WEBVTT - The Debt Bomb in Middle America, with Ken Brown

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bethany McLean and this is making a killing interviews,

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>exploring the headlines you thought you understood and finding the

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>lessons we can all learn from them. Already in this series,

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken with Sahel Patel about Netflix, Mike Isaac about Uber,

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and Peter Robeson about Boeing. I'm at Bethany mac twelve

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Families go deep in debt to stay in

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the middle class, reads the Wall Street Journal headline. In

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the article, we meet several responsible, educated, employed families who

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are making nearly one hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>yet going deeper into debt with every paycheck. It sends

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a chill down my spine because it's true, it's widespread,

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and it might get worse. Here's what's going on. For

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the last two decades. Incomes have been pretty much stagnant.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Over the same period of time, the average cost of cars,

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>college tuition, healthcare expenditures, childcare, and housing have swelled at

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>an alarming rate. In order to bridge this widening gap

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>between earnings and costs, the middle classes turned to that

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>night and not so shining armor debt, filling the gap

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>between earning and spending is an explosion of finance into

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>nearly every corner of the consumer economy. Is how the

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Journal put it. Consumer debt, not counting mortgages, has climbed

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to four trillion dollars, higher than it has ever been,

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>even after adjusting for inflation. According to the Journal, our

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>appetite for debt has been fueled by a decade of

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>super low interest rates engineered by the Federal Reserve after

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the last financial crisis, interest rates that by design made

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it easier for us to spend and made the classic

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>American middle class dream seem affordable. But of course, debt

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is a double edged sword. Yes, borrowing can spur spending

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in economic growth, but if borrowers can't repay, our collective

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pile of debt may turn into a dangerous economic landslide.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>There isn't much room for the low interest rates that

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have facilitated all of this to go any lower, and

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve data shows that the proportion of credit card

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>balances that are seriously passed due is already on the rise.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>What will happen if the economy heads into a recession?

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The step bomb we are all sitting on raises a

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>whole host of societal questions too, most of all, what

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for the beleaguered middle class? Here to

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>help us answer these questions, and mores Ken Brown one

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of the three reporters on this Wall Street Journal piece

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that has gotten such a huge response. So, Ken, you've

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about debt for a long time. What made

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal tackle this particular topic. Now you

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the economy, which has done pretty well the

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>past bunch of years, and then you look at how

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>people feel about the economy, and it's not great. There's

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>been this sort of unease out there, and so we

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>were just trying to figure out why, you know, unemployment

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so low incomes her up decently and we're trying to

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out why. And when you look at the costs

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of being middle class, what people expect when you make

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty thousand dollars a year, one hundred

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand dollars a year is twice the median household

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>income in the US, and so when you make one

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty thousand, you feel like you should be middle class.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk to people who feel like that,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>they can't make it, and so they end up the

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>bottom is falling out somehow right, and so they can't

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>afford a middle class lifestyle a house, two cars, college

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for the kids, etc. And so we were trying to

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>understand why there was this unease. What surprised you the

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.399
<v Speaker 1>most in looking into this when you look at consumer

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>debt it's low, like debt to income levels and all

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that stuff has come down a ton since the financial crisis.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And you scratch your head because you're like, well, wait

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a minute, people don't feel they're not acting like that.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And then you start to look at it and you say, well, okay,

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason debts down it's because mortgage debt is down

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so much. Mortgage that is down so much because there

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was so many defaults, and because interest rates so low.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Then you look at student debt, auto debt, credit card debt,

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all at record highs and even if you adjust

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for inflation, and so what you realize is people are

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>not buying homes like they were, but they're borrowing for

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>everyday things. They're borrowing more than they would have in

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the past to buy a car, they're borrowing in their

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>credit cards. Student debt, we all know, is up a

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ton in the past decade. And someone that's weighing on people.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So the data is very compelling once you peel back

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the overall debt data and you

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>look at these areas like credit card debt or auto loans.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>The average car new car in the US cost thirty

