WEBVTT - Frances Haugen: How One Whistle Makes a Difference

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, I'm Katie Kurk, and this is next question.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>In September of twenty twenty one, The Wall Street Journal

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>began to roll out a series of eleven stories that

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>would have a major impact on the way people think

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about technology companies. The series was called The Facebook Files,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and the source for the series maybe one of the

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest journalistic treasure troves of the century, was a former

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook product manager named Francis Hogan. Francis had only been

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook for a couple of years, but during that

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>time she became increasingly alarmed by a disturbing pattern.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>The only data that we get out of these companies

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>is how many users do they have? How much time

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>do you spend, how the ads do you book on?

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>What's that revenue? You don't get the societal costs that

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>come as a consequence.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It seemed that Facebook was prioritizing their own profits over

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>public safety and putting people's lives at risk. So she

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>blew the whistle. She made tens of thousands of pages

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of internal documents available to The Wall Street Journal. And

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened next testifying before the US Congress, the UK

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and EU parliaments, and filing a complaint with the sec

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>exposed the depths that the tech company would go to

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to mislead the public and grow its bottom line. Now,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Francis has written a book. It's called The Power of One.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>How I found the strength to tell the truth and

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>why I blew the whistle on Facebook, And I'm very

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>glad that it's brought her to next question. First of all, Francis,

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's great to finally meet you. I am a huge

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>admirer of yours, so.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Excited to be here. Thank you so much for inviting me.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's been quite a ride for you since

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you became the Facebook whistleblower in October of twenty twenty one,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>now a year and a half or so later. How

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are you feeling? Are you happy that you came forward?

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any regrets? Would you do it all

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 1>over again?

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I originally came forward, I had very

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>very basic goals, like I wanted to not have to

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>carry a secret that I thought had the potential to

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>really impact the lives of others. I came forward because

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I was concerned about how Facebook was operating in African

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>countries in Southeast Asia, and I then and still genuinely

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>believe that if we continue to operate the way we do,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 2>there are millions of lives on the line from things

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>like ethnic violence. But the world has changed a lot

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>since I came out. I was really shocked last week

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>when the Surgeon General issued his advisory on social media

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and mental health for kids. I've been amazed at how

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 2>just knowing that these companies knew these harms were real

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>across a wide variety of harms has really galvanized the

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>activist community. It's caused legislative conversations around the world that

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>were pretty stalled for a long time. And so if

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 2>I could do it again, I would totally do it again.

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I've been incredibly fortunate and how smooth it's gone, and

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it's exceeded my wildest expectations.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You've written a book about your experiences. Why did you

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>want to take pen to paper, fingers to laptop and

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>share your story with the world.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that kind of baffles tech journalists

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>when I talk to them is because tech journalists live

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>in a little bit of an echo chamber. You know,

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>like our classic criticism of tech is tech lives in

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>an echo chamber. Tech journalists also live in an echo chamber.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 2>A little bit when I say to them, you know,

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>when I take flights. You know, I'm a friendly person.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm one of those annoying people that talks to their

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>seed mates.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I did that too.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's amazing. At least half the people I

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>sit next to you have never heard of the Facebook whistleblower.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 2>And so it's one of these things where culture change,

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and that's the thing that we really need. We need

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>to reset our relationship with these companies. It takes a

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>long time, and this book, I'm hoping helps a much

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>much larger set of people, much more diverse set of

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>people get a seat at the table, but kind of

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>laying out, like what are the conversations we need to

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 2>be having, Like what are the choices we get to

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>make in the next few years, because we are in

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a moment of inflection and we need to have as

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 2>many informed people at the table as possible.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you talk about the Vic Murphy, the Surgeon

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>General issuing a warning about the dangers of social media

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for kids. Other people becoming more aware, and I'm just

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>curious if you feel this way. But for me, I'm

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, what took so long? This doesn't take

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>a brain surgeon, a rocket scientist, or a tech expert

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to know that people were becoming have become incredibly addicted

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to social media. Tristan Harris was sounding the alarm after

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he left Google. All kinds of experts were saying, this

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous. Why did it take so long for this

