WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - August 3rd, 2019

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Hi, I'm

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly and I'm Taylor Riggs. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Weekend Podcast. In this episode, we're going to

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bring you news of the week, insights from the magazine,

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>and more, and this week a host of stories all

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>over the world, all over the map. Victoria's secret, they

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have more than a Jeffrey Epstein problem, Taylor. We also

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>take you to Minneapolis. They're taking aim at single family homes.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Will be the hunger Games of the entertainment industry. That

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is a pun intended. It is this week's cover story.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>First up, though, Jason, So, raising venture capital money is

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>complicated on all sides of the equation for both the

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>funders and the funds, and the level of difficulty only

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>gets more difficult if you are a woman, and that

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is still the case in Silicon Valley, even at the

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>best known shop. Sarah McBride back with me from San Francisco,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>taking us inside the experience of one partner at Sequoia Capital.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>That's Just Lee. Sarah, great to have you with us

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and tell us about Jess So. Just Lee is the

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>first US investing partner at Sequoia Capital, who's a woman.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So the firm was founded in nineteen seventy two, and

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for decades there were no women partners here in the US,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>And then a couple of years ago the firm hired

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just Lee, who is a former product manager at Google

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of a startup called polly Vore. And it

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal and everybody was looking to see

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>how she did, especially since Sequoia had been in the

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>news a couple of times over some of the things

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that partners had done that people thought weren't that female friendly.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So there was a lot riding on her shoulders, right,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and specifically, Mike Mooret's on this network said, and I'm

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>quoting here, what we're not prepared to do is lower

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>our standards when asked about bringing in women partners. That's

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a tough beat, to say the least. And yet Just

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Lee perseveres, she takes the partnership, what has her experience

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>been like with more it than others? Right to be fair,

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people thought that she was brought in

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as a direct result of those comments. Segoya had actually

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>been trying to recruit her before that point, but the

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>timing was just unfortunate. So um, she told me this

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy experience she had right after she joined Sequoia Capital. Normally,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>partners from a big prestigious firm like that have to

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>be kind of careful when they go out into the world.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>They get mobbed. Every entrepreneur wants to pitch them their

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>startup idea. And she described for my colleague Lizette Chapman

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and me going down to a conference at Upfront Ventures

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in l A. So there were lots of entrepreneurs, lots

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of other vcs people who normally would have given their

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>eye teeth to talk to a partner at Sequoia Capital,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and she says that, you know, she was a new partner,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>so people didn't know who she was. But she described

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>walking around the room and people just looked at her,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>saw a young face, an Asian woman, and didn't even

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>look down at her name tag to see who she was,

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>just assumed she was in marketing or just not an

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>important person that they didn't even need to look at

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>her name tag. That wouldn't happen now because she's a

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>more recognizable figure now. But I think that just was

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a devastating anecdote that shows the subconscious mindset that a

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in technology have well, And one of

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the really important things about your story that I appreciated

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was this notion of the complexity of women dealing with

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>other women in the VC and tech world. Talk a

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that, because it's not this straight ahead

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like women helping other women, sisters doing it for themselves

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. It's very different, right, So I do

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think that now there's an attitude where most women do

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>want to help other women, but it hasn't always been

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like that. And even a lot of the women who

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think they want to help other women sometimes subconsciously realize

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of an outsider and don't want to be

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lumped in with the other outsiders. This is something I've

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>written about over the years. There was an academic study

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that came out a couple of years ago that showed

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>when women were evaluating startup pitches and men were evaluating

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>startup pitches, the women were a lot harder on the

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>pitches that came from other women, whereas the men were

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>actually more likely to be supportive of those pitches. Young

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>women founders have told me that they dread going to

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pitch women, but because women are harder on them and

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>ask tougher questions. Now, I think a lot of people

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have done some thinking about how women are treated and

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>how women can help each other, and there's less likelihood

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of that happening. There's a group here in Silicon Valley

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that just Lee is deeply involved with, called All Rays,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>where there's a conscious effort to help women founders and

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>women entrepreneurs. So I think because people have really examined

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>their own behavior, hopefully that happens less. But that's an

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate tendency. And so did you leave this story and

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>leave your conversations with just more optimistic about the future

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 1>of women in Silicon Valley, especially on the investors side,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I did. I think there's a tendency to

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tell each other great, the sisterhood, everybody helping each other,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's a lot more complicated than that. But overall

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I did leave a lot more up to mystic well,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and as you point out importantly in this story, it

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>feels like we are at least getting to this moment

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>where it's not enough to say, okay, we have a

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>woman who is a partner, that most firms are taking

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a holistic approach here that's right,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>they are. They want to have at least two women.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of studies that show that once you

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>get to the benefits multiply much more. There are efforts

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to just do more than pay lip service and not

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just promote the woman, but make sure she's comfortable in

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the position. And that's Sarah McBride a really smart story

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>taking you inside the world of venture capital, the gender relations,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the gender and balance. It's complicated, well safe to say.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>One of the most important and certainly controversial sports figures

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of the last twenty years, maybe the last century if

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we really stop and think about it, is Lance Armstrong.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Well he's back in a way. Mat x Chafkin caught

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>up with him, he joins me from San Francisco. So, Max,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you spent some time with the man himself. Take us

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to Lance armstrong state of mind here in twenty nineteen. Yeah, So,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Lance Armstrong, you know, one of the

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>most controversial athletes, you know, pre controversy arguably, you know,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest athletes, won the Tour de France

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a record seven times UM and you know in the

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>US particularly, you know there is really no one in

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in cycling or even endurance sports UM like him. Over

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of decades. UM, so he was banned

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>from sports, you know, totally disgraced. UM according to the

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>U s Anti Doping Agency. You know, it was the

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he was like the worst doper in history, part of

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the part of a team that did something just unprecedented

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and UM, according to government bad. The government suited him

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred million dollars. It's one of these things

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you would think, you know, Okay, this guy is never

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.559
<v Speaker 1>coming back from this. And what the story is about

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the way that Lance Armstrong UM sort

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of meticulously built this comeback and he started beginning with

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a podcast in UM. It was this confessional podcast and

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>as the story talks about, you know, while he was

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that, it kind of looks like this you know,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>total you know, vanity project. But he was sort of

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>putting the pieces into place to to start to rebuild

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>his business empire. Well, and what you capture in this

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>story so well, I thought, is what made him so successful,

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it was pre doping early early in his career,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or even as candidly a cheater, This guy is a grinder,

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, like whatever he's gonna do he's just gonna

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do it and do it and do it and do it.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what he's done here, as you say,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>very meticulously building this up so help us understand what

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. He's got this podcast, but there's merch, I mean,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>there's an event series he's out and about what's he

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>up to? So yeah, I mean, probably the best way

