WEBVTT - Strzok Threatened with Contempt Citation in Hearing

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>important legal news of the day. You can find more

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Today's congressional testimony

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of Peter Struck, the FBI agent who exchanged anti Trump

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>text with a bureau lawyer, promised to be contentious, and

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it lived up to its promise, breaking down in partisan

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bickering among the committee members from the very first question.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>In an impassioned answer, Struck said his personal political beliefs

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>played no role in the investigation. I can't assure you,

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Mr Chairman, at no time in any of these texts

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>did those personal beliefs ever enter into the realm of

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>any action I took. Furthermore, this isn't just me sitting

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>here telling you you don't have to take my word

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for it and restep at every investigative decision. There are

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple layers of people above me joining me now. Is

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>William Banks, professor at Syracuse University Law School. Bill Republicans

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have been using these personal texts for their argument that

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Mueller's investigation is biased for some time. Is there any

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>hope that this hearing won't turn into a partisan match

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>as it started out? I don't think so. June had

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>more fireworks this morning, and there we're on the mall

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on the fourth of July. From the accounts that I read,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's lining up that way. We already know as much

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>as we need to know about his behavior during the investigation.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We all recalled just a few weeks ago the in

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the Inspector General report thoroughly reviewed uh the involvement of

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Stroking and his UH then girlfriend page and the inappropriate text,

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and he it in no uncertain terms that while the

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>behavior was improper and unprofessional, that there's no evidence that

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>it had any impact on the impartiality of the investigation.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So what's the point of this testimony. He already testified

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in private, right, so you know? The Independent Council investigation

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and the more investigation are separate, of course, from Congressional investigations.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>They are conducted in the executive branch. Congress likes to

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>remind the American people and others in government that it

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>has at least as much authority to investigate the going

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on in government as does the other political branch, and

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're doing. Unfortunately, in this case, I believe

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's been done to make partisan points and not

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for any fruitful purpose. Did you hear anything that you

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>hadn't heard before about those texts? No, not sing at all.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know there was. The investigation in the

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General, of course, was lengthier, more deliberative, and indeed

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the report was more thorough about the nature of the

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>texts and the context in which they were written than

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>anything that's going to come out in the hearing today.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>What the Republicans wanted to demonstrate, I think at the

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>very beginning was that he Struck was much more heavily

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>involved in the Mueller investigation than uh then had been

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>led we have been led to believe before he asked

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how many individuals he interviewed in the first eight days,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and things like that that get into the weeds of

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing investigation, that he Struck the witness properly refused

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to answer. A couple of things struck me as a lawyer,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and one was when Struck said that the FBI Council,

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, instructed him not to answer questions about

0:03:55.240 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the continuing investigation of Russian meddling, and then Republican Robert Goodlad,

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>who was an attorney and chair of the House Judiciary Committee,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>said Struck couldn't consult with the FBI's attorney and could

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>only consult with his personal attorney. It seemed to be

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the FBI's privilege. He was asserting, are there any grounds

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>for saying you know which attorney you can consult with? Well?

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>There was, you know. Underlying that that debate, which is

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a fair one, is the question of whether he was

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>there under subpoena or voluntarily. He says, uh that he

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was there voluntarily. He'd agreed to appear before he ever

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>received a subpoena. So if he's there voluntarily, I suppose

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>there's there's more reason to argue that he should be

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>consulting only with his own a lawyer other than rather

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.239
<v Speaker 1>than with the FBI. If he's responding subpoena, of course,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's part of his job to ask for advice from

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>his employer about what he can say and what he

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>can So then that would cut against what good Lad said,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>because good landing that he was there nder subpoena. Yes,

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be an easy thing to figure out

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>whether he was there under whether subpoena was served or not. Um.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Something he did say that that also struck me was

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>he said he was one of a handful of people

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>who knew details of the Russian election interference and it's

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>possible connection to Trump camp and to the campaign. He

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>said this information had the potential to derail and quite

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>possibly defeat Mr Trump, but he didn't. He didn't even

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>cross his mind to expose that. Do we know what

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he's referring to their No, we don't for sure, although

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>given the timing, we can surmise that he was aware

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the electronic surveillance that may have been carried on

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in June and July of those who were involved in

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>in the Trump campaign because of their involvement themselves with

