WEBVTT - Conning with the Stars: Anna Delvey, Voting Rationally, and the Maine Nebraska model

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:26.964
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, our podcast about making

0:00:27.044 --> 0:00:29.684
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kannakova.

0:00:29.404 --> 0:00:33.204
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Today we're talking about somebody named

0:00:33.244 --> 0:00:36.724
<v Speaker 2>Anna Delvi, who I am apparently supposed to have heard of.

0:00:38.004 --> 0:00:41.644
<v Speaker 1>Anna as she likes to be known, delve as I

0:00:41.724 --> 0:00:46.764
<v Speaker 1>will be calling her Anna Sorokan a con artist, convicted

0:00:47.004 --> 0:00:50.444
<v Speaker 1>con artist who has found her way to dancing with

0:00:50.604 --> 0:00:51.164
<v Speaker 1>the stars.

0:00:51.364 --> 0:00:54.524
<v Speaker 2>This week and after we talk about this kinn artist

0:00:54.564 --> 0:00:56.284
<v Speaker 2>that I've never heard of, will talk about a different

0:00:56.324 --> 0:00:58.044
<v Speaker 2>type of con politics.

0:00:58.284 --> 0:01:00.844
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do it. I'm excited to get started.

0:01:05.484 --> 0:01:10.004
<v Speaker 1>So so first up, Nate, are you really were you

0:01:10.164 --> 0:01:12.404
<v Speaker 1>just like hamming it up a tiny bit for the

0:01:12.444 --> 0:01:15.884
<v Speaker 1>podcast or do you really not know who Anna Delvy is.

0:01:16.524 --> 0:01:19.564
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man of a medium number of interests. Right.

0:01:19.684 --> 0:01:22.924
<v Speaker 2>I know about poker. I know about several of the

0:01:22.924 --> 0:01:26.444
<v Speaker 2>sports quite well. Right. I know about restaurants. I know

0:01:26.444 --> 0:01:28.724
<v Speaker 2>about Curb your enthusiasm. I know a little bit about

0:01:28.884 --> 0:01:31.284
<v Speaker 2>mid century modern architecture. I do not know who the

0:01:31.324 --> 0:01:33.444
<v Speaker 2>fuck this person that was a curveball.

0:01:33.524 --> 0:01:35.564
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I love that you just kind of

0:01:35.844 --> 0:01:40.044
<v Speaker 1>threw in mid century modern architecture amazing. All right, So

0:01:40.764 --> 0:01:46.924
<v Speaker 1>let's let's give a little primer on Anna, and I

0:01:46.964 --> 0:01:49.284
<v Speaker 1>won't go I'm assuming that most of our listeners do

0:01:49.404 --> 0:01:51.484
<v Speaker 1>know who she is, but I'll give I'll give you

0:01:51.524 --> 0:01:54.364
<v Speaker 1>the rundown. So, first of all, her name is not

0:01:54.604 --> 0:01:58.284
<v Speaker 1>Anna Delviy, and I'm actually really really pissed that in

0:01:58.364 --> 0:02:01.924
<v Speaker 1>absolutely every single media source she's called Anna Delvy, which

0:02:02.004 --> 0:02:05.684
<v Speaker 1>is her con artist name. Her actual name is Anna

0:02:05.844 --> 0:02:10.484
<v Speaker 1>Sorokan bites from Moscow, not an era from Germany the

0:02:10.524 --> 0:02:14.204
<v Speaker 1>way that she has always portrayed herself to be. But

0:02:14.324 --> 0:02:17.204
<v Speaker 1>she is someone who is a grifter who ended up

0:02:17.244 --> 0:02:21.884
<v Speaker 1>scanming New York High society out of hundreds of thousands

0:02:21.924 --> 0:02:26.004
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, including fraudulent bank loans, and all of these

0:02:26.044 --> 0:02:29.644
<v Speaker 1>things predicated on her being an heiress to this fortune.

0:02:29.804 --> 0:02:32.364
<v Speaker 1>She said that she was going to start this cultural

0:02:32.844 --> 0:02:35.564
<v Speaker 1>arts club that was going to be nate you know

0:02:35.604 --> 0:02:37.244
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about art. So she was going to

0:02:37.284 --> 0:02:40.284
<v Speaker 1>be exhibiting people like Cindy Sherman. Right, So threw she

0:02:40.364 --> 0:02:42.124
<v Speaker 1>threw the big guns at it. She said, you know,

0:02:42.404 --> 0:02:44.644
<v Speaker 1>I've got all this money and we're gonna we're gonna

0:02:44.644 --> 0:02:46.604
<v Speaker 1>have a private member's only club. We're going to have

0:02:46.644 --> 0:02:49.524
<v Speaker 1>Cindy Sherman exhibits. I mean, we're going to have the

0:02:49.564 --> 0:02:52.524
<v Speaker 1>best restaurant in New York. This is going to be amazing.

0:02:52.964 --> 0:02:55.844
<v Speaker 1>She weaseled her way into New York society by very

0:02:55.964 --> 0:03:01.484
<v Speaker 1>very clever use of Instagram, social media, connecting herself to

0:03:01.524 --> 0:03:08.324
<v Speaker 1>the highest kind of social cachet people. And she befriended

0:03:08.564 --> 0:03:12.804
<v Speaker 1>this woman, Rachel Williams, who at that point was a

0:03:12.844 --> 0:03:15.684
<v Speaker 1>photo editor. I believe I might be getting her title

0:03:15.684 --> 0:03:18.644
<v Speaker 1>wrong at Vanity Fair, but she was a photographer, you know,

0:03:18.724 --> 0:03:22.324
<v Speaker 1>photo editor person there. And Rachel was the one who

0:03:22.404 --> 0:03:26.404
<v Speaker 1>ended up bringing her down because she went on a

0:03:26.444 --> 0:03:30.004
<v Speaker 1>trip with her to Morocco that Anna said was part

0:03:30.124 --> 0:03:33.844
<v Speaker 1>of kind of this whole thing that she was doing

0:03:34.524 --> 0:03:37.524
<v Speaker 1>to raise money for the foundation, and Rachel ended up

0:03:37.524 --> 0:03:41.124
<v Speaker 1>getting saddled with the bill sixty two thousand dollars, which

0:03:41.204 --> 0:03:45.244
<v Speaker 1>was more than her annual salary, and she was not

0:03:45.364 --> 0:03:47.884
<v Speaker 1>able to get this money back from Anna. She got pissed.

0:03:47.884 --> 0:03:49.844
<v Speaker 1>She went to the police, and then Anna's house of

0:03:49.884 --> 0:03:54.244
<v Speaker 1>cards unraveled. She was convicted. She served time. When she

0:03:54.324 --> 0:03:59.484
<v Speaker 1>was released from Rikers, she ended up overstaying her visa

0:04:00.164 --> 0:04:04.644
<v Speaker 1>was put back into jail and is now out again

0:04:05.124 --> 0:04:08.604
<v Speaker 1>and back in the news because last week Dancing with

0:04:08.684 --> 0:04:12.844
<v Speaker 1>the Stars to make the lovely decision of having Anna

0:04:13.124 --> 0:04:15.644
<v Speaker 1>Sorokan on their show.

0:04:17.004 --> 0:04:20.324
<v Speaker 2>I did that's in preparation the performance. I thought that

0:04:20.404 --> 0:04:21.084
<v Speaker 2>was mediocre.

0:04:21.164 --> 0:04:23.724
<v Speaker 1>But again I'm not very mediocre. It was very mediocre.

0:04:23.724 --> 0:04:26.444
<v Speaker 2>I inspired. You had your moment in the fifteen minutes

0:04:26.444 --> 0:04:29.684
<v Speaker 2>of fame, your fourteenth out of fifteenth minute. Use it better?

0:04:29.764 --> 0:04:33.044
<v Speaker 2>Anna psoric and what's her name? And by the way,

0:04:33.044 --> 0:04:37.364
<v Speaker 2>all about this decision by Dancing with the Stars, Yeah,

0:04:37.444 --> 0:04:40.124
<v Speaker 2>how do I buy my employer ABC News?

0:04:41.044 --> 0:04:43.884
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's horrific. I do not think

0:04:43.964 --> 0:04:46.804
<v Speaker 1>that con artists deserve to be given that sort of

0:04:46.804 --> 0:04:50.284
<v Speaker 1>a platform. People are like, oh, she deserves a second chance.

0:04:50.364 --> 0:04:56.444
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely fucking not. I have dealt with so many con

0:04:56.524 --> 0:05:01.644
<v Speaker 1>artists over the years, and they do not go straight.

0:05:02.164 --> 0:05:06.044
<v Speaker 1>She has expressed zero remorse, In fact, the opposite. She said,

0:05:06.524 --> 0:05:10.084
<v Speaker 1>I am not sorry for anything I've done. She feels

0:05:10.124 --> 0:05:13.444
<v Speaker 1>like she completely deserves it. She has profited off of

0:05:13.484 --> 0:05:17.204
<v Speaker 1>her story, and I understand that networks are out there

0:05:17.244 --> 0:05:19.964
<v Speaker 1>to make profit and to make some money, but like,

0:05:20.324 --> 0:05:25.804
<v Speaker 1>give me a break. Moscow skeazy con artists, like there

0:05:25.844 --> 0:05:29.444
<v Speaker 1>are better people to give your platform too. And I

0:05:29.564 --> 0:05:32.564
<v Speaker 1>just I'm begging everyone listening, and I'm begging the media

0:05:32.644 --> 0:05:36.244
<v Speaker 1>to stop calling her Anna Delvy. This is not respect

0:05:36.364 --> 0:05:38.724
<v Speaker 1>for something that you know, Oh, this is a name

0:05:38.724 --> 0:05:41.364
<v Speaker 1>that she wants to be called by. No, absolutely not.

0:05:41.404 --> 0:05:46.284
<v Speaker 1>It's like calling Christian your high rights are Clark Rockefeller? Right?

0:05:46.564 --> 0:05:49.404
<v Speaker 1>The dude's a murderer. He just happened to want to

0:05:49.404 --> 0:05:53.084
<v Speaker 1>be known as Clark Rockefeller. Seriously are we doing that?

0:05:53.564 --> 0:05:56.964
<v Speaker 1>Are we calling them by their chosen con name under

0:05:57.004 --> 0:06:02.004
<v Speaker 1>which they defrauded people and like completely assumed a new

0:06:02.044 --> 0:06:04.924
<v Speaker 1>identity because they fucking felt like it. I have zero

0:06:05.044 --> 0:06:08.924
<v Speaker 1>sympathy for her. I have zero thoughts that she's ever

0:06:08.964 --> 0:06:11.804
<v Speaker 1>going to go straight. You know, do we think Billy

0:06:11.884 --> 0:06:14.884
<v Speaker 1>McFarlane is going to have a really nice new venture

0:06:15.004 --> 0:06:16.244
<v Speaker 1>that we should all invest in?

