WEBVTT - Quibi Quibble

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio and I love all

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Things tech and. On April sixth, twenty twenty, a video

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>streaming service called Quibbi launched in the United States. Unlike

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>streaming services like Netflix or Hulu, Quibi's content is short form,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>though extremely highly produced. They are episodes or movie chapters

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that time out at around ten minutes or less. The

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>whole idea was to go after a relatively untapped market,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>people who have a little bit of time to kill,

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>but who don't have the ability to sit down for

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a full half hour or longer and watch a movie

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>or TV show. Quibi would go after folks who might

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be standing in line or otherwise doing next to nothing.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It would really be the smartphone crowd. Quibi would help

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>people fill in those short gaps of the day that

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't really dedicated to something else. When Jeffrey Katzenberg first

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>started working on the concept a couple of years before launch,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like it could be a really big thing,

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a potential hit. But Quibi didn't count on COVID nineteen.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to be fair, none of us did, and

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, even when it was becoming more apparent, a

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of us were not giving it enough attention, and

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen would change the landscape dramatically, taking the legs

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>out from under Quibi before it could even launch. So

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>today I'm going to talk about Quibi, how it went

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from idea to service, and how the era of COVID

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen has really messed the business plan up for the company.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But let's get into the history of Quibi. Our story

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>starts with a famous media businessman, Jeffrey Katzenberg. He was

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>born in New York City in nineteen fifty. He attended

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>New York University for a year and then held a

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>series of odd jobs before being hired on in the

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>mail room of Paramount Pictures. The CEO of Paramount was

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>another famous movie businessman at that time, Michael Eisner. Katzenberg

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>worked up through the mail room all the way to

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the position of president of the Motion Pictures and Television

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Production Division. When it comes to American dream stories, this

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>one really seems to fit the bill. In nineteen eighty four,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Eisner shifted over to Disney and Katzenberg joined on as

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a junior partner. At the time, while the company had

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>an enormous vault of beloved movies and animation, and the

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>theme parks were still you know, real vacation destinations, the

0:02:55.600 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>company itself was kind of in the doldrums. Creatively speeding,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Eisner and his team helped transform that. Katzenberg oversaw the

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>animation division as well as Touchstone Pictures, the movie studio

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that made stuff for you know, adult audiences, and he

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>gained a reputation for being quick to cut anything he

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>saw as dead weight, downsizing the division in the process

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to cut costs. But his ruthless aggression worked.

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>The division had been bringing in about three hundred and

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars in revenue before he was brought on,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but by the end of his run it was close

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to four billion dollars. Katzenberg was good at his job.

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Along the way, Disney had its renaissance in animated films

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with releases like The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and this seemed to be a return to the company's

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>former animation glory. Honestly, a lot of the work Katzenberg

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>did set the stage for the Disney that we see today,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a true month of a media company that owns, you know,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>practically everything. Katzenberg had a massive falling out with Eisner

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineties. However, the third piece of the

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Eisner Katzenberg puzzle was a guy named Franklin G. Wells,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and he had served as the president of the Walt

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Disney Company since nineteen eighty four, and he was kind

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of a balancing force. He brought sort of a harmony

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with Eisner and Katzenberg, and together they made great things happen.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And he also didn't report to Eisner. Eisner was the

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>company's CEO, but you know, Wells as president, actually didn't

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>report to him. Instead, he reported directly to the board.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>But in ninety four, Wells died in a helicopter accident,

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and things became unbalanced at the company pretty quickly. Katzenberg

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted a bigger role at the company, and he felt

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that Eisner was blogging him at every turn, and then

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he was either fired or he resigned in nineteen ninety four.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>The story changes depending on who's telling it, but he

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was definitely bitter about the whole thing, like super bitter.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Not long after he resigned, in a huff or was

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>fired again, depending on who you believe. He founded a

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>new company with Steven Spielberg and David Geffen called DreamWorks SKG. Spielberg, Katzenberg,

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Geffen get it, and it would be a new animation

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and live action film studio. Katzenberg was determined to repeat

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the success he had at Disney and then beat them

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at their own game. If you've seen the film Shrek,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you will have seen some of Katzenberg's bitterness built right

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>into the movie. The movie has a sequence in which

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the villain's plans for an amusement park that lampoons the

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Disney theme parks plays a role, and it was definitely

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a jab at Disney. Very mature anyway. DreamWorks produced several

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hit films, though I would argue they aren't quite the

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>classics of the Disney Renaissance animated films, but that's a

