WEBVTT - [Beeeep] $: Elon, Jane Street, Hunterbrook

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 2>podcast where we talk about stuff related to money. Hi'm

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Matt Levin. I read the Money Stuff column for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Katie Greifeld. I'm a reporter for Bloomberg News

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>It's the best day of our lives.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It is the best day of our lives, which happens

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>every day on Fridays. We have a lot to talk

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>about today. We have to talk about Elon Musk.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we had a whole week with that Elon Musk.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, I know it was weird that we didn't

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>get to it in the first week. So we'll talk

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>about Elon Musk on that pay package fifty six billion dollars,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and of course his issues with Delaware. We're also going

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Jane Street versus Millennium. You just published

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on this.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>By the time you heard this podcast, I will published

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>on it roughly twenty four hours ago. Were recording it

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>shortly after I published on it.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's Thursday right now, and Matt published twenty minutes ago.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is the one I'm least prepared for. As

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to talk about Hunter Brook, the hedge

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fund that's also a newspaper question mark. Indeed, before we

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get into this week's topics, it's our second episode.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>It's our second episode. We got a lot of feedback

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>on the first episode.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot of feedback. A lot of it

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was about all of its comment that I made about

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the doped Olympics. Surprise, they already exist and they're funded

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>by Peter Teel.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, it don't exist, they're like launching.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the idea is out there, the enhanced Games that

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>would have no drug testing. So if you didn't want

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to do it performance enhancing drugs, you could still enter.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>You would just lose, yes, or you could do the

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>regular Olympics, which you'll still have drug testing.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you'll probably still lose.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if, like presumably day one, the best athletes

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>will still do the regular Olympics.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I wonder how long it'll take for the Enhanced Olympics

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>to have faster times and it jumps.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question because if you're like.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>The tenth best track athlete and you do a lot

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of drugs are better than the best.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>You probably there's only one way to find out.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Is going to do?

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>These games need to happen. The event roster includes individual

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sports such as athletics meaning track and field, aquatics, gymnastics,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>strength and combat. I would watch these, but.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>What we don't have on that list is drissage.

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Trissage Yeah, for the uninitiated, dressage is horse dancing. Effectively,

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>just go on YouTube look it up. It's a ridiculous

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sport that, for better or worse, I partake in. I'm

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>not sure if when I enter the enhanced games, which

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I will, whether I take the drugs, the horse takes

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the drugs. Do we both take the drugs the drugs?

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Have you or your horse ever been like offered drugs?

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Has ever been a controversy at your dressage?

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>We're not that good maybe in higher levels of the sport,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but what we're doing, it's very loosely dressage. Let's talk

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>about the time, moving gracefully along laon Musk. The big

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>news this week is that Tesla came out with their

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>proxy statement two items of interest. They're going to havesh

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>shareholders to vote again on that twenty eighteen pay package

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of fifty six billion dollars that was voided by a

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Delaware judge, and related to that, they're going to vote

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>on whether to move Tesla's state of incorporation from Delaware

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to Texas. What do you want to start with?

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 2>They're inter related, yes, right, he got paid a giant

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 2>snack of options in about twenty eighteen. Everyone says they're

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>worth fifty six billion dollars. Whatever they're worth, like forty

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars, fifty billion dollars, just like a conventional number

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that people attached to it because you know, go up

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>and down with the stock. But right now they're with

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>forty billion dollars and judge took them away in January.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I said that was too much to pay him, and

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't properly approved by the shareholders. And so they're

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>going back to the shareholders to one get it properly

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>approved and two never has to deal with a Delaware

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>judge again because they're going to move to Texas.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, these are two intimately related issues. But

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sticking with the pay package, which everyone is saying is

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty six billion dollars, maybe it's forty billion dollars. But

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the vote is in June. Yeah, are they going to

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>approve it again these shareholders.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, so the proxy quits a lot of letters

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>from individual shareholders saying how much they love Elon Musk

