WEBVTT - The Impeachment Episode

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:25.116
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:25.156 --> 0:00:28.116
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:28.556 --> 0:00:34.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. Welcome to this week's episode where we

0:00:34.196 --> 0:00:36.796
<v Speaker 1>talk about the republic and whether it is about to

0:00:36.836 --> 0:00:40.396
<v Speaker 1>collapse entirely. We are in the midst of a genuine

0:00:40.436 --> 0:00:44.396
<v Speaker 1>impeachment inquiry. This time it is not address rehearsal. Ladies

0:00:44.396 --> 0:00:47.836
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, hold on to your hats to discuss this

0:00:48.076 --> 0:00:50.876
<v Speaker 1>and many other issues. I'm thrilled to have with me

0:00:50.996 --> 0:00:54.716
<v Speaker 1>Seth Burman, a former state and federal prosecutor and my

0:00:54.916 --> 0:00:58.916
<v Speaker 1>spirit guide to all things criminal, no offense, Seth, and

0:00:59.116 --> 0:01:03.396
<v Speaker 1>indeed to all things connected to inquiries, impeachments, and everything

0:01:03.436 --> 0:01:05.516
<v Speaker 1>else we've had to deal with from the beginning of

0:01:05.556 --> 0:01:07.916
<v Speaker 1>this administration on. Seth, thank you so much for being here.

0:01:08.036 --> 0:01:10.236
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Now, so let's just start

0:01:10.316 --> 0:01:13.716
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of it, Seth. The impeachment inquiry. What

0:01:13.796 --> 0:01:15.716
<v Speaker 1>do you think the whistle blower complained? How do we

0:01:15.796 --> 0:01:18.996
<v Speaker 1>get here? The whistle blower complaint is absolutely fascinating, because,

0:01:18.996 --> 0:01:22.236
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the reality is the whistleblower didn't really

0:01:22.276 --> 0:01:24.276
<v Speaker 1>tell us all that much. That if you weren't paying

0:01:24.276 --> 0:01:26.876
<v Speaker 1>attention you didn't already know. It was well known that

0:01:26.916 --> 0:01:29.316
<v Speaker 1>Giuliani was running around. He was advertising that he was

0:01:29.356 --> 0:01:32.236
<v Speaker 1>running around in Ukraine and trying to get the Ukrainian

0:01:32.276 --> 0:01:35.396
<v Speaker 1>government to dig up dirt on Biden. It was reasonably

0:01:35.436 --> 0:01:37.596
<v Speaker 1>clear that the President was involved in that, because Giuliani

0:01:37.636 --> 0:01:40.836
<v Speaker 1>had said things like that over the time. But what

0:01:40.956 --> 0:01:44.156
<v Speaker 1>the whistleblower complaints seems to have done is number one

0:01:44.356 --> 0:01:47.916
<v Speaker 1>brought tremendous attention to it, and number two was point

0:01:47.996 --> 0:01:51.596
<v Speaker 1>out a way in which the veil of Giuliani doing

0:01:51.596 --> 0:01:55.316
<v Speaker 1>it as the president's lawyer or the president's individual lawyer,

0:01:55.596 --> 0:01:58.516
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to doing it as part of his official duties,

0:01:58.636 --> 0:02:01.196
<v Speaker 1>which he has none, because Rudy Giuliani has no official

0:02:01.236 --> 0:02:03.756
<v Speaker 1>duties in the US government. Correct. And that created just

0:02:04.116 --> 0:02:06.236
<v Speaker 1>enough of a cover that I think it was hard

0:02:06.276 --> 0:02:08.516
<v Speaker 1>for anyone to know what to do about it. But

0:02:08.596 --> 0:02:11.036
<v Speaker 1>then once the call or the fact of the call

0:02:11.156 --> 0:02:13.196
<v Speaker 1>was revealed in the whistleblower complaint and the phone call

0:02:13.356 --> 0:02:17.436
<v Speaker 1>between President Trump and President the Lodimir Zelenski of Ukraine,

0:02:17.476 --> 0:02:20.916
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. And once that call was was revealed,

0:02:21.236 --> 0:02:23.236
<v Speaker 1>and then the call itself or at least what we

0:02:23.316 --> 0:02:26.236
<v Speaker 1>think is a transcript of the call, semi quasi kind

0:02:26.276 --> 0:02:29.956
<v Speaker 1>of transcript exactly that semi quasi transcript seemed to show

0:02:29.996 --> 0:02:33.676
<v Speaker 1>Trump doing exactly the core of what he's not supposed

0:02:33.676 --> 0:02:36.636
<v Speaker 1>to be doing, the core abuse of power, which is

0:02:36.716 --> 0:02:39.236
<v Speaker 1>essentially using the power of the US government for his

0:02:39.316 --> 0:02:42.196
<v Speaker 1>own personal goals. To me, one of the takeaways from

0:02:42.236 --> 0:02:44.876
<v Speaker 1>this is, if you want to be in the president

0:02:44.916 --> 0:02:46.876
<v Speaker 1>and you want to get away with being the president

0:02:46.876 --> 0:02:48.156
<v Speaker 1>and doing the stuff you want to do, it might

0:02:48.156 --> 0:02:50.236
<v Speaker 1>be fine to be investigated by the former head of

0:02:50.236 --> 0:02:52.756
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, Bob Mueller, but you really don't want to

0:02:52.756 --> 0:02:55.476
<v Speaker 1>be investigated by some CIA desk officer who knows how

0:02:55.476 --> 0:02:58.036
<v Speaker 1>to write a five page memo. It certainly seems that way.

0:02:58.036 --> 0:03:00.636
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the five page memo did so much more

0:03:00.756 --> 0:03:04.836
<v Speaker 1>damage to the president than Mueller's report. And it's more

0:03:04.836 --> 0:03:08.156
<v Speaker 1>happened in five pages of the whistle blower complaint than

0:03:08.196 --> 0:03:10.956
<v Speaker 1>in five hundred of Muller reports. Right, And it's not

0:03:10.996 --> 0:03:12.516
<v Speaker 1>clear to me how much of that is because of

0:03:12.556 --> 0:03:14.876
<v Speaker 1>the sort of boiling of the frog thing that the

0:03:14.876 --> 0:03:17.236
<v Speaker 1>problem with Mueller is that it took so long that

0:03:17.356 --> 0:03:19.876
<v Speaker 1>by the time the report was done. We'd all gotten

0:03:19.956 --> 0:03:21.396
<v Speaker 1>used to all the facts in it. We were the

0:03:21.436 --> 0:03:23.516
<v Speaker 1>frog in the water and it got warmer and warmer,

0:03:23.556 --> 0:03:26.116
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't notice we were boiling, right, And now

0:03:26.236 --> 0:03:27.916
<v Speaker 1>this all came at once. So now it's like you

0:03:27.996 --> 0:03:29.836
<v Speaker 1>suddenly we're thrown into the boiling water. And there's no

0:03:29.876 --> 0:03:32.716
<v Speaker 1>avoiding the fact that this was outrageous. This is the

0:03:32.756 --> 0:03:38.236
<v Speaker 1>core outrageous, not the kind of what Republicans started calling

0:03:38.236 --> 0:03:40.396
<v Speaker 1>the process crimes. So I want to talk about the

0:03:40.716 --> 0:03:43.756
<v Speaker 1>phone call and the outrage because there are at least

0:03:43.796 --> 0:03:45.836
<v Speaker 1>two elements of the phone call, and I'm really interested

0:03:45.876 --> 0:03:47.996
<v Speaker 1>in maybe it's possible to untangle them a little bit.

0:03:48.036 --> 0:03:49.556
<v Speaker 1>Because we're sitting here, we have a little time, we

0:03:49.596 --> 0:03:53.276
<v Speaker 1>can analyze it. So, on the one hand, Trump is

0:03:53.316 --> 0:03:57.996
<v Speaker 1>asking Zelenski to spur an investigation of Joe Biden and

0:03:58.076 --> 0:04:01.356
<v Speaker 1>his son, and that's really clear to me. It's really

0:04:01.356 --> 0:04:03.836
<v Speaker 1>clear that that's an abuse of the president's power in

0:04:03.916 --> 0:04:08.276
<v Speaker 1>office for personal gain, because there's no national security interest

0:04:08.676 --> 0:04:11.596
<v Speaker 1>or national interest of any kind, even plausibly in the

0:04:11.636 --> 0:04:15.236
<v Speaker 1>investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden. And that's also the

0:04:15.236 --> 0:04:17.516
<v Speaker 1>part that Rudy Giuliani seems to have been most directly

0:04:17.556 --> 0:04:20.596
<v Speaker 1>involved in correct On the other hand, Trump is also

0:04:20.676 --> 0:04:23.556
<v Speaker 1>asking on that call. In fact, he asks first for

0:04:23.756 --> 0:04:26.996
<v Speaker 1>Zelenski's help in investigating what's basically a crazy right wing

0:04:27.116 --> 0:04:33.756
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory involving the company that first, the security company

0:04:33.796 --> 0:04:38.196
<v Speaker 1>that first looked at the Democratic National Committees hacks right, CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike,

0:04:38.476 --> 0:04:40.356
<v Speaker 1>What the hell is he doing and what does it

0:04:40.436 --> 0:04:42.516
<v Speaker 1>have to do with Ukraine, at least in Trump's mind.

0:04:43.236 --> 0:04:47.116
<v Speaker 1>So it is always very hard to untangle what people

0:04:47.196 --> 0:04:50.596
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about these crazy right wing conspiracy theories, right,

0:04:50.716 --> 0:04:54.036
<v Speaker 1>do Trump and Giuliani actually think it's true or are

0:04:54.076 --> 0:04:56.236
<v Speaker 1>they just trying to? But what's even the thing that

0:04:56.236 --> 0:04:58.076
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed that we're supposed to think, or so they

0:04:58.116 --> 0:04:59.836
<v Speaker 1>want us to think. As I understand it, what we're

0:04:59.836 --> 0:05:02.996
<v Speaker 1>supposed to think is that CrowdStrike was started by someone

0:05:03.076 --> 0:05:05.516
<v Speaker 1>who was born in Russia but is an American citizen.

0:05:06.116 --> 0:05:12.076
<v Speaker 1>That person is connected to a foundation, someone donated to

0:05:12.116 --> 0:05:15.756
<v Speaker 1>the foundation, or a wealthy Ukrainian donated to that foundation,

0:05:16.316 --> 0:05:20.716
<v Speaker 1>and based on that string of evidence, the conspiracy theory

0:05:20.836 --> 0:05:24.756
<v Speaker 1>is that CrowdStrike made up the idea that Russians hacked

0:05:24.796 --> 0:05:27.956
<v Speaker 1>into the DNC servers, and that in fact, it was

0:05:28.036 --> 0:05:30.836
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainians who are doing it essentially as a false

0:05:30.876 --> 0:05:34.076
<v Speaker 1>flag operation to help Hillary in some way, though it's

0:05:34.076 --> 0:05:37.076
<v Speaker 1>not totally clear how or maybe hurt the Russians, and

0:05:37.156 --> 0:05:39.316
<v Speaker 1>certainly to hurt the Russians, right, and that this is

0:05:39.316 --> 0:05:42.396
<v Speaker 1>a kind of made in Moscow conspiracy theory. It would

0:05:42.436 --> 0:05:46.756
<v Speaker 1>seem that way. Yeah, Okay, So that if it were true,

0:05:47.036 --> 0:05:49.116
<v Speaker 1>and that's an enormous if that we have to like

0:05:49.116 --> 0:05:51.036
<v Speaker 1>put up there in huge bold letters because obviously it's

0:05:51.036 --> 0:05:54.236
<v Speaker 1>not true. But if it were true, would the United

0:05:54.276 --> 0:05:57.916
<v Speaker 1>States have a genuine, legitimate interest in investigating that? As

0:05:57.996 --> 0:06:01.276
<v Speaker 1>part of the overall question that Trump says he's asked

0:06:01.316 --> 0:06:05.316
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General William bar to investigate, namely, if he never

0:06:05.476 --> 0:06:07.956
<v Speaker 1>colluded with the Russians, if there's no evidence that eclid

0:06:07.996 --> 0:06:10.676
<v Speaker 1>with the Russians, I did the world think? So, which

0:06:10.716 --> 0:06:13.076
<v Speaker 1>Trump thinks deserves to be investigated? Does that question deserve

0:06:13.116 --> 0:06:17.036
<v Speaker 1>to be investigated? I think the answer to that is no.

0:06:17.756 --> 0:06:22.156
<v Speaker 1>But it's a lot it's a lot closer, not so

0:06:22.236 --> 0:06:23.916
<v Speaker 1>much as to whether or not it should be investigated,

0:06:23.916 --> 0:06:26.476
<v Speaker 1>because of course it's absurd. So he's asking the Ukrainians

0:06:26.476 --> 0:06:29.596
<v Speaker 1>to investigate something, and I think we should be not

0:06:29.756 --> 0:06:32.156
<v Speaker 1>quick to use the president's word. It's not clear to

0:06:32.156 --> 0:06:34.636
<v Speaker 1>me that he really means investigate. When he says investigate,

0:06:34.716 --> 0:06:39.276
<v Speaker 1>he means find dirt on. Investigate implies that some proper

0:06:39.716 --> 0:06:41.876
<v Speaker 1>thing is going to happen, some search for the truth.

0:06:42.036 --> 0:06:44.516
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually think the President was asking them to

0:06:44.516 --> 0:06:47.116
<v Speaker 1>search for the truth of this. He was saying, find

0:06:47.156 --> 0:06:49.956
<v Speaker 1>me evidence that suggests the thing I want to find,

0:06:50.036 --> 0:06:53.196
<v Speaker 1>because that's a really important and fascinating things. If that's right,

0:06:53.236 --> 0:06:55.996
<v Speaker 1>then they are really at least two things wrong with

0:06:56.196 --> 0:06:59.036
<v Speaker 1>the phone call with Zelenski. One the request to find

0:06:59.036 --> 0:07:02.156
<v Speaker 1>dirt on Biden, and two just the request at all

0:07:02.236 --> 0:07:05.836
<v Speaker 1>and the pressure to find evidence to support this conspiracy

0:07:05.876 --> 0:07:08.916
<v Speaker 1>theory or to make up evidence to support this conspiracy theory.

0:07:08.876 --> 0:07:12.556
<v Speaker 1>Because that part actually involves the attorney general. And although

0:07:12.556 --> 0:07:14.876
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General denies he knew anything, I don't know

0:07:14.956 --> 0:07:16.916
<v Speaker 1>it's plausible or not, but he denies he knew anything

0:07:16.956 --> 0:07:20.476
<v Speaker 1>about the Biden investigation, he can't deny that he knows

0:07:20.516 --> 0:07:23.156
<v Speaker 1>about this other investigation because he says he's performing it.

0:07:23.796 --> 0:07:25.796
<v Speaker 1>And this is relevant to an issue that I'm kind

0:07:25.796 --> 0:07:27.716
<v Speaker 1>of fascinated by, which I sort of think is going

0:07:27.756 --> 0:07:32.116
<v Speaker 1>to become significant in these impeachment inquiry proceedings eventually. And

0:07:32.156 --> 0:07:35.996
<v Speaker 1>that is just how careful, legal and rational as the

0:07:36.036 --> 0:07:38.876
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General of the United States has he as he's

0:07:38.876 --> 0:07:41.316
<v Speaker 1>done so far, been very careful to act in a

0:07:41.356 --> 0:07:44.156
<v Speaker 1>way that a reasonable lawyer could always defend in court,

0:07:44.596 --> 0:07:48.716
<v Speaker 1>or under Trump's sort of consistent pressure that he cross

0:07:48.796 --> 0:07:53.436
<v Speaker 1>over into wacko land by asking various countries to investigate

0:07:53.476 --> 0:07:56.396
<v Speaker 1>this conspiracy theory. I'm actually going to expand that idea

0:07:56.476 --> 0:07:58.436
<v Speaker 1>even further because I think that the same question could

0:07:58.476 --> 0:08:00.916
<v Speaker 1>essentially be asked in a slightly different way of the

0:08:00.956 --> 0:08:06.036
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State, right, who essentially also got involved in this.

0:08:06.596 --> 0:08:10.876
<v Speaker 1>I suspect what's going on is that as the presidency

0:08:10.996 --> 0:08:14.956
<v Speaker 1>now revolves around Trump's crazy whim of the moment, right,

0:08:15.036 --> 0:08:19.196
<v Speaker 1>every senior official is out there trying to tamp down

0:08:19.236 --> 0:08:22.516
<v Speaker 1>whatever that is, and they make certain compromises necessary to

0:08:22.556 --> 0:08:24.916
<v Speaker 1>do so, which is every so often they just give

0:08:24.956 --> 0:08:27.836
<v Speaker 1>into the whim. They go investigate the latest crazy idea,

0:08:27.876 --> 0:08:31.276
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. Probably they convince themselves that that's just

0:08:31.316 --> 0:08:33.516
<v Speaker 1>a side thing they're doing. But you do wonder whether

0:08:33.596 --> 0:08:37.956
<v Speaker 1>or not does bar actually believe this crazy conspiracy theory also,

0:08:38.156 --> 0:08:40.276
<v Speaker 1>or is he making a big show of investigating it

0:08:40.556 --> 0:08:43.276
<v Speaker 1>so as to keep the President happy on the theory

0:08:43.316 --> 0:08:47.116
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing illegal or unconstitutional about the Department of

0:08:47.156 --> 0:08:50.996
<v Speaker 1>Justice engaging in a pointless investigation. The President says, investigate.

0:08:51.436 --> 0:08:54.316
<v Speaker 1>It's perfectly permissible to investigate as long as you don't

0:08:54.316 --> 0:08:56.796
<v Speaker 1>harm anybody. And if it's a crazy thing, like the

0:08:56.836 --> 0:08:59.036
<v Speaker 1>presidents would like to us to investigate whether the UFOs

0:08:59.116 --> 0:09:01.796
<v Speaker 1>landed in Roswell, so you investigate whe the UFOs landed

0:09:01.796 --> 0:09:04.316
<v Speaker 1>and Roswell, no harm, no foul. That would be the

0:09:04.396 --> 0:09:06.876
<v Speaker 1>kind of if we had bar here and truly off

0:09:06.916 --> 0:09:09.076
<v Speaker 1>the record, maybe that's what he would say about the investigation.

0:09:09.876 --> 0:09:12.236
<v Speaker 1>I assume that's what Baro two you're saying, correct. I

0:09:12.276 --> 0:09:14.716
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably what Barr would say. It is also

0:09:14.756 --> 0:09:17.236
<v Speaker 1>possible that Barr actually believes this, and I think that's

0:09:17.276 --> 0:09:19.916
<v Speaker 1>where it becomes a little bit hard to untangle what's

0:09:19.956 --> 0:09:24.596
<v Speaker 1>going on. Have some of the folks in the administration

0:09:24.836 --> 0:09:27.676
<v Speaker 1>reached the point of imbibing so much right wing news

0:09:27.716 --> 0:09:30.316
<v Speaker 1>that they've come around to believing theories that, on their

0:09:30.356 --> 0:09:32.876
<v Speaker 1>face are just absurd. So let's turn out to the

0:09:32.876 --> 0:09:35.436
<v Speaker 1>actual phone call, and I want to begin with this

0:09:35.516 --> 0:09:39.396
<v Speaker 1>question of whether there was just pressure, which is obvious

0:09:39.396 --> 0:09:41.396
<v Speaker 1>on the face of the phone call, or whether there

0:09:41.476 --> 0:09:44.036
<v Speaker 1>was some kind of a quid pro quo associated with

0:09:44.076 --> 0:09:46.036
<v Speaker 1>the fact that just a few days before the call,

0:09:46.276 --> 0:09:49.276
<v Speaker 1>the President had suspended three hundred ninety one million dollars

0:09:49.436 --> 0:09:52.116
<v Speaker 1>of military aid to Ukraine. He did it without telling

0:09:52.196 --> 0:09:55.036
<v Speaker 1>anyone the reason within we know from the whistleblower complaint

0:09:55.076 --> 0:09:57.436
<v Speaker 1>within the National Security Council. At the meetings where it

0:09:57.436 --> 0:09:59.716
<v Speaker 1>was announced, people wondered why the President was doing this,

0:09:59.876 --> 0:10:01.836
<v Speaker 1>and there was no answer. They just were told the

0:10:01.876 --> 0:10:04.276
<v Speaker 1>President wants to do that. So that's the setup. Then

0:10:04.356 --> 0:10:08.196
<v Speaker 1>the President comes into the call and he asks Zelenski

0:10:08.276 --> 0:10:12.836
<v Speaker 1>for quote a favor, and then Zelenski brings up Giuliani

0:10:12.876 --> 0:10:16.196
<v Speaker 1>immediately before the President brings up Juliani, and then the

0:10:16.196 --> 0:10:18.316
<v Speaker 1>President says, oh, and another thing and talks about the

0:10:18.356 --> 0:10:22.836
<v Speaker 1>Biden matter. So, first of all, do you think there

0:10:22.916 --> 0:10:25.556
<v Speaker 1>was a quid pro quo here? Put on your prosecutor's hat,

0:10:25.836 --> 0:10:29.756
<v Speaker 1>Was there, in fact some exchange between Trump and Zelenski

0:10:29.836 --> 0:10:34.116
<v Speaker 1>being proposed? I think the answer is clearly yes, for

0:10:34.156 --> 0:10:38.076
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's looking at the call fairly. I'll come back

0:10:38.116 --> 0:10:40.956
<v Speaker 1>to why I think people have the other interpretation. But

0:10:41.436 --> 0:10:44.316
<v Speaker 1>the quid pro quo is I think there may actually

0:10:44.316 --> 0:10:46.716
<v Speaker 1>be two quid pro quos in the call. The first

0:10:46.756 --> 0:10:49.836
<v Speaker 1>one is about the money, or at least the supply

0:10:49.956 --> 0:10:54.076
<v Speaker 1>of military aid, the fact that Trump had suspended the aid.

0:10:54.476 --> 0:10:57.396
<v Speaker 1>We don't yet know whether or not the Ukrainians knew that.

0:10:58.516 --> 0:11:00.756
<v Speaker 1>They certainly knew that they hadn't yet gotten it, and

0:11:00.796 --> 0:11:02.756
<v Speaker 1>they knew that it was held up. But whether or

0:11:02.796 --> 0:11:04.916
<v Speaker 1>not they understood that this call was a way to

0:11:04.956 --> 0:11:06.876
<v Speaker 1>break that through, we don't know because it's not on

0:11:06.916 --> 0:11:08.756
<v Speaker 1>the call. So let's put that aside for the moment.

0:11:08.796 --> 0:11:11.036
<v Speaker 1>Although and I just adds MS maybe it's just a footnote.

0:11:11.076 --> 0:11:13.796
<v Speaker 1>We know from the whistleplower complaint that after the call,

0:11:14.276 --> 0:11:19.756
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian President website actually said something along the lines

0:11:19.796 --> 0:11:23.396
<v Speaker 1>of we had a good call with the president. Investigations

0:11:23.396 --> 0:11:25.916
<v Speaker 1>will get started that will remove the obstacles to our

0:11:25.956 --> 0:11:28.316
<v Speaker 1>good relationship. So we do know that within a few

0:11:28.316 --> 0:11:30.596
<v Speaker 1>moments after the call they were interpreting it this way.

0:11:30.596 --> 0:11:31.676
<v Speaker 1>But go back to your point, Well, we know they

0:11:31.676 --> 0:11:34.756
<v Speaker 1>were interpreting about the good relationship. And I think that's

0:11:34.796 --> 0:11:37.116
<v Speaker 1>where the other interpretation will get to in a minute

0:11:37.196 --> 0:11:40.516
<v Speaker 1>comes from. The Ukrainian president didn't say and we're expecting

0:11:40.516 --> 0:11:43.556
<v Speaker 1>to get our money soon, right, He said something that

0:11:43.796 --> 0:11:46.036
<v Speaker 1>no doubt was code for that, but he didn't actually

0:11:46.116 --> 0:11:48.116
<v Speaker 1>say that. He said that there had been something that

0:11:48.196 --> 0:11:51.076
<v Speaker 1>was obstructing the relationship, and that was obviously the freezing

0:11:51.116 --> 0:11:54.116
<v Speaker 1>of the money. Anyway, go on. So I think that

0:11:54.276 --> 0:11:56.396
<v Speaker 1>is the broader context. But focus just for a moment

0:11:56.396 --> 0:11:59.836
<v Speaker 1>on the call itself and forget the broader context, which

0:11:59.876 --> 0:12:01.356
<v Speaker 1>isn't the right thing to do, but at least it's

0:12:01.356 --> 0:12:04.796
<v Speaker 1>a place to start on the call itself. The comment

0:12:04.836 --> 0:12:06.676
<v Speaker 1>about I need you to do me a favor, and

0:12:06.996 --> 0:12:11.356
<v Speaker 1>look at Joe Biden and his son comes immediately after,

0:12:11.956 --> 0:12:17.476
<v Speaker 1>literally like the sentence after Zelenski asks for anti tank

0:12:17.516 --> 0:12:21.436
<v Speaker 1>weapons and Trump says, okay, I need you to do

0:12:21.476 --> 0:12:23.596
<v Speaker 1>me a favor. So in that sense, there was a

0:12:23.676 --> 0:12:26.796
<v Speaker 1>literal ask the response to which is I need you

0:12:26.836 --> 0:12:29.356
<v Speaker 1>to do me a favor. So it is definitely true

0:12:29.396 --> 0:12:32.796
<v Speaker 1>that nobody used the words unless you do me this favor,

0:12:32.836 --> 0:12:35.076
<v Speaker 1>I will not give you what I asked for. But

0:12:35.196 --> 0:12:38.396
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. Literally, nobody talks that way. You

0:12:38.436 --> 0:12:42.196
<v Speaker 1>don't have to start espousing that this is a moblike

0:12:42.276 --> 0:12:46.956
<v Speaker 1>conversation to understand that people often do exchanges without actually

0:12:46.996 --> 0:12:50.236
<v Speaker 1>spelling out the if versus. You know, if then part

0:12:50.276 --> 0:12:52.196
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation. Right, I point my gun at you.

0:12:52.276 --> 0:12:54.396
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to say your money or your life.

0:12:54.516 --> 0:12:56.076
<v Speaker 1>I expect that you're going to give me your wallet.

0:12:56.276 --> 0:12:59.756
<v Speaker 1>Would you, as a prosecutor, have gone into court to

0:12:59.876 --> 0:13:03.876
<v Speaker 1>prosecute a public corruption case with a phone call tape

0:13:03.876 --> 0:13:07.236
<v Speaker 1>of a phone call with about as much connection to

0:13:07.276 --> 0:13:11.036
<v Speaker 1>the quidd pro quo as this phone call has. I

0:13:11.076 --> 0:13:14.716
<v Speaker 1>think that there's no question. Yes, everyone, every prosecutor I

0:13:14.756 --> 0:13:18.676
<v Speaker 1>know would do that. The connection between the ask and

0:13:18.756 --> 0:13:22.076
<v Speaker 1>the other ask, right, they ask for the for the weapons,

0:13:22.156 --> 0:13:27.316
<v Speaker 1>and the quote yes are right there. Usually these cases

0:13:27.316 --> 0:13:31.356
<v Speaker 1>fall apart because there's much less connection between the quid

0:13:31.356 --> 0:13:34.076
<v Speaker 1>and the quo then there is on this call. Correct, right,

0:13:34.236 --> 0:13:35.636
<v Speaker 1>This is one you you'd go in as a prosecutor.

0:13:35.676 --> 0:13:37.276
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't just go into the court. You think you'd

0:13:37.276 --> 0:13:39.476
<v Speaker 1>be like, I'm going to win this one knowing that

0:13:39.516 --> 0:13:41.596
<v Speaker 1>I think you would walk into court and say this

0:13:41.636 --> 0:13:44.436
<v Speaker 1>tape has a very clear quid pro quo on it. Wow,

0:13:44.516 --> 0:13:46.836
<v Speaker 1>he asked for one thing, and his response is you

0:13:46.916 --> 0:13:50.036
<v Speaker 1>need to do this instead, and is that why? So,

0:13:50.156 --> 0:13:53.396
<v Speaker 1>just to give a word of background to listeners. When

0:13:53.636 --> 0:13:57.436
<v Speaker 1>the complaint arose and we heard about it, I immediately

0:13:57.636 --> 0:13:59.596
<v Speaker 1>grabbed my phone and I texted you immediately, and I said,

0:13:59.676 --> 0:14:02.476
<v Speaker 1>what's the crime? And you immediately texted me back public corruption.

0:14:02.636 --> 0:14:04.476
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you just use a number you wrote back

0:14:04.476 --> 0:14:06.716
<v Speaker 1>section eight seventy two. So I'm embarrassed to say I

0:14:06.716 --> 0:14:08.356
<v Speaker 1>had to look that up to that was public corruption?

0:14:08.476 --> 0:14:09.796
<v Speaker 1>And is that why you thought it was a public

0:14:09.796 --> 0:14:13.076
<v Speaker 1>corruption right away? Because it resembled those kinds of cases. Absolutely,

0:14:13.076 --> 0:14:15.916
<v Speaker 1>it's the Normally these kinds of cases come up where

0:14:15.956 --> 0:14:18.916
<v Speaker 1>Congressman says, oh, we'd like to help you. I'd love

0:14:18.916 --> 0:14:20.396
<v Speaker 1>to be able to help you. I also need to

0:14:20.396 --> 0:14:24.796
<v Speaker 1>get reelected. It's much vaguer. Usually you don't say I

0:14:24.836 --> 0:14:27.076
<v Speaker 1>need your vote on this bill, all right, I need

0:14:27.116 --> 0:14:29.316
<v Speaker 1>you to do me a favor. Okay, So now talk

0:14:29.356 --> 0:14:33.156
<v Speaker 1>about the other interpretation, which is presentally the interpretation. Before

0:14:33.196 --> 0:14:35.036
<v Speaker 1>I get to that, there's one other quid pro quo.

0:14:35.076 --> 0:14:36.476
<v Speaker 1>I think that's in the call that's gotten a lot

0:14:36.556 --> 0:14:38.756
<v Speaker 1>less attention, which is at the very end of the

0:14:38.796 --> 0:14:42.356
<v Speaker 1>call again they're talking about the favor, and Zelenski says,

0:14:42.476 --> 0:14:45.316
<v Speaker 1>I'd really like to come visit the White House, which

0:14:45.396 --> 0:14:48.396
<v Speaker 1>is its own kind of favor that the president could grant.

0:14:48.716 --> 0:14:51.956
<v Speaker 1>It is extremely important to the Ukraine president to be

0:14:52.076 --> 0:14:54.516
<v Speaker 1>seen as being a close ally of the president, and

0:14:54.556 --> 0:14:56.636
<v Speaker 1>they had been trying to get a meeting with the

0:14:56.676 --> 0:14:59.356
<v Speaker 1>president in the White House for a while. And Trump's

0:14:59.396 --> 0:15:03.516
<v Speaker 1>response is something like, all right, you know, We'll look

0:15:03.516 --> 0:15:06.116
<v Speaker 1>at that. And it's clear that he's dangling yet another

0:15:06.156 --> 0:15:08.036
<v Speaker 1>favor in front of him, not just the money and

0:15:08.116 --> 0:15:11.236
<v Speaker 1>not just the weapon, but also this other favor of

0:15:11.276 --> 0:15:14.196
<v Speaker 1>the White House visit. Now, if that were all that

0:15:14.316 --> 0:15:16.596
<v Speaker 1>was there, I think it's a touch mushier because the

0:15:16.596 --> 0:15:19.516
<v Speaker 1>White House visit is arguably not an official act of

0:15:19.556 --> 0:15:22.556
<v Speaker 1>the president, although I think I think it is. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:23.596 --> 0:15:26.476
<v Speaker 1>but that's also in there and really hasn't gotten I

0:15:26.476 --> 0:15:29.116
<v Speaker 1>think the attention it probably deserves. And you know, it's

0:15:29.116 --> 0:15:31.036
<v Speaker 1>important to note in this context before we turn to

0:15:31.116 --> 0:15:37.236
<v Speaker 1>the alternative viewpoint, that this kind of dangling and pressure

0:15:37.716 --> 0:15:41.236
<v Speaker 1>is completely normal for a president if he's not seeking

0:15:41.356 --> 0:15:44.796
<v Speaker 1>personal gain for his own political reelection, right. I mean,

0:15:44.956 --> 0:15:47.276
<v Speaker 1>this is what governments due to each other all the time. Presumably,

0:15:47.276 --> 0:15:49.556
<v Speaker 1>if we had a hundred tapes of one hundred phone

0:15:49.556 --> 0:15:52.636
<v Speaker 1>calls by American presidents to foreign officials, maybe it's more

0:15:52.676 --> 0:15:56.516
<v Speaker 1>polite and more subtle. But we're always trading and making

0:15:56.516 --> 0:15:59.036
<v Speaker 1>demands and pressuring them to do stuff. It's just supposed

0:15:59.036 --> 0:16:01.596
<v Speaker 1>to be stuff in the national interest, not for the

0:16:01.636 --> 0:16:04.316
<v Speaker 1>personal gain of the president. Correct. And that's almost certainly

0:16:04.316 --> 0:16:06.756
<v Speaker 1>what Joe Biden had actually done here, which is that

0:16:06.836 --> 0:16:10.956
<v Speaker 1>Biden also told the Ukrainians that they couldn't get American

0:16:10.996 --> 0:16:15.236
<v Speaker 1>money unless they dealt with corruption. It appears, by all

0:16:15.276 --> 0:16:18.676
<v Speaker 1>accounts of what happened back then, that Biden and virtually

0:16:18.716 --> 0:16:22.276
<v Speaker 1>every other Western government was pressuring for the firing of

0:16:22.316 --> 0:16:25.396
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor who was famously corrupt and who was not

0:16:25.476 --> 0:16:28.276
<v Speaker 1>in fact investigating Hunter Biden or anyone else. And we're

0:16:28.316 --> 0:16:31.036
<v Speaker 1>going to come to him later. This is the prosecutor Lutzenko,

0:16:31.156 --> 0:16:33.436
<v Speaker 1>who is going to be a non trivial player. He's

0:16:33.876 --> 0:16:35.396
<v Speaker 1>not yet a household name, but the guy's on the

0:16:35.516 --> 0:16:38.236
<v Speaker 1>edge of becoming a household name. Is this inquiry proceeds,

0:16:38.276 --> 0:16:40.356
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to come to him in a little while. So, okay,

0:16:40.516 --> 0:16:43.596
<v Speaker 1>with all that build up, let's imagine now you know

0:16:43.796 --> 0:16:46.196
<v Speaker 1>you were a prosecutor. Now you defend people for a living,

0:16:46.636 --> 0:16:49.876
<v Speaker 1>alleged criminals. President calls you and says, take the case

0:16:49.876 --> 0:16:51.796
<v Speaker 1>and leave it aside. Whether you would take the case,

0:16:51.916 --> 0:16:54.356
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've taken the case. What's the defense that you

0:16:54.396 --> 0:16:56.516
<v Speaker 1>would raise for the president? What's the interpretation you would

0:16:56.516 --> 0:16:58.196
<v Speaker 1>offer to get him off the hook here? Well, I'm

0:16:58.196 --> 0:17:00.436
<v Speaker 1>going to answer that a slightly different way. The interpretation

0:17:00.476 --> 0:17:02.756
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans have been offering. I'm not sure it's the

0:17:02.756 --> 0:17:05.116
<v Speaker 1>one I would offer, but that they have been offering

0:17:05.236 --> 0:17:07.876
<v Speaker 1>is that, well, there's no literal quid pro quo when

0:17:07.876 --> 0:17:11.596
<v Speaker 1>you look in this conversation. Never once does someone say

0:17:12.116 --> 0:17:14.836
<v Speaker 1>if then that's a bad defense because in court those

0:17:14.836 --> 0:17:16.996
<v Speaker 1>defenses fail. I think that's a bad defense because it

0:17:17.036 --> 0:17:21.556
<v Speaker 1>will fail. Yes, But what is clever about it, I guess,

0:17:21.756 --> 0:17:24.916
<v Speaker 1>is that ultimately this is a political not a legal argument,

0:17:25.356 --> 0:17:29.356
<v Speaker 1>and it sort of has the veneer of believability to it.

0:17:29.636 --> 0:17:33.436
<v Speaker 1>What's I think plausible deniability? Sort of, Yeah, it's somewhat plausible.

0:17:33.476 --> 0:17:36.196
<v Speaker 1>It sounds legalistic, right, And they're going down the road

0:17:36.276 --> 0:17:38.996
<v Speaker 1>of well, if this isn't a crime, then you can't impeach,

0:17:39.076 --> 0:17:41.796
<v Speaker 1>which is also not true. Also not true, but but

0:17:41.916 --> 0:17:44.916
<v Speaker 1>something that is probably their best argument here. What would

0:17:44.916 --> 0:17:46.396
<v Speaker 1>you do if it were up to you, if you

0:17:46.716 --> 0:17:50.276
<v Speaker 1>could design the defense from scratch, I think you'd want

0:17:50.356 --> 0:17:53.796
<v Speaker 1>to start going down the path of this was a

0:17:53.836 --> 0:17:57.316
<v Speaker 1>misunderstanding and that's not what he meant. The problem here

0:17:57.356 --> 0:17:58.836
<v Speaker 1>is that the President has made a whole bunch of

0:17:58.836 --> 0:18:01.436
<v Speaker 1>other statements that support the idea that this is in

0:18:01.516 --> 0:18:04.076
<v Speaker 1>fact what he meant, and Giuliani is running around making

0:18:04.076 --> 0:18:05.956
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of statements that also make it clear

0:18:06.116 --> 0:18:08.836
<v Speaker 1>this is what he meant. So they're a little far

0:18:08.876 --> 0:18:12.716
<v Speaker 1>down that road to try to reframe what this conversation

0:18:12.836 --> 0:18:15.756
<v Speaker 1>was about. I had thought that one thing they could

0:18:15.756 --> 0:18:18.396
<v Speaker 1>try to say about this misunderstanding, and maybe this is

0:18:18.396 --> 0:18:20.236
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too inside the weeds of the phone

0:18:20.276 --> 0:18:24.156
<v Speaker 1>call is that all Trump intended to do in the

0:18:24.196 --> 0:18:28.516
<v Speaker 1>call was to bring up the investigation of CrowdStrike, and

0:18:28.596 --> 0:18:32.396
<v Speaker 1>he never intended to bring up the Hunter Biden investigation.

0:18:32.756 --> 0:18:35.836
<v Speaker 1>And he only did because when he brought up the CrowdStrike,

0:18:35.916 --> 0:18:37.516
<v Speaker 1>which is the thing that he brings up right after

0:18:37.556 --> 0:18:42.436
<v Speaker 1>the javelin missiles are mentioned. Zelenski then misunderstood and immediately

0:18:42.516 --> 0:18:45.676
<v Speaker 1>brought up Juliani, who was primarily working on the Biden thing,

0:18:45.996 --> 0:18:48.396
<v Speaker 1>and then Trump kind of went with it. I mean,

0:18:48.396 --> 0:18:50.716
<v Speaker 1>that may not be a great defense that I wasn't

0:18:50.716 --> 0:18:52.796
<v Speaker 1>going to commit a crime, but then he offered me

0:18:52.796 --> 0:18:54.836
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity, because if you think about it, in the

0:18:54.956 --> 0:18:59.796
<v Speaker 1>call with the Australian Leader which has come up subsequently,

0:19:00.196 --> 0:19:03.396
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they only talked about investigation of the

0:19:03.396 --> 0:19:07.156
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen collusion investigation. They didn't talk about Biden, which

0:19:07.156 --> 0:19:08.876
<v Speaker 1>I guess is partly because Biden did everything to do

0:19:08.876 --> 0:19:11.796
<v Speaker 1>with US Rail. So the problem I have with that

0:19:11.916 --> 0:19:14.996
<v Speaker 1>defense is that whether or not he intended to bring

0:19:15.076 --> 0:19:17.996
<v Speaker 1>up the Giuliani thing, the core problem with having brought

0:19:18.076 --> 0:19:20.476
<v Speaker 1>up the Giuliani thing is that it blew apart the

0:19:20.556 --> 0:19:23.916
<v Speaker 1>plausible deniability that they sort of had about what Giuliani

0:19:24.036 --> 0:19:27.556
<v Speaker 1>was doing, which is that Giuliani was freelancing. Hearing suddenly

0:19:27.596 --> 0:19:30.396
<v Speaker 1>that the President one hundred percent knows what Giuliani is

0:19:30.436 --> 0:19:34.556
<v Speaker 1>doing and is telling Zelenski to follow it is actually

0:19:34.636 --> 0:19:36.596
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible thing he could say, whether it was

0:19:36.636 --> 0:19:41.236
<v Speaker 1>on purpose or not, because It essentially brings Giuliani's activities

0:19:41.276 --> 0:19:44.716
<v Speaker 1>and numerous statements into the picture and makes it almost

0:19:44.756 --> 0:19:47.196
<v Speaker 1>impossible to deny that he was doing it at the

0:19:47.236 --> 0:19:50.156
<v Speaker 1>direction of the president. It's a fantastically good point, and

0:19:50.276 --> 0:19:51.796
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of something that I wanted to ask

0:19:51.836 --> 0:19:55.876
<v Speaker 1>you about about Giuliani. So I had the intuition somewhere

0:19:55.876 --> 0:19:58.636
<v Speaker 1>over the last few months that Rudy Giuliani had become

0:19:58.716 --> 0:20:02.196
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's new Michael Cohen. Like when he was just

0:20:02.236 --> 0:20:05.396
<v Speaker 1>a the Trump organization, not the president, Donald Trump used

0:20:05.436 --> 0:20:08.796
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen as his quote unquote lawyer. We now know

0:20:08.876 --> 0:20:11.036
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of what they did wasn't exactly legal,

0:20:11.436 --> 0:20:14.116
<v Speaker 1>but used Michael Cohen to be his fixer, to go

0:20:14.156 --> 0:20:16.276
<v Speaker 1>around doing the stuff that he didn't want to have

0:20:16.436 --> 0:20:19.556
<v Speaker 1>his hands on himself. And then he lost Michael Cohen

0:20:19.596 --> 0:20:23.836
<v Speaker 1>after Cohen was convicted of a crime, and he needed

0:20:23.876 --> 0:20:26.116
<v Speaker 1>someone to play this role, and it's like Giuliani stepped

0:20:26.116 --> 0:20:28.236
<v Speaker 1>into the role. So first, I want to know, do

0:20:28.276 --> 0:20:31.436
<v Speaker 1>you think that analogy makes some sense here? And second,

0:20:31.636 --> 0:20:35.116
<v Speaker 1>is it different insofar as by owning all what Giuliani

0:20:35.156 --> 0:20:37.676
<v Speaker 1>has done, Trump has broken the benefit of using your

0:20:37.756 --> 0:20:39.836
<v Speaker 1>lawyer to go around and do your dirty work for you.

0:20:41.476 --> 0:20:44.156
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot to that analogy. So I

0:20:44.236 --> 0:20:47.476
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think that yes, he has broken it,

0:20:47.516 --> 0:20:49.876
<v Speaker 1>and he's actually broken it in two ways. One has

0:20:49.876 --> 0:20:52.596
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Giuliani being a lawyer. Right, Every

0:20:52.636 --> 0:20:55.916
<v Speaker 1>politician has someone whose job is to some extend or

0:20:55.916 --> 0:21:00.076
<v Speaker 1>another smooth things over. Most politicians, I think, are smart

0:21:00.196 --> 0:21:02.796
<v Speaker 1>enough to know that they and that person should have

0:21:02.876 --> 0:21:06.836
<v Speaker 1>a certain distance between them so that they can not

0:21:06.956 --> 0:21:09.636
<v Speaker 1>just plausibly deny, but actually be able to that they

0:21:09.676 --> 0:21:13.556
<v Speaker 1>know what that person did. Trump doesn't operate that way, right.

0:21:13.556 --> 0:21:16.276
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have that level of subtlety even to be

0:21:16.316 --> 0:21:18.356
<v Speaker 1>able to say the sort of you know, who will

0:21:18.436 --> 0:21:20.556
<v Speaker 1>rid me of this troublesome priest and then let someone

0:21:20.596 --> 0:21:23.276
<v Speaker 1>do it without actually ordering someone to do it. I

0:21:23.276 --> 0:21:25.556
<v Speaker 1>feel confident that Trump would probably just order someone to

0:21:25.556 --> 0:21:28.396
<v Speaker 1>get rid of the troublesome priest, right He's instead of saying,

0:21:28.436 --> 0:21:30.516
<v Speaker 1>who will rid me the troublesome priests, He's like, yeah,

0:21:30.556 --> 0:21:33.196
<v Speaker 1>that Beckett guy, someone shoot him because that's the kind

0:21:33.196 --> 0:21:37.396
<v Speaker 1>of thing. So, okay, let's turn now to what's about

0:21:37.436 --> 0:21:41.476
<v Speaker 1>to happen, to the full dress impeachment inquiry. Followed by

0:21:41.556 --> 0:21:44.596
<v Speaker 1>it seems very likely to me a full dress impeachment

0:21:44.716 --> 0:21:47.676
<v Speaker 1>vote in the House, and then something will turn to

0:21:47.716 --> 0:21:50.076
<v Speaker 1>the question in a moment of what in the Senate?

0:21:50.356 --> 0:21:55.076
<v Speaker 1>So what are your bookmaker's odds that Donald Trump will

0:21:55.076 --> 0:21:57.236
<v Speaker 1>be impeached by the House of Representatives, that a majority

0:21:57.276 --> 0:21:59.236
<v Speaker 1>of members of the House of Representatives will vote to

0:21:59.276 --> 0:22:01.676
<v Speaker 1>impeach him and send the case to the Senate. I

0:22:01.716 --> 0:22:03.636
<v Speaker 1>think we're on a glide path where that is all

0:22:03.636 --> 0:22:07.716
<v Speaker 1>but certain at this point. Okay, And what quirks or

0:22:07.836 --> 0:22:11.316
<v Speaker 1>surprises do you expect along the way to that vote?

0:22:11.316 --> 0:22:13.836
<v Speaker 1>I mean, could they vote on that, you know, in

0:22:13.876 --> 0:22:16.556
<v Speaker 1>a matter of weeks? Does it necessarily have to take

0:22:16.596 --> 0:22:19.116
<v Speaker 1>months where they work through lots of details. Will the

0:22:19.156 --> 0:22:21.036
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in the House try to push back at all

0:22:21.076 --> 0:22:23.356
<v Speaker 1>since they don't have the votes? How do you imagine

0:22:23.356 --> 0:22:25.756
<v Speaker 1>that playing itself out? Well? I think Republicans in the

0:22:25.756 --> 0:22:28.316
<v Speaker 1>House have very little power because the majority in the

0:22:28.316 --> 0:22:31.476
<v Speaker 1>House has all the power. So aside from making outrageous

0:22:31.476 --> 0:22:34.516
<v Speaker 1>statements or asking a bunch of questions that are self

0:22:34.556 --> 0:22:36.956
<v Speaker 1>serving in some way, there's not a whole lot Republicans

0:22:36.956 --> 0:22:39.476
<v Speaker 1>can do in the House. So I don't think that

0:22:39.476 --> 0:22:41.716
<v Speaker 1>they will throw in a bunch of roadblocks. I think

0:22:41.756 --> 0:22:45.516
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration at some point will realize that releasing

0:22:45.516 --> 0:22:48.756
<v Speaker 1>the tape and being as open as they've ever been

0:22:48.916 --> 0:22:52.156
<v Speaker 1>was a terrible mistake, and that they will attempt to

0:22:52.196 --> 0:22:55.396
<v Speaker 1>close the door and stop cooperating. We're already starting to

0:22:55.436 --> 0:22:57.796
<v Speaker 1>see this happening. So then, on this theory, on your theory,

0:22:57.796 --> 0:23:00.796
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration can start being obstructionists. They can, and

0:23:00.836 --> 0:23:03.596
<v Speaker 1>that runs the clock, right, That runs the clock as

0:23:03.596 --> 0:23:06.876
<v Speaker 1>we get closer and closer and closer to November twenty twenty.

0:23:07.316 --> 0:23:09.556
<v Speaker 1>Why does that benefit them? Isn't it better for them

0:23:09.556 --> 0:23:11.836
<v Speaker 1>to get this all over with quickly? I think that

0:23:11.876 --> 0:23:14.276
<v Speaker 1>there are two ways to look at that. So one

0:23:14.436 --> 0:23:16.516
<v Speaker 1>is get it over with quickly and then they can

0:23:16.556 --> 0:23:19.796
<v Speaker 1>move on right, and that is an advantage, But I

0:23:19.796 --> 0:23:23.676
<v Speaker 1>think it also becomes harder and harder for this process

0:23:23.716 --> 0:23:26.036
<v Speaker 1>to be maintained the closer it gets to the election,

0:23:26.356 --> 0:23:28.516
<v Speaker 1>because it begins to seem absurd that you're trying to

0:23:28.556 --> 0:23:30.796
<v Speaker 1>throw out a president who's about to be voted on

0:23:31.436 --> 0:23:35.236
<v Speaker 1>and may be reelected. Correct. So that's one answer. I

0:23:35.236 --> 0:23:38.276
<v Speaker 1>think the second answer is, look, their concern is not

0:23:38.436 --> 0:23:40.556
<v Speaker 1>ultimately that they're going to get impeached by the House.

0:23:40.636 --> 0:23:44.876
<v Speaker 1>The concern is that ultimately some senators, enough senators turn

0:23:44.956 --> 0:23:47.836
<v Speaker 1>on them that he either gets thrown out of office

0:23:47.996 --> 0:23:50.596
<v Speaker 1>or it becomes impossible to maintain that this is entirely

0:23:50.596 --> 0:23:52.916
<v Speaker 1>a democratic thing. So even if he doesn't get thrown

0:23:52.916 --> 0:23:56.236
<v Speaker 1>out of office, if ten senators, ten Republican senators vote

0:23:56.236 --> 0:23:58.676
<v Speaker 1>with the Democrats, it's a lot harder to paint this

0:23:58.796 --> 0:24:01.636
<v Speaker 1>as only a Democrat could think he did anything wrong? Right,

0:24:02.076 --> 0:24:04.636
<v Speaker 1>so how do you prevent that? And it could be

0:24:04.676 --> 0:24:06.436
<v Speaker 1>that the answer to how you prevent that is you

0:24:06.516 --> 0:24:08.836
<v Speaker 1>make sure where stuff doesn't come out. But it also

0:24:08.916 --> 0:24:11.636
<v Speaker 1>might be that if you look like you're blocking everything,

0:24:11.676 --> 0:24:15.476
<v Speaker 1>that gives some reason for Republicans in the Senate to say, well, gee,

0:24:15.876 --> 0:24:18.636
<v Speaker 1>we think he did obstruct justice or obstruct the inquiries

0:24:18.636 --> 0:24:20.756
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, and that's a reason to vote against him too.

0:24:20.916 --> 0:24:22.956
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it feels like that ship sailed long ago.

0:24:23.036 --> 0:24:25.436
<v Speaker 1>The President's been obstructing Congress for the last year, and

0:24:25.516 --> 0:24:27.996
<v Speaker 1>not a single Republican has complained about it. Right, Is

0:24:27.996 --> 0:24:29.956
<v Speaker 1>there anything you said, We're on a glide path to

0:24:30.036 --> 0:24:33.996
<v Speaker 1>almost certain impeachment. Can you imagine anything that would cause

0:24:34.036 --> 0:24:36.956
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats to say, you know what, you know, maybe

0:24:36.956 --> 0:24:39.156
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't do this. Let's imagine that polls come in

0:24:39.516 --> 0:24:42.036
<v Speaker 1>that tell the Democrats that a lot of their base

0:24:42.476 --> 0:24:45.756
<v Speaker 1>thinks impeachment is a mistake, because you know, in the

0:24:45.876 --> 0:24:49.436
<v Speaker 1>end it's going to distract the country from the twenty

0:24:49.476 --> 0:24:53.276
<v Speaker 1>twenty election. I don't anticipate that happening. I think there's

0:24:53.276 --> 0:24:55.676
<v Speaker 1>a different set of polls that might create a problem.

0:24:55.676 --> 0:24:58.996
<v Speaker 1>My guess is the Democrat take voters in polls will

0:24:59.356 --> 0:25:01.836
<v Speaker 1>kind of come around on impeachment if they haven't already. Right.

0:25:02.196 --> 0:25:03.676
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think that voters are going to vote

0:25:03.676 --> 0:25:06.076
<v Speaker 1>against Trump anyway, impeachment or no impeachment, correct, So it

0:25:06.076 --> 0:25:08.556
<v Speaker 1>almost doesn't matter what they think. I think a bigger

0:25:08.596 --> 0:25:12.436
<v Speaker 1>problem is they do rely on certain moderate or Democrats

0:25:12.476 --> 0:25:16.236
<v Speaker 1>from moderate districts, and if those Democrats get cold feet

0:25:16.276 --> 0:25:19.436
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not this is a good idea, then

0:25:19.476 --> 0:25:23.876
<v Speaker 1>I think the impeachment process could run into some rocky waters.

0:25:24.036 --> 0:25:27.876
<v Speaker 1>Can Nancy Pelosi effectively stop the whole thing herself or

0:25:27.916 --> 0:25:30.076
<v Speaker 1>does she need a vote? I mean, is she in

0:25:30.076 --> 0:25:33.436
<v Speaker 1>a situation where Donald Trump says she is no longer

0:25:33.436 --> 0:25:35.076
<v Speaker 1>the Speaker of the House by which she doesn't literally

0:25:35.116 --> 0:25:36.676
<v Speaker 1>means she's not the Speaker of the House. He means

0:25:37.036 --> 0:25:38.876
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't really have the center of power in the

0:25:38.916 --> 0:25:41.276
<v Speaker 1>House anymore. Of the power has shifted to the part

0:25:41.276 --> 0:25:43.516
<v Speaker 1>of the party that's been demanding impeachment, like a lot

0:25:43.556 --> 0:25:46.676
<v Speaker 1>of the presidential candidates have been doing. That is to say,

0:25:46.716 --> 0:25:49.676
<v Speaker 1>to Pelosi's left, is it realistic for her to stop

0:25:49.716 --> 0:25:52.436
<v Speaker 1>it at some point? Could she do it? I think

0:25:52.436 --> 0:25:55.076
<v Speaker 1>it will at this moment. Probably not, But is it

0:25:55.116 --> 0:25:57.876
<v Speaker 1>possible that some set of circumstances or polls could come

0:25:57.876 --> 0:26:01.036
<v Speaker 1>out later. Maybe. But the other option she has is

0:26:01.036 --> 0:26:02.556
<v Speaker 1>she could bring it to a vote and he could lose,

0:26:02.996 --> 0:26:05.636
<v Speaker 1>but that it would only lose if a significant number

0:26:05.636 --> 0:26:08.036
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats voted against impeachment. And it seems to me

0:26:08.556 --> 0:26:11.396
<v Speaker 1>that even a Democrat in a moderate district can't get

0:26:11.436 --> 0:26:13.756
<v Speaker 1>away with voting against impeachment at this point. I mean,

0:26:13.756 --> 0:26:15.636
<v Speaker 1>how can you get up in the House of Representatives

0:26:15.676 --> 0:26:18.436
<v Speaker 1>as a Democrat and cast any vote that is perceived

0:26:18.476 --> 0:26:21.276
<v Speaker 1>as a vote for Donald Trump. You'll be primaried and

0:26:21.396 --> 0:26:23.396
<v Speaker 1>it'll be all over for you, no matter where you're from.

0:26:24.076 --> 0:26:26.036
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, and thus it's a little hard

0:26:26.076 --> 0:26:29.036
<v Speaker 1>to understand how So bottom line, impeachment is coming. Okay,

0:26:29.076 --> 0:26:32.196
<v Speaker 1>So once impeachment comes, according to the Constitution, we're supposed

0:26:32.196 --> 0:26:34.596
<v Speaker 1>to move to a trial in the Senate. And miss

0:26:34.676 --> 0:26:37.156
<v Speaker 1>McConnell has said, don't worry, I will hold a trial

0:26:37.156 --> 0:26:38.836
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. But as for how long it's going

0:26:38.876 --> 0:26:42.556
<v Speaker 1>to last, he said, that's another matter altogether. What's the

0:26:42.716 --> 0:26:46.596
<v Speaker 1>fastest and the most minimalistic proceeding that McConnell think can

0:26:46.636 --> 0:26:48.756
<v Speaker 1>get away with in the Senate. And remember, Chief Justice

0:26:48.796 --> 0:26:51.076
<v Speaker 1>John Roberts will be there presiding, but he's just one guy.

0:26:51.116 --> 0:26:52.796
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the Supreme Court doesn't come with him.

0:26:52.876 --> 0:26:56.196
<v Speaker 1>I remember actually watching the Clinton impeachments when I was

0:26:56.196 --> 0:26:57.596
<v Speaker 1>a law crook at the Supreme Court. That so I

0:26:57.636 --> 0:27:00.556
<v Speaker 1>got a ticket, and you know, Chief Justice Ranquist was

0:27:00.596 --> 0:27:03.556
<v Speaker 1>just sort of sitting there in his fancy robe and

0:27:04.116 --> 0:27:05.876
<v Speaker 1>he was like an ornament to the room. But he

0:27:05.876 --> 0:27:08.396
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get to say or do almost anything. So

0:27:08.436 --> 0:27:10.556
<v Speaker 1>I think this is probably more in your area than mine.

0:27:10.596 --> 0:27:12.956
<v Speaker 1>But my understanding is that they could just go ahead

0:27:12.956 --> 0:27:15.516
<v Speaker 1>and have a vote on day one should we impeach

0:27:15.556 --> 0:27:17.956
<v Speaker 1>the president. I don't think they could get away with that.

0:27:18.036 --> 0:27:22.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean to my mind, the Constitution clearly imagines a

0:27:22.516 --> 0:27:25.716
<v Speaker 1>process in which the impeachment is recommended, like an indictment,

0:27:25.956 --> 0:27:29.276
<v Speaker 1>and then there's some kind of proceeding or discussion or

0:27:29.396 --> 0:27:33.356
<v Speaker 1>trial in front of the Senate. And you know, historically

0:27:33.676 --> 0:27:36.716
<v Speaker 1>trials in Britain in parliament, trials for impeachment were a

0:27:36.756 --> 0:27:39.516
<v Speaker 1>serious undertaking and they went on for years. You know.

0:27:39.556 --> 0:27:42.196
<v Speaker 1>The most famous and influential impeachment that the Framers knew

0:27:42.196 --> 0:27:44.516
<v Speaker 1>about was the impeachment of Warren Hastings, who had been

0:27:45.076 --> 0:27:47.876
<v Speaker 1>the governor in India effectively, and he was impeached in

0:27:47.916 --> 0:27:50.076
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen seventies, and that trial went on for I

0:27:50.076 --> 0:27:53.356
<v Speaker 1>want to say seven years, you know. I mean it

0:27:53.396 --> 0:27:55.556
<v Speaker 1>was like you know, front page news for a lot

0:27:55.596 --> 0:27:57.956
<v Speaker 1>of that time too, And the Framers knew all about

0:27:57.956 --> 0:28:00.556
<v Speaker 1>it because it was in the newspapers. They contemplated some

0:28:00.676 --> 0:28:03.996
<v Speaker 1>kind of a trial like process, but couldn't they decide

0:28:04.036 --> 0:28:06.516
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to let the the house managers of

0:28:06.556 --> 0:28:09.716
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment come in, make their presentation, put the call

0:28:09.756 --> 0:28:11.956
<v Speaker 1>into evidence, and then vote on whether or not that

0:28:12.036 --> 0:28:14.516
<v Speaker 1>is sufficient grounds for impeachment. And a bunch of Republican

0:28:14.556 --> 0:28:16.716
<v Speaker 1>senators come out and say, even if we assume this

0:28:16.796 --> 0:28:18.876
<v Speaker 1>is all true, I don't think it's grounds for impeachment.

0:28:19.076 --> 0:28:21.276
<v Speaker 1>They vote and it's over right, sort of like a

0:28:21.316 --> 0:28:24.996
<v Speaker 1>directed verdict process correct in a courtroom. Yeah, I think

0:28:25.356 --> 0:28:27.556
<v Speaker 1>they might be able to get away with that. They

0:28:27.556 --> 0:28:30.516
<v Speaker 1>won't want to go down in history. I think as

0:28:30.516 --> 0:28:34.156
<v Speaker 1>the people who made the impeachment process look like a sham,

0:28:34.196 --> 0:28:36.916
<v Speaker 1>they may not have to hear lots of witnesses. I

0:28:37.556 --> 0:28:39.756
<v Speaker 1>get you there, I don't know. I think there's going

0:28:39.836 --> 0:28:42.276
<v Speaker 1>to be tremendous pressure on them to hold something that

0:28:42.436 --> 0:28:45.036
<v Speaker 1>looks a little bit like a trial for at least

0:28:45.156 --> 0:28:47.516
<v Speaker 1>a few days. I mean, you know, when we go

0:28:47.556 --> 0:28:50.476
<v Speaker 1>after a Supreme Court nominee that already takes a week

0:28:50.476 --> 0:28:53.076
<v Speaker 1>of hearings. I have a hard time imagining them spending

0:28:53.196 --> 0:28:56.036
<v Speaker 1>less time on it than they would would on that maybe.

0:28:56.116 --> 0:28:57.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think formally, I guess they could do it,

0:28:57.796 --> 0:28:59.116
<v Speaker 1>but I doubt if they would really think they could

0:28:59.156 --> 0:29:01.796
<v Speaker 1>get away with it. But so what difference does that make?

0:29:01.876 --> 0:29:04.116
<v Speaker 1>So they have a sham trial of one to five

0:29:04.196 --> 0:29:07.276
<v Speaker 1>days at the end of which they vote any of

0:29:07.276 --> 0:29:11.036
<v Speaker 1>they acquitment and either a bunch of those senators from

0:29:11.356 --> 0:29:15.796
<v Speaker 1>states that are purple, I guess, or blue decide to

0:29:15.836 --> 0:29:18.156
<v Speaker 1>vote with the president or they vote against, and it

0:29:18.196 --> 0:29:21.236
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter because there still are enough enough numbers to

0:29:21.236 --> 0:29:24.716
<v Speaker 1>get to an actual removal. So that's assuming that the

0:29:24.716 --> 0:29:27.236
<v Speaker 1>tide doesn't break. Like there's also the possibility that the

0:29:27.276 --> 0:29:30.516
<v Speaker 1>tide breaks and at some point Republicans say we'd be

0:29:30.516 --> 0:29:32.636
<v Speaker 1>better off with Pens. So let's talk about that. What

0:29:32.716 --> 0:29:35.156
<v Speaker 1>does it take for the tide to break? And then

0:29:35.196 --> 0:29:36.916
<v Speaker 1>we'll come to the question of what are the odds

0:29:36.956 --> 0:29:38.716
<v Speaker 1>of the tide breaking? But what would it take. What

0:29:38.796 --> 0:29:40.676
<v Speaker 1>are the kinds of facts that would have to enter

0:29:40.676 --> 0:29:43.076
<v Speaker 1>into the mix in your view that would lead enough

0:29:43.116 --> 0:29:46.276
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to say we're better off with pens. I'm actually

0:29:46.356 --> 0:29:48.316
<v Speaker 1>of the view that the answer to that has nothing

0:29:48.356 --> 0:29:50.076
<v Speaker 1>to do with the facts. I think the answer to

0:29:50.116 --> 0:29:52.996
<v Speaker 1>that probably has something to do with the polls. Well,

0:29:53.036 --> 0:29:55.436
<v Speaker 1>what we'll move the polls? That is the question. And

0:29:55.596 --> 0:29:58.076
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, say the President called a dozen countries

0:29:58.396 --> 0:30:00.476
<v Speaker 1>and put pressure on them, and maybe doesn't this too much,

0:30:00.516 --> 0:30:02.636
<v Speaker 1>but three or four other countries, and we as a

0:30:02.676 --> 0:30:05.196
<v Speaker 1>gradual drip, drip drip, we find out that the President

0:30:05.236 --> 0:30:08.036
<v Speaker 1>has been going around pressuring lots of countries, essentially to

0:30:08.116 --> 0:30:10.996
<v Speaker 1>make up evidence to help him in his political campaign.

0:30:11.916 --> 0:30:14.436
<v Speaker 1>My general view of the moment we're in is that

0:30:14.876 --> 0:30:17.636
<v Speaker 1>as people say, nothing matters, and what that seems to

0:30:17.676 --> 0:30:20.596
<v Speaker 1>mean is that no matter what happens, the polls are

0:30:20.596 --> 0:30:23.916
<v Speaker 1>basically steady. Somewhere between fifty to fifty three percent of

0:30:23.916 --> 0:30:28.916
<v Speaker 1>Americans think the president is disapprove of his performance performance

0:30:29.116 --> 0:30:32.196
<v Speaker 1>and something between, you know, around forty one to forty

0:30:32.196 --> 0:30:34.796
<v Speaker 1>three percent approve. My guess is that no matter what

0:30:34.916 --> 0:30:37.916
<v Speaker 1>comes out, that will basically be true. Now, what happens

0:30:37.996 --> 0:30:40.956
<v Speaker 1>if some of the people in that gap, right the

0:30:41.396 --> 0:30:43.956
<v Speaker 1>five to whatever percent it is in that gap, you

0:30:43.996 --> 0:30:46.116
<v Speaker 1>know what happens if they come around and say, you

0:30:46.156 --> 0:30:48.956
<v Speaker 1>know what, I don't like this either. So I don't

0:30:48.996 --> 0:30:50.516
<v Speaker 1>know what the answer to that is, but I'm not

0:30:50.556 --> 0:30:52.796
<v Speaker 1>sure it would matter. So if you're right about that,

0:30:52.876 --> 0:30:54.716
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hear everything you're saying, and it seems

0:30:55.116 --> 0:30:59.476
<v Speaker 1>logically correct. If that's the case, there's almost no chance

0:30:59.996 --> 0:31:03.476
<v Speaker 1>of the tide breaking and Republicans voting to remove It's

0:31:03.556 --> 0:31:07.316
<v Speaker 1>close to a zero chance because as you say that, core,

0:31:07.796 --> 0:31:09.436
<v Speaker 1>you know they could hear, I mean, may not be

0:31:09.556 --> 0:31:11.396
<v Speaker 1>quite the Trump position that they could hear that he

0:31:11.396 --> 0:31:13.956
<v Speaker 1>shot someone at Fifth Avenue, but it's pretty close to

0:31:14.036 --> 0:31:16.836
<v Speaker 1>saying that they wouldn't, you know, they wouldn't abandon him.

0:31:16.876 --> 0:31:19.356
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, if you're a Republican, there's

0:31:19.396 --> 0:31:21.956
<v Speaker 1>no way you're better off going into the election with Pence,

0:31:22.316 --> 0:31:25.116
<v Speaker 1>because we know that that forty one percent base of

0:31:25.196 --> 0:31:29.196
<v Speaker 1>Republicans like Trump, but we have no idea if they

0:31:29.196 --> 0:31:32.156
<v Speaker 1>feel as strongly about Pence, and Pence certainly can't rally

0:31:32.156 --> 0:31:34.916
<v Speaker 1>the base the way Trump can, especially if the Republicans

0:31:34.956 --> 0:31:38.756
<v Speaker 1>have somehow admitted via removal that there's something wrong with Trump.

0:31:38.996 --> 0:31:41.996
<v Speaker 1>So in that scenario, you're actually saying this is a

0:31:42.076 --> 0:31:44.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of for ordained conclusion, like Trump is going to

0:31:44.796 --> 0:31:47.316
<v Speaker 1>be acquitted by the Senate full stop. Well I'm not

0:31:47.396 --> 0:31:49.316
<v Speaker 1>quite saying that, because I think there's one exception I'll

0:31:49.316 --> 0:31:51.236
<v Speaker 1>come to in a second. But I want to respond

0:31:51.236 --> 0:31:53.436
<v Speaker 1>to your point about Pence first, which is I actually

0:31:53.476 --> 0:31:57.036
<v Speaker 1>agree with you that if they Republicans vote to impeach Trump,

0:31:57.436 --> 0:32:00.356
<v Speaker 1>they are all but conceding the next election. The reason

0:32:00.436 --> 0:32:04.236
<v Speaker 1>to do that might be that they're better off letting

0:32:04.276 --> 0:32:07.596
<v Speaker 1>the next election happen and not as a landslide and

0:32:07.636 --> 0:32:09.996
<v Speaker 1>then regrouping over the cot of the next four years,

0:32:10.076 --> 0:32:13.036
<v Speaker 1>essentially fast forwarding the post Trump era. One interesting about

0:32:13.076 --> 0:32:15.156
<v Speaker 1>this is it shows you that the timing really matters.

0:32:15.276 --> 0:32:18.036
<v Speaker 1>So when Republicans signaled that they were going to abandon

0:32:18.196 --> 0:32:21.396
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nixon and he therefore stepped down rather than been

0:32:21.436 --> 0:32:24.516
<v Speaker 1>removed from office, it was still early enough for them

0:32:24.516 --> 0:32:28.196
<v Speaker 1>to think that once Gerald Ford became president they would

0:32:28.236 --> 0:32:31.756
<v Speaker 1>have a shot at the nineteen seventy six election. It

0:32:31.796 --> 0:32:33.756
<v Speaker 1>was still wasn't clear at that point. It was still

0:32:33.836 --> 0:32:36.636
<v Speaker 1>really late seventy four by the time that happened, and

0:32:36.796 --> 0:32:38.756
<v Speaker 1>we still didn't know who the Democratic nominee was going

0:32:38.836 --> 0:32:41.476
<v Speaker 1>to be, and it was still conceivable that Ford could win.

0:32:41.556 --> 0:32:43.396
<v Speaker 1>And Ford didn't beat Carter, but he put up a

0:32:43.396 --> 0:32:48.196
<v Speaker 1>reasonable show considering that a Republican president had just been impeached.

0:32:48.756 --> 0:32:51.156
<v Speaker 1>Now the timing is different because we're so much later

0:32:51.236 --> 0:32:54.956
<v Speaker 1>in the cycle. So it seems very, as you say,

0:32:55.076 --> 0:32:58.116
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine the Republicans thinking we removed Trump and

0:32:58.156 --> 0:33:01.356
<v Speaker 1>then we go on to win the election. So what's

0:33:01.396 --> 0:33:04.836
<v Speaker 1>the scenario where things could genuinely So this isn't probably

0:33:04.836 --> 0:33:07.476
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat unsatisfying answer, but I do think that when

0:33:08.516 --> 0:33:11.716
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of regimes, if I may say that, crumble,

0:33:12.076 --> 0:33:15.716
<v Speaker 1>they crumble instantly. They don't crumble bit by bit. So

0:33:15.796 --> 0:33:17.996
<v Speaker 1>what I don't think we're going to see happen is

0:33:18.596 --> 0:33:21.836
<v Speaker 1>Republican senators coming out in onesie twosies saying, you know,

0:33:22.436 --> 0:33:25.476
<v Speaker 1>other than maybe Mitt Romney, you know, saying I disapprove

0:33:25.516 --> 0:33:28.276
<v Speaker 1>of this. I think that there would have to be

0:33:28.396 --> 0:33:30.556
<v Speaker 1>in one fell swoop, in one fell swoop, But what's

0:33:30.556 --> 0:33:32.396
<v Speaker 1>the swoop? What do we need to hear? I mean,

0:33:32.556 --> 0:33:34.716
<v Speaker 1>let's imagine that one of these calls, or maybe on

0:33:34.756 --> 0:33:37.516
<v Speaker 1>this tape, we find out that the president literally said,

0:33:37.636 --> 0:33:40.876
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quo, you do this, I do this? Would

0:33:40.876 --> 0:33:42.916
<v Speaker 1>that do it? I would like to think the answer

0:33:42.956 --> 0:33:45.356
<v Speaker 1>to that is yes. But I honestly don't know what

0:33:45.476 --> 0:33:47.636
<v Speaker 1>else could what else could could bring us to that

0:33:47.676 --> 0:33:50.516
<v Speaker 1>point of collapse, just some out of the blue new

0:33:50.596 --> 0:33:52.796
<v Speaker 1>factory that comes out. I mean, you know one thing

0:33:52.796 --> 0:33:54.276
<v Speaker 1>that makes me think there could be something like this

0:33:54.316 --> 0:33:56.596
<v Speaker 1>out there is looking at how Donald Trump is reacting

0:33:56.636 --> 0:34:00.276
<v Speaker 1>in real time to this inquiry. He doesn't seem like

0:34:00.316 --> 0:34:03.196
<v Speaker 1>he's unrattled. Of course, he's escalating his rhetoric. You would

0:34:03.196 --> 0:34:07.316
<v Speaker 1>have expected that under all circumstances. But he seems unhinges

0:34:07.356 --> 0:34:08.956
<v Speaker 1>in a word we can really use because he's often

0:34:09.236 --> 0:34:12.076
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric like this. But the way he's kind of lashing

0:34:12.116 --> 0:34:16.276
<v Speaker 1>out in this non planned instinctive and it seems to

0:34:16.316 --> 0:34:19.036
<v Speaker 1>me kind of threatened way, does make me wonder if

0:34:19.116 --> 0:34:22.716
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that he's in trouble here. I agree, and

0:34:22.756 --> 0:34:26.756
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe that what causes the damn to break is

0:34:27.636 --> 0:34:30.396
<v Speaker 1>a sense that he's out of control. I mean, is

0:34:30.436 --> 0:34:32.276
<v Speaker 1>there something that he could do, maybe not even an

0:34:32.316 --> 0:34:34.716
<v Speaker 1>unknown fact, but a thing yet to happen, you know,

0:34:34.836 --> 0:34:37.916
<v Speaker 1>he launches a war against Iran or something. He's not

0:34:37.916 --> 0:34:39.956
<v Speaker 1>going to do that in what seems like a transparent

0:34:39.996 --> 0:34:42.956
<v Speaker 1>effort to change the subject that horrifies people. I mean,

0:34:42.956 --> 0:34:44.876
<v Speaker 1>we think of the Wag the Dog, Snarah. That's a

0:34:44.916 --> 0:34:48.036
<v Speaker 1>movie called Wag the Dog. And then Bill Clinton, in

0:34:48.076 --> 0:34:51.636
<v Speaker 1>the middle of his impeachment, actually did commence the bombing

0:34:51.836 --> 0:34:55.276
<v Speaker 1>of Serbia over a Cusso bombing of Serbia over a

0:34:55.316 --> 0:34:58.996
<v Speaker 1>cussovo and that wasn't enough to get him removed from office.

0:34:59.196 --> 0:35:00.836
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I don't think that a war would

0:35:00.876 --> 0:35:02.436
<v Speaker 1>would do it. And I also don't think don Trump

0:35:02.476 --> 0:35:05.236
<v Speaker 1>wants to go to war, and it's nothing. On Twitter.

0:35:05.356 --> 0:35:08.556
<v Speaker 1>He could tweet literally anything and it will not suffice

0:35:08.556 --> 0:35:11.796
<v Speaker 1>to get him removed by Republicans. It does seem that way, Okay,

0:35:11.836 --> 0:35:15.036
<v Speaker 1>So we think that we're hard pressed to come up

0:35:15.036 --> 0:35:18.236
<v Speaker 1>with a scenario where Trump would appear to be so

0:35:18.276 --> 0:35:20.436
<v Speaker 1>far over the edge that he would be removed. I

0:35:20.436 --> 0:35:22.116
<v Speaker 1>just want to add a little footnote here before I

0:35:22.116 --> 0:35:24.316
<v Speaker 1>turn to the grand question of what history is going

0:35:24.356 --> 0:35:26.876
<v Speaker 1>to say about all of this, And that little footnote

0:35:26.996 --> 0:35:30.836
<v Speaker 1>is it's quirky, but it's kind of interesting. In principle,

0:35:30.876 --> 0:35:33.796
<v Speaker 1>there is a scenario where Trump could be impeached and

0:35:33.916 --> 0:35:38.316
<v Speaker 1>removed and still run for reelection and win and become

0:35:38.356 --> 0:35:41.596
<v Speaker 1>president again. And the reason for that is a constitutional quirk.

0:35:41.796 --> 0:35:43.916
<v Speaker 1>So in the clause of the Constitution that says what

0:35:43.996 --> 0:35:46.396
<v Speaker 1>happens if you're impeached, it says there's two things that

0:35:46.436 --> 0:35:49.996
<v Speaker 1>can happen to you. You can be removed and you

0:35:50.036 --> 0:35:53.116
<v Speaker 1>can be disqualified from holding any office of trust under

0:35:53.116 --> 0:35:56.436
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Now, under traditional interpretation of impeachment, it's

0:35:56.476 --> 0:36:00.516
<v Speaker 1>not enough to be removed for the disqualification principle to

0:36:00.676 --> 0:36:04.036
<v Speaker 1>kick in. Rather, Congress has to do two things. That's

0:36:04.076 --> 0:36:06.276
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate has to both vote to remove you

0:36:06.636 --> 0:36:10.036
<v Speaker 1>and separately vote to disqualify you, and almost all cases

0:36:10.036 --> 0:36:11.996
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment they only do the former. There actually are

0:36:12.036 --> 0:36:15.436
<v Speaker 1>a few cases where they've done both, but if they don't,

0:36:15.756 --> 0:36:17.516
<v Speaker 1>you can get back involved, and so, in fact there

0:36:17.596 --> 0:36:21.036
<v Speaker 1>is I was amazed to discover this. A sitting representative

0:36:21.076 --> 0:36:22.516
<v Speaker 1>in Congress right now, a member of the House of

0:36:22.556 --> 0:36:26.356
<v Speaker 1>Representatives who was a federal judge, was impeached and removed

0:36:26.396 --> 0:36:29.876
<v Speaker 1>by the Senate, ran for Congress, got elected to Congress,

0:36:29.916 --> 0:36:32.916
<v Speaker 1>and has been serving in Congress ever since. So Donald

0:36:32.916 --> 0:36:37.076
<v Speaker 1>Trump could, in theory, be impeached and removed, run and win.

0:36:37.756 --> 0:36:40.236
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a kind of far out scenario, but

0:36:40.276 --> 0:36:43.836
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem out of bounds to me. I have

0:36:43.996 --> 0:36:46.916
<v Speaker 1>to think that if we reach the point where Republicans

0:36:46.996 --> 0:36:48.876
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate are willing to vote to remove him

0:36:48.916 --> 0:36:51.436
<v Speaker 1>from office, the last thing they'll want is the nightmare

0:36:51.476 --> 0:36:53.476
<v Speaker 1>of him turning around and running again. So you think

0:36:53.516 --> 0:36:56.276
<v Speaker 1>they would actually then put in the disqualification thing for

0:36:56.316 --> 0:36:58.436
<v Speaker 1>their own sake, for their own sake, so he doesn't

0:36:58.436 --> 0:37:02.116
<v Speaker 1>come back after them. Yeah, I guess, I guess that's right. Okay,

0:37:02.636 --> 0:37:06.916
<v Speaker 1>the view of history for a long time. In this presidency,

0:37:07.716 --> 0:37:11.356
<v Speaker 1>there's been a debate why, a debate among Democrats saying,

0:37:12.076 --> 0:37:13.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, should we impeach or should we not impeach?

0:37:13.876 --> 0:37:15.636
<v Speaker 1>We've got enough evidence to impeach. It might be a

0:37:15.636 --> 0:37:18.956
<v Speaker 1>political mistakes. Weighed on Muller, a lot of shilly shalling

0:37:18.956 --> 0:37:23.796
<v Speaker 1>around this issue. Now things seem to have changed, and

0:37:24.196 --> 0:37:27.116
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi's answer, at least when she's spoken about it publicly,

0:37:27.196 --> 0:37:28.916
<v Speaker 1>is it's not that this is so much worse than

0:37:28.956 --> 0:37:32.196
<v Speaker 1>what Trump has done before. This is just clear and explainable.

0:37:32.876 --> 0:37:35.276
<v Speaker 1>When historians look back on this period and ask why

0:37:35.276 --> 0:37:38.076
<v Speaker 1>didn impeachment happen? Now, is that going to be a

0:37:38.116 --> 0:37:41.836
<v Speaker 1>sufficient answer for them. I suspect that the answer to

0:37:41.876 --> 0:37:43.836
<v Speaker 1>that will depend a lot on what happens in the

0:37:43.876 --> 0:37:47.956
<v Speaker 1>next year if Donald Trump is reelected, assuming he survives

0:37:47.956 --> 0:37:51.156
<v Speaker 1>this impeachment scandal and he gets reelected, which, by the way,

0:37:51.516 --> 0:37:53.596
<v Speaker 1>still the upshot of our conversation is that the most

0:37:53.636 --> 0:37:56.516
<v Speaker 1>probable event is that he survives by far, and that

0:37:56.556 --> 0:37:58.316
<v Speaker 1>there's a reasonable chance. I think we both agree that

0:37:58.356 --> 0:38:01.796
<v Speaker 1>he'll get reelected, correct, and if those things happen, I

0:38:01.956 --> 0:38:04.676
<v Speaker 1>think that this will be seen as you know, one

0:38:04.756 --> 0:38:07.356
<v Speaker 1>step in the process of the dismantling of the constitution,

0:38:08.116 --> 0:38:09.796
<v Speaker 1>But all of that will end on what he does

0:38:09.796 --> 0:38:12.036
<v Speaker 1>in his second term. I assume that it will be

0:38:12.076 --> 0:38:14.116
<v Speaker 1>even more outrageous things than he did in his first term,

0:38:14.116 --> 0:38:18.116
<v Speaker 1>because they'll have even fewer constraints then if however, because

0:38:18.156 --> 0:38:19.916
<v Speaker 1>he will have been impeached and it'll be like, I mean,

0:38:19.956 --> 0:38:21.996
<v Speaker 1>we know that the day after the Moll investigation was over,

0:38:22.196 --> 0:38:24.756
<v Speaker 1>he called Zelenski, So what's it going to be like

0:38:24.796 --> 0:38:26.716
<v Speaker 1>if he's been impeached and not removed, he's really going

0:38:26.796 --> 0:38:29.396
<v Speaker 1>to feel like and one reelection and one relection. Maybe

0:38:29.836 --> 0:38:32.876
<v Speaker 1>isn't hoping to serve another term after that, although who knows, right,

0:38:33.276 --> 0:38:36.036
<v Speaker 1>I think that at that point all bets are off,

0:38:36.436 --> 0:38:39.556
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will then become a step in

0:38:39.596 --> 0:38:43.596
<v Speaker 1>the process of the dismantling of what had been our

0:38:43.636 --> 0:38:46.676
<v Speaker 1>system of constitutional government. Maybe maybe on a path to

0:38:46.676 --> 0:38:48.596
<v Speaker 1>some other system, but it's not gonna be the same system.

0:38:48.796 --> 0:38:51.836
<v Speaker 1>So here's a big question in that story, that incredibly

0:38:51.916 --> 0:38:55.796
<v Speaker 1>depressing story. Is it good or bad that the Democrats

0:38:56.036 --> 0:38:58.956
<v Speaker 1>tried via impeachments only put a hypothesis to you. The

0:38:59.076 --> 0:39:02.036
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis would be this, you know, someday we're going to

0:39:02.116 --> 0:39:04.836
<v Speaker 1>die and go to Valhalla and you know, meet James

0:39:04.836 --> 0:39:07.636
<v Speaker 1>Madison and Alexander Hamilton, or at least in my fantasy world,

0:39:07.636 --> 0:39:09.476
<v Speaker 1>that's where I go, and that's my first meeting I

0:39:09.556 --> 0:39:12.156
<v Speaker 1>take when I get to Valhalla, and you know, they're

0:39:12.156 --> 0:39:15.476
<v Speaker 1>going to say, we told you this could happen. You know,

0:39:15.556 --> 0:39:17.636
<v Speaker 1>we told you that foreign powers would seek to be

0:39:17.676 --> 0:39:20.676
<v Speaker 1>in the ascendant, and we told you that we created

0:39:20.676 --> 0:39:23.796
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment proceeding for this circumstance. What did you do?

0:39:24.036 --> 0:39:25.876
<v Speaker 1>You know, what did you take action? And I have

0:39:25.956 --> 0:39:29.596
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis that even if the Democrats can't remove Trump,

0:39:30.356 --> 0:39:34.276
<v Speaker 1>that they might be justified in going forward now, just

0:39:34.356 --> 0:39:36.116
<v Speaker 1>so that they can say, in front of the judgment

0:39:36.156 --> 0:39:40.036
<v Speaker 1>of history, we tried. We tried to save the republic.

0:39:40.196 --> 0:39:43.956
<v Speaker 1>We had a present who openly abused power. We tried

0:39:43.996 --> 0:39:47.356
<v Speaker 1>to vote him out. Okay, the people weren't with us,

0:39:47.636 --> 0:39:49.676
<v Speaker 1>and as the founding fathers should be the first to acknowledge,

0:39:49.716 --> 0:39:51.796
<v Speaker 1>if the people lack political virtue, it is the end

0:39:51.836 --> 0:39:53.916
<v Speaker 1>of the republic. But can't there's no fix to that one.

0:39:54.716 --> 0:39:57.956
<v Speaker 1>The alternati view would be, no, you know, don't do something.

0:39:57.996 --> 0:39:59.476
<v Speaker 1>It's going to make it worse for the Republic. We're

0:39:59.516 --> 0:40:01.356
<v Speaker 1>better off not trying, because then we'll have a Trump

0:40:01.396 --> 0:40:03.916
<v Speaker 1>who's empowered by the failure of impeachment. And we shouldn't

0:40:03.916 --> 0:40:06.556
<v Speaker 1>have even done that. We should think only about practical consequences,

0:40:06.716 --> 0:40:08.916
<v Speaker 1>not about the judgment of history. Where do you come

0:40:08.956 --> 0:40:12.316
<v Speaker 1>down on that debate. I think we reached the judgment

0:40:12.316 --> 0:40:15.196
<v Speaker 1>of history point. But I also think that part of

0:40:15.236 --> 0:40:18.716
<v Speaker 1>what informed Pelosi up till now was fear of the

0:40:18.716 --> 0:40:21.396
<v Speaker 1>Clinton situation, which is that he gets impeached and gets

0:40:21.436 --> 0:40:23.796
<v Speaker 1>more popular. At least that's how it's remembered. I don't

0:40:23.796 --> 0:40:25.756
<v Speaker 1>think it's perfectly clear that's what actually happened, but that's

0:40:25.756 --> 0:40:29.156
<v Speaker 1>certainly how it's remembered. I think for a bunch of

0:40:29.196 --> 0:40:33.556
<v Speaker 1>reasons that position became untenable, mostly because this was such

0:40:33.596 --> 0:40:36.236
<v Speaker 1>a clear slap in the face, and it particularly what

0:40:36.276 --> 0:40:39.636
<v Speaker 1>he's accused of doing is attempting to influence the next election.

0:40:40.156 --> 0:40:41.796
<v Speaker 1>If you thought the only way to get him out

0:40:41.796 --> 0:40:44.476
<v Speaker 1>of office is by voting him out of office, you

0:40:44.516 --> 0:40:47.116
<v Speaker 1>can't then let him try to put his finger on

0:40:47.156 --> 0:40:49.756
<v Speaker 1>the scales to prevent that very thing from happening. So

0:40:49.756 --> 0:40:52.076
<v Speaker 1>it's really the perfect storm on that view. I mean,

0:40:52.196 --> 0:40:53.796
<v Speaker 1>that's a good answer. It says, it's not just that

0:40:53.836 --> 0:40:56.916
<v Speaker 1>this is clearer, it's that everything else had happened in

0:40:56.956 --> 0:41:00.276
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, and that election was over because although the

0:41:00.316 --> 0:41:03.356
<v Speaker 1>Democrats won, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, Trump won

0:41:03.396 --> 0:41:06.276
<v Speaker 1>the election. But if you're talking about twenty twenty, if

0:41:06.276 --> 0:41:09.436
<v Speaker 1>the conduct that's alleged is trying to subvert the twenty election,

0:41:09.556 --> 0:41:12.556
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats had to act because it's forward looking, and

0:41:12.636 --> 0:41:15.076
<v Speaker 1>what's the alternative if you don't act now. I don't

0:41:15.076 --> 0:41:17.476
<v Speaker 1>know that it will make that much difference in terms

0:41:17.476 --> 0:41:20.596
<v Speaker 1>of empowering Trump once it comes out that he's trying

0:41:20.596 --> 0:41:22.676
<v Speaker 1>to influence the twenty twenty election, which it has come

0:41:22.716 --> 0:41:25.436
<v Speaker 1>out of this correct for the Democrats to do nothing

0:41:25.716 --> 0:41:28.876
<v Speaker 1>also says the field is yours, do whatever you want,

0:41:28.996 --> 0:41:31.636
<v Speaker 1>Although the other thing it could be saying is we've

0:41:31.676 --> 0:41:33.996
<v Speaker 1>told the public about this, The public knows about it,

0:41:34.276 --> 0:41:35.876
<v Speaker 1>and now we're going to vote it out. You know,

0:41:35.916 --> 0:41:38.556
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to actually see who wins the election.

0:41:38.956 --> 0:41:40.796
<v Speaker 1>And you could see that argument, you know, put that

0:41:40.836 --> 0:41:42.996
<v Speaker 1>was the Polosi argument up until a few weeks ago.

0:41:43.356 --> 0:41:46.116
<v Speaker 1>Put all the eggs in the twenty twenty basket. Say

0:41:46.116 --> 0:41:48.996
<v Speaker 1>to the electorate, the president's trying to con you, The

0:41:49.036 --> 0:41:50.796
<v Speaker 1>president's trying to play you. The president's trying to get

0:41:50.836 --> 0:41:53.916
<v Speaker 1>help from Ukraine to influence you. You know, resist that influence.

0:41:53.916 --> 0:41:55.596
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose you can do that va impeachment, But

0:41:55.636 --> 0:41:58.516
<v Speaker 1>you could also do that not via impeachment. Yes, but

0:41:58.596 --> 0:42:00.716
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what we don't know, So what else

0:42:00.796 --> 0:42:03.036
<v Speaker 1>is he doing? Right? What if he's also making a

0:42:03.076 --> 0:42:05.196
<v Speaker 1>side deal with the Russians to actually hack the electoral

0:42:05.196 --> 0:42:08.316
<v Speaker 1>equipment and change the votes. Not everything can be resisted.

0:42:08.716 --> 0:42:12.196
<v Speaker 1>But now, I mean, you're right, but that to me

0:42:12.676 --> 0:42:15.036
<v Speaker 1>heads off in the direction of conspiracy. Not that the

0:42:15.076 --> 0:42:17.716
<v Speaker 1>Russians might not try to do that, that's improbable, but

0:42:17.836 --> 0:42:20.916
<v Speaker 1>not totally conspiratorial, but rather that the Trump emmustician would

0:42:20.916 --> 0:42:23.796
<v Speaker 1>collude in that, because as we know, when it came

0:42:23.836 --> 0:42:26.916
<v Speaker 1>to the last election, they came very close to the

0:42:26.996 --> 0:42:30.196
<v Speaker 1>line of colluding with the Russians, but they didn't. No, no,

0:42:30.236 --> 0:42:32.196
<v Speaker 1>we don't know that. What we know is that there

0:42:32.236 --> 0:42:34.876
<v Speaker 1>was never evidence that they actually colluded. What we have

0:42:34.996 --> 0:42:38.116
<v Speaker 1>this time that's different is actual evidence of collusion, direct

0:42:38.156 --> 0:42:40.996
<v Speaker 1>evidence of collusion. Right, we still don't know what we

0:42:40.996 --> 0:42:43.636
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and I'm not saying we have now as

0:42:43.676 --> 0:42:47.036
<v Speaker 1>evidence of attempted collusion, all right, but in a much

0:42:47.196 --> 0:42:50.796
<v Speaker 1>clearer way than we had with the last election. Right.

0:42:50.996 --> 0:42:53.076
<v Speaker 1>If a phone call like this had come up about

0:42:53.116 --> 0:42:56.356
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen with Putin, where would we be. I think

0:42:56.356 --> 0:42:58.716
<v Speaker 1>that Muller's report would read very differently if there were

0:42:58.796 --> 0:43:02.236
<v Speaker 1>the transcript of a phone call in which Trump laid

0:43:02.236 --> 0:43:05.036
<v Speaker 1>out this same type of deal with Putin. So when

0:43:05.196 --> 0:43:09.956
<v Speaker 1>we meet Madison in Hamilton, they're going to say what

0:43:10.116 --> 0:43:12.876
<v Speaker 1>they're going to say. Okay, good that you tried. But

0:43:12.996 --> 0:43:15.956
<v Speaker 1>in the end it's all about the people, you know,

0:43:16.316 --> 0:43:19.076
<v Speaker 1>will the people be convinced? And in the end, I

0:43:19.076 --> 0:43:21.996
<v Speaker 1>think that measurement will come less from the impeachment process

0:43:22.036 --> 0:43:24.156
<v Speaker 1>than from the twenty twenty election. I mean, in some sense,

0:43:24.196 --> 0:43:25.876
<v Speaker 1>what I hear you saying, and I think maybe I

0:43:25.916 --> 0:43:27.676
<v Speaker 1>agree with this, is that the twenty twenty election is

0:43:27.716 --> 0:43:30.316
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important in the history of the Republic,

0:43:30.796 --> 0:43:33.836
<v Speaker 1>not so much because of Republican versus Democrat, or because

0:43:33.876 --> 0:43:36.356
<v Speaker 1>of the future of the country with respect any given policy,

0:43:36.956 --> 0:43:39.356
<v Speaker 1>as because it will be the judgment of history on

0:43:39.396 --> 0:43:43.236
<v Speaker 1>how much a president can subvert the Constitution openly and

0:43:43.836 --> 0:43:47.396
<v Speaker 1>still have a shot at getting reelected. I believe that's true.

