WEBVTT - Humiliation Ritual

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Did you know I interviewed Adam Back on Tuesday?

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 3>On Tuesday?

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, do you know when the New York Times article

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>came out Wednesday?

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So that's fascinating. John Carrier at the New York

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Times identified Adam Back as Satosha knocking out over, the

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 3>founder of bitcoin. And there's a lot of skepticism of

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 3>this arification. A lot of the evidence for it is

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 3>like sort of circumstantial stuff and a lot of like

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>linguistic analysis, and like Adam Back is like a.

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Cryptographers also British, British.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 3>And there's all these things that like are basically shared

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 3>by any of the you know, one hundred people who

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 3>might have invented bitcoin. So there's a lot of skepticism

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>of the identification. But what I really like in the story, Yeah,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 3>and this is why I wish you would interviewed him

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>a day later. What I really liked in the story

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>is that John Carrier doesn't hang his hat on these analyzes.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I met with the guy and asked if he was

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Satoshi and he said no, but he looked shifty when

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>he was doing it. Yeah, and I love I read

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>out this all the time, like this notion that like

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>investors get information from like the tone and body language

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>of executives. I love the idea that everyone sort of

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>goes around thinking that they can spot a liar, where

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>like they can just look into someone's eyes and know

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 3>if they're telling the truth. But the supposed to John Carrier,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>that's true, right, Like he's an accomplished investigative reporter. But

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I wish that you had looked at him back in

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the eyes and said so.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>And then my follow up question could have been like,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>why are you so nervous?

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>You know you look turning red? Why is this adam

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>so anyway? I love that as a category of evidence.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I'm convinced, but I like it.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like it too. I will say I wish

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I wish that New York Times article had come out

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a day earlier. You were talking about quantum computing and

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I was filling in on our crypto show. I wasn't

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>supposed to do it. It was just, you know, an

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 2>anchor called out and I hopped in and it wasn't

0:01:58.440 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 2>my best work.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>No, I tell you, if you had sat Nakamoto on

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>your show and you didn't.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Add yeah, I said, I was just talking to the

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Blockstream, you know, about quantum computing, also potentially

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the founder of bitcoin itself. I really think it is

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the most interesting modern mystery, you know. Yes, what else

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>you got like truly modern, like still happening mystery.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. My first instinct is that we are

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>sort of training my children to be skeptical of the moonlanding.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Just for fun, just for fun.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I've been telling my nephew that I'm a witch for

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 2>consistently for the past couple of years.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I feel like that's a good aunt joke.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't know if I'm joking at scared apparently I

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>love the story. He was riding in the back of

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>my brother and my sister in law's car and they

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>hadn't been talking about me, but he very seriously asked,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 2>does Aunt Katie write a broom like it's on his mind? Yeah,

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>he's just thinking, Yeah.

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 3>It'spare moments. Yeah, that's what it means that you're a witch.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast. You're a

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm Matt Levine and I write The Money Stuff column

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 3>I feelin like we have some money stuff the podcast

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Greatest That's Today. Bill Ackman keeps doing stuff.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Got so much stuff. He has a lot going on,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>It's impressive. But yeah, the news this week is that

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>he's doing something with the Universal Music Group, or proposing

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:51.839
<v Speaker 3>to do something with Universal Music Group.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>He wants to buy it, No he doesn't, but he

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>wants to do all this stuff that isn't necessarily just

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>buying it.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love it because like you love it. The

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>headline is that he is proposed to acquire all of

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 3>Universal Music Group for fifty five billion euros. But that's

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 3>not true. Like what's happening is so universal? Is it?

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 3>It's like listen in your ainext ins and Acman and

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people would like it to be listed

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 3>in New York and it's proposed to listen to New

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 3>York and like delay it and so partly as a

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>matter of speeding that along, Akman has proposed basically a

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 3>series of activist things. He wants the company to like

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 3>borrow some money to buy back stock, you know, classic

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>activist move. He stock buyback funted by borrowing. They own

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>a stake in Spotify. He wants them to sell that

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 3>off and use the cash to buy back more stock.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>He wants to buy some stock, and like they use

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>those proceeds to buy back other people's stock and all

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>of that activist stuff, he says, and his letter to

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the board will cause the stock to go up from

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, something like seventeen years now up thirty years. Right,

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 3>So we created a lot of value for shareholders, and

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that's good theoretically. Yeah, yeah, strictly, this is great, right,

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like the law of nature. It's just like that's

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that's his analysis of what would happen if they changed

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 3>their capital return strategy and you know, listed in New

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 3>York and did some other stuff for sure, and the

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>way that he would buy stock and the way that

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>they would do this borrowing to buy more stock is

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>a transaction that's technically a merger. It's a merger with

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>like one of his vehicles. Kid, he's like falling directly

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>asleep here.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 2>The problem is, I've read this so many times and

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 2>my eyes glaze over every single time.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>But so I believe it has this thing called a spark. Yes,

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>like a speck, only doesn't have money. It's going to

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>raise money later, Yeah, don't worry about So he's going

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to go ahead and raise a billion dollars in the

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>spark or he won't because like it's backstop by his

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>hedge fund that has the money, and he's going to

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 3>use the spark to merge with Universal. And like the

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 3>combined company will list on the New York'stock Exchange, So

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 3>like most of the stock in the combined company will

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>be owned by existing Universal shareholders, you know, Pershing squirrel on,

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, ten eleven percent of it. That's the transaction.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 3>But because it involves a merger, he can say things

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 3>like I'm proposing to buy all of Universal, and because

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 3>it involves a merger, he can say I'm proposing to

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 3>buy it for a value of thirty yuros per share,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>even though that's not he's not buying it for thirty

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>years per share. Yeah, buying a little bit of that

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty two years a share. But because the activist thing,

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 3>like the math on, it pencils out to being worth

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 3>thirty years a share, says him, he can say I'm

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>going to buy the whole company at a seventy eight

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 3>percent premium and get people to write that Andy, Yeah, Yeah,

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>it's proprilling to buy the company. It's seventy eight percent premium.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And a lot of places did write yeah, or a.

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Version of it, that's the headline. It's a good way

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>to get attention for your activism because you send a

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>letter being like, I want to buy a little bit

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 3>of stock and I want you to make some changes

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>in your capital return strategy. So yeah, everyone says that

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 3>all the time, right, yeah, and then you go, oh,

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>it'll be worth a lot of more money and sure whatever.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 3>But if you say I'm gonna buy it, and then

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 3>it sounds real.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 2>So I mean the stock surged on this, eighty rs popped.

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>There are some very high hurdles to this happening, sure,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean he has to convince two thirds of investors

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 2>to agree. And also there's a certain.

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 3>Thought suggests people like it. You can wave away everything

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 3>else and be like, well, listing in New York it

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>is going.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>To be good for the that's the interesting part. I

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 2>mean that makes sense to me. We've seen a lot

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of European companies come to New York or IPO on

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>US exchanges. But I didn't realize that Universal Music Group

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>UMG had planned to do this but then scrapped it

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>just last month. Their plans a list setting market uncertainty,

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>which is fair. But I mean.

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's yeah, maybe it's nothing.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>But I don't really understand is what he wants to

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>sell the stake in Spotify, Like why that would be

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 2>good long term because Spotify has crushed it over the

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 2>last five years or so compared to UMG. Yeah, like

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that seems pretty valuable.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Sure, but if it seems pretty valuable, you can sell

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>it for money now, I know.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>But it might be something you want to hang on to.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but if the market value is that as highly

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 3>or more or more highly than you do, then you

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>should sell it now. Also, it's just it's like very

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>standard activist playbook to be like, the market never values

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 3>some weird random minority stake at its full value because

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the market is focused on, you know, investing in the

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>company's business. If you make the business a simpler story,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>then the market will, you know, describe more value to

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 3>that story. If you can sell a minority stake in

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Spotify for more dollars than like the market describes to

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 3>its value when it's part of a bigger company. So

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, that's like pretty standard logic. It might

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 3>not be true, but like, if you're sure that Spotify

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 3>is going to continue going up much more than the

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 3>rest of the company, then sure, hang out to it.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, anyway, I did want to bring up the French

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>billionaire that he has to convince. Sure, I'm so bad

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>at French names, so I'm scared to say it. Vincent

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Pulair Does that sound good?

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Sounds good?

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 2>French person's going to write in anyway, he owns more

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>than an eighteen percent stake through his family holding company.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>But apparently Ackman said that he spoke to bull Air

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and his investment group and said that they were quote

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>intrigued with the.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Right part of the point of the proposals. So maybe

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>intrigued crush him out, you know, if he wants cash

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 3>instead of his stake. But I'm not privy to those negotiations.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 2>No, that was billionaire to a billionaire, not for us

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 2>to know the ft.

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Today Thursday, I think reported another he's so busy he's

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>got going on.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 2>I know I was wondering if we were going to

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 2>get there.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, briefly because I don't really understand it. He's got

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>a big let's say hedge fund, it's not really the

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>right word for it, but he is a big pot

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 3>of money that he invests in some stocks basically and

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 3>he does the occasional like asymmetric derivatives trade as he

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 3>would say. That makes a lot of money on for instance, COVID,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 3>and it's in this like series of funds that are

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>most prominently is like close end fund in Europe, and

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>he's like launching a closed end fund in the US,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 3>pushing to where USI We've talked about this a lot.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 3>It keeps being in the process of launching.

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, as a launched, it's going to happen.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna happen. But so he's raising like five to

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 3>ten billion dollars for that. He's like Peoing the management

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>company is part of that, blah blah blah. But the

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>f he reported that he's also in talks three is

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>a separate fund. Now only do the like asymmetric toatives.

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>So instead of owning like you know, a concentrated portfolio

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 3>of large cap stops and sometimes buying index CDs, oat

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>of a pandemic, he would own treasury bills and occasionally

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 3>buy index CDs instead of a pandemic, which okay, yeah sure, yeah,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 3>like a like sort of like a tele risk hedge fund. Yeah,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a permanent capitol vehicle.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The ft called it like you know, he's making

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>doomsday trades here.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The headline is something like he wants the profit

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>from market complacency. Right, He's going to bet against complacency, Yeah,

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to the rest of the portfolios. Is like

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 3>owning latche caap equities.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>This is something that apparently he has highlighted two investors

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>as a way to turbo charge the firm's fee earnings.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>So it does play into the potential IPO here.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Right. The way the IPO works is that he's

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 3>mostly selling shares of this closed infund's mostly selling shares

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of a pot of you know, investments, but he's partially

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>selling shares in the management company. And so the more

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>assets the management company runs, the more that is worth,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>and therefore the more appealing it is to investors in

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the I p O. Right, So, like, if you're paying

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 3>people to buy your clothes end fund and the currency

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 3>of your management company, then like the more funds you run,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the better that.

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Is doesn't seem very more in buffet of him. I

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>keep getting confused over who Bill Lackman is.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, is he Warren Buffett?

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Or is he a bird?

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Bill Ackman, who are you?

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>He's a bird? Don't answer that or do He's also

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>like tweeting a lot, But that's a that's a whole

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 3>other story of all.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The thing he wrote today is that it is not

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>quite fair to say that Billlackman runs a portfolio of

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a dozen ish large cap stocks that don't change very much.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's a little bit true, and that's very cool

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>if you can do that and make money and be

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 3>edge trying to manage it. Right, You're just like, I'm

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 3>gonna own twelve stocks with the right twelve stocks, and

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna change it that much. I'm just gonna

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of hang out here and tweet a lot.

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what I would do.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>That's what I would do it. Like that is my

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>dream as a money manager, right, Like the people who

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>are like, I'm going to like work all day and

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 3>change my portfolio every day so they can capture like

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 3>every incremental piece of alpha. That sounds like a hard job,

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 3>whereas like I'll just pick the red stocks and then.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Tweet I'll just pick good snack.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Incredible move. But what I like about this idea of

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 3>the like whatever complacency.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Doom to day fun.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 3>So one way to run a doomsday fund and the

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 3>way people run their dooms day funds is basically you

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>wake up every day and you buy some pots on

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the S and P. Yeah, and it costs you money,

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and at the end of every year you send your

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 3>investors a statement being like I've lost ten percent of

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>your money, and then once every like ten years you're

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 3>like I've made twenty thousand percent of your money and

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>they're like, okay, fun. It's like a bad profile, right.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 3>But like the alternative way to run a doomsday fun

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 3>which is like a little bit what is implied by

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the ft article though I don't have no idea, is

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 3>you take the investors' money put in treasure. But I

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 3>don't do anything. You're in four percent a year, and

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 3>every once in a while you're like, you know what

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 3>next week is doomsday. I'm gonna buy puts on the

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>S and P today, And if you're right all the time,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 3>every time you buy doomsday insurance, it pays off, which

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 3>is like what happened to Acmin in COVID, Like you

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 3>bought like some index CDs twenty seven million dollars. I'm like,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 3>the next week it paid off like billions of dollars. Right,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you're just perfect at predicting doomsday like next week,

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 3>then like your return profile is like most years you

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>just earned treasury bills. In some years you return like

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand percent. That's a great fund. And the reason

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 3>that no one does that is one, no one's perfect predicting,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>right and too because like you know, you have a

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>job and you're like, oh, I'm like charging fees and

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>like taking investors' money to protect them from doomsday, And

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 3>so you end up buying a lot of doomsday insurance

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 3>because it's just like what it says on the tin.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 3>And if you're Bill Ackman and you have the zen

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>like repose to just buy twelve stocks and hold them

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 3>and tweet all the time, they're like, maybe you can

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 3>do the doomsday fund the right way, where you just

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>don't do anything until it's almost doomsday and then you

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>buy insurance and make a lot of money. This is

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>like I'm mostly joking suggestion, but I kind of like it.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>No, I fantasize all the time, Like what if I

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't in journalism, what if I had a completely unrelated job,

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>what if I was a novelist. Then I dream about

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>what my portfolio would be and doing something like that

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>sounds really fun, right, Like the best.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Way to invest is to just buy a stock right

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>before it goes up a lot, or buy crash insurance

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 3>right before the market goes down a lot. Yeah, it's

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>hard to pull off, both intellectually and as a matter

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>of getting antsy. But like Bill, likeman might not get antsy,

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 3>that's true.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Also very busy man. He's got a lot going on.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>A lot going on.

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 2>He has one, like really big thing going on right now,

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>can you guess?

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 3>No, I actually wonder like if you went to him

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and said, what's a big thing you've got going on

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>right now? Would he be like fighting the woke mind virus?

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 2>No. I think he'd say something like trying to make

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>more people use rock. Really, it'd be one of the things.

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be something much weirder. God, it

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 3>would be like solving the population crisis.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>That's my second big question. Of the podcast Elon Musk,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 2>what's your big thing anyway?

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I believe the big thing you were referring to, Yeah,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>is the space, the impending SpaceX slash X.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's factually very big. It's very big. It

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>keeps getting bigger, probably.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Soon, although yeah, they filed confidentially. Everyone says they're looking

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>to go in June, although it's not clear that they

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>will go in Jane. But yeah, very big, two trillion

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>dollars supposedly, and yes, as part of his quest to

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 3>get everyone to use Croc and thus fight the woke

0:15:58.480 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>mind virus.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Your Times reported that is making bankers who want to

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>lead the IPO by subscriptions to Kroc for their banks,

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 3>which is like a little frowned upon. But I don't

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>know why. It's like impolite. It feels somehow dodgy. Yeah,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>but I kind of respect it. You know, he's the

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>CEO of or whatever he is.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>He's not actually I don't think he's sick or whatever.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 3>He's the owner. Yeah, and he's like making a sale. Yeah,

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, like shows up this meaning like, hey, guys,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 3>you know what's great is groc? You should by Groc. Yeah,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>they're like, okay, well look into him, be like no, no, no,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 3>by Grock right now.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 2>And this matters personally that Elon Musk. It also matters

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>to SpaceX, and SpaceX now owns XII.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so first of all, this company is going to

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 3>go public at one hundred times earnings or a hundred

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 3>times revenue or something. I don't actually know the revenue numbers,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>but like the two trillion dollar evaluation is not closely

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>connected to any amount of revenue or income. But you know,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 3>every little bit helps, and in particular, you know, to

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the extent you are going public not only as a

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 3>rocket company, but as ooh AI everything's AI, you know,

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>showing like AI adoption is valuable, even if the AI

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 3>is still a sort of smallest part of the business

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 3>commerci Yeah, and so saying you know, all of these

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 3>big banks there's names are on the cover of the perspective,

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>So all these big banks have purchased subscriptions to GROC.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Some of the banks seems positive.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean not if you have articles being like, oh,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>they only did it because they were forced through, but

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe they'll like it.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Or I was also wondering like after they get the

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>IPO over the line. Can they just cancel their subscriptions?

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>So One, I'm sure they'll pay for some portion of

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>it upfront. Two, maybe they'll like it.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's the best.

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>No, because Elon Musk is like a continual source of

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 3>ajata for banks, right, and then fees, you know, and

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 3>so you're always looking to win continued business and you know,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars a year for crock or whatever.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>It's fair. Feel maybe it's good.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Be they like it, Maybe they like it.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they will.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 3>You'd hope that Sam Altonman and Tima Day are reading

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 3>this and being like, I we should do that too.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 3>So now every bank has to buy the subscriptions every

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 3>that's true.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course, open Ai and Anthropic also potentially going public

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 2>I love some of the details in this piece from

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times. Some of the banks have agreed

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 2>to spend tens of millions of dollars on the chatbot.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 2>But also this is fun. Elon Musk also reportedly asked

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 2>the banks to advertise on X, his social media site

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 2>also owned by SpaceX, but was less adamant about that request.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, which I think makes sense.

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's one, it's not a natural fit.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not a natural fit, right, use my AI because

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>it'll help you run your banking business. Advertise on Twitter

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>to run your banking like that makes sense. But also

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>because you know, like you're selling an IPO and being like, oh,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 3>our flagship AI product is being adopted by big you know,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 3>fortune five hundred companies. Is a good pitching. I always

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>tell some ads on our cess pool social media. So

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 3>let's have a good pitch catering to IPO investors.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say. I mean when it comes to

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 2>all these chatbots, actually getting enterprise customers is like a big,

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>big part of it because people individuals use chatbots, but

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 2>it's less common.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>No, enterprise is a big deal. And my impression is

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 3>that Groc has some trouble there. Marketing is like, oh,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 3>we're making mecha Hitler or whatever.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. Like from what I can I don't

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 2>really use chatbots in general, but I spent a lot

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>of time on X, which means I spend a lot

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>of time reading Elon Musk's posts on X and everything

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 2>he posts from Groc is like, I don't know, it's

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>just like anime girls.

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I could see not like a button down corporate it stuff,

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 3>but they have other marketing channels to corporate clients, like

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 3>forcing them to buy it for the IPEA.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>There you go, twist my arm.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 3>I love that because you know, I used to be

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 3>an equity capital markets.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 2>I've heard and how delighted would you be if they

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>were like, guys, we have to use CROC.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I wrote about this. There's so much stupid stuff in

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>these pitches, right, there's so much like you know, like

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 3>programs drove an Uber for a year to pitch Uber.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 3>But also like the one I always come back to

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 3>is when Lululemon went public, every bank sent their teams

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 3>in like yoga pants got to pitch the IPO god,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 3>and like did that boost Lulemon's revenue like a little bit?

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 3>They had to go out and buy the yoga pants,

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 3>but not materially, not enough to like move the numbers

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 3>in the IPO perspectives, But like how humiliating the banks?

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Humiliation ritual, just a humiliation.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Whereas when you show up and Elon Musk is like, look,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 3>you can pitch me, but you gotta spend twenty million

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>dollars on rock and I was like, okay, that's like

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not humiliating. It's just like transactional. It's very straightforward.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 3>I like it. Gosh, it makes sense.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Other possible humiliation.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 3>There's so much like this. Used to be a real

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 3>big thing. Banks were really into thinking about how they

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 3>could prove to a company is that they loved those companies' products.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, with AI you have some of that, right, Like,

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that everyone who shown up the pitch open

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 3>a or anthropic or even I say I on the

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 3>right pa. I was like, well, we made this pitch

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 3>book with chat GPT or Claude or you know, whatever

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>it may be. And some days they probably get it wrong.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 3>We made this with chat GPT and it's like, nope,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 3>you're pitching anthropic. But I'm sure they'll do that, but

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 3>more direct connection.

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:24.479
<v Speaker 2>We made Mecha Hitler.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>You have to show up and be like we made

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>this pitch book with Crock and he opens and I

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know, it's kind of woke. You're like, no, no,

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 3>here's all the slurs.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Where's the anime?

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>I take it back?

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>It would be pretty That was fun, you know, it's

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 4>also fun everyone.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 3>It's been a while since we talked about the reads

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of the ETF markets. I'm going to leave, and.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Katie is gonna If you are not interested, you can

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 2>leave now for the dozen, the dozen listeners who are

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>still with us, Matt, you threw me a bone.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Can you talking about competition for QQQ?

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>And Katy's like, yes, obviously, that's the fastest I've ever

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>answered an email.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>So this is interesting, So I promise. So the ques QQQ,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>it's investos, NAZAQ one hundred ETF, it's been around since

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety nine, is everywhere.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we've talked about why they advertised every which is

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>they have too much money.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, my eyes just lit up. They might not

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 2>advertise everywhere going forward because their proxy vote passed at

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the end of twenty twenty five, so now they don't

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>have to spend as much on marketing.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I still see them on the trend, but.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, they probably made commitments for twenty twenty six. You know.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Anyway I'm getting anyway, we're.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Still talking about the cues anyway. So NASAC and the

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Cues have had this long standing relationship. NASAK has been

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>historically very selective about who they license out the NASAQ

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred two and at least in the US as

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 2>of right now, there's only two ETFs that purely track

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the NASAQ one hundred. You can there's other ETFs that

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 2>like add derivative income options overlay stuff to it, But

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the pure NASAQ one hundred, there's just

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 2>two Invesco ETFs in the US. Outside in a Mia

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>there are NASTAQ one hundred ETFs. But anyway, Matt is

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>slowly inching towards the DOR. What's interesting is that Black

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Rocks six am on Monday filed for a Nasdaq one

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred ETF. Mat what is going on, h you know,

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it's crazier. Tuesday in the morning, State Street filed for

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 2>NASAQ one hundred ETF. I know, it's nuts. So apparently

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq is feeling a little bit, you know, more open,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 2>and Invesco shares, I mean, at least on Monday they

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 2>went straight down. I think they closed five percent lower

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>or something, because they might have some serious competition here.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, then cues have been a cash cow and

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Invesco just figured out how to open the piggybank and

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>actually get some of that windfall since they have to

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>spend less on marketing now. But to have black rocks

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 2>show up months later. Traders reacted appropriately here.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 3>So I really love that index licensing is such a thing. Yeah,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 3>because if I in my personal account wanted to track

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the NASAK one hundred index without buying any ETF that

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>licenses that index, it could probably do okay, Like it's

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of a public knowledge.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>But if you went out and launched a product.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 3>If I launched a product, right and I called it

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the like one hundred and three tech stock index, that

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 3>would get less traction than the Nasdaq one hundred, We'll

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 3>call it.

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 2>The matt Levine At least.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 3>It is kind of weird to me that, like the

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 3>licensing of the actual official indexes is so valuable because

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 3>like you can recreate much of that performance, and there

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 3>are some pan cardial role that's on indexes sometimes. Yeah,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 3>but least the nas like one hundred has enough like

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 3>cachet that you really do need to license it.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 2>It's funny to talk about this because as I was

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 2>writing this article, I was talking to my husband about

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 2>it very excitedly, because this is huge. He's a he's

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a very nice man, but he raised the same question.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>He was like, why Googles you like a sleep mask,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 2>but he was like, why can't I just go and

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 2>buy all the stocks he can? I was like, you

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 2>just you can't, Joe, Okay, you can't. And probably the

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 2>answer is that NASAC would sue you no, if you

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 2>launched a product, fine, right, right, I'd sue you.

