WEBVTT - SpaceX Said to Pursue 2026 IPO

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and Edva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up a Bloomberg exclusive SpaceX

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>targeting and IPO next year. The goal to raise far

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>beyond thirty billion dollars.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 3>The most in history.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>The valuation around one point five trillion. Why data centers

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>in space plus open then closed meta making a pivot

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>on open source models. We had the Bloomberg deep dive

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and reports that deep Seak smuggled thousands of banned Blackwell

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>chips into China. Nvidio pushes back, let's get to our

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>top story in the private markets and soon to be

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>public markets. Bloomberg reporting the SpaceX is very much underway

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>targeting in IPO in mid twenty twenty six. They want

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>to raise far north of thirty billion dollars. In terms

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>of dollar raised, that would be the biggest IPO in history.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 2>The valuation we're hearing one point five trillion. There's a

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 2>lot in play here, but my understanding this is very real.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>It had an impact in public market. Some of the

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>names out there in the space sector, particularly EchoStar that

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 2>is in talks on licensing spectrum deals with SpaceX really

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>moving over the course of two sessions in reaction to this.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I use that as an illustrative example. This is the

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>IPO that all corners of the technology market and the

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>private market have been waiting for. Let's bring in Bloomberg

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Space editor Eric Johnson. Eric broke this story with me

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>yesterday afternoon, and we'll go back to the basics of

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>what we're reporting, Eric, because there's a lot of data

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>in there, but the main headline, I suppose, beyond the valuation,

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is SpaceX wants to raise north for thirty billion dollars.

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>You and I are getting a sense on why they

0:01:58.880 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>need that capital.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 4>That'd great to be here, and congratulations on your scoop

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 4>and great reporting.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes they are.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 4>What we're hearing is thirty billion dollar rays, which you know,

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 4>if you look at the history of SpaceX, you know

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Musk is known for his grandiose visions. They're building Starship,

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 4>a colossal rocket which he expects to put humans on

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 4>the Moon and eventually one day go to Mars, so

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 4>the money could.

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Be used for that.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>He also has talked about, as you mentioned, the idea

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 4>of putting data centers in space, harnessing solar power and

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 4>having you know, huge amount of computing resources in space.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 4>They would need to buy chips to do so, so

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 4>the money could be used for that, you know. Of course,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 4>the other side of SpaceX is starlink, you know, the

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 4>satellite internet business, which has grown substantially over the past

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 4>few years. So there's a huge portfolio that SpaceX is

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 4>bringing as they transform space travel.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 7>Eric.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>We're showing the other parts of what we reported, which

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>is through our reporting confirmation of this tender or secondary

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that's going on. In other words, SpaceX allowing employees to

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>sell shares. But to do that you need to set

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 2>a price and that gives evaluation. We've now done that reporting,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 2>run us through the numbers that we need to know

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>about this tender, and for me, the important bit here

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.559
<v Speaker 2>is that this kind of settles valuation ahead.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Of that IPO.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, this level sets the market valuation as they as

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 4>they as a precursor to the IPO. But essentially SpaceX

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 4>runs you know, bi annual tender offers secondary offerings where

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>they allow existing you know, shareholders, employees and others insiders

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 4>to essentially generate liquidity from their from their piece of SpaceX,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 4>and so as part of that they set a valuation

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 4>of eight hundred billion dollars, which is a record, beating

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 4>open AI's latest tally from October a five hundred billion,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 4>so making it once again the most valuable space startup

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 4>in the world. So this is walking up to that IPO,

0:03:58.320 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 4>and of course, as you mentioned, the IPO would be

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 4>one point five trillion roughly valuation in.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>The private markets.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>The share price right now is about four hundred and

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty four hundred and twenty one dollars a share. There

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>is so much that left to discuss. I think that

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people will say, how expected was this.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>We've done reporting over a number of years actually on

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the Space team that originally the focus was on spinning

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 2>off starlink right because you and I also reported some

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>of the financials for SpaceX in this current year and

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>next year. Starlink right now is really the cash cow

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>for this company.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>They bring in the majority of revenue they're expected to

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 4>do so last year. As I said, they've now they've

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>got thousands of satellites and lower Earth orbit.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a booming business. Millions of customers.

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 4>I've flown on many flights around the country that the

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 4>airlines are starting to use starlink. You're starting to you know,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>the customer reviews are favorable. So I think investors are

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 4>seeing that growth. You know, people as they've watched this company,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 4>they're seeing Musk make these promises and then and then

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 4>is you know, iteratively incrementally delivering on them. So there's

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 4>a lot to be seen as far as you know,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 4>can he continue the growth of starlink and also direct

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to sell That's another, you know, nascent business area that

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Musk has promised to link regular consumer cell phones with

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 4>this network of satellites and low Earth orbit. There's just

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of growth, a lot of promises, but a

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of challenges. Right the company has to meet these expectations,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 4>live up to them to earn that valuation and to

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 4>excite people.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Eric Johnson, who leads the team on space coverage,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much. I point out SpaceX hasn't commented

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>on this as it stands. Elon Musk has not posted

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>on X about it. That's just the Bloomberg reporting. Let's

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 2>bring it.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Phil Haslitt for more.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 2>He's the chief strategy off sobe at Equisizen, one of

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the largest platforms for pre i PO shares. There's a

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>lot that you and I have to cover on a

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>potential SpaceX IPO, which we've reported is for the entirety

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>of the business, right, not just starlink, but actually important

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to start with, you would note that SpaceX is the

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 2>private company that uses of your platform are most interested in.

