WEBVTT - House Passes Permanent Daylight Saving Time; Science Says Not So Fast! 

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Hate everybody.

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>We can't agree on anything in this country, including what

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 2>time it is. Welcome everybody that's robes on TJ Daylight

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Saving time the way we do it now, you're forward

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>or against it?

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you want them to change this?

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Before reading all the research.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That you've provided here, There you go.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>My answer has always been, yes, I get depressed when

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>we have to turn the clocks back. Yes, I get

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 3>an extra hour of sleep, but that doesn't in any

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 3>way compensate for the fact that I hate when it

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>gets dark at four point fifteen here in New York

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>City in the winter time. It's oof. That takes a

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>toll on me mentally.

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, like everybody else, they hate it because of the moment,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the moment being when you switch the clocks. You don't

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 2>have a problem when they switch the clocks. When we

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>spring forward, that doesn't mess you up necessarily.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, because it stays lighter longer, which makes me happy.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>When it gets darker early, it makes me sad.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know you know this better than anybody. But

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the weather is not in control of your mood.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 3>You tell me this, all right, but it does it.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>They have been the mood when things get dark at

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 3>four fifteen.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>It's personal to everybody and that's the issue, and we're

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to make it uniform for the whole country and

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 2>it's difficult, but yes, it's talked to, being talked about

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>right now, it's being talked about again. It's talked about

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty much every year. This happens pretty much every year,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and there's some bills that have been sitting in Congress

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>for years and years. They introduce it and they want

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of this bi annual thing we do,

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 2>which is switch the clocks. So they want us to

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>all be on what as we sit here, we're currently

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 2>on daylight saving time, which means we put the clocks.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Forward, yes, in the springtime.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>So the way they are right now, a bill that's

0:01:55.040 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>been now approved in Congress would keep the time as

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 2>it is and we'd never switch back.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And here we are.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>How's that sounding amazing? And by the way, it was

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>overwhelmingly approved in the House wheep this time. However, it

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean that's where we're headed, because why would we

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>ever expect the House and the Senate to agree on anything.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is when they should agree on. This is

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>what we should have a debate about. During war maybe not.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem of all.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>That was going on and we had a shut down,

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>they can get this done priorities.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But yes, it is.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>They bring it up every year, but it's a big

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>deal now, Rose because yes, not only did it get

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>brought up.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It has passed the house robes.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 2>It's one step away from possibly this country going to

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a full time daylight saving time, no more switching.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>And the President has already said he absolutely will give

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>his stamp of approval. In fact, he has been encouraging.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I believe he started making comments about this as early

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>as May of this year, twenty twenty six, and was

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of saying, you're an idiot if you don't want

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 3>more sunshine. I mean you paraphrasing a little bit. Is that?

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you find that's an oprah simplification of what's happening.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>But that's the argument that most people make. This is stupid.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Why are we doing this? It throws us off, It

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 2>throws our bodies off.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 3>It does get a lot easier now in current times

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>where my phone automatically updates and a lot of our

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>electronics automatically update. But I have to tell you, I

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>remember being so annoyed. In fact, we do have some

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 3>manual clocks. I'm like, for the love of God, twice

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 3>a year I have to change the yes and you

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>end up doing most of it. But the few times

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>I've had to do it, yeah, that's I am put out.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 2>So what I'm saying, what you're saying is right. It

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>is inconvenient. It's an annoyance. We have to go through

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>it every year. And yes, it's difficult to all of

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>a sudden change your clock, your body clock to all

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, I gotta get up an hour early

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>or hour late. Things get thrown off that I buy.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>The problem here is we're having the wrong argument. I

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't even realize that, but it's the wrong argument. We're

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>arguing over whether or not we should go to daylight

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 2>saving time full time. The argument should be we should

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 2>absolutely get rid of the way we're doing it now

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>doing it the switch is what everybody kind of agrees

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>is wrong.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the annoying part that's wrong. And especially I will

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>say this now that my kids are older, it doesn't

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 3>affect me. But when my kids were younger, that one

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 3>hour through the whole schedule into Mayhem, I couldn't believe

