WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: How Ad Blockers Work

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to text Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. It is time for

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a classic episode. This episode is called how ad Blockers Work,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>and it originally published on Marche. And I've got some

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>things to say about ad blockers. I'll save it for

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the end, and it's likely going to be repeated in

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the actual episode, which you know, full disclosure, I have

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>not gone back and listened to, so it may very

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>well be that everything I say is repetitive. But that way,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>I'll just throw it at the end, and if you

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hear stuff I've already said, you know you just stop it. Anyway,

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>let's go back and listen to this classic episode. Before

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we get started on this, We'll go ahead and say

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there there are the advertisers who make

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>ads are not necessarily trying to make them to annoy you.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>That would actually be counter productive to what the ad

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to do. Well. I would argue that some

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ad theory um states that if you annoy an audience

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to get their attention, then that's a good thing.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's but but we're getting into sticky territory there,

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll cover all of that as we go along.

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you wanted to hear a really simple story

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>about how ad block came to be bad news everyone.

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, ad block has got an incredibly

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>complex story because it is one of those things where

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a hydra. You know, eventually one

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>head would get cut off and two other heads would

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>spring up, and those two heads would each be doing

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the first head did, but they're doing

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it in a different way, and they're not really communicating

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>with each other, and when they do communicate with each other,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting a little bit. Yeah, it's a it's one

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of those that it's it's not so simple as to say, like, uh,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know this one piece of software. Now it's version two,

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>now it's version three. You actually have lots of forking

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>going on. It's more like Windows. How Windows would occasionally

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>fork into different groups and you're like, well, I used

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to explain the history of Windows, but

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>now not so much. But you can actually trace it

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>back to a single point, a historical moment when the

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>very first version of ad block came out, and it

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>originally came out for the Firefox web browser. This was

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a browser extension. UM Firefox being open source, it allows

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>people to developers well, I mean developers are people. I

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean to. UM. It allows you to create extensions

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or add ons for the browser in order to change

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or improve or to increase its functionality. Right, Yeah, because

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some things that a browser can do, and then

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>occasionally the web develops in such a way where there's

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>some really awesome stuff you could you if the browser

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>just supported it, and the extensions kind of allow you

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to create that ability, right, and so according to one

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Poland, a Danish programmer by the name of Henry

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Ostav Sarson, I think I got that right. Yeah, well

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely better than I could have. UM who developed

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this extension. I I don't remember now if we said

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>already in two thousand two. No, we did not. Yeah.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the reason why we said we don't

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>know already is because you guys do not get treated

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that our buildings started to vibrate because

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of something going on somewhere inside this building, and we

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>figured you'd rather be you know saved that experience. But yeah,

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>three minute break in which we went what is that? Yeah,

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But in two thousand two, in fact, he did begin

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>development on this. This was formally the ad Block Extension,

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and at that point it was spelled A D little

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>B L O C K. No. The reason I say

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>little B is because the other versions will talk about

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>differentiate themselves with capitalization as well as adding other words.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is the first one. Now, this one could

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>block images, which at the time was pretty much the

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>main form of web advertising. It wasn't the only one

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.559
<v Speaker 1>that was the main one. So things like banner ads

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that were at the top, or the ones that are

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 1>along the side of the column, or even just inserted

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>directly as like a picture inside an article. That's the

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that would block. Sure. And so if

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you found an image that you didn't like a probably

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>because it was an add, you could add that that

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that images u r L to a list of blocked images, right,

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and it would actually go all the way back to

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>where the source of that image came from and then

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>start blocking other images from that source. Because, of course,

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's one advertiser that happens to run a lot

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of different campaigns, and back in those early days of

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the web, there were a few that had lots and

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:59.679
<v Speaker 1>lots of clients. You could essentially blanket block a whole

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>list stuff advert right. It was pretty effective at the time. Yeah, yeah,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>for for images. Anyway, they did have some downs sides.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the downsides was that it did not actually

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>prevent the web page from loading the image. In fact,

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that the earliest version, which they called point three. Uh