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to think of about him is as like a YouTube

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>star or an influencer. Um, he's got a a new

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>media platform with a pretty sizable audience. Story during the

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Tour de France with which just uh wrapped up a

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little less than a week ago. You know,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>this podcast was was near the top of the iTunes charts. Um.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>And he's sort of using that and using the community

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of fans that that, you know, as he pointed out

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to me, they never went away. I mean, you know,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Nike and and every authority figure can say Lance Armstrong

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is bad, um, but there's like a pretty sizeable chunk

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of sports fandom that will love him no matter what.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And kind of what he figured out and what others

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have figured out, frankly, is that if you have a

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>new media platform like a podcast, you can bring those

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people to you you know, once a week or or

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>every day or what have you, and then you can

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can send them to events. So so Armstrong has

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>these um they're not races be as he's sort of

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>banned from uh you know, organized cycling, from sanctioned races,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but their rides um and uh. And then he has

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>basically an athletic brand called We Do uh W E

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>d U uh and and the they're selling kits cycling

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gear basically, and water bottles and and you know the

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that that apparel companies have sold. And

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>then he's got one of these kind of um Patreon

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>style membership programs where fans are paying sixty dollars a

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>year and they get you know, special access to gear,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they get you know, special live Q and a podcasts

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and and you know all sorts of little member perk

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>stickers and kind of the what's amazing here to me anyway,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is he's basically, I mean, he's not as rich as

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he used to be, you know, and he's talked on

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast about you know, he misses his private jet

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But but he's kind of got the band

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>back together. And you know, I was listening to the

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast during the Tour de France, and you know it

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was I mean, it was a really exciting tour. And um,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got Lance Armstrong wrong. Uh, you know the disgrace

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>cyclist George Hincope, his his teammate who was you know,

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a domestique which is like a sort of a helper

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>cyclist on the on the great um Us postal teams

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the of the late nineties. And then you have

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Johann Berneil, who was another um sort of acute you know,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>part of the alleged you know, doping conspiracy. So it's

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like all these guys who basically the cycling authority who

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of mainstream sports has said, you know,

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>get out there. They're back in and they're all together

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're sort of doing what they've always done well

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>and notably. I mean, wasn't Hincope one of the guys

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>who ultimately helped take Armstrong down? Yeah, you know I

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>talked to Hincopy about that. I mean he I think

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically, Armstrong, you know, had had a difficult time.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the government was was going after um, you know him,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and then and then attempting to flip all these witnesses

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, I think Hinkompe and a bunch

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of other people in that circle sort of briefly lost

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>touch with Armstrong and uh, Hincopy told me, you know,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't seek for a while, but you know they've

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>built back the relationship and and it's something that I think,

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, sports fans in general are doing for better

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or worse. Now, we should say there are a lot

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of people, um, both in terms of sort of the

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>cancer world. You know, Lance Armstrong was was a huge

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>um sort of activist, philanthropists and and cancer. A lot

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of people felt betrayed. Those people, many of them still

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>feel betrayed. Um. You also have a lot of people,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know in sports who who still you know, are

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>never going to forgive this guy. And you know they're

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>good reasons for that. There's a long paper trail of

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>basically betrayal. Right well, because it wasn't only what he did,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but the vitriol with which he defended himself, which leads

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>me to this last question, which is how is he

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>from a personality perspective, because to say he was defiant

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for a long time is an understatement. And you know

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he uses language that I won't repeat here on this

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>family program about his state of mind throughout what's he

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like now? He's you know, I think Lance Armstrong is

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of a communications genius, and he, you know, during

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>his his career was able to take this kind of

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>niche sport um and this really unique story, you know,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>his the fact that he survived you know, late stage

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>testicular cancer and basically turned cycling into a huge thing

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>make make himself, uh you know, a skinny road cyclist,

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>not normally a marketable commodity into you know, one of

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the highest paid athletes in the world. Um, he's kind

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of doing the same thing now. So so like he's

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>still combative. I mean he he you know, told me

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he hates the media, and you know, kind of apologized

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to me for it, and and and uh and so

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of this weird thing where he he sort

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of hates the media and and he he doesn't he

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't stopped hating the media, hasn't stopped being sort of

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a difficult interview and and all of those things. But

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he's also kind of found ways to cultivate the parts

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of his personality that you know, make for good podcast.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's what's so wonderful? I mean, and you know,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>even if you really don't like Lance Armstrong, you kind

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of have to admit that the podcast themselves are super

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>entertaining because he is good at it. He can be vulnerable,

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he can mind those pieces of himself that are really compelling,

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's you know, even if you don't

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like him, you sort of can't help. But listen, that's

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Max Chafkin and Jason that Land's Armstrong. I hadn't thought

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about him and so long I'm going to call him

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>my new combat kid. Yeah. Absolutely, And you know, the

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast format is really amenable apparently to him. He's a

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit confessional and it seems to be working. So

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Victoria's Secret very much in the news, not in the

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>way that it would like to be. It's CEO and

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>his association, his longtime association with Jeffrey Epstein, who is

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>under an enormous amount of scrutiny currently in jail in

0:14:54.480 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>New York City awaiting trial. Jordan Holman follows all of

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>this for us and takes us inside Victoria's Secret. Not

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a great moment for Victoria's Secret, correct, So it's not

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a great moment, right, now for Victoria's Secret for multiple reasons.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're CEO um Les Wexner, who also runs L

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>brands in bath and body works. He has a longtime

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. At one point, Um Jeffrey Epstein

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was the power of attorney for Less Wexner. They say

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that they suffered ties more than a dozen years ago,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but just the skeletons in that closet have caused more

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>issues for the company down the line in terms of

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the modeling agency they use and just responding to consumer

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>demand for today and so beyond the relationship between these

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>two men, which I think it's safe to say more

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to come on that it feels like there's more to

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>be revealed. This is coming at a time where Victoria's

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Secret does not feel, shall we say, without being too glib,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel very twenty nineteen. No, not at all. So

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they've in the past few years, Victoria's Secret has gotten

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criticism for not being body positive, more

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>inclusive with their advertising, who's on their catwalks for the

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>fashion show. And at the same time they've had a

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of competitors come into the space and say, actually,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to make laundry for women and not for

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>men just to look at, and Victoria's Secret has not

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly shifted to that trend. That's happening because it's fair

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, I think Jordan's that no one has essentially

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>used sex and maybe more specifically sexy ness to better

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>effect or two more profitable effect than Victoria's Secret. As

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you point out in your story, the words sexy finds

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>itself into the names of its products. Yes, literally, they've

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>trademarked dozens of products with the name sex sexy in it,

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and then on top of it. Some history on Victoria's Secret.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>It was created more than forty years ago by a

