WEBVTT - Boeing Latest, Lennar Earnings

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 4>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big business

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Today we'll look at how Japan is dealing with rising

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>cases of a flesh eating bacteria X plus.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>World, Let's go how electric vehicle markets around the world

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 3>are not all traveling in the same direction or at

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the same speed in twenty twenty four.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>But first we dive into the airline industry and Boeing.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>A Boeing quality inspector recently alleged that the plane maker

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 2>mishandled and lost track of hundreds of faulty parts, some

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>of which he said may have been installed on new

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>seven three seven maxplanes.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 3>The claims were detailed in a complaint by Boeing inspector

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Sam Mohawk with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>they deepen the pressure that Boeing already faces from Washington.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>The company's under investigation by multiple federal agencies, including the

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>For more on to all Things Boeing, we were joined

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 2>by George Ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence, senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analysts.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>We first asked George about some of the challenges that

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Boeing is now facing with its outsourcing strategies.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 5>So in that same report, right, they talk about inspections

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 5>at suppliers, they talk about monitoring quality suppliers better.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I just think.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 5>This is a it's a wholly different industry, right. I

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 5>think there's a bunch of people that have come to

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 5>the aerospace world from auto backgrounds and other mass production backgrounds, right,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 5>and in those worlds, safety isn't as important. Volume is

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot higher. You can get multiple suppliers to provide

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 5>products to your production line, you can work cost on

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 5>those suppliers, and I think that whole game plan is

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 5>really really difficult to do in aviation. And I think

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 5>this is part of what we're seeing, right. I think

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 5>you can outsource, but I think if you outsource, you know,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, to your supplier base, I think it's still

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 5>got to be you know, a pretty strong relationship with them,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 5>not a combative relationship where it's always about price, because

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 5>it really matters the quality you get to your line, right,

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 5>safety is dependent upon it. And so I think what

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 5>we're finding out as this sort of you know, whole

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Boeing saga unravels, is outsourcing and banging up your suppliers

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 5>for price just isn't a winning strategy in aviation.

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Have they course corrected enough or can?

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Look?

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 5>I think they can. Everything can be fixed. I think

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 5>if you look at their competitors across the pond, Airbus,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 5>they're not having these problems. I think Airbus has been

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 5>less combative with some of their suppliers. They're in the

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 5>middle of this correction. We know they want to buy

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Spirit Aerosystems. We're still waiting to hear news on that.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 5>There's still, you know, the challenge of getting some of

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 5>the other companies that Spirit supplies, to name the Airbus

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 5>probably out of the portfolio so they can recover. It's

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 5>gonna take some time and it's gonna take a lot

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 5>of work with their suppliers.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So, George, if I think about, you know, rethinking my

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 2>strategy with my suppliers and maybe focusing less on price

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>competitives maybe a little bit more on quality, does that

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>imply that Boeing's profit margins will be under pressure going forward?

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I think for sure, right, I think you're you're not

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 5>going to receive a return to the Boeing margins you

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 5>saw at the end of last decade. I'm not gonna

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 5>say in time, perhaps they could get back to that.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 5>It's going to take a bunch of work here near

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 5>term to improve the quality, and that's going to cost money.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Plus we already know that some of the business they

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 5>put in the books, right, they had some challenges delivering

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 5>into China. That was kind of the one two whammy

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 5>after they had the grounding of the Max and the crashes.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 5>We know they probably sold a bunch of airplanes for

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>some pretty good prices to really core customers like United,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 5>like Southwest. So I think that I think both, you know,

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 5>both on the cost side again, given this correction to

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 5>improve the supply base, improve production, get capacity rolling again,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 5>as well as some of the pricing they gave away

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 5>on backfill for orders means you're not looking at a

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Boeing that's going to get those margins fore you through

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 5>this decade.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I think if I look at Boeing stock, then I

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>mean it's down from December. Does that accurately reflect then

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 3>this tighter profit margin world to sort of revamp and

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the course correct and that they have.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 5>To do so, you know, I think when you look

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 5>at their valuations, you know, their historical valuations, One, they're

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 5>really high right now, right because earnings are so low,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 5>you know. So I think that there is a little

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 5>bit of investor look through at this point, you know,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 5>on the current problems they have. But whether or not

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 5>they're properly positioned for the out years right now, I

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 5>think it's all a function of if they can quickly

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 5>improve the build rate so they can improve economies of

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 5>scale and start to get more profitability back into this

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 5>business and that you know, really remains to be seen.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>George, you mentioned China. Where is Boeing in terms of

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>getting the seven three seven macs in the air and

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 2>China kind of how's that business looking in terms of

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>sales and deliveries.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 5>So their deliveries going into China, right and uh, it

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 5>looks to us to largely be deliveries that were you know, built,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 5>you know, when the seven three seven was grounded, and

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 5>they're started to get some of those back into the country.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>But China's also has this problem now with.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 5>The flight recorder that's been authorized by other jurisdictions, including

