WEBVTT - From the Vault: Twilight of the Moa

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Time to go into the vault for a classic episode

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of the show. This originally aired on March. It's part

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>two of our series about the Moa. That's right. The

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>first one was more about the Wingless Wonders themselves themselves,

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is more about, you know, the fall of

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Moa, the twilight of the Moa, their extinction and

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what we know about how we can you know, put together, uh,

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>their final days, where they went, and we'll even touch

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>on the question of what if we could bring them back. Hi, everybody,

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Seth the producer of Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm here in March to just pop on a quick

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>note into this episode saying, Hey, it's March, and you

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. We're all recording from our own homes,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all separate and all social distancing, so that means the

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sound quality of this one is a little strange. But

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>just to let you know, each time we've been doing

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>these home recordings, they've been getting better and better and better.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So I can guarantee you that next one is going

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to sound a little better than this and the next one,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and after that's going to sound a little bit better

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>than that one, etcetera, etcetera. So just so you know,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this is all temporary and we'll get back to our

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>regular episodes as soon as we can sound quality wise.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, and enjoy the show. Welcome to

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of My Heart Radio. Hey,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name is

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back. We're

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>still social distancing now. There must have been a weird

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>back and forth year because Thursday of last week's episode

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we were broadcasting from our closet and our laundry room, right,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but then Tuesday of this week's episode. I think that

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was recorded in the studio before we came home for

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Great Retreat, that's right. And also we record our

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>vault episode intros about a month out, so people might

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have noticed that as well. But this episode, part two

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of our Look at the Moa, Twilight of the MOA

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>we're calling it. This episode is recorded from our respective

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>closets in our homes. You're actually in a closet now,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to your your laundry roomness. That correct, that's true.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I decided to become a monster in the closet. Uh,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And I've got so I've got the same talisman's that

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I had last time in order to bring me good

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>luck and watch over me while making this recording. I've

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>got tom Atkins from Night of the Creeps. I've got

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my thor Christ. But this time I also brought in

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>an extremely tasteful novelty mug that my wife found an

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>East Tennessee thrift store. Which is great because I cannot

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>bring this mug to the office. I am sure I

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't get in trouble for that. Yeah, the home office

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>brings with it certain advantages, doesn't it? For For me?

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I looked around the house. I would have loved to

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have had a toy of a moa, like a little

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>plastic like Schleck moa, but sadly we do not have one,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and it would be irresponsible for me to even try

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and mail order one at the moment. So you have

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a plastic Shrek, no I have. I do have a

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>plastic terror birds. So it's not accurate, but it's it

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is still an extinct flightless bird. Uh. So I'm gonna

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>set it right here next to my microphone and it

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>will it will serve as my mascot. Well mayor pocket

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sized titles watch over us. So, so where do we

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>leave off last time? All right? So in our last episode,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and if you didn't listen to it, do go back

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and listen to that episode before this one. In it,

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we discussed the evolution of flightless birds and the rise

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of the moa, nine species of large flightless birds that

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>evolved as the dominant vertebrates on the isolated islands of

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>what he's currently known as New Zealand. But the rule

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the moa did not last forever because Homo sapiens arrived,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and this episode will deal with the subsequent extinction of

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the moa because you know what they say, more humans

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>moa problems. I wondered how you were going to work

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that in, saying, you know, I had to get to

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it eventually. Yeah, yeah, that's true for I'd say every

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>organism except us, right, except maybe like Hathogen's that that

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>prey upon us. Right, Yeah, it's certainly when we're dealing

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with with megafauna um creatures of that nature, there's this

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>is a tale of doom whenever humans enter the equation,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll point out some other examples of that

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>as we'd move along. No, wait a minute, I'm thinking

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of some more exceptions. We've got rats too. I mean

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>rats were great for them, and rats will come up. Yeah,

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>so so yeah, a few exceptions there. But you don't

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be a moa when humans show up. Right,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So the rule of the moa was lengthy. They evolved

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into the into these dominant positions in New Zealand, but

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed on the show before, it can be

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>precarious at the top, certainly for apex predators, but also

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>from massive dominant herbivores, especially when something changes. Oh yeah,

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>we also talked about this in our episode. I believe

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>it was on the Leviattan or the Leviathan genus of

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like the the ancient predatory sperm whale. That's right, yes,

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>where it's easy to look at a creature like that,

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>or a creature like hosts eagle, which we discussed in

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the last episode, to look at these creatures and think, well,

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that's there's no taking that down. That's that's that's a

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>dominant organism. But it is, uh, you know, it is

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the ruler. But it is it is it's thrown rest

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>upon a precarious pyramid of bones. Yeah, heavy lies the

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>crown exactly. So Yeah, when something changes, it can topple

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>everything over. And in the thirteenth century, see I've seen

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>twelve a d c. As a potential date, a major

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>change arrived on the shores of New Zealand. And that

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>change came in the form of Homo sapiens. Uh. The

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>long world changing wave of human migration had only made

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>its way to you know, near the bottom of the world,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>to this nation of the birds, and this would have

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>been what would come to be known as the Mallory. Uh.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>These were uh, these settlers were a Polynesian people who

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>arrived in several waves uh in what is now New Zealand.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the later regions of planet Earth

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to be settled by humans. Absolutely like these were some

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of the last in true pioneers heading into parts of

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, not not only parts of the world that

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they had not been to before, but where no human

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>had gone before. Um. You know, the European colonists and

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>explorers would only come in the wake of these true pioneers. Now,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Polynesian culture itself is endlessly fascinating, and I'd love to

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>come back and deal with some of the related topics

