WEBVTT - Goldman Sachs to Exit Russia in Wall Street’s First Pullout

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Search Bloomberg Global News. The headlines crossing g UH gap,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>suspending deliveries to Russia and moving deliveries to Port Southern

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>and Eastern ports specifically. And then you've get Disney uh

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>taking steps to pause businesses in Russia that includes content

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and product licening licensing excuse me, and it also includes

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Disney cruise line activities. And then you have Tim our

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>most read story on the Bloomberg and this has to

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>do with the Wall Street Banks Goldman Sachses who were

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically talking about it. And it's an exclusive from shrined

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Raja and Sally bake Well as finance team leader for

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Near she's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Sally,

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you edited this story from shri Um. Talk to us

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the significance of actually Goldman exiting

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Russia and what are the details with with an exit?

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Is this like done with Russia indefinitely or bring us

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>into it. I think it does seem like it is

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>done with Russia indefinitely. I don't think we can say

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that for absolute certain because that is quite a big

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>step to permanently pull out of a country. Massive. It

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is massive. Although to note city has itself done that,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.639
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't it was in Russia. It pulled out of Russia.

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>We went back right now that bank is assessing um

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it stays in Russia or not um. So I

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>think it is very significant that Goldman SAX has done

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this because actually no European banks have exited the country.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>They're all assessing their exposure, but they haven't actually made

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that step yet. How much exposure do these guys have

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to Russia and like how much business do they really

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>get in Russia? So Wall Street banks have emphasized that

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>actually their exposure is quite small. Um. I think the

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sax story said that they have about six dred

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million of exposure there. Um City is the

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>largest one. It has a very substantial presence with about

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>three thousand workers. And if you recall City which is

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to um sell its retail operations, Russia is included

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in some of those, so that sale has obviously been

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit stalled by by the situation in the country. Sally,

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>we just talked a little bit about the idea that

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Russia could start to move in and nationalize foreign firms.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering about this decision. If it's a decision

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>about Okay, well, we don't want to operate a bank

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>in a place that you know it is doing something

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we disagree with, like Russia's because of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Or is it also about business risk? And I'm not

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just talking customers when I'm talking like, oh wait a second,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Russia could come in and actually sees this bank, right,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably a question that they are all

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>debating right now. UM. And what is interesting that I

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>think some of the banks are actually involved in the

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>company who were suspending operations and putting out of the country.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They're actually helping UM with that, so it is a

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of business stream for them as it is already UM.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>But I think that does complicate matters. I mean that

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they have to deal with the tremendously complicated Swift situation

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>UM and those transactions that they might have to block,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, whether some of the transactions have less

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>obvious sanctioned Russian entities involved in them, and then they

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have the sanctions to and then now they're going When

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>you say Swift, you're referring to the global platform for

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>messaging that banks used to communicate with one another that

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Russia was suspended from that. Jamie Diamonds did there are

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ways to get around, although that they aren't now that

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan exactly exactly help me out here because and

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>forgive me for being the cynic. I'm an optimist usually

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think good of people and entities. But what's

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting is it's not the first time we've seen the

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>financial sector kind of back away from a troubled area

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of our world, only to get back in because there's

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>money to be made. Is that ultimately, I mean, right now,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there's sanctions right there's rules when there are sanctions implied

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>against a certain area of the world. How do we

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think about that relationship right that global banks Wall Street

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>banks specifically have with areas of the world. If there's

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>money to be made, they will go there. I think

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>UM City might again be correct. Yeah, I think They

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>City is an example of that, maybe in the in

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the sense that it was in Russia and it came

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>out and went back in again. UM. I suspect that

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>memories become a little bit shorter when there is money

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on the table. UM. Obviously, the degree of severity of

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the responses from from everyone, from all corporations and from

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>some banks that we're starting to see now UM do

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>indicate perhaps a slight shift in philosophy about about something

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like this UM. But I guess time will tell as

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to whether it becomes a permanent UM sort of frame

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of mind about the Russia Ukraine situation. So, Sally, is

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this the first of every major bank to pull out?

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I think your going to look yet. This is the first,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to look pretty strange if

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>others don't follow from now. UM. So you know, we're

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>chasing hard to see if we can pin down similar,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>similar decisions. I think every bank now has to be

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at this UM and assessing whether it's a question

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of winding down some of the business but keeping something there,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>or wholesale pulling out. I always think about you guys.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're a finance team leader. I can only

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>imagine the discussions you guys are having around the desks

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or on virtual meetings as you look at this, you know,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>globally and certainly from the Wall Street banks. What are

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the issues you're thinking about as we continue

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch a situation that we fingers crossed had hoped

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would never happen, did happen, hoped it would wrap up soon,

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and now we're in we're entering our third week here

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or so. So I'm just curious, what are the discussions

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys have been having. UM. Well, A lot comes

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>down to exposure. As I said at the beginning, a

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the banks have said that their exposure is

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>quite small. But as time goes on, maybe they start

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to realize they have more than they thought through various

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>UM complicated financial instruments, UM and so and so we're

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that, UM just the very sort of physicality

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of what they have to do um to move people out.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We had a great story today by Jenny Seraine about Visa. UM.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>The CEO gave this quite harrowing account of how they

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>evacuated their staff from Ukraine, and you know they had

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to use mercenaries. Um. The CEO got a text while

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he was in church from President Zelenski asking for help,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and of course Visa suspended its business there. UM. So

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sort of about a question of you know,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>exposure business direct or indirect business. How complicated it is

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to to wind that down um, and then the actual physics,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>physical presence. It is tough. Thank you so much, Sally

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Bell big Well. She is of course financed team leader

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Masure and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Steinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Conversation that has been lost I think with Russia's invasion

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine is what the COVID situation has been uh

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're fortunate should be joined by Rapauli LeMay, Associate

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>scientist in the Department of International Health at Johns Hopkins

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health, who joins us now on

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Dr Limay, it's good

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to have you back with us. How are you? Thank

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for having me. It's great to be back. Well,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about what your what your

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>focus has been over these last couple of weeks, because

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking, of course, a lot about the global

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>economic effects of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. But I think

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>partly lost in that conversation has been what it means

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for the spread of COVID, especially as you see more

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>than two million refugees flee Ukraine. Um, what have you

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>been focusing on over the last couple of weeks. Yeah, No,

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you hit it right on the head. There's

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>two million refugees that we know of, that number is

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>likely likely higher than that, And I think the biggest

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>issue that we're seeing is that we do know that

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>conflict and infectious disease go hand in hand. So the

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>concern really here is how do we make sure that

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as individuals are moving to different cities, to different locations,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to different countries, that we're doing all that we can

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to protect them from from COVID. Previous to the invasion,

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the rates for primary dose series completion in

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine were not great. So we were already dealing

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>with a large proportion of the population that had not

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been vaccinated, and so this has really just been exacerbated

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and that then you add on this issue of not

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>being able to get help supplies in so it's just

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a really dire situation. Yeah, no, dire situation on so

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>many different levels. When I you know, anything to do

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>right now with Ukraine, we think about obviously, we talk

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>about so many different impacts on markets of course, and

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>what businesses are doing. But of course it's a humanitarian

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>story that we are all following so closely. We probably

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's just a reminder it's hard right now.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be very honest with you to remember

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in a pandemic. We all are still in

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic because of what's going on in the world

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. But you know, I am curious to you guys,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like what will ultimately determine that we are beyond the

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic stage as as a war all and moving to

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the endemic stage. You know, it's a really good question.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think in parts of the United States, I

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think folks are already there. Um. A lot of states

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>are repealing their mask mandates. For example, I mean here

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, we still have almost of the

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>population of the adult population that has not gotten vaccinated.

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little bit concerning when you're seeing states

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>doing that when you're also seeing an increase and perhaps

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a new sort of sub variant that's starting to rise.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Um And so I think part of it. To me,

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>no deaths are really acceptable. I think people think about

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>this and say, you know what, only forty four children

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have died from COVID. I don't I think that number

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>should be zero. I think other individuals would say, well,

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's time for us to quote unquote get back to normal. Well,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to do that in a way that's equitable,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>but that also allows for protections if we need them,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>which you know, again, a mask is one of the

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>easiest mitigation measures that we really have and we should employ.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But many states are repealing that right now. What's a

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what's a realistic way for us to think about how

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic actually ends? And Carol asked about it becoming

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an endemic, but but I think how much of the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>way we of our sentiment has to do with expectations,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>so help set expectations for us. Yeah, I mean, I

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think the most realistic way is that if we can

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure and think about community transmission and gets under

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a specific level, a threshold level, we do know it's

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be with us. So it's not something that

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we can eliminate, it's it's here to stay. I think

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the key here is how do we essentially protect individuals

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that are immuno compromised or or are at risk for

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>severe COVID And so part of that has to do

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>is we really need to make sure that community transmission

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>rates are very low. That requires a bit of a

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>nuanced approach. And what I mean by that is if

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you live in a particular area and rates are starting

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to increase again, then we need to be able to

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>implement mitigation strategy strategies again. So that can be essentially

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>put bringing the mask mandates back, ensuring that there's ventilation

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in schools, et cetera, and so forth. I'm hopeful because

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going into the warmer months that more people tend

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to be outside, there tends to be better ventilation, so

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>we hopefully will see some good downward trends. But I

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>think the question is going to be what happens in

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>the fall when it starts to cold again. We to

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>see other infectious pathogens like RSV right and influenza start

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to circulate again, and so I think a more realistic

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>pathway is going to be. We do know it's here

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to stay. It will be a bit in my opinion,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>of using of these measures, but we also need to

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be prepared that some of these measors might be implemented

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>again depending on transmission. We're probably yes, or now we're

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you need to get another booster. Oh goodness,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a hard time. We do know that immunity, Wayne,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think part of it will depend on how

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>much transmission is occurring and how many people actually have immunity.

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, so I think kind of not known yet. Okay,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. We're Pobaby LeMay. She's Associate scientists in the

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Department of International Health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Public Health. Of course, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. But the new issue of Bloomberg

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Business Week it is out. In it a story by

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Olivia Carvil, who you might remember reported out a

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>revealing BW cover story that was last summer about airbnb

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is handling of violent crimes at its listings. Well, this week,

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>she looks at sexual abuse in the world of show

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>jumping and the efforts to Impede's Safe Sport, which was

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>an organization set up to help young athletes victimized by misconduct.

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Olivia Carville is an investigative reporter for Bloomberg new She's

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Joel Webber

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is editor at Bloomberg Business Week. He's also with us

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Olivia's story featured in

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the new issue of Business Week magazine, available on newsstands,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week. Joel,

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a powerful story. It's one about an institution, uh,

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and one about an institution being set up to try

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to help that institution. There are a lot of familiar

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>threads here. Yeah, it's um, it's a rarefied world. The

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>sport that we're talking about here is equestrian Uh, it's

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>an Olympic sport. Um. Uh. Olivia's uh Carverlos reporting on

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this has just been an amazing one. UM was was

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>really just honored to the ship in the magazine and

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and also talk about it UM today because ultimately a

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of this legacy of what what she writes about

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in this story actually goes back to Larry Nasar and

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the gymnastics world UM, and there have

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>been there There have been many things that have changed

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>since that moment um a couple of years ago, one

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>being this organization Safe Spoort that was founded by US

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Congress to basically help police sex abuse and protect young athletes. UM.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But what's happened and what Olivia's reporting revealed is that

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of one community that has resisted any sense

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of discussion about this and has not liked watching its

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>heroes fall. So Olivia bring us into the story and

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened at the stables? Yeah, sure, and thanks so

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>much for having me on. This was a really important

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>story from my prospective as well, just to be able

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>to tell the young writers UM stories to hear it

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in their own words, what happened to them, what does

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>grooming look like to them, and why their community was

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in in a sense, actually attacking them in some cases,

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think with an equestrian we have seen really elite

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sport be torn apart by um by safe sport be

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>torn apart by its history. And here you've actually got

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>some you know, pretty wealthy individuals who have spent their

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>life within the sport coming out and attacking safe sport,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this watchdog agency and also questioning the antics of some

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of these survivors, which has been really sad to see. Um,

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of stucked that this hasn't come out sooner. Again,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like what it was once again, a situation of

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the institution protecting itself. Yeah, that's right. I think if

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you look back in Olympic sporting communities, there has been

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a history of prominent figures who have been accused of

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>sexual misconduct being covered up by the national governing bodies,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've certainly seen that within equestrian Some of the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>most prominent figures that we mentioned in this piece, um,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know headhead complaints about sexual misconduct raised against them,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but it had never really resulted in them being banned

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. And yet with the creation of Safe Sport,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing some of these individuals finally being held accountable,

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and the sport doesn't like that. Olivia. The pieces filled

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with powerful but harrowing anecdotes and stories about people who

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>were affected, but also some really startling statistics. Through the

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>end of seven of the one thousand two sanctions that

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Center had handed down and publicized, we're talking Safe

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Sport here um in its discipline and database, had been

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>against members of the US Equestrian Federation. By comparison, members

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the U S t A, the U S Tennis

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Associations eight times it's big have only received thirty five

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Safe Sport sanctions. What's going on with equestrian Yeah, I

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing a bigger number of equestrians sanctioned by

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Safe Sport than other sports, and that is causing a

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>pushback from within the sport as well. I think that

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a sport that has historically been very insular,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>very exclusive. They don't like to let outsiders in. It

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was quite a challenging story to write because it's hard

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to break into this community, and so when they started

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to be sanctioned from historic cases going back to the

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>seventies eighties. The sport started to fight against that. It's

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a sporting community that doesn't like being told what to

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do and is willing to push back and challenge those

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in power when it doesn't believe they're getting it right.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So Jury's Cologne was appointed chief executive officer of Safe Sport.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Had a background where she was. She previously had worked

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. What

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was her experience coming in to Safe Sport and taking

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>over the rens of the organization. Yeah, Juris was a

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty incredible interview. Actually, she um she was shocked when

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 1>she came in and started running Safe Sport. She had

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>been working in child's safety before, but she had never

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>experienced so much animosity, so much hostility, so much anger.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Because when you're working within child's safety at the elite

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sporting level, these are people who want their children to win.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>There is a sense of desire to win, but also ambition.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This is particularly equestrian. It's a community of very rich

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and very powerful individuals, and they did push back against

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Juriss And she actually mentioned to me and in her interview,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>how on her first week on the job, she received

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a call from the mother of a young writer who

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted her daughter's trainer to be reinstated. He had been

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>removed for sexual misconduct and she wanted him back in

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the job because she wanted her child to win. And

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that's something that Dress had never really experienced before in

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>any any of her previous roles in this area. And

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>let's let's kind of talk about who she's had to

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>struggle with, the critics, the people who are critical of

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Safe Sport. What's the rationale, what are they objecting to?

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>And just unfortunately have about twenty seconds. Sure, the critics

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are saying safe Sport less transparency, it lecks to process.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>They believe that it is unconstitutional in the US to

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>have an organization set up that is labeling people guilty

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>before proven innocent. And they're coming after juriss and they're

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>coming after Safe Sport for that reason. I'm just gonna

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>say a most read, a Bloomberg big take, a must read,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's in the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Unbelievable, Olivia,

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Olivia Carvil, investigative reporter, Bloomberg News

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course our thanks to do A. Weber, editor

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine. Yeah, how about you let me drive? No,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>no hone please, I want to drive. It's good question

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the Globe on Blueberg Radio. All Right,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just about ten and a half minutes left in today's

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>trading session, getting ready to wrap up another volatile day.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We're definitely off our loads of the session, as you

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>just heard from Charlie on those major equity averages. But

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>tech really still having a tough time. Could be as

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Rasco higher here today, Tim, it certainly could be.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it with Tracy McMillian, head of Global

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>act Allocation Strategy at Wells Fargo Investment Institute. You and

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Winston Salem, North Carolina. Tracy,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>how are you? I'm well, Thank you, Thanks for having me. Okay,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of superlatives over the last few weeks here,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility. Uh, it's difficult to kind of

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>understand what investors are thinking. Um, what's your read on

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the situation? Yah? Well, we continue this favorite quality across

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>our equity allocations in particular, and for us that means

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>us that were international. Um, it means that within the US,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we're favoring things like large caps and mid caps over

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>small caps um and just today we downgraded emerging market

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to an unfavorable position, and what that means is that

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we're taking some money out of emerging market. We're putting

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it into short term and intermediate term bonds while we

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>played out some of this disruption with a lower risk profile.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there a point where you say, Okay, this is

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have a bigger impact on the second half

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>The I m F already has come out. We talked

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about this a little bit earlier with our TV colleagues

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as they are putting out there um our thoughts about

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they say they will likely cut world GDP outlook because

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Ukraine War. We did have the g E

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>CEO on our air with David Weston, and you know,

