WEBVTT - We Lost The War in Afghanistan. Now What? 

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:24.116
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:24.116 --> 0:00:27.716
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:28.356 --> 0:00:32.996
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. This week, no story is more pressing

0:00:33.356 --> 0:00:37.236
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and elsewhere than the fall of

0:00:37.316 --> 0:00:40.636
<v Speaker 1>Kabul in the aftermath of the US announcement that it

0:00:40.756 --> 0:00:45.196
<v Speaker 1>is imminently withdrawing from Afghanistan. As this story broke, I

0:00:45.316 --> 0:00:48.356
<v Speaker 1>knew that the person I wanted most to hear from

0:00:48.396 --> 0:00:52.436
<v Speaker 1>about it was doctor Emil Simpson. Emil is a former

0:00:52.476 --> 0:00:56.036
<v Speaker 1>British Army officer who served three tours of duty in

0:00:56.076 --> 0:01:00.636
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan with the Royal Gurkha Rifles. He is a scholar

0:01:00.676 --> 0:01:03.716
<v Speaker 1>who wrote an extraordinary book, War from the Ground Up,

0:01:04.036 --> 0:01:08.756
<v Speaker 1>twenty first Century Combat as Politics, that described new forms

0:01:08.796 --> 0:01:11.396
<v Speaker 1>of war fair both from the standpoint of the soldiers

0:01:11.436 --> 0:01:14.316
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and from the big picture perspective of

0:01:14.436 --> 0:01:18.156
<v Speaker 1>military strategy. He's also a scholar of international law and

0:01:18.196 --> 0:01:22.316
<v Speaker 1>international relations, and currently is a barrister in London working

0:01:22.356 --> 0:01:26.676
<v Speaker 1>on international and commercial matters. Emil, thank you so much

0:01:26.756 --> 0:01:34.796
<v Speaker 1>for joining me, especially on short notice. Emil. Let's start

0:01:34.836 --> 0:01:39.036
<v Speaker 1>with the immediate question of the evacuation, which we're all

0:01:39.116 --> 0:01:43.836
<v Speaker 1>watching in real time. How is it going, and how

0:01:43.836 --> 0:01:48.556
<v Speaker 1>would you compare it to other instances of evacuation from Afghanistan,

0:01:48.676 --> 0:01:52.156
<v Speaker 1>since eventually, it seems any power that decides that it

0:01:52.196 --> 0:01:57.996
<v Speaker 1>wants to govern Afghanistan ends up evacuating inner hurry. Yes, well,

0:01:58.076 --> 0:02:01.916
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand the evacuation, the plan is to

0:02:01.996 --> 0:02:05.476
<v Speaker 1>complete it in two or three days. The Nazi evacuation

0:02:05.516 --> 0:02:07.596
<v Speaker 1>of our forces, it's a question mark as to how

0:02:07.596 --> 0:02:10.236
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get out inter as others who helped

0:02:10.316 --> 0:02:13.156
<v Speaker 1>us who are not part of that evacuation. And that's

0:02:13.236 --> 0:02:17.796
<v Speaker 1>clearly a severe problem in terms of the kind of

0:02:17.876 --> 0:02:20.956
<v Speaker 1>very near term situation. The basic problem is that because

0:02:21.196 --> 0:02:25.196
<v Speaker 1>the US evacuated Background air Base sometime ago, there's only

0:02:25.236 --> 0:02:27.876
<v Speaker 1>one airfield effectively in Afghanistan that we can use, and

0:02:27.876 --> 0:02:31.236
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the Comble Airport, which only has one runaway

0:02:31.356 --> 0:02:34.236
<v Speaker 1>and is overlooked by high ground. So it's clearly very vulnerable.

0:02:34.596 --> 0:02:37.476
<v Speaker 1>So you could have, you know, an accident. So regards

0:02:37.476 --> 0:02:39.796
<v Speaker 1>to what Taliban leaderships say, a kind of unit on

0:02:39.836 --> 0:02:42.236
<v Speaker 1>the ground that doesn't follow them might decide to take

0:02:42.276 --> 0:02:44.796
<v Speaker 1>a pot shot at a plane that clearly would be disastrous.

0:02:44.836 --> 0:02:47.276
<v Speaker 1>That that's the kind of flash point that could happen,

0:02:47.556 --> 0:02:49.756
<v Speaker 1>but short of that, it looks like we're just going

0:02:49.756 --> 0:02:54.356
<v Speaker 1>to get out without further do really, as long as

0:02:54.356 --> 0:02:59.036
<v Speaker 1>there's no accident, you know, for me personally, I do

0:02:59.756 --> 0:03:04.196
<v Speaker 1>remember vividly the expect not just the interpreters but of

0:03:04.236 --> 0:03:08.156
<v Speaker 1>cause them too, but also just the ordinary Afghan soldiers

0:03:08.356 --> 0:03:10.596
<v Speaker 1>and especially you know, their officers who are basically the

0:03:10.596 --> 0:03:14.836
<v Speaker 1>people I was working with on a daily basis. Who

0:03:14.836 --> 0:03:17.196
<v Speaker 1>are my age. These aren't the kind of high level

0:03:17.556 --> 0:03:19.476
<v Speaker 1>officials in Kabul who are cr up. These are guys

0:03:19.516 --> 0:03:24.996
<v Speaker 1>who and women too, who were very brave and very hopeful,

0:03:25.116 --> 0:03:28.836
<v Speaker 1>very idealistic. They'd grown up really with this new government

0:03:28.916 --> 0:03:30.476
<v Speaker 1>or at these they didn't remember the had a bands,

0:03:30.476 --> 0:03:35.636
<v Speaker 1>they're too young, wanted a sort of better Afghanistan, and

0:03:36.236 --> 0:03:39.916
<v Speaker 1>they really were putting their lives on the line for

0:03:39.996 --> 0:03:44.596
<v Speaker 1>this project. And those are the people who have basically

0:03:44.636 --> 0:03:47.676
<v Speaker 1>been abandoned, you know, unlike US, I mean, Western Force

0:03:47.756 --> 0:03:50.756
<v Speaker 1>is obviously for extremely hard too. These guys were deployed

0:03:50.756 --> 0:03:52.556
<v Speaker 1>constantly on the ground. You know, they were in Hell

0:03:52.636 --> 0:03:55.076
<v Speaker 1>Mount for ten years without relief. I mean maybe a

0:03:55.116 --> 0:03:57.876
<v Speaker 1>week back in Kabul or whatever, but basically they were

0:03:57.916 --> 0:04:01.476
<v Speaker 1>just constantly there. This was their life. This wasn't at all,

0:04:01.556 --> 0:04:04.396
<v Speaker 1>This was their life, and they didn't have the option

0:04:04.396 --> 0:04:07.916
<v Speaker 1>to leave Afghanistan. I don't know whether it crossed their

0:04:07.916 --> 0:04:11.116
<v Speaker 1>mind that day they might have to evacuate, but that's

0:04:11.156 --> 0:04:13.556
<v Speaker 1>the position we're in now, and we absolutely have a

0:04:13.596 --> 0:04:17.116
<v Speaker 1>moral obligation to evacuate these people. You know, regardless of

0:04:17.116 --> 0:04:19.076
<v Speaker 1>whether we leave Ghanistan, we should be ashamed of banding

0:04:19.116 --> 0:04:21.196
<v Speaker 1>these people because this isn't These aren't kind of numbers.

0:04:21.196 --> 0:04:23.796
<v Speaker 1>These are real people. And personally, I think it's not

0:04:23.836 --> 0:04:27.036
<v Speaker 1>good enough just to evacuate the interpreters, because yes, we

0:04:27.076 --> 0:04:29.956
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't evacuate those people, but there's a whole bunch of

0:04:30.196 --> 0:04:34.156
<v Speaker 1>very brave Afghan junior officers and you know, equivalent in

0:04:34.196 --> 0:04:37.876
<v Speaker 1>the government who have served us, and we should evacuated

0:04:37.876 --> 0:04:41.316
<v Speaker 1>them and their families too. That that is absolutely moral responsibility.

