WEBVTT - Jon Stein Discusses Fintech and Robo-Advisers

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>His name is Jonathan Stein, and he is the founder

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of essentially the very first of the robo advisors to

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>come out UH and enter the world. Betterment is the

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>name of the company. They manage most twenty billion dollars,

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a substantial sum of money. And you will find

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jonathan Is or better known as John is a

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>UM enthusiastic advocate on behalf of investors. UH. He does

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>not like the way much of Wall Street does business,

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the way fees are hidden, the way people are not

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fiduciaries to their clients, and he is looking at Betterment

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as a way to UH change the institution of money

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>management if you are at all interested in the use

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>of technology to manage both investments and cash and everything else,

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>how things are done right and wrong in the industry.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And also here some inside dirt about what he thinks

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about some of his competitors. Well, you're gonna find this

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation fascinating. So, with no further ado, my interview of

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>John Stein. My special guest today is Jonathan Stein. He

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is the founder and CEO of Betterment, which is a

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic asset allocation also known by some people as a

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>robo advisor. He graduated from Harvard got his NBA from Columbia.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Betterment currently has about twenty billion dollars in assets. They

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have a digital advisory platform for advisors known as Betterman

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for Advisors, as well as a four oh one K option.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Stein, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you, Barry, so nice

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be here. It's nice to have you. So before

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we start, I have to do a quick disclosure. I

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the intro that you have a B two

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>B product offering called Betterment for Advisors. My firm, Ridholtz

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management is a user of Betterment for Advisors. Are

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>robo advisor called Liftoff is powered by your back ends.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So we like to engage in full disclosure around here,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to get that out. So let's start

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with your undergraduate You went to Harvard. What did you

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>study there? Did you have any plans on going into finance. Yeah.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm so excited to be working with

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you and lift Off. I think that's really a great

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>thing where you and Josh and the whole team have

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been wonderful to work with, and we're excited to be

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>on boarding clients and all of that. We're a fun group. Yeah,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys, are you really are? Yeah. In college I

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>studied economics was my major, and I studied a lot

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of psychology on the side, and I was really interested

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in the union or the interest section between those two fields.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>My my economics professor freshman year was Marty Feldstein, who

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>was one of Reagan's economic advisors. He was super efficient markets.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if we're all just rational and we

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have the right incentives in place, people will obviously do

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the right thing and so uh in the world will

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>be a better and and then I love the fantasy

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>world of economists professors. It's an amazing world to live in. Right,

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like you know, it's it's it's a beautiful place, right,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>no bubbles, no crashes, everybody's perfect. Everything is priced efficiently incorrectly,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and all information is But on the behavioral side, I

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was so fascinated with how people actually work, which is

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not at all like the economic models to predict. We're crazy, irrational,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we do the wrong thing all the time. And I

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to reconcile that. You know, there's like Diccartian

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of duality and in our lives of like if

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I know the right thing to do, but I never

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>end up doing it because I'm driven by short term impulses,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and so I wanted to do something. They're coming out

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of college. No one was recruiting for people who just

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to help will make better decisions. But that's what

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do. So so coming out of college,

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what was your first job? What did you go post Harvard?

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I went to a company called First Manhattan Consulting Group. Okay,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>now again, no, the disclosure years ago we sublet space

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from them, Is that right? And the legend had preceded

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you because over on On Park and M and ninety

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Park Avenue, and when we were discussing what we did,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>when we were having the conversation, oh, have you ever

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>heard of betterment? Yes, we have work for us. Just

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a hilarious coincidence. Yeah, it was a great firm, so

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>many smart people. You know, I'm still still friends with

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people there. And I got from that

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>vantage point to work with big banking clients all around

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the US and around the world brokers as well, and

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>got to understand how the big financial institutions work and

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>how they're very well intentioned but oftentimes haven't innovated around

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the customer. And I started to see opportunities to you think,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>financial services, to really change it, and I just wanted

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it all to happen, you know, Like I. Change was

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>too slow, and by the time I was leaving there,

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we were moving into the financial crisis years right, two

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight and on. So, So from FMGC, did

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you go right to betterment or was there something in between?

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I went to business school in between. Okay, so you

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>went to Columbia and then you come out of business

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>school two years later, and what where did you go

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from there? Then? I started Betterment right away, so right

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>out of business school, and I knew I wanted to

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>start Betterment going into business school, I had the name

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>right and I started. I was talking about it on

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>day one and I said, We're going to make financial

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>services better. Uh. And some people would say, well, why

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't you just go and do that? And for me,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>business school was necessary. It was a good spot to

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>test the ideas to get to work. And I worked

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with the dean of the Business school as my betterment

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>was like my case study for my final presentation and

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial finance. So I got a lot of good feedback.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You could wait out the financial crisis exactly. It was

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it Actually it was a good time to to not

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>be fundraising. So you had the idea. How fully formed

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>was it on your way into business school? And what

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>did you learn that might have had an impact on

