WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - American Democracy Is Clogged, But Not Beyond Repair + The Constitution Needs An Update

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Thursday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. Here at Chuck podcast World Headquarters. The

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Thursday recording means we are at the end of our

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>production week of sorts, and we say of sorts because

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they've oh sixty or seventy other commitments that I feel

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like I'm constantly juggling here. But these are good problems

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to have, right you know, at the beginning of this

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>calendar year, there were not as many commitments, so that

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is a tribute to the growth of the audience. You

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>guys have been out there. You guys have been terrific.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Got my newsphere show coming up later this week, Please

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tune in for that. We'll have another another version of

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a preview of campaign twenty twenty five. You know, it's interesting.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I can tell that Campaign twenty twenty five is not

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>grabbing folks. You know, is not the you know I

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>assume on too day itself, people will be fascinated with it.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>You should tune in. I'm going to be doing an

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>election live stream along with pretty much all of my

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>friends in the political data geek world. We're going to

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>be doing it in partnership with my friend Chris Eliza

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Decision Desk HQ, which is quickly turning into the premier

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>organization for counting and calling elections these days, and so

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to this live stream. But it was interesting.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I did my preview on substack, and you could just

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of feel the And I think part of it

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is there's actually no drama in the top tier part

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of these races. So maybe that's why people aren't just

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>gobbling up every piece of information, whether it's Virginia governor,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>feels like you kind of know where that's going, New

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>York City Mayor, and the really drama is does he

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>get over fifty or not? And Mom, Donnie, I am

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>here to tell you folks, New Jersey Governor. I think

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got some drama to it. But for whatever reason,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the candidates are running. They're pretty normal politicians

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're so used to crazy thanks in the Trump

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>era that when you have two people running relatively normal

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>campaigns that would have been normal in the pre Trump era,

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it doesn't grab our attention, grab our attention

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the way all things Donald Trump grabs our attention. But

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this week you're reminded when Donald Trump is is in

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially halfway around the world and therefore time zone wise

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>halfway around the world as well. There is a perception

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of a slower news cycle in Washington, which frankly shouldn't

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be the case, because we're in the middle of a

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>government shut down and you're sitting there going where is

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the sense of urgency. We've got deadlines happening all over

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in some states, the expiration of funding

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for snap benefits for people for working poor and others

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>who need school assistant, school lunch assistants, things like that.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>The fact that that's expiring, that that isn't creating urgency

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>here is frankly a bit frustrating for someone like me

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>who's sort of a considers myself a reformist and just

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>wants to get things working. You know, I count myself

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>among those who views government like your toilet. When it

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work, I just want to do whatever it takes

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to get it working again, and then I don't want

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it to bother me that much overall, And I think

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we're the fact that we have a clogged toilet. The

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>collective American government is clogged, and nobody's even willing to

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pick up the plunger at this point is kind of frustrating,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think there is a I think it's obvious

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if you sort of sit back here and understand why

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going nowhere in shutdown negotiations at this point. Number one,

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been telling you there's no Donald Trump in the

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>room right his inability to sort of focus on this

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be dragged into the conversation. As he himself said earlier

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week, he is both the speaker and

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the president, and Mike Johnson cannot do a thing without

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Mike Johnson is a Spino speaker in name only.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He has to get all of his you know, whatever

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he needs to get done whenever he needs votes, he

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>has to get the White House involved, he has to

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>get Trump twisting arms. So he can't speak for the

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Republicans only. Donald Trump speaks for the Republicans. So that

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>inability right now of him engaging being interested in this

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of the problems. But there's a second problem here,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is sort of when you sort of look

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this century in particular, but really going back to the

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>two you can go all the way back to the

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Reagan era and note this, and that is when you

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have divided. When you don't have power

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>divided among the two parties, the moderates in both parties

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>become extraordinarily weak. There are a handful of moderates a

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>lot still left in both parties. They don't really have

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 1>power within their own conferences unless there is split government.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Unless there is a divided government Republicans controlling either one

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>House of Congress, Democrats controlling the other House, or obviously

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>split between the White House and Congress. And the fact

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know it's this is a you know, full

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican control of Congress, and you need but you do

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>need a bipartisan vote in order to open up the

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>government in the Senate. In the Senate without without this

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of split control, there is no incentive for the

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>moderates to sort of tiptoe out and work amongst themselves.

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't really have the gangs of the past, even

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of the recent past. Right, there's no cinema and mansion there.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But their empowerment either comes with when you're sitting literally

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at a fifty to fifty Senate, which we are not

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in this case, or you have this divided government. The

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>point is the lack and I think you can look

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at one of two ways. They're not enough moderates who

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>truly see themselves as moderates, or the moderates are too

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>weak politically to sort of step out in this moment

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the polarization issue in the country. But the

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is that's why we are getting nowhere. The

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>moderates have no power in Congress. And whether you want

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to argue, do they have a spine, I think they

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do have a spine, but you know it's within reason, right,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a soft spine, if you will, and without without

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the ability of sort of obvious compromise that has to

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be made because of split in a situation where there

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>would be split party control of some form or another.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact that there's not. There's just at this point

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there's I think the moderate Democrats, not enough of them

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>see enough to be gained. That said, I do think

0:06:55.880 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we're tiptoeing to a point where Democrats, frankly, probably a

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>week or two too late as far as it because

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>of some of the damage that's going to be done,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I still think they can declare victory here. They still

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have Donald Trump on the ropes with health care. He's

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of rambling about, oh, you know, we've got to

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>do something better than Obamacare. Dude, You've had ten years

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a plan. The Republicans have had

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years to come up with a plant better than Obamacare.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>They've yet to be able to agree on anything. Donald

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump had a whole term in Congress and couldn't do it.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>He had a whole exile, you know, he was exiled

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for four years, didn't focus on a health care plan,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and now here he is again sort of begging for

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>help to come up with an alternative to Obamacare. It's

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>just not going to happen because there is a policy

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>laziness on the right to come up with an alternative,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>because the only alternative that's affordable will deny most of

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you insurance. Right. The only way you can create affordable

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>insurance is if you create a healthcare situation where they

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>can deny insurance coverage for people that actually need it. Right.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But as long and at this point, there is a

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>baseline believe here, pre existing conditions cannot be used to

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>decide what your premiums are and whether you get insurance

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>coverage or not. And because of that, this is always

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get expensive unless there's a a tougher regulation

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on the insurance markets in general. Number one or number

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>two is sort of an acceptance that medicaid is America's

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic insurance coverage. Ultimately, I think that is what medicaid

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is basically become. But until there's sort of an acknowledgment

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's what it is going to be for the

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>country rather than always just based on income there, I

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much stability you're ever going to have

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the insurance markets there. But the point is the

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that Democrats orchestrated the shutdown and snap benefits are

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>going to expire. How do you explain that away long term?

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a tough thing to explain. Democrats have

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the power to open temporarily, open up this government, get

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this money flowing to the people that really need it,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and they still have Republicans on the defensive on healthcare.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the why keep this shutdown? This isn't going to

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>make this better for better politically. And I know I

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sound like a broken record here, but you're in a

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>great place at this point. Mike Johnson has completely abandoned

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>work here. You have a restive Republicans, there is a

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>divide among obamacares. You're going to win this And the

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>question is do you just hope that you can extract

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a little more political pain and hope it doesn't punish

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>more Americans while you extract and ounce more of political gain.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Here just something to think about as this shutdown drags on,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>as we get closer to November one, because oh, by

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, the bill that's been on the floor would

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>only open up the government till November twenty first. As

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>it is, so we're really starting to feel the pinch.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And if this is why, I think this is an

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>easy answer. If snap benefits are about to expire, Democrats,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>just vote yes on this thing. You're looking at three

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks and then you get to force leverage one more

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>time and healthcare premiums are out there for all to see.

