WEBVTT - A Burrito Of Deceit 

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Katty.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Arm Strong and Getty and he Armstrong and Getty. You

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>take it for granted, you say, give me French fries.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll never forget this experience. I always figured somebody stuffs

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the in with a hand, and I don't like that.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>And they don't do it that way, that you never

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>touch them. It's really great. But you've been eating a McDonald's.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>You thought the fries come out of the boiling oil

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>and the workers making that sweet sweet four twenty five

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>an hour just reach in and go.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Get with their hands.

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, do you think that's how the burg get flipped?

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh God, someone order ice train.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Right? Unfair but funny.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>No, I seem to allow plastic gloves on and like

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>a little metal thing you take him out of. Actually,

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 4>I've seen him. You can see him make him the

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 4>fries right there. It's not like it's a mystery.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't think Trump stands in line at the count

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 5>nos do that far.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Trump eats a lot of McDonald's for real, which

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 4>helps him a lot. I mean, there's nothing, there's no

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>level of certainly not cardiovascularly, it doesn't. There's there's no

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 4>level of phoniness with him when it comes to like

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 4>a fast food thing, where there would be with almost

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 4>any other politician where you'd know they've never been, they've

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 4>never eat McDonald's in their lives, Whereas you know, there's

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 4>got tons of pictures of Trump sitting on Air Force

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 4>one in a suit surrounded by gold opulence, with a

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 4>big mac and friese. But you're right, he's probably never

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 4>stood in line in a McDonald's. All right, right, maybe

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 4>never literally never. Michael, do me a favor. Would you

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>please play me clip number forty six. Now I need

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 4>to explain.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 5>I had as usual, let's do you call it dvring

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 5>with the YouTube.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>TV, all the new technology. It's too much.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 5>But at the very beginning of my many newses, this

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 5>happened to be NBC News. Just before the show started,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 5>I caught like the last twenty seven seconds of this commercial.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 5>The first three seconds that we missed are clearly an

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 5>old lady saying something about I wish I'd remembered it

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 5>jumps in like midward she's talking about she depends on

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 5>social Security.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So go ahead and roll at Michael tired.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 6>I need that money for groceries and bills. But the

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 6>way Trump is talking about cutting social security, Wow, it's crazy.

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 6>Cutting social security is like giving the middle finger to

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 6>the middle class. Kamala Harris will protect social Security, not

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 6>cut it.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Every thought was responsible for the content of.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 4>His add Now where does one start, well, Kamala said

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 4>the very same thing on stage with Liz Chaney yesterday.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 4>That's part of her closing argument is Trump is going

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 4>to cut social Security.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Perhaps you're familiar with the fact that not only has

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Trump not said a syllable about cutting social Security, he

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 5>has vowed up and down to not approach it, not

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 5>even look at it, much less touch it. And in fact,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Republicans consider it such a third rail of politics at

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 5>this point they don't even breathe a word about reforming

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 5>it so it doesn't go broke. I wish Trump had

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>said something about reforming social security. That ad was for

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 5>pinocchios and throw in a bonus geppetto that was utter, pure, distilled,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 5>weapons grade dishonest and more disinformation, disinformation and malinformation wrapped

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 5>into a burrito of deceit.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, I think it more importantly to your point

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 4>is the fact that I mean that is one hundred

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 4>percent a great example of.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know which of those words that are the

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 2>same thing.

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 4>You want to use disinformation, So you're putting out disinformation

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>on purpose to mislead people one hundred and eighty degrees

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 4>from the truth. Yet you're the party that is going

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 4>to endlessly talk about reigning in free speech and having

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 4>some committee that determines what should be on the air

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 4>and all that sort of crap, which will be entirely

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 4>your side deciding which speed is speech is permitted or not. Folks,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 4>if you fight against nothing else in your life, fight

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 4>against censorship, because that well, as Washington put it to paraphrase,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, without freedom of speech, may we be led

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 4>to the slaughter, silent and dumb like sheep. Yeah, and

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:03.559
<v Speaker 4>fact checking is a different word for censorship, it seems

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 4>to be.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And so we just got to do away with all that.

