WEBVTT - August Trade Value Chart Changes | Dynasty Trade Block (Ep. 391)

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, and welcome to the Fantasy Pros Dynasty Football Podcast,

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by League Tycoon, the Dynasty first fantasy

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>football platform. I'm Ryan Warmley, joined as I am on

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the first Tuesday of every month on this fine discord

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>stages by Pat fitz Morris.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 2>It's how you're doing.

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Doing great, worm. It's great to have NFL training camps

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 3>open and a flot of news. Of course, we don't

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>like the injury news, but everything else. Man. Great to

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 3>have football back in our lives.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Training camp is here.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Overreaction season is here, certainly, and as you mentioned, sadly,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the season of the unfortunate injuries that come before you

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>even get to the season, which are always I mean,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>no injury is good, but that always feels extra painful

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>when it happens in the first week of August. So

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some of that, off course impact our

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>rankings already, guys like Ricky Piersoll being sort of the

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>headliners there, Chris Brasel in terms of rookies thinking from

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the Dynasty persive, So some.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunate developments there.

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about whatever people want to talk

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about here as they raise some questions on this stages.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You can feel free to raise your hand if you're

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the audience listening, and we'll call you up in

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the show and answer your questions

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>live on the air. You can of course always drop

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your questions in the chat as well. It's usually pretty active,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get to those throughout the show as well.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But Fits, as we usually do, we're going to start

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>off with our reaction to the latest update to the

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>trade value chart. You can search the Dynasty Trade Value

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>chart just on Google Fantasy Pros, or you can go

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to fantasypros dot com navigate the site find it there

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>as well, and you can see all the updates. We

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do it the first of every month, so we're sitting

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>here August fourth. This is just three days old, so

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a very fresh set of updates here, as it has

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>been throughout a lot of the summer. And I do

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>say this pretty much every month. When we're not in season,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a ton of movement, right because we're not

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing games being played or anything like that. The exception

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>might be some of the injury stuff going on. We'll

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>look through all the different positions here. We always start

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with the quarterbacks. Fits again, not a ton going on

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, the up and down. Here

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>one player that I feel like we haven't talked about,

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and this isn't based on any kind of movement on

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the latest chart. It's just somebody that I feel like

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you and I haven't really talked about. What I've talked

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>about with ericson a lot I know you've talked about

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in other shows. Is Trevor Lawrence. He finished so strongly

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last season, you know, was the

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>highest scoring player from like in the second half of

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the season, obviously had some insane weeks to finish off

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the year. Sits here at QB nine in the rankings.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 1>He's actually tied with Patrick Mahomes at QB eight, and

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he's four years younger than Mahomes. But he's surrounded by

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>other guys who are in that kind of same range

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the twenties. You know, Lawrence twenty six, Jalen Hurts

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is right behind him at twenty seven. Purty and Nicks

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are a couple spots later at twenty six apiece. So

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of this range, does nine seem too high, too

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>low or just.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Right to you?

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Again, this is a collaborative effort to put together this chart,

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just strictly your rankings. If you were

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>ranking Lawrence, where would he be in Do you think

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>year two with Liam Cohen is going to be a

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>step up from what we saw last year? Is gonna

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be something in between the first half of last year

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the second half last year.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Where are you out on Trevor Lawrence Right now, I've.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Got him QB eight. I have Patrick Mahomes QB ten.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Last month's chart had Patrick mahomes worth. There was a

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a gap between Mahomes and Trevor Lawrence,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 3>and now we've got that gap bridged and they're both

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 3>sporting identical values. So I'm pro Trevor Lawrence. I think

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>what we saw once he digested the Liam Cohen offense

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:49.279
<v Speaker 3>was really encouraging, and it was like twenty six points

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points a game. I want to say, from like

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>week nine or week ten on. Now, granted he was

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 3>like getting one touchdown run a week during that stretch,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 3>don't expect that to continue. You don't know if he's

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>going to equal last year's I think nine touchdown runs.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 3>But what we did see as a passer was still

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 3>really encouraging. Best probably half season of his career as

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a passer, and we like the weapons, were very confused

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>about this Jacksonville wide receiver corp on how to play

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>it for fantasy, But you know, in redraft, maybe the

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 3>easiest answers just to have Trevor Lawrence as your quarterback

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and that's good. Like we know he's not short on weapons.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Brian Thomas Junior really talented, still the guy who, although

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 3>he did it largely with Mac Jones, had that impressive

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>rookie season, Parker Washing and came on like Gangbasters late

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>last year. Jacoby Myers the ultimate reliable veteran. And then

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Travis Hunter is this wild card who we know is

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 3>really talented. So a lot of weapons for Trevor Lawrence

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 3>to work with Liam Cohen one of the best offensive

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 3>mines in football. I think it took a while for

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>us to, you know, get excited about Trevor Lawrence. He

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>seemed like a tease for quite a while, but now

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 3>it seems like he's finally achieved lift off.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you in a startup draft take Trevor Lawrence ahead,

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and obviously think he's super flex here with quarterback being

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>very valuable, would you take him ahead of you know,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>JSN Pukunukua. I'm trying to look at the trade value

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>chart and find where amongst the non quarterbacks he would

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fit in for you in a super flex startup draft.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So obviously he wouldn't go in the top seven because

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you have seven quarterbacks ahead of him. I think I

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think I would probably assume Jamar Chase would be ahead

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know of him for you. Then you get into

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like Bijon Gibbs, JSN Pooka. Where does he fit in

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>amongst those guys in a startup draft?

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Second round value?

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 4>For me?

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I think probably mid second round, kind of around the

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 3>spot that I would consider Drake, London, o'mari and Hampton

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 3>that sort of range. Does that sound right to you?

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 2>It sounds a little low to me.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, if we're talking about him as

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>QB eight, then that sounds like something in the range

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>of more like the first pick of the second round

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. Again, you say those seven quarterbacks go ahead,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe Bejana Gibbs. I personally wouldn't take a

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>running back over him. That's just my philosophy. I totally

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>get why other people would. So I'll give you those

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>two and then those big three receivers. I think is

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fine after that, though, Like if I'm staring in a

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>super flex startup, I'd probably rather have Lawrence than Aman

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Ross Saint Brown. I mean, the trade value chart would

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>suggest that you should value Lawrence higher. You know, justin Jefferson,

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>CD Lamb. Those guys are twenty six, twenty seven years old.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they have a full decade of elite

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>play left ahead of them the way a quarterback might.