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand dollars. The median household income is sixty one

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. Yeah, the median household incomes. They're not buying

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 1>a new car every year. But the reason that works

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is because there's been this explosion of auto debt, and

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so auto loans are bigger than ever, they're longer than ever.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And one of the trends we wrote about is people

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't pay off that car loan. People roll the old

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>car loan into a new car loan and basically keep

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:49.679
<v Speaker 1>paying it off. When you look at the surface number,

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it tells you one thing, and you look underneath and

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an entirely different picture. Before we get back to

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>breaking down the numbers, what did you hear from the

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>people that you talked to? Did you hear unease, frustration?

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>What was the predominant emotion that came through? Yeah, well, anxiety, fear.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>It's worse than that, you know. So the stories repeat themselves.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>To some extent, we talk to people in that one

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred two hundred and fifty thousand dollars income range because

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to talk to It's not necessarily the middle

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>class statistically, but these are people who've done well right.

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>These are people who should be okay, and they fall

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>into two categories. One category is student debt. So a

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people graduated school would say fifty thousand dollars

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in debt, thirty thousand dollars in debt, and they just

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>can't catch up because they're making their debt payments. Maybe

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they have a mortgage, maybe they have a car payment,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and they just can't get ahead. And so while in

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the past, you know, most people didn't have a lot

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of debt when they were young, and then they would

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>take on a house, they'd get a car loan, and

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the debt would build up, these people are starting out

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with debt and so then it just builds on itself

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and they can't get out from under. The other group

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that we run into, there's people who've had unexpected expenses,

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so they have their student debt, or they have a

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>car loan and they have a mortgage or something, and

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they get hit with something a healthcare costs, erect car,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and it just tips them over the

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>edge and again they can't catch up. Let's break down

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>each of those categories a bet. Why when you look

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at auto debt, why has it exploded so much? What's

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the primary reason for that? Our car is more expensive

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>than we used to. Are we buying more expensive cars

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>than we need? Yeah, so cars are more expensive. So

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the average new car in the US thirty seven thousand dollars,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and the price has gone up steadily over the past

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of years. And part of it is people want SUVs.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>People want again the trappings of a middle class lifestyle.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of kids. Everyone around me has

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>an suv. Whether you agree that they should buying an

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>suv or not, that's what people are buying, and so

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why the prices have gone up. The auto industry

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>has feasted on this stuff. Auto sales have been up

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>until last year, we had the best four year stretch

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of auto sales ever in the history, and a lot

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of it was driven by this consumer debt. So thirty

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>two percent of new car loans are now six to

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>seven years long. So in the past, the typical new

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>car loan was three to five years, and then you'd

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>have the car for a few years and you without

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>car loans. I mean we all remember, right, you paid

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>down the car loan and you had the car and

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have that monthly payment. It was like a

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>great time, and then you hoped the car would last. Well,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>now there's six or seven years long, and people don't

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>even pay them down. I mean, first they roll over

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the old debt into a new loan. The second thing

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is car leases is the cheapest way to own a car,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>although you don't really own it. The cheapest way to

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>get a car in terms of monthly payments is to lease.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And leases used to account for about ten percent of

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>car sales and now it's about a third. And so

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>again people don't have the cash, and so everything is

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>termed out. Everything is paid over longer periods. With leases,

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you kind of pay forever. Right, you have a lease,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you go to the next lease, you go to the

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>next lease. I actually never thought about that, and it's

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really interesting that combination, whether you lease or whether you

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have a loan, that you now pay back over a

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>much longer period of time. Both me and you never

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have a period in your life where you're not making

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that payment, right, it's there every single month, right, right,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's kind of interesting. And you know, you

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to car dealers, which we did, they make more

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>money from the financing of a car than they do

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>from the sale of a car. Everyone knows. You walk

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>into a car dealer, you pretty much know, you have

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>all these services on your phone. You pretty much know

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>what you should be paying roughly for a car. And

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, these guys can do their song and dance,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but you can you can kind of look and see

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what you should be paying. Then you go into the

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>finance office of the dealership and then they get you

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>into this loan and it's longer term, and it has

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>all these bells and whistles, and the dealer makes more

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>money because they all sell on these loans. They make

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>more money on the loan they do on the car. Wow.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And are you hearing when you go and talk to

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>dealers about this, are you hearing any worries from them?