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and how they're going to approve it, and also, by

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the way, letters from like Trope Price Right big shareholders too.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting if you were a sharelder in like twenty

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, or even like December of last year, I

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>think you would say this pay package was worth it.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>In twenty eighteen, they said we're going to pay you

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>on Musk fifty six billion dollars if he takes the

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 2>market cap of Tesla from like sixty billion dollars, like

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and fifty billion dollars, And at the time

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>that seemed like a real stretch goal. And then he

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>did it really quickly, and so all the shareholders got rich,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 2>like they made a lot of money on Tesla, and

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I think they felt the real sense of gratitude, and

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 2>so I think very few shareholders were complaining about his

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>pay package, but one did ensued. Right, Yes, I think

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the shareholders were happy with it. But now if you

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 2>go back to them and say you want to approve

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it again, they could be like, we already got whatever

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>he did. He did the stuff that made it a

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and fifty billion dollar company. So if we

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>can get those past efforts for free, why shouldn't they

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>get it for free? They feel grateful, but do they

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 2>feel fifty six billion dollars grateful? But that's it. If

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 2>you're a Tesla scholder at this point, you're playing a

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>longer game, and rightly or wrongly, I think Tesla sholders

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>assume that Elon Musk and his continued affection are essential

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to the value of Tesla's stock. And so if they

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>vote down this paypack goods, Like will he quit in

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>a huff? Maybe he's got a lot going on, right,

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 2>He's got a lot of distractions, so he could quit

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>in a huff. And although his mercurial stewardship has not

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>been great for the stock price in the last couple

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of years, he quits in a huff, that's going to

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>take the.

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Stock think, Yeah, I mean the stock's already down forty

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>percent year today.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like it's been a rough ride. But still I

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 2>think they want him there. It's not like if they

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>vote this down, he'll come back and be like, Okay, fine,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>can you be like two billion dollars? Like I think like,

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>if they vote this down, he's going to be really mad,

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>like really mad.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess I have two kind of related points to

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that to what you're saying, what is the key man

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>risk to Tesla? Like, how much does Tesla need Elon

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk at this point? Is something I think about all

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the time. This is an established company at this point.

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree with that, it's an established company that

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>could probably operate on its own. It's not like the

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>stock has been continuing to go out from strength to strength.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>It's been a rough time. I do think that there's

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>probably still a valuation premium for Elon Musk, and I

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 2>think like it's a somewhat retail heavy stocked a lot

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of people who like Elon Musk and the stock, and

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I think if he were to leave, that would be bad.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not sure of that in the way that

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I might have been in like twenty twenty one.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I also think, by the way, whatever your sort of

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 2>economic calculation, I do think that some of the sholders

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>at least are like, we agreed to pay him to

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>these options. We voted on it. A court in a

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>weird technical opinion struck that down, and we don't think

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>that's fair. We think it's like bad for corporate democracy

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 2>and also bad for like fairness to Elon Musk, and

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>so we're going to give him that fifty six billion

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 2>dollars back anyway. I think there's probably some of that

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>going on among some of the including some of the

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 2>institutional shareholders.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Even if this is approved, we'll just get avoided again.

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Like how does this work if they approve it again.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a fascinating question, I think, and Tesla thinks the

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>answer is that if they approve it again this time,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>it will stick, right, because what happened last time is

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>they approved it and the judge found that the shaholders

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>were not fully informed of all the conflicts of interest

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>involved in setting his pay package. Now they're fully informed,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in part because, like Tesla went back and gave disclosures,

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 2>but also they just attached the judge's opinion to the

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 2>proxy statement to be like anything that the judge found

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>bad here, you can read it, right. So I think

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>they have to be fully informed. There's no problem with

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the vote, but the law and this is not super clear,

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>and they say in the proxy statement, we're not totally

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 2>sure what the effect of this will be I think

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>there's some argument that the disgruntled shareholder can sue again