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 4>And the fact that one side gets to makes oh

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 4>I almost dropped it as bum One side gets to

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 4>make stuff up but not get called on it, and

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 4>beyond not get called on it, they get to hold

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 4>their noses in the air and prints around as if

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 4>they're the higher than the rest of us when it

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 4>comes to truth and honesty. Give me a break. The

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Republicans do it too, all kinds of misedited, misleading stories.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 4>But the Republicans aren't the way. Aren't the ones, at

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 4>least to my knowledge, that are trying to claim that

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 4>you need to reign in social media's misinformation.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's add in the.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Fact that that old lady trope, which is she's obviously

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>a voiceover actress, is the classic. Anybody who talks about

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 4>reforming social security phasing in over many years different formulas,

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 4>is trying to rip the checks out of eighty year

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 4>old's hands and make them eat dog food.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>It's just, oh my god.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 5>You want to talk about the lowest common denominator political message,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 5>and here's here's the eyes.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Even the most hardcore fiscal conservative who says we need

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 4>to deal with this today, if you're already old and

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 4>getting soci security wouldn't have anything to do with you

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 5>I get that this is an ad, but I mentioned

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 5>the burrito of dishonesty or deceit, well, the the tangy

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 5>salsa of irony.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>On God, I'm not feeling good today. I'm not liking

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.679
<v Speaker 4>this can you do different metaphors that aren't like food

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 4>that would make me feel bad?

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>What are you in the mood for? Like yogurt? Maybe

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 2>you're something easy to digest than an ice cream. And

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it was in the chicken soup of.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Exactly the parsley on the soup of deceit is better,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 5>much better. That led directly into Lion Lester Holt with

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 5>a series of headlines, each of which was on the campaign,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.679
<v Speaker 5>but the two about Trump were.

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump claimed without evidence blah blah blah and elon musk

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and it may be illegal.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, Kamala Harris talked to nice old people and comforted

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 5>them in their old age and then promised to make

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 5>life better for everyone.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>And in other news so oh.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 4>And so he actually in the newscast used the phrase

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 4>without evidence, which is used exclusively for Republicans, right right

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 4>on the heels of this ad that was utterly one

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred and eighty percent one hundred and eighty degrees rather dishonest. Wow, unfreakingly,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting that you took an NBC news because I

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 4>watched ab ABC News and like the first ten minutes,

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I just I couldn't believe how incredibly one sided it was.

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>I thought, man, they've gone all in now there were

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 4>two weeks from election today. This is like it was

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 4>designed by the Harris campaign to make her look good

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 4>and Trump look bad. It's that this is a newscast,

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 4>right right, So moving on to that's a good joint

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 4>a kid, I can't argue with you, So moving on somewhat.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 4>That kid's probably forty now, right, Oh yeah, he's got

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 4>kids of his own. He's watching Fox News with the

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 4>volume two high. He's an older fella. At anyway, where

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 4>were we?

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Ah?

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Yes, anybody who knows the show knows that I Joe

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 5>am fairly Trump skeptical, love a lot of the policies,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 5>the judges blah blah blah, and I am extremely cautious

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 5>about conspiracy theory crap because, much like the posters we

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 5>were discussing before, the one thing I want to be

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 5>is right.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I would rather be right than happy.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 4>Having said that, I'm following a Twitter thread by Will Sharf,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 4>who he's worked as an attorney for Trump. He's also

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 4>he very well thought of Washington, d C. Attorney's worked

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 4>on two Scotis confirmations. He's a former federal processor. I'm sorry, prosecutor.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 4>He's a man of substance.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 5>And he tweeted the other day he said, remember November eighteenth,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two, was the key day when all four

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 5>criminal cases against Trump kicked off. Number one, Nathan Wade

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 5>was at the White House that day for eight hours.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 5>You remember Nathan Wade, the lover of Fannie Willis. He

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 5>was at the White House.

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>He was enjoying some of that sweet sweet Fannie Willis tale.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>That's what he was doing.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, oh boy, and some of the transcript of his

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 5>testimony because he was grilled in front of a congressional

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 5>committee about that in a second. That was also the

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 5>day Jack Smith was appointed the special counsel to dig

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 5>into the other charges. And Matthew Colangelo quit the DOJ

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 5>that very day and showed up a few weeks later

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 5>at Alvin Bragg's office in New York.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So this guy was.