0:43:47.476 --> 0:43:50.476
<v Speaker 1>But let's assume for the moment that the Democrats win

0:43:50.996 --> 0:43:54.036
<v Speaker 1>the next election. I think there's another way in which

0:43:54.076 --> 0:43:57.636
<v Speaker 1>this fight may yet reverberate back that is worth at

0:43:57.676 --> 0:44:01.556
<v Speaker 1>least pondering. Which is the moment that happens. Let's assume

0:44:01.556 --> 0:44:04.476
<v Speaker 1>that two years later, as has become the pattern, Republicans

0:44:04.516 --> 0:44:07.076
<v Speaker 1>regain control of the House or the Senate. If they

0:44:07.076 --> 0:44:10.196
<v Speaker 1>don't already have control, do they immediately turn around and

0:44:10.236 --> 0:44:13.356
<v Speaker 1>impeach the Democratic president? And I think the answer to

0:44:13.436 --> 0:44:15.996
<v Speaker 1>that may end up being yes, because this will be

0:44:16.036 --> 0:44:19.716
<v Speaker 1>seen on the right as the coup that Trump says

0:44:19.716 --> 0:44:23.116
<v Speaker 1>it is, and I worry that. I don't think there's

0:44:23.116 --> 0:44:24.916
<v Speaker 1>a way around this problem. But I think that we

0:44:24.956 --> 0:44:27.516
<v Speaker 1>have to be mindful of the fact that this is

0:44:27.556 --> 0:44:30.596
<v Speaker 1>going to feel like we are now normalizing. To some

0:44:30.956 --> 0:44:33.956
<v Speaker 1>we are normalizing the impeachment process to throw out a

0:44:33.996 --> 0:44:37.636
<v Speaker 1>president we do not like that. Already Republicans flirted with

0:44:37.676 --> 0:44:40.476
<v Speaker 1>that with Obama but never actually got there. They talked

0:44:40.476 --> 0:44:42.756
<v Speaker 1>about impeaching Obama, though they didn't have any grounds and

0:44:42.756 --> 0:44:45.516
<v Speaker 1>were never able to produce any. I wonder whether or

0:44:45.596 --> 0:44:47.796
<v Speaker 1>not they will be as restrained, if I could even

0:44:47.876 --> 0:44:50.036
<v Speaker 1>use that word, as they were with Obama, with the

0:44:50.076 --> 0:44:52.556
<v Speaker 1>next Democratic president. So in that sense, we didn't dodge

0:44:52.596 --> 0:44:55.236
<v Speaker 1>the bullet when after Bill Clinton's impeachment, when many people

0:44:55.276 --> 0:44:57.676
<v Speaker 1>said the same thing, you know, next the Democrats are

0:44:57.676 --> 0:44:59.036
<v Speaker 1>going to do it, and then the Republicans will do it.

0:44:59.076 --> 0:45:01.276
<v Speaker 1>But it didn't happen right away. But the argument would

0:45:01.276 --> 0:45:04.276
<v Speaker 1>be that an historical perspective, twenty years later we did

0:45:04.356 --> 0:45:08.236
<v Speaker 1>have another impeachment, and since it had been since eighteen

0:45:08.316 --> 0:45:10.116
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight when they came around to it in nineteen

0:45:10.196 --> 0:45:12.876
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, it's a long stretch of time, one hundred

0:45:12.916 --> 0:45:15.356
<v Speaker 1>and thirty years. This time it only took twenty and

0:45:15.396 --> 0:45:17.636
<v Speaker 1>then you can imagine that it'll take ten and five

0:45:17.676 --> 0:45:20.356
<v Speaker 1>and then we could enter into a world of constant impeachments.

0:45:20.716 --> 0:45:24.956
<v Speaker 1>And that is not the world that the Framers anticipated. Well,

0:45:25.076 --> 0:45:27.316
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to find all that out, and in

0:45:27.356 --> 0:45:31.236
<v Speaker 1>this extremely fascinating and challenging period of time, all we

0:45:31.356 --> 0:45:34.756
<v Speaker 1>can do is try to understand what the Constitution requires,

0:45:34.956 --> 0:45:37.956
<v Speaker 1>try to live in some accordance with its dictates, and

0:45:38.396 --> 0:45:40.876
<v Speaker 1>keep on watching our news feeds and find out what

0:45:40.916 --> 0:45:44.796
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary revelations will come next set. Thank you for clarifying

0:45:44.836 --> 0:45:46.996
<v Speaker 1>all this and talking it through with me. I feel

0:45:46.996 --> 0:45:51.236
<v Speaker 1>like I'm a little more pessimistic about the inevitability of

0:45:51.276 --> 0:45:53.716
<v Speaker 1>certain events after talking to than I was when I started.

0:45:53.756 --> 0:45:55.476
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like I'm enlightened with respect of what

0:45:55.636 --> 0:46:04.836
<v Speaker 1>may happen. So thank you very much. And now our

0:46:04.876 --> 0:46:15.596
<v Speaker 1>sound of the week, Why that was the sound of

0:46:15.756 --> 0:46:20.076
<v Speaker 1>chaos in Hong Kong, a sound that heralds a genuine

0:46:20.196 --> 0:46:23.796
<v Speaker 1>split screen for the government of the People's Republic of China.

0:46:23.916 --> 0:46:26.316
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, as you just heard, Hong Kong

0:46:26.396 --> 0:46:28.716
<v Speaker 1>is in the midst of the worst protests that it's

0:46:28.756 --> 0:46:32.956
<v Speaker 1>seen in the modern historical era, direct challenges to the

0:46:32.996 --> 0:46:36.676
<v Speaker 1>authority of mainland China on the island. And yet at

0:46:36.676 --> 0:46:40.556
<v Speaker 1>the same exact time in Beijing, the government of China

0:46:40.716 --> 0:46:45.076
<v Speaker 1>celebrated the seventieth anniversary of the People's Republic and in effect,

0:46:45.356 --> 0:46:48.276
<v Speaker 1>the victory of the Communist Party in the long historical

0:46:48.356 --> 0:46:51.556
<v Speaker 1>process of bringing China into the modern era and turning

0:46:51.556 --> 0:46:55.756
<v Speaker 1>it into a major global power. A centerpiece of that

0:46:55.876 --> 0:47:03.796
<v Speaker 1>celebration was a rather extraordinary military parade. Underwater vehicle after

0:47:03.916 --> 0:47:10.036
<v Speaker 1>underwater vehicle innovative unmanned drone after unmanneddrone paraded through the

0:47:10.036 --> 0:47:13.476
<v Speaker 1>streets of Beijing, signaling to the world that China was

0:47:13.516 --> 0:47:16.916
<v Speaker 1>not merely one of the most significant economies in the world,

0:47:17.236 --> 0:47:20.956
<v Speaker 1>not merely enmeshed in an increasing and extending set of

0:47:20.996 --> 0:47:25.996
<v Speaker 1>relationships with economic partners, but increasingly is emerging as the

0:47:25.996 --> 0:47:31.396
<v Speaker 1>world's second genuine superpower, not yet directly competing with the

0:47:31.476 --> 0:47:34.636
<v Speaker 1>United States globally, but increasingly capable of doing so, and

0:47:34.796 --> 0:47:38.156
<v Speaker 1>certainly capable of competing with the United States in the

0:47:38.276 --> 0:47:42.356
<v Speaker 1>region around China itself in Asia. So what are we

0:47:42.476 --> 0:47:46.796
<v Speaker 1>to make of this extraordinary split screen that faces China.

0:47:46.996 --> 0:47:49.636
<v Speaker 1>One way to think of it is that the Hong

0:47:49.716 --> 0:47:53.036
<v Speaker 1>Kong protests are in fact, in historical terms, more of

0:47:53.076 --> 0:47:55.796
<v Speaker 1>a blip in the rise of China than they are

0:47:56.036 --> 0:47:57.996
<v Speaker 1>what most people in the West have taken them to be,

0:47:58.316 --> 0:48:02.796
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that China is fundamentally an autocracy. Seen from

0:48:02.796 --> 0:48:07.076
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of the longer swath of history, China's rise

0:48:07.236 --> 0:48:11.756
<v Speaker 1>is now an accomplished fact. There's no going back. Any

0:48:11.836 --> 0:48:16.196
<v Speaker 1>goal by the United States to limit, cabin or contain

0:48:16.356 --> 0:48:18.356
<v Speaker 1>China is going to have to take place against the

0:48:18.396 --> 0:48:25.956
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of China's tremendous economic growth and China's tremendous military improvements.

0:48:26.316 --> 0:48:29.196
<v Speaker 1>That means that we're increasingly moving to a world that

0:48:29.316 --> 0:48:32.116
<v Speaker 1>is not unipolar, in which there is a single superpower,

0:48:32.196 --> 0:48:34.476
<v Speaker 1>as the French would sometimes put it hyperpower in the

0:48:34.556 --> 0:48:37.276
<v Speaker 1>United States, but rather something a little bit closer to

0:48:37.316 --> 0:48:39.196
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in the Cold War when there were

0:48:39.196 --> 0:48:43.356
<v Speaker 1>two competing powers. Indeed, that's what made me, already almost

0:48:43.356 --> 0:48:45.796
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, think that we're entering a period not

0:48:45.916 --> 0:48:48.276
<v Speaker 1>of Cold War but of cool war between the United

0:48:48.276 --> 0:48:52.956
<v Speaker 1>States and China. The Hong Kong protests, though they symbolize

0:48:52.996 --> 0:48:57.196
<v Speaker 1>and remind us the China's government is autocratic, don't fundamentally

0:48:57.436 --> 0:49:02.476
<v Speaker 1>undercut that geopolitical analysis. The island of Hong Kong may

0:49:02.516 --> 0:49:04.916
<v Speaker 1>be full of unrest, but that is not sufficient to

0:49:05.036 --> 0:49:08.756
<v Speaker 1>derail China. I think that when historians look back on

0:49:08.756 --> 0:49:12.796
<v Speaker 1>the seb anniversary, that's the take they're more likely to have. Yet,

0:49:12.796 --> 0:49:16.196
<v Speaker 1>there is an important message associated with the realities of

0:49:16.236 --> 0:49:18.836
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Hong Kong, and it is the reminder

0:49:18.916 --> 0:49:22.996
<v Speaker 1>to China's leaders, and particular to Shijinping, that just because

0:49:23.036 --> 0:49:27.156
<v Speaker 1>you're a superpower doesn't mean every part of your increasing

0:49:27.196 --> 0:49:32.036
<v Speaker 1>empire will do what you want. That's a lesson that

0:49:32.116 --> 0:49:33.756
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have to think about when you're in

0:49:33.796 --> 0:49:36.116
<v Speaker 1>the process of rising, but you do have to think

0:49:36.116 --> 0:49:39.276
<v Speaker 1>about when you're in the process of expanding. There will

0:49:39.276 --> 0:49:42.156
<v Speaker 1>be global actors, including actors who are just a bunch

0:49:42.196 --> 0:49:44.916
<v Speaker 1>of teenagers in a place like Hong Kong, the no

0:49:45.036 --> 0:49:50.276
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical significance, who nevertheless are capable of interfering and blocking

0:49:50.276 --> 0:49:53.796
<v Speaker 1>you from doing what you want, and who can enable

0:49:53.876 --> 0:49:57.116
<v Speaker 1>you not to have the global feel good story that

0:49:57.156 --> 0:50:00.356
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to accomplish. That is a message that we

0:50:00.436 --> 0:50:03.956
<v Speaker 1>need to remember because it's a reminder that China's rise

0:50:04.396 --> 0:50:07.716
<v Speaker 1>is interwoven with the question of how China governs itself.

0:50:08.396 --> 0:50:11.036
<v Speaker 1>Through much of the period of its rise, China was

0:50:11.076 --> 0:50:15.676
<v Speaker 1>governed by a broad elite of Chinese communist power elders

0:50:15.916 --> 0:50:20.356
<v Speaker 1>who shared power amongst themselves and indeed alternated power in

0:50:20.396 --> 0:50:25.476
<v Speaker 1>ten year cycles. They do not have that structure anymore today.

0:50:25.516 --> 0:50:29.436
<v Speaker 1>Shijunping has emerged as the single dominant leader of China,

0:50:29.796 --> 0:50:32.116
<v Speaker 1>more on the model of Mao than on the model

0:50:32.156 --> 0:50:35.556
<v Speaker 1>of those who immediately preceded him. If you run the

0:50:35.596 --> 0:50:39.556
<v Speaker 1>world that way, there's no guarantee that you can sustain

0:50:39.916 --> 0:50:43.276
<v Speaker 1>and pass along the structures of authority over the long term.

0:50:43.916 --> 0:50:47.236
<v Speaker 1>Dictatorship is smoother in a ten or twenty or even

0:50:47.356 --> 0:50:50.596
<v Speaker 1>thirty year way, but dictatorship is not smoother when it

0:50:50.636 --> 0:50:54.556
<v Speaker 1>comes to moments of transition, because again, the unruly public

0:50:54.796 --> 0:50:57.596
<v Speaker 1>may get in the way of the transitions that you want.

0:50:57.956 --> 0:51:01.436
<v Speaker 1>The genuine challenge that faces China going forward is to

0:51:01.476 --> 0:51:06.796
<v Speaker 1>consolidate and stabilize its form of government. Shijinping has actually

0:51:06.876 --> 0:51:11.716
<v Speaker 1>moved China backwards with respect to transitions from one generation

0:51:11.836 --> 0:51:15.116
<v Speaker 1>of government to another. Sure, he's got the capacity to

0:51:15.156 --> 0:51:18.436
<v Speaker 1>reduce corruption, which is a genuine systemic risk to the

0:51:18.436 --> 0:51:22.596
<v Speaker 1>People's Republic, Yet in doing so, by consolidating power, he's

0:51:22.716 --> 0:51:27.156
<v Speaker 1>opened himself to the possibility that the small voices at

0:51:27.156 --> 0:51:31.036
<v Speaker 1>the periphery of his empire, and it is increasingly an empire,

0:51:31.436 --> 0:51:35.916
<v Speaker 1>can interfere with the smooth operation that he actually wants.

0:51:36.316 --> 0:51:39.636
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that's the takeaway of the split screen.

0:51:44.276 --> 0:51:47.236
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our

0:51:47.236 --> 0:51:50.316
<v Speaker 1>producer is Lydia Jane Coott, with engineering by Jason Gambrell.

0:51:50.516 --> 0:51:54.276
<v Speaker 1>And Jason Rostkowski. Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme

0:51:54.356 --> 0:51:57.156
<v Speaker 1>music is composed by Luis Gera special thanks to the

0:51:57.156 --> 0:52:01.276
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weisberg and Mia Lobel. I'm

0:52:01.316 --> 0:52:04.596
<v Speaker 1>Noah Feldman. You can follow me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman.

0:52:04.956 --> 0:52:06.316
<v Speaker 1>This is deep background