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think, like I'm probably closer to the one

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>two turn. I don't think he would get into the

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>first round for me, but like that thirteen fourteenth pick

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>or so, I think I'd probably be looking to take

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>him if he is.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I haven't sat.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Down and ranked my quarterbacks, but if if if you

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>work QB eight for me, for example, the way he

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>is for you, I think to me, I want the

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>eighth quarterback going off the board in that range. Now,

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>if other quarterbacks get pushed down because other people want

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to go non quarterback even more aggressively than I would,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>then maybe I don't take him because I'm taking Herbert

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>instead or something like that. But if it plays according

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to my rankings, I think he's closer to the turn

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>than he is to the middle part of the round.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he went two oh four in the

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Dynasty startup we just did, so that's very close. Like,

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that's very much within the range. I think he goes

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>somewhere from early early second, maybe even on the turn

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 3>one twelve two oh one to somewhere like two eight

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>two nine is probably as late as he lasts, and

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I've got him about that to eight two nine.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like and then, as a larger conversation

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for the quarterbacks in general here before we move on

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to the next position, I do feel like Lawrence and

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>then Hurts at ten are the last two quarterbacks where

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I personally can really dream on You're

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>getting a value here where this guy could be in

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that top five conversation a year from now. I think

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody after them, Like, I'm really scared off of the

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>injury history with Jackson Dart brock Purty feels more high

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>floor than high ceiling. Maybe that's unfair to him, it's

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>just the way I feel about it, you know, bo Nix,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like is more you know, I'm more confident

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because he's with Sean Payton than I am in him

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the player Jordan Love another floor guy, maybe as opposed

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to a ceiling, and then there's just uncertainty. You know,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen it from Nana Mendoza. Cam Ward Prescott's

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a little older GoF a little older So I feel

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like if I'm looking for a guy who's not going

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as a Tier one dynasty quarterback, but who has that

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of upside, it feels like Lawrence at QB nine

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and then hurts just if you know, if he continues

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a bunch of rushing touchdowns every year at

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>QB ten or sort of the last two out of that,

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like fit in that bucket. So maybe that

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>makes me extra interested in getting one of them. If

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking, you know, late in the first, early in

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the second in a startup, so I have some degree

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of upside to kind of match the guys who had

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>those early picks.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense?

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 3>It does? And I agree with you on that, I.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Think, Yeah, any other thoughts on the quarterbacks or can

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we move on to two other positions?

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, there's not a ton of movement right now.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, not a ton of movement. Yeah, let's

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 3>move on to the running backs.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Bijon and Gibbs have both been kind of doing the

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>hold in this training camp, and of course Bijon just

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>signed a big contract here in the last couple of days.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>As far as I've seen nothing from Gibbs yet, but

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't expect him to really miss time

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Did that contract stuff like change

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>your opinion about their dynasty wrecking at all? Or is

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it just that they were already the easy one and

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>two and that hasn't even been remotely touched.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 3>The easy one and two. I think the gap has

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of closed in Dynasty between Bjon and Gibbs, and

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 3>in Redraft it seems like Gibbs is the preferred choice,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 3>at least among the rankers. I get it like. I

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 3>think Detroit has one of the easiest, if not the

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>easiest schedules in the league, and super clean start for Gibbs.

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 3>As far as Dynasty like, it's kind of almost splitting

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>hairs between the two guys. They're both really young and

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>both fabulous, and both contribute mightily as pass catchers, so

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>it is a tough call. I think it's totally fine

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 3>that they're separated by one value. Point in our chart.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to do a thought exercise here for RB

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>three in Dynasty, and I hope this makes sense the

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>scenario I'm trying to describe. Let's pretend that you Pat

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fitz Moors were in ten startup drafts, and in all

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>ten of these drafts you were required to take the

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>third running back off the board. How many of those

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>drafts would that third running back for you be Ashton genty?

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>How many times would you take Jeremiah Love? How many

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>times did you take o? Mary and Hampton? If there's

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>other names you want to throw in there, I'm looking

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in the trade value chart. Those are the next three names,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're all comped very closely together. And the reason

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I asked that is to sort of set the idea

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of do you think Gent is the easy RB three,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>which he is RB three in the trade value chart,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you'd take them all ten times? Do you think

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd rather like kind of split your bet and put

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>some of those chips on Jeremila, put some of those

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>chips on Hampton, devon a Chan, whoever it is. How

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>would you sort of break out that if you had

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to take RB three in ten different leagues?

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 3>That is a really interesting question. And the question I

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 3>think the biggest debate I have is like, do I

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>want one of those ten picks to be on O'maran Hampton.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 3>It would be no more than one, but do I

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 3>want it one? I think I'm just going six genty

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>four Love. That's how I want to play this. I

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 3>like Hampton, he could be fantastic. I just Gent was

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 3>always the better prospect, And even though Hampton has the

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>more desirable ecosystem right now, I feel good about the

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 3>trajectory of things with Clint Kubiak, and you know, Fernando

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Mendoza soon to settle in as the quarterback in that offense.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Presumably they're going to get a top drawer wide receiver

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 3>next year to kind of round out the starting lineup. Yeah,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Gent was just such an elite prospect and Love is

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of right on his heels, and I just don't

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>think Hampton is quite on that tier with those guys.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>So I like genty a little more than Love as

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 3>a prospect. And you know, even though neither Gent nor

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Love has the ecosystem Omarion Hampton has, I like Gent's

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a little more than Love's at the moment. And yeah,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 3>six four is how I'd split it. How would you

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>split it if you were in the same position.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think Love is actually the more interesting running

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>back here, more so than Hampton because obviously he's a

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>really good player, but a we haven't seen him do

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at the NFL level yet and be like you talk about, well,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Hampton's environment might be better than Gent's now, but long term,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>who knows Loves is the worst environment clearly, and that

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>he's the younger player, which we like, the worst environment

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>which we don't like, haven't seen him do it yet, like,

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard for me to sort of parse between

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about Gend and Love as individual prospects

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>coming in because they were both awesome and the clear

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>cut number one guys in their classes, so it's a

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>little hard to compare them to each other.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Also stylistically they're.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Different, So Love for me is like, I think he's

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>totally deserving of being RB four, but I just get

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>nervous seeing Arizona Cardinals next to his name, and I

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>know environment can change. I was a big I really

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>planted by flag on CJ. Stroud the year he came

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>out saying a good quarterback can make his environment better.

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Same thing with Drake May.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Drake May was falling to like the seventh eighth pick

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and some rookie drafts in his year because of the

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Patriots landing spot. I'm like, and I remember saying on shows,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback can make his environment look better. I don't

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>know if that's true of a running back. So I

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>get a lot more nervous with Love with his landing spot,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and also like the fact that not only are the

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals kind of a mess, but the division they're in, Like,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in what world are the Cardinals going to be competing

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to a division title against Sean mcvay's or Mike McDonald's

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks or Kyle Shanahan's Niners anytime soon? So it just

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's gonna be a team that's losing a

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of games in the foreseeable future. Having said that,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Love is a really talented player, So for me, I

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think I'm probably if I were breaking down that percentage

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>going something like, I think I would also go six

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on genty. But then I think I would maybe do

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like a it's either four and two or three three split,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I see Love versus Hampton is pretty close because

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Hampton's environment is so good right now. I'm really excited

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>about what twenty twenty six might look like for Amrian Hampton,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I think he's gonna have a better

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>year than Jeremiah Love, I'll put it that way. And

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so then if we're sitting here a year from now,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>these guys are both still really young. One of them

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is coming off what I expect to be a great season,

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the other one maybe a bit of a frustrating season