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 2>In quantifying that for us, just transparently explain what equity

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 2>zen relationship to SpaceX's private market shares is.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Sure, thanks for having me ed. Yeah, you hit the

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 5>nail on the head.

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 8>SpaceX is the most popularly requested private company on equity Zen.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 8>It's been that way for probably our entire existence as

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 8>a business over the last thirteen years. And that really

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 8>just means that there is retail exuberance about investing in SpaceX.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, the company is twenty three years old, it's

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 8>older than a lot of my employees. It has garnered interests,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 8>it's had success, it's out in the public. People have

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 8>done incredibly well with Tesla as public market investors, and

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 8>so there's a lot of enthusiasm to invest in the

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 8>company while it's private. And what seems to be now

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 8>an opportunity to invest in it. Well, it's public and

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 8>maybe even less than a year, which is pretty surprising.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>There is, of course a lot that we don't know

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>what percentage of the company is SpaceX going to offer,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>what is the structure of the IPO going to be.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>But in reporting this story, Phil, one of the things

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I reflect on is that existing SpaceX shareholders.

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Aren't that diverse.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>You have founders fund fidelity Google through Google Ventures and

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>through Corp dev one three seven Ventures, and then like

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>others in the world of venture capital and strategics. But

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>my point is that quite a lot of the company

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>is owned by quite a small group. And then there's

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the Elon Musk factor as well. How does that translate

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>in an IPO environment for anyone that wanted to get

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>into the company.

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, there's a couple of other things to think about,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 8>which is that a twenty three year old company has

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 8>had a lot of employees come, stay, leave, right, and

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 8>so you have a wide slot of shareholders, kind of

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 8>like a long tale of ownership. And so sure there's

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 8>some concentration in some of their biggest investors and in

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 8>the founder shares, but this thing is pretty widely held.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 8>I'd go so far as to say that an IPO

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 8>might also be a solve for the fact that the

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 8>company is a private entity and can only have two

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 8>thousand shareholders that is a requirement before they have to

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 8>start filing financials. That may actually be a bit of

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 8>a driver here as well. But as far as what

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 8>the IPO is going to look like, this is uncharted

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 8>waters right, Saudi Ramco, Ali Baba, those would actually be

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 8>smaller than these IPOs, right, And we don't know or

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 8>than this IPO, and we don't know if it's going

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 8>to be primarily secondary liquidity to existing, if it's going

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 8>to be new capital. Though I would posit it's probably

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 8>going to be new capital based on a lot of

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 8>your reporting as well, because there's going to need to

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 8>be investment from SpaceX into new computing and processing power.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 2>So to a big portion of the Bloomberg Tech audience

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>that work in the world of technology tenders and the

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>secondary market is something they'll be familiar with. Loads of

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 2>people will not be familiar with that, And so what

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>usually happens with a big IPO is in late stage growth,

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>prior Marie rounds, where the company raises money issues new equity.

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>You get these kind of anchor investors that come in

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>ahead of an IPO might be a year in advance.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 2>In this case, what we're reporting is the tender is confirmed,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred billion dollar valuation, four hundred and twenty one.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Dollar share price.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Could you explain that dynamic ahead of a big IPO,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>how there isn't any new primary round not raising new money, which,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 2>as you know Elon Musk has been at pains to

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>point out on.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 8>X sure in as simplest form, if you're a business

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 8>that's profitable and you don't need new capital to continue growing,

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 8>why dilute yourself by taking in new investment injection? You know,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 8>through a primary a secondary liquidity offering is a way

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 8>to reward employees or perhaps early investors by getting them

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 8>liquidity for their shares without diluting ownership overall for everybody else.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 8>And this is something that SpaceX has elected to do

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 8>over the past few years, I believe, kind of semi

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 8>annually in a way to provide liquidity not dilute themselve

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 8>we also set a new kind of external price for

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 8>their shares, but still maintaining an immense amount of control

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 8>and the only thing I would call out here, Ed

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 8>is that obviously two billion dollars of liquidity is a

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 8>big number, but it's actually only probably two to five

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 8>percent of the valuation of this company. And so I

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 8>hesitate to kind of identify that eight hundred billion is

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 8>the new market price for SpaceX, more so that it

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 8>is the market price that SpaceX has decided is out there.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, the tender was capped at two billion dollars.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 2>That's what I reported. We just have thirty seconds valuation

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>at IPO one point five trillion dollars.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of that?

