WEBVTT - Civil War is Solvable (Again)

0:00:15.076 --> 0:00:24.476
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. This is solvable. I'm Anne Applebaum. The answer is

0:00:24.516 --> 0:00:29.996
<v Speaker 1>not to turn inward, to retreat into competing factions, distrusting

0:00:30.036 --> 0:00:33.596
<v Speaker 1>those who don't look like you, or worshiped the way

0:00:33.636 --> 0:00:36.156
<v Speaker 1>you do, or don't get their news from the same

0:00:36.236 --> 0:00:42.076
<v Speaker 1>source as you do. We must end this uncivil war. Thankfully,

0:00:42.116 --> 0:00:45.756
<v Speaker 1>President Biden was using poetic language in his inauguration speech

0:00:45.876 --> 0:00:49.596
<v Speaker 1>on November twentieth, twenty one. The US is not in

0:00:49.636 --> 0:00:53.316
<v Speaker 1>a state of civil war, but certainly with the insurrection

0:00:53.356 --> 0:00:57.756
<v Speaker 1>at the US capital, uncivil actions by US citizens as

0:00:57.796 --> 0:01:01.476
<v Speaker 1>well as our deep divisions were on full display. What

0:01:01.636 --> 0:01:05.516
<v Speaker 1>is it that they want? What are their concerns, What

0:01:05.716 --> 0:01:09.956
<v Speaker 1>are their ideals their objectives. If you don't have an

0:01:09.996 --> 0:01:13.116
<v Speaker 1>idea of what they want, it's very difficult to negotiate.

0:01:13.596 --> 0:01:17.236
<v Speaker 1>Negotiation is a way to mitigate tension. Another is to

0:01:17.236 --> 0:01:20.756
<v Speaker 1>elevate truth and distinguish it from fiction. But just how

0:01:20.836 --> 0:01:23.476
<v Speaker 1>best to pursue any of these tactics can be harder

0:01:23.516 --> 0:01:27.036
<v Speaker 1>to discern. Here it's solvable. We're going to explore these

0:01:27.116 --> 0:01:29.716
<v Speaker 1>questions and others as part of a series examining the

0:01:29.756 --> 0:01:34.876
<v Speaker 1>strength of democracy and how to solve polarization in the US.

0:01:34.996 --> 0:01:37.876
<v Speaker 1>President Biden has inherited a nation that is not just

0:01:37.956 --> 0:01:41.156
<v Speaker 1>politically polarized, but it's also reeling from a long history

0:01:41.156 --> 0:01:44.836
<v Speaker 1>of racial trauma. We know that anger and pain don't

0:01:44.876 --> 0:01:48.236
<v Speaker 1>disappear with the installation of a new president. Every peace

0:01:48.276 --> 0:01:53.036
<v Speaker 1>process boils down to where you draw the line between

0:01:53.156 --> 0:01:57.476
<v Speaker 1>peace and justice. No matter where you draw the line,

0:01:58.476 --> 0:02:02.596
<v Speaker 1>there will always be some people from one side seeking

0:02:02.676 --> 0:02:06.156
<v Speaker 1>more justice or from the other side seeking more peace.

0:02:06.756 --> 0:02:10.596
<v Speaker 1>Je Manuel Santos was awarded the Nobel Prize in twenty sixteen.

0:02:10.916 --> 0:02:14.236
<v Speaker 1>He is the former president of Columbia. He is credited

0:02:14.236 --> 0:02:17.796
<v Speaker 1>with reuniting his country by ending its deeply divisive civil war,

0:02:18.276 --> 0:02:22.356
<v Speaker 1>a conflict that lasted more than fifty years. Columbia makes

0:02:22.396 --> 0:02:26.316
<v Speaker 1>an interesting example for Americans, not because we are involved

0:02:26.356 --> 0:02:29.396
<v Speaker 1>in a civil war, but because the habits of mind

0:02:29.516 --> 0:02:33.436
<v Speaker 1>and the tactics that the Colombians have used to reintegrate

0:02:33.476 --> 0:02:37.516
<v Speaker 1>their insurgency might help us think about how we can

0:02:37.556 --> 0:02:41.316
<v Speaker 1>bring Americans back together into a single political system too.