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Or are they all excited? Did they think this is

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>an unqualified good thing or do they say, oh, maybe

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>this poses a danger does in the future. They say

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>two things. One is we serve our customers. They want

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to buy these cars. We're going to get them into

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>this car. You know, you get a customer walks in

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the door with a car with a five thousand dollars

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>balance on the loan and they want a new car.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get them into that car, they say that,

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And so they they're very short term oriented. They want

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to make the sale. They're quarter to quarter. These guys

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do not think about the financial health of their customers.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Like a mortgage broker in two thousands. They don't own

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the loan, right The loan goes to carlanders. And it's interesting,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so you mentioned mortgage crisis, so we all know all

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>these mortgages went bad and banks got crushed, right, Well,

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>back then, car loans didn't go bad. I mean some did,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but not nearly to that extent. And one reason is

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>because consumers, if you lose your house, you go to

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>rent somewhere and you have a place to live. For

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>most people, you can't get to work without a car.

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So the last thing you're not going to pay off

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>as a car loan. And the people who don't don't

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>pay off the car loan, they repossessed a car. And

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so it was a low risk form a lending. So

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there's been a ton of money pouring into car lending

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>since the financial crisis because it was seen as a

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>good bet. Because of course, what was seen as a

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>good bet last time has to be a good bet

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this time around, exactly. And also it's low interest rights.

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to make a return on your money, and

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>so car lending is a pretty good way to make

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a return, especially for people with low credit. And you said,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they said two things, So what's the other thing the

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>dealers told you. The other thing is these people want SUVs,

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>will give them SUVs they want. You know, they can

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be irresponsible with their money, but you know it's not

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>our job to judge them. Did you think it with

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the people you talked to were making irresponsible decisions or

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>did you see them more being backed into a corner

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't have all that much choice. It's usually

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a combination. I mean, so sometimes people spend too much

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on a car, Sometimes people ran up credit card bills,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they had unexpected expenses and they thought, wow,

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I one hundred and forty thousand dollars a year, I

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can afford all this stuff. So we got a ton

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of response on the story, and a lot of it was,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>these people are responsible when I grew up, when I

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>went to college where I didn't borrow, We didn't borrow

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>back then. Oh he's these answers. And my response to

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>those people was, look, first of all, for the people

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>who grew up twenty thirty years ago, the amount of

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>credit available today is far bigger than the amount of

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>credit that was available back then. I mean, people didn't

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have lots of credit cards. Car Loans were harder to get,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>there were no leases. It's credited. I'm thinking of that.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Ask our wild quote. Most morality is only the lack

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity, maybe in most debt free lifestyles, or only

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the lack of credit. Yeah, exactly, exactly. So that's one thing.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is it doesn't really matter whether people

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>are being irresponsible or not. The fact is this debt

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>level out there in the economy, and so the real

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that matters is the US economy is driven by

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending. Two thirds of you know, the US economy

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is consumer spending, and a big chunk of consumers have

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>been spending by borrowing. And so two things happen. Either

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they reach a limit, you can't keep borrowing, you've maxed

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>out your credit cards, they won't lend you a more

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>money for a new car. You know you're maxed out,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or you'll lose your job, or you get a pay cut,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and or you know there's a recession and you can't

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>pay and you default, right, right, So in both cases

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it hurts the economy. And so the biggest point we

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>try to make is like, you could say what you

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>want about these people, but you've got to understand that

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>there is an economic cost to this, and policymakers need

