WEBVTT - May Q&A (5/10/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Solid Verbal. Call that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for dake Ado state?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that? Whoo whoom? And Dan and Tie welcome back

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 2>to the Solid Verbal boys and girls. My name is

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Ty Hildebrandt joining me over there. Fine gentlemen. You know

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Ms Dan Rubinstein, Dan and I. We run a little

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 2>show called It'll Come to Me Dan. What is this called? Well?

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I would I would hope that everybody knows the name

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>of the show. They already clicked on it. It's the

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Solid Verbal, Tie the Solid Verbal. You can find us

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>at solid verbal dot com. Also out on iTunes, dot com,

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>slash Solid Verbal, or Apple podcasts if you want to

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have the proper nomenclature. We are also on Facebook and

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Instagram and everywhere you can find fine social media.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Sir. How are you you?

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. I feel like you're having a day. Yeah,

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long day for.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Me, Dan, okay, long day of meetings, a long day

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>of corporate America. So I'm a little bit I'm a

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a brain drain state right now.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>That's good I love that because I know you've had

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this show. Not unlike fans looking at the fall schedule,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the football slate, they got that that week circled. Oh

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>when we go to X State, x Tech, that's the game, right,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we've had this, or at least you

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have have had this topic. We're doing a Q and

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>A show. We've got a ton of college football questions.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, it's still, at least in name, a college

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.639
<v Speaker 1>football show. But we also have bathroom etiquette questions, which

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I would venture to say, and I will stress this Ty.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Bathroom etiquette not procedure. Right. We had some people write

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in and say, like should I wipe standing up or

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting down? It's like, you know what, that's a you thing,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>follow your bliss. I can't tell you the right or

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong answer, but etiquette wise, Ty and I have strong thoughts.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But you, in particular, this is this is not just

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a professional endeavor for you, right, this is a personal passion.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of like my life's work. You could say you.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Love space, you love bathroom etiquette, and the forever search

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>for a full night's sleep.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Correct. There are other oddball subjects in there. No, Yes,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the subject has been something I've observed in my professional

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>life in my personal life.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, So we'll try to get into it without

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of question Intenny Laura details.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we should point out we decided bab we'll throw

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>it out there to people ask us some questions. We

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>received more questions on this subject for lack of a

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>better term, because this is a bathroom Meticutt show. It

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>binds us. Tie, don't forget you can write a review

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>for the show. I saw some folks out there saying, well,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>we like the show, but they talk a little bit

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>too much about themselves, too much personalized stuff. It is

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>may this is what we do.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a show about ourselves, and we get sidetracked

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>into college football. We promised to get to more college football,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>fair criticism, but we're going to start with college football

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>here this evening, and then we will see where the

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>conversation takes us.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>If that is fine with you, Dan.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I know where it's going, Ty, It's going down that

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>drain quite literally and figuratively.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations, Skippy, you've got mail.

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You've got mail.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>On the solid verbal Dan. As often as we can,

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>we like to play that age old sound. One of

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the lone holdovers from our early days back in two

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>thousand and.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Eight, a by gone era.

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>We like to pay homage Dan to those folks who

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>write in via email, via Twitter, Facebook, what have you

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>messenger pigeon. In this particular case, we decide to ask

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>for football and some other college football or not college

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>football related questions. Why don't we start with the college

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>football If I think that's a good direct, that is

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 2>all the same to you, Let's go to John John Tucker, Dan,

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 2>John Tucker must die? He said, who is the next

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Bill Snyder?

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how do you take that interpretation? How do you

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>take that question? What does that mean to you? Who's

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the next coach of Kansas State? Or who's the next

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>legendary coach to retire and come back? That's how I

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>took it.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I was I was thinking more along the lines of

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 2>the ladder, maybe with a weird twist of an age

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>old starter jacket. I don't know if you're going to

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 2>find a whole lot of coaches who retire and come back,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 2>that's that's almost impossible to predict. But I kind of

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>thought of it more broadly in the sense of which

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 2>coaches are currently in a role that I could see

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 2>them being in forever.

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, that's more of a Paterno. I'm going to say,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like in a role, they maybe move on to another level.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they go up to the NFL and maybe they're fired.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they just decide it's not for them, and they're

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>more of a like a say in situation, they're more

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a college type and returned to the place that

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>helped to build that reputation. So not unlike and this

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>would be an example, Bobby Patrino at Louisville, right, sort

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of realized NFL wasn't for him, got into trouble at Arkansas,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>returned to the place that helped to build him. I'm

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to say he was going to be thought

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>of as fondly as as Bill Snyders in Manhattan, but

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say that return to past glory sexy

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Randy Edsel, Right, So let me let me ask you this.

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Then, Yeah, if Lane Kiffin were to somehow, in a

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>weird alternate universe be rehired by Tennessee or USC, would

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that count.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>No, Because he left on acrimonious terms. So did Bobby

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Patrino from Louisville. I think it was Okay, maybe it

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>was acrimonious in that, like you're losing this guy who's

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>been so good for your program, but he was advancing

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL at that point. Okay, it was an

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>understandable It's not we hate Bobby Patrino because he left

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>us for the Falcons. Like if you were to leave

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>your job for like a higher class gentleman's club, your

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>current job couldn't say this doesn't make sense. Right, So

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>here's what I have, and it saw me if you

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have the same thing. Legendary Cincinnati coach Brian Kelly returns

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to his glory. Maybe he takes a shot with the

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Vikings in three years and doesn't work out. He's a

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>legend and unfinished business like the Sugar Bowl that he

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>abandoned his team in Sexy Randy Etzel obviously as the

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>opportunity right now, I mean, taking Yukon to a festival

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.559
<v Speaker 1>now appears to be more significant than it perhaps seemed

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Robert Davey at Notre Dame and with

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin and Barry Alvarez, like thirty yards from the head

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>coach's office, it's always on the table ty. Yeah, what

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about Tom Herman long term because Tom Herman. If Tom

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Herman has any degree success in rebuilding Texas, right, he

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is clearly going to get a call from the NFL okay,

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and if that doesn't work out, you have to believe

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that if Texas needs a guy, they'd go back to

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Herman well, because he started his career there. Clearly

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at that point he wove some credibility within Longhorn Nation.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I could see perspectively him being an interesting name for this.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's two steps you're looking at two steps. So

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>he has not you know, he's only built his legend

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>basically at Houston. He was only there a couple of years.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't feel like so Bill Snyder's first go

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>round at Kansas State was sixteen or seventeen years nineteen

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine to two thousand and five. Came back in

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine when it was clear that the

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Wildcats needed his help. So I would imagine Tom Herman

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to be at Texas for a while to

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>compare it to a Bill Snyder situation. What about Chip

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Kelly going back to Oregon. So that seemed like it

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was on the table, and that would have fitted slightly

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>different circumstances. Than Bill Snyder and Kansas State. But yes,

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>realizing that perhaps his speed was more Eugene, Oregon than

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia or San Francisco in the NFL would have been

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a cousin to the Bill Snyder situation.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Good question here from John Deaker. Next John, No, Josh,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, Josh, how about some Big ten West talk?