0:04:41.476 --> 0:04:45.356
<v Speaker 1>The West bears at the moment in terms of historical comparisons,

0:04:46.116 --> 0:04:49.996
<v Speaker 1>the evacuation of Kabal in eighteen forty two after the

0:04:49.996 --> 0:04:52.796
<v Speaker 1>First Afghan War, when the entire British army was destroyed,

0:04:53.596 --> 0:04:56.876
<v Speaker 1>so that that clearly is an instant of an evacuation

0:04:56.916 --> 0:04:59.316
<v Speaker 1>that went far worse. But you know, an example that

0:04:59.396 --> 0:05:02.516
<v Speaker 1>evacuation that went better is that would be the Soviet experience,

0:05:02.596 --> 0:05:06.716
<v Speaker 1>in which the Soviet main force left Afghanistan in nineteen

0:05:06.756 --> 0:05:10.556
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine having trained a Naska forces of roughly the

0:05:10.596 --> 0:05:14.956
<v Speaker 1>same size, about three hundred thousand, and those Afghan forces

0:05:14.956 --> 0:05:19.076
<v Speaker 1>fought on for another two years until the Soviet Union

0:05:19.156 --> 0:05:23.556
<v Speaker 1>itself collapsed in nineteen ninety one. And the Soviet force

0:05:23.636 --> 0:05:28.116
<v Speaker 1>also counterattacked critically. So when the Mujadin massed immediately after

0:05:28.156 --> 0:05:32.476
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet withdrawal, the Soviet main force withdraw the Mujadin

0:05:32.596 --> 0:05:35.876
<v Speaker 1>tried to attack Jaulalabad in a conventional kind of attack.

0:05:36.596 --> 0:05:39.876
<v Speaker 1>The Afghan Soviet Army, with Soviet air support and some

0:05:40.116 --> 0:05:45.796
<v Speaker 1>artillery support, counterattacks and severely defeated the Mujadin, who basically fragmented,

0:05:46.476 --> 0:05:49.476
<v Speaker 1>and that brought them more time. So there are important

0:05:49.636 --> 0:05:53.836
<v Speaker 1>comparisons being made in terms of the historical analogies. Another

0:05:53.876 --> 0:05:56.876
<v Speaker 1>analogy that's foremost in the minds of Americans, of course,

0:05:57.156 --> 0:06:00.596
<v Speaker 1>is the American withdrawal from South Vietnam in the wake

0:06:00.636 --> 0:06:04.516
<v Speaker 1>of the fall of Saigan. As we know, in that instance,

0:06:05.196 --> 0:06:07.516
<v Speaker 1>some people who had been allied with the United States

0:06:07.556 --> 0:06:10.356
<v Speaker 1>and have helped the United States were able to get out,

0:06:10.396 --> 0:06:14.716
<v Speaker 1>but the great majority were essentially left to their fates,

0:06:14.756 --> 0:06:18.876
<v Speaker 1>some to be oppressed or even killed by the North Vietnamese,

0:06:19.036 --> 0:06:23.716
<v Speaker 1>others to desperately get onto boats and hope that the

0:06:23.996 --> 0:06:26.236
<v Speaker 1>rafts or barely see where the vessels they were on,

0:06:26.276 --> 0:06:29.316
<v Speaker 1>would take them somewhere. And certainly from news reports, it

0:06:29.396 --> 0:06:32.356
<v Speaker 1>sounds as though there may be a significant number of

0:06:32.876 --> 0:06:36.436
<v Speaker 1>people who worked with the Allies in Afghanistan who don't

0:06:36.476 --> 0:06:39.436
<v Speaker 1>manage to get out. I was wondering whether when you

0:06:39.516 --> 0:06:41.916
<v Speaker 1>were on the ground now a bit more than a

0:06:41.916 --> 0:06:46.876
<v Speaker 1>decade ago as an officer, whether the locals who worked

0:06:46.956 --> 0:06:50.796
<v Speaker 1>with you were already thinking about what would happen if

0:06:50.796 --> 0:06:54.356
<v Speaker 1>the war were lost and they were left to their fates.

0:06:54.756 --> 0:06:57.356
<v Speaker 1>Was that on their minds? Was it something you discussed

0:06:57.356 --> 0:06:59.196
<v Speaker 1>with them, or was it something that nobody wants to

0:06:59.196 --> 0:07:02.036
<v Speaker 1>talk about because it was too terrible a prospect. It

0:07:02.076 --> 0:07:04.036
<v Speaker 1>depended on where you were in the country. I think

0:07:04.156 --> 0:07:07.876
<v Speaker 1>in southern Afghanistan people did not think that the army

0:07:07.916 --> 0:07:10.036
<v Speaker 1>would hold out in the country side, at least not

0:07:10.076 --> 0:07:13.276
<v Speaker 1>in the whole countryside. Because the Taliban is predominantly a

0:07:13.516 --> 0:07:16.476
<v Speaker 1>Christian movement from the south and east to Afghanistan. People

0:07:16.516 --> 0:07:18.676
<v Speaker 1>did not think that the north to Afghanistan, or the

0:07:18.716 --> 0:07:21.556
<v Speaker 1>center or the big cities would fall to the Taliban,

0:07:21.676 --> 0:07:25.076
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's the Soviet analogy in nineteen eighty eight,

0:07:25.196 --> 0:07:28.396
<v Speaker 1>that the Majudin took the countryside, especially in the south

0:07:28.396 --> 0:07:30.716
<v Speaker 1>and east, they did not take the north, or the

0:07:30.756 --> 0:07:34.076
<v Speaker 1>center or the big cities. It is heartrap heart rendering

0:07:34.156 --> 0:07:38.636
<v Speaker 1>seeing or hearing about the experience of those who worked

0:07:38.676 --> 0:07:42.516
<v Speaker 1>with us who couldn't get out, And indeed it's particularly

0:07:42.556 --> 0:07:46.636
<v Speaker 1>poignant when one has oneself given those assurances, not necessarily

0:07:46.636 --> 0:07:49.916
<v Speaker 1>in absolute terms, but certainly implied. You know, when you're

0:07:50.236 --> 0:07:51.716
<v Speaker 1>leading to platoon of soldiers and you go to from

0:07:51.716 --> 0:07:55.316
<v Speaker 1>Afghan village you're based there for six months, and the

0:07:55.396 --> 0:07:57.876
<v Speaker 1>local elder or you know that their people are trying

0:07:57.916 --> 0:07:59.796
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions about whether to support you or not,

0:08:00.076 --> 0:08:03.076
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to encourage them. You are implicitly giving assurances.

0:08:03.396 --> 0:08:05.636
<v Speaker 1>And sure you're not giving insurances and your personally, it's

0:08:05.636 --> 0:08:08.196
<v Speaker 1>not you're personally making the promise. You're a you're acting

0:08:08.196 --> 0:08:12.716
<v Speaker 1>as a representative channeling national policy. But they are nonetheless

0:08:12.756 --> 0:08:15.756
<v Speaker 1>real promises, and there are real life and death. Effectually

0:08:15.796 --> 0:08:18.956
<v Speaker 1>decisions and risk calculations made on the base of those assurances,

0:08:19.036 --> 0:08:21.076
<v Speaker 1>and so when those people are sold out, which they

0:08:21.076 --> 0:08:23.476
<v Speaker 1>absolutely have been, you know, you can say, well, that's

0:08:23.476 --> 0:08:25.636
<v Speaker 1>not a national interest. That doesn't change the fact that

0:08:25.636 --> 0:08:27.636
<v Speaker 1>promises have been given. And if you're the one who

0:08:27.676 --> 0:08:30.996
<v Speaker 1>actually gave the promises, as you know thousands of Western

0:08:30.876 --> 0:08:34.476
<v Speaker 1>military personnel and diplomats and aid workers would have done,

0:08:34.796 --> 0:08:39.836
<v Speaker 1>that's a very different moral proposition. That's very tough, and

0:08:39.876 --> 0:08:43.356
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine what you're feeling around it. What went

0:08:43.436 --> 0:08:47.116
<v Speaker 1>wrong in the most recent period of time, I mean,

0:08:47.716 --> 0:08:51.556
<v Speaker 1>the US, the UK, other actors spent upwards of a

0:08:51.596 --> 0:08:57.956
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars on trying to shore up, train and essentially

0:08:58.036 --> 0:09:02.396
<v Speaker 1>buck up an Afghan military, and yet it seemed that

0:09:02.516 --> 0:09:06.116
<v Speaker 1>once the final withdrawal was announced, the response of the

0:09:06.116 --> 0:09:09.836
<v Speaker 1>Afghan military effectively was to lose more. I think that

0:09:09.876 --> 0:09:14.436
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't win and give up the ghost relatively quickly.

0:09:15.116 --> 0:09:20.276
<v Speaker 1>Why what's happening here? The first thing to say, I

0:09:20.356 --> 0:09:22.916
<v Speaker 1>think this is not a story that's really cut through

0:09:23.556 --> 0:09:25.036
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of days, but even in the

0:09:25.076 --> 0:09:28.276
<v Speaker 1>last five years, frankly is the number of Afghan casualties.