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>man who went into a department store to buy lingerie

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>for his wife, did not love the arians, and said, hey,

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to create a store that men feel comfortable

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>buying women's underwear. That's how you get Victoria's Secret. So

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>they were founded with men in mind, even though there

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in customers a woman. So that is you know, they're

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>dealing with that history, and that's why they're kind of

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>very slow to respond to this. Women are speaking oun

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>saying we don't want that type of product anymore, and

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's reflecting in their sales. They've lost twenty billion dollars

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in market value in just the past four years. That's

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>such an interesting point to history and really important important

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to point out. And you know, you fast forward to

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>closer to the president, and you have this chief marketing

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>officer who is seen as this uber powerful guy in

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the modeling industry and in the sort of lingerie fashion industry.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You have a great anecdote about him backstage at the

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>fashion show. Tell us about that. So ed Razik, he

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is the chief marketing officer of Victoria's Secret. He's seventy

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>one years old, and he's really he's the one who

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>runs this fashion show. Less Wexner's a little bit more

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>removed from it, and he takes his job very seriously.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>So um in between the tapings of the Victoria's Secret

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>fashion shows as two tapings, he gathers all the models together,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>all the angels, and basically talks to them as if

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>he's a coach, giving them a pep talk before the

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>big game. And he says, literally, in the history of

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, there has not been a more important job

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>than being a Victoria's Secret Angel. Only a hundred and

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty five women have had this job. At this point

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the world. It's very over the top.

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>He's very much looking at their jobs through this lens

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of you guys are wearing you know, these underwear with

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the angel wings, and this is the most important job

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and used to be proud of yourselves and most women

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>can't do this, right, amazing? I mean that, I have

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to say reading this, you just encounter this company, especially

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in light of what their competitors are doing, as you mentioned,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that just feels out of step. Tell us a little

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>bit about the competition, because to be fair, Victoria's Secret

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only company you think about American Apparel. You

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think about Abercrombie and Fitch, all of whom, each of

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>whom have used sex to sell in different ways as well.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And yet those other companies have kind of gotten the joke. Yeah,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so in retail it's not new to use sexy to advertise.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But what's happened with the companies you name American Apparel

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have Abercambi Infins. They got hit by that,

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, people, they got a lot of criticism. They

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>had to reel that back. Um, American Apparel isn't as

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>strong as they used to be. Abercombie, they you know,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>turned on the lights and they've changed their mannequins, all

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. Victoria's Secret has been more resistant

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and so during this time, even though they still have

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of market share in the lingerie industry, you

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>have American Eagles Area, which is like braw Letts and

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>more body positive, and teams really love it, and they're

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.239
<v Speaker 1>marketing and using women of all sizes, not like what

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you're used to seeing if you walk into a Victoria's

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Secret store. So you have that, you have smaller competitors

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like Third Love Um and it's all with the woman

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in mine at the end of the day. And that's

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>not what's happening at Victoria's Secret. And that's Jordan Holman Taylor,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>what a smart story, because it's very bloomberg in a

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, that Jeffrey Epstein story. Its tentacles are

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going everywhere, and yet Victoria's Secret, it's bigger than just

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>this one guy. Crazy enough, though, Jason, we took a

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the annual revenue this company, Victoria's Secret still

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>pulling in more than seven billion dollars. Hard to see

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to go anywhere from here exactly so Taylor,

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the most interesting battle grounds right now across

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the world. A business is streaming your eyeballs.

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants them. Felix to Lette is here to bring

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>us up to date on the streaming wars. It's getting crazy,

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's this incredible showdown and the next year

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to get even more fierce and even

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>more brutal. For you know, all these tech and media

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>companies are piloting into the space. So we've talked to

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you before about this collision, you know, this collision course

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that all these companies have been on. It's been looming

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for a while. But as you say, this is really

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>where it comes to bear. Netflix doesn't have this to

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves anymore. Netflix and Amazon, I guess I should say,

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have this to themselves anymore. Disney seems to be

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and Disney is leading the charge. So Disney Plus will

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be arriving in November. That's gonna be huge, um, you know.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>And then following after closely after that, um, you know,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>next spring, we're gonna have HBO, Max is going to

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be arriving. NBC is putting together they're streaming uh subscription

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>video on demand service, so uh, and also you have

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple coming in sometimes this fall also with Apple Video

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>TV Plus, which is gonna be coming in there. So

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, yeah, for a long time it was

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of Netflix, a little bit of Amazon, maybe check

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>out CBS All Access. All of a sudden, it's just

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be this uh, you know, wide open field. Well,

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have to hand it to Netflix. I mean,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they really sort of paved the way, and it feels

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to me like everyone else playing catch up. Really at

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this point, how worried is Netflix? I don't think they're

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>too worried in the sense that they do have a

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a buffer. They have the rights for

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these shows that they've licensed from these companies.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are coming to an end. And there's

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of news recently about you know, a

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>T and T paying this vast amount of money to

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>get Friends back from Netflix, one of Netflix's most popular shows,

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>which is to me kind of amazing. Also, but you

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>know that's gonna cost you know, hundred million dollars or

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever they were getting from Netflix. You give up that

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>money so you can bring it over to HBO Max

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and hope that you know, Friends fans will come over

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to HBO Max as a new service. But it kind

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of like gets to what's also just so daunting about

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>this competition is you know, for years these media companies,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, as DVD sales were declining, they made up

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that money by licensing their show to Netflix and Amazon.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And it was kind of easy money. I mean it

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was you didn't really have to do much. You already

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>made the shows and they were getting good prices for them.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>And now it's that's part of the difficult decision. Okay,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give up that easy money. We're gonna bring

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>those shows back. And the big question is how many

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of those subscribers can you bring back and get them

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to test out these new services. One of the questions

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that I keep thinking about is how do you delineate

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>value between existing shows? The Friends, which, as you say,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like has a popularity that I think baffles at least me.