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>given the environment.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Then you know, I'm.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Trying to kind of project ahead there a bit. But

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree with you on genty sort of

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>six out of the ten, and then the other split

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I more struggle on. I actually almost expected you, if

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd weren't including Hampton, to do just a fifty to

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty split between gent and Love. But I guess you

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>do just like genty a little bit better at the

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>very least.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you know, I don't want to underestimate the

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>initial impact that Jeremiah Love could have because we have seen.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I believe over the last eleven years, eight running backs

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>drafted with top twelve picks in the NFL draft, and

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>those eight running backs in their rookie years averaged I

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>think fourteen hundred like it was around fourteen hundred and

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 3>fifty yards from scrimmage and ten point nine touchdowns a season,

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 3>like they were all And this was a lot of

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 3>really good prospects. It was Ezekie Elliott, it was Jumior

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Gabbs by John Robinson, Ashton Genti, Christian McCaffrey, Leonard four Nett,

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>couple of guys. I'm forgetting here, but and I know

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>that the Cardinals look like they're in terrible shape. Well,

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the winning percentage of the teams that drafted those eight

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>running the previous years before they were drafted, the combined

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>winning percentage was thirty two percent. Like those teams looked

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 3>terrible too when they took those players, hence why they

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 3>were drafting early enough to get those guys. So maybe

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Love just sort of defies what looks like a really

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>bad situation and still has a really good rookie year.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>And you know, this time of year from now, we're

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering whether he might be closer to Bijon Gibbs

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 3>than genty. You never know.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask one more quick question on the

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>running back position. Jonathan Brooks on this chart is RB

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. Are we maybe getting out a little too

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>far over our skis on the injury return optimism for

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Brooks because I have been on board with the hype

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about it early in the summer when

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he was in like the RB forty range.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 2>This is somewhat of a redraft conversation as well.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in Dynasty, I know he's still pretty young,

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but multiple really really.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Crushing knee injuries.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen him really do it at the NFL level,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and now we have him as almost in RB two

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty. That makes me nervous how strong he's being valued.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if maybe he should be lower than

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Mnungai, who's one spot behind him, David Montgomery if

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you're a win now team, who's two spots behind him.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Blake Korham Jalen Warren are the next two guys. Brooks

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>being ahead of those guys just makes me a little

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>bit nervous. I know our guy Bogman would maybe fight

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>for Zach Sharboney ahead of him. It's it raised my eyebrows,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is what I'll say. What do you think about his ranking?

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 2>For you?

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I've got him RB twenty eight. I've got him. I've

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>got Manangui twenty six, Korum twenty seven, Brooks twenty eight,

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and then Sharboney, Montgomery Warren. So yeah, it's hard because

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 3>he's young, he was highly drafted, he was a really

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>good prospect. But this situation with two ac al tarrors

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>in the same knee within a span of thirteen months, Yeah,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>you wonder if it's gonna be career shortening. You wonder

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 3>if the career will ever really get off the ground.

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's probably one more knee injury away from

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 3>that's it. So there's risk here for sure. But I

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 3>do feel like it's kind of a flat teer worm

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 3>like once we're sort of in that range where they're

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 3>probably you could hash it out with like twelve or

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>fifteen different running backs and what their value is. Maybe

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 3>not quite that many, but man from yeah, from Anangai

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 3>to I don't know. For me, it's like RJ. Harvey Chewbahabard.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 3>That's like a range of about eight or nine running

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 3>backs where I think people would order them very differently

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 3>depending on who you were talking to.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>If you plan a serious dynasty league, you should check

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>out League Tycoon. It's a modern fantasy football platform built

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>specifically for dynasty leagues, not redraft. Standard Dynasty leagues on

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>League Tycoon are completely free. League Tycoon is two for

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>serious dynasty league's slow auction drafts with twenty plus players

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>at once, trade auctions, draft lotteries, compensatory picks, and trade

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>history import with no ads or sportsbook clutter. And if

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>your league wants to go even deeper, League Tycoon also

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>offers contract dynasty with multi year contracts, extensions, rookie deals, tags,

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and restricted free agency tenders. Standard Dynasty is free for

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone and for contract dynasty leagues use promo code pros

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to get your first season free. Start your free Dynasty

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>league today at League tycoon dot com and for contract

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>dynasty leagues that's promo Code Pros to get your first

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>season free. All right, fits to the receivers. Some news today,

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Ze Flowers signs a big extension.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Four years, one hundred and forty.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Million, added on to the last two years he was

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>already under control for. So I think it all told

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is something like sixty years, one hundred and sixty something

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>million that he's under control for for the foreseeable future

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore. Ironically, he did get bumped up a little bit.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>In the most recent trade value chart, which did come

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>out prior to the news of the extension, he's at

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty, just behind a tie between Jordan Tyson,

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Luther Burden, and Lad McConkie. He himself is tied with

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Mackay Lemon in general this and you can answer this

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically Tuesday or just thinking about the big picture of

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>any player in the NFL when you see a big

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>extension like this, it's not market setting, but obviously he's

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>now up there amongst the highest paid receivers in the league.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Is your inclination to adjust a player's dynasty ranking, whether

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it's officially in the chart or just for your own

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of personal how you're valuing somebody. Do you want

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to maybe be more aggressive on them because the team's

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>really investing in saying this player is a star? Do

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you get you maybe want to dial it back and say, well,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>now he's stuck in Baltimore where they don't always you know,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>run the pass heaviest offense. How do you react to

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a big extension like this when you're thinking about dynasty value?

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Not a lot of influence on how I rank guys

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 3>form unless maybe it is a guy re signing and

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>getting caught in a sinkhole, sort of like Breise Hall.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>But like, I don't know, I'm still not knocking him

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 3>too much because that, like the Jets offense could be

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot better next year. They could get arch manning

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 3>against their quarterback and all of a sudden, we're more

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>excited about the direction of the Jets. And yeah, so

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess it doesn't matter that much. I mean, it

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 3>doesn't just because they give some guys the bags. Some

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>people might that might be like a boost for them

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>as far as their confidence and a player. Some people

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe prefer the lean and hungry players who are playing

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 3>for that first giant contract after rookie contracts and would

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 3>rather see a guy they know is playing for his

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>second contract. So different philosophies on this. For me, it

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 3>doesn't move the needle all that much. Where is they

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>ranked for you, by the way, fourteenth. I'm pretty bullish

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 3>on him man coming off at twelve hundred yard season

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 3>for a team that had, like I think they said

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 3>since like twenty eleven, the Ravens were like one of

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 3>the three or four lowest teams in terms of pass

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 3>attempts I'd have to go back and look at exactly

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 3>what the number that is, and I know it's been

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 3>cited in a couple different podcasts I've listened to, and

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I should have memorized it by now. But yeah, for

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the passing volume being that down, I mean, they accounted

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 3>for a huge percentage of team passing yardage last year,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and now Declan Doyle maybe brings a little bit of

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 3>a breath of fresh air to the Ravens offense. What

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>about you, were, I mean, I know were You've been

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 3>frustrated by the lack of touchdowns and he did sort

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 3>of score them in bunches last year, a couple early,

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>couple lates, but not a lot of touchdowns in the

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>middle of the season, basically none over like what a

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 3>ten game stretch, eleven game stretch last year. How do

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you feel about Flowers going forward?