0:09:28.596 --> 0:09:32.156
<v Speaker 1>So the basic message from President Biden is the Afghans

0:09:32.476 --> 0:09:36.676
<v Speaker 1>won't fight for themselves, therefore Western soldiers should not fight

0:09:37.276 --> 0:09:40.756
<v Speaker 1>for them when they won't fight for themselves. Were that true,

0:09:40.796 --> 0:09:43.396
<v Speaker 1>that would be a good argument. But that's not the case,

0:09:43.436 --> 0:09:47.036
<v Speaker 1>at least in a five year time frame. So although

0:09:47.116 --> 0:09:50.676
<v Speaker 1>the country numbers are estimates, it's roughly a ballpark figure.

0:09:50.716 --> 0:09:53.636
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at the Brookings Institution Afghan Index,

0:09:53.636 --> 0:09:58.436
<v Speaker 1>which is most reliable source, they've estimated forty five thousands,

0:09:58.516 --> 0:10:02.556
<v Speaker 1>so that's forty five thousand Afghan security forces. That's police

0:10:02.556 --> 0:10:07.116
<v Speaker 1>an army deaths between two thousand and fourteen and two twenty,

0:10:07.236 --> 0:10:10.916
<v Speaker 1>so just over five six years. So you compare that

0:10:10.956 --> 0:10:14.356
<v Speaker 1>to US forces which are just under two thousand, five

0:10:14.476 --> 0:10:17.196
<v Speaker 1>hundred deaths, and then coalition deaths of another two thousand

0:10:17.236 --> 0:10:20.156
<v Speaker 1>and another two roughly contractors, So about five or six

0:10:20.196 --> 0:10:23.916
<v Speaker 1>thousand Western death if you liked, the Afghan forces have

0:10:23.996 --> 0:10:27.476
<v Speaker 1>taken about eight times more dead and then you're going

0:10:27.516 --> 0:10:29.276
<v Speaker 1>to have a factor of about three in terms of

0:10:29.276 --> 0:10:32.716
<v Speaker 1>wounded from that. So the idea that the Afghan army

0:10:32.836 --> 0:10:35.316
<v Speaker 1>have not fought is it is not right. Forty five

0:10:35.356 --> 0:10:38.036
<v Speaker 1>thousand of them if that estimate is right, or even

0:10:38.036 --> 0:10:41.556
<v Speaker 1>close to being right have for and died doing exactly that.

0:10:42.156 --> 0:10:45.036
<v Speaker 1>Were they fighting for their government? No, their government is

0:10:45.036 --> 0:10:47.396
<v Speaker 1>crupt and rotten, and everyone knows that they're fighting for

0:10:47.436 --> 0:10:50.716
<v Speaker 1>their families, who, unlike their leadership, don't have the option

0:10:50.876 --> 0:10:55.116
<v Speaker 1>of leaving Afghanistan. They were fighting in remote provinces with

0:10:55.196 --> 0:10:57.476
<v Speaker 1>their backs to the wall for the last five years,

0:10:57.476 --> 0:11:01.196
<v Speaker 1>basically getting hammered and taking a lot of Catholics. Granted

0:11:01.316 --> 0:11:05.596
<v Speaker 1>they weren't fighting completely independently. They had crucially Western logistical

0:11:05.636 --> 0:11:08.396
<v Speaker 1>support the Afghan army mainly because of massive corruption at

0:11:08.396 --> 0:11:11.276
<v Speaker 1>the higher levels of government, and the army was unable

0:11:11.316 --> 0:11:15.556
<v Speaker 1>to do logistics. You put to you put those two

0:11:15.556 --> 0:11:17.636
<v Speaker 1>factors together, and you've got an army that's basically being

0:11:17.676 --> 0:11:20.276
<v Speaker 1>hammered in terms of catalties and has fought bravely, but

0:11:20.676 --> 0:11:24.516
<v Speaker 1>it's morale's very low. The Taliban attack right at the

0:11:24.596 --> 0:11:28.156
<v Speaker 1>very moment at which that Afghan force has to adapt

0:11:28.236 --> 0:11:30.156
<v Speaker 1>to having no logistics support, so they can't get their

0:11:30.196 --> 0:11:33.316
<v Speaker 1>couches out, they can't get ammunition and other supplies forward,

0:11:34.236 --> 0:11:36.836
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time they see various members of

0:11:36.876 --> 0:11:40.956
<v Speaker 1>their government at the cabinet level basically tweeting oh, I've resigned,

0:11:40.956 --> 0:11:44.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving my leaving combolts Jordan, my family in Dubai

0:11:44.236 --> 0:11:48.116
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and finally enough morale collapses. You know, query

0:11:48.156 --> 0:11:50.676
<v Speaker 1>whether a Western force would be an indifferent You know,

0:11:50.916 --> 0:11:54.916
<v Speaker 1>it's entirely understandable why the Afghan regular forces, isolated and

0:11:54.916 --> 0:11:59.236
<v Speaker 1>abandoned in these provinces basically gave up. It is also

0:11:59.276 --> 0:12:02.716
<v Speaker 1>clever as the final point of the Taliban to attack

0:12:02.796 --> 0:12:06.116
<v Speaker 1>the southern towns first, because they basically attacks and the

0:12:06.116 --> 0:12:09.036
<v Speaker 1>southern the big southern towns, and that triggered the Afghan

0:12:09.196 --> 0:12:11.756
<v Speaker 1>government to deploy its reserves special forces kind of the

0:12:11.916 --> 0:12:14.316
<v Speaker 1>unit they went south, and then the Taliban switched they

0:12:14.356 --> 0:12:17.036
<v Speaker 1>main effort and sat the north. In conjunction with clever

0:12:17.036 --> 0:12:19.476
<v Speaker 1>political tactics from negotiating strends and stuff, and you put

0:12:19.516 --> 0:12:22.636
<v Speaker 1>that together, it's not surprising that the whole thing fell

0:12:22.676 --> 0:12:26.916
<v Speaker 1>apart emil. A question that's really very pressing for a

0:12:26.956 --> 0:12:30.836
<v Speaker 1>lot of listeners, myself included, is do you think this

0:12:30.996 --> 0:12:34.236
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal was correct? Was it the right thing to do?

0:12:34.316 --> 0:12:36.956
<v Speaker 1>Because part of what you're saying in terms of the

0:12:36.956 --> 0:12:40.836
<v Speaker 1>directionality of the war suggests that there wasn't really a

0:12:40.956 --> 0:12:44.676
<v Speaker 1>viable way either for the security forces to beat the

0:12:44.676 --> 0:12:47.956
<v Speaker 1>Taliban or even to just hold them off indefinitely. And

0:12:47.996 --> 0:12:50.236
<v Speaker 1>that starts to contribute to the idea that withdrawal was

0:12:50.876 --> 0:12:53.396
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. But of course the alternative

0:12:53.396 --> 0:12:56.436
<v Speaker 1>picture would be one in which there were ways to

0:12:56.556 --> 0:12:59.756
<v Speaker 1>withdraw eventually, but to do it in a different way

0:12:59.756 --> 0:13:02.436
<v Speaker 1>that would have a chance of stopping the country from

0:13:02.476 --> 0:13:04.756
<v Speaker 1>falling into the hands of the Taliban in this way.

0:13:04.796 --> 0:13:06.756
<v Speaker 1>So what is your view on that was the withdrawal

0:13:06.756 --> 0:13:10.156
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do? Now well as the military side,

0:13:10.196 --> 0:13:12.556
<v Speaker 1>on the political side. On the military side, the US

0:13:12.676 --> 0:13:15.356
<v Speaker 1>could in theory have stayed there indefinitely. Had a force

0:13:15.396 --> 0:13:17.756
<v Speaker 1>of roughly two thousand, five hundreds by the end, spending

0:13:17.836 --> 0:13:20.916
<v Speaker 1>roughly three billion dollars a month on a military budget

0:13:20.956 --> 0:13:23.476
<v Speaker 1>of around just under eight hundred billion dollars a year.

0:13:24.036 --> 0:13:26.636
<v Speaker 1>That's a significant but it's not a huge cost objectively,

0:13:26.756 --> 0:13:28.836
<v Speaker 1>so you could just carried on. I should mention that

0:13:29.236 --> 0:13:31.916
<v Speaker 1>eight US soldiers died in twenty twenty, so that's a

0:13:31.916 --> 0:13:34.676
<v Speaker 1>serious number, but it's pals a comparison to the Afghan

0:13:34.676 --> 0:13:38.396
<v Speaker 1>categies at numb As I mentioned. Politically, clearly, there was

0:13:38.436 --> 0:13:40.276
<v Speaker 1>an appetite for that, So how do you square that.