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and the judge again gets to decide if the pay

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>package is fair, and we kind of know she thinks

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 2>it isn't, so it might get stricked down. But the

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>other thing I want to say is that I don't

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>know what the disgruntl cherold. There's a guy named Richard Tournetto.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what he thinks. I don't know if

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>he wants to do this again. But you know who

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 2>cares his lawyers who when they won in the dellar

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>A court and they streck down this fifty six billion

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>dollar pay package. They went to the court and they said,

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>we want five point six billion dollars worth of Tesla

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>stock as a fee for this win. Right, And their

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>theory is we saved shareholders all this money by clawing

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>back the fifty six billion dollars from Elon Musk. If

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the shareholders give Elon Musk the fifty six billion dollars back,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>they haven't gotten the fee yet, right, it's still in court. Yeah,

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 2>if they give the money back, what is their argument

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that they save the shareholders any money? Like, yeah, they've

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of money riding on the argument that

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Musk's compensation actually got clawed back, so they care.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about the second part of what happened Texas.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to run into this problem again in

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Texas moving to Texas? What does that do for Tesla?

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>They say that moving to Texas makes sense because they're

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>big factories in Texas, their headquarters in Texas. Elon lives

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>in Texas, and so they have to bet their incorporation

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>to Texas because that just makes sense. No other company

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>thinks that, right, Like, that's not really a thing. Like

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 2>every company is incorporated in Delaware, and very few are

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>located in Delaware. But it's what they say. The answer is,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 2>nobody knows. There's a lot of Delaware corporate law and

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>there's not a lot of corporate law anywhere else because

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 2>most big companies that have big lawsuits are incorporated in Delaware,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and so that's where all the cases are. Tesla says,

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's proxy that they think the law in Texas

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>is mostly the same as the law in Delaware. I

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 2>think it's probably true. But everyone kind of assumes that

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>if this had all happened in Texas, and if a

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>shareholder had sued Elon Musk in Texas, they get back

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>to the fifty six billion dollars, a Texas judge would

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>have been like, Nah, Elon Musk can keep that money.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no basis for assuming that nobody knows. It seems

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>that way, and clearly Elon Musk assumes it, because as

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>soon as the Delaware opinion came out, he's like, we're

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>moving to Texas. By the way, that happened, the opinion

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>came out and he was like, we're moving to says

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>right away, was saying it on Twitter. But Tesla now

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's proxy statement has to explain why it's moving

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to Texas, and it describes this very thorough process that

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it did to evaluate moving to Texas. So it formed

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a special committee of independent directors. There's one person on

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the committee.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Was his name Elon Musk.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it's a truly independent director. Her name is Kathleen

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Wilson Thompson. The special committee met sixteen times for more

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>than twenty six hours, says the proxy, which is like

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 2>a fun thing to imagine, Like I first imagined it

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>as like I met four hours today with the money

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>stuff committee. Like I was like typing on my computer.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh, there's a meeting, But in fact

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>she met with like her lawyers, so she did. There

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>were real meetings, but just she was the only director

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>at the meetings. But they the committee evaluated all fifty

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 2>states to decide. It was like throwing darts, being like,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 2>which state should we move to, and like it just

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 2>so happens that the best state turned out to be Texas. Coincidentally,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>the same thing that Elon Musk was treating about like

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 2>two months ago. It's beautiful, so it worked out nicely.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's good that it turned out that way.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>By the way, you asked you if the laws move

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 2>with I wrote this before there's some small chance of

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>a Delaware judge saying, no, you're not allowed to move

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to Texas because you're only moving to Texas to pay Elon.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Muskmore and which seems reasonable.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 2>That is like a violation of your pretty shaddies to

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>your Delaware shaholders, so we're going to stop you. I

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>wrote that in like January. I thought that was like

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 2>some extremely funny theoretical chance of that happening. Since then,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 2>there's been like a Delaware court decision that makes it

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 2>less likely, So I don't think that's going to happen,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>but it would be really funny.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So I have one point, and I also have a question.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll start with the point, and that is

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>that there is like a human psychology component to this,

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>because I remember when this happened in January that it

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was voided this pay package. My suggestion to Elon Musk

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>would be, why don't you just have Tesla do a dividends.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg did that with Meta. Now he's going to

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.599
<v Speaker 1>make like seven hundred million dollars a year. Mark Zuckerberg

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously owns a lot more Meta share, so it makes

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>more sense there. But you made the point to me

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that Elon mus isn't trying to make normal extremely wealthy

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>man money. He has like insane aspirations that he needs

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all this money for.

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 2>He owns a minority of Tesla. He's a controlling Cheryl

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>everbody owns like twenty percent of the stock, so a

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 2>dividend would go mostly to other people, and like they're

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>not so rolling in cash, they could pay it like

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 2>tens of billions of dollars or dividends. Mark Zuckerwood gets

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 2>a dividend because he likes to go water skiing or

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is that he does, right, hoverboarding, He.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Has cows, right house, Yeah.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Archery, I don't know, all sorts of normal things hobbies, Yeah,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 2>like moderately expensive hobbies some of them. But Elon Musk's

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 2>hobbies are like brain implants, going to Mars, buying Twitter.

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm forgetting a few, but like, he's not like looking

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to spend money on a nice vacation. He's looking to

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>have tens of billions of dollars to fund going to Mars,

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>and so he needs these giant pay packages every now

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>and then to pursue his next ambition.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to get that from your dividend checks.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And then my question for you is what do you

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think is the most interesting way that this proxy vote

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>could turn out? What would be the most interesting chain

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of events for you?

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Look, I love the idea of a Delaware court preventing

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Musk from leaving for Texas. I think that would be

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>extremely funny. But I actually think the simpler answer is funnier,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>which is, if the shareholders vote this down, that's wild,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Like he'll quit it a huff on Twitter like that day. Yeah,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it'll be an amazing thread of tweets and it will

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>be an amazing corporate tobaccle. Whatever time he's devoting to Tesla,

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>he'll go and devote to some other wild thing and

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>that'll be wild, and Tesla will like find its way,

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>as you know, it'll get back that fifty million dollars

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>and find its way as a company not controlled by

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>a wild, wild sequence of events.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, in my mind would be the most interesting scenario

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, and then we could truly find out what

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk premium.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Is the thing about Elon Musk companies is that if

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>you're an investor in Elon Musk companies, like you like

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, like that's just how it goes, right, Like

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you're not there because you like the assets but think

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>they're mismanaged, Like you're there because you like Elon Musk.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 2>It would be really shocking for the investors in an

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk company to vote against them in such a

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>striking way.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to talk about Elon Musk for like

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five more minutes or do you think we should

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>move on?

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I saw your look of like I have wrapped this

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>up so nicely. And then Matt comes in with more stuff.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I have some more stuff, but I'm gonna wrap it up.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Never mind, Stay tuned, Stay tuned. There's always more, love, Katie.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>You're so impatient to get to James sain Street. Yeah.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know why not that it's not super

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting set the scene for us, what's going on?

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to talk you about this because Jane

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Street sued Millennium. Two Jane Street traders left Jane Street.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>They went to Millennium, and Jane Street thinks they took

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 2>a complicated secret trade with them and are now making

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>money for Millennium at the expensive Jane Street, and so

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 2>they sued. I wanted to talk about it because the

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>complaint is public, but it's heavily redacted because Jane Street

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is like, we have the secret trading strategy that's being

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>ruined by someone else copying it. They don't want to

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 2>say what the strategy is, right, but they have to

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>say what it is. They just have to black it

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 2>out in the publicly filed version.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>So I want to read the complaint and all.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>The biopes go for it.

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm not really going to read the whole complaint,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 2>but they did a trading investigation. They had this idea

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and they like tested it out, and the results confirmed

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Jane Street's initial findings, notwithstanding their facial improbability, and revealed

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that the market was bibe for certain classes of trades

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 2>in the presence of specific market signals and underline conditions.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Probably we could have, like a podcast producer put a

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 2>real beep over that, but I think I think I

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>did a pretty pretty good peep.

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, that definitely was a beeB anyway.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, they have this trade. Yeah, we don't know

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>what it is.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what it is.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So what we know about it is one that makes

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 2>money like reliably for like some number of months at least.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And two it's weird. Yeah, they really emphasize that it's weird.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It's facial improbability, and they say that it was counterintuitive, unexpected,

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and initially met with significant skepticism and incredulity internally at

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Jane Street. It's really tantalizing. They're like, we found this

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 2>trade that you would not believe. It's so crazy. They

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like discovered it in like the data and they all

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 2>sat it on and being like this can't be real.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>And then they tested it for like a year and

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 2>they go, wow, it's real.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of silly. But reading about it and

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>reading that line specifically made me think of like Rudolph

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Red Nose reindeer, how everyone made fun of him

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and then his nose actually lit up and illuminated the

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>night sky and they were like, Wow, this works. It's

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of a similar situation. Yes, something else in the

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News article, apparently Jane Street saw evidence that one

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of the traders who left in February he was using

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the strategy. They figured it out because Jane Street said

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that its profits from using the strategy fell by fifty

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>percent in March, a drop, it said, could only be

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>attributable to quote, the entrance of a competitor using the

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>same strategy. What is this trade?

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It's apparently a trade where there's like capacity to make editor.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to make up a number, make a million

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 2>dollars a day, right, And Jane Sat was doing it

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and making a million dollars a day, right, and then

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 2>Millennium starts to do it. Now that each make half

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars a day.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, Because it's not like they lost money because

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>someone else started doing it. They're just they're not the

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>only person in this market anymore. Whatever this market is.

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>It's some sort of options market. It seems clear it's

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 2>like some sort of options trade. Rumor is that it's

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>not in the United States, but it is.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>How does this work? Are we ever going to find

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>out what the trade is? Or is it just a secret?

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to keep asking. One of my favorite things

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>about this complaint is that one of these traders leaves

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Jane straight from Millennium, and the complaint mentions how much

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>money he's getting, because they're making the point like he's

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 2>getting paid so much money. It can't be just because yeah,

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>he's like whatever experience, whatever skill, he wouldn't be making

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 2>that much money. He's getting paid that much money because

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 2>he's bringing this Chaine Street trade.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>To the millign people.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>How much he's making, Yeah, the complaint says, based on

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>conversations between shadow Wald and his colleagues at Jane Street,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>his companies from MILLENNAUMO, but so they don't know. He

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>told his friends at Jane Street and then like Jane

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Street asked his friends how much he was making. They're like,

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 2>all right, man, he's getting and then they put that

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>thing complaint.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine telling people so casually what I make,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>especially if it's a lot of money.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I can like, he's leaving, he's leaving a financial firm

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>for another financial firm, and like he goes out to

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>drinks with his friends and they're like, oh man, what

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>are they giving you? And he's like boob right, like

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 2>like that's why he's leaving, right, Like, it's not like

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>this is a very mercenary business.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He should have just bought a huge

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>apartment and let that speak for itself. That is how

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>much I'm making.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, he hadn't made it yet. I feel like the

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>day of he's like, oh my, look at how much

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 2>money I'm making. I also love the best possible amount

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>of money to make is boob right, Like a number

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>is so big that they can't publicize it.

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>That is pretty amazing. So I guess, yeah, the two

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>things I want to know what the tradear how much

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy is making? Also, is this an unforced error

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>by Jane Street which doesn't have non competes? Like could

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this all have been avoided had they had a non compete?

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 2>There are really like two different things, right, There's a noncompete,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 2>which usually it's like time limited. You can't go to

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 2>another firm for six months, a year or two years. Yes,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that would avoid that here, because what's it

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be like in a year, Like it seems unlikely.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the strategy is, but it seems

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 2>unlikely Jane Street will still be making a lot of

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>money on the strategy in a year because someone will

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 2>notice it. Somehow Alpha gets competed away all over the place.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Whatever this weird counterintuitive strategy is, Like, probably it'll decay.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I have an idea, what maybe it's uh, this is

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>half a joke. This is a joke. Actually closed end

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>fund arbitrages.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, you love closed end trying evertise, I'm thinking

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not that, but right, so if you have a

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>non compete and like the guy goes and sits on

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a beach for a year and then he comes back,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>whatever he knew a year ago is just not valuable anymore.

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not as valuable, and so that solves the problem. Now,

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't always solve every problem, because you know, you

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 2>do have like a confidentiality agreement about IP because like

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>there's some stuff that has value longer term, like if

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you really know how, like Jane Street Systems, there's some

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 2>chance that two years from now you could sell that

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to someone and it would be valuable to them. Right.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 2>So Jane Street does not have non competes, but they

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 2>have confidentiality agreements. That's how you can't use what you

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 2>learn here somewhere else. You know. They say in the

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>complaint like, well, it's typical for people to take some

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 2>time off between firms. This guy didn't. It's like, it's

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 2>not typical. It's not like people just feel like taking

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 2>some time off. They do. Yeah, I would, but a

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of people don't. It's typical because usually firms have

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 2>non competes that require them to take time off. Yeah,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't. And so the impression from the complaint

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>is that he had a real time sensitive trade and

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 2>he's like I got to start the next day to

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>make as much money as I can from.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>This trade, and that's what he did allegedly.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I think it's interesting because, like the non

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>compete is a really good solution because like it's clear,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 2>m you know that whatever the time period is, so

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>let's say it's a year, you know, you can't go

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>work for the competing firm for a year, and then

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>after that you can What's interesting here is Jane Street

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>is arguing that these guys stole their intellectual property. As

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>of today Thursday, we don't have Millennium's response, but I

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 2>assume their response be something like, no, we didn't, we

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't steal their intellectual poverty. But there's like this wide

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 2>overlap where if you work at a financial firm doing

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 2>closed un fund arbitrage, right, and then you leave and

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you go to another financial firm, and you're like, I'm

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 2>going to close in fund.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Arbittrge, I'm going to find closed on funds with huge discounts. Right.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna like forget everything you learned at the

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 2>first firm, right, Like there's some amount of just like

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 2>general skills and knowledge building and just like market experience

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>that everyone understands is portable and goes with you, Like

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 2>if you like download the code from your first firm,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>like that's bad, right, But a lot of stuff it's

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>like the general experiences that you have at one firm

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to inform what you do at the next firm.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's I think sort of hard to tease out

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>which is which Sometimes which is why gardening leave is

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>such a good solution, because it's like you do nothing

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>for a year, and then after that it's like we

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 2>don't have to worry about it. Here, Like Jane Street

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 2>makes it sound like this is a very complicated, very

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>counterintuitive and weird trade that like is their secret sauce.

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>But what if it's just like noticing that the price

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 2>is if some options are like too low, and like

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>clicking on them right like then like kind of weird

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 2>to say, like you have to forget that you noticed

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that when you moved to another firm.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>My heart always hurts when I'm in a conversation about

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gardening leave because I've never been on gardening leave. I

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>will never be on gardening leave. It sounds idyllic.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>When I left investment banking for deal Breaker, the Great

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street comedy blog, I had, I want to say,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 2>three months of.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Gardening leave sounds great.