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm also baffled by the continuing popularity in my own

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>house with my teenagers of the office, I mean, which

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is another hundred million a year property which NBC is

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>going to bring back for their stream in straw. Yeah,

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is a successful show? I mean that

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is a huge question that we knew what a successful

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>show was in the old paradigm of broadcast and cable television,

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and now this is a new world. It's not based

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on advertising as much. Now it's based on this fierce

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>competition for subscribers um and that changes the dynamic of

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what you know in your strategy. I mean, it's interesting

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that one of the things that's happening now is you

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>see this kind of similar uh, you know, all these

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>services are trying to create tent pole events and blockbusters,

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar to what you had with Hollywood studios

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and the movie business. And I think a lot of

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, shows like Game of Thrones that

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>just creates so that are hugely expensive, but if they click,

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>if they work and bring in uh you know, vast

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>numbers of new subscribers and hopefully hold onto them for

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple seasons. And so yeah, that's part of the escalation

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of this competition. Also, I mean Amazon going out and

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>paying two d and fifty million dollars for the rights

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>um to do a Lord of the Rings TV series,

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's before you even start shooting, before you've even

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, hired a single actor, started script I mean,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cost a lot of money, and um, everybody,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's great for you know, the the TV writers and creators, um,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the peak TV phenomenon. But I guess

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're writing the checks, it can look a little

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more like a value. Jason brought up a good

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>point about trying to differentiate the value between existing shows

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and new shows. We've talked a lot about Netflix spending

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>four or five billion dollars wacky it, you know, sometimes

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>per quarter when we're taking a look at negative free

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, for example, are some of the new entrants

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>prepared to pay that price to really heavy, heavily invest

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in original programming. I don't think anyone's gonna be able

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to match Netflix's programming budget out of the gate. I mean, uh,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but they are going to spend a lot of money.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Will it be enough? I mean, what's crazy? As you

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about, Oh, you know Apple, they're only going to

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>spend a billion or two of them. That's not enough,

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean Disney, which has the most enormous

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>library of content in the world. The fact that they

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>before they launched a new Plus and you know that

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they went out and oh we gotta go by twenty

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>one century Fox. We need to really stock up on

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>some shows. I mean, it's crazy, UM. And I think

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it does get to the dynamic that's changed. I mean,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the old world, if your network, UM, you know,

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>had a little lull in programming, you're kind of insulated

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>from UM, you know by being part of a bundle

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>UM and people. It was hard to cancel, you know,

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in the subscribe. In the you know, streaming world, it's

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>so easy to just you know, I've seen everything I

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to see here, there's nothing else for me. I'm

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>just gonna cancel this. It takes a couple of clicks.

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>You don't have long term contracts UM, and so the

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>churn rates are much higher. And you also have this

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that people talk about now it's just the bingeing churn,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>which is, oh, I want to see that one show.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'll subscribe, go in there, spend a week

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>watching the show, and after a month, I'll cancel the service. UM.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the good thing for these in this competition, UM,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for the new services, is that consumer surveys show that

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>people are willing to go test out a new service

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>based off and on one show. So you can definitely

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pull people in, but the trick is, you know, how

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>are you going to keep them? And I think to

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>do that, yeah, you're gonna have to have vast amounts

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of um, you know, spend vast amounts on programming, both

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for original new shows and also to have you know,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a really deep bench of classics. One of the things

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think certainly knocked me back, and I think

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>even you in reporting this was the vast amount of

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>money that Netflix alone is spending on marketing. I mean,

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have some great examples in the story of

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the links that they are going to to get in

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>front of people. Talk to us about that. Yeah, I

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>mean two point four billion dollars in marketing in two

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen, which we were comparing that was more

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>than you know, it's basically what HBO was spending on

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all of their programming and two thousands seventeen just to

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>give you some comparisons. So, yeah, Netflix is spending a

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, um getting out there. Of course, they're

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, also pushing the boundaries in terms of you know,

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not just a US service. They're going all

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>over the world with that. So that's part of the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>cost um but they have this incredible brand name, and yeah,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they just all the different touchpoints. And there's gonna be

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>so many shows, so many news shows, so much competition

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that just trying to get people's attention is going to

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>cost huge amount of money, to the point where this

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is my favorite anecdote in the story, stickers in public

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>bathrooms that have lines of cocaine and build up dollar

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>bills to promote an arcas. Yeah, I mean that's you know,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's part of every show. You got to come up

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with some campaign. Uh, try and make some noise, because

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>things do kind of come and go um a captive audience.

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Taylor clearly talk to me about pricing strategy, you know,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because we really vary five nine for Hulu. HBO comes

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out fifteen dollars a month. Is it going to be

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a race to the bottom we're given the competitive force?

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Is we're all now just gonna pay five dollars a month? Yeah,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's incredible. There's gonna be a lot

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of pressure on HBO at that price. I mean, Disney

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus is coming in at you know, seven dollars a month,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which is I mean that's like if you have kids,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you're like that's babysitting costs alone. That's nothing. I'll just

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>get that. And and yeah, I think it's gonna put

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure. Um. Netflix just raise their prices

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, and what happened, you know, for the

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>first time, they lost net subscribers in the second quarter

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because of those price hikes, and they didn't even raise

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the price that much. Um. So I think what that

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>shows is, Yeah, it's gonna be a lot of pressure

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep prices down. And uh, you know, Disney says

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't expect to turn a profit on Disney Plus

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, twenty four. I mean, I think everybody is

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be losing money in the short term. And

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think your hope is that, you know, three or

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>four or five years from now, you survive, as you know,

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the top two or three services, and the

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>competition falls back a little bit and at that point

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can bring up prices. You mentioned earlier this

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>notion of peak TV, and I feel like we've been

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about that for a couple of years now. How

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>much longer will this peak last? And what is the

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>other side of the peak? Look like? The one way

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in which it's changing now is I think, uh, you're

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna see Netflix with this new increased pressure, be a

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more conscious cost conscious about you know, uh,

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, is a show working, is an audience growing?

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it bringing in new subscribers? And if it's not,

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to renew it. And I think that's

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing you're starting to hear out of Hollywood now,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is you know that they're being a little bit more

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>um judiciows about renewals and um that you know, that

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>might put a little bit of pressure on shows and

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna upset some fans and your favorite show gets canceled.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>That's Felix Gette Jason my key takeaway here. I cannot

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>wait to see the amount of capex and negative free

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. As these companies spend so much on original programming,

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of them are expected to post

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a profit through well. A major interview down in Mexico

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>City this week, the first international interview with the relatively

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>new President of Mexico. He has spent a lot of

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>time am Low as they call him, has talking to

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican people. Now he's talking to the world. John

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thwaite, our editor in chief, conducted the interview, he

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>joins me from Mexico City. So John, this was a

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>big get. As they say, what do you think lad

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>uh M low to talk to us at this moment.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think two things. One was a personal thing. He

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>came to see Bloomberg when he was in opposition and

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he was impressed we saw him. The second thing is

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>actually I think he does need to reach out to

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. You have the situation where he has approval ratings. Um,

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>he is an austere populist. He's not spending money, rather

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, which is very, very unusual for somebody from

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the left. But he's got the people behind him because

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they think that he's against corruption. He's lean, drives around

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and rather not tawdry but not exactly smart voxwagon. Um,

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the bit he's doing very well. The bit he's

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not doing so well is reaching out to the business community,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to investors, and they're there are bigger doubts

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about him. And why is that? I mean, is this

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>purely economically? You look at the data coming out of

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and it doesn't look great, to say the least,

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's slowed it's slowed down a bit and that's a mixture.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>That's some ways part of the good things he's doing.