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand what's going on. And you see in the economy,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So the economy has stayed relatively strong, and you know,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>largely because the jobs market has been so great, but

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, when interest rates went up over the last

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, we saw hired defaults on credit cards,

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We saw the housing markets slow down, and so people

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive to debt. They've borrowed a lot, they're very

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to interest rates, and so that's an economic impact.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I hate just make too many analogies to the financial crisis,

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>although although they're they're right, they're waiting to be made.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But there was such a debate about where borrowers and

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis irresponsible, right, And in the end it

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter because whether it's a predatory borrower, predatory lender,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's debt in the system that can't be paid back,

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a massive problem. Right before we get to

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>those broader economic questions, I want to come back to this,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the way in which you broke down the categories of

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>debt and tell me about student debt. Were you It's

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been a headline, but were you. Were you surprised

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>by the magnitude of the impact it's had on people's lives.

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I knew the numbers. We all know the numbers. You

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>see the chart going up and up and up and

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>up and up. But then you talk about the impact

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and it just weighs on people. It's just at the

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>time in your life when you are kind of just

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>making it. You have a lot of expenses, You've gotten married,

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you may start a family, You're you're needing things, you know,

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's a tough financial times. Everyone has a story

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>of I was twenty eight years old and I was

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>down to my last nickel and then something how, you

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>know whatever. Everyone has that story. But when you have

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars with the debt sitting on you, especially

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like married couples, you know, eighty thousand dollars whatever, you know,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't there's no margin for error, and there's no

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>margin for error meeting either screwing something up, having some

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of financial surprise, or spending too much going on

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a vacation. You know. One of the couples, one of

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the families we wrote about, deep in debt, really struggling,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were slowly getting their arms around things. One

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the cars got wrecked, so they had to buy

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a new car, and then they were invited to three

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>out of town weddings in a row, so airfare, hotels, gifts.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>They have a young child, so they had to get

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>either childcare or whatever. It was a lot of money.

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It was a few thousand dollars, and it went on

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the credit cards because there's no other way, and so,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then credit cards at twenty percent interest

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>or eighteen percent interest, which they're not paying off anytime soon.

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. Yeah. I thought one of the most pointed

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lines in your story it was a quote from one

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the people you talked to, and he said, what

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be an asset became a liability. And

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that about education and that seems to me

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to have deeper societal ramifications if people are starting to

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>perceive that this thing, and education is supposed to be

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>all of our goals, has actually become a liability. Did

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that stand out to you in the same way. Yeah,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean people didn't regret their education. They regretted going

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to private colleges, They regretted maybe not working while they

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>were in school, they regretted taking on so much debt,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't understand it. But again, like when you're

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineteen years old, you don't understand it. And it's

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>also interesting you go back to the financial crisis. You

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the rise in student debt and it picks

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>up when the financial crisis hit. And you talked to

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of experts and they say, look, a lot

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of people counted in equity in their homes for to

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for college tuition because the home was a piggy

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>bank in the two thousands. Everyone that fascinating connection ten

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or twenty percent a year. And so you know, you

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>had yourself one hundred thousand dollars in equity in a

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>home or whatever, fifty thousand and that was going to

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>help pay for college. Once that equity got wiped out

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and you couldn't borrow against your house, it was tough,

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and so parents took on student debt and kids took

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on student debt, and so it's sort of this lingering

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>echo of the financial crisis, and it just left people

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable and it's plays out. I had not thought about that,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about the connection between the rise and student loan debt

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and the financial crisis. And what's interesting is that it's

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a vicious circle, isn't it. Because you have a lack

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of home equity means that people have to pay outright

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for education where they might have been able to finance

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it with borrowing on their home. And then because people

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have so much student loan debt, they're not able to

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>buy homes right. And so so this one of the

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>odd components in here is mortgage debt. Right, And were

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>there surprises for you and what you saw on the

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>picture and mortgage debt? People still want to buy homes

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the people we talk to. The statistics don't really bear