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 5>the US. So I mean it feels to me like

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 5>China's allowing deliveries, but you know, they're still not maybe

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 5>keen on taking a lot of deliveries from Boeing. I

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen a bunch of orders come in from China,

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, for Boeing, And so I would say that

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 5>relationship still, while it's maybe thawing a bit, is nowhere

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 5>near where it was in the last decade. And they

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 5>have their problems too.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Right now.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 5>I think they don't need as many airplanes, their economy

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 5>isn't growing as fast. Air travel isn't growing as fast.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 5>But I still think that relationship is not in the

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 5>right place where it should be, where you'd like it

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 5>to be. I think for Boeing before I let.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 3>You go, any word yet on the replacement for Dave Calhoun. Like,

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>how's that going?

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 4>He laughed?

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Answer is laughing.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, what I hear from news reports is picking up still.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 5>But gee, I mean, I don't know, it's been a while.

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of conjecture. It's a hard job. There's

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 5>probably a lot of people that just aren't willing to

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 5>take it. I don't know, you know, they got to

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 5>the end of the year, and so maybe they're going

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 5>to use it all. I don't know.

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and anyone but Larry Culp that you keep

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>hearing about, that's for real.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 5>So I don't really track the people that's you know,

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 5>that's kind of hard for me. I do know, like

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 5>it said, it's got to be a rock star manufacturing,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, sort of CEO. I don't know that there's

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of them left in America. I think we

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 5>do a lot of outsourcing now, so maybe that makes

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 5>it a taller order too.

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and Airlines analyst.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>We move next to big tech and alphabet's Google. Google

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>has faced immense pressure to keep pacing artificial intelligence with

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Open AI and other companies, and in April of twenty

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, the tech giant announced it would combine its

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 3>two elite AI teams, Google Brain and deep Mind.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Google would form what it described as an AI super

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 2>unit called Google deep Mind. This is the subject of

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg BusinessWeek story this week entitled Google deep Mind

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 2>shifts from research lab to AI product factory.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 3>For more. We were joined this week by one of

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the stories authors, Bloomberg Tech reporter Mark Bergan. We first

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>asked Mark about Google's AI strategy.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, the good way to put their

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 4>their strategy in some ways is they're trying to longer

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>be in their back foot. But I think that with

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 4>the past two years and that our story looks at

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 4>how Google and deep Mind really set the infrastructure and

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 4>then the base layer for this sort of AI boom

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 4>that we've had, and then Chatgebt kind of took all

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 4>the glory in some ways, and so in their playing

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 4>ketchup in you'd say, not necessarily on the technical side,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 4>but there's certainly now you know, chat, scheebt and all

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 4>iterations from the different companies building language models like anthropic

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 4>and cohere, they're all sort of threatening Google Search in

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 4>a way that really hasn't happened in almost two decades,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and so their strategy is I would say defensive at

0:08:58.840 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 4>this point.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 3>How does does it get on the offense? What does

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 3>it need to do to sort of change that narrative?

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you know the story. We looked at

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot about this mergers that they that Google put

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 4>in place a year ago so they've had out here

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 4>in London is Deep Mind, which is widely consider like

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 4>the world's leading AI lab and has for the past

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 4>decade effectively been the best funded university running in the world.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 4>They basically been a research lab. They put out some

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 4>great breakthroughs like alpha go alpha fold around protein folding,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 4>but they've not been deeply integrated and connected with kind

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 4>of Google's commercial and profit center, Google Brain, which was

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 4>the competing AI lab or that they also had in

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 4>California that was a little bit more tied to a

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of the popular Google services, and they've been all

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 4>merged that for the past year under demosacibus here who

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 4>runs all of Google AI. It's had kind of a

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 4>bumby road so far, but I think their plan is

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 4>to continue to ship things like Gemini their big foundational model,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 4>tweak that and start kind of integrating a lot of

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>this research directly into commercial services.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Mark what does Google say about that chat GPT and

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>just as a fundamental threat to the core Google search business?

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>How do they respond to that?

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, you know, Google publicly is great about

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 4>never talking about their rivals by name. Anyways, they say nothing,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 4>And I think that something they've talked about for a

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 4>long time is that sort of their their token phrase

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 4>that soon they're but cha uses is that the search

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 4>is the last kind of biggest moonshot for Google. I

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 4>think they are thinking, and you know, they're thinking a

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 4>lot about what that search interface looks like. You know,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 4>how they're going to adapt to if consumers move to

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 4>things like Chat, schipt and Gemini. What does that mean

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 4>for Google Search ads business, which is still the line's

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 4>share of its revenue. They've had some some clear mishaps.