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>how much a baby or a toddler got thrown from

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 3>one hour from a one hour change, and it really

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 3>was disruptive for a couple weeks until your child gets

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>into a new rhythm, and twice a year you have

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to go through this. I remember that being an added

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 3>annoyance from birth, I think from birth up until probably

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>even like like double digits. It threw my kids off,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sure a lot of parents had that have

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 3>had or are having that same experience.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>What romes You bring up a very good point that

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get talked about enough in these debates. Your circadian rhythm.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's we're gonna talk about it here a little more later.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>But for kids, they don't have one. I know that

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>out when they're born. They don't have that internal clock.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>It develops over time. So if a kid trying to

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 2>develop an internal clock, you just took an hour away,

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 2>or you gave an hour twice a year, it's hell.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It is bad on kids, and that's exactly why, And.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>That means it's bad on parents, which affects almost everybody

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 3>in this country at some point in their lives.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Between your clocks and your kids. You really hate.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Daylist, Nay, I really do I've actually felt very passionate

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 3>about it for most of my life. I'm kind of

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 3>embarrassing to admit, but I have felt passionate about it.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>To the point I was shocked that we were bordering

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>on a relationship fight over daylight saving.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It was I didn't know you would that bad.

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>You actually told me that you like the switch. You

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>look forward to the switch. I have never heard anyone

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 3>say that before in my life.

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But I like the little gift you get.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I like the change. I like all of a sudden,

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>we just wake up one day and there's more light.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I like robes that we wake up one day we

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>get an extra hour of sleep.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I like the switch. I've become some way a customed

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>robes my entire life. This has been the case. Why

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to change it now?

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>The change has been constant, which is why you like it,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>because you're used to it, because.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>There is a rhythm to it. I am used to it.

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>My body is adjusted to it now. That's my thinking. Actually,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize there is science that backs me up.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying, why did you just search for the

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>science that validated your feelings?

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>No, normally, I would do that.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I did, just wanted to check, okay.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 2>I did not have to this time because it was

0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>just hitting me in the face.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>TJ, you are right, boom boom, Wow.

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>That's just a Monday or a Tuesday or a Wednesday.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>No, but this was interesting to hear.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>So do we have to explain this everybody, because sometimes

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a little difficult for me to understand daylight saving time.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I get them mixed up sometimes.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>So daylight saving time we set our clocks back one

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>hour in the colder months, we set our clocks ahead

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>one hour in the warmer months. So we're in it

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>now as of this recording, but it goes from March

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to November. Daylight saving time standard time is November to March.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Makes sense, so standard time, you turn the clock back

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>an hour, we get earlier sunrises and we get earlier sunsets.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>You don't like the earlier sunset part.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely cannot stand that. And I think it does

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>go back to my childhood. I remember doing homework and

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>thinking it's pitch black and it just made me feel eh,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I just there was actually something fun

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And maybe this is because of our early morning ritual

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>being broadcast journalists for so many years, I thought there

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>was something exciting and fun about driving to work in

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the dark, like I was doing something that no one

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>else was doing. And I liked that feeling. And literally

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I remember I was like, oh, it's already light. My

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>job isn't that special. Everybody else is up now too.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 3>It's funny there coming and going. There was something about

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 3>the light differential that I somehow viewed negatively.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Look, everybody has their thing.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You have your reasons, and that's okay, yeah, and you

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 2>are passionate as hell about it. So daylight saving time,

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 2>So when we turn clots ahead an hour, what happens there?

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You know what I didn't ask you about this first?

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>The earlier sunrises, the early not the late sunset, but

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 2>the earlier sunrises. Forget the work part of it, but

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 2>just naturally on a weekend, it.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Feels weird to me that the sunrise is here at five.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I get five thirty in the morning, it's already getting light.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's strange.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, just getting a text message there from Sabine. I'm

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 2>sure she's asking about the sunrises as well. Okay, so

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>daylight saving time, we turn clots aheadun rises later.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you feel about that?

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 3>I like it?