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So look, no one said Chuck Schumer was really good

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at tactics. He has displayed a lot of mediocrity right now.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the fairest way to describe Chuck

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Schumer's leadership is kind of like Bill Belichick as coach

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of North Carolina Great career Hall of Fame coach Chuck

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Schumer peak. Chuck Schumer political savviness as good as anybody

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. You know, knew that there was

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>always a little bit of baggage trying to be a

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>national Democratic leader, but being based in New York City,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>always was really good at balancing it really well. You know.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I think now he's in the Bill Belichick coach of

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina faith. Every once in a while he calls

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent play. The game plan may be there,

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think in this moment where politics are today headed,

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera, I think tactically this has passed

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>them by. But the fact is both Jeffreys and Schumer

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>seemed paralyzed in some form here, and I think some

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of it has to do with what's going on in

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City and this divide inside the party and

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this fight inside the party between progressives and pragmatists, which

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is certainly really what is the overhang of

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this government shutdown strategy that were't in. But it leads

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>me to something else about Washington these days that I

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>thought I would share for my non Washington listeners. I

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think those that live in and around here, and we'll

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>find what I'm saying to be quite familiar. Look, I'm

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>participating in quite a few reform projects. Many of these

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>meetings or conferences that I go to or all Chatham

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>how rules meaning you know, we're we're We're there with

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>unique groups of people trying to figure out, you know,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's on the journalism side of things, ideas and

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>fixing this information ecosystem, how do we reanimate local news?

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If it's on the democracy reform side of things, you know,

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's with you know, do you break up the duopoly?

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you open things up here? Do we there

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>is this the moment to call for a constitutional convention?

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Things like that? And what's fascinating about Washington in this

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five, And I think I've discussed this before,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the sort of you vacillate between you know when when

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>you know right now in DC it's just a it's

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a weird feeling, right the way Trump sort of stormed

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the city this time, there's almost right he's there's there's

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>self segregation of the sort of political elite in Washington, right,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>MAGA only hangs out with MAGA. Then there are Republicans

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>who aren't MAGA, who still want to, who still believe

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's a Republican party, think like you know that

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>will exist after Donald Trump. I think the John Thune

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>wing of the party, right, whatever's left of there, which

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is really a lion's share of Republicans in Washington or

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>not MAGA, right, they are sort of institutionalists Republicans, and

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know they still you know that part of the

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>political bipartisan world. You still you still see that. But

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>MAGA is its own separate thing, right, The MAGA elite,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, payoff Donald Trump Junior for his club that

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he created. And then you have some of the you know,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the tech bros that have moved here, that throw their

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>own parties. They all just sort of mingle with each

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>other and all that. And there's in some ways that

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that group of people is constantly thinking out, hey, man,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no security right now in government contracts, government money,

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>there are no rules. What can we do in this

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>moment before the gig is up to sort of secure

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>government contracts? He said secure. It's a bit of a grift, right.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>They're just constantly saying, you know, hey, now that we've

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>got a president that will blow past any ethical line,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that there is a compliant Congress, a House Republicans set

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in particular, that will do whatever is asked. There won't

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>be oversight. It is open season for a certain group

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of lobbyists. And so there's basically three groups, three types

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of Washington gatherings these days. Right, There's those in that

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of mega lobbying world who are like, oh my god,

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a jewelry store without security, and there's all sorts

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of things we can get and everything is open season,

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, how do you make as much money

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.119
<v Speaker 1>off of this period in time where Trump is basically

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>created a no rules environment. Right, So that's one group

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of people who sort of are occupying Washington in this moment,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>who go to gatherings, but who are just there trying

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out out, Hey, this is there's never been

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at a time essentially to steal money from the government

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with nobody watching anything. What kind of schemes can we

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>come up with, Whether it's a crypto scheme, whether it's

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a creating a new you know, public private partnership for

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>screwing the government taxpayer. I think I made up that

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>last part, but the public private partnership I didn't. And

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>then there's two other sort of entities out there that meet. Right,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you have this group of of Democrats and it's two

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>different groups of Democrats that are constantly having various meetings. Right,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you have a progressive set is saying, okay,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a moment where progressives can take over the party.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>The established innshment has proved that they can't deal in

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trump era, they can't win in the Trump era. Clinton, Biden, Harris,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that wing of the party is atrophying, Schumer, Jeffreys.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't know what they're doing. This is the moment

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for progressives to takeover. So there's this, you know, instead

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, sort of a lot of a lot

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of gatherings that are about, you know, how can progressives

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of this moment. Then you have sort of

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>what's left of sort of the establishment wing of the party,

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>or the pragmatic wing of the party, or the frustrated

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats who want to win first, want to want to

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>rally the base into something and say, hey, look, the

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>goal should be to build a broader coalition that that

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>has an animated progressive base but also is appealing to

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>swing voters. And there's you know, those types of gatherings.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's the abundance debate that has recline.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Iglesias Derek Thompson have been sort of talking about,

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, is there better policy solutions that Democrats ought

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to be standing for that would be more appealing to

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a broad a broader set of the electorate. So you

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have those conversations, and then there's a third group of

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>gathering of gatherings, And this is the group of gatherings

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm most involved with. And one last week a trusted

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>with a organization that I've talked about before on this

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>podcast called Trusted Media, where it's a sort of it's

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a coalition of folks who have worked in government, worked

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in a national security space, including uh NSSA and CIA

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and State Department, who are concerned that the information ecosystem

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>is untrustworthy. And it's like, this is bigger than just

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a media problem, right, you know, this is this is

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>larger than that. So we did a gathering that gathered

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>business leaders, gathered scientific scientific experts, journalists, government of former

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>government officials talking about why you have if you don't

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>have trust, if our information ecosystem is untrustworthy, how this

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>suddenly essentially makes us less safe, you know, less safe

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>as a country, less safe. Uh individually, you know, when

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you think about health scares and viruses and things like

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that and less safe in your community. And so that's

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>one type of sort of gathering that I am anticipating

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in because we've got to fix this information ecosystem. It's

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not just about journalism. It's not just about you know,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what corporations have done, the legacy media, what big tech

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is doing and what and the AI impact is about

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>whether we're going to be able to you know, scientists

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can come up with something and it's trusted, and whether

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a doctor prescribing a pill won't get sort of distrusted

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>by their patients because of what doctor Internet is telling

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>them or is pretending to tell them, or what you know,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kennedy crazies are assuming at any moment in time.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>On that front, there's a reason results matter more than promises,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just like there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>large just injury law firm. For the last thirty five years,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they've recovered twenty five billion dollars for more than half

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>a million clients. It includes cases where insurance companies offered

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>next to nothing, just hoping to get away with paying

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as little as possible. Morgan and Morgan fought back ended

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania, one client was

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>awarded twenty six million dollars, which was a staggering forty

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>times the amount that the insurance company originally offered. That

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>original offer six hundred and fifty thousand dollars twenty six million,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>six hundred fifty thousand dollars. So with more than one

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand lawyers across the country, they know how to deliver

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for everyday people. If you're injured, you need a lawyer,

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You need somebody to get your back. Check out for

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the People dot com, Slash podcast, or dial pound law,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>pound five to nine law on your cell phone. And

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>remember all law firms are not the same, So check

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free unless they win.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also those that are in the They're

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they're there that are in the how do you stop

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>prevent Another Trump? And that group of folks are sort

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of the true what I call the true reformists because

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not partisans. That doesn't mean they don't have partisan

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>points of view that they do, but these are gatherings

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that include liberals and conservatives who have one thing in common.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>They're constitutionalists and they are alarmed by the fact that

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>there are so many entities essentially not using the Constitution right.