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on the company that exists today? I learned a lot

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>about myself and my management style that my my favorite

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>classes were things like top management process and you know,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think about myself as having like a leadership

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>style or management style, but you know, in small groups

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and in sessions like breakout sessions, I learned that like

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the types of things that I do, like wanting to

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>hear from like everyone in the room, like you know,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>hearing all that feedback before coming to a decision. Like

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of things can be effective. And you know,

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not one right way to lead or manage. Was

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a thing that I took away, But you

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to lean into your own style. So

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you participated in one of the tech crunches. I think

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it was oh nine, is that right. My familiarity with

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that comes from the HBO show Silk on Value. Yeah,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what was the experience. That's pretty accurate depiction of the

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech Crunch. Yeah, like Striking Lee. So as as with

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot about that show, Well, it true. That's what

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>makes it so, and it's hilarious. Um So the sort

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of frenetic last minute things are glitching and nobody really

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>knows who's going to be the breakout star, and everybody's

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of looking over the shoulders. That was your actual

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>It was so intense. It was one of the most

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tense days in my life. I mean, and I didn't

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have kids at that time, right, I was, I wasn't

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>even married, right, And I just I was up all

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>night the night before. And I know because I looked

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back at like my BlackBerry and I was writing into

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it every thirty minutes one am, one thirty am, two am,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some idea of like how I wanted to reframe my presentation.

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I memorized the entire thing, you know, which you should

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>never do. It was. It was a five minute speech

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and I knew every word and it was all exactly memorized.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And I was just so nervous about it because it

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was our coming out party, right, it was like this

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was it was. We actually launched on that day, and

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to me that was a big deal, Like this was

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>our chance to debut or a chance to get customers,

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and if we did it, we were going to be

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>successful and if not, no one would ever hear about

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>us again, you know. So there's a lot writing on

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that moment. Let's talk a little bit about the process

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of raising money and what was like to be a

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>venture founded start up. What was that like. Some people

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have described it as exhausting and draining and harrowing, and

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>other people have said, you know, if you have the

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>right idea, money seems to find it. What what was

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>your experience. I remember saying to my co founders when

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we started out, at least we're going to raise some

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>money with this thing, right, Like this is a good idea,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Like people want this. We were confident that people would

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>want it and at least we get there and maybe

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a little too confident, right. I We went into tech

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Crunch thinking, yeah, we'll get some attention and this would

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be the thing everyone gets funded coming out of these things.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>We talked to a bunch of people there at the

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>actual conference, and honestly, we didn't know what we were

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>asking for. Remember thinking maybe I wanted million dollars and uh,

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, frankly, in retrospect, that was way too little money,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, but at the time it just seemed like

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>an impossible amount of a million dollars. Think of how much?

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Think of like how long that'll that'll feed us for

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a good long time. That's almost a really nice car,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>right framework the framework reference is kind of crazy. So

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are you guys done raising capital or is there going

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to be more capital raises in the future. Where we

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>were lucky in that first, you know, in those first

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>conversations to meet Bessemer, who letter Series A, and they've

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>been great partners for a number of years. Over the years,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we've met a number of other firms that have just

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>been awesome to work with, who share our long term vision,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>who have deep pockets genetic big big Swedish firm is

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the most recent one. Great like long term family office

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>style investor. And all of these firms have given us

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>enough capital where we don't have to worry about raising

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>money again. We have you know, we we are our

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ambitions are to be a public company. That's the past.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So you have to be watching this. I P O

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>market and saying, what's going on? You bet you've got

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>My friend Near Cassir, who writes for Bloomberg Opinion, said, um,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Uber basically waited too long to come public. You know

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you need to go public sooner. There has to be

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>some upside left on the table, and this could dog

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>them for a good couple of years. Are you paying

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>attention to this? I P O market. I think it's

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see that gap between the private markets

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and the public markets. And however, you know, frankly, I

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone should be that surprised by the Uber story.

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean evaluation alonguationwise, we were all saying, like three

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I was thinking sixty billion dollar valuation, Like

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty hi. I think someone said anybody who's in a

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>private investor into Uber over the past four years is

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>underwater as of May nineteen, which is pretty pretty astonishing.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's pivot from the capital structure side

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to the business side. I know you guys are um

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Matthey and you look at a lot of data. Have

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you figured out what the qust of acquiring a new

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>client is like? And how do you deal with that

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of marketing and just looking for new business.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of financial services firms are effectively marketing engines, right, Like,

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they have a product that they make and then two

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the company is they're pushing that riot, pushing

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that product into market. We are not built that way.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Most of our team is R and D. We're building,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we're building technology right and of course we have an

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing programmatic marketing team helping us understand our funnel, helping

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us make sure that if you've visited the site, you're

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>getting the content that you want. We might retarget you

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and bring you back. Uh. And we do some sponsorships

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and podcasts and we just had Maggie Stiff, you know

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>from from Billions and and so and do do a

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 1>campaign for us. So we've done a good bit of

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>marketing to raise awareness and drive that top of the funnel,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>awareness to betterment. By and large, were so efficient. We

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>keep becoming more and more efficient every year. We acquire

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>more customers and spend less doing it per customer less

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>per customer, so that's been great. So there are a

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>number of different companies that do what you do. How

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>do you differentiate yourself from the competition? Having competition is

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a blessing I know, if you you know, go to

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some like monopolists, they might disagree, right, they might say

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's great to be alone. But for us,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, we started this category right, this

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is smart money manager. Thing didn't exist before, and we

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>said on stage at tech Crunch. At that launch, I

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>was asked, Hey, how are you going to deal with competition?

