WEBVTT - Selects: What are think tanks all about?

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody. Josh here and for this week's Select I've

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>chosen our episode on think tanks from September twenty eighteen.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a common misconception that our elected officials in Washington

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and the state capitals and everywhere else make the laws

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and the policy that they introduce. In most cases, they

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>do not do that. That's up to special interest groups.

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And once upon a time, think tanks were one of

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>those groups. And even accounting for political bent, the policy

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they suggested lawmakers was sound and unbiased. It was good stuff,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in other words. But that's not the case any longer.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>As we learned in this episode, think tanks are open

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for business and the US is far the worse off

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for it. Hope you enjoy this episode. Hope it opens

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>your eyes.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, Charles

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>w Chuck Bryant, and Jerry's over there actually sitting in today,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is stuff you should know about think tanks,

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the thinking this kind of tanks. There are fish tanks.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>They don't think at all, well, they barely think. They think.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>This water feels a little warm for me, and then

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>they think what's water, what's being wet? And then that's

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And then they're like, how about some of those tasty flakes?

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, give me some, and that's its. Think tanks. There's

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:29.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot more thinking going on in these.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Kind of tanks, more like stink tanks.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It depends on your opinion, and that's everybody's opinion. So yes,

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess they are more like stink tanks these days.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those weird ones where I for

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>forty seven years, I've just sort of had this. I

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>never dug in on what a think tank was. I

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>hear it, and now I kind of assumed I knew

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 2>what it was.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of right, yeah, yeah, yeah, it's good.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a good term for something.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I was like with this, is this like a

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>bunch of smart people sitting around thinking about smart stuff?

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Exactly? That's kind of right, That's exactly what it is.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's ideally, it's like a place where people sit around

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and think about things that eventually hopefully affects public policy

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in a positive way, is what you're ultimately hoping for.

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and by think we don't mean if you went

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 2>by a think tank, they would all just be sitting

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>around going hmmm.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on the day of the week

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>or if it's right after lunch.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Like, there's a ton of research and study. Oh, I

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>see it, stuff like that.

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not just pulling stuff out of thin air.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>No, that's the point of think tanks is they are

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>groups of people, nonprofit organizations. In the US we should say.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which we'll get to the finer points of that.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Who say, you know what, we see this problem in

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>America and or the world or wherever. Great Britain has

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>plenty of China has a bunch, and they say, how

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>can we solve this problem? Let's get too. We're going

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to take this problem on and figure it out through

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic science and evidence based research. We're going to come

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up with a solution to this problem. And then the

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>next step is to get it out there to the public,

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to policymakers, to get people talking about it. And then

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>once enough people talk about it and there's a public

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>debate over it, ideally, if it's a good idea, it

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>will be adopted as public policy and that problem will

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be solved in a good way.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's the ideal function of an ideal think tank,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>which is to say, it is nonpartisan, it is fact based,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't have an agenda necessarily. But things have

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>changed over the years, as we will see.

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Fairly recently, Chuck seems like.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>And think tanks can be very much slanted. But we'll

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 2>get into all that. That's just sort of a long

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>winded setup.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that was a good man.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Should we go back and check on our buddy Plato?

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So great?

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Plato his academy. The Academy was some people

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>say it was sort of the world's first think tank,

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>which makes sense. Yeah. He would get dudes and they

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>would sit around in the garden and I would imagine

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>drink wine and talk smarts and philosophy and kind of

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, like it was high minded stuff for the day,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to sit around and think about sort of what was

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>going on around them and how they could impact change.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or thinking about the nature of reality or existence.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>They once decided that knowledge was uncertain and life is

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially a craps game based on probability rather than absolute truth.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>If you step back and think about it, that is

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the basis of quantum mechanics.

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Could you imagine if they had access to LSD back then.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, I don't think it would have been too

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>terribly different.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, they were sort of traveling down that road anyway.

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But that was I mean, that's pretty impressive some of

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the stuff they came up with. This is again, you know,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>we did a skeptics episode, skepticism episode or no, I'm sorry,

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>not skepticism, stoicism and remember this is oh yeah, this

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is where this stuff was. All these different philosophies were

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>all like kind of grew from this academy. So yeah,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you can make a pretty good case that it was

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the world's first think tank. Yeah, it's a little it's

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not the first modern think tank, but it qualifies in

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 2>No, there was one. In eighteen thirty one in Great Britain,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the Duke of Wellington established what was called the Royal

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>United Services Institution.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Which studied like military science.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then here in the US in nineteen ten

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Which studied the results of military science.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, and that's still around Carnegie, man, I mean, they