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>You have Corporate America choosing not to use it to

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>defend their First Amendment rights. You've had other companies choosing

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>not to use it to to defend their their various

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>constitutional rights when it comes to mostly frankly due to

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment issues in different free speech free speech issues.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's in this space that I'm also like to

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>get involved. And again, all of these are under Chathamhouse Rule,

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>so I'm you know, I don't want to I'm not

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going to out any individuals, but I wanted to share

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>an experience I had recently because it was a new

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>take on how to find hope. Right, there's there's always

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had somebody ask this question in the

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>last podcast. You keep using the expression your short term

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic but long term optimistic, and you know, explain that

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>more if you will, And you know, I always sit

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there and say, well, I'm my long term optimism is

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly due to our history, our nation's history, and that

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>we've had moments like this before where we're at a

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>fork in the road and you know, we can end

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>up in one direction or the other, and we sort

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of always end up in the right space. We meander,

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, I will reiterate what I love

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate the Martin Luther King quote about the arc

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of history. Well, an arc sometimes goes backwards before it

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>loops its way around to go forwards. And sometimes you

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>have to go backwards if you're going to if you

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to be able to do something that actually

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>takes this country forward. And it's pretty obvious that we

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have to update this constitution, we have to update the democracy.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's happening now with the redistricting wars is

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>just a symptom of this larger problem. I mean, we

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>now have Virginia is going to try to do this,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and you have Indiana is going to try to do this,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're in North Carolina is going to try to

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're just it's it's getting absurd, and it's

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>clear that we need to do a constitutional reform, specifically

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on this issue in particular, to sort of stop this madness,

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because what it is doing is disenfranchising voters, pure and simple. Right.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's state after state after state, partisan disenfranchising of voters.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Part stop. That's what Texas Republicans want to do to Democrats.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what California Republicans are doing to Republicans in California. Response,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>it's what Indiana Republicans are doing to Indiana Democrats. It's

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>what Virginia Democrats are going to be doing Virginia. You

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>see run point here, right, It is depending on the

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>state that you live in. If you're in a one

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>party control state, there's now an incentive politically to disenfranchise

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>voters of the other side. This is you know, I

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>could argue that all of this is it should be

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>covered by the equal Protection Clause in the Constitution, but

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to spell it out and spell

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>out exactly what is fair and what isn't on that front.

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>But the reason, you know, sometimes there's something that's staring

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you right in the face and you're like, well, duh,

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I should have of course, that's the best argument you

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>could make for why we shouldn't be afraid to ask

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the voters for big change. And this person was making

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the case that the second election of Donald Trump is

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>actually the best case you could come up with to

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>prove that Americans are looking for something different. They're not

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for status quo and The point is is that

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you can make an argument for something different, something big,

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>something bold. This is an electorate that if you persuade them,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if you go out there and make the case, you know,

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if you say to them, look, we've got we cannot

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>allow ourselves to again have seventy five year old presidents.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We have our second seventy five year old president. I

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>think we now second term in a row where many

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Americans have real questions about whether our president is all there. Right,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>There was obvious moments during the Biden presidency where that

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was an issue, and there are obvious moments pretty much

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>now every day with Donald Trump. Right, Donald Trump cleverly

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>set the bar of crazy so lower high, depending on

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.239
<v Speaker 1>how you want to describe the metric that you know

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was easier for folks to see that

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>something was wrong with Biden because we had seen a

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>competent version of Biden for so long in the public

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>SA square. With Trump, right, he's had his meandering, his weight, weave,

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>his crazy. He's been out there for so long that

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>only the folks that are following, that follow him super

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>closely start to notice that, hey, you know this he's using.

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>His vocabulary is shrinking. He seems to be harping on

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the same stuff. He seems to not quite always know

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>who's all there. And maybe some of it's laziness. I've

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>always said, a big chunk of Donald Trump's misspeak and

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, he's just lazy. Right. He never reads

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a speech before he gives it, you know, let alone

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>actually participates in the writing of any speeches. Right. I

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>don't even think he does the dictation into a into

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>his iPhone and then hey, transcribe this as a way

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to get started on a speech for speech writers. So

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there's always been an inherent laziness that weirdly has made me,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>has given me a sense of hope, hope, hope's not

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way, a sense of why I don't assume

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst, because he's too lazy to pursue the worst course, right,

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the worst course, you know, trying to consolidate power being

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>an authoritarian. There's actually some work that would have to

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be done, right, you know, if he truly were desired

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>untiltalitarian authoritarian, you know, presidency, he'd be orchestrating a campaign

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to amend the constitution to allow him to run again, right,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to come up with some sort of amendment that somehow

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>would allow him to run, but would bar Barack Obama

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>from running for a third term. Maybe it would be

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, presidents can run for reelection if they don't

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>win reelection the first time, or some bizarre thing, right,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the non consecutive to sort of find a to create

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a non consecutive term loophole. But the fact of the

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>matter is he's he and mag are too lazy to

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>pursue a constitutional option, right, So it's always at you know,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>if they really you know, if there's an easy shortcut,

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll try it. But if if it's a little more

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>legwork or if it's a little more effort, like writing

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a health care plan. You know, he's always claimed he

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>wants to come up with a better healthcare plan, that

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be easy, Well do it, write it. But

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he's lazy, right, you know, he's not. You know, the

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>reason our democracy is, I think safer than some people think,

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is because of how lazy he is. Just let's not

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, overestimate you know something. He may have desires,

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but he is too lazy to pursue some of those

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>some of those desires. But I want to go back

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to this optimism and I want to go back to frankly,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a call to action. I think we've all you know,

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>there's one of the ways that some people have explained

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump's success in twenty twenty four over Democrats has been

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's on the right side of eighty twenty issues,

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>right like the border wasn't turned out to be an

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty twenty issue. Transgender women in sports is an eighty

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty issue, you know. So he's been on where Democrats

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>have had to explain exactly why they're on the side

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of an issue that doesn't have popular support. And you

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>know the rule in politics if you're explaining you're losing.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Reforming this government and reforming our constitution is an eighty

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty issue, folks. The lack of leadership in the general

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>common sense middle has been quite frustrating. It does not

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>exist in this current Congress. Nobody has stepped up to

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>be the leader of the common sense movement that says, hey,

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what we've been doing these last decade is insanity. This

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. This is no way to run a lemonade stand,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>let alone the largest government in the on the globe.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's about time that we fixed the proverbial metaphorical

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>bridges and roads of the American democracy. Would you tell

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>folks about it? It's in eighty twelve. Yeah, that makes sense. Yeah,

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense that we need these things, getting rid

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of partisan primaries right like it is obvious. Now you've

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>got to connect these issues to people's day to day lives.

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It can't just be an esoteric Hey, this is what

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the founders would have wanted, right that that may appeal

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to someone like me, but that's not going to appeal

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to the to the everyday American who's not a political

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or civics junkie, who's simply trying to make the best

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of their lives, raise their kids, build a nest egg,

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and and have a good life in this country. But

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if you tell them that the current system is rigged

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>against them and you want to unrig the system, you

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>can't trust a part of politician to do this on

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>their own because either they don't have the power or

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they are never going to be looking out for you.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be looking out for their self interests.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>We need to prevent that. We need to create a structure.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We need to update the constitution to change our incentive structures.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether it's getting rid of partisan primaries, putting

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in a campaign finance reform minimum, putting in age maximums

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for serving in federal office, whether it's an appointment to

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court or running for the presidency. And yes,

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all of those are going to have to be constitutional amendments.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>If you have age minimums in the constitution, it means

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you have age maximums. The US House was supposed to

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>expand with the population. It is stopped, but you're going

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to have to force that into the constitution. There's an

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>easy metric to come up with on that point zero

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>zero zero one percent of the population. Boom done. You

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have your baseline metric for that, and it will easily

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>decide how many congressional districts state. And oh, by the way,

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college and the popular vote won't be as

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>easily split if you actually have a Congress and a

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>US House that fits the country. So if you already

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have a group of voters that are willing to experiment

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on the first African American president right where there was

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>some skepticism is this going to work? And they were

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to do it, And then you have group of

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>voters that are willing to basically a failed celebrity, fake

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>billionaire as president and try him twice because they want

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>because they know the current system is broken. So this

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is the good news. The voters already know the system

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is broken. What we need is a good leader from

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the common sense center that makes the case of, hey,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we can fix this. Are you tired of having to

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>just find a cult of personality that might be able

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the bull in the china shop to shake

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>things up? Right? That is not how you run a country.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That may be how you run a small business. Right,

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you get a better leader, and you might be able

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to transform a small business. It might be a better

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>way to run a football team. You don't want a

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>democracy deciding deciding a game plan for a football game.

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Your head coach does need to be an authoritarian of

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some sorts, benevolent. I think a malevolent coach these days

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work, but a benevolent authoritarian. But in this case,

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just this isn't going to be a functional solution. The

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>functional solution to the dysfunction that we have is to

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>update the rules of our democracy, update the blueprint of

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>our democracy. That's the constitution, that's the leadership that is necessary.

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And the fact is, and like I said, I just

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to channel. If you don't believe the public would

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>would support this, you haven't been paying attention. Right. The

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>public knows something's wrong, which is why they keep voting

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>against status quo. Whenever they get the chance, they keep

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing people out. Okay, but in fairness to the general public,

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they've got to live their own lives, and so you

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>need to If you lead them to the stream, they'll

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>drink the reform water. But someone's got to lead them

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to the stream, and you've got to galvanize it. And

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>again we have seen it. That's why I began with

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown and the lack of leadership from the Common

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Sense Center here, and this is what needs to happen.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue to sort of, you know, go

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, like we've erected barriers in front of

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the gutter. You know, they have little kids come up,

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they erect the little barrier so that they don't have

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to throw a gutter ball. So we always the system

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>does just enough to pure gutter balls presidencies, But we're

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of our ball is slamming back and forth. If

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we need is a bit a bit smoother set of leaders.

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But we're not going to get it without an updated

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>structure that creates the incentives, that makes it so that

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>some some terrible leader doesn't take advantage of our weak system,

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's for personal financial gain, or whether

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it's for some other pet project that they might have

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>their own narcissism, or whatever it is. And right now

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>our system is weak enough and rickety enough where we've

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>allowed that to happen, and the focus needs to be

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on preventing the next strump. In some ways, you know,

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can tie some things up with lawsuits and it

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>slows things down, it comes up the works, But the

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>real solution is going to be coming with fixing this

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>small d democratic infrastructure. But this lack of interest in

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a political leader making this the platform to run for

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>national office to galvanize the country on this has been

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>disappointing to me that that somebody hasn't had the guts

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to go down this road. But I actually think that

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you have an electorate that is hungry for this. They

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>don't fully know what they're hungry for, they know what

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to eat, but they're hungry for this.

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You just have to make the case and you have

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to connect it to hey, the shittiness that they feel

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about how government's been and not helping them live their lives.

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>This better structure will create the We'll create the opportunity

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>so that government can be put to work to simply

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>help you live your life better. So, look, I'm often asked,

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes I'm a bit pessimistic on here. You know,

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>give people something tangible to be hopeful on. The tangible

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>aspect is we have a hungry electorate that wants change,

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>wants reform. What we need is some leaders that have

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the guts to pitch the reform in such a way

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that it is not about themselves, that it is not

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>about Donald Trump alone. Okay, that is about you know,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>how we end it up in this situation, how two

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>parties exploited Rickety rules to do put us in the

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>situation that we're in. Because I promise you, I know

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 1>there's some of my friends of the left and think,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stop both sidesing this, or some of my friends on

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the right saying you're you're picking on Trump, You're not

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>doing you're not saying enough about how the left contributed

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to this. The point is we're never going to get

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>anywhere if we just argue about who's more fault. That's

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>why we need a leader that comes from the eighty

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>This is an eighty twenty issue, fixing the infrastructure of

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>American democracy. It's an eighty twenty issue, folks. We just

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>need the right leader to grab this, grab this platform,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and run with him. The good news is this electorate

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is hungry for it. They just haven't been given a

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>meal prepared for them in such a way that they're

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>ready to eat it. All right, Little Q and eight

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>DoD ask Chuck, this comes from Mike Salex. Uh. I

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is Mike P. From Salex, Iowa

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>or Mike P. Salex from Iowa. So as an Iowa guy,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see if Salex it is. It's town,

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So my apologies for not knowing Salex, Iowa. It's a

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>small city in Woodbury County near the Missouri River, so

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the western side of the state. All right, I see

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I see you there, I see you Salex, Iowa. So

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be My apologies, little Uh. My eastern Iowa

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>geography is much better than my western Iowa geography. But anyway,

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>here's your question. Chuck Love the podcast never missed them.

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what you think would happen if Democrats took

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>back the House with a five to ten member advantage

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and took the Senate fifty one to forty nine. You

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>think Dems would try and impeach Trump? Obviously they would

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>start huge amounts of oversight and slow down or completely

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stops agenda. Just curious on your thoughts. Did that happened.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I do not think there will be a third impeachment, Okay,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I really don't. It just it is. I don't think

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat will it will will instigate a third impeachment.

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>The only shot you would have at a third impeachment

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of Trump is if Republicans in the Congress were the

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ones to instigate it. For some reason, there's Democrats are

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to start this because the minute it becomes partisan,

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get anywhere. You're going to get

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. It's going to be a lot more fruitful, frankly,

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to do the oversight, a lot more fruitful to force

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this administration to tell to tell the country what it's doing,

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on military campaigns like what's going on in Venezuela,

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>what they've been doing with USAID, what's been happening at

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Education, what's been happening at HHS and

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the CDC that is, you know, there's a lot of

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some ways, impeachment would be a distraction

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>from all the work that in oversight, work that needs

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to be done in a variety of other places. So

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be politically it is. Look I

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 1>think Republicans in some places are going to use as

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>part of their count are messaging in the midterms that

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Democrats just want control of Congress in order to impeach Trump,

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to be trying to figure out how

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to goose the Trump voter to show up for the midterms.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I do think the impeachment issue is going

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhat salient in these campaigns, but mostly from

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Republican campaigns. And you're going to have I think a

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of Democrats running for the House and Senate saying no,

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to pursue impeachment, and probably saying it

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>on the campaign drum. So I don't expect an impeachment.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I expect rigorous oversight. I go back to something I

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hinted at in a previous episode, This is the bad

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>bet Corporate America's making this decision to essentially allow themselves

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to be extorted by Trump, whether it's to give money

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>to the building. Again, I could make a patriotic case

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for funding the building, and you know, and as the way,

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 1>presidential libraries are sort of kind of bipartisan money, people

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>will throw money at, you know, the Biden Library and

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the Trump Library right to sort of claim that they're

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>balancing themselves out. I think all of these corporate entities,

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>whoever's given money to the inaugural fund, whoever's given money

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:26.919
<v Speaker 1>to the to the building, these various crypto ventures, they're

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>all because while Trump may be able to use executive

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>privilege to prevent a lot of testimony from Trump appointed officials,

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Corporate America is not going to be able to hide

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from these subpoenas as well. And that's where I expect

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there to be a lot of action and potentially a

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of confessions, and where we'll find out exactly how

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>how Trump Trump World's extortionist tactics work, right, How does

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it work? There's going to be corporate entities that, if

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats get control, that are going to be put in

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>some uncomfortable positions thanks to subpoenis that's where I expect

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the most fruitful ways. And you may say, well, they'll

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>probably what gets uncovered. May say, hey, that's impeachable, of

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which I would argue anything's impeachable. It's whatever a majority

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of the House says, right it is. There's basically a similarity.

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You know how they say grand jury's you know you

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>can get it. You can indict a ham sandwich. Well,

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you can impeach a ham sandwich if a majority of

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the House decides to impeach anam sandwich. So anything to

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.479
<v Speaker 1>me and an impeachable offense, I think it goes into

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what should be an impeachable offense on that front. All right.

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Chris k out of South Carolina.

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Chris K Jr. Don't want to leave that out. We

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>got it have we got it wrong when it comes

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to how we compensate members of Congress and government officials. Lately,

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been wondering if better pay might attract more serious,

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 1>qualified individuals but service. If term moments are the future,

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 1>who besides the wealthy can afford to pursue a short

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>lived political career. Would a higher salary make it more palatable?

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Demanding stock trading and divesting from personal financial interests within

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that helped shift the focus from personal enrichment to public service.

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Civic duty may only go so far, go Hawkeyes. So look,

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I've always been a bit more empathetic of members of

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Congress and this salary. Right, I think you have to

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do this one of two ways. You either have to

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>make it easier to be a member of Congress and

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>have essentially have two living conditions. Right, the idea that

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress have decided they're going to sleep in

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 1>their office because they don't want to to pay extra

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 1>money for you know, a rental or something like this. Look,

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we out of corporate housing for members of Congress.

0:43:57.000 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we might have dormitories, right, you know,

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 1>high end dormitories, high in corporate housing. That was a

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 1>popular thing a decade or so ago. With remote stuff.

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's corporate housing is sort of not no, no, not

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as prolific as it once was. There was used to

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>be quite a few corporate housing complexes here in DC.

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>There's still a fair number because you do get a

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of temporary deployments in the government, particularly military or

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>defense contractors and things like that. But I think corporate

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>housing would be a more affordable way. You know, it's funny.

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I I think congressional pensions. I I don't think members

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of Congress should get a pension, but or if you

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>do get it, or it should be sort of if

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you want the pension, then you've got a band stock

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>trading like. I think you could do something like that

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, because once you've hit five, you

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>get this pension and it's you know, it's quite something.

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think staffers ought to be eligible for this stuff.

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think you could have a conversation about elected

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>official But look if you if you could, if you

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>had corporate housing so that there wasn't this pressure to

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>have two locations, if you could have remote voting. And

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think if we don't look the House of Representatives,

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if we if it were, if it were right sized,

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what with the ratio that it should be about, want

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:35.959
<v Speaker 1>to say, one for every four and one thousand people,

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we'd have about eight hundred somewhere between eight hundred and

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine hundred members of Congress eight hundred and eighty

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>one if you buy one calculation that I did, but

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between eight fifty and eight ninety and I do

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think that that would diversify the pool of people. It

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would sort of make it a little more accessible to

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>get in if if you will, but you allowed people

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to still could deal with their families, remote vote every

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, have remote committee meetings. I do

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think there should be some more flexibility where your main

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>office is your constituent's office and maybe you really only

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>have a small hideaway here in Congress. You know, there's

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there's very The bottom line is I think it's Congressional

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>salaries are awfully low for have to have two households, right,

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially two places to live. At one hundred and seventy

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year, that's you know, that's not yes,

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you get all your expenses paid, your travel expenses. You

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>know you're likely eating for free things like that. You know,

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if you told me we were going to have hard

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>term limits to you know, to your terms, and I

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>might be all in favor of doubling or tripling the

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>salaries because it's only a finite amount of time and

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>then definitely no pension on that if you did term limits.

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think it really just depends on This goes

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the need for a constitutional convention. I think

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>we would rethink all this if you will, I really do,

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think it all needs to be thought about here.

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>But corporate housing could help, and I think that would

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>lower the barrier or entry, the financial barrier to entry

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to some. I think that would help, making a little

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 1>more ease of participating in committee meetings, remotely voting from

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>your congressional district. You know, I might say you have

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to vote from your congressional office. You couldn't just vote

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>from anywhere remotely, that you'd have only either vote in

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the four of Congress or your vote from your official

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>district office. But I think there's a lot of room here,

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which is why we need a constitutional convention, all right.

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Greg from Alexandria, Virginia. You've talked

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot about political reforms, yes, I have, But what

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on the biggest reform of them all?

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>If you could waive a magic one, would you make

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the US a parliamentary system where the executive branch is

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.959
<v Speaker 1>chosen by the majority party in Congress? Things raise high, Greg,

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know no, and I'll tell you why. I thought.

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the most compelling articles I've read

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the American democracy was about a

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>month ago. I recommended it. If for some of you

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>may remember when I recommended this reading it. It was

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in Politico magazine, right, and I don't even know if

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they publish a hard copy, but it was under their

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>magazine section of their website. And it was a case

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of sort of like you know, it was as a writer.

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a political science professor was basically arguing that, hey,

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, all we read about is all the ways

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that were the democracy is eroding, but not explaining, like

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and comparing different things here with what to

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>happen in countries where the democracy failed. Right, Usually it's

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a comparison to something that happened in Germany in the

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties or thirties. But this person pointed out, hey,

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the countries that didn't fall to

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian fascism or authoritarian socialism versus the countries that did.

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Parliamentary systems are very vulnerable to authoritarian populists. You can,

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of, you can, you can you can

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>win with a minority. You know. The issue with a

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 1>parliamentary system and how it makes you, I think, more

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to an authoritarian is that you can win with

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>a minority, you know, with the largest minority, and then

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>cobble together a majority to hold power, you know, using

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, just look at how net Nyahu has held power.

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>He's held power by cobbling together a majority in order

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to get power in the Knesset even though none of

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>those parties have sort of majority support in the country, right,

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And so you can you can sort of win small

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>d democratically and have a government that is immediately unpopular

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with a majority of the country because it's not what

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a majority of the country voted for. So, you know,

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's funny when I grew when I was growing up,

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in a household that was I think

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>i've expressed this, that was, you know, somewhat divided politically.

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So I grew up in a very bipartisan way, sort

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of always being shown you know, well at this point

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of view, that point of view, and I'm always was

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.879
<v Speaker 1>very thankful of that. You know. My mother and father

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in some ways were training me for this job, and

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they fully do it, and my father

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't would occasionally make the argument in favor of a

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:51.720
<v Speaker 1>parliamentary system and he was, you know, he was somebody

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>who was frustrated that Democrats always had control of Congress,

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>even though a majority of the country seemed to prefer

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, more center right politics, right, and

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that was in an era, right we kept electing Republican

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>presidents because we had the assumption was, well, Democrats always

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 1>control Congress, and for like forty years it felt like

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they did, right, that this was just sort of the

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>permanent majority, and that was the case. I mean in

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, you know, we were in the thirty fifth,

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, thirty seventh, thirty eight, forty, you know, a

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>year of democratic control of the House, and and the

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:29.720
<v Speaker 1>six years that Republicans controlled the Senate in the eighties

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time was sort of a I think the

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>first time that happened in a couple of decades. So,

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he would occasionally express interest in that. But

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the older I've gotten and that that article really you know,

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 1>I could I could go back and forth. I mean,

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:51.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a I think the ideal system is more I'd

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like to see a four party system in presidential runoffs.

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the top four system is probably the best

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of both worlds, where it forces some coalition building right

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:08.279
<v Speaker 1>where you'd have the top two party vote gethers then

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 1>meet in a runoff so that somebody wins fifty percent

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of the presidency. That I think that that's the system.

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I would want four major parties, top four, you know,

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, no other third part you know, no other

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>top four political parties, you know, no independence you'd have

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to form your own party to get on the ballot.

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 1>That might be one reform I might include in here,

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but top four party nominees, you know, essentially, you know,

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>can get major party status in any election cycle, and

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the top two vote getters meet in the runoff, and

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>then they figure out in a democratic way with the voters,

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>rather than in a back room smoke filled way that

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 1>would happen in a parliamentary system whose voters you go

0:52:59.840 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 1>out after to build your coalition. I think you would

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>get the best of what parliamentary systems give you, which

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a force of compromise coalition building without

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerability of minority authoritarianism. Next question comes from David

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in Highland Park. All right, hey, check, I'm a longtime

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fan of yours. Thank you love the podcast. SAW sixty

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:25.840
<v Speaker 1>minutes interview with Dana White on Sunday, and I couldn't

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>help but notice this a couple of weeks ago. Now

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm catching up. I'm trying to catch up on some questions.

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So my apology, but couldn't help but notice the softness

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of the questions as well as not asking once about

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 1>his efforts to change the Mohamad ali ak. Is this

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a signal that sixty Minutes and CBS are transitioning to

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a fox stout propaganda machine. Side note, I used to

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be a sports reporter in Tallahassee and some of the

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>most intense football, baseball, and basketball rivalry games were between

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Miami and FSU. Yes, sir, they are were, That's for sure.

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd almost say the baseball games equal the intense hatred

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>between the two schools on the football field. In your mind,

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>who is Miami's most hated rival regardless of sport? Keep

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>making these podcasts. Your unique long term optimism means a

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>lot in these uncertain times. Kindly, David, thank you for that. Yes, look,

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to realize that the Dana White

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>interview happened what like one week after Paramount announced a

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 1>massive investment in UFC rights. Right for paramount plus and

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:25.799
<v Speaker 1>all of that. So I think, look, I think what's

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fair to say is on what you're going to see

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:32.839
<v Speaker 1>with sixty and this, And I kind of almost want

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to defend the promotion. As long as sixty minutes can do,

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to devote a segment to something hard hitting.

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can sort of, you know, you can

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>accept the premise that, hey, corporate overlords want to promote UFC,

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:59.919
<v Speaker 1>so here you go, and you can sort of suck

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>up and accept it. And by the way, I would argue,

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes is always sort of have They've always preserved

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one of their pieces for something soft, for sort of

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a cultural icon. That and and those interviews never have

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 1>heard any questions. And you can go back to the

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike Wallace days and know that those things existed, right

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there was like they would almost have three types of segments,

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and I suspect that because of the sixty minutes brand,

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll still have this, You'll have one that was basically

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to service the football viewer, right, so they could they

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the sixty minutes is mostly a ratings

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 1>juggernaut thanks to football, right, you sort of can see

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the distinction between sixty minutes ratings in the spring versus

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the fall. But there's always been sort of the tough,

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hard hitting piece, the think piece, the analytical piece, and

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>then the soft piece, right the entertainment piece. And in sports,

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:03.799
<v Speaker 1>they've always kind of been soft. So I understand, I'm

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not disputing your observation here. I had the

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>same reaction, And I think Dana White in particular has

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been a polarizing figure and probably deserves some questioning in

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a in a straight news setting, and you're not. And unfortunately,

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty clear that in that first week of

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Paramount Control, sixty wasn't going to do that. I'm guessing

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, it's Dana White's not the prime minister

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of a country, and he's not a US senator, and

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not a governor. So it is it is, you know.

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I also don't know if you know, if you're if

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>we're going to totally hammer them for this. Do I

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wish they did a little accountability with him. I do

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>with Brian Gumble and real sports mean, but there's a

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>reason real sports existed even in the era of sixty minutes,

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:55.839
<v Speaker 1>because sixty minutes never did sports in a hard any way,

0:56:56.640 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Real Sports and my friend Brian Gumble that was another story, right,

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>they'd have done a piece on Dana White that that

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that would have that would have either included him or

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>not included him. But that might have been And by

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, I miss Real Sports and Bryant. If anyone

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>gets this to you, man, just thinking about you, hang

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>hang in there. But that was you know, I think

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian Gumbele is one of the last great sports journalists

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on that on that on that run, if you will.

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>As for Miami's most hated rival, I don't hate Florida State.

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just because I'm married to a Florida

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:46.760
<v Speaker 1>State alum. This was true even before, Right, It's what

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>made my family accept the Florida State alum and why

0:57:50.840 --> 0:57:55.600
<v Speaker 1>her family accepted a Miami fan because it's a sibling.

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Florida State has always been a sibling rivalry. The heated

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 1>rivalry for Miami's is basically for me and my childhood

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is Notre Dame. But that was more of we were like,

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 1>screw Notre Dame. Right, We were not Notre Dame's biggest rival,

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but we felt Notre Dame was ours. And it's the

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>same with Florida. So the hatred is for the Gators

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and Notre Dame. But I'll even admit my hatred for

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame is softened with Marcus Freeman, as I just

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's a stand up dude, and I think that

0:58:25.040 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's there's less arrogance to the team, Right, Lou Holtz

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>plus Notre Dame. I mean, you couldn't have come up

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with an easier sort of villain to deal with. And oh,

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:40.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Steve Spurrier and Florida combo platter was

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a good set of villains for me. And throw an

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 1>urban Meyer and Florida was a good combo platter for that.

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's never even been a coach pairing with

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Florida State that says, oh, what a jerk coach? You know.

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Do I think what Jimbo did to them was a

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 1>jerky move? Yes, I don't think he was a jerk

0:58:56.920 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>coach on that front. So I think, Look, the ESPN

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>archives will tell you. I think who Miami's you know,

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 1>most hated rival is. For a certain generation of Miami fans,

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it's those boys from South Bend, that's for sure. All Right,

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do one more question here and then

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll just in college football. Gillian F. Frights, Hey, Chuck,

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to your podcast on the treadmill this morning.

0:59:26.080 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Had to write in, I share your belief that political

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>violence is no place in America, but I disagree that

0:59:29.920 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's equally fueled by all sides. I never said it

0:59:32.560 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was equally fueled by all sides in reference. In fact,

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been my frustration from my view, the rhetoric and

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>inaction on gun violence coming from the right epitomized by

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk's comments about accepting gun violence to protect the

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment, drive much of today's dangers. His racist and

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>homophomic remarks like saying black women lack the brain power

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be taken seriously make that hypocrisy even starker. As

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a pre k teacher and mother of an adopted black daughter,

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I find it infuriating, especially when those same voices hide

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>behind Christianity. I appreciate the pod Joan, I, I don't

1:00:02.720 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not gonna First of all, you're you're

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>your concern. I get it, and I and I share it.

1:00:12.600 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>My point on all this is trying to trying to

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>win the debate that one side does this more than

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the other is an unwinnable debate because it just it's

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>no way to get anything done. Like you're going to

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have to if you want to get a larger focus

1:00:29.280 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on this issue, you're going to have to let someone think, well,

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going more than halfway, so I'll meet them there

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and vice versa. It just you sort of have to

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to. It doesn't matter if it's thirty sixty

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or sixty thirty. If everybody's going to come to the table,

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>there has to almost be this sort of Okay, we're

1:00:53.160 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>all going to admit some fault here, but we're all

1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>secretly going to believe the other side's more at fault.

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna we're gonna we're gonna stop that part

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the argument and accept the premise that we've got

1:01:02.840 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to turn the temperature down. So that's that's, you know,

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>my nuanced way of trying to go about this, like

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, you know, trying to own a moment

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that's terrible, particularly when it you know, came from one side,

1:01:16.560 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, did come from from you know, this person

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was inspired. You know, there's enough political violence inspired by

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the left and the right to say there's a problem

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>on both sides. Is it equal. It's never equal. There's

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>moments in time that that one rises more than the other.

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It's never equal. But it is very reactionary and violence

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>always is met with more violence, and so we have

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop. And we could probably agree that, you know,

1:01:48.360 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I do. I think Donald Trump is responsible for the atmosphere.

1:01:52.200 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he creates the political weather. That does not

1:01:56.000 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>mean somebody that's inspired to violence on the left while

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>due to the weather that Donald Trump is created, that

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that person that we should blame Trump for that person

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on the left's actions. No, the person on the left's

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>actions are who responsible for that action? Anyway? I hope

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that gives a little more clarity to what the argument

1:02:20.600 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to make and why it's not about whether

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I am not. And this is where people people sometimes

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with this both sides stuff it is they use it

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>as a way to compartmentalize and ignore the times where

1:02:37.320 --> 1:02:41.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe an ally isn't behaving correctly. And I think that's

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's our problem right now in our polarized system. The

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>left doesn't police the left, and the right doesn't police

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the right. The right only wants to police the left.