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 5>That I think would put it in uncharted waters?

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 8>Right, You've got three public companies that are worth north

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 8>of three trillion dollars.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Where's the upside from one point five? I'm not sure.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 8>At the same time, the bull in me, says Palenteer,

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 8>how a robust retail investor audience, it trades it north

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 8>of one hundred times revenue. So the art of the

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 8>possible is somewhere in between those numbers. I do know

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 8>that this would probably be literally the most exciting IPO

0:10:59.400 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 8>we've ever seen.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Phil Haslich, chief strategy officer at Equiszen, thank you very much.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Coming up Meta making moves toward a new AI model

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>from open to close.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Metas Mark Zuckerberg is shifting the company's focus toward a

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 2>new artificial intelligence model that can make it some money.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 2>One new model is expected to launch next spring, potentially

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>as a closed model that Meta can sell access to.

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 2>This would mark Meta's biggest move yet away from open

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 2>source models. The reporting comes from Bloomberg Tech's Riley Griffin.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a case study. The case study is Avocado. So

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 2>let's start there. This is all what we're hearing from sources.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>But my under saying it is originally Avocado might have

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>been an open source model. It's now not going to

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 2>be based on our reporting. Take it from there and

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>then we'll get into the bigger picture.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Essentially Meta is working on this Avocado model that

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 9>is the code name internally, and they have not officially

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 9>decided whether it will be open or closed, but closed

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 9>is the way they are leaning out the moment. And

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 9>this is a really important distinction because it points to

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 9>a monetization strategy, and as you know, Meta is under

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 9>pressure to show that it can return on its multi

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 9>hundred billion dollar investment in AI, and this is one

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 9>path towards that.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>There's detail in the reporting about how Alexander Wang, who's

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>basically you know, the lieutenant leading the AI lab effort,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 2>is pro closed model. In July, Mark Zarkobak kind of

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 2>told us why open source in this environment isn't that great?

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 2>As the models get bigger, there are fewer people that

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>can access them. It's a resource and constraint issue. But

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>what else are you putting in the story here? Because

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>you know Meta was the sort of flag waiver for

0:12:58.720 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>open source.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 9>Things we heard from in and around the company. For one,

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 9>employees after July were told that they should not be

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 9>talking publicly about open source as Meta reset its strategy. Remember,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 9>Mark Zuckerberg brought in all of these expensive researchers and

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 9>had to reset after a very disappointing release of Lama

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 9>for that was their open source model earlier this year.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 3>And so this is a.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 9>Resetting of the strategy under Alex's leadership, with close involvement

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 9>from Mark Zuckerberg who.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 3>Sits quite close to Alex.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 9>And the pressure is leading to tensions too, but that

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 9>steer to employees internally to not be speaking publicly about

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 9>open source should be a big tell.

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>The report is a muster read Bluemog's Riley Griffin with

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the reporting alongside Kurt Wagnan. Thank you very much. President

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Trump decided to let him videos. So it's h two

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred AI chips to China, after concluding the move carried

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>a lowest security risk because the company's Chinese arts rival,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Huawei already offers some AI systems with parapol performance. That's

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>according to a Bloomberg source Bloomberg Tech report. Maggie Eastland

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>joins us. Maggie, you and I broke this story together yesterday.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>As we understand it right, the President was presented with

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a range of options from exporting no technology at all

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 2>to the latest technology, and they landed somewhere in the middle.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Take it from there. And what else we reported and

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 2>what we know about the Huawei Cloud Matrix three eighty

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>four system.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 10>Yes, one key detail we've reported is that this Cloud

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 10>Matrix three eighty four system, which can link together hundreds

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 10>of chips, was a key rationale underpinning the White House's

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 10>logic to allow these advanced chips, which are better on

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 10>a per chip basis than what Chinese companies.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Are capable of.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 10>However, as was made clear in our reporting, the White

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 10>House is looking at this more at a system level,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 10>and their understanding was that Huawei's systems are actually advancing

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 10>quite quickly, so that was the rationale here. And though

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 10>this is a paradigm shift from previous administrations during which

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 10>Huawei's advancements were an impetus to actually crack down and

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 10>further restrict those Chinese companies, now that same evidence is

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 10>being used as a reason to loosen controls and kick

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 10>off this new strategy of selling in video chips to China.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 2>The main focus, as I understand it, is that age

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>two hundred is eighteen months behind Blackwell generation to generation,

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and that's the comfort level this administration has. In Vidia's

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>down one point three percent in the session right now.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>The other big report out there is from the Information

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 2>which reported that deep Seek smuggled in thousands of Blackwell

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>chips into China, getting them from countries of origin where

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>they were allowed dismantling the servers. Nvidia has come out

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 2>with a statement, Maggie, pushing back on that report. Let's

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>start with that in Vidia's statement.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 11>Please, yes, So Nvidia has said that these smuggling claims

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 11>are a bit far fetched in its own words, and

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 11>while it investigates every tip it receives, it hasn't seen

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 11>evidence of this.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 10>One interesting thing from the report. Jensen Wong has said

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 10>before that these Blackwell racks are just a bit too

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 10>heavy to be feasible to smuggle, but this report from

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 10>the Information did say that the smuggling for a deepseek

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 10>took place in these sort of eight chip segments that

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 10>could potentially fit in the suitcase.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Maggie east Land, who's out in DC, covers the

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 2>intersection of tech and politics with the reporting.

