Speaker 1: I'm thank you, Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Write down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: It's eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn if you'd
Speaker 1: like to join us. It is great to be back,
Speaker 1: but what an incredible experience, and thanks to all of you.
Speaker 1: You know, Linda was kidding me before, why don't you
Speaker 1: just go and enjoy the trip. I'm like, the only
Speaker 1: reason I'm on this trip is because of this audience
Speaker 1: allowing me and putting me in a position that I
Speaker 1: can report on this and I wanted to share it
Speaker 1: with everybody. And she was mostly half kidding when she
Speaker 1: said it. And throughout the course of the program, I
Speaker 1: will go through a lot of what I learned. One
Speaker 1: of the most important things that I've learned is and
Speaker 1: somebody in the New York Post had a story about
Speaker 1: I think it was Rich Lowry today about the Trump
Speaker 1: the doctrine emerging. He seems to think is more related
Speaker 1: to money, and I'm like, yeah, you're missing a very
Speaker 1: big part of the equation here, which is I can
Speaker 1: tell you this or start with this and believe that
Speaker 1: everything is predicated on this. Maybe in past years decades,
Speaker 1: there was a belief system that you can westernize some
Speaker 1: countries in the Middle East, et cetera. That I could
Speaker 1: tell you haven't been there. It's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: And it should not be America's goal to tell other
Speaker 1: countries how to live their lives. It should not be
Speaker 1: our goal, however, insisting that they separate from radicalism and
Speaker 1: help eradicate radicalism and not turn a turn a blind
Speaker 1: eye towards radicalism. That is a prerequisite to any relationship
Speaker 1: with the US. And similarly, the President was very very
Speaker 1: clear as it relates to wanting these countries immediately, almost
Speaker 1: on day one, challenging in Riad Saudi Arabia to join
Speaker 1: the Abraham Accords, and the same thing in Qatar, and
Speaker 1: the same thing in the UAE and Abu Dhabi. That
Speaker 1: the President wants this, but the shear the desire is
Speaker 1: definitely there, and and this is my interpretation of it,
Speaker 1: there is such fear among these countries of Iran that
Speaker 1: this is why the underreported story from Donald Trump's first term,
Speaker 1: which is he had created an alliance with the with Israel,
Speaker 1: the United States, with the Egyptians, Jordanians with the Saudis,
Speaker 1: with the Emirates, with the Guitaris and and the UAE
Speaker 1: against Iranian hegemony. That is very real and really the
Speaker 1: root of their desire and their willingness to invest trillions
Speaker 1: of dollars in our economy and have the best relationship
Speaker 1: with the United States, because certainly they they could align
Speaker 1: themselves with China, they could align themselves with Putin and Russia,
Speaker 1: but they want want to be in business with the
Speaker 1: US because they see the United States as their best opportunity.
Speaker 1: And that was evidenced by this one business luncheon that
Speaker 1: I was invited to, where every single it was a
Speaker 1: who's who of American business. It was every major company
Speaker 1: you can think of, and every private equity firm you
Speaker 1: can think of, and every Wall Street firm you can
Speaker 1: think of, all in the same room, all with the
Speaker 1: wealthiest business people in Saudi Arabia, all of their foreign
Speaker 1: ministers and cabinet members, and the Crown prints himself, et cetera.
Speaker 1: And all of this is real. And when you add
Speaker 1: up the money and how beneficial it will be to
Speaker 1: this country and the hard working men and women in
Speaker 1: this country, it is we're putting together a foundation. The
Speaker 1: President is building a multifaceted foundation for American prosperity and success.
Speaker 1: He's calling it the Golden Age, and just look at
Speaker 1: the parts that are in place. We're going to be
Speaker 1: coming to you all week about this big, beautiful one,
Speaker 1: big beautiful bill, and it's going to be contentious, but
Speaker 1: I think in the end it's going to be passed.
Speaker 1: The President will absolutely have to involve himself. I will
Speaker 1: deputize all of you in this audience at the appropriate
Speaker 1: time with the appropriate names of the of the people
Speaker 1: that need to understand. I mean, I go to Washington,
Speaker 1: I do these town halls, and I say in every
Speaker 1: single one of them, you all know you're not going
Speaker 1: to get everything you want. They all say, we understand that.