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I sat on my catch being terrified. I regret it

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 2>so much. I really wasted my gardening leave because I

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 2>was like, I have made this huge career change. I'm

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>getting paid so much less money. This is around the

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 2>time that like Goldman had that programmer who still code,

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 2>they had him prosecuted for still encoding. He went to

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>jail for a while, and so I spent some of

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>my time thinking Goldman's going to kill me eventually. Like

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 2>my last week of gardening leave, I talked to like

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>a Goldman PR person. He's like, no, this is great,

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 2>We're excited for you. It was like so worried. But

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>in any case, I spent my gardening leave being nervous

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 2>and not partying.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh I hate that.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's really a shame. I did get to

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 2>experience gardening leave once, but I didn't get to really

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 2>enjoy it.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Gardening leave wasn't that great. Take a big sip of water.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into hunter Brook. This is a meati.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 2>One hunter It's a hedge fund.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is something that you and I have talked.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 2>About a lot in our private conversation.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>In our private conversations. Maybe explain what hunter Brook is

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're pronouncing it with vowels.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the thing is called hunter Brook. Their website is

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 2>it's h n t rb rka hunter Brook is. I

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>don't know how to describe it. Say it's a headphone.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>That's also our newspaper. Sometimes I think it's a activist

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 2>short hedge fund that is very good at getting me

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to pay attention to it.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if I've seen it anywhere else,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I'm just not looking at this.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>No. How to Work is is a media organization that

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>does like investigative reporting around the world to find interesting news,

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 2>and it funds its reporters by they take their scoops

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and they give them to its affiliated hedge fund. And

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 2>if the hedge fund is like this is a market

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>moving scoop, then they trade on it and then they

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>publish the scoop and then the stock goes up or

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 2>down or whatever it's about. The market moves, and then

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>the hedge fund makes money, and it gives some of

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the money to the reporters to pay for the continued reporting.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not a typical journalistic business model.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>True.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>All journalistic business models involve some conflicts of interests.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>True.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Possibly it maybe involves a little bit more conflict of ventures. Yeah,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 2>because like your incentive is to make your story as

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 2>market moving as possible. If you find some like bad

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff about a company, and then I'll see you find

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>some good stuff about the company, and like also it's

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>like not that bad and like there's some mitigating factors.

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 2>You're tempted to just be like, this is the worst

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>company in the world, or this is the best company

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>in the world, because you're on the move the stock

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>price as much as possible. Yeah, So it is a

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>conflict in that way.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess the part that feels strange to me is

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that the hedge fund sees it first before it's published.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's the whole part I know, there's no other part.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>That's how they make money.

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, in terms of like how they report things out,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't talk to insiders. They can't talk to insiders.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 2>If you're like a regular journalist at a regular journalistic publication,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>you can like call an insider at a company and

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 2>be like, hey, is it doing fraud. If the insiders like, yes,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 2>it's doing fraud. Here are some secret documents proving it,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you're like, oh my god, this is a great scoop, right,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a Hunter Book and you do that,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 2>then you're like, oh, no, this is inside information. We

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>can't trade on it. So they try to stay away

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 2>from information underli on published sources.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what Hunter Book has done so far.

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>They officially debuted in early April. I believe their first

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>article was on United Wholesale mortgage. Now they've come out

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>with another splashy report that you wrote about. I'm impressed,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>honestly by the volume so far, because there's a lot

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of work that goes into investigative journalism of this degree.

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Also like into activist short selling, the sort of like

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 2>well known activist short selling funds. You know, every so

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>often they'll put up a short report, but it's not

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 2>like a daily news meeting to figure out what's going

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to go on. The real meeting is like somewhere in between.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 2>My question when they launched was like, what's it going

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to look like on the second day, because the first

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>day it launches the big investigation. The second day is

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that like bumped down the feed so they can do

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 2>like more local news, and that's there is no kind

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>of looks like a short seller's website where it's like

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that big report is on top for a week or so.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>But now it looks a little bit more like a

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 2>news organization where like they've had two like big stories

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 2>in the sense of like kind of short investigations this week,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>but there's like a spinoff story for one of them.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>It's like they's the other stuff. So one of the