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I've looked pretty ugly snaffoos, and since the launch of

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 4>Gemini or this year, right, like there was that kind

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>of famous incidents where they were some of the responses

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 4>were encouraging people to put glue on pizza, right, there

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 4>were these They've described this as sort of like this

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 4>is kind of early stage in this technology and some

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 4>stumbles that they've had, but you know, they are the

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 4>world's leaders in search and this is something where you

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 4>know they have a lot of deep responsibility to get

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 4>this right, not just for their business but for people's

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 4>trust in using Google.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Well that's what's so difficult, right, It's like all the

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 3>technology is changing so fast, but you still need to

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>like do it. So it's it's you're like we're watching

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>it in real time. Paul and I were just talking

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 3>about a Washington Post article and then talked about how

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 3>all the AI models cannot answer who won the presidential

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>election in the US in twenty twenty. And I'm just wondering,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>like how these advanced technologies solve for problems that they're

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>using these large language models, which is basically like, you know,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 3>me and Paul talking are regular people talking, does that

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>also mess them up?

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 4>It reminds me a little bit of it's a slightly

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>different technology obviously, but you know they're In twenty sixteen,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Google had this big mess where if there was a

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 4>popular or there's a blog or this kind of fringe

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 4>blog that said that if I remember this correctly, it's

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 4>been a long time, it was that Hiller Clinton won

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 4>the election in twenty sixteen, right, and that was a

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 4>top of for briefly and momentarily top of Google News results.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 4>And they've dealt with this sort of problem around misinformation,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 4>around totally not credible sources being at the top of

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Google Search. You're seeing problems that are now dealing with.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>I saw a story about Google images and like consensual porn.

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these problems I think are being multiplied because

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 4>with these tools of that generative AI do, which Google

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 4>talks a lot of as being revolutionary, it also just

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 4>makes content production so much easier. And so there's this

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 4>multitude of content now and Google has been this sort

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of their primary services to organize this, and that has

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of messy problems, especially what OpenAI has kind

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 4>of forced and Microsoft as forced Google is to move

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot faster than they have been in years past,

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 4>and we've seen some clear stumbles from that.

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Mark Bergan, Bloomberg Technology Reporter.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, We're going to break down my recent guidance

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 3>from the home old Leonard disappointed investors.

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>depth and data on two thousand companies one hundred and

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence be a B I,

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>go on the terminal.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and amlex Deal and this is Bloomberg.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apocarplay and and broud

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 3>We move next to the home builder Lenar. This week.

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 3>The company reported better than expected orders in the second quarter,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>but it's forecast for deals in the current quarter missed

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 3>analyst expectations, and Lenar shares fell.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>After the report, Lenar said that affordability continued to be

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>tested by interest rate movements and simultaneously challenged consumer sentiment.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>For more on this and the latest in the home

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>building space, we were joined by Drew reading Bloomberg Intelligence

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>US Homebuilding analysts.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Drew for his key takeaways and why

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 3>investors were so unhappy after Lenar reported its results.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 6>It's so much about what's happened with the volumes they

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 6>deliver good orders. They're up nineteen percent. They maintain their

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 6>full year guidance for eighty thousand home closings. It has

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 6>to do with their outlook for gross margin. They guided

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 6>to about one hundred basis points below what the street

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 6>was looking for, and as you mentioned, that would require

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 6>a ramp in the fourth quarter to about twenty five percent. So,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 6>like you said, there's definitely some skepticism in their ability

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 6>to meet their full year outlook. The reason for that

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 6>is because we saw rates move up as high as

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 6>seven and a half percent during the quarter. You know,

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 6>they've come back in a little bit, but we're seeing

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 6>their need to incentivize buyers remain elevated, and that's what's

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 6>impacting profitability.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 2>So where are we in that activity there? If I'm

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>looking at of seven percent mortgage, what are they going to.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Do for me?

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So typically what we're seeing is that the builders

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 6>will maintain a spread versus the headline rate. So if

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing seven and a half percent in the market.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Typically you're going to get six percent from a builder.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, there are some other builders, and depending on

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 6>the market, depending on how strong the market is, what

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 6>the man looks like, they could get you into the fives.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 6>But obviously that's going to cost them on the gross

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 6>margin line. So the incentives they're using are certainly working.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 6>It's just what's the cost so.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>That one percent the hundred basis point missed, but then

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>keeping their guidance for gross margin for the year, that

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>must imply that they're looking for rake cuts.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think a lot of it has to do

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 6>with what they're doing on the cost side. One of

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, Lenar's emphasis for their business over the last

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 6>several years has really been running a more efficient manufacturing

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 6>based business where they're not necessarily just chasing volume, but

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 6>they're doing it the right way. They're fine tuning their

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 6>floor plans, they're pushing back on their suppliers. You have

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 6>to remember they're one of the second largest builder in

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 6>the country, but they're one of the only builders who

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 6>has scale at the national level, so they're able to

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 6>leverage that and kind of push back a little bit.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 6>So certainly some of the benefit that they expect in

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 6>foro Q, I would assume is going to come from

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 6>what they're doing on the costs side, as well as

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 6>fixed leverage from higher deliveries. But nonetheless that's still going

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 6>to be the focal point for investors is how do

0:15:59.320 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 6>they get there?