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah, how about some Big ten West talk? We

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>do have a soundtrack for this, Dan.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to spice this Big ten West talker.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Fuck you?

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 2>What are Northwesterns chances to win the division? How about

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Purdue's timetable for success? With Jeff Brahm at the helm,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>is his offense going to change the league? Like Joe

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Tiller in the ninetiesel Youl?

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So here's how I see the Big ten West at

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Wisconsin is probably still in the best overall

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>shape even though they're on there. What it's third defensive

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>coordinat in three years? Yes, and agreed, lost some big

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>names on defense. TJ. Watts was a first round pick.

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he went to the Steelers.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Also, did you know JJ Watts brother?

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I did? I did just find that out this morning. Yeah,

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>what a crazy world in which we live. Experience back

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at running back. They got a couple of pieces to

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>fill in on the offensive line. Your boy Alex Hornybrook

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is full time now quarterback. So I think Wisconsin's still

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in the best position. It appears. They miss Ohio State

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>and they get Michigan and Iowa at home. It's it's

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a good time to have a nice schedule in the

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Big Ten. West Iowa new quarterback Brian Farrens is now

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator, so you know that Farence family. They're

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna open things up on offense. Nebraska will be starting

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a kind of below average Tulane QB. So get excited

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. Bob Diaco so great head of hair, great

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>hit that three four. Nebraska replaces pretty much everybody than

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the very fast and sometimes injured de Mornay. Piersonell and

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>also a really really good name on Nebraska's defense. His

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>first name is Freedom. I'm not going to even attempt

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to pronounce his last name, but he's an edge rusher

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for Nebraska and his name is Freedom. I have PJ Flack,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you have Purdue with Jeff Broms, so two new head

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>coaches there, so Minnesota has a lot of work to do.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Rob Smith. You may remember Rob Smith from his time

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>giving up every single yard at Arkansas last year and

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern it's a really good time and all seriousness, ty,

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it is a really good time to have a steady program.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the thing. You mentioned that, and you're right,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Northwestern. The question here is what are their

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 2>chances to win the division? They probably have as good

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a chance as anyone outside of Wisconsin because they bring

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>back Clayton Thorson, who we both like. Justin Jackson had

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a huge Bowl game. The question will be what do

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>they put around those two guys from a playmaker stamp

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>can they block for them? But they do bring back

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a very talented defense that should help them in the

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten West. Do you look at the schedule, I

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>mean there are some land mines on there, but no

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Michigan Ohio State though no Michigan or or Ohio State,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>so they're set up pretty well if they want to

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 2>make a run, if they can get it together early enough.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The meat of their schedule is Wisconsin on the road,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>followed by Penn State, and that's relatively early in the season,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 2>so we'll get a better idea of where the Wildcats

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 2>stand as far as that goes. But I like Northwestern

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 2>per do. I like moving forward, but they've got holes

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>all across the field. While I do think Jeff Brom

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>will build them up, it's going to take time.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So on our Coach Higher podcast Weird show that we

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>did a couple weeks ago, one of the things that

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Stephen Godfrey mentioned was the most important hire

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is the coordinator on the side of the ball in

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>which the coach is not used to or not his

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>background specifically. Sure, so Jeff Brom brings over one of

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>my all time favorite defensive coordinators and Nick Holts from

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Western Kentucky. You may remember, I think Pete Carroll had

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>hired him at USC, spends some time at Idaho as

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>their head coach has been around and Nick Holts at

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Western Western Kentucky. The S and P plus defense went

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>from one to eighteen to sixty to forty two the

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>past three years, and that includes a jump in one

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>year from the first to second year of one seventeen

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five against the pass pass efficiency defense against

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the conference teams, So there is a track record of

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>defensive improvement from year one to year two. Year one

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is just establishing culture scheme, playbook, getting to know what

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to fill in. Purdue is not going to

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do all that much beyond. I think have some fun

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>nuggets this year, but I would not expect a ton

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty seventeen Northwestern. When I look at the Big

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Ten West, I don't know if you want to play

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the medal again.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh, there we go, Okay, go ahead.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern may have the best and most proven backfield. Is

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that weird to say in the division? I'm a little

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable with that. So Clayton Thorson last year finished third

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Ten inefficiency as a quarterback, ahead of J. T. Barrett,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead of C. J. Bethard, ahead of Alex Harnybrook, Tommy Armstrong,

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Lyner, all these people hit a good year. Justin

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's been there for seventeen years. He's going to rush

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for a million yards if he stays healthy. And here's

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the big thing with Northwestern that we have not even

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned yet. They're coming off of an enormous Pinstripe Bowl victory.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Time cannot overstate the importance of that Pinstripe bowlwin. So

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>I think the Big Ten West will go as follows.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Top three Wisconsin, Northwestern Iowa.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Moving on, let's go to Ryan. He says, would you

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 2>rather Danny Ettling or June arriving Malik Zayer to run

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Matt Canada's offense at LSU in twenty seventeen?

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, Zayir, I think the ceiling is higher. I

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think we have a concept for Danny Etling's ceiling. That said,

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>I think Matt Canada is very good at fine wrinkles

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and the best position for his quarterbacks in offense. You

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>saw that last year with the blending of some spread

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>concepts and power with James Connor a pitt. I feel

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>as if, I don't know why I need to preface

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it with I feel it seems as if LSU with

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>an experienced offensive line, intriguing skill talent, a legitimately great

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>running back, if not one of the best in the

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>country already, it seems as if Malik Zayre gives them

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>an element if he can stay healthy and if Matt

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Canada can put him in position to complete completable throws

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for him, that the offense will have a higher ceiling

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with Zayre, So I would go. I would go in

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that direction if he is as advertised, Yeah, I mean.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>LSU has had mobile quarterbacks who could scramble but couldn't

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>necessarily throw. Zaire can throw. Zaire can throw. Last year

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>might not have been the absolute most representative sample of

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 2>what he has to offer on the football field, but

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>dude can throw and he can certainly run, so absolutely

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>higher ceiling for league's are. Like you said, you already

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>have a baseline for Danny Eetling. You know what you're

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>getting there with Matt Canada, I think MALIGU'SAIA would be

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>a much better option.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it. What'll come down to, especially when

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Zaya gets to campus, is who picks up the verbiage.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Who is just more comfortable running the sort of skeleton

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of that offense?

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh, Santos be free, Santos. If Oregon played Notre Dame

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in a future championship game, which of you would take

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the loss better? And would you be friends afterwards? Yeah?

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>This is an interesting question.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you've you have recently fallen asleep while watching

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a Notre Dame national championship game.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I have. I would be outwardly more upset you, really,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I would. You would probably be a little more tranquil

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>on the surface, but more passive aggressive later. That's my

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 2>on the situation.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would shut down having to watch what three

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>national championship losses in say, a ten year span. If

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>this happened in the next couple of years, that'd be rough. Tie,

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that'd be rough. It takes me a little bit. You

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>were sort of resigned and made peace with it pretty quickly.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>The thing about it is that people don't realize neither

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>one of us is really a trash talker.

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I'm much more passive aggressive with the music

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and the elderly audience for Notre Dame football. Okay, but we.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Don't necessarily have a trash talking not to each other,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>not to each other. We put on a good show here.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>But so from that standpoint, there wouldn't necessarily be a

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>very obvious reason to be mad at that person. It

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>would be more directed at our teams or their opponents.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>But right, so, yeah, I think friends afterwards as be

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>would be in order. Yeah, absolutely earliest friendly acquaintances. I

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know about this sub question here.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh you don't like that sub question, No, you can

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>ask it, But I'm just wants to know has type

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>been antagonistic towards Oregon lately, Am I just being sensitive?

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You're probably just being sensitive, which is okay, that's part

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of being a fan.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 2>But in fairness, Dan, h I have taken a lot

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>of crap. After the Fantasy Thing show and after the

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Secret Garbage Bracket, people really have really come at me.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm a big boy. I can take the criticism right,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 2>but there seems to be an assertion out there that

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I am just a giant beta male unable to hold

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 2>my ground against you.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, ty well. I think it also hurts that everybody

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>loved the Notre Dame fourn eate thing an Oregon one

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>fourn eight, and everybody just sort of glossed over that

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and turned their collective attention to Notre Dame's record.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>What people don't realize is that you're so insistent that

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>eventually I have to give otherwise our show is going

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 2>to be four hours. That's true, Okay, relentless, You're relentless,

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>But I have maybe been a little bit more antagonistic towards.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Organ That's okay. We'll see what happens during the season.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Kenneth right, he writes, in which Arizona School will have

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a better season.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Dan shout out to the territorial cop tie.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Arizona and Arizona State are the two most

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>obvious choices here. Do you have a strong lean?

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Probably Arizona, but I'm worried about that defense.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Arizona State's overhauling everything. They've got two new coordinators. The

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Blake Barnett edition is interesting, but they are philosophically just

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>overhauling everything. And Arizona State, since they went what three

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago now to the Pac twelve Championship game, they've

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>been kind of secret garbage. They have not been good

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>as well as Todd Graham has coached this team early on,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Whereas with Arizona, I think there is something with the

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Wildcats that I feel better about than I do about

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>anything with Arizona State, and that's some sort of combination

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of Brandon Dawkins Khalil Tate. Now they have a twenty

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>six year old quarterback, Donovan Tate, I believe his name

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is Okay, was a minor league baseball player drafted now

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is coming back to college and they've got a really

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>fun running back duo that has been beat up constantly.

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 1>But if they're healthy, they can cover up for some

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive deficiencies JJ Taylor and Nick Wilson. So there's sneaky

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>danger for Arizona and secret garbage for Arizona State. So

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with Arizona, not confidently, but Arizona

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at the moment things aren't great.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:34.239
<v Speaker 2>I tend to agree. Yeah, moving next question, Lee right,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So with a very interesting question, yes, and we actually

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>got a bunch of questions as it relates to college

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>football quarterbacks. Lee says, is this year really the quote

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>unquote year of the quarterback in college football? And can

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>we expect a slight shift towards the pro norm pro

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>style NFL quarterback in Sam Darnold, Josh Allen, Josh Rosen, etc. Etc.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I got a couple questions about Sam Darnald, Kyle writes

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>in is there too much hype for him? He was

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 2>second best quarterback on his team a year ago, now

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 2>he's second on a Heisman list. We also got a

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 2>question from Blaine who wants to know a few under

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the radar quarterbacks other than the obvious ones, who could

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>have a really strong impact in twenty seventeen. So a

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>bunch of quarterback related questions. My comment on the Year

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>of the quarterback, the Year of the pro style quarterback.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there's going to be any great

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>movement of foot in college football towards any pro style systems.

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 2>My hunches. No. I just think we're kind of entering

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a chapter where the better quarterbacks in college football happen

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to be pro style. Does that seem fair to you

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 2>to say?

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. And the term pro style is

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>such a loose catch all for things that aren't super

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>defined in college Because USC will run the zone read

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Darnold, they run RPO stuff with Sam Darnold,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>same for Josh Rosen and UCLA. Trace McSorley runs a

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ton of RPO and spread concepts at Penn State, even

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>though he is super productive in getting Heisman Trophy attention

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. So it's hard to sort of write

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>unless you're looking at maybe Stanford, and even they run shotguns,

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>spread option running stuff with certain quarterbacks. Recently, Kevin Hogan

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>ran a bunch of that, Andrew Luck ran some of that.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Even So style isn't pro style anymore, right exactly, And

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>as we see more and more quarterbacks and offenses in

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL sort of introduce all sorts of different concepts

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to their repertoires. I think it's hard to define anything

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as pro style and spread. That said, under the radar

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks at this point, I think Josh Allen is going

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to get a ton of attention for Wyoming.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and they play Oregon and somebody else of

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>significance early on in the season. I want to say, God,

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not Wisconsin. I think it's one of the big

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ten teams I was looking up. I think I think, oh,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they play Iowa early on, so he'll have an opportunity

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>early on to make some sort of statement in either direction.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Will Greer is an interesting name.

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I have Will Greer down on mine as well. I

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>also have Eric dungeye okay, a little slight maybe yeah.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's so much under the radar,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 2>but he does play for Syracuse and it will be

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>year two of the Dino Babers offense, which we know

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>is pretty potent. So he's a name that you can

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 2>get used to hearing more of and probably won't be

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 2>on that headline, but he's going to bring up some

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 2>sick numbers.

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Both quarterbacks in the state of Washington put up and

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have put up ridiculous numbers. You know, Jake Browning didn't

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>end the season super well with the games against Colorado,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>USC and of course Alabama. Luke Fox has been there

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>forever and I think we'll receive attention because he is

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>really he stands in and he's a warrior. I know

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he plays in the raid, but he has a nice

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>arm and he will just he will deserve attention throughout

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>this season. Jake Browning is not under the radar, but

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>he is a name that perhaps isn't garnering NFL attention

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way that Sam Arnold and Josh Rosen halfmen.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>But he throws a hell of a ball. Also kind

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of small though outside of that. Curious about Shane Michelle

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in an offense that was very productive these past couple

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of years.