0:13:40.996 --> 0:13:42.756
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, you've got this fact that when

0:13:42.796 --> 0:13:46.836
<v Speaker 1>the US is there as a backstop, providing sport, providing logistics, crucially,

0:13:46.916 --> 0:13:49.916
<v Speaker 1>the Afghan forces can carry on. You could have maintained

0:13:49.916 --> 0:13:52.676
<v Speaker 1>the stalemate indefinitely, but there's no political wealth of the

0:13:52.676 --> 0:13:56.036
<v Speaker 1>indefinite presence. Answer. You have to get a peace deal,

0:13:56.196 --> 0:13:59.796
<v Speaker 1>So you have to use the stalemate as leverage to

0:13:59.796 --> 0:14:02.436
<v Speaker 1>get a pace deal with the Taliban. That PCAL wasn't coming.

0:14:03.316 --> 0:14:05.916
<v Speaker 1>I think a mistake was not to counterattack in the

0:14:05.996 --> 0:14:08.676
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. The Taliban attack kind of paralyzed us.

0:14:08.796 --> 0:14:13.996
<v Speaker 1>They too fast. We appeared unable to move almost I mentioned,

0:14:14.076 --> 0:14:17.236
<v Speaker 1>you know, in nineteen eighty nine the Soviets did counter

0:14:17.236 --> 0:14:22.636
<v Speaker 1>attack at Lalabad. And when a gorilla force changes from

0:14:22.676 --> 0:14:24.716
<v Speaker 1>being a gorilla force to being a conventional force, as

0:14:24.756 --> 0:14:26.836
<v Speaker 1>they must do to take a country, that's their most

0:14:26.876 --> 0:14:29.076
<v Speaker 1>vable moment. That's when you can really fight them for

0:14:29.116 --> 0:14:31.716
<v Speaker 1>once conventionally, and it wouldn't have been very hard to

0:14:31.756 --> 0:14:35.276
<v Speaker 1>inflict serious losses on them and basically forced them into

0:14:35.356 --> 0:14:38.236
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least at least give the peace deal

0:14:38.236 --> 0:14:40.956
<v Speaker 1>a chance. That's how Aban I think will surprised themselves

0:14:40.996 --> 0:14:42.796
<v Speaker 1>are how easily they took Kaba, And indeed, you know

0:14:42.836 --> 0:14:46.236
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about Sigon earlier. Note how in seventy two

0:14:46.356 --> 0:14:48.476
<v Speaker 1>in the East to seventy two the North Vietnamese also

0:14:48.516 --> 0:14:52.036
<v Speaker 1>tried to attack the Easter Offensive, and the Americans did

0:14:52.076 --> 0:14:56.036
<v Speaker 1>counter attack. And I'm surprised North Etnams with their political

0:14:56.076 --> 0:14:58.636
<v Speaker 1>will and bought more time, and he bought time for

0:14:58.676 --> 0:15:01.116
<v Speaker 1>the peace deal. And I mean, obviously it collapsed in

0:15:01.156 --> 0:15:03.276
<v Speaker 1>the end, but bought more time. So you know, a

0:15:03.276 --> 0:15:05.436
<v Speaker 1>counter attack would have helped to get that peace deal.

0:15:05.476 --> 0:15:09.116
<v Speaker 1>What it happened, who knows. It's impossible to be certain

0:15:09.116 --> 0:15:13.316
<v Speaker 1>about these things. But I think we should have counter

0:15:13.316 --> 0:15:16.596
<v Speaker 1>attack in terms of the wider decision. You know, it's

0:15:16.636 --> 0:15:19.596
<v Speaker 1>for the US president's judge, US natural interest. I'm not American.

0:15:19.676 --> 0:15:21.636
<v Speaker 1>It's not made to say that the Americans should or

0:15:21.636 --> 0:15:24.796
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't bear that cost. That's President Biden. And if he

0:15:24.836 --> 0:15:28.116
<v Speaker 1>thinks that that cost is too much, it I mean,

0:15:28.156 --> 0:15:30.796
<v Speaker 1>I think people in the Biden administration would probably respond

0:15:30.796 --> 0:15:33.196
<v Speaker 1>to that by saying that there was effectively a counter

0:15:33.276 --> 0:15:37.236
<v Speaker 1>attack in the second term of the Obama administration, and

0:15:37.276 --> 0:15:40.996
<v Speaker 1>that that was the effort that they hoped would be

0:15:41.076 --> 0:15:44.156
<v Speaker 1>able to turn the tide, but that it failed. That

0:15:44.276 --> 0:15:46.916
<v Speaker 1>then the Trump administration was just in a holding pattern,

0:15:46.956 --> 0:15:49.356
<v Speaker 1>and that Biden had already decided himself. And this is

0:15:49.356 --> 0:15:53.036
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear he had already decided, now seven years ago

0:15:53.116 --> 0:15:57.076
<v Speaker 1>or eight years ago, that this wasn't worth continuing. And

0:15:57.196 --> 0:16:00.876
<v Speaker 1>once he had that view, the possibility of motivating a

0:16:00.876 --> 0:16:04.476
<v Speaker 1>counter attack would have been pretty difficult because the Talbin

0:16:04.556 --> 0:16:06.236
<v Speaker 1>would have just tried to wait it out. You know,

0:16:06.236 --> 0:16:07.916
<v Speaker 1>they would have said, listen, you don't really mean it.

0:16:08.076 --> 0:16:09.996
<v Speaker 1>So if he had said, listen, we're just counterattacking in

0:16:10.116 --> 0:16:12.636
<v Speaker 1>order to change the strategic calculus and make the Taliband negotiate,

0:16:12.796 --> 0:16:14.636
<v Speaker 1>which was a version of what the United States had

0:16:14.636 --> 0:16:17.836
<v Speaker 1>already said between twenty twelve and twenty fifteen, it just

0:16:17.876 --> 0:16:20.996
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have worked. Yeah, you put your finger on the

0:16:21.036 --> 0:16:23.316
<v Speaker 1>pulse of the master. If you like, the key is surprised.

0:16:23.356 --> 0:16:25.156
<v Speaker 1>You've got to make the Taliban think it's in the

0:16:25.196 --> 0:16:30.036
<v Speaker 1>minds of the enemy. That's where victory lies. It's psychological state,

0:16:30.076 --> 0:16:34.436
<v Speaker 1>if you like, and surprised works in Afghanstan. The surgery

0:16:34.476 --> 0:16:37.596
<v Speaker 1>was not surprised. It was telegraphed the idea was we'll

0:16:37.596 --> 0:16:39.796
<v Speaker 1>search for three years and then we'll draw down. So

0:16:39.836 --> 0:16:42.636
<v Speaker 1>it was all very predictable, very telegraphed, no surprise, and

0:16:42.716 --> 0:16:44.836
<v Speaker 1>indeed this points to a broader failing in the West

0:16:44.916 --> 0:16:48.436
<v Speaker 1>approach strategy, at least in my view, whereby we think

0:16:48.436 --> 0:16:50.956
<v Speaker 1>strategy is a kind of form of project management. It's

0:16:50.956 --> 0:16:53.476
<v Speaker 1>a kind of strategy taught in business scopes where you know,

0:16:53.556 --> 0:16:55.756
<v Speaker 1>if you want to build a house or something, you

0:16:55.796 --> 0:16:57.676
<v Speaker 1>get your workers, your money, and your materials and you

0:16:57.996 --> 0:17:00.516
<v Speaker 1>put put them in a spreadsheet, and you know, things

0:17:00.596 --> 0:17:02.596
<v Speaker 1>might go wrong, like you might get some bad weather

0:17:02.676 --> 0:17:04.796
<v Speaker 1>or something for a month, but and that might delay you.

0:17:04.836 --> 0:17:06.956
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately you can get from A to B through

0:17:06.956 --> 0:17:10.716
<v Speaker 1>the pretty kind of techno crash approach where you just

0:17:10.756 --> 0:17:14.036
<v Speaker 1>put resources on a spreadsheet and your project manage with

0:17:14.156 --> 0:17:16.596
<v Speaker 1>no account of the enemy, no account of the enemy whatsoever,

0:17:16.636 --> 0:17:19.156
<v Speaker 1>as if wres some kind of scientific endeavor, and that's

0:17:19.156 --> 0:17:22.276
<v Speaker 1>just completely wrong. War is all about getting into the

0:17:22.316 --> 0:17:24.756
<v Speaker 1>mind of the enemies, about initiative, seizing the initiative, and

0:17:24.796 --> 0:17:28.156
<v Speaker 1>holding the initiative, and it's much more psychological than that.