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>He's just said, I do not want I want to

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>keep the primary surplus. I don't want to spend money.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's far too much money being spent corruptly,

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to crack down on it. And I

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think on the whole, the business and the investment community

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>quite like that. The stuff they worry about is, I

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>suppose the economic nationalism. He's pulled back and said he

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to do any more oil auctions, cancel those.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And he also kind of interfered a bit. And he

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>has this thing where every morning he does the Bress

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Confidence about some ninety minutes um where he just talks

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>about what's on his mind. But he has done things like,

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance, he scrapped an air an airport project. Most

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people think that Mexico City needs a big new airport.

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He scrapped this thirteen billion one, even though it's sort

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of some way halfway through, and that I think, you know,

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good thing with investors. Investors don't like

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>things where there's suddenly uncertainty. Well, it's hard to talk

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about him without talking about his neighbor in the north,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. There have been many comparisons made between the

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>two men their relationship. If they were on Facebook, I

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>think they'd call it complicated, right, John, So what did

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>he had to say? What did you take away from

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>his view of President Trump? Well, he has been rather

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>remarkable in that respect. Again, you know, from Mexico, man

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the left, not generally somebody who would temper his

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>words about Trump. And indeed, in the last time we

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>spoke to him back in two thousand and seventeen, or

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the last time he did a big formal interview with us,

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he complained that Trump was setting up an atmosphere of

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hatred towards Mexicans and Mexican Americans. Ever since he has

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>become president, he has been remarkably calm no matter what

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump says. He sometimes stands up to Trump, but on

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole he's resolutely polite back and even in our

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>interview he talks about Trump becoming more moderate, which to

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>some extent, I'm rather surprised that Fox News and Trump

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>have not seized on as proof that he has many

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>friends across the border. But he sits there and he

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>takes it. He does fight back on some things an

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>animos not probably will not agree to do this thing

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>called safe third country status, which is what Gratemalad will

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have been forced into, which is where you are. You say, look,

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I will look after anyone looking for asylum has to

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>get asylum with me first, Rob and come to America

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and Mexico. I think he's likely to say no to that.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, he notably did not attend the G twenty

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>summit John and has not been as engaged maybe with

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the broader cadra of world leaders. What do you make

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a that and what does that say about his statue?

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>He's very clear. He's very clear he wants to focus

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>purely on Mexico. He doesn't want to travel. And we asked,

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can talk to him about whether he

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>would come and meet Trump, and I think the answers

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he'd rather Trump came to meet him. He's not being impolite,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.439
<v Speaker 1>but he's basically told the Mexican people that he'd spend

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the first year here focusing on what he thinks he

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to do for the country. And I think also

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that's his style. You could see from the interview he

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>talks very slowly, very deliberately. On the campaign, trail. He

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>does these rallies every weekend, again a little bit like Trump,

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>but with a very different style. He goes to all

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>corners of Mexico and he tells them, look, he's fighting

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>for them and he's doing things for them. And it's

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a very big change from pennonetto who is his predecessor.

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So put him in the pantheon, as it were, of

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the world leaders that you've talked to just over the

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years. I'm thinking of Putin or to Wan, May, Trump,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>etcetera merkele. Where does he fit in? How does he

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>compare to his peers around the world. He has one

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.959
<v Speaker 1>similarity with o Down is that he believes a little

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>bit and what might be described as an unorthodox economics um.

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has a sort of theory that if

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he cut spending, everything will be fine, and that there

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>are some bits where and he often lashes out at

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>what he calls sort of neoliberal So he doesn't now

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>now that the g d p as number is not

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>advancing as he hoped, you know, he makes comments like that.

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But it is a very very different style to a

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>do and it's a much more gentle one. I think

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the really remarkable thing about him is this sort of

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>man of the left who doesn't want to spend money thing.

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You know that that is a really unusual thing. Imagine

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you would spend all your life, um, Jason Kelly, waiting

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to become Prime Minister of Ireland or deep President of America,

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and throughout that entire time you had sat on the

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 1>left wing talking about spending on this, doing this, doing that,

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you come into power and then actually do

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. You clamp down on spending because you partly

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>because you think there is too much corruption, but also

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>because you just want to be absolutely clear that max

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Go is not going to be badly run. And that's

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>his That's a novel way of looking at it, and

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very different thing. And whether he

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 1>can keep on pulling that off, we'll see. That's Winberg

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>editor in Chief John Michael Thwaite and Taylor. I was

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>really eager to catch up with him post interview, just

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to see where he puts Amlo in the pantheon of

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>world leaders that he talks to all the time while

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>in talking about his relationship with the US, and then

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>define some of those fiscal hawks. So if you're looking

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for a revolution in housing. Look no further apparently than

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis didn't necessarily see that one coming. Noah bu Hire

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>joins me from Seattle, where he has taken a look

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>at what's happening there in the Midwest. So an unlikely place, Noah,

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. But what's going on in that

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>sitting Yeah. Um, So what happened is last year Minneapolis.

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Every ten years, all the cities in the Twin Cities

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>regions are quired to go through this long range planning exercise.

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, often this this is a pretty boring exercise.

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of people pay attention to it. But

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>what happened last year when Minneapolis went through this is

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that they decided to really take a hard look at

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>housing access and quality around housing. And as they were

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>drafting this planet's over a thousand pages, it's got all

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff in it, Um, they came up with

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting idea, which is basically that this whole

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>concept of single family zoning, putting one house on each

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>residential lot, really didn't fit what the city wanted to

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>do and what the city needed in terms of how

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it should grow. So um, the proposal in this really long,

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>dense document. Uh basically was to allow by right developers

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.919
<v Speaker 1>to put up to a triplex on all of those

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>single family lots. And you know, this sounds like a

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of technical thing, but it's actually a really big

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 1>deal in America because it's not just Minneapolis. All across

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the country we've developed or in the latter half of

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century, these zoning laws were a big reason

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>why we developed really uh, low density cities. So what

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the leaders there in Minneapolis were trying to solve for

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was was a housing affordability crisis and the fact that

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people wanted um to move into their town.

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And they were also looking at some historic racial inequity

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in housing. Uh. You have, for instance, in Minneapolis, about

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>six of whites are homeowners, but just around of blacks are.

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>That's actually one of the biggest gaps in the nation.