0:06:17.044 --> 0:06:21.524
<v Speaker 2>Look? What what would you say? The cultural role of

0:06:21.604 --> 0:06:23.444
<v Speaker 2>Dancing with the Stars is because they've had an on

0:06:23.524 --> 0:06:28.364
<v Speaker 2>other people who have had, you know, various controversy or scandal's.

0:06:28.484 --> 0:06:32.684
<v Speaker 2>Former White House Press Security Sean Spicer was a guesst.

0:06:33.444 --> 0:06:37.804
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Lochte had a very minor scandal. We're involving some

0:06:37.844 --> 0:06:42.204
<v Speaker 2>gas station and was on the show. Paula Dean is

0:06:42.204 --> 0:06:46.604
<v Speaker 2>a Southern celebrity chef who maybe use some some racial

0:06:46.644 --> 0:06:50.004
<v Speaker 2>woods that you wouldn't want to use so much, and

0:06:50.084 --> 0:06:54.124
<v Speaker 2>she was on the show. So what why does ABC

0:06:54.284 --> 0:06:57.804
<v Speaker 2>News feel the need to rehabilitate these people who are

0:06:57.844 --> 0:07:02.364
<v Speaker 2>like not even like that interesting or note.

0:07:01.964 --> 0:07:08.084
<v Speaker 1>People have been fascinated with con artists, and oftentimes especially

0:07:08.124 --> 0:07:13.684
<v Speaker 1>con artists like Anna Soroken, who are people who kind

0:07:13.684 --> 0:07:16.604
<v Speaker 1>of go for the upper echelons of society, right like

0:07:16.804 --> 0:07:20.724
<v Speaker 1>the high society, glamour crime like Clark Rockefeller by the way,

0:07:20.764 --> 0:07:28.964
<v Speaker 1>who I who I mentioned Christian. They are just media

0:07:29.284 --> 0:07:34.804
<v Speaker 1>fodder because first of all, like they you know, they're charismatic,

0:07:34.844 --> 0:07:40.924
<v Speaker 1>they're appealing all this stuff, but also they end up

0:07:42.884 --> 0:07:46.804
<v Speaker 1>conning people who people have they victim blame them. They

0:07:46.804 --> 0:07:48.484
<v Speaker 1>have less sympathy for should.

0:07:48.404 --> 0:07:51.484
<v Speaker 2>Get you know, shouldn't you have something where like at

0:07:51.484 --> 0:07:54.844
<v Speaker 2>any given time, like one man and one woman, con

0:07:55.004 --> 0:07:57.364
<v Speaker 2>artists are permitted to just continue being con artist because

0:07:57.364 --> 0:08:01.124
<v Speaker 2>they're so good at it. I want to create some incentive.

0:08:01.404 --> 0:08:03.964
<v Speaker 1>I mean that has happened though, like you don't actually

0:08:04.084 --> 0:08:07.924
<v Speaker 1>have to create that incentive So in The Confidence Game,

0:08:08.044 --> 0:08:12.364
<v Speaker 1>which was the book I wrote about artists, Ferdinand Waldo Damara,

0:08:12.444 --> 0:08:15.884
<v Speaker 1>who's known as the Great Impostor, who had ended up

0:08:15.924 --> 0:08:19.924
<v Speaker 1>having this biography written about him, The Great Impostor, and

0:08:19.964 --> 0:08:23.244
<v Speaker 1>then a movie made where Tony Curtis starred as him.

0:08:24.524 --> 0:08:30.964
<v Speaker 1>He became ridiculously recognizable because he's like over you know,

0:08:31.484 --> 0:08:33.844
<v Speaker 1>six foot I don't remember six foot four or something

0:08:33.884 --> 0:08:38.204
<v Speaker 1>like that, like very massive, like huge guy, just someone

0:08:38.284 --> 0:08:40.924
<v Speaker 1>who you would instantly recognize. He doesn't have. You know,

0:08:40.964 --> 0:08:43.804
<v Speaker 1>there are some faces that like look like every man.

0:08:43.844 --> 0:08:46.044
<v Speaker 1>He does not look like every man. And he was

0:08:46.124 --> 0:08:49.964
<v Speaker 1>on every single TV outlet, you know, Johnny Carson, he

0:08:50.044 --> 0:08:53.564
<v Speaker 1>went on Groucho Marxist show like he was. He was

0:08:53.604 --> 0:08:58.324
<v Speaker 1>on everything, and so you would think that, you know,

0:08:58.404 --> 0:09:01.004
<v Speaker 1>he would need some sort of program to be allowed

0:09:01.004 --> 0:09:03.644
<v Speaker 1>to con again because everyone would know he's a con artist.

0:09:03.924 --> 0:09:07.084
<v Speaker 1>Turns out he didn't need anything like that, because he

0:09:07.284 --> 0:09:11.164
<v Speaker 1>ended up running and continuing to con long after that.

0:09:11.444 --> 0:09:14.564
<v Speaker 1>So he had every opportunity to go straight. He was

0:09:14.604 --> 0:09:17.324
<v Speaker 1>given all of this money, all of this stuff, but

0:09:17.444 --> 0:09:20.004
<v Speaker 1>he just loved conning too much. So even after all

0:09:20.044 --> 0:09:22.964
<v Speaker 1>this media attention, he just switched his con, and so

0:09:23.084 --> 0:09:26.884
<v Speaker 1>he ended up conning multiple people for multiple decades after

0:09:26.924 --> 0:09:29.644
<v Speaker 1>this saying and the con was I've gone straight. You know,

0:09:29.684 --> 0:09:33.204
<v Speaker 1>I'm repentant, like you're the one person who understands me.

0:09:33.844 --> 0:09:36.284
<v Speaker 1>Let's you know, I really want to like prove that

0:09:36.324 --> 0:09:39.244
<v Speaker 1>I'm a good reformed person now. And then he would

0:09:39.324 --> 0:09:41.404
<v Speaker 1>like take them for all they were worth. And he

0:09:41.484 --> 0:09:43.204
<v Speaker 1>was so good at it that he kept doing it

0:09:43.244 --> 0:09:45.844
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over. So con artists do not

0:09:46.044 --> 0:09:48.924
<v Speaker 1>need any help. And the best con artists, nay, you

0:09:48.964 --> 0:09:50.804
<v Speaker 1>and I have no idea who the fuck they are

0:09:51.084 --> 0:09:54.724
<v Speaker 1>because unlike Anna, they have not been caught. There are

0:09:54.764 --> 0:09:58.444
<v Speaker 1>probably impostors out there in the world right now. I

0:09:58.684 --> 0:10:00.844
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked briefly, I think on the show

0:10:00.924 --> 0:10:04.124
<v Speaker 1>about therahos at some point, you know, there are more

0:10:04.204 --> 0:10:08.524
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth holmes is out there. There are more theraphnoses out

0:10:08.564 --> 0:10:10.684
<v Speaker 1>there that are getting the millions of dollars from venture

0:10:10.764 --> 0:10:13.764
<v Speaker 1>capital in Silicon Valley. Like we don't. We don't have

0:10:13.804 --> 0:10:17.004
<v Speaker 1>a problem with con artists not getting a second shot

0:10:17.044 --> 0:10:20.404
<v Speaker 1>at the con. Even Billy McFarland, who who I just mentioned,

0:10:20.964 --> 0:10:23.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, he tried Fire Festival too, and all sorts

0:10:23.924 --> 0:10:28.884
<v Speaker 1>of other lovely things, so you know, they they you

0:10:28.964 --> 0:10:29.804
<v Speaker 1>can't get them down.

0:10:30.764 --> 0:10:33.924
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading a little bit about PT. Barnum. Actually in

0:10:33.924 --> 0:10:36.084
<v Speaker 2>this book, we read the book The forty eight Laws

0:10:36.084 --> 0:10:40.324
<v Speaker 2>of Power I have. Yes, it's a very interesting book.

0:10:40.484 --> 0:10:42.804
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll have a little mini segment on it one day.

0:10:43.244 --> 0:10:47.284
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a slightly evil, very Machabellian book. Two. Yes,

0:10:47.884 --> 0:10:50.844
<v Speaker 2>but it's talking about some of the ambiguities of someone

0:10:50.924 --> 0:10:54.604
<v Speaker 2>like P. T. Barnum, who you know, would reject the

0:10:54.644 --> 0:10:56.524
<v Speaker 2>label of being a con artist. I hadn't read that

0:10:56.604 --> 0:10:58.324
<v Speaker 2>much about him, but I've actually kind of, you know,

0:10:58.364 --> 0:11:01.164
<v Speaker 2>became a member of the House of Representatives or something

0:11:01.164 --> 0:11:06.644
<v Speaker 2>in Connecticut and was kind of rehabilitated into somewhat polite society,

0:11:06.684 --> 0:11:09.484
<v Speaker 2>I guess. But yeah, there it is a spectrum, I guess, right,

0:11:09.604 --> 0:11:10.644
<v Speaker 2>Or is that not correct?

0:11:10.924 --> 0:11:12.804
<v Speaker 1>No? I mean I think there's a spectrum. But I

0:11:12.804 --> 0:11:15.084
<v Speaker 1>don't think P. T. Barnam is a con artist, right

0:11:15.204 --> 0:11:18.804
<v Speaker 1>like he I think that there's a very like he

0:11:19.284 --> 0:11:23.684
<v Speaker 1>sold deception, right he's a circus owner who like this

0:11:23.924 --> 0:11:27.124
<v Speaker 1>was everyone knew exactly what he was doing. I think

0:11:27.164 --> 0:11:30.804
<v Speaker 1>that there's you know, there are people who act in

0:11:30.804 --> 0:11:33.164
<v Speaker 1>good faith and in bad faith, but not all bad

0:11:33.164 --> 0:11:38.324
<v Speaker 1>faith actors are con artists. And I think that there

0:11:39.284 --> 0:11:41.884
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty it is a spectrum, but there's a

0:11:42.084 --> 0:11:47.204
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear demarcation point between con artist and not, which

0:11:47.244 --> 0:11:51.884
<v Speaker 1>is your intention to take advantage of people for your

0:11:51.884 --> 0:11:58.324
<v Speaker 1>own personal benefit without their awareness. Obviously you mentioned machiavelian

0:11:58.604 --> 0:12:01.364
<v Speaker 1>so it is incredibly Machupelian. And in fact, you know

0:12:01.404 --> 0:12:04.404
<v Speaker 1>out of the dark triad of traits that con artists

0:12:04.444 --> 0:12:10.404
<v Speaker 1>often have, So that's psychopathy, narcissism, and machubelianism. Psychopathy is

0:12:10.444 --> 0:12:14.124
<v Speaker 1>the least common just because it's the least common in society.