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I sort of firmly sit in on the side of

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like I need to see it to believe it.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>And when I say it.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the usage that will get him more touchdowns

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>because the touchdowns that even when he scores him in bunches,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they're usually big play touchdowns. It's not them scheming him

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>up near the red zone. It's not him getting targets

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>near the red zone. I think I want to credit.

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the Ringer Fantasy Show. Somebody I

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>saw had a clip or something where they mentioned that

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Zay's average touchdown a red zone target rate is about

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>one for every three games. Like he just they do

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>not target him when they get to that area of

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the field. So I just don't know how the touchdowns

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>are gonna become more consistent. I don't know how the

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>number is gonna get higher unless he just happens to

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 1>have a season where he runs really hot on the

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>big plays. And so I feel like I get kind

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of repetitive whenever I talk about Zay because I say

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the same things. I'm like, I love him in real life.

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a good player. I think he

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>deserved this contract, honestly. I Mean, the CAP's going up.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the same numbers that Jefferson and Lamb got, but

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>two years ago when the cap was fifty million smaller.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So like it's it's like a twenty percent discount relative

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to that, and it's only going to look even better

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>as new contracts get side and the cap continues to

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>go up. So like I'm totally on board as a

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Ravens fan with this contract. I just don't know in

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy if I'm if I see the ceiling without the touchdowns,

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you need you know, Rickson has done a

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of work. And it's kind of funny because he's

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>very high on Zay this year, but Ericson has done work,

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some of the articles on the site

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the past about how like the key to finding

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the best breakout receiver is the red zone targets.

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And I just don't see where that's coming from.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Isay even in a new offense with Declan Doyle, So

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>that will just, I think, kind of continually make me

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>nervous about the ceiling. I think the floor is excellent.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to catch a lot of passes.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to get a lot of yardage.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think his percentage of the team you know, target

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>total is going to be awesome. And I think he's

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a quality player who can maybe even continue to get better.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty five years old. It's not like he's

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a fully finished product. I just don't know, with his

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>size and skill set if they will ever use him

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. And I just think that's such

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a cap on the ceiling, especially when there's so many

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>other receivers that are so good. It's not like it's

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a weak position right now. It's really strong and really deep.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I would be closer to ranking him

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>where he is ranked in this chart, then I would

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>be to where you have him.

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, that's fair. He probably is a guy

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 3>who's touched on production is probably always going to lag

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 3>his reception and yardage production. Man, you just hope that

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe there are a few more catch and run scores

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>for him, And you know, I can remember, I know it

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 3>was that maybe now it was two years ago, but

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>like having he did have a long catch and run

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 3>touchdown called back by some bogus penalty. Yeah, we were

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 3>both grouty.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 2>It was like a sixty yard touchdown or something. It

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>was a big play.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it costs both of us. Both of us

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>had Ze on a team that year and it hurt us.

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, so it's possible that we never get the

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 3>touchdown production. But man, right now, like on our trade

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 3>value chart, and I disagree with this vehemently, Like we've

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 3>got Carnel Tait ahead of Jay Flowers, Like We've seen

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Jay Flowers be pretty good at the NFL level, and

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 3>even though we like Tate's prospect profile, man I would

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 3>much rather have Jay Flowers than Cornel Tait.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's worth noting, just since you brought up that comparison,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Carnel Tates Wide receiver twelve, Jay Flowers Wide receiver twenty.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>On this chart, there's only sort of seven numerical points

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>different in terms of the actual value we're assigning these guys.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Carnel Tait his values a sixty four. To put that

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>in perspective, Jumar Chase is an eighty nine. He's the

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>highest receiver Carnel Tate's out of sixty four. Zay is

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>only at a fifty seven. So that's only a sort

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of a seven numerical gap between wide receiver twelve and

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty. Just shows there's a lot of closeness

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>amongst the guys in this range.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 2>And again, Zay is a great player.

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>He has literally everything except for the touchdowns, and that

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>will just always be the thing that kind of makes

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>me nervous. Where do you have Ricky Piersol ranked in

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty given the latest injury stuff?

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh all right, so I really haven't. Man, we did

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 3>our last update before the injury, so I've not let

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 3>me see if I have moved Pierce. I'm not, you know,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I haven't, So let's just do that in real time.

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I had him at wide receiver thirty seven. I'm going

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 3>to drop him too, Man, he's missing here, so I've

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 3>got I'm still putting him ahead of Michael Wilson, DeVonta Adams.

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I'm gonna stick him at forty eight right now,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 3>behind Jaden Reid, behind Mike Evans and Jaden Reid. What

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 3>do you think about that, or um By?

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>My initial reaction is given how injury prone he has

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>been and the fact that we know we are not

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>going to see him again until September of twenty twenty seven,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>when he's gonna be He's twenty five now, I'm not

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sure when his birthday is.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Let me look it up real quick.

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you that.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>So, oh, by the way, he will be twenty So

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>he will be twenty seven years old when he is

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>back next season. Without having done much, I think he

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>should be outside the top fifty. I don't think by much.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather see about like fifty one, fifty three or

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>something as opposed in the forties. That's maybe just like

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>using the top fifty as a milestone arbitrarily, but it

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just feels like given what his age will be and

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the injury history and the lack of production, I mean,

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>he's I like him when he's on the field, but

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be twenty seven years old.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It makes me nervous.

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 3>You talk me into putting him behind Trey Harris, who

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I had at wide receiver fifty one. Now he's in

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 3>between Trey Harris and Jalen Nol. So look at fifty four.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I've got Jeremy Bernard fifty five, Antonio Williams fifty six,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Sarratt's should he be ahead of those guys or

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.239
<v Speaker 3>behind those guys?

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he should be ahead if you are at

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>all taking into consideration market value, because I do feel

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like the average fantasy manager will say these aren't rookies

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that we were like fighting each other to get in

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>rookie drafts. We liked taking swings on those guys, but like,

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>these aren't. This isn't a crop of like you know,

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>must have tons of hype guys and pearsall is still

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>considered a good player. I think if if I were

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>drafting in a startup, I would rather somebody else take

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Pearsaw and then I take you know, Elijah Serate round

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>later or Jeremy Bernard, you know, around later. I don't

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's exactly where they would go

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in ADP. Just you know, I'm thinking out loud, like

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd almost rather let somebody else take Pearsaw, even if

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, based on market value, he still should

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be ranked ahead. But I don't know, I might. I mean,

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys could easily. Bernard's a good player, he could

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>be good right away. Sat there's an opening behind z

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Flowers in the Ravens receiver room. Like, if one of

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>those guys has a strong start to their careers, it's

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very easy to move them ahead of Pearsall.