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they have put out their fiscal year outlook because they

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>say that's based on the things that they can control

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>hole and have a good grasp of, but again pointing

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>out the Ukraine War and that that volatility is something

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, is a variable that nobody can ignore.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So when do you get to a point where you say, okay,

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a different year and definitely

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a different second half. We didn't kind of re evaluate. Yeah,

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're there on the direct impacts outside of

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Russia are definitely falling hardists on Europe, and now we

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>do accept a recession later this year in Europe. We

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the US is going to see a recession,

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>um but we're reducing our growth and our equity forecast

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for the US along with our growth expectations for the

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. And at the same time we're

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>increasing our inflation expectations. Al right, so just a recession

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, not in the US, but you're reducing your

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>growth estimates for the for the US this year, that's right,

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>really reducing the growth estimates of around the world. And

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that, of course, you know, is that

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this higher inflation, and we're seeing centual banks

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that are going to have to come in and they're

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have to fight these higher levels of inflation.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think here in the United States, but

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that is going to start with a fifty I'm sorry

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>this point increase next week. And then the impacts of

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion are reinforcing our belief that they're going

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to have to keep raising rates multiple times. And we

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>started the year thinking they were going to raise rights

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>four times. We've just increased that just six times because

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of these lingering, persistent inflationary pressures. So stagsflation, So not

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily stagsflation. I guess that depends on how you define it.

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So we define that as a persistent level of very

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>low growth with high inflation. And yes, we're seeing the

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>high inflation part, and we do you think that all

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>thramps to lower inflation has gotten longer because of the

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>const lift, But we don't necessarily think that growth here

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Young State is going to fall to a

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>level that would be considered slow growth. We're still seeing

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>about three and a half percent growth here in the

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>nth States, and that's above trends. Okay, so three growth

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. Of four rate increases, what

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you were thinking at the beginning of the year, Now

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you're up to six times this year, So one point

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>five percent interest rates a d fifty basis points at

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. Is that what you're thinking

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or could there be a fifty basis point raising there?

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And if there could be, but we're saying anywhere from

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one point five to one point seven five. Okay, um,

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>hey Tracy, what would change your view on a recession

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US? If if oil keeps spiking, for example,

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and at leadst to demand destruction, could we see a

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>recession in the US. It's it's very I shouldn't say very,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it is palps hole. So within the realm of the

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that you know, we would be considering, but it's

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>certainly not our base case. Um. If we were to

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>see oil slides to say one fifty of arrel, then

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that would definitely lead to some demand instruction, um, and

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we would we'd also, you know, uh, factor into that

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>view that other commodities prices are also rising. So not

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>only our consumers being faced with higher oil prices, they're

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>also facing higher food prices. And while you can moderate

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>your your driving or vacations, you can't necessarily stop eating.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So as that is going to continue to weil on consumers,

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and should those prices continue to rise much more than

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we might have to reevaluate our Ryan Vastelica

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>has a story in the Bloom Bargains is tech valuations

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>back and focus on the anniversary of the dot com peak.

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So the sell off a major US tech and internet

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>stocks coming at an in a space just time as

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>March tesch parks the anniversary of the peak of the

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com era, after which some of the markets and

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>then biggest names began a collapse that would take years

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to recover from. We are seeing a lot of pressure

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on tech. We're rethinking maybe some of what is the

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>outlook for some of those fang names. UM, how do

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you see it? You see the opportunities in some of

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>big tech? Correct? We do? We continue to life to

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>information technology. There are just a few sectors that we

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like right now, information technologies, one of them, communication services

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and financials round delta top three for US. UM. We

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>do think that technologies earnings and revenue are going to

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to be attractive to investors. And our planning frame

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>here is sixty eighteen months, so over that time frame,

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we we think revenues, earnings are are are going to

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to come in pretty strong. We also think that

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>those earnings are high quality earnings and the leverage of

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>those companies generally speaking, is pretty low. Is there just

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>really quickly fifteen that cons This is a particular area

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>within tech because when we say tech, it covers a

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of ground. It does cover a lot of ground,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and we are more broadly speaking about technology here and

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not not necessarily a particular area, but we'd be diversified.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>All Right, We're gonna run. Hey, Thank you so much,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Tracy McMillian ahead of Global Asset Allocation Strategy. It was

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Fargo Investment Institute. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News