0:12:14.564 --> 0:12:18.684
<v Speaker 1>Narcissism is kind of this not just this sense of

0:12:19.084 --> 0:12:23.764
<v Speaker 1>a grandized self, but also this sense of I deserve right,

0:12:23.844 --> 0:12:25.684
<v Speaker 1>So like I deserve all of this, so I'm not

0:12:25.724 --> 0:12:28.484
<v Speaker 1>doing anything wrong, like I'm just taking what is mine,

0:12:28.524 --> 0:12:30.844
<v Speaker 1>what I deserve. And then there's the one that con

0:12:30.924 --> 0:12:33.404
<v Speaker 1>artists most commonly have. In fact, I would argue that

0:12:33.484 --> 0:12:37.004
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be a successful con artist without this, and

0:12:37.044 --> 0:12:42.164
<v Speaker 1>that's machiavellianism, which is the ability to get people to

0:12:42.244 --> 0:12:44.564
<v Speaker 1>do what you want them to do, but they think

0:12:44.604 --> 0:12:46.644
<v Speaker 1>it's their own idea, right, So you're very good at

0:12:46.724 --> 0:12:50.044
<v Speaker 1>kind of planting the seeds in their mind that they think, oh,

0:12:50.164 --> 0:12:52.204
<v Speaker 1>this is what I should do, but really it's coming

0:12:52.244 --> 0:12:54.804
<v Speaker 1>from you. So you manipulate them. But you're not seen

0:12:55.044 --> 0:12:59.404
<v Speaker 1>as manipulative. You're seen as charismatic, which is Machiavelli's whole thing.

0:12:59.924 --> 0:13:04.924
<v Speaker 1>And so that intent to knowingly deceive, to take advantage

0:13:04.924 --> 0:13:07.524
<v Speaker 1>of other people's confidence in you, is what makes a

0:13:07.564 --> 0:13:08.084
<v Speaker 1>con artist.

0:13:08.204 --> 0:13:10.164
<v Speaker 2>What about a politician?

0:13:10.604 --> 0:13:14.644
<v Speaker 1>So it depends. So within every single profession you'll find

0:13:14.684 --> 0:13:18.164
<v Speaker 1>con artists. But to say that all politicians are con

0:13:18.204 --> 0:13:21.004
<v Speaker 1>artists is to completely dilute the term so that it's meaningless.

0:13:21.404 --> 0:13:25.164
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a politician who does normal politician things,

0:13:25.204 --> 0:13:30.004
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, you might exaggerate, right, like you

0:13:30.084 --> 0:13:33.044
<v Speaker 1>know that like you probably won't be able to deliver

0:13:33.124 --> 0:13:35.684
<v Speaker 1>on all these promises. You kind of give the strongest

0:13:35.764 --> 0:13:39.004
<v Speaker 1>case argument for all of them. But you truly believe

0:13:39.044 --> 0:13:41.324
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to make the world a better place, Right,

0:13:41.324 --> 0:13:43.324
<v Speaker 1>that's why you got into politics. Your heart's in the

0:13:43.364 --> 0:13:46.884
<v Speaker 1>right place. Like you're not trying to completely deceive someone,

0:13:47.124 --> 0:13:51.204
<v Speaker 1>and you're not saying something like, oh, like I promise

0:13:51.484 --> 0:13:56.004
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to protect abortion at all costs, and

0:13:56.084 --> 0:14:00.404
<v Speaker 1>then secretly you're anti abortion and trying to stack the

0:14:00.444 --> 0:14:03.444
<v Speaker 1>court to reverse Ruby Wade, you're not a con artist

0:14:03.484 --> 0:14:06.284
<v Speaker 1>because you actually kind of you're trying to make the

0:14:06.284 --> 0:14:08.484
<v Speaker 1>world a better place. You're believe that you're doing it,

0:14:08.764 --> 0:14:11.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the best of your ability. You're kind

0:14:11.044 --> 0:14:14.364
<v Speaker 1>of advancing that message. Now if you actually, like, if

0:14:14.364 --> 0:14:16.884
<v Speaker 1>there's a mismatch between your beliefs and what you're doing,

0:14:16.924 --> 0:14:20.044
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing it in a cynical way, if you're misleading,

0:14:20.204 --> 0:14:23.564
<v Speaker 1>knowingly misleading, saying one thing while you know you're gonna

0:14:23.724 --> 0:14:26.444
<v Speaker 1>do another, or you don't fucking care because you don't

0:14:26.484 --> 0:14:28.964
<v Speaker 1>care if abortion is protected or not protected as long

0:14:29.004 --> 0:14:31.804
<v Speaker 1>as you remain in power. Right, you're motivated by control.

0:14:31.884 --> 0:14:34.364
<v Speaker 1>You're motivated by power, which, by the way, is the

0:14:34.444 --> 0:14:37.884
<v Speaker 1>single biggest motivation of all con artists. It's not money,

0:14:38.164 --> 0:14:42.604
<v Speaker 1>it's control, it's power. It's affecting other people and influencing

0:14:42.644 --> 0:14:45.524
<v Speaker 1>other people. If you're that, then you're a politician who

0:14:45.564 --> 0:14:47.764
<v Speaker 1>also happens to be a con artist. And they are

0:14:47.764 --> 0:14:51.444
<v Speaker 1>both right, and I think that there is a big difference,

0:14:51.684 --> 0:14:53.484
<v Speaker 1>and you have a spectrum by the way of you know,

0:14:53.524 --> 0:14:56.644
<v Speaker 1>true believer politicians, right, Like You've got the Bernie Sanderses

0:14:56.684 --> 0:15:00.484
<v Speaker 1>of the world, who I think is probably pretty far

0:15:01.004 --> 0:15:02.764
<v Speaker 1>on the true believer spectrum. And then you have the

0:15:02.804 --> 0:15:05.564
<v Speaker 1>people who are you know, much more pragmatic, who are

0:15:06.084 --> 0:15:08.684
<v Speaker 1>who do what needs to be done, who kind of

0:15:10.204 --> 0:15:12.844
<v Speaker 1>get down and dirty, but they still kind of believe

0:15:12.884 --> 0:15:14.964
<v Speaker 1>what you want. On the other side, I'm just gonna

0:15:15.244 --> 0:15:17.444
<v Speaker 1>say his name, that you've got the Donald Trump who've

0:15:17.444 --> 0:15:20.084
<v Speaker 1>been convicted of fraud. Like I used to have to

0:15:20.124 --> 0:15:22.004
<v Speaker 1>say that he was an alleged con artist, I don't

0:15:22.044 --> 0:15:25.204
<v Speaker 1>have to say alleged anymore. Like shit's been proven in court.

0:15:25.604 --> 0:15:26.524
<v Speaker 1>He is an artist.

0:15:26.604 --> 0:15:30.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I don't know they sure the election case.

0:15:31.764 --> 0:15:33.524
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even talking about the I'm not even talking

0:15:33.564 --> 0:15:35.884
<v Speaker 1>about the election case. I'm talking about real estate fraud.

0:15:36.484 --> 0:15:39.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's all you need. All you need is someone

0:15:40.364 --> 0:15:43.604
<v Speaker 2>to what extent. Do people feel like they're in on

0:15:43.604 --> 0:15:45.084
<v Speaker 2>the joke with the con artists?

0:15:46.164 --> 0:15:49.124
<v Speaker 1>They're not, so I think that well.

0:15:48.924 --> 0:15:51.484
<v Speaker 2>With Trump though, you're pushing with Trump. I think people

0:15:51.484 --> 0:15:54.084
<v Speaker 2>feel like he's on my side and you take him.

0:15:54.444 --> 0:15:58.244
<v Speaker 1>No. No, that's the thing though, But they don't think

0:15:58.244 --> 0:16:00.924
<v Speaker 1>they're in on the joke like they actually believe right,

0:16:01.044 --> 0:16:04.044
<v Speaker 1>Like they don't understand that they're victims of con artists.

0:16:04.564 --> 0:16:07.724
<v Speaker 1>I think that people who are Trump supporters are victims

0:16:07.724 --> 0:16:09.804
<v Speaker 1>of a con artist, and they just really you don't

0:16:09.804 --> 0:16:13.444
<v Speaker 1>see that. They see Trump as on their side, they

0:16:13.484 --> 0:16:15.644
<v Speaker 1>see him as a true believer, and so they're willing

0:16:15.684 --> 0:16:19.604
<v Speaker 1>to discount Red Flag's evidence. It doesn't matter. And this

0:16:19.724 --> 0:16:22.524
<v Speaker 1>happens over and over and over. Let's put Trump aside

0:16:22.604 --> 0:16:25.164
<v Speaker 1>for a second and just look at a pattern that

0:16:25.244 --> 0:16:30.844
<v Speaker 1>happens within con artists throughout history, which is that when

0:16:30.924 --> 0:16:32.964
<v Speaker 1>you have and this is rare, by the way, because

0:16:33.084 --> 0:16:36.324
<v Speaker 1>so many con artists can kind of skirt the laws

0:16:36.404 --> 0:16:39.084
<v Speaker 1>get away with it, but in those cases when there's

0:16:39.244 --> 0:16:44.164
<v Speaker 1>incontrovertible evidence, when they're actually tried in court and proven guilty,

0:16:44.604 --> 0:16:47.764
<v Speaker 1>you often have the case where their biggest victims don't

0:16:47.804 --> 0:16:50.924
<v Speaker 1>believe it and think it's a big government conspiracy, legal

0:16:50.964 --> 0:16:55.004
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy whatnot against them, and it's just mind boggling. And

0:16:55.044 --> 0:16:57.604
<v Speaker 1>then you talk to them. I've talked to hundreds of

0:16:57.644 --> 0:17:01.084
<v Speaker 1>victims of con artists. I can give them all the receipts, right,

0:17:01.124 --> 0:17:03.364
<v Speaker 1>I can show them everything. I can be like, hey,

0:17:03.404 --> 0:17:07.484
<v Speaker 1>this pastor who you think is the second coming of

0:17:07.524 --> 0:17:11.604
<v Speaker 1>the Lord, Like the best thing that has ever happened

0:17:11.604 --> 0:17:14.164
<v Speaker 1>to your community, the money that you donated for a