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Another story, Amazon pledged to invest thirty five billion dollars

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>in India over the next five years, boosting its spending

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 2>in the key growth market to expand in businesses from

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>quick commerce to cloud computing. The e commerce giant says

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it will invest in areas such as AI and logistics infrastructure,

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>and that the planned outlay through twenty thirty will help

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 2>create an additional one million jobs in India.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Oracle reporting earnings.

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>After the bell, this is the story they expect on

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the street. The backlog to grow, remaining performance obligations basically

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>deals signed but revenue not booked to continue pushing north

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 2>for five hundred billion dollars. But Oracle's got a very

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>big debt pile and the one metric we're looking at

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>negative free cash flow expected to be almost six billion

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars in the quarter. Let's preview, let's discuss City Panagrahi

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Managing director, senior analyst and Mazuho covering SAS but also

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 2>covering Oracle.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 3>This is the equation.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>We want to see growth in the cloud division OCI

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 2>in particular. But in the background there's that stat Oracle

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>swinging to negative free cash flow for the first time

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen ninety two. Remind us what your price target

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 2>and call is on the stock, and then how you

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>feel about that stat.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 6>That's great, thanks for having me here.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 7>Look, I think what you said right at this point,

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 7>investors are concerned about.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Free cast flow more.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 7>You know, they have to build massive CAPEX build out

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 7>for AI capacity data center build out, and also they

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 7>need to do the funding for that.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 6>So what matters at.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 7>This today in the earnings call, is Oracle during some

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 7>kind of clarity on that. Look, I think what investors

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 7>missing is that Oracle has multiple options. They don't have

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 7>to raise data or CAPEX. They can also go for

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 7>alternative financing like vendor financing or capital leasing. Then you

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 7>won't see that in a capex. But at this point

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 7>Oracle is not able to tell you how much you

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 7>the capex as how much they have to raise because

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 7>they are going to evaluate this as they are building

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 7>out data center. Each data center, they are going to

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 7>look at their own cost of capital and compare that

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 7>to the leasing. So that's what I think the one

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 7>of the concerns we hope to hear from management on

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 7>that how they are going to fund the capex they're

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 7>going to build their data center.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Right, I've been trying to learn as much as I

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 2>can about how this world works. CT Remaining performance obligation

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 2>RPO is a term that gets bandied around all the time,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but basically it's a backlog right of business five hundred

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 2>billion as it stands as Bloomberg's reported it, quite a

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of that is open AI. Now in the future,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 2>if something happens and a deal falls through, often in

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the contracts there's some kind of penalty for cancelation or severance.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 2>But the question still out there, how do we know

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>that open AI in particular is good for it that

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 2>they'll be able to actually front up on the projects

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>that they're committed to.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 7>I mean that's a fair point, as you say, But

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 7>if you look at right now, they're only handful of

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 7>EI companies like clear or four, Open Ai Andthropy, Mata

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 7>and Xai. So Oracle got most of them except Anthropic,

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 7>so yes, and open Ai is a trail blazer in that,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 7>so they have that as a customer. That's I think

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 7>most important at this point. To your point, can open

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 7>Ai pay or that contract will fall apart. Look, this

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 7>is a non cancellable contract, what Oracle says.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 5>So with that and there will be demand.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 7>If we think about AI at this point, the rate

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 7>it's growing, probably probably will need that demand at this point.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 7>But I think if you look at the concern Oracle

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 7>lost more than three hundred billion dollar market gap, you know,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 7>and or open a contract is only three hundred billion

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 7>I think if I remember, it's three hundred twenty two

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 7>billion market dollar market cap loss. So even investors are

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 7>more skeptical beyond even open Ai at this point, which

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 7>we don't think like core business is still doing well

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 7>the way we are looking at You asked about the

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 7>price target. I think if you're an investor, you need

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 7>to believe on this long term AI story. Growth is

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 7>accelerating twenty one dollars EPs they guided for fiscal thirty

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 7>and if you discount it back, even applying twenty five times,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 7>we get to this four hundred dollars price target.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Sidi, we just have less than a minute here.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you like this co CEO structure and the leadership

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of Oracle?

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 7>I think the way right now Oshi is very important

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 7>for Oracle. So that's where they're separate, separating OSCI.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 6>This Clay is.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 7>He's going to SUPERVISEE. He's going to look at that

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 7>business and rest of the application and rest of the business.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 7>Mike Cecilia is going to do it. I think this

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 7>model works. Larry's still there, he's the chairman, he's leading

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 7>the group, leading the company there.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 6>So we like it. I think we'll see how it goes.