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that out. I mean, we've seen a decline in home

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ownership from the peak, but but people we talked, we

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>still want to buy homes. They feel like it is

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what a middle class family should do. But one of

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that we have written about, and we'll write

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about more, is there's been this big rise in the

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>rent rentals of single family homes. So typically people rent

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>apartments and condos and they own homes, and the economics

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of trying to rent homes at scale rent a thousand

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>homes has always been really hard. But a bunch of

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.239
<v Speaker 1>folks brought up homes post financial crisis, big investors, and

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they have them and they've been very popular. And the

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>people who rent these homes say, listen, our people make

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars a year. Our tenants make one

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars. You they're not poor people, but they

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have no assets. They have debt. You know, when you

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>add up I own X, Y and Z, and I

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>have X, Y and Z debt and it nets out

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>to zero or only a little bit, and so they

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>don't have the money to put down. We talk to

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a guy at the Federal Reserve who studies this stuff,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, buying a home for the

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>average person in the average city is becoming a luxury.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really a luxury and that is a difference from

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the past. I thought it was stunning. I had no

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that Blackstone, the big private equity firm, is now

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the largest renter of single family homes. That it's really interesting.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought, I've I've done a fair amount of work

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>on housing, and someone said to me about our broken

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>homeownership policy. Let them meet rent. And you think about

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that now, because in the end, right this has huge ramifications,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and that it's people's homes that paid for them to

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>retire often, and so what's the spillover effect of a

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>nation of renters who with no assets. One element of

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this story is income inequality, right, and wealth disparity, and

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they go hand in hand, but just on the wealth side.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>So people accumulate wealth basically in two ways. For the

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>average person, One is they invest in the stock market,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>bond market, you know, whatever. And one is their own

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>real estate and stocks and bonds and all that are

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>basically the vast majority are owned by the wealthiest people

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>top ten percent own a huge amount of securities, and

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>real estate is owned by the middle class. And so

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth creation for the middle class is depended on real estate.

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>And you go back to post World War two, for

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of. The three decades after World War Two, real

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>estate prices were up and the middle class did really well,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and wealth gap, the wealth gap in the US was

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty was relatively small. You go back to more recent years,

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the stock market has done much better than housing, and

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been this gap. Now, this is a complicated story.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to oversimplify. Well, that's fascinating. When you

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>don't own a house, you lose that opportunity both for

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>force savings you're paying down your mortgage and your accumulating

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>equity in the house and appreciation of the asset. And

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that's how middle class people have made money maybe just

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, made their retirement for decades. And so

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>if you don't own anything, it's tough to build that up.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is the debt that's gone up. Student loans,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>car loans, credit card doesn't help you accumulate wealth. I

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>mean student loans arguably, arguably because you make a higher income.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>And so yes, that that is. But a mortgage is different.

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>A mortgage. I mean, if you think about it, even

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>if you take on a big mortgage and you work

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>hard to pay it off and you even get in

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>over your head someone if you can stick with it.

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You have this house happy set, right, And the house

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is for most people, if you're law own it long enough,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>gone up in value, and these other things don't do that,

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it widens the wealth gap. And that's been

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a political issue and an economic issue. So another component

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of this that I found really interesting was the way

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in which unsecured personal loans are also exploding. And that's

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of components, right, It's it's one tells

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a picture of what's going on with people, but it

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>also tells a picture of this or paints a picture

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of this ferocious competition between traditional lenders and new upstart lenders. Right,

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And how how did you guys think about that? Again,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rate to low, it's hard to make a return.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And one way you can make a nice, sweet return

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is lending to consumers because they pay higher interest rates

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>until of course they don't pay at all, Right, And

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>so that's the risk you take, and everyone seems to

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a good risk. The problem is, as

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we know, and there's a lot of competition, people make

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions, The lenders make bad decisions, and so you

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:56.239
<v Speaker 1>have these Silicon Valley financed lenders fintech lenders. You have