0:02:41.876 --> 0:02:48.156
<v Speaker 1>My soluble is to find the ways to end civil

0:02:48.236 --> 0:02:53.836
<v Speaker 1>armed conflicts and to find reconciliation. I first spoke with

0:02:53.916 --> 0:02:58.476
<v Speaker 1>one Manuel Santos in twenty nineteen. Here's our conversation Juan

0:02:58.556 --> 0:03:02.196
<v Speaker 1>Manuel Santos. When you became president of Columbia, you were

0:03:02.236 --> 0:03:07.556
<v Speaker 1>faced with one of the longest running, most insoluble civil

0:03:07.556 --> 0:03:12.036
<v Speaker 1>wars in the world. When you begin thinking about how

0:03:12.036 --> 0:03:14.796
<v Speaker 1>to solve a problem like that, it seems intractable, it

0:03:14.916 --> 0:03:17.676
<v Speaker 1>can't end. How do you break the problem down? What

0:03:17.756 --> 0:03:20.796
<v Speaker 1>do you think of first? What was your first instinct?

0:03:22.156 --> 0:03:26.076
<v Speaker 1>My first instinct was to try to get a complete

0:03:26.116 --> 0:03:31.356
<v Speaker 1>picture of the problem and try to generate the necessary

0:03:31.396 --> 0:03:35.476
<v Speaker 1>conditions to solve it. Many times this is not done,

0:03:35.756 --> 0:03:41.316
<v Speaker 1>and when you don't have the necessary conditions at your disposal,

0:03:41.956 --> 0:03:45.716
<v Speaker 1>it is impossible to solve a conflict of the nature.

0:03:46.476 --> 0:03:49.036
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by conditions? What exactly what you're

0:03:49.036 --> 0:03:54.956
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I studied why my predecessors failed, because all

0:03:54.996 --> 0:03:59.356
<v Speaker 1>of them tried to negotiate peace. And I studied more

0:03:59.356 --> 0:04:03.236
<v Speaker 1>than seventeen conflicts around the world. Some of them were

0:04:03.276 --> 0:04:09.436
<v Speaker 1>successful in being ended, some of them not. But I

0:04:09.476 --> 0:04:14.636
<v Speaker 1>studied each and every one of these conflicts and extracted

0:04:14.676 --> 0:04:18.516
<v Speaker 1>what was applicable to our conflict and what to do

0:04:18.636 --> 0:04:21.636
<v Speaker 1>and what not to do. And when I had those

0:04:21.676 --> 0:04:27.756
<v Speaker 1>conditions ready, I then started negotiations. Conditions like you have

0:04:28.156 --> 0:04:31.636
<v Speaker 1>to have the military balance of power in the favor

0:04:31.676 --> 0:04:36.276
<v Speaker 1>of the state. As long as the insurgency the grillers

0:04:36.636 --> 0:04:41.316
<v Speaker 1>think they can win by using violence, it's very difficult

0:04:41.796 --> 0:04:47.876
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate peace. You need the commanders of the insurgency

0:04:48.556 --> 0:04:52.156
<v Speaker 1>to personally consider that for them on a personal level,

0:04:52.756 --> 0:04:56.796
<v Speaker 1>it's better to negotiate a peace agreement than to continue

0:04:56.796 --> 0:05:00.556
<v Speaker 1>the war. And something that is very very necessary in

0:05:00.596 --> 0:05:04.356
<v Speaker 1>today's world. Any asymmetric war in any part of the

0:05:04.396 --> 0:05:10.116
<v Speaker 1>world needs the support of the region and if necessary,

0:05:10.156 --> 0:05:14.076
<v Speaker 1>of the international community to reach an agreement. So these

0:05:14.116 --> 0:05:21.516
<v Speaker 1>conditions were identified and then created. Because conditions don't appear

0:05:21.836 --> 0:05:24.956
<v Speaker 1>just out of the blue. You have to create those conditions,

0:05:25.036 --> 0:05:27.476
<v Speaker 1>and we created those conditions in the case of Colombia.

0:05:27.596 --> 0:05:30.756
<v Speaker 1>And what did you do first? Well, my first effort

0:05:31.116 --> 0:05:34.196
<v Speaker 1>was to strengthen our military and I had the opportunity

0:05:34.436 --> 0:05:37.276
<v Speaker 1>of doing that because I was Minister of Defense before

0:05:37.396 --> 0:05:43.596
<v Speaker 1>being president. And also to use the carrot and the

0:05:43.676 --> 0:05:48.516
<v Speaker 1>stick with the military commanders, telling them that they personally

0:05:48.996 --> 0:05:52.836
<v Speaker 1>would be better off if they negotiate peace. And something

0:05:52.876 --> 0:05:55.916
<v Speaker 1>that I did which was quite controversial at the moment,

0:05:56.796 --> 0:06:01.116
<v Speaker 1>was making peace with our neighbors in order to seek

0:06:01.316 --> 0:06:05.676
<v Speaker 1>their support. Charis in Venezuela, who's not popular in Colombia,

0:06:06.076 --> 0:06:09.996
<v Speaker 1>was very unpopular, and we didn't have diplomatics or even

0:06:10.036 --> 0:06:13.196
<v Speaker 1>trade relations with aswell at that time, and I made

0:06:13.276 --> 0:06:17.516
<v Speaker 1>peace with him. Also with President Correa and Ecuador, the

0:06:17.556 --> 0:06:21.636
<v Speaker 1>south of Colombia. We did not have diplomatic or even

0:06:21.676 --> 0:06:26.436
<v Speaker 1>trade relations with either, and we needed them to support

0:06:26.436 --> 0:06:30.236
<v Speaker 1>the peace process, otherwise the peace process would not be successful.

0:06:30.476 --> 0:06:32.916
<v Speaker 1>So I made peace with both of them, and with

0:06:32.996 --> 0:06:36.116
<v Speaker 1>other neighbors which we did not have it at that time,

0:06:36.516 --> 0:06:40.196
<v Speaker 1>in good relationships Brazil and Peru and the rest of

0:06:40.236 --> 0:06:43.076
<v Speaker 1>that America. I know that one of the other things

0:06:43.116 --> 0:06:45.876
<v Speaker 1>you did is that you sought to give the rebel

0:06:45.996 --> 0:06:50.716
<v Speaker 1>leaders some incentive to join the political process in Colombia,

0:06:50.796 --> 0:06:53.876
<v Speaker 1>in other words, to bring somehow bring them in, allow

0:06:53.956 --> 0:06:56.636
<v Speaker 1>them to have a political party, allow them to be elected.

0:06:57.076 --> 0:06:59.876
<v Speaker 1>And this, of course was also controversial because many people

0:07:00.076 --> 0:07:02.356
<v Speaker 1>feel that these are criminals and they should be in jail.

0:07:02.916 --> 0:07:05.236
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain why you thought that was necessary and

0:07:05.236 --> 0:07:09.796
<v Speaker 1>whether you think it worked well. Every peace process boils

0:07:09.836 --> 0:07:14.396
<v Speaker 1>down to where you draw the line between peace and justice.

0:07:15.276 --> 0:07:19.516
<v Speaker 1>No matter where you draw the line, there will always

0:07:19.516 --> 0:07:24.196
<v Speaker 1>be some people from one side seeking more justice or

0:07:24.316 --> 0:07:27.716
<v Speaker 1>from the other side seeking more peace. So to make

0:07:27.956 --> 0:07:31.956
<v Speaker 1>peace is not very popular, and this is an experience

0:07:31.956 --> 0:07:37.716
<v Speaker 1>that all peacemakers have had during the recent history. Also,

0:07:37.996 --> 0:07:41.916
<v Speaker 1>in a process of this sort, what are the guerrillas

0:07:42.356 --> 0:07:46.076
<v Speaker 1>fighting for. They want to change the country, they want

0:07:46.316 --> 0:07:50.716
<v Speaker 1>political power, and you have to give them a way out,

0:07:50.796 --> 0:07:53.756
<v Speaker 1>a dignified way out, if you want them to lay

0:07:53.796 --> 0:07:56.636
<v Speaker 1>down their arms, and the way to do that is

0:07:56.636 --> 0:08:02.076
<v Speaker 1>to offer them space in our democracy. And almost every

0:08:02.516 --> 0:08:07.316
<v Speaker 1>peace process around the world has to give the counterpart

0:08:08.156 --> 0:08:12.596
<v Speaker 1>some guarantees that they can continue their struggle without violence

0:08:13.156 --> 0:08:16.316
<v Speaker 1>through democratic means. And this is an essential part of

0:08:16.356 --> 0:08:18.556
<v Speaker 1>any agreement. Yes, this is what was done in Northern

0:08:18.556 --> 0:08:21.516
<v Speaker 1>Ireland as well. Absolutely, and every other conflict in the

0:08:21.556 --> 0:08:26.756
<v Speaker 1>world has been solved by giving the counterparts some kind

0:08:26.796 --> 0:08:30.796
<v Speaker 1>of guarantees in their democratic life. Otherwise they will never

0:08:30.956 --> 0:08:35.596
<v Speaker 1>give up their arms unless you defeat them militarily and

0:08:35.756 --> 0:08:39.276
<v Speaker 1>exterminate them, which is something impossible. In the case of Columbia,

0:08:39.276 --> 0:08:44.876
<v Speaker 1>it was impossible. Then you have to negotiate, and negotiations

0:08:45.036 --> 0:08:48.956
<v Speaker 1>mean making transactions. In the case of Colombia, for example,

0:08:49.036 --> 0:08:53.116
<v Speaker 1>I gave them ten places in our Congress, five in

0:08:53.196 --> 0:08:56.716
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, five in the House of Representatives, to guarantee

0:08:56.716 --> 0:09:02.276
<v Speaker 1>them for three periods representation in Congress. And they were

0:09:02.276 --> 0:09:05.156
<v Speaker 1>satisfied with that, and I think that was an essential

0:09:05.236 --> 0:09:08.516
<v Speaker 1>part of the agreement. When you do that, though, don't

0:09:08.556 --> 0:09:11.636
<v Speaker 1>you really and I know this was you know this

0:09:11.676 --> 0:09:15.716
<v Speaker 1>did happen in Colombia, don't you risk losing public support?

0:09:16.036 --> 0:09:18.836
<v Speaker 1>The public is angry at these people. They're terrorists. They've

0:09:18.876 --> 0:09:22.276
<v Speaker 1>caused all this damage, They've killed people, they forced people

0:09:22.316 --> 0:09:25.356
<v Speaker 1>to leave the country. They've been very destructive. So how

0:09:25.356 --> 0:09:27.596
<v Speaker 1>do you bring the public along and convince them that

0:09:27.636 --> 0:09:30.676
<v Speaker 1>this is trade off between peace and justice is worth it.

0:09:30.956 --> 0:09:34.356
<v Speaker 1>When I became president, I was the most popular politician

0:09:34.356 --> 0:09:38.236
<v Speaker 1>in Colombia. I had more than eighty five percent favorability.

0:09:38.876 --> 0:09:42.916
<v Speaker 1>As soon as I talked about negotiating peace, I was warned,

0:09:43.036 --> 0:09:46.276
<v Speaker 1>this will cost you your political capital. People will not

0:09:46.476 --> 0:09:51.556
<v Speaker 1>understand that you are very effective. Hawk was elected because

0:09:51.556 --> 0:09:54.796
<v Speaker 1>you were successful making war. You now sit down with

0:09:54.836 --> 0:09:58.476
<v Speaker 1>the terrorists to make peace. But it's the only way

0:09:58.756 --> 0:10:03.276
<v Speaker 1>to finish the war through a negotiation, And so you

0:10:03.356 --> 0:10:08.236
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to do what is correct, even

0:10:08.236 --> 0:10:11.476
<v Speaker 1>though it's I'm popular. You have to be able to

0:10:11.836 --> 0:10:16.236
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice your political capital if you want to achieve your objectives.

0:10:16.276 --> 0:10:18.596
<v Speaker 1>And I was warned that was going to happen, and

0:10:18.636 --> 0:10:25.876
<v Speaker 1>it happened. My favoriteity went down dramatically. But I have

0:10:26.116 --> 0:10:30.036
<v Speaker 1>the great satisfaction of ending the war with the FARC

0:10:30.276 --> 0:10:34.876
<v Speaker 1>after fifty years, and that, of course, is made it

0:10:34.956 --> 0:10:38.756
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile in every respect. I was in Columbia last year

0:10:38.956 --> 0:10:42.276
<v Speaker 1>and was traveling with a friend who was doing a project.

0:10:42.396 --> 0:10:45.316
<v Speaker 1>We met lots of young people who were entrepreneurs and

0:10:45.356 --> 0:10:48.476
<v Speaker 1>who were building new things in Columbia, and I did

0:10:48.556 --> 0:10:50.596
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that this is a country where there

0:10:50.636 --> 0:10:53.836
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of optimism. People kept beginning sentences by saying,

0:10:53.876 --> 0:10:55.916
<v Speaker 1>now that we have peace, now that the war is over,

0:10:56.556 --> 0:10:58.396
<v Speaker 1>now we can do things that we couldn't do before.

0:10:59.116 --> 0:11:03.436
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, they weren't at all enthusiastic

0:11:03.596 --> 0:11:07.676
<v Speaker 1>about the deal, about the rebels entering the political process.

0:11:08.116 --> 0:11:10.876
<v Speaker 1>It was a very strange contrast, you know, You is

0:11:11.236 --> 0:11:13.396
<v Speaker 1>if they were half convinced that this was a good thing,

0:11:13.396 --> 0:11:15.476
<v Speaker 1>and they saw why it was beneficial, but they didn't

0:11:15.516 --> 0:11:19.596
<v Speaker 1>feel optimistic about the process itself. This happens in every

0:11:19.596 --> 0:11:24.356
<v Speaker 1>peace process. The people like peace, but they don't like

0:11:24.476 --> 0:11:27.796
<v Speaker 1>to pay the price for peace. The price in this

0:11:27.836 --> 0:11:32.236
<v Speaker 1>case was to see the guerrillas terrorists who had committed

0:11:32.556 --> 0:11:37.276
<v Speaker 1>tremendous atrocities war crimes in congress. A lot of people,

0:11:37.436 --> 0:11:39.556
<v Speaker 1>of course, don't like it. I don't like it, but

0:11:39.676 --> 0:11:42.916
<v Speaker 1>it's the necessary price you have to pay in order

0:11:42.956 --> 0:11:47.316
<v Speaker 1>to have peace. I prefer to have them in congress

0:11:47.356 --> 0:11:51.036
<v Speaker 1>shouting and making speeches, then to have them in the

0:11:51.116 --> 0:11:54.636
<v Speaker 1>jungles can napping and putting bonds. How do you bring

0:11:54.756 --> 0:11:57.916
<v Speaker 1>society around? What is the Do you have advice for

0:11:57.956 --> 0:12:01.316
<v Speaker 1>your successors? How do you How do you convince people

0:12:01.316 --> 0:12:02.756
<v Speaker 1>that this is a good way to end the conflict,

0:12:02.756 --> 0:12:05.556
<v Speaker 1>because I know some people are not convinced. One of

0:12:05.556 --> 0:12:10.596
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult problems that you run in a process

0:12:10.636 --> 0:12:14.076
<v Speaker 1>of this sort is to tell the people that they

0:12:14.156 --> 0:12:18.036
<v Speaker 1>have to learn how to forgive, how to reconciliate. And

0:12:18.076 --> 0:12:21.756
<v Speaker 1>this is very hard. To tell a mother whose daughter

0:12:22.116 --> 0:12:27.356
<v Speaker 1>or son had been killed raped to forgive the perpetrators.

0:12:27.396 --> 0:12:32.076
<v Speaker 1>This is very, very difficult. But I learned from the

0:12:32.196 --> 0:12:37.156
<v Speaker 1>victims that the victims, and this is a very strange paradox,

0:12:37.236 --> 0:12:40.596
<v Speaker 1>were the ones who at the end were more enthusiastic

0:12:40.636 --> 0:12:43.636
<v Speaker 1>about ending the war because they did not want other

0:12:43.676 --> 0:12:46.516
<v Speaker 1>people to suffer what they suffered. For me, that was

0:12:46.556 --> 0:12:51.236
<v Speaker 1>a lesson in life. I never expected that. On the contrary,

0:12:51.276 --> 0:12:55.516
<v Speaker 1>people who had never experienced war or was not affected

0:12:55.516 --> 0:12:59.116
<v Speaker 1>by war were the ones who were more critical of

0:12:59.156 --> 0:13:03.116
<v Speaker 1>the peace process. But this is something which is normally

0:13:03.116 --> 0:13:07.916
<v Speaker 1>in many other processes. I studied them. For example, in

0:13:07.956 --> 0:13:12.156
<v Speaker 1>the case of Israel and Palestine, Prime Minister Rabine, who

0:13:12.236 --> 0:13:15.676
<v Speaker 1>paid with his life the piece processes he did with

0:13:15.716 --> 0:13:19.436
<v Speaker 1>the Palestinians, experienced that from the Israeli people who did

0:13:19.476 --> 0:13:24.196
<v Speaker 1>not want the Palestinians to have a say in Israeli politics.

0:13:24.596 --> 0:13:29.276
<v Speaker 1>And this is a common denominator of almost every piece process.

0:13:29.436 --> 0:13:33.476
<v Speaker 1>Mandela who was very much criticized by his own people

0:13:34.236 --> 0:13:38.156
<v Speaker 1>for being too lenient, but as he said, if you

0:13:38.196 --> 0:13:42.516
<v Speaker 1>want peace, you need to make transactions. Did you meet

0:13:42.556 --> 0:13:47.116
<v Speaker 1>with victims? Yes, I had a marvelous experience. A professor

0:13:47.156 --> 0:13:50.676
<v Speaker 1>from Harvard went and visited me at the beginning of

0:13:50.716 --> 0:13:53.836
<v Speaker 1>my government and said, you are embarking in a very

0:13:53.956 --> 0:13:59.036
<v Speaker 1>very difficult trip. I advise you when you're sad, when

0:13:59.076 --> 0:14:01.796
<v Speaker 1>you're about to throw in the towel to talk to

0:14:01.796 --> 0:14:05.116
<v Speaker 1>the victims, tell you their dramas, what they have gone through.

0:14:05.716 --> 0:14:08.596
<v Speaker 1>That will re energize you. And that's what I did.

0:14:09.236 --> 0:14:13.596
<v Speaker 1>I had as a discipline to talk to victims every

0:14:13.636 --> 0:14:17.396
<v Speaker 1>week or every two weeks, to different victims, and that

0:14:17.556 --> 0:14:21.756
<v Speaker 1>served through the process with six years as a tremendous

0:14:22.036 --> 0:14:26.356
<v Speaker 1>re energizer. Every time I talked to a victim, I

0:14:26.476 --> 0:14:30.956
<v Speaker 1>came out saying I have to continue, I have to persevere.

0:14:31.556 --> 0:14:34.836
<v Speaker 1>And they, the victims, were the first ones to tell me, President,

0:14:35.396 --> 0:14:40.236
<v Speaker 1>don't throw into town, continue persevere. What was your experience

0:14:40.356 --> 0:14:43.636
<v Speaker 1>like of speaking to the rebels whom you'd fought against

0:14:43.676 --> 0:14:48.196
<v Speaker 1>for many years? You need to put yourself in their shoes.

0:14:48.716 --> 0:14:53.116
<v Speaker 1>Empathy is very important in any negotiation. What is it

0:14:53.196 --> 0:14:57.516
<v Speaker 1>that they want, What are their concerns, what are their

0:14:57.556 --> 0:15:02.076
<v Speaker 1>ideals their objectives. If you don't have an idea of

0:15:02.116 --> 0:15:06.036
<v Speaker 1>what they want, it's very difficult to negotiate. So I

0:15:06.116 --> 0:15:09.796
<v Speaker 1>came into the negotiation with tremendous ap hancian. I was

0:15:10.316 --> 0:15:15.196
<v Speaker 1>their worst enemy, but I made it as one of

0:15:15.276 --> 0:15:19.476
<v Speaker 1>my objectives to build trust that they started trusting me

0:15:20.116 --> 0:15:23.956
<v Speaker 1>and I started trusting them. Of course, I put many

0:15:24.396 --> 0:15:29.396
<v Speaker 1>sort of measures throughout the process to confirm that they

0:15:29.396 --> 0:15:32.836
<v Speaker 1>were negotiating good faith, and I think they did the

0:15:32.876 --> 0:15:35.436
<v Speaker 1>same with me, and at the end the trust was

0:15:35.476 --> 0:15:37.996
<v Speaker 1>there that I was negotiating good faith and that they

0:15:37.996 --> 0:15:42.396
<v Speaker 1>were negotiating good faith, and that was essential. From your experience,

0:15:42.756 --> 0:15:45.556
<v Speaker 1>do you think you can generalize you learned from other

0:15:45.756 --> 0:15:49.996
<v Speaker 1>conflicts which you studied. Are there lessons that you would

0:15:50.036 --> 0:15:51.876
<v Speaker 1>like to pass on to others when you look around

0:15:51.876 --> 0:15:54.676
<v Speaker 1>the world, when you look at you at Israel, Palestine,

0:15:54.836 --> 0:15:58.636
<v Speaker 1>or at some of the other other civil wars that continue, Yes,

0:15:58.676 --> 0:16:04.276
<v Speaker 1>there are many lessons. First, that every conflict can have

0:16:04.396 --> 0:16:08.716
<v Speaker 1>a solution. Five years ago, six years ago, nobody in

0:16:08.756 --> 0:16:12.716
<v Speaker 1>colum We thought that a peace agreement with the fart

0:16:12.876 --> 0:16:17.796
<v Speaker 1>was possible, and people say that we made possible the impossible.

0:16:18.196 --> 0:16:22.196
<v Speaker 1>And that is a lesson for any conflict if you

0:16:22.236 --> 0:16:27.076
<v Speaker 1>find the correct conditions and you find the correct moment,

0:16:27.116 --> 0:16:31.276
<v Speaker 1>because there are moments in a process which are essential

0:16:31.316 --> 0:16:36.236
<v Speaker 1>to have a successful negotiations. I think every conflict in

0:16:36.276 --> 0:16:40.196
<v Speaker 1>the world can be solved. Any other specific lessons I mean,

0:16:40.356 --> 0:16:43.516
<v Speaker 1>is it just is it just being optimistic or the

0:16:44.196 --> 0:16:48.636
<v Speaker 1>specific of any conflict, you need to know what the

0:16:48.716 --> 0:16:55.276
<v Speaker 1>counterpart really wants. You need to be able to convince

0:16:55.556 --> 0:17:00.836
<v Speaker 1>the international in today's world, the international community, of a

0:17:00.916 --> 0:17:04.916
<v Speaker 1>solution to this conflict. You need to know where you

0:17:05.236 --> 0:17:10.516
<v Speaker 1>draw your red lines, but where you can give to

0:17:10.556 --> 0:17:14.876
<v Speaker 1>the counterpart what is necessary to obtain peace. For example,

0:17:14.956 --> 0:17:17.556
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Colombia, and in the case of

0:17:17.876 --> 0:17:22.116
<v Speaker 1>today's conflicts, there's no way you can have a solution

0:17:22.756 --> 0:17:27.996
<v Speaker 1>with total impunity because all countries are are subject to

0:17:28.116 --> 0:17:31.676
<v Speaker 1>the Rome Treaty, which is a treaty that was negotiated

0:17:32.196 --> 0:17:38.556
<v Speaker 1>by the international community precisely to allow peaceful solutions of

0:17:38.716 --> 0:17:43.916
<v Speaker 1>armed conflicts. In that Rome Statute, the International Criminal Court

0:17:44.556 --> 0:17:51.236
<v Speaker 1>was born, was created, and the transitional justice was in

0:17:51.276 --> 0:17:56.676
<v Speaker 1>a way invented, and the negotiation in the case of

0:17:56.716 --> 0:18:01.676
<v Speaker 1>Colombia and in any case, was go and negotiate as

0:18:01.796 --> 0:18:07.396
<v Speaker 1>much justice as you can without sacrificing peace. And this

0:18:07.476 --> 0:18:12.156
<v Speaker 1>is the nutshell of any today. You cannot have total

0:18:12.196 --> 0:18:17.676
<v Speaker 1>amnesty for war criminals or people who have committed terrorist

0:18:17.676 --> 0:18:23.076
<v Speaker 1>acts that are considered crimes against humanity, But how to

0:18:23.516 --> 0:18:27.316
<v Speaker 1>punish them, how to judge them, is an essential part

0:18:27.476 --> 0:18:30.876
<v Speaker 1>of any conflict today. In the case of Colombia, it's

0:18:30.916 --> 0:18:33.876
<v Speaker 1>the first time that the two parts sat down and

0:18:33.956 --> 0:18:39.156
<v Speaker 1>negotiated a special tribunal to apply transitional justice, and this

0:18:39.316 --> 0:18:45.436
<v Speaker 1>is being showed as an example for other conflicts from

0:18:45.516 --> 0:18:49.076
<v Speaker 1>No One. Lots of people say, whenever you approach a

0:18:49.116 --> 0:18:51.356
<v Speaker 1>country in the throes of a civil war or a

0:18:51.436 --> 0:18:55.076
<v Speaker 1>difficult conflict, I'm thinking of Libya, I'm thinking of several

0:18:55.076 --> 0:18:58.156
<v Speaker 1>other particularly difficult places. People from those places will say, Oh,

0:18:58.236 --> 0:19:02.076
<v Speaker 1>our country is so specific. Our conflict is to do

0:19:02.156 --> 0:19:04.916
<v Speaker 1>with our history. You know, there aren't any lessons we

0:19:04.956 --> 0:19:07.836
<v Speaker 1>can learn from the outside. Sounds like you don't agree

0:19:07.876 --> 0:19:12.476
<v Speaker 1>with that. No, because we're all human beings, we all

0:19:12.516 --> 0:19:17.316
<v Speaker 1>have concerns, we all want to live in peace, and

0:19:18.076 --> 0:19:23.036
<v Speaker 1>you get any conflict via a religious conflict, ethnic conflict.

0:19:23.196 --> 0:19:27.916
<v Speaker 1>These conflicts can be solved when there's goodwill from both

0:19:27.996 --> 0:19:32.996
<v Speaker 1>parts and a conviction that peace is better than the war.

0:19:33.916 --> 0:19:36.276
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of countries that have now have

0:19:36.516 --> 0:19:40.916
<v Speaker 1>very deep divisions and deep polarization, which doesn't necessarily lead

0:19:40.956 --> 0:19:44.756
<v Speaker 1>to civil war violence. The United States right now is

0:19:45.276 --> 0:19:49.076
<v Speaker 1>very bitterly divided and polarized. Do you have advice for

0:19:49.116 --> 0:19:52.476
<v Speaker 1>Americans about how they can think about overcoming these deep

0:19:52.596 --> 0:19:56.476
<v Speaker 1>civic divides? Well, this is a problem that there is

0:19:56.836 --> 0:20:01.876
<v Speaker 1>president Almost everywhere in the world, there's deep polarization. That's

0:20:01.876 --> 0:20:06.556
<v Speaker 1>when emotions take over and arguments are left to one side.

0:20:07.076 --> 0:20:13.956
<v Speaker 1>We must try to recuperate the importance of the arguments

0:20:14.076 --> 0:20:20.076
<v Speaker 1>of dialogue and not simply react with your emotions. This

0:20:20.196 --> 0:20:24.996
<v Speaker 1>is much easily said than done, but it is again

0:20:24.996 --> 0:20:28.756
<v Speaker 1>a necessary condition to try to diminish the polarization that

0:20:28.796 --> 0:20:33.396
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the US, in Colombia, in Europe, for example,

0:20:33.436 --> 0:20:37.276
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in Europe due to the problem with migration.