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I like because we're always up early, and I have

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>before most of my life, and I there is something

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>cool about being up when it's dark and I know

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the sun's about to rise, so light is coming, and

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, there's just something about the anticipation of

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>the sunrise. I like it.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>One other things, what's too late for a sunrise for you?

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 2>What's too if the sun's still not up at what

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>time is that?

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I like the sun to be up around seven am.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're totally in my camp. We're gona get to

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that in just a second. So what's happened now in

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Congress this year? Robes, Yes, this kind of came as

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>a surprise and we saw the news first cross But

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 2>the House has passed this bill. It's called the Sunshine

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Protection Act. Funny name from the Sunshine State Representative Anna

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Paulina Luna, Republican from Florida. She is sponsoring at this time.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.599
<v Speaker 3>So funny. Her last name means moon like this.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Anna Paulina Luna from the Sunshine State has sponsored the

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Sunshine Protection Act.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I love the name. I think it's hilarious.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 2>You can't make this stuff up though, but threeh eight

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 2>to one seventeen in the House, that's overwhelming.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 3>Overwhelming. They can't agree on anything. Everybody can agree we

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>want to protect sunlight.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 2>And they call it the Sunshine Protection Act. It makes

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>them sounding like their heroes or something.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 3>It's hilarious.

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So this would make what we have now, what

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>we're sitting in daylight savery time, permanent throughout the country.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Robes some I did joke about it, but there are

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>some people who are asked for comment in Congress about this.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>They said, just say, we got better things to do.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Like why are you asking me about I don't have

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 2>an opinion? Like who cares? Why are we doing this

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of Iran war inflations?

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>What it is?

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>We got fights and stuff and we got all this

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 2>going on, We got ice, we got robes.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are we doing so?

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 3>We have to protect the sunshine.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I have to protect the sun so.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I have guardians of sunlight.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, a little sarcastic there, but they have tried this

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>year after year after year, but it's gone through this time.

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Robes.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the Senate though, Okay, it got proved in

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the House overwhelmingly. Word though about whether or not this

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>could become law. It sounds like that was a pretty

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 2>immediate pushback. It doesn't sound like this is actually gonna.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Become well know, and it seems like it's a senator

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 3>from your home state who's leading the way.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>As we continue with names and Senator of Margason named.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Cotton, can't make it up.

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know we were gonna go this direction on

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the show.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Senator Tom Cott has already come out and

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 2>said he is pleading with them not to even bring

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>it up for a vote, and if it does, they'll try.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>To block it.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it seems like the Senate Majority Leader John

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Thune is inclined not to bring it to the Senate floor,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 3>so they won't even vote on it.

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I salute you fellas. Go back a little bit, folks.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 2>This was actually one hundred years ago that we ended

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 2>up here. It was called the Standard Time Act of

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighteen. This was actually a wartime measure ropes. They

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>were trying to save energy, They were trying to save

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>coal and oil for heating homes, so they made the switch.

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>It only lasted a year, so they re peeled it

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen nineteen. Move forward to nineteen sixty six with

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the Uniform Time Act of nineteen sixty six. That's when

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Congress gave themselves we have the power to change the

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>time zones all across the country. That's when it goes

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>into place. Now, we did this thing. Now in nineteen

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 2>sixty six rope they made the system that we currently have,

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the bi annual change. But in nineteen seventy three they

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 2>changed it to permanent daylight.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Saving time the year of my birth. That makes a

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of sense. Maybe that's why I'm so passionate about it.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>They canceled it the next year. Wow, because it didn't work.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So if we've already tried this and it didn't work,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 3>why have we not learned from that?

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Because people don't remember history. They remember when their kids

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 2>were young and daylight saving coust hell, they remember changing

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 2>their clocks. They remember all the annoyance annoying they have.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Those are people all elections. It's personal people. This is

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>personal for.

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 3>People, and it affects everybody.

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It does, but it's very personal. People have their reasons.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>So they tried it in nineteen seventy three, they'd haven't

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>yo the emergency daylight saving time energy Conservation Act.

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You like that one.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>It was about energy. It wasn't about annoyance. It was

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 3>about conserving energy.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>It was because at the time there was a fueling crisis,

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 2>so they wanted to conserve injury concern.