Speaker 1: You all know that this is important for the President's agenda.
Speaker 1: Now put all the components together, the eight to ten whatever.
Speaker 1: The final number is trillion trillion with a T, not millions,
Speaker 1: not billions, trillions of dollars that are committed in the
Speaker 1: next four years in investment in this country to build
Speaker 1: out manufacturing, to create high paying career jobs for Americans,
Speaker 1: but also benefiting our national security, building our pharmaceuticals here
Speaker 1: our semiconductor ships here, automobiles here, on every level, it's
Speaker 1: just great for our country. It is what I'm putting
Speaker 1: America First is all about. It is not just rooted
Speaker 1: in finances or money. Runs much deeper than that. There
Speaker 1: is a belief system in an argument that certainly the
Speaker 1: better the world does financially, and the more you can
Speaker 1: eliminate poverty, and the less likely that people will want
Speaker 1: to radicalize, that they might want a better life for themselves.
Speaker 1: But the President was pressing very hard on choosing sides
Speaker 1: and rejecting radicalism and not turning a blind eye towards it,
Speaker 1: and so on, multi levels between economically and defense agreements
Speaker 1: and so on and so forth. The President is moving expeditiously,
Speaker 1: but put the pieces together energy, dominance, energy and dependence
Speaker 1: that will help make America rich. There's never been a
Speaker 1: case in history where we have cut taxes and not
Speaker 1: benefited with more revenues to the federal government. That is
Speaker 1: the one big beautiful bill that would be making the
Speaker 1: Trump tax cuts permanent. That would be no tax on tips,
Speaker 1: social security, or over time. That means the Republican parties
Speaker 1: now the party of hard working men and women versus
Speaker 1: the Democratic coastal elites that cater to you know, championing
Speaker 1: the rights of Vibrago Garcia and illegal immigrants over your safety.
Speaker 1: The party of defund dismantle nobail laws, the party of
Speaker 1: championing the right of men to play women's sports. The
Speaker 1: party that thinks it's a constitutional crisis if in fact
Speaker 1: you eliminate waste, fraud and abuse. The things could not
Speaker 1: be any more clear. So this is these are amazing
Speaker 1: times we're living in. And I found it so cheap
Speaker 1: and pathetic and ridiculous, this whole notion that that Donald Trump, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, nobody wants to spend any time in this
Speaker 1: industry that I work in media and do any research
Speaker 1: or any work. The largest military base in the Middle
Speaker 1: East was in Qatar. The Kataries have spent over eight
Speaker 1: billion dollars on our military base, improving our military base.
Speaker 1: It's not Theirs, it's ours eight billion, and we have
Speaker 1: defense agreements. Do you realizeI all these countries, Saudi Arabia, Katar,
Speaker 1: you A, they don't have military preparedness, they don't have
Speaker 1: modern weaponry. It's not just that we sell them, we're
Speaker 1: selling them also our technology, our ingenuity, and that is
Speaker 1: they're very survival is based on it. So, you know,
Speaker 1: four hundred million dollars when you're talking about eight billion
Speaker 1: dollars being spent on our air base that nobody seemed
Speaker 1: to ever care about, is a drop in the bucket.
Speaker 1: And even some friends of mine, guys that are conservative,
Speaker 1: just they haven't put two and two together, and I'm
Speaker 1: kind of a little surprised by it. We have a
Speaker 1: lot of news we've got to get to. We really do.
Speaker 1: By the way, Chuck Schumer blaming Trump after a Mexican
Speaker 1: Navy ship crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge, how many times
Speaker 1: have I said of the dog bites of the beast things.
Speaker 1: If you're feeling sad, blame Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: We know what the table administration has been meddling in
Speaker 2: US Coast Guard operations, from staffing to command and comms.
Speaker 2: And I have the general sense of a doge dysfunction
Speaker 2: in parts of the Coast Guard, to put it mildly,
Speaker 2: After being fully briefed on last night's Brooklyn Bridge accident,
Speaker 2: one thing is very clear. There are many more questions
Speaker 2: than answers.
