WEBVTT - The Fed's Big Cut,  More  Devices Explode & Global Shadow Fleet Exclusive

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Blueberg

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Day BAC podcast, available every morning on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen. It's Thursday, the nineteenth of September in London.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline HEPK and.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephen Carroll. Coming up today is the first cut,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the deepest. The Fed ops for fifty as it delivers

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>its first rate reduction in more than four years.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Israel diverts troops to its border with Lebanon as a

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>second wave of communication devices explodes.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we have exclusive reporting on the global shadow network

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 3>transporting sanctioned Russian gas.

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with a roundup of our top stories.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 3>The Federal Reserve has cut its benchmark lending rate for

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the first time in four years. Policymakers voted to lower

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the rate by fifty basis points as they shift focus

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to concerns over the strength of the US economy and

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>jobs market. Speaking after the announcement, Federal Reserve Charger Own

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Powell used his press conference to push back against the

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>notion that the oversized cut was to make up for

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>lost time.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 4>A broad set of indicators suggests that conditions in the

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 4>labor market are now less tight than just before the

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 4>pandemic in twenty nineteen. The labor market is not a

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 4>source of elevated inflationary pressures. I do not think that

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 4>anyone should look at this and say, oh, this is

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 4>the new pace. You know, you have to have to

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 4>think about it in terms of the base case. Of course,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 4>what happens will happen. If the labor market were to

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 4>slow unexpectedly, then we have the ability to react to that.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 4>We have greater confidence now that inflation is moving down

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>to two percent, But at the same time, our plan

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 4>is that we will be at two percent.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Despite Pile's positive spin at multiple moments during his press conference,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 3>the half point cut was not a unanimous decision. Michelle

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Bowman cost a vote in favor of a smaller quarter

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 3>point cut, the first descent by a fat governor since

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and five.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>The decision to opt for a half point cut led

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>traders to rampop bets on the pace of US ray reductions.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The market is now pricing in around sixty five basis

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>points of easing at the fed's two remaining meetings this year.

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>That's despite officials forecasting just fifty points of further cuts

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, Bloomberg Intelligence is Chief Interest Rates

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>trash is are a Jersey says he expects the Fed

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to stick to that pace, but it's what happens after

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that which is more significant.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 5>When you think about November and December's meeting, you know,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 5>they made it pretty clear that unless something significantly changes

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 5>with the trends in the economy and inflation, that you're

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 5>likely to see, you know, modest cuts going forward, so

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, twenty five basis points over the next couple

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 5>of meetings. But I think that's less important to me.

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>What I was focused on was what they said they were,

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 5>where they said they were going to ultimately, and where

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 5>they think they're going to even with the economy not

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 5>hitting into a recession, is all the way down to

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 5>under three percent on the FED funds.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Rate Bloomberg Intelligence Chief Interest Rates trashes are a Jersey,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>referring there to the fomc's median forecast for the end

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty six for rates to be just below

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>two point nine percent. The move caps months of uncertainty

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>over the timing and scale of the Fed's first rate cut.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Now the focus shifts to the pace of reductions ahead well,

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bank.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>Of England doesn't focused today as it announces its decision

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 3>on rate. It's thought of the patient approach to reversing

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the most aggressive policy tightening in decades will be maintained.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 3>Our UK correspondent Lizzie Burden has more.

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 6>It's decision day on thread Needle Street, but economists and

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 6>investors are expecting policymakers to stick to the status quo,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 6>holding the benchmark rate at five percent. However, wages are

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 6>increasing on a faster Bank of England cutting cycle ahead

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 6>after invation readings came in lower than Central Bank forecasts.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 6>In July and August, Attential will be focused on Governor

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 6>Andrew Bailey for hints that borrowing costs could be lowered

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 6>again in November after committee members voted narrowly to end

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 6>their sixteen year high last month. Traders are also awaiting

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 6>news on the speed of quantitative tightening, a decision which

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 6>could prove pivotal for new Chancellor Rachel Reeves's October budget.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 6>Will have full coverage of the announcement to do at

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 6>twelve pm London time on Bloomberg in London, Lizziebird and

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Radio.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Now to other news Israel has declared a new phase

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in its regional war with Islamist groups. The country's defense minister,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you Have Gallant, also said that troops would be diverted

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Lebanese board up, where Israel has been exchanging

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>rocket far with HESB militants. His comments come after exploding

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications devices in Lebanon killed twenty six people over two

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>days and wounded more than three thousand, according to Lebanon's

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Health ministry. Lebanon's government has blamed Israel for the attack.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The U S Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln says that

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the US had nothing to do with the assault.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 7>The United States did not know about, nor was it

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 7>involved in these incidents, and we're still gathering the infram

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 7>and gathering the facts. Broadly speaking, we've been very clear

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 7>and we remain very clear about the importance of all

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 7>parties avoiding any steps that could further escalate the conflict.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Blincoln, US Secty of State speaking, The shift in

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Israeli military operations to the north of the country has

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>spoked fears of a wider war. As the US tries

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to calm the situation.