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 2>stories this week was like an oil company that has

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 2>been telling investors it's going to reopen a trilling platform

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and Hunter Bruk thinks they're not. And it's just like

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a very straightforward kind of small short bet. It's like

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 2>this company is going to have like a little bit

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>worse news than the market expects, you know, So they

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 2>traded on that. I don't know. That almost feels like

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>something like a hedge finanalyst would come up with and

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>trade on and not bother to publish. It's just not

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>that interesting a news story, right. But the other one

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>they had was about Pasco, the big Korean like steel

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 2>company and Conglomberate doing a lot of work with very

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>unpleasant military hunter and Myanmar, and that one they didn't

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 2>trade on. Yeah, they said they did this big investigation

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and they said, we're not trading on this, and I

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 2>was curious why. And I think the two leading answers

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 2>are one that it might not be that market moving,

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 2>which is like you can think of that as being

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>like a depressing story of like complicity and human rights

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 2>abuses actually doesn't matter to share.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Olders, Cold Embrace of capitalism.

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Or you can be like you know, one reader email

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 2>to be like Posca's involvement in Men war has actually

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>been known for a long time. It's like been on

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 2>an ESG exclusion list. Like it might not be market

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 2>moving because like it's news to you, it's news to

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 2>many people, it's news to many of your general interest readers,

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>but it may not be news to the market.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 2>The other explanation for why they didn't short Pasco that

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I find much funnier is that South Korea has banned

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 2>a short selling.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe like the winner there, it could be.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>It could honestly be either because like it's not like

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 2>it's huge market moving news.

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It seems like a hard business journalism. Yes,

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's bone crushingly hard, but also short selling is super

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>hard too, especially in this market. But also there's the

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>question of like, even if you are right, your thesis

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is right, there's no guarantee that the stock is going

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to do what you think it's going to do. And

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's happened to a lot of short sellers

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in recent history.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>People hate short sellers, Yeah, it is part of it,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 2>and in particular, like when you talk about recent history,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Like since like the memestock era, if it gets out

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that you are short a stock, that stock could go

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to the moon just because people are mad at you,

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to the point that, like some number of activist short

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 2>sellers have gotten out of the business or said they'd

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 2>get out of.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>The business, have gone underground.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Gone underground because like it used to be that if

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>you found a company that you thought was a fraud

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and you published a report saying it's a fraud, people

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>would read it, and if you were right and convincing,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>then the stock would go down. Now, if you think

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of company's a fraud and you publish that report, people

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 2>on Reddit might say, we have to make that stock

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 2>go up to punish the evil short seller. So it's

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>just not as worth it. One possible advantage of the

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Brick business model is like, to the extent they

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 2>convince people that they're a media company and not a

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>short seller, you like somewhat avoid that. Instead of instead

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 2>of being like, ah, this hedge fund is shorting the stock,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>let's make it go up, you're like, oh, they've published

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 2>this media company published a report about human rights abuses.

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>That's bad, right, Like, yeah, there's some chance of you

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 2>like getting a little bit more of a sympathetic audience.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll see if they do take a shot at

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a stock that has any.

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 2>It'd be amazing if they were like game Stop, not

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a very good company.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, like, if they come after a company

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that has any chance of becoming a meme stock, like

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think about United Wholesale Mortgage, I don't even think

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Bets could get excited about that one. It

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just it doesn't have that curb appeal.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right. The oil company they went after this week

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>is interesting just because it's like a six hundred million

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>dollar market cut. Like you're not playing in territory where

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 2>like Ro Street Bets gonna have some fun.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Did you want to talk to you on musk worn.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 2>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifelt.

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>between ten to eleven am Eastern.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us a

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>question and we find answer it on air.

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps some

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>more people find the show.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>The Money Step Podcast is produced by anim Masaracus and Moses.

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Francis Nenham is our executive producer, and.

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcast.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more boo