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 4>One of the top couple levels of the DOJ and

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 4>quit that job to take an assistance job at a

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 4>local prosecutor's office. Now, granted, the Manhattan DA is like

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 4>the most high profile local prosecutor, but I remember, I

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 4>remember at the time there was talk about what's Colangelo

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 4>doing quitting the.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 2>DOJ to take that job. That's a weird thing.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 5>And he headed up that local prosecution. All of this

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 5>launched on November eighteenth, twenty twenty two, which I do

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 5>not think is a coincidence. Then you have this, uh

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 5>what committee is this in front of?

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It?

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't say that would be helpful.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>He admitted to multiple meetings with the Biden White House

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Biden Harris White House doing Fannie Willis's prosecution of Donald

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Trump in Georgia, but repeatedly claimed I don't recall or

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember the details of those meetings, over and

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 4>over again. So I'm I was asking if you remember,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 4>would you have had a paralegal, someone on your team

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 4>and assistant reach out to schedule this conference with the

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 4>White House Council?

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't recall.

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, do you remember who attended this conference with White

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 4>House counsel?

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't recall. Is it safe to assume since you

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 5>build for the conference with White House Council billible hours,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 5>you know that you attended the conference with the White

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 5>House Council. Yes, okay? Do you remember if it was

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 5>in person or by telephone? I don't recall. He doesn't recall.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, that is.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 4>That's pretty rich. You don't remember if he was on

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 4>the phone or in person. I think anybody whose brain

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>works at all would remember that. Well, right, and then

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 4>they go into yeah, we're pressed for time. All right,

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 4>I'll move swiftly. He goes into all right, I'll remind you.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Here's your billing hours eight hours of two hundred and

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 4>fifty dollars. It was two thousand dollars. Do you remember

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 4>an interview with DC or the White House occurring on

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 4>November eighteenth, twenty twenty two. I don't remember it happening.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I know it did because the entry says that it did.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Do you remember it occurring on or near the eighteenth?

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember it happening, but I do know that

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 4>it did because the date completed says November eighteenth.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 2>I skipped one.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you have any recollection of what you were referring

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 4>to or who you were referring to when you said

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 4>you had an interview with the DC at the White House?

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't remember that. It goes on and on. Literally,

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at the next page of the transcript. Every

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 5>single answer is I don't recall.

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 4>This is a huge Watergate style store. It's bigger than Watergate,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 4>much bigger. Doesn't get any air I'm guessing not.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>It's outrageous.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, there are a lot of folks and the

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 5>lying media that we've been referring to would never admit this.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 5>There are a lot of folks who say who when

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 5>they say the election was stolen?

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 2>This is what they're talking about.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 4>They're not talking about of votes in Georgia's spirit away

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 4>and spirited away in the night. They're talking about the

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 4>forces of government and media and lawfare and the rest

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 4>of it conspiring to fix an election.

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And they have a point.

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 4>So travel season is upon us, and they're already trying

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 4>to get the airports prepared, including one airport. Who is

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 4>going to limit the amount of time you can hug

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 4>someone to try to keep the lines moving along. This

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 4>is created a fair amount of controversy. You're gonna time

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 4>your hugs. That'd be fun work if you could get it, plice,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 4>among other things.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>On the way, can you step up and make up play?

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Here in crunch time, putting straight down the field, they're

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>looking farm and he comes back and drops the football.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>A flag comes in very late from deep center field.

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>That was in Marvin's bread basket couldn't collect it at

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the forty six. So that's from last night's Monday Night Football.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 4>If you had the over under on Harball goes nuts,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 4>perhap harbos had.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>Exploded had exploding.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 4>They called a like an one of the worst penalties

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 4>you can have for like the whole helmet to helmet

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 4>trying to kill a guy and they didn't collide, but

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 4>it kind of looked like maybe he was hoping to

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 4>but missed anyway. So that's become kind of a controversial

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 4>call to trond, like, if your intent was to hit

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>him but you missed, does that count?

