WEBVTT - CIBC's Tucci: Fed Raising Rates Is About Asset Prices (Audio)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the radio plus mobile LAC and on your radio.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Pella. Just getting earnings out of splun Kit

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>develops web based applications software. It does say it sees

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>third quarter revenue in the range of two hundred twenty

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>eight million to two hundred thirty million. Estimates were for

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred twenty eight point nine million dollars. Also reporting

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>moments ago, Autodesk second quarter net revenue coming in at

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>five hundred fifty seven million. The estimate there was for

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred twelve point three million. Stocks lower the DAL,

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, NESDAC all declining today SMP five hundred index

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>down three to seventy two, a drop of one tenth

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of one percent. Naztack lower today by five points, down

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>one tenth of one percent down, Industrials down thirty three,

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a drop there of two tenths of one percent. The

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 1>tenure down four thirty seconds, with the yield of one

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>point five eight percent. Gold down three ninety ounce two

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>drop of three tenths of one percent. Crude oil up

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>one point one percent, picking up fifty four cents of

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>barrel one on West Texas Interemedia Crude. I'm Charlie Pellette.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>That's a Bloomberg Business Flash. This is taking stock with

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Bim Box and Kathleen Hayes on Bloomberg Radio. If central

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>banks want rates to rise, why do they keep buying

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>up all the debt? I mean, doesn't that just increase

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the price, driving yields even lower. Let's find out. Maybe

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom Tucci, head of US Treasury Trading at CIBC World Markets,

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>has an answer. Tom Tucci, thanks for being with us.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>So can you explain that? Does that make any sense? Well,

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the magnitude of what you're talking about

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>when you say the central banks are looking at the

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates. It's only here in the United States

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're talking about that, and they're not talking about

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that about raising them too dramatically. But having said that,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they want rates to actually increase, why

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>don't they just sell some of the treasuries that are

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>on the balance sheet of the US Federal Reserve because

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that creates a complete dislocation of markets in general. The

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan has been buying assets for over two

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>decades with none of those assets ever coming back into

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the market. It will happen the same way in the

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 1>United States. These assets will never be sold back into

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the market, So the Federal Reserve will orchestrator maintain the

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>structure of interest rates through the actual overnight rate itself.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, And of course we just spoke to Rob

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Kaplan here on taking stock here in Jackson Hall, Wyoming

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Big FED symposium today. Rob, of course President

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Fed and met it wasn't talking as much about

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>bond buying. My uh, Tombody did say, basically, as Steve

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Matthews are Bloomberg News reporter here who helped cover the interview,

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>negative rates in the US. Forget about it that Rob

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Kaplan says will distort the banking stem. It just wouldn't

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>work here. Does that give you any comfort that at

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>least one beneficial saying even if we you know, even

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have room to cut rates in a recession,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to go there, right I think happing

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing that's happening right now is all the

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>central banks realized that these negative interest rates that we're

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing out of the Bank of Japan and the CD

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not working. The question is what is their alternative,

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 1>And to date they don't have a solution. They don't

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have a transition mechanism or an alternative to move away

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>from that. And they're concerned about moving away from that

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>because what it will do to asset prices as a whole.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So they walk this fine line. The interest rate policy,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the monetary policy that they've established creates this kind of

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>asset inflation that we've been experiencing now for years, and

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>by pulling away they would deflate that. And so it's

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a very fine line that they're walking. They've painted themselves

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in the picture. And I would imagine that the symposium

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're having here at Jackson Hole, we're going to

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot of different al henatives. A lot

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of different ideas are going to be thrown on the table.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Not that I think that they have one uh cemented,

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of people have to rethink

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of policy, structure, economy outlooks, inflation outlooks. All these things

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have to change, and I think they're trying to adapt

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to that. Well, if all these things have to change, tom,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, isn't that going to create that very chaotic

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and dislocated situation that you just described a moment ago.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's how it's managed. If you think about it.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>From the first part of our conversation, you talked about

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates. I don't think it's the FEDS intentions

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the significantly raised interest rates. If you look at their

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>forward forecasts, which haven't been very correct, but their outlook

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>has been more consistent of late, they've reduced their expectations

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>for where they think the neutral terminal FED funds rate is,

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's pretty well established. I think everybody agrees that

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't expect rates to move up to what we've

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seen historically in the past, where rates have had to

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>move significantly higher because we currently don't have an inflationary

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>type environment. So when we talk about why are they

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>raising rates, I personally don't think it has anything to

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>do with anything other than asset prices. We don't have

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>an inflationary picture. The economy as a whole, as far

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as GDPs calculated, certainly isn't overheating. We do have a

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>stronger employment picture. But if you listen to a lot

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the FED members, including the Chairman themselves, they still

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's some slack there, and I do believe that

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the makeup of them of employment is different than what

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it was even three or four years ago. So it's

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>how they communicate the message about what it is that

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing with interest rate policy and how they're going

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to restructure that in order for the market to understand,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and we don't get that type of volatility or that

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>asset selling that might happen if we were going into

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>an extreme interest rate rising environment. Tom Today we had

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Rob Kaplan say he's patient on raising rates. Oh, patient, patient, patients,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Steve Matthews said, implicitly, he seems to be one who's

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>not necessary pushing for September at all, right for the

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rate high we had Jacob Frankel, who is the former

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>head of the Bank of Israel and he's the chairman

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of JP and work in Chase International. They've got a move,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, and he thinks they're helping to distort investment decision.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It may not be the inflation problem, it's getting back

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to a more normal kind of financial markets in relationship

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with investing, which is so lacking in this country right now.

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect you from Janet Yellen tomorrow? That's

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the big speech tomorrow morning, right, and you know, I

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think that what's happening here is you have seen several

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the FED members, particularly some of the ones that

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you would consider in the inner circle. And what I

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>mean by that as Fisher and Dudley have come across

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more hawkish in the last week, and

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I personally think it's a direct result of where the

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>stock market has been asset prices in general. Bill Dudley

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned the fact that he was surprised at how

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>low the yield was on the turn your note, So

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's in response to that. The problem the

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>dislocation in the marketplaces right now are if you remember

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>two years ago when the Feds are to their tapering

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and the potential for tightening, the markets swung and a

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>complete uh parish direction, and that we were expecting significantly

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates. Well we've spent two years trimming that down,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>even the Fed, as I said earlier, trimming down their

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>forecast where they think that neutral funds rate is. And

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>what you have now is a situation where the Fed

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>loss their credibility. They've talked tough many times and never

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>followed through with any action. So I think Jenny Yellen

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to help smooth out that credibility tomorrow. God

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. With Tom Tucci from CNBC World Markets,

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kathleen Hayes along with Pim Fox. Day one of

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>our Jackson Hole coverage. This is Bloomberg coming up. Bloomberg

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Law is brought to you by cash pro, the cash

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>management platform from Bank of America Merrilange. Cash Pro let

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you stay on top of your working capital in real time.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's totally pro business. That's the power of global connections.