WEBVTT - Natural Wine: Part 2

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Natural wine is a term that doesn't have a rigid

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.319
<v Speaker 1>or standard definition. As we learned from our friends in

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Port one of the series, natural wine, in its essence

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is really just about a non intervening style of winemaking

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that adds nothing to the fermenting grapes or in the

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>vineyard from which they originate. From this definition, the question

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>many of you have been wondering is what is added

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to wine? Isn't it just grapes? Well, let's address that

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and dive back in to natural wines Part two. As

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Somalias and wine nerds and so on kind of began

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to realize that, like, you know, we should ask questions

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about how things are made. I think the general public

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>has become aware of it at a similar pace, maybe

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like five years behind me. You know. The momentum in

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of the way that like guests and consumers ask

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about these things and talk about these things has become

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.919
<v Speaker 1>really powerful, I would say, in the last five years.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>That's Amanda Smelts. She's the wine director at Estella and

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Cafe Ultra Parody so in New York. She's also a

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>leading protagonist in the natural wine movement. Alright, cool, um,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>so why don't we just start off we have some

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>working understanding of natural wine. But since there is no

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>formal definition, maybe we could just get a definition from

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Smelts about what you think natural wine is. I mean,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no obviously there's no formal board because you know,

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a term that doesn't belong in the Ousford English Dictionary.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's there's a fairly agreed upon working definition among

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>those who work with not or wine, or who make

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it or who are around it a lot. And the

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>idea is generally speaking, in the vineyards and in the sellers,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing added, nothing taken away. So when it comes to farming,

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that means you don't use that. This is probably the

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>most important part. You're not using chemicals in your vineyards

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're adding anything to vine your you know, farming

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>at all, it's it has to be organic compounds, ifting

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>at all. And then when it comes to your seller work,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I actually fermenting and making the wines, you're not adding

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>any chemicals. They're either or any other host of synthetic additives, colorance,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different stuff that is that are currently

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>legal to be added to wine in the aim of

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>making kind of the most transparent wines possible, And at

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what point in your career did you notice that natural

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a wine was something that might have been something that

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was more for people who were in the industry, so

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're fellow wine nerds and maybe other industry people too,

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>something that as a buyer you started to notice people

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>coming into your establishments and asking you about the process.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>For me, was a gradual one because there there was

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>not such a clear distinction and not such a clear

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation at least here in the States about wines that

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>were maybe made in a different way. The means of

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>production were certainly not the thing that you started talking

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about first. When you're tasting, you know, wines with a

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>vendor or when you're listening to an importer talk. Mostly

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to you know, sell their wines and

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>their products that they import, without kind of any conversation

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about how things are made. But that has changed a lot,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, as the conversation about how things are made

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of food and beverage around the world has

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>changed definitely, and that sort of checks out with what

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing from other folks that we've talked to

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>as well, and of course in my own observations. What

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you're kind of making the link here

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>between a group of let's say, influential UM wine buyers

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and UM wine makers that really spawn from an environmental concern.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that's a fair kind of place

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of origin for the natural wine movement, is that it's

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in relationship to an environmental practice. I think that there

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>are two or three fundamental like like origin concerns or

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of themes that are behind it, But environmental concerns

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>are is definitely ground zero. The only other one that

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say is actual quality of wine, Like people

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about like what does wine tastes? Like what are

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>global tastes? Like what does it mean for there to

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be a global taste in wine? Because that was a

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>really big issue. It continues to be a huge issue.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Most people don't think it's a problem, but ultimately a

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>few people here and there started to pipe up and say, hey,

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>why is it that all of a sudden, red wines

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>taste very much the same everywhere from Rioja to Bordeaux

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to Napa Valley to Burgenland, Like why is it that

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I can crack open for red wines from all of

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>those places and everything has the same style and the

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>same seller work, you know, the same type of production.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Once people start to notice that, like it's almost like,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's almost like you've had the wool poled

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>over your eyes a little bit. You're like, wait a minute,

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I've just opened forty Napa cabernets and I can barely

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>tell the different between all of them. You know, to

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the untrained eye, they all kind of taste the same.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Or you could insert category here, you know, salving oblanc

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>from wherever? What's going on here? And I think that's

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the second question of origin, is why does all this