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 2>still have endowed many things.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>They're well in doubt, they are very well doubt.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>And then of course the Brookings Institution which may be

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the most famous modern American think tank to this day.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>This is one you probably hear about the most. It

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>was founded by Robert Brookings in nineteen sixteen, and they

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of I mean, they still have a

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of influence, but they had a great deal of

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>influence kind of post depression with FDR's New Deal, helped

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>construct the New Deal, helped construct the Marshall Plan after

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>World War Two.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That was huge.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Yoh, very huge. So like both were for sure.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The New Deal definitely was. But the Marshall Plan is

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a survey done of I think like four

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty historians and the number one most important

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that any government has done since World War Two,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>between World War Two and the twenty first century was

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Marshall Plan. Like it not only like brought Europe

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>back from World War Two, it set Europe on a

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>path away from communism. Yeah, where if you're not into communism,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a great positive benefit, right Yeah. And the

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>way it did that was in two years, based on

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this economic plan. In two years, it got Europe war

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ravaged World War two ravaged Europe back to production levels

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent higher than the production levels it was

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at before World War Two in two years, so it

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just went back to normal plus twenty five percent better,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and Europe said, I kind of like this capitalism thing,

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and Western Europe went that way.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I was kind of curious because Brookings, the Brookings Institution

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 2>gets a lot of like left leaning criticism today, so

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I kind of wonder where that all came from. And

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 2>the article I read said that is a victory of

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the conservative side to have Brookings labeled liberal just from

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of pounding it the press, even though it's history

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>and its member board throughout the history has not been

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 2>liberal at all, and it has been filled from the

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 2>top down over the years with rank and file Republicans

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>and conservatives from like the Reagan era on through Bush

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 2>one and two.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, so they've gotten it across as liberal so

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that liberals will swallow the stuff that Brookings is putting

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>out there. No, I know what they undermine their own

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 1>think tank.

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think it's not their own think tank.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not a conservative think tank.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's centric. It's like almost right down the middle for.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Me, right, But I think they want to advance their

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>own with their conservative thing tanks. They want to advance them,

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 2>so they label Brookings as super liberal.

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I got you, So anything centrist is liberal.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I think I got the way it's going down.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember who scored it, but somebody has a

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>liberal score between zero and one hundred for think tanks,

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and Brookings scored like a fifty three, right down the middle. Like, apparently,

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>as far as think tanks go, it's about as centrist

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>as you possibly can get.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they've been around for a long time. Yeah,

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>makes a lot of sense.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Yep, So not just Brookings. Brookings is definitely one of

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the most famous around the world and has done quite

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of stuff, but there's plenty of others. There's

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Rand Corporation is a very famous think tank, which

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>did you know. Rand is actually a I don't know

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what you'd call it, but it's supposed to. It started

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>out as R and D Research and Development RAND Corporation,

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and from what I understand, they've come up with the

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>ideas for computers, the Internet, spy satellites, the Space program,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff that America did in the mid twentieth century. Technologically, yes, yeah,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the RAND Corporation, like thinkers, were the ones who came

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>up with this stuff.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I knew some of that, and I

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think it fully hit home that they were a

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>think tank. Yeah, with the name like the Rancore Right

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>sounds like just a corporation.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But they're they're like a think tank that's really specifically

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or was specifically zoned into America's technology progression. I guess.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean a lot of think tanks can be

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 2>specialized like that, Like some are very very much just

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>concentrate on economics, some concentrate on social issues in that

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>case technology, and then I think some like Brookings are

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of a little more broad. Yeah, they'll they'll take.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Any case, right, they'll take all comer.

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So after World War Two, like there were think tanks before,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Brookings, Carnegie, the Royal United Services Institute

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, there were, like there were think tanks

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>prior to World War Two, but after World War Two

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they really proliferated. And the reason they started was government

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of government it was in the in

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the early twentieth century. It was just just this. It

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was It wasn't anything like you see it now. It

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't this monolithic behemoth that has its tendrils in every

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>aspect of people's lives or anything. It was a little

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>too far the other way where it didn't quite know

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>what it was doing. So some of those early philanthropists

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like Carnegie and Brookings, they endowed these think tanks to

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of help government out, to basically be like the

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>research arm for government to help direct the best way

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for America to go. And that's how it started out.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And then after World War Two, when America had like

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all this cash and all this forward momentum, think tanks

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really popped up and there were all these kind of

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>competing and then sometimes harmonious voices from these think tanks

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to say go this way, go this way, let's go

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this way. But they all had something in common, and

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that was that they were staffed by very smart people