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show, such as their amazing navigational abilities or

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the use of aquaculture in in the Lion Islands. But

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially we're talking about a long curving leg of human

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>expansion that extends from China through the Philippines, New Guinea,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Solomon Islands, Samoa, Tahiti, uh Hawaii, Eastern Island, and

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>other islands in this broad stretch of the ocean. Again,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they were the Polynesians were the last true pioneers of

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>human expansion, and Polynesian expansion took place over the course

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of years as well, and the culture evolved

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>along the way it takes on ends up taking on

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>different forms in the locations where they land, often due

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to resulting isolation, uh, you know, because these are in

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>many cases very far flung islands and and and sometimes

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, you know, centuries and centuries between people

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>making it to one island versus another. So New Zealand

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was discovered and colonized very late in human expansion, and

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>when the archaic Mallory arrived, they encountered the Moa Following

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this encounter, the nine species of moa would scarcely last

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>more than another century, and they were extinct by fourteen five.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into what we're mainly going to discuss

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. This this collision between Homo sapiens and moa,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And probably the best place to start there is by

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about just the word moa. Where does it come from?

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I was reading in Prodigious Birds, MOA's and Moa Hunting

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.679
<v Speaker 1>in New Zealand by Athol Anderson, and the author shares

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that the earliest recorded use of the word moa comes

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>via Cornish missionary William Colenso who in eighty eight heard

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that some mallory described the moa as a large bird,

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>others as a large bird with a face like that

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of a man, lived in a mountain cavern that was

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>guarded by two giant lizards. This in other tales described

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the residents of Mount uh Taranaki or Mount Egmont's described

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the very strange residents that live there, often taking the

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>form of abnormal birds or lizards, sometimes with human qualities.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And this really lines up with what we've talked about

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>on the show before about sacred mountains and holy mountains

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and the various myths that people accumulate regarding the sorts

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of things you would find there, in the sorts of

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>creatures that would populate those uh, those mysterious cliffs up there. Yeah,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of ways of looking at that.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>In our episode on the Sacred Mountains, I guess we

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>did two of those episodes. I mean, one thing is

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the idea that if you get really

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>really high up there, there's some evidence that people sometimes start,

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, experiencing psychosis or hallucinations. Um, so, like that

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>could be a source of some supernatural beliefs in some cases.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But but I'd say probably the more prevalent issue is

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just that the top of the mountain is inaccessible, so

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it is naturally a place to put your mythical creatures

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at home in You know that that is where they

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hide absolutely now I know it. As some people were

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>probably wondering, here is eighty eight. That sounds kind of

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>late for the earliest recorded use of the word moa. Yeah,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so how long would the species have been extinct before

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the word appears in writing? Yeah? Yeah, it's uh, it

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seems a little confusing at first, right, because first contact

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>between Europeans and Maori occurred December eighteen, sixteen forty two,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>with Able Tasman's Dutch East India Company expedition. Now specifically,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Europeans had been asking the Mallory about other giant creatures

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>recorded in their traditions since the seventeen seventies. In the

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>near two centuries after, there was certainly communication and exchange

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>between Europeans and Mallory, in addition to, of course colonial subjucation.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh Anderson discusses this uh in his book, and it

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>points out that earlier references to the moa might either

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>have not been recognized or not associated with the term

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>moa self, so you know, descriptions of the animal might

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>not have been immediately tied with moa. For instance, there

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were accounts of spirits covered in hair in the form

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of birds, and there was talk of how a giant

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>kiwi lived in the mountains. Uh and will again remind

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>everyone that the kiwi and the moa are not actually

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>all that related. But this UH, this sort of discovery

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>would have stemmed from Earth, from general European interests in

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the extent kiwi, so you know, they might have been

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>asking about the kiwi and they would have been heard

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about myths of giant birds that are in some way

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>like a kiwi. That is interesting, Yeah, the idea that

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the concept could persist over time, especially if you have

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like something that's morphologically very similar but just like much

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller to refer to. Right. And in all of this,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>again we're just we're discussing like European knowledge all of

0:11:55.440 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the Moa, which is ultimately tied to European knowledge edge

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and understanding of the Mallory, which of course is is

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a strained relationship, you know, to say the least, because

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>again you're talking about the the indigenous people, the Maori,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking about the the colonial power that then

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>arrives on their shore in the form of the Europeans.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Anderson also points out that a major factor might be

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Mallory conceptionalize the moa as not being true

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>birds but is just being is being bird like, which

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Nights had a little confusing. But then I think back

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to just some of the weird things about the moa,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they had the thing that the fact

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that they had no wings, not even vestigial wings. They

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>were just two limbed organisms. Um, you can see why

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they might defy easy categorization. Likewise, they're just the size

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the larger species. Well, sure, I mean when we

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>use the term bird now, I think like you and

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I are going to be referring to an evolutionary clade,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>uh that is defined by evolutionary relationships. But if you're

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>just categorizing animals that you see in the world, what

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are the bases on which you form your categories? Like

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a bird might well be understood as something that flies.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So if there's something that, look, this is kind of

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>like a bird, and that it has a beak and

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>all that, but it doesn't fly, it doesn't meet your

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>necessary criteria for what makes something a bird exactly. Yeah,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and so the bones of the moa were apparently not

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>described by the Mallory as bird bones, but they were

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>described as moa bones. So here's the here's a quote

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>from from Anderson on all of this quote, it is

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to document this point, but the separation of

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>dangerous mythological moa from large birds used as food and

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>easily hunted to extinction in Pollock's description, and the lack