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 4>How much?

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I remember this back in the beginning of

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic, lumber went crazy, Where are we in lumber?

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>And how is that a part of their gross margin?

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 6>Sure so numbers about ten percent of the cogs for

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 6>a builders, so it's certainly the most important input costs.

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 6>As you would expect, you know, lumber prices have come

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 6>back down a lot, so builders have been benefiting on

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 6>the margin side. I think we've seen more stabilization of late,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 6>perhaps a little rise to the upside, but really lumbers

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 6>not impacting the business in as significant a way as

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 6>it was over the last couple of years.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 2>What the companies tell you about their expectations for interest rates,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>mortgage rates, what are they think is going to happen?

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 6>So I think the expectation broadly is that mortgage rates

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 6>will start to come in a little bit as we

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 6>get through the end of the year. I don't think

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 6>they're managing their business for any you know, significant and

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 6>dropping rates back to you know, where we were previously.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 6>But I think as a builder from a demand perspective,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 6>if we get rates coming back to the six and

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 6>a half percent range, you know, that's that's pretty much

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 6>a sweet spot for them. You know, we've heard that

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 6>as you get to five and a half percent, that's

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 6>really when demand in the market starts to move. So

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 6>the fact that if we could get to six and

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 6>a half they're buying down rates one hundred basis points,

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 6>I think they'll continue to do well. And you know

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 6>what's interesting is the public builders are kind of at

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 6>the top of the food chain as it comes to housing.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 6>You have to realize they're generating about fifty percent market

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 6>share compared to call it thirty eight percent prior to

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 6>the pandemic. Really, so they've really leveraged that lack of

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 6>inventory in the resale market and the struggles among some

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 6>of the smaller private piers, and they've capitalized on it.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>So when you say we have to the five and

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a half percent is kind of a nice sweet spot.

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So that implies the Fed funds rate a six and

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 3>a half percent and the home builders still give that

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred basis point discount. When the Fed funds rate gets

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 3>to five and a half percent, do the builders still

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>offer that one hundred basis point discount.

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 6>I think it's going to depend on what the broader

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 6>macro economic situation looks like. If we get a pool

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 6>back in rates, you know, a modest pullback, and we

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 6>are still dealing with a pretty solid labor market, I

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 6>think that you know, builders will be able to definitely

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 6>pull back on their use of incentives. I don't know

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 6>that they'll go away altogether, because at this point that's

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 6>something that buyers are looking to and it certainly made

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 6>their product more attractive. If we get a significant pullback

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 6>in rates and it's because you know, the economic situation

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 6>has deteriorated further, that's obviously more of a concern and

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 6>we would see them probably pushing centives even harder.

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Drew Redding Bloomberg Intelligence at US home

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>building analyst.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Moving to Japan, we hear the country is now dealing

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>with rising cases of a disease caused by a rare

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 3>flesh eating bacteria that can kill people within forty eight hours.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Health authorities have reported over one thousand cases of strip

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to cockle toxic shock syndrome in the first six months

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty four. At the current rate of infection,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>experts fear the number of cases in Japan could reach

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty five hundred this year.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 3>For more on all this, we turned to one of

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the experts, Amshidalgia, Senior Scholar at the Center for Health

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Security at John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. He's

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 3>also an infectious disease physician.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Amash to tell us more about the

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 2>bacterial infection in Japan.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 7>Streptococcus is a bacteria that all of us have dealt with.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 7>It's the same bacteria that causes strep throat. What can

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 7>happen though in certain individuals is it can be a

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 7>much more severe infection where it can cause what we

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 7>call necrotizing or flesh eating type of skin infections and

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 7>then also spread systemically and caused multiple different organ systems

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 7>to shut down. So that's when we use the kind

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 7>of term toxic shocks, and there would say that bacteria

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 7>basically disseminates toxins throughout your whole body and it's a

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 7>very serious illness with high levels of morbidity, immortality.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Doctor, is this new or has this always been the case.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 7>It's always been the case. What's new is that in

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 7>Japan post pandemic, they've reported at least two years where

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 7>they've had higher than normal cases and trying to unravel

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 7>the mystery of why that change in epidemiology occurred is

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 7>what's getting headlines right now. But streptococcle toxic shock syndrome

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 7>has been around forever. It's just this increase in Japan

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 7>that people are interested in.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>How do the medical professionals, how are they treating this?

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 7>So the mainstay is going to be antibiotics, but because

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 7>it's this systemic toxin disease, we often give other drugs

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 7>to modulate the immune system, and if there are elements

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 7>of flesh eating disease going on, they basically have to

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 7>do extensive surgery to kind of cut ahead of the infection.

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, this sounds terrible. How quickly does this happen?

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, strap can come on really quickly

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 3>and it might take you a couple of days to

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 3>realize that you have it. Like, what's the cycle for this?