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is a city in the north.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>This is not exactly where people think that kind of

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>disparity would exist. Yeah, and you point out on that

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>exact point. I mean, you put out something really interesting

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>in your story. You quote the mayor of Minneapolis, that's

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Fry. You quote him quote you had these intentionally

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>lea segregationists and racist policies that effectively barred blacks from

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 1>living in certain parts of town. But then once that

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>became illegal, the city quotes started doing it in other

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ways through the zoning code. And what you end up

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with is a very, to say the least, sort of

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>bifurcated city, both in terms of the geography of it

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and as you say, homeownership really being a sharp divide racially. Yeah, yeah,

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that's exactly what the city leaders were

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>pushing back on. And so when I went there earlier

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, I really went with two questions. One was,

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>how did they get this to happen? Uh? This, these

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are the This is a kind of policy that just

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>has been particularly fraught for local governments to take on

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in America because you have a lot of pushback from

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>folks who own those single family homes Historically, Uh, we

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot about nimbism. Not in my backyard. Um.

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But the other question I was really interested in was

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>will it work? I mean, when you actually pass this

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and put something like this into effect, is it going

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to achieve the equity and affordability goals that the city

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>has set out? And so what did you find. Well,

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated, right, So on the first question, Uh, you know,

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it was quite a fight. I mean, they're I think

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the keys to this thing passing is that

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you had a change election in seventeen and you had

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a motivated city council UH led by UM, a politician

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>named Lisa Bender who has a background in city planning,

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and set this as a as a long term goal

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and really worked diligently toward getting the political support for it.

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 1>You also had a grassroots effort to back this plan

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that really spun a very positive message. Their slogan was

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>neighbors for More neighbors UH. That really resonated with a

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in Minneapolis. So they built this broad

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>coalition of people who were for the plan UM, which

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:00.959
<v Speaker 1>was pretty effective encountering UM, the NIM the sentiment, which

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>for sure was there. I mean, this was an incredibly

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 1>divisive political fight in Minneapolis last year, and the local

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>council passed it in December. It's still awaiting sign off

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>from a regional council, but that's expected in September. Well,

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and I like one of the things, one of the

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>things you point out, no, which I really loved in

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>your story. Is this idea that this slogan, you know,

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 1>neighbors for more neighbors sort of turns on its head

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>what we normally see as you know, neighbors for fill

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the blank, which is usually neighbors against anything changing

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>around them, Right, Yeah, Yeah, I mean they they certainly

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>had a sense of humor, and we're good at using

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>social media to sort of put this idea out there,

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and they really brought a lot of the city along

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>with them. And so will it work because this is

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>an experiment that is going to be looked at very

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>closely by big cities around the United States. You know,

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Bender herself has gotten a lot of praise from well

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>beyond Minneapolis for being very aggressive. This has become an

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>issue in the election on the Democratic side already. But

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the question is what's going to happen? Yeah, I mean

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's complicated and we're just gonna

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>have to see how it plays out. One thing that

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I think is important to know is when I when

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I talked, I spent some time with a builder who

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>has actually done a few triplexes around um Or. He

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>just completed a triplex. He got a variance to do

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>one um in in Minneapolis, and he basically told me,

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, these projects are really idiosyncratic. It's it's gonna

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 1>be hard to make it a giant business opportunities. So

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to think how that one change is

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>going to add a ton of new density to the

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>city or a ton of new housing. UM. The plan,

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the urban plan that the city put forward also allows

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for more density for basically mid size and larger apartment

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>buildings in other parts of town. And that's actually where

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it gets really interesting because the city wants to usher

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in this development boom, but they also want to make

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that some of those new units are affordable to

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, working class people, to low income people, and

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they're working through the policy for how to make that work. Uh.

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, the policy that they floated has

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>really put a lot of the real estate industry locally. They're, uh,

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, up in arms. They're quite up in arms

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>about it because they think they're basically being forced to

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>pay for the city's affordable housing goals, and they think

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a non starter for a lot of their projects.

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to have to see how this plays

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 1>out over time. UM. But like you said, this is

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a very very important case study in America right now

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for how we're gonna uh tackle our housing affordability problem,

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>which is which is not just you know, something that's

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>happening on the coasts is happening in the heartland. That's

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>noah boo higher and Jason, this is a zoning story.

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a home price appreciation story. Interestingly enough that

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the residents maybe not three old with

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the new law that's going into place. Well, and I

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have to think, you know, coming from California being in

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, now, Taylor, you understand better than anyone. This

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>has really complicated this whole affordable housing issue. And it's

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 1>time for another edition of Business Week Talks. This week,

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>my co host Carol Master and I sat down with

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of nasdac so NASA got with earnings and

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us to talk about that and really the bigger

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>picture of the market environment, the trading environment. Is Adina Freedman.

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>She's the CEO of NaSTA, So nice to have you

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>here with us. It's great to be here. Thank you.

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the quarter um a little bit of

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a it feels like well street, we to get a

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a mixed picture. You did have an

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>earnings be a little bit light on the revenues. How

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do you see the quarter? Well, from our perspective, we

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>really focus on organic growth, and in our non trading

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>businesses we grew eight percent every year, so we're really

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pleased with continued progress of our technology business or index

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and data businesses, as well as the really healthy environment

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing for I p o S in our corporate

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>services business. The trading business has some fluctuation in it

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just overall volumes and in impact that

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>we're having in certain parts of our market, but at

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we're very pleased with the market share

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're experiencing in the S equities and options markets as

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>well as our Nordic equities markets. So from a competitive perspective,

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we feel very good about our core marketplaces and at

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the same time we managed through different environments that that

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>operate there. But in our non trading businesses, that's where

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we're really driving for growth and we're experiencing that. We're

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very pleased with that, and so talk to us about

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the market technology business, especially because that's something people are

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>keeping a very close eye on one of the drivers

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>underneath their sure Well, we actually just came out with

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a new metric called a r R that we launched

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this quarter that really shows you the recurring revenue streams

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and looking at kind of how we look at our

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>our growth of our recurring revenue in that business market technology. Today,

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we provide the technology that powers a hundred and thirty

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.280
<v Speaker 1>other markets around the world, and we also provide market

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>monitoring technology for a hundred and fifty broker dealer firms.

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's becoming a very scaled business for us. We're

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>investing heavily in growth in that business, so in terms

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of generating a creating a new next gen system technology

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>system to support our clients, moving more towards the platform

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>as a service model, and expanding our market technology implementations

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:13.800
<v Speaker 1>beyond just the traditional capital markets into other industry verticals

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like insurance, um in some cases betting and other things

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've been getting involved and you guys have some

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>news about betting and also getting involved with footballers or

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>footballers right in terms of where clients can actually what

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 1>makes some bets on them. So we are we are

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>providing the technology to a company called the Football Index

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a UK based firm, so Football and that Carlans

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>means soccer and UM and basically that it allows people

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to bet on certain players and and understand it's almost

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like fantasy football in a betting context. And they've created

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a marketplace that allows people to essentially buy interest in

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a player and then watch that player, UM that player's

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>performance and understand kind of what the returns are from that.