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 3>European car sales dropped by sixteen and a half percent

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 3>last month, with over seven hundred and fifty seven hundred

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and fifty five thousand sales. Total deliveries were dragged down

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>by Germany and France as sales of electric vehicles cratered.

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>EV sales dropped by sixty nine percent in August to

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 3>just over twenty seven thousand. The UK was the only

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 3>major market where EV sales rose, gaining ten point eight percent.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 3>The data comes from the European Automobile Manufacturers Association, the

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Industry Group, which is now calling for urgent action from

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 3>the US European Commission ahead of twenty twenty five emissions

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>targets that could potentially cast billions of euros and fines.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Leading think tanks are calling for more ambitious reforms from

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK government. The Resolution Foundation says that Prime Minister

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Kirstarma is only halfway towards his target of making Britain

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing economy in the G seven.

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's James Orcock has more.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 8>Slow growth, mysteriously poor productivity, and a contagion of worklessness.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 8>The problems of the British economy have been well charted,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 8>but now there's a flurry of policy solutions which think

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 8>tanks and lobbyists are trying to get the new government

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 8>to look at the Resolution Foundations say, on top of

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 8>everything Labour has done so far, it needs to get

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 8>its workers' reforms right, create better trade relations with the EU,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 8>and step up investment if it wants to achieve its

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 8>growth pledges. On the investment side, the left leaning think

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 8>tank has an unlikely ally in the City of London

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 8>thinks the UK could attract as much as seven point

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 8>seven billion pounds more investment by twenty thirty if it

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 8>did a better job of attracting foreign sovereign wealth in London.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 8>James Wilcock Bloomberg Radier.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Turning next to the United States and the chair of

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the Security and Exchange Commission, says the way markets are

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 3>using AI risks heartbreak. Gary Gensler is warning that too

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>many traders are relying on the same models, potentially causing

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a next future market meltdown. He compared it to the movie.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 9>Her Like Scarlett Johansson, was that romantic interest in her

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 9>and then when she went offline, all eighty three hundred

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 9>and sixteen of her romantic partners were heartbroken. I don't

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 9>want that to happen in the financial sector.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.559
<v Speaker 3>Gensler added that he thought automation was still a good

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>thing overall. The SEC made a proposal last year to

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>require brokers and investment advisors to mitigate conflicts of interest

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>in their use of AI tools that might put their

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>interests before clients at a moment. Will bring you more

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 3>on the FED decision plus are exclusive reporting on the

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Shadow fleet of ships exporting Russian gas. But first, another

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>story that caught our eye this morning, how AI is

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>bringing back dead celebrities and they're making millions from it.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.119
<v Speaker 3>This is our colleague Mea Dowkins has been writing about

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 3>how the estates of the likes of James Dean, Judy Garland,

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and Burt Reynolds, among others, have signed up to an

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 3>AI voice cloning startup called eleven Labs, which can use

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>their iconic tones to narrate books or other materials.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this is I mean, we've seen some

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, haven't we, especially in London.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 2>Abb of Voyage.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I went to see that, of course, which is kind

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of a hologram image.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>As an eldest version to cod Yes.

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, that's coming soon.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So me did a really nice piece of kind of

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into this about the financial implications, it's quite complicated, actually.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of and look, there are some in the

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 3>industry who say it's a great thing and points to

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the que amounds money can Others aren't so convinced, and

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 3>she's spoken to both sides on this as well. She

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>spoke to one industry player who talked about this being

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>a trend a kin to the nft fad as well

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 3>as somebody to think about that. Of course, there are

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 3>ethical concerns involved her as well, and you mentioned Abba Voyage.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>She spoke to the co producer of that show as well,

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>saying that AI can't replace the emotional connection that people

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 3>have to arts. There are limits to this as well,

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's a fascinating read on Bloomberg dot com and

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 3>on the terminal.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good stuff.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's think about then, the Fed's decision, now, shall we

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to cut interest rates by fifty basis points? Will change

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>your own Pal says that future moves will be based

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>on how the US economy performs in the months ahead.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And let's bring in bloom Big Opinion columist Daniel Moss,

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>who joins us now for more on this Good morning.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Daniel in the end.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>What message you think Powell actually sent with this cut