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, they made it count in that case.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 5>Wow, I didn't go to football law school, Jack, so

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like the thought police to me. It's a thought crime.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Friends At Prize Picks with a quick Word, America's number

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 5>one daily fantasy sports app over five million active members,

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 5>all you do is pick more or less on at

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 5>least two players, stat projections, and watch the winnings role

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 5>in Prize Picks, as Easy's most excited wa had played

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 5>daily fantasy sports, it's just you against the numbers.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>You can win up to one hundred times your money

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 4>on Price Picks with as little as four correct picks,

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 4>and all the withdrawals are fast, safe and secure. Don't

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 4>get into some other wacky stuff on the internet. Do

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Prize Picks and when your pick's hit you can get

0:14:58.480 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 4>your money in as quick.

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>As fifteen minutes.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 5>And Prize Picks invented the flex play, which means you

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 5>can still cash out if your lineup isn't perfect. You

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 5>can double your money even if one of your picks

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 5>doesn't hit. So download the Prize Picks app today and

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 5>use the code Armstrong get fifty bucks instantly when you

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 5>play five dollars. That's the code Armstrong on Prize Picks

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 5>to get fifty dollars instantly when you play five. You

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 5>don't even need to win to receive the fifty dollars bonus.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 5>It's guaranteed. Again, use that code Armstrong on the Prize

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Picks app today. Prize Picks run your game. So they

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 5>actually have this sign at the airport now. Now this

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 5>is a New Zealand, but who knows if this will

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 5>catch on around the world. At the airport they have

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 5>a sign up that says max Hug time for fonder

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 5>farewells please use the car park. They're making a maximum

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 5>on how long you're allowed to hug someone when you

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 5>drop them off at the departure gate. What do you

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 5>suppose the hug time max is? This seems plenty.

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Long to me.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 4>It's three thirty seconds. It's three minutes max hug minutes.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 4>If you're hugging somebody for longer than three minutes, I

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 4>don't know. I don't know what you're doing as one

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 4>of you. You're you're, you're having sex.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I miss you. I'll miss you too, and it's I

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 2>can't wait. It's gonna be tough without you. I know,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>this is so great. It was so good. I love you.

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen that new series on Netflix with the

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 2>cowboy thing? That's pretty good, isn't it.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I saw turned off the stove. What are you doing

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>for three minutes? Yeah?

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 5>That's that doesn't seem overally restrictive to me. Otherwise you're

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 5>just hanging out.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 4>Emotional farewells are common sights at airports, but travelers leaving

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 4>this airport will have a new time limit on goodbye

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 4>hugs in the airport's drop off area, intended to prevent

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 4>lingering cuddles from causing traffic jams. Who is hugging for

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 4>longer than three minutes? That's a really long hug. People

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 4>are upset about it, though, as people get blasted on

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 4>social media, et cetera, as happens on everything on social media.

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Right, of course, everybody's angry about everything on social media

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 5>all the time. Is there anybody who likes long goodbyes?

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't?

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Isn't it practically universal that the whole because back in

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the day, for you young kids, you don't be in

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 5>pre nine to eleven, you could go to the gate

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 5>with your loved one and hang out with them at

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 5>the gate, right exactly, making small talk and.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it was a good visit.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I just see you gotta rip the band aid off, right,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 4>isn't that better?

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I don't.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that I know anybody who prefers the

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 5>long lingering.

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like that last day of vacation.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 5>You got a flight at eleven am and you're hanging

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 5>around in the morning and you're packed, but you're not

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 5>leaving this a little weird just to just go to

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 5>just go.

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 4>We said everything. We're gonna say it's gotten as it was,

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 4>as good as it's gonna get right, yeah right, hold

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 4>me up later this hour.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 5>China understands our society almost as well as we do,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 5>and they're exploiting.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 2>The hell out of it. Stay with us for that.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 4>And President China currently in Russia for the Brick Summit,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 4>where over the half of the words population is getting

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 4>together with one of the most evil people on earth.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a troubling situation.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 2>I think school choice is a good idea, and particularly

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>underprivileged people.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 7>A fringe issue twenty years ago, school choice is on

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 7>the ballot.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm not a fan of the vouchers, but I am

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 6>in favor of choice.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 4>What's happening here is we want families to control the

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 4>education dollars. Every dollar should follow every kid to every option,

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 4>and that's what we're searching for.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 7>Twenty nine states offer school choice programs, ranging from vouchers

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 7>and tax credits to savings accounts that allow parents to

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 7>use public money to help pay for a private or

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 7>parochial education.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Interesting. I want to know more about that. A little

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 4>bit later, we're going to get into minimum wage.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 4>That old topic comes up all the time, especially the

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 4>closing days of a presidential election.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It was the leaded political story.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 4>And all your big newscasts yesterday as Kamala Harrison Trump

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 4>were both speaking about it.

