WEBVTT - FBI Raids Trump’s Florida Home (Radio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Stunning development in the ongoing legal battles evolving former President

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, a search warrant executed at the home of

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the former president. With some perspective this morning, Wendy Shoulder,

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>director of the Tavern Center for American Politics and Policy

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>at Brown University, If I'm not mistaken, first time zever

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>happened to a former president where a search warrant was

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>executed at the home of a former president. Wendy, your

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>initial reaction, well, I mean, there's so many things to

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think about here. I think that clearly things are ramping

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>up to figure out whether a case can be made

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>against Donald Trump, either for this, which is most of them,

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I say, an infraction, but it's actually a criminal offense

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to remove classified documents from the government and particularly president.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Everything has to go to the archives or be clear

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>through the archives. But also the January six Committee continues

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>its work on what his behavior was on January six

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and whether he actively participated in essentially insurrection. So there's

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a two two fronts here. Plus he's got a criminal

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>investigation uh in New York State, so there's a lot

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>going on politically. This helps the Republicans mobilized voters for

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>mid term two particularly, they're very very strong Trump supporting base.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot of people running for office across

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the country that he supported that won their primaries and

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>not you know, governor of pet Venue who's actually testifying

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>before January six here in today, Mastriano. So this can

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have a big effect as the FBI we know in

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years has had on elections. Uh,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>mid term, short term, good for the Republicans, um long

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>term for Trump for twenty four you gotta say it

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>leans towards the bad for Trump and good for people

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like Rnda Santis or Christy Nome or Kim Reynolds, any

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the other people who might be thinking about running.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So why has this been Why can this be used

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>as political opportunity for Republicans? Can you dive a little

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>deeper into that? I mean, it's a it's a potential

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>double edged store, but you gotta lean towards the positive

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>here in terms of mobilizing voters for the mid term.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans tend to get out mid terms up until twenty eighteen,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more more consistently than Democrats. Their bases riled up. They've

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>got an opposite party president, I mean, all all things

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>count towards Republicans getting out the door who want change

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in the government. Now the Trump supporters who may or

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>may not have gotten out, for all the Republicans across

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the country, they'll get out because already Kevin McCarthy is

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>promising if the Speaker to investigate the Justice Department. So

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the stakes really just went up, I think for the

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>stability of government. And it's really extraordinary to think about,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as you say, the impact of a former president on

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the subsequent midterm elections of a new president. This we

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't really seen. I mean, Clinton had reverb because of

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Monica Lewinsky going into two thousands, but then there were

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>September eleven, that tragedy and the wars, so things, you know,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the subject changed. But now you know this is still

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be about Donald Trump two years later, about

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, and that's extraordinary. What will be behind his

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>decision whether or not to run for president for? Will

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they be legal reasons or political reasons? Well, there's also

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>financial reasons. He's raising a lot of money, which pays

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for some portion of his expenses because as long as

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he's campaigning and out there involved in politics. You know, um,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the FBC has to decide about this, but he can

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>use a lot of that money to support what he's doing. Uh,

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know that that helps him, uh and it

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>keeps him out of jail if he actually wins. The

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>question is will this become Trump fatigues for key Republican

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>suburban voters across the country. If the Republicans will like

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>too much on Trump going into mid term twenty two,

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've got also the question of abortion, gun violence,

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>all the other things, inflation, guest prices, will voters decide

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they want government to focus on those things quality of

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>life matters, not Donald Trump. And if enough suburban voters

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do that, that could basically keep the Senate from going

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>totally Republican or keep it sort of in that tide

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>state that it's so. I think the House, I think

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this will help Hopings quite a bit, But for the Senate,

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear. Voters really want to hear about Donald Trump

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for the next couple of months, either way negatively or positively.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Could he he could be legally disqualified from running for

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>president as well. Well. I don't think anything will stop

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>him from running. Honestly, even if they say you can't win,

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>He'll say, well, elect me will change the law. Elect

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans will change the law. Give him the Congress and

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>they'll change the law. I mean, that could be the

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>next step for Trump to ramp up his sort of

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>hold on the Republican Party. You can't just say you're

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna investigate Mark Carwin. You have to actually promise to

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>change the law, and that Biden won't sign that, but

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he can make members of Conference go on the record

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>saying we're going to change the law, so former presidents

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can do whatever they want. That's the kind of thing

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that will start to scare key suburban constituencies, particularly independents

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and some Republicans about the prospect of a Republican control

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of the House. And send it together so you know

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got a Democratic president. Then hold the line. But

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>come twenty four, I don't think this overall benefits the

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party. We saw what happen in Trump lost eighteen.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people defected from Trump. So this is

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a very risky proposition for the Republicans, but I think

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>more so for twenty four than two. Wendy always a

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.119
<v Speaker 1>pleasure appreciated Professor Wendy Shilder, director of the Talmun Center

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for American politics and policy at Brown University,