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>discussion for a totally different podcast. A decade later, DreamWorks

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>spun off the animation division as its own subsidiary called,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>fittingly enough, DreamWorks Animation. Katzenberg was at the helm. Katzenberg

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>was also an executive at the live action DreamWorks company

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at least until Paramount Pictures you know, Katzenberg's old employer

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>purchased it in twentyd and six. In twenty fourteen, twenty

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>years after he founded the original DreamWorks company, Katzenberg sold

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the animation studio to NBC Universal for three point eight

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Now Katzenberg was already extremely wealthy, but he

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>took home a few hundred million from that sale, and

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>then he jumped into his next venture. To do that,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he first established a holding company in twenty seventeen called Wonderco.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a WndrCo. Through this company, he could establish other

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>ventures that you know, actually do things. Holding companies typically

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>only exist to own other companies, and it all has

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with money and taxes and leadership, hierarchies and stuff.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go into it. Quibi would become

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest ventures of this holding company, though

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time it had a different name, New TV.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That was always intended to be something of a placeholder,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and the idea was to create a video streaming service

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>aimed at young adults who were increasingly relying on smartphones

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to access everything. The opportunity seemed fairly obvious create a

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>service designed for smartphone users with short form content. Katzenberg

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>would make sure that the content was studio level quality,

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with big names attached both to starin and direct or

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>produce the shows, but the stories would be designed to

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>play out in the time it takes to say wait

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in a line to order at Starbucks, or write a

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>subway train or whatever. They would fill a niche that

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>other services didn't quite hit. Stuff on Amazon or Hulu

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>or Netflix was long form for the most part, requiring

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>longer viewing times, and the short form stuff on services

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like YouTube tends to be a few or sometimes several

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>steps below studio quality productions, so it seemed like a

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid bid. There were a lot of things Katzenberg

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to need to do to make this idea

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>into a real business. He was going to need investment

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>money to get the ball rolling, he was going to

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>need someone to serve as the leader of the business,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a CEO for the company, and he was going to

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>need to establish agreements with studios and filmmakers to produce

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>content for the service and advertisers to support it. So

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>while new TV would spring up as an idea in

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, it would take a little bit longer to

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>become a reality. Now. One of those three tasks finding

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a leader, Katzenberg would check off in early twenty eighteen.

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Lead would be Meg Whitman, another famous entrepreneur in tech,

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>so we need to hear a bit about her story

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. Whitman was born in nineteen fifty six in

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Long Island, New York, so we got a couple of

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>New Yorkers here. She attended Princeton and Harvard. She earned

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a master's degree in business administration, and then she went

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to work for Procter and Gamble in the brand management

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>division in nineteen seventy nine. She got married and relocated

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to California in nineteen eighty one and joined the consulting

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>firm Bain and Company, where presumably she fought Batman. Wait,

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm sorry, I'm being told this is a different bane.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It's spelled differently in everything. Okay, that's my bad. In

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty nine, she became the senior vice president of

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>marketing of consumer products over at the Walt Disney Company.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So from eighty nine to ninety two she worked as

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>an executive at the same company as Katzenberg, though they

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>were in very diff diferent divisions of that company, Katzenberg

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>over in the studio side and Whitman over on a

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>strategic planning side. Whitman did say that part of her

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>job was to keep people like Katzenberg contained inside a box,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and Katzenberg hated that that was in an interview that

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>they gave it south by Southwest in twenty nineteen. From

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety two to ninety eight, she worked as an executive

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or leader of a few different companies, including some that

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>were difficult to manage. In nineteen ninety eight, a headhunter

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>approached her about joining a new startup called eBay, and

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it took some convincing, but she eventually agreed to be

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the company's president and CEO. Now at that point when

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>she joined, eBay had about thirty employees. By the time

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Whitman left the company in two thousand and eight, the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>number was closer to fifteen thousand. She had seen the

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>company grow tremendously and kept it afloat even after the

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble burst in two thousand and two thousand

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and one. Oh And also while at eBay, Whitman would

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>join the board of directors of drum Roll Please dream Works,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>bringing her back along with Kabzenberg after retiring from eBay,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Whitman turned her hand to politics. She ran for governor

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of California in two thousand and eight and spent millions

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, including an enormous amount of her own money,

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>on her campaign. She actually broke the record for campaign

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>spending in the United States. In the process. She got

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Republican nomination for governor, but ultimately lost the election

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to Jerry Brown. In twenty eleven, she joined the Hewitt

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Packard board of directors and became the president and CEO

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the company. Four years later, she was in charge

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>when HP split into two separate companies. One of those

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was HP Incorporated, which encompassed the consumer products division like

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>printers and computers, and the other was Hewitt Packard Enterprise,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a business to business company offering products and

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>services to corporate customers. Whitman made the move over to

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>HP Enterprise and served as CEO until she announced her

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>retirement in November twenty seventeen, although she wouldn't actually step

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>down until the following February. In late January twenty eighteen,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>news broke that Meg Whitman would become the head of

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Katzenberg's new media company, then known as new TV, and

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>she would also be the first official employee of that

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>company and officially started work in March twenty eighteen. Katzenberg

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>would serve as chairman of the board and a bit

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of a busy body. At that same time, news outlets

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>were reporting that this fledgling startup had a pretty massive

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>goal for raising investments to the tune of two billion

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with a b dollars a princely sum. We call startups

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that reach evaluation of a billion dollars unicorns. Katzenberg was

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>looking to make new TV a unicorn right out of

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the gate, and this is probably something that I should

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>cover for a second. Valuing a startup is a very

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>tricky thing, largely because startups frequently can go months or

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>years before having any real means of generating revenue, so

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they stay in business by raising investments over and over again.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>A brand new company may have nothing to sell, which

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>means there's no way for money to come into the business,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and the goal is to get to a point where

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're either bringing in revenue, or more specifically, you're bringing

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in enough revenue to both cover all of your operating

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>expenses and still have some leftover. You know what, we

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>would call profits, But a lot of startups have no

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>means of bringing in revenue right away. They may be

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>based around an idea that is compelling and exciting and

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially bring in a lot of revenue down

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the line, but it will take time to execute upon that.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, the startups still have operating expenses. They

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have to pay employees and spend money on office space

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. So the challenge for a startup

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is to convince investors that the idea is solid and

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a money maker in the long run, and that the

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>people in charge are capable of taking that idea and

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>making it a reality. The investors can pour enough money

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>into the startup to foot the bill for operating expenses,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>banking on the bet that this will pay off in

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the long run and that they will get a big

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>return on their initial investment. Or they could just really

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>hope that the company gets bought up by a larger

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>entity and everyone gets a big payout just for coming

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>up with a really cool idea. A media company in

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>particular is a really expensive endeavor, especially one that's aimed

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>at producing original and exclusive, highly produced content. So while

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars is a truly enormous amount of money.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It was also not exactly an unrealistic need. If New

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>TV was going to launch a new streaming service with

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a broad variety of original programming, much of its studio

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>quality production, and backed by known entities in the entertainment industry,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it was going to cost a lot before the service

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ever became available for customers, and so Whitman and Katzenberg

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>began to have a lot of meetings with potential investors,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and those meetings paid off. I'll explain more after this

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>short break. The temporary digs for new TV slash Quibi

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was in a shared working space in Los Angeles owned

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>by Serendipity Labs. Coworking spaces are a topic that I

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>should probably tackle at some point, though it's really only

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>tangentially related to technology. It served as a base of

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>operations for doing the legwork of getting investments and interviewing

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>potential team members, and it was only temporary. Later on

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they would move into what has been described as lavishly

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>decorated and expansive headquarters now according to Variety, by August

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, the company had fewer than ten employees, and

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Meg Whitman said that she and Jeffrey Katzenberg spent half

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to three fourths of their time interviewing potential executives to

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>join the group. While the streaming media landscape wasn't as

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ludicrously crowded in twenty eighteen as it is today, launching

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a brand new competitor at that time with original programming

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and no major established brand behind it like Disney or

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>HBO was a pretty gutsy move. When Katzenberg and Whitman

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>started looking for investors, I'm sure they frequently had to

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the argument that their service would have to compete

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>against Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, CBS All Access, YouTube, Premium,

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>HBO Now, not to mention numerous other services. But their

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>sales pitch was that this new service would really focus

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on the mobile market. The content would be made with

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>smartphone users in mind from the beginning, not just in

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the length of content, but in the actual way it

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>shows up on screen. It was going to be optimized

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for the mobile experience. As long as the content was

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>good and the experience was compelling, they argued, it would work.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It would scratch an itch that people had, even if

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know they had it, and it wouldn't require

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>viewers to break up a movie or show into smaller chunks,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>because that had already been done for them. The content

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on the service would already be in those small chunks. Still,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it had to be a tough sell. And heck, it's

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>not like no one had ever tried something like this. Already,

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Verizon had spent more than a billion dollars launching a

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>service called Go ninety. This service included original short form

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>videos as well as licensed content from network television. The

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>service was free to Verizon users, with the idea that

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>advertisers would leap to be part of a service that

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>was marketed to twenty five to thirty five year olds,

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's what would bring in revenue since these folks

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>were spending more and more time on their phones. The

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>only problem was it flopped. Verizon pulled the plug in

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the summer of twenty eighteen, and that I'm sure made

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Quibi's business case even harder to sell now if it

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't for the fact that you had the pairing of Katzenberg,

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who had spent his entire professional career in media and

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>much of it in leadership positions, and Whitman, who had

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>gained notoriety for taking a small internet startup into a

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded, enormous company. I don't think new TV would

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 1>have received an enthusiastic reception among investors, but the pair's

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>expertise and business acumen were undeniable, and the list of

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>investors grew relatively quickly. That list included a lot of

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>established media companies. In fact, all the major studios would

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>become investors, so that included companies like Sony, Viacom, WarnerMedia, MGM, Lionsgate,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and even Katzenberg's old target, Disney. In addition, there were

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>other companies investing as well, such as Liberty Global and

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba. All told, the first round of venture capital funding,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which closed on July thirty first, twenty eighteen, raised around

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars, pretty impressive for a business that had

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>no product yet. In addition to that money, the holding

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>company Wanderco, had secured seven hundred and fifty million dollars

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of its own Now, that was not just for new TV,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>though Variety reported that quote a good portion end quote

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of it was going into the venture. It wasn't quite

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars, but my goodness, it was a lot

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of money. Wonderco would be quote a significant shareholder end quote,

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but not a majority shareholder in this company. Katzenberg was

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>playing KOI with evaluation of New TV. He declined to

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>disclose how the company was being valued, at least publicly.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>The biggest investor of the group was actually a firm

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>called Madrone Capital, which was headed by the chairman of

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the Walmart chain of stores, Greg Penner. One decision the

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>leaders made early on was that new TV was not

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>going to produce content itself. Instead, it was going to

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>partner with established entertainment producers and license programming from them.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Through these licensing agreements, new TV would cover the costs

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.959
<v Speaker 1>of production plus some and it also meant that new

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>TV would have a lot of different entities producing content

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for the platform that would help the company avoid having

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a production bottleneck. Katzenberg said in interviews that to have

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a successful launch, the service would need a lot of content,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and not just a big quantity of it, but a

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>variety of content as well. To appeal to a broad

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>spectrum of audiences. Some folks might be big fans of action,

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>while others prefer horror or comedy or and I hate

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>to use this phrase, reality television. I'm something of a

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>snob in that regard, not to mention, you know, I

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>worked for a company that made reality television stuff, so

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I had a chance to see, you know how totally

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>not real. It can get enough editorializing. Katzenberg also stated

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that the licensing deal they had in place was quote

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>highly highly appealing into quote to entertainment studios. Now, I

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know any of the details of those deals, like

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there's an expiration on the license, meaning,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, some content might eventually disappear off the platform.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>If you've got a Netflix subscription, you're probably familiar with

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>this trend. Honestly, I'm still upset that the sketch show

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that Mitchell and weblook disappeared from US Netflix streaming. But anyway,

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Vulture reported that the deals typically included the cost of

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>production plus another twenty percent, so that's not bad. Now.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>At this point, the venture was still called new TV,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and the plan was to launch by the end of

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. That would mean building out the infrastructure, building

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the app itself, securing the cloud services, or building them.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But my guess is that Quibi relies on a major

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 1>vendor to host the actual service, licensing all the content

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for launch, figuring out the marketing strategy, and getting those

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>advertising deals in place. As for revenue, that was really

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>something that Whitman and Katzenberg actually had concrete plans for,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a nice change of pace with startups. Typically,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when I do talk about startups, the details around how

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the company is actually going to make money get a

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>little fuzzy. In fact, I suspect a lot of startup

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>founders are just hoping that a bigger fish is going

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to come along and scoop up their company, buying it

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for a ridiculous amount of money, and then some bigger

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>companies then saddled with a service that might not ever

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>even generate revenue. But this was not one of those cases.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>From the start, the plan was to offer two tiers

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of subscription service. One would be an advertising light option,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar to how Hulu operates, where the subscription

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fees would be subsidized by in app advertising. It would

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>happen in between those short videos. The second option was

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to be an advertising free plan, in which subscribers would

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>pay a little bit more but would be spared ads.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Generally speaking, Whitman said her job was to focus on

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>business strategy, well, Katzenberg would spend his efforts on securing content,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and they must have been working pretty darn hard. Whitman

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>told the press that new TV was merely a placeholder

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>name and that they would soon announce a new official

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>name for the service, and sure enough, in October twenty eighteen,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the new name was launched. New TV officially became Quibi.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Now the word quibi Quibi is a combination of the

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>words quick and bite, because that's what the content on

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the service is all about, quick bites of content, whether

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's drama or comedy or whatever. Around that same time,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Katzenberg announced that filmmaker Guillema del Toro, who has made

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>some truly phenomenal films that I adore, would be making

0:23:55.200 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of zombie story. Sam Raimi, another filmmaker who's

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>work I love, would be producing a horror anthology called

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Fifty States of Fright, about folklore and urban legends in

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the States of the United States. Jason Blum also had

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>a project announced, so at least when it came to horror,

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Quibi was shaping up nicely. But while various productions may

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>have begun, there wasn't anything to show off yet just

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea, which admittedly sounded pretty interesting. I mean, whenever

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone has more than a moment of nothing that's going on,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they tend to whip out their phone. Creating content specifically

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to entertain people who do that sort of thing makes sense,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and grabbing big names in entertainment would help raise Quibi's

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>profile as well as act as a great draw for

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>curious fans. At least that was the idea. In twenty nineteen,

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Whitman and Katzenberg were still making the rounds at various conferences,

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>talking up the service and announcing new content partners and projects.

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>At south By Southwest in twenty nineteen, Hey, you guys

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>remember when we used to have south By Man. I

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>feel awful for all the people who are counting on

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it this year. Anyway. At south By in twenty nineteen,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Katzenberg and Whitman delivered a keynote about Quibbi and gave

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more information about their plans. At this keynote,

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Katzenberg made another case for Quibi, this time to consumers.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>He said that the analogy he liked was Dan Brown's

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>novel The Da Vinji Code. Katzenberg said that that book

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is four hundred and sixty four pages long with one

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five chapters, which means it averages out to

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>fewer than five pages per chapter. The result of this

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>is that you could read a chapter in just a

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>few minutes, and you could read as many or as

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>few as you liked. You could put the book down,

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you could pick it back up later and just continue on.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown structured the book so that the chapters were discrete

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>units of story, with the end of one being almost

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like a cliffhanger for the beginning of the next one. Now, personally,

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I found this style to be exhausting. I hate it,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm in the minority here that the book was

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a massive hit, and I'm old. I mean, I feel

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the same way about Mulin Rouge. Can't stand the movie

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because the camera never stays on anything for more than

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a second. But then again, I'm old, So I'm not

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that this style is a bad thing. It's just

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not my thing. But maybe it's the thing that lots

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of young people like. That was the target audience anyway.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Katzenberg said the goal of Quibi was to allow storytellers

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to craft content with that sort of short form in mind.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The overall story could be very long, feature links or longer,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>but the chapters of the story would be ten minutes

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or less, with ad breaks in between them. The pair

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>also revealed that the Quibi app would allow users to

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>view videos either in portrait or in landscape mode, so

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>either holding a phone vertically or horizontally, and in either

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>case the movie would be full screen. Witman in particular

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that this experience was unlike other streaming services that

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>work on mobile, with some stuck purely in one mode

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or the other and others creating a large amount of

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>unused space when you go from landscape to portrait. Katzenberg

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>also differentiated Quibi from YouTube. He pointed out that content

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>creators can make videos for YouTube and make money off

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>those videos, but the advertising model on YouTube means that

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>as a creator, you have a limit of how much

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you can spend per minute. You can only spend up

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to three thousand dollars per minute, which that's already incredible

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, but after that you won't make enough money

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to cover the costs. And while that works great for

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>someone who's making load to maybe mid level production videos,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>high end production stuff you know, like movies and television

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>can cost upwards of one hundred thousand dollars per minute,

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and so he argued, Whibby has a place because it

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>would allow for that kind of high production content that

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube just can't support. Whitman added that the timing for

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Quibi was lining up with the rollout for five G networks,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and just for a quick recap, five G is actually

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a general description for the next generation of wireless network technologies.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>There are actually many different flavors of five G. The

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>relevant bit here is that these technologies will allow for

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>much larger filesized transfers across a network at any given moment,

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>so you can watch something like a high resolution video

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on a mobile device without having to worry about stuff

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like buffering. Now, there are a couple of things outside

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of Quibi's control that didn't really come up in these conferences. Sure,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>five G would be a great help to Quiby's use case,

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but then you also have to worry about stuff like

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>battery life pulling down big files and playing high resolution video.

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Consumers a lot of battery power, and battery technology just

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't evolve as quickly as some other technologies do, so

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a potential bottleneck, and another big one is data caps.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>If the company providing network service to your device places

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>caps on how much data you can use in a month,

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and app designed to push big video files for you

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty minutes a day could end up being

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.719
<v Speaker 1>super expensive because of data overage fees. As for that

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty minute figure, Katzenbriggs said that was kind of their

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>target to create a service where users would spend twenty

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the seventy minutes a day on average that they

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>would watch video on their phones. This time those twenty

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>minutes would go to Quibi. Again, Quibi doesn't have control

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>over this stuff, but then if they're going to talk

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about how five G is helping their case, I think

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they have to acknowledge how these other factors are challenges

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to overcome. Now, when we come back, I'll talk a

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more about the lead up to the launch and

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what has happened since, But first let's take another quick break.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The content plan for Quibi was incredibly ambitious. The idea

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is for the service to launch a Lighthouse series every

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>other week. A lighthouse series is a prestige story consisting

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of several chapters that collectively would make the story feature length.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So every other Monday Quibi would launch a news series

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>consisting of ten to fifteen chapters or so of episodes,

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>each around ten minutes in length. In addition, the service

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>has news shows that update daily, clip shows that show

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sports highlights, documentaries, reality TV shows, competition shows, entertainment news shows.

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The list goes on. Katzenberg said the service would launch

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred new short videos on Quibi every week, so

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that means more than five thousand per year. In fact,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for the first year, the idea was to release eight

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>than five hundred Quibis. It's a truly enormous amount of content,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's no wonder that the company was still seeking

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>out an additional one billion dollars in funding in twenty nineteen,

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>after having already secured more than a billion the year before.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>By the end of twenty nineteen, the streaming landscape had

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>changed a great deal, and this was before the COVID

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen crisis. Disney had launched Disney Plus, HBO Max was

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a new service on the way, Several other high profile

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>services had either launched or announced an upcoming launch. A

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>crowded streaming space was getting even more crowded, with each

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>service competing for the entertainment dollars of consumers. The fact

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that Quibi was aiming purely for a smartphone viewing experience,

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.479
<v Speaker 1>rather than a service that was meant for televisions that

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>could also be viewed on smartphones was a big differentiator,

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as was the price. In June twenty nineteen, at the

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>produced By conference in California, Katzenberg and Whitman announced that

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Quibbi's ADS supported subscription would cost four dollars ninety nine

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>cents per month. If you wanted to upgrade to the

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>AD free experience, you could pay seven dollars ninety nine

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>cents per month. Compared to other streaming services, this is

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on the low side, but not outrageously low. The standard

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>package for Netflix is twelve dollars ninety nine cents a month.

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Hulu's basic plan with ADS is five ninety nine per month.

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Without ADS, it's eleven ninety nine. Amazon Prime, if you

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to it on its own, is eight ninety nine

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>per month. Disney Plus is six ninety nine per month. Also,

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>apologies for talking about all of this in terms of

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>US dollars, but to go through all the variations and

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>explain which services are available in various countries would that

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>would be a really long and boring discussion, even for

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>my show. Quibi continued the march toward launch, paying for

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a content production and negotiating ad deals, and along the

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>way some early trouble signs started popping up. A few

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>executives began to depart the company. One was a former

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Hulu executive named Tim Connolly, who was the head of

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Partnerships and advertising. He left in August twenty nineteen, and

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the company subsequently eliminated the position he had held. Another

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.239
<v Speaker 1>was jenis Men, formerly of The Hollywood Reporter, who had

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>served as the head of Quibi's daily content you know,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like news and the scuffle bolt was that Men had

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>been having conflict with Katzenberg, who was particularly involved with content.

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>There were rumblings that Whitman and Katzenburg had a bit

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of beef between each other on occasion, and rumors that

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Whitmen had even threatened to walk away from the business

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>if Katzenberg didn't back off a bit. So the implication

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was that Katzenberg was really micromanaging and Witmen felt she

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't being allowed to do her job. I don't know

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>how true those rumors are, but whatever the case may be,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Whitman stuck around. Connolly and Men would not be the

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>only executives to leave Quibi, though the next one I'm

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>going to mention didn't make tracks until after the service

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>actually launched, so I'll get to that in a little bit.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that's something. Quibi landed ad deals to

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the tune of a few hundred million dollars leading up

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to the launch, and the advertisers included really big names

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like Google, Walmart, Pepsi Co and more. Whitmen was instrumental

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>in making those deals and the ad dollars would be

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>there when the service, now scheduled to launch in April

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, would go live, so the stage was set.

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>By late twenty nineteen, the company was banking on some

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 1>hunches but didn't have much hard data to support them,

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and the initial idea was to only offer Quibi for smartphones.

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>There was no intention to offer a version that would

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>play on televisions or computers. And then we get to

0:34:55.800 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty and the COVID nineteen outbreak. I don't have

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to tell any of you how disruptive the outbreak has been,

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the United States, where we see continuing trend

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of people behaving in irresponsible ways, and I apply that

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>label to everyone, from citizens to politicians. COVID nineteen has

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>changed just about every aspect of life, and it definitely

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>changed how people are accessing entertainment. With more people staying home,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there was less of a need to access stuff using

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone. I mean, we've got computers and TVs and

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>game consoles and other stuff right there in front of us.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of us use phones because in

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>our normal lives, that's the option that's open to us.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We want stimulation and entertainment. We've got the phones with

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>us all the time, So that's the solution to our

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>perceived problem. In the olden days, you know, before smartphones,

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we had to wait until we were at some sort

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of connected screen, whether it was television that was connected

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to satellite or a cable or even over the air antenna,

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>or a computer connected to the internet. Smartphone entertainment was

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of a matter of necessity once it was able

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to support it. Suddenly, Quibi's use case seemed less relevant.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>The nature of the game had changed dramatically and unpredictably,

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>leaving Quibi's whole value proposition in question. The service launched

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on April sixth, twenty twenty, and it included a free

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety day trial with ads supported service. Not surprisingly, a

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks downloaded the app when it first launched,

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 1>nearly three million within the first two weeks, but the

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>real test was yet to come. For three months, people

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>would be able to serf Quibi and check out content.

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Would that be enough to hook them so that they

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>would pay for a subscription once the ninety days were up.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There was definitely no sh shortage of content. There were

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>tons of options with big name talent attached to them.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of it was written specifically with Quibi in mind.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Some were adaptations that tried to work within the confines

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of Quibi as best they could. And that's no small thing.

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Shaping a story so that it fits naturally in ten

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>minute chunks requires a lot of work. Heck, I typically

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 1>try and have the three big segments and tech stuff

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>last approximately fifteen minutes each. And I never want to

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>put an ad break in the middle of a thought

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>or concept if I could possibly avoid it, and that

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>can be tough. I imagine it's got to be a

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.919
<v Speaker 1>lot harder when you're presenting a long form story over

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the course of a series of short blasts of video.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Before April was over, another top level executive left the company.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>This time it was Megan Imbras, who was head of

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>brand and content marketing. In a departing email, she said

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>that post launch was quote opportunity, time to transition end

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>quote I imagine, So I bet it's getting pretty darn

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 1>hard to land brand deals right now. The company saw

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the limitations of having the service only available on phones

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to be an issue in the stay at

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>home world of COVID nineteen, so in May twenty twenty,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they released a version of Quibi that works on Apple TV,

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit later they included the ability to

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>send Quibi to a chrome Cast device, which allows people

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>who have Chrome Cast to play Quibi on televisions. This

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was a quick pivot to try and course correct for

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a world that was drastically different than twenty nineteen, when

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the potential for the service seemed, you know, fairly relevant.

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>In June, the Wall Street Journal ran apiece analyzing how

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Quibi was doing. The company had a goal of hitting

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>seven point four million subscribers after the first year, so

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>by April twenty twenty one. In other words, ording to

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal piece it was really on track

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to just hit two million subscribers, and this piece also

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>went out before the three month free trial period had expired.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>App downloads had slowed after an initial spike following the launch,

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Journal also reported that the company expected it

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 1>would need to raise another two hundred million dollars by

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the second half of twenty twenty one in order to

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>keep things going, and that executives were also going to

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>take a ten percent pay cut to help lower costs.

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>In addition, COVID nineteen has thrown a monkey wrench on

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>content production. It's a lot harder and riskier to produce

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood level television and film programming, and so that fire

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hose of content might be dribbling out before the end

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty. Things are not looking too good for

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Quibi right now. The bet on the service might ultimately

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>go south. I actually downloaded Quibi for the purposes of

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, just to see what it's like to use.

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The feature allowing users to view videos in either portrait

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>or landscape is called turnstile. I can confirm that it

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>works in that you do get full screen with no

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>black bars, no cropping, but if you're watching it in

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>portrait mode vertically, then the app cuts off some of

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that's on either side of the frame. However,

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that filmmakers would take this into account

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>when shooting the content. For Quibi, the process of shooting

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and editing would keep the most relevant stuff in frame

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>when you are viewing it in portrait mode, and I

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's interesting from a filmmaking perspective. It means cinematographers

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and directors really have to think about the composition of

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>their shots, filming them in both landscape and portrait, or

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>editors have to make really tough choices when it comes

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to how they frame a sequence so that someone watching

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the program in a vertical orientation isn't going to miss

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>out on something critical that's happening within the action of

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the story. I tried watching a couple of things. I

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>haven't really found anything that really hooks me, though I

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have yet to watch an episode of Reno nine to

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 1>one one, and I very much enjoyed that show when

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 1>it was on its run on Comedy Central, so I

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>will have to check that out. But I think part

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the issue is that the ten minutes per segment

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>thing is a real problem. I think creating very good

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>short form stuff that linked together makes a compelling long

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>form story is just hard. I think of it kind

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of like the general rule of fiction. The shorter the format,

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the more difficult it is to do well. So writing

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a good novel is hard, writing a good novella is harder.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Writing a good short story is even harder than that,

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and writing a truly great short poem is extremely difficult.

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the same thing is holding true for video content,

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's why I've always felt that tech stuff should

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>just be as long as the subject requires it to be.

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Will Quibi be able to survive its slow start, I

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm a little doubtful. I mean, it is

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:18.439
<v Speaker 1>an expensive endeavor. There are reports that advertisers already want

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to renegotiate in light of lower app download rates. I mean,

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>why would you pay premiums for impressions you're not getting?

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 1>The content production side is still pretty shaky with COVID

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen going on. The user numbers aren't there yet, and

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>now that we're out of the ninety day free trial,

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really challenging to win an audience

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>large enough to support the business. Gizmodo reported that more

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>than ninety percent of users who enrolled in the free

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>trial stopped once the trial ended. It may be that

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Quibi is sunk. Some folks think that was inevitable even

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 1>without COVID nineteen. Now I don't know if that's true.

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I do think it was an ambition long shot, but

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it was impossible. However, I do

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think the health crisis was an unforseeable obstacle that might

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just be too great for the company to overcome. To

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>all the people out there who are working for Quibi,

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>my heart goes out to you. For all the writers, actors, directors,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and crew who are getting work because of Quibi, you know,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>people who had a chance to be part of something new.

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel for them too. It is really hard to

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get stuff produced and distributed. It's just really tough. Out

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of every film or TV show you see, there are

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>hundreds that never get made. So I hate to see

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>any venture like this fold, even if I don't think

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>it worked all that well. As for Witmen and Katzenberg,

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll be fine. The investors, no, they'll be fine too.

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It'll sting a bit, but let's face it, they're wealthy too.

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 1>They can handle a sour bet that's not going to

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>break the bank for them. But for all the people

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>who are the rank and file who are working for this,

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that's tough. And I really hope things turn around. I

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a lot to ask for that to happen,

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's also a lot to ask consumers. It's getting

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>increasingly difficult to convince people. Hey, you know you've got

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 1>four or five subscription services going right now, how about

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you add this one to the list? And Whitman at

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>south By Southwest said something interesting. She said that chances

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are we're going to see a pretty big increase in

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of streaming services in the short term, and

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>then over time audiences will end up gravitating toward probably

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 1>three or four of them, and the others will fade away.

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And the hope was that Quibi would be among that

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>three to four. I think that hope is getting more

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and more unlikely as time goes on, but I hope

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that I am wrong. That's it for this episode. It's

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting to cover a company that has only really been

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>live since April of twenty twenty and is already on

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>very shaky ground. It was interesting to dive into the

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>history here. If you guys have suggestions for topics I

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>should cover in future episodes, whether it's a company, a technology,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a trend in tech, anything like that, let me know.

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Reach out on Twitter to handle It's tech stuff HSW

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.