WEBVTT - An Interview With Bill Janeway: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholds on Bloomberg

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Radio Today. On the podcast, we have William H. Jane Way,

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>better known as Bill Janeway. You'll hear his whole curriculum

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>VITA in a minute, so I won't go into the

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>details on that. Uh. For those of you who are

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in technology, venture capital, the history of financing, you

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are about to sit through a master class in angel investing,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>VC technology, how the world has developed to fund speculative innovation,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the proper role of government, of the private sector, of

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the public markets. This is really a fascinating conversation, a

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>tour to force. I'm not exaggerating when I said we

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have another eight pages of question. I could have kept

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going for another hour of half, but I promised to

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>get him out of here fifteen minutes ago and we

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>still ran late. Um. He is tremendously insightful, with an

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>enormous breath of experience and thoughtfulness about what it means

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a successful early stage investor in technology and

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>other fields. I think you're gonna find this to be

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely brilliant, insightful, delightful conversation. So, with no further ado,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Bill Janeway. This is Masters in Business

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with Barry Ridholds on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>is William Janeway, better known as Bill. I think he

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is the most important person our listeners may never have

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>heard of before. And that's only because some of the

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>things we're gonna talk about are a little inside baseball.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>But let me give you a quick walk through of

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>his curriculum vita. He is currently a managing director and

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>senior advisor at Warburg Pincus, where he helped to develop

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>their Technology Investment division. Princeton undergrad got his PhD in

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>economics at Cambridge ultimately became the co founder of the

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Institute for New Economic Thinking that he co founded with

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>George Soros. In two thousand and twelve, he published a

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating book called Doing in a Capitalism in the Innovation Economy,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna talk a little more about that during

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>our conversation. He also helped to fund and create b

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>e A Systems. Is that an accurate way to describe that?

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And we'll spend some time explaining how he a cash

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>investment of a little more than fifty million dollars became

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a six point five billion dollar payout a few years later.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>There's so much more stuff to go over. We'll we'll,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into it as we go. William Janeway, Welcome

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg. Great to be here, Barry so I said

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>as in the introduction that many of the lay people

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>listeners may not know who you are. But let me

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>give a quote from your book by Mark and Reason.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>UH currently a VC at Andreson Horowitz and essentially the

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>person who invented UH Netscape and and really created the

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>modern browser and the modern form of the internet. And

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Reason said Bill Janeway is a key creator of modern

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>venture capital, and he tells an amazing story of the

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>intersection of economics and innovation. This book is essential to

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>anyone who wants to understand technology and how it's creation

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>will be financed for decades to come. That's That's quite

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the endorsement, isn't it. It's a great endorsement. I have

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a great regard for Mark, and he is one of

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>those rare people whose transition from building a business operationally,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>which of course he did at Netscape and then opswhere,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to being a success will investor. It's a hard frontier

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to cross. So let me ask you a simple question,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious when people ask what do you do?

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you respond to that? Well, it depends on

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>which morning I wake up. Some mornings I wake up

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's a hundred percent Warburg Pincus. It's working with

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>my younger colleagues defining investment opportunity or thinking strategically about

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>where there's a hole in the market for innovative technology.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I wake up and it's a Cambridge University day.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm deeply embedded in the economics department at Cambridge, which

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is playing a key role in creatively responding to the

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>global financial crisis of two thousand and eight, which woke

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of minds, a lot of economists who

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have been living in a kind of fantasy world of

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect expectations and efficient markets. So that's another part of

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>my life, and that, of course, is where the Institute

0:04:55.520 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>for New Economic Thinking comes in and and sometimes I'm

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>very much involved with the Social Science Research Council, a

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not for profit based here in New York run by

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a great social scientists named Irak cats Nelson, and where

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we're creating an environment where economists can feel comfortable interacting

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with other social scientists rather than playing at being sort

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of physicists because they've got the math, and so these

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>different lives intersect and they keep the neurons talking to

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>each other NonStop. You know, I've long said that economists

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have suffered from physics envy. You know, physics and astrophysics.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>They can land a rover on a comet a billion

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>miles away. Economists don't quite have that practical application of

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>their models. Something you've been critical of and said economics

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to move from a theoretical practice to something more practical. Well, here,

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem. Economics is just so much harder than

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>physics because look, the molecules. The molecules don't have consciousness,

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not aware of what they don't know. But every

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>human being, except for maybe an extremist who might be

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>running for president, wakes up in the morning knowing that

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>not only does she not know what the consequences of

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>her actions are going to be, but nobody else does either.

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, that is the lesson I deeply learned when

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I was a graduate student at Cambridge studying under the

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>students of the great John Maynard Keynes. The central thesis

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>of Cames's economics was making decisions that you have to

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>make about committing money, whether it's to household goods or

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>investment in new stuff, where you know that you can't

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>know what the return is going to be, so people

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>do the best they can, and all too often the

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>result is a mess. That's why to us in an

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>eight to me for economics and for everybody dependent on economists,

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight was the gift that keeps on

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>giving a wake up call. To say the least, it

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>taught us humility about what the great hyak cames as

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>rival and friend called the pretense of knowledge we pretend

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we know in our models more than we can, and

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing back into the reality of decision making under uncertainty

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and how that scales up into failures of coordination. That's

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>what new economics is about, and that's why I'm so

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>thrilled forty years after I left Cambridge to be back

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>involved in economics, having spent that time making decisions under

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty about information technology venture capital. You're listening to Masters

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My guest today is William Janeway.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>He is a venture capitalist and author of the book

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy. I want to pull

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a quote out of the book and discuss something you

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>had written some time ago. The innovation economy emphasizes the

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>strategic role played by the state and by financial speculators

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>sources of investment unconcerned with economic value. Explain that a bit.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So when you're operating at the frontier, you're making investments

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in new stuff. Maybe it's building railway networks, maybe it's

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>putting fiber optic cable in the ground, or maybe it's

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to find out what this new stuff is good for.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that you share with other investors at

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the frontier is you don't know what the return is

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. You can't. You can you can run a

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>spread street. Anybody can run a spreadhet. Those are those

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>are really assumed numbers, and you know, when you start

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>out with that basis, who knows where it goes. So

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if investment that the frontier is limited only to where

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you have a really high degree of confidence that you're

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna make a profit, you're not gonna have very much investment.

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are two forces that historically, this is his

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this is history, this isn't theory. Historically two forces have collaborated,

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have intersected. One is governments driven by political missions, legitimate

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>missions that transcend cost benefit analysis economic calculation. Manifest destiny

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>is what we called it in the nineteenth century when

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we took nine percent of the land mass of the

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>lower forty eight states and gave it to a bunch

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of railroad promoters who criss crossed the country with railroad

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>lines on the basis of which came Railway Express and

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Sears Uh Sears, Roebuck and cantal Monk created the the

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the mail order retail economy, created a national market. The

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>state moved the technology building that network out to the

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>point where speculators could fund the exploration of what to

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>do with that. They mobilized capital on a scale that

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>those rational, careful green eye shade investors would never have done.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>We saw exactly the same thing in the ninety nineties

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>when we built out the Internet and we had, you know,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dot coms that went bust, but we were

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>left with Amazon and Google and eBay. Amazon took two

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>point two billion of cash investment to get to positive

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and transform the retail economy of the world.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>You could only do that with speculative money. That is

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>investing to get out in time before the bubble bursts.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about bubba. So let's talk about bubble

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. You mentioned railroads. They eventually be am a

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>giant boom and then collapsed just a handful of survivors.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, every major technological innovation, it seems there's a

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>huge boom, it reaches a point of speculaive excess, becomes

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a bubble, and then collapses. Whether it's cars that were

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred card manufacturers at one point, what are there

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>now three or four in the United States and a

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>couple of dozen worldwide computers, radio and television, and of

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>course the internet. Is this the nature of technology that

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>boom bust cycle. Well, first, the first thing, the first

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>law of bubbles is wherever you have markets in tradeable assets,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>from tulip bulbs to beach houses in the Nevada desert.

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Wherever you have market, you're gonna have hurting behavior. You're

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna momentum investing. You're gonna have people who, just like

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>today with the unicorns, are motivated by fomo fear of

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>missing out. And by the way, when you have professionals

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>managing other people's money, if they don't follow the bubble,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they get fired, the money gets taken away, so somebody

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>else does. So bubbles are banal. There are indogenous, they

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>are ubiquitous. Everywhere you look in the history of finance

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you find bubbles. But not all bubbles are the same.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So before we go into how bubbles differ, I have

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask you a question. I'm going to assume that

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you believe Himan Minsky was correct. Well, you know, Himan

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Menski was a mentor of mine during the thirty five

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>years when I was totally immersed in venture capital investing

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on the side, I kind of kept my mind open,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>listening and looking for people who for thinkers, who who

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>who wrote and analyze the world I was actually living

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in and I met Hi Menski in about two We

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>bonded he was out at Washington University. I read his books.

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I wrote some essays for him when he moved east

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and was at Bard College at the Levy Institute, I

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>used Tom up for his conferences. He had a tremendous

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>influence on me. And of course, in two thousand and

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>eight the world rediscovered the most neglected economists of the

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>second half of the twentieth century. I discovered him through

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul McCulley, who has been a guest on the show

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and I know for many years from his days of PIMCO,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>briefly explain Minsky's primary economic thesis about stability leading to instability.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Minsky's thesis the the evolution of the UH, of the

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>movement from the conservative, prudent UH system to one of crazy,

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>wild speculation that self destruction goes like this, and and

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and let's remember Minsky was really applying this to the

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>banking system, not to the stock market. But there's an analogy.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So I lend you money, Barry. I lend you money,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and you not only pay me back the interest on

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a timely fashion, but when you owe me back the loan,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you pay me act the loan out of your own income,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>out of money you've earned. So guess what you want?