0:20:38.076 --> 0:20:41.116
<v Speaker 1>When you analyze the problem migration in Europe, this is

0:20:41.716 --> 0:20:46.716
<v Speaker 1>a very very small problem to create such political reaction,

0:20:47.436 --> 0:20:51.196
<v Speaker 1>and you have to be able to explain to the

0:20:51.236 --> 0:20:54.036
<v Speaker 1>public opinion that the problem is not as big as

0:20:54.076 --> 0:20:58.196
<v Speaker 1>many people are trying to present it. The problem is minimal.

0:20:58.916 --> 0:21:02.076
<v Speaker 1>I will give you a statistic. In Colombia, we have

0:21:02.556 --> 0:21:07.436
<v Speaker 1>today many more Venezuelan refugees than the whole amount of

0:21:07.436 --> 0:21:10.436
<v Speaker 1>refugees that have gone into Europe. We had been able

0:21:10.476 --> 0:21:13.116
<v Speaker 1>to cope with that. How is it possible that in

0:21:13.196 --> 0:21:17.196
<v Speaker 1>Europe governments are falling because of that? It's simply an

0:21:17.196 --> 0:21:21.116
<v Speaker 1>example to show you that many of the problems that

0:21:21.236 --> 0:21:25.476
<v Speaker 1>have caused this polarization are not that big, and the

0:21:26.316 --> 0:21:30.196
<v Speaker 1>big challenges to try to explain why this is so

0:21:30.876 --> 0:21:36.756
<v Speaker 1>and try to reduce the polarization. Are there examples of

0:21:37.156 --> 0:21:41.556
<v Speaker 1>ordinary Colombians or groups of Colombians who contributed to the

0:21:41.636 --> 0:21:45.716
<v Speaker 1>peace process by their actions? Are there examples? You can give,

0:21:45.876 --> 0:21:51.956
<v Speaker 1>oh many many examples. I will tell you one specific example.

0:21:52.596 --> 0:22:00.076
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Pastora Mida. Her son was tortured and

0:22:00.116 --> 0:22:05.156
<v Speaker 1>then killed. Two weeks later, somebody went into her house.

0:22:06.236 --> 0:22:11.916
<v Speaker 1>He was wounded, and she took care of him. And

0:22:12.476 --> 0:22:17.476
<v Speaker 1>when he recovered, he saw a photograph of her with

0:22:17.516 --> 0:22:20.876
<v Speaker 1>her son, and he said, I am sorry to tell

0:22:20.916 --> 0:22:23.116
<v Speaker 1>you I was the one who killed him, and I

0:22:23.236 --> 0:22:28.236
<v Speaker 1>was the one who tortured him. And she reacted in

0:22:28.236 --> 0:22:33.196
<v Speaker 1>a most spectacular way, positive way, saying, thank you for

0:22:33.276 --> 0:22:37.676
<v Speaker 1>telling me, because I will forgive you and this will

0:22:37.716 --> 0:22:41.596
<v Speaker 1>liberate me from my hate. That story for me was

0:22:41.756 --> 0:22:47.836
<v Speaker 1>so powerful, liberate me from my hate. This is what

0:22:47.916 --> 0:22:51.756
<v Speaker 1>the world needs to be liberated from hate. And this

0:22:51.796 --> 0:22:55.596
<v Speaker 1>specific example I can mention a hundred in the war

0:22:55.676 --> 0:22:59.916
<v Speaker 1>in Colombia, people who really are the heroes of this

0:23:00.316 --> 0:23:04.396
<v Speaker 1>peace process. That's why when I received the Peace Prize

0:23:04.396 --> 0:23:07.276
<v Speaker 1>and Nobel Laureate. I said this is not for me,

0:23:07.436 --> 0:23:14.116
<v Speaker 1>It's for the victims. That was the former President of Columbia,

0:23:14.356 --> 0:23:17.876
<v Speaker 1>Juan Manuel Santos. To learn more about the Colombian peace

0:23:17.916 --> 0:23:21.796
<v Speaker 1>process and truth and reconciliation, please check out our show notes.

0:23:22.556 --> 0:23:26.396
<v Speaker 1>Solvable is produced by Joscelyn Frank, Research and booking by

0:23:26.436 --> 0:23:31.316
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Dunn. Our managing producer is Katherine Gerardo and our

0:23:31.396 --> 0:23:35.876
<v Speaker 1>executive producer is mil LaBelle. Solvable is a production of

0:23:35.876 --> 0:23:39.916
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. You can find additional Pushkin podcasts on the

0:23:39.996 --> 0:23:43.996
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:23:44.036 --> 0:23:57.756
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. I'm Ann Applebaum.