1:02:50.120 --> 1:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And the left only wants to police the right, and

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>until we get out of that cycle, we're going to

1:02:57.320 --> 1:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>be stuck in this place that we're stuck in. I'd

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>be remiss if I didn't admit that I'm now two

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>days removed from that eighteen inning game, and I still

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like I haven't recovered from enough sleep. I fell

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>asleep between innings twelve. Sort of, I sort of woke

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>up when Kershaw survived it got out of the inning.

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see him come in. I was like, oh,

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw's pitching, but he survived the inning. And then I

1:03:36.760 --> 1:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>kept watching that game, and you know, it was interesting.

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to somebody, somebody who talked about being

1:03:46.160 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>at that game. You know, when you're at a game

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like that, you don't actually know some of the little

1:03:51.000 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>things that's going on. I mean, I was mesmerized in

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth by the fact that Yamamoto was warming up

1:03:57.960 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to come in in the nineteenth and Shane Bieber was

1:04:00.520 --> 1:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>stretching to get ready to warm up to come into

1:04:02.880 --> 1:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth. So as a as a baseball fan, I

1:04:07.040 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was sort of kind of rooting for the nineteenth inning,

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But then all of a sudden, it was two forty

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>five e straight time, and I was like, man, I

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't fall asleep. But anyway, it was just a mess

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on that front. But I know some of you have

1:04:18.800 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>known me a long time agoing, aren't you a Rabbit

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Dodger fan? You know, aren't you excited about this? And

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know the rise of the Gnats. My son's love

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Nats really has I've, you know, so the

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>first time I've lived in a city with a major

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>league team. So I'm I'm more Nats fan, you know,

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers of the team of my youth. I still

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>collect Dodger paraphernalia from my youth and even further back.

1:04:40.960 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a Roy Campanella collector because that was

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>my dad's favorite player. I collect any cool, affordable pieces

1:04:49.040 --> 1:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I can get, Jackie Robinson and Don Newcomb. I just

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>love those, those those early Dodger players, and of course

1:04:55.160 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all things Sandy Kofax. You know, as Jewish Americans, we

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>love our avatar in Sandy, if you will. So I

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>still sort of glorify the past. My greatest memory as

1:05:09.920 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a Dodger fans the eighty eight World Series, watching watching

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers win that World Series with my dad on

1:05:15.360 --> 1:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>his deathbed, but he did get to see the Dodgers

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>winning win that World Series from there, So it is

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>there is so much and so I will always root

1:05:27.440 --> 1:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Dodgers as my second team. But as I

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>learned during the NATS playoff run of the teams, whenever

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they were matchup with the Dodgers, I wanted the Nets

1:05:37.040 --> 1:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to win. So I knew that the switch had been

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the switch had been complete. But wow, is it so

1:05:44.400 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>much fun to watch Otani play baseball. I mean, it's

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just unbelievable. Five walks, nine reached base nine times in

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>one game, four for four and it's not even the

1:05:55.440 --> 1:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>best game that he played this postseason. It's just astonishing,

1:05:59.360 --> 1:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is awesome when great players are great

1:06:03.280 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in big moments. It's just awesome, right, It's amazing when

1:06:08.320 --> 1:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they step up in great moments, right, Like it's like,

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll tell you when I finally sort of

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>got over my sort of denial that Brady was great

1:06:15.680 --> 1:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was the twenty eighth to three Super Bowl,

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You're like, the dude did it in a Super Bowl, right,

1:06:20.160 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that at a Super Bowl? Right? You just

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>when great players are great in big moments. It's there's

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing like it. It's just a joy to watch as

1:06:29.400 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a sports fan, even if it's for a team you're

1:06:31.480 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>not rooting for. All right, let's talk about this weekend

1:06:33.640 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in college football, because guess what, I'm about to go

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>see my beloved Miami Hurricanes in person for the fourth

1:06:39.840 --> 1:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>time this year. Went to the Notre Dame game, went

1:06:42.280 --> 1:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Florida game, went to the Florida State game,

1:06:44.600 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>going to the SMU game. Close Listeners' podcast know I

1:06:48.480 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>now have a divided family. I my mother, my kid's grandmother,

1:06:53.200 --> 1:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>tried to get the tried to get a Miami SMU

1:06:56.880 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>half and half shirt and she but she's tried so far,

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>claim that they don't have the copyrights to do that.

1:07:05.880 --> 1:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd love some advice from any of you on how

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to do those divided loyalty shirts, because I can tell

1:07:13.000 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you I have a mother and grandmother who would both

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like to be wearing Miami some sort of joint Miami SMU.

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not the most requested dual jersey type things out there.

1:07:26.200 --> 1:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>They're probably there are Miami Florida State divided loyalties. Those exist.

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing the big Miami, Florida State SMU ones are

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to come by, but if anybody has advice on

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>how to do that, I would love to have it.

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So I will be seeing SMU in person there. I'm

1:07:42.440 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lie little concerned, not as concerned as I

1:07:46.200 --> 1:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was going into the Louisville game. But this is Miami's

1:07:49.160 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>first road game out of the UH, out of the

1:07:54.040 --> 1:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>state of Florida, believe it or not, first time they

1:07:56.000 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have traveled outside the state of Florida. This is a

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>small stadium, but this is going to be an excited

1:08:01.200 --> 1:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>SMU fan base. It's a good thing for Miami that

1:08:04.320 --> 1:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a day game, not a night game. I

1:08:06.240 --> 1:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think this would be a much tougher atmosphere if this

1:08:08.360 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>were at night there. But I'm looking forward just my

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>first in person SMU football game, if you will, so

1:08:15.240 --> 1:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that. That should be fun. I do

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>wish SMU had won last week, because then I think

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it would make this game a little bit bigger. The

1:08:22.520 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 1>game would have probably been later in the afternoon, maybe

1:08:24.560 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>even at night, and oh, by the way, game Day

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>might have been there. In fact, I think game day.

1:08:29.360 --> 1:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine, like they assumed Penn State. Ohio State

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would be where they would go, or maybe Miami SMU.

1:08:36.080 --> 1:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>I think they're out west, They're doing Utah, Cincinnati. Anyway,

1:08:41.600 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we shall see. But I think the most important thing

1:08:45.960 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is is there any coach that gets fired this week

1:08:49.600 --> 1:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>for performance? Or are we done with all the fired

1:08:53.960 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>coach games? Right? I guess the only coach that it

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>might be on the hot seat before the end of

1:09:00.360 --> 1:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the season at this point is Luke Fickle at Wisconsin,

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:05.479
<v Speaker 1>but he has you know, been shut out and back

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to back games. Frankly played a slightly better game against

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Oregon than I think many people expected last week. He's

1:09:12.800 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>probably the only in person, the only coach left that

1:09:16.200 --> 1:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>could get at least in the power for that could

1:09:18.760 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>get candled. Though what happens if Brent Benables loses two

1:09:25.640 --> 1:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of the next three games just something to think about

1:09:28.880 --> 1:09:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in Oklahoma. But anyway, so we got the big Miami

1:09:31.760 --> 1:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>SMU game. Other than that, I think that you know

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoff implication games, Mimi SMU is one of them, right.

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>The third loss for SMU eliminates them, right, and they're

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>basically they have a very narrow path at the ACC

1:09:46.280 --> 1:09:50.519
<v Speaker 1>title game. But it does seem unreal. And I'm really curious, right,

1:09:51.200 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>three loss teams this week who maybe had visions of

1:09:57.960 --> 1:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>making the playoff, how do they perform? Right? How does

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:07.599
<v Speaker 1>an lsu perform? I just just very curious on those front. So, anyway,

1:10:07.880 --> 1:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>the playoff oflmitigation games Vanderbilt Texas. Right, if Vanderbilt beats

1:10:11.640 --> 1:10:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Texas backup quarterbacks starting this week at Texas, what happens

1:10:16.680 --> 1:10:27.519
<v Speaker 1>if backup quarterback does well? Anyway? As a gambler, Texas underdog?

