WEBVTT - Stanley Cup Finals Betting Preview (Ep. 706)

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Good afternoon everyone. Welcome to the NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>live stream here on the Fantasy Pros Twitch channel. The

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Cup Finals have arrived, perhaps a little bit earlier

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>then we expected. I am Tyler Kanyam wearing the Edmonton

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Oilers jersey today had to do it, joined as always

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>by Betting Pros, NHL expert and Edmonton Oilers fan Kelly Kirby.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't have to ask you how you're

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>doing today.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing pretty splendid. I'm wearing last year's Western Conference

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 2>champion shirt, which is just more I wore it last

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>night too, which is just more indication of how stupid

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>confident I want. Otherwise, like why am I wearing? Why

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>would I jinx them? And yet I didn't care so

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and I didn't drink them.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it worked out and we're going to talk about

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>jinxes today for sure, because there's a big thing that

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the Oilers and McDavid did last night that we will

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>get to. As a reminder, we are live each and

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>every Tuesday and Friday at three pm here on Twitch

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>throughout the end of this Stanley Cup Finals. If you

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are watching this on YouTube, you're following and subscribed to

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitch dot tv Slash Fantasy Pros so you can come

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>hang out with us live on those days. So feel

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>free to drop drop a comment, question, anything you want

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. As we get into the Stanley Cup Finals.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So lots to get into here, lots of storylines, lots

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of different things we can talk about, lots of bets.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You cast your Game five bet there for the Carolina

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and Florida series, so we made some money there. I

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>got the Panthers to win Game five on their own,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>so that was nice there. So obviously we've got the

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Florida Panthers and the Evonton Oilers Part two. They rematch

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>again in the Stanley Cup Finals last year with the

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Florida Panthers winning this They've never made it for the

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>third consecutive year, so I guess in hockey terms, we

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>consider this to be a dynasty.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know, like I guess, I hadn't

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>really thought of it, but maybe. I mean, they keep

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 2>arriving out of the East no matter who else is

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>doing anything. But you know, again with the rearranged playoffs

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>this year was also like did they you know? Was

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the setup in the best way possible? For them, which

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I kind of start to believe that it was a

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I've kind of been having this conversation with

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>my friends of you know, he can't, I guess considered

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>a dynasty because they've only got one championship so far.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just three appearances. You look at the Golden State

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Warriors and New England Patriots to Kansas City Chiefs. But

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like in hockey it's not the eighties anymore.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's so much harder to get to multiple finals, just

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen with upsets and all that. So I

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think they're pretty close. And then I saw a thing

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the two thousan You looked at the twenty fourteen NHL draft,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way or how that worked out, and I

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was looking at it today. Number one pick was Aaron

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Ecklad by the Florida Panthers, still there. Number two was

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, dry Settle went through to Edmonton. Number two

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was Reinhart to Buffalo, who then got traded for a

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>second round twenty twenty two pick. Eight years later, Bennett

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was number four. He also got traded, so the Panthers

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>have three of the top four picks, where he went

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to Calgary so it's interesting to see how they've built

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of the old fashion wakes. I think a lot

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of times they're saying, you know, the big thing is

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers get the tax breaks while the players want

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to go there. But when you look at it, they've

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of built it through the draft. So you

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>did mention the playoff format. How do you feel I

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>know we've talked about this before the one versus eight.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>We had some great first round series, great second round series,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>then we get to the conference finals. Both of them

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>wrap up in five games. Did you find them taking

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself out of the Oilers fan part of it? Were

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they anti climactic series? Were they still exciting? How did

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you feel about that?

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they were pretty anti climactic. I mean,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that even the discussions that you and I had,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>even with the I don't know, can Carolina do this

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>type of thing, we also talked about how it kind

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>of felt inevitable, like the rematch really kind of seemed

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 2>like it was set up specifically for this. What you know,

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you liked Carolina, you liked the stars that

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>it was. I feel like it was okay, maybe on

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>paper it wouldn't it shouldn't have gone this way that

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the way that it went, And I'm not sure who

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>else you would put in the conference finals to have

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>made it better, like for any of these teams.

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, and I think the Dallas Evonton series

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was certainly entertaining. I think more entertaining than Florida Carolina,

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>which was pretty one sided. I think there, you know,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>there were a couple of games Dallas could have maybe

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>won and got this to a game six or maybe

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a game seven. The end of the day, I think

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>these were just the two best teams. But I think

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Dallas Colorado being a great series, you

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think of Winnipeg being a great series. Florida and Toronto

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they go to a game seven, So it's it's you know,

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would you prefer the Leafs and the Panthers to be

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in the conference finals. I don't know, but I know

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a big topic of conversation, as

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it always is, because you know, when the most eyes

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are on you in the conference finals for one for one,

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>see you later, time to go home, so be interesting

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to see. I don't think anything is going to change

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. I think the NHL just likes that

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>system way too much, and you've got your Stanley cut

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>bet there on the oilers, So what are you planning

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to Are you planning to play off of that and

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>taking Florida here? Are you just gonna ride it with Edmonton?