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I assume that versions point one and point two or

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier dat yeah, yeah, and never were released. But this

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>point three one, it did not prevent the images from

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>loading at all. It would, in fact, first load the

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>entire web page images and all, and then block those ads.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this was an important deal, Like people really

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have it blocked, not just you know, from view,

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but blocked period so it wouldn't download. Not just because

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>people thoughts or at least some people thought that advertising

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was really intrusive and and it decreased their enjoyment of

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the surfing experience visually annoying, but also was using up

0:05:55.320 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>precious memory and usage bandwidth. Yeah, so you would take

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you extra time to download a web page because I

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>had to download all of those assets, including the ads,

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and if you could turn those ads off, then the

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>web pages would load faster. You know, this is the

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>era of dial up. You know, I remember that era well, uh,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not happily, but I do remember it well. I couldn't

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have find memories of it, not at all. Uh. You

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>know when when someone would would say, hey, you need

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to go and look there's this funny picture, and you

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>click on it and then six minutes later you go

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and make yourself a cup of coffee. Right, You're like, well,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm just gonna go wander offer a bit.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, so this ad block version was limited in

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.559
<v Speaker 1>its use, but it had potential. And so the next

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>version of ad block came along from someone else. Because

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Sorenson was interested in creating this tool, but not necessarily

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>interested in continually updating it and uh and and and

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>giving it more features. It was kind of a one

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>off for Sarrenson. So we then have a mysterious figure.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So someone by the handle of Rue, whose name I'm

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>still not sure of. Yeah, Ru are you e? As

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in uh, you know that that spelling not r O O.

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>But the Ru created ad block zero point four and

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>went in a completely different way used XML binding language

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>also known as x b L. Now that's a web

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>markup language, so HTML is hypertext markup language. This is

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>similar except instead of it telling specifically like a browser,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>how to display things, it's more about defining specific behaviors

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of elements that would be displayed in a web page.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's all about letting a program know what any

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>particular element is supposed to be able to do, so

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that the computer does that thing when you make the command.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So an easy example is a scroll bar. If you

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>were to put a scroll bar within the context of

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a web page itself, you know this isn't this isn't

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the browsers scroll bar, but something that's inside the web page.

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Then you might use XBL to define those behaviors, so

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you say, when the user drags the scroll bar, this

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that's supposed to happen. Now, in this case,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they were using XBL to sort of, uh, just prevent

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>again these these display these ads from displaying. But it

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>could prevent more than just images because it was working

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>within the code of the browser. It could also prevent

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>flash and Java objects right, and this was another big

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>advance as far as ad blocking was concerned because anyone

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>who has been using the web for a while knows

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>ads that are just pictures that appear on the top

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or the side, or within the context of an article

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>or something. That's just a small slice of the types

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of web advertising we've seen out there. There are a

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that have float over ads, float under ads,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>AutoPlay ads, which boy, are those my favorite. I definitely

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>feel some sympathy here for folks who really get tired

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of ads that have, you know, a negative impact on

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>your user expect if they're intrusive. Absolutely. I mean, if

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I go to a website where there's some sort of

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>audio component that I want to listen to, and because

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I moved my cursor and it goes over a AD

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>panel and then some advertising audio starts playing at the

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>same time, that's clearly not an enjoyable experience. You can't

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>really get around that. But anyway, Yeah, this meant that

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it was more useful than the point three version of

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ad block, But it should be said that because it

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was using a different approach, while it was called ad

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Block zero point four, it wasn't necessarily a direct descendant

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of ad block ad Block zero point three. And this

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is where we already have some confusion, right, right, further

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>confusion would happen because Um Latimer point who who we

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, was basically unaware of of this update going

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>out and created his own point for right. So you

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have Ladimir saying, okay, I know that this this thing

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that Sarnsen did was useful, but it was very limited.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to make my own approach and try and

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>create a more versatile, useful platform to block this sort

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of intrusive advertising. Uh and started working on and then

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>was prepared to release it, and then discovered through some

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what the tone was from the

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>basis of the history that that that Pollent wrote, I