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>who did very deliberate, very good research, who produced policy

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>pusicians that lawmakers could then take themselves and go out

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to the people and say, see, this is what I'm

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about, here's the data, here's a SoundBite for you

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to make you all understand it. That's what things tanks did,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and in a way they very much were along the

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>same track as lobby lobbyists which we did an episode

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on that that was pretty good too. But think tanks

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>stopped short of lobbying allegedly.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because they kind of had to. Starting in nineteen thirteen,

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 2>they were granted tax exempt status, which is a very

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>big deal because there's a lot of money involved in

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>many of these.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying to get that for myself for years, Sax,

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, it is a very big deal.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>The Church of Josh just get it going.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>That's so I'm wearing this robe right now.

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>In the nineteen fifties, though, is when Congress really kind

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of because they were tax exempt, had to get involved

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>and say, hey, listen, you got to walk a line here.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>You politically, you can't if you want to keep this

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>tax exemption. Now, yeah, we for sure do. They said,

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you can't be partisan, it's got to be good information.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>You can't slant things a certain way or support officially

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>support or endorsed candidates. You are here to educate with

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>your objective work. And that went along for a while,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and then we started getting think tanks that set out

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 2>to do just that, which they are called advocacy think

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>tanks now, which I'm not sure how they managed to

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>skirt unless they change the rules, skirt those rules and

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 2>say hey, we're going to be a conservative think tank

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>or liberal think tank and still be tax exempt.

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>The do you know, The only thing that I can

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>tell is that they're still technically producing a public good,

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>or if they believe that they're producing a public good,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>even if they have conservative alignment or a liberal alignment.

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to move society along in a way that

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they think is good or for the betterment of society.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what stuff you should know is, dude, That's what

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I've been telling I mean, could we be a think tank?

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not. I mean think about it, like I mean,

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess we could. I think that there's a I don't. Okay,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>let me take that back. No, we absolutely couldn't because we.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Can't be brought to you by.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't have we don't have time. I don't know,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, but we don't have. Yeah, you

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>couldn't advertise and have like you couldn't get advertiser money

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and be tax exempt.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>That's just yeah. Like I doubt if the Brookings institutions

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>papers have like Burger King coupons on them.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You never know they should So we'll get to why

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we can't be later on. Okay, But one of the

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>things about about think tanks is they're they're the reason

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a tax exempt status is what they're doing

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is producing work that furthers the public good. Yeah, that's

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>why they're supposed to have tax exempt status. What you're

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>pointing out is a really good thing to point out.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, there's a lot of stuff here that

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they could lose their tax exempt status for. And if

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we fast forward to three or five years from now,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to start seeing them lose tax

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>exempt status. They just haven't yet, I think, is what

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because some of them flat out like it's so

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 2>obvious when they come around, Like when the Democrats were

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>beaten in two thousand, they got together and they started

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>left leaning thinkers got together and started the Center for

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>American Progress, which is an economic organization. It says this nonpartisan,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 2>but it literally says as a quote, their goal is

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to develop new policy ideas, critique the policy that stems

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 2>from conservative values, challenges the media to cover the issues

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that truly matter and shape the national debate. So it's

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of flat out saying like we're out to

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>prove not just have an opinion about maybe that's a distinction,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>out to prove that conservative economic values are bad for

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the country. Basically, Yeah, is that the difference. Maybe here's

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>our data.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know, dude.

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not a bunch of op eds thrown together.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It's so No, it's not supposed to just be op eds.

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be backed by data. Yeah, but I

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>mean like Center for American Progress or like the Heritage Foundation,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or like ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, like these

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>are like and we're going to do a whole episode

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just on ALEC one day. Okay, seriously, Yeah, but they're

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like little They're like Kareem abdul Jabbar, like karate training

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>islands for liberals or for conservatives or for rich billionaire followers,

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't matter, Like that's what they are. They

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>come up with new ideas to push their agenda, and

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>then they train activists to go out and get that

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>message out, to change people's minds, to get themselves on

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>CNN or Fox News or whatever, right, and to shape

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the public discussion on something. It has a lot of

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the contours of what think tanks used to have.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but there's this whole.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Other layer of like like seeing you and gristle there

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that think tanks aren't supposed to have.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Should we take a break? Sure, all right, we'll take

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a break and we'll talk a little bit more about

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 2>the Heritage Foundation right after this. All right, nineteen eighties,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the Heritage Foundation, which you briefly mentored, mentored.

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure, that's the new mentioned before.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Before we broke. They came about and we broke a

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>long time ago. They said, all right, teen eighties, we

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>got Ronald Reagan in there. He is watching movies or

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>asleep most of the time, so we have a good opportunity.