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>So more on that later.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 5>I do want to flag one of the things William

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Laugenessa Fox News just said seventy percent of Americans, seventy

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 5>percent are in favor of school choice. Keep that in

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 5>mind as we go further in the discussion. But the

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 5>DNC claims, quote, we've shortchanged our children by underinvesting in

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 5>our nation's public schools. And they're absolutely right about the

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 5>kids getting short changed, but it's not because the system

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 5>lacks funding. Taxpayers are handing over more and more of

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 5>their money, more than ever before. But adults are the

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 5>ones benefiting, not the kids.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 4>So is the idea that in some states, so a

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 4>chunk of my tax money goes to the public school,

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to use the local public school. So

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I want to keep some of that money that I'm

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>paying to use in a different way to educate my kid.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, absolutely.

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 5>There are a variety of programs, but they're all more

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 5>or less reflect that that desire. So we've increased inflation

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 5>adjusted public schools spending by one hundred and sixty four

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 5>percent since nineteen seventy So that's you know, more than

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 5>two and a half times adjusted for inflation. Yes, sir,

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 5>that's our at homes gotten one hundred and sixty four

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 5>percent better.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 4>Of course not did they need to get one hundred

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 4>and whatever percent better? Or were we relatively happy with

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 4>the way public schools were then? I know they had

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 4>stricter guidelines for what was proficient and all you know,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 4>you're reading your math, all your different things, and more

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 4>people met them. So why did we even need to

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 4>spend more money anyway? American government schools and I really

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 4>prefer the term government schools over public schools, where that

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 4>makes it clear what's happening.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 5>UH spend about twenty grand per student each year, which

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 5>is that's on average, which is about fifty two percent

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 5>higher than average private school tuition. Teachers' unions plan to

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 5>give themselves more money is the definition of insanity doing

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 5>the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 5>Quoting now from who wrote this for the National Review,

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Corey DeAngelis kind of dipping in and out of his

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 5>opinion piece. The National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 5>the Nation's Report Card, shows that only about one in

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 5>four eighth grade public school students are proficient in math

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 5>one and four less than a third or proficient in reading,

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 5>and we are failing miserably. But despite more than doubling

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 5>inflation adjusted overall funding for student, average teacher salaries have

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 5>remained flat, increasing by only three percent in real terms

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 5>over the last half of a century.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 4>So if the most valuable education research and resource in schools,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 4>teachers aren't getting the money, who is this is all?

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>We talked about this the other day. It's administrative bloat.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, we talked about the percentage increase in the

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 4>number of not teachers, not students, other people at the

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 4>school doing whatever it is they do. This is so

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 4>obviously true. Is it just now breaking through to most

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 4>peace people.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's say encounter extremely extremely inconvenient for the lefty

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 5>media to report this. This runs absolutely countered all of

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 5>their narratives on the topic.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Will all the higher ups in lefty media their kids

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 4>go to private school so they only have kind of

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 4>like what they see on TV version of what public

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 4>schools even are. So the argument on the other side,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 4>I suppose, would be if you let too many parents

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 4>keep their twenty grand per kid and spend it however

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 4>they want. We wouldn't be able to function as a

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 4>public school, is.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>That the argument?

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 5>The government schools would be decimated for money, well, especially

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 5>because they've got so.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Much administrative bloat.

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 5>But in Chicago, for example, spending is nearly doubled since

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 5>twenty twelve to about thirty thousand dollars per student. Today,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 5>spending for students skyrocketed three and a half times the

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 5>rate of inflation, whereas reading and mass scores plummeted by

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 5>sixty three percent and seventy eight percent, respectively.

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>In fact, not a single student was fishing.