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>golden sacks champions, right. I mean it's interesting and they

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.479
<v Speaker 1>want to build a deposit base. I have no idea

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>how that's going to play out for them. And then

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>all these banks pulled back on personal lending post financial

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>crisis because it's risky. It's the first thing you don't

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>pay off, right, you know it's insecure. What are they

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do to me? And so you don't pay

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a credit card, right, And they're all doing it again.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So's you know, a lot of people trying to find

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that market. Did you in talking to people for this,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>did anybody voice worry about what happens if the recession

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's looking for hits. The whole premise that people lend

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and borrow in these markets in these times is they're optimistic.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you don't lend to someone if you're pessimistic, right,

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and you don't borrow if you're pessimistic. So everyone is

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that they'll have a job, that wages will be solid,

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that the borrowers will pay things off. And so it's

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>an assumption. And people have made a lot of money

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>being positive and optimistic, right, And people have lost a

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of money being up positive and optimistic, and we

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's how it's going to happen. But when

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you have ten years of economic growth, that's the time

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>when people get sloppy. Right. Historically people do stupid things

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>when they have things have been good for a long time.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm not saying people are doing stupid things.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, what's interesting, as you point out, though,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is how different the mood feels than it did. You know,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and five, two thousand and six, it

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>felt a bulliant, right, and now we've ten years into

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this supposed, you know, economic growth, and it doesn't feel

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a bulliant and it's just it's it's really interesting contrast

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>when you think back on how just how the mood

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of the country feels. And that was one of the

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>reasons we originally got into the story, was like, some

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite add up. People are feeling nervous, people have

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say they've been cautious, but there's

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just there's not that ebulence that we saw before from consumers.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'd like to think we kind of try to

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>sort that out a little bit and explain that definitely.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's eyes the hands of the Federal

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Reserve a little bit. I mean, there's an immense amount

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of controversy surrounding FED Chairman, your own Powell. Now, right,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had these low interest rates, totally ahistorical for a

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>longer period of time than anybody would ever have imagined.

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no room for them to go lower. But can

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they go higher? When you think of what that would

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>mean for all of these households that you profiled, it

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>would be very hard for them to go higher. The

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>good thing in the US is mortgages are mostly fixed rate,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and so that wouldn't hurt so bad. But you know,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>credit cards, auto loans, either they adjust or people know

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that I'm they're going to have to borrow to get

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a car in the next two years, and so they're cautious.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It makes people cautious. And we saw it, you some

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence last year that the interest rate increases were biting.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the consumers were the big reason

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>why the economy is slowing and the FED is cutting rates,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly a factor. And the idea that they're

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to get rates back to four percent

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>five percent, right, shocking, right? Not alone the ten and

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent, and that our parents grew up and can

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you imagine, So you had a line in the story

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that maybe this is a vote of confidence in the future.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>That may be borrowing as a sign of confidence in

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the future. Do you believe that most people will borrow

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if they feel that they can pay it back, and

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>so it is a sign of confidence. It may be

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a misplaced sign of confidence. People may be over confident

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about how things are. Look we all know from psychology,

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, people extrapolate what they've seen in the recent

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>past into the future, right, And so if the economy

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>has been good, people think it's going to stay good.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>If the stock market's been down, everyone thinks it's going

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep going down. So it's human nature, and I

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>think it is a vote of confidence. It just may

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>be misplaced, right, Although it's also another way to look

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 1>at that, and this is not my thought, I don't

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>remember who said it, but that we've become a nation

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of basically interest expense rather than rather than principle. So

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we look at can we pay the interest, We don't

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think about paying back the principle. And then that would

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>play into your idea that it isn't really that if

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a misplaced vote of confidence because we're not thinking

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the principle. We've been taught for so

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>long to think in terms of the interest, right, No,

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you're absolutely right. I mean, look, so I

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>mean internally, recall this story and some of the other

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>stories you've done. Rent or nation. So you don't own

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a house. You rent a house. You don't own a car,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>your Lisa car. You don't even buy your phone, right,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you pay No one buys a phone, you know, you

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>pay it twenty five dollars thirty dollars a month, right

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for two years, and then you get another phone, so

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you're always paying your phone. So no one owns anything

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>anymore in the middle class. And that's an exaggeration, of course,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but the mentality, just like you said, the mentality changes,

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>so like, Okay, what's my monthly payment, what's my monthly income?