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>with with foreign entities Russia and the Ukraine. We know

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>more about the nature of those now than we did that.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Where does this leave the Muller investigation? Will this have

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>any more effect on the Republicans ratcheting up of the

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 1>attempts to derail the Muller investigation? Will this give credence

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to either side? I don't think so. You know, it's

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>been relatively quiet lately, and and here we are in July,

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and soon the Congress is going to take their summer recess,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think this will quiet down and Mueller will

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>will continue on. We might think that he's getting close

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to the end of his investigation, but we don't know

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that for sure. But I doubt there'll be more fireworks

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>unless something happens, say around the Labor day period when

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>they when they come back from recess. I like to

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to change gears just a little bit and talk about

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer. He's been He's been doing

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>things that sort of don't fit in with the way

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he has behaved up until this point, one being that

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>he talked with ABC. And is this an outreach to

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor's office saying that, you know, basically indicating that

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>he wants to turn or do you really need to

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do outreach to the prosecutor's office? You don't. I mean,

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to read Cohen, and there have been so many, uh,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>permutations and changes in the narrative along the way. But indeed,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the longer this goes on, in the morning,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks pile up against him. He may be looking for

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ways out and ways to make a deal and talking

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to the media. Is there's one way to hasten that process,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, but you know it's uh, it's hard to tell.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>In his case, again, it may just have been a

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>slow day at ABC. Well, Um, what what sort of

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>puzzles me is what I mean, we assume that his

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>attorneys are that at least his attorneys who are representing

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>him criminally, they are talking with the prosecutors about the case.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's just it's so people are saying, well, is

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>there going to be a deal, And maybe this is

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>outreach for a deal. I mean, isn't that something that

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you discuss with the prosecutors. Yes, it is and and

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and I assume that is going on. And why you know,

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Cohen may just needed to get some attention on that

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>particular day. Uh. You know, how much of the allegations

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>against Colin are amenable to deal making is hard to

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know at this point, but certainly they're talking about some

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of the issues. And another odd thing is he has

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>hired Lanny Davis, who is known he wrote a book

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>about how the election was stolen from Hillary Clinton by

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the revelations of FBI Director uh Comy, and now he's

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>representing Michael Cohen at what you know, just just for

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a second think about it. Tell us what you're thoughts

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are about why, well, uh, success rate? I think you know,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>there are a few high profile lawyers and these politically

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>connected cases who have done especially well. I think Davis

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is a very good reputation, and so I think which

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the partisan line Cohen is on matters very

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>well when it's his own skin. And the other thing

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is Lennie Davis is has connections to the Clintons. He does.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's ironic to be sure, But again, you know, he

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>closed the Clinton file. Now he's opening a Colon file,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's got other files. And that's that's what lawyers

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in this business do. Yes, Well, it's it's it gets

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more complicated, and it seems like there's

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of overlap recently. Well thanks Bill. As always,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that's William Banks. He's a professor at Syracuse University Law School.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are a value to throw roadblocks in the way

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of a confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. One

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of the groups mounting the fight is Demand Justice, joining

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>me as Christopher Kang, Chief Council of Demand Justice and

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>former Deputy Council to President Barack Obama Chris Only conservatives

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>will be nominated by President Trump. So why fight Kavanaugh

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>when you could end up with someone even more conservative

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>next time? Well, I'm not sure that we could end

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>up with somebody even more conservative next time, given Brett

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh's demonstrated record. And so we're going to fight this

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>nomination because Brett Kavanaugh's record demonstrates that he is anti healthcare,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he's anti abortion, and he thinks Trump is above the law.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And these are the values and the principles that we

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>need to stand up and fight for, regardless of what

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>theoretically might happen down the line. So from the y

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to the how Republicans have the votes? Justice Neil Gorsich

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was confirmed by a vote of fifty ft. How can

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>you beat that Republicans do not have the votes? Republicans

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>currently have a majority of Senators. But when this nomination

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and unfolds, when Judge Kavanaugh's full record comes out, when

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the one million documents that are sitting in the Bush

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Presidential Library come out from his time there and reveal

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>even more about his thinking and his analysis when it

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to these critical legal issues, I think you'll see

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the tide change. They are currently a majority of Senators

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>who believe that healthcare for people with pre existing conditions

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>should be maintained and not as the Trump administration is

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to do taken away in the courts. And there

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>are majority of people who believe that Roe versus Way

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it should not be overturned. These are critical issues that

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we can change the tide on, and when

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the time comes for a vote, Judge Kavanaugh can and

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>should be defeated. Let's skip over the Republican votes for

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a moment and talk about the three red state Democrats

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>who voted for Gorsage. Joe Mansion of West Virginia has

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>said that Kavanaugh has all the right qualities and high

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>moral standards. Can you keep him and the other Democrats

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>from voting for Kavanaugh to protect themselves at the ballot box?

