, you need some sort of

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 3>technology to enable it.

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. I mean that person must be traveling quite.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 4>A bit or busy person. Yes, hard chat.

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So one thing we haven't talked about is rare earths.

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They're crucial to semiconductors and AI data centers, and of

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>course it's an area that China dominates as well. So

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder can the US hope to become or can

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>any country become a leader in chip semiconductors without having

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a rare earth's monopoly or at least having a larger

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>share of the world pie of rare earths.

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it depends a lot on which specific

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 3>mineral you're looking at, So that rare earth magnets are

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 3>mostly used in chip making equipment, not chips themselves.

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 4>There's a bunch of other materials.

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Tungsten, gallium, germanium used in the chip making process, which

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.879
<v Speaker 3>are also largely processed in China. For a lot of these,

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 3>what you find is that the chip industries demand is

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 3>a small share of overall demand. So for rare earth

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 3>magnets this is the case. There's a lot more demand

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 3>that goes to the auto industry than the chip industry.

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 3>My sense is that most of the companies in the

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 3>chip industry that used rare earth magnets have than a

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 3>fair amount of stockpiling in contrast to the auto industry,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 3>and so for the magnet side, I think the industry

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 3>is better insulated than the auto industry certainly was in

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>response to China's shut offs. But for other materials like

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 3>gallium germanium, it's less clear. There's not good data what

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 3>exactly the disruption might be if China were to impose

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 3>comparable restrictions on gallium and germanium, and it hasn't really

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 3>yet in terms of the severity. It's threatened restrictions, but

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 3>they haven't been biting yet, and so I don't know,

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 3>and I don't really think the Chinese government's sure if

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 3>it were to try to do the same thing for

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 3>these other materials, how impactful or not would it be.

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 3>The key question for all these is first how easy

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 3>is it or hard is it to do without a

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>given material? And second how quickly could you bring online

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>alternative supply and sort of like for rare er it's

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 3>not actually rare. They're just polluting and capital intensive to produce,

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and that's why they've concentrated in China. The same with

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 3>gallium and Germanium. It's not geology that dictates that these

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 3>are in China, it's the economics of the mining and

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 3>processing industry, which means that these are probably much less

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 3>solid monopolies. If you will, then is the Netherlands monopoly

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 3>on UV lithography tools.

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 2>So Chris. Earlier this year, China had its Deep Seek moment.

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 2>It came out with this LLM that really challenged the

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 2>status quo. How impactful was this too, you know, like

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 2>the whole AI system, I.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Think it was very impactful.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 3>It represented a shift in the axes of progress in AI.

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 4>So for the most period.

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 3>From chatchipt up until the start of this year, advances

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 3>in AI were largely driven by what's called pre training,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.479
<v Speaker 3>so training models on larger and larger quantities of data.

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 3>And Deep Seek as well as the one reasoning model

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 3>from open AI that was released in twenty twenty four,

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 3>represented a shift towards reasoning after a question is asked.

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 3>So rather than training your model in large quantities of data,

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:26.760
<v Speaker 3>you still do grint and large, but you're you're focusing

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 3>more on spending your compute resources on the thinking about

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the answer. And this really matters because it has very

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 3>different implications for how you use compute and where you

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 3>position your compute. So deep Seek they predominantly open source

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 3>their model, which means that most queries to deep seak

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 3>models take place not in deep seak servers but on

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the devices that deep Seak models are run on, so

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you can download their model computer use in your phone,

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 3>and this has led to its rapid spread both in

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 3>China but also globally. But it also poses an interesting

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 3>business model question. If everyone's downloading your model, they don't

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 3>need you after they downloaded the model, and the model

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 3>downloads for free, and so you've now had a number

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 3>of Chinese companies Alibaba's quin Models series for example, and

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.720
<v Speaker 3>others that have been very permissive in terms of open

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 3>sourcing and downloading, and as a result haven't built businesses

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 3>despite having really massive distribution of their models. The US firms,

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 3>with the exception of Meta, have taken an opposite approach.

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 3>They've kept mostly closed source, which means that customers need

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 3>to call back to open AI servers every time you

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 3>want check sipet to ask you a question, and so

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.919
<v Speaker 3>there's very different business models system from this. But there's

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 3>also implications for the types of computing controls that we've

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 3>been discussing earlier. The initial computing controls were intending or

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 3>hoping they could slow the pre training process in China,

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 3>but then everyone's pre training process slowed for technological reasons,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 3>and so instead what we've seen is that the controls

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 3>have actually been the most impactful on the ability of

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Chinese firms to build out their own inference infrastructure. So

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 3>you actually saw after deep Seek released its model It's

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 3>our one model in January, they had to cut off

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 3>access to using their servers to run their model because

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have enough servers to meet the demand of

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the entire world. And so they've actually been pushed in

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the direction of open sourcing more, I think by the controls,

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:36.479
<v Speaker 3>which had a contradictory and interesting effect of encouraging use

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 3>because it is open source, but also undermining the long

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 3>term business viability because right now it's unclear what the

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 3>funding mechanism will be for either deep Seek or the

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 3>other open source models in China in the long run.

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Fascating discussions. Thanks so much for joining us today, Chris.

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you for having me.

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:45:57.880 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Kai Di Dimitriva on Hong.

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Kong, also in Hong Kong. You can listen to all

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 2>our episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or review listen and

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.359
<v Speaker 2>this podcast was also produced and edited by Clara Chen.

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.