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Can I do this? There's no thought of do I

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>want to put away fifty thousand dollars for a down

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>payment on a house? Do I want to put money

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>away from my kids college? So I want to, you know,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.479
<v Speaker 1>like really save and think about the future and think

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about assets. It's just cash flow. It's just in and out.

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Another example of short termism. Right, So the politicians are

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about many of the Democratic candidates are talking about

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>student loan forgiveness. Is that just a small piece of

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle as you think about this array of debts

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>bread in front of us. Student debt is a trillion

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half bucks. I think it's a big piece

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of the puzzle because it would take a burden off

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of the middle class, which would then they would be

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more money left for them to spend and save and invest.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be a real game changer for

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>people who really are looking at it a decade of

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>student loan payments in the years where they should be

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>starting to accumulate assets and things like that. Does that,

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself have the power to start reversing

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this trend toward renter nation? Do you think or do

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you think there are other things that would need to

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>be done concurrently? I think it would go part of

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the way to reversing that. I mean, I think someone

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>who has fifty thousand dollars in student loan debt, I

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think would be happy to take on more debt to

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>own a house and see something for it. I mean,

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>student loan debt is also this weird thing. When you're

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>paying off a mortgage, you're living in the house, When

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you're paying off a car, you're driving the car to loan.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>That is like I finished school five years ago, I'm

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>still paying for it. It's like a It's just a

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>bad way. And of course you're benefiting taxiological, you're benefiting

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>from the education you got, hopefully with the job you

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have and the income you have. But it's a hard

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>thing and it just is. It weighs on people. And

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I'd say is the impact would probably

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be not as great as the optimists or as the

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>people promoting it think, because the reality is a lot

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of people are not paying off the student debt. There's

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a big default rate, or people are just behind, and

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then a lot of it is in deferments because people

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are still in school or whatever. And so the big

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 1>number that people always read is really not the amount

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that's getting paid off. It's a much smaller numbers. So

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the economic impact would probably be small. It would make

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it would ease a huge psychological burden, but it would

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>make less of a difference in people's monthly cash lot

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>than than you might expect. Isn't part of the problem too,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that student loan debt that if you if you don't

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>pay your loans, they can even come after your Social

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Security money later on. I mean, it just has so

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>many reverberations. What's really tough is you can get rid

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of it in bankruptcy. And so, you know, the great

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about US bankruptcy law had been, you know, in

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a year's past, it gave people a fresh start. It

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was awful, but it gave you a fresh start. Now

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the laws have gotten much tougher and it's gotten much

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to declare bankruptcy, but it's still a way out

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for people. And you know, you can't get everybody student

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>debt in bankruptcy, and so it's this burden that you

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>carry with you. So did you, in thinking as you

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>reported this piece and wrote it in the other pieces

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you've done, did you think, wow, we just need a

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>radical rethink of how we all live and of economic

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>policy or did you sort of shrug your shoulders at it?

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>What was what was your response? I think we're going

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to have to address it because at some point, people

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.719
<v Speaker 1>with this level of debt will reach a limit of

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>borrowing and that's going to hit the economy, and the

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 1>economy is dependent on contumer spending, and if consumers are

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not spending, the economy really slows down. And that that's

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the thing that's sitting out there. I

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's it's a hugely frightening issue lurking over all

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, Right, And it's a double whammy in a sense,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>because not only does consumer spending slow down, then you

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have bankruptcies at the same time. Right, that then further slowdown.