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of any comparable prosaic tradition about MOA's in most of

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the moa stories collected by missionaries seem suggestive. Certainly, it

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was the very lack of an unequivocal association between the

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>term moa and any straightforward account of large birds hunted

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and eaten by maories which formed the main flaw exploited

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>throughout the long debate about what, if anything malories had

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>known about the dinner riforms. Oh, and the dinner if

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the forms that refers to the group to which the

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>moa belong, right, Yes, so, well, we'll ponder this dangerous

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>versus easy to drive to extinction question as we perceive,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not entirely convinced this species can't be both

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of these things. You know, certainly when humans and the

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>humans in question have tools, tactics, and invasive species on

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>their side. Oh sure. I mean some of the most

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>dangerous creatures in a one on one context are also

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the easiest to drive extinct. I mean, if

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you just wanted to drive an animal extinct, what would

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be like the easiest ones to do? Probably like large carnivores,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because there's already so few of them. Of course, the

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>moa were not carnivores like this, But yeah, of course,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like large animals generally being fewer in number because of

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>their energy requirements within the environment, would seem to be

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>easier to drive to extinction than if you were trying

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to exterminate something that's very easy to kill like rats. Yeah,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and again I think they the evidence seems to indicate

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they would have been dangerous creatures because these were big animals.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Even the little bush moa was four and a half

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>feet tall. Now that's smaller than an adult southern castlewary,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which is generally five to six feet taller one and

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a half to one point eight meters, But if you

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>see one, you would not mess with it, right. Yeah,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>They're they're fierce creatures. So it seems like the larger

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>species of moa especially would certainly be in a position

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to put the hurt on an aggressor and do so

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's in keeping with what we see

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in in extant rack eye species. But does that mean

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they were a match for the humans that arrived on

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>their shores. No, because the archaic nowory were a very

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>skilled and advanced people. They arrived in waves from Hawaiki.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a mythical land that is usually identified as

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to Hiti by historians. And they were of course skilled

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>sailors that arrived on wooden vessels capable of traversing great

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>distances at sea. For instance, the distance between Tahiti and

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand is two thousand, nine hundred and fifty miles

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>or four thousand, seven hundred forty seven kilometers. I mean,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a long way to go, even if you know

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly where you're going. But here we're talking about like

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the settlement of a new, previously unknown island, right, So yeah,

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I just I just really want to drive home. Like

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the skilled nature of these Homo sapiens that arrived um,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and what's more, they brought with him both human cunning

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and human tool use. They were masters of the club

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and the spear especially. They also brought with them other animals,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>including a breed of domesticated Polynesian dog known as the curry, which,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as with other Polynesian dogs, did not bark. But apparently

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>how they also brought with them, quite by accident, the kiori,

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the an Asian rat um. Now, the curi is still

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a pest species in New Zealand because, as we know,

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>once rats become established anywhere, they're very difficult to get

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>rid of. The curry dog, on the other hand, has

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>been extinct since the arrival of Europeans, and we'll talk

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>more about that species in a minute. And they also

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>brought with them um plants as well, such as the

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sweet potato. Well way, does there any thinking that the

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>sweet potato could be involved in driving them OA extinct

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or not? I have not read anything to suggest that,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but I mean that kind of that sort of thing

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is certainly possible, right and generally speaking, when you have

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>humans from a distant land show up and introduce into

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem not only their destructive selves, but also invasive organisms,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>uh there's you know, you're just really up ending the

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>croc pie. You know, you're really changing the chemistry of

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole ecosystem around potentially. Oh yeah, well, actually, now

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think about it, I could totally see how

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying this is the case here, but I

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>could totally see how something like this wheat potato could

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>drive a native species extinct. Because humans come, they bring

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with them their crop staples. In order to plant those crops,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they have to, uh to establish agricultural zones that destroy

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>natural ecosystem. So yeah, I could see it. Again, not

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>saying we know that happened here right. All right, On

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that note, let's take a quick break, and when we

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>come back, we will continue to discuss the collision between

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens and the Mola. Thank alright, we're back. So

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you need as fresh colonists in a world

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like New Zealand. Well, let's see classic hierarchy of needs.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd say first you need you need fresh water, food,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>and shelter probably right, Oh yeah, absolutely, Am I on

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the right track here? Yes? Yes, another need that I

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I didn't instantly think of. And part of this is

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>probably because I've never been to New Zealand myself, so

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have like the bodily experience of this. But

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand can be quite cold, so you know you're

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you're arriving in an new land, but also a land

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>where the temperature has dipped down a bit more. Uh

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So the the archaic mallory. Uh they were fortunate and

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>they did bring within the couri dogs, which helps solve

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these issues. Because the creatures had many utalitarian uses.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>They could be eaten, their pelt could be made into clothing,

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and other parts of its body could be used for

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>bits of clothing and tool use and so forth. But

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, you know, when they started exploring this new world,

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>they very quickly would have discovered the moa, and the

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>moa would be just a gift of resources to these people.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Now here's a question that researchers and historians have have

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>pondered over the years. So what sort of moa population

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>did the archaic Mallory encounter. It's long been widely accepted that,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the newly arrived humans at least played a

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>role in the extinction of the moa. But there there

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been some disagreement in the past over to what extent.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, did the archaic Mallory encounter thriving populations of

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>moa across much of the islands, or did they encounter

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>dwindling populations of moa that were restricted to certain areas,

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or did they find moa populations that were already in

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>severe decline. And of course, depending on the answer, it

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>paints a different picture of the extent of Maori moa

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>hunting and the impact of their arrival. You know, some