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>More deals like that coming. Different sports are different industries

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in a similar way. Well, we already are in the

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>horse racing business. We have three racing authorities that use

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>our paramutual betting platform and we do see that as

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>an as an industry vertical that is obviously very relevant

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to real time price discovery and and high high transaction

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>processing capacity, as well as the potential for more advanced

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>surveillance technology. We actually have a module well and are

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a technology that we provide to the industry

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with regulators, exchanges and market participants that help the monitor

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for manipulation other nefarious behavior in the markets. Well, you

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>can use that same technology and a betting context as well.

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And we do have a module that we created specifically

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for sports betting that would allow you to monitor the

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>behaviors of the different people who are betting in your platform.

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've got to ask you because when you

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>hear about these sports things, I think, you know, you

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go back, what a decade or a couple of decades,

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have thought the nastac or and exchanges would

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be getting into this, but it's a different environment. Does

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that become much more of your business, those kind of

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>new um platforms, if you will, versus kind of the

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>core marketing and net core marketing, but core trading so well.

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Today the trading business are trading revenue is is about

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>overallent depending on the quarter of our overall revenue are

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue streams are that can come from data and analytics,

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It can come from our corporate services, and it also

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>comes from market technology. Our technology business think of us

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is almost like Switzerland. We can provide that technology to

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>other exchanges, We could provide some of that technology to

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>some of our competitors. We provide that technology to markets

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in very different spaces, not just in the traditional capital markets.

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And it is the fastest growing part of our business.

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Does it become the biggest part of your business of ultimately, well,

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I would love to think that as an opportunity for

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 1>us over a very long term. But we obviously have

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:45.839
<v Speaker 1>other great parts of our business as well, So when

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you think about what's out there in terms of potential acquisitions,

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a huge amount of consolidation and a lot

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of mergers and acquisitions across the exchange business broadly defined.

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:58.479
<v Speaker 1>More to be done in the short term in terms

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of buying buying up things, well, I think we number

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>one are Our primary focus is on organic growth and

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 1>we do feel very good about how we're delivering on that,

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.359
<v Speaker 1>but we do find opportunities to make some acquisitions. We

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>recently bought a company called snob that helps expand UH

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and catalyze more business into the market technology space UM.

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We also bought Investment, which is in our data and

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>analytics business supporting our investment management firms. And we bought Quandole,

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a very small platform but it's in an

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting space around alternative data. So we do find ways

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to leverage technology or leverage acquisitions to help execute our strategy.

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But we have a very defined strategy, so we want

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that our primary focus is how we

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>grow our relations with our clients in an organic way

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:47.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially catalyze with some acquisitions. That's as x CEO Adina Freeman.

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And for our full conversation, download the Bloomberg Talks podcast

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. So we heard earlier in

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the show from Jordan Holman on what's happening at Victoria's

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Secret of fascinating look at where that company may need

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to go next, And what was clear about that story

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a reckoning of sorts happening. Well, if

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the pursuit section toward the back

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine, Jordan has another piece she works very

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>hard here at Bloomberg and it's this week's critic, And

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the headline alone really grabbed my attention. Who gets to

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 1>be an American? Jordan's back with me here in New York.

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about this story, because I have to say,

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it really stopped me in my tracks because you take

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this very important notion of American and Americanism and the

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>use of the word American in art and sort of

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>unpack it a bit. Take me here for sure. So

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, I think one of the main conversations that's

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 1>happening is who is an American? What makes you an

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 1>authentic American. And as I've been mulling this question, I've

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>been reading a lot. So there's a few handful of books.

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>You have An American Summer, in American Merrits, you have

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>An American Son, which is a play, and all of

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>them actually deal with the black experience, which is kind

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of a shocking thing because that's not what comes to

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>mind when a lot of people are talking about who's

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>real America. And so I wanted to explore in this

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 1>piece that this is a great subversion that's happening with

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.879
<v Speaker 1>this artwork, saying I'm going to show you a very

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 1>specific story about an African American, and that's going to

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be authentic America. You quote the author of An American Marriage.

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I believe that saying that when she told she told

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>her editor quote An American Marriage sounded like a novel

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about some white people in Connecticut experiencing feelings. I thought

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that just captured it so perfectly, because that is not

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 1>at all what this book is about, not at all.

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>So An American Marriage is the New York Times best

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>selling book, and it is about a couple in Atlanta,

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So a black couple in Atlanta. The husband is wrongfully convicted,

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>goes to prison, and now you're looking at what is

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>life like when you have um an incarcerated partner. And

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:01.479
<v Speaker 1>so I loved that quote that she said as well,

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because even as African Americans, we've been so in and

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>day to say like this is you know, America is

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>wide America. And so even pushing that joke and making

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it reality, that's amazing, and that and oprahset that is

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>why I picked up that book. And so it's part

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of that process of your giving the reader a challenge.

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Even before they open that book and delve into that story,

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you're making them think differently about like who who stories

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 1>do we care about? And what does that represent in

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:29.879
<v Speaker 1>this country? Well, and as you point out, when we

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>think about that word used in novels and movies, you

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.839
<v Speaker 1>think about American beauty, you know, the sort of onwi

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of white suburbia. You think about American Pastoral Philip Roth's

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:45.359
<v Speaker 1>novel that was turned into a movie, and those are

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously very different experience, very suburban white experiences. And yet

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this is happening in a different way here in twenty nineteen.

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:57.879
<v Speaker 1>You talk about an American summer, which is again a

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:03.280
<v Speaker 1>very different picture of Chicago. Right, Yes, so I'm from Chicago.

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I love this book, And this book is about three

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>months in the summer. What is the effect of gun

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>violence in the city on the people who live in

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these neighborhoods. So we're looking at a mother who's lost

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a child from gun violence, or a friend who watched his,

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:18.240
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, sixty year old friend die from gun violence,

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and what is the effects of living in that and

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not feeling like you're getting resources um to survive that.

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.319
<v Speaker 1>So the title of it is an American summer, and

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone loves summer conjures these images of going to the

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:33.760
<v Speaker 1>beach and having fun and being on vacation. But this author,

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Alex Catlowitz, he's making the argument that this too is

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>an American summer for millions of people living in this country,

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and how about we give more attention to that, right well,

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And you also point out towards the end of this piece,

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:51.440
<v Speaker 1>which I highly recommend, this notion that what these books

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically are doing in the play you mentioned as well,

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is move a lot of this experience from a section

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe in a different part the bookstore, the African American section,

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:06.280
<v Speaker 1>much more into the front area in a lot of ways,

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, among all the other novels that people may

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be picking up, and you talk about, you know the

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>power of seeing people read this on a train or

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on a beach or on a plane, and that really

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>hopefully moves the conversation in a different direction totally. I

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 1>think one of the biggest frustrations that African American writers

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of playwrights have is that they get typecast is like,

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you can be in this section and your audience is

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this Black Americans and enjoy that. But what I've really

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed about seeing these books is that I see white people,

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Asian people, all of different people reading it. And by

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>reading it, you're slowly starting to unravel the assumptions we

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:44.719
<v Speaker 1>have about who belongs here, whose stories matter, and like

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what this country represents. And I think that's really the power.

