WEBVTT - Monologue: Annualized Revenues Are BS

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>All Zone Media. Hello and welcome to this week's Better

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Offline Monologue. I'm your host ed ze Tron, and I've

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>heard so many nice things from all of you about

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>last week's Haters Guide to AI, and I really couldn't

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be more grateful. It was a labor of love and

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>hate in some cases. I guess as we approach what

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I see as the precipice of this hysterical era, we're

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>going to start seeing and hearing big tech and big

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>model developers make intentionally vague statements with the intentive misleading

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you and the media. And I really want to be clear.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry there's going to be some maths in this,

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's necessary for you to know how people are

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>trying to swindle you and the media too. So Microsoft

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>kicked this off this week with this week's earnings breaking

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>out annual revenue from their a Zeo cloud platform when

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they sell the means for people to run applications and

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>organizations in the cloud but also bury their AI services,

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and they did this for the first time in history.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>This naturally led people to say that as yours growth,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>which is up thirty four percent twenty twenty four, when

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't disclose it was driven by art official intelligence somehow,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that Microsoft intentionally stopped reporting on their

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>own things their AI revenue in January when they said

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they had thirteen billion of annualized revenue, meaning about one

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>point eight billion dollars a month, and God, that term

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>annualized this is a tricky one. Also, by the way,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>they made over seventy billion dollars on Azure, so thirteen

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of annualized revenue is actually not that much.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the term annualized this is a really tricky one.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>When you read or hear someone say annualized revenue, it

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>means a particular month multiplied by twelve. However, what they

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>want you to think is that annualized means that the

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>company in question will make that much money in the year,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in part because there isn't a single goddamn media outlet

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that seems capable of seeing through this. I should also

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be clear that annualized revenue is a one month snapshot.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>If I sell boxes at one hundred dollars apiece and

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>sell three in June, I have thirty six hundred dollars

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in annualized revenue. That's three hundred dollars times twelve, because

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a year. But if I only sell a one

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>box in j that means I have twelve hundred dollars

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in annualized revenue, which doesn't quite sound so good. My

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>June annualized revenues of thirty six hundred dollars make it

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>sound like I'll make that much in a year. However,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if I also tell you that I only sold one

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>box and I had twelve hundred dollars of annualized revenues

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>based on July, you'd suddenly be more concerned, and quite

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>concerned indeed, about the volatility of this box business. In

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>simpler terms, annualized revenue is a deliberate attempt to hide

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 1>something or mislead someone. Nowhere has this been more obvious

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>than an open AI's recent leak of their twelve billion

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in annualized revenue, which the information who I genuinely

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like and appreciate reported as somehow indicative of open ai

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>being on track to make their twelve point seven billion

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars in revenue for twenty twenty five. Here's the thing.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Twelve billion dollars in annualized revenue means one billion dollars

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in revenue in one month, which is genuinely a milestone,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of impressive, at least it would be if open

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ai didn't burn up puts of eight billion dollars this year,

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>even though I think they're probably going to burn more

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>than that. But anyway, back in May, CNBC reported the

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>open ai was up ten billion dollars in annualized revenue,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning eight hundred and thirty three million dollars. And back

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in December twenty twenty four they were at five point

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in annualized revenue. And that's the thing.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, five point five works out to

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about four hundred and fifty eight million dollars in the month.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that they're going to hit twelve

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion dollars. In fact, best case scenario, this

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>means that open ai has, by my calculations, made just

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>over five billion dollars in total revenue through the end

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of July twenty twenty five. That's in the first seven

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>months of the year. So anytime you see annualized revenue

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you should immediately be suspicious of whoever is leaking it.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Open ai has likely leaked this number as a means

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of making people believe that they'll make twelve billion dollars

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or more. In twenty twenty five, they projected to do

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve point seven billion dollars, which would be a remarkable

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>number that they're not even halfway towards reaching, despite what

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some people might be reporting. Now another company playing silly

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>buggers with di figurers, of course, Anthropic, who have leaked

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, every single month of every single

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>month other than April. It's kind of crazy. And they

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but they started in January when they leaked that they'd

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>hit a billion dollars in annualized revenue, and then they

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are one point four billion dollars in February, and then

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars annualized in March, and then three billion

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars annualized in May, and then four billion dollars annualized

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>in June. One might believe this means that Anthropic will

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>make four billion dollars this year, but the actual numbers

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>work out to the company making no more than one

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>point one five billion dollars through the end of June.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to check my maths, you can

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of ar will be eighty three billion, one

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>point four one one six. Two billion would be one

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty six. Then May would be three billion annualized, so

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>it it'd be two hundred and fifty million, and four

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>billion ar would be three hundred and thirty three million.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this with the person that emails me is like,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what are their numbers? Anyway? These are obfiscations, these are intentional.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic has made no more than one point one five

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars through the end of June. Is not going

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to get them to four billion dollars without something ridiculous. Yeah.

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw a Bloomberg reporter, love your ed, but the

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.679
<v Speaker 1>saying maybe they'll hit nine billion dollars in annualized revenue

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this year as an absolute joke. Open Ai barely hit

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>then they have all the it's just it's all deliberate

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's all intentional. It's also that you kind of

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>watch the mouth are not the hands. It's so that

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't think too hard, because when you look at

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual numbers, open Ai has only made like five

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars this year. That's not They're not

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>even to the lofty goals they have. They're not even

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>halfway there, and Anthropics are one point one to five billion.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>These are not huge amounts, and they're dwarfed by the

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that each I think Open Ai is going to

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>burn eight to probably fifteen billion dollars this year and

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that's after revenue, and Anthropic I think they're three to

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars. It's an absolute joke. But you, you,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the listener, I want you to know that all of

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this is intentional, as Anthropic is currently raising around as

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>large as five billion dollars from the bone saw capital

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and the media is helping by obfuscating

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>their actual revenue. Opening Eyes doing the same thing. The

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Information reported they're at seven point five billion dollars of

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the remaining well thirty billion that they actually have to raise,

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with soft Bank covering the rest. They're trying to hoodwink people.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And I want you, the listener to know better. Agree

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with me, disagree with me. I've much rather you knew

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>what these terms mean and why they're being used. And yes,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be someone who says, annualize there's a

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>fine term. People use it ethically, and that's true. You

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>can use this term ethically. You can use this to say, yeah,

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>if things keep up at this pace, will be at this.

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not what these fuckers are doing. They're doing this

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as a means of They're selling it to people that

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to think about it too hard, so that

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>those people don't think about it much more than thinking, oh,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>open AA is going to make so much bloody money.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh when Throbic's going to do that too. And it sucks.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It sucks because this is being used to make people richer,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to make Dario Amma Day and Sam Clammy Sam Altman

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more money, and it's really sad. It's sad,

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a sign that things are kind of deteriorating.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And yes, there are going to be people that say, well,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the revenue's going up, that means things are going well. Ah.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>In a situation where things are going well, these companies

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>would talk about the real revenues. They wouldn't be playing

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>weird card games and weird shuffling. Shuffling. Though, now, as

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this is forgetting what you call the game

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with the cup on the ball, Someone's going to email

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>me and make fun of me for this. I'm stupid.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't get to do that. But in all seriousless

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing tricksy things and they're doing it because they're

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to raise money. It's a classics windle, and it

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pisses me off to see because people are going to

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think that this is a victory for the AI boom,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>when in reality they're trying to hide something a little

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>more grim than that, which is revenues are nowhere near

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>their arrs they wish they were. And indeed, I think

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in the next six to twelve months we're going to

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>see this sour or somewhat. I look forward to telling you,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what happens, what's actually happening.