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, when you get into that toxic shock syndrome, spiral

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 7>it's very fast. They can be dramatic, you know, even

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 7>in an hour can be a major difference in a patient.

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 7>But it's important remember that not everybody that gets a

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 7>strep infection is going to get it's still rare. Most

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 7>people who have a strep infection of their throat or

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 7>of their skin going to turn out to be kind

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 7>of a garden variety infection. But it is important for

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 7>clinicians to keep in mind that if people are getting worse,

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 7>if they're not getting better, if they're more concerning systemic

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 7>symptoms occurring, that they think about this. And it's also

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 7>important for patients to know that as well, that if

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 7>they're not getting better in the expected time, or they're

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 7>taking a turn for the worst when they're already on antibiotics,

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 7>that this is something where they need to seek care immediately.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Is there any reason why it would be I guess

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 2>localized in Japan here, anything that is unique to that part.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 7>Of the world, not particularly, I mean, we've seen increases

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 7>in streptococal infections, not necessarily toxic shock causing ones all

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 7>over the different countries. For example, the UK had a

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 7>major issue with this a couple of years ago, and

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 7>it may be having to do with kind of idiosyncrasies

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 7>in the immunity in the population in Japan. Remember, we

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 7>all came through a pandemic where there was a lot

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 7>of social distancing and many of the ordinary infections that

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 7>people get every year were kind of disrupted. And there

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 7>may have been different disruptions in different parts of the

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 7>world and different lens of these infections, and now they're

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 7>kind of coming back to their prior levels and there's

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 7>some catching up to do. There are people who might

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 7>not have had as much immunity because they weren't exposed

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 7>at a low level over the last couple of years,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 7>or they just might not have been infected. And there's

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 7>a certain number that are going to be expected every

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 7>year in Japan, and because you had a two year lull,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 7>now it's coming back to baseline levels and that's what

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 7>they're noticing. So this is kind of one of the

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 7>leading hypothesis. But we don't know quite everything for sure

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 7>what's going on in Japan, but that's what I think

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 7>is at play.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 3>What are the signs you mentioned that if you're on

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 3>antibiotics for strap and you don't get better, but you

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>get worse. What are some other signs that people should

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 3>be looking out for.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, so severe a spreading rash that's getting severe, severe pain,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 7>if there's a rash where the infection might have been,

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 7>anything involving low blood pressure, extreme fatigue, not being clear mentally,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 7>difficulty breathing, all of those kind of signs that the

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 7>infection is not localized.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Nic doctor. I remember we should talk to you all

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the time during the pandemic. You're very kind to share

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>your time and you know, kind of educate a lot

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of folks on what this virus was, how doctors and

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 2>health professionals were treating it, and then ultimately the vaccine

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and the efficacy of the vaccine. So we again appreciate

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 2>all that time you gave us. Now that we've got

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>that in the rear view mirror here, I know one

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of the themes that came out of that was just

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the stress on the healthcare system and the people of

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the healthcare system that doctors and nurses and everybody of

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the work they had to be in the front lines

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>during those early months and that year. How are the folks,

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the good folks at Johns Hopkins that you deal with

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 2>in the facilities, how are they doing? Several years on now, well,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 7>That most healthcare systems around the country have kind of

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 7>come to a new normal where there's kind of chronic burnout,

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 7>there are chronic staffing issues where people quite haven't recovered

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 7>from the way that the pandemic altered hospital operations. And

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 7>this is going to be one of the long tails

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 7>of the pandemic. It's not something that you can just

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 7>bounce back from. There wasn't a lot of resiliency built

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 7>into the system, There wasn't a lot of kind of

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 7>slack in it, and the pandemic ate up all that slack,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 7>and I just think that we're in a situation where

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people still are carrying those scars around

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 7>of that time when they were overworked, where there were

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 7>concerns about personal protective equipment, where hospitals were crashing, and

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 7>even when you look at the economics of hospitals, we're

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 7>seeing hospitals closed world hospitals really looking at their financial viability,

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 7>hospital bankruptcies. So this was something that took a major

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 7>toll on the healthcare system, just like we expected and

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 7>predicted it would, And this is why it's so important

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 7>to incorporate healthcare preparedness healthcare resiliency into planning for the

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 7>next infectious disease emergency, whatever it might be. This can't

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 7>just be something that we think about when there's a crisis,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 7>when it's in the headlines. This is something that needs

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 7>to be done kind of with a long term eye

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 7>to the future to make a sustainable way to operate

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 7>hospitals and make emergency prepared and as part of their

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 7>core function.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 3>How are we doing with COVID? I mean, COVID loves me.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't love Paul, but it loves me. How are

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 3>we doing with COVID? What are the cases like? Are

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>we going to get vaccinations in the fall for flu

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>en covid? What do you think?