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Oracle down three tens percent with treading water. That is

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the big earnings print after the bell CT Panagrahi of

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>MISSOI great to have you on the show.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Probably the story of the week maybe has been the

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 2>saga around Warner Brothers Discovery two competing bids, one from

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Netflix cash and stock at twenty seven dollars seventy five

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>cents a share, which is just for the streaming and studios,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and one from Paramount Skydarks thirty dollars per share for

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 2>the whole Enchilada. This is what those stocks have traded

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 2>like on week. We're not quite in the sort of

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 2>discussion territory around arbitrage, in other words, looking at the

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>gap between where the stock's trading and the price of

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the deals offered, because it's a live situation with multiple bids.

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>But we are looking at the structure of the deals. Now.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Netflix is looking to become debt Flix again.

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you see what we did there?

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>After cutting back on debt during the pandemic, it's back

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to borrowing heavily to finance its planned acquisition. For most

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 2>of Warner Brothers Discovery, the caveat that they'd spin off

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 2>the legacy network and cable lines. The difference is that

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 2>now Netflix has a stronger balance. Hot of the press

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>just hit the wire. Bloomburst Cross Asset reporter Emily Graffeo

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>has the deep dive. Debt is becoming so important generally

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>across technology, but in this case with Netflix, it is

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>a change of corporate policy in what is a potentially

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>very big deal.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 3>What are you reporting? It really is ed.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 12>So what we found is that this term Debtflix was

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 12>introduced a couple years ago by some detractors when the

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 12>company was rated high yields. They really built their business

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 12>around borrowing heavily in the junk bond market, and some

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 12>people didn't like how much cash the company was burning.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 12>But they've really turned that credit profile around now. So

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 12>now the company's rated investment grade. That allows Netflix to

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 12>tap into a deeper market more investors here, and they

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 12>have to raise a lot of debt to finance this

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 12>acquisition of Warner Brothers. Bloomberg Intelligence estimates that right now

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 12>they have about fifteen billions dollars of debt that's going

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 12>to about seventy five billion given the current terms here.

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 12>But what we're hearing from a lot of different credit

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 12>analysts is that Netflix has the balance sheet to fund this.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 12>So it's a turnaround story here. They are Debtflix. It's

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 12>a fun term. I wish I could take credit for

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 12>coming up with it, but I did not. But again,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 12>here it's it's investment grade debt, and it's debt that

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 12>most analysts are confident Netflix can actually still keep that

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 12>investment grade rating and it can actually even potentially raise

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 12>more debt if need be, to top that hostile takeover

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 12>bid because that balance sheet is so strong.

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Ed Bloomo's Emi Crofeo.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 2>It's a must read on the Bloomberg terminal Netflix to

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Debtflix check it out. All right, let's bring in Laura

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Martin for more on this deal. There is a lot

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 2>more to discuss. Laura's senior entertainment analysts at Needam and Co.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>It's one of these situations where there's the Wall Street

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.239
<v Speaker 2>view on this deal, the structure of the deal, and

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 2>then there's the what is this for Hollywood? And the

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 2>reason I'm so excited to have you on the program

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>is I think we could probably talk about both. But

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>this is the first opportunity I've had to talk to

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 2>you about two competing bids. I set the stage for

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 2>it on Netflix's offer cash and stock and paramounts offer.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 2>What is your position at this time and what is

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>your research into the competing bids?

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 13>So, I mean, I think the kudos have to go

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 13>to Zaslov for creating this auction for an asset that's

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 13>worth twelve dollars. We're now at thirty dollars a share,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 13>and now we've hear over the tape this morning that

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 13>both Paramount and Netflix have said they could go higher.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 13>So so far we have a three hundred percent like

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 13>premium over what the assets were trading at before the

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 13>auction rumors. So, first of all, kudos to David Zaslov

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 13>and the Warner Brothers team for selling an asset deer.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 13>In terms of who wins, you know, we are much

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 13>more sanguine about Paramounts or Peace Guy is its ticker

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 13>regulatory ability to get it through the Trump administration, right.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 13>You know, we think that there are real issues with

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 13>Netflix being successful, not only with Hollywood talent who see

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 13>this as anti competitive. I sit in Hollywood is anti competitive,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 13>especially because Netflix has said repeatedly it does not believe

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 13>in the theatrical box office release window, and so all

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 13>of Hollywood is scared to death that if suddenly Netflix

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 13>owned Warner Brothers that within five years they would stop

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 13>releasing films in the theatrical box office, which is why

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 13>we've seen pressure on the exhibitors also, So I think

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 13>Hollywood is really negative or let me say it this way,

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 13>much more negative about Netflix taking over Warner Brothers than

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 13>Peace guy, So I would say that.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>And on the side, let me jump in real quick.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>On the money side, we will get to Hollywood, particularly technology,

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 2>because you know, Netflix's competency is the algorithm to an extent,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and the library and the content. But I just want

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to go back and back to basics and what you said,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 2>twelve dollars with Warner Brothers Discovery. You're not the first

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>person to make this point, Laura, but just explain the

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>basics to our audience.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 3>Please.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>People do feel that the value of what iver entity

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>ends up getting may not be at twenty seven dollars

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>seventy five cents for the studio streaming or thirty for

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the whole enchilada, as I keep saying.