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Another loan? You got it. And this time you know,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care. I trust you. You keep paying

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>me that interest on a timely basis. And if at

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day we got to roll over

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the loan, we gotta refinance it. Well, we've just moved

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from what from what Minsky called the first the hedged environment,

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're paying the loan back out of cash flow,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>out of earnings, to the speculative environment, because there's a risk,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a risk that the market may not be so

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>acceptable when it's time. But it's still it's still pretty

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>solid in its business as usual. But then, and this

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is what happened in two thousand and seven. Then people

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have been making so much money making these loans, they

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>feel really comfortable lending you the third loan. And this time,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you wake up one morning and things are

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a little tight, and you call me up and say,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, I know, I owe you this interest payment,

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but it would really help me if instead of paying

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you cash, I pay you in kind. I give you

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a little more of that debt. This is called pick loans.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Payment in kind, another word to recapitalize the interest and

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the previous principle. And you're rolling the whole loan over again.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And the signal that you're in a banking bubble which

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to blow is when the lenders start lending

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the borrowers the interest to pretend the loan is still good.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what happened in two thousand and seven. You're

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio, My guest

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>today is William Janeway. He is a venture capitalist, author

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and managing director at Warburg Pinkis. And we are discussing

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>how you helped to create b e A Systems, which

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is a technology company that really integrat rates databases with

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Is that a gross over simplification. B e

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>A was created in the mid nineties and became the

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>company that delivered the platform for running important commercial applications,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>applications that involve people spending and collecting money across the

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet with millions of simultaneous users. Companies now owned by Oracle.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the core of Oracles platform technology today, which is

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>called Oracle Fusion. But b e A, beginning in the

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties through the mid audies, was a pioneer in

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>transforming the world of transactional computing, of commercial computing from

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>being dominated by IBM everything on an IBM mainframe to

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>being distributed out across millions of separate machines interlinked by

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. So this this allowed the transition from mainframe

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to server. And and so that's such a weird name.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>B e A Systems would be a stand for well

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>in at Warburg Pinkers, we we had created an investment

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>thesis that it was time the technology had evolved to

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the point where IBMS dominant control of the marketplace where

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it could charge enormous premium prices, that that was was vulnerable,

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and that around the commercial world of enterprises you were

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing client servers Sun Systems running Oracle databases was opening up.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So we began a program that that went on for

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a decade of investing in the way I like to

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>put it in frankly, and kind of helping IBM become

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just another competitor. So in the middle of that process,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>um I was introduced to a felic called Bill Coleman.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill had run UM the core software, it's Sun micro Systems.

0:17:55.560 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>He had actually been working for Eric Schmidt and and right,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and and Bill had a great idea sons sons mantra

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>was the network is the computer, So Bill said, if

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if the networks the computer, the network needs an operating

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>system like a computer does that that allocates and manages

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>all the different resources. And he connected with a brilliant

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>young engineer named Alfred Twang and a seasoned commercial sales

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and marketing guy named Ed Scott. So Bill and Ed

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and Alfred had this idea that that they could, with

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>enough capital and enough time, build software that would effectively

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>replace IBM's core transaction platform. So we began having conversations

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the autumn of ninety four, and you know, I said,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, guys, I I get it. I get the vision.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We've been thinking about this ourselves for five years. You

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>guys are incredibly landed. But before we set down to

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to build something's gonna take three or four years, gonna

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>cost a ton of money. Why don't we see if

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>we can cheat. Why don't we see whether there's stuff

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>out there that could play this role but is owned

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>by people who don't know what to do with it.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So we actually launched the e A with Bill and

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Alfred with the working title it's like, you know, working

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>title for a play bill Out and Alfred b e A.

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>We did it as a research project, first to evaluate

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>all the existing technologies that were available, and then to

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>validate that there were real markets, real markets with real

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>customers that could buy into alternatives to IBM. And we

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>found this technology that had been developed in guests where

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Bell Labs A T and T and Bell Labs A

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>T and T in those days when it was a

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>dominant communications company basically had to give everything away that

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't using in communications because of the monopoly rules. Exactly. Well,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that was that became loosened. But before then A T

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and T sold its Unix Systems Labs. This is where

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Unix operating system was, and this is where this

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>core technology called Tuxedo was. They sold it to a

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>little company called Novel nowhere competing with Microsoft, run by

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.959
<v Speaker 1>a guy called Ray Norda who was dedicated to fighting

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates to the death. So he bought this technology

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>which was super complex, big heavy duty stuff. You needed

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 1>engineers surrounding it into a company that that told everything

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in a red box at a computer land store. I

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>used to say, you know, I'm not well unless they

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>can microminiatureize three systems engineers and put it in every

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>red box so that they can come out and dance

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and make it work. So in any case, Ed Scott

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>had a long conversation with the new CEO, Bob Frankenberg.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Bob Frankenberg had come from HP, he knew enterprise computing

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and he knew that Novel and Tuxedo didn't mix. So

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we put together a deal which launched the e A

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>by acquiring the Tuxedo technology and having it in the

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>hands of people Billonette and Alfred who knew what to

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>do with it. So that was a fifty five million

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars was we we We had already bought a couple

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of consulting businesses by this time. We had we had

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>committed because we knew we were gonna be buying stuff

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>from scratch. This was the innovation. We created what we

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>called the line of equity, not a line of credit,

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a line of equity. So we priced out fifty million

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars up front, and so when the guys went into

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Novelle needing to do a deal, they didn't have to say, hey, Bob,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>don't do a thing. We'll be back in six months

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>when we raised another round of venture capital. We were

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>there with them. We could do the deal in real time.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That meant in a year BA was running at a

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar revenue base could go public just in

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>seven as the Internet bubble started to take off. But

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Tuxedo wasn't designed for the Internet. And this was the

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>genius of Bill and Nett and Alfred and Bill and Alfred,

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the technology guys really came together. They did a search

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for technology that was that was Internet native, and they

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>found a little startup called web Logic. So web Logic

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>was already a hot company even though it was just

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>beginning to ship stuff, just beginning, and the valuation happened

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it before it will happen again. This is what a

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>bubble starts to smell like. The valuation for the startups

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>started rising and rising, but so did the stock of

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>b e A because we've been able to go public.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Well you did it Beego public? And what sort of

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>value sen to go public at? Well, initially it was

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at about a two dollar valuation and that's so that's

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good return on fifty five million and we

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't even have all the million in yet, But by

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that valuation was up to a billion, which was a

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>very good thing because the Bye web Logic it took

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty million of shares of stock and

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>if we hadn't had the public market valuation, couldn't have

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>done it. So how long after that did it take

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to get to six and a half billion, Well, first

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it took it took about a year after that to

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>get to a billion dollars in revenues, a billion revenue.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a real company, that's a real company, very profitable,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>becoming the standard. And with the bubble, with the bubble

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and the stock market valuation went to twenty five billion.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>So who ends up taking b e A out when

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>everything is well? First of all, the public speculative stock market,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:02.719
<v Speaker 1>war Paying Kiss owned after the I p O. Warburg

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pink Is still owned more than fifty percent of the company.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And when we were the Soul funders, Soul funders through

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this line of equity. So we began distributing our shares

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to our limited partners. The shares were fully tradeable, completely liquid,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and the stock kept rising as we were distributing the shares.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where that's six and a half billion

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 1>of realized value came from distributing shares into a rising market.

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we talked about high mensky. I My

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my senior partner, John Vogelstein, who was the chief investment

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>officer at Warburg Pinkers, was a great student of markets.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>And I bat Way back at Cambridge, had written my

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>PhD thesis on nineteen nine to nineteen thirty one in Britain.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 1>So I'd seen, if you like, I'd seen the movie before.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the stock market bubble of nineteen twenty nine.

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>When our c A. She took the stock price chart

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of our CIA from twenty six to nine. It looked

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like b E A from nine six to and that's

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all you needed to see. We knew it was a bubble.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We knew it wasn't gonna last. We knew we'd built

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a real company, but it was time to realize the

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 1>value that we've created. You're listening to Masters in Business

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My guest today is Bill Janeway. He

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is a managing director at Warburg Pinkus, an author of

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the book Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy, as well

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as a venture capital investor. Let's let's dive right into

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the VC process. We were speaking earlier about B e

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>A systems. What's the decision process like when you're doing

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>more traditional sort of venture investing where someone brings you

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a company and you're interested in it. There may be

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>other investors, other vcs or angels participating. What's that process like? Well,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we want to frame this in thinking about

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>venture capital as an industry. So to begin with, this

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is not a very old industry. It's about nine eighty

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>when it went from being a craft practice by people.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>We could get them all in this room, I promise you,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the founding and entrepreneurs, but American research and Development, Graylock,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ven Rock, J. H. Whitney, um Warby Pinkins was a

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>founder of the National Venture Capital Association. That were barely

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty five firms in the country that were founders of

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the NVCA, But one of the venture capital has been

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>studied intensely through empirical analysis, and there are a few

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>stylized facts that emerge over these thirty five years since

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty. The first is there is tremendous kew in

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the returns of venture capitalists, meaning a small number of

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>venture capital funds have fantastic performance, a large number have

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>very mediocre performance. We see something very similar amongst hedge funds,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and not quite as skewed, but still there is a

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a shifted distribution most private equity as well. Now. Second,

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and this has been confirmed right through two thousand and ten.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Unlike most public market investors, there is persistence in the return.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just a few funds, it's a few firms.

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So performance of firm one helps predict performance of firm

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of fund to fund three and that's why you have

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>these iconic names and well, uh, Benchmark and Sequoia, these

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>firms have been successful over decades um So. Third, however,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for the industry as a whole, for the me infirm,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the returns are very closely correlated with the public market

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>because there and that's that's where we're going to come

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to a very interesting change in the last fifteen years.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It used to be that we could take in the

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties, we kind of take access to the

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I p O market for granted each year. And this

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is frankly, this is my own research when I went

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>back to Cambridge and became a financial economist again after

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years as a venture capitalist. The correlation is

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really tight with the state of the I p O market.

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>In a hot I p O market, venture capitalists look

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>like geniuses. When the market cools down and the exit

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>opportunities shrink, then the returns And since two thousand, venture

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>capital returns have been just for the for the average,

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have been just about what you get from investing in

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the nest AT index, where you also have complete liquidity.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is a stress, This is a strain and

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are concerned about this. Do we

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have do we have too many vcs? Is there too

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>much money slashing around? Well, there certainly is a lot

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of money slashing around, but you don't have to think

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>about the technology the environment for innovation, and that's changed too.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So back in the eighties and nineties, if you wanted

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to build a new I T company, talk about biotechnology separately.

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to talk about a new I T company,

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to the first dollar of revenue, you have

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking ten to twenty million dollars of complete

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>risk capital. You had to you had to build a

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>company from scratch. You had to have your own hardware,

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>your own software, develop your own servers today, and your

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>own by licenses today. You could pretty much do that

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with off the shelf stuff. Well, it's open source with

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>free stuff and renting by the or what. I was

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to an old friend of mine, an old timer

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>who goes back then and is doing a new startup,

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's building some software for investment banks how to

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>pull together all the data they need for spreadsheets. And

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, so, Chris, when you get this to where

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you can actually start chipping it to a customer how

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>much it will it have cost you? He thought for

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a moment, he said, you know, sixtys it would have

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>been ten to fifteen millions years ago, when lots of startups.

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>When I was about to say, when people are a

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>little negative on the future of the country, the future

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, when I go to certain conferences and

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I go to this thing on the West coast

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego, of all places that are these young

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs right out of college, my mind is blown at

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how innovative and forward looking a lot of these new

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>technologies are. What we're playing off is the maturation of

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the digital internet infrastructure, spilling over into the open source software,

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the cloud computer. It is a golden age for innovating

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and developing new digital services. Obviously we all talk about

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Uber and Airbnb, but there are twenty more a week now.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me interrupt you there. If you have

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.959
<v Speaker 1>a longer perspective, if if for the people who are

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the US economy to collapse, isn't this the

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>antidote to that? Aren't we going to see a boom

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in new services, new technology, new apps. Hasn't the whole

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>app economy just completely changed the game. Based on what

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, it's ten or twenty thousand dollars or

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>free to to change the world. Well, and it has

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of impact. You know, it changes what kinds

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of jobs are available, it changes what time, the terms

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of employment. A lot of people think that in this

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>world you can't rely on your employer for healthcare. We

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>really need to expend even more the social safety net

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so people can afford to play in the gig economy,

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a uber driver, or whether making deliveries, or

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>whether writing software for a startup, writing code for open source.

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So it has a lot of social impact. But you're

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right, You're dead right. Innovation isn't over. It's on

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a roll, and it's really just ramping up your building

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>on decades of innovation that have made so much things,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so much stuff cheaper and more available. And in fact,

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>again taking a long historical look back, it took you know,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty years from the invention of the microprocessor to get

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>where we are today. Well, going back to that railroad age,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it took fifty years from the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to Sears Roebuck. Going back to the age

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. It took fifty years from Edison turning on

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the Pearl River, the Pearl Street Power Plan in New York,

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the first generating station to where you could have a

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a mix master and a refrigerator in every middle class

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>home in America. And oh, by the way, you could

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have manufacturing factories where you could just move the machines

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>around and reconfigure the process and create tremendous increase in productivity.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>What what's the significance of that fifty year? It takes

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time to first make the new stuff reliable

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and ubiquitous. How much of that is it takes a

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>generation to grow up just assuming Hey, electricity, Yeah, I

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>could do stuff with that. There's a lot to There's

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot to that, Barry, there's a lot to that. Um.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>There's another aspect of it too, however, and that is

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that it takes time to explore wastefully what this stuff

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is good for. You. Remember we started out talking about

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>decisions under uncertainty. Why we need a mission driven government

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to to to subsidize the railroads and initially create the Internet,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and why we need speculators. It's because we don't know

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna work and what isn't we gotta try and try.

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I like to say the innovation economy proceeds by trial

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and error and error and error and error. It's learning

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>by doing. There's no roadmap that is given from on

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>high that tells us how to get there at the frontier.

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot easier for somebody who's playing catch up.

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But why not playing catch up? My friend Dan Gross

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called pop Why Bubbles are Good for

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Economy Ill and his thesis is railroads, radio, television, computers, fiber.

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>He said, if it wasn't for global crossing and Metromedia

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fiber that laid thousands and thousands of miles at hundreds

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 1>of dollars per mile and then ultimately it's pennies per

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>mile out of bankruptcy, you don't end up with YouTube

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and Google and Facebook and all these other things. That

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So so in the last minute we have

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>you you mentioned, and we'll we'll get a little more

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>into this in the next segment. In the last minute,

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>we have what is the proper role of government in

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fostering this sort of speculative innovation. Well, government isn't good

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at picking winners, but it's good at enabling competitive entrepreneurs

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to become winners funding science and also, and this WEE

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can come back to, it's not just providing research funding,

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it's being a customer and early supportive customer for stuff

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that is not yet ready for commercial prime time. If

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>people want to find information about your writings or or

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing doing, capitalism in the innovation economy is

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>available at bookstores and at Amazon. Where else can they

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>find your writing? And Amazon outlet near you, and they

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>can also find me. I've written for Forbes, i write

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>UH for Projects Syndicate, and I'm pretty visible on the

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>on Google. And thanks good part to Bloomberg Television, Tom

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Keane and Surveillance and UH and now with Barry ridhlt UH.

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, be sure and hang around

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for our podcast extras where we keep the tape rolling

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and continue chatting. Be sure and check out my daily

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>column on Bloomberg View dot com. You can follow me

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Rid Halts. I'm Barry Ridhults. You've been

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the podcast extras. We've been speaking with Bill Janeway and

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in case I forget to say this later. Thank you

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for doing this. This is fascinating stuff. I

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>am just holy entranced by the intersection of technology, finance,

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and economics. And that's a space you know, really really well.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>There's so many questions I did not get to. But

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>before I even get to my favorite questions, let me

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>let me go back through a few things that I

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>blew through and might have missed. By the way, be

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>e a sist is that I get the numbers right.

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The initial investment from Warburg was fifty four million dollars,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the distribution two limited partners was six point

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>five billion in less than a decade, about six years later.

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? That's right, Barry, that's an astonishing number.

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I hope you were one of those limited cards, right.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I assume that's a fair statement that. Uh do you

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>ever look back and say, if only I put another

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred grand into that, it would have been worth bajillions.

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I've learned over time is good

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>enough is good enough? There you go, that's the right,

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the right attitude. You know, the would have could

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have shoot a philosophy will just eat away. I know

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>people who constantly kick themselves my my, my, my wife.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>We met as partners in the firm where we both

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>worked before I joined Warburg Pink. She was an investment

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>professional and her boss had a great saying because somebody

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>would come to him and say, you know, you know,

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I knew we should have we should have recommended that stock.

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I knew we should have, and he said, you know what,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.479
<v Speaker 1>put it in the retrospect fund. That's the one where

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever loses any money. That's right, and everything they pay.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm I remember writing getting my hands on

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the first iPod, literally one of the first iPod and

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>writing it up. And at the time, many many splits ago,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple was fifteen with thirteen cash. You're risking two dollars

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and the guys I knew board of fifteen and they

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>sold it at twenty and they were thrilled to death.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And I can't tell you how often you see a

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>stock like that. But the reality is, no one's going

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to hold it for a thirty seven thousand percent run.

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Think about how many drawdowns Apple has had over that period.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Most people have no choice but to get but to

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>panic out. There's no other way. Well, this is what

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. We were talking about bubbles. We

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about Minsky in the banking system bubbles, the stock

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>market bubbles, and and and this is something that I

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think is is really important. Bubbles are you, big buddess?

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Bubbles happened everywhere, and you can think about them in

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>two dimensions. One is, where is it taking places that

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the banking system highly leveraged when it blows up, it

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>blows up the economy, or the stock market very little

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>leverage when it blows up, the world doesn't come to

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>an end difference between two thousand and two thousand and

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>eight bingo. But the second dimension is what's the object

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of speculation? Is a toolip bulbs? Is it those beach

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.760
<v Speaker 1>houses of the Nevada desert, Or is it some kind

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of technology that if it's deployed at scale and if

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>enough exploration, enough trial and error takes place, it really

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can change the world. It can create a new economy.