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, COVID is something that's increased over time in the

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 7>last several weeks or so. But we've seen is this

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 7>virus is endemic, but it continues to mutate and spin

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 7>off new variants that are able to infect us. So

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 7>right now, all across the country, COVID cases are up,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 7>emergency department visits are up, but its ability to cause

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 7>severe disease, its ability to crush the hospital severely constrained

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 7>because of the immunity and the other tools that we have.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 7>We will have new vaccines in the fall that are

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 7>better targeted to what's circulating, and that will likely be

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 7>something that's recommended to high risk individuals that they get

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 7>right alongside their flu vaccine.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Ama Schadalgia, senior scholar at the Center for

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Health Security at Johns Hopkins's Bloomberg School of Public Health.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program versation with Weatherford International CEO

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>about the company's turnaround post bankruptcy.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>We're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies in one hundred

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.719
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bigo

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal, I'll Paul Sweeney.

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>And Amlex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 3>We take a look now at the company Weatherford International

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 3>ticker WFRD. Weatherford is an oil services company that also

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 3>has a leg into the energy transition.

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>What makes them interesting is that the company went bankrupt

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen, and in twenty twenty, Weatherford announced several

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 2>changes to its executive leadership team, and its stock has

0:26:58.320 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>since rebounded.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Weather Firs stock part increase ninety two percent in the

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 3>full year of twenty twenty three, outpacing its peers. So

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 3>for more on the company, we were joined by its

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 3>president and CEO, Garesh Salgram.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Garesh where the company is in its turnaround.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 8>Look, it's been a terrific four years. The team's done

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 8>an incredible job. I think very few people could have

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 8>dreamt where it would be today and what was possible.

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 8>You Know, the way I think about it is, the

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 8>turnaround's mostly done. You know, we've gotten the company out

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 8>of the ditch. We have stabilized everything, We've fixed the

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 8>balance sheet. So the journey so far has been from

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 8>broken to good. The next phase of the journey is

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 8>really the good to great journey. And that's what I'm

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 8>actually very excited about, because if we've been able to

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 8>do all of the things that we've done over the

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 8>past four years with a lot of constraints, a lot

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 8>of shackles. You know, the exciting part is what we

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 8>can do without that.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 3>So when you go from good to great, does that

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>mean like a lot of buybacks and dividends?

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Does that mean? Yeah?

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 9>What is that?

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Look, it's a lot of different things, but ultimately it

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 8>is creation of value, and it's creation of value for

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 8>our customers, for our employees, and most of all for

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 8>our shareholders. But it's doing that with continued focus on

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 8>greater cash generation, which comes from better margins, better improvement

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 8>in the way we manage our networking capital, but also

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 8>ultimately better investments. So our real goal is to make

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 8>sure that we've got world classes that are done on

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 8>invested capital.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Now that you've I see as an outsider to the

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 2>energy industry, I see a lot of m and a

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>activity there, and being a former banker myself, that's what

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 2>hits my radar screen. How do you guys think about

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>MNA for your business now that you are on maybe

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 2>firmer footing correct?

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, for the first three years, MNA was a

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 8>bad word. You know, Weatherford actually built up on a

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 8>series of acquisitions and a lot of issues with that,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 8>especially around the lack of integration. So the first three

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 8>years that I've been in the role, we really focused

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 8>on the organic capabilities of the company, building out the portfolio,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 8>making sure we fix the operating intensity and the rigor

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 8>around the company. But we have now gotten to a

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 8>point where MNA has become a very important salient topic.

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 8>We actually just exercise that muscle for the first time.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 8>We announced three small acquisitions back in February, so two

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 8>in the wireline technology space, one in a very exciting space,

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 8>and Intervention, which really gives us capability in slaught recovery

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 8>and plug an abandonment, which is a very key part

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 8>of that energy transition. So we've started to do that,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 8>and I think there will be more to come because

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 8>we've now got a balance sheet that allows us to

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 8>do that, and more importantly, a team that understands the

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 8>importance of integration and is learning how to build that

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 8>into the opening cadence of the company.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>How do your services differ than say one of your competitors,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and how do you sort of invest for the life

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 3>cycle of a welfare customer.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 8>Sure so in oilfield services, there's a lot of companies

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 8>that do a lot of things similarly. So we've got

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 8>what differentiates us. We've got a portfolio that provides core

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 8>ofs services, so everything from brilling services to wireline, etc.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 8>But we're also able to complement that with what we

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 8>call specialty services, things like managed pressure drilling, tubular running services,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 8>intervention services, etc. That very few, if anyone, has, So

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 8>that combination of broad based services that allow us to

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 8>go toe to toe with the larger peers in the

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 8>sector as well as then these specialty products and specialty

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 8>services give us that differentiation and also allow us to

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 8>have higher margins.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I keep jogging to alex with oil at

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>eighty dollars a barrel. I'm going to drive down to

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Texas and start drilling some holes. I mean, isn't the

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>cost like forty bucks in eighty dollars? I can make

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 2>some money there, but I don't see a whole lot

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>of drilling activity. What's going to take it for the

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 2>industry to take advantage of these prices here?