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think other people would do this? And I said,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if we're successful, we're going to have lots of competition.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk about some of the giant names

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that have are late to the space. Schwab rolled out

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>their version. Um, it's a little bit of an odd

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>portfolio coast. They make their money on the banking side.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a big I think it's like ten percent or

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>eight percent is cash and that's the really there is

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing free, so the cash is what covers the cost

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. And then there's Vanguard, which I believe across

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the hundred billion dollars in their robot, they're they're just immense.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Any concerns is at a different audience, a different demographic.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you deal with those two giant firms breathing

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>down your neck? So they're not taking customers from us.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>It's important to know that we're getting customers from them,

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting customers organically from from other firms and

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are sometimes new to saving and investing. But

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>no one's going I'm leaving betterment because honestly, we just

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>have a better product than these other firms. We're doing

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>more for our customers. We've run an analysis recently that

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.239
<v Speaker 1>shows that if you sum up all of the investment management,

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>tax management, portfolio diversification, etcetera. That we do for you

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and compare it to what you would get through doing

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, even net of our fees, we're earning people

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>more in retirement than they could get on their own.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the value of great advice and management. So

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm very bullish on advice and these other these incumbent

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>firms are not primarily advisors, right. They're trying to pivot

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to become that. They're talking a lot about it, but

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not their d n A right. Vandguard a wonderful firm.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I have incredible respect for Jack Bogel. He's we wouldn't

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be here without him. However, that firm today is just

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a mutual fund sales machine. They just want to push

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>their their their mutual funds. And there's an old kind

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know, orthodoxy that says, as long as you're

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>diversified and have low costs, that's the best thing you

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>can do, and like, we do that the best and

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Well, I'm here to tell you that's not

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>good enough anymore. The world has changed, technology has changed,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and you really need an advisor to make the most

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of your money today because smart money management is here

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not going away. Um. I can say the

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>same about Schwab. I mean, these guys did a lot

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to innovate. I mean, Chuck, you know, like was one

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the very few people who said we're going to

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>take commissions down, not up. That was great in the

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies when they did it. They've continued to drive

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that that trading price down. Now there's folks out there

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like Robin Hood or whatever where you can trade for

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely free. Does that mean that's what people should do

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>or that's a good thing. No, Absolutely, it's not a

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Uh. And I don't think that they're encouraging

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>good behaviors over there, Schwab. They want you to keep

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money in cash, and they're robbing you

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. They're just taking your money, They're just taking

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it away from you. And I think that needs to

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be exposed and they should be held to account for

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that behavior. Wow, those are those are strong words. So

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk a little bit about UM what Vanguard

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>has called Advisors Alpha and you have discussed in detail. Uh,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>tax lost harvesting is one thing that the computer does

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>much faster than sending an accountant with a green ice

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>shade to go through every transaction you've had. How much

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can the average portfolio garner in in some tax loss

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>harvesting when we some across all of our features like

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>smart rebalancing which figures out when you have a dividend paid,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>where to put that so you don't actually trigger a

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>taxable event, or UM are lot sorting which instead of

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just doing FIEFO or LIFEO like most first and you

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>know first and last and first out, which are kind

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of common algorithms, we will actually choose the right lot

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to sell or buy at any specific moment. And my favorite,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>which is tax coordination that looks at your roth IRA,

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>your traditional IRA, your four own K accounts, etcetera, and

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>puts the right assets into the right ones, to shield

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>your dividends, to shield things that might have long term appreciation.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You some across those features. And we're earning our average

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>customer net of our fees after our fee, one point

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>six one percent per year of alpha. It's an incredible

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as it's big. That's a big number, right, It's like

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's it's incredible, it's incredible. But we have

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we've run amazing you know, scenario analysis on this, and

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not like, you know, I can show you the picture.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>It's not like in of outcomes, you're guaranteed to be

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>better if there's nothing like that in in investing. However,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in the average case, you're one point six one per

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>year better off with our algorithms then without them. So

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean in terms of returns? It's one better,

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>but that's not that's as a percentage of the total

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pl How much does that show up in actual returns

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>over over time? Well, that is that that is the

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>net return to a customer, that's after our fees, that's

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>after all taxes. So if the market gives you ten,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>theoretically someone who's just invested in equities should see eleven