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 13>Right, So, I mean, I'm comparing the trading price for

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 13>WBD Warner Brothers for like a year. Essentially it was

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 13>falling and it hit about a twelve dollars price before

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 13>the first rumor of a Pea Skuy bid started the

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 13>stock moving up. And then I can't remember the Larry

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 13>Ellison first bid or the David Ellison first bid, but

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 13>now we're up at thirty dollars a share for the

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 13>whole thing, and that includes twenty seven from Netflix for studios,

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 13>plus the ideas there'd be a two dollars three dollars

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 13>stub left trading for the network's division, which would add

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 13>up to thirty dollars also. But in theory, so anyway,

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 13>I'm saying we're like at thirty dollars for the comparable

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 13>asset that was trading at twelve dollars before the auction began.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>For this asset, I think there's a lot of value

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in that answer, because the next question is of course

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 2>about antitrust and what the combined entities would look like.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 2>In either case, you said you believe or you're more

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 2>sanguine about Paramount Skuidance combined Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.479
<v Speaker 3>Why okay?

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 13>So in streaming, in the streaming industry, Netflix has over

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 13>three hundred million global subscribers and HBO Max has one

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 13>hundred and fifty, so together there's some duplication there, but

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 13>let's just call it four hundred and fifty subscribers, which

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 13>is like forty percent of the streaming market. Whereas Paramount

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 13>or Peace Guides now called has seventy five million subscribers

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 13>that you would add to the HBO which is one

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 13>hundred and fifty So now you're two hundred and twenty

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 13>five million subscribers, much smaller market share of streaming than

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 13>if you combine Netflix, which is the industry leader, with

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 13>Warner Brothers HBO Maxset streaming asset. So I would say

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 13>that's one reason, and then the Hollywood Studios. As you know,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 13>Netflix is one of the largest global creators of content,

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 13>and you would combine it with Warner Brothers, which is

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 13>one of the largest global creators of content. They have

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 13>different windows, meaning distribution windows, meaning Netflix primarily creates for

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 13>television direct to streaming the television screen, and Warner Brothers

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 13>primarily creates content for both TV but also the film business.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 13>It's a big film a distributor. So I think the

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 13>idea is putting these two huge content creators together would

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 13>dampen competition for talent and lower prices for talent and

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 13>also raise prices for consumer. That is not a concern

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 13>with Peace Guide Bar Warner.

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Brothers, Laura, we have less than a minute, Netflix would argue,

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and I am simplifying that. You know it would simplify

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it for the consumer. You know, having HBO Max Netflix,

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>people have multiple subscriptions. But it sounds like you don't

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>think that that argument will make traction.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, it would simplify it for the consumer.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 13>But if they collapse, the thinking is they would collapse

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 13>Netflix and HBO Max.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Great, But what happens to the price.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 13>The consumer is going to get a much higher price

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 13>if you add those two things together. So it's simpler,

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 13>But really a monopoly policy is based on simplicity versus complexity.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 13>It's based on the price to the consumer and consumer welfare,

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 13>and price is part.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Of consumer welfare.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 13>Actually, simplicity is not and in the laws as a

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 13>driving factor, but prices and price would go up for

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 13>consumers if they combine those two assets.

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I think, Laura Martin o'needham, it's great to have you

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>back on bloombog Tech. I suspect we'll be talking about

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 2>steal for quite a long time to come.

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Sticking with entertainment M and A, Disney co chairman Dana Wolman.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Dana Wolman sat down last month with Bloomberg's Emily Chang

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 2>for an episode of the Circuit to discuss broadly the

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 2>m and A landscape and what she thinks of the

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 2>competition coming out of a potential merger.

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Listen to this.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 14>I don't worry about a stronger competitor coming out of it,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 14>because we already went through an incredible transformation in twenty

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 14>nineteen as Disney integrated the entertainment assets of Fox. We

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 14>already went through you know, a big em and a

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 14>event to expand our library, to increase the amount of

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 14>IP that we ultimately could take over the top directly

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 14>to the consumer.

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not worried right now. I also think.

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 14>Whichever whoever ends up in you know, in this situation

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 14>acquiring WBD or any asset that's available, these are situations

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 14>that require a lot of time, time for regulatory approval,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 14>time for integration, time to figure out, you know, how

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 14>to combine apps, a lot of the things that we've

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 14>already been through now.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Disney co Chairman Dana Wolman long with bloom eg Zemini

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Chang again, recorded last month. You can catch the full

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>episode at the Circuit tomorrow at eight pm Eastern on

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Originals or ten pm Eastern on Bloomberg Television.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 3>All Right, coming up.