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>What did you just say, angel energy?

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 2>So one year later, Robes, you were born. Oh my goodness,

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you were born in daylight saving time.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>See that's what I said. It just comes to me naturally.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 2>It was year round at the time, year round daylight

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>saving switched it back.

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Why would they switch it back in just a year, Robes,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because people were pissed and it didn't work. It didn't

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>work in one of the major arguments.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm curious to what you think about this, Robes,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>kids were going to school and pitch black darkness in

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 2>some places in this country.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what's funny? You asked me why if

0:13:54.120 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I recalled or if I remembered why people were against this,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 3>And I said, I thought it was because kids were

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>going to the school bus stop in the dark. I

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 3>must have remembered that from childhood, that that was a

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 3>big conversation that people were upset about it. They didn't

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 3>want their kids going to school in pitch black darkness,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 3>that it was unsafe.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 2>They also made arguments ro overy the time this is

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll get into some more of the safety issues, but

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>as far as having cars out on the road, people

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>driving in the mornings, rush out and whatnot, they have

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>some evidence that they do believe led to more accidents. Now,

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy three year robes when they put this in place,

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>seventy nine percent of Americans supported permanent daylight.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Saving time overwhelming Wow.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>In March that dropped a forty two percent after people

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>actually went through it.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Hell, no, we don't like this, My goodness.

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, for whatever, I would be so curious to see

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>how you felt in permanent daylight saving time to where

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you might go this. People overwhelmingly switched once they actually went.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating that once they actually got what they wanted,

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 3>they didn't like it.

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>So are you saying, now, are you still willing to

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>try it? You want them to give it a shot?

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, now, I'm kind of afraid. Why was it so

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 3>terrible that everyone just completely made a one eighty and

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>they lived through it? Obviously I was one, so I

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>have no memory of it. But that actually does give

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 3>me pause. I would like to learn more about why

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>people overwhelmingly wanted it and then overwhelmingly rejected it.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>It was a lot of parents, they cite parents. There

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 2>was a New York Times article I look that from

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy four. Parents, parents were that upset. Now this

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>is not the only thing that was going on, but

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 2>robes if you are madgine, there's some place you talk about,

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>New York. We're here, Our sunrise is at what time?

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Now it's or in the winter, it's a little before

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 2>seven maybe.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I actually don't know the exact date or exact time,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 3>but it seems reasonable. I think for me. The only

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 3>thing that's shocking to me is how early the sun

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>sets here in New York during the winter.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but there are some places, a place like Cleveland,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>that is, that experiences later sunrises than a lot of

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>places in the country far our west, in the Southwest,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they get earlier sunrises. But ropes, what if kids in

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the winter are going to the bus stop pitch black

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>darkness and the sun doesn't come up until nine nine thirty.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 3>That's tough.

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>How does that feel?

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 3>That's tough? And look, I know there are countries that

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>deal with this certain parts of you know, Scotland and

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 3>all of these northern European countries. They get like incredibly

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>small windows of light and a lot of darkness, and

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 3>that is overwhelming. But you're choosing to live there in

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that latitude, and you understand that that comes with the territory.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 3>But I do think, yeah, that is tough to have

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the sun not rise until nine am. I get that.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a legit push back. I get that for us, though,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go eight eight thirty.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Like Sabine goes to school Rope, she has to be

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in the school by seven fifty.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it is.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I get seven fifty to think for the next hour.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 2>She's in pitch black darkness. Kids going to school through

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>the winter and every morning rush hour is in the

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>dark as if it's nighttime. That feels a little weird

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and it might be a little dangerous. Oh that's the

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>time you got more people out and more kids out

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 2>walking the street.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 3>That's legit that I do understand that argument. And it

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 3>is something where it sounds like a good idea until

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>it's actually put into practice, and then you realize the

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 3>reason why this system has been in place for as

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 3>long as it has.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So what do proponents say, well.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them say robes.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>There is a safety issue here having to do with

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 2>there's more light in the evening means less crime. If

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you take away two hours of darkness, an hour of

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>darkness that's one or two hours, it fewer crimes are

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>going to take place.