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>would like to imagine that Rue was a little miffed.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Great was the message thereof and that um and that

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir found out that he couldn't release it as a

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>point for because there was already a point for. So

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>now comes the discussion of whether or not Vladimir's work

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>should be incorporated into a point five version. So keep

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.479
<v Speaker 1>in mind that while this is all going on, Firefox

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>itself is continuing to slowly release updates, which necessitates that

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>browser extensions be updated as well. Because exactly. Yeah, So

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this was not, you know, just an academic discussion of

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>should this go forward or not. It needed to keep

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>developing for it to be useful. So his approach was

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to look at content policies to both predict and block ads,

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which ended up being an advance over the previous versions

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>because it was finally allowing the user to have these

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>ads blocked before the page even loaded. So now we

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>get into that that era where things can be sped

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>up because you don't need to load all the assets.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>He also had this discussion with Rue about what needs

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to be done. They decided to kind of collaborate, but

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>according to Plans history, he got very frustrated that Ru

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would kind of piecemeal pick the bits that Vladimir had

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>created and then ignore everything else. And Laddim felt that

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things he had contributed were being

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ignored and that uh, and that some of the things

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he had made we're being used in ways he had

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>not intended. There was one in particular way said users

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>were complaining about this particular interface, and the problem was

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I had never intended users to be activating this interface.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't meant for us. But now it's part of

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what because I'm not the one who I don't own

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ad block and not implementing these changes myself, and so

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that became kind of a source subject. So you move

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>forward to two thousand and five, and no one had

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>really worked on ad block. Yeah that there was still

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that xbl stuff involved, and and some of

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Ladimir's approaches were in there. He was kind of a mishmash.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like a Frankenstein's Monster version of the of

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>what what each person like rou and Ladimir had both

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>had in mind. But out of this grew um what

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to be called ad Block Plus. Yeah. This

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is when a fellow named Michael McDonald who used the

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>handle mc m came along and he created a new

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>version going back to point three as sort of the

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>point of inspiration with enhanced features. He did call it

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>ad Block Plus. And at this point one of the

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>things that was added was this ability for users to

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>white list certain file sources so that they would still

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>get those shown to them, right, white white listing being

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of blacklistings, certifying that a certain thing or

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>person or entity is acceptable exactly. So instead of just

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>having a giant X over any advertising, this would allow

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you to be more selective, so you could say, no,

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to see these particular types of ads, these

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>ads are okay. So Vladimir and Rue continued there discussion

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about what should be ad block, and Ladimir even went

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>so far as to offer to rewrite, uh the zero

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>point five version of ad block and then adding the

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>new features as well as try and tweak some of

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that he felt was clunky or not user friendly.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But there was more disagreement between Rue and Ladimir, and

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>then eventually Ladimir contacted McDonald mc m about ad Block Plus. Yeah,

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and m c m said, you know you can, you

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>can come on over, you can come on over here,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because I don't really want to to forever be developing

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this this extension, just like you know Sartinson did years ago.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He you know Sartenson said, no, I made this thing,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want to have to keep making it.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And especially at the time Firefox was going through this

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like update every other day sort of process,

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it was really rapid. Yes, So McDonald said, you know,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I really don't have the time and effort that to

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the steward of this extension. So so Latimer,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to take it, take it, and Latimer

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>say a yeah, okay, fine. So in January two thousand

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and six, they launched ad Block Plus zero point six.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So again, the versions are starting to get a little

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>confusing because this ad block Plus was not directly connected

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to ad Block. It existed as his own thing at

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So we have two different versions going on,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>two different approaches um and two different communities of users.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So then Pilot decides he'll he'll keep on working on

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ad block Plus and he wanted to try. You know,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not that he hated the old ad block. He

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>actually tried several times to address issues because as the

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the extension got older and less relevant, it also became

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>clear that there were some security vulnerabilities, and so he said, listen, guys,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I found these vulnerabilities. You really should patch them. You

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>need to. You need to update ad block so that

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't remain a vulnerability for users. And then it got

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to a point where it's like, really, I mean, I

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>can I can help do this if you need to.