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>If you just look at Judge Kavanaugh his record resume,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that he has the qualifications. But qualifications

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are more than what school you went to and where

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you worked as your last job. When Senator Manson and

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>other senators look at his record, they look at President

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump's litmus test when it came to overturning the Affordable

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Care Act and its critical healthcare protections. I think he's

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a very hard time politically going

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>back and saying I am continuing to stand up for

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the West Virginians who have pre existing who

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have pre existing conditions and are receiving healthcare, and that

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>would be taken away if Judge Kavanaugh were confirmed. We're

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>hearing the same things from the two Republican female senators,

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins and Lisa Rakowski that we heard when came

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>up for a nomination. They wanted to make sure he'll

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>follow precedent and not overturn Roe v. Wade. But Gorsuch,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>his votes show that whatever nominee says, he's been vetted

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>by the federal society and will follow his past. I

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>completely agree with you, and I think that that will

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be true of Judge Kavanaugh as well. And Judge Kavanaugh's

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>record goes even further than that. Just last year, he

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>delivered a speech in which he praised Justice rank with

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>dissent in row. I think we know where he's headed

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and what his views are with respect to precedent and

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with respect to Roll versus Wade and I think that

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>when Senator Collins and Senator Makowski and other senators have

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a chance to question him and examine that record, they're

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>going to understand that if he is confirmed, Roll versus

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Wade will in fact be overturned. So what is your

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>group going to do? Concretely? Where are you going to

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be spending your money? How much of it? What's the plan?

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We already have ads up in Maine and Alaska, will

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have other ads up going as soon as the end

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of the week talking about these issues, talking about healthcare,

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about protecting healthcare for people with pre existing conditions,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fact that Roll versus Wade is on

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the brink of being overturned, and encouraging people to contact

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>their senators and make their voices known. We are. We've

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>announced that our overall budget for ads will be five

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, and I think you'll see that spread out

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from now until the time that this vote is taken.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>How does your budget compare to the budgets of the

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>conservative groups that have made this You know, for years

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and years have been fighting to have a more conservative court. Well,

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll never match the conservative groups dollar for dollar. But

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I also don't think we need to when the American people,

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>by a majority of two, by a margin of two

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to one, believe that ro versus wage should not be overturned,

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and by a majority of two to one do not

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>believe the President Trump should be taking away health care

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for people with pre existing conditions. We're gonna see a

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of grassroots energy and activism come out, and I

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think that people's voices, their telephone calls, they're marching in

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the streets. I think that's going to overwhelm any money disadvantage.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>We might have about a minute left here. You helped

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>oversee the confirmations of Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Sonya

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Soto mayor are you gonna be taking part in the

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>prep of Democratic senators for these hearings or how are

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you going to be taking part in that? I mean,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we leave it to the Democratic senators and

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>their staff and the legal experts that they can sult

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out exactly what lines of questioning and issues

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that they might be interested in. But I will say

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I'm helping to lift up,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>based on my experience with Atlanta Kagan's nomination, is again

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>these documents at the White House the Clinton administration. The

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Library turned over a hundred and seventy thousand pages

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of documents from Atlanta Kagan's confirmation process of what the

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Senate asked for on a bipartisan basis. There are more

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>than a million documents out there in the Bush Library

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for Judge Kavanaugh, and I'm helping China light on that

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the entire Senate gets the documents

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it needs in order to make a decision. Thanks Chris,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll note that you change your Twitter name to Chris

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hashtag stop Kavanaugh Kang. That's Christopher Kangy's Chief Council of

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Demand Justice and former Deputy Council to President Obama. Thanks

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I am June Brolso

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg m HM.