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff taste the same. So it's it's a question of

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>both quality of wine and character of wine itself in

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of like consumption, and then obviously environmental concerns, which

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is where does this stuff come from and how did

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they get here totally, which again just completely checks out

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with the previous conversation that we had with the winemakers

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>from the other right, who both mentioned, you know, environmental

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>concerns as well as a pursuit of their own artistry,

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>kinds of wines that they wanted to make as part

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of their own expression as artists, which I found to

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be compelling as well. So I guess in terms of

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the discourse that is happening in a more insular community,

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say the wine community, and specifically the US wine community.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we seem to see headlines with greater frequency

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>now about natural wine, and then these articles always kind

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of pop off in a way that feel oddly emotional

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are removed from these communities, so for for

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are are far away from the wine industry,

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and we see these really spirited exchanges like what are

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we supposed to make of that? And why is it

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that people feel so strongly about? Okay, this is such

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a great question. So I'm gonna liken it to a

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thing first and then I'll explain in more practical I

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>think terms. But the first thing I will liken it

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>too is, you know, when everybody listened to opera in

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Vienna at the height of the Austro Hungarian Empire, and

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>opera was the form, right, and somebody introduced the first

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>opera in German, you know, like when German operas began

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the thing as opposed to say Italian opera

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or and so on and so forth. I think whenever

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:26.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a major shift in a like deeply well known

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and well regarded esthetic media. Entire cultures are kind of

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>rocked by it, you know, especially if the art form

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>or the craft work or whatever it is. The cultural

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>nexus is super important to people if it if it's

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>closely associated, like in the case of opera, with national

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>identity or cultural identity, if it's something that brings people

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of meaning and a lot of joy and

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a feeling of importance in their lives. Um when there

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are major paradigm shifts in those things, I think it

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>takes on the hue of the personal because it's stuff

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that's deeply beloved by people. So if you follow wet

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Stone media closely, you'll know that there's nothing that I

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know more about or care more about than wine. In fact,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I loved it so much that for an entire decade

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it was my job just to drink wine. Like Amanda,

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I was a sammie, which is how the French say

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>trained wine professional. But over time, as I began to

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>rise up through the ranks in my career, I couldn't

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>move beyond the overwhelming lack of diversity in the wine industry.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>The further along I moved, the bottles and the wine

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>producing regions I was exposed to were fast and ever changing,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but the people for whom I was opening those bottles

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>were decidedly less so. So I decided to do something

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>radical in my mid twenties. I decided that I wanted

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to connect with the black and indigenous communities in the

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>western Cape of South Africa, who were the overwhelming majority

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of the labor force but represented less than even a

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>single percent of its ownership. I began to think of

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wine as a catalyst for social change, for historical and

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>anthropological learning, for identity and origins. And in this work

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>there was an epiphany. It was that wine did not

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>belong exclusively to the French or the Italians, no matter

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>how hard my formal education tried to convince me. Through

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>working with the families in South Africa's wine industry, I

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>began a process that I would call decolonizing wine, a

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>process that culminated in two thousand seventeen, where I traveled

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Republic of Georgia, often called the Cradle of Wine,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to visit the oldest grape vine in the world that

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is still being used to produce wine. We're in the

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>village of Church Cardi and We're gonna go see a

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>very very old vine. Do you see this is not

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a tree? So earlier today we saw one year old vines,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>which we're about that big, and four year old vines

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the oldest probably in the world. Huh yeah, it's the

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>oldest in the world. Which is to gives us a grape,

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and it is to ali, it is for Senator yourself.

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the most amazing thing I've ever seen in

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>my life. This is unbelievable. And I think wine is

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in this special there's really special nexus between like you

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>were just saying, agricultural product and environmental reality and a

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>made thing, right, human artifact, cultural artifact, and an aesthetic object.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not only one of those things, it's it's

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>caught in the crosshairs of both. And so that means

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people who care about things as diverse as climate change, farming, music, art, cooking,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>kilinary history, you know, I don't know, collecting things. There's

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like so many different angles through which people might care

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>about wine because of that interesting overlay of you know,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>environment and means of production and farming and then aesthetic

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>things that I think this is a truly major paradigm

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>shift in the global culture of wine, and it is

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>having the same sort of impact as something, you know,