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 4>In math in thirty three government schools in Chicago in

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty two. Not a single kid. So what would

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 4>most parents do? I wonder if you, if you, if

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 4>you were able to throw open the doors this much

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 4>where you just announced, Okay, next year, you you can

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 4>either send your kid to the local fourth grade public

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 4>school or you know, we'll cut you check for twenty

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 4>five thousand dollars, you know, different depending on where you live. Yeah,

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 4>and figure out how to educate your kid on your own.

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 4>What do you think most people would do?

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting question.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Plenty of money to go to a decent pub private school, yes, plenty.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think many people would opt out. It depends

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 5>on the state of their local schools. When my kids

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 5>were going to government schools in the town that they

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.719
<v Speaker 5>grew up in, they were quite good. It was, you know,

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 5>a reasonably affluent area of a red county in California,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 5>and it was pretty good. It's changed since then, but so, yeah,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 5>so it depends, but a lot would opt for that.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 2>A couple more stats, just very quickly.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned this the other day, but it bears repeating

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 5>that between twenty and twenty twenty two, this is the

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 5>modern era, the number of students enrolled in government schools

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 5>increased by five percent. The number of teachers grew twice

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 5>as fast, ten percent, which, well, that's explainable because special

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 5>ed programs became more robust than that sort of thing.

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 5>And I'm not against more teachers, more teachers doing a

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 5>good job as a wonderful thing.

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Smaller teachers, smaller classrooms is great. Sure, Yeah, nobody's against that.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 4>But while the students grew in population by five percent,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 4>the number of principles and assistant principles grew by forty percent.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Now there's no possible way you can explain that not

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 4>and a chance you can explain that and have it

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 4>makes sense to me.

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 5>And dwarfing That number administrative staff increased by ninety five percent,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 5>or about nineteen times the rate of student enrollment since

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 5>the year two.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 4>Thousand also impossible to explain other than you're just creating

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 4>jobs for people to do that aren't needed. So when

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 4>last we chatted with William Launch and Ess, he mentioned

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 4>that school choice is on the ballot and seventy percent

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 4>of Americans are in favor of it.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 2>That is a huge majority. Can you roll the next clip?

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 7>Michael Trump supports school choice, Harris doesn't. Number one, we

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 7>want school choice, but we have to get out of

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 7>this Washington thing. Well, Harris promises to strength and education.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 7>Her party's platform is consistent with that of the teacher unions.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 7>We oppose the use of private school vouchers, tuition, tax credits, opportunities, scholarships,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 7>and other schemes that divert taxpayer funded resources away from

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 7>public education.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's a scheme.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I gotta believe if you fully explained, even in your

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 4>like your low income inner city areas, if you explain

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 4>to people, look, we're going to cut you a check

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>at the beginning of the year for twenty five grand.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Here are the local private schools you could send your

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 4>kid to that are between I don't know ten and

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty thousand dollars a year.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Which would you rather do? They would just take that option.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 5>And just to make it clear for folks, it's it's

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 5>not a check exactly, it's a so you have to

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 5>use it for education.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to allay people's.

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Fear of I'm just trying to make the argument clear

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 4>of what would be because I think they confuse it

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 4>so much with all the various words for it, that

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 4>people don't understand that's an option. Sure could be an

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 4>option in a different structured society.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and the utter egregious failure of America's government schools.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 5>And I haven't even gotten into far left neo Marxist indoctrination,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 5>which if they were doing like the world's greatest job

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 5>in teaching to read and write and an arithmetic but

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 5>indoctrinating your kid to be a Marxist who hates America

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 5>and hates Wistern civilizations, I'd yank them out anyway, right, No, obviously,

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 5>if you just cut people a check, there'd be an

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 5>awful lot of people that would go on vacation and

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 5>their kid won't go to school at all. But you know,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 5>in effect, you get to spend this much money on education, harmy,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 5>You want tons of people would choose a different option

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 5>than their local public school. Sure, get together with four

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 5>other families and hire the best teacher in the world

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 5>to run a classroom for your five kids.

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 2>And it's our for instance, and it's our money, we taxpayers' money,

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:19.959
<v Speaker 2>and my kid.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Why don't I get to decide exactly? And the teachers' unions,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 4>damn them, the big ones make it sound like you're

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 4>yanking money out.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Of public schools or government school You won't.