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of slight, oh, I.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Got one more name. I have one more name that

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>could find himself into a very productive We know about

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. He's not under the radar. He's been a

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>playoff quarterback, Mason Rudolph. Same state has Junkyard Jim Waite.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>He is he under the radar.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Probably he's under the radar because he plays in a

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>state with Baker Mayfield, who is I think received the

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>lion's share of the attention in that area.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I don't know if subscribe to that.

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say Mason Rudolph just because Oklahoma State has

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>not been in big national conversations as much as perhaps

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they should have, because probably because of the defense.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>All Right, agree to disagree on that one. I want

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to go to Set's Arnold though, Kyle Kyle wrote in

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 2>and this was a question about him being the second

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 2>best quarterback on his team last year. Now he's like

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>second on the Heisman preseason Heisman list. Has the hype

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 2>gone too far? I don't think so at all. I

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 2>think he's really good. If if I'm an NFL fan

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 2>and my team has an opportunity to get him, I

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>want Sam Darnald. I'm very excited to see what he

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 2>can do this year.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm with you. And the part of the comment

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>early on second best quarterback on his team, I don't

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's totally accurate. I imagine Max Brown had been

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in the program for a while, and the first game

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>was against Alabama and it was in Jerry World, right, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So I just at a certain point, I think the

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>USC coaches said it might hurt Sam Donald long term,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to just throw him against the Wolves against Alabama as

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>his first start in an NFL stadium. We're not expecting

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>all that much from this year, so why don't we

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>ease in and see where we are in a few games.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Because I think in fall camp reports were coming out

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Donald was more talented than Max Brown, but

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he was a red shirt freshman and didn't have the

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>experience in the program, so they just they went with

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the experience early on. Not unlike what happened with I

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>want to say it was Cole Stroud and Deshaun Watson, yeah,

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>right right against Georgia. I imagine Clemson coaches in practice said, yes,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson is clearly more special than Cole Strout, but

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. We'll see what happens against Georgia and we'll

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>work him in at an appropriate pace. I think that

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was more of the thinking than he was the clear

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>second best.

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, we've got one, two, three, four, or five, six,

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 2>six or seven questions.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>We can do as many as these as you want, Ty,

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to rifle through the college football ones if

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we could please very quickly, Matt, which two Power five

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>teams in the same conference or rivals would be best

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and worst pairing for a love This question couple's marriage.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So okay, you're about to get married and what three weeks? Yes,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up on us here less than three weeks? Yeah,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>do you have any any thoughts on this question? So,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're talking about fan bases that you know,

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of oil and water, whatever, you have to stay

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>away from, perhaps schools with families mixing in only there's

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>one game in town in that state, in that area,

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>so like Michigan, Michigan State, a lot of people within

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the same family are attending both of those schools. That

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>becomes troublesome. South Carolina, Clemson, Ole, miss Mississippi State, Oregon,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Oregon State. I think people look at the Michigan Ohio

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>state rivalry or Oregon Washington as super fierce and above all,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think there's as much familial mixing. Okay,

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's I think the same state thing

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>where there's not not a lot else going on, that's

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst. I think for the best. Maybe common enemies,

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe like an Auburn Tennessee they both hate Bama, Michigan State,

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State the enemy of Michigan is exactly Oklahoma, Texas

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech that kind of thing to say, I would stay

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>away from rivals or any kind of intra.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 2>SEC type stuff because the SEC always reached for the SEC, right,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 2>you know? So maybe that's the answer for the best,

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike, Which new coach will see the most

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 2>success in their first year with their new team? Which

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>will see the least amount of success? Is Tom Herman

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>too obvious an answer at Texas for most?

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean because any success at all, any four oh progress,

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I think is going to be viewed very positively. Well,

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Strong at us F could have a hell of

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 2>a year, right, Quintin Flowers, sure with how much they

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 2>return there new coach Wise, I like Texas just because

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Charlie Strong recruited well enough and there are

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>enough interesting pieces there. PJ. Fleck is going to move

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 2>the needle, and I think that will be view to success.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess it depends on how you define that in

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>terms of actually driving interest to a program. PJ. Fleck

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 2>will be successful in that regard.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Shore Matt Rule might have a really long year.

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Matt Rule, I was going to say, is probably

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 2>the obvious answer for a least.

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Jeff Brohm Matt rule for just looking

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>at Power five schools. Yeah, I don't think it's going

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to be great there.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, Joe wants to know, can you give me

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the best case, worst case scenario for the Maryland Terrapins

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.479
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen. I'm sure Joe is aware of this,

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 2>but Maryland is replacing pretty much everybody. They need help

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 2>across the board, a new quarterback situation, So I think

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the best case scenario is twofold. First off,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 2>if you can get to a bowl game, I think

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>that's an accomplishment. Yeah, that's an accomplishment because the Big

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>ten East is going to be pretty tough again. Got

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to one last year, Yeah, got to one last year.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>If you can do it again this year, I think

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 2>that's good. I think what you really need to see

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>is development from a player's standpoint, some guys that you

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 2>can hang your hat on for twenty eighteen. Not to

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>give two Morbid an outlook here, but I think Dj

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Dirkin is doing a really good job. He certainly brought

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>in plenty of coaching talent to help mold that program.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Man, it's tough to find five wins on here. It's real,

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's real, tough. They have tousand, UCF is improving. They

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>go two Minnesota to Ohio State, two Wisconsin, two Michigan States. Luckily,

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they are a team that will get Rutgers every year.

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.479
<v Speaker 1>They have Indiana, changing Indiana a little bit. They have

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Penn State to finish out the year. Aye, Man, I

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>don't see five wins here. Yeah, that's ROF, Texas and UCF.

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>And the non con is just I don't think a

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>ball is probable because of all they have to replace. Right,

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>But again, if you can hang they've been recruiting well,

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 2>right exactly, If you can hang your hat on some

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 2>new AMMO coming in on the recruiting side, if you

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 2>can see a few names on defense that develop and

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 2>can give you reason for excitement as you move forward,

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that. I think that right now is what

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:07.239
<v Speaker 2>you have to hang your hat on.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So if we did the drive for six for Illinois,

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I want the path to danger five, from path to

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>danger five like they've won it, very dangerous. They're a

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>dangerous five win team like any given week they could

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be weird. That's what they need to aspire to this year. Probably,

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go to John. He says, pretend you're six five

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>two twenty. You've got poster boy good looks, don't we all?

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You're also the number one quarterback in the twenty eighteen class.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Rumor has it that some NFL teams are already salvating

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>over you. Hell yeah, which program spelled in the British

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>way with the two m's and.

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 2>The e at the end? Are you committing to Dan?

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 2>We've had this question. Yeah, not in a while, but

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>several times in the past. Hmm.

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always answered Georgia. I know you have.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>George has been my go to answer here. But I

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>think think if you're six five, number one quarterback, you

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>are entering college under the assumption that you're going to

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 2>go onto the NFL, I might have to amend that

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>answer and go Mark Richt at Miami, Okay, because we

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 2>know we can develop quarterbacks. I think that's what you're

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>going for. If you've got the poster boy good looks,

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe maybe you're looking for a place where you can

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 2>be big man on campus, and you know, Miami is

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>an interesting place for that kind of mentality as well.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's change the answer. Let's go Miami.

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Stanford, and I'm not thinking twice. You're in California,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have really good offensive line in front of you.

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna have a ton of top NFL type

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>talent at on the defensive line that you're seeing, defensive

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>back that you're seeing, you'll have a good running game.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Worst case scenario, you're at Stanford, you blow out your knee,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You're getting a Stanford education.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Diggity dog rights. It hit me, why are there such

0:31:56.320 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>few PAC twelve versus SEC, more versus ACC non conference

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 2>bowl matchups? And what can be done to change this? Dan?

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would assume they're not a ton of these

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>matchups because where are you gonna have them? You want

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve and SEC fans to travel, and West Coast

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.719
<v Speaker 1>is far away, ty, You know this only having been

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to the West Coast two or three times, right, that's correct. Yeah,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a far away place. And I understand the attraction

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of going to like Pasadena or San Diego. But still

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that's if you're coming from Athens, if you're coming from Knoxville,

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're coming from Columbia, that's a ways and what's

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in between. I don't know if it's an attractive New

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Year's Ish destination. If you're trying to go exactly in between.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to hold a bowl game in Little Rock.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to hold a bowl game in Houston

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in that that's going to attract people from Seattle. So

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's geography. I honestly do. And there probably

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't all that much more to it that. That's just

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>unless you're playing in the Rose Bowl. Why would And

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>especially sac and Acc country is pretty warm, even in

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the winter, So coming out west to play a bowl

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>game in San Francisco or Portland or wherever, it's not

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that attractive.

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Why all right? You're comfortable This next gentleman who rides in.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this is his real name?

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is.

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>He goes by the name Owl Owl. What is a

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 2>venue you have not yet visited that you would like

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to see a game in? He does not specify college

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 2>football if it's non college football, and the answer for

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 2>me is Wimbledon. Yeah. I was going to say something

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>across the pond, but if we are assuming college football,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to see Neiland Stadium. Yeah, visit the Vaal Navy.

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I'd be crazy about hearing Rocky Top

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 2>every every other minute, but Neiland Stadium would be pretty

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 2>damn cool. I've not been yet.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You know where it might be. It might be Norman,

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it might be at it might be going to see

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an Oklahoma game, just because it's a huge, huge program

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't been there.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Either Norman or Fordham obviously or for obviously.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That always goes without saying.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, and finally before we drastically shift gears here, yes, Curtis,

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 2>longtime listener. Curtis writes, and he says, you've gone the

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>indie and semi indie route in covering the National Championship

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>on site. Do you have any tips or pitfalls to

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 2>avoid if one is thinking of heading down in twenty

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 2>eighteen to Atlanta.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I would see to me, I would avoid everything that

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the game until the game, right.

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I would avoid the concerts and the open media days

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or you can pay to go to media days, whatever.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I would avoid all of the lead up stuff because

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just sort of corporate and sale. Not that exciting

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, because that's you can do that in any city.

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>What I would do, specifically, and this is specific to Atlanta,

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is personally, I'm super into food, So I would try

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to go to as many different neighborhoods as possible and

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>eat as well as I possibly could locally, or just

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like take in a city, see what's awesome in the city,

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's an aquarium, if it's like running the steps

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Rocky Statue. I use food as my sort

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of guide. But figure out what excites you about life.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>If you like running in parks, find out where the

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>best running trail is in Atlanta. Do that.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Find some good Facebook groups. Find some Facebook groups. Well

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking like furries or anything. I'm saying, find

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.720
<v Speaker 2>people who are going to the game, fans of whatever

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 2>team are playing in said game. Go on the reddit

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and subreddit for college football. There are always a lot

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of great fans on there, and see what other like

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 2>minded fans are up to, cause you'll find that there

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of college football fans who just go

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to these types of things and sure may not have

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>a rooting interest. So I would start there.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, I just go eat, Go eat

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>at Heirloom Barbecue. It's wonderful. It's great barbecue in Atlanta,

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with like a Korean touch.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Before we move on I did want to mention springtime

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 2>is a great time to hit the reset buttoned in. Yeah,

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and you can retackle your personal goals like getting fit, cleaning, cooking,

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe getting married. If I don't know you're interested in

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 2>such things.

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>One word two Yeah. Luckily Dan Blue Apron, they make

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>it incredible and incredibly easy to home cook a meal.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 2>It's easy accessible. They deliver seasonal recipes with step by

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 2>step instructions and preportioned ingredients right to your door for

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>less than ten bucks a meal. Can even customize your

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>recipes based on your preferences and select a delivery option

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 2>that's right for you. I know you're a very picky eater.

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Plus, there's no weekly commitment. You can only get the

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>deliveries you want when you want them. If you're interested

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in that. Here's what is featured.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Some of the meals available in may include beef cheroaki.

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 2>I've not pre screened these, so there's a good chance

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to I'm ready, I'm gonna botch it. But

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>beef karaaki stir fry with sugar, snap peas and lime rice.

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I got that, you nailed it.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Baked spinach and egg flat bread with sauteed asparagus and lemon,

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a olie two for two, three cheese and baby broccoli,

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 2>strumbowli with tomato and a reguano dipping sauce, and finally,

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 2>crispy salmon and roasted potato salad with pickled mustard seeds

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and creme A. Oh boy, uh freak sauce f r

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 2>A I s yeah, crem fresh. We've both gotten Blue Apron.

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 2>We love it.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I know you got some.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Have you cooked it yet?

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I have cooked it and it was delicious. It was

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like grilled pork with a mustard sauce,

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>straightforward easy, you can controlled the ingredients. Got some wanton

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>noodles for later in this week. Actually, and there's a

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>tandory chicken recipe that looks it looks hearty, tye without

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>being super unhealthy. Look, it's I'm excited for this, ty

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Check out the menu and get your first three meals

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 2>for free with free shipping by going blue Apron dot

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 2>com slash solid solid. You will love how good it

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 2>feels and tastes to create incredible home cooked meals with

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Blue Apron, So don't wait again, Blue Apron dot com

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>slash Solid three free meals with free shipping apron a

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>better way to cook.

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Crme frke sure, speaking of food, Now we're going to

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:45.879
<v Speaker 1>go the other end. Awkward transition, boom, where are we going?

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me?

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>So we asked for bathroom medico questions because you have

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of strong thoughts. I do, yeah, and I found

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>out I have strong thoughts, so we solicited these questions.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>We got these questions. First off, a couple of people

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this to us. Did you see Tom Herman's Guide

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to Peing?

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, and hydration it's very weird. Do you yourself, ty,

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>because there are no secrets between us, do you take

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>hydration and peeing seriously?

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Do I take it as a basic human function? Yes?

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, who doesn't a.

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Lot of Well, obviously, if you are so, we should explain.

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Tom Herman, head coach at Texas, has put up these

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>laminated signs above. I would assume urinals and toilets in

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Texas facility.

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Very well, very very weird behavior.

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I dig this. I think it's wonderful and it's basically

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>different shades of I guess clear to orange, burnt orange.

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I suppose of championship level hydration levels next to shades

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that are like white and very faintly yellow selfish teammate

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>deeply yellow, and then more gold and light orange is

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>associated with and I quote, blatant disregard for your teammates.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>You are headed to area fifty one.

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay. See, here's the thing about bathrooms in general. And

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if you're in a public facility. I

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.439
<v Speaker 2>don't care if you're at a work facility. What I've

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 2>found is that people in bathrooms you learn a lot

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 2>about them. Presumably you're not in the stall with them,

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 2>but just in general, watching people just go about their business,

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 2>you find out which people were raised by wolves in

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 2>which were not right. So this to me is just

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 2>you see weird stuff going on in there in the

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 2>hydration chart, while kind of funny, is just weird to me,

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 2>excessively weird to me.

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>If you give me an opportunity to take pride in

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>my hydration and color code, it, I'm all about it.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Strong disagree.

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 2>We got several different buckets of questions here, Okay.

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>We did, and again should we stress etiquette not procedure? Right.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 2>The first big general category we got was summed up

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought pretty well by Michael who wanted to know

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 2>is it okay for someone to see someone using the

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 2>stall and to talk to them. This whole topic around

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 2>bathroom conversations.

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Or speaking in general, like on the phone, perhaps dialing

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>into a conference call while you're sitting on the john.

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so bathroom etiquette as it relates to conversation. Do

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 2>you have strong thoughts on this topic?

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Sync totally fair game as you're washing hands, I

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think yeah, if you are friends with the person, and

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like you walk into the bathroom sort of together incidentally,

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and you head towards the urinal friend heads towards the stall,

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and you want to say something like hey, good luckome there,

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fine. But once the door is closed,

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's their office. That is their business, and you let

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>them to it. But if you've got a great goof

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that's where they accept is TI to me? I would say,

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>no conversation though, no, like, hey, should I expect the

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>file by three or none of that.

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I've already been in this situation where just as kind

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 2>of a random passerby washing my hands going for the

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 2>retuck of the shirt, I've witnessed two gentlemen. Not actually witness,

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 2>but heard two gentlemen in adjacent stalls having a full

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 2>on business discussion. That's so odd it struck me as

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 2>odd too. It's the holiest of places, no pun intent.

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I've also been in the stall listening to a business

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 2>pep talk occur on the outside of the wall.

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not with it.

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 2>In general, pleasant trees can be exchanged, but the full

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>on conversation the cell phone.

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Come.

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>If you hear a cell phone conversation going on in there,

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 2>just flush, make as much noise as you can. We've

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 2>conducted interviews here with Houston Nut where presumably he was

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 2>in the bathroom may have been his own private bathroom,

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 2>may have been his own private bathroom, in which case okay, fine.

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 2>But if in fact you hear an associate in the

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 2>restroom talking on the cell phone, I don't care how

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.320
<v Speaker 2>important the call is. Initiate the flesh. Let him know

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 2>whose boss, right, I would also ask, and then perhaps

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 2>we can move on to a related subject. Have you

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 2>ever been in a situation where someone's walked into a bathroom,

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>saw you, maybe for the first time in a while,

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>and offered offered their hand to shake your hand.

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>No I've never gotten like, hey, what's up, dude, long time,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>never for like a hand even a fist bump.

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Now see, I've already been walking out of the bathroom

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and I've seen someone walking in that I hadn't seen

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 2>in a while.

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>M hm.

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 2>And curiously enough that gentleman put his hand out, Hey,

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 2>how are you? I'm fine. I'm curious how you're gonna

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 2>be after I shake your hand here.

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would just sort of give you like the

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of like hand like show the hands, like, hey, sorry,

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just wash my hands.

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Do you go with the the gear shift and try

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and go fist hound now I'll pull.

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>My hands back. I was like, it just was in

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Very odd circumstances. But I'm generally no on talking, no

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>on the on the cellular conversation. I'm okay with texting

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 2>if you can do it discreet.

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Will you play a game on your phone?

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I have played a game on the phone.

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, Yeah, I think that's that's fine for bathroom time.

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>And when I say goof. By the way, our pal

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>will here at espianation claims, and I really hope it's true,

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's so wonderful that if he is in the

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>bathroom and he's using the urinal and somebody else is

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the stall and they have a louder experience in

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the stall. Will will while he's right next to the

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>stall peeing at the urinal, go, I'll have what he's having.

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's wonderful. That's wonderful because it makes the person

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so uncomfortable.

0:44:57.640 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what is what is our next sort of bucket item?

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>This one I thought was borderline brilliant and not the

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>easiest to answer. This comes from a tiger tiger, I

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know how that's what his name is on name

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. How inappropriate would it be to bring your

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>own toilet paper?

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Wow?

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>The in laws have thick toilet paper so multiple ply

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing what he means by that. But weak toilets Okay,

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>wife and I average about one and a half clogs

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>per visits.

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that might be grounds for a new house.

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean some places the plumbing just is not great,

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or the toilets are low flow, whatever it is. Bring

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>your own TP is definitely an option if they're like

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on triple ply and you could bring one and a

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>half ply one. You know, if you can take one plly,

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't recommend it.

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 2>But here's here's the thing, though, one and a half

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 2>average indicates there have been somewhere there, maybe five.

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>In a multi class. Yeah, sure.

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 2>So the question is would bringing your own toilet paper

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 2>have any effect on that at all? It might bring

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that number down, but it still leaves you in a

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 2>circumstance where you're you're clogging things up. The answer here

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 2>might be to bring your own plunger.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a not a particularly easy thing to travel with.

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Amazon has to have a retractable version somewhere

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 2>for like, you know, nine ninety nine on Prime.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So short of bring your own plunger or simply

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>buying in laws a really top notch elite plunger, right,

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you could be more efficient with the toilet paper, which

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is not a great ask. Ty, No, I'm gonna be honest,

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not a great ask.

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Rationing toilet paper is difficult.

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tough. You could start figuring out the timing

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of your daily schedule. Say you go out for breakfast

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:40.959
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Maybe you have an early coffee knowing

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.479
<v Speaker 1>you will be at a different facility at around ten Ah.

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, right, right, so you're you're talking a little co

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 2>location situation here.

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I'm talking about. It's just sort of

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>timing some sort of caffeine intake or you know, a

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>catalyst that if you can time it right, that you

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about the plumbing there. If you

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to a park, if I know, park's

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not the greatest place, but if you're going somewhere you

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:06.959
<v Speaker 1>want a bookstore, you always go into town at this hour,

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you always do that whatever, and just sort of adjusting

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>your timing if that's on the table. I would also say,

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>eat less roughage less fiber. Just offer less to the cheese, yeah,

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or eat a bunch of nuts that'll stop you up.

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'd never advocate people slowing down. I'm a job creator, ty,

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I keep that factory moving, and so I will never

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>advocate people slowing down the matap. So that's what I

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>would say at this point. But I don't think there's

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>anything wrong with bringing your own TP.

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:39.439
<v Speaker 2>That's your movantic moment.

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:43.479
<v Speaker 1>If you are downstairs and you have to go kind

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of badly and your portable TP is upstairs, it's easy

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to forget. You have your eyes on the prize, it's

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>easy to forget. You write your own customizable TP situations.

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.720
<v Speaker 2>If you brought your own, would you tell the in laws?

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's an odd conversation to have.

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>No, But here is a situation I've been in my

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one of my younger brothers former fiance's family.

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:11.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's very difficult to follow, but I think

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 2>so his.

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Would be in laws and it didn't work out. Have

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a very old home, and it's a nice home, but

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's very old and the plumbing is such that I

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think the pipes are particularly thin. So they tell people

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>when they are in the house or about to use

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom or staying with them, like, hey, if you

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the bathroom, don't use a lot.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And they have to have that conversation with everybody. So

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I've been there. Wow, it's not great. Okay, So that's

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the best I can do.

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Your own TP.

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>How long, brother Mazonne difference to the wire? How long

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>would you need to be dating somebody before pooping in

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>his or her bathroom knowing they would smell it? Okay?

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, ty.

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I don't think there's any one right answer.

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 2>No, No, but I would It obviously depends on the

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 2>level of urgency.

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to have some sort of idea, and I

0:49:10.160 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think everybody in some sense does have some sort of

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 1>idea of how potent, the ceiling of the potency, what's

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 1>common and would I would judge in that way.

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:25.919
<v Speaker 2>This is where you need to develop a very good

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 2>courtesy flush. Yes, that's what the courtesy flush was invented for.

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I would also do some scouting of is there some

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of freshener, Is there a fabrize situation already in

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>these or her bathroom matches?

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Something? Yeah?

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, be ready to go with something like that

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very quickly.

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 2>We did get one another one here from al He

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 2>says three urinals, two men. No one should be at

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the middle. Correct, Yeah, that's correct. That's a no brainer.

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Unless there's something particularly heinous in one of the side urinals.

0:49:57.840 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I think you're fine.

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:01.439
<v Speaker 2>What like a human what wouldn't Yes, I don't see

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 2>any explanation for going in that middle one. Well, sometimes

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 2>urinals can be stopped up and kind of gross. I

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:12.919
<v Speaker 2>think you go stall, I think that's right, all right,

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>brushing your teeth in the bathroom at work, okay? Or gross?

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>That comes to us from old pal Quinn. I can't

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>do it, Dan, My brother does this here at this

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>office regularly. Yes, every day after lunch. No, yeah, one

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. Tro Your brother is a little weird. You

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>said he's all about dental hygiene. Oh yeah, everybody here

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit weird.

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 2>True. I mean, if you've got a dentist appointment, then yeah,

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I get that. If you've got something stuck in your teeth,

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 2>if it's an emergency, I understand the need to keep

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the keep the portable toothbrush handy in case you got

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 2>a big meeting or ate something with a lot of onions.

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I get that, I do. I've never done it. It

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of grosses me out a little bit.

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Why it just does?

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 2>It just does. If it's my own bathroom at home,

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.959
<v Speaker 2>it's different. I can control the cleanliness of it, right,

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But in a public facility where I'm not sure. Now,

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 2>it's just not for me.

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think it's fine. I think it's just people

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>taking their dental hygiene seriously. And I feel more ashamed

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not as serious about my teeth than they are.

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's go two or three more very quickly.

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how about Brian. Brian, Okay, my wife and I

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>moved into our condo about a year and a half ago. Unknowingly,

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>when setting up the living room, I created a situation

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 1>with a slightly with a slight a jar of our

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.799
<v Speaker 1>bathroom door. I have a perfect line of sight to

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the TV.

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Nice. This is a thinking man right here, Brian.

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>My question is when is it appropriate to use the

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:47.760
<v Speaker 1>door as slightly ajar to see the TV from my toilet?

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I would say never, ever, ever.

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Really, So, he's basically saying that he has inadvertently created

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 2>a situation where if he leaves the door slightly a jar,

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 2>he can see his TV. Plenty of situations arise during

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:09.360
<v Speaker 2>college football season due to the dawn of the DVR.

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and every game streaming on your iPad and your phone.

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, you can probably bypass the need for this in

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a way that you couldn't five to ten years ago. Right,

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 2>But still, in a live sporting event type situation, I

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:29.760
<v Speaker 2>can see I can see pulling it off for that.

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That's how would say, since outfit your phone or tablet

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with some sort of streaming app if it's live sports.

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If not, there's enough to entertain you. People aren't gonna

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be in there for twenty five minutes if they rushing

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 1>to get back to something. What if his wife's not home,

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You're still polluting everything time. Yeah, do whatever you want yeh. Yeah,

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>now you got the waves coming.

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 2>All right. We got a bunch of questions here as

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 2>it relates to troughs in the men's bathroom. Yeah, this

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.360
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a thing. Somebody made this decision. Yeah,

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 2>around the time they invented the cotton gin that ap

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 2>trough would be a good idea in men's facilities. Dan

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of questions around what is the strategy for

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 2>using the trough? I try to avoid it at all costs.

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say, don't drink any liquids for two

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>hours and during any sort of supporting event.

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 2>The ultimate test of this is it just comes at

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the top of my mind because I went to Penn State.

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 2>But up in State College, the saloon, which is a

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.839
<v Speaker 2>popular location, used to have a trough situation. I don't

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 2>know if they still do, right, used to have a

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 2>trough situation, And I could remember the apprehension amongst my

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 2>friends and I knowing that we were there to consume

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 2>a reasonable amount of liquid and that the trough situation

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 2>is what awaited. So in a lot of situations we

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 2>would use saloon as the initial location. Go there early,

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 2>hit there for happy hour, and then you know, either

0:53:56.160 --> 0:53:59.359
<v Speaker 2>hit your apartment afterwards or go somewhere else to get

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more privacy.