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was kind of one of those things where

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>ad Block just sort sort of began to die out

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at that point. In ad Block Plus was the it's

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong to say the winner because it wasn't like it

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was a real battle, but it's the survivor of the two.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I was about to say it sounds like

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like internet Darwinism. Yeah yeah, it kind of is. So

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>h then you get into I got really snarky with

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this note, y'all, But I'm going to go ahead and

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>include it because schadenfreude. No. In two thousand seven, PC World,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the magazine named ad Block Plus one of the one

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>best products of two thousand seven. The reason why I

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>felt the need to include this is because today PC

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>World is online only. It ended its print format in

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen, and now it depends very heavily on

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the online format, you know, the one that is sported. Yeah, so, um,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I did. I didn't want to mention though, that that

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly not the only award that ad Block Plus

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is one. Um. For example, it also nabbed best Firefox

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Extension from Lennox Magazine, in which, by the way, you

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can still get in print, So bully for them, how

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about that. So then we move up to December eight,

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two thou nine, and boy, we just we just got

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to the point where we narrowed it down ad block

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Plus was the only player in the game. It was

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be so much easier to talk about this

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of this podcast. And then Google made

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>an announcement, which led to a whole bunch of more

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>mass happening. Well, we have more to say about ad blockers,

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but first, um, hey, what do you know? We have

0:17:54.000 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>some ads. We'll be right back. Okay, so December eight,

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, and this is the first time where

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>we can actually put a specific date on one of

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>these things. You know, again, developers don't necessarily write down

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff for historical records, which, guys, you've got to start

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Yeah, seriously, everyone get on that. I know. Well, actually,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean everyone is on that at this point because

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of the popularity of blogging and micro blogging. But at

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>any rate, right, this is when Michael Gunlock developed his

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>own ad blocker called ad block with a capital B

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this time. Right, that makes it totally different obviously spelled

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the same way as the original ad block, except that

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the B is capitalized. Like you said, Look, it's the Internet.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Things can be case sensitive. I just think that's funny

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that you already have a product called ad block Plus,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so clearly what you want to come out with is

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>one called ad block. But you know, again, these are

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>open source approaches. It's not like these these different developers

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are all getting into it in order to make book

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>who's amount of money. It's stopped something that they felt

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was necessary to extend functionality, and it's a passion thing. Absolutely.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is totally separate from the original ad block

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and also ad block Plus. And originally this was an

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>extension for Google Chrome. And in fact, the reason why

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I said December eight, two thousand nine, is that's also

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the very first day that Google allowed extensions in Chrome,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>only in the beta version of Chrome. Actually at the time,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it would roll out extensions for for Chrome as a

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>as a whole a couple of months later, but you know,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they made this amount announcement, and gun Launch checked to

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>see whether there was already an ad block for Chrome,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and specifically ad block plus for Chrome because he really

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>liked that block plus it was his favorite Firefox extension.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And he saw that there wasn't and started coding one

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like on the spot. Yep, and so uh and now

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>these days you can actually get it from multiple uh browsers,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>not just Google Chrome. Also there's version for Safari and

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>one for Opera. Ad Block Plus, by the way, also

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>available on multiple browsers, including Chrome, Safari uh as well

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as Internet Explorer and of course Firefox where it got started.

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>So now we're covering pretty much all the basis and

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these you know, you're you're limited on choice,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're using Opera, Uh hello, Now, I mean,

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Opera fans out there are big

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>passionate fans. They love that browser. I just I think

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>there might be three of you. But hey, if you're

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one of those three, write us and tell us why

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Opera is the best, because I would I would love

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to hear it. I've I've used it a couple of

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>times and that's all I know about it. So at

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>any rate, uh, you had ad block going under version

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers like two point oh being the first one that's

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>being released for actual use, so we're no longer at

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the zero point whatever. For ad block, it's it's on

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a totally different path. Again, it's not really connected to

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>those other ones other than the fact that the end

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>result is it blocks ads. Right, It's supposed to be