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>six one exactly. And it's not that linear, right, it's

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not one per year guaranteed. But if you compound that,

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we've run a bunch of you know,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>scenario analyzes and things, and if you compounded over third

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>years investing for retirement, and that's how you end up

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>with more cash in the end. Let's talk a few

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>moments about this business. There's been some pushback into the

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>concept of automated advice giving. What do you say to

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>people who say, this is just a temporary technology fed

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and people need live advisors. Being able to do this

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with just software isn't going to get it done. I

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>believe live advisors provide a tremendous value to their clients.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes advisors, we have a product for advisors, it's Betterment

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 1>for advisors, as as you know. And sometimes advisors come

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to us and say, what's to keep my clients from

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>just leaving me and going straight to betterment? And they

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>might worry about that, and we say, well, number one,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>what's to stop them from doing that today? Why are

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they with you? And they say, well, because I tell them,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I give them a full financial plan, I'm talking to

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>them about all their needs I see or fears I'm

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>there when the market's bad to talk to them, and

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we say exactly, and that is a service that they

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>value very highly and are happy to pay for it

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because you're giving them a lot of value. So that

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of that relationship, all of that advice that advisors

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>are giving is still very valuable. What we can do

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is we're a smart money manager, right, so we'll we'll

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>automate like the right kinds of things with your money

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>will help you make more on your money. And uh,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and we we we try. We also, um, you know,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 1>work very hard to make it a convenient experience, right.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Our mobile apps are web apps make everything very accessible.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So originally you launched as a B two C as

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a business to consumer, and there was a pivot to

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>add exactly what you were just describing, UM, you as

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a business to business being the back ends for any

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>form of r I A or investment advisory firm. UM.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>How did that pivot come about? And how challenging was

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that transition? Getting to work with advisors was a thing

0:19:58.160 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that we knew we wanted to do for a while,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It just it wasn't top priority we had to get.

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had to build I RA s for instance,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we had to build a mobile at back in two

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve when we were just just getting our feet

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>under us. And it took some partners coming to us

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and and saying, hey, we really want to do this,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll invest with you. Uh, if you'll, if you'll help

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>make this a reality for us. Uh. Steve Auction was

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those early early partners uh and uh. And

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>working with them, we had an instant client, right, so

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>we had someone that we were building for and that

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was with which firm. So that was with advice period

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Uh and uh. And we've grown from there.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>We now work with thousands of advisors all across the country.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Quite quite intriguing. Now, some of your competitors have tried

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>some interesting variations UM. One of them rolled out a

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>risk parity fund, sort of well maybe we're not in dextors,

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can beat the market. Didn't seem to work

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>out too well. Uh. If you're a Bridgewater or a

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Q you are, Hey, that's one thing. But Wealth Front

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>had some problems with this. I know a few other

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>companies had looked at it. Uh. What do you think

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of this idea of UM? People still being enthusiastic for

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to beat the market. Everyone wants to beat the market.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You do, I do, and if we could do it well, like,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that'd be amazing. The reason that Vanguard has

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the big business that they do is a lot of

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>people came around to believe that it's really hard to

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>beat the market net of fees, right, and the old

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>technology of having you know, somebody who's just picking stocks

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for you, it was probably not the most efficient way

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to to deploy your assets. Now today that idea of

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just pure indexing is you know, it's a little bit

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>boring and maybe it's no longer the cutting it. So

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>people are trying alternative indexes. And to me, it's very

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell the difference between active and passive anymore

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many different types of passive out there. Well,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we've and is an algorithm active or passive? Right? Is it?

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>You know? If you in in index? Is an active choice? Right? Like?

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Which index? Are we going to track what gets added

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's and what's not? Do we put in companies

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that don't have you know, equal equal share voting things

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>like this? Uh? And so I think those lines are

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be blurred, But ultimately what what

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>drive performance is low fees, optimizing for the things you

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>can control, and not worrying about the things that you

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>can't control. The things you can can control include your

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>own behavior, right, So like auto deposit invest very regularly.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>They include taxes, so account for that over time. UM.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They include having the right types of account set up

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for things so that you don't need to go and

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>raid your retirement account to meet some short term expense.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh So advice and planning can help with all of

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>these things that you can control and help you make

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the most of your money. So some people dislike the

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>phrase robo advisor. What what's your view on that phrase

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and what's your preferred terminology. I think robo advisor is fun,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a hand all. It's been around for for

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit now, and it's how it's how we're now.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And I use smart money Manager because I think of

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>us like a smart home or a smart car. There's

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just better technology now that's available and people should all

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be using it. Eventually everyone will be. Uh, there's just

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of inertia in our space. Well, you know,

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the pushback is it's not necessarily advisor and there's no

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>robots involved. We call has has been the pushback. Um

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so so, given the technology that we've seen, given how

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's deployed, what is the next logical step for this

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice we we've you've rolled out a four