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.479
<v Speaker 1>It will provoke a vicious circle. In other words, Right,

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the fact that this isn't

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just a US issue? You spent a lot of time

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in Asia and you led a twenty thirteen series entitled

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>China's Rising Risks, which highlight highlighted the potential problems called

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>by China's China's rapidly rising debtload in the Journal just

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>did a front page story about the rise in debt

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in China. Why is that and what does it mean

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't just a US issue? China is fascinating

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Chinese economy as a whole. You can have

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole discussion about it. But Chinese economy has been

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>very debt dependent for a long time now. And at

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>first it was Chinese companies that were borrowing and Chinese

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate developers that were borrowing, but more recently Chinese

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers have been borrowing, particularly young consumers. The Chinese have

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>always been great savers, partially because frankly, it's been a

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tough place to live for many decades, and people saved

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>because they had to. You talk to people who are

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, middle age and older in China and they

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are like, they save every yuan and they invested in

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate, they keep it in the bank whatever. Young

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people have not done that, and they've been spending every

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar they get. And you know, one of the parallels

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>with the US is it's very easy to borrow in

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>China now. I mean it was not easy to borrow

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in China a decade ago. As short as a decade ago, really,

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>people didn't have credit cards people, you know it. It

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was a cash economy. And now it's an electronic payments

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>economy and you borrow on your phone small amounts very simply.

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And some of that spending is on goods from American companies. Right.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's also one of the downsides of a global world.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that there's a potential for a boomerang effect there, right, sure,

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, China is a huge market and

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>companies Apple, Nike, you know, all these companies have done

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>well there, and yeah, some portion of it is debt

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese travel, the amount of Chinese going overseas, I

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a lot of Chinese, you know, and even

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>when a small number goes overseas makes a big impact.

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's helped the US economy and the global economy.

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Travel in Europe, Chinese tour groups are everywhere and they're

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>spending and that's had a big global economic impact. So

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we might be headed for a huge rethink all over

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. It could be Yeah, I mean again, at minimum,

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point, if people keep borrowing, they reach a

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>limit on how much they can borrow and how much

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they could spend. And that is the thing that sort

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of sits out there. And you know it's not only China.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The UK debt levels are very high, Canada debt level

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is very high, Australia, same thing. Central banks in all

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>those places have said, essentially, consumer debt is a big

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>issue for US. It's hard to raise rates. We really

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>need to watch that, and so it's it's not just

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the US and China. So it's both reassuring and that

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just profligate, entitled US citizens, right, but it's

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>also incredibly frightening because it is global, and that means

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no place to turn. Well, thank you so much

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for all the fantastic work, and thanks for coming to

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to me. Thank you. As Ken and I talked,

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought about what's been a theme of this podcast,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>which is short termism. Our own short termism is consumers

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>as we think only about the interest we have to pay,

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not about the principle, but also business short termism and

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>lending to increasingly cash strapped consumers. The former makes me sad,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the latter frankly makes me mad. Will they expect another

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bailout when the inevitable recession comes? And a worried little

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>voice in my head also kept saying something has to

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>give and soon. The longer term ramifications of what can

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>called renter nation are ugly. What happens is renter's head

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>into retirement. I've always been resistant to relying on policymakers,

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but the incentives for us and for businesses have to change,

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think we have to change our behavior. In

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>any event, the economy, the global economy, is going to

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>undergo some seismic changes. Making a Killing is the co

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>production of Pushkin Industries and Chalk and Blade. It's produced

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>by Ruth Barnes and Rosie Stoffer. My executive producers are

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Alison McClain no relation in Making Casey. The executive producer

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at Pushkin is Mia Loebell. Engineering by Jason Gambrell and

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Jason Rostkowski. Our music is by Jed Flood. Special thanks

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to Jacob Weisberg at Pushkin and everyone on the show.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bethany McLain. Thank you so much for listening. You

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>can find me on Twitter at Bethany mac twelve and

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>let me know which episodes you've most enjoyed.