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Does that makes sense?

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? Do that makes sense? Yes, when it's dark, yes,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 3>you might be more inclined to do something that you

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 3>hope nobody will see.

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Also on the safety front, car accidents, but they focus

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 2>on the afternoon and evening, the evening rush hour. There's

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 2>more light in the evening, so you can have fewer

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>car accidents as people are making their way home.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense?

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? Get that.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 2>They throw out energy savings as well, and they also

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 2>say there's more family time at the end of the day.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>There's more time for people to spend time together.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 3>People, I think when it gets dark, you wind down,

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 3>you might go to bed early, you might just kind

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 3>of go into your own private spaces because you feel

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>like you're you're just it's cavernous, you're denning, you're kind

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.239
<v Speaker 3>of in your own space. I get that far. If

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 3>it's light, you're out, you're active, you're participating you're more social.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so all that makes sense. But here's what your

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>opponents say, robes one. See, those are practical things in life.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>The opponents are talking about something else, long term health consequences.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>It's better for your natural body clock to not be

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 2>on daylight saving time. You need more light to be

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>awake and alert in the morning, baby, and you need

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>more dark in the evening in order to fall asleep. Now,

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 2>just you don't have to get too deep into sign.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 3>That all makes sense.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>That just makes it.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 3>But then, so was this what you were referencing at

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, That we're making the wrong argument there it

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 3>is we should be advocating for standard time, not daylight

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>saving time.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>We should first be arguing to get rid of the

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>system we have, the bi annual switch.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Should I think we can all agree to that the

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 3>switch is what's annoying.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>That we need to But that's the thing. We're not

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 2>in agreement about which direction to go, daylight saving time

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 2>or standard time.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard anybody make an argument to stay in

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 3>standard time.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Because we're not listening to scientists. We listen to the

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>arguments on TV. We listen to the politicians. We listen

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to people get on and I'm not I'm not knocking

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 2>before this, but most people it's personal.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard anyone say we should stay on standard

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 3>time the entire time, and obviously just the idea of

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 3>daylight saving. Who doesn't want to save daylight sounds good,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>that sounds protection, that sounds good. Standard time won't.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Won't camp has.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 3>A PR problem? Absolutely standard But I didn't even know

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 3>you had a CAMP. I didn't know that was an option.

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>It was always either switch or full time daylight saving.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard the argument made to just stay on

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 3>standard time.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Baby, we're having We're all in agreement that the current

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 2>system sucks. So which one should we go to? And yes, Roades,

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 2>once you say it that way, who wants to go

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 2>get anything? Yeah, just give me the standard.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I want the saving, I want the sunshine protection. I

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>don't want standard standards mine.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's we'll just take a standard room.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 3>I want the executive suite.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, yes, we have a PR problem, Robes. This

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>was a quote from run researcher. It puts us permanently

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 2>out of sync with our natural environment. If you do

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 2>daylight saving time, you are permanently putting yourself out of

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 2>sync with nature and what your internal clock is doing.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>By doing so, we're gonna explain any even more. But Robes,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>you read that statement there from the Academy of Sleep Medicine,

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. I said, we're listening

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to the wrong people. There is a camp, and it's

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 2>doctors who think we need to change.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Their voices should be louder than is what I would say.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>But here is what the American Academy of Sleep Medicine

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.479
<v Speaker 3>had to say. An abundance of accumulated evidence indicates that

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the acute transition from standard time to daylight saving time

0:21:53.880 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 3>incurs significant public health and safety risks, including increased risk

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 3>of adverse cardiovascular events, mood disorders, and motor vehicle crashes.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Although chronic effects of remaining in daylight saving time year

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 3>round have not been well studied, daylight saving time is

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 3>less aligned with human circadian biology.

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, here comes not pay close attention to this next.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Part, which, due to the impacts of the delayed natural

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 3>light dark cycle on human activity, could result in circadian misalignment,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 3>which has been associated in some studies with increased cardiovascular

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 3>disease risk. Metabolic syndrome and other health risks. It is

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>therefore the position of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 3>that these seasonal time changes should be abolished in favor

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 3>of a fixed, national, year round standard time.