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>could argue that well, in perhaps climate change, volcanic eruptions,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and or disease had already impacted moa populations, and humans

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>were just the final straw. So the moa certainly went

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>extinct over the next century or so. You know, there's

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>no moa hiding in the wilds of New Zealand, sadly,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>no matter what anybody might try and tell you. And

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until the nineteenth century the Europeans discovered evidence

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of the great birds, consisting of charred skeletons, gizzard stones,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and eggshells. They certainly told the tale of their demise.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>DNA evidence, however, does shine light on the question of

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>pre maori moa populations. As Rachel Newer wrote in The

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>New York Times back in quote Morton Eric Allentoft, the

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>researcher the University of Copenhagen and colleagues analyzed DNA from

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>two D one moas collected from museums and new excavations

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and estimated the age of these specimens using radio carbon dating.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>They found that in the millenniums before humans arrived in

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, the moa displayed none of the genetic bottlenecking

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>indicative of a declining population. So there's no genetic evidence

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of any of a decline in the moa during the

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years prior to their rapid extinction. Uh, you know,

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>via the human arrival. Okay, so what does that tell us? Well,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>that leaves us with this version of the story. The

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>archaic Mallory arrived on the shores of a new land

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>where strange, often gigantic birds were roaming around, and through

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the use of spears and snares and hunting dogs and

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the human cunning, they were able to bring the birds

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>down and process their kills with the same sort of

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>efficiency we see, you know, with the curios. It's also

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>possible that the moa had no natural fear of humans

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, which would have just made them even more

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to this kind of harvesting. Well, yeah, i'd imagine

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's possible, especially without um, without large mammalian predators on

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the island of New Zealand, like they're only real predator

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>would have been the hostile eagle, right, which they're adapted

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to a landscape in which the only thing to worry

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>about comes down at you from above. Who knows what

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they would have done if, like, you know, a bipedal

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>hommaid walks up to them in a group. Yeah, exactly,

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and and plus their extinction didn't just come via the

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>hunting of grown adult MOA's because they're they're large, eggs

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>were certainly sought after foods as well. We see that

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>from some of the you know, the evidence of you know,

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they're finding egg shells and evidence of the eggs having

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>been consumed. And since the moa produced just one or

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>two eggs, the harvesting of their eggs would have further

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>spelled doom for nine species of moa. For example, the

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I believe this is a co Cora egg, the largest

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>moa egg ever uncovered, would have weighed nine pounds when fresh. Wow.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>To put that in perspective, an ostrich egg typically weighs

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>one point four kilograms or three point one pounds, which

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is more than twenty times the weight of a chicken egg.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about you know, two people, uh that

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have arrived on these islands, you know, struggling for existence

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's a huge bounty of resources in that egg.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever see anybody eat an ostrich egg? I

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like I have before in the past, but I haven't.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not the kind of thing I've seen on a

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>menu recently. It did not come highly recommended to me.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Apparently in addition to being very large, it's gott a

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got a tough shell, I guess as you might imagine.

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it can't just have like an egg shell

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thick like a chicken egg shell thickness shell. Uh, that's

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit difficult to get into. But then once

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you do get into it, tremendous nutritional resources. Yeah, I

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that that that's a one egg omelet for you. Yeah.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So basically the situation is the maori ended up hunting

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and harvesting the moa faster than the moa could reproduce,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and as the bounty of moa flesh and bone dwindled,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the moa hunting Maori diversified and came to depend on fishing,

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>fouling uh in the gathering of mollusks, etcetera. And this

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>led to the establishment of more permanent and semi permanent settlements.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So then it looks like it really was us. It

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>was people that drove the moa extinct. Oh yes, I

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>think at this point, especially with the genetic evidence, that's

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what without question. Now it is reported in why

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>did New Zealand's moas Go Extinct? By Virginia Morrell Morton Allentoft,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>who mentioned earlier evolutionary biologists of the University of Copenhagen,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>remarked that the idea may run counter to some ideas

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that we tend to have about indigenous people. We often

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think of them, uh, you know, living in equilibrium with nature.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But the Maori end up killing and eating the moa

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>at every stage of the creature's life. So alan Toft

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>contends that this sort of harmony with nature that we

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes envisioned ultimately rarely exists within human beings, and that

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>any arriving humans would have extinguished the moa the same way.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And certainly we see other such extinctions, um, you know,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>including the distinctions of large flightless birds due to the

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>arrival of humans. So again, don't think less of the

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Maori for the extinction of the moa. Uh. These great

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>birds were always on a collision course with humans, and

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>if by some miracle the Polynesians had never found New Zealand,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the Europeans would have eradicated the moa on their own.

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So again, it's an old story. Humans arrive somewhere, mega

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fauna is hunted into extinction. We see that with the mammoths.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We see that with cave bears, giant kangaroos, etcetera. Oh yeah,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it seems like a ubiquitous picture of human

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>development and geographical spread, like it is absolutely nothing unique

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>about whatever individual culture reached this megafaunt of first. Now,

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the really fascinating questions in all

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of this is beyond the questions of like Europeans figuring

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>out what the Mallory thought about the moa, is just

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a question of like, what how does that impact a people?

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, to to have come to this, to come

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to New Zealand to be essentially become the Mallory. And

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the process of becoming the Mallory, you go through

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>this period of moa hunting Mallory in which you have

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this you know, this bounty of these these creatures too

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to to hunt and feed on, and then they're gone.

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Then you have to diversify and change the way you live,

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Like what is the memory of that like in a people.