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I've got to move him down even further.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm moving them behind those guys, behind Pittman and behind Cocher.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 3>So now I'm putting him in fifty eight, one spot

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Jacoby Myers, ahead of Chris Bell, ahead of

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Romeo Dobbs. That's kind of I.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Think that makes sense.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dobbs like Dobbs I'd rather have if I'm a

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>win now team and need the receiver depth, and I

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think he's got an opportunity this year. Like I think

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you could make the case that trading away Pierce awful

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Dobs is still smart, but in general in a vacuum,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.479
<v Speaker 1>like I think, I think Pearsall should be ahead him.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you thin about Piarresow versus Stribbling, Like Stribling is

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have this opportunity now, and you know Mike Evans

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is missing a bit of practice time, Like I know

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you weren't the biggest Stribbling fan as a player, you know,

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to put it mildly, but there somebody's gonna catch passes

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>year and what should be a pretty good offense we think, So,

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Stribling versus Pearsall, how do you have that ranked?

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think Stribling is going to have a

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>big rookie or in act and the next year. I'd

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 3>still rather bet on Pearsall's profile than Stribling's profile. I mean,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Stribling just did not command a major share of targets,

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 3>yardage or whatever for Old Miss. It's just we've seen

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 3>it proven, you know, back tested with guys like, if

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 3>you don't have a big share of your college teams

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 3>targets and yardage, like, you're probably not going to be

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a star at the next level. Like, it's just it

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 3>doesn't bode well for your NFL future. It's not to

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>say that every player who pops in the NFL. Some

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 3>guys like we're a little light on their college numbers,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 3>but those are kind of rare instances. They're the exceptions

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 3>rather than the rules.

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me ask you one more here, Ricky Pearsall

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or Travis Hunter.

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Still Ricky Pearsaw. I just I don't know if Travis

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Hunter ever plays enough offensive snaps to be a guy

0:31:56.120 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 3>you feel good about starting in dynasty bestball dynasty maybe,

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, if if it's a specifically a bast ball format,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe I've got handra ahead of Pearsaw, but managed legs,

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather Pearsaw.

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, we're going to do some tight end

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>talk and they'll get to some questions here in the

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>discord stages. So if you've got any questions, we've got

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple in the chat already and we've got at

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>least one hand raise, so we'll start getting to those here.

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>In just a couple of minutes looking at the tight ends,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, pretty similar to what it looked like

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the last time we talked, just a few weeks ago.

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Bowers won McBride to Loveland three. There is a bit

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of a gap between Bowers and McBride, then another gap

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>between McBride and Loveland, then another gap between Loveland and

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Warren at four. So based on this chart, at least,

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty solidified the order. There's not like a bunch

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of ties or anything that we're trying to break here

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>until you get into the tight end five, six, seven range,

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>where guys start to get a lot more clumped together

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not even asking you about, like the name specifically,

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but just in general. Do you feel like that's accurate

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that it should be a bit of a gap between

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>really all of these spots at the top.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Or do you think these guys should be closer.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the gaps feel about right, you know, a

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a I personally have Loveland ranked ahead

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>of McBride in Dynasty, and we still have kind of

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 3>a gap with McBride fairly well ahead of Loveland, and

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's not just us. Some of the

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 3>other trade value charts and calculators. I've looked at have

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 3>McBride ahead of Loveland for Dynasty. I just don't know

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.959
<v Speaker 3>if it's right. I agree with the sizeable gap between

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Bowers and McBride and Loveland. I agree that, you know,

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Warren is Tyler Warren fairly close to Colston Loveland, but

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a gap there. Then a little

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 3>bit of a gap down to Tucker Craft, Harold Fan

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 3>and Kyle Pitts, Sam Laporta, who are all pretty baunched.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think I think it feels right the way

0:33:58.480 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 3>we've got it.

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like the case I would make

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>if anything about changing things isn't necessarily re arranging the order,

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's putting Tucker Craft closer to Warren at four than

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he is to Fan in at six, because right now

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a bigger gap between Warren and Craft than

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there is Craft and Fan and are basically tied, and

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Pitts and Laporta are right there too. That group from

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>five to eight's all very close. I kind of feel

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 1>like Tucker Craft should be a little bit higher. We've

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of positive, you know, quotes from him

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and his doctors about the recovery that he's you know,

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>showing so far and you know some of the stuff

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>you see about all he's reached x miles per hour

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on the treadmill, and the knee looks great, and he's

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.959
<v Speaker 1>healing like Wolverine. And I mean, he was a guy

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>who if he didn't get hurt last year, I mean,

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>would he be tight end three right now in Dynasty

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe four at worst, like he was having such a

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>superstar breakout season last year. If he's back to being healthy,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this offense is going to be good this year.

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge believer in Jordan, loved the player and

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>see I think there could easily be a world where

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we're all pointing to Christian Watson as this, you know,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>really interesting breakout value in Dynasty leagues this year, and

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>actually the number one target ends is just being Tucker

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Craft the way it looked like it was at the

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 1>first half of last year. If he has a healthy season,

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I could absolutely see him finishing as a top three

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tight end in twenty twenty six. And he's only twenty

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>five years old, and we know tight ends tend to

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>hit their prime later in their twenties. I just kind

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of think Craft is a little undervalued here. I mean

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't sit here with a straight face and say

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>he should be ranked ahead of Bowers or McBride or

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>even Loveland, But like, I think he should be closer

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to them than he is to like Sam Laporta and

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts.

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's not meant to be a knock on those two.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Craft, I totally agree. I do worry a

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 3>little bit about a guy who so much of what

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 3>makes him great is what he does after the catch,

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 3>and a guy like that coming off a torn acl

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 3>especially since you know, when tight ends are running after

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 3>the catch, a lot of times they're in the secondary

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 3>and they're going against these smaller dbs who want to

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 3>hit them low after that. And I mean there have

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 3>been times I remember, you know, a game where Kirby Joseph,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 3>like a guy who's already wrecked a couple of tight

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 3>ends acls, tried to go low on Tucker Craft and

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 3>he very artfully hurdled that low tackle attempt. But I

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 3>it makes me a little nervous just the style he plays,

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:38.280
<v Speaker 3>that George Kittlesque, you know, yack game that he's coming

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 3>off that injury, and I would defend Fannin like I

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 3>actually think there could be a case for fan and Overcraft.

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>He's younger, he hasn't any had any sort of injuries,

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and maybe Fannin is just awesome. I know his situation

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 3>in Cleveland kind of stinks right now with the quarterbacks,

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 3>but Fannin goes right from his final year of college

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 3>edge where he leads all pass catchers, tight ends and

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers in catches and receiving yardage in you know,

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 3>he's number one in FBS in both of those categories,

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 3>granted in a max school, and then he comes into

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the NFL as a rookie and immediately pops in a

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 3>bad offense. Maybe this guy's just awesome and a year

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 3>from now we're going to have him much higher than

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 3>he is because he has another good year. Sohow with

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Deshaun Watson, Shade or Sanders, Dylan Gabriel and Taylor Green

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 3>as his quarterbacks.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>If he has a good year with those guys as

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>his quarterbacks, then he has hard to deny what a

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.760
<v Speaker 1>great player he is. Although does you know Todd Munkin

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>likes tight ends and is a play caller, So yeah,

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I do like fan In too. I just I just

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>like Craft that much that it's it's not about disliking

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Fan and Pitts and Laporta. It's about liking Craft, although

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a totally fair point on his style

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of play and coming back from the from the knee stuff.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you the same thing that I did

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for running backs for tight ends.