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Need it for that kid, because my kid's not gonna

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 4>be going there, So I'll go ahead and.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Keep my money. Yeah, I'm keeping my money.

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 7>Last clip Paul show growing support for school choice. Close

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 7>to one million students are currently enrolled in programs nationwide,

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 7>with taxpayers typically covering half to three quarters of private tuition.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be nice to be able to

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 2>choose where you go to school somewhat. Public school money

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 2>should stay in public schools. That's the debate.

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 7>Choice supporter say public money is their money too, and

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 7>that states actually spend less when students use a voucher

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 7>or tax credit than if that child attended a public school.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>How sure? Opponents say that isn't the point.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 7>They argue school choice programs suck resources women already struggling

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 7>public systems.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 4>A bloated, miserable, failing government program. How about you phrase

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 4>it like that, or how about you just bottom line

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 4>it to your own kid for less money, then we'll

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 4>be spent to go there and get a bad result.

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I can go here and get a better result. VM. Yeah.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I think because of the way human brains work, people

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 4>have been used to government schools their entire lives. People

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>of our generation certainly, and younger parents. Right now, you

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 4>got to shake yourself out of the assumption.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>That that's always been there, it will always be there, It.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Is always the best choice. Would you go with government

0:28:54.080 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 4>air conditioning service if the results were analogous to government education?

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Would you go with that?

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Would you go to a government grocery store if the

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 4>food was as miserable government?

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>And quality is the education government. I could go through a.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 4>List of Yeah, government go and run in all restaurants.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Every town has a postave place, a Hamburger place, whatever,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 4>run by the government's way. It's always been what's your argument,

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 4>food's bad, it's overpriced. They've got fifty people in there.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 4>We're going to make one burger for some reason. Would

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 4>you buy a government car or would you prefer that

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 4>you kept your tax money and took a voucher down

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 4>to your local dealer and bought a non government car.

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if it will happen in my lifetime,

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 4>because it's going to take a long time to break through,

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 4>as you've said, But with those poll numbers, I think

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 4>we're going to reach a point where we decide no,

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 4>every family's gonna come up with their own way for

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 4>educating their kid, with a bunch of different options in

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 4>their town. You know, this church based school, this other

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 4>private school that leans more toward arts, this private school

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 4>that leans more towards stem, whatever, this one that's closer

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 4>to my house. All kinds of different choices that are

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 4>just have better results and worth repeating Corey Deangelis's headline,

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 4>the public school system is a jobs program for administrators

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 4>and teachers who, again, God bless them, they do the fabulous,

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 4>fabulous works. Some of them government schools are now a

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 4>jobs program for a union to make itself rich.

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Have you considered being good at your jobs? And then

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 2>you have a whole bunch of private.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Things, institutions and entities in your town that educate kids,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 4>and they'll have so much reason to keep costs down

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 4>and test scores high so that they can attract more students,

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 4>whereas your public school apparently has no incentive whatsoever. As

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 4>you can see in a whole bunch of big cities

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 4>where nobody's reading at proficiency level or doing MATHI proficiency level,

0:30:58.800 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 4>and they just keep on keeping on.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 5>And to quote the great Tim Sandifer, or at least

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 5>reference him, what are they saying at those Chicago schools

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 5>about their miserable failure.

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>They're saying, we need more money.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we would be more successful if we had more money. Wow,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 4>that's that's quite the story, man. That's a burbling change

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 4>in the way society is structured. Let it burble, man,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 4>let it burble. I don't know how long it'll take, man,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 4>that's fascinating. If you have any thoughts on that text

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 4>line four one two nine five kftc.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong, Hey Eddie.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Let's go Trump.

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 7>What's the main reason why you are supporting President Trump,

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 7>the border.

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Any message you got for President Trump, go get the win,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Go get the win. We got it. Win the election.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Come on, I know what I want to happen. President

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump back in office.

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 7>This is a state that's going to make or break

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 7>this election.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling about it?