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to really become headline news.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I talk about in my book is,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's the difference between say, the car industry

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and like the automotive industry and social media when it

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>comes to our ability to hold it accountable or or

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>our ability to understand it. Back in nineteen sixty five,

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>it's going to sound shocking. There were no seatbelts in cars,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 2>no airbags. I remember that, Yeah, Like I listened to

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 2>like my parents still stories about the kids all like

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 2>jumbling all over each other in the back of the

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>station wagon, and it's like, really, wow, a different world.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>We now put eight year olds in car seats, right.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>But the world changed very suddenly when a guy named

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Ralph Nader came out with a book called Unsafe at

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Any Speed. And what really changed was that people didn't

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>realize that there was the ability to live in a

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>different world. You know, that our fatality rate today is

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>way less per mild driven for cars because of a

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>long series of actions. But the thing that people need

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 2>to understand is when when Ralph Nator published that book.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, there were one hundred thousand automotive engineers in

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the world when I came forward. I think they were

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on in order, probably three hundred or four hundred people

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>in the world who really understood how systems like facebooks work.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And of those people, you know, we are educated in

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>such narrow ways, I think a lot of those people

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't understand the larger societal consequences of those choices and decisions.

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And so Ralph Nader could have a chorus of automotive

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>engineers all say this is happening. When it comes to

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>social media, each of us sees a different world. You know,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 2>for many, many, many people who would be the ones

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 2>asking those questions. When they open social media, they see

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>their friends and family who are likely relatively similar to themselves.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, the idea that Facebook could be radically different,

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 2>radically more dangerous in a place like an African country

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 2>or in Southeast Asia, it sounds foreign to us. Were

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>like social media is about looking at pictures of cats,

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>and so I think that's a big part of it,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Like we need to be able to have the right

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>to study social media, We need to have the right

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to be able to get independent data off these systems,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 2>because then we can have definitive conversations.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that because we're not having a universal experience. It's

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a highly deeply personalized experience for everyone. So it's not

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as if we're all driving cars. We're all on different vehicles,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>if you will. So it's not unifying people to realize

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that they have to demand change.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>It's really important for people to understand just how different

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>those worlds are in terms of transparency. And that's part

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>of why I wrote the book. You know, I've I've

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>got to live a lot of that arc of how

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>we write software or like what does it mean to

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>have experiences online? And I wanted to walk people through,

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is what changed from step to step

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>to step so that more people have that context.

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious, Francis, I know you weren't super psyched

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to go to Facebook. When did you realize we're not

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas anymore? Something is awry.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It was interesting, like when they reached out to me,

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I was like the only thing I work on is misinformation.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 2>You know. It's interesting. I got there and I think

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>one of the first moments where I was like, wow,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>this is this is chaotic is to the role I

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>had is something called a product manager. So product managers

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>are responsible for helping articulate what is the problem we're

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to solve, how might we solve that, and then

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>once we come to consensus on a solution, what's this

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>series of engineering tasks that will allow us to execute

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that solution. I had a role of being a product manager.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>And Facebook understood that they were a different enough company

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>that they had seen that if people came in from

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>the outside, they didn't succeed at a very high rate,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>like there was a lot of churn, and so they

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>established a boot camp for two full weeks to just

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 2>give kind of a basic level of like heire's how

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Facebook works. And my manager pulled me out of it

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>with a like three days. He was like, we're you know,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 2>things aren't fired too much, Like we have to come

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>up with a plan for the next six months, even

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>though you know nothing about the problem or what's going on,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Like we need you an articulative plan. Now. That was

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 2>kind of my first warning that I was like, oh, wow,

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 2>like the house is on fire. The house is on fire,

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 2>and people are running around, even having the self awareness

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>to be like, oh, we know that if people don't

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 2>get at least a certain amount of bootstrapping. Facebook is

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>very hard to figure out, even internally, how it works.