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>That's how they want you to think he has a

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>good Did you see the numbers about his movie watching?

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, it's great. What like a movie fan? It's great?

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>How many movies did he watch? Your day?

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>He watched a lot of movies.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is like back when they just had like reels, right, films, trips.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess they probably just you know, cued the projector

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 2>when he and Nancy wanted to watch a good old

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 2>fashioned western. Oh that was a good starring me.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you do the rest of the episode as.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>No, So they came along and they said, all right,

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Reagan's in office, here are our recommendations. What UPI would

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>call a blueprint for grabbing the government by its frayed

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 2>New Deal lapels and shaking out forty eight years of

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>liberal policy. And it came by way of two thousand,

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 2>more than two thousand recommendations.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they tried to institute about two thirds of them.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, was like, great, here's my thanks for the outline

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 2>for what I should do.

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Right my plans.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so two thirds, like he said during his two terms,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>is what he tried to implement. And then, of course

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 2>when Bill Clinton gets in there, the Progressive Policy Institute,

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it was two thousand plus, but

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>they offered similar recommendations. And that's how it goes with

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 2>think tanks right now.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because if you're a lawmaker, and again we said

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this in the Lobbying episode two, you're not necessarily like

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>some smart whip crack sharp person.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>No, I think we've seen that played out.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>You can just like get people to vote for you, Yeah,

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the aisle. Just a crack at

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like you know Trump or anything.

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, no, no, I mean all up and down the

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 2>House and Senate.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 2>You don't like to think they're all geniuses, but they're not.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>They're not. No, And you don't have to be smart

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold office. You just have to get people to

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>vote for you. Again, which is why think tanks have

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>flourished for so long while lobbyists have flourished for so long,

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're the ones who do the research and write

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the policy and say, yeah, here you go, you want

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to go look smart, here you go, buddy. We even

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like highlighted some sound bites for you to go say

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to people and get the get into the twenty four

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>hour news cycle.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the big roles that think tanks

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>play today is by and have you know, especially since

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>World War Two, is by going to policymakers and being like,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>here's your agenda, take your leave as much as you want.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But all of this is back by data, like it

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dovetails with what you want to do with the country,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is just gangbusters stuff. Yeah, high quality, well

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>researched stuff.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It's really interesting because I think there are still

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:48.479
<v Speaker 2>think tanks that only craft, only do research and present

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 2>it and say do what you will with it, but

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>those seem to be more and more gone by the wayside.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, twenty ten was a real watershed year. It feels

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like for think tanks.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like you mentioned ALEX, which are going to cover

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 2>in full, but I mean they are a bill writing organization.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 2>They call them model bills. But I mean when when

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 2>you hear a senator or something said, you know, we

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>crafted this legislation, well, that probably means is an organization

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 2>like ALEC handed them the legislation and said here, you know,

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 2>here it is if you want to use it, right,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 2>and you probably should want to use it.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 1>That's so. That is so ALEC, I think does in

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>many ways qualify as a think tank. They're not one

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent standard think tank, but actually writing the law. Yeah,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and for the lawmaker to go and go into Congress

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and introduce it as their own bill, right, that's a

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>little beyond what think tanks to think tanks more like

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>write a paper that says, here's this problem in America,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>here are some ideas to solve it. Here's this research

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>to back up those ideas, go write a law based

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on it. What things like ALEC does is take it

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a step further. But ALEX still qualifies as a think tank,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and ALEC is part of something called the State Policy Network, Yeah,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>which apparently there's one in every state and Puerto Rico.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And they're like a confederation of think tanks that basically

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>sit around and figure out ways to sue local, state

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and federal lawmakers over laws, to try to get laws overturned.

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Like they use the courts rather than the legislation, but

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>it's still the stated goal is to affect public policy

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and turn it in one direction or another.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what was what was the website that you sent

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that watch? Yeah? Sourcewatch called them called ALEC a corporate

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to Bill mill, right, So they are just churning out

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of bills a year. Not all of them get used,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 2>but many of them do. And it's just I don't know,

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't think a lot of Americans realize that a

0:22:54.160 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of actual legislative policy is being written by McDonald's. Yeah, exactly.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to do the ALQ one. We're both

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be well, our cars are going to blow

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>up right after, but by god, we're going to get

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that episode.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we should make that our like last episode in

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the year. Whatever. What's twenty years.