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I found a fascinating article about this published on the Conversation.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's by conservation biologist Priscilla Way, University of what Kat

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor him A Wanga and Professor of computational biology

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Murray Cox. It was published in two thousand and eighteen

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in its title Dead as the Moa oral traditions show

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>that early Maori recognized extinction interesting. So the team of

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>researchers here, which includes a conservation biologist, a linguist, bioinformationist,

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and experts in Maori culture, they stressed that tracing the

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>centuries old extinctions is difficult, but that through the collaborative

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:36.479
<v Speaker 1>analysis of ancestral sayings traditional ancestral sayings in Maori culture,

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they found that early Maori certainly paid attention to the

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>state of flora and fauna in their environment, and that

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they recognized the extinction of the moa. But despite knowing

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 1>roughly when and who you know regarding the more extinction,

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know a lot about how the Maori

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>felt about and how they processed this event, which again

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>would have been a major event in their lives. This

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was the destruction of an important food source as well

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as a source of various tools and parts. Uh. Some

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of this remains in the Maori oral traditions, specifically in

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>these various ancestral sayings. So the researchers here they point

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>out that of these ancestral sayings. Uh, the ones that

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>refer to birds anyway, A disproportionate number of them refer

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Moa, to their appearance, to their into their nature,

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and their uses to humans. All right, so what would

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>these things go like in translation? Well, yeah, I'm just

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna share the translations. So they do. They include the

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>original Maori versions in this article, so encourage anyone to

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's interested to check that out. But like, one of

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>them is lost as the Moa was lost. So that's

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an expression like dead as a doornail,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, or hidden as the Moa hit. And then

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>here's another one. The people will disappear like the Moa.

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And this this one's really haunting because they point out

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that as the Europeans arrived, the Maori compared their plight

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to that of the Moa. Wow. So here's a quote

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Maori recalled the Moa after Europeans arrived, too malory. We're

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>suffering badly from diseases and deprivation. In the late eighteen hundreds,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was as though the Maori world was being felled

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>along with the forests. There was a very real fear

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>among both Maori and Europeans that Maori people and culture

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>would also disappear, just like the moa wow, that is haunting. Yeah,

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm still thinking about these expressions. I was trying to

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think of a point of comparison. Of course, one is

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>uh is like gone the way of the dinosaurs uh,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>an expression in English. Though, of course, our knowledge of

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>where the dinosaurs went does not come from cultural memory.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It comes from like something we learned through science. I

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>guess you could maybe say gone the way of the dodos.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Some people say that that. Yeah, though I guess when

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>people say that, they tendn't they tend not to do

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it with any accepted role in the in the extinction,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like I feel like that's one of the

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>aspects here worth pondering is that, you know, the Mallory

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>would have have realized that their ancestors played this role

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in the extinction. Now that's not to say that, you know,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>did it on purpose. Obviously, there's a there's a huge

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>difference between you know, say, setting out to cause an

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>extinction and I don't. You know, obviously they wouldn't want

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to have to have done that, because these creatures were

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a source of of of of vast resources to them.

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they were you know, ultimately it was

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it was not something that were capable of exerting control over,

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, like it's it's really has always

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been a human struggle to figure out to what extent

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we can exploit the natural world without damaging it beyond control.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And clearly like that is something that is still a

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>major stumbling block to human beings. We still mishandle that

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>same equation on a on a daily basis. All Right,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take one more break, but when we come back,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to move beyond the extinction of

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the moa and ponder the question, well, could we bring

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the moa back? Than alright, we're back a dinosaur story?

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that a movie? We're back a dinosaur story? You

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know that movie? I don't know that. I do.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I think I rented that when I was

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a kid. Let's see when did that come out? Based

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seven book? Oh yeah, I rented that one when I

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was a kid. That was that was a Turtles video

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>find that I brought home, avenge that from the from

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the bone heap, and I don't think it was good.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I haven't seen it since I was a child.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>It does not seem like one of the animated dinosaur

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>movies that would hold up best. I don't know. I'm

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>looking it up. And this voicecast. You got John Goodman,

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you got Jay Leno, Walter Cronkite. I think Walter Cronkite

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>plays like a mad scientist who brings dinosaurs through a

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>time portal or something and puts him into New York

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the in the nineties. And Julia Child is in

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this really yeah, does she play one of the dinosaurs. No, sadly,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>she plays a worker at the Museum of Natural History. Okay, well,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe that would be uh interesting to

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>go back and excavate at some point. But it looks great.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It has four directors, a mark of quality. Okay, so

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the possible resurrection of the moa. Now,

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a pretty good article I was reading about

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this on stat by the science writer Sharon Begley from

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>February seven, uh and concerned the possible d extinction of

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one species of moa. Of course, if you're not familiar

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>with the concept of d extinction, it has come up

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, but you can probably figure it

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>out from the name, right It's also known as a

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 1>resurrection biology. It refers to the process of bringing an

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>extinct species back to life. The pop culture example that

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows is Jurassic Park. Now, what did they do

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>In Jurassic Park? They found ancient deposits of amber or

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fossilized tree sap in which dinosaur era mosquitoes had been

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>trapped when the sap was still soft, and then the

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sap hardened over time and then fossilized in the ground.