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. They do this.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Has anyone put forth a bill asking that standard time

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>become the noise permanent?

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they have, and it went nowhere. It's never gotten

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a vote. Actually, sweetheart, I don't think I have it

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in here. Even the title of it I think is boring.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I think let's just all stay standard.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's I think it has a boring title.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>But yes, there's one that's not getting an attention, and

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>it hasn't gotten a vote and certainly not gonna get pass.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>It does have a pr problem. Now roads the next

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 2>thing here, Stanford Medicine. This is probably the most cited study,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>comprehensive study when it comes to this particular thing. And

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 2>they looked at three scenarios that we're talking about. What

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>happens to people if they're on permanent daylight saving time?

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>What happens to people they're permanent standard time? What happens

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 2>to people when they're doing the bi annual switch.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>How do they look at those scenarios if we haven't

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>experienced them.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 2>They are studying people in those particular okay segments, So

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>they're studying people and the and they did this so all.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't just in the US, but they study why

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>is he wearing glasses? Sorry, we're looking at something. I

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>just got distracted. Like I always say about you chasing

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the laser, I saw something in that.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>What is that? Anyway back to the circadian rhythm? Where

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because the.

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Conclusion is clear the work, we are doing the worst

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>out of.

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The three options. Wow, like do one or the other permanently?

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Don't switch?

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree, I'm actually so on board with that.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>And now here's a problem.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Not the problem, but here this is where the science

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>comes in and it makes it clear. They say in

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>their study they can account for the switch. If you

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 2>switch full time to standard time, you would have three

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand fewer strokes in this country and two point

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>six million people.

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Would not be obese. They're scientists from Stanford.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, if you want me to break that down scientifically

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>how the study was done, I don't have all that

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 2>for you, but what I can tell you is that

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>they noticed a drop off in people when they studied

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 2>who stayed on standard time. Their bodies were more in

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>line constantly with the rhythm of the earth the day,

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and in doing sol robes, it makes an impact on

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 2>your health, a positive one because the lack of sleep,

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the lack of circadian rhythm we're talking about hearts here

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>robes leads to very serious and adverse health PROCEM.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and they have a number.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that is remarkable, but I guess I can

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 3>understand it from what little I know about. When you

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 3>don't get enough sleep, when you're sleep deprived, when your

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 3>sleep is messed up, you have higher cortisol levels and

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>your body literally goes into starvation mode and starts just

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>you have hung You're more hungry, you are storing fat

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 3>because your body is protecting itself. And so I know

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 3>that sleep issues absolutely lead to waking.

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this is what you'll appreciate robes. They studied

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 2>people who are on full time daylight saving, which is

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 2>what you prefer.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I think, I prefer, I thought, I prefer.

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 2>You'll appreciate this. It had the same health impact, not

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 2>as much, but by two thirds. It had the same

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>impact with fewer strokes and fewer people obese, but only

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 2>two thirds of the results, so it wasn't as impactful,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 2>but still impactful.

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>The point being, get off what we're doing.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 3>That you're talking about saving lives and at least pretty

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 3>significantly vastly improving the quality of life for a large

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>number of people.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>So as you see headlines, you make robes, it does

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>go to you're telling me we can improve health in

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>this country. We've been fighting obese to left and right

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 2>and not don't seem to be getting anywhere, you're telling me,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So we.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Get I love fascinating, but I love robes that we

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 3>see these public debates and back and forth and quick

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 3>little quips and clickbait robes.

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>There's something to this story.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 2>That something as simple as changing the clock and keeping

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 2>it the way it is can improve the health of

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>literally millions of people.

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 3>That is remarkable. We're just well, I guess this bill

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 3>could help a little bit, but we're actually putting forth,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 3>or at least the House put forth the wrong bill.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, it helps some, it could, but and this

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>is the next argument, This might be the thing that

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 2>gets you to get on board with standard time. The

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>body circadian rhythm. We understand generally what that means. You

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 2>have a natural body clock, and it is twenty four hours.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 2>It adjusts to it. Just natural science, it happens. We

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 2>have this circadian rhythm and a clock. It's a natural

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 2>clock that regulates our body. It doesn't just regulate your

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>sleep wake schedule. It regulates hormones, It regulates digestion, it

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>regulates all kinds of stuff everything.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 3>It's obviously super important.