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>oh one K department seems to be fairly um human intensive.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>There's so many people along the lines that sales arc

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>has to take forever. What else are you looking at

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as a possible way to use your technology to make

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>investing more efficient. I'm so bullish on the four own cabinus.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>The better effort for a business line has been great.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>We've been growing that quickly. Uh and I I just

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>keep trying to lean into that, Like, more of that

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we can do that the better because all these employers

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>are really concerned about employee wellness and the best benefits

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to retain the best talent. And that's where we really

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>stand out as having this great client experience and personalized

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>advice for every participant. Nobody else offers that, right, It's

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a it's a really great plan. But as I look

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>towards the future, the things that I'm excited about now

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>are around your everyday cash management. Right, UM, When I

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>think about um our mission to begin. Going all the

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>way back to the launch, we said we want to

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>help customers do what's best with their money so they

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>can live better. And people took that to mean when

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>we launched investing that we were all about being just

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a financial advisor and just sort of a wealth manager.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we're sometimes put in that category. I've always thought

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of us as this holistic smart money manager, and that

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>includes your every day checking and savings and all of

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>these kinds. So so Schwab has effectively become a bank.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs is a bank. Are you saying Betterment is

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming a full FDIC in shored bank. Is that the plan?

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that. I'm saying, you know, I'm saying

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to get you to tell me whether

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or not that's gonna happen. You know, In the last

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>last December, we launched smart Saver, which was our high

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 1>yield savings account alternative. Then we launched two ways Sweep

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>early this year, uh, and that allowed people to automatically

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>move money back and forth from their checking account. And

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>your sweep is a reasonable fee. You mentioned Schwab. They

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a big Wall Street Journal article their sweep is

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>no longer a high paying short term um fund. It's

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>really a low paying cash account. It's crazy that they

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>were able to get away with that, isn't it. It's

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>complicated enough that nobody really understood what they were doing.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's real money. And in my office and I'm

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sure in yours, it meant that anything we custody to

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>SWAB there had to be a decision made. Hey, for

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>this much money, for more than this many days, it

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>has to come out of cash and go into this

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>bond short term bond fund. Because it's a substantial difference

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and interest rates. I think people, customers, citizens need to

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>stand up and demand better. I just it just frustrates

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>me to no end that these banks and brokers can

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>get away with this kind of behavior because that's where

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they make most of their money. Right, SCHWAB makes more

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>than fifty of their profits off of your idle cash.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>If you're a SWAB customer, you don't know how much

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you're just giving them money, just giving it away, and

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they are lending it out for mortgagees and whatnot, and

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're getting nothing off of that, well, practically nothing. It's

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a very low amount. It's nothing, but They're not alone

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in this, right, you know, Bank America is doing this,

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan is doing this. This is how they're all

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>making their money. So those retail accounts is where all

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the money is in banking, and I think it's time

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>for a change there. I don't think most people are

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>aware of that because you're taught, oh yeah, just put

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>your money in your checking incot your savings account. That's

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a safe place to put it. I'll tell you. As

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a consultant back at First Manhattan Consulting Group, I saw

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 1>some really bad practices with those checking accounts, crazy amounts

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of fees charged to people, and then and then the

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>interest is silly low. But it's a collective active problem.

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Where collective collective action problem, I mean where uh you know,

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>basically you're only losing a few hundred dollars a year,

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't care that much. You have to band together.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We all have to demand better. And that cash management,

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to me is a super exciting spot for us where

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we can make a real impact on all

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of americans lives. So let's talk a little bit about

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the different model portfolios that you guys run there, mostly Vanguard.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Last time I looked old Vanguard, mostly Vanguard. In our

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>core portfolios that we recommend for customers, something like seventy

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>percent of every of every dollar would go into one

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of dozen Vanguard funds. Now. The other

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent is across black Rock and Schwab funds, and

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's others in there as well. What we

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>do is we're independent. We don't make any money off

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the funds that we offer. We don't offer any of

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>our own funds, and that makes us virtually unique, by

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, in this in this space, you're a fiduciary

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to your clients or a fiduciary to our clients. So

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not a broker. You're not selling shelf space, you're

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>not getting kickbacks. There's none of that, right, And and

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>all these all these other firms do right, even Vanguard, right,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they're only selling their own funds. Schwab has their own

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>funds in their portfolio. So all of these guys are

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>double dipping. In my view, they're charging you not just

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for the fund, but also for the advice on top

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of We get paid for advice, and that's it. And

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that advice, that simplicity of what we do

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is how you know that we're acting in your best interests.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So talking about Van Goard and the fiduciary um obligation,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you wrote a very lovely tribute after Jack Bogel, founder

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of Vanguard, passed away. Um tell us about what motivated that,

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>what was your relationship with Jack, and what did he

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>mean to you. Jack. I wouldn't be here without his

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>influence and example. When I was initially thinking about doing

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>something in this space, the examples that inspired me were

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the investing efficiency of Vanguard and the online simplicity of