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>From now two thousand.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 2>No, that was eighteen years ago. Okay, I used to

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>love that bit though. Yeah, all right, so we got

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 2>to talk about money here, got because this they are

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 2>not the independent most times these days they are not

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the independent organizations that you think they are. Uh. They

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>used to be funded by these endowments, and more and

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 2>more it's it's corporations, large businesses. Sometimes private individuals of

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>course will give. And sometimes it's a great workaround for

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>campaign finance laws. Instead of directing you know, you know,

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>tens of millions of dollars like you can't do to

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 2>a campaign, you can throw it in a think tank

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 2>that will probably get a better result anyway.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 1>That's new the time was. It used to be like

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in my day, right, a rich philanthropist would say, I

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hate poverty and the effects it has on Americans. Go

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>figure this out. I'm going to fund a think tank,

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what you're dedicated to. I like, just go

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>make that happen. And that's what think tanks were originally

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>born from. And that's largely the only kind of oversight

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they worked under is they were trying to end poverty

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or they were trying to work against communism, like these

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>huge haughty goals. Yeah, now they're being micromanaged. That's one

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that's happening to them.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the idea that these think tanks are not

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 2>swayed or influence or affected by their donors is not true.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 2>And the sort of the biggest problem going is that

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 2>now you have legislation being drawn up by think tanks

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 2>because corporations are paying money to get research that looks

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>like it's in their favor.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So one of the problems is the like, there's

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>not as many philanthropists who are just endowing think tanks

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with no strings attached anymore. There are plenty of philanthropists

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out there still that are funding think tanks, but their

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>donations are directed, their results oriented. They're very technocratic, right,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to see bang for their buck. Whereas before

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it was just like to make America a better place

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was it. There wasn't a lot.

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Of like.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's feet were being held to the fire, you know.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's like, we want you to further this specific agenda,

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>which is we want to make sure that Saint Louis's

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>children there's not a single one malnourished any longer, which

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is great. It's a great goal. There's nothing wrong with

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that goal, but it's just so very narrowed and tay

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's ways that you can hold the think tank accountable,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which is good in one hand, but it's also basically

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of like a corporate management to think tanks,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which that's not really how they were originally formed, and

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's having a weird effect on them. So think tanks

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are starting to say, all right, thank you for this money,

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll go save the children of Saint Louis. And by

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, shout out to Saint Louis. That was a

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>great show.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 2>That what a cool down.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So again, saving the children of Saint Louis good stuff,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But we've got all this other stuff we want to

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>do too, So to keep that going, we're going to

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>have to also go find sources elsewhere, right, and again

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you can find them from other people, but one of

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the places they're finding them from his corporations, and that

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is having a big negative impact on think tanks right now.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it goes both ways. In the past, you know,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 2>eight or ten years, conservative billionaires of says that here

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 2>they funneled one hundred and twenty million dollars to about

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred grew and think tanks to do things like

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 2>discredit climate change science, which I mean, dude, I know.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The Koch Brothers and Exon Mobile specifically funded a couple

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of think tanks called Atlas Economic Research Foundation and the

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>International Policy Network to basically to basically question the science

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>behind climate change to further fossil fuel interests, which is,

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>see you guys in hell for that one. Like that,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>What a crummy legacy to leave on Earth just to

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>make a few extra bucks. Forget future generations they can

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>all burn. Forget all the endangered species that are on

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the brink of extinction that are oh wait no, they're

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>now extinct. It doesn't matter because we made a few

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>extra billion dollars. Yeah, that's that's despicable.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, what it's funny. I just watched the movie Chinatown

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 2>for a movie crush episode and there's that. You ever

0:27:59.560 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 2>seen that?

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>You know a lot of that movie is about It

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>was originally titled Water and Power, you know, because it's about,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, this weird political situation in Los Angeles in

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirties where they were diverting water to the valley

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 2>which was a desert and all these rich fat cats

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 2>that were getting the water diverted. There were buying up

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>land in the valley like hundreds of thousands of acres

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 2>because they knew it was going to be a lush

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>green valley soon. So all that really happened in La

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Chinatown was based on that. But there's that great scene

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>when Jack Nicholson is Jake Gettis, confronts John Houston about

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's the big bad guy Noah Cross and

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>he says, you know, how much money do you need?

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 2>How much how many more things can you buy? Or

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 2>this or that? And he says, what are you trying

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to secure? And he looked at him and he said,

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the future, mister Gettis, And that's what it is. They're

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 2>not after more billions to buy more plain in a

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>bigger house, right, They're trying to leave that they that's

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>what they want out of their legacy. Is they're trying

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 2>to affect the future and in their own specific way, right.