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>So that's why the lecture I give today mostly is

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>called productive bubbles, separating out that small number of this

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon of this crazy irrational speculation, which again and again

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for the last two hundred years has been responsible for

0:39:55.800 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>moving us from the Malthusian economy of misery through the

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>railroad age, the electricity age, the automobile age, and now

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the Internet age. That you would think the Malthusians would

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>give up the ghosts, but they seem to be perennially

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>forecasting doom and gloom even though the genius of human

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>intellectual capital is this never ending parade of even though

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it began his wartime technology. You look at at innovations,

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it all goes back to how can we become a

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>better finding machine a thousand years ago? It's now trans

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>transposed itself and become something entirely different, which leads me

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to a really fundamental question I have to ask you.

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So you get your PhD at Cambridge in economics, how

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 1>did that turn into a career in venture capitalism? That's

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not the typical route. Well, I'll tell you what happened.

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I studied, as I mentioned briefly, I studied on Derrick

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Kanes's directs students. I'm what they call, you know. They

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have post Kinzians and Neo Kaanesians and new Canesian's. I'm

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a Paleo Kanesian. I'm an old Kynesian. I took to

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>heart the core message of Canes in the general theory

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the other writings, which was, first of all, decision

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>making under uncertainty. Nobody knows the future, and everybody knows

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that nobody knows the future. I would challenge a lot

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>of you on that, because I think a lot of

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>people believe either they know the future or experts, economists,

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>analysts have a good sense of the future. But you're

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>singing my song. I believe no one has a clue

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen, and they spend most of their

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>day lining to themselves that they do, and then they

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>wake up one morning and it's two thousand and eight

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or it's nine. That's when the uncertainty meme raises its head,

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>when people start saying, well, things are very uncertain. No, no,

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>we you just realized temporarily that you don't understand what's

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. But then take that one step further,

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>take that one step further. So I'm worried about the future.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So I want to save more money. Okay, I want

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to save more money. And by the way, you're worried

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about the future too, and you save more money, and

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, everybody saving more money. Paradox of

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thrift coordination failure. Each person individually does what's rational, and

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the result is a systematic mess, which which makes perfect

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sense and also raises the role of government. Two, During

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>periods of a collapse in private sector business household demands,

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the government should temporarily step in and and fulfill that,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which is eventually what the United States has done most crises,

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but didn't really do it this last crisis. At least

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>it did some. It did more than Congress wanted to do.

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It could have done more, as the president's advisors begged

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>him to. But in any case, but where we get there,

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the policy message that there's another aspect.

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>There's another aspect of this. Why I left academic economics

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>because the third piece is economics by nineteen seventy had

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally come to be about how do we allocate resources efficiently?

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>How do we eliminate waste in the system. Now you

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>need two assumptions for that to be the case. First,

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 1>all resources have to be already fully employed, so you're

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>just it's a question of moving to the most productive

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>application of labor capital natural resources. And second, coming back

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to where we began this whole discussion, you have to

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>know what the return on that next investment is going

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in advance? Can you really do that? Well,

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I in nineteen seventy nine seventy there were jobs available

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at the best economics departments everywhere because frankly because of

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, because of the response to Sputnik, the

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>federal investment in higher education, huge increase in graduate schools.

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And I had a real heart to heart talk with myself,

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>having been immersed in kains and uncertainty and ignorance and

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 1>coordination failure, was I really going to be capable of

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>teaching these naive and innocent young minds that we all

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>know how to allocate resources efficiently, that the problem of

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>economics is just about efficient allocation, that we can assume

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that all resources will always be fully employed. And I said,

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that. I said to myself, I can't

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. So how did you How did you morph

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>from an academic economist too a pragmatic investor in technology.

0:44:56.400 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Well it happened by way of a very unusual firm. Now,

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this is back in the old days of Wall Street,

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when there were hundreds of private investment partnerships in Wall Street.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>They were all subsidized by being members of the New

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange. Back then, brokerage commissions were fixed. Monopoly

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>profits were available, so you couldn't compete on price, but

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you competed for business. There were usually three ways to compete.

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>First of all, we all went to school together. We

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all went to St. Grattle, Sex together. Second, the three Bees,

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Booze babes and baseball tickets. That was literally how you

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>would you would attract four brains. Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the LJ had created the idea of the research based

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>brokerage firm doing fundamental research. That that was a new

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>innovation that hasn't always existed, did not always exist, and

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it was it was It grew up with the rise

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of institute sational investors who would pay for research by

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>directing brokerage commissions to the firms that provided smart guidance.

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So the firm I joined was one of those research

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:16.280
<v Speaker 1>firms which had a very distinctive style. It focused only

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on the science based industries chemistry, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, electronics, and

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this new stuff called computing. But you come with a

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>economics background, you don't have a science or undergraduate what

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>was your background? I did I did not have a

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>technical background, but pretty good reader, and I learned, actually

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>as an economist, about this new computing stuff. In V

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>three we had the first oil crisis. The economy went

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>into freeze free fall. Simultaneously, inflation went up, unemployment went up.

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't supposed to happen. The models, the first econometric models,

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>all broke down, and I went in search for people

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to make sense of this. I found

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>some guys at M I T who were building simulation

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>models of the economy, not purely statistical models, but what

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>are now called agent based models, where you could watch

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>an artificial economy evolved. And I got it. It just

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>hit me like a ton of bricks that computers were

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not just flexible typewriters or quick adding machines, that they

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>were engines for exploring systems that were too complicated to

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>model in simple mathematics, and I fell in love with computing.

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I then discovered by way of the getting involved and

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding the first wave of artificial intelligence. I found my

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>way out to Xerox Park in uh Palo Alto, California.

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>This is in the seventies nine. I spent as many

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>nights after dinner, hanging out there watching the future unfold,

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing things lie um mice for controlling a computer. Steve

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Jobs got the tour of Xerox Center two years before

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he was So why didn't you start Apple? The graphical

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 1>user interface, the mouse, there's a the network, the dot

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>matrix and uh ink jet printer. There's a run of

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>things that that is just an astounding like a T

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and T labs. But that but that was how. That

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was how I made the transition and and became immersed

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in learning the technologies, learning enough about the technologies to

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to talk to entrepreneurs in their own language,

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>and to see the world in the course of the

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>eighties to see these these these highly special technical styles

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of computing that we're used by engineers and by academics

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>begin to grow in scale and reliability. And that led

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to this sense by none ten nine that these technologies

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>could spill out of the laboratory and come into the

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>big markets for commercial computing. That's how we got to

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>be e A. How did you How long did you

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 1>spend on the West Coast? How long were you out

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 1>there for? Well? I I spent probably a week to

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>ten days a month for thirty five years. I had

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:29.280
<v Speaker 1>three million miles on American by about and uh we

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we we um when I I should first say that

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the world of Wall Street was changing through all this

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pict brokerage commissions go away, commissions start to decline fundamental

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>research by the mid nineteen eighties. You can see two

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>paths forward. One, it becomes a commodity because you can't

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>afford to pay the smart guys, they're going to the

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>buy side. There are people like Ben Rosen, who was

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a great computer analyst at Morgan Stanley creates seven rows

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in the your capital firm. So there was a migration

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the real talent. Uh So, either it becomes a

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 1>commodity or you need another subsidy. If the subsidies investment banking,

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not a commodity, it's prostitution. So we sold the

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>firm in night five to a great British investment management

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>firm called Robert Fleming. Our firm was called f Ebberstat

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>sold it to Robert Fleming in eight five. I served

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>out my contract as part of the deal, and the

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I had the great opportunity to join Warburg Pincers and

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to help build this technology investing at Warburg pink You

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>really created that. At Warburg they didn't have much of

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a technology footprints or am I overstating that, well they

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we we No, that's not quite fair because, for example,

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Warburg Pinkers was one of the founding investors in Gartner

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Group back Gideon Gartner, another one of those great sell

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>side investment research analysts who got the message and created

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the great advisory firms. I was gonna say,

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not a technology innovation, that's really a alright, someone's

0:51:06.239 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>leaving to do a research independent company play. But it

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>gave you. It gave you a view of what was

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in technology, and there were some really smart people.

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But the center of gravity of the firm was was

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not doing these relatively earlier stage, risky technology investments. So

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you moved them down downstream to a much or upstream

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to a much earlier stage. The Lionel Pinkus and John

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Boglestein were great entrepreneurs. They were pioneers of private equity

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 1>broadly defined from venture capital through growth equity investing. In

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six they had raised the first billion dollar

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>fund that anybody had ever raised. WARBURI Pinkas was always

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>large relative to the industry. And given that they decided

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that we ought to explore investing in technology as Warburg

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Pinker as a lead strategic investor, rather than following other people.

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>What was the billion dollar fund they had raised initially?

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>What was that for? Was that was for the same

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>breadth of investing, investing in emerging growth companies, investing in turnarounds,

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>investing very occasionally in buyouts, but very broad. Warburt Pink

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>has always had a very broad expanse investing contrarian to

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what the stock market thinks is the great thing to do.

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So when did the first pure technology early early stage

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>funds come out of Warburg Pinker. Well, we always invest

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>out of one fund. It's one fund, we invest across it.

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And that means that when markets changed as they did

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in we could be realizing the investments in technology while

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.240
<v Speaker 1>putting new money into energy at twelve dollars a barrel,

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so we could move against markets within un fund. We've

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we've always invested from one big fund. The actually the first,

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the first real technology investment that we lad. There were

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>there were several, the first really early stage it's a

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 1>company called Level one. Remember Level one, I'm thinking that

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Level one. Level one was not unrelated with silicon optimized

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for communications and particularly for digital communications for d s L.

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Warburge was a big broadband in between what we have

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>today and and the twisted copper playing a whole telephone.

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>When I got to warburg Pin because we made a

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 1>small investment with some other investors um and the first

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 1>go round, the first customer had been acquired by IBM

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>and basically closed down. So we had a choice. We

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>could either restart but if, or just give up. But

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if we and and and the leadership of the company

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.719
<v Speaker 1>with an outstanding scientist named Bob Pepper who would work

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>very closely at r c A. Starnoff Labs, with my

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>new partner, Henry Crissell, who was himself a great applied

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>physicist and also a great investor. So we took a

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>deep breath and we said we're gonna restart Level one

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>behind Bob Pepper, make a second effort and focus on

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>making it possible for the plain old fashioned copper wires

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to carry data at a high enough rate so that

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you can actually interact with a computer, not just you know,

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:40.439
<v Speaker 1>push a button and have a cigarette wait to see

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens. And so this is still pretty early stage stuff.

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:47.120
<v Speaker 1>This is not this was this was a restart of

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a startup. So it really was a startup UM, but

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 1>we had tremendous confidence in Bob Pepper. We helped bring

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>up a board of really strong people. UM. Some years

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>later into wound up acquiring the company for more than

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars. Really, let's talk a little bit about Intel,

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 1>because you mentioned that vcs really blossomed in nine eighties.

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 1>But my recollection of National Semiconductor and then Intel and

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that whole line of companies that starts in the like

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen sixties, well, Butt Nick and all that is

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>where Kleiner, Perkins and some of the other big vcs

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>traced back to. Well, getting the timing, there's it's it's

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting history. So American Research and Development a R

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and D. The great General George Dorio starts a R

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and D in the late nineteen forties, takes them about

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 1>five years to scrap together a few million dollars out

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Boston Trust industry and makes a bunch of investments,

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>none of which really worked very well, but put seventy

0:55:54.960 --> 0:56:01.439
<v Speaker 1>thousand bucks behind an engineer named uh Ken. Oh my God,

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm blanking. No, No, that's Bob Neiss's Intel. No Digital

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Equipment Corporation, Ken Ken Ashman, No, We're gonna look it up.

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But filling in um that becomes seventy dollars becomes hundreds

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of millions of dollars. Digital Equipment is the in a way,

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the first truly great technology investment out of a R

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and d uh. Some of the youngsters got some backing

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Watson family created Graylock Ventures. This is still

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties. And then on the other hand, an

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary entrepreneurial stockbroker named Arthur Rock follows the New York

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Giants to San Francisco in the baseball giants in the

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the fifties, and he puts together the financing

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>for Fairchild Semiconductor with Sherman Fairchild, the industrialist. That's why

0:56:55.760 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it was called that those were the geniuses, the treasonous six.

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess seven who left Shockley. That was Bob Nois

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and Gordon Moore and by the way, you go fajen uh.

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And they started what from Fairchild, which then begat Intel,

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's when Silicon Valley begins to be Silicon Valley.

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And by the way the book. I don't remember the

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Intel book. I don't remember if it was Um, I'm

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to remember who wrote it, or it's not the

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Intel, but it was someone who was Andy Grove.

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't Andy Grove, only the Paranoid survivor. But it's

0:57:39.080 --> 0:57:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the history of Intel, which is really a discussion of

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the early history of venture investing. I remember that was

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating read, but it was It's important to remember

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this was a craft. These were a tiny number of firms,

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen, tiny number of individuals. There were a

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch on the East coast. East Coast tended to be

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>family offices like ven Rock, the Rockefeller family, J. H. Whitney,

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Whitney family UM and the West coast tended to

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be these new partnerships. But even as late as nineteen seventy,

0:58:10.520 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the model, the business model hadn't been established. So there

0:58:14.680 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was a guy called ned Heiser in Chicago. He started

0:58:17.760 --> 0:58:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the front. It was a corporation and had some preferred stock,

0:58:20.880 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>which was what was owned by the limited partners and

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>had the preferred return, and the common stock, which was

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in effect that carried interest, was owned by the general partners.

0:58:30.400 --> 0:58:34.120
<v Speaker 1>When Warburg Pincus was went from putting deals together on

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a case by case basis, you know, was some entrepreneurs

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in one room and some rich family representatives and another

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and created its first fund in nineteen seventy one. Uh

0:58:45.440 --> 0:58:49.840
<v Speaker 1>wear EM E MW Ventures was forty forty one million dollars.

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Lionel used to say, it was all the money in

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, and it was set up as a corporation

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and they took all the money down on day one.

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Despite that, it generated net to the investors through the

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies when the stock market was a disaster. If

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they'd taken the money down step by step the way

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we all do today, it would have been so there

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was an experimentation, trial and error going on about financial innovation.

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Venture capital was an institutional innovation which by nine eighty

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>began to reach scale because of a regulatory change. What

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was that? What was that change? It was under the

0:59:30.840 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>law that governed pension funds, the Ariskle Law, the Employment

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Retirement Investment. Well, originally when it was first established, there

0:59:43.280 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were very tight rules about what pension fund trustees could

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>do with the money that they were responsible for. They

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>had to be very conservative. The amendments to the regulations

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in seventy nine created a kind of safe harbor. You

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>can take a portion of the pension fund and a

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>little more risk seeking, and that enabled pension funds to

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>start investing in venture capital. Before that, it had been

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>wealthy families, and it had been a few university endowments,

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but it was very limited capital. After night, the capital

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>began to open up, and then in eighty three the

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I p O market opened up. Between seventy three and

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty three, there were just a couple of windows. One window.

1:00:34.200 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>December nineteen eighty Apple goes public, jan Entech goes public.

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Then the Great Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Boker sends rates

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to I p O stop It reopened in eighty three.

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>We thought, hey, we thought it was a bubble. What

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>did we know? But from seven it must have felt

1:00:54.520 --> 1:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like it. After fifteen years in the desert, a little

1:00:57.800 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of water, it looks like actually very well put

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>barry so. But but there were real returns and a

1:01:03.600 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>whole wave of new companies that began to go public,

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and the validated the venture capital model, particularly around it

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>also around biotech. Now biotech biotech shares with I T

1:01:17.520 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the same dependence on long term government investment in research.

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't you can't just do this bootstrap it. You

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can't just pull a bunch of things off the shelf.

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>This is really complex, sophisticated, expensive research to create a company,

1:01:35.760 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>well to create the science on which you company can

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>exploit for a particular application. But there's one big difference,

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>fundamental difference between biotech and information technology. In biotech, when

1:01:49.360 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you sit down and say we're gonna try to apply

1:01:52.440 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this molecule to cure that disease. If it works, if

1:01:58.280 --> 1:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you get through the f d A, you know what

1:01:59.880 --> 1:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the market is. You know it's big. And one way

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about this for investors, early stage investors is,

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know there are two states of the world. We

1:02:10.360 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>get to the FDA, we make a gazillion dollars, we fail,

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we lose everything. Half a gazillion sounds pretty good, right,

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>half a gazillion, of course, But the fact that the

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>market risk is low, even though the technology risk is huge,

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is what distinguishes biotech from infotech and information technology. The

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>market risk is at least as big as the technology risk,

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you're building the infrastructure or whether you're exploiting it.

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>With these new applications and solutions. How many dot com

1:02:45.040 --> 1:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>babies went bust? How many of the unicorns today are

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>going to wind up lying down and falling over after

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>their mark to reality. Let's talk about the unicorns, and

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned how much money is out there slashing a round.

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we have a technology bubble? We have a unicorn bubble.

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>We have a unicorn bubble, meaning the most desirable companies

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to get. Here's what's really weird. This has

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not happened before. This is unique. Here you have major

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>investment firms, you know, Fidelity, t Row, who are paying

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>public companies that normally own publicly traded equities, and they

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have been paying valuations that are higher than the comparable

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>valuations of already public web services companies. They're paying premium.

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>They're paying a premium. Now. In the old days, back

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>back when there was no I P. O market in

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>my prior life, we raise capital my old firm at

1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Eberstat back in the late seventies for emerging growth companies

1:03:51.360 --> 1:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that were already profitable that we're growing and we and

1:03:56.160 --> 1:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we valued them at below the public companies because there

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was no liquidity. Because my my question is why I

1:04:05.360 --> 1:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was about to say, why it's strictly driven by the

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>liquidity factor. Well, the premium paying premium for illiquidity is

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you know is it won't last. It

1:04:18.600 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>won't last. You can every bubble, and the Unicorn bubble

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is is a bubble. Every bubble has a plausible story

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere under the hood, right, Well, the narrative always gets

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you to suspend your irrational self because the narrative is

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so compelling. Even the south Sea Bubble, the south Sea

1:04:36.680 --> 1:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Company was going to take over all the trade to

1:04:39.160 --> 1:04:43.439
<v Speaker 1>South America as the Spanish Empire collapsed. But this time

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the story is very plausible because with the Internet matured

1:04:49.120 --> 1:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>as a medium for distributing and consuming services with zero

1:04:56.480 --> 1:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>cost and and just incremental renting the cost of run

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in it, the reach the potential scale of these new

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>companies appears to be limitless. So you have the appears

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to be limitless, but we know nothing real well, but

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>so you have these examples, you have these proof points.

1:05:13.840 --> 1:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the jokes, one of the lines people use

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is um it's motivated. The Unicorn bubble is motivated motivated

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>by fomo fear of missing out in pursuing the next FAGA, Facebook, Apple, Google, Amazon.

1:05:30.800 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So the for the time being, as long as these

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>companies have access to what appears to be limitless capital,

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so they they're avoiding too marks to reality. There are

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>two ways these these valuations will get marked to reality.

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>One is they do an I p O. You know,

1:05:53.800 --> 1:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you get a price every day, and you know, the

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>joke is the I p O is the new down round.

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, look at school. I do not know that,

1:06:01.280 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's very funny. And and the other is sooner

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or later, positive cash flow is corporate happiness. Sooner or later.

1:06:11.960 --> 1:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>If you have a sustainable business, you're gonna be paying

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>your bills based on what your customers give you, not

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what your investors give you. And therefore you have an

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>objective way to mark the valuation relative to earnings. And

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see which of these companies are able to

1:06:30.240 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>monetize the usage that they're generating in order to generate

1:06:37.160 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>positive cash flow. Doesn't have to be a lot. Amazon

1:06:40.800 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't generate a lot of positive cash flow. But you

1:06:43.560 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and I know that Jeff Bezos has about fifty three

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>different levers he wants to generate cash. He just tweaked,

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, tweaks uh free shipping another buck on Amazon Prime.

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got an infinite number of ways because he's got

1:06:57.600 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a real sustainable business. Amazingly, his investors have allowed him

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to take twenty years to be profit free while building

1:07:05.240 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>out what is now one of the most valuable, disruptive

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>businesses in the world. And he has been He's been

1:07:12.280 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a genius at exploiting the opportunity to maximize growth subject

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to minimum positive cash flow. And I think it is

1:07:21.320 --> 1:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because people appreciate that he can generate more cash flow.

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>He can trade growth for cash flow any day he

1:07:27.120 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wants through a dozen different levers. So you you mentioned Amazon.

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Not too long ago, Tim Cook was on sixty Minutes

1:07:35.040 --> 1:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and he mentioned, they're not that far away from the

1:07:39.280 --> 1:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>billion iPhones sold. Stop and think about a billion of

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>these at five hundred bucks apiece. No wonder that the

1:07:49.240 --> 1:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest and wealthiest company. We could talk about Facebook, we

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>could talk about Google, but I know I don't have

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you all day, So I want to get to some

1:07:57.840 --> 1:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite questions that I asked, and and we

1:08:01.320 --> 1:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we skipped enough questions that we could do another hour.

1:08:04.560 --> 1:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But let me let me work through some of these,

1:08:06.360 --> 1:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>because um, these are what really hangs some meat on

1:08:10.720 --> 1:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the bones. So you mentioned going to M. I. T.

1:08:14.040 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And seeing what they were doing with economic modeling, and

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you've mentioned another number of people have been influential. But

1:08:20.840 --> 1:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to specifically ask who were your mentors? Who

1:08:24.160 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are the people who really shaped your intellectual philosophy. I'd

1:08:29.400 --> 1:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>say there were three. First of all, there was the

1:08:32.000 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>founder of the firm I joined soon after he died.

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>His name was Ferdinand Everstadt. He was probably the greatest

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>unknown American of the middle of the twentieth century. Really

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen twenty nine he wrote nineteen He wrote the

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the Young Plan that was going to save the world

1:08:49.720 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>from reparations and war debts blown up by the depression,

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>by by the crash of twenty nine and the depression.

1:08:56.040 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But during the war he ran industrial mobilization for World

1:09:00.000 --> 1:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>War Two on a dollar a year. In between, he

1:09:04.000 --> 1:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>started his own firm and created the first mutual fund

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>after nineteen nine, the first fund investing only in the

1:09:12.640 --> 1:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>science based industry. That's why it was called Chemical Fund.

1:09:16.400 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>After the war, he wrote the National Security Actor nineteen

1:09:19.320 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, which created the Defense Department. He was a

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>public private financier, public servant. I knew him from when

1:09:28.080 --> 1:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a boy. He was a great Princeton alumnus.

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:32.879
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the funders of the original Woodrow

1:09:32.920 --> 1:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Wilson School. He taught me about this intersection between Wall

1:09:37.479 --> 1:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Street and Washington, this dynamic play between private and public

1:09:41.240 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>sector in a positive way. Lawrence lobbying votes factly, how

1:09:49.479 --> 1:09:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the collaboration between the two could create a great country.

1:09:53.280 --> 1:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Second mentor was Ed Giles. Ed Giles gave me my

1:09:56.439 --> 1:09:58.639
<v Speaker 1>shot at every stat He was one of the greatest

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>investment analysts in history. He had three business cards, Chemical Analysts,

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>director of Research, and President. He only used the chemical

1:10:09.040 --> 1:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst card. He taught me about going deep, really understanding

1:10:15.040 --> 1:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics of the industry, whether it's chemicals or computing,

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in which you want to play a role in in

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>finding investments, in defining investment opportunities. And then the third.

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>The third was an extraordinary man named Fred Adler. Fred

1:10:31.120 --> 1:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Adler in the nineteen eighties, nineteen seventies and eighties was

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>an iconic venture capitalist. He was a lawyer, he was

1:10:41.080 --> 1:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a turnaround artist, a crisis manager, and he was a

1:10:46.160 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalist. And Fred Fred had an unusual personality. Um

1:10:52.880 --> 1:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he Uh. He was very tough, very tough with people

1:10:56.000 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>who worked for him. Uh. He had funded one of

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the second of the great mini computer companies, Data General.

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>He built a firm, He built a firm Uncle. Data

1:11:08.000 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>General became a huge company absolutely, and Fred put the

1:11:11.160 --> 1:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>money together financing together for that ten years later, fifteen

1:11:14.960 --> 1:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>years as after Arthur Rocket put the money together for

1:11:17.400 --> 1:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fair Child, semi same kind of way. Um. Fred taught

1:11:21.200 --> 1:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>me about how to understand the internal dynamics of a

1:11:28.920 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>business followed the cash Fred, you had these had these

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>pillows made up that said corporate happiness is positive cash

1:11:36.320 --> 1:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>flow and used to throw them at his entrepreneurs. In

1:11:39.400 --> 1:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>between yelling and screaming at him. I used to tell

1:11:41.479 --> 1:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>him that the only compliment he ever gave me was

1:11:43.800 --> 1:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that he never offered me a job because he but

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but the guys who found an Axcel one of the

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 1>great firms in the world, they were they worked for

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Fred back in the in the early nineteen eighties. So

1:11:55.720 --> 1:11:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Fred and I collaborated. We created a number of companies together.

1:11:59.840 --> 1:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>One of them was emerged as Life Technologies, the the

1:12:03.760 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>company that provided the tools for all the people doing biotechnology.

1:12:09.080 --> 1:12:11.639
<v Speaker 1>So that was my third mentor before I joined before

1:12:11.640 --> 1:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I joined Warburg Pinkas. So so these are mentors. What

1:12:14.240 --> 1:12:18.599
<v Speaker 1>about investors who influenced your approach to investing? You mentioned

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Keynes as obviously a key influencer. I think a lot

1:12:22.120 --> 1:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of people don't realize what a great investor he was.

1:12:25.800 --> 1:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Kaine's John Maynard Keynes was was a great investor. Um,

1:12:29.439 --> 1:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know him personally. He died when I was

1:12:31.640 --> 1:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>three years So I was gonna say what other investors, well,

1:12:34.640 --> 1:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Vogustin John Boglestein was the founding chief investment officer and

1:12:39.800 --> 1:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>president of Warburg Pinkas. John was a great investor. He

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>hired me, he gave me my shot at Warburg Pinkas,

1:12:47.840 --> 1:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and he had, as I say, in extraordinary knows from

1:12:52.360 --> 1:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>markets and he was he was one of the fundamental contrarians.

1:12:56.880 --> 1:13:00.759
<v Speaker 1>And so he helped me understand that, you know, being

1:13:00.800 --> 1:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>patient looking for where the world isn't looking building new

1:13:06.160 --> 1:13:10.639
<v Speaker 1>businesses or there's a It actually ties very closely to Kines.

1:13:10.680 --> 1:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a wonderful passage in Kiness general theory where he

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>talks about how the value the price of shares in

1:13:17.680 --> 1:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the market has an inevitable impact on investment activity in

1:13:24.240 --> 1:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the real economy. He says, it makes it makes no

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sense to start a new business if you can buy

1:13:29.800 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one on the stock exchange more cheaply than it would

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>cost to start it. Kane's this is the ninety six

1:13:35.320 --> 1:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>He saw the LBO business in advance, and then on

1:13:39.960 --> 1:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, he said, it could it could be

1:13:42.000 --> 1:13:46.759
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile to take an extravagant amount of money to invest

1:13:46.800 --> 1:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in a startup like b e A if you can

1:13:49.439 --> 1:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>float it on the stock exchange for a profit. So

1:13:52.120 --> 1:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>this dynamic feedback between what's happening in the stock market

1:13:57.800 --> 1:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and what's happening with real investment from John Maynard Kin's

1:14:01.400 --> 1:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to John Vogelstein and my experience is a seamless web.

1:14:05.520 --> 1:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Those were my mentors. How about books aside from your

1:14:08.720 --> 1:14:11.479
<v Speaker 1>own book, and I could tell by your writing that

1:14:11.520 --> 1:14:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you've read quite widely. What what are some of your

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite books, whether they're about investing and venture capital or

1:14:21.080 --> 1:14:25.479
<v Speaker 1>anything else. Well, of course, the general theory changed my life.

1:14:25.520 --> 1:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It's why I went to Cambridge. It remains an enormous

1:14:29.600 --> 1:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>UH reservoir of insight and understanding about people making economic

1:14:34.720 --> 1:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and financial decisions. Hi Minsky's book UH it's got a

1:14:38.800 --> 1:14:44.439
<v Speaker 1>terrible title, Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, But boy, if if

1:14:44.479 --> 1:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you if you'd read it before two thousand and eight.

1:14:47.080 --> 1:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, and Tim Geitner's memoir, my partner,

1:14:49.920 --> 1:14:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Tim Geitner, who's president at Warburg broncas now he talks

1:14:53.560 --> 1:14:57.479
<v Speaker 1>about how, having been immersed in the in the Asian

1:14:57.560 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis of the late nineties, he read Minsky. So

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he was prepared intellectually for two thousand and eight in

1:15:05.880 --> 1:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a way that most policymakers were not. Uh. So Minsky's

1:15:09.560 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>work tremendously important. The There are two books that I've

1:15:14.160 --> 1:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>read recently that I would recommend to everyone. UH. They're

1:15:17.280 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not they're not directly economics books. One is UH. It's

1:15:21.160 --> 1:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a book by a young historian called Jonathan Levy. It's

1:15:25.360 --> 1:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>called Freaks of Fortune. Freaks of Fortune. It came out

1:15:30.160 --> 1:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, and it's about how during the nineteenth century

1:15:36.040 --> 1:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States we involved evolved a whole array

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of new institutions for dealing with the risks and uncertainties

1:15:46.479 --> 1:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of an industrializing economy, adopting British patterns of maritime insurance

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to insurance of UH for railroads UH and right through

1:15:59.280 --> 1:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the creation of credit unions sharing financial risk. It's a

1:16:03.840 --> 1:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>tremendous book I really recommended very strongly. And the second one,

1:16:08.080 --> 1:16:11.599
<v Speaker 1>the second the second is a book that I literally

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>just finished reading yesterday. It's called Liberty and Coercion. Liberty

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and Coercion. It's written by a historian named Gary Gerstel

1:16:21.920 --> 1:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>g E. R. S. T. L E. He just moved

1:16:26.000 --> 1:16:29.519
<v Speaker 1>from the United States to Cambridge, England as the Paul

1:16:29.560 --> 1:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Mellon Professor of American History. It's an extraordinary exploration of

1:16:36.000 --> 1:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic, contradictory intersection between the federal government, whose powers

1:16:45.200 --> 1:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>were enumerated listed in the Constitution, and the state governments,

1:16:51.280 --> 1:16:55.559
<v Speaker 1>which inherited the more or less unlimited power of the

1:16:55.600 --> 1:17:00.719
<v Speaker 1>British police power the British state. So that even while

1:17:00.800 --> 1:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the federal government is limited by the by the Um

1:17:06.320 --> 1:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the states

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>could tell you whether you can own another human being,

1:17:13.080 --> 1:17:18.519
<v Speaker 1>who you were allowed to marry, whether you could own

1:17:18.520 --> 1:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a home. The power of the state was effectively limitless.

1:17:23.920 --> 1:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And this conflict that of course exploded in the Civil War.

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Then after the Civil Rights amendments, the States struck back

1:17:34.520 --> 1:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and segregation was entirely a function of state law. Then

1:17:40.320 --> 1:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Great with the New Deal and the Great Society,

1:17:44.560 --> 1:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the thirty years of the exertion of federal authority over

1:17:49.680 --> 1:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the states, and then now the counter thrust against it

1:17:54.680 --> 1:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>under the Robert's Court. So this is an extraordinary Very

1:17:58.760 --> 1:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>little attention has been paid to what goes on at

1:18:01.280 --> 1:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>state level in the US, but for citizens and non

1:18:05.960 --> 1:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>citizens in America is what happens at the state level

1:18:09.360 --> 1:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is at least as important at the federal It's a

1:18:11.320 --> 1:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>great book. It's amazing when you step back and look

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>at things through a longer timeframe, how these phases and

1:18:18.240 --> 1:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>faints and counterfeits become so obvious that you don't see

1:18:21.920 --> 1:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in the day to day operation. It's true for markets,

1:18:24.320 --> 1:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's true for history. If there's one thing that I

1:18:27.120 --> 1:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>feel that I've had an unfair advantage of because of

1:18:30.680 --> 1:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the education I had, it's being able to bring to

1:18:36.400 --> 1:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the immediate situation, whether it's a dot com bubble in

1:18:39.960 --> 1:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, or whether it's the global financial

1:18:42.920 --> 1:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>crisis two thousands, of the global financial crisis in two

1:18:45.720 --> 1:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, it's a longer term historical perspective that

1:18:49.960 --> 1:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>crosses over from economics to politics and backing. So so

1:18:53.520 --> 1:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>let me digress from my questions and ask something I

1:18:56.439 --> 1:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>did not want to skip. So, Cambridge a couple of

1:18:59.800 --> 1:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago just celebrated its eight hundred year I think

1:19:03.880 --> 1:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it was twelve or six and twelve o nine. Um,

1:19:08.240 --> 1:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's been around a couple of years. You're not

1:19:11.800 --> 1:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>only a member of the uh CO, chair of the

1:19:15.000 --> 1:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred campaign for the University of Cambridge, but you

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>funded an endowment for research in finance at Cambridge as

1:19:24.000 --> 1:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>well as creating a um U k US connection for

1:19:31.160 --> 1:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for research on both sides of the Atlantic. Tell us

1:19:34.280 --> 1:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>what you want to accomplish with that that endowment and

1:19:37.920 --> 1:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and what the impact of that has been. Well, when

1:19:41.000 --> 1:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I went to Cambridge on a Marshall scholarship in nineteen

1:19:43.800 --> 1:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, just exactly fifty years ago, the four years

1:19:47.479 --> 1:19:50.519
<v Speaker 1>I was there just changed my life um and and

1:19:50.520 --> 1:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and getting reconnected with Cambridge as I did UH in

1:19:55.960 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the in the nineties, in particular at a time when

1:20:00.040 --> 1:20:03.519
<v Speaker 1>and a major change was going on in Britain and

1:20:03.560 --> 1:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>had already been going on in the US from the

1:20:07.320 --> 1:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>end of World War Two through the nineteen eighties into

1:20:10.680 --> 1:20:14.599
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nineties, Cambridge and the other great British universities Oxford.

1:20:14.600 --> 1:20:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Of course we're essentially funded by the government. They were

1:20:18.760 --> 1:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially national institutions. But just as the state universities in

1:20:24.880 --> 1:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>America in effect over the course of fifty years, have

1:20:28.560 --> 1:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>been privatized, so that state legislatures are responsible for less

1:20:32.720 --> 1:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>than ten percent and declining, and probably most of that

1:20:35.720 --> 1:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>goes for the football coaches salary, most of that for

1:20:39.479 --> 1:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the worst, say the least. Um. So this idea of

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the of the university, of a national or a state

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>university is a public good was being dismantled. Cambridge, with

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this incredible history, you know, from Newton to Darwin to

1:20:54.360 --> 1:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Krick and Watson to Keynes, the the you know, probably

1:20:58.640 --> 1:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the source of more original thinking that changed the world

1:21:03.560 --> 1:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years. UM, Cambridge was discovering that it, too,

1:21:11.080 --> 1:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>like the American universities, was going to have to depend

1:21:14.560 --> 1:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on private philanthropy to supplement, if not replace, the money

1:21:19.400 --> 1:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that had been coming from the government. So I got

1:21:23.120 --> 1:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>involved as as an American and knew something about philanthropy.

1:21:26.439 --> 1:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>After all of your principal alumnus you know about fundraising,

1:21:30.320 --> 1:21:35.519
<v Speaker 1>UM and and and at the same time, internally, Cambridge

1:21:35.520 --> 1:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was going through some internal reforms towards a greater degree

1:21:40.439 --> 1:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of professionalism in the leadership, the academic leadership, and the

1:21:43.960 --> 1:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>governance of the university. So on the one hand, given

1:21:49.720 --> 1:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>this deep history of Canes and and my perception somewhat

1:21:54.720 --> 1:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the time, I have to confess that finance

1:21:58.120 --> 1:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and economics are one discipline in that they what goes

1:22:01.160 --> 1:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on in the stock market, goes on in the real economy,

1:22:03.880 --> 1:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>goes on the banking system. All of that needs to

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be brought together. That's why my wife and I initially

1:22:09.200 --> 1:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>funded the Cambridge Endowment for Research in Finance. But it

1:22:13.080 --> 1:22:17.759
<v Speaker 1>was really joining forces with an extraordinary woman, Alison Richard,

1:22:17.800 --> 1:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>had been Provost of Yale. She became Vice Chancellor of

1:22:21.280 --> 1:22:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge at the start of the new millennium and we launched.

1:22:25.160 --> 1:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>What I said to Alison, we should present this as

1:22:28.520 --> 1:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the first fundraising campaign for Cambridge since Henry

1:22:32.240 --> 1:22:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the eighth knocked off the monasteries. It will not be

1:22:35.560 --> 1:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the last, and it isn't. We completed that campaign. We

1:22:39.760 --> 1:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>raised more than a billion pounds. Nobody had done that

1:22:42.160 --> 1:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in Britain ever before. We didn't only raise money we

1:22:46.479 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>raised consciousness. We raised consciousness among alumni, among leaders of

1:22:51.040 --> 1:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>other universities. It has to be some alumni association. You

1:22:55.240 --> 1:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>think about all the people have come out of Cambridge,

1:22:57.960 --> 1:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's quite an illustrious list. But they spent two

1:23:01.120 --> 1:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>three generations where if you ask somebody about giving some

1:23:05.040 --> 1:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>money to Cambridge, the answer would be, hey, I pay

1:23:07.920 --> 1:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>my taxes. So building a culture of philanthropy is a

1:23:13.040 --> 1:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>generation's long process. That's amazing. Now Cambridge has launched its

1:23:18.680 --> 1:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>second campaign two billion pounds double or nothing. They got

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:26.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion pounds to catch up to Harvard and Yaleen's

1:23:26.760 --> 1:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they do they do that? You would think they had

1:23:29.080 --> 1:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>an eight hundred year or year head start. Well, some

1:23:32.160 --> 1:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the endowments to college endowments go way way back,

1:23:35.160 --> 1:23:38.719
<v Speaker 1>did didn't Cain's actually manage some of the Caine manage

1:23:38.720 --> 1:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the money of King's College, that's right, his college and

1:23:42.240 --> 1:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and and by the way, Cambridge now has a

1:23:45.479 --> 1:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>very well managed professional endowment fund, which I'm pleased to

1:23:49.680 --> 1:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>say over the last year two has done at least

1:23:52.800 --> 1:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as Harvard and Yale at Princeton Um. So

1:23:55.920 --> 1:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the money that's given to Cambridge is very well taken

1:24:00.040 --> 1:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>can care of. And the breadth of the um donations

1:24:04.680 --> 1:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and the breadth of the professionalism of fundraising at Cambridge

1:24:09.280 --> 1:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in the last fifteen years has been tremendous. It is,

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it really is a great achievement. Celebrating the emergence of

1:24:18.040 --> 1:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge's own revival of post two thousand and eight economics,

1:24:22.680 --> 1:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>My wife and I just made another major contribution million

1:24:26.520 --> 1:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a professorship in financial economics and a fund

1:24:31.920 --> 1:24:38.839
<v Speaker 1>for economics which will guarantee that the pore research funding

1:24:39.000 --> 1:24:42.519
<v Speaker 1>is perpetuated. It's an endowment, not spend down money. And

1:24:42.600 --> 1:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that's and that's at Cambridge. That's at Cambridge. So what

1:24:45.439 --> 1:24:47.599
<v Speaker 1>do you say to Princeton when they come knock. I've

1:24:47.760 --> 1:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I've also First of all, of course, Princeton is the

1:24:50.320 --> 1:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>richest university in the world per capita. Is that true? Yes,

1:24:53.439 --> 1:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea. And second, we also, celebrating my

1:24:57.000 --> 1:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty three union at Princeton, have funded a pro am

1:25:00.200 --> 1:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in financial economics at Princeton, which I'm delighted to say

1:25:03.280 --> 1:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>has has taken root. So given all this education, let's

1:25:07.479 --> 1:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the students who are just graduating. The millennials,

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and soon there's going to be in another generation behind them.

1:25:16.920 --> 1:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>What advice would you give to someone coming out of

1:25:19.800 --> 1:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>school today who's interested in economics and venture capital and finance. What,

1:25:26.400 --> 1:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Because it's a different world today than when I started,

1:25:29.320 --> 1:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and certainly that from when you started. What sort of

1:25:31.880 --> 1:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give someone who wants to go into

1:25:33.920 --> 1:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>your field. Well, first of all, the world is very,

1:25:37.280 --> 1:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>very competitive. It's more more competitive than it was. It's

1:25:40.000 --> 1:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>more open, there's more access, and that's that's unquestionably a

1:25:43.760 --> 1:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Um. I I speak a bit as a father,

1:25:48.280 --> 1:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a very proud father of my twenty six year old

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>son who went to Oxford as it happened, the great university,

1:25:56.040 --> 1:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>shame to the family. On the contrary, and an Oxford

1:25:59.479 --> 1:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>has a wonder full program of philosophy, politics and economics

1:26:02.840 --> 1:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>PPE and our son was Sperversity of Pennsylvania. It's so

1:26:08.280 --> 1:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>funny you mentioned that that that's its own specific thing.

1:26:12.040 --> 1:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>But but that advice would you give him? And what

1:26:14.600 --> 1:26:18.519
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give other recent graduates? I'd say one

1:26:18.680 --> 1:26:24.599
<v Speaker 1>one bit of advice is um combining a really open mind,

1:26:24.640 --> 1:26:30.719
<v Speaker 1>really reading and reading broadly, with a willingness to get

1:26:30.760 --> 1:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>down to work. I mean one of the one of

1:26:32.840 --> 1:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the things that just has thrilled my wife and me

1:26:36.520 --> 1:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>about our son is that he just loves to get

1:26:40.680 --> 1:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>dug into doing real work. Academics, yes, but actually real

1:26:46.840 --> 1:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>work out there, um, doing his apprenticeship. Um, So looking

1:26:53.320 --> 1:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities two whatever the job may be, but learning

1:26:59.400 --> 1:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how too. As Woody Allen said, showing up is half

1:27:04.080 --> 1:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the battle. Showing up on time, doing the job you're

1:27:07.080 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>asked to do, and then looking for what more there

1:27:10.600 --> 1:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is to be done. That somebody is absolutely but also

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>as I say, reading and thinking about the context in

1:27:20.720 --> 1:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>which you're working, not just going down the line. Because

1:27:25.360 --> 1:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the way things have opened up so much, there's so

1:27:27.880 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>many diverse possible opportunities. UM. But I do respect, I

1:27:33.760 --> 1:27:37.519
<v Speaker 1>do recognize that it is it is so competitive today

1:27:38.360 --> 1:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that um, there's no there's no guaranteed road. Um. You know,

1:27:46.000 --> 1:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Edison said, perspiration ten percent inspiration. The perspiration really matters.

1:27:52.080 --> 1:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But but but the informed mind can can confind opportunities

1:27:56.200 --> 1:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for the inspiration too. And and then my final question,

1:27:59.479 --> 1:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to change the date on this, what

1:28:02.080 --> 1:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is it that you know about investing today that you

1:28:05.320 --> 1:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>wish you knew fifty years or so ago when you

1:28:08.760 --> 1:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>left school. That's a very very good question. Um, I

1:28:14.320 --> 1:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think I learned, Um, I think I learned how important? Well,

1:28:24.000 --> 1:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this is something I learned from my mentor at Giles.

1:28:26.320 --> 1:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I used to say, a winner is somebody who knows

1:28:29.960 --> 1:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what to do when he's a loser. What's the backup plan?

1:28:34.520 --> 1:28:39.599
<v Speaker 1>What's the hedge? What's the cash in the bank that

1:28:39.640 --> 1:28:43.599
<v Speaker 1>you the the extra resource that you have that lets

1:28:43.720 --> 1:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you survive when the world goes against you. There's a

1:28:48.200 --> 1:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>quote that's attributed to Cains. Nobody can ever find in

1:28:50.880 --> 1:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>any of his writings that the market can remain wrong

1:28:55.040 --> 1:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>longer than you can remain solvent. Um, So I can

1:28:59.760 --> 1:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>remain in irrational far longer than the average investor can

1:29:02.200 --> 1:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>remain solvent. That's right. And so I would say that

1:29:05.760 --> 1:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the it's it's it's thinking in advance about what

1:29:11.160 --> 1:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do. What's plan B, what's plans to see?

1:29:13.280 --> 1:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do when the world goes against you?

1:29:15.800 --> 1:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>When you plug it in, it doesn't light up? Um,

1:29:18.560 --> 1:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>how you going to ride out the heart? Touch? Right?

1:29:21.040 --> 1:29:25.439
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Bill, Bill, This has been absolutely fascinating. I know,

1:29:25.479 --> 1:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I promised i'd get you out of here fifteen minutes ago,

1:29:28.200 --> 1:29:31.639
<v Speaker 1>but I just couldn't stop. We've been speaking with Bill Janeway.

1:29:31.680 --> 1:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>He is the author of Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy,

1:29:36.479 --> 1:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as the managing partner at Warburg Pincus and

1:29:40.720 --> 1:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a co founder of the Institute for New Economic Thinking.

1:29:45.600 --> 1:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, be sure to look up

1:29:49.080 --> 1:29:51.519
<v Speaker 1>an inch or down an inch on all of our

1:29:51.840 --> 1:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>previous on Apple iTunes so you can see all of

1:29:53.960 --> 1:29:57.439
<v Speaker 1>our previous conversations. I would be remiss if I did

1:29:57.439 --> 1:30:01.679
<v Speaker 1>not thank my recording engineer Reggie, my producer Charlie Volmer,

1:30:01.800 --> 1:30:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and my head of research, Michael Batnick. You've been listening

1:30:05.760 --> 1:30:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.