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 2>There are twenty four hours in a day. Your circadian

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>clock is twenty four hours and twelve minutes. Right, Okay,

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>this messed me up, It really really did. I was

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to explain it as best I can. What doctors

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>are saying here, Robes, is that you need help jump

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>starting your clock, because soon as you start your day, you're.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Behind twelve minutes behind.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Your twelve minutes behind.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 3>That's where the snooze button's great.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>See when I'm dealing with folks, No, you're twelve minutes behind,

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 2>which means Rope, you need help kickstarting your day.

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm just thinking I needed twelve more minutes of sleep, Christ,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 3>which is usually the bare minimum.

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 2>But still when you wake up, you're still twelve minutes behind.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>You can hit twelve as much as you want, you're

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>still behind in the day.

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So how do you catch up?

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Part of the way you catch up is that light

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>hits you and it gets you going.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 3>When's the last time you woke up to sunlight?

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Sweetheart?

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Some of us are just freaks. Okay, some of us

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>are just freaks of nature. And it's a mind thing

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 2>for me.

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know this.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter how much sleep I got the night before.

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 2>It's what do I have to do today?

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 3>You wake up at three am, no matter what, and.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I bounce up.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't go sit for a second and drink some coffee.

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>We got stuff to do.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's just me.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone's feeling my pain nor Sunday morning, Saturday morning,

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I wake up alone.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I hate when you describe your relationship with me as

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>something being in pain. I knew as you were getting

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 2>at but it still stings.

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>A little bit.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I love you, baby.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>But the circadian rhythm, you're twelve minutes behind. So let's say, Robes,

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 2>you get up at the sun rises at seven, your

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>body is still at about six forty five. The clock

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>gets later, Robes, So what if it doesn't the sun

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't rise until seven thirty, you're still behind. Doesn't rise

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>until eight, you're still behind. You need that light. You

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>need that thing to kick in and start you to

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>get going. If you don't have that, robes is why

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you see people sometimes at work at ten o'clock, like,

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>what the hell is wrong with you?

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And they're still grogging and dragging the clock is off.

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a re wow thing.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So we are every single day waking up behind. We're

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>behind schedule, and we're trying to catch up. And the

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 2>later it is that it's dark, the longer it takes

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 2>us to catch up.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 3>That makes absolutely makes sense. Makes I just don't understand

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 3>why we haven't heard more from doctors and scientists. And

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I actually think if people are presented with all of

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 3>this scientific evidence, it's kind of an easy call. Look,

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I actually am just for not having a switch. I

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>don't like the switch. I've never liked it. It irritates me.

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 3>I've never fully understood. I've heard all the reasonings from

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>the school bus you know stops being dark, to this

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>was made for farmers and so farm workers could have

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 3>light when they were working in the fields. I've heard

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 3>all of it, but I just felt like in present day,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 3>none of it really made sense, and so I appreciate this,

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and I could absolutely get behind keeping it to standard time.

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 3>I just I'm against the switch.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Isn't this Isn't this go in line with how we

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>always sometimes we miss the point in public debate and

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 2>in conversations rose because we needed to be in click

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>baity form, in short, social media digestion.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Form, and we lead with emotion, yes, and personal.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.719
<v Speaker 2>It's personal people, and it's hard to get somebody around

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 2>what I'm just saying ropes. It took us thirty minutes

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 2>here to explain, to go through it all, to have

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a conversation about it, and most people just see a

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 2>headline they're getting rid of daylight or getting rid of

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 2>the switch.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Awesome. I hate having to switch to my clox. That sucks.

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I want more light at night, and yeah, I love that.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And then when December comes around and you're living in

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta and it's nine point fifteen in the morning and

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>it's still dark, you go, what the actual hell is happening?