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>And it was interesting. I showed up for that first meeting,

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the one that my managers like urgently pushing

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 2>me to prepare for, and we spent twenty minutes basically

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 2>discussing should I have a job? So imagine you show up,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 2>You've just gotten hired for this thing, and all the

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>leadership you're saying is like, why why do you have

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a team? Like why does this team exist? Like think

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>about that for a moment. You know, because activists have

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>told you, because the un told you, Hey, and me

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and Mark, your negligence around misinformation killed twenty four thousand people.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 2>You know of a problem. And yet I could sit

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in a room full of the leadership of safety having

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 2>them be like shouldn't this team exist? Right? You can

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 2>imagine that first six months was a little stressful.

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>What was Facebook doing in the lead up to the events?

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>On January sixth, we'll talk about that right after this,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we're back with Francis Hogan, Facebook whistleblower and author of

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Power of Want. Francis, did Facebook really care about

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>misinformation or did the company just feel like dealing with

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it was an exercise and futility.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 2>I think part of the problem was that Facebook had

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>taken the most obvious path to deal with misinformation, which was,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 2>let's hire experts, let's hire journalists to help us assess

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>what's true and false. But that kind of approach, you know,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>fixing safety after the fact, like, oh, we've already hyper

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>amplified you know, extreme content. Now we're going to pluck

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>out the dangerous parts. Those strategies don't scale. You know,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Facebook has three billion users. There were maybe a few

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand fact checks being done a month, maybe a few thousand.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>You can see why you actually need to take a

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>different kind of approach, which is coming in and saying,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 2>why are the algorithms rewarding extreme content? How do we

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>change our operations to deal with that fact?

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>As they say, lies make it around the world before

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth has the chance to tie its shoes, And

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so what was the alternative? What would that approach it?

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben I mean, what is the answer.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's take, for example, something as simple as should you

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>have to click on a link before you reshare it,

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>so you hit the nail on the head. One of

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the problems with third party fact checking is journalism takes time.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>At Facebook, on average, it was like two or three

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 2>days for someone to write a fact check, and they

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>put a huge amount of effort into trying to build

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 2>prediction systems to guess which are the pieces of content

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that might go viral, because we have to give the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>journalists a head start. Alternatives are things like if you

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 2>require people to click on a link before they reshare it,

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that reduces misinformation by like ten or fifteen percent, just

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 2>because people have to pause and think for a moment.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's one or two billion people on Facebook

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>who live in places where Facebook is the internet. You know,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>they might have become literate to use Facebook, and as

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a result those places. In some countries, thirty five percent

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>of everything you see on your news feed is a

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>reshare and so Facebook wasn't willing to take the hit

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>of you know, zero point one point two percent less

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>profit of reducing the amount of content that was moving

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 2>through the ecosystem. As a whole. So those are kinds

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>of product design ways of dealing with misinformation.

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Our third party fact checker still the primary way Facebook

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is ostensibly trying to combat miss and disinformation.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't know like because we have no transparency.

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, right now, we don't have any trend parency

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>into how these book operates. We know that Mark fired

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>lots and lots of safety people during his year of efficiency,

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>so it's possible that things have changed, but given his

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 2>recent behavior, it's unlikely things have materially changed.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about sort of the public facing explanation from Facebook.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed Cheryl Samberg in twenty nineteen when you were

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>still working at Facebook. I asked her if she felt

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook was doing enough to invest in its security.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen and let's hear your reaction to

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what Cheryl told me.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>We've put tremendous engineering resources, and we're doing things like

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>red teams, asking what do we think the bad guys

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>would do and how would we do it? So we're

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 3>never going to fully be ahead of everything. But if

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 3>you look at if you want to understand what companies

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>care about, you look at where they invest their resources

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and if you look back three to five years and

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>you look at today, we've totally changed when we invest

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 3>our resources. And my job has changed too. If I

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>look at up at Facebook eleven and a half years,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>for the first eight or so, I spent most of

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 3>my time growing the company and sometime protecting the community.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 3>We always did some protection, but now that's definitely flipped.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 3>My job is a majority building the systems that protect

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and minority grow. And so we're definitely changing as a company.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 3>We're in a different place across the board on all

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>of these things.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you're changing enough fast enough?

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I hope, so we're trying.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your reaction to that, Francis, It's.

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So interesting when we listen to media, you know, a

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>film clip, an audio clip from the past, you know,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you can often hear the emotional echoes of that moment.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think back in twenty nineteen, she's quite earnest,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 2>like the only part of Facebook that was growing was

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the civic Integrity team. I think twenty nineteen was the

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>year that the UN report on Menmark came out and

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, firmly placed blame on Facebook. They were still

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>living right in the immediate echoes of Cambridge Analytico for context,

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 2>right about when when you interviewed her, that would have

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>been when the FTC find Facebook five billion dollars because

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>of privacy violations from Cambridge Alica. But over the course

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of the next two years or even the next year,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think Facebook began to realize that having a big

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>safety team, having people with PhDs asking questions was putting

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Facebook in a quite awkward position because the more people

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>dug in, the more people having the ability to ask questions,

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>they found things, and they found things that were quite disturbing.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they did a pretty good job in the

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>run up to the twenty twenty election, but as soon

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>as the twenty twenty election passed, they fired that team,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the Civic Integrity team.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>One month after the election, yeah, one month, and of

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>course five weeks later was when the Trump supporters, many

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of whom organized on Facebook, stormed the US capital.

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think part of what happened was their papers

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>in the Facebook files. They say like, we saw all

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 2>this building up. But I think because now no single

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 2>person was responsible, no one felt like they had the

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>authority to go in there and intervene.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Where do you draw the line? And nobody has a

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>crystal ball to say these people are going to do that.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Facebook talks about the difference between movements and we are

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to knows adversarial movements. So an adversarial movement knows that

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>they're violating Facebook's policies and actively does countermeasures to try

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to get around Facebook. That's one we differentiate between, like,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>does this movement think they're doing something wrong? Right?

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>And you saw that extensively with Stop the Seal.

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>If the Facebook Civic Integrity Team had not been disbanded

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>less than one month after the election, what would they

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have seen and what would they have done with the

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>activity they witnessed going on on the platform.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>In the round of the twenty twenty election, there were

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a number of things in place where Facebook said, hey,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>we know we have vulnerability in our system. For example,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>live videos. This is where you know, I can film

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>something on my phone and Facebook will put a little

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>announcement at the top of people's feeds. Facebook knew that

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>live video was a particularly big vulnerability for the company

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>because video is harder to monitor than audio or text,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 2>for sure. So you either can deal with that after

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the fact, or you can say, hey, what's leading to

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 2>that video? Going viral, and in the case of live video,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Facebook said, hey, you know, every piece of content on

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Facebook earns a score based on how relevant it is

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>to uktie or to your listener. You know, is it

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>similar to other things that they've seen before. Does this

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.239
<v Speaker 2>person generally produce content that people would like to engage with?

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a bunch of factors. You earn a score,

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and that gives you a priority in the news feed.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 2>When it came to live video, they would give a boost.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>They'd say that score, We're going to multiply it by

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and fifty times to make sure that it

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 2>will show up at the top of your feed. They said, hey,

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 2>we know this is dangerous. We're going to only boost

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 2>it sixty five times. In the runchy election, it's a

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 2>little tiny detail, but when they stormed the capitol, the

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 2>rioters actively used live video to coordinate, and so there's

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>these little things where they could have had the safety

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 2>measures on that were on election day, but because no

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>one felt they had the authority to say we're in

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a situation, no one turned those on until the day

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 2>after they stormed the capital. These are little, tiny details,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 2>but you have to remember When people interviewed the rioters

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 2>after January six, they said it seemed real. It seemed real.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 2>It seemed like everyone was saying, like, we're about to

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.959
<v Speaker 2>experience a coup, like we need to like go and

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 2>save our democracy. These little product tweaks would have changed

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the information environment that those people experienced, and who knows

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>what would have happened with January six.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>So why didn't they do it? Because the team had

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>been dissolved.

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>There was no longer a person in the company who

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 2>wore the hat of saying, let's make sure we're a

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 2>positive force in society, right, there was diffuse responsibility for

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Little Tiny Slippers. And I think after they dissolved the team,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 2>which was on December second or December third, I don't

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 2>think there was anyone who felt like they had the

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 2>authority to say, hey, some people are going to have

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 2>to work over the holidays, right, Like this is a

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>big enough deal that someone's going to have to do something.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's why Facebook was asleep at the wheel.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Francis and I talk about improvements

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in social media that could have a positive impact on

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the team Mental health crisis. We're back with Francis, Howgan

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think Mark Zuckerberg just cares about profit over everything?

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And is there something about the broader culture of Facebook

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes this almost a Sisifian task to try to

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>control or at least even monit or remove really dangerous content.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad that you bring up Mark, so just

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>for people understand how different the leadership of Facebook is

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>versus other companies. Mark Zuckerberg holds about fifty five fifty

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 2>six percent of the voting shares that control Facebook, so

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 2>that means he's the chairman of the board, He's the CEO.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>If he wants to invest tens of billions of dollars

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 2>in the metaverse, no one can stop him because he

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>is the only voice that matters. I do think responsibility

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 2>goes to the top, right, Like part of the challenge

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>here is you have a man who has been CEO

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>since he was nineteen years old. Facebook is intimately tied

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>to his identity, and it's very hard for people to

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>admit that their life's work might be hurting other people.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>And so unfortunately, there is an internal culture to the

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 2>company where the people who surround Mark know that being

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>too critical isn't going to get you very far, I said,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I think part of why Cheryl left from when I

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>came out, she left maybe six once after the Facebook

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>files happened. I think as Cheryl was a voice that

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>was trying to push for responsibility, and there wasn't really

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>an appetite in Tronto the company to do that.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>To this point, in twenty nineteen, I spoke with her

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>about whether Facebook's business model ultimately rendered implementing security measures

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bad for business. Let's hear what she said.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 3>So on this, I'm really pretty proud of our track record.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 3>If you look a number of years ago and you

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 3>listen to our earnings calls, So earnings calls are exactly

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 3>what people are worried about. They're directed at investors. It's

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 3>our quarterly report. If you actually watch us in earning calls,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 3>we are spending as much time talking about the measures

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>we take on safety and security as we are about

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 3>our business growth.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Easily.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 3>We actually said many quarters ago, this is so important

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 3>to us that we are going to make massive investments

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and change the profitability of our company by making real

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 3>resource investments. And we have to the tune of billions

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 3>and billions of dollars, and we will keep doing it.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 3>We've taken action after act after action that is better

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 3>for protecting them community than it is for our growth,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to continue to do that. Mark has

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 3>said it over and over again. I have said it

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 3>over and over again.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that, Francis.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Kittie, I'm so glad you played that clip for me,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 4>because I am totally going to go get the transcripts

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 4>now of the investor calls just to see how things

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 4>have changed, right, because I think back in twenty nineteen

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 4>they were trying like they got burned by Cambridge Analytica.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 4>They lost a huge amount of goodwill and regulators from users.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that sentiment she expressed is still true.

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that Elon Musk showed was that

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 4>you could fire all your safety teams and no one bad.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 4>It an not right because we don't have any stats.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 4>I want to be super honest with people. Mark Zuckerberg

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 4>has fired a huge number of safety people in the

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 4>last six months, and the market has rewarded him. You know,

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 4>their stock price is going up because Facebook looks more profitable.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 4>But he also fired their AI safety team, and then

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 4>they open sourced their large language model when people talk

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 4>about existential risks from AI. Allowing for mass proliferation of

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>these technologies doesn't allow us to do thoughtful, slow, intentional development,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 4>And so I don't think what she's saying is true anymore.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 4>We're living in a very different world.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>In fairness to Cheryl, do you think it was true

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I think in twenty nineteen, they were trying hard. If

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Facebook had continued in the vein they were working in

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen, I probably would have never been a whistleblower.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>You know. I probably would have been like many people

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>who came before me, who've kept their head down and

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>kept trying, kept trying to make it safer, and eventually

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 2>burned out because the only part of Facebook that was

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 2>growing was the safety teams in twenty nineteen. By twenty twenty,

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 2>they had given up on that. You know, they'd said,

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 2>we're not getting acknowledged for the effort we're putting in,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>and these teams are just liabilities.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you just what can be done. We've

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>heard about kids and mental health. We've heard about misinformation

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and the election. We've heard about so many things that

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are causing harms to society because social media platforms like Facebook.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Section two thirty prevents or protects these social media platforms

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>from liability for the content they may carry. The Supreme

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Court just made a ruling on that, and I guess

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>now it's up to Congress. But in the best of

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all possible worlds, what would you like, Francis to be

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>done to rain in the social media companies if you

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>had to wave a magic wand so.

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important for people to understand kind of

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>what's the tool chest that's available to us. I think

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the way forward is more something like what Europe did.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So Europe came in and said, hey, you need to

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>be honest with us about the risks, the harms you

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 2>know about. You need to publicly tell us how you're

0:24:57.800 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 2>going to reduce those risks, and you need to get

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>us enough data that we can see if you're making

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 2>progress on those things. Because for context, I think the

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>fundamental problem is our relationship with these companies is spewed.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And Congress doesn't seem to really understand the rudimentaries of

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the technology that powers Facebook to actually want to do

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>something about it.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing that's going to push Congress over

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the line is actually the growing crisis around teenage mental health. Historically,

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 2>just for people's contexts, over the last sixty years, we've

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 2>had only a handful of Surgeon General advisories. It's things

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>like seat belts save lives, smoking causes cancer, breastfeeding helps

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>infants health, things that we take for granted today. But

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 2>before those advisories happened, there was ambiguity, there was controversy. Historically,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 2>after a Surgeon General advisory is issued, usually within two

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to three years, some sort of legislative action takes place.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll be really interesting to see how things

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 2>play out over the next year or two, at least

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 2>in the context of kids.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And what can be done about that. Tell me how

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to reverse or stop the negative impact that social media

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 1>and things like Instagram are having on young people.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned earlier that you know the business model

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is working counter to our own well being or safety.

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at sleep deprivation and kits. So

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the things called up by the surge in

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 2>general was that thirty percent thirty percent of teenagers say

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>they use social media till midnight or later most weekdays.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>That's crazy when we look at risk factors for things

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>like multiple kinds of mental illness. That's not just depressure

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and anxiety. It's also things like bipolar. When we look

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 2>at risk factors for accidental death, both automotive and just

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>general accidents. When we look at risk factors for substance use,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>uppers post they're tired downers because they're depressed. All of

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 2>those things link back to sleep deprivation. We've known for

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty years that we can influence whether or not people

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>use products. Imagine if for two hours before eleven, Instagram

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 2>got a little bit slower and a little bit slower,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>and a little bit slower, it was like it was

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 2>like you're pushing the post a little harder. Maybe there

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 2>was a lag on TikTok between videos. Who knows. We've

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 2>known for twenty years that if you make an app

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit slower, people use the less. Imagine as

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 2>you approached your bedtime, you just got tired and went

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 2>to bed. That feature is live on Instagram today. That's

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a meaningful thing that would help kids go to bed.

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>How Mud if parents come in and take their kids' phones.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 2>We should definitely do that, right, we ignore the fact

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that these technologies are extremely powerful and addictive, and they

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 2>operate the level of independence that no other consumer product

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 2>does today.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>In closing, Francis, I feel like I have to ask

0:27:54.960 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you about AI, which is the new boogeyman of technology,

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And rightfully so, it was pretty chilling when these AI

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>leaders said that artificial intelligence poses a threat as big

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>as pandemics and nuclear war, and it's sort of like,

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>holy shit. And yet you wonder, since the government has

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been so impotent when it comes to figuring out how

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to regulate social media, what they're going to do about

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this looming threat.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's always important to remember that these

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 2>are percentage risks, right, So this is you know, they

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>say there's a one percent and two percent risk, which

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 2>is terrifying, right, you know, one or two percent risks

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>of extension. We should take those seriously. But I think

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that people also need to be

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>honest about is we kind of let the cat out

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 2>of the bag, right. I think things like Fortune five

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred companies should get together and say, hey, we will