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a fan of the trough.

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the worst ty. When is it appropriate, if ever,

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to use the handicap stall, Oh, if you are yourself

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not differently able.

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a fan of this, Dan, I'm not a

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 2>fan of it. I feel I feel like I am

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 2>breaking my moral compass by by utilizing it.

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So generally speaking, the handicap stall the higher throne I believe, yep,

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and more spacious to accommodate, like a wheelchair or something. Right,

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, if we're talking office or a

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>business of you know, you're out of Barnes and Noble

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 1>or something at an office or a busy business during

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:51.359
<v Speaker 1>peak hours or during office hours, avoid unless I would

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 1>say there is a caveat unless you are almost positive

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody in your office, if you have a smaller office

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to use it because of a physical ailments or

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>is around that day or something like that. And if

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got some sort of you know how Phil Jackson

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sat on that special chair because he had like a

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>million different back and whatever hip issues. If you've got

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it makes you handicapped, it probably doesn't.

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you've got like a terrible, terrible back and

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:23.359
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, that's more comfortable for you, I think

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm morally okay with it. If you were at the

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>office at an off hour, if you have a late

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>meeting and you're one of three people still at the

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>office at eight forty four pm, go ahead and use it, Okay?

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Would you never use it?

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 2>No? I don't use it.

0:55:38.760 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think that would be a reason for

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>me too. Sometimes when if I'm at the airport at

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>like five am and I've got a bunch of luggage

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's just easier in the in that stall, I

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>might go for it.

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think for the most part, it's kind of an

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 2>irrational fear. Sure it's not usually that heavily used, but

0:55:57.480 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 2>just a mental thing. I don't know.

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Sure. The one here kind of along the same lines.

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll do this one and one more.

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, someone asked for the etiquette and is there

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 2>like a line length any situation in which using the

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 2>opposite bathroom is acceptable, or what is the strategy for

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 2>using the opposite bathroom? Right, so your guy along line girls'

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 2>bathrooms open, you decide to make make the move, try

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and get in there and out. I think it's only

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 2>acceptable if you have pre screened to see what the

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 2>situation is there, like, if it's not heavily trafficked, then

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:39.879
<v Speaker 2>it's okay. And also if you can have someone's stand guard,

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 2>that would be right. If you have a century at

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the gate, that would be ideal.

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I probably just wouldn't. Yeah, I probably just wouldn't, just

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>to avoid any any sort of problematic situations that could

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 1>arise over undertie toilet paper, Which direction do you skew?

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not heavily in favor of one over the other.

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay. I used to be an under. I thought

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it was more aesthetically nice, but now I'm an over

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think I'm an over because I just why

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:14.279
<v Speaker 1>would I want something touching the walls? I don't need particles.

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm good, all right.

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So here's the deal. We've got one left, and I

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 2>want to try and actually help someone with this show.

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 2>We've got a lot of questions here. So my thought

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 2>is that because we've been doing one of these per month,

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 2>because it's a long off season, we should save these.

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 2>We should share this dock out, and we should we

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 2>should save these and use them moving forward, maybe sprinkle

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a few in here and there. But we got one

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 2>from a gentleman who's going to be living in a

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:45.000
<v Speaker 2>house with eight guys. Yeah, all right, this is from Michael.

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 2>He says next year, I'm living with eight other guys,

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 2>so nine guys in total in a house with only

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 2>two bathrooms. He says, at least there are four showers.

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Any general tips or advice.

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So if becoming an early riser is an option, I'd

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 1>go with that, uh for the household itself. I would

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:09.959
<v Speaker 1>also start scouting out. If you are in college and

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be on campus, figure out a super under

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>traffic bathroom that's on campus somewhere. I think we all

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>have figured out where that is.

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:19.480
<v Speaker 2>TI.

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you remember did you have a bathroom on Penn

0:58:21.200 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>State's campus?

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I did, Yeah, I did.

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Where was it in the uh the Hetzel Union Building

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>aka the Hub? Okay, mine was in the EMU also

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the UH the Union building. Sure, and it was on

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the floor where the radio station was, which you needed

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>like a passcode to get into.

0:58:36.080 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 2>The very's very smart dan So it was it.

0:58:39.480 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Smelled a little bit like cinnamon. It was wonderful.

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a secret Do you have a secret

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 2>bathroom at your current job?

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't, but we have the the individual ones, so

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not as needed. Here's somebody else asked this question,

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like it's sort of adjacent to this topic.

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Will you can you be strategic? We use different floors

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were going to have a lengthier stay. So

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in our old building, we used to be in Midtown.

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Now we're downtown in New York and Manhattan. In our

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>old building, we had the eighth, ninth, tenth, and fourteenth floor,

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and I worked on the ninth floor, and I would

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes go to the eighth floor for lengthier stays whatever.

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But apparently the tenth floor was super popular among people

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:33.400
<v Speaker 1>because that floor was like ninety percent women at least,

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So the men's room was a ghost town. So people

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 1>would go up there specifically to have some privacy. What

0:59:42.040 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess the people that went up there didn't realize

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>was that the people working in the office there was

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>glass doors and you go in whatever. All of the

0:59:51.320 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>women that worked for those you know, the office that

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was on the tenth floor could see people getting off

0:59:57.080 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the elevator and coming onto the floor. They would come

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>into the office so they wouldn't whatever, and they realized

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody that came up to the tenth floor that didn't

1:00:05.880 --> 1:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>walk into the office area was dropping a load. They

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>were just like so we could just chart people's schedules

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in trying to be less obvious. Everybody was indeed alerting

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that it was time.

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>This has been a very productive discussion.

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Dan absolutely, Ty absolutely, I love that. Email us at soliverbal.

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>At gmail dot com with more. We will promise to

1:00:32.720 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>sprinkle a few of these in as best we can

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>throughout the course of the next couple weeks. Here.

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still thinking about the dating thing, Ty, there's some

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>people who won't do it at all.

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I know married really won't do it. Yeah, email us

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 2>soliverbal at gmail dot com. Subscribe, find us on social media.

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>We got a bunch of other great questions that I

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:57.959
<v Speaker 2>think we want to get to in due time here,

1:00:58.720 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>and I promise we will so keep on sending them in.

1:01:02.640 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>We read all the emails. We do our best to

1:01:04.120 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>try and get through as many of them as we can.

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back next week talks more college football.

1:01:11.720 --> 1:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Again.

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Tell your friends solobuble dot com is the website for

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>that guy over there, Dan Rubinstein for myself, Ty Hildebrand,

1:01:18.160 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>thanks again for tuning in solib At showing a week

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 2>stay solid peace