0:17:14.204 --> 0:17:17.204
<v Speaker 1>new church he spent gambling away in Las Vegas. This

0:17:17.244 --> 0:17:20.324
<v Speaker 1>is not a hypothetical, This actually happened. And the person

0:17:20.364 --> 0:17:22.924
<v Speaker 1>will be like, no, I you're you know this is

0:17:22.964 --> 0:17:25.244
<v Speaker 1>a fake receipt. This is not true. He didn't take

0:17:25.244 --> 0:17:28.004
<v Speaker 1>this flight. He's not a gambler, Like, he doesn't believe

0:17:28.004 --> 0:17:30.564
<v Speaker 1>in it. And even if he did, and then it

0:17:30.604 --> 0:17:33.764
<v Speaker 1>was for a reason, and he like the Good Lord

0:17:33.844 --> 0:17:35.564
<v Speaker 1>told him that he was going to make more money

0:17:35.604 --> 0:17:40.364
<v Speaker 1>for our church. Right, so they can just run. They

0:17:40.444 --> 0:17:44.244
<v Speaker 1>just do all these mental jumping jacks. The cognitive dissonance

0:17:44.364 --> 0:17:47.364
<v Speaker 1>is so large that the dissonance reduction, which is what

0:17:47.404 --> 0:17:50.484
<v Speaker 1>we do to kind of bring down that cognitive dissonance

0:17:50.484 --> 0:17:54.524
<v Speaker 1>and bring our internal thoughts about what reality should be

0:17:54.604 --> 0:17:57.244
<v Speaker 1>like in line with what we're seeing, is just so

0:17:57.484 --> 0:18:01.444
<v Speaker 1>huge that basically these people are beyond reach. This is

0:18:01.484 --> 0:18:03.964
<v Speaker 1>why the single best victim of a con artist is

0:18:04.004 --> 0:18:07.004
<v Speaker 1>someone who's been conned before, because they are so good

0:18:07.004 --> 0:18:10.484
<v Speaker 1>at rationalizing away the fact that they been conned that

0:18:10.484 --> 0:18:14.164
<v Speaker 1>they're very easy to take advantage of again, because that's

0:18:14.244 --> 0:18:16.764
<v Speaker 1>easier to them than admitting that they've been the victim

0:18:16.804 --> 0:18:17.964
<v Speaker 1>of this horrible long.

0:18:17.804 --> 0:18:21.364
<v Speaker 2>Con Marie, you want to talk some politics.

0:18:22.804 --> 0:18:27.484
<v Speaker 1>I think we started talking politics without without meaning to Nate.

0:18:27.604 --> 0:18:31.124
<v Speaker 1>So yes, let's take a break from Anna Sarokan, and

0:18:31.364 --> 0:18:35.564
<v Speaker 1>after the break we will talk about Donald Trump, the

0:18:35.604 --> 0:18:40.444
<v Speaker 1>con artist and Kamala Harris in a non con artist

0:18:40.684 --> 0:18:43.204
<v Speaker 1>setting or maybe a con artist setting, who knows.

0:18:52.764 --> 0:18:56.444
<v Speaker 2>Let me just push. I think Trump's a tricky case, right,

0:18:56.484 --> 0:18:59.764
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because, for one thing, the biggest Karne's trying

0:18:59.804 --> 0:19:03.724
<v Speaker 2>to pull off is a stolen election claims right. On

0:19:03.764 --> 0:19:09.164
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, isn't he just promising to deliver cultural

0:19:09.204 --> 0:19:16.004
<v Speaker 2>bash to progressive elites and lower taxes for wealthy business owners.

0:19:17.364 --> 0:19:20.884
<v Speaker 2>I think that if we actually he actually delivered those things, I.

0:19:20.844 --> 0:19:22.844
<v Speaker 1>Don't think so. And I think if we parse his

0:19:22.924 --> 0:19:25.844
<v Speaker 1>different messages to different groups of people, we will see

0:19:25.884 --> 0:19:28.364
<v Speaker 1>that he has said and I actually believe that there

0:19:28.404 --> 0:19:32.124
<v Speaker 1>are YouTube compilations of this. He's given the absolute polar

0:19:32.164 --> 0:19:35.724
<v Speaker 1>opposite message to different groups of people, depending on who

0:19:35.804 --> 0:19:38.124
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to appeal to at the moment. So he's

0:19:38.164 --> 0:19:41.644
<v Speaker 1>been He's been both pro and anti abortion depending on

0:19:41.684 --> 0:19:44.324
<v Speaker 1>the day that you get him, even one day apart.

0:19:44.684 --> 0:19:46.964
<v Speaker 1>So like, let's just leave it at that. This is

0:19:47.004 --> 0:19:50.124
<v Speaker 1>not someone who you can trust to have a single opinion.

0:19:50.684 --> 0:19:56.524
<v Speaker 2>Politics tour event. I'll do some concern, you know, with

0:19:56.604 --> 0:20:00.164
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro. I'm I'm messaging the book very differently than

0:20:00.204 --> 0:20:02.404
<v Speaker 2>when I'm at the Liberal book fair in Seattle. I'll

0:20:02.404 --> 0:20:03.284
<v Speaker 2>tell you that much.

0:20:03.484 --> 0:20:05.684
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, you can use different messaging, but do you

0:20:05.724 --> 0:20:09.524
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally change your meaning and say, actually, you know what

0:20:10.804 --> 0:20:14.604
<v Speaker 1>the river sucks and the village is where all the

0:20:14.644 --> 0:20:15.324
<v Speaker 1>smartest things are.

0:20:15.324 --> 0:20:20.084
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Kamal wild are Kamala Harris uh a very

0:20:20.164 --> 0:20:23.164
<v Speaker 2>left of center platform in twenty nineteen, was that a

0:20:23.204 --> 0:20:24.044
<v Speaker 2>co matters?

0:20:24.164 --> 0:20:26.844
<v Speaker 1>There are matters of degree and then there are complete

0:20:27.684 --> 0:20:31.804
<v Speaker 1>just saying polar opposite things one day apart. And I

0:20:31.804 --> 0:20:34.524
<v Speaker 1>think you're being a little disingenuous just to push back

0:20:34.564 --> 0:20:35.124
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:20:35.404 --> 0:20:36.924
<v Speaker 2>But I think that way, I know more about what

0:20:36.964 --> 0:20:39.524
<v Speaker 2>I get in the Trump administration than a Harris administration.

0:20:40.044 --> 0:20:42.924
<v Speaker 2>It might not exactly match what Trump says, but like, but.

0:20:42.844 --> 0:20:46.404
<v Speaker 1>That's that's but that's also that's the key, right, This

0:20:46.564 --> 0:20:48.804
<v Speaker 1>is what we were going back to with con artists.

0:20:49.324 --> 0:20:53.764
<v Speaker 1>Do they believe what they're saying or are they using

0:20:53.804 --> 0:20:56.124
<v Speaker 1>it as a means to a personal end to take

0:20:56.164 --> 0:20:59.044
<v Speaker 1>advantage of other people to gain power for themselves, and

0:20:59.084 --> 0:21:01.724
<v Speaker 1>that is all they care about in the end is

0:21:01.844 --> 0:21:05.084
<v Speaker 1>power and control to give a fuck about other people

0:21:05.404 --> 0:21:07.484
<v Speaker 1>or about the world. I do not believe that is

0:21:07.484 --> 0:21:10.244
<v Speaker 1>true of all politicians. I absolutely believe that that is

0:21:10.244 --> 0:21:13.364
<v Speaker 1>true of Donald Trump. We have good evidence for it.

0:21:14.244 --> 0:21:18.324
<v Speaker 1>And with your book, yeah, sure, you're going to change messaging.

0:21:18.404 --> 0:21:22.604
<v Speaker 1>You're going to not push on certain points to certain audiences,

0:21:22.604 --> 0:21:25.444
<v Speaker 1>but you're not going to change your thesis like your book.

0:21:26.124 --> 0:21:28.524
<v Speaker 1>But Nate, let me ask you a question if I

0:21:29.004 --> 0:21:32.084
<v Speaker 1>were to, you know, when you're talking to different audiences

0:21:32.124 --> 0:21:35.204
<v Speaker 1>about what your polls say, do you manipulate your polls?

0:21:35.244 --> 0:21:37.844
<v Speaker 1>Do you take certain do you take certain do you

0:21:37.924 --> 0:21:42.244
<v Speaker 1>take certain surveys out? Do you waight them differently so

0:21:42.284 --> 0:21:45.284
<v Speaker 1>that your message changes so that you're more appealing to

0:21:45.324 --> 0:21:48.924
<v Speaker 1>your audience? And you say, Kamala is ahead, and then

0:21:48.964 --> 0:21:52.524
<v Speaker 1>two hours later, without you know, without any new polls

0:21:52.564 --> 0:21:54.444
<v Speaker 1>coming out, you say, oh, no, you know, I think

0:21:54.484 --> 0:21:56.284
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is going to win. Do you do that?

0:21:56.644 --> 0:21:57.444
<v Speaker 2>I do not do that.

0:21:57.564 --> 0:21:59.924
<v Speaker 1>No Donald Trump would do that. That is the difference

0:21:59.964 --> 0:22:02.124
<v Speaker 1>between a con artist and a non con artist. I

0:22:02.244 --> 0:22:02.924
<v Speaker 1>rest my case.

0:22:03.044 --> 0:22:06.644
<v Speaker 2>We are going to think. I think, out of all

0:22:06.724 --> 0:22:08.844
<v Speaker 2>the dimensions by what you can criticize Trump, and there

0:22:08.844 --> 0:22:11.004
<v Speaker 2>are many, I'm not sure that's a to mention where

0:22:12.284 --> 0:22:15.844
<v Speaker 2>where he stands out, particularly relative to the ability to

0:22:15.884 --> 0:22:17.924
<v Speaker 2>tell groups slightly contradictory things.

0:22:18.164 --> 0:22:21.444
<v Speaker 1>It's not slightly contradictory. This is not a question of degree.

0:22:21.524 --> 0:22:22.924
<v Speaker 1>This is just this is just.

0:22:22.964 --> 0:22:25.684
<v Speaker 2>A question of inher so she wanted to ban tracking,

0:22:25.724 --> 0:22:27.804
<v Speaker 2>and now she does it anymore and has offered no

0:22:28.244 --> 0:22:30.524
<v Speaker 2>reason for that change from political expedience.

0:22:30.724 --> 0:22:34.364
<v Speaker 1>Sure that that happens, and that happens with all politicians.