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the press conference afterwards, this jumbo cut in

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the end.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm not so sure we should call it jumbo.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Don't forget when the head was was hiking, it did

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 10>a couple of seventy five basis point moves in the

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 10>other direction. That was jumbo. I think the message that

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 10>were sent today was if we were perceived to be

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 10>late as inflation was climbing, we're not going to be

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 10>lacking for forcefulness as unemployment begins to rise. Now, you know,

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 10>it's all very well for j. Powell to say it

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 10>is press conference, Oh, don't take this as a future sign.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.599
<v Speaker 10>Don't take this as like meaning that we're going to

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 10>do fifty to fifty to fifty to fifty. That's fine,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 10>But he would know that by starting with fifty, which

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 10>the Fed rarely does absent a crisis, and this is

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 10>not a crisis, he is laying down a marker for expectations.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 10>Does really a sense he's trying to have.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 11>It both ways?

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, what do you make of how the

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>markets are interpreting that? Than the pricing in about sixty

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>five basis points are further easing this year. What does

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 3>it tad That's about why the fad goes for the

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 3>rest of the air.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 10>It tells you that there's a couple more cuts coming.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 10>But you know, look, this can oscillate based on data

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 10>and based on commentary. Don't forget It's like, only five

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 10>business days ago the consensus was that fifty would be

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 10>a stretch. Yet by the time that press release came

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 10>at two o'clock yesterday afternoon, people had coalesced around fifty,

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 10>So things can changed, and emphasized his data dependent on

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 10>all the rest of it. But look, there's a marker

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 10>being laid down here. We're going to respond forcefully to

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 10>signs of emerging softness in the labor market. And by

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 10>the way, inflation heading toward two percent gives us the

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 10>flexibility to do so. It was interesting, he added, just

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 10>by way almost of clearing his throat at the end

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 10>of his sense. Of course, you know we still think

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 10>we'll get to two.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, which is interesting of itself, where the new normal

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic actually is. What did you make of a

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>descending vote from Michelle Bowman?

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Is that significant?

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, when I first saw it, Central banking

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 10>geeks like me. You know, I got pretty surprised about

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 10>that because I'm always asking people when was the last

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 10>time a FED governor dissented, and prior to yesterday, the answer,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 10>of course was two thousand and five John Olsen in

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 10>the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. So this was interesting from

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 10>a geeky perspective. Then again, when you look at it closely,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 10>it's not like Michelle Bowman favored no cut at all.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 10>She was dessenting on the size of the cut, not

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 10>the cut per se. The other thing I would say

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 10>is when it comes to monetary policy, she's not particularly influential.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 10>I believe her background is as a community banker. Community

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 10>bankers have a lot of clout in DC. Congress always

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 10>likes to see a community banker on the foe. See.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 10>I think the vote that Paw really wanted for fifty

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 10>and that he got was Chris Wall.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 3>What about looking ahead? We've got a decision from the

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Bank of England today, We've got the Bank of Japan tomorrow.

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 3>How much will policymakers in London and in Tokyo be

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>eyeing the fad decision?

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, again, we're at that point. Everyone will say, well,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, we don't just follow the FED. You know,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 10>we act in our own domestic situation. Da da da

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 10>da da da da. But they're all responding to the

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 10>same trends. And I would put the Bank of England

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 10>in that category. I mean, the Bank of Japan is

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 10>the outlier in this whole conversation. What's going to be

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 10>very interesting is whether the Governor Kazuo Waider can back

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:45.359
<v Speaker 10>the hawkishness that he exhibited back in August with language

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 10>like this on Friday, or does he you know, is

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 10>he perceived to be walking away? You know, my colleague

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 10>garaud Ready and I have written that one of his

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 10>weaknesses is as a longtime academic figure, we'll answer questions

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 10>on their merits, and sometimes it seems like he's given

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 10>giving secondary thought to the message he seeks to convey. Well,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 10>that's a very interesting point. No, no, no, it's not

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 10>necessarily a signal. But this is the danger for Wader.

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 10>He was forceful with hawkishness in August. You know which

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 10>Wader shows up Friday.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we shall wait that interesting question. Daniel, thank you

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for your time this morning. A big opinion

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that columnist Daniel Moss. Then, as we think about that

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point rate card. So we had the vote.