Speaker 1: We know, many more questions than answers anyway, So that's
Speaker 1: Chuckie Schumer, who cares what he has to say. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think he's probably on his way out, and he
Speaker 1: doesn't even know it yet, won't get a lot of attention.
Speaker 1: The President's just been unrelenting in wanting this war in
Speaker 1: Europe to come to an end. I did have an opportunity,
Speaker 1: both on the record and off the record, on my
Speaker 1: interview on Air Force One with President Trump and then
Speaker 1: off the record with him, which I won't disclose. He
Speaker 1: is he is committed as ever to do everything humanly
Speaker 1: possible to end this war, and he kind of knew,
Speaker 1: he knows that it's going to take him and putin
Speaker 1: to hammer this thing out, and he wants to end
Speaker 1: the killing. Interesting Donald Trump, the Darth Vader evil in
Speaker 1: our time according to the left and the legacy media mob. Anyway,
Speaker 1: you know, he said that will mean redrawing the Ukraine
Speaker 1: Russian borders. That's already been done, saving lives, ending billions
Speaker 1: of dollars in aid. And he noted for the for
Speaker 1: conditions negotiated between the two parties, it can only be
Speaker 1: because of the details of the negotiation that only he
Speaker 1: would know of. And they're going to start negotiations immediately
Speaker 1: and the President's going to get actively involved himself, which
Speaker 1: I think is very good. We'll get into this in
Speaker 1: great specificity, in detail. But the Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 1: Tulsea Gabbert, I believe is correct. I mean, what James
Speaker 1: Komi did with eighty six forty seven is beyond. It's unconscionable.
Speaker 1: And maybe he thinks we're stupid. And I don't know
Speaker 1: why this guy feels the need to constantly communicate with seashells.
Speaker 1: You might recall in October twenty twenty four seashells that
Speaker 1: were painted blue with the words vote Harris. I don't
Speaker 1: think and the timing is, by the way, all too convenient.
Speaker 1: Our friend Dan Bongino Cashpattel also issued very sharp public condemnations.
Speaker 1: My understanding is is that a meeting of some ninety
Speaker 1: minutes with the Secret Service took place with James Comy.
Speaker 1: He is extraordinarily arrogant, and I think that most people
Speaker 1: know that James Comy was warned not to use the
Speaker 1: dirty Russian disinformation dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton. He
Speaker 1: was warned about that he used. He signed three of
Speaker 1: the four warrants. That's nine months worth the spying backdoor
Speaker 1: spying on the Trump campaign, transition team, and presidency. This
Speaker 1: is the guy. No reasonable prosecute or whatever prosecute anyway,
Speaker 1: we'll get into that. I think you unfortunately fall into
Speaker 1: a situation though, where you have to quote figure out intent.
Speaker 1: This is why I've always had a problem with, you know,
Speaker 1: with with hate crimes legislation, because you have to you
Speaker 1: have to ascertain what's in people's head rather than what
Speaker 1: they did. Although you cannot threaten a sitting president. Oh,
Speaker 1: I had no idea that eighty six forty seven meant
Speaker 1: get Trump. Uh, the President's still in a battle against
Speaker 1: you know, the court system. I mean, this is the
Speaker 1: one time that I really don't understand the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: and the Alien Enemies Act of seventeen ninety eight. It
Speaker 1: was used by four prior presidents and I really for
Speaker 1: the life of me, and they had a Supreme Court
Speaker 1: decision nineteen forty eight that upheld the law and went
Speaker 1: as far as to say that after the president makes
Speaker 1: that decision, that it is not subject to judicial review.
Speaker 1: It makes no sense. Even Jeffrey Tubin said, the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court appears stumped on the issue. I think that probably
Speaker 1: is about right. Every federal judge should not have more
Speaker 1: power enumerated powers than a president of the United States.