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>based on the same concept, so it was written from

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>an entirely separate bit of code exactly. So one of

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>my favorite stories about the the ad block extension is

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened on April Fool's Day two thousand twelve. So

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this day, the developer decided to do something playful by

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>tweaking the code a little bit, so instead of just

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>blocking ads so that you don't see them, it replaced

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>ads with the Internet's favorite thing, little cats. So it

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>became cat block Day. And in fact, it got so

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>popular that and people loved it so much that they

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>went ahead and added cat block as an as an

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>optional add on it. Yeah, you could subscribe and get

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 1>cat block if you wanted everything to permanently well everything

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all the ads to permanently be switched over to cats,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not not the entire and not just a cat browser,

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>although someone's got to have done that, I'm sure, right,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm positive anyway, Yeah, so uh interesting, yeah yeah. So.

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Features of good launches ad block are that it can

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>it can block resources in Google Chrome so that the

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>elements won't even load in the browser, right, um, and

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that includes uh, not just pictures but also flash elements.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It can block ads and videos like if if YouTube

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>plays an ad before a video, it can just wipe

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that from creation, right yea, at least as far as

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>your concerned. Yea. Um. The current version I believe is

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>available in more than thirty languages. Yep, yep, it's got

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>international capabilities built right into it. Also a note of

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>interest in good Luck launched a successful Crown funded campaign

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to and and follow me closely here, kids create ads

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for ad block so that ad block can block more ads.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure you're talking about bob blah blaws blaw blog.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what it sounded like to me. It was.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>The campaign was to advertise his his service ad Block,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>because not that many people use it. I mean, I

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think that as as of the campaign, he was saying

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that only three and ten Internet users had any kind

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of ad blocking software at all. Um. And so he

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that, you know, more people need to know about

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this thing awareness problem, right right, Yeah, and and that

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if people knew so, right, So he launched

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this campaign and yeah, they made enough money to like

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>put up a billboard in Times Square. Yeah. So they

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>took an analog and ad blocking company paid for an

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>advertisement and what is one of the world's most well

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>known advertising Mecca's meat Space, where no one can block it. Yeah, okay,

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm my brain is hurting right beautiful, Well, anyway, if

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>you're one dring, Hey, what happened ad block? Plus? He

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>kept on keeping on. Yeah. In two tho it would

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>receive an anonymous donation that was generous enough to allow

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Ladimir to quit his day job and work full time

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the project for two entire years. Yeah. He during

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that time expanded it for use with all of the

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>browsers that we were talking about a moment ago. Oh

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and also Firefox Mobile and Android. I didn't even mention

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the mobile operating system, right, um and then inn would

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>incorporate what became a very controversial feature, UMU developer led

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>white listing. Yeah. So you know, the earlier white listing

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about was about users defining Okay, I

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>want to see this particular content, right, every personal user

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>using this ad blocking software. This is on the developer side,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>This is before it ever gets to the user. And

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that the philosophy was kind of interesting

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to me. The the premise is that people want ad

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>block because they don't want annoying, intrusive ads. However, a

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people still want to be able to support

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the sites that they go to, and they realize that

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>those sites depend on AD revenue exactly, so in order

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to make sure they are not denying these these different

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sites that add revenue, that they are allowing their participating

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of marketplace where we can have people

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>paid for the work that they're doing and other people

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>can enjoy that work. Ad blog plus took it kind

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of upon itself to define what a good ad is

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>versus not a good ad. Yeah, the whole thing grew

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>out of a partnership between Ladimir and uh person by

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the name of till fed A who's who's an online

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>marketer who agreed that lots of online ads are really terrible.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Um but but right, But he didn't want to see

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the revenue from online ads dry up entirely. Yeah, So

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of an idea that ads that follow a

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>certain set of rules are okay, right if if they're

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>not um, if they're not preventing you from accessing the

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>content that you went to that page to read, or

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or auto playing sound which is terrible all the time,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or video or or otherwise just coming up the works

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in such an annoying way that that you want to

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>block that thing. Yeah. In fact, ideally according to this