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think the industry has really really embraced this

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 8>concept of delivering returns for shareholders, and so I think

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of discipline, especially around managing capital within

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 8>the industry that's further exacerbated by the wave of M

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 8>and A that's happening, which again goes back to driving

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 8>higher returns. So I don't think in the US there's

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 8>going to be necessarily a sea change. You know, at

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 8>the range of oil prices that we are seeing right now,

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 8>which I think in the long term is actually good

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 8>for our especially it creates a balance versus the seesaw

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 8>effect that you see in the cyclicality that we've seen

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 8>in the past. We also have a very robust international market.

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 8>So for Weatherford, less than twenty percent of our revenues

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 8>come from North America. The bulk of it is really

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 8>an international orientation, international leverage, so we see a very

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 8>healthy market. Now the US is still the largest market

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 8>in the world. We see a lot of activity, but

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 8>it is something that is driven by capital discipline by

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 8>our customers, which is a good thing.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And we have M and A too. Does that eventually

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 3>lead into less business for oral services companies because in theory,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe an Exxon pioneer going to drill ten wells rather

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 3>than twenty.

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think, Look, we are seeing a lot of

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 8>drilling efficiencies, we are seeing the recount go down, But

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 8>I think it all comes down to differentiation. As long

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 8>as companies can differentiate and deliver value to allow our

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 8>customers to make greater headway on their efficiencies to generate

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 8>higher returns. I think they'll always be business again. It

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 8>is the largest market still.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm looking at your income savent, I mean

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 2>roughly half your revenue Eastern Hemisphere, half Western HEMISAE fear

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>it gives the economics of both of those, your domestic

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>markets versus your international.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, Historically North America was a very profitably

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 8>challenged market for us on a profitability basis. Yeah, right,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 8>So our team's done a fabulous job over the past

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 8>few years really changing the way we run the North

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 8>America business. So today the profitability across all of our geographies,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 8>all of our regions is pretty much imbalance. So and

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 8>I think, you know, I've always said the litmus test

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 8>of our turnaround has been what's happened in the North

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 8>America market over the past year. We've seen revenues decline

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 8>in North America, but the profitability has actually gone up.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 8>So that's a real testament to what we've been able

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 8>to do at Weatherford and the opening rigor the opening

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 8>intensity that the team has put in.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Gresh Saligram, President and CEO at Weatherford International.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 3>We have something here at Bloomberg called Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 3>The idea behind it is to provide data on commodities, power, transport, industries,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 3>buildings and agriculture plus new technology.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>This week we look at BNF's globe long term forecast

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>for electric vehicles for more. We were joined by Corey

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Cantor Bloomberg bn EF lead US electric vehicle analysts.

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Corey for his key takeaways from bnef's

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 3>recent EV research.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 9>I think the big takeaway is that EV sales growth

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 9>is happening on evenly across different regions in the world.

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 9>Maybe not a surprising finding if you're following EV's on

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 9>a day to day basis, but moving forward, we expect

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 9>that to be a bit of the same. To give

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 9>you a sense of where we see things going, we

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 9>basically have both the near termout look and a long

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 9>term out look. The near turnout look ends in twenty

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 9>twenty seven, and so what we expect is by twenty

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 9>twenty seven, global passenger EV sales will be about thirty

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 9>million in our base case called the economic transition scenario,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 9>and a probably a better metric of that is thinking

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 9>about EV share of passenger vehicle sale. So we'll move

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 9>from a world where one in five cars sold is

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 9>electric to a world where one in three is about

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 9>thirty three percent, up from eighteen percent last year. By

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 9>twenty forty, we expect that about seventy three percent of

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 9>all new car sales will be electric, but there's a

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 9>long way to go. And then on the US question,

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 9>always good to compare it, I think to China and Europe.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 9>US passenger EV's shareff sale last year was around ten percent.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 9>We expect the next two years to see a bit

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 9>of a slower growth. So only about twelve percent of

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 9>new car sales should be electric this year, rising to

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 9>about twenty nine percent by twenty twenty seven. Seems pretty good,

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 9>but if you look at Europe in China, it's going

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 9>to be much higher there. So by twenty twenty seven

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 9>we expect about sixty percent of new car sales to

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 9>be electric in China and forty one percent in Europe.

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 9>And when we talk about passenger evs at B and

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 9>EF that's both battery electric and plug and hybrid electric vehicles.

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Talked us about this plug in hybrid it feels like

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of folks are suggesting that might be a

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>very vible interim step for at least in the US

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the transition. Ev Is that how you

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 2>think about it, Paul?

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 9>Really good question. I also co wrote the plug and

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 9>hybrid section of the report. We do a kind of

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 9>deep dive which we do with a few different deep

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 9>dives every year, and what we call thematic highlights. I

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 9>think around p Has the question really is.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Pheaps, yeah, pheat. Pluggin hybrids okay, plug in hybrids okay?