Speaker 1: It is that simple. And Article two powers are very
Speaker 1: very clear, and these are designated terrorist organizations, especially in
Speaker 1: the case of Trende Aragua or MS thirteen. But this
Speaker 1: is now, this is now the left's latest weapon of
Speaker 1: lawfair against Donald Trump. We'll get into this in a
Speaker 1: few more minutes. House Republicans focused on one thing this week,
Speaker 1: and that is their big, beautiful bill. Let me just
Speaker 1: warn you all, it's because of how this process and
Speaker 1: this Arcanian rule archaic rule rather in the US Senate
Speaker 1: known as reconciliation. There are very rigid rules that need
Speaker 1: to be applied to make this work in the United
Speaker 1: States Senate. Every time I've done town halls with either
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives or US Senators, they all know
Speaker 1: and they all acknowledge that they're not going to get
Speaker 1: everything they want. But we will get tax cuts permanent.
Speaker 1: We will get no tax on tip, social security or overtime.
Speaker 1: We will get money for the border, we will get
Speaker 1: money for the next generation of weaponry, and we will
Speaker 1: get the beginning of the economic turnaround that President Trump
Speaker 1: is desperately trying to get which will help all of
Speaker 1: them in a midterm, and they'd buck the trend and
Speaker 1: hold on to the House, which is going to be critical.
Speaker 1: Otherwise Donald Trump is going to be impeached probably fifteen times.
Speaker 1: So we are probably going to need to call the
Speaker 1: White House switchboard at some point during this week as
Speaker 1: we roll along eight hundred and nine point one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: So it's really a make or break. My guess is
Speaker 1: you're gonna hear a lot of noise this week. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be troublesome, You'll get worried, and in the end
Speaker 1: it's going to pass. That's my prediction. I hope I'm right.
Speaker 1: And you know, there's a great piece in the New
Speaker 1: York Post. G piers in Congress need to stomp on
Speaker 1: the Prima Donna attitude and hang together well or they're
Speaker 1: going to hang separately, is what I was saying to them.
Speaker 1: You will succeed or you will fail together. But it does.
Speaker 1: It did pass a key House hurdle. There were four
Speaker 1: members of the committee that voted present. And I think
Speaker 1: it's really going to take Donald Trump to get on
Speaker 1: p Both Kevin McCarthy is right, ripping GOP hardliners for
Speaker 1: a real misstep on this delay. We waited long enough.
Speaker 1: If these people, you know, some of them have safe districts,
Speaker 1: so they come from a very different position than people
Speaker 1: in marginal districts that you know, we are going to
Speaker 1: need if we're going to hang on to the majority.
Speaker 1: You want to hang on to the majority because Democrats
Speaker 1: get power impeach in beach in beach and beach and peach.
Speaker 1: They want one last point on this James Comy issue
Speaker 1: because I think it's kind of important. I think that's
Speaker 1: actually very important. And you know, remember Martha Stewart, you
Speaker 1: know it was responsible. Remember Martha Stewart. Is actually met
Speaker 1: her on two occasions and told her, I admired how
Speaker 1: tough she was when they were going after it. You
Speaker 1: know the person that was going after her that was
Speaker 1: James Comy, because he was the lead prosecutor for the
Speaker 1: New York Southern District when they put Martha Stewart in
Speaker 1: jail at sixty three years of age, and it was
Speaker 1: like a nothing case. It really wasn't. And it's the
Speaker 1: same call me. By the way, that General Flynn quote
Speaker 1: supposedly lied to who call me sent to the White
Speaker 1: House in a bid to frame Trump on the bogus
Speaker 1: Russia gay charges. Remember all that. Luckily Comy's attempt to
Speaker 1: frame Flynn was exposed before that was too late. But
Speaker 1: there's a documentary delving into the life and legacy of
Speaker 1: Martha Smith. It was on Foxnews dot com. And I mean,
Speaker 1: she was like the first billionaire female billionaire in nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety nine. And she says, it was so horrifying to
Speaker 1: me that I had to go through that to be
Speaker 1: a trophy for these idiots in the US Attorney's office,
Speaker 1: he says in this Netflix documentary, and Comy was the
Speaker 1: lead prosecutor. Now Comy's response is and she said, those
Speaker 1: prosecutors should have you know, she said, I was I
Speaker 1: was a prominent woman. I was the first billionaire woman
Speaker 1: in America. And when the charges were brought against her,
Speaker 1: he goes and he said, this is a case about lying,
Speaker 1: lying to the FBI, lying to the SEC, lying to investors.