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>iron g Direct. And now this was back in two

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six when iron g Direct was an independent

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>brand and you know, it was innovating in web financial

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>services and that's nowther part of Capital One and it's

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>no longer the case. But I was inspired by Jack,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and when I met him, it was just like it

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was like meeting you know, your idol. You know, I

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't believe it. And he talked to me and

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>he signed my book and he said, uh, you know,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do a lot of good for a

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. And I was just so touched by that.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I was really encouraged and inspired to to move on

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and over the years we kept in touch. I went

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to his office, we we talked a number of times

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at conferences and this and that. I uh, I just

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he was such a good person and he

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>cared about his people. He cared about his customers. That

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>example is with me all the time. So, so let's

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about the fiduciary rule. Since we're discussing um, caring

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about your customers or at least doing what's in their

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>best interest. We were supposed to have at least four

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts UH a moderated version of the fiduciary rule,

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and that in April twenties seventeen got a killed at

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>least temporarily set back. What are your thoughts about this?

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And again full disclosure, You're a fiduciary your clients. I'm

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a fiduciary to my clients, so I'm not arguing against this.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We're on the same side of of the street with this.

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's always a lot of pushback anytime the fiduciary

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>rule comes up. I think this is why we have

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a collective action problem. There are so these these firms.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm making so much money off of recommending the wrong thing,

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>off of suggesting that you keep more money in cash

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>off of suggesting that you should just buy our mutual

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>fund because it's just as good as anything else out

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there that is such a profitable thing, because it's a

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>way of hiding a fee from you. Now, the thing

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you might say, why can't regulatory actions solve this? Why

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>why don't they do something about it? Well, it takes

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a crisis. And in the mortgage crisis, we had that moment.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>We had you know, people on TV who had lost

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>everything because they had gotten a mortgage that they didn't understand,

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we regulated mortgages. And now, frankly, I just

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>got a mortgage, and so I can tell you it's

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>still a pain in the neck, but it is pretty

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>clear at least what you're paying and what you're getting.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Those disclosure forms are good. Now, all we are asking

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for with the fiduciary rule or with the SEC's Best

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rule, is to have clarity around disclosure, around what

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you're paying for and what you're getting. And of course,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>these financial firms are arguing against the with all of

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>their might because they love burying fees, They love taking

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>advantage of your behavior and hiding fees in places that

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you won't notice them like, oh, this money is just

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting here, we won't pay you any interest on it,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>or oh, you'll only pay us if you overdraft her,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>if you pay late, because people think, well, I'm smart,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I won't pay late and I won't keep very much

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>money in that account. I'll manage this. And the firms

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have all your data and they know you won't do

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>those things. You will misbehave, you will accidentally forget something,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you won't actively manage it because you don't have infinite time.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And so what you need increasingly as an advisor in

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>your corner doing these things for you. You need an advisor,

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You need a smart money manager, You need the best technology.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You need both of those things. So, if I recall

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>under the Obama administration when they wrote the white paper

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about the fiduciary rule just in retirement accounts, they claimed

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>excess fees were north of seventeen billion dollars a year.

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of money collectively that should be going

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>towards people's retirements and it's not. So is this just

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is the fujuciary rule just about money? Is that why

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>people are opposing this? That's it, that's that's seventeen billion

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars that should be going to clients is going to

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Right. The industry didn't argue with that number.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>They just said, if this rule goes through, it will

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>impact our profits by seventeen billion dollars. Okay, So do

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you want that money to go to consumers, to individuals,

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or do you want it to go to the financial

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>services industry. Personally, I'm all about the consumer. I'm super

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>passionate about making things more transparent, about giving letting people

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>know what they're getting, letting them know what they're paying for,

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and let them make the decision. If they want the

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>high priced option, you can have it, but just have

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the transparency. Uh. That's that's fair enough. So from your perspective,

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you you sit at the nexus of technology and financial services.

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I won't use the terrible phrase that that everybody else uses, um,

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but looking forward, what does the next twenty years or

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so in that space look like? What changes should we expect.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We think about the self managing wallet, we think about

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the self driving car. Right and if if, if you

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>like me, I I believe that sometime over the next

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, we're going to have self driving cars. Right,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's going to be twenty is

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>probably less than that, it could be, right and uh,

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and eventually that's just going to become the way that

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>we get around and everyone's going to be used to it.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Right now, it still seems a little bit far fetched. Well,

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at the self managing wall at the same way.

