Speaker 1: Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg
Speaker 1: dot com, the radio plus mobile LAC and on your radio.
Speaker 1: This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.
Speaker 1: I'm Charlie Pella. Just getting earnings out of splun Kit
Speaker 1: develops web based applications software. It does say it sees
Speaker 1: third quarter revenue in the range of two hundred twenty
Speaker 1: eight million to two hundred thirty million. Estimates were for
Speaker 1: two hundred twenty eight point nine million dollars. Also reporting
Speaker 1: moments ago, Autodesk second quarter net revenue coming in at
Speaker 1: five hundred fifty seven million. The estimate there was for
Speaker 1: five hundred twelve point three million. Stocks lower the DAL,
Speaker 1: the SMP, NESDAC all declining today SMP five hundred index
Speaker 1: down three to seventy two, a drop of one tenth
Speaker 1: of one percent. Naztack lower today by five points, down
Speaker 1: one tenth of one percent down, Industrials down thirty three,
Speaker 1: a drop there of two tenths of one percent. The
Speaker 1: tenure down four thirty seconds, with the yield of one
Speaker 1: point five eight percent. Gold down three ninety ounce two
Speaker 1: drop of three tenths of one percent. Crude oil up
Speaker 1: one point one percent, picking up fifty four cents of
Speaker 1: barrel one on West Texas Interemedia Crude. I'm Charlie Pellette.
Speaker 1: That's a Bloomberg Business Flash. This is taking stock with
Speaker 1: Bim Box and Kathleen Hayes on Bloomberg Radio. If central
Speaker 1: banks want rates to rise, why do they keep buying
Speaker 1: up all the debt? I mean, doesn't that just increase
Speaker 1: the price, driving yields even lower. Let's find out. Maybe
Speaker 1: Tom Tucci, head of US Treasury Trading at CIBC World Markets,
Speaker 1: has an answer. Tom Tucci, thanks for being with us.
Speaker 1: So can you explain that? Does that make any sense? Well,
Speaker 1: I think it's the magnitude of what you're talking about
Speaker 1: when you say the central banks are looking at the
Speaker 1: raising interest rates. It's only here in the United States
Speaker 1: that they're talking about that, and they're not talking about
Speaker 1: that about raising them too dramatically. But having said that,
Speaker 1: I mean, if they want rates to actually increase, why
Speaker 1: don't they just sell some of the treasuries that are
Speaker 1: on the balance sheet of the US Federal Reserve because
Speaker 1: that creates a complete dislocation of markets in general. The
Speaker 1: Bank of Japan has been buying assets for over two
Speaker 1: decades with none of those assets ever coming back into
Speaker 1: the market. It will happen the same way in the
Speaker 1: United States. These assets will never be sold back into
Speaker 1: the market, So the Federal Reserve will orchestrator maintain the
Speaker 1: structure of interest rates through the actual overnight rate itself.
Speaker 1: All right, And of course we just spoke to Rob
Speaker 1: Kaplan here on taking stock here in Jackson Hall, Wyoming
Speaker 1: at the Big FED symposium today. Rob, of course President
Speaker 1: Dallas Fed and met it wasn't talking as much about
Speaker 1: bond buying. My uh, Tombody did say, basically, as Steve
Speaker 1: Matthews are Bloomberg News reporter here who helped cover the interview,
Speaker 1: negative rates in the US. Forget about it that Rob
Speaker 1: Kaplan says will distort the banking stem. It just wouldn't
Speaker 1: work here. Does that give you any comfort that at
Speaker 1: least one beneficial saying even if we you know, even
Speaker 1: if we don't have room to cut rates in a recession,
Speaker 1: we're not going to go there, right I think happing
Speaker 1: the biggest thing that's happening right now is all the
Speaker 1: central banks realized that these negative interest rates that we're
Speaker 1: seeing out of the Bank of Japan and the CD
Speaker 1: they're not working. The question is what is their alternative,
Speaker 1: And to date they don't have a solution. They don't
Speaker 1: have a transition mechanism or an alternative to move away
Speaker 1: from that. And they're concerned about moving away from that
Speaker 1: because what it will do to asset prices as a whole.
Speaker 1: So they walk this fine line. The interest rate policy,
Speaker 1: the monetary policy that they've established creates this kind of
Speaker 1: asset inflation that we've been experiencing now for years, and
Speaker 1: by pulling away they would deflate that. And so it's
Speaker 1: a very fine line that they're walking. They've painted themselves
Speaker 1: in the picture. And I would imagine that the symposium
Speaker 1: that we're having here at Jackson Hole, we're going to
Speaker 1: talk about a lot of different al henatives. A lot
Speaker 1: of different ideas are going to be thrown on the table.