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, SpaceX aims to blast into the record books

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>with possibly, possibly, maybe we're ready for lift off the

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>biggest IPO of all time.

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 3>That conversation. Next, this is Bloomberg chat range.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>In good call out healthy systems aren't the booster as

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it started to pitch over.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Over the show.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, back to our top stories.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX shooting for the stars yet again, this time in

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>the financial context. Sources tell us the Elon Musk led

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>space company well underway with plans for an IPO that

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 2>would seek to raise far above thirty billion dollars, with

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the targeted valuation around one point five trillion dollars that

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 2>would make this by money raised the biggest IPO ever.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 2>A representative for SpaceX didn't respond to my many requests

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>for comment. Joining us to discuss is Will Whitehorn, chairman

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of Seraphim space. Will was also former chairman of Virgin Galactic.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Somebody's works side by side with Richard Branson in the

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>domain of commercial space. We have a lot to get

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>to Seraphim. You know, an investor in all kinds of

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>different space assets, and it's the space asset that I

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>think is central to this.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX IPO story.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 2>My reporting is that they want to raise the capitol

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 2>for the SpaceX AI cluster, the SpaceX AI stack space

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Space Data Center.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Your reaction to that.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 15>Will well, I think that's probably right, and I think

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 15>that this is a seismic event for the entire space industry.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 6>We're not going to see the like of this.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 15>I think it's going to cause huge changes to the

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 15>companies that are suppliers to SpaceX, to the whole massive

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 15>kind of environment that they've created, particularly in the United

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.479
<v Speaker 15>States and in the UK. Some companies as a company

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 15>in the UK called Filtronic, for example, which has become

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 15>a major supplier to SpaceX. Many of the companies in

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 15>the Seraphin portfolio they launch on SpaceX rockets. Starlink has

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 15>obviously when you link Starlink to AI to data centers,

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 15>you are seeing an entire ecosystem of businesses growing up.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 15>And many other constellations will benefit from this sort of

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 15>InOrbit servicing, more data analytics coming out through the space industry.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 15>Space and AI will become interlinked in a way they've

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 15>never been before. I mean, space really is going through

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 15>a lot of change. As it goes through this industrial revolution.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Will we're going to question report on react to wherever

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>the valuation of this company settles. My reporting again is

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.479
<v Speaker 2>that the target based on what they want to raise,

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 2>the amount of the percentage of the company they offer one

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 2>point five trillion dollars. But macro, this is an industry,

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 2>private commercial space that's growing. What is seraphim seeing What

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 2>are the numbers that you're tracking on how an industry

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.479
<v Speaker 2>is basically growing out of SpaceX's wake.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'll give you an example.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 15>We've got one of the biggest companies in airportload's called

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 15>i Sie, which has a very special kind of apperture radar.

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 6>The demand for it has gone through the roof.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 15>I sized business plan has ended up being two years

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 15>ahead of play and they're in profit already. And they

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 15>are They've just in the process of a very big fundraise.

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 15>Other companies like Maucai three sixty, Satellite View, All Space,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 15>all of these companies, app orfolio are all doing very

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 15>well and getting ahead of their business plans very rapidly

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 15>because the demand for data from space is going through

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 15>the roof for both climate change, defense, natural security, communications,

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 15>I mean, everything is relying more and more on space.

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 6>And of course as people get scared about.

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 15>The underground and undersea cables that supply the Internet. The

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 15>demand for Internet data from space is starting to rise

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 15>as well in the fintech sector.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 6>So everything is happening all at once.

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 15>The insurance companies want space data because they realize it's

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 15>more accurate than ground based data for agricultural assets, buildings,

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 15>infrastructure projects.

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 6>So you've got insurance demand, agricultural demand, climate change demand.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 15>And now defense demand rocketing ahead since Ukraine and the

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 15>Middle East happened over the last three years. And indeed,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 15>you know, I got an OBE today from Prince William

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 15>which is one of the first in the space industry

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 15>to show that even royalty are catching up in the

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 15>Actually one of the first things he asked me, that's

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 15>what I thought was going on in the space industry

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 15>at the moment.

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 2>From the UK okay well for our audience around the

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 2>world outside of the UK. Obviousely, I originate from the

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 2>United Kingdom, an OBE officer of the Most Excellent Order

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of the British Empire.

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 3>So congratulations to you.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Awarded to you this morning by Prince William, and I

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 2>understand that you then ran to be here on the

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 2>show and that actually Prince William may be tuning in

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and a fan of the show anyway, appreciate.

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 6>That that's true, and that's very true.

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 2>I believe in transparency on this program. One thing that

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 2>we should have done to start is what is Sarah

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 2>FIM's exposure to SpaceX?