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 4>You know what we're doing winning, winning, you know why

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:00.719
<v Speaker 4>we're winning policy. So that's Steelers fan in the parking

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 4>lot at the game the other day that Trump attended.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sure they went out of their way to

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 4>find a group of people that looked like Trump fans.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe they had flags, hats, I don't know, whatever, But

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Trump got introduced at the game. We didn't play the clip.

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 4>People started chanting USA, USA when Trump was introduced at

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 4>the Pittsburgh game and he was around doing various things

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 4>in a hard hat, helmet and that sort of thing.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 4>We're going to talk about masculinity and how it polls

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 4>among Republicans and Democrats, which fits into this. But did

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 4>you see the thing? It was a really cool AI

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 4>picture of Trump. It's Trump's head on a Pittsburgh Steeler body,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 4>and it's such a good AI picture. It looks like

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Trump if he was playing in the NFL.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 5>It's really cool, but from like the nineteen seventies heyday,

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 5>it had that look to me.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah, yeah yeah, And it's a pretty cool picture.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, the funny thing is that Newsweek on their

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Twitter feed had that picture and had this disclaimer. Donald

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Trump has shared is what is likely an AI generated

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 4>image on his truth social account, which showed him as

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 4>a player for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Thank you, Oh he

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 4>didn't play for the Steelers with Terry Bradshaw elo. Elon

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Musk actually retweeted Newsweek's disclaimer with you know, the laughing emoji,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 4>like hilarious. Thanks for the pointing out Trump isn't actually

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 4>currently a member of the Pittsburgh Steelers.

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 4>On the whole masculinity front, a poll finds that the

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 4>GOP men identify as highly masculine more than Democratic men.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that a surprised anyone.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 4>A recent Pew Research Center poll found that fifty three

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 4>percent of Republican men consider themselves highly masculine. Fifty three

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 4>percent compared to twenty nine percent of male Democrats.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 2>That's quite a gap. Now.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 4>When I first read that, I thought, what I call

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 4>myself highly masculine and a poll. Well, to get around that,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 4>they didn't ask you, are you highly masculine or kind

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 4>of That would have been I'd feel a little uncomfortable

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 4>with that question myself, Yeah, because that just I mean,

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 4>I actually kind of do, but it just seems like

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of a douchey thing to say anyway, But so.

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>They don't do it that way.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 4>They have traits and then you click, you know, on

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 4>a scale of one to five where you are in

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 4>various traits, and then it puts you in the category

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 4>of how masculine you see yourself as, which is a

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 4>much better way to.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Do it, And we got to do that on air.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>That'd be fun.

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 4>It would be qualities such as confidence, risk taking, assertiveness,

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 4>physical strength, stuff like that. You rank yourself and then

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>other things such as, you know, do you soft speaking,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 4>caring about others, affectionate behavior toward this group or that group,

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 4>and then you rank yourself and then they spit out

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 4>where you are on the masculine scale. And again the

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Republican numbers were fifty three percent highly masculine to twenty

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 4>nine percent for Democrats, which is interesting and might explain

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 4>some of the gender gap that's going on where Trump

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 4>is leading by like seventeen points among men, whereas Kamala

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Harris is leading by roughly the same number among women.

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 4>And there's never been a divergence this large strictly along

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 4>male female in a presidential election before.

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 5>And it helps explain why the Democrats have nominated hashtag tampon.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Trotsky, Tim.

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 5>Who kicks around like a sitcom dad, ashamed of his maleness.

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>So how much, sir, damn business? How much time I got,

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Michael my out of time? I got a little less

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 2>than a minute, Okay, I can get it.

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 4>So on the positive side for masculinity, that you had

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 4>people explaining highly masculine to me is a male who's

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 4>looking to lead in every area, someone who does not

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 4>accept just getting by, wants to excel at everything he does.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah blah. I like the description of that.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 4>You had other people, though, who described it as its

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 4>traditional toxic masculinity, rooting in the suppression of women and blah.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah that sort of thing.

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh please, A toxic masculinity, what a ste masculine male

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 4>doesn't need to oppress anybody or belittle or hold down

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 4>anybody in toxic the point, and toxic masculinity implies that

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 4>just being traditionally male is toxic somemile, which I find

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to punch him in the stomach for seeing that.

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Whoops, Sorry

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty