1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:05,560 Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from Coast to Coast AM on iHeartRadio. 2 00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:07,800 Speaker 2: And welcome back to Coast to Coast George Nori with you. 3 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:11,479 Speaker 2: Astrophysicist doctor Charles lou with Us, professor at the City 4 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:15,239 Speaker 2: University of New York's College of Staten Island and an 5 00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:19,600 Speaker 2: associate with the Hayden Planetarium and Department of Astrophysics at 6 00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:23,720 Speaker 2: the American Museum of Natural History. His research focuses on 7 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:28,840 Speaker 2: colliding galaxies, star wars, galaxies, coisars, and the star formation 8 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:31,680 Speaker 2: history of the universe. His book is called The Handy 9 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 2: Quantum Physics answer Book. And he's back with us on 10 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:38,279 Speaker 2: Coast to Coast Charles. Welcome have you been. Oh, I've 11 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:40,519 Speaker 2: been very well, George, Thank you so much. I really 12 00:00:40,560 --> 00:00:41,920 Speaker 2: appreciate being here tonight. 13 00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:42,880 Speaker 3: Be a lot of fun. 14 00:00:43,440 --> 00:00:45,479 Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, when you look at the marvels of 15 00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:49,080 Speaker 2: the universe, it is just truly unbelievable. Now taking God 16 00:00:49,120 --> 00:00:51,199 Speaker 2: out of the equation for a moment, and that's not 17 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:55,200 Speaker 2: easy to say or do. How in the world did 18 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:56,640 Speaker 2: this start from nothing? 19 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:01,480 Speaker 3: Well, this is a great question, and the reality is 20 00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:05,080 Speaker 3: that scientists are humble enough to recognize that we don't 21 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 3: know how did these start from nothing? It may well 22 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 3: have been something, but it's something that we don't understand yet. 23 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 3: For example, our understanding of space and time three dimensions 24 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:19,959 Speaker 3: of space and one dimension of time. If there are 25 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 3: other dimensions, there could have been plenty of stuff from 26 00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 3: which those other dimensions funneled into what we now know 27 00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 3: is our four dimensional space time, and some sort of 28 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:36,959 Speaker 3: a quantum event or a multidimensional event having to do 29 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 3: with membranes or string theory or something like that, but 30 00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:43,319 Speaker 3: we don't have any evidence for it yet. We can 31 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 3: set up the equations, shall we say, the structure for it, 32 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 3: but then we have to design the experiments and have 33 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:58,520 Speaker 3: enough technological capability to test those hypotheses to decide which 34 00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 3: one is actually reality. We don't have that technology yet, unfortunately. 35 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:06,480 Speaker 2: Do you think we will ever get the answers your 36 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:07,280 Speaker 2: real answers? 37 00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:11,200 Speaker 3: I think so, and I think the answers will be 38 00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:13,120 Speaker 3: much more complicated than we hope. 39 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:13,799 Speaker 1: Right. 40 00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,960 Speaker 3: We always like to think that there's one thing that 41 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:22,679 Speaker 3: explains everything, all right, one idea, But we've found out 42 00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 3: that the simpler the basic idea, the more complexities that 43 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 3: it can spawn. Right, So, for example, the idea that 44 00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 3: the universe started with a big bang. That's pretty settled 45 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:39,079 Speaker 3: in terms of the observational evidence. The universe used to 46 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 3: be much smaller and much hotter than it is now, 47 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 3: and it is now bigger and colder, and it's continued 48 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 3: to grow bigger and colder over time. That's something we understood. 49 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:53,720 Speaker 3: But that simple idea has led to much more complication, 50 00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:56,919 Speaker 3: like what is the density of the universe in terms 51 00:02:56,919 --> 00:03:00,960 Speaker 3: of matter? How about the dark energy distribute? Has the 52 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:06,320 Speaker 3: changing of the expansion rates caused changes and variations in 53 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 3: the development of stars and galaxies and planets and people. 54 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:14,040 Speaker 3: So the more we simplify and create the truth shall 55 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 3: we say and answer, the more we realize that there 56 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:20,480 Speaker 3: are greater details that yet have to be explained. 57 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:24,800 Speaker 2: We have emotion, we get sick, we get the happy. 58 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 2: So I'm pretty sure that we are real, We're alive. 59 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:32,600 Speaker 2: But is there a possibility, Charles, that all of this 60 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 2: is an illusion? 