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine that you're going to get in a

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>self driving car to take you to work, and then

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day you're still going to

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out how much to putting your wrath

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>versus your traditional I RRA And did I actually balance

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>my checking account this much? Of course, that's going to

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>be managed by, you know, a smart system, and that

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>system exists right now, and it just keeps getting better

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>every day, so it's time to start using it. Do

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at companies like Amazon as potentially coming into

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the financial service the space? I know lots of people

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>of UM positive that thesis, But what else is coming

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>along to disrupt financial services? We see the financial services

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a broad space, and certainly Amazon and Apple are interested

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the payment side, the sites closer to commerce, which

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is their core right. They would rather earn that three

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>percent interchange than you know, have some other third party

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>earn it for them to get into, say, managing on

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 1>wealth is a little further afield. But maybe in between

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>some of this everyday cash management that I was talking about,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe they will play there. I think certainly the large

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>incumbents and financial services could use some challengers. Frankly, so

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>could these large uh, these large I T companies use

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>some some challengers. I think they're They're in a lot

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of businesses right now. And um, Fortunately in financial services

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a pretty good regime of competition being good. Right,

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>There's all kinds of laws around mack size of banks

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and competitive pricing to keep it a dynamic competitive market.

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>You see prices continuing to go lower even in your

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>space or is that you know, twenty five basis points

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty reasonable price point. How much lower could

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that possibly go? If you have a competitive market like

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>financial services, prices will generally follow to uh to the cost.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Right if if there's you only get real difference divergence

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>between price and costs when you have more monopolistic areas. Now,

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the interesting things that's going on

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>is there is a monopolistic tendency in retail banking right now.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So the banks that control fort of retail branches opened

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of accounts over the last five years. If

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you go back thirty years, the five biggest banks had

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>less than ten percent of the total deposits. Now it's

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>practically fifty. It's amazing how how much consolidation and there's

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>been in that space, especially after the crisis. So there's

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>less and less competition. And none of those banks, those

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>big ones, those big four or five, are price leaders.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>None of them are actually giving customers the best deal.

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>The reason they're growing is because technology is becoming a

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger asset to these institutions, and those who

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>can afford to invest in it are And I do

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>worry about the smaller institutions who can't make those kinds

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of investments. Were empowering investment advisors with the best technology,

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>who's empowering the banks. I mean, I'm sure there's a

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of like B two B businesses out there, but

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to compete with like the the big consolidated say,

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, JP Mortgage and Bank of America's, any of

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the money center banks are not under the same price

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>competition that smaller companies are is that is that the

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>argument they have different ways that they compete. Let's say, yeah,

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right, and it's getting harder for say

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>small regional retail banks to to raise deposits. That's a

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>spot where I think we want to help them. Uh So,

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're looking broadly at the financial services landscape

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about how can we make things better for

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and consumers. I think competition is great in the space.

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>We want to continue to encourage it, and people have

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to speak up and demand better. We have been speaking

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Sedin, founder and CEO of Betterment. If you

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>enjoy this conversation, well, be sure and come back and

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>check out the podcast extras when we keep the tape

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>rolling and continue discussing all things robo Advisor related. You

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>can find that at iTunes, Overcast, SoundCloud, Stitcher, Bloomberg, wherever

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>your final podcasts are sold. We love your comments, feedback

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot net. Check out my daily column on Bloomberg

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Opinion. Follow me on Twitter at rid Holts.

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Hults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast. John, Thank you so

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this. I've been looking forward to this

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for a while. UM. I think you guys are in

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting space, and I've followed your progress over

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the years. Although I'm astonished how effective you have been

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>on the the space has been on the venture capital side,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because unless and until there's an I p O, exits

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>are becoming fewer and further between. We've seen a lot

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>of people say well, we don't have to buy. We've

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>seen a few companies get bought, but a number of

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the latter entrance said well, we could build this ourselves.

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard built it themselves. Schwab built it themselves, although I

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>know they had a series of small UM related acquisitions.

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>UM some of the big first round robos that had

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>achieved some a UM scale got purchased primarily for the

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>a U M. What's the what's the exit strategy? Is

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it I p O or a big, a big entity

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>down the road. We've always said since we launched that

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>we want this to be an independent public company. If

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're to have the impact we want, that's the route

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have to take. We want to have such

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a strong relationship with our customers and constantly reinvest in

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that in their well being, which is not what the

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>typical incumbent is trying to do. Right, They're great at

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>making money for themselves, not necessarily for their customers. You

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>get any any pushback on that philosophy from hey, it's

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>been a decade since your first venture capitalists back to you.

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, these guys have a tendency to want to

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>see something eventually, what what's the relationship like, and what

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are they what are they pressing you to do. Our

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>investors have been fantastic from day one. They've they've known

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is a long term, generational type opportunity. We

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>went into it. I was open. We said this is

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a thing that we quickly flip

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and sell. We're trying to build an institution here. And

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the cycles in this space, it's

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>every thirty or forty years you get another generation of

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that grow up. And so the last major one

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was back in seventies when Schwab and Vanguard both launched

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.760
<v Speaker 1>about seventy five, and they're big companies today. They didn't

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>displace the old companies. They didn't put Merrill Lynch out

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of business. They didn't put more against Stanley out of business.

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Those continue to beat companies to the more recent one.