0:17:28.196 --> 0:17:31.116
<v Speaker 1>And in Afghanistan, actually, you know, in retrospect, maybe we

0:17:31.116 --> 0:17:33.436
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't urge in two thousand and nine, maybe we should

0:17:33.436 --> 0:17:35.596
<v Speaker 1>actually have researched and actually put some pressure on n

0:17:35.636 --> 0:17:38.636
<v Speaker 1>Fan government to do more themselves. But ultimately, if you

0:17:38.716 --> 0:17:41.476
<v Speaker 1>step away from all this, it's not about these kind

0:17:41.516 --> 0:17:44.276
<v Speaker 1>of set template approaches. You know, does a surge work

0:17:44.276 --> 0:17:46.476
<v Speaker 1>in the abstract? You can't tell. The question is can

0:17:46.556 --> 0:17:50.316
<v Speaker 1>you use surprise to regain the initiative so doubt in

0:17:50.316 --> 0:17:53.356
<v Speaker 1>the minds of your opponent, such as to get them

0:17:53.356 --> 0:17:55.556
<v Speaker 1>to at least think, oh, maybe it is my interest

0:17:55.636 --> 0:17:57.236
<v Speaker 1>to do a PCE deal because I don't know what

0:17:57.276 --> 0:17:59.116
<v Speaker 1>the outcome is going to be. That wasn't the case here.

0:17:59.156 --> 0:18:02.036
<v Speaker 1>The Taliban could totally plan around the US and Western

0:18:02.076 --> 0:18:06.436
<v Speaker 1>plan and then hit the forces Afghanic horses extremely hard

0:18:06.476 --> 0:18:08.556
<v Speaker 1>when we took the justic support away and basically with

0:18:10.116 --> 0:18:21.916
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back in a moment. I mean, I'm really

0:18:21.956 --> 0:18:26.916
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by what you've just said, the idea that somehow

0:18:26.956 --> 0:18:30.516
<v Speaker 1>the US in particular maybe Western forces more generally tended

0:18:30.556 --> 0:18:33.116
<v Speaker 1>to think about Afghanistan as though it were a war

0:18:33.196 --> 0:18:36.076
<v Speaker 1>without an enemy, you know, a war you're fighting in

0:18:36.076 --> 0:18:38.716
<v Speaker 1>your own head, where you think that logistics are really

0:18:38.716 --> 0:18:41.596
<v Speaker 1>about what you're going to do. Seems to fit into

0:18:41.996 --> 0:18:46.356
<v Speaker 1>a kind of systemic failure throughout this war, maybe deriving

0:18:46.396 --> 0:18:49.356
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that in the early invasion the Taliban

0:18:49.796 --> 0:18:53.716
<v Speaker 1>ran away relatively quickly and were then not treated as

0:18:53.836 --> 0:18:56.796
<v Speaker 1>a serious opponent, a serious enemy who had to be

0:18:57.276 --> 0:19:00.796
<v Speaker 1>surprised and engaged, but were rather thought of almost as

0:19:00.796 --> 0:19:03.316
<v Speaker 1>though they were the drip drip drip of a body

0:19:03.356 --> 0:19:06.516
<v Speaker 1>of water, and the question was could we hold out

0:19:06.516 --> 0:19:09.636
<v Speaker 1>against that drip, drip drip, rather than could we actually

0:19:09.756 --> 0:19:12.476
<v Speaker 1>conceptualize the enemy as a set of human beings, as

0:19:12.476 --> 0:19:15.196
<v Speaker 1>another who needed to be engaged, which, as you say,

0:19:15.276 --> 0:19:17.756
<v Speaker 1>is crucial to warfare. Why do you think, I mean,

0:19:17.796 --> 0:19:20.156
<v Speaker 1>when we turn to lessons learned here, one of the

0:19:20.156 --> 0:19:22.996
<v Speaker 1>crucial ones is surely that's no way to fight a war.

0:19:23.076 --> 0:19:24.156
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're going to fight a war, you

0:19:24.236 --> 0:19:26.356
<v Speaker 1>have to conceptualize the enemy. You have to put your

0:19:26.396 --> 0:19:28.516
<v Speaker 1>mind inside the mind of the enemy, and you have

0:19:28.556 --> 0:19:32.476
<v Speaker 1>to do the things that will defeat the enemy. And why,

0:19:32.716 --> 0:19:35.876
<v Speaker 1>why why did the United States approach war in this way?

0:19:35.956 --> 0:19:38.956
<v Speaker 1>Is it something about our training? Is it's something about

0:19:38.996 --> 0:19:41.476
<v Speaker 1>how we conceptualize war. Is it's something about the tremendous

0:19:41.476 --> 0:19:45.516
<v Speaker 1>disparity between our resources and the resources of the enemy.

0:19:45.596 --> 0:19:47.756
<v Speaker 1>What what put us in a position to make these

0:19:47.796 --> 0:19:51.276
<v Speaker 1>mistakes which to me as you depict them, sound rather fundamental. Yes,

0:19:51.356 --> 0:19:53.596
<v Speaker 1>well it's I mean, the term war is a good

0:19:53.596 --> 0:19:55.556
<v Speaker 1>place to start. I mean, clearly, Afghana stands war in

0:19:55.556 --> 0:19:58.716
<v Speaker 1>a sense that there is at a high level of

0:19:58.756 --> 0:20:00.636
<v Speaker 1>violence going on on the ground, and that the kind

0:20:00.636 --> 0:20:03.796
<v Speaker 1>of combat tactics are not this similar across different kinds

0:20:03.836 --> 0:20:06.516
<v Speaker 1>of wars. But really there is a fundamental difference between

0:20:06.596 --> 0:20:09.356
<v Speaker 1>interstate war, which our finite in the sense that that

0:20:09.396 --> 0:20:13.276
<v Speaker 1>there are two governments with whom you can negotiate a pcedal.

0:20:13.356 --> 0:20:16.716
<v Speaker 1>So effectively you've got two kind of hierarchies fighting each other.

0:20:16.796 --> 0:20:18.636
<v Speaker 1>You know, you use military force against the base of

0:20:18.676 --> 0:20:20.556
<v Speaker 1>the hierarchy of the army, and that sort of tingles

0:20:20.636 --> 0:20:22.596
<v Speaker 1>up the nerve system of the state the other side

0:20:22.716 --> 0:20:24.876
<v Speaker 1>to a government, and that government kind of gets the

0:20:24.876 --> 0:20:28.156
<v Speaker 1>message and it is defeated. That's completely different when you're

0:20:28.196 --> 0:20:30.396
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a network. A network is flat and loose,

0:20:30.476 --> 0:20:32.356
<v Speaker 1>there's no real leadship structure. So how are you going

0:20:32.436 --> 0:20:34.076
<v Speaker 1>to how are you going to win? In the kind

0:20:34.076 --> 0:20:37.196
<v Speaker 1>of political sense, you can't. Actually you're managing an ongoing

0:20:37.236 --> 0:20:40.276
<v Speaker 1>security problem without trying to escalate and without getting sucked

0:20:40.276 --> 0:20:42.316
<v Speaker 1>into things like nation building. Really just trying to deal

0:20:42.356 --> 0:20:46.596
<v Speaker 1>with the security side of things, and war is not

0:20:46.676 --> 0:20:49.636
<v Speaker 1>often that even that appropriate label. So it's much more

0:20:49.716 --> 0:20:53.116
<v Speaker 1>often sometimes akin to policing operations, where you know, in

0:20:53.116 --> 0:20:55.396
<v Speaker 1>a western city, no one expects the police to defeat

0:20:55.436 --> 0:20:58.636
<v Speaker 1>crime in a decisive sense. Rather you manage it. Now,

0:20:58.676 --> 0:21:01.316
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's not exactly policing, but there is a spectrum

0:21:01.356 --> 0:21:05.516
<v Speaker 1>of activity and treating these conflicts as war with these

0:21:05.596 --> 0:21:08.356
<v Speaker 1>kind of expectations of decisive outcomes where you have surgies

0:21:08.396 --> 0:21:11.196
<v Speaker 1>for like three years and somehow expect the military to

0:21:11.316 --> 0:21:13.476
<v Speaker 1>deliver you a decisive outcome in three years. That's that's

0:21:13.516 --> 0:21:18.756
<v Speaker 1>not helpful. Actually, you need to have lower intensity but