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>as profound as translating an ancient text from Latin into

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Old English. You know, it's a stupid thing to compare

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it to because obviously wine isn't important as those ancient

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>ancient texts. But but or say, as opera was to

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Viennese. You know, I think that that's what's happening,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and and that's that's why people are responding to it

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with this kind of vehemence. Because while wine is not

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>art exactly, it does carry some of the hallmarks of art,

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and it definitely is craftsmanship, and it's definitely labor and

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely farming. So there's lots of entry points through

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>which you could really come to care for this strange

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>living artifact, and lots of entry points in which it

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>could come to represent your culture, or your history or

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>even just your your sense of art, which means that

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it is weirdly very democratic. It means that lots and

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of different of different people can care about wine

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>from all many, many different walks of life as long

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as you have access to it. I think that's why

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>people are heated because because it's it actually does have

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the power to move. It has the capacity to speak

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to many, many different people from lots of different angles.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And because it speaks to so many, when there are

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>big challenges or big changes kind of presented to the

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>commonly accepted way of doing things worldwide, we feel the

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:56.239
<v Speaker 1>heat a little bit. Wow, congratulations to you. That's officially

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the best description I've heard of this internal ire around

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>natural wine conversations. You know, You've given me a lot

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to think about, because now I'm thinking about wine in

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a democratic sense, which of course makes me think about

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>our own political system here and the challenges that Democratic

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Party has as a party of big tens and a

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>wide variety of ideas. On the one hand, it's very

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>easy for people to find themselves in these broad politics,

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but on the other hand, when it comes to say,

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>electing a candidate suitable to around, you know, much more

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult because the reasons that we've shown up to support,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or the areas in which we see ourselves reflected, of course,

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are are varied, and that makes it hard. Yeah, that

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>makes it really challenging. So um, I think it's exactly

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the right analogy and helps me understand is there a

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>social capital or is there kind of an idealism in

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>people coming to this wine tint who never found a

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship to wine before. Is there some cash and people

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>saying like, I'm into natural wine and therefore like I'm

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>part of this movement now? Well I wish, I wish

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that my answer were no, But my answer is yeah,

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure, it's hip. It's become hip. But I think

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we should push at and poke at why it's become hip. Right,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's because of what you say. You say, Okay, at

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>least on the surface, natural wine seems to present this

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that is more democratic, it's not just superficial. It

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>arises up out of you know a handful of people France,

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, California, you know, lots of Australia, like lots

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of different places, being like I don't want my wines

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to taste like everybody else's wines anymore. Like there's something

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>really unnerving there, and and you don't know any better.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You just keep drinking them like whatever, it's no big deal.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But the moment that someone presents one of these wines

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to you and you go, holy crap, that tastes so

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>different from anything else I've ever seen what's going on here?

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it wrong? Is this? Like? You know? And I

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 1>watched that happen literally every day at my job, Like

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>all the time. People are like, Oh, I don't know.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>This wine is so different? Is it? Is it bad?

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's bad? You know. So when you when

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you have that much of like a jarring kind of

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>encounter with something that you can smell and you can

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>taste and you can feel in your body, Okay, so

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>now you're like, whoa, I'm awake? What was going on before?

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>And the answers that are behind what was going on

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>before are not cute, They're disconcerned. They're disconcerting. And when

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you start to get a little bit of an understanding

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on what has happened, i e. Like the mass industrialization

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of wine across the globe, that you start to think like,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't really I don't love that.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>H of course not the same as the conventional wines,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>which were made to taste like the other. Perhaps they

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>were made to taste like wines that had performed well

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the meat. If we don't know anything about natural wine,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've only been drinking nine dollar mile back from

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from Australia or to Argentina. What is the experience

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that we can expect as a consumer as a drinker

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>when we are drinking natural wines versus wines that don't

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>share that label. Well, it depends a little bit again

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the means of production, because under the wide umbrella

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of natural wine, they really can taste quite quite different.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think to me, fundamental thing you should expect

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>first is that everything you've ever tasted in wine before

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that is going to change. So like the first thing

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you can expect is difference, and I think that is

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that's crucial, right because it means that you are reintroduced

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to your own senses and you hear them say this

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is different from my previous sense memories. Now that can