61 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:40,560 Speaker 3: You have hit upon a fundamental question that astronomers are 62 00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:44,160 Speaker 3: asking ourselves all the time, and in fact all scientists 63 00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 3: really when we're thinking about the concepts of consciousness or 64 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 3: reality or perception, right, we actually cannot mathematically prove that 65 00:03:55,240 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 3: there is any universe outside our own heads. So, George, 66 00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 3: you and I are talking right now, but you actually 67 00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 3: don't know if I am actually a person just like you, 68 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:12,440 Speaker 3: or I'm just some sort of a clever simulation that 69 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:17,440 Speaker 3: responds so perfectly that you're imagining me to be a 70 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:20,800 Speaker 3: real person with actual thought, and you, yourself are the 71 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:23,360 Speaker 3: only person in the universe with actual thought. Indeed, you're 72 00:04:23,400 --> 00:04:26,240 Speaker 3: the only person in the universe period. And all of 73 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:29,839 Speaker 3: the other stuff is not the reality that you think 74 00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 3: it is, or that anybody else thinks it is. And 75 00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:36,120 Speaker 3: because all of us, all the billions of us humans, 76 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 3: have the same problem, we can get a sense of 77 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:44,120 Speaker 3: what everything else is, but we always have to reserve 78 00:04:44,360 --> 00:04:48,080 Speaker 3: the possibility that we are fooling ourselves. 79 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:53,359 Speaker 2: What about the possibilities that Charles that I'm chat GPT, 80 00:04:53,640 --> 00:04:55,480 Speaker 2: that I'm more intelligent? 81 00:04:56,720 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 3: George, I can't just prove that, right, I mean, I 82 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:05,840 Speaker 3: can just prove that you're not CHATGPT. Because if someone, say, 83 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 3: on the other side of this phone line, were to 84 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:12,479 Speaker 3: go into a studio and see, oh, there is George right, 85 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:16,960 Speaker 3: there is a perception, there is an observation of reality 86 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:20,919 Speaker 3: that we share, and that person could then call me 87 00:05:21,120 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 3: or contact me and say, yep, George is a human being. 88 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:24,320 Speaker 1: Right. 89 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 3: But if we were only talking through a screen, and 90 00:05:27,480 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 3: I did not know that you were a person over there, 91 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:33,080 Speaker 3: and you did not know I were a person over here, 92 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,960 Speaker 3: then there may not be a way for you to 93 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:41,839 Speaker 3: confirm definitively that I'm not a clever computer program. It's 94 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:45,520 Speaker 3: just a matter of whether or not that computer program 95 00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:50,600 Speaker 3: that chat, GPT or any other large language model can 96 00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:57,040 Speaker 3: express itself so effectively that you can't tell. And right now, 97 00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 3: the artificial intelligence scientists are able to create computer programs 98 00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:08,200 Speaker 3: that can fool a human being after five minutes of 99 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 3: conversation about a third of the time. 100 00:06:13,400 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 2: Well, with doctor Charles lou we are going to be 101 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:19,800 Speaker 2: taking calls with him next hour. We're talking about the 102 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 2: marvels of the universe. Is science continuing to find new 103 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 2: discoveries of this fourteen billion year oly universe all the time. 104 00:06:29,080 --> 00:06:31,919 Speaker 3: It's amazing how much we're discovering. I mean, even on 105 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 3: the smallest scales, things like human DNA and the evolution 106 00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:39,919 Speaker 3: of life here on Earth, and the possibility of planets 107 00:06:39,920 --> 00:06:43,240 Speaker 3: existing in such abundance that there is life elsewhere, Like 108 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 3: that's the smallest stuff, the biggest stuff that's happening right now. 109 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:52,520 Speaker 3: With new technology. Specifically, I'm thinking of the James Webb 110 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:56,000 Speaker 3: Space Telescope and also other telescopes that are both on 111 00:06:56,040 --> 00:06:59,279 Speaker 3: Earth and in space. We are able to look so 112 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:04,040 Speaker 3: far away and into the distant past that we're seeing 113 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:08,400 Speaker 3: objects in the universe that we only theorized could exist 114 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:12,280 Speaker 3: so early in the history of the cosmos. As a result, 115 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 3: we're discovering that we have to keep adjusting our models 116 00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 3: and understanding how the universe is going forward is being 117 00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:24,800 Speaker 3: continuously informed by new discoveries that are literally being made 118 00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:25,320 Speaker 3: every night. 119 00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:29,280 Speaker 2: And James Webb just discovered a planet that they think 120 00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:33,840 Speaker 2: has the possibility of harboring life because it's got all 121 00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 2: the makeup. That's fantastic. 