1:10:28.160 --> 1:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Are they an underdog? I think they're going to be

1:10:29.680 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a slight favored by game time and kickoff. Look, Vanderbilt

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>wins this one, and I think they lock a playoff spot.

1:10:36.040 --> 1:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Vanderbilt loses this one and they may not, I don't

1:10:39.800 --> 1:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. Then they have to win out, and I

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:43.479
<v Speaker 1>do think if they went out, which would mean a

1:10:43.560 --> 1:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>victory over Tennessee they attended to, Vanderbilt does get into

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the playoff, but nine and three Vanderbilt doesn't at this point.

1:10:49.880 --> 1:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So and certainly for Texas, this is a playoff elimination game,

1:10:54.240 --> 1:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and they can. They have the schedule to win out.

1:10:56.040 --> 1:10:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Now they have to play Georgia and A and M.

1:10:57.680 --> 1:10:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Only anybody thinks they're going to win both those games.

1:11:00.080 --> 1:11:02.639
<v Speaker 1>But guess what, when they were preseason number one ranked

1:11:02.640 --> 1:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>team in the country, I think there was some assumption

1:11:04.320 --> 1:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that they they could and so in the Texas defense

1:11:09.040 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good. Point is Vanderbelt Texas. They gets a

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff elimination game. The other playoff elimination game is probably

1:11:18.320 --> 1:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma Tennessee. Certainly a third loss for either team, and

1:11:23.400 --> 1:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that's it, right, That's that's done. There's no I don't

1:11:27.240 --> 1:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing a three loss team get into this

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>playoff win the first three loss team that isn't a

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:35.519
<v Speaker 1>conference champion because we've had that with Clemson, but a

1:11:35.600 --> 1:11:39.759
<v Speaker 1>three loss team at large that gets into the playoff,

1:11:40.360 --> 1:11:42.599
<v Speaker 1>it will be an SEC team and it will be Alabama,

1:11:42.680 --> 1:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame. Those are right now. I think the only

1:11:45.400 --> 1:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>two programs that the ESPN Invitational because it is and

1:11:50.479 --> 1:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, my friends at ESPN don't like

1:11:53.160 --> 1:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>when I want I refer to that. But it's it's hard.

1:11:57.200 --> 1:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we know that that stuff matter. Okay, that

1:12:02.240 --> 1:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff matters because if it were straight metrics, they'd tell

1:12:06.560 --> 1:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>us it was straight metrics, and it is not right.

1:12:08.960 --> 1:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>There's there's enough leeway there in order to find ways

1:12:13.200 --> 1:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you find ways to get bigger programs

1:12:16.640 --> 1:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>into this thing. So sorry, Vanderbilt, you're not going to

1:12:20.439 --> 1:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be the first three loss SEC team to crack the playoffs.

1:12:23.400 --> 1:12:28.519
<v Speaker 1>So playoff elimination game there, playoff elimination game. Oklahoma Tennessee

1:12:29.720 --> 1:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and technically I think Cincinnati Utah, USC Nebraska are both

1:12:35.360 --> 1:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>playoff elimination games. But you have to believe that USC

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska are are somehow realistic. If the winner of this

1:12:41.439 --> 1:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>game could win, could win out now they both could.

1:12:45.840 --> 1:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's the point. Big ten and SEC you know,

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>ten and two Big ten teams we're going to are

1:12:52.000 --> 1:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>going to get strong consideration, and ten and two SEC

1:12:54.680 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>teams are almost all going to get in. And USC

1:12:57.360 --> 1:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska still technically can both become ten and two teams.

1:13:00.120 --> 1:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So loser, though, you know you're out. So that's why

1:13:04.200 --> 1:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to that. And Cincinnati Utah, right, the loser

1:13:07.320 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of this game is going to not be able to

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:11.719
<v Speaker 1>get to that Big twelve title game, but the winner

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to. I think the winner is still going

1:13:13.880 --> 1:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to feel alive. So I have to say this is

1:13:17.439 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>where I love the addition of this playoff and I'm

1:13:20.000 --> 1:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all for making sixteen team shoot. I like the twenty

1:13:23.080 --> 1:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>four and twenty eight team idea that the big ten

1:13:25.120 --> 1:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>through a round. Actually I could get behind that idea

1:13:29.160 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think you could actually make it a little

1:13:31.320 --> 1:13:34.639
<v Speaker 1>more metric based and keep the ESPN TV executives out

1:13:34.640 --> 1:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of the decision making process. But the point is this

1:13:38.400 --> 1:13:42.519
<v Speaker 1>expanded playoff means we have essentially playoff games. Look, Miami,

1:13:42.760 --> 1:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, sorry Miami to say this. Do I

1:13:46.600 --> 1:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think at ten and too Miami team should have been

1:13:48.680 --> 1:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>invited last year? Yes, should attend into Miami Team probably

1:13:51.720 --> 1:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>get invited this year? Yes? Will they? No? Not unless

1:13:56.640 --> 1:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's Miami and Notre Dame for the last two slots,

1:13:58.880 --> 1:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they'd have to give it to my me

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:03.519
<v Speaker 1>since might be beat Notre Day. But I think Miami

1:14:03.600 --> 1:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>has to operate on the one loss mindset and that

1:14:09.000 --> 1:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>every game now is a playoff game. And this is

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the real test for me with Mario and this staff,

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which is and this team is do you have these

1:14:18.120 --> 1:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>team mentally prepared to realize that every game is an

1:14:21.680 --> 1:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>elimination game going forward, there can't be any slip ups.

1:14:27.479 --> 1:14:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I was sorry to see Shannon Dawson take the bait

1:14:29.920 --> 1:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of some straightforward media questions about about run calls, the

1:14:35.200 --> 1:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>play calling on the run side of things. Never let

1:14:38.280 --> 1:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>them see your sweat, Shannon, You've been pretty smart about

1:14:41.040 --> 1:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that going forward. Don't do it. Don't do it. You

1:14:43.920 --> 1:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>never win a debate with crazy fan boards, So don't

1:14:46.800 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>try to win the debate with fan boards simply saying, Hey,

1:14:50.280 --> 1:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've been pretty happy with our run game.

1:14:52.000 --> 1:14:54.759
<v Speaker 1>You could just say it. You know, we've got running

1:14:54.840 --> 1:14:57.559
<v Speaker 1>backs that know that are more comfortable running in those

1:14:58.120 --> 1:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>small A and B gaps. You know, we are better

1:15:00.479 --> 1:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to answer that question without getting defensive on the

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>play calls. And you know you do try to run outside, right,

1:15:07.760 --> 1:15:10.599
<v Speaker 1>That's what jet sweeps are for, and a few other things.

1:15:13.000 --> 1:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But I thought the defensive nature of your response, it

1:15:18.000 --> 1:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>strikes me that you're feeling some pressure. I get it.

1:15:22.240 --> 1:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the big time. All of you are going

1:15:23.840 --> 1:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to feel pressure. I understand it. But always think about

1:15:33.400 --> 1:15:37.559
<v Speaker 1>your answer before you say it, especially in this media climate.

1:15:38.240 --> 1:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I am happy, by the way, Coach Chris Ball, if

1:15:39.960 --> 1:15:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you would like to hire me for any media training

1:15:41.760 --> 1:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for any of your coaches, count me in for that.

1:15:44.960 --> 1:15:48.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, With that, I've gone ramblan long enough, by

1:15:48.560 --> 1:15:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the way, for you NFL gamblers out there, nine home dogs,

1:15:53.080 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>be careful out there, and with that, I'll see you

1:15:55.880 --> 1:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>next week.