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>There were sort of like a mini one when E

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Trade and so on launched in the early nineties. Right,

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and today, I think we're in a new era. We

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>are in the smart money management era, and we are

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the leader in that space. Nobody is close to us. Right,

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we have more assets, we have a bigger reputation than

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>any other firm. And sure there's companies saying, hey, we

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, do something about recommending portfolio too. That's nothing new.

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not smart money management. Where the smart money manager? Right? Like,

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 1>where the one that's actually doing all the right things

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with your money? Quite quite interesting, all right, So let's

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>jump to our favorite questions. These are what we ask

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>all our guests. Are our speed round. Um, you might

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be the first person who can't answer for this question.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>What was the first car you ever owned? Your making model?

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I started driving when I was fifteen. In Texas, where

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I grew up, you can get a hardship license, and

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>my hardship was that both my parents worked and I

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>lived a long way from school and there was no bus,

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>so I got to get a license early. I got

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a Nissan Stands. It was a red Niscense Stands. It

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was the nerdiest car that I probably ever could um So,

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so you mentioned Jack Bogel as a mentor. Who else

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>were some of your early mentors. I gotta think my

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.760
<v Speaker 1>parents and my grandparents. My family was just such fantastic influences.

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my parents were city planners. They taught me

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad efficiency and the value of good design. And

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I learned to love business through my my grandparents, who

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>ran a furniture furniture factory and and upstate New York.

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And I love their style of just building a community

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>around that factory. I thought was so fantastic. Who influenced

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>your approach to invest him? Well? Aside from Jack Bogol

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously was huge. I learned a lot from the Chicago School.

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So one of my professors at Harvard and undergrad was

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>worked with the Chicago guys. He worked with Dick Taylor,

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I learned about Richard Taylor, I learned about

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Fama and French And now you know, we've partnered with

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Dimensional Fund advisors Dave uh and it's almost coming full

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 1>circle back to to that relationship, right. I always thought

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that like Fama and French and Taylor were onto something,

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and Fama and French were big advisors to d f

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>A and have been pretty much from from the beginning,

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So everybody's a favorite question. Tell us about some of

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>your favorite books. I love Sapiens, big fan of that,

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But probably my favorite is Dan Kneman's Thinking Fast and Slow.

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a tome, right it is, you know, a

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thick one, and but it's a page turner too, So

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for three quarters of that you just really blow right

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>through it. Yeah, fascinating, absolutely how we think. It's how

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we work, and it's that I talked about that union

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of like rational and irrational. He explains it right, He

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>gets it and got a Nobel for getting. Any of

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the books you want to mention or just leave it

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with those two leave it there. What do you do

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for fun? What do you do out of the office.

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 1>All of my time outside of work these days is

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:27.399
<v Speaker 1>occupied by my family. I've got a three year old

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and a four year old, two daughters, and I just

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>love spending time with him. It's such a precious age

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, I can't do anything else. What are you

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>most excited about in the financial services industry today? I

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think this idea of what happens with everyday money management

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is hugely exciting. I know I keep coming back to it,

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's ripe for change, and integrating that with this

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>long term financial plan is the realization of our mission.

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing we've been talking about for years. But

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we can't really help you with your long term unless

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>we help you with How do you save more today?

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>What sort of advice would you give to a recent

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.919
<v Speaker 1>college grad or a millennial who came to you and said, um,

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>interested in a career in fintech? How would you How

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>would you advise them? I think having real passion is important.

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We always look for passion obviously, like you gotta have horsepower.

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>That's like you gotta work hard and get things done.

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>But showing like something that you have real passionate about

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is important. The other thing is openness. Can you listen?

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you You know if somebody's got all the ideas

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and not listening to others that that's not really a

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>recipe for success. And our final question, what is it

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know about the world of investing technology? Uh,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 1>anything else related today that you wish you knew uh

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ten plus years ago when you were first started well

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>back when I was a student, I was learning all

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about how to invest, and to that I

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was just as dumb as the next person. And of

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>course then I went out and started managing my own money,

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and I bye end Ron on the way down. You know,

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I made some of the same dumb mistakes that I

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>had read about, and I wish I hadn't done that,

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and I wish, you know, I learned my my lesson.

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>We're all just as as as as dumb as the

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 1>next person. In the end, I certainly am anyway, quite

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. We have been speaking with Jonathan Stein, founder

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Betterment. If you enjoyed this conversation, we'll

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>be sure and look up an intro down an Inch

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple iTunes. Well, you can see any of the

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>previous let's call it two hundred and forty three such

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>conversations that have taken place over the past five years.

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>We love your comments, feedback, end suggestions right to us

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. If you

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed this conversation, well give us a review on Apple iTunes. Lastly,

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Crack staff that helps put this conversation together each week.

0:46:56.120 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Blatka val Bron is our project manager. Medina Irijuana is

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>our producer, Slash audio engineer Taylor Riggs is our booker producer.

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael bat Nick is our head of research. I'm Barry Ritolts.

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Master's in Business Von Bloomberg Radio