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>those wines can be maybe not so perceptibly different from

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a conventional wine because maybe they were, you know, put

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>in used oak barrels, and maybe there's a little bit

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sulfur dioxide application, and maybe there's a slightly

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more ripe fruited style and they're a little bit more polished,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe to the uninitiated they won't be that

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>clear right away, but there are some where, maybe because

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of the means of production again, what happens in the

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>cellar and the lack of preservatives added. Sometimes these things

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>can smell and taste really wild. And so the way

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that I translate wild is you know, often people will

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>smell them and be like, whoa kind of sour. People

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>will struggle for words to describe it. Other times it's

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like wow, really heavy, like, because the aromas can be

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>explosive like that, Like the actual bouquet of wine can

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>become the type of thing that I will often say

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like jumps out of the glass and you barely need

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to put your nose near the glass to smell it

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and sense it because it's aromatically so supercharged. So the

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>range of experiences can be kind of different, but I

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>mean actually quite broad. But as a first principle, everyone

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>should be prepared to smell and taste something that is

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything they understand as wine before. Right. That makes

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sense because in people reflecting back to you, these potentially

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:05.479
<v Speaker 1>unusual smells which are reflective of nature, you know, something sour,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>something yeasty, something funky, something dank. These are all characteristics

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>presumably that the winemakers themselves are trying to bring forth

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and and present right, So um, in the transparency that

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're alluding to, part of what the offering is in

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the transparency is the expression of the wine without the

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>manipulation of you know, some of these other chemical inputs

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>or even winemaking inputs, so that people can you know,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>experience the full breadth of whatever the land has to say.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things that you have you

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have to know about kind of conventional winemaking or more

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>industrial winemaking is that I alluded to it earlier. But many, many, many,

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>many forms of additives are legal, both in the United

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>States and in the EU and kind of all over

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the world, depending on you know, country to country. And

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>some of those additives essentially have an origin that are

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>from either animal material or protein material, like you know,

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>eggs and egg derivatives are really common. They're used as

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>clarifying agents, you know, just the same way that like,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're not specific in a restaurant, you may be

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>surprised to find that there is, say, for example, gelatine

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>used as a stabilizer or as a textural thing, and

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the gelatine is you know, animal derived as opposed to

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or or when you're thinking about cheese and say you're

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a vegetarian and you're you know, you find out that like, okay,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>animal renn it. You know, it's the same thing with winemaking.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>And again like this is about signing a light on

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the way things are made. I mean, I know I

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of I see a lot of like

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>media articles and so on that are click baity these

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>days that are like, oh the death of the term

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>natural and can we stop using this word? And can

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know. Wittgenstein said all of our

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>problems come down to problems of language, right, and so

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just talking about whine at all is a challenge.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you that from having to do

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it every day, you know, trying to find language that

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that approximates what two different people mean when they're attempting

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to relate sense experience with this, you know, aesthetic and

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>agricultural object before them being smelled and tasted and consumed

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>by them. Adding in the subjectivity of the human experience

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and the difficulty of you know, coming to agreed upon language.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>We have to do the best we can right to

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>understand each other. So if we're trying to describe an

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>entire paradigm shift in how people attend to their vineyards,

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>how they harvest their fruit, how they ferment that fruit,

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>how they usher that fruit into a completed state, bottle

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>it and send it off to people to be consumed.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's very very different from industrial and you know,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>slightly more conventional methods. What then are we to say, right,

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that just took me like fifteen words to try to

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>describe to you all the steps in the process. We

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 1>have to find some kind of signifier that enables us

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to continue having the conversation. I think the reason that

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>people are all up in arms about it is that

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>there's this you know, sort of ridiculous thing where people

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>are like, well, you know what, what wine is unnatural?

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like, well, now we're playing semantics, right,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're not actually pointing at the root issues, which

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.479
<v Speaker 1>which are farming and the finished product, and like how

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>much are we asking questions about where do things come from?