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But they're affecting the future in the worst way.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Possible according to us. And the problem is not according

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to them, sure, you know, but if.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You if you pull enough people and just ask them plainly,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>if you took money and billionaires in power and sure

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and all that out of it. Do you want a

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>better future for humanity and for earth? Yeah, one hundred

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>years from now, I would guess the majority of people

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would say yes. And if you can say, well, these

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>guys are actually doing the opposite of ensuring that right

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, how do you feel about that? Most people

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>would say I don't feel so great about that.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is most people would also follow up with,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but what can we do?

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They're rich, and that's a great point. Let me what

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>can you do?

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Let me hop back on Facebook and find a goat video.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Right. That's when the hopelessness sets in. And that's what's

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>causing the paralysis in our world right now, is hopelessness.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not grim at all of it. By the way, everybody,

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be sure to listen to my new podcast, The End

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of the World with Josh Clark.

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a really.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Uplifting coming very soon.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, coming this fall sometime eventually.

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Just stuck up on your happy bills. So. In twenty thirteen, however,

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 2>on the other side, left leaning weekly magazine The Nation

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 2>revealed the positions of the left leaning Center for American

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Progress and other thing tanks in DC are shaped by

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>interest of their donors. So it happens on both sides

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>of the aisle for sure.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah oh yeah, yeah, No, it's an equal opportunity screwing

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that the world is getting from lobbying from think tanks

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>from wealthy interests. Like, it's it's both both sides.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So they're effectively unregistered lobbyist organizations now to a

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>large degree, because they're tax exempt, they're not obligated to

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 2>release financial statements or reveal their donors. So I'm surprised

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 2>it took that long for people to be like, wait

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a minute, we can really take advantage here.

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's take another break and then we'll get well, it

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>will spell out what the advantages are of hiring a

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think tank. All right, Chuck, we're back. I'm a little

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>warm under the collar.

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we should mention this thing with the

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Walton Family Foundation quickly, because that's interesting.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a great example of what a

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>think tank can do these days.

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's obviously the Sam Walton family of walm aren't fame.

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 2>They fund a lot of conservative think tanks. I think

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 2>most people know that. But then they also fund funded

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>one and think tanks backed by Barack Obama when it

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 2>came to the Affordable health Care Act, and you're like,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, why would they do something like that

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>if they're a conservative family supporting conservative causes. Then you

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 2>do a little poking around and it turns out that

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>critics would say that the healthcare bill that forced employers

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:35.239
<v Speaker 2>to pay for their employees healthcare tax. Walmart was like,

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>this is great because we can afford to do this,

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 2>but our mom and pop competitors can't. So we're actually

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>going to try and get this push through. Even though

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 2>at its face it doesn't quite make a lot of sense,

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense to them, like why would Walmart take

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on the cost of their employees' healthcare because they know

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that they.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Can go back to sleep. Everybody, Yeah, stop asking quests.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Really interesting, it is, it's fascinating. But that's one thing

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 3>you can do is donate to a think tank that's

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 3>furthering your agenda. And because think tanks are now largely

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 3>agenda driven, there's a lot of think tanks out there

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 3>that can help you out. And there's a new thing

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 3>that's happening with think tanks these days is they're starting

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 3>to solicit corporate donations. And one of the saddest stories

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 3>is the story of the Brookings Institution, the most centrist

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 3>think tank that has put out the Marshall Plan that

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 3>helped figure out the New Deal and how it addressed

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the depression, like has done all this amazing stuff. Is

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>now they hired a lobbyist for their strategic development chief

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 3>and they're now soliciting corporate donations left and right, and

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 3>they're basically this is what you can get, Like if

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>you hire a think tanker, I'm sorry, you're not supposed

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to say higher. If you enter into a part ownership

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 3>or donate to a think tank and your corporation, we're

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 3>a very wealthy person. What the think tank will do

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 3>is they will basically get your ideas out there.

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>They will deploy. So first of all, let's say there's

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this really great New York Times article about the what

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>was the name of that company, the Lenar Corporation. Okay,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to build in San Francisco. They wanted to

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>redevelop the site in San Francisco, which whatever, apparently there

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>was pushback on it or they were getting some sort

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of pushback from the residents of San Francisco. So I

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>guess the Brookings Institution went to them and said, hey,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 1>we've got some ideas for you. We can support this

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>as basically like a great idea for cities of the future,

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to lend the credibility of our experts

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in our think tank to your project. Yeah, and make

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it like a champion kind of thing, like a blue

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>type and archetype for how to further cities in America

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>your development problem.

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 2>It's it.