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Presumably the the mosquitoes in the sap were trapped with

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>their bellies full of dinosaur blood that they had just

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>feasted on. And so the scientists in the book, in

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the movie Jurassic Park, they extract the preserved dinosaur blood,

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they sequence it out, they get mr DNA from the

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>from the insect bellies, and then they used that blood

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and the DNA sequenced from it to clone dinosaurs. It was,

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, I would say, a very ingenious plot device,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately it looks like it probably would not work

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in reality. What if? What if? The reason it didn't work, though,

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was that it turns out the mosquitoes had not consumed

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the blood of dinosaurs, but he consumed the blood of

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Time Travelers from Ray Bradberry Sound of thunder Man.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>What what were the chances that would be a very

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>good closed time travel loop? What? What do you like

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>better the time travel movies where you go back and

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually change the past, or the ones where you go

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>back and it proves to be a closed loop where

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you just cause whatever present already happened. Oh, you have

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to go back and forth between the two. You know.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's the only way it really works.

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like it's the sour in the suite

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>with your time travel. But let's bring things back to

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Jurassic Park. Why didn't it work? Okay, so basically there

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>are several reasons, but they all come down to time. Now.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons is not in fact that you

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't discover a mosquito with prehistoric blood and it's guts

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that uh. But believe it or not, paleontologists actually have

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>discovered preserved insects full of the remains of not not intact,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but the remains of prehistoric blood in fossil beds. Uh.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is a slight tangent. But I didn't already

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>know this, and I was amazed by what I was

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>reading here, so there's one prominent example I could find.

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is still the only major

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>example known today, but it was described in a research

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>article published in P and A s in called hemoglobin

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>derived porphyrins preserved in a Middle Eocene blood engorged mosquito,

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was by Daily Greenwall to Julia S. Garreva,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Sandra M. Celia Strom, tim Rose, and Ralph E. Harback,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and the discovery was also written up by Ed Young

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in a short news item for the journal Nature on

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>October four. So the researchers here were examining a total

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>of thirty six mosquito specimens from a shale deposit known

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>as the Coal Creek member of the kischen In formation

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>in northwestern Montana, and the layer from which they were

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>recovered is estimated to be about forty six million years old.

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So this collection of fossilized mosquitoes included two previously unknown

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>species of the genus Lisda. One was cool Assada kischen

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in and one was cool Asda lemniscata. But one of

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the mosquitoes from this boniard was truly special and you

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>can look up images if you want on the Internet.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>In the words of the researchers, the image of this

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>specimen was quote obviously that of a female blood engorged

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mosquito with non plumos antennae and a very dark red

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>black distended abdomen compared with the non hematophagus male. Uh

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's a new word for your vampire fiction. By

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, him at aphagus means eats blood or drinks blood.

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Non hematophagus would mean does not drink blood like the

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 1>male mosquitoes. The male mosquito doesn't drink blood. Obviously, if

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>your gut is busting with blood like this, uh, this

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>female mosquito here, you are him atophagus. But but ed

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Young writes in his summary that prior to this discovery,

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>paleontologists had found fossils of blood sucking insects, but we

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>always had to yes what these insects were feeding on

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>through kind of indirect cues, like preserved evidence of blood

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>borne parasites contained in their digestive systems. This fossil find

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was totally different because it contained direct molecular evidence of

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>blood feeding within the insects gut, specifically lots of iron

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and organic compounds called porphyrans, which are constituents of hemoglobin,

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the protein responsible for transporting oxygen and blood uh.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And the find was also extremely unlikely. In the words

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>of the lead author, Dale Greenwalt quote, the abdomen of

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a blood engorged mosquito is like a balloon ready to burst.

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>It is very fragile. The chances that it wouldn't have

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>disintegrated prior to fossilization were infinitesimally small. And it's amazing

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>because that's on top of the already minuscule chances of

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>any animal being fossilized in the first place. I mean, remember,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the fossil lottery has few winners. Almost all organisms that

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ever live just decom hose and disappear without leaving a trace.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, there are a couple of reasons you cannot

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>use this mosquito or a mosquito like it to extract

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>dino d NA DINO. Both of these reasons have to

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>do with time. So the first is that the fossil

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>mosquito is only forty six million years old. So the

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 1>last of the non avian dinosaurs we know died out

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in the KPg extinction that was about sixty six million

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago. This Mosquito would have been from the Middle

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>EO scene. So if it were possible to clone anything

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>based on what was in the mosquitoes guts, it would

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be something that lived in North America around

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that period. And I was like, well, hell, I'll look

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>up a candidate, and I found a pretty cool one

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that the coolest candidate I could come up with was

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 1>named Miss Sonics, whose name means middle claw, and who

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>was part of a now extinct larger group of carnivorous ungulates.

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Carnivorous ungulates. Remember the unguluts are the hoof to mammals. Uh.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So examples would be dear you know, bo vines, uh, horses,

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but these, of course are carnivorous. You can't think of

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on gill. It's like that today there were once predatory

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>carnivorous hoofed mammals roaming the continents. Uh. You know, trying

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to think of a donkey that could eat you. Yeah.

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And this is a really cool and to look up

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>paleo art for because it seems like it's just a

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>very hard creature to try and envision in your head.

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the illustrations end up just

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>looking like this weird kind of like long snouted, almost

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>almost like a cross between a rodent and a lion. Uh.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's you get a really really weird sense of category

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>confusion when you look at these images. I mean a

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh descriptions say it would have been in

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some ways superficially like a wolf, but of course it

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was not of the order of the dogs. It was

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>not like a big cat. It's not like a wolf.

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not any of that In terms of evolution airy relationships.