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 2>So I asked, if you had to if.

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You were in a startup and you were required to

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>draft the RB three, how many would go to gent

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>how many would go to Hampton, et cetera, et cetera,

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>if you had to draft a tight end nine, Because

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a really clear top eight right now.

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>In pretty much every draft we've done, it's been the

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>same eight in some order. So if you had to

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>draft tight end nine in a startup fits in ten leagues,

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>how many of those ten are you taking the swing on?

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Sadik?

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>How many of those ten are you taking the swing

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on Stours? Isaiah likely is eleventh on this chart. Arona

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Gadson had some flashes last year. Maybe you're still believer

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in Kincaid. Maybe you want to be overly aggressive on Ferguson.

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're starting to get into territory where it

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make a lot of sense. But how would you

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>break down across ten leagues where you had to take

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the tight end nine? What percentage are you putting your

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>chips in on each guy?

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 3>All Right, I'm limiting it to Stour, Sidik and Likely

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 3>because I think I could get Ferguson a little later,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 3>like I've got him tight end twelve in Dynasty Back.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think most people have him that high. So

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say I almost want to spread the

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:14.439
<v Speaker 3>bats here. I'm going to say four stars. It's either

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>it's either four three and three or four four and two.

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm going to go four stours for City

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 3>too likely? How about you?

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it for me it's three three and four.

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Not one hundred percent sure who I want that four

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. But I want to put this as c

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>like if I could do three point three, three point

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 1>three and three point three, I would. That's that's how

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of divided I feel on it. It sounds like

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you it's easier for you to put four on Stours,

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so he might be your favorite from what it sounds like.

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But man, like I say, Likely was so good whenever

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he got the opportunity in Baltimore, and he's going to

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>get opportunity, especially this year with neighbors coming back from

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>injury in New York.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 2>And again he's only twenty six.

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Tight ends breakout later Stours crazy athlete, you know, an

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>organization that knows how to use tight ends and thinking

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>long term, really excited about it. And Sadik is so young,

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:17.320
<v Speaker 1>also such a crazy athlete. Maybe this quarterback situation looks really.

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Good a year.

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a world where a year from now

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we're more excited about Sidik's quarterback than we are Stours

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and likely I mean if they get arch Manning or

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, d'antemm or whoever it is, and we end

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>up liking them more.

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 1>So, and Cidik has his own kind of was it

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a hernia stuff that he's kind of recovering from and

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>having a little bit of injury stuff, But we don't

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>really care about this year for sidek Anyway, He's twenty

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>one years old in a bad offensive environment. So I

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think I think I will just give the tiebreaker honesty

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to Sidik's age and the fact that he's so much younger.

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But man, I I you could ask me tomorrow, and

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd say I'd put my fourth chip on stours or

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>likely and go back and forth on it.

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Really, Yeah, that's fair, I mean it is. Those three

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>are pretty tightly packed.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, I think we can go ahead and

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>wrap up the trade chart segment here. We'll get to

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>your questions in just a second, but first you can

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 1>evaluate trades with confidence using the Trade Analyzer. Instantly see

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the impact of trades on your team and get expert

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>recommendations whether you're receiving a two for one package or

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>swapping draft picks for that stud who will help you

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>win now? Our analyzer helps you make smarter, data driven decisions.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Access to the Trade Analyzer is included for all premium subscribers.

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Start your three day free.

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Trial today at Fantasypros dot com slash Dynasty twenty six

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and win the trade market with the Trade Analyzer at

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot Com slash My playbook. All right, fits not

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a ton of questions today, so we should easily be

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:48.959
<v Speaker 1>able to get to everybody's here. We'll start by calling

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>up some folks here on to the stage. First up

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 1>will be Collins.

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Yo, what's up, fellas, how's it going? It's going well,

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 5>it's going well. I'm down here in Mexico.

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 6>I think last time I called you guys was like

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 6>a year ago because I'm a teacher, so it's hard

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 6>to get.

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 5>On the same same track as you, guys.

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 6>I recommended a garlic pork, Chimmy Shanga and Phoenix to you.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic.

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 3>Are you just getting in the last year of vacationing

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 3>before school starts up again.

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm a teacher down here in Mexico.

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh you are, You're teaching in Mexico. Cool?

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's good stuff. I like it a lot.

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Awesome.

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, But my question for you.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 7>So, I I've been having a been going back and

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 7>forth on this. I have a team I got offered

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 7>mylik neighbors for Justin Herbert in a twelve team super

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 7>flex tight in Premium PPR. We also do a point

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 7>for every first down when you're receiving or rushing. And

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 7>I have my other quarterbacks are Josh Allen and Kyler

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 7>Murray and then my receiving room is Luther Burden, Roma

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 7>Doon's Day and like Travis Hunter.

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, that's kind of what I'm working with.

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 6>And I I don't know, I I got off of

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 6>the trade like a few hours ago, and I've had

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 6>no idea what to do.

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 2>It's what's your initial reaction to this?

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Because when I first hear like, I definitely do have

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Herbert ranked higher in a vacuum between the two, although

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>when you consider the extra point per first down rushing

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and receiving that you go a long way towards bridging

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that gap, even in superflex. But then you hear you

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>know what the state of his receiver room is, and

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>my interest is a little more peaked.

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 2>What's your reaction, Pat.

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I need a little more for that, just

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I know in the Dynasty startup, I just did like

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Herbert went on the turn or I think he might

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 3>have went even one to eleven and I got neighbors

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:49.240
<v Speaker 3>at three to h two. So yeah, I just even

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 3>with the gap closed a little bit with the extra

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 3>point per first down, man, I still think Herbert is

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the more valuable asset in even the oh you have

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:06.479
<v Speaker 3>a pressing need, I think I would want that juice

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 3>stuff a little bit before I pulled the trigger on that.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>How much does that gap close for you? Fits, Like,

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to what degree do you care about the point per

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>first down?

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I wish I could like run the math

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 3>on this to figure out how it's going to be.

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I still think Herbert is going to be the

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 3>higher point score, but yeah, it is bridged a little bit.

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean it might be as little as uh maybe

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 3>like I don't know, getting a twenty twenty seven second

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and giving up a twenty twenty seven to fourth something

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 3>like that. Maybe what do you think warm is that

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:52.479
<v Speaker 3>a good way to bridge the gap? Just a little

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 3>something more?

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>It looks like Neighbors.

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to just quickly google it, so sorry if

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>google Gemini is leading me astray. But it looks like

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:05.400
<v Speaker 1>he caught fifty five first downs in twenty twenty four,

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know that's in.

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 2>That's in fifteen games.

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So something like you know, three to four a game

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of extra points that you're getting from a high level receiver.