0:21:18.836 --> 0:21:21.276
<v Speaker 1>longer term presence with lower expectations of what you can

0:21:21.276 --> 0:21:25.356
<v Speaker 1>achieve in order to manage risk over longer time frames,

0:21:25.516 --> 0:21:29.956
<v Speaker 1>without these kind of fantastic expectations of decisive victories. And

0:21:29.996 --> 0:21:33.036
<v Speaker 1>so there's a spectrum in terms of political outcomes. Is

0:21:33.036 --> 0:21:35.076
<v Speaker 1>there even an enemy or are you dealing with a

0:21:35.196 --> 0:21:39.116
<v Speaker 1>kind of kaleidoscopic bunch of factions who can change depending

0:21:39.156 --> 0:21:41.756
<v Speaker 1>on how you define the enemy. I think in Afghanistan

0:21:41.836 --> 0:21:43.996
<v Speaker 1>that was an issue. You know, we started off defining

0:21:44.036 --> 0:21:47.476
<v Speaker 1>an enemy narrowly as aar Qaida, and that was broadly

0:21:47.476 --> 0:21:49.836
<v Speaker 1>even the position still two thousand and five, and then

0:21:49.876 --> 0:21:52.476
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and five we went into the South

0:21:52.556 --> 0:21:55.196
<v Speaker 1>and the east in bulk. There are already some forces,

0:21:55.316 --> 0:21:58.156
<v Speaker 1>but really very few forces before that, especially in the South,

0:21:58.836 --> 0:22:01.156
<v Speaker 1>and we started sort of treating everyone who short at

0:22:01.236 --> 0:22:03.436
<v Speaker 1>us as you know, the enemy and attributing to the

0:22:03.836 --> 0:22:07.036
<v Speaker 1>single corporate identity are either Taliban, and actually that wasn't

0:22:07.076 --> 0:22:08.716
<v Speaker 1>the case. There was lots of lots of different factions

0:22:08.756 --> 0:22:14.276
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, and by tlicely disaggregating a network, franchise

0:22:14.396 --> 0:22:17.836
<v Speaker 1>movement into its constituent parts, you can use much less

0:22:17.876 --> 0:22:20.156
<v Speaker 1>force as little false as possible, so you're only using

0:22:20.196 --> 0:22:23.276
<v Speaker 1>force against the really hardcore. And that's absolutely not what

0:22:23.436 --> 0:22:26.316
<v Speaker 1>we did. We use force much too broadly against far

0:22:26.396 --> 0:22:29.556
<v Speaker 1>too many factions because we didn't have that political, low

0:22:29.636 --> 0:22:32.396
<v Speaker 1>level political insight, which is so crucial, and thus we

0:22:33.196 --> 0:22:37.556
<v Speaker 1>very quickly found ourselves swimming upstream against an ever expanding insurgency.

0:22:37.956 --> 0:22:40.156
<v Speaker 1>So a lesson here, you know, not to the tactical level,

0:22:40.196 --> 0:22:41.956
<v Speaker 1>but at the kind of global level too, is always

0:22:41.956 --> 0:22:44.716
<v Speaker 1>a disaggregate to try to not group everyone in the

0:22:44.836 --> 0:22:48.036
<v Speaker 1>same brush, owise you end up fighting kind of everyone really,

0:22:48.836 --> 0:22:52.636
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that's that goes to basically back this

0:22:52.756 --> 0:22:56.836
<v Speaker 1>concept of war, not treating everything through this binary paradigm

0:22:56.876 --> 0:22:59.636
<v Speaker 1>of war in which as a clear line between military

0:22:59.676 --> 0:23:03.276
<v Speaker 1>and political activity. That's not the case, especially in says

0:23:03.316 --> 0:23:06.036
<v Speaker 1>context with the information revolution, whereby you know, you get

0:23:06.076 --> 0:23:09.876
<v Speaker 1>a lot more networks. What was your experience of that

0:23:10.076 --> 0:23:12.476
<v Speaker 1>when you were on the ground, I mean, when did

0:23:12.556 --> 0:23:17.876
<v Speaker 1>you find yourself able to try to do that kind

0:23:17.916 --> 0:23:20.236
<v Speaker 1>of disaggregation at the local level and not just treat

0:23:20.276 --> 0:23:22.916
<v Speaker 1>anybody who might be shooting at you and your soldiers

0:23:23.116 --> 0:23:27.596
<v Speaker 1>as definitively at the Taliban Or was it simply the

0:23:27.676 --> 0:23:30.196
<v Speaker 1>case that the lack of differentiation at the higher level

0:23:30.236 --> 0:23:33.996
<v Speaker 1>of command made it all but impossible for you, you know,

0:23:34.396 --> 0:23:37.356
<v Speaker 1>to do differently on a day and in day out

0:23:37.436 --> 0:23:39.436
<v Speaker 1>basis very much so. I mean on my first one,

0:23:39.476 --> 0:23:41.396
<v Speaker 1>not so much because I was a protune commander, but

0:23:41.476 --> 0:23:43.196
<v Speaker 1>on my second tour, when I was actually working on

0:23:43.276 --> 0:23:45.516
<v Speaker 1>planning operations, and my third tour, I was very much

0:23:45.556 --> 0:23:48.516
<v Speaker 1>able to do that, and it's totally possible. You need

0:23:48.556 --> 0:23:51.356
<v Speaker 1>to think about things differently. You need to be doing

0:23:51.636 --> 0:23:54.796
<v Speaker 1>networking hours on the grounds understanding who's who. I mean,

0:23:54.876 --> 0:23:56.556
<v Speaker 1>this is almost obvious, you know, if you're the British

0:23:56.636 --> 0:23:58.956
<v Speaker 1>Army in Northern Ireland, it's like going in there and saying, oh, well,

0:23:59.076 --> 0:24:01.436
<v Speaker 1>what's a Catholic, what's a Protestant? You know, these are

0:24:01.436 --> 0:24:04.876
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental kind of cultural drivers of this conflict. And

0:24:04.996 --> 0:24:07.276
<v Speaker 1>we just went in southern Afghanistan thinking everyone's either Afghan

0:24:07.356 --> 0:24:09.996
<v Speaker 1>Government or Taliban, and actually it's much more sophisticated than that,

0:24:10.076 --> 0:24:11.796
<v Speaker 1>and it's not particularly hard to kind of find out

0:24:11.836 --> 0:24:16.156
<v Speaker 1>who these tribes are as the barracks, alazai Ishize Popalzi,

0:24:16.316 --> 0:24:18.196
<v Speaker 1>and they all have different motivations. And then there's the

0:24:18.316 --> 0:24:21.676
<v Speaker 1>narco dealers as well, and you can quite easily find

0:24:21.676 --> 0:24:24.356
<v Speaker 1>out what these different cultural kind of groups are just

0:24:24.476 --> 0:24:28.116
<v Speaker 1>by asking people. It is absolutely doable. But a problem.

0:24:28.236 --> 0:24:31.396
<v Speaker 1>A further problem is that the nature of civil military relations,

0:24:31.556 --> 0:24:33.876
<v Speaker 1>the paradigm we have is a very much one way model.

0:24:34.596 --> 0:24:38.476
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea that there's this very hard division between

0:24:38.676 --> 0:24:41.716
<v Speaker 1>the political side and the military side. Neither side Shoor trespass.

0:24:41.956 --> 0:24:44.676
<v Speaker 1>I mean that comes from a really post Korean War

0:24:45.476 --> 0:24:48.276
<v Speaker 1>model where you didn't want to get the military with

0:24:48.356 --> 0:24:50.156
<v Speaker 1>their things on the nuclear trigger because then you can

0:24:50.196 --> 0:24:52.116
<v Speaker 1>have a nuclear war. And that makes sense. So it

0:24:52.196 --> 0:24:54.756
<v Speaker 1>absolutely makes sense that the military should stay out of

0:24:56.516 --> 0:25:00.956
<v Speaker 1>politics in a kind of political sense, and indeed in

0:25:01.036 --> 0:25:03.356
<v Speaker 1>that context and the nuclear context, which should stay out

0:25:03.436 --> 0:25:06.436
<v Speaker 1>that those kindcisions too. But in a counterinsurgency, you absolutely

0:25:06.516 --> 0:25:10.076
<v Speaker 1>need people on the ground to be able to say this, actually,

0:25:10.236 --> 0:25:12.276
<v Speaker 1>at a political level, that's not working. We shouldn't be

0:25:13.276 --> 0:25:15.676
<v Speaker 1>pushing this policy lining to it doesn't work with this tribe.