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>They're home builders, but with Brookings Institution behind it, there

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was a veneer of something bigger than building homes, bigger

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>than redeveloping, something about the future and progress, and Brookings

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like went to them and in exchange for four hundred

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>grand Brookings added this credibility to it, got talking heads

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>out there on the news to talk up this development

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and like what it meant for the future. And one

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of the other things they did and can do is

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they can set up summits conferences on cities of the

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>future and get the home builders and lawmakers into the

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>same room to hang out together. And so that's lobbying. Sure,

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no other way to put it. That is lobbying.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And they were doing it on behalf of a specific corporation,

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>there should be no tax exemption whatsoever any longer. It

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what side of the aisle you're on. If

0:35:54.760 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a taxpayer, you are funding that by by through

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>these tax exemptions, because we put the bill for tax deduction. Sure,

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>so if a single corporation's interests are being served, even

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if society in general is benefiting in some way, that's

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>too much of a slippery slope that breaks the tax

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>exemption status. And then that that should go away. And that,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>sadly is apparently where Brookings the direction Brookings is going. Yeah,

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and others too, I should.

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Say, oh sure, sure, even the ones that aren't maybe

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 2>as outright are aren't as bald faced about this stuff.

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Like a lot of scholars say that you know, bought

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and paid for research is sort of the exception. Still,

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 2>But even even so, there's still places where you know,

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you may not you may not push out certain research

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 2>if you think you're might piss off your boss.

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is the same thing.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Or sort of self censor yourself if you think, like,

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>oh man, I don't know, like we're getting donations now,

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 2>like this might not ease them.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It might make them look bad. So I probably should

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just avoid this conclusion.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so maybe not of like completely inventing a study

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>or something, but being very selective in what you choose

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to research or how you research it or what you release.

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Sure is, you know, it's another version of the same thing.

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It totally is. And one of the other things that

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been found to do a lot of think tanks,

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>or one of the new things that think tanks do,

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is they will circulate drafts before there's a final draft

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>two donors like what do you think about this? And

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes their opinions will be incorporated into the final draft.

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>That is the antithesis of the spirit of think tanks

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and what they were originally meant to do. They were

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be like, here's the facts, here's the research

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to back it up. It is what it is. We

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think you can apply it to make the world better

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in this way, not what you know, What do you

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>guys think does this jibe with the kind of sinks

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you've selected for this redevelopment, because we can change this

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>part to jibe with the sinks you you know, that's

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just not what it's supposed to be. And the reason

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that think tanks are doing this is they are in

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>existential danger through the death of expertise that I remember

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I talked about in the Elimination Diet episode.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, it's not like America just said, we're

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>sick of expertise. We're tired of you experts, like you're

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>always right, and we're tired of hearing you're always right.

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>People got tired of being lied to and misled and

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>misinformed and manipulated, and they finally said, you know what, experts,

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that's enough. Enough of you are full of it. Enough

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of you have let your credibility be co opted. We're

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>just not going to listen to any of you anymore

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because we don't know who to trust. And the experts

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>brought about the death of expertise themselves in large parts.

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there's another Uh. There was this article from

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the Washington Post called or think tanks Obsolete, which sort

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 2>of argues along those lines about and also incorporates the

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Internet and the length of like a research cycle, like

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 2>with the Internet and Twitter and Facebook and things like

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 2>ted Talks. There's a guy, Donald Abelson, a professor at

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 2>University of Western Ontario, wrote a book called The Thing

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Tanks Matter, where his conclusion basically is that the marketplace

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 2>of ideas he says has become congested and you don't

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 2>have time anymore to do a twelve month research proposal

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 2>to come to the following conclusions when one hundred ted

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 2>talks over that twelve months will be published. Not picking

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 2>on ted talks are great.

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:36.760
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a good example though.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 2>But you can push out of ted talk. You can

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>push out a Facebook live video as an economist and

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of sway. They mentioned in here in

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the article about vaccines, for instance, as far as it

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 2>goes with the vaccines, the Rank Corporation, one of the

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 2>largest thing tanks that we already mentioned, they did like

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a very thorough deep dive in research debunking the notion

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that vaccines cause autism, and it took a long time.

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>But you can get on Facebook and go to a

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 2>group called Educate before you vaccinate and watch videos by

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 2>non experts, and people are swayed these days by this stuff. Yeah,

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 2>like why wait, you know, the news cycle is so

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 2>shortened you can't wait for a long, deep dive research

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 2>paper to come out with some abstract summary that no

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 2>one reads anyway, And apparently now they're you know, they're

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 2>written in such a way where they will just say,

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 2>abstract summary, this stinks, we shouldn't do it. You know,

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 2>they've become so opinionated. I don't know, man, It's just

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it's depressing to think that Facebook and Twitter have outsized

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>a think tank as far as they definitely have influence.