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 1>That's not nothing, right, That's that's if you're talking about

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's one of the best in the game,

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>which we think Neighbors is when he's healthy.

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 2>I also, you know, this fits I adore Herbert.

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Like if this was a different quarterback in this range,

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I might feel a lot differently, But Herbert is somebody

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that I am very heavily invested in, both in Dynasty

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and in Redraft, and it's really hard for me to

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>get off of having Alan and Herbert and just saying, Hey,

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in a super flex, I have those two for the

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>next eight years and loving it is really appealing to me.

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 1>So I do think even with that gap, and even

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with the need at receiver, I would probably want something

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>more too. But it's closer than I would have maybe

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>said first glance when hearing the question.

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's Herbert has never been in a

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 3>better offensive environment in his career. He was fantastic early

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 3>in his career, like he was putting up some big numbers.

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 3>It just seems like Mike McDaniel's mission is for Herbert

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 3>to have like an MVP caliber season.

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to bet on Herbert to win the MVP

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, Like I am buying into that reality.

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Herbert can run a lot.

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Herbert will run for some first downs too,

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 1>which will get some of those points back that you're

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>losing out on, you know, by him not catching anything.

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll get his fair share of rushing first

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>downs too, not as many as Neighbors is going to

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>catch but something. So yeah, I think as we're talking

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it through, even with this being PPR and the point

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for first down and all that, I do think I

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 1>would want a little more to move off of Herbert.

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Would would my proposal bridge the gapp or is that

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 3>even not enough of getting a twenty twenty seven seconds

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.320
<v Speaker 3>giving up a twenty twenty seven to fourth.

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd if I could just take get the

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>second and not give up a pick of my own.

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'd look for better about that.

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I would do that at that point because

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the class is so strong. I wouldn't give done it

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for a twenty twenty six second, but for a second

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in extra's class as strong as it is, I'd.

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Be willing to do it.

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The other thing, too, is like Neighbors does have the

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>question mark of the injury and how he'll return from that,

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and obviously we're you know, uh, it's seemingly somewhat optimistic

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and right now compared to how it felt earlier in

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the summer, but that's still a factor. So yeah, I

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>would want that extra piece in a second, which is

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty valuable to get it over the top for me.

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:45.239
<v Speaker 5>All right, Yeah, that sounds great. Yeah, I was.

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:47.280
<v Speaker 6>I thought it was close to with the first point

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 6>and with the first first down points. Yeah, and my

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 6>part receive room being a mess. But I appreciate the

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 6>recommendations y'all, and you know, have a go one.

0:47:57.719 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Definitely, thank you so much.

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thanks you. I'll see you next year, all.

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, thanks to call for that. Let's bring up Nick here.

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 8>Hey guys, I don't have any Chimmy Changa Rex, but

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 8>I need anything of Island in New York.

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Let me know.

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll make dear here without any recommendations.

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 8>Amazing, So I put my question in the chat. But

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:30.479
<v Speaker 8>basically I have the opportunity or opportunity given the trade

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 8>chart stuff a little bit to give it. Buka up

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 8>for James Cook. I know you guys have BUKA a

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 8>little bit higher than him, but not by like a ton.

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 4>I however, have a very serious need at.

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 8>Running back to pair with Bijon because I have like

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 8>no RB two's and I have a very strong wide

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 8>receiver room. I've listed all those in the chat, but

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 8>like it's London Buka right now, Lad Burden, T Higgins,

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 8>AJ Brown, DK metcalf Omar Cooper. Like a bunch of

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 8>really talented guys, So I don't know that I would

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 8>necessarily miss Igbuka on the team because I already have

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 8>so many people I can't even start. It's like a

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:09.240
<v Speaker 8>start eight, so I can only start like four max

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 8>per week. I'm just wondering what you guys think about that,

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 8>given that, like again, iBook is a little higher in

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 8>the chart, but you know, I have a very serious

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 8>need of the position.

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Is your team nick like a contender? Obviously it looks

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong to me. I don't know if there's like

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>other teams in your league that are super stacked and

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you're actually only you know, the fourth

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>best team in the league or something like that. But

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>do do you feel like your team is a contender

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're like in win now mode?

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 8>I think so. I've basically been like a semi finalists

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 8>every year other than when I thanked for Bijon.

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and in that case, my initial reaction is I

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:48.839
<v Speaker 1>would do this trade. I think it's totally okay sometimes

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, looking at the state of my team and

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that I'm contending, and the fact that

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm so loaded at receiver and that I'm so weak

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>at running back and say I'm willing to get the

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 1>worst end of this deal in a vacuum to make

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>my team better, because this will make your starting lineup better.

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And I would agree with the chart that says I'd

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>rather if I was drafting a startup, I would definitely

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>much rather have a BUCA than Cook, just given you know,

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>age and position and how much I believe in the player.

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But I have no problem as a win now team

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when the receiving room is this loaded and the running

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>back room is this shallow. As long as you go

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in saying I know I'm getting the sort of the

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:29.360
<v Speaker 1>worst end of deal in the vacuum, but it's going

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to make my starting lineup better, I'm all for it. Honestly,

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with it, even if it goes against the

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>trade value chart because that it's impossible for that chart

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to consider cut the context of who else is on

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 1>your team and if you're contending or not. So that's

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:44.479
<v Speaker 1>my first thought, Pat, what do you think?

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 3>Still, I guess I would be willing to do that too.

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, I philosophically agree with what warm was just

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 3>telling you as far as making your team better, even

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 3>if you are losing a little bit of value in

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 3>this deal, and I think you are losing a little

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:04.879
<v Speaker 3>bit of value in this deal. The only thing I'd

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 3>ask Nick, like, is there any chance you could talk

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.760
<v Speaker 3>the other person into doing lad for James Cook?

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I doubt it.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 8>This kid literally, for like he was new to the

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 8>I think he bought or like bot and or took

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 8>over a pretty bad team like a year or two ago,

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 8>and he was like asking, I think James Cook for

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 8>like London and Igbuca at the beginning of the ame

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 8>and so like, I've had to work very hard to

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 8>try and get him to be more realistic in trade talks,

0:51:38.560 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 8>and he's like desperate for receiver also h So I

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 8>feel like it's a mutually beneficial thing. I lean in

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 8>your direction of like yes, sure, like could I maybe

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 8>squeeze a little bit more or like go for one

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 8>of the other guys. But I mean it's been I

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 8>just I don't think I could do that with this guy.

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 8>And it seems like, you know, he has like a

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:01.920
<v Speaker 8>ton of running back depth and so the other people

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 8>are a lot less apt to move on from running

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 8>backs from at least how trade talks have.

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Gone cool, okay, because I know I think there are

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 3>probably some dynasty managers who would have a Mecca and

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Ladd close, and maybe even there might be a small

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 3>minority who prefer Lad. But yeah, I think there's kind

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.280
<v Speaker 3>of a gap there. I would rich much rather have Abuka.

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, like you're not taking a huge value hit

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 3>on this one. It helps your team for this year

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 3>for sure. You've got a really nice roster, and sometimes

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 3>there's something to be said for the goodwill that it

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 3>builds if you sort of meet a guy halfway in

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 3>a trade like this, so might open things up for

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 3>future deals. I'm cool with it.