0:25:15.756 --> 0:25:17.436
<v Speaker 1>We should be doing that, we shouldn't be doing this.

0:25:17.916 --> 0:25:20.836
<v Speaker 1>So for example, the classic example in southern Afkanastan was narcotics.

0:25:21.076 --> 0:25:24.556
<v Speaker 1>The anti narcomission pretty much alienated everybody. You know, query

0:25:24.596 --> 0:25:26.316
<v Speaker 1>why we're doing it? Well, were there to fight terrorism

0:25:26.396 --> 0:25:29.036
<v Speaker 1>or drugs? I mean, we could fight drugs, that's a

0:25:29.036 --> 0:25:32.436
<v Speaker 1>political decision. But would we would cut about nine percent

0:25:32.476 --> 0:25:35.516
<v Speaker 1>of the enemy out if we didn't fight drugs. No

0:25:35.596 --> 0:25:37.356
<v Speaker 1>one would listen to the military on the ground. That's

0:25:37.436 --> 0:25:39.716
<v Speaker 1>not our job. We're not allowed to talk about politics.

0:25:39.996 --> 0:25:43.076
<v Speaker 1>You just fight the enemy. We'll do the politics. This

0:25:43.156 --> 0:25:45.476
<v Speaker 1>idea that politics is. It's something that's some like higher up.

0:25:46.196 --> 0:25:50.276
<v Speaker 1>It's not the right approach, and it challenges and requires

0:25:50.316 --> 0:25:54.036
<v Speaker 1>us to reconfigure this paradigm of civil military relations. It

0:25:54.116 --> 0:25:57.276
<v Speaker 1>needs to be much more fluid and dynamic and flatter.

0:25:58.396 --> 0:25:59.716
<v Speaker 1>What I hear you saying there, and I think this

0:25:59.876 --> 0:26:01.916
<v Speaker 1>is also as I read it, one of the themes

0:26:01.956 --> 0:26:05.236
<v Speaker 1>if You're a Terrific book is that it would be

0:26:05.316 --> 0:26:07.396
<v Speaker 1>a mistake to think that in a world where the

0:26:07.556 --> 0:26:10.356
<v Speaker 1>enemy is networked and flat, that the way to fight

0:26:10.436 --> 0:26:13.916
<v Speaker 1>it is in some hierarchical sense where the decisions about

0:26:13.956 --> 0:26:16.236
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote politics are made somewhere up to chain and

0:26:16.316 --> 0:26:19.756
<v Speaker 1>then the decisions about military tactics are made down on

0:26:19.876 --> 0:26:23.036
<v Speaker 1>the ground. In fact, to fight a war against a flat,

0:26:23.156 --> 0:26:25.436
<v Speaker 1>networked enemy, you have to be flatter, you have to

0:26:25.476 --> 0:26:27.596
<v Speaker 1>be more networked, and we have to break down the

0:26:27.756 --> 0:26:32.716
<v Speaker 1>artificial distinction between a political judgment and a tactical judgment,

0:26:33.276 --> 0:26:36.676
<v Speaker 1>especially in an operation that has certain features of trying

0:26:36.756 --> 0:26:39.836
<v Speaker 1>to keep the peace, namely a counterinsurgency. No exactly, there's

0:26:39.876 --> 0:26:42.076
<v Speaker 1>this expression out gorilla. The gorilla. You know, if you're

0:26:42.076 --> 0:26:44.436
<v Speaker 1>a Western, big heavy Western falls you're basically a kind

0:26:44.436 --> 0:26:46.156
<v Speaker 1>of elephant trying to catch a kind of mouse, And

0:26:46.196 --> 0:26:49.596
<v Speaker 1>so obviously when the mouse hears the elephant going through

0:26:49.676 --> 0:26:52.236
<v Speaker 1>the jungle, hears it from miles away and runs away,

0:26:52.236 --> 0:26:55.116
<v Speaker 1>and it's impossible to catch the mouse email. I want

0:26:55.116 --> 0:26:58.356
<v Speaker 1>to turn now in our concluding moments of our conversation

0:26:58.556 --> 0:27:01.476
<v Speaker 1>to the question of how much it matters for the

0:27:01.636 --> 0:27:05.316
<v Speaker 1>US role in the international order that the US managed

0:27:05.556 --> 0:27:09.436
<v Speaker 1>to lose this war. Now, one could say, as was

0:27:09.476 --> 0:27:12.076
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway from the Vietnam War, where the US learned

0:27:12.236 --> 0:27:16.196
<v Speaker 1>that it couldn't defeat an enemy like South Vietnam. Here

0:27:16.316 --> 0:27:19.596
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway is that the US couldn't defeat a persistent

0:27:19.716 --> 0:27:24.036
<v Speaker 1>insurgent force like the Taliban, but that that doesn't necessarily

0:27:24.196 --> 0:27:27.596
<v Speaker 1>mean that the position of the US visavi China with

0:27:27.676 --> 0:27:32.156
<v Speaker 1>respect to Taiwan, for example, or visa its position in

0:27:32.236 --> 0:27:35.316
<v Speaker 1>other places in the world where its geostrategic power remains crucial,

0:27:35.796 --> 0:27:39.236
<v Speaker 1>has really fundamentally changed. Or you could say, listen, there

0:27:39.316 --> 0:27:41.556
<v Speaker 1>must be a bigger takeaway of a failure like this

0:27:41.716 --> 0:27:45.396
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, a trillion dollars, failure to achieve its goals,

0:27:45.596 --> 0:27:48.436
<v Speaker 1>failure to learn the lessons of counterinsurgency that should have

0:27:48.476 --> 0:27:52.356
<v Speaker 1>been learned from Vietnam surely has consequences, And I'm wondering

0:27:52.436 --> 0:27:55.116
<v Speaker 1>where you come down in that grand debate, which is

0:27:55.156 --> 0:28:00.316
<v Speaker 1>really just beginning now. Yeah, in terms of international order, Noah,

0:28:00.516 --> 0:28:03.796
<v Speaker 1>the key is what happens next in Afghanistan. So question one,

0:28:03.956 --> 0:28:06.756
<v Speaker 1>who really are the Taliban? Their pr is all very

0:28:07.076 --> 0:28:09.916
<v Speaker 1>rosy and glossy. They say they're can happen inclusive government,

0:28:10.156 --> 0:28:14.276
<v Speaker 1>including women, for example, and have an amnesty for government

0:28:14.316 --> 0:28:17.316
<v Speaker 1>officials and everyone in fact, and if that were really

0:28:17.356 --> 0:28:20.596
<v Speaker 1>worthy case, then the West could live with that and

0:28:20.716 --> 0:28:24.276
<v Speaker 1>that won't badly damage US press, if you like. On

0:28:24.356 --> 0:28:26.916
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, if one their pr is not true

0:28:26.916 --> 0:28:29.636
<v Speaker 1>to reality, then that wouldn't be the case. But the

0:28:29.716 --> 0:28:32.556
<v Speaker 1>real issue is that can the Taliban even maintain control

0:28:32.556 --> 0:28:35.276
<v Speaker 1>of the country. They've been united through a common enemy

0:28:35.716 --> 0:28:39.276
<v Speaker 1>for the past twenty years and now actually the Taliban

0:28:39.396 --> 0:28:41.716
<v Speaker 1>being a franchise movement, the question is whether those different

0:28:41.796 --> 0:28:44.076
<v Speaker 1>factions will start to come apart. So you've got some

0:28:44.436 --> 0:28:47.756
<v Speaker 1>more moderate, some more extreme, and the whole country could

0:28:47.836 --> 0:28:50.436
<v Speaker 1>send in civil war, creating a haven for terrorists. That

0:28:50.436 --> 0:28:54.436
<v Speaker 1>would clearly be extremely damaging for US credibility in terms

0:28:54.436 --> 0:28:57.316
<v Speaker 1>of having to potentially go back in there and deal

0:28:57.396 --> 0:28:59.676
<v Speaker 1>with that, or just take it on risk and accept

0:28:59.716 --> 0:29:03.116
<v Speaker 1>the consequences. Neither of those good options. Beyond Afghanistan and

0:29:03.156 --> 0:29:05.796
<v Speaker 1>beyond the kind of terrorism question, I don't think that

0:29:05.876 --> 0:29:08.756
<v Speaker 1>this is going to undermine US alliances in East Asia

0:29:08.836 --> 0:29:11.796
<v Speaker 1>on the country. The whole point of this move was

0:29:11.836 --> 0:29:15.556
<v Speaker 1>to reinforce alliances in Asia, So I don't think that's

0:29:15.596 --> 0:29:18.236
<v Speaker 1>going to be undermined. But perhaps the contrarian answer is

0:29:18.316 --> 0:29:21.196
<v Speaker 1>that is the West being repeating the mistake of not

0:29:21.356 --> 0:29:25.996
<v Speaker 1>using surprise, not being imaginative here. If the West and

0:29:26.036 --> 0:29:29.996
<v Speaker 1>semicly United States starts just putting all its effort into

0:29:30.076 --> 0:29:33.236
<v Speaker 1>focusing on Taiwan really and the defense in the Far

0:29:33.356 --> 0:29:36.916
<v Speaker 1>East in a very conventional sense, is that not going

0:29:36.996 --> 0:29:40.276
<v Speaker 1>to open the door for states that basically want to

0:29:40.356 --> 0:29:43.556
<v Speaker 1>undermine US and Western interests across the rest of the world.