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and YouTube and basically anything that gives a voice

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>to the average person, which on the one hand is

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>really cool and great.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Sort of democratizes it in a way, but in the

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 2>worst way at times.

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's tied into this death of expertise in a

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>really toxic manner, you know what I'm saying, Like the

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>two that democratization of like giving everybody like a mouthpiece,

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is not in and of itself like a bad thing,

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but when since it coincided with a loss and trust

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and experts and expertise, that's where the problem came from.

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And that was the reason why we couldn't be a

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>think tank. Sadly, we could be a think tank now,

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but we couldn't be a bonafide think tank because, Chuck,

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't have enough time in any given week to

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do so much thorough primary source research into stuff. If

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we release one of these every couple of months. Sure

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we could be like a real think tank, but it

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be nearly fun.

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Six episodes a year. People would love.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>That, Yeah, they'd love it. You got anything else?

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Nope, I guess either.

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for going off everybody, Thanks for listening. I'm sure

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll get some email, but what evs It is worth it.

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about think tanks, well,

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, go on the internet and look up

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>some think tanks and see if there's any that you

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>agree with. A lot of them have like daily interpretations

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>of news that kind of go through their lens. Yeah,

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a way to keep up with things. Sure, and

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you can also read this article on how stuff works,

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>just not a think tank called how think tanks work.

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And since I said that it's time for listener mail.

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to call this a Ballpoint pen addiction or

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 2>just pin addiction. Hey guys, been listening for a couple

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 2>of months or so, New listener, You were my first

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 2>foray into podcasts. I just really enjoy listening to you too.

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome.

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I saw the Ballpoint Pin podcast and I could not

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 2>pass it up. I have a bit of a pin problem,

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you see. I own many mini pins, especially the gel

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 2>type inc roller ballpins. Way to Go, you got taken

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 2>a task a few people who were just like Josh Clark,

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 2>heresy gel pins. Yeah, there are a lot of I

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 2>guess traditionalists to boo poo.

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That I think they're great. I got a lot of

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>support for that one.

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Too, agreed, We got a lot of pin recommendations. It

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 2>was good to see. Yeah, and here's another one. I

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.439
<v Speaker 2>own many many pins, especially the gel ink rollerball pins.

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 2>I also own a collection of sharpiees and various tip

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.760
<v Speaker 2>withs and colors. I probably have a couple of gallon

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>sized ziploc Bagsworth. You mentioned the way certain pins ride

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 2>on certain types of paper. I think it's probably the

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 2>rollerball gel pins that were best on the thermal paper

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 2>that they use in most restaurants. Remember I was talking

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>about signing the check. I think it's what she's talking.

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We still never found out what that thing's called.

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Thermal paper.

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>No, No, the thing that the check comes out in

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the little portfolio.

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 2>The clamshell. Someone actually said, did you see that? Yeah,

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.959
<v Speaker 2>this great couple send in a picture of a clamshell

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 2>check delivery system. What are they called?

0:43:58.680 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:43:59.480 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Check cat.

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're gonna name them clamshells now all right,

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the new name for him.

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So I have a favorite pin, though, guys. I buy

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 2>them by the box. It's the Pilot V ball B

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 2>green pin, the point five millimeter. Okay. I love the

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 2>way they feel when they write. I can't go back

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to ballpoint pins. I use them at work. I carry

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 2>at least three in my bag and I draw on

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 2>doodle with them. Using them on a newsprint pad is

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>my favorite thing when doing word art.

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Sorry for the ramble, guys, have a great day. That

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>is from Davini M. Barry, Davini Berry, Davini M Berry,

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>M Berry. I wasn't going okay.

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't know if Davini's middle initial was M,

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>or if I was miss hearing you in Davini and Barry.

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 2>It's actually Divina, excuse me, Divina M Berry. If I

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 2>would have said Divina M Berry, that would have been

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 2>much more clear. Or Mberry, it might be Divina Mbury.

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Was it say Divina or Davina?

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh God? How about d E? Thanks d E.

0:44:58.080 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 2>It's d I.

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, we're glad that you started listening to us.

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Thanks for taking the time to let

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>us know about your pen addiction. Totally fine with us.

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to let us know about something you're

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>super into, you can hang out with us on social meds.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>You can go to stuff youshould Know dot com and

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>find all of our social media links. You can also

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>send us an email to stuff podcast at HowStuffWorks dot com.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.