Speaker 1: Not that I think that they have one uh cemented,
Speaker 1: but I think a lot of people have to rethink
Speaker 1: of policy, structure, economy outlooks, inflation outlooks. All these things
Speaker 1: have to change, and I think they're trying to adapt
Speaker 1: to that. Well, if all these things have to change, tom,
Speaker 1: I mean, isn't that going to create that very chaotic
Speaker 1: and dislocated situation that you just described a moment ago.
Speaker 1: I think it's how it's managed. If you think about it.
Speaker 1: From the first part of our conversation, you talked about
Speaker 1: raising interest rates. I don't think it's the FEDS intentions
Speaker 1: the significantly raised interest rates. If you look at their
Speaker 1: forward forecasts, which haven't been very correct, but their outlook
Speaker 1: has been more consistent of late, they've reduced their expectations
Speaker 1: for where they think the neutral terminal FED funds rate is,
Speaker 1: so that's pretty well established. I think everybody agrees that
Speaker 1: they don't expect rates to move up to what we've
Speaker 1: seen historically in the past, where rates have had to
Speaker 1: move significantly higher because we currently don't have an inflationary
Speaker 1: type environment. So when we talk about why are they
Speaker 1: raising rates, I personally don't think it has anything to
Speaker 1: do with anything other than asset prices. We don't have
Speaker 1: an inflationary picture. The economy as a whole, as far
Speaker 1: as GDPs calculated, certainly isn't overheating. We do have a
Speaker 1: stronger employment picture. But if you listen to a lot
Speaker 1: of the FED members, including the Chairman themselves, they still
Speaker 1: think there's some slack there, and I do believe that
Speaker 1: the makeup of them of employment is different than what
Speaker 1: it was even three or four years ago. So it's
Speaker 1: how they communicate the message about what it is that
Speaker 1: they're doing with interest rate policy and how they're going
Speaker 1: to restructure that in order for the market to understand,
Speaker 1: and we don't get that type of volatility or that
Speaker 1: asset selling that might happen if we were going into
Speaker 1: an extreme interest rate rising environment. Tom Today we had
Speaker 1: Rob Kaplan say he's patient on raising rates. Oh, patient, patient, patients,
Speaker 1: Steve Matthews said, implicitly, he seems to be one who's
Speaker 1: not necessary pushing for September at all, right for the
Speaker 1: rate high we had Jacob Frankel, who is the former
Speaker 1: head of the Bank of Israel and he's the chairman
Speaker 1: of JP and work in Chase International. They've got a move,
Speaker 1: he said, and he thinks they're helping to distort investment decision.
Speaker 1: It may not be the inflation problem, it's getting back
Speaker 1: to a more normal kind of financial markets in relationship
Speaker 1: with investing, which is so lacking in this country right now.
Speaker 1: What do you expect you from Janet Yellen tomorrow? That's
Speaker 1: the big speech tomorrow morning, right, and you know, I
Speaker 1: think that what's happening here is you have seen several
Speaker 1: of the FED members, particularly some of the ones that
Speaker 1: you would consider in the inner circle. And what I
Speaker 1: mean by that as Fisher and Dudley have come across
Speaker 1: a little bit more hawkish in the last week, and
Speaker 1: I personally think it's a direct result of where the
Speaker 1: stock market has been asset prices in general. Bill Dudley
Speaker 1: even mentioned the fact that he was surprised at how
Speaker 1: low the yield was on the turn your note, So
Speaker 1: I think it's in response to that. The problem the
Speaker 1: dislocation in the marketplaces right now are if you remember
Speaker 1: two years ago when the Feds are to their tapering
Speaker 1: and the potential for tightening, the markets swung and a
Speaker 1: complete uh parish direction, and that we were expecting significantly
Speaker 1: higher interest rates. Well we've spent two years trimming that down,
Speaker 1: even the Fed, as I said earlier, trimming down their
Speaker 1: forecast where they think that neutral funds rate is. And
Speaker 1: what you have now is a situation where the Fed
Speaker 1: loss their credibility. They've talked tough many times and never
Speaker 1: followed through with any action. So I think Jenny Yellen
Speaker 1: is going to help smooth out that credibility tomorrow. God
Speaker 1: leave it there. With Tom Tucci from CNBC World Markets,
Speaker 1: I'm Kathleen Hayes along with Pim Fox. Day one of
Speaker 1: our Jackson Hole coverage. This is Bloomberg coming up. Bloomberg
Speaker 1: Law is brought to you by cash pro, the cash
Speaker 1: management platform from Bank of America Merrilange. Cash Pro let
Speaker 1: you stay on top of your working capital in real time.
Speaker 1: It's totally pro business. That's the power of global connections.