0:22:34.364 --> 0:22:37.364
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, if we just label all politicians

0:22:37.444 --> 0:22:41.044
<v Speaker 1>con artists, that label loses all meaning. So we need

0:22:41.124 --> 0:22:43.564
<v Speaker 1>to have it as a continuum. As we started off

0:22:43.564 --> 0:22:46.084
<v Speaker 1>this segment by saying, right, it's shades of gray. It's

0:22:46.084 --> 0:22:48.924
<v Speaker 1>not black and white, but there are you know, there

0:22:48.964 --> 0:22:51.964
<v Speaker 1>are dividing lines. And unless you want to label every

0:22:52.004 --> 0:22:55.564
<v Speaker 1>single politician in history, by the way, including Bernie Sanders,

0:22:55.684 --> 0:22:58.484
<v Speaker 1>as a con artist, then then.

0:22:58.404 --> 0:23:02.324
<v Speaker 2>We have to least Connie politicians.

0:23:01.804 --> 0:23:05.004
<v Speaker 1>Exactly That's why I said, But then we include him

0:23:05.044 --> 0:23:08.404
<v Speaker 1>because he's done connie things in the past. But unless

0:23:08.404 --> 0:23:11.284
<v Speaker 1>we do that, in which case the word con artist

0:23:11.404 --> 0:23:14.964
<v Speaker 1>completely gets deprived of all meaning. We have to start

0:23:15.004 --> 0:23:19.644
<v Speaker 1>making certain kind of certain distinctions along that continuum.

0:23:19.964 --> 0:23:21.964
<v Speaker 2>Forty of the country is going to vote for Trump.

0:23:21.964 --> 0:23:26.004
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to explain, they're.

0:23:25.884 --> 0:23:28.604
<v Speaker 1>Victims of a con artist, and they will never be

0:23:28.684 --> 0:23:32.804
<v Speaker 1>persuaded otherwise because victims of con artists will stay victims

0:23:32.884 --> 0:23:35.404
<v Speaker 1>and will always think that the person that they're following

0:23:35.524 --> 0:23:38.644
<v Speaker 1>is not a con artist. For me, are true believers.

0:23:39.044 --> 0:23:42.084
<v Speaker 2>It's their narrow self interest to vote for Trump. Sure.

0:23:42.124 --> 0:23:44.284
<v Speaker 1>And then there are those people who are their positions

0:23:44.284 --> 0:23:48.724
<v Speaker 1>elevated in absolutely absolutely. Then there are those cynical piece

0:23:48.844 --> 0:23:52.244
<v Speaker 1>of shit human beings. Yeah that I'm just gonna who

0:23:52.404 --> 0:23:55.524
<v Speaker 1>vote for Trump just because of cynical self interest and

0:23:55.604 --> 0:23:57.404
<v Speaker 1>don't give a fuck what happens to the rest of

0:23:57.444 --> 0:23:59.924
<v Speaker 1>the world and the rest of the country. Those people also,

0:24:00.484 --> 0:24:01.084
<v Speaker 1>Sorry listener.

0:24:02.684 --> 0:24:05.084
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I hope we have some Trump listeners. No, like,

0:24:05.124 --> 0:24:07.604
<v Speaker 2>I disagree with that. I think I don't think it's

0:24:07.604 --> 0:24:09.084
<v Speaker 2>a bad thing if people vote in terms of their

0:24:09.164 --> 0:24:12.444
<v Speaker 2>narrow self interest I think that's that's a part of

0:24:12.484 --> 0:24:16.604
<v Speaker 2>a political economy that can be healthy. I think sometimes

0:24:17.004 --> 0:24:19.284
<v Speaker 2>Trump understands that you do want to appeal to people's

0:24:19.724 --> 0:24:23.524
<v Speaker 2>sense of identity and people aren't doing some Cartesian expected

0:24:23.604 --> 0:24:29.964
<v Speaker 2>value calculation right about the impact of climate change or whatnot.

0:24:31.124 --> 0:24:33.284
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that that's right. But I think that

0:24:33.324 --> 0:24:37.164
<v Speaker 1>there are people who are completely cynical and who have

0:24:37.564 --> 0:24:41.364
<v Speaker 1>this sort of very narrow lens of what's better for

0:24:41.524 --> 0:24:44.564
<v Speaker 1>my bottom line. I don't give a fuck what happens

0:24:44.604 --> 0:24:47.044
<v Speaker 1>to anyone else in the world except for me, and

0:24:47.084 --> 0:24:49.484
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to vote for the person who makes that better.

0:24:49.964 --> 0:24:54.284
<v Speaker 1>And that there's certainly you know, that's fine. There are

0:24:54.324 --> 0:24:57.084
<v Speaker 1>psychopaths in the world. Do I think that makes them

0:24:57.364 --> 0:25:00.404
<v Speaker 1>good people? Do I think that that makes them some?

0:25:00.684 --> 0:25:02.604
<v Speaker 1>You know? No? I don't.

0:25:02.884 --> 0:25:06.804
<v Speaker 2>I Actually, if campaigned on a platform to ban poker,

0:25:06.844 --> 0:25:07.844
<v Speaker 2>would you vote for Trump?

0:25:08.644 --> 0:25:08.804
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:25:08.884 --> 0:25:09.884
<v Speaker 2>I would. I would.

0:25:10.244 --> 0:25:11.124
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely would not.

0:25:12.124 --> 0:25:13.644
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I would.

0:25:13.884 --> 0:25:17.804
<v Speaker 1>I would absolutely still vote for Family because in my mind, sure,

0:25:17.924 --> 0:25:21.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a poker player. But like if we're

0:25:21.324 --> 0:25:25.764
<v Speaker 1>talking about one person says they're going to ban online poker,

0:25:26.244 --> 0:25:29.964
<v Speaker 1>and the other person says they're going to do a

0:25:30.004 --> 0:25:32.844
<v Speaker 1>lot worse to the world. Like, all right, you know,

0:25:33.044 --> 0:25:34.764
<v Speaker 1>if you want to play online poker, you can go

0:25:34.804 --> 0:25:35.804
<v Speaker 1>to Canada.

0:25:36.604 --> 0:25:40.084
<v Speaker 2>I think. I mean, there's a long discussion about this

0:25:40.124 --> 0:25:42.644
<v Speaker 2>in my book, right. I think if you're not protecting

0:25:42.684 --> 0:25:44.644
<v Speaker 2>your self interest, you wind up getting stumped on in

0:25:44.684 --> 0:25:46.204
<v Speaker 2>the long run. I think that's what the game theory

0:25:46.244 --> 0:25:50.964
<v Speaker 2>equilibrium is, is that if you're not willing to defend

0:25:50.964 --> 0:25:54.004
<v Speaker 2>your self interest, then you get trampled.

0:25:54.724 --> 0:25:56.884
<v Speaker 1>But it's not black and white, right, Like, I think

0:25:56.924 --> 0:26:00.764
<v Speaker 1>being a single issue voter, like poker is a really

0:26:00.804 --> 0:26:03.124
<v Speaker 1>stupid single issue to vote on, just like it would

0:26:03.124 --> 0:26:06.204
<v Speaker 1>be a really stupid single issue, you know, to vote on,

0:26:06.284 --> 0:26:09.564
<v Speaker 1>like on crypto or something like where only one thing

0:26:09.604 --> 0:26:13.044
<v Speaker 1>matters to you, because the world is much more complicated,

0:26:13.124 --> 0:26:15.204
<v Speaker 1>and so you have to actually just try to figure

0:26:15.244 --> 0:26:20.124
<v Speaker 1>out out of this constellation of policies, which future is

0:26:20.164 --> 0:26:23.404
<v Speaker 1>going to be a better future for me and for

0:26:23.884 --> 0:26:28.084
<v Speaker 1>everyone else. And unless, like unless you think that you

0:26:28.284 --> 0:26:32.244
<v Speaker 1>are you know, wealthy enough and insulated enough that you'll

0:26:32.244 --> 0:26:34.804
<v Speaker 1>be kind of okay no matter what, like if the

0:26:34.804 --> 0:26:37.244
<v Speaker 1>world burns, you'll still be fine, which I think is

0:26:37.244 --> 0:26:38.244
<v Speaker 1>also kind of delutible.

0:26:38.324 --> 0:26:40.244
<v Speaker 2>I would just say that if Kamala Harris were to

0:26:40.244 --> 0:26:42.844
<v Speaker 2>say I want a ban poker, I would feel targeted

0:26:42.884 --> 0:26:45.404
<v Speaker 2>as a poker player. And clearly this is a community

0:26:45.404 --> 0:26:47.764
<v Speaker 2>that wouldn't be interested in the votes of people like me,

0:26:47.844 --> 0:26:49.284
<v Speaker 2>So why would I want to be in their coalition?

0:26:50.124 --> 0:26:52.004
<v Speaker 1>But you wouldn't then go and vote for Trump?

0:26:52.044 --> 0:26:55.164
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to Yes, I would if Kamala Harris campaign

0:26:55.164 --> 0:26:56.924
<v Speaker 2>on a platform to ban all forms of poker, I

0:26:56.964 --> 0:27:00.084
<v Speaker 2>would vote for Donald Trump or maybe a vote libertarian

0:27:00.164 --> 0:27:00.604
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:27:01.044 --> 0:27:02.804
<v Speaker 1>Well those are two very different.

0:27:02.444 --> 0:27:05.604
<v Speaker 2>Things sort of but like, but yeah, I would want

0:27:06.204 --> 0:27:08.564
<v Speaker 2>Harris to lose, right, Like, I think a lot of

0:27:08.604 --> 0:27:12.044
<v Speaker 2>people have it in there. Rational Maybe perhaps.

0:27:11.764 --> 0:27:13.324
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was trying to say. I don't actually

0:27:13.324 --> 0:27:17.204
<v Speaker 1>think it's rational, because if the payoff matrix is such

0:27:17.364 --> 0:27:20.764
<v Speaker 1>that okay, no poker, but end of the world poker,

0:27:21.724 --> 0:27:26.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, no poker, you know, no poker, but world

0:27:26.124 --> 0:27:28.164
<v Speaker 1>is fine or poker and kind of end of the

0:27:28.204 --> 0:27:30.684
<v Speaker 1>world in a lot of different ways a civil war,

0:27:31.044 --> 0:27:34.964
<v Speaker 1>then your ev matrix is completely different, and that one

0:27:35.324 --> 0:27:38.484
<v Speaker 1>that one reason why you voted for the other candidate

0:27:38.804 --> 0:27:42.444
<v Speaker 1>is completely invalidated. If your rational the rational thing is

0:27:42.484 --> 0:27:45.524
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at the total of the payoff matrix,

0:27:45.844 --> 0:27:48.044
<v Speaker 1>and then you vote for the one with the highest total.