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Why do I feel like this right? It's not until

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you go through it. So maybe we do need to

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 2>go through the exercise, But I'd hate for us to

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>go through the exercise ropes and go to permanent daylight

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>saving time, and they go, oh, we messed up. It

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.239
<v Speaker 2>should have been permanent day permanent standard time, and then

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>have to switch back to that.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 3>But then if we switch back to that and then

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 3>we just stayed there, I'd be cool with that.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>That'd be a tough transition.

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>One time, they one time, and then we don't have

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 3>to switch again, whatever it takes. I'm just against the switch.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Last thing I'll give you here is just the polling

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:19.239
<v Speaker 2>where we are Gallop last year Gallup polling, fifty four

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 2>percent are in favor of specifically permanent daylight.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Saving Okay, I mean that reads that's a.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Little closer than I.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Not overwhelming compared to what it was in nineteen seventy three.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 3>You're right, that is not as big of a push publicly.

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Which is so interesting to me that Congress was so

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 3>quick to or at least the House, not Congress, but

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the House was so quick to pass it so overwhelmingly

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>so when their constituents aren't necessarily overwhelmingly behind.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Why this is why, now, young ladies from Florida, I

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 2>said the young lady, the congresswoman's from Florida, and they

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 2>have issues there with I mean, she's looking at for

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 2>her constituents when it comes to I mean tourism, people.

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Being down there, hanging out, being outside all the time.

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That kind of makes us make it. I can see

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that it might not.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Work for everybody, but only forty percent Robes were against that,

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>fifty four to forty percent. I just wanted to throw

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>this in there for shits and giggles. Democrats versus Republicans.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what that is.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 3>That's weird.

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It's weird, isn't it.

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Forty four percent of Democrats are in favor of

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 3>permanent daylight saving time. Only thirty four percent of Republicans are.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 3>That's bizarre. I wouldn't think that would split along party lines.

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 3>But okay, and then this is interesting. Fifty three percent

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>of lower income Americans are for keeping it permanent, thirty

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 3>five percent of middle income Americans are for keeping it,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and thirty three percent of higher income So that's I

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 3>don't understand that.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Either, I don't know, Robes.

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 2>This was I was kind of almost dismissive of this,

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>or roll my eyes or when you start looking into it, Robes,

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>there's so much that's in a headline or in that

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 2>clickbaity headline or something on social media. There is more there,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>and this is important. It's just too bad the conversation

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 2>around it doesn't make it sound important.

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It just everybody said, yeah, me, even the president, this

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous. Only a fool with.

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 3>It like this against sunshine.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's dismissive of a significant policy debate that could

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 2>actually impact every single American but certainly impact millions of

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Americans health.

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We should talk about a little more seriously.

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Then, I agree, we do. I agree.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Where are you now that we've Now that we've gone

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 2>through the conversation, where are you on daylight.

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm fine if it's daylight saving time or if it's

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 3>standard time, just end the switch.

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, for your for the sake of your relationship. What

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 2>do you think would work better?

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 1>You want the sun to rise later?

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, it doesn't matter.

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't I'm up at three, It doesn't matter.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 3>We get up before the sunrise, no matter what, whether

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 3>it's daylight saving or standard time, we're up before the sunrise.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, however, you all do it, which camp you're in,

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 2>just please when you do have the conversation just know

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 2>there is more to it than just setting some clocks,

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>hitting us anooze button, and dropping the kids off at

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the bus stop. There is a lot more to this,

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 2>So I thought it was a fun one able to

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about this.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>In a way on.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 2>A way to talk about this now, Robes. I am

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 2>so appreciative that we have where we are. We can

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>have conversations a lot differently than we did.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we can actually put in some perspective and some

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 3>careful opinion just based on experience. But I think it's

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>something that resonates with everyone because we've all we all

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 3>experienced the impact and the effects of that switch. So

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 3>we'll see what the Senate does, but it's probably not

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 3>going anywhere, So get ready November first, going back to

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 3>standard time, everybody.

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens. Sorry, appreciate Joel as always, See

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you soon, see soon, see soon, see you soon. I said,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>see you soon. Yeah, okay, Sorry, see y'all. Not get

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>enough sleep the kitchen na k