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>What is the origin of my drink? And we're obsessive

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about definition and we're obsessive about that. To me is

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>there is the bigger picture question and the rest of

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it is sort of I don't know, squabbling over the crumbs,

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, categorizing instead of being interested in

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>disc active and qualitative understandings of things. Right, this is

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>us getting caught up in, you know, in labeling. And

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I would love to recenter questions about means of production

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>back on everybody's mind and on everybody's lips, because they

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are really serious questions attended about like health, beauty, and yeah,

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>justice too, not to mention economics and power. You know.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm totally fine with the term if it gets

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>me talking about those things that people you know, cluche,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, I love. I'm starting to develop a newfound

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>affinity for this phrase natural wine for all the reasons

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in which it has been a conundrum in trying to

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>explain or describe. I think that's kind of the magic

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of the term, especially if we were to extrapolate, you know,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>this like democratic analogy, and I think one of the

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>stifling elements could be trying to appease so many different factions. Yes,

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and I totally I think that we actually could see

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of how that can go wrong. Organic as

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a label in which the certification to get the label

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is inherently excluding people who otherwise tons of farmers, tons

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of farmers practices, right, so in a way, you know,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>organic is able to be co opt and in a

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>weird way, a less effective or less exhaustive, you know,

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>words to describe who is actually acting in the most

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>environmentally progressive or responsible way with natural wine, and saying

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that we have a roughly agreed upon term that is

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>about nothing added and nothing taken away. You keep alluding

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to it as a signifier, which I think is actually

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot more closely aligned with the way that human

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>beings are able to understand social cues and able to understand,

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, big ideas that we understand perfectly well are

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>not absolute. Human beings are intellectually mature for the most

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>part enough to understand that nothing is purely absolute, or

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>a few things are. And so when we talk about

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>things as less absolute than say organic, it actually opens

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>up a space for us to to go deeper because

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't leave people out. It's less exclusive because it

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>can't be co opted, because there's no formal language for

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just a signifier. This okay, So this is exactly

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>why I actually I kind of love the term. I

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>love it because some people will be like, well, it's

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a slippery slope, and you know, big businesses can co

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>opt this idea of natural and and you see it now.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You see like big grocery stores abroad and elsewhere trying

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to like make their weird natural wine and they're just

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're you know, there's a there's like co

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>opting as always every subculture, every subculture tries to get

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>co opted or like is you know, there's an attempt

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>toward that kind of at any point, right, But I

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of love that it is slippery. It's that's literally

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all that's happening here, as opposed to understanding practice, you know,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and as opposed to getting a deeply narrative and a

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>deeply qualitative and an experiential understanding of things which require

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>time and effort and dialogue and study. You know, all

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff is hard, and everyone wants to just

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to be like, well, this bogus because you know,

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the terminology doesn't make any sense and who knows what

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about at all. Like that's that's such a

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>quick way to be intellectually superior because you feel as

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>though the definitions are not clear enough. I love that

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this pushes back against that a little bit. You know,

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really more like are you trying to be correct

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or you trying to be understood? Absolutely? Absolutely, and do

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you just want to be the smartest guy in the room.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Because wine is a really sensitive place for that button

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to get pushed as well. You know, given that wine

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>has been traditionally and especially it's especially bad in the States,

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>associated with having some level of kind of sophistication, and

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>therefore it is elitist because of those associations. People really

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>want to define wine in this way that makes them

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like they have mastery of it and they have

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of it, and that's that's the social capital they're

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for. But like wine eludes these things, the practice

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of fermentation eludes these things. Wine when it is living

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and when it hasn't been stultified by industrial process, it

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is it's alive in the bottle, it's alive in the barrel,

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's alive in the tank, and it changes. It's a

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>moving target, right whether you whether you're in your first

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes of a bottle or your two hours in.

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>If that wine is sound, you're going to be experiencing

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>something different kind of at every moment. So what does

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it taste like? I'm like, I don't know. Mark fifteen

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>minutes or like mark three hours. You know, I wanted

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to taste like yesterday? What's it tastes like today? Same object? Right?