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It's more like a deer or a cow or a

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>horse or something. But it is a carnivore that would

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, might bite your leg off. So anyway, I'm

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>all for cloning a ton of those if we could,

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>But again I want to stress that, uh, there was

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not clonable material within that mosquito's abdomen, and in fact,

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>based on what we know, there couldn't be because the

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>other reason you couldn't clone dinosaurs from the gut contents

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of any mosquito is that DNA is extremely fragile. It

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>breaks down very quickly and starts breaking down within hours

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of the death of an organism. After forty six million years,

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>DNA would degrade to the point where a genome can

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer be recovered all the more at anything older

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>than sixty six million years, so you can't get to

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a dinosaur. Uh So, then you might wonder, well, how

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>long can DNA last in in preserved animal remains? What's

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the farthest back that we could go to sequence the

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 1>genome of an extinct creature, extract all that information, and

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>then maybe even clone it back to life if possible. Well,

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the MOA has a part to play in the answer

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to this question. I found this out by total serendipity.

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know this when I started looking into

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>this subject. Uh So, to determine the period within which

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you could reasonably expect to extract usable DNA from a sample,

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to know the rate of molecular decay for

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>DNA as a molecule. And there was a study inve

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that looked into this question. It was by our friend

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Morton E. Allentoft that you mentioned earlier, but also by

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Collins, David Harker, James Highly, Charlotte L. Oscome, Marie L. Hale,

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Paula F. Campos uh oh, and apparently add others. I

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>guess it had a lot of authors. Sorry, but it

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>was called the Half Life of DNA and Bone Measuring

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Decay Kinetics in a hundred and fifty eight dated Fossils

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society b So.

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>The authors here examined mitochondrial DNA from a hundred and

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight radio carbon dated bones of the extinct New

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Zealand MOA, all from between six hundred and eight thousand

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and all preserved in roughly equivalent environmental conditions.

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's very important because it gives us a point

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of reference. If like the conditions under which the bones

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are preserved or roughly the same, then you can start

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to get a good idea between them what the average

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>rate of decay is. It's not going to vary as

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 1>much due to differing environmental factors. Um so, they estimated

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>from this sample that the average half life of DNA

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was about five hundred and twenty one years. So you

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>start with an original sample of DNA and a bone,

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and after five twenty one years half of it's gone.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Then after another five hundred and twenty one years, half

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of what remains is broken down, So now you're down

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to a quarter of the original concentration. So the the

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>decay adds up fast. Now, of course, the decay rate

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of DNA will not be the same in all cases.

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's going to depend on factors about in what conditions

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's preserved. But even in ideal conditions, there does appear

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a ceiling on how long DNA lasts, or

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or how long you could expect to get any usable

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>information out of it. Under the absolute best conditions. This

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>means basically every molecular bond between the nucleotides of the

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>DNA would be broken down after about six point eight

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.280
<v Speaker 1>million years, but long before that, even if some bonds

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are still intact, the DNA would be so broken up

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be unreadable. The maximum recoverability threshold for meaningful

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>genetic information might be something like one point five million

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>years or so. So it seems to have been the

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>scientific consensus for for several years now that DNA is

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>way too short lived for us to ever clone dinosaurs.

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Except I did come across a really recent study just

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>from this month March. Uh. Now, it doesn't disprove that this,

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>but it is a still controversial reported finding that would

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>seem to challenge this if it's correct. So it was

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>published in National Science Review in March by Alita im

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Baliol at All and uh so the the author's right

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>here quote a histological ground section from a duck build

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur nestling in the species is uh. Hippacrosaurus Stebben Jerry

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>revealed micro structures morphologically consistent with nuclei and chromosomes in

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>cells within calcified cartilage. We hypothesize that this exceptional cellular

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>preservation extended to the molecular level and had molecular features

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 1>in common with extant avian cartilage. So this is a

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>duck build dinosaur. It's another Montana special discovered in the

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. It would have been a nest of young

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.479
<v Speaker 1>duck build herbivores that all died sometime around seventy five

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>million years ago, and the paleontologists here were examining skull

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>shards from these juveniles, and the shards would have been

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>made out of car ritilage rather than out of bone.

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But when examining these cartilage skull shards are the remains

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. Uh. The researchers believe that they discovered signs

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of intact cell nuclei and DNA within these fragments, but

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>then again, I want to say a lot of paleontologists

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>are skeptical about this supposed find. Of course, there's the

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>theoretical limitation on how long DNA would last, or at

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>least is believed to last on a molecular basis. But

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I was also reading a piece by a University of

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Bristol vertebrate paleontologists named Michael Benton, who thinks it's more

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>likely that if there is any actual DNA in this sample,

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it came from recent external contamination, not from a dinosaur.

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we'll have to wait and see what

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>happens there with follow up research. But I don't know.

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting and he gives us some hope, right, But

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got to bring it back to the MOA. So,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.919
<v Speaker 1>whatever the truth about DNA from millions of years ago,

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as unlikely as that seems, the MOA has existed much

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>more recently, and for that reason, the idea of recovering

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the genome of the MOA and bringing a species of

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>MOA back from extinction is much more plausible by orders

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude. So back to that Sharon Begley article from

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>She writes about how there's a team of researchers based

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>out of Harvard University that were able to assemble an

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>almost complete genome for our old friend we mentioned in

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the last episode, and I think earlier in this one,

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the little bush moa or a nomal opterics did aform us.

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So these again would not be the biggest ones. These

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:37.439
<v Speaker 1>are not the towering moa. These would be the smaller variety.