Speaker 1: This is conduct that will not be tolerated. Martha Stewart
Speaker 1: is being prosecuted not because of who she is, but
Speaker 1: what she did. Meanwhile, the attorney for Stuart questioned whether
Speaker 1: the charges were filed for publicity purposes or because Martha
Speaker 1: is a celebrity, but who sends to five months in prison?
Speaker 1: He made next to no money on this deal. I
Speaker 1: mean it was like a pittance to her. It was
Speaker 1: just to humiliate, which unfortunately, this is why we talk
Speaker 1: so often about weaponization and why you can't have the
Speaker 1: weaponization of a justice system. He just can't. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's got to stop. Anyway, Moving on other things. Look,
Speaker 1: there's a lot going on. We'll deal more with this
Speaker 1: at the top of the hour. Greg Murphy's more charitable
Speaker 1: than and I will be. He's a congressman and a
Speaker 1: medical doctor. But I'll tell you a couple of things
Speaker 1: that came out about Joe Biden and will also play
Speaker 1: this later. He was not placed under oath during his
Speaker 1: special Prosecutor interview with Robert Hurr. And now that it's
Speaker 1: come out during the interview, why wasn't he placed under oath?
Speaker 1: Why not? You know? When Bill Clinton was interviewed by
Speaker 1: Ken Starr's office, he was under oath. One of the
Speaker 1: articles of impeachment against Clinton was perjuring himself with stars prosecutors,
Speaker 1: and in the interview, knocking to you can tell this
Speaker 1: guy was a cognitive mess. We'll get back to that
Speaker 1: in a second. Here's the problem. If you do any
Speaker 1: rudimentary amount of health checking and you're a mail, you
Speaker 1: get something called a PSA score. And I happen to
Speaker 1: have a fairly low range of zero point eight or
Speaker 1: nine to one point one or two, and one year,
Speaker 1: just out of nowhere kind of doubled it and I
Speaker 1: ended up getting a biopsy because my doctor said that
Speaker 1: that is unusual for something to go up, and he
Speaker 1: wanted to get on top of it. Then it went
Speaker 1: back down and stayed back down now for over a decade,
Speaker 1: and I'm still in that my normal range. But it
Speaker 1: is it is the earliest indication. And he even wrote
Speaker 1: me earlier said I've never seen a glease since score
Speaker 1: of nine. Ever, and medical experts all over the place
Speaker 1: are quick to flag. You know, how is it possible
Speaker 1: he was diagnosed with an aggressive prostate cancer that has
Speaker 1: already spread to his bones, especially given that the disease
Speaker 1: is easily detected with blood work. I mean, it's the
Speaker 1: PSA and usually most people have a baseline. Now I
Speaker 1: have friends of mine whose baseline is higher than my baseline,
Speaker 1: but that is their baseline. You had doctor Zeke Emmanuel
Speaker 1: saying he probably had prostate cancer at the start of
Speaker 1: his presidency, you know, and how they didn't pick up
Speaker 1: on this. It really would be too simple tests. And
Speaker 1: you know, some are questions whether or not this was
Speaker 1: Why would you not look I traveled with the president
Speaker 1: last week. I can tell you there are doctors around
Speaker 1: him at all hours of the day and night, all hours.
Speaker 1: And that's every president, Democrat, Republican, doesn't matter. Access to
Speaker 1: the finest, the best medical care. And in the case
Speaker 1: of prostate cancer, it happens to be something most men
Speaker 1: will die with, but not die from. You know, hours
Speaker 1: before Biden revealed he had prostate cancer, James Clyburn was
Speaker 1: out there insisting that the eighty two year old was
Speaker 1: fit to serve another four years. I'm like, okay, whatever,
Speaker 1: Jadie Vance is right and saying that the that Biden
Speaker 1: should have told the American people about his prostate cancer
Speaker 1: when he was first diagnosed. Why didn't the American people
Speaker 1: have more accurate information? That's right too. Now, with all
Speaker 1: of that said, I wish I wish him the best,
Speaker 1: but it did not need to metastasize it. There are
Speaker 1: some doctors saying it could have taken ten years to metastasize.