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 9>Is how good are they going to be? If you

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 9>look at the plug and hybrids in China, they're all

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 9>electric mode, meaning they're kind of electric. Mileage they get

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 9>before they have to turn on that gas engine is

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 9>about twice as high in China currently as it is

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 9>in the US. So quite simply, China is making not

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 9>only better fully electric vehicles, but better plug and hybrids.

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 9>We still think that there is some role for pehabs

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 9>to play this decade in markets like the US in Japan.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 9>But what I've been big on pushing on is the

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 9>product that we're getting today is not necessarily as good

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 9>as it should be. So when you hear automakers say oh, well,

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 9>maybe we'll do more hybrids or do more plug and

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 9>hybrids instead of fully electric vehicles. I think a fair

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.959
<v Speaker 9>response would be to say, well, in Europe and China

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 9>they're getting far more all electric mileage than here, so

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 9>can you deliver some of that more high quality product. Ultimately,

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 9>we do a bunch of different scenario analysis in the

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 9>full report, and one downside of plug in hybrids is

0:35:58.120 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 9>that if you go down that route and people are

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 9>aren't charging them enough, which is harder to do because

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 9>of the lower all electric range, you could end up

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 9>in a scenario where you're having a lot higher oil

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 9>demand use than if you just switch to fully electric vehicles,

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 9>and that would not be good for your climate targets.

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>When do you think the tipping point is when EV's

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.959
<v Speaker 3>become more of mass adoption here in the US.

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 9>So what we've pointed that historically is this idea of

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 9>upfront price parody. We're seeing total cost of ownership parody,

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 9>including fueling already being hit in many different regions in

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 9>terms of upfront costs. It really depends if you're comparing

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 9>apples to apples, right, you see a lot more evs

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 9>in that kind of low forty thousand dollars price range

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 9>now high thirties. I think once you get to the

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 9>low thirty thousand dollars price point. Really, according to our analysis,

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 9>when we're looking at kind of a generic BEV versus

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 9>a generic ice vehicle, we see it happening in the

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.439
<v Speaker 9>US over let's say the next three to four years,

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 9>really twenty twenty six to twenty twenty eight. But really,

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 9>if you're comparing a Tesla Model Y towards a lot

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 9>of its competitor vehicles or Model three, you're getting pretty close.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 9>But that's where you start to see I think higher

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 9>adoption where you won't have to necessarily have a premium

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 9>and price. You also get a lot of good leasing

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 9>deals today on EV's but it's a bit messier to

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 9>kind of figure that out because you've got dealer markups,

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 9>you've got different rates. But big picture, that upfront price parity.

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 2>How about the charging infrastructure in the United States? To

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>what extent is that been holding back the adoption of

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 2>evs here and kind of how do we expect that

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to evolve?

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think that's the biggest difference between Europe and China.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 9>Our EVY outlook for folks who aren't familiar, has whole

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 9>sections on charging infrastructure, how much investment is going to

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 9>be needed moving forward, but really just taking a base

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 9>level stat TESLA remains the number one provider of charging

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure here in the US in terms of reliability, in

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 9>terms of number of fast charging stations, and then there

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 9>isn't really a clear cut number two, three, four, five.

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 9>My colleague Ryan Fisher does a bunch of great presentations

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 9>on this, and one of actually the most impressive findings

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 9>is US and Europe actually have a similar amount of

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 9>chargers between the top six kind of charging infrastructure operators,

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 9>but Europe has an addition five hundred operators after that

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 9>that really supply the bulk of the market. So again,

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 9>we want to see more of that infrastructure built out.

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 9>There's been a lot of reporting around the federal funds

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 9>rolling out really slowly because they've had to go through

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 9>state RFPs. But yeah, that's the number one issue holding

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 9>back probably the US market, maybe even moving past the

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 9>upfront cost issue.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 3>At least with my IC car, right, I can trade

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 3>it in and I can get value for it. Do

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 3>we know how this market evolves for evs?

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean I did a residual value note with the

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 9>team at BADF maybe about two years ago, and the

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 9>market looks so different than that's when Tesla prices were

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 9>going ten to fifteen percent above their kind of selling price.

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 9>And so now you've seen because Tesla brought its prices

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 9>down that residuals for a lot of evs have crashed.

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 9>I think it's going to be something that continues to develop.

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 9>We need to find out how long batteries are going

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 9>to last.

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that yet.

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It varies.

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we don't have I think any research here

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 9>where we've said that this is what we find amongst

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 9>all the kind of evs in the market. But right,

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 9>if your battery holds up longer than people expect, you'd

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 9>expect to see me even more residual value. If not,

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 9>you know, you could see more of an issue. But yeah,

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 9>it's an outstanding question, like so much of the space.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 9>But to your point, Alex, that's why you want to

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 9>see more, you know, look into battery life over time.

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Corey Kanter Bloomberg, an EF lead US Electric

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Vehicle analyst.

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg Terminal