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this manager in Nick League would

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>do this, but for you personally, fits, would you rather

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like this where you have so much depth,

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>would you rather give up just the one player in

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Aguka if that's what it takes to get or would

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you rather give up like he and AJ Brown or

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Burden and T Higgins or something like that where it's

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you're keeping sort of the highest end asset and using

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>your depth to maybe pay a little bit more, but

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you still get the elite guy, or at least the

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>way it's ranked as the more elite guy.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 2>What would you prefer in that scenario.

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't give up the way he has his wide

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 3>receiver room listed Londa Buca, London Abuca, McConkie, Burden, T Higgins,

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 3>AJ Brown, DK Metcalf. The split for me would be

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 3>AJ Brown, DK Metcalf. I'm not giving up any two

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 3>player combo that involves guys AJ Brown and higher.

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think that's fair.

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to throw out the possibility given the

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>depth that he has. But yeah, I would make the trade.

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Nick I. I'm very happy you got him down to

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just like Buka.

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.600
<v Speaker 4>It's been crazy, so thank you. I appreciate the blessing.

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Awesome. We've got another hand raise here. Before we get

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 2>to that.

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You can join our Fantasy Pros Discord community, chat with

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>other fans, and get access to exclusive amas that wind

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up on our podcast feed. Our current schedule looks like this,

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.280
<v Speaker 1>myself in fits at five eastern on the first Tuesday

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of every month, Bogman and Fits at five eastern on

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the third Tuesday of every month, and then Welsh and

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Erickson Thursdays at two eastern. Come get your questions answered

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and be on the show at fantasypros dot com slash chat.

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, We've got a question here from like a

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>good neighbors.

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Hey, guys, how's it going good? How are you doing well?

0:54:37.400 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Doing well?

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so I put my question in the chat as

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 9>well here. But basically twelve teams Superflex PPR. I came

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 9>in second last.

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:52.359
<v Speaker 10>Year, and I am very weak at running back. I

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:55.839
<v Speaker 10>saw the previous Nick said that he's week at running back.

0:54:55.840 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 10>I raised his Bijon Robinson with none of those, so,

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 10>uh yeah, but pretty.

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Strong in all other areas.

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 9>I've talked to some managers and I feel like the

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 9>most available running back is gent perhaps, So I'm just

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 9>wondering based on the state of my team. I have

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:17.319
<v Speaker 9>some picks. I have two twenty seven first and two

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:21.839
<v Speaker 9>twenty eight first, so I'm just wondering. I guess I'm

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 9>not quite sure, like should I push all the chips

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 9>in or should I just kind of hang out? Like

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 9>I mentioned in the chat, there's one super team and

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 9>there's like three or four other teams that I'm a

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:34.879
<v Speaker 9>part of that are basically the second tier. So yeah,

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 9>just wondering if you guys have any trade ideas for

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 9>going after gent Uh.

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Looking at the assets that I have.

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 3>How is this? How is this other manager fixed at

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 3>tight End neighbors.

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 4>He is I believe I'm opening real quick. I believe

0:55:56.520 --> 0:56:01.800
<v Speaker 4>he is not very bad. Yeah. Think it's a J

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Barner and Kayotten.

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 3>So with Pits he might not be too.

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 3>With Kyle Pitts, he might not feel two too desperate.

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Because that's a fairly decent answer tight End, oh Man,

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:25.280
<v Speaker 3>like worm, what do you think just in terms of picks,

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:28.800
<v Speaker 3>like I don't want to I was thinking about it.

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Where where do you think those twenty seven first are

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to land?

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 9>One is mine so late and the other one, Yeah,

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 9>the other one is a pretty good team, So I

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 9>would say mid to late.

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, late mid to late for both of them. I

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think I would be willing to give up one of

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>them for genty, and I definitely wouldn't give up both.

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 1>The class is too strong, but Genty's a really good player,

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So giving up like GENTI the type of player you

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hope to get with somebody in a really strong class,

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I would move one of those late twenty seven

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>first and maybe whichever one I think is going to

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be the latest twenty eight also because then you can

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>go into this season with you know, keeping gent and

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you have Tutan's breakout potential as your RB two instead

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of your RB one, and you don't want to give

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>up your your by far your best tight end, and

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you still have all your depth at receiver, and you

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:28.080
<v Speaker 1>still would have a pick in each of those drafts

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to add future depth to.

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think given the fact.

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:34.959
<v Speaker 1>That you have those picks to spend, and the fact

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're probably going to be late, I think I

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>would be willing to do like your twenty seven first

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and your twenty eight first, knowing you still have two

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>others fits. Does that feel like an overpay to you?

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that's right. But would the other team take it?

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Is the other team rebuilding?

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they're kind of in the middle. They're yeah, I

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 9>mean they I mentioned the pits. So they have Burrow

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:05.800
<v Speaker 9>and Stroud as qbs. They have Gentie and Javante as

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 9>running backs, and then Rome, Tyson, Wattle Pittman as receivers.

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 9>So it's really just kind of a middle of the road.

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 9>I think he thinks he's competing.

0:58:16.760 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 3>In that case. The other thing I might propose would

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 3>be and I don't know if you could get away

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 3>with this, Like some people perceive a big value gap

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 3>in dynasty between McBride and Pitts, and you know, our

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 3>trade value chart kind of reflects that. I don't think

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 3>the gap is going to be that big because the

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals artificially inflated number of pass attempts last year, like

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Jacoby Brissett in his starts averaged forty attempts a game.

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 3>That's just we all.

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Know, we all know how much you hate McBride past.

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, okay, you've you've heard this feel before, so I

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I'd see if you can maybe get away

0:58:56.360 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 3>with giving up one of those first and Trey McBride

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 3>for Pitts and genty and maybe if you have to

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:10.120
<v Speaker 3>like throw in one of your seconds next year too.

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Like i'd maybe start with the offer of McBride and

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 3>a twenty twenty seven first for Pitts and genty and

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 3>be willing to throw in a twenty twenty seven second

0:59:23.640 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 3>if the other owner wants more.

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:28.959
<v Speaker 4>I like that.

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd be okay with that too.

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I would prefer if you if they were

0:59:34.560 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 1>open to a cumulating draft capital just the two first.

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But if that's what it took to do that to

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 1>downgrade from McBride to Pitts.

0:59:43.800 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's totally reasonable.

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 3>And for the record, I do not hate McBride. I

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 3>think he's a good player. I just think he was

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 3>artificially the numbers were a little pumped up last year.

0:59:57.000 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Awesome, Thanks guys, Awesome, Thank you so much for the question.

1:00:00.200 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks man.

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we are right at an hour here, so

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll go ahead and wrap things up because I don't

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think I'm missing any other questions. Thanks everybody for tuning in,

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you just listened or through one of your great questions.

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Our way forfeits. I'm Ryan Warmley. We'll see again next time.

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Dynasty Football podcast.

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Fantasy Pros.