Speaker 1: They have a thing called watchful waiting when it comes
Speaker 1: to people that are diagnosed with prostaate cancer, just because
Speaker 1: it's it's not as quite as aggressive as his. But
Speaker 1: it makes no sense at all that this does not
Speaker 1: make sense, just like his cognitive state issues make no sense,
Speaker 1: the President said. Malaney and I are sadden to hear
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden's recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest
Speaker 1: and best wishes to Jill in the family and wish
Speaker 1: Joe a fast and successful recovery. But this is an
Speaker 1: aggressive form of prostaate cancer that is already metastasized to
Speaker 1: the bone, and this thing is now a thousand times
Speaker 1: harder than it would ever need to be. It's just sad.
Speaker 1: A lot of medical every medical person I talked to,
Speaker 1: said that they were taken aback that it was so
Speaker 1: far advanced. If you look at Google, for example, AI
Speaker 1: it says prostaate cancer is diagnosed before it metastasizes, it
Speaker 1: takes several years for it to spread to other parts
Speaker 1: of the body. In most cases, slow growing cancer may
Speaker 1: be combined to the prostate gland for years, and some
Speaker 1: studies have shown that PSA levels indicate the risk of metastasis,
Speaker 1: especially if the levels were at a certain point. This
Speaker 1: is so rudimentary, but you know what, think about it.
Speaker 1: Did we really ever get the truth about him? Even
Speaker 1: Van Jones is now saying that Biden's cognitive dementia cover
Speaker 1: up was a crime against the republic. Now the only
Speaker 1: thing I would say gently at least he's saying it.
Speaker 1: But he and David Axelrod kind of came as close
Speaker 1: as anybody on the Democratic side of stating the obvious,
Speaker 1: but they didn't want to be the ones to do it.
Speaker 1: But in reality, we knew before twenty twenty. We took
Speaker 1: a lot of heat for it, and it was a
Speaker 1: cover up. Why is this critical Because the President of
Speaker 1: the United States is mentally incapacitated, ognitively incapacitated. He is
Speaker 1: our commander in chief. He was not up to the job.
Speaker 1: And these people knew about it. They knew about it
Speaker 1: for the longest time. They exposed it. Anyone that dared
Speaker 1: talk about it or show videos of him like yours
Speaker 1: truly was excoriated for doing it. But this is a
Speaker 1: culture of concealment that was within the administration, and yet
Speaker 1: James Clyburn still believes he could have served a second term.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. And that was and we'll play
Speaker 1: it later. But it was clear in the audio tapes
Speaker 1: about all the memory life he didn't even know when
Speaker 1: his own son died. It was so sad he didn't know,
Speaker 1: and they treated him with kid gloves in this in
Speaker 1: this her interview, you know, there was an interesting piece
Speaker 1: I saw from somewhere, you know, and this is where
Speaker 1: the media legacy media died. They'd this idiot over at
Speaker 1: the Washington Post and anyway, you see that everybody knew
Speaker 1: about the decline. Anybody that denies his flat out lying, well,
Speaker 1: I didn't know about it till that debate. You're lying,
Speaker 1: I would say, you're lying. Whoever's saying that, you know,
Speaker 1: look at him wandering all from a group of world leaders.