0:27:48.244 --> 0:27:52.284
<v Speaker 1>And unless poker outweighs everything else, and pokers waited at

0:27:52.284 --> 0:27:54.964
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand, and if there's no poker, then nothing

0:27:55.004 --> 0:27:58.964
<v Speaker 1>else matters. Then I don't actually see that that payoff

0:27:59.004 --> 0:28:03.764
<v Speaker 1>matrix is necessarily going to the EV for EV, for me,

0:28:03.924 --> 0:28:08.084
<v Speaker 1>for you, I understand, And variety goes to hell and

0:28:08.244 --> 0:28:11.804
<v Speaker 1>the world burns down and there's a civil war and

0:28:11.844 --> 0:28:16.084
<v Speaker 1>you Nate get murdered because you know you were right

0:28:16.444 --> 0:28:18.524
<v Speaker 1>You're like, then you don't care if you were playing

0:28:18.564 --> 0:28:20.604
<v Speaker 1>poker when you got murdered, right like?

0:28:20.764 --> 0:28:24.364
<v Speaker 2>I think we to as those risks then, right like,

0:28:24.684 --> 0:28:29.164
<v Speaker 2>So let me make a distinction. So Trump recently, I

0:28:29.164 --> 0:28:31.604
<v Speaker 2>guess changed his stance or flip flop because you passed

0:28:31.644 --> 0:28:35.524
<v Speaker 2>a policy in during his tenure to limit the State

0:28:35.564 --> 0:28:39.924
<v Speaker 2>and Local tax deduction SALT. If you live and own

0:28:39.964 --> 0:28:43.164
<v Speaker 2>property in New York State, you probably play a lot

0:28:43.204 --> 0:28:46.004
<v Speaker 2>of combined taxes between the city and the state and

0:28:46.044 --> 0:28:50.404
<v Speaker 2>property bills. So Trump has said that he's interested in

0:28:51.684 --> 0:28:54.644
<v Speaker 2>unlocking this deduction where you can claim unlimited amounts and

0:28:54.684 --> 0:28:57.164
<v Speaker 2>not just ten k. Trump broy the way was responsible

0:28:57.164 --> 0:28:59.724
<v Speaker 2>for the bill that introduced this deduction in the first place,

0:28:59.764 --> 0:29:02.564
<v Speaker 2>so he might not be trustworthy there. But if I

0:29:02.604 --> 0:29:05.044
<v Speaker 2>believed him and narrowly had self interest, then the salt

0:29:05.044 --> 0:29:07.724
<v Speaker 2>cap would be something that affected my bottom line a

0:29:07.724 --> 0:29:16.244
<v Speaker 2>fair bit. So if I were voting purely selfishly, that's

0:29:16.324 --> 0:29:24.284
<v Speaker 2>probably pretty tangible, right, something that affects me directly. Now,

0:29:24.364 --> 0:29:26.484
<v Speaker 2>I would not one for Harris. I would not vote

0:29:26.524 --> 0:29:31.284
<v Speaker 2>for Trump on that basis because whatever probably I wait,

0:29:31.404 --> 0:29:34.684
<v Speaker 2>things that happened to me at like some multiple of

0:29:35.364 --> 0:29:39.244
<v Speaker 2>good for the world, right, But that wouldn't outweigh if

0:29:39.604 --> 0:29:42.404
<v Speaker 2>Harris and Democrats were to outlaw poker, my response would be,

0:29:42.484 --> 0:29:45.124
<v Speaker 2>fuck you. You know, I am clearly not a person

0:29:45.524 --> 0:29:48.004
<v Speaker 2>that you care about. I'm clearly not a person. You know.

0:29:48.044 --> 0:29:50.204
<v Speaker 2>You don't see the world in a way that I

0:29:50.284 --> 0:29:52.844
<v Speaker 2>see the world. And if you think this thing is bad,

0:29:52.924 --> 0:29:55.404
<v Speaker 2>then and that I think that's more obligation to vote

0:29:55.444 --> 0:29:57.964
<v Speaker 2>against people who want to band poker.

0:29:58.044 --> 0:30:01.124
<v Speaker 1>I think if you actually listen to yourself out of context,

0:30:01.164 --> 0:30:04.444
<v Speaker 1>you will see that that is such an emotional response.

0:30:04.564 --> 0:30:10.884
<v Speaker 1>You are doing something. Now's a response no completely emotional.

0:30:11.204 --> 0:30:14.884
<v Speaker 2>Reciprocity are important in in game theory.

0:30:14.644 --> 0:30:17.804
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but fuck you because you did this is not

0:30:18.084 --> 0:30:19.444
<v Speaker 1>is not an appropriate response.

0:30:19.884 --> 0:30:24.604
<v Speaker 2>You would look at the emotional response because.

0:30:24.844 --> 0:30:28.364
<v Speaker 1>Of course, of course, however, I think that you just

0:30:28.444 --> 0:30:32.804
<v Speaker 1>need to realize that rational cannot be based on an

0:30:32.804 --> 0:30:36.804
<v Speaker 1>issue like poker, right, because you need to have I know,

0:30:36.844 --> 0:30:40.804
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to make a very strong case for a point,

0:30:40.844 --> 0:30:42.924
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're kind of pushing it to.

0:30:42.884 --> 0:30:44.484
<v Speaker 2>The extreme, but it's not.

0:30:45.244 --> 0:30:46.964
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a rational.

0:30:46.604 --> 0:30:50.284
<v Speaker 2>Extreme complete expecting value calculation of Harris versus Trump.

0:30:50.564 --> 0:30:54.924
<v Speaker 1>No, I haven't okay, and I never said I have

0:30:55.044 --> 0:30:57.604
<v Speaker 1>I have no, I don't know. I would need Yeah,

0:30:57.604 --> 0:31:00.804
<v Speaker 1>i'd go, I could go down the line. But there

0:31:00.844 --> 0:31:04.084
<v Speaker 1>are certain things and certain risks that I actually believe

0:31:04.444 --> 0:31:07.524
<v Speaker 1>are very big risks that I know are much higher

0:31:07.524 --> 0:31:09.764
<v Speaker 1>with Trump, And so I don't feel like I actually

0:31:09.764 --> 0:31:12.164
<v Speaker 1>have to sit down and do an expected value calculation

0:31:12.484 --> 0:31:15.124
<v Speaker 1>because there are certain existential risks like AI, by the way,

0:31:15.524 --> 0:31:19.204
<v Speaker 1>that I think would be much higher under Trump. And

0:31:18.764 --> 0:31:21.044
<v Speaker 1>you are the person a by the way, who convinced

0:31:21.044 --> 0:31:23.404
<v Speaker 1>me that I should be much more worried about AI

0:31:23.804 --> 0:31:27.084
<v Speaker 1>than I was, so europe doom was much higher than mine.

0:31:27.884 --> 0:31:31.244
<v Speaker 1>I think that what Trump does to the environment is worrisome.

0:31:31.684 --> 0:31:35.124
<v Speaker 1>Trump as an existential risk to females who are facing

0:31:35.244 --> 0:31:39.004
<v Speaker 1>pregnancies that might not be viable. We know multiple women

0:31:39.004 --> 0:31:41.684
<v Speaker 1>who have lost their lives because they couldn't get abortion.

0:31:42.164 --> 0:31:45.844
<v Speaker 1>We see kind of it on an individual level. I

0:31:45.884 --> 0:31:48.204
<v Speaker 1>think there are many more existential risks when you have

0:31:48.244 --> 0:31:51.164
<v Speaker 1>a candidate like Donald Trump and with Kamala Harskin.

0:31:51.444 --> 0:31:53.604
<v Speaker 2>So if you consulted let's say that you had a

0:31:53.644 --> 0:31:57.764
<v Speaker 2>super intelligent chat GPT, right, that was possessed of all

0:31:57.844 --> 0:32:00.444
<v Speaker 2>the knowledge that we're capable of having. We can't control

0:32:00.484 --> 0:32:04.644
<v Speaker 2>every contingency, but on a probabilistic basis, right, And I

0:32:04.684 --> 0:32:08.204
<v Speaker 2>asked it, what are the chances that the world there's

0:32:08.244 --> 0:32:13.564
<v Speaker 2>more in net utility created considering all these things with Harris?

0:32:13.604 --> 0:32:17.564
<v Speaker 2>Then under Trump, right, I would not be a Harris voter.

0:32:17.564 --> 0:32:19.724
<v Speaker 2>I would not be one hundred percent confident. I have

0:32:19.804 --> 0:32:22.964
<v Speaker 2>no able say Harris maybe seventy thirty. I don't know.

0:32:23.004 --> 0:32:24.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are a lot of complicated factors here, right,

0:32:24.844 --> 0:32:28.284
<v Speaker 2>There's a big margin of error. You know, they're also

0:32:28.364 --> 0:32:30.684
<v Speaker 2>knockoff effects on what happens to future elections and things

0:32:30.684 --> 0:32:33.204
<v Speaker 2>like that. Absolutely, I do know that if you're fucking

0:32:33.204 --> 0:32:35.884
<v Speaker 2>me over with some of this hypothetical poker example that

0:32:35.924 --> 0:32:38.044
<v Speaker 2>I that I know, right, and I think it's like

0:32:38.084 --> 0:32:41.884
<v Speaker 2>a reasonable heuristic to weigh things that clearly indicate that

0:32:41.964 --> 0:32:43.964
<v Speaker 2>you're part of the out group. And this is part

0:32:43.964 --> 0:32:46.284
<v Speaker 2>of big part of democrats problem is that if if

0:32:46.564 --> 0:32:51.124
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is declined versus four years ago, but

0:32:51.284 --> 0:32:54.324
<v Speaker 2>you know, Democrats have this thing particularly progressive where if

0:32:54.324 --> 0:32:56.924
<v Speaker 2>you're not aligned with them on everything, then you are

0:32:56.964 --> 0:33:00.524
<v Speaker 2>created like some deplorable months. Absolutely absolutely and a lot

0:33:00.524 --> 0:33:01.084
<v Speaker 2>of you know.

0:33:02.364 --> 0:33:04.684
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that should absolutely not be the case.

0:33:06.404 --> 0:33:10.524
<v Speaker 2>I think Democrats under rate how many votes they lose

0:33:10.524 --> 0:33:11.364
<v Speaker 2>because they're annoying.