0:29:44.156 --> 0:29:47.876
<v Speaker 1>So China and Russia primarily using all kinds of means,

0:29:47.956 --> 0:29:53.756
<v Speaker 1>not just military means, but also geoeconomic means and informational means,

0:29:54.556 --> 0:29:56.956
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of sort of grazoon tactics we've seen

0:29:56.996 --> 0:30:00.196
<v Speaker 1>in the past ten years or so to undermine interests

0:30:00.436 --> 0:30:02.196
<v Speaker 1>Western interests in the rest of the world while we're

0:30:02.236 --> 0:30:05.956
<v Speaker 1>focused on on the Far East. In a very conventional sense,

0:30:06.156 --> 0:30:09.436
<v Speaker 1>that's the actual risk, and there could be a a

0:30:09.556 --> 0:30:12.516
<v Speaker 1>kind of ironic outcome where the worst there's all this

0:30:12.636 --> 0:30:15.076
<v Speaker 1>effort to kind of shift pivot to Asia if you like,

0:30:15.156 --> 0:30:18.516
<v Speaker 1>and telegraphics intentions in a very unimaginative way, and the

0:30:18.596 --> 0:30:21.236
<v Speaker 1>other countries just plan around that. And actually there isn't

0:30:21.236 --> 0:30:23.716
<v Speaker 1>any big fight over Taiwan. But there's no sort of

0:30:23.756 --> 0:30:27.676
<v Speaker 1>decisive moment which US power ends. Rather, there's kind of

0:30:27.716 --> 0:30:29.956
<v Speaker 1>death by a thousand cuts, which indeed is how the

0:30:29.996 --> 0:30:32.596
<v Speaker 1>British Empire basically ended, and how most empires end in

0:30:32.636 --> 0:30:35.756
<v Speaker 1>that if indeed empires the right analogy. But the point is,

0:30:35.996 --> 0:30:38.716
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the kind of superpower, is that really

0:30:39.116 --> 0:30:40.876
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. I think actually that's more likely

0:30:40.916 --> 0:30:43.916
<v Speaker 1>to happen than any kind of decisive battle. And really,

0:30:44.116 --> 0:30:48.676
<v Speaker 1>if we want to stand by our values and Western values,

0:30:48.676 --> 0:30:50.676
<v Speaker 1>which I think personally how worth fighting for or at

0:30:50.716 --> 0:30:52.556
<v Speaker 1>least worth sounding up for. Not I don't mean fighting

0:30:52.596 --> 0:30:56.596
<v Speaker 1>necessarily ligial sense. It requires us to be more agile

0:30:56.956 --> 0:31:00.196
<v Speaker 1>and to think about strategy in a way that actually

0:31:00.276 --> 0:31:04.756
<v Speaker 1>uses the values of surprise and flexibility of means not

0:31:04.916 --> 0:31:07.836
<v Speaker 1>always focusing on the military side of things, but at

0:31:07.876 --> 0:31:10.996
<v Speaker 1>the same time where there is a need to intervene,

0:31:11.156 --> 0:31:14.276
<v Speaker 1>not to do regime change, but on the contrary regime support.

0:31:14.476 --> 0:31:16.436
<v Speaker 1>You know, I gave the example of France and Marley earlier.

0:31:16.716 --> 0:31:20.276
<v Speaker 1>Then we should do that and not always be completely predictable.

0:31:21.996 --> 0:31:33.356
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back, Emil. I want to thank you

0:31:33.556 --> 0:31:38.756
<v Speaker 1>for this fascinating account of events on the ground and

0:31:38.996 --> 0:31:42.836
<v Speaker 1>they're deeper, meaning in Afghanistan, and also of course for

0:31:42.956 --> 0:31:46.556
<v Speaker 1>your combination of being a soldier on the ground and

0:31:46.636 --> 0:31:50.116
<v Speaker 1>then a scholar explaining things to the world and to

0:31:50.236 --> 0:31:53.636
<v Speaker 1>all of us. For me talking to you, I was

0:31:53.756 --> 0:31:59.596
<v Speaker 1>just deeply struck by the reality of the number of

0:31:59.676 --> 0:32:04.116
<v Speaker 1>Afghan dead. Forty five thousand Afghan dead soldiers is close

0:32:04.156 --> 0:32:06.996
<v Speaker 1>to the total number that the US lost in Vietnam.

0:32:07.076 --> 0:32:10.236
<v Speaker 1>It's a very significant cost. And very struck by your

0:32:10.276 --> 0:32:13.836
<v Speaker 1>observation that it wasn't just that the US and the

0:32:13.916 --> 0:32:16.396
<v Speaker 1>Afghan security forces lost the ward, but that the Taliban

0:32:16.676 --> 0:32:19.876
<v Speaker 1>really want it. I was also very very struck by

0:32:19.956 --> 0:32:23.636
<v Speaker 1>your observation that we failed to think about this war

0:32:23.756 --> 0:32:26.356
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of the enemy and therefore failed to

0:32:26.436 --> 0:32:30.436
<v Speaker 1>have the advantage of surprise. I was really struck by

0:32:30.516 --> 0:32:33.956
<v Speaker 1>your point that in a networked world where the enemy

0:32:34.116 --> 0:32:37.036
<v Speaker 1>is flat and networked, we need to do the same.

0:32:37.156 --> 0:32:38.836
<v Speaker 1>And then if you want to catch a mouse, you

0:32:38.916 --> 0:32:40.956
<v Speaker 1>can't be an elephant, maybe you actually need to be

0:32:41.036 --> 0:32:44.276
<v Speaker 1>something closer to a cat. And last, but not least,

0:32:44.316 --> 0:32:48.276
<v Speaker 1>just very struck by your point that the deep failure

0:32:48.356 --> 0:32:53.036
<v Speaker 1>of the US here does have broader geopolitical consequences that

0:32:53.116 --> 0:32:57.316
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be grappling with in the future. So

0:32:57.396 --> 0:33:00.716
<v Speaker 1>I want to again thank you for your analysis and

0:33:01.196 --> 0:33:04.916
<v Speaker 1>for your commentary, for your service, and for coming on

0:33:05.076 --> 0:33:07.796
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background to explain this to us on short notice.

0:33:07.916 --> 0:33:19.436
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Amil, Thank you very much. Deep Background is

0:33:19.476 --> 0:33:22.876
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Mola Board,

0:33:23.156 --> 0:33:26.476
<v Speaker 1>our engineer is Ben Tolliday, and our showrunner is Sophie

0:33:26.516 --> 0:33:31.356
<v Speaker 1>Crane mckibbon. Editorial support from noahm Osband. Theme music by

0:33:31.436 --> 0:33:34.996
<v Speaker 1>Luis Gara at Pushkin. Thanks to Mia Lobell, Julia Barton,

0:33:35.276 --> 0:33:39.836
<v Speaker 1>Lydia Gencott, Heather Faine, Carlie Migliori, Maggie Taylor, Eric Sandler,

0:33:40.036 --> 0:33:43.316
<v Speaker 1>and Jacob Weissberg. You can find me on Twitter at

0:33:43.356 --> 0:33:46.556
<v Speaker 1>Noah R. Feldman. I also write a column from Bloomberg Opinion,

0:33:46.756 --> 0:33:49.716
<v Speaker 1>which you can find at bloomberg dot com slash Feldman.

0:33:50.156 --> 0:33:53.596
<v Speaker 1>To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to bloomberg

0:33:53.636 --> 0:33:56.516
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcasts, and if you liked what you

0:33:56.636 --> 0:33:59.556
<v Speaker 1>heard today, please write a review or tell a friend.

0:34:00.156 --> 0:34:01.836
<v Speaker 1>This is deep background