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that has very strict size restrictions that you know, ads

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be a certain size and write all that down.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But there ideally our text only, which advertisers do not

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>care for. Uh. You know it's you know, it's not

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>as eye catching as something like picture of so. But

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>according to the white listing approach, it's supposed to be

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>text only. None of that AutoPlay stuff, whether it's sound

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>or video. It's supposed to be um, like you said,

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to be unobtrusive. So it's not supposed to

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>cover up things you can't have like a scrolling swoop

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in or scroll in or or shadow box or yeah

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or reform all the words to spell out this product

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. You know, it's not supposed to do any

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of stuff. Uh. And that if you

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>played by those rules and if you filled out some

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>forms and stuff, you could work with ad blocks because

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>to get onto this white listed program. So like a

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>company that would provide advertising, because you know, the companies

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that you see advertising online, they're usually not the ones

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that are handling the actual ads. It's usually an ad agency.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>There are some companies that have their own ad departments,

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of them will go to a third party.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>So if these third parties partner with ad block plus

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and create ads in this way, those ads would in

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>theory not be automatically blocked by the ad blocker. However,

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>if if as a user you wanted to still say

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to see any ads. I don't care

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>about the revenue thing, I don't care. All I want

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is all the free existence, you could actually turn that

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>option off so that you it was automatically on by default,

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but you could turn it off in the settings and

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and block all ads whether they are on a

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote good ad list or not. Also, it was

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of a um honor system approach. It still is

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of an honor system approach because ad block plus

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have an automated way to make sure that the

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>ads that are submitted in fact follow those criteria. Right.

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Once a company gets gets white listed, all of their

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ads are white listed, and it's up to the developers

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and also to the users of the program to pick

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>out ads that they still find offensive and submit a

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>report about them. Right. So, if as a user, you

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>see something on a web page and you think, wait,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't fit the criteria, and I've totally got ad

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>blocker plus on and it should be blocking all this stuff.

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You can report the ad and then add block plus

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>could take action and say, hey, guys, this isn't following

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the rules that we said. Of course, there was still

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pushback from from users about this, who said that, um,

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, first of all, they didn't agree with a

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>group of developers making this choice for them of what

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was and wasn't acceptable um. And second of all, that

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a potential that ad block plus was getting

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>paid to serve ads to them. Yeah, there was a

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>blogger named um Sasha Palenberg who first said that ad

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>block plus was an advertising mafia, that this put them

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in charge, like they were the ones who could say

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what ads are showing on the web in which ones

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't effectively at least to the audience that uses ad

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>block Plus. And then someone who has not been named

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, an anonymous person alleged

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that the developers of ad block plus had demanded a

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>share of ad revenue in order to white list ads

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>from his or her site. We don't know who this

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>person is, We don't know their gender or anything, but

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>According to this, one person who presumably works for an

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>advertising company ad block plus was saying, okay, well, if

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you share a third of your money that you make

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>from these ads, then you can totally be on the list. Um.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot. Not that everyone who applies to get

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on the list makes it right. Most people don't, and

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ad block has has. Ad Block plus rather has said

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this issue online and in blogs and interviews. UM.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>They they published a uh clarifying piece in October stating

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that it rejects over half of its applicants based on

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>unacceptable ad practices right out the door um, and that

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>overall it only has accepted about nine point five percent

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of its applicants to the program. Meanwhile, over at ad

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>block you have the founder saying, hey, uh, I'm sure

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if I had an option, they're saying, show me ads

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that don't suck. Those are his words that my users

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>would opt in. But it doesn't actually have that functionality.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>This would become so controversial that ad block plus actually

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ended up, and not not just among advertisers. Clearly it's

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>controversial to them, but also to users, users who said, hey,

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want this to be on by default. I

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have to go into my settings and

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>change it. They ended up for king ad block plus

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>because it couldn't get more confusing, right uh, and created

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ad block Edge, which doesn't have any of the white

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>listing features. It's essentially this is this is just going

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to block everything unless you manually go in and tell

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it not to write um and and a brief point

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>going back to that monetary issue UM In that company

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>blog from ad block Plus, basically they said that less

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>than ten percent of the applications that they've advanced to

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the final stages UM were submitted with some kind of

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>monetary benefit to ad block plus. So some were submitted

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with monetary benefit. Yes, that just raises more questions. Really,

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would call that so clarifying anymore.

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there needs to be a clarification of the

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>clarifying statement. After this next set of ADS, I promise

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 1>will block more until we need to run more ads.

0:31:52.400 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Take it away ads. This is, UH is beyond just

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the issue of I don't want to see ADS or

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I find this intrusive. There there are other thing considerations

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that are legitimate that people have because today the way

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the web works, there's a lot of different ways to

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of gather information about users, even in ways that

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily name who you are, but if there's enough

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of your behavior there, they can totally tell who you are.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>They can and they can certainly track you anonymous user number,

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know x online as much as they want to,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and people do continually, and a lot of that tracking

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>software is packaged along with ad serving software, so so

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and these are are modern times of big data.

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of an issue. Um As of March, ad

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>block plus claim to have the capacity to block eight

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand six different trackers, you know, different cookies and scripts

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and all that other stuff that runs in the background

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of sites that you visit, collecting continual information about you

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and your activities and your habits to either use or

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to sell to other companies, you know, companies that are

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sifting through it for whatever potentially nefarious purposes they choose

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to or just other advertisers. It may not be so

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>much nefarious, but it could just mean that you're going

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to get yet more ads right right, and and those

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>weird creepy ads that show that they know what you've

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>been looking at on Amazon dot Com right right, Like

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>when you go to Facebook and you notice that all

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the ads on Facebook somehow match things that you had

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just been browsing on a totally different site. What really

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>confuses me is when they serve me ads of something

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that I just purchased because I'm like, I I did

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like that thing. Yeah, I already thought it. I bought

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing that you told me to. I'm not going

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy it again. I'm not going to click there.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What confuses me is when I get the ones for

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>enormous muscles, because y'all, I don't know if you see

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>me recently, but I mean you're basically already already human perfections. Actually,

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like you know, I don't so much have

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a six pack as I have a raging kicker. That's

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>what I've got going on. But anyway, so to get

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.439
<v Speaker 1>down to the the side that we're on. So we're

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Lauren and I Obviously we both work for a company

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a web based company. We get, uh, you know,

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 1>there there are ads that run on how Stuff Works

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Absolutely, and so we run ads in our podcast.

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a different kind of thing certainly, but

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>still it's it's that's how that's that's one of the

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>main ways we generate revenue. Yeah, that that is what

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>allows us to have jobs. Right, So if everyone were

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to block it and it got to a point where

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>advertisers said, well this, this isn't working because now we

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can no longer make any money. Like essentially, if you

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 1>pull the rug out from underneath that entire industry, you, uh,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>it forces everyone to have to rethink how do I

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>make money? Because if I can't make money, I'm not

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>going to do this. I'm gonna go do something else

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>where I can make money. Sure, so you know, are

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you going to put your content behind pay walls of

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>various tiers or are you going to rely on donations

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or merchandise? Uh? And and none of those are as

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>easy I guess as just selling ad spaces, right, Yeah,

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And it all depends. Like there's some larger organizations that

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have a historical following that could do things like shift

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to a paywall method and still stay afloat. There are

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>others that cannot, just as there are examples of uh

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that or or individuals who exist on on patronage.

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>There's there's the site Patreon now where you can pledge

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount per month for people who are doing

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.919
<v Speaker 1>things and a crowdfunding you know that the controversial Penny

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Arcade crowdfunder that that basically let them run their site

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>for a year for you. So, I mean there there

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are other ways, but it's not necessarily something that's within

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the grasp of everyone. So sure, you know, I think

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that the general recommendation is too if you like a site,

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>uh white list it and and let let it serve

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>you ads, right and uh so yeah, I mean this

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to be an ongoing conversation between users and advertisers

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and the companies that want to advertise, right, because, like

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, most most companies are saying, we want people

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to be encouraged to buy our goods and services or

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to at least have a more increased awareness of them.

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>We would rather that increased awareness doesn't come along with Oh,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>those are those irritating so and so's that always block

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it whenever I want to watch such and such a right, right.

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really interesting that in all of this Google,

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>which is an ad company, don't don't ever think it's

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a search company because that's not what they're there for. Um,

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they allowed, they chose to allow ad blocking

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>extensions for for Chrome for its browser. UM. Speaking about

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jonathan Rosenberg, the senior vice president of Product Management

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>as of two thousand nine, wrote in an in company

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>letter UM that aiding users with options can can really

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>only grow and enrich the Internet community at large. Yeah,

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very interesting take. I mean, particularly from someone who,

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like like you said, is working for essentially an ad company.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, they absolutely didn't have to do that, and

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty pretty beautiful that they do. I

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have a quote actually from another Google employee, one um

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Linus Upson, who is of at least was Google's engineering director,

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about this entire issue. He said, it's unlikely ad blockers

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to get to the level where they imperil

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the advertising market, because if advertising is so annoying that

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a large segment of the population wants to block it,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>then advertising should get less annoying. Yeah, I agree with that.

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, the best way of going

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>about this is to design ads that are that definitely

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>advertise your product or service, but don't do so at

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the expense of the user experience. It's really I mean,

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's easy to say, it's really hard to do because

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but but you know, I kind of appreciate that it's

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing the design impetus back to the people responsible for it.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 1>It's saying like, don't create bad stuff. If you want

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>people to not block it, don't don't go with the

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>easy approach of using something that blocks their view of

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to get at, or something that's so

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>eye catching that you literally can't pay attention to anything

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>else on the page. Right if it if it looks

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like a MySpace page, let's the old school MySpace. By

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's like Geo c s that would have

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>been a better way of putting it. Yeah, if it

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>looks like a Geo cities page, you may want to

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>revisit that unless you're doing it specifically for the irony

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's going on a site that that would that

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>would fit in well. And that wraps up that classic

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech stuff the things I wanted to say

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about ad blockers. So I used to be a big

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>user of ad blockers because a lot of ads were

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so intrusive, particularly the ones that would just launch with

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>audio and video out of nowhere, and it was really disruptive,

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're someone who's doing a lot of research

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of tabs open, maybe you don't

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>even know which tab is the one that's making the noise.

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that at least in Google Chrome you can

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>see the little megaphone icon that shows which one is

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>playing noise. But when you've got like twenty tabs open,

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to even see that. So you know, it's

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where because the ad experience was

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so bad, I didn't want to have to deal with it. However,

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that being said, I also these days feel like it's

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>really giving the short end of the stick to the

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that are running the uh, the site or service

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that I'm on. You know, that's how they generate revenue.

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm denying that, then if you do enough

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>people do that, then the stuff goes away, right, There's

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not enough money to support it. And as someone whose

0:39:55.680 --> 0:40:00.280
<v Speaker 1>job depends upon ad revenue, I I get it. Um.

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish that ads could be less intrusive, and I've

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>actually found some ads to be really helpful. I followed

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 1>some ads, and I've bought stuff. Heck, I've bought stuff

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from other podcast ads and including some of my own.

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.959
<v Speaker 1>I've used my own. I've used my own discount code

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy stuff, so they do work, but yeah, I

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. I still only the disruptive ones that

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ends up being something that sticks in my you know,

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>six center my skin, and I don't care for it.

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely understand the need for ads, and um, yeah,

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't use ad blockers anymore. Sometimes that ends up

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>being a challenging situation. But at the end of the day,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that was the choice I made. Not that I'm telling

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>any of you guys how to choose to do things,

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just that it was something that I ultimately decided. I would,

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, live in an ad filled world because I

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>want the stuff I to keep going. All right, that's it.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me. The best way to do that

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>is over on Twitter and the handle we use as

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff hs W and I'll talk to you again

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Y. Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from My Heart Radio, visit the I

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.