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But time and change and feeling have altered the experience

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of the thing that's experiential understanding versus definition, right and categorizing.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, maybe that's why I fell in

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>love with wine, because it is elusive in that way. Okay,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so now that we've engaged in some wine philosophy, let's

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about the thing that's probably more important than any other,

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>which is how to drink. So when you're tasting wine,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the first thing you'll want to do is look at

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the wine. No really, I mean like, look at the wine.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>See what it looks like. Is it shiny and golden

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>around the rim? Is it pale and brickish? And the

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>center core transparent or opaque? Not that what you see

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is always what you get with wine. But what looking

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at it does is it forces you to pay attention.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And since wine is a multisensory indulgence, paying attention will

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be your greatest resource for enjoyment. The next thing to

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do is to smell. And when I'm smelling wine, I

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have this two steps approach. First, I take a whiff,

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not a huge one, just like a grazing one. And

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a habit I developed from my sunnier days,

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>where I would smell hundreds of wines each night, primarily

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>just to make sure that they were okay. If it's

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>not okay, what's most often the case is that it

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>smells a little bit like wet, moldy cork. If detected,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it is this pungent and unpleasant smell. When you go

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to a restaurant and you order wine. Have you ever

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>noticed how they first give you like a little teeny taste. Well,

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this is your window to detect a flaw. If you're unsure,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>don't be afraid ask if there's someone there to validate

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>your suspicions. Almost always, even if it's on the edge,

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the house will do the right thing and get you

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 1>sorted with a new glass. Okay. So then after that

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>initial grazing with I pick up my glass and I

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>give it a big swirl. You know what I'm talking about?

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The thing where people who seem like they know a

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>thing or two about wine are always doing well, what

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they're actually doing is bringing oxygen into the glass. And

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's this invitation of oxygen that really allows us to

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>smell the true character of the wine. After you give

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it a whirl, give it a world. But a sort

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of disclaimer is that when I taste, I am ashamed

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to say that I do the thing where I make

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the slurping noise. I mean, I'm not obnoxious about it.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I take a small sip and with the tip of

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>my tongue on the roof of my mouth, I bring

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in the air sort of like an inverted whistle. The

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>wine moves along my mouth, along my palate, and then

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>right before swallowing, I give a good swish, kind of

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but not exactly like a mouth wash. The part that

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>comes next is my favorite part. It might last a

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>second or several minutes, but it's the finish or the

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>contemplate of moment, just after the wine goes down and

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the brain begins to make sense of what it just

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>had and how all the parts fit or don't fit together.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But of course, you could also just like you know,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>drink the wine, pay attention to what you like or dislike,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>try to find the language from a dialogue with the

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bartender or the internet to synthesize whatever you just tasted.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>This level of engagement will help me better enjoy wine, because,

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>after all, and drinking wine, enjoyment is always the desired ye.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So if you've made it this far, then it is

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt clear that wine is really special to me,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and this two part series is really special to me.

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for listening. I hope you've gained a

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>deeper understanding and appreciation of natural wine and understand why

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been at the center of a discussion in the

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>larger cultural conversation about the things we eat and drink,

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>how they're made, and where they come from. I hope

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that if you have the opportunity to try natural wine,

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that you do so, and you can check out our

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>website if you'd like to see some of our favorite

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>wines from many diverse winemakers who we would love for

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you to support and are sure that you will enjoy it.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Amanda Smelts, wine director at Estella and Vino

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Parody So in New York And to write out, we'll

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>play another clip from Wild Grapes, a short film I

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>shot with my dear friend and brother who was also

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a partner at Whetstone, David Alexander, from our two thousand

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen release of Wild Grapes. What I came to understand

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is that this day was not a day of remembrance,

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>rather a revival of spirit. Wine is central to Georgian culture,

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and once again I'm taken by the earnestness with which

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it permeates daily life without pretension. This ceremonial but informal

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 1>inclusion affirms my own mission to demystify one, to shed

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>it of its formality, and in doing so share the

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>gift of a new tongue, a language that, once learned,

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>deepens our capacity for pleasure and connects us to a

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>collective human history. Special Thanks to my business partner who

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>makes all things possible at Whetstone are co founder Melissa

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>she Thanks mel. Thank you to Selene Glazier, who is

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>our lead producer. To Cat Hong, our editor, to habn

0:36:55.880 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Obasa Lassa and Quentin lebou Are production interns. To our

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>friends at iHeart Radio for helping us bring you this podcast.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>To Gabrielle Collins are supervising producer, engineer J. J. Pauseway

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and executive producer Christopher Hasiotis. I'm your host, the origin Forager,

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Saderfield, and we will be back here next week

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with more from Whetstone Magazine's Point of Origin podcast.