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And so an American Son, the play with Carrie washington

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Um going through a night in a police station trying

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to hear word of her missing black son, that's going

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to Netflix now, So that's going to get

0:55:59.200 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 1>even wider audience to start thinking about who's an American. Well,

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and you point out, I'm glad you brought that up,

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because you point out there too, that the algorithms ultimately

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.239
<v Speaker 1>will say to you, Okay, you liked Scandal, You're gonna

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like this, and so you don't. That discover ability becomes

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that much more important. Jordanholm in really really great piece

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Pursuit section. She is this week's critic. Thank

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Thank you so one of the coolest

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 1>cats we know. Hannah Elliott back with me in New

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>York City. This headline really grabbed me. The twenty million

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar Porsche that may not be a Porsche, Say what right, Well,

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it depends on who you ask. Now, this is the

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Type sixty four, a car from ninety nine made by

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Ferdinand Porsche himself. Now, so the Visa is selling it

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.440
<v Speaker 1>next month at They're Big Pebble Beach Auction, and so

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Visa is calling it the Porsche Type sixty four

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because it was indeed made by Ferdinand Porsche. However, Porsche

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Company wasn't started until ten years after this car was made.

0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>This car was also made mostly VW parts or parts

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that Mr Porsche built himself, and um it's been augmented

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with parts from Fiat and a bunch of other obscure

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 1>German parts makers. So is it a Porsche or isn't

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it. It It really depends on who you ask, And that's

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the controversy, right. And the heritage of this car,

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, is complicated. Even beyond the timing

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Nazi Party in Germany. Porsche himself

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>was ultimately served time in jail for war crimes. He

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was associated more than associated with the Nazis. But even

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the car, as you mentioned, is sort of coupled together

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with all these different parts, not in a way that

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we're used to seeing in these types of cars. Right,

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that's again part of the controversy. Um. This car was

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 1>owned for over four years by the same man Otto

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Matthew who had it until he died. In Otto race

0:57:59.880 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the car and it got crashed, as it happens in racing.

0:58:03.840 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The car has been painted a bunch of colors, turquoise, silver, black, UM.

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.720
<v Speaker 1>The engine has been switched out multiple times, the breaks,

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the transmission, it's been a lot of things. Um. Some

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the original parts are still with the car, however

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not in the car. So again, this is it's

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really getting to the nut of what is original.

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 1>This car has never been restored though so a lot

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of people say, look, this is the car in pristine

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>condition because it has never been restored. This is truly

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 1>how it is. What you see is what you get.

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But other people say, well, it hardly has any of

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the original parts that were put in by Mr Porsche himself.

0:58:41.760 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>In again, it's really controversial, and so as you say,

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>different people feel very strongly about this, and in the

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:55.840
<v Speaker 1>middle of it essentially saying nothing is the modern Porsche

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>company itself is Porsche. And that's another very interesting aspect.

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The Porsche Museum UM during the nineteen fifties and sixties

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to buy this car many times. There are over

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 1>forty letters between Otto Matthew, the owner, and the Porsche

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:10.800
<v Speaker 1>family trying to buy this car back as part of

0:59:10.800 --> 0:59:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the Porsche heritage. The Porsche Museum is a great space

0:59:14.360 --> 0:59:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and Stutgard, Germany has many members of the Porsche family there.

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You would think they would want this if they recognize

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it as part of their lineage. The DNA of the company,

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, you can see this car looks very much

0:59:25.080 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like the three Porsche. The museum has not responded to

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a request for comment, has not released any official comments

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on this car. They are very very quiet about it. Yeah,

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting too. As you point out, Porsche himself, Mr

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Porsche himself referred to this car the type sixty four

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>as in English the ancestor. So that seems to tell

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you at least something about this certainly, and there's no

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 1>denying that if you look at this car you can

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>see the influences into the three six and even the

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, the cars that came after it. It's certainly

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>UH is in part the ether of what became Porsche.

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So exactly. Well, it's a wonderful story. So moving on,

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>just more evidence that you are such a cool chick.

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>If I may say that you write in this week's

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the one I believe about a really cool guitar, Cindy

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Guitarist tell us about this. It's a beautiful that talk

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>about a beautiful piece of machinery. Wow, I love it.

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's so rare to find instruments that are being handmade. Still,

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>these are built by UH Cindy of Cindy Guitars um

1:00:32.160 --> 1:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in the shop Carmine Street Guitars in New York City.

1:00:34.680 --> 1:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And the cool thing about these cars are guitars are handmade,

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>but they're using wood reclaimed from historic buildings around New York,

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>buildings from the Bowery Old churches, um old saloons, and

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they're made, you know, over months of time by hand

1:00:50.360 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to be really customized, and so so much of what

1:00:53.640 --> 1:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they do when their customized is they try and capture

1:00:56.680 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the personality of the player, right, tell us how you

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>do that? Well, there's a lot of talking going on,

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of back and forth consultations. You know, what

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is special to that artist. Maybe it would be a

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>little eye on the back of the back of the

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>guitar that is like any you know to ward off

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>bad spirits or pinstriping flames, you name it, right, Keith

1:01:16.600 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Richards he plays one of these, Yes he does. All right,

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So what's this going to run you? The one we

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>feature in this section is about four thousand dollars. Wow.

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're looking for this type of guitar,

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what else might you go? Because you guys always talk

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>about the competition. Sure, there's Tom Anderson guitars and he's

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>really the icon of the era. He's in California, he's

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>been doing it since the seventies. Yeah, alright, so people

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>should go out and buy this one, think, Yeah, I like,

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I like, it's Cindy's in her twenties. Still,

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very rare to find a young woman. She's apprentice

1:01:51.760 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>apprentice there for many years and she's really a rising star. Wow,

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a really really cool looking guitar, cars, guitars. You're

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>good for everything, Anna Elliott, thanks so much, thank you,

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up Bloomberg Business Week's weekend of podcast.

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us. I'm Taylor Riggs in for Carol Masser,

1:02:08.440 --> 1:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Jason Kelly. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Radio Live Monday through Friday starting at two

1:02:13.080 --> 1:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>pm wall ST Time. Can catch the show live, get

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the daily podcast for the ride home wherever you download

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>your podcast, and you get this week's edition of the

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>magazine on newsstands now. This is Bloomberg