0:33:11.884 --> 0:33:14.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they are annoying, And I hate the holier

0:33:14.884 --> 0:33:18.284
<v Speaker 1>than now attitude, and I hate the people who have

0:33:18.404 --> 0:33:21.004
<v Speaker 1>this whole blanket like if you disagree with me on X,

0:33:21.084 --> 0:33:24.284
<v Speaker 1>then you know, then that's it, Like I'm done, I

0:33:24.324 --> 0:33:28.284
<v Speaker 1>completely agree with you, and the good news is nowhere.

0:33:28.524 --> 0:33:32.004
<v Speaker 1>Has Kamala Harris even suggested that she was going to

0:33:32.044 --> 0:33:36.684
<v Speaker 1>ban poker, so poker players, you can be happy. I'm happy.

0:33:36.724 --> 0:33:39.844
<v Speaker 1>I would be. I would obviously be completely miserable and

0:33:39.924 --> 0:33:44.324
<v Speaker 1>really upset if that were to ever happen because I,

0:33:44.444 --> 0:33:46.004
<v Speaker 1>as I said, I love poker and I think it's

0:33:46.044 --> 0:33:49.524
<v Speaker 1>such a force for good in society. But luckily this

0:33:49.764 --> 0:33:53.884
<v Speaker 1>was all a hypothetical example, and poker is in no

0:33:54.044 --> 0:33:58.284
<v Speaker 1>danger of getting banned, so let's be grateful for that.

0:34:03.444 --> 0:34:07.364
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute to talk about politics

0:34:07.364 --> 0:34:10.884
<v Speaker 1>and more conventional framework and talk about some polling and

0:34:10.924 --> 0:34:35.244
<v Speaker 1>what's happened since we spoke last week. Nate, you want

0:34:35.284 --> 0:34:38.284
<v Speaker 1>to give us a little bit of an update of

0:34:38.964 --> 0:34:42.524
<v Speaker 1>what has happened since we spoke last Tuesday. Have there

0:34:42.604 --> 0:34:46.724
<v Speaker 1>been new polls, new data? What's on your mind? What

0:34:46.844 --> 0:34:48.884
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing? How's the race looking?

0:34:50.524 --> 0:34:54.484
<v Speaker 2>So, Kamala Harris has gained in the neighborhood of one

0:34:54.564 --> 0:34:58.204
<v Speaker 2>percentage point since the debate, which might not seem like

0:34:58.244 --> 0:35:01.604
<v Speaker 2>a big deal, but it actually is, given that last

0:35:01.604 --> 0:35:03.764
<v Speaker 2>two elections basically came down to one point or so,

0:35:04.044 --> 0:35:07.324
<v Speaker 2>and moreover, it's been a little bit more than that

0:35:07.444 --> 0:35:11.244
<v Speaker 2>in Pennsylvania, which is the most important tipping point state.

0:35:12.684 --> 0:35:14.924
<v Speaker 2>So as a result, if you may remember, this little

0:35:14.924 --> 0:35:18.084
<v Speaker 2>built model had Trump a little bit ahead for a bit.

0:35:18.244 --> 0:35:20.724
<v Speaker 2>Now it's fifty to fifty. You know, Look, you're poker

0:35:20.764 --> 0:35:23.524
<v Speaker 2>players today it's fifty four forty six Harris, if you

0:35:23.564 --> 0:35:25.924
<v Speaker 2>want it, if you want to be on the pocket

0:35:26.004 --> 0:35:29.364
<v Speaker 2>Jacks versus Ace King student, you'd rather have the Jacks,

0:35:29.364 --> 0:35:32.284
<v Speaker 2>which win more than half the time. But about the

0:35:32.284 --> 0:35:37.324
<v Speaker 2>closest election that we've seen, you know, polls within one, two, three, four, five, six,

0:35:37.404 --> 0:35:41.244
<v Speaker 2>seven swing states are within two and a half points.

0:35:41.644 --> 0:35:44.884
<v Speaker 2>If you have the election today, then Harris is ahead

0:35:44.884 --> 0:35:48.844
<v Speaker 2>in states totaling two hundred and seventy six electoral.

0:35:48.244 --> 0:35:51.524
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy, Yeah, like that is that's incredibly close. And

0:35:51.564 --> 0:35:53.084
<v Speaker 1>you said seven and a half by the way, and

0:35:53.124 --> 0:35:54.484
<v Speaker 1>you're in your update because you have.

0:35:54.524 --> 0:35:57.564
<v Speaker 2>So Florida is this is this high risk, high rewards

0:35:57.564 --> 0:35:59.564
<v Speaker 2>state where if you're in Florida, it's thirty electoral votes

0:35:59.564 --> 0:36:02.764
<v Speaker 2>and you're probably in. That's game over for Trump. But

0:36:02.764 --> 0:36:05.084
<v Speaker 2>it's probably a little closer. But it's Florida's little bit

0:36:05.164 --> 0:36:05.484
<v Speaker 2>quite up.

0:36:06.004 --> 0:36:08.844
<v Speaker 1>Unlikely, right, but no, so.

0:36:08.804 --> 0:36:11.764
<v Speaker 2>Two seventies as if she holds Harris holds the blue

0:36:11.764 --> 0:36:17.324
<v Speaker 2>Wall states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania plus Nevada.

0:36:17.524 --> 0:36:18.524
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations.

0:36:18.804 --> 0:36:22.404
<v Speaker 2>Now she doesn't win Nevada, she's at two seventy and

0:36:22.444 --> 0:36:24.084
<v Speaker 2>you need two hundred and sixty nine to win.

0:36:24.324 --> 0:36:29.244
<v Speaker 1>Okay, even without even without Nevada, she win by one. Okay, Yeah,

0:36:29.284 --> 0:36:30.844
<v Speaker 1>that's insane, that's insane.

0:36:30.884 --> 0:36:34.124
<v Speaker 2>If she wins the second congressional district in Nebraska, which

0:36:34.124 --> 0:36:36.164
<v Speaker 2>is why I'm long winded they getting into this.

0:36:36.404 --> 0:36:39.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about that, because how many states are

0:36:39.644 --> 0:36:42.724
<v Speaker 1>there that split electoral roads. Is it just Maine? In Nebraska?

0:36:43.364 --> 0:36:46.564
<v Speaker 2>There are two states. So in Maine there is one district,

0:36:46.564 --> 0:36:50.204
<v Speaker 2>the rural second district, home to Acadian National Park and

0:36:50.364 --> 0:36:53.244
<v Speaker 2>some of the most beautiful coastline in America's but also

0:36:53.244 --> 0:36:56.204
<v Speaker 2>home to logging industry.

0:36:55.804 --> 0:36:57.364
<v Speaker 1>And sponsored by the state of.

0:36:57.404 --> 0:37:01.004
<v Speaker 2>Maine, sponsored by Main second district, but also home to

0:37:01.124 --> 0:37:07.004
<v Speaker 2>logging communities. Weird French, American Acadian shit. I even know

0:37:07.044 --> 0:37:12.204
<v Speaker 2>what goes on up there. They're speaking France parts of Maine, right, fishermen,

0:37:13.484 --> 0:37:16.924
<v Speaker 2>I don't know little. It kind of mains an interesting state, right,

0:37:17.884 --> 0:37:20.204
<v Speaker 2>It's not very religious, but you can still get some

0:37:20.324 --> 0:37:24.804
<v Speaker 2>kind of kind of rednecky behavior. For sure. I love

0:37:24.884 --> 0:37:29.764
<v Speaker 2>Main but it's an interesting state. So Trump is expected

0:37:29.804 --> 0:37:32.404
<v Speaker 2>to win that one district in Maine, that rural one,

0:37:32.804 --> 0:37:36.924
<v Speaker 2>whereas Kamala Harris is expected to win Omaha, Nebraska, Basically

0:37:36.964 --> 0:37:40.764
<v Speaker 2>that's the Correschi DiscT for Omaha and its suburbs. So

0:37:40.804 --> 0:37:45.324
<v Speaker 2>those offset the GFP wanted to change this law in Nebraska.

0:37:45.444 --> 0:37:49.564
<v Speaker 2>They've been trying, which was kind of sleazy because the

0:37:49.604 --> 0:37:54.004
<v Speaker 2>campaign's already begun strategy has already been involved for campaigning

0:37:54.004 --> 0:37:57.484
<v Speaker 2>in Omaha and running ads there and things like that. It's,

0:37:57.484 --> 0:38:02.404
<v Speaker 2>by the way, too late for Democrats to reciprocate in Maine.

0:38:02.924 --> 0:38:04.844
<v Speaker 2>So and they but they lacked the votes to do this,

0:38:04.924 --> 0:38:07.564
<v Speaker 2>so they were trying to change the rules in a

0:38:07.604 --> 0:38:10.044
<v Speaker 2>way that I thought was very dirty. Pool But as

0:38:10.044 --> 0:38:12.524
<v Speaker 2>a result of not doing that, this two seventy to

0:38:12.764 --> 0:38:17.284
<v Speaker 2>sixty eight map still works for Harris, provided she actually

0:38:17.364 --> 0:38:20.644
<v Speaker 2>does win the Nebraska district. And by the way, there's

0:38:20.644 --> 0:38:23.884
<v Speaker 2>also this thing with faithless electors where some years some

0:38:24.164 --> 0:38:26.284
<v Speaker 2>electors in the electoral colleges actually a group of people

0:38:27.004 --> 0:38:28.804
<v Speaker 2>don't vote for the candidate they're pledged to vote for.

0:38:30.084 --> 0:38:33.444
<v Speaker 1>How many times has that happened in history?

0:38:33.484 --> 0:38:35.924
<v Speaker 2>It hasn't swung an election, But like in twenty sixteen,

0:38:36.644 --> 0:38:39.204
<v Speaker 2>some people were so fed up with the Trump Clinton

0:38:39.204 --> 0:38:41.884
<v Speaker 2>election that there were quite a few faithleus electors, not

0:38:42.044 --> 0:38:45.484
<v Speaker 2>enough to like cost Uh Trump the election, but like,

0:38:46.604 --> 0:38:49.644
<v Speaker 2>but there were some defectors for sure, have.

0:38:49.644 --> 0:38:52.964
<v Speaker 1>There is that the only election I'm genuinely asking, I

0:38:52.964 --> 0:38:53.924
<v Speaker 1>actually don't know.

0:38:53.964 --> 0:38:56.964
<v Speaker 2>There was somebody who voted for John Edwards instead of

0:38:57.004 --> 0:38:58.564
<v Speaker 2>John Kerry in two thousand and four.

0:38:58.804 --> 0:39:01.444
<v Speaker 1>So it's often, it's rare, but it happens, and it's

0:39:01.484 --> 0:39:04.564
<v Speaker 1>never been decisive, is what your No.