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I took Florida when they were plus one twenty five,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>just that conversation that we had, and I'm like, I

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think that I did. However, last night I looked

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>at it. I was like, so, let's see how this

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>set up. And I was sitting there and I was like, oh,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>such cowards with the minus one ten minus one ten thing.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, come on, But yeah, no, I took them

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>at plus one twenty five just to offset. So I

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>will come out ahead either way.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But and I think we kind of predicted yet. I

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if we get to the end and

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>they just say minus one ten minus one ten, especially

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>because we've got so much time before Game one. Let's

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.559
<v Speaker 1>see where that's It's already kind of gone a little

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bit towards Edmonton. I think they're like minus one twelve

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>or minus one thirteen now, so it will be interesting

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to see how that shakes out.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk about Stanley Cup odds, but

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>before we do, I do want to talk to you

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>about an offer at FanDuel. So if you want to

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>boost your bets, new FanDuel customers can bet five dollars

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and win two hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>If that first bet hits, all you need to do

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>is head to bettingpros dot com slash FanDuel to get started.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That's bettingpros dot com slash FanDuel. Make your plays on

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel today. Bet five dollars, cash that bet, and then

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got two hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So as a statsky, as a stats nerd, I always

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like going back in time and looking at things and

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 1>looking how things have changed as we've progressed. So before

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs started, the Florida Panthers were plus three point

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty to win the Eastern Conference, which they did, so

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if you bet that they cashed. The West was interesting,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about this a lot. The Stars and

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Avalanche were both the favorites to come out of

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the West. Oilers were third at plus four fifty, and

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things I'm looking. You look at

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it now at the benefit of hindsight, and you go,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>why the heck did I not take Edmonton Oilers at

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>plus four fifty. They looked mortal at the start of

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>round one, and there we are. And then you look

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Stanley Cup odds beforehand. You know you got

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a plus eleven hundred I think, or a plus one thousand.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>The Oilers were around plus nine hundred, the Panthers were

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>plus eight hundred, which were the second best odds before

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the Stanley Cup started. And now it's obviously shrunk all

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the way down to essentially even money. And then another

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting. When we wrapped up last week's show,

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we said, Connor McDavid for the con smythe is plus

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one sixty five. You're never going to find better odds

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in a first of all, did you bet him at

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>plus one sixty five?

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, me too, when I was like, yeah, I mean,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>if they make it, I just don't know who else

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>takes it.

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and he opened. He was the second favorite

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>behind Nathan McKinnon. He was plus fifteen hundred to win

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the con Smyth before the playoffs started, and I'm kicking

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>myself all the way through because he was plus fifteen

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred before round two, he was plus eight hundred, before

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>round three, he was plus three fifty. He's now down

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to plus one twenty. So if you got the plus

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>one sixty five last week, good for you. Do you

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's still value there at taking him at plus

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>one twenty, Yeah.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I think there's definitely value. I don't know. I don't

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>know personally if someone from the losing team wins the

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 2>consum ice ever, but I also think that if this

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>is even close, or if it's a high scoring and

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers somehow win, I mean, if Bobrovski gives up

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>more goal, of like, who else are you going to

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>give it to? But yeah, you know, yeah, I just

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>don't have any issue. If it's plus money. There's so

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>many bets I will make if when you give it

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>to me, I'm McDavid. So this one seems like, I mean,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 2>if they win, there's no question.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And let's just say hypothetically, I don't want to put

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it into the universe for you, but let's just say

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers win this Daily Cup. Bobrovski's the current favorite

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>at plus two fifty got bark Off at plus five

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and to Chuck all the way down at plus

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred. Do you think Bobrovski is to play there

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>if the Panthers were to win this.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Sort of I was looking today about like which players

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>had really good series last year, and Kochuck was was solid,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and so for his number to be that low, I

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>that's tempting to me. But I mean, I think that

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they have that scored correctly because basically what they're saying

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>is Edmonton is going to try to outscore him. It's

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 2>on Barofsky to stop that. And so I think that

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>it's okay that he's there. I'm not going to bet it,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 2>but I think that Kokchuck could also have just a

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 2>blow up series and steal it.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So I agree. And when I saw that too, to me,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where like I think McDavid

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at plus one twenty is great because I think that

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the most likely situation. But yeah, when I

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>looked at Florida, I'm like, this is an opportunity that

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>let's just go hunting for some value here. You've already

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>got plus money on McDavid. That to me, to Chuck

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>knowing how he plays in the finals in the playoffs

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in general, he's the type of guy that plus eighteen hundred. Like,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I just think, if you give to Chuck eighteen times

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the best player in the series, is he

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>going to do it more than once? And so in

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that sense, I feel like there is some value there.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think for myself McDavid, I've already got the

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>plus one sixty five, but I still like it at

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty and I do not hate Kachuk at

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>plus eighteen hundred at all. So as we get into

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this series, as we mentioned, it's opened up basically the

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>same on either side, minus one ten on the Oilers,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>minus one ten on the Panthers. When you look at

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this series spread, there's some money to be made there

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if you so choose, If you think that this series

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a quick one, You've got the

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Oilers minus one and a half, they're plus one eighty

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Panthers at minus one and a half are

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>plus one seventy. So we talked about it a little bit,

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but do you think that this is how you expected

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the lines to open for the series? Markets and what

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think about the series spreads. Do you think

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>one of these teams can get it done in five

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>games or less.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, actually we'll talk about that a little bit. But

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 2>I do think that this could actually get lopsided in

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>a hurry. So it is interesting to me that the

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 2>Panthers spread is actually that it has better odds and

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the oiler spread either way, Like I don't know, Like

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 2>in my head, I when I again, when we get

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>to our other bets, I'm going to make a case.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I think the smart money is to

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>avoid the spread at this point because it went seven

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>last year, even after being down three to zero. It's hard.

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to really see if one of these teams

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>can kind of just dominate it. But I'm still not

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a big fan of the spread.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>That's how I felt as well, and I mean stupidly.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess my favorite bet from round three was for

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>both series to go six or more games, and neither

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of them went to six games. And I have the

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>same feeling here of just this is what's going to

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be interesting, because what I loved about the Eastern and

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Western Conference finals was that Florida and Carolina were

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>so similar that was going to be an under series

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't going to be a ton of scoring. Dallas

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>and Edmonton were pretty similar. That was going to be

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a highest scoring series. So now you take the highest scoring,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the best defensively, you put it together and now it's like, okay,

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>well it was an automatic over for Edmonton Dallas, it

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>was an automatic under for Carolina Florida. Once we start

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>getting into the games, which we're not going to talk

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>too much about today, but once we start getting into

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the games, how are you looking at this? Like, I know,

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>game one you can get six's already, Like, do you

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think that the offense can overpower here and we're looking

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>more towards overs or are we looking more towards unders?

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that entirely depends on which Skinner shows up, right.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that because I think that others are going

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to put three or more goals up pretty easily, Like

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>not I mean not easily, but I mean I think

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>that they'll get to three. The questions is Skinner going

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to give up four? So it's that's that's how you

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 2>have to look at it. The return of Eckholm is huge,

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, and now that he's got like six days

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 2>of rest, like that's just a monster opportunity there, so

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>so that with his return, I'm a little bit leaning

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>towards the under sometimes. But when we get back together

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesday, I'll probably give you an entire speech on

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>why we should the over. So it's you know, right now,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm just like, yeah, I want to see how the

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 2>first game goes. But the fact that it's in Edmonton,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I'm like, I don't know, I would still

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>if the over stays plus money, I'm like, I'll just

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll take it.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was my thought I did. I had it

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Best bet graphic. Briefly, I took it off,

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>but I have bet game one over. It's minus I've

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>got the six, so you can get a six and

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>a half if you want the plus money. I just

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>took the six because I always I'm obsessed with push

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>potential in hockey, and it was minus one ten or

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifteen, I think, So I did take that

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>initial over, and as you mentioned, the deciding factor for

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>me was that this game is in Edmonton. They are

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the streak is now, is they

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>had won ten of twelve. It might be like either

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve of fourteen or something like that. Now like they've

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>just been rolling and their offense has been rolling that

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>now they roll right into Edmonton and they just feel

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like a different team. And the one thing, there's two

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>things that you mentioned that I want to talk about,

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>one being the goalie, but got to start with it.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>They touched the trophy. So as tradition, if you I mean,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure if you're watching this, you're probably a hockey fan.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you're not, when the Eastern Conference Finals and

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the Western Conference Finals champions are named, they get a trophy.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>There is the Clarence Campbell Trophy and there's the Prince

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of Wales Trophy. For the Western Conference, it's the Clarence

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Campbell Last year and if there's a stigma, you don't

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>touch the trophy. You certainly don't touch the Stanley Cup

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>until you win it, but you don't touch the you

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>can or you can't. Yeah, last year the Edmond Snoilers

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>refused to touch the Clarence Campbell Trophy. They lost. This year,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they touched it. Connor McDavid, there's this funny picture floating

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>around and him like very unsure or should he should

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he not? Afterwards he said, well, you know what, last

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>year we didn't and it didn't work out. Florida Panthers,

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, didn't touch it last year. One didn't

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>touch it this year. What do you make of this?

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it was a smart thing? I actually

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I like this move because I think again last it

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>just to me it shows last year they were a

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit timid. They were a little bit scared. It

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was new to them. The Panthers had been there already

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>when they lost to Vegas, so they were They had

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of hesitancy. And to me, this shows,

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're just going to go win this now.

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I know, I keep bringing up the four Nations,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's such a huge deal for those players to

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have won that tournament. McDavid scores the winning goal in that.

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>To me, it just shows this mentality of like, I'm

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not letting us lose it. We're gonna go win this now.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about it?

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? That was the first of all. I left so hard.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 2>When he was standing there and he looked back and

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 2>it was kind of that it was that look of

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>are we sure we're doing this? Like obviously they talked

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>about it before, you know, I went I told you

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 2>last time, I went to the Hockey Hall of Fame

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>last summer and they were not in the Stanley Cup yet,

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 2>but they were in the finals and the Stanley Cup

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 2>was there, and so we stood on the platform, my

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>parents and my wife and I and she was my

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>wife's like, can I touch it?

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>And the photographer was like, he's like, well, most people

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>don't do that, like because the team would lose. But

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I was like, my wife is so impulsive that I

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 2>think she touched it and didn't want to tell me

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>after and then Edmonton went on to lose.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we know who's exactly.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 2>So I've blamed her for a year. Yeah, I mean again,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>this comes back to I I've never I don't know

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it's been I watched a lot of sports and this

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>team is literally acting exactly how you said, Like there

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>is there is a strong effort going on like like

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't care, tradition doesn't matter. And yeah, but there

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 2>that moment where he was just like are we sure?

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Was totally it's gonna be. Just it blazed in my

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>memory of him, look like he looked like a little

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>kid all of a sudden, and I done it. Like

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Conor McDavid is a superstitious player. He's worn the same

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>socks if you've ever seen that, the same sock since

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Junior that has have hold in them. Like he is

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>someone who is very specific with how he goes about

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>his business. So I love to see that to say, yeah,

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>screw it, we're just gonna go win. And if we don't,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not because of a superstition. It's not because we

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>touched a trophy. It's because the Florida Panthers are going

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to have to beat us. So that to me, and

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about it before. They just when you watch sports,

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you just sometimes go You see it all the time

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Kansaity Chiefs because they just have Patrick Mahomes

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and they just don't lose. You go, yeah, this team's

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>just gonna win, like you seting it right now. I

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think with the Okac Thunder in the NBA, they're gonna win,

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>right And I think that that's the vibe that I

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>get from the Edmonton Oilers. So I'm happy that he

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>touched it. Like I said, the Panthers didn't, So we'll

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>see how all that plays out. Getting into the nitty

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gritty of the series a little bit, obviously, this is

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a rematch of last year, and the big storyline was

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that the Florida Panthers win the Stanley Cup in Game seven,

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a two to one victory. They jumped out to a

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>three nothing lead before you know, there's the I think

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it was Game seven, but there's the famous clip also

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of Conor McDavid screaming at everybody in the locker room

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to get it together and to take it seriously. Oiler's

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>store and back. They win Game four, five, and six

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>by a combined score of eighteen to five. And then

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the other big storyline going into this I guess, is

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's been more than thirty years since a Canadian

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>team has won the Stanley Cup. That was Montreal Canadians

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety three. What do you make of I'm

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>interested to get your perspective as an American me a Canadian,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of this whole? Like Canada hasn't

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>won a Stanley Cup. I don't make much take much

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>stock into it because I look at all the teams

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that win and go Yet well, half your team's Canadian anyway,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>So does this really matter? But at the same time,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>for my fellow Canadians, it would be nice to say Hey,

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm happy that the fan base has

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the Cup more so than the Cup just being on

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a Canadian team.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's kind of interesting because I sometimes lament that

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I was not born in Canada. I mean, I'm so close,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and I just think that one of the things about

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 2>it is the egotism of Americans, Like that is a

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 2>thing that people have held up forever. So if you're

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 2>not a fan of a Canadian team, or if you're

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>not a fan of an American team, and you're just

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 2>listening to this, like you're listening to the stat over

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and over and over again. So I'm like, obviously, it's Edmonton,

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>it's my team. I want them to win. But I'd

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 2>also just like to shut that up, like because the

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 2>same thing, right, like, Okay, let's go through the rosters,

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 2>take off all the Canadians, and then let's see how

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you do type of deal. But yeah, yeah, and then

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 2>in this one, I'm really hoping like if they do

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 2>a map of like who's cheering for who, I would

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>assume that only one specific part of Florida is going

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>to cheer for Florida. They won last year. I don't

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>think they're that likable. They don't have like, you know,

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 2>there's not a lot of charisma going on. And then

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>you look at Edmonton and it's like pick someone, yeah,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>and and the whole thirty year in which you know

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 2>will get brought up constantly. So so yeah, it's a

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a thing.

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Edmonton is definitely the more fun team to watch, the

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sexier team to watch. They've got the goal, They've got

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>David Ryesida leading the way with those goals. They just

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>play a really fun style of hockey. They're playing old

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>school style of hockey in that sense. But I'm hoping

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>from that narrative too, because I've had to hear it

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>over and over all. The American wins the cob the

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>America's one. Like it's like, again, it's not like you

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>got It's not like it's the nineteen forties where the

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Maple Leafs are all players from Toronto and the Boston

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Ruins are all players from Boston. It's completely global, So yes,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it, it's technically in America. But also you know,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>when the Toronto Raptors won the twenty nineteen NBA Championship

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't really kind of but it's still America's game,

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's my own personal little event there. But yeah,

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be nice to see and it would be

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>nice to end that drought just because we've got six teams,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so it'd be nice to change that up. As I mentioned,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>when you start looking at the matchups, obviously the star

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>powers on Edmonton, you've got McDavid, you've got dry Sidle

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>leading the way with twenty six and twenty five points.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But Sam Bennett does lead the way in the NHL

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Playoffs with ten goals, which is three ahead of dry Sidle.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you look at it like Florida is a deeper

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>team in the sense of, yeah, they don't have that

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>top end talent, but they're back in talent might be

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better, and then Edmonton is very top

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>heavy and not so much or do you think it's

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>evenly matched all the way through there?

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean I last year, I would say, if we've

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>been doing this show, I would have talked about nothing

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>but how top heavy Edmonton was, because it just seemed

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 2>like if if McDavid and dry Sidle were on the ice,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 2>there was nothing happening. I've never seen two athletes look

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 2>more tired than they did in Game seven. I mean,

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I was just like, I don't even know how they're

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 2>standing up at this point. I think that they're deeper

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>this year. We've talked about him a lot, the return

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>of Evander Kaine. Everybody loves to hate him. That's fine,

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I would if he wasn't on my team, but he

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 2>has been kind of holding down that second third area

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 2>and really facilitating some some things. We're gonna miss hymen uh,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>mostly because of the hits he was getting this in

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 2>in the series. But I but again, Skinner is not

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 2>exactly a nice guy. So anyway, you just had to

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>have the And it's it's third playoff game next, But

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Florida has a deep They have a very brusher I

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>think that, yeah, they can score from all over. That

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 2>third line with Marshawn has been killing it, but I

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's at all as top heavy as it

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 2>used to be either.

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think Corey Perry is sort of offset. And

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he's another player I can't stand him because he doesn't

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>play for Toronto. If he did, you'd love him. He

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to kind of have offset the Brad Marshawn addition

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to Florida, which I think was a great addition on

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>their side. But he reminds me of the same type

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of player at Grinder. He's going to get in front

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of the net, can kill penalties, and he's going to

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>get those dirty goals. I think he's I mean, he's

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>certainly not going to slide into Zach Hyman's role and

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the pure goal scoring and all that. But I think

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in a seven game series they should be able to

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, cover that up a little bit

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>better than you know, if it was through the course

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of eighty games. I do want to talk about the

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>goaltending in a second, but first I just wanted to

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>tell you about the NHL prop bet cheat sheet. You

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>do want to be using this through the Stanley Cup Finals,

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in a series with so many stars. So if

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're betting all on the NHL Stanley Cup Finals, you

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>want to be using the NHL prop bet cheat sheet,

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>which shows you the very best value plays each and

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>every game. Get daily prop bet value rankings based on projections,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>find the best props for shots on goal, for points, saves,

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and more. Use it now at bettingpros dot com, slash

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>NHL props or on the Betting Pros app So make

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>sure when those props start going live. You are all

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>over that because you've got McDavid, you've got dry Sidle,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things looking at the goaltending. The main

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>question I have for you obviously, which Stuart Skinner is

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>going to show up. That's been the talk of every

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Oilers game that we've had on every single stream. Pickard

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>got hurt, but he is back on the bench backing

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>up Stuart Skinner. Is this Skinner series win or lose?

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Or could we see a change if he comes out

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in game one in game two and gives up six goals.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Right this very second, I wish this was not a

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 2>strictly betting podcast because I could talk. I think we

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>should talk forever about how quickly they about how quickly

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>they pulled up in last night, and I thought it

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>was the dumbest thing I've ever seen. But anyway, yeah,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's I don't think it's skinners. I think

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it's Skinners to win or lose. But I also they're

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 2>not afraid to make a change, like if if there's

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>if they're if bad Skinner shows up in game one,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that Picard might get a game two. But

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>the next question I guess I have is like he

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 2>hasn't really been Bad Skinner as much at all for

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a while. So it's like, I like you tweeted last

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 2>night after the three goals, You're like, it doesn't even

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>matter if Bad Skinner shows up. So yeah, I mean,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>so it's kind of I guess I need to give

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 2>him a little bit more of a break. He's it. Yeah,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they'll ride. They'll ride with him, unless it

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 2>turns into a blow out the first game, in which

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>case they might give him a break.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's it's one of those things that not

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's a first impression, but it's kind of a

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>first impression where he had those just brutal games against LA.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He comes out and really since then he's been good.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Like when you look at the goaltending matchup, obviously Bbrovski's

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>been better, sitting in second in goals against IT two

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>point one one, But Skinner's been moving up the ranks.

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He's at fifth, He's at two point five to three,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>which in the playoffs is pretty good anytime you can

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be around two and a half. Bobrovski's got the nine

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to one to four safe percentage, which is good for third.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps that's the only fault. It's at nine oh four,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>which is eight. But you know a lot of that's

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be affected by those early games where he

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was giving up five goals and like ten shots, which

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is really going to destroy your percentage there. So do

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you think that that is good? How much of goaltending

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you think is going to be a factor in this series?

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Less more than the offense?

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think the way Florida plays right

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and with Bobrowski there doing what he's doing, then yeah,

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the goalten the goaltend is going to make a really

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>huge difference. You don't want to have that, Like, like

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I said, I just keep seeing like one giant slip

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 2>up from either one of them. But the Oilers got

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the Bibrovski last year. I mean Games four, five, and

0:25:55.600 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>six were absurd. So it's it's I don't think it's

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 2>as big. I don't think it's as big of a

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>deal as it would be if this was like Winnipeg

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 2>versus Florida, where then it would be like, oh the

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 2>goal ton In is all of it. It's just uh yeah,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to go with it's not as big

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 2>as the offense. And then all of these games are

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>going to end two to one.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a situation, yeah, exactly where I think

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Game one is going to be very interesting for this

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on what the score is. Who wins, Like if

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Skinner has the bad game and he gives up six

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>because Florida is not really going to be expected to,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like if they're going to win this series, Florida's got

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to win two to one, three to one, like there

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 1>he can't win six'. FIVE i don't think that's just

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>not their style of. Game it's not how they like to.

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Play so If skinner comes out and does give, up

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>say six, goals And bbrovski has a six as a

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>has a good, game like let's Say florida wins five

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to one in game, one it would be interesting just

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to see what the confidence level might. Be but as of, now,

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>YEAH i think that he's going to benefit now from

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's not playing The Dallas. Stars he's

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>not playing you, know some of these more high powered

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>offenses that you might. See so it's going to be.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Interesting AND i think THAT i agree with you with

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>The audinger. Pull you can't especially in that instance Where

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>audinger played every single game the whole way through you

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>get into this game now with your back against so,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on and it's, like, okay well you're. Done and it's,

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>LIKE i don't know how you can just sort of

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>veer away from that trust so, quickly and to react that,

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>QUICKLY i do think was a bad. Move so if

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you had to pin one thing is the all things are?

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Equal there's ONE x factor in this. Series is it

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>McDavid being the best player in the. World is it the,

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>goaltending is it the special? Teams what do you think

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>could be the difference maker of this?

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 2>SERIES i, mean my initial instinct is McDavid, right, like

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 2>you have the best player on the, planet and he

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>again seems so beyond locked in that it's LIKE i

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 2>feel like he just he has another gear and then

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and if that gear isn't, enough he'll just get another

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 2>one and he'll just keep. Going SO i think he's

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the correct answer for. Me it's also Like Newton hopkins

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>has been playing out of his mind AND i And

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.719
<v Speaker 2>BENNETT i actually on the floor to side like how

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>much do they keep doing? It because you Know barkhov

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 2>And kachuck And reinhart like that those are their top

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Three and If bennett And Jet hopkins can keep doing

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 2>what they're, doing then that will be a little bit

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 2>more of AN x. Factor SO i would say McDavid

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 2>than that, line and then the return Of eckholm is

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the other.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Thing, YEAH i have to, agree and THAT i wanted

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to try to come up with a deeper, answer but

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>coddor McDavid is truly the best player on the planet

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>AND i don't think it's particularly close right. Now and

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then when you see the confidence level that he's playing,

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>at it just reminds you of all these great players

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>who have put the team on their back and, said

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>IF i have to play thirty five, MINUTES i, Will

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>IF i have to play all the special, TEAMS i.

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Will IF i did have to look outside, THAT i

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>do think it would be the. GOALTENDING i think that's

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the only, real the only real weak Spot edmonton, has

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>which hasn't been that, week BUT i think if there is,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>one it's. There perhaps in the. COACHING i Think Paul

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>maurice is a great. Coach he's gotten his team to

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The Stanley cup finals three straight. Times so maybe just

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the x's and, o's when they

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>get back To, florida can he come up with a

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>game plan when he has the second. Change BUT i

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>do think these teams are very really evenly, matched just

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in different. Ways BUT i, AGREE i think this series

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>could also be over pretty quickly. TOO i think it

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of. Depends game, ONE i think is really

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to set the, tone especially with it being In.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Edmonton so as we get into, it, now let's start

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about our best series, bets because both of us

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have some pretty juicy. Ones SO i will let you

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>get things.

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Started, Okay so keep in mind we won last night

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to go to The Stanley. Cup i'm a Massive oilers,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 2>fan so WHEN i was looking at the, bets they

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>are so confident like and, AGAIN i really haven't ever

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>cheered for a team that was this confident at. All

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 2>SO i am putting sprinkling something on the series to

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 2>be a sweep at plus six, Hundred could it go

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the other way In florida, Sweep i'm. SURE i mean it's,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 2>yea BUT i THINK i think that it would. BE

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>i feel like it's more possible THAN i would have

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>considered a month. Ago the other, thing, though is THAT

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>i would also kind of sprinkle on five games that's

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 2>at plus two. Seventy the same rule applies where maybe

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 2>If edmonton gets out to The sea lead and then

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 2>they punt a, game like you, Know game three In

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 2>florida doesn't go their way and then they finish it

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 2>up at. Home So i'm fine on four and five,

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Games i'm sure the better bet is to go for.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Ten it's gonna go, seven OR i think it's gonna

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>go seven because they are evenly. Matched BUT i woke

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>up this running And i'm, like, nah we're gonna go.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Sweep AND i think BECAUSE i, THINK i think seven

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>games is plus two, hundred and to, me it's, LIKE

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>i think the plus six hundred is probably, like is

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it likely to be a? Sweep probably, not BUT i

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably more likely than a game seven at those,

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>odds like at six to, ONE i think it's definitely

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>worth putting the money on. That SO i, think, again who? Knows?

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Right LIKE i thought the same thing about the conference

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>finals that, oh you, know these teams match up really,

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>well and we could see a seven game series Between

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>carolina And, florida and it couldn't have been more. Wrong

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they just rolled right over a team that it had

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>rolled right over everybody going into, it SO i do.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>THINK i think that BET's really good. Too mine's pretty.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Simple i'm just gonna take The Edmonton oilers to win

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>The Stanley cup at minus won ten for the same

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>reason you've. SAID i Just i've pretty much put a

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of my eggs in the basket of being The

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Edmonton oilers, now so if The panthers, Win i'm, SORRY

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>i JUST i look at that. Confidence and you can

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Say florida's got the same confidence because they're defending champions as,

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>well AND i can say that is, True BUT i

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Just edmonton's got the better. Player SO i took The

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Edmonton oilers to win the series minus won. Ten and

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then another one THAT i really like is The oilers

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to Win game one and to win the. Series that's

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>plus one sixty. Five SO i think game one being

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>In edmonton just the momentum they have right. NOW i

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Know florida is hot as, well but the Way edmonton's

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>been playing at, home with how absolutely unbelievably loud that building,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>gets and how much of an advantage it is to

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>play In, edmonton give me The oilers to Win game

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>one and the series at plus one sixty five and

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>then to kind of hedge off that the one THAT

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>i like as well is For Sam bennett to lead

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this series in. Goals it's plus eighteen, hundred so he is.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Eight that number is, correct, Right let me just double

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>check and make sure that that is. RIGHT i know

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a big plus. Money just double checking that

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bear with. Me plus makes for good, too, sorry plus

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven hundred For Sam bennett to have the most, goals

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and AS i mentioned, earlier he is leading THE nhl

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>playoffs in goals with ten so. Far and SO i

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>just look at it like IF i don't want to

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>put all my eggs in The edmonton, basket so If

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>i'm going to use The florida, BASKET i Like Sam

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>bennett to lead the way there with. GOALS i know

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>To chuck's. GOOD i Know Ryan hart's, good but he's

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just Been he's been the steadying force on offense there

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>at plus eleven. Hundred SO i know you've got some

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>some juicy ones as.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>WELL i first of, ALL i do love the win

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 2>game one in the. SERIES i think that combo is

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 2>is pretty. Great so when you headed in, THERE i

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 2>was a little sad BECAUSE i try not to double,

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 2>up SO i was looking on DraftKings at the most,

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 2>points and McDavid is plus one thirty to have the most,

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 2>points so as the rule, GOES i should just make

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a shirt that's, like that's, like if McDavid is plus,

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 2>money go for, It, LIKE i, mean there's a there's

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 2>always a chance on, paper this is what this is

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>what he thinks. Like he can always turn that. On

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:45.239
<v Speaker 2>SO i would definitely look into. That and then it

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 2>is only plus one, thirty just to, Note but then

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 2>If i'm going to hedge, RIGHT i was looking at,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 2>AGAIN i was looking at The panthers players versus The

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>oilers in the, playoffs and Kachuk is he's done really

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 2>well against them throughout his, career like when he was

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>In calgary and. Whatnot so the idea that he would

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 2>have the most points like On florida's, side seems reasonable to.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Me and at plus one. Thousand, again if when you're

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>looking at future stuff like, this you just sprinkle on

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 2>where you sprinkle on where you want to, go and

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 2>then sometimes it just works.

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Out so, YEAH i like that one as. Well AND

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>i did a quarter unit on The bennett one for

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the plus eleven, hundred AND i just look at it

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>like you, know the whole way through the, playoffs whether

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>it Was ajo or whoever else to lead a lot

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of times because the you, know the coaching and the

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>defense are going to be so keyed in on these

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>players that sometimes who you think is going to lead

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the way and, scoring LIKE i don't know how many

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Points NuGen hopkins had in the conference finals a, bunch

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>And Evan bouchard has been great as. Well that when

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you start getting into these ten to, one eleven to one,

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 1>ODDS i think it's definitely worth just throwing a little bit,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>there a quarter unit or, something just because you never,

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:54.919
<v Speaker 1>know and you could also not THAT i ever want

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this to, happen but if you get an injury to

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a key player all of a, sudden you, know it

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>might change things there as, Well so be interesting to

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. There SO i like To chuck to

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>get the most points as, well because he's JUST i

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>hate him because of the way he plays the, guys

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy you want on your, team but you hate

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to play against. Him SO i like that as.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Well SO i think the Closest i've ever come to

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 2>dine because of the sporting, event And i'm A cubs fan,

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 2>SO i mean there have been, times but uh was last.

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Year if if it had if it had mattered when

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 2>he chased down that, puck When Ku chuck chased down

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that puck and slid and at the last second flipped it,

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Out if that had mattered at, ALL i may have

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 2>died BECAUSE i was just, LIKE i put. IT i

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>even put it On. Twitter i'm, LIKE i loathe him

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>as a, player And i'm, like and that was probably

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the most impressive hockey like Things i've ever.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>SEEN i, mean he chased there was no way he

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>could get to. That so you, Know i'm just hoping

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 2>that it continues to be worthless all of his. Efforts

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 2>that's What i'm hoping for this.

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Year and it is frustrating you hate him so much

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because unfortunately is. Good so that is the problem. There

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so before we get out of, HERE i just have

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to ask, you as An oilers, fan obviously you're, confident

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what's your excitement level heading into The Stanley Cup? Finals

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>are you? Ready are you?

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 2>PREPARED i Think i'm Think i'm more. Ready i'm definitely

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 2>more ready THAN i was last. Year like last, YEAR

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 2>i felt like it was kind of a, surprise almost

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.439
<v Speaker 2>that we were there and like we didn't really act

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 2>like we've been there, before and you know that whole.

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>THING i also had had a surgery WHERE i was

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>not allowed to lift my arms AND i tend to

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>have a really strong like lift my arms up when they,

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 2>score like you, know and so that was. Difficult so,

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes i'm looking forward to having full use of my

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 2>limbs and being able to really just kind of sit

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 2>and enjoy it versus like last, year going what are

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 2>we doing? Here so, Yeah SO i Mean i'm a ten,

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>on a ten on excitement with all Question.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Well try not to pull any shoulders at a joint

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>by cheering too. Hard my excitement level is really high,

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>too AND i think last Year i've tended to sort

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of after the leaves get eliminated, early my, interest you,

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.439
<v Speaker 1>know it's still, there but it's not quite as. High

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but this, year especially being able to do this, stream

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>which has been an absolute blast going all the way

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>through and really you, know watching and focusing on every

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>single game sort of it's gonna be a fun way

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to end this. Story AND i think this is going

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to Be they've Beenton earliers have supposed to have been

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>good for so long with all the draft picks From

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Taylor hall Through Nugent hopkins through the one NAME i

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>forget who was the bust The russian. PLAYER i think

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they deserve it and it's going to be fun AND i,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>HOPE i hope that they. Do so thank you for

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us today here on The. Friday as a, reminder

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're watching this on, YouTube be sure to subscribe

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>over on twitch dot Tv Slash Fantasy, pros where where

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we will be live Every tuesday And friday at three

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>o'clock Pm eastern all the way through These Dailey Cup.

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Finals when we see you next time On, tuesday we'll

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to break Down game one with all of

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>our best picks and. Props thank you for joining us

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>today and have a great. Weekend thanks for.

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Listening to The Betting pros. Podcast if you love the,

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 3>show the best freeway to see us is by leaving

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>a positive review On Apple podcasts Or. Spotify follow us

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 3>on x and TikTok At Betting pros And instagram At

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Betting PROS. Nfl also subscribe to our YouTube channel at

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>YouTube dot Com Slash Betting pros