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It was eleven to one, of course, to reduce the

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rates to arrange now of four point seventy five to

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>five percent after the FED of course held for.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>More than a year.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of the projections, you've got ten out

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen officials favoring lowering rates by at least an

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>additional half point over the next two meetings.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's ahead.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course, plenty to read more from Daniel and

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 3>as colleagues are Bloomberg dot Com, Forward, Slash Opinion. I

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>would also point and John Othis's referenced and his piece

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 3>just out this morning as well as Bimberg Opinion has

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>a FED day soundtrack and there's a Spotify playlist that

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 3>you can click through on his piece. The first song

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 3>on the list, the first cut, is the deepest. Let's

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 3>go to a different story now. This morning some exclusive

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg reporting on how Russia's weaving a global web of

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 3>shell companies to create a shadow fleet to export liquefied

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 3>natural gas. This is an effort to circumvent US energy

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 3>sanctions over the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We've got Bloomberg

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Stephens Staptinski with us for more. It leads our team

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of energy reporters in Agist even great to have you on.

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>We've reported previously on the shadow fleet of ships carrying

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Russian oil. This investigation looked at the way Russia's exporting

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 3>LNG from its Arctic terminal that only opened last December.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>How are they doing it?

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean the LNG dark fleet is much smaller

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 11>than Russian the Russian one which is so far when

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 11>you some calculations show that they've a met hundreds of

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 11>billions of dollars with that trade for liquefied natural gas,

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 11>it's a little bit more challenging. Unlike the oil industry,

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 11>where there are thousands over seven thousand vessels available, so

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 11>it's easier to hide your movement and buy old and

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 11>smaller ships. The LNG industry liquified natural gas is much smaller.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 11>It has only seven over a little bit over seven

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 11>hundred ships, and it's a very specialized trade, so you

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 11>can't just bring it to any old port. You have

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 11>to bring it to a specialized LNG export terminal or

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 11>import terminal. So through our reporting we discovered that a

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 11>company in Dubai we're not exactly shared the relation with Russia.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 11>But this company started amassing vessels in March twenty twenty

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 11>four to help Russia essentially export the fuel. The fuel

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 11>was finally exported with one of these ships in August.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 11>A picture satellite pictures confirmed it was the first of August.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 11>The vessel called Pie was faking its AIS location, so

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 11>that ship tracking data showed that it was in the barns.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 8>See.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so who's buying this leng what are the known

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>risks about this?

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 11>So through our investigation we found that the Russian government

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 11>has been putting pressure on Arctic Energy two to get

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 11>exports out of the facility. Because of the sanctions from

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 11>the United States last year, they weren't able to get

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 11>their icebreaker ships and they were also struggling to find

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 11>buyers and to this day they still do struggle to

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 11>find buyers. So because of that, they were looking at

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 11>waves to get the fuel out. That's why the dark

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 11>Fleet was developed. And I think it's important for Putin

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 11>as well. He's looked at this project, which has been

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 11>hit by sanctions, as a sort of prestige project. If

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 11>they're able to get these exports out of the facility,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 11>then it shows that Western sanction aren't effective against Moscow's

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 11>trade of fossil fuels. So this has gotten Putin's personal

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 11>stamp of approval to get it through and through our

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 11>According to people with knowledge of the strategy, there is

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 11>pressure from Russian officials to get the shipments out.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 3>What about the counter efforts to is this? Surely the

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 3>US must be looking at the circumvention and thinking about

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 3>how to combats.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 11>Precisely so, the shadow fleet of vessels were accumulated over

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 11>the last few months, and the first shipment was in

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 11>early August. In quick succession, there were three more shipments.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 11>All three of the vessels were faking their location when

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 11>they picked up the energy from the Arctic Energy to facility,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 11>but later in August the US slap sanctions on all

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 11>three of the ships. There was another instance where one

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 11>of the sanctioned vessel transferred the energy through a ship

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 11>to ship transfer onto a vessel that hadn't been sanctioned yet. Basically,

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 11>less than two weeks later, do you sanction that ship

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 11>as well? So US is taking unprecedently fast steps to

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 11>make sure that any way they can put pressure on

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 11>the development or further development of the Dark fleet, and

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 11>so they're throwing sanctions on very quickly. By doing so,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 11>you're also deterring potential buyers, because if you're a company

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 11>somewhere looking to potentially purchase the fuel, would you risk

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 11>counter sanctions from the United States if they see that

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 11>you're involved in this trade.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 10>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Europe.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 3>You're morning brief on the stories making news from London

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to Wall Streets and beyond.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed every morning on Apples, Spotify,

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 3>You can also listen live each morning on London DAB Radio,

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Business app, and Bloomberg dot Com.

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Our flagship New York station is also available on your

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hipka and I'm Stephen Carroll. Join us again

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow morning for all the news you need to start

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 3>your day right here on Bloomberg Daybreak Europe.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 6>Mm hmm