Speaker 1: Come on, Joe, come back to the group, or him
Speaker 1: shaking air, or him not knowing where to go, or
Speaker 1: him not being able to get through a press conference
Speaker 1: or a speech. Ever, it's you know, the New York
Speaker 1: Posts had a meander in chief and then the Washington
Speaker 1: Post quote fact checker, this idiot, Glenn Kessler, who's going
Speaker 1: to fact check the fact checker. He faked Biden videos
Speaker 1: and raptures right wing media, but deeply misled. No, we
Speaker 1: told the truth. And you know, in this case, this
Speaker 1: guy Kessler who thinks he's the king of truth, who
Speaker 1: frankly is nothing but a hack leftist Democrat, as evidenced
Speaker 1: by things that he said about me, they'd been just
Speaker 1: dead wrong about simply wrong. On the economy, we got
Speaker 1: some good news. April's budget surplus was the second largest
Speaker 1: in US history. The government collected eight hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: point two billion in receipts while spending five hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety one point eight billion, resulting in a budget surplus
Speaker 1: of two hundred and fifty eight point four billion. That's
Speaker 1: not just any surplus. It's the first monthly surplus of
Speaker 1: the fiscal year twenty twenty five, which began in October
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, the second largest monthly surplus in US history,
Speaker 1: So this is a big deal. Retail sales, we learned
Speaker 1: edged up last month after March was upwardly revised to
Speaker 1: one point seven percent. The Commerce Department Census Bureau said,
Speaker 1: more good economic news. We know the grocery prices saw
Speaker 1: their largest decline in five years. Gas prices now fell
Speaker 1: for the third month in a row. I'm seeing that
Speaker 1: big time at the pump. Egg prices saw the largest
Speaker 1: one month decline in more than four decades. Workers real
Speaker 1: wages were up one point nine percent. Prices for airfare, energy, hotels,
Speaker 1: used vehicles all down compared to last year. I mean,
Speaker 1: good things are happening on the economy, and Treasury Secretary
Speaker 1: Bessett was right this Moody Mott. It was a minor,
Speaker 1: one little inch down down shift. It's a lagging indicator
Speaker 1: of US credit downgrade. That will my prediction, that will
Speaker 1: be fixed very very quickly. That's what I'm predicting we'll see.
Speaker 1: And then everything the President has in terms of the
Speaker 1: economy for energy, the trillions of dollars in manufacturing that
Speaker 1: will be coming to America from countries and companies that
Speaker 1: are going to be building here. That is going to
Speaker 1: help the people that do make this country great, hardworking
Speaker 1: men and women. They're the ones that make the country great.
Speaker 1: The radical left has no idea what they're doing. We have.
Speaker 1: I guess Tim Walls is delivering the commencement address at
Speaker 1: the University of Minnesota Law School. You know, being ripped
Speaker 1: for us seeing you know the term. Some would say, boy,
Speaker 1: this is getting way too political for a commencement address,
Speaker 1: he said, But I would argue I wouldn't be honoring
Speaker 1: my oath if I didn't address this head on. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna start with the flashing red light. Donald Trump's modern
Speaker 1: day gestapo here we go works so well for him
Speaker 1: in the final arguments of this campaign. Nazi, fascist, racist
Speaker 1: hitler Stala mussolinim I as will stick with what fails
Speaker 1: and fails dramatically. Chris Murphy, Connecticut, we have a madman
Speaker 1: in the Oval office because DEM's failed to oust Biden.
Speaker 1: Oh now they're all mad that they all knew Biden
Speaker 1: was a mess. They only have themselves to blame. Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton appears to have not learned a thing from her
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen basket of Deplorable's remarks and you know, we
Speaker 1: don't need to be a handmaiden to the patriarchy. That's
Speaker 1: what she say. Kind of eliminates every woman on the
Speaker 1: other side of the aisle except for very few. Clinton's
Speaker 1: sa just you know what's happening, And the New York
Speaker 1: Times actually got something right. Is every top Democrat running
Speaker 1: for president. The answer is yes, here's their problem. You're
Speaker 1: in the middle of a civil war. David Hogg, fellow
Speaker 1: vice chair of the Democrats, is warning Democrats he's not
Speaker 1: being honest with you. He's talking about the you know,
Speaker 1: they're now openly fighting. Every single day Pole comes out.
Speaker 1: The impact that Donald Trump's comeback is as lower Democratic
Speaker 1: morale and their polls to the lowest levels they've ever seen.
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer takes the cake at seventeen percent Democrats in
Speaker 1: the load to mid twenties. They have let the far
Speaker 1: left of their party, the Jasmine Crocketts squad, AOC's Grandpop
Speaker 1: Bernie take over that party, you know. And then they
Speaker 1: got Bruce Springsteen. A lot of good he did for
Speaker 1: a lot of good. All these actors did, all these
Speaker 1: singers did, They didn't do anything. They had no impact
Speaker 1: on the election. They tried their hardest to destroy this man.
Speaker 1: They threw everything at him. They brought in every actor,
Speaker 1: every musician, and they lost, and they lost because they
Speaker 1: deserved to lose. And all those people lied and covered
Speaker 1: up for Joe too, because they all knew better.