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>only buy generative AI products that meet this bar of safety.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>There's a code of practice, the code of conduct, where

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>we're like, we're not going to let our economic might

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 2>fuel development of AI unless you do it in an intentional, thoughtful,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 2>responsible way. I think that's totally a thing that should

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 2>happen one hundred percent. I think Sam Altman's talks about

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 2>having licenses of saying hey, right now, there is a

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>market disincentive to be safe, you know, move fast and

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 2>break things to quote more exeper work. The fact that

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Facebook fired AI safety team, no one's punishing them for them.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 2>But when people talk about existential risk, to not have

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 2>that existential risk, we have to say, no one in

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the world, that includes governments and militaries, get to have

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>AIS more powerful than a certain level. You know, how

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 2>do we have a just more stable world? Because if

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>we are just escalating, the path of escalation will lead

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 2>to will lead to all those existential risks.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything you're excited about when it comes to AI, Francis,

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so we don't have have to end on a terrifying note.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we need to talk about short term and long term.

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 2>The short term on generative AI, I think is transformative.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Right now around the world, there are literally billions of

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>people who don't have doctors. We're going to live in

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>a world in the next ten years where every child

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 2>in the world has a pediatrician, it just might be

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a robot pediatrician. We're going to live in a world

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 2>in the next ten years. We're going to live in

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>a world where every child in the world is going

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>to have the highest quality reading instruction that has ever

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>existed for humanity. You know, an endlessly patient tutor that

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 2>will sit there and over and over again as long

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>as that kid keeps working, will help them learn to read.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be transformative. There are high probability short

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>term rewards that I think are almost certainly going to happen.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 2>It is going to transform the world. The thing I

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>try to caution people on is those existential risks are

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 2>very low probability, and they're much longer off, and so

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>it is more important for us to try to build

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a just world where the motivations incentives for doing those

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 2>existential risks are as low as possible. So one of

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the things that I am always trying to remind people

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 2>is we have invented new communication technologies before. When we

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 2>invented the printing press, suddenly a bunch of people learned

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 2>to read, and people start publishing pamphlets on things like

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 2>how do you know if your neighbor's a witch? What

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 2>should you do about that? And chaos ensued. We had

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>wars that killed huge numbers of people when we invented

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the cheap printing press. We had wars about misinformation things

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>like you know, yellow journalism. But we learned and we responded.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>We developed journalistic ethics, We founded journalism schools to teach

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>those things, journalistic trade associations to help people self regulate.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 2>We passed laws on media concentration to make sure that

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, you got to hear from different voices. We

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>learned about how it lived in our media environment or

0:31:55.200 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 2>information environment. It feels overwhelming right now because because we're

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the ones who are responsible for figuring out where we

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 2>go from here, you know, it's about how are we

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>going to learn, How are we going to respond, how

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 2>are we going to act? And part of why I

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>have faith that we're going to figure this out is

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 2>is while it may seem impossible right now, every single

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>time before when we've made a new media technology, we've

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>learned and we've responded. So I will keep on pushing

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and I just have a longer time horizon, I think

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 2>than many other people did.

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.719
<v Speaker 1>From your lips to God's ears. Francis Hagen, thank you

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for talking with me. Your new book is

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>called The Power of One. How I found the Strength

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to Tell the Truth and Why I Blew the Whistle

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook. Thank you so much. Thanks for listening everyone.

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>If you have a question for me, or want to

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>share your thoughts about how you navigate this crazy world

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>reach out. You can leave a short message at six

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>oh nine five one two five to five oh five,

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>or you can send me a DM on Instagram. I

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear from you next time. This Question

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartMedia and Katie Couric Media. The

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>executive producers are Me, Katie Kuric, and Courtney Ltz. Our

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer is Marcy Thompson. Our producers are Adrianna Fazzio

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and Catherine Law. Our audio engineer is Matt Russell, who

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>also composed our theme music. For more information about today's episode,

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or to sign up for my newsletter wake Up Call,

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>go to the description in the podcast app or visit

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>us at Katiecuric dot com. You can also find me

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram and all my social media channels. For more

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app. Apple podcasts, or

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.