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Have you any skin in the game.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 15>No, we don't have a steak in SpaceX. Only a

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 15>couple of British investment trusts do have steaks, both of

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 15>them Scottish based Seraphim. When we started, it was too

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 15>late to get into SpaceX at that time, which is

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:13.240
<v Speaker 15>a shame.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 6>But we have a lot of.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 15>Exposure to companies that I think are going to really

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 15>benefit from this huge ecosystem of new investment as SpaceX

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 15>will create. And I'm looking personally at other companies that

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 15>will benefit. And in fact, I bought a steak in

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 15>one today, which I think will be a beneficiar. This

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 15>will have, as I said, a seismic effect on an

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 15>industry already undergoing an industrial revolution.

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 6>It is going to be, you know, one for me

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 6>as an old hand.

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 15>I mean I'm sixty five now and you know I

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 15>was around in the days when the Netflix, the Netscape,

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 15>moment happened in nineteen ninety five, which kicked off that

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 15>range of Internet investment.

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 6>That we still see today.

0:38:56.160 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 15>And I think that this is the space equivalent happening

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 15>right now.

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Will do you want to tell us what the company

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 2>is that you invested in this morning?

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 15>Mask Seraphim doesn't have mistake in It is a company

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 15>called Filter Chemic.

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me ask this. Then, let me ask this.

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 2>You are sixty five years old. Thank you for sharing

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 2>that with our audience. Elon Musk is fifty four. He's

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 2>committed to Tesla for ten years. We just have thirty seconds.

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 2>But is it realistic that this man leads to public

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 2>companies at that scale for the long term?

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 15>Well, this is going to be a big question around

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 15>the ido of the sleep of SpaceX. Is he going

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 15>to spend more time on SpaceX with this size of

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 15>fundraise or is he going to carry on in his

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 15>Tesla environment as well. Both companies will be quoted, both

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 15>will be some of the biggest companies in the world,

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 15>and you're quite right, this is going to be an

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 15>issue that investors will look at very very closely.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Will WHITEH Seraphim, space chairman ordered and ob this morning

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 2>by Prince William then running over to the camera for us,

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much. The Adobe sets report Q four earnings

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>this afternoon after the bell is The company looks to

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 2>convince investors it is on the right track in the

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 2>AI era. Bloomberg Intelligence says Adobe could see it's and

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 2>your recurring revenue target in the low double digits for

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six. Let's get out to Bloomberg's Matt Day

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 2>and Seattle with the preview. Matt, what do we need

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to know?

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 16>That's right, Sir Jeffreys, Brint Phil said, and I know

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 16>the other day, low expectations and low investor interest. There's

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 16>a lot of worries about whether Adobe, which has navigated

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 16>the transition from package software to subscription software, whether we're

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 16>going to be able to do the same in the

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 16>AI era and survive all beating newfound competitors they've got

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 16>in the space.

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 3>That sets the scene, it sets the tone as well.

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I did a big interview with

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the Adobe CEO in the summer, and there's clearly a frustration

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.399
<v Speaker 2>this is a stock that's down twenty two percent this year,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that they're not getting credit for the work they think

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 2>they've done in AI. Part of it is how they

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 2>sell it. Is there a bigger Adobe AI story that

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 2>someone's buying.

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 5>You know, there might be.

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 16>They've tried to convince investor with a couple of metrics,

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 16>you know, one sort of AI first revenue that's tracking

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 16>about two hundred and fifty million dollars. They've got another

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 16>one AI influenced revenue about five billion dollars. But you know,

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 16>as the stock price to date shows, investors aren't buying

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 16>that all the way. You know, particularly in a world

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 16>where open ai is getting a whole lot of interest

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 16>with Sora, Google's got new video generation models. If you're

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 16>a creative professional doing something that's Adobe's wheelhouse and there's

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 16>a whole lot of AI in the monitors.

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Right now, I'm grateful you mentioned that open ai in particular.

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 2>The debate the Adobe's had, and maybe the shift is

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.879
<v Speaker 2>they try to pitch themselves as we have our own

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 2>models with our own safeguards and data, and that's best

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 2>for customers. Now they seem to be saying we're open

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.720
<v Speaker 2>to using other models and other data inputs as well.

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Have they kind of settled on their approach.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 16>It's a little bit both as you said, they definitely

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 16>built their own models. They say their copyright compliant. But

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 16>just this morning they've li've out with a partnership with

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 16>chat gpt macer opening. I had to put Adobe products,

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 16>a limited version of them inside of chat GPT, so

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 16>they clearly realized they can't own the space entirely. Have

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 16>kind of got to be everywhere that the users want

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 16>to be.

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bloomg's Matt Day with the Adobe preview.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a good way to end a show that does

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 2>do it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. But I

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 2>would remind you it's not just Adobe out with earnings

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 2>after the Bell Oracles, the big one probably that we're

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 2>looking for. We expect a big backlog of business with

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 2>a big debt parle that we're worried about. Those are

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the two names we're watching. In the show, it was

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.959
<v Speaker 2>all about SpaceX and an IPO we think is coming

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the next year. Recap that on

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the podcast. You know where to find it on the

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg platforms and online Ihearts, Spotify and on Apple. From

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, have a great afternoon. This is Bloomberg Tech.