122 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 3: That's a really neat story. Yes, this telescope is just 123 00:07:40,640 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 3: the latest to provide evidence on this particular planet. This planet, 124 00:07:45,440 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 3: which orbits a star many light years away, was seen 125 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:55,000 Speaker 3: to have possible indications that in its atmosphere there was 126 00:07:55,040 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 3: a kind of gas that here on Earth is produced 127 00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:06,440 Speaker 3: by biological life, DNA based life, and we haven't yet 128 00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:10,040 Speaker 3: figured out a way to produce this gas in quantity 129 00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:14,800 Speaker 3: that could saturate in an entire atmosphere in any way 130 00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 3: other than having like algae or other kinds of semi plant, 131 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 3: semi animal microbiome to be able to produce it. And 132 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:30,160 Speaker 3: so when the JWST came online, scientists asked to point 133 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:34,160 Speaker 3: that telescope at this planet and take a more detailed 134 00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:36,920 Speaker 3: observation to see what they could find, see if they 135 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:41,080 Speaker 3: could confirm those hints that they had found before using 136 00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:45,959 Speaker 3: other telescopes, And sure enough those hints were confirmed at 137 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:50,640 Speaker 3: a higher confidence level than ever before. And so this material, 138 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,920 Speaker 3: this gaseous material that seems to be in this planet's 139 00:08:54,960 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 3: atmosphere could well be have formed if chemistry and biochemistry 140 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:02,520 Speaker 3: is the same on that planet as it is here, 141 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 3: could have been formed by microbiobes. But these microbes we 142 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:09,880 Speaker 3: don't know of their existence there. We just have this 143 00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 3: one chemical signature. And so right now what we're doing 144 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 3: is well, not me specifically, but my colleagues who are 145 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:20,760 Speaker 3: involved in things like astrobiology and biochemistry, are trying to 146 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:24,960 Speaker 3: figure out are there any other ways with which this 147 00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:28,840 Speaker 3: gas can be formed in such quantity that it could 148 00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:35,560 Speaker 3: signal a planet wide kind of process other than extraterrestrial 149 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:36,680 Speaker 3: life as we know it. 150 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:41,760 Speaker 2: Doctor Low, give me your impression, your thoughts on the 151 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:43,800 Speaker 2: Big Bang and what happened. 152 00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 3: Okay, the Big Bang has been tested and has been 153 00:09:53,040 --> 00:10:00,040 Speaker 3: poked and prodded and used looked at by hundreds of 154 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:04,880 Speaker 3: scientists thousands of scientists over decades, and so it is 155 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:10,559 Speaker 3: now quite certain scientifically that the universe as we understand 156 00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:15,280 Speaker 3: it and experience it was once very small and very hot. 157 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:19,319 Speaker 3: By very small, I mean smaller than an atom, and 158 00:10:19,360 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 3: by very hot, I mean trillions upon trillions of degrees. 159 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:29,040 Speaker 3: And now it's not right. So, over the past thirteen 160 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:32,880 Speaker 3: point eight billion years or so, give or take maybe 161 00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:36,079 Speaker 3: one hundred million years, based on our measurements, the Big 162 00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 3: Bang has happened. That doesn't mean though we know how 163 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:44,360 Speaker 3: it happened or what the pieces of it are going 164 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:49,320 Speaker 3: on with it, that event could have been triggered by 165 00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:54,320 Speaker 3: a wide variety of physical activities which we can't test 166 00:10:54,400 --> 00:10:57,680 Speaker 3: yet because we don't have the technology. We can't see, 167 00:10:57,720 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 3: for example, much smaller than the sub atomic particles that 168 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:05,680 Speaker 3: we detect, things like electrons. Right, But the physics of 169 00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:10,240 Speaker 3: what must have happened when the universe was that small 170 00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:14,720 Speaker 3: is not reproducible. In a laboratory that we have today. 171 00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:18,400 Speaker 3: All Right, the closest we've been able to get is 172 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:23,880 Speaker 3: being able in our most powerful particle accelerators to mimic 173 00:11:24,440 --> 00:11:28,559 Speaker 3: what the universe might have been like about a trillionth 174 00:11:28,640 --> 00:11:33,120 Speaker 3: of a second after the Big Bang, but not before 175 00:11:34,040 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 3: that point. And before that point, trillionth of a second 176 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:40,839 Speaker 3: doesn't seem like a much time, but so much can 177 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:44,439 Speaker 3: happen at the quantum level, at the sub atomic level 178 00:11:44,559 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 3: in that period of time that it could have shaped 179 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:52,360 Speaker 3: everything that's happened since then. So the short answer, which 180 00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:54,880 Speaker 3: I've just given you a long answer, right, my personal 181 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:58,120 Speaker 3: take is that the Big Bang did happen, and there's 182 00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:01,360 Speaker 3: a lot of evidence scientifically to show that it did. 183 00:12:01,760 --> 00:12:04,359 Speaker 3: And then the question now is to figure out the details, 184 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:09,280 Speaker 3: including what happened before the time that our technology has 185 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 3: been able to study the Big Bang. 186 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:15,200 Speaker 1: Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at 187 00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:18,840 Speaker 1: oneam Eastern, and go to Coast to coastam dot com 188 00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:19,280 Speaker 1: for more