0:39:04.604 --> 0:39:08.564
<v Speaker 2>But if it's two seventy, then if any comes bound right,

0:39:08.604 --> 0:39:11.324
<v Speaker 2>but it's to seventy, then in some states are cracking

0:39:11.364 --> 0:39:13.404
<v Speaker 2>down on this. If it's two seventy, then it means

0:39:13.404 --> 0:39:14.764
<v Speaker 2>there are two hundred and sixty nine or two so

0:39:14.764 --> 0:39:19.124
<v Speaker 2>tenty people that could change history by by by refusing

0:39:19.124 --> 0:39:20.964
<v Speaker 2>to cast their vote as their as their pledge. So

0:39:20.964 --> 0:39:23.924
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit of a you know, we use

0:39:23.964 --> 0:39:26.484
<v Speaker 2>the term existential risk of this episode, but it can.

0:39:26.404 --> 0:39:28.124
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I think I think that makes sense

0:39:28.164 --> 0:39:30.284
<v Speaker 1>though in this particular case, if we're looking at an

0:39:30.364 --> 0:39:33.044
<v Speaker 1>election that could be that close, that could you know,

0:39:33.124 --> 0:39:35.604
<v Speaker 1>could come down to two seventy versus two sixty eight,

0:39:36.124 --> 0:39:39.844
<v Speaker 1>then than we are talking about about that sort of thing.

0:39:40.524 --> 0:39:42.964
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm kind of curious to hear your

0:39:43.004 --> 0:39:46.564
<v Speaker 1>take on this. Do you think that the main Nebraska

0:39:46.644 --> 0:39:50.084
<v Speaker 1>model is a good one. Do you think that like?

0:39:50.444 --> 0:39:53.804
<v Speaker 1>And do you think it's good to split the electoral votes?

0:39:53.964 --> 0:39:58.244
<v Speaker 1>And do you see any other states potentially going that direction.

0:39:59.044 --> 0:40:00.164
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just curious.

0:40:00.644 --> 0:40:03.364
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more likely that what will happen is

0:40:03.404 --> 0:40:07.524
<v Speaker 2>that because Nebraska threatened to rescind this, it wouldn't surprise

0:40:07.604 --> 0:40:12.004
<v Speaker 2>me if main prem deive ly rescinds their system. And

0:40:12.044 --> 0:40:17.124
<v Speaker 2>then look, these are weird cases where they kind of

0:40:17.124 --> 0:40:19.204
<v Speaker 2>offset one another. In general, No, I think it's bad

0:40:19.324 --> 0:40:22.164
<v Speaker 2>for I think it's bad when you have different states

0:40:22.164 --> 0:40:24.284
<v Speaker 2>with different rules. I think it's a slippery slope too.

0:40:24.964 --> 0:40:27.204
<v Speaker 2>You know, for a while Pennsylvania want to allocate it's

0:40:27.244 --> 0:40:31.444
<v Speaker 2>just delegates proportionately for example, I think I think you

0:40:31.484 --> 0:40:35.484
<v Speaker 2>want consistent rules. The main Nebraska thing is pretty unikely

0:40:35.564 --> 0:40:38.764
<v Speaker 2>swing election because they offset. But yeah, I and by

0:40:38.804 --> 0:40:43.244
<v Speaker 2>the way, it's also giving more power to redistricting, which

0:40:43.284 --> 0:40:46.764
<v Speaker 2>is how districts are drawn, which in many states is

0:40:46.764 --> 0:40:52.924
<v Speaker 2>a very partisan process. Yeah, puts huge steaks into this

0:40:53.084 --> 0:40:58.004
<v Speaker 2>once every ten year process. The Supreme Court has ruled

0:40:58.004 --> 0:41:04.364
<v Speaker 2>that partisan jerry mandering is legal within certain boundaries. Probably

0:41:04.404 --> 0:41:07.884
<v Speaker 2>will not change the Roberts Court, and so yeah, I

0:41:07.884 --> 0:41:09.844
<v Speaker 2>would not want to give the redistrict pros this even

0:41:09.844 --> 0:41:10.324
<v Speaker 2>more power.

0:41:10.764 --> 0:41:13.084
<v Speaker 1>By the way, since you keep saying that they're balancing

0:41:13.124 --> 0:41:16.444
<v Speaker 1>each other, let me bring our episode full circle. We

0:41:16.564 --> 0:41:19.364
<v Speaker 1>started off talking about Anna Sarokan, and you said you'd

0:41:19.364 --> 0:41:21.724
<v Speaker 1>never heard of her. However, you know there are certain

0:41:21.764 --> 0:41:24.084
<v Speaker 1>things that you have heard of, like Curb your enthusiasm,

0:41:24.524 --> 0:41:28.124
<v Speaker 1>So let's I just want to bring kurb back here.

0:41:29.044 --> 0:41:33.764
<v Speaker 1>There was an episode last season where Larry David is

0:41:33.844 --> 0:41:38.284
<v Speaker 1>standing in line to vote, and it's a really long

0:41:38.324 --> 0:41:42.044
<v Speaker 1>line and it's hot outside, and he asks the gentleman

0:41:42.044 --> 0:41:44.564
<v Speaker 1>in front of him who he's voting for. They're voting

0:41:44.604 --> 0:41:48.124
<v Speaker 1>for the opposite party's candidates, and he asks if he

0:41:48.244 --> 0:41:50.964
<v Speaker 1>wants to leave the line with him so that they

0:41:51.004 --> 0:41:54.644
<v Speaker 1>both do not vote, and they offset each other and

0:41:55.084 --> 0:41:56.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't have to wait in line. The

0:41:56.804 --> 0:42:00.164
<v Speaker 1>guy agrees, they both leave. Larry David's candidate ends up

0:42:00.204 --> 0:42:03.764
<v Speaker 1>losing the election by one vote, and then it comes

0:42:03.804 --> 0:42:06.724
<v Speaker 1>out that someone saw him leaving the line and not voting.

0:42:07.604 --> 0:42:12.124
<v Speaker 1>And so I just wanted to bring this into our

0:42:12.164 --> 0:42:16.284
<v Speaker 1>discussion because it's what I keep thinking about when you

0:42:16.324 --> 0:42:19.084
<v Speaker 1>say they offset each other because, by the way, there

0:42:19.164 --> 0:42:21.924
<v Speaker 1>is kind of that logic, and some people do kind

0:42:21.924 --> 0:42:24.124
<v Speaker 1>of do that and they don't vote, and they find

0:42:24.124 --> 0:42:26.524
<v Speaker 1>someone else who agrees not to vote, who's voting in

0:42:26.564 --> 0:42:27.204
<v Speaker 1>the opposite to right.

0:42:27.364 --> 0:42:29.364
<v Speaker 2>Like two thousand and four, there was some Nator thing

0:42:29.524 --> 0:42:33.364
<v Speaker 2>where you trade your Nator vote in a safe state

0:42:33.444 --> 0:42:35.524
<v Speaker 2>for a carry vote in a swing state or something.

0:42:36.244 --> 0:42:37.804
<v Speaker 2>A memory hold all this stuff.

0:42:37.844 --> 0:42:41.964
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, curb your enthusiasm taught us that you should be

0:42:42.204 --> 0:42:44.804
<v Speaker 1>very wary of doing this because you are a candidate

0:42:44.924 --> 0:42:46.404
<v Speaker 1>my loose by one.

0:42:46.004 --> 0:42:49.924
<v Speaker 2>I sway to waction for like nineteen votes. Actually really, yeah,

0:42:49.964 --> 0:42:52.804
<v Speaker 2>so I am because I am strategic with my voting.

0:42:52.844 --> 0:42:57.524
<v Speaker 2>I'm a registered Republican because you have a lot of

0:42:57.604 --> 0:43:02.844
<v Speaker 2>influence if you're a registered Republican in Chelsea, Manhattan, which

0:43:02.884 --> 0:43:06.604
<v Speaker 2>is a very blue place. So twenty sixteen, I register

0:43:06.604 --> 0:43:09.604
<v Speaker 2>as a Republican to vote against Donald Trump. The cann

0:43:09.764 --> 0:43:12.244
<v Speaker 2>who was most viable at that point was John Kasick.

0:43:13.604 --> 0:43:16.684
<v Speaker 2>So I voted for Kasik, and Kasik won my congressional

0:43:16.684 --> 0:43:21.924
<v Speaker 2>district by I think nineteen votes or something, and therefore

0:43:22.084 --> 0:43:26.444
<v Speaker 2>won an extra delegate to the Republican Convention. So you

0:43:26.484 --> 0:43:31.044
<v Speaker 2>know me and nineteen other Chelsea Heights cost Trumpet a delegate.

0:43:31.524 --> 0:43:35.324
<v Speaker 1>All right, well it is, it is. It is a

0:43:35.324 --> 0:43:37.884
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun mileage. I think that's how strategic voting

0:43:37.884 --> 0:43:38.564
<v Speaker 1>should be done.

0:43:39.164 --> 0:43:41.924
<v Speaker 2>Kudos, Yeah, Maria. I think let's leave it there. I mean,

0:43:41.924 --> 0:43:44.244
<v Speaker 2>we've which wound up being a lot of politics, a

0:43:44.244 --> 0:43:45.084
<v Speaker 2>lot of politics.

0:43:45.124 --> 0:43:45.684
<v Speaker 1>It did it?

0:43:45.724 --> 0:43:48.764
<v Speaker 2>Did I need anythink I needed?

0:43:49.364 --> 0:43:52.804
<v Speaker 1>I need a decompression politics break. I love you and

0:43:53.004 --> 0:43:58.044
<v Speaker 1>I respect all of your opinions. Let's let's go grab

0:43:58.044 --> 0:44:00.684
<v Speaker 1>a drink and not talk politics.

0:44:04.564 --> 0:44:07.364
<v Speaker 2>Risky Business is hosted by me Nate Silper and me

0:44:07.524 --> 0:44:10.764
<v Speaker 2>Maria Kannakova. The show was a coproduction of Pushkin Industries

0:44:10.804 --> 0:44:15.044
<v Speaker 2>and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced by Isabel Carter. Our

0:44:15.044 --> 0:44:19.404
<v Speaker 2>associate producer is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our engineer is Sarah Bruger.

0:44:19.884 --> 0:44:21.964
<v Speaker 2>Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:44:22.204 --> 0:44:23.924
<v Speaker 1>If you want to listen to an ad free version,

0:44:24.004 --> 0:44:26.684
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Pushkin Plus For six ninety nine a month.

0:44:26.804 --> 0:44:29.764
<v Speaker 1>You get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.