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>But I would not be surprised if they could still

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>kick your throat out. You know, they probably were some

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tough little customers. As we were talking about earlier, the

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>little bush moa when extinct in the thirteenth century. Now,

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this work was dependent on DNA extracted from the tow

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>bone of a moa that was housed in the Royal

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Ontario Museum in Toronto. And this kind of reconstruction is

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not easy at all because, well, you can extra act

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of genetic information the physical genome that, like

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the chromosomes, are often kind of shattered, so you have

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how all the pieces of information that

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you've extracted fit together into a broader chromosomal structure. And

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as with other assemblies of this kind, the researchers here

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 1>looked into the genomes of living relatives for clues, basing

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the reconstruction of the pieces on the reference template of

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>an EMU, kind of like how mammoth reconstruction would be

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>based on the genome of of living elephants and things

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>like that. Now, at the time of Begley's article, there

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>were several experts in the field who praised the work.

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Morton Allan Toft, who we were talking about several times, Uh,

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he called it a significant step forward. Also, the evolutionary

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>molecular biologist Beth Shapiro of You See Santa Cruz praised

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the research. There was one concerning feature. So this paper

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in ten was published on bio archive, which is a

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>non peer reviewed preprint server. It's so it's like, nothing

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong with something going up on there. It's a place

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to post research for public access and review before it

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>gets published in a journal. But I was unable to

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>find evidence of this paper appearing in an actual journal

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>since then, So I'm not sure what that means. Uh,

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe it doesn't mean anything, or maybe it means something

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.240
<v Speaker 1>about this genome assembly didn't hold up to scrutiny. I guess.

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll have to wait and see. But either way,

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the recent disappearance of the moa I think absolutely makes

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>them a potential candidate for de extinction, and this research

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>helps move things in that direction. Now. Of course, just

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because we could doesn't necessarily mean that we should. I

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know if I have a

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 1>position on the ethics of de extinction overall. But uh,

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's a question that should be considered before we

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bring these things back and just set them loose at

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Disney World. But what an attraction that would be at

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>disney World, Right, you go up to the Mickey, you

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get your picture taken with the Mickey, then you go

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>up to the moa, you try to get your picture taken.

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>You see if it cooperates danger Sure, but it's like

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what if what if Jonald Duck could kick what if

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you had them my decloto? Yeah, I mean there's so

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>many factors to consider and potentially reintroducing a creature like this,

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if it's feasible to to bring them back,

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because again, you're you're to a certain extent doing what

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all these different waves of interference have done in the past.

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>You're taking the environment and you're shaking it up again.

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You're you're adding something to it, even if it's something

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that used to be there in some form. Um, it's uh,

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult equation. And then I imagine also there's

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the argument of is this the best use of our

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>our energy towards you should we instead be focusing on

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>creatures that are still with us, that can be um,

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that can be saved, or creatures that are saying extinct

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in the wild but can still be reintroduced. I mean

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those are are you know, entirely separate

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.840
<v Speaker 1>battles so that you know that that you know certainly

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>involved genetics. But um, yeah, it's it's it's it's a

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:55.319
<v Speaker 1>complex situation. It's not just a matter of, oh, well

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we can bring it back, let's do it. Moa is everywhere.

0:49:58.239 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, if we were going to make a

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>hark with de extinctive animals, maybe maybe extinct giant birds

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than dinosaurs. Since you can't do the non avian dinosaurs,

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>why not terror birds in MOA's Without a doubt, I would.

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see one of these creatures in

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>real life. They just sound amazing. It's you know, to

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>see these these two legged organisms handling about, Uh, muntioned

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on twigs and branches. Uh, it would be beautiful, provided

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was there was the space for it. Um.

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:35.919
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know it would be interested to see

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>what happens with this. I know it's been It's been

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>brought up before sometimes I think by politicians even um,

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's been kind of controversial. There's a New Zealand

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>politician who for some reason has been very in favor

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of bringing back the moa. I'm not sure why, by

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, I just looked it up. Unfortunately, the terror

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>birds appeared to be just out of range given the

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>figures we were citing early I think they went extinct

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>probably around one point eight million years ago. Uh. Well,

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>there you go, the mo moas it is then MOA's

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:13.840
<v Speaker 1>elephant bird's anything else you know within within reach that

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>would have to Those would have to be the main

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:18.280
<v Speaker 1>attractions at our park. Give me a host eagle baby,

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, for for sure. All right, So there you

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>have it are two part look at the Moa, The

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Rise of the Moa, the Twilight of the Moa. I

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:32.760
<v Speaker 1>found this to be just a really engrossing, uh project

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to work on because it ends up, you know, dealing

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>with so many things you're dealing with, uh, with biology,

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>evolution of organisms, You're dealing with the history of human migration, UH,

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 1>colonial disruption, and then the possibility of of bringing an

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>extinct creature back to life through genetic science. Uh. It

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>really has everything spared no expense. Yeah, all right, So

0:51:57.520 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously we'd love to hear from everyone out there. I

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>also know that we have you know, we have plenty

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of listeners who live in New Zealand and who have

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.720
<v Speaker 1>traveled to New Zealand or have some sort of roots

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>or connection to New Zealand. We would love to hear

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>from you about this topic. What are your thoughts about

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the moa uh and what you have to add to

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>our discussion here. What are your thoughts about being called Kiwi's?

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, I would. I would love to hear

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 1>from actual uh New Zealand residents on the matter. Would

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they rather be called MOA's Mm hmm, Sorry, I mean

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>both of the names of birds, so I don't know.

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if you want to check out other

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind, you know where

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to find them. Wherever you get your podcasts and wherever

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be make sure you rate, review, and subscribe. Hue.

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson,

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>who's doing a heroic job of helping us cope with

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.479
<v Speaker 1>recording from home, so so big shout out to Seth.

0:52:58.200 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like to get in touch with us with

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>back on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hi, you can

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:17.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.