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Right. You'd have to be very careful to not use

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 3>words like Nasdaq or one hundred of the product.

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting and fun to think about why now

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, why is NASDAK Now.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 3>The answer SpaceX? I don't know.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's one of the big theories out there

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 2>is that if SpaceX does go with Nasdaq as the

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>change that they list on, and if they fast track

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX into the NASAQ one hundred, NASAK is going to

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>have a huge competitive advantage here over other.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Big period where you know, the NAZA one hundred is

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 3>a big deal, but like S ANDB five hundred is

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the main like indix that people index.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Two, but they're not mutually exclusive.

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Well they are in product terms, like I.

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Know, but I'm saying, like.

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 3>Right, you can be in both indexes, but like crucially, yeah,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 3>for some period of months, it seems like SpaceX will

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 3>be in the NAZAK one hundred and not in the SMP.

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it seems like NASDAC has changed its rules to

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 3>fast track listing SpaceX, So that's shortly, you know, weeks

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 3>after it goes public, it'll be in the NAZAK one hundred,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 3>and the SMP moves more slowly, So there will be

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 3>some period of months where, yes, if you want space

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 3>X and your index fund because you're buying index funds

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that like deep down you're an active stock picker or

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 3>at least like that name, then you have to buy

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 3>the NAZAQ one hundred one.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that could be a theory.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's break it theory. And then it's you know,

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 3>it's like also open AI and all of the big

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 3>tech companies. You know, the NAZAC rules will allow them

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 3>to fast track into the Nasdaq index and SMP might

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 3>move more slowly, and so you have this period where

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>like the big tech IPOs that everyone is most interested

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>in will come first to the NAZAK one hundred if

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 3>all breaks now the next way, I.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Was also wondering if it connects to the proxy vote somehow.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, under the new fee revenue breakdown of the queues,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 2>NASAC is still getting paid and I think that they're

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 2>getting paid the same amount, So maybe that doesn't quite connect.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>But obviously Invesco is going to theoretically be marketing the

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 2>cues less. Yeah, so maybe that could be it as well.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>But maybe it's some delightful combination. You know. See, who

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 2>wasn't this fun? Yeah? What I'm waiting for. What I

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 2>can't wait to see is that we haven't had fees

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>listed on any of these filings yet. They're very preliminary

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 2>filings from both What do people pay.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 3>For neke licensing like a basis punt?

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>It left depends on the index you know, the cues

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>right now, they were charging twenty basis points. Then post

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>privacy charging yes, yes, now that fee is eighteen basis points.

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>They have qqq M, which is fifteen basis points. And

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about an index, like an index tracking ETF.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty it's pretty expensive. So very curious to see

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>if Blackrock comes out with a three basis point productor I.

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Assume how much of that fifteen or twenty basis prints

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 3>is is that's not kidding.

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I believe when it was twenty basis points, it was

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>something close to like seven or eight basis points.

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 3>That's a lot.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>It is a lot, I know. So we'll say they

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 2>could do something. This is something that black Rock does occasionally,

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>is you know, the way of fees for the first

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>year or something, just accumulate a bunch of scale and.

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Then they go, do you think they're paying now seven

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 3>basics points?

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm so curious to find out. I want

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to know what if their fee is like ten basis points,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>then you have to assume that, okay, And as I

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>still yeah, I'm also interested to see, like if a

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Vanguard files for Nazaq one hundred ETF that would be

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>fun for me and.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Or for like a big tech ninety eighty ts.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, man, Thank you to everyone who's still listening.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>This is really great for me.

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel we need to have like a reward.

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Tell us right.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 3>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Stuff queletter on Bloomberg dot.

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV every

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 2>day on the Clothes between three and five pm Eastern.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 3>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 3>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us a

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 3>question and we might answer it on the air.

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.239
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 3>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamasarakis, Moses Onam

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and Alexis HoTT Our.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Amy